Slashdot Mirror


User: leviramsey

leviramsey's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,947
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,947

  1. Re:channel surfing on Report: Broadband Too Expensive For Many · · Score: 2

    This is why you get DirecTV. Their UI is very usable, and the greater bandwidth that you get from a broadcast satellite allows them to actually make every channel MPEG-II, with very sane encoding settings.

    All I can say is, DirecTV is the best way to watch TV... (the NFL Sunday Ticket has *nothing* to do with this... :oP)

  2. Re:DOWNLOADS! *kick ass* on Slashback: Courseware, Towers, Drives · · Score: 2

    That was just plain bizarre.

  3. Does this mean on NetBSD-Current Gets SMP · · Score: -1, Troll

    That NetBSD is now dying twice as quickly?

  4. Slap that Ho on T-Mobile Sidekick Reviewed · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...Top!

    I think we have a new candidate for comical Taco misspelling of the year...

  5. Re:New Google feature! on Google sued as PetsWarehouse Lawsuit Continues. · · Score: 2
    New to Google! It's Google Pet Warehouse! Now you can search and purchase all your pet needs right from your favorite search engine!
    Want to know how we did it? Sure, we'll tell you! Some moron sued us and we won! We got his pet store and now it makes us a mint!

    Will they have specials on pigeons?

  6. The US attitude on gambling sickens me on Internet Gambling Law Resurfaces · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not a moral objection to gambling (most of the states either have legalized casinos, legalized dog/horse racing, or state lotteries).

    In the case of casinos and dog tracks, very few of those exist. In most cases, there are a fixed number of licenses, and the only way to start a new casino is to buy an existing one and demolish it.

    In the case of state lotteries, they are quite obviously the worst method of gambling (from the perspective of how likely you are to come out with more money than you put in). In most states, a sales tax is charged on the ticket. Further, a portion of the remaining bet is deducted for "administrative expenses". And then 50% of the remainder is placed into the prize pool. If the odds of winning the lottery are 1 in 10, a winning $1 bet will pay about $4 (including the $1 bet being returned). This means that you have to be 2.5 times luckier than dumb luck to break even. That's an insane house advantage.

    Contrast this with casino games, where the house advantage is significantly smaller, on the order of 5-10%. In sports betting (assuming standard Vegas payout rates, which you should be able to get from whatever bookie you choose; if the book don't offer Vegas payouts, take your money elsewhere), the vig is 4.5% (1/22), meaning that only being slightly better than randomly making bets will break even.

    Basically, the only reason that sports betting is illegal in most states is because it would drive state lotteries out of business.

  7. Re:Why does this "right" need to be enumerated? on Protecting Your DRM Rights · · Score: 1

    Read the fucking Bill of Rights, idiot.

    The Ninth Amendment states:

    The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
  8. Re:This is not a black and white situation... on Mouse Gestures Gain Followers · · Score: 2

    Opera had gestures before Black and White was released.

  9. Re:WRONG! on Call For Linux 2.5 Testers · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Remember the 2.4 vm fiasco? That was supposedly a finished kernel.

    However, this time around, many of the new things have been in development outside the kernel for several years, with heavy testing (ALSA being the best example of this). I may give 2.5 a try...

  10. Re:DOWNLOADS! *kick ass* on Slashback: Courseware, Towers, Drives · · Score: 1

    Why the fuck should they care that the trailer ends up on P2P networks? It's not like they get royalties everytime the trailer is shown. It's FREE PROMOTION!

  11. Re:Metatags still useful on Declaring The Death of Metatags · · Score: 2

    My bad... When Google shows the description for a page, they use the description from Open Directory (which is arguably more reliable than the meta tags).

  12. Re:Mass protest on Freeing the Specs? · · Score: 1

    Also, be sure to have some number of attractive people running around naked (or possibly only in undies) with slogans painted on their bodies. This will ensure that the photos and videos will forever live on.

  13. Re:search engine optimization and ranking. on Declaring The Death of Metatags · · Score: 1

    You know, for someone who has a reasonably old slashdot UID (I'm guessing you registered in December of 2000), you gotta be pretty stupid to think Slashdot behaves like an ultimatebb or phpbb board. I'm surprised you didn't try [url=]...

  14. Re:They're used... on Declaring The Death of Metatags · · Score: 1
    So which is it? They have "nothing to do with" Google bombing, or they "do help"? You've managed to contradict yourself in under four sentences. Congratulations.

    Retard.

    Google Bombing refers only to abusing links to get a higher pagerank in Google. As meta tags have nothing to do with <a href>'s, they have nothing to do with Google Bombing.

    However, meta tag spamming does have a slight effect on pagerank, as Google does take meta tags into account.

  15. Re:Metatags still useful on Declaring The Death of Metatags · · Score: 3, Informative

    Uh Google already shows the meta description in their search results.

  16. Re:Monkey wrench in hopes for mend on Ozone Hole Splits in Two · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Exactly.

    Much as it's fashionable to rail against the US for not being as environmentally responsible than it could be (or maybe even should be), the fact remains that various third world (to use an obsolete term) nations are far more egregious offenders than the US (see leaded gasoline, CFCs, etc.).

  17. Re:$480M vs $67M on Music Industry Pays $67M Fine For Price Fixing · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Idiot.

    The RIAA did not make a cent off the price fixing, as that had no effect on wholesale prices. What the RIAA was doing was to say to the chain stores, "you can't advertise the new Britney CD at less than a certain amount over wholesale". Why was this done? To prevent the Wal-Marts and Best Buys of the world from monopolizing CD retailing and using their distribution might against the RIAA. It's in the RIAA's interest to keep as many non-chain and small chain stores around as possible, as it prevents WalMart from holding CDs for ransom (as in, "we won't buy the CD for our stores unless you sell it to us for $2 less than normal wholesale").

    The $480 million that consumers overpaid went to CD retailers, not the RIAA.

  18. Re:themes.org and X11 theme site fragmenting on Get Gnome Art at art.gnome.org · · Score: 1

    Well, KDE has been pretty much locked up by kde-look (which has a link on themedepot). In some way, I think it may be better to have a network of sites devoted to certain small subsets of theming and have them link to each other.

  19. Re:themes.org and X11 theme site fragmenting on Get Gnome Art at art.gnome.org · · Score: 4, Informative

    Have you tried Theme Depot?

  20. Are they sure it isn't on 22lb Ice Blocks From the Sky · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Frozen masses of piss and shit being dropped from commercial airliners?

  21. Re:Ice blocks are not falling from the sky on 22lb Ice Blocks From the Sky · · Score: 1

    Another amazing post from DesiredUsername. Hip Hip Hurray!

  22. Re:Sidney was an elephant. The city is Sydney on California Sues Spammer for $2 Million · · Score: 1

    The link is broken, as well. Someone forgot to put an "http://" in the url.

  23. Re:Regan the democrat.... on Boston's Big Dig Delayed Because of Programmers? · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and Reagan was a Democrat, too.

    You think the parent was being a wee bit sarcastic?

    Think, McFly, think!

  24. Metallica on Which Artists Support Music Swapping? · · Score: 1

    Metallica are dead-set against sharing of studio albums (and concerts which they have recorded and released). However, they have always allowed taping of concerts and trading/sharing of concert recordings.

  25. Re:You cannot post correspondence on When Do You Really Need a Lawyer? · · Score: 2

    Sir, read my fucking post.

    This was not a letter to the editor. It was a private letter from Carl McCall, Comptroller of the State of New York, to the CEO of Verizon. In this letter, McCall points out that the New York State Employee Pension Fund, which he controls and makes the investment decisions for, owns (IIRC) 5 million and some-odd shares of Verizon, making it one of the largest shareholders in Verizon. He then asks the CEO to take a look at an enclosed resume, belonging to McCall's daughter. This is not the sort of thing that McCall would want to come out in public.

    Through whatever means, this letter made it to the Post, where it was printed on the front page. Everything printed by any major newspaper is scrutinized by lawyers, especially if there's the slightest hint of impropriety (which there definitely is in this case). The fact that they decided to run it, after a consultation with lawyers indicates that they weren't breaking the law.

    Under your contention, however, that correspondence is copyrighted, this would most definitely be illegal, and could be spotted by the greenest lawyer on the staff. Considering all these facts, I call bullshit.