Slashdot Mirror


Mouse Gestures Gain Followers

StefMeister writes "According to this article at ZDNet, the use of the mouse using 'mouse gestures' (as introduced in Opera) is gaining a lot of followers. Personally, I almost solely use the keyboard as input device, but it might be interesting for others. Although changing the way people are accustomed to working is always tricky." I certainly enjoy gestures in Mozilla, thanks to OptiMoz.

325 comments

  1. And with my track ball? by mesocyclone · · Score: 5, Funny

    So how is this going to work with my track ball?

    Mice are for people with more than 10 cm^2 of desk space :-)

    --

    The only good weather is bad weather.

    1. Re:And with my track ball? by StuffYourReligion · · Score: 3, Informative

      I use gestures just fine in Opera with my track ball.

      Especially the best ones: right-left click (back in history), left-right click (forward in history)

      But the other ones (close window, etc.) also work, sometimes I have to repeat once or twice, though I think "Ctrl-W" is the best gesture for that.

      --
      I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
    2. Re:And with my track ball? by Ducky · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, I could comfortably use gestures with an IBM Thinkpad's pencil eraser nub for a pointing device. Well, "comfortably" might be too positive a word... perhaps "without the desire to go gouge my eyes out," was was the case when trying to play quake with the infernal thing.

      -Ducky

    3. Re:And with my track ball? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, optimoz really needs to replicate opera's click-click gestures. the click-drag versions in mozilla are not bad, but click-click is much better, easier for lazy people, and does not get confused when selecting text.

    4. Re:And with my track ball? by zulux · · Score: 5, Funny

      gestures with an IBM Thinkpad's pencil eraser nub

      My girfried has benifited from all the training I've gotten with my Thinkpad.

      Thanks IBM!

      (Now if only I could get her to use the Thrustmaster correctly...)

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    5. Re:And with my track ball? by SlugLord · · Score: 3, Informative

      So how is this going to work with my track ball?

      Actually, quite well. I actually use the radial context menus on Mozilla set to only activate when the right mouse button is dragged. Essentially, this allows for "normal" operation in most cases, and mouse gesture operation with right dragging (plus I get a little reminder gui if I don't remember what gesture to do).

      I use a Microsoft optical trackball (the one with the thumb ball) and I've migrated almost exclusively to mouse gestures and it works great. One nice thing is that the length of the strokes of the gesture don't matter, so you can spin the trackball and use a larger gesture or just one small stroke and you get the same response.

    6. Re:And with my track ball? by crapulent · · Score: 5, Funny

      My girfried has benifited from all the training I've gotten with my Thinkpad

      Now if only IBM had given it a more creative name...like Compact Laptop Interface Tool.

    7. Re:And with my track ball? by SacredNaCl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      After having a non-active KVM switch (and browsing in W2K w/Opera)for far too long. I got really good with keyboard shortcuts for most things. Turn switch, lose mouse ... Now that I have an active switch I still use most of the shortcuts. I find them faster than using the mouse for most things.

      My favorites in Opera: Ctrl-F4/Ctrl-W (closes window), Ctrl-N opens new window, 1 cycle backwards through windows, 2 cycle forwards through windows -- even with a scrollpoint I still prefer to page down or arrow key through the open window. Shift-click (open in new window), Ctrl-Shift-Click (open in new window in background). Alt-Tab (brings up list of all open pages and can cycle through them). Ctrl-Shift-W (Close all windows).

      I played around with the gestures for a day or so, but never really got used to it. I appreciate the thought, but developers serve me better by making lots of keyboard shortcuts for various task and having some standization in them.

      --
      Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
    8. Re:And with my track ball? by zulux · · Score: 5, Funny
      IBM is also famous for their "Mouse Ball" feild note:

      here

      ..a sample of the note:
      Mouse balls are not usually static sensitive, however, excessive handling can result in sudden discharge. Upon completion of ball replacement, the mouse may be used immediately.

      It is recommended that each servicer have a pair of balls for maintaining optimum customer satisfaction,and that any customer missing his balls should suspect local personnel of removing these necessary functional items.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    9. Re:And with my track ball? by pennsol · · Score: 1

      Being a long time Opera user and an old school (pre GUI user) it'll be hard to get used to this mouse thing... just joking.. I use keybord shortcuts in every prog i run it takes too long to reach for the mouse find where the hell the arrow is and then find the button your looking for.. Besides as a tech working on many machines at once you don't always have the option of the mouse.. cheap KVMs and such.. wait till You see the look on a new users face when you start bouncing around thier Winblows box without pluging in the mouse.. it's rather funny, they look at you like you've lost it or your a god of some sort. ;) any way just 6 cents, ECC that is.....

      --

      Just Limin' Mon

    10. Re:And with my track ball? by keriaan · · Score: 1

      I am using a Toshiba laptop with one of those "pencil eraser nubs." I installed gesturing for Mozilla and find it works great.

      I really like the nub and am dreading the day I have to give it up when I upgrade (it seems as if most laptop manufacturers are using touchpads). I like being able to keep my hands on the keyboard all of the time. I find that having to take my hands off the keyboard to use a touchpad or mouse wastes time--especially when doing typing intensive tasks. With a nub I can use either gesturing or keyboard shortcuts from the keyboard!

    11. Re:And with my track ball? by moonbender · · Score: 2

      I think mouse gestures are incredibly well suited for a browser - the mouse is the controller for the web, anyways. Keyboard shortcuts might be faster, but if you have to search for the keyboard first, they sure aren't.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    12. Re:And with my track ball? by gymbrall · · Score: 1

      I'm kind of the other way around.

    13. Re:And with my track ball? by gymbrall · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm kind of the other way around.
      I instinctively took to working the Thinkpad with my tongue

    14. Re:And with my track ball? by Dog+and+Pony · · Score: 2

      That actually becomes even more funny when partly translated to Swedish, where the word for mouse, "mus" is actually also a word for vagina.

      Don't ask me who thought that was a good name though...

      And well, before you ask, I haven't heard of "vagina balls" either. :)

    15. Re:And with my track ball? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > My Girlfriend...

      Is this before you blow her up or after? :-)

    16. Re:And with my track ball? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My girfried has benifited from all the training I've gotten with my Thinkpad.


      Why, because you were to busy to notice she was screwing your best friend?
    17. Re:And with my track ball? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  2. gestures by jadedlogic · · Score: 0

    second post.. mozilla gestures rock

    1. Re:gestures by jadedlogic · · Score: 1

      grrr.. heh

  3. RSI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What effect do mouse gestures have on RSI?

  4. Re:FP by beerman2k · · Score: 1

    I thought mouse gestures were introduced by Black and White. Didn't Opera "borrow" the idea from the game? Or is it the other way around?

  5. Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by sys$manager · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have used a CAD/CAM package called Applicon Bravo (now owned by unilogic) for many years that used mouse and tablet gestures since it ran on a VAX 11/780, through newer VAX and now PC systems. It uses the middle mouse button to indicate that you are "gesturing" and you can make multi-level menu selections with gestures.

    1. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by obdulio · · Score: 1

      But it was Opera that popularized them.

      They are great, I just hope that some ass hasnt patented them....

      --
      PENAROL: Seras eterno como el tiempo y floreceras en cada primavera.
    2. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by sys$manager · · Score: 1

      Even if it was patented, there is prior art from at least 1983-1985 (the first time I used Bravo).

    3. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by silvaran · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Computers were introduced to me when I was 6 years old, by my father. Consequently, he didn't invent them, but he did introduce them. Similarly, Opera brought their web browser to the masses, and mouse gestures along with it. Just like Microsoft introduced GUI to the masses, they didn't invent it, and weren't the primary people to actually "introduce" it first. Opera is the first application I've ever used that supported gestures, and I would imagine many people are in the same situation.

    4. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by mjackson14609 · · Score: 1

      Are you sure about that? I don't recall that behavior from Bravo, and a glance at the Bravo chapter in the Alto User's Handbook doesn't turn up anything.

      Perhaps you're thinking of the Alto's Press file editor (Markup); that used a gestures-like interface for invoking rotation and scaling.

      --

      --
      I decided that behaving ethically was the most nihilistic thing I could do. - Paul Pavel
    5. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by tb3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Early Logitech serial mice shipped with a text editor called "Point", that used mouse gestures. I was using it back in 1987. The fun thing was editing text without touching the keyboard. Really freaked out my co-workers.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    6. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh, well I guess it could have been clearer. Would you be happy if it read "introduced in Opera to people under the average age of dead?"

    7. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by pclminion · · Score: 2
      I have used a CAD/CAM package called Applicon Bravo (now owned by unilogic) for many years that used mouse and tablet gestures since it ran on a VAX 11/780

      Uh, I don't think too many people have used such a system. Opera introduced gestures to the common desktop user. No one is claiming that they invented them.

      If I introduce you to my friend Bill, does that mean I gave birth to him? Opera took a great concept that wasn't getting the attention it deserved, and introduced it to a great number of people (including myself).

    8. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by BilldaCat · · Score: 0, Funny

      how the fuck could Opera 'popularize' anything? Doesn't it have to be used by more than 3 people first?

      --
      BilldaCat
    9. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by Bat_Masterson · · Score: 1

      The word should be "popularized".

      Using "introduced" as the word, although possibly correct in the sense you mention, gives a sense of possessiveness to the thing. So, although you didn't give birth to your friend Bill, you had all the access to Bill (from my perspective) until you introduced him to me.

    10. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by mjackson14609 · · Score: 1

      Whoops, sorry - I see the OP was referring to a different Bravo. . . .

      Regardless, the Markup editor on the Alto would be even earlier art - late 1970s.

      --

      --
      I decided that behaving ethically was the most nihilistic thing I could do. - Paul Pavel
    11. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TROLL.

    12. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by Ooblek · · Score: 4, Funny
      I first used them in Black & White. Does that count?

      I mean, there has to be a population of people that were introduced to using gestures by trying to get their animals to stop eating their own shit, throw fireballs at enemies, and make rain clouds appear.

      So does this mean that I can make a gesture and all my coding work will be complete? Damn, that would be nice.

    13. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by Suppafly · · Score: 2, Informative

      Heh.. man I wish I had mod points today.

    14. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was the game Black & White that popularized them.

    15. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by littleRedFriend · · Score: 5, Informative

      FROM THE ARTICLE:

      "Indeed, mouse gestures have been incorporated
      into some advanced 3D CAD (computer-aided design)
      programs, but they are now being extended to ordinary
      computer tasks."


      --
      IANAL, but imagine a beowulf cluster of in Soviet Russia all your belong are base to us welcoming the new SCO overlords.
    16. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this. Especially since I WAS A DEVELOPER for the Applicon PDP-11 and Bravo Vax based software packages. Called: Tablet Symbol Recognition. It was developed in 1969. In the original implementation the dragged vectors were broken down on a tick-tac-toe styled grid and the squares crossed, as well as the order were encoded into a 16 bit number that was unique. It simply referenced whatever definition the user assigned to it. It was first used on Applicons PDP-11 based AGS/870 2d graphics system. /Steve McCauley
      Sanera Systems
      stevemc@sanera.net

      "Everything old is new again"

    17. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by TillmanJ · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, Optimoz' piemenus page attributes them to "Don Hopkins, who introducted in 1974 the use of gestural motions to execute context-menu like functions..."

    18. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well thank you very much for helping to develop the best CAD/CAM package on the market. I first used it on a Tektronics graphic terminal connected to an 11/780, then on various VAXen, and now I still use it on the PC. I don't think I would ever switch.

    19. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I used to work for Applicon in "Applicon Common Graphics" groups which implemented this feature. It is a little clumsy to do it with mouse but very nice and quick interface using tablets. I thought this method was patented but couldn't find in the patent database.

      With google, here is one reference I found which mention this technique by Applicon:

      jrward@alum.mit.edu: Annotated Bibliography in On-line Character Recognition and Pen Computing

    20. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had moderator points left I'd mod you up and the parent post down -- you read the article! woohoo!

    21. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by n2n · · Score: 1

      I was using mouse gestures in 1987 in Logitech Modula-2 development environment. PieMenu is in Logitech MouseWare for Windows for years.

      --
      If we cannot be free, at least we can be cheap -- FZ
    22. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 2

      Mentor, the CAD program, has been using this sort of technology for years. Various letters are traced on the screen while holding the main button and the functions for which the letters stand are activated. This is deinitely, as you suggest, NOT an invention of Opera.

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    23. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by Usquebaugh · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm glad you don't...

    24. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the first program to use gestures is Pointix in 1996. The method was patented in 1994, see the link right here. Pointix was an excellent program, and believe it or not, it still works today, provided you can find a copy. I love it. Of course, they called 'em Glicks instead of Gestures.

    25. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, I did some more research about the company and the person who filed the patent. Apparently, he formed another company, F&G Scrolling Mouse LLC which was working with Keytronics on producing mice. Well, Keytronics divulged trade secrets to Microsoft which they took and used the technology in their Intellimouse series. They won the court case and were awarded $20mln from Keytronics.

    26. Re:Mouse gestures were not "introduced in opera" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG that was fucking hilarious.

  6. I only use hand gestures, thanks by Synithium · · Score: 1

    I've tried a few products that use the mouse gestures and I tend to find that I'm much much faster using the keyboard shortcut keys, etc. I would envision that these features may be directed towards newbies?

    1. Re:I only use hand gestures, thanks by BigOTeeToe · · Score: 1

      For many applications (text editing, etc...) keyboard-only makes a lot of sense, but when I am surfing the web, I basically have to use the mouse to navigate to links (Try tabbing through a page with about a hundred links to get to the one you want). So using mouse gestures makes a lot of sense to me.

    2. Re:I only use hand gestures, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I "would envision" that they're only useful for those not as old-school as you are.

    3. Re:I only use hand gestures, thanks by Raskolnk · · Score: 2

      It can actually be significantly faster, given that much of the web is point-click oriented so your hand is probably already on your mouse. (Unless you're too cool for mice and use lynx, of course.)

      --
      Don't blame me, I get all my opinions from my Ouija board.
    4. Re:I only use hand gestures, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hand gestures work great, especially when integrated with voice commands, with this input device called an "employee."

      Response time is pretty bad though, and sometimes you need to repeat commands.

    5. Re:I only use hand gestures, thanks by NetFu · · Score: 1

      That's true, but I think there are probably a lot of people out there who only use one hand for the mouse and use the other hand for keyboard shortcuts...

    6. Re:I only use hand gestures, thanks by guns · · Score: 1

      Dude, why did the header of this article have to mention "Personally, I use solely the keyboard as an input device" That is so stupid. Personally it has no bearing on the article, and I'm so sick of hearing about (read with smug accents on "I" for full effect)"I only use text mode command prompt", "I only use the keyboard" Like it makes you somehow smarter for doing things the hard way. I'm not saying the prompt or keyboard are not very powerful... I'm just saying everybody friggen uses them... Why do you have to use every opportunity you get to tell people how you only use a keyboard, or you do all youwork in a text mode? Anytime I hear someone say that, I know that they are trying to look cool. But it sounds ridiculous. It's a stupid thing to be arrogant about.

    7. Re:I only use hand gestures, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For most things, I prefer the keyboard/shortcuts. However, I just started using Opera about, 3 weeks ago and have gotten very use to using mouse jestures to things like close windows and move backwards/forwards in the history.

      Its alot less moving of my hand to left-click drag left to bounce back a page then it does to go upto the top and click back, and less effort then hitting the back shortuct.

    8. Re:I only use hand gestures, thanks by thomas.galvin · · Score: 2

      That's true, but I think there are probably a lot of people out there who only use one hand for the mouse and use the other hand for keyboard shortcuts...

      For me, web browsing is a background task; it's what I do when I'm waiting for a compile to finish, or something simmilar. Because of this, I do most of my web-reading via keyboard; page-up and page-down, primarily, then alt-tabing or ctrl-alt-lefting back to whatever I was doing originally. Still, when it comes to navigation, i.e. clicking a link or traveling through my history, I have to go to the mouse. Gestures would be ideal in this situation, since they can take place anywhere, but you have to mouse over to a menu/button.

    9. Re:I only use hand gestures, thanks by good-n-nappy · · Score: 1

      That's true, but I think there are probably a lot of people out there who only use one hand for the mouse and use the other hand for keyboard shortcuts...

      Yes, and more importantly performing these mouse gestures typically requires a mouse drag. Mouse dragging is a well known cause of RSI. Dragging also requires a significant amout of energy relative to a mouse button or key press - its finger motion versus wrist or arm motion.

      I think these are better explanations for why highly experienced computer users prefer keyboard shortcuts. Its really a matter of trying to conserve energy - ultimately leading to better efficiency.

      The problem with using the right-hand-on-mouse left-hand-on-keyboard approach is that most of the keyboard shortcuts for web browsers require two hands or are on the right side of the keyboard. Backspace and alt-arrows are two good examples. I think if there were some consistent single-hand keyboard shortcuts on the left side of the keyboard, they would quickly dominate mouse gestures - for expert users anyway.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of fiber.
  7. yes... by intermodal · · Score: 1

    perfect for those too lazy to learn the hotkeys...now all they have to do is learn an equally confusing mouse gesture! why hit backspace instead of the back button on the browser when you can just hold the button and move the mouse?

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    1. Re:yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cause what if your hands are not near the keyboard? Or what if your only means of input happens to be a mouse. Don't be so shortsited that if YOU can't find a use for it, it's obviously worthless.

    2. Re:yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, if I'm using the mouse anyway, why is some gesture I have to both memorize and perform correctly easier than simply clicking the appropriate icon or right-clicking and choosing a menu option? It might be faster, but so is the keyboard, and CTRL-C will always be correctly interpreted by the machine, which isn't necessarily true about some funny squiqqle I draw with my mouse.

    3. Re:yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put your resolution up to 1600x1200. Now see how easy it is to stop, go back, go forward, reload. All without taking your hands off the mouse. And no, sorry I don't browse the web with 1 hand on the keyboard and 1 on the mouse.

  8. mouse gestures. by garcia · · Score: 1

    I took a look recently (the last time this sort of thing was mention on /.) and I wasn't very happy w/the motions I had to make to move between pages.

    It was a list of "drawings" I had to make w/my mouse in order to move through pages.

    I just want Moz to use the same keys as IE so I can switch between them and not have to think which one I am using.

    If the gestures themselves became easier for me to remember I would probably hop the bandwagon. Until then, I will stay away from having to learn PalmOS-like graffiti.

  9. sounds like a great Idea - by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

    I enjoyed using "mouse moves" to cast spells in Black and White - And it would be cool maybe to input text that way, Mouse a smiley to create a smile icon and such.

    I must run forth and patent the idea of mouse gestures inputting text to a form! //grabs two by four

    Back off - It's my idea!

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
    1. Re:sounds like a great Idea - by Ultra+Magnus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sensiva does all that. You can program the gestures to input text. Nothing is cooler than having multiple term windows open, and cleanly logging out with just a slash.

    2. Re:sounds like a great Idea - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      to cast spells in Black and White"

      Second time somebody mentions Black and White - what's that, a Black and Deckers ripoff, maybe a router?

  10. Galeon has it too by fundflow · · Score: 2, Informative

    Great Galeon has gestures for a while now

  11. Check out the radial context thingie from optimoz by egghat · · Score: 5, Informative

    God, how I love this.

    Much better than gestures, at least for me as a trackball user.

    Optimoz PieMenues.

    But your mileage may vary.

    Bye egghat.

    --
    -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
  12. i should use this.... why? by LinuxFreakus · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I'm not sure why anyone would use this unless they have some wierd disability. Keyboard is clearly much faster and more versitile.

    1. Re:i should use this.... why? by Kwil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As has been mentioned above.. when navigating the web, one hand is likely already on the mouse. The gestures quickly become second nature, more-so I'd say than the appropriate keyboard press, and require less concentration than using the mouse to find the appropriate button on the top tool-bar. (Plus allow full control while in full-screen mode, without requiring a context shift from keyboard to mouse.)

      Of course, this all depends on having simple mouse-gestures for the most used features. Opera's "back" and "forward" mouse gestures are so intuitive that it very quickly becomes a pain to use browsers that don't have the ability.

      --

      That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

    2. Re:i should use this.... why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right. I'm sure you tab through all the links on a web page to get where you going.

      Look, for mouse-centric applications (the web being the primary example, but there are others) it makes a lot of sense to have mouse gestures. Having to move your mouse hand to the keyboard wastes time, as does clicking little icons scattered across the screen (not to mention trying to hit hot-keys with only one hand on the keyboard.)

      Optimoz works great with Mozilla and is one of the primary reasons I use the browser.

    3. Re:i should use this.... why? by zadkat · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing when it came to GUIs and a command line interface-- they must be for people with a weird disability.

      Like attention deficit order.

      Keyboard commands are clearly faster than a GUI :-p

      On my Sony Vaio laptop, I've enabled the "functions" tab, off the mouse icon on the control panel, and it enables such exotic functions as:
      Sliding Finger
      Shortcut Menu
      Auto scroll
      Easy Launcher
      Easy Capture

      I've been using them for about a year now, and I rather like it. I do have the same problem, as one reader mentioned, of inadvertently closing a window I've been working on. Training wheels do come with it-- you can make it pop up a quick picture of the action it thinks you want it to do.

      What's more disturbing, is that this laptop has Windows 2k on it-- and I rather like it! (ducking)

  13. Mouse gestures for other window apps by shakey_deal · · Score: 5, Informative

    For mouse gestures in all your favorite window programs try 'stroke it' (heh, nice name). Link included... http://www.tcbnetworks.com/strokeit/forum/

  14. They did the same in the game Black And White by ClickNMix · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The idea of waving the mouse about the screen to do things is good, if done right. But I don't see it as any major innovation, just something thats handy at times.

    There is also the problem of having the 'gestures' easy to remember, and how do you document what counts as a gesture, how acurate does it need to be. - Maybe it will take off in many applications, but, its not likely to change the way we work or anything is it?

    --
    I saw the light at the end of the tunnel... But it was just someone with a flashlight bringing more work.
  15. Sensiva has changed my life by Ultra+Magnus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I didn't think that gestures was all that great when they first came out. But after getting used to using them for web browsing, I wanted more for every application. Since then I've used Sensiva, and even tho I only use a few like minimize and new, I find that I am now handicapped when I use machines that don't have mouse gestures. Its so slow and cumbersome. Don't get me wrong, the keyboard is great for a lot of things, but I still find myself using the mouse, and a lot of the gestures can be done without moving my hands back and forth.

    1. Re:Sensiva has changed my life by sedrikk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I love sensiva. I started using it right after i played Black & White.

    2. Re:Sensiva has changed my life by uXs · · Score: 1

      i didn't really like sensiva
      it conflicted with opera & didn't work very well imho
      so far, StrokeIt seems to work much better

      --
      What our ancestors would really think, if they were alive today, is: Why is it so dark in here? (Terry Pratchett)
  16. "'mouse gestures' (as introduced in Opera)" ??? by niconico · · Score: 1

    I've first used mouse gestures features back in 1994 in Mentor Graphics EDA tools. It was running under SunOS.
    http://www.mentor.com/

    Nÿco

    1. Re:"'mouse gestures' (as introduced in Opera)" ??? by GayBliss · · Score: 1

      I was a developer at Mentor Graphics and we had mouse gestures (we called them 'strokes') at least back to 1986 and probably a couple years before that.

    2. Re:"'mouse gestures' (as introduced in Opera)" ??? by i7dude · · Score: 1

      "I was a developer at Mentor Graphics and we had mouse gestures (we called them 'strokes') at least back to 1986 and probably a couple years before that."

      well then i'd like to personally thank you cause those "gestures" made my life as a circuit/layout designer much much much easier.

      dude.

  17. Mostly good. by Raskolnk · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought this sounded like some nifty gee-whiz crappy feature when I first heard about it, but after trying it in Opera I was quite impressed. It quickly became a normal browsing habit.

    The only problem was that on occasion I would accidently make the gesture for "close window" and my pages would magically disappear.

    It'd be ultra-nifty if there was a mouse gesture training app, so I could map commands to custom gestures. Then I could bind the movement made when I throw my mouse at my monitor to Ctrl-Alt-Del.

    --
    Don't blame me, I get all my opinions from my Ouija board.
    1. Re:Mostly good. by Ultra+Magnus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sensiva . It has a linux port (what more could you ask) but it is trainable. While the newest versions cost money, the earlier versions like 1.07 are free and have all the functionality. You can prolly find some of them roaming around the internet still.

    2. Re:Mostly good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I don't know about Opera, but if you use Mozilla's mouse gestures, you can customize them. Try reading Optimoz's customizing page.

    3. Re:Mostly good. by mskfisher · · Score: 2

      I use StrokeIt for Win32, customized for individual applications. It's quite versatile.

      --
      0x0D 0x0A
    4. Re:Mostly good. by NoahsMyBro · · Score: 1

      >>> The only problem was that on occasion I would accidently make the gesture for "close window" and my pages would magically disappear.

      I used to encounter this same problem, and a handy suggestion pointed out to me was to enable the 'Confirm Exit' option in Preferences|Starting & Exiting . I haven't unintentionally closed Opera since, and I use mouse gestures in Opera without thinking about it every single day.

      Unfortunately, I also tend to hit a site that requires IE about once/day, and almost always try to use mouse gestures there too. Of course the only consequence is having to wait for IE to pop up a slowly-drawn context menu that I can then use. It's a small, daily annoyance.

    5. Re:Mostly good. by Raskolnk · · Score: 2

      Heeeeehhh, hahhhhhh, hhhaaaaaah, heh...

      Someone in marketing has a sense of humor.

      --
      Don't blame me, I get all my opinions from my Ouija board.
    6. Re:Mostly good. by Dalcius · · Score: 2

      Probably -1 Redundant, but I haven't read much...

      I would love to see mouse gestures implemented at the library level. I don't know what level it'd be best to implement it at in Linux (I don't know enough about the relation between X, desktop and WM), but I would *LOVE* to have a close window gesture for all my programs.

      It's great that options are coming out so it's easier and easier to use one form of input for most of your actions while working with and given program. When I'm in word processing, keyboard shortcuts are the best. When I'm surfing in Galeon, mouse gestures rock the house. =)

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
  18. Sketch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The coolest gestrual system I've ever seen is the gestural 3D Drawing program Sketch at Brown University. You can build pretty detailed 3D scenes with constraints and all quickly.

  19. New Gesture Ideas by SmlFreshwaterBuffalo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think they should implement gestures similar to those in Black & White.

    Drawing out something resembling an ancient religious symbol to go back a page would be interesting. I've been looking for a way to push my carpal-tunnel to its limits.

    1. Re:New Gesture Ideas by SmlFreshwaterBuffalo · · Score: 1

      Hmm, apparently by the time I finished deciding what I wanted to say, my thought became rather redundant. Sorry :)

  20. Only the keyboard? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Personally, I almost solely use the keyboard as input device"

    Even for web surfing??

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    1. Re:Only the keyboard? by StuffYourReligion · · Score: 1

      "Personally, I almost solely use the keyboard as input device"

      Even for web surfing??


      Errrr, what's so astonishing about almost soley using a keyboard for web surfing? I rarely use the mouse for anything except clicking links, though with Opera you can do nearly everything with the keyboard (including selecting text and links), it is very keyboard-friendly.

      --
      I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
    2. Re:Only the keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They may prefer a text browser such as Lynx.

    3. Re:Only the keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Except for the, erm, one-handed web surfing...

    4. Re:Only the keyboard? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 3, Informative
      Well I don't know what everyone else does when they're web surfing, but I do two things primarily:
      1. Click hyperlinks. Can't beat the mouse for this, IMHO.
      2. Scroll. Since my hand is already on the mouse, the mouse wheel is perfect. Mouse wheels are pretty common these days.

      Other than those two, the only other action I perform really frequently is probably "Back", which I have a side button on my mouse for. I realize most people probably don't have a back button on their mouse; I used to use the keyboard for this rather than drag the cursor up to the toolbar. But still... hyperlink clicking and scrolling is like 90% of web surfing to me. I suppose I could use the arrow or page keys for scrolling (and I tend to for long articles), but switching back and forth between mouse and keyboard all the time is a pain.
      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    5. Re:Only the keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use the keyboard exclusively... Moz 1.2a, with type ahead find, is amazing...

    6. Re:Only the keyboard? by Tassleman · · Score: 1

      That's where the Intellimouse Explorer comes in handy. Forward and Back buttons on the side, and I can remap the Wheel Button to MAXIMIZE, so I can see bewbs in all their glory.

    7. Re:Only the keyboard? by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Personally, I almost solely use the keyboard as input device
      Even for web surfing??

      Is it so shocking? I often use Links, w3m, or even the old standby Lynx for browsing. These fine console browsers have almost no mouse support and are plenty usable.

      All of the major browsers support full navigation with the keyboard, and I use them frequently. (Galeon even supports vi-like keybindings, bringing me endless glee.)

      For various reasons it sometimes makes sense to keep your fingers on your keyboard. If I'm in the middle of hard core coding, it's faster to Alt+Tab to Galeon to reference something, scroll down the page, and chase a link than it is to grab the mouse. Grabbing the mouse can break my concentration, my zone, when deeply engaged in code. For skilled users who are familiar with the system, a keyboard can be a significant speed win, even when referencing something on the web.

      (Yes, yes, yes, the all knowing Tognazzini has told you that the mouse is always faster. Unfortunately Tog has only shown this for novice or adequately skilled users. He doesn't seem interested in studying heavy duty users. If I'm going to be using a piece of software for eight hours a day, five days a week, fifty weeks per year, perhaps it makes some sense to investigate an interface that keeps your hands on a keyboard. I was particularlly struck by the importanance of this while checking into a convention several years ago. Each attendee gave several pieces of information to a staff member which the staff member entered into a form on screen. After each piece of information, each staff member would cast about for their mouse, slowly navigate to the next entry, click, then slowly reset their hands on the home row. Repeat this for 10,000 attendees and you have some serious time wasted. Teen years ago every one of those staff members would have been familiar with using Tab to switch between fields and would have been able to enter information limited by their typing speed. Wow, this parenthetical comment really got off track, huh?)

    8. Re:Only the keyboard? by jesser · · Score: 2

      1. Click hyperlinks. Can't beat the mouse for this, IMHO.

      No, but you can get close. IE for Mac lets you type the first few characters of a link to focus the first matching link. Current Mozilla nightlies have a similar feature, but in Mozilla, you can type letters anywhere in the link text. Mozilla gives you more feedback as you use its version of the feature. Mozilla lets you use Ctrl+G to go to the next matching link. Mac IE's version currently works better for pages that use image links, as long as the images have alt text.

      I use accesskeys (Alt+S, etc) and type-to-focus for links on my start page and type-to-focus for paths I follow frequently from my start page (classes -> bio -> schedule, mozillazine -> talkback, etc). I also use type-to-focus to search through a list of students and phone numbers where the names happen to be links. If I need to open a large number of links at once, I often use a bookmarklet : Linked Images for thumbnail links to images, Linked Pages for a list of links to non-image pages. I use the mouse for most other links.

      2. Scroll. Since my hand is already on the mouse, the mouse wheel is perfect. Mouse wheels are pretty common these days.

      I also use the mouse for scrolling often, even if my hand isn't on the mouse before I want to scroll. Why? It might have something to do with the way the down arrow key only goes one line in Mozilla and the pgdn key goes a little too far. Or maybe I miss "smooth scrolling" from IE. Or maybe it's because in a maximized Mozilla window, there is no space between the scrollbar and the edge of the screen, so it's easier to scroll using the mouse in Mozilla than in IE.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    9. Re:Only the keyboard? by killmenow · · Score: 1
      Click hyperlinks. Can't beat the mouse for this, IMHO.
      Yeah, but I'm not usually trying to beat my *mouse* while surfing the web...
    10. Re:Only the keyboard? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2

      Dude, you're preaching to the converted. I'm also a code monkey. I've been messing with computers since before they even USED mice. I use keyboard shortcuts and bindings all the time.

      ALL I am saying, is that selecting hyperlinks, that is, picking arbitrary points on a 2D surface, seems ideally suited to the mouse.

      These new type-ahead find features on IE for Mac or Mozilla 1.2a look interesting, but come on, one's on a Mac, and one's in a non-mainstream alpha, hardly ubiquitous just yet.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    11. Re:Only the keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Even for web surfing??"

      I'm so cool, I even use Photoshop with just my keyboard.

    12. Re:Only the keyboard? by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      But you don't have to have a mouse with extra buttons or move your pointer all the way to the back button on the toolbar, in IE.

      I just right-click in a space on the page and click "back" that's right at the top of the menu.

      Unless you're on a page whose creator thinks he's making all his content secure by disabling right-clicking, that is.
      Why do people bother to do that???

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  21. Opera and mouse gestures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, mouse gestures are very easy to get used to. Within a day of installing (and registering) Opera, I was using them more than the buttons to navigate. Now I only have trouble when I try to use IE and have to remind myself that the gestures don't work. I know that it's not free software, but IMHO Opera is such a better browser than anything else out there that it's worth coughing up the $30 if you use the web with any frequency.

  22. Middle-F by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "It uses the middle mouse button to indicate that you are "gesturing" and you can make multi-level menu selections with gestures."

    Hey! I use the "middle" gesture. Doesn't work too well, and pisses people off. Don't think my computer likes it either.

  23. huh? by RoadWarriorX · · Score: 1
    In Opera's Web browser, for example, a person who wants to return to a previous page can simply hold down a button and slide the mouse to the left, rather than moving the cursor to the top of the screen and hitting the "back" button.


    I don't use Opera. So if I need to hold a mouse button and move my mouse,then how in the heck would I select text for cut-n-paste?
    1. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't use Opera either, but I'd guess you could do it by clicking down a different mouse button and dragging the mouse!

    2. Re:huh? by RailGunner · · Score: 2
      The right mouse button is held down for Opera Mouse Gestures. Alternatively, you can turn them off completely in the settings menu.

      So, to select text to copy / paste, do it the same way you always have.

    3. Re:huh? by RhetoricalQuestion · · Score: 3

      I don't use Opera. So if I need to hold a mouse button and move my mouse,then how in the heck would I select text for cut-n-paste?

      I do use Opera, and to go back, you hold down the right mouse button and drag left. (The section you quote does not make that clear.) Alternatively -- and this is better for trackball users -- you could hold down the right mouse button and click the left button once to go back. Essentially, Opera takes advantage of relatively easy but unused mouse motions to implement gestures. You can still select text for cut'n'paste, and right-click to access context-sensitive menus.

      The gestural back and forward is great for web browsing. I find it much faster than the keyboard, since when I'm browsing, I almost always have my hand on or near my mouse, but I'm not always poised and ready to type. (Plus I type slow.)

      Personally, I'd like gestures to be more configurable. I think Opera's gone a little overboard on creating some of these, so occasionally, I end up doing something like closing a window when I really wanted to open a new one. I'd like to be able to selectively disable the gestures I don't use -- presently, it's all or nothing. (At least in the version I'm using anyway.)

      --

      I can spell. I just can't type.

    4. Re:huh? by Kwil · · Score: 1

      I don't use Opera. So if I need to hold a mouse button and move my mouse,then how in the heck would I select text for cut-n-paste?

      Mouse gestures are done with a right drag in Opera.

      Let's look at the situation where I need to copy and paste some information from the page previous into this form.

      I'd sit with left hand on the keyboard in the home position, my right hand on the mouse & with the mouse pointer anywhere on the screen. To go back, I right-click-and-hold the mouse and drag it to the left slightly. Release the right button and the page jumps back.

      Find the text I want to copy, left-click-and-hold at the beginning of the text, drag the mouse to the end and release. Now, I personally tend to use Ctrl+C & Ctrl+V to cut and paste, seeing as how they are directly under my left hand on the keyboard. But let's say I'm doing something with my left hand like holding a phone. In this case, I simply move the mouse pointer into the highlighted text I've selected and right-click&release.

      The context sensitive menu pops up and I choose copy. Now I right-click&hold and drag the mouse right slightly and release. It pops back to this page. I position my mouse where I want the text to be, right-click, select paste, and I'm done.

      Note that I never have to hunt for a back button, on the screen (I can do this in full-screen mode if I want, with no buttons visible at all) I never have to stretch for an alt+arrow-key, remove my right hand from the mouse, or use my left-hand at all (pr0n surfers take note).

      Some other things to note are that those right click and holds are very short, just slightly longer than a right-click & release to be honest. Also it's worth noting that this whole combination becomes instinctive very quickly. I find that I no longer think "Oh, I need to go back a page", I just do it.

      My only problem with mouse gestures is that I now get frustrated when trying to use a browser that doesn't have them.

      --

      That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

  24. Re:FP by zapfie · · Score: 1

    What the hell does that have to do with the post you replied to?

    And for the record, I am pretty sure Opera had it first.

    --
    slashdot!=valid HTML
  25. This is not a black and white situation... by h0tblack · · Score: 2

    ..although it's got to be the first time a feature from a game has made it to a web browser ;)
    I guess the next stage in development will be to hook up eye-movement sensors for control of a UI, altho thats bound to cause some nasty and new forms of RSI.

    1. Re:This is not a black and white situation... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      Then in the future the 1337 kidz will be in situations like:

      MOM: Tommy, take out the garbage.

      TOMMY: *looks up, down, left, right, left, right* What?

      MOM: Tommy what the hell is that- stop making those gestures at me with you eyes.

      TOMMY: * looks down, right, around, up, down* What?

      MOM: that's it! Go to your room.

      and kids will be kicked out of class for using gesturing to communicate secretly behind the teachers backs.

    2. Re:This is not a black and white situation... by leviramsey · · Score: 2

      Opera had gestures before Black and White was released.

  26. Good Morning! by RealBeanDip · · Score: 1

    Is there a way to get my mouse to wave "Good Morning" New York style?

    --

    You know you're a geek if you've ever replied to a tagline.

  27. gestures in XP by cybermace5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't think my computer wants to know what gestures I make at it when Windows XP curls up and dies. The good thing is that it reboots into Linux by default, so....

    Combine this with one of those infrared finger mice, and you can feel like a Jedi: "This isn't the page you're looking for, go back." *waves hand to the left*

    --
    ...
    1. Re:gestures in XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh what a fuckin karma whore you are. Excellent usage of both anti-Microsoft and pro-Linux sentiments.

    2. Re:gestures in XP by cybermace5 · · Score: 2

      Excellent usage of both anti-Microsoft and pro-Linux sentiments.

      You forgot Star Wars.

      And my karma is already maxed. :-) I feel so special!

      --
      ...
  28. Someone has to say it by GrantZ · · Score: 1

    I personally love mouse gestures. However, how long will it be before M$ picks up on the idea an either tries to "own" the technology or claim that it was always theirs in the first place when the functionality magically appears as a C# or ASP.Net API.

    1. Re:Someone has to say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, really, nobody had to say it. That's a piss-poor excuse.

    2. Re:Someone has to say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're already using it in some of their applications. The Microsoft-published RPG, Dungeon Siege, uses gestures to rearrange battle formations and tactics. Hold right mouse button, drag a mark on the ground, click left mouse button.

    3. Re:Someone has to say it by EggMan2000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah it will be called Intelligestures or something.

      --
      what? what I thought we were in the trust tree in the nest, were we not?
  29. We need some kind of a standard here by arestivo · · Score: 1

    Mouse gestures just won't work for the average Joe while all the applications that use them don't follow the same patterns.

    It's hard enough to memorize all the gestures for Mozilla now imagine all software developers inventing their own crazy gestures.

  30. complicated?! by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1

    Isn't this an oxymoron ("complicated point-and-click toolbars")?

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  31. StrokeIt by cascino · · Score: 2

    Does anyone else think "StrokeIt" is a really bad name for a product?

    1. Re:StrokeIt by JMan1 · · Score: 1

      "Does anyone else think "StrokeIt" is a really bad name for a product?"

      Not in a world where UNIX is a common OS.

    2. Re:StrokeIt by Schrader · · Score: 1

      Amen, Brother.

      I just picked up the program today. I love it! I have been telling all my co-workers about it, but it's fairly embaressing everytime I say the name. I have to put out a disclaimer every time I say it.

      Still, love the program.

    3. Re:StrokeIt by kubrick · · Score: 2

      Does anyone else think "StrokeIt" is a really bad name for a product?

      I guess that depends on which market you are trying to reach. :)

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  32. As introduced by Opera? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of crack is the submitter on?

  33. Additional mouse buttons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A number of mouse manufacturers, including Microsoft and Logitech, have incorporated additional buttons that you can configure to do anything you want. Why use software when hardware already has the ability to perform the same functions?

  34. Existing gestures in multiple OSes by Elentar · · Score: 1

    Gestures '02 = Mac '84

    Today: Hold down a button, move the mouse, go back a page in your browser.

    18 years ago: Hold down a button over an icon, move the mouse toward the trash, watch your item get deleted!

    Also: Hold the button down, move the mouse over some text, watch it get selected!

    And: Hold the button down, move the mouse diagonally across some files, watch them get selected!

    -Elentar

    --
    The wheel it turns, around and around, with an ancient rumbling sound.
    1. Re:Existing gestures in multiple OSes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Bah! Mouse gestures can't accomplish anything that couldn't be done easier by adding 8 more buttons to the mouse.

      What, you mean your computer came with a mouse that has only three buttons? What a piece of crap!

  35. Re:Check out the radial context thingie from optim by Hast · · Score: 2

    I second that. I used the normal gestures at first, but after I got this installed I've used gesturing a lot more.

    For those not in the know it's a circular menu interface, like in Neverwinter Nights. It works the same as gestures, but it has icons and text to make it easy to learn new gestures. (Which is the biggest problem with the standard gestures IMHO.)

  36. Hey! by mao+che+minh · · Score: 1

    This is something new that Redhat can add to Bluecurve!

  37. Nothing new under the sun... by DLWormwood · · Score: 1

    Apple had something similar with the Newton (now part of OS X's Ink system)... I'm sure Xerox and others experimented with this earlier as well.

    --
    Those who complain about affect & effect on /. should be disemvoweled
  38. Optimoz and security by drhairston · · Score: 1

    The problem with Optimoz and its successor RadialContext is that both require a Linux user to have root priveleges in order to be installed. When will the Mozilla project pause from developing advanced functionality and begin to make it accessible to all but those who follow poor security practices? In addition to not even entering the 'known issue' with non-priveleged installs in their bugs database, anyone who installs as these packages as root can't use it with normal user accounts anyway. By admitting to using this package, you are publicly admitting to running as root on console. This may not be a wise thing to do with your real name.

    --
    Dr. Joseph Hairston
    Superintendent, CCBC
    1. Re:Optimoz and security by TillmanJ · · Score: 1

      By admitting to using this package, you are publicly admitting to running as root on console. This may not be a wise thing to do with your real name.

      except for those of us that run Mozilla from our /home directories, that is....

    2. Re:Optimoz and security by whovian · · Score: 1

      Why does it have to be installed at the system level? Why not automatically install it in the user chrome directory?

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    3. Re:Optimoz and security by boarder · · Score: 2

      that is not true...
      You can just change the permissions on the chrome directory and all is solved... all users are able to install the program and have it work.

      --
      IANAL, but I play one on /.
    4. Re:Optimoz and security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as the parent indicated, optimoz cannot be installed to a non-root user. therefore no matter where you run it from, you are running your browser as root.

  39. Explorer Supprts Gestures! by zulux · · Score: 4, Funny



    I give it gesture every day...

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  40. Re:Check out the radial context thingie from optim by *xpenguin* · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I tried pie menus for about 3 weeks, and they are terrible. The first thing is that the pie menu that moves around is incredible laggy. Second, it's hard to know what the pictures mean, while it's easy to right click, and find what you're looking for in a text menu. Pie menus could be optimal if you want to spend months memorizing exact movements to get where you want, but a lot of people don't have the patience.

  41. For the niftiest tricks, try this... by Cervantes · · Score: 1
    There is a touchscreen addition you can get... it looks like a standard glarescreen, but converts your CRT monitor into a touchscreen monitor and hooks up to your PS/2 mouse port (link not available, I'm at work, sorry). I tried one recently with Opera, and let me tell ya, it's nifty! I put the touchscreen on a 14", mounted it facing up next to my chair, and ran it to a dual-head graphics card set to mirror (or whatever the hell it's called) the image. Et voila! My hand movements on the 14" translated to mouse movements on my standard monitor (20"). The 14" was pretty comfortable, though I spent a bit of time adjusting the angle and hight. As a keyboard warrior, it took me some getting used to, but only a 1/2 hour or so. Additionally, you can use it with your off hand, which is very uber-nifty!

    Check eBay, they should be quite cheap... not good resolution on the mouse movements (maybe 150-300 dpi), but still useful. I want to pick one up and try Q3 or UT with it.

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  42. Good for the Pr0n Industry by TrollBridge · · Score: 0

    It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that this functionality could have some real practical uses for the pr0n industry.

    --
    There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
  43. Reasonable use of gestures by AlecC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I use Opera gestures - and love them. But they don't make sense for all applications. The problem is a dsicontinuity when you switch between keyboard and mouse - either way. Editing, and most programming operations, is fundamentally a keyboard based operation, and hot keys are far more sensible than mouse gestures for this. But for me, browsing the web is a mouse-based operation. I have to point to links to follow them, so my hand is on the mouse. I have a wheelmouse, so scrolling is also under my fingers. The only gestures I use regularly are back and forward, and they have become so automatic I use them (uselessly0 wherever the model applies - i.e. in all "browser" type applications, such as Konqueror or Windows Explorer.

    One thing we want to do is to try and get people to standardise. It will be a *real* pain if one piece of software used a gesture for minimise and another for quit.

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    1. Re:Reasonable use of gestures by Kallahar · · Score: 2

      Exactly, I have no use for gestures because I have a wheel, a forward mouse button, and a back mouse button. Mouse3 and Mouse4 also work in explorer for going forward and back. Maybe these are a good idea for people button-impaired, but it's sure easier to just click a button then to have to remember a gesture to go forward or back.

      Travis

    2. Re:Reasonable use of gestures by wbattestilli · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree with this and would like to make a second point.

      I work for Alias|Wavefront. We make Maya. It has a fantastically efficient and powerful UI that is based around gestures. To see people working with Maya, who use it professionally, is quite amazing. I also have to say that it has a very steep learning curve and is way beyond what you can expect from Joe User.

      For gestures to work efficiently, there can be no visual feedback while executing the command. If there is visible feedback, your interface is basically reduced to multidirectional menues. Maya can be used this way but it is no better than using the standard pulldown menues.

      I love gestures in Galeon/Opera/Mozilla, but I think that they should be left to the power user and that they should be used sparingly in applications.

    3. Re:Reasonable use of gestures by Idarubicin · · Score: 2
      One thing we want to do is to try and get people to standardise. It will be a *real* pain if one piece of software used a gesture for minimise and another for quit.

      But Microsoft would never embrace, extend, and corrupt a standard. I'm sure that if IE ever includes gestures, then Opera gestures will work perfectly.

      Damn it, I love classical music, and you can pry my Opera from my cold, dead hands.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    4. Re:Reasonable use of gestures by qute · · Score: 1

      > It will be a *real* pain if one piece of software used a gesture for minimise and another for quit.

      You mean like F6 in IE takes you to the location and marks all the text so you can begin writing something.

      In opera, which I use 99% of the time, F6 is used to tile. I have at least 10 windows open, so this is really painfull :-(
      I'm with IE here. Tiling is completly useless.

      --
      -- Make software not war
  44. Favorite Mouse Gesture by ErikTheRed · · Score: 2, Funny


    ...when I give those DRM assholes over at Disney the finger.

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
  45. wayV by xandi · · Score: 1

    check out wayV for gesture recognition in X11 - it's cool and apt-getable.

    x

  46. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dunno about Opera, but the original Myth: The Fallen Lords used "gesture clicking", moving your mouse as you clicked the button, to indicate formation alignment when moving units.

  47. Some of these programs are way to anal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried Stroke It for about 15 mins and found it wants movements that are too precise

    1. Re:Some of these programs are way to anal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are full of the poop.
      If you take the time to re-train the program to only gestures you want to use (I destroyed its database and started from scratch), it learns your eccentricities quite well.

  48. Mouse gestures... by CoderByBirth · · Score: 1

    ... in Opera were a pretty nice feature.
    Really, it sucks moving your mouse all the way
    to the top of the screen just to press back/forward ,
    which is exactly what you spend 90% of inputtime on when using your browser.

    Then, I got the Intellimouse Explorer 3.0 mouse with a forward/back button on the side.
    And I gotta tell you: Mouse gestures suck when all you have to do is push a button :)

    1. Re:Mouse gestures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least in Opera, hold down right mouse and click left to go back, and the opposite goes forward, no gestures required. If you try and go back while a page is loading, it seems to crash, at least in the Windows build.

  49. Patent it! by giminy · · Score: 2

    I also thought that an (hopefully non-profit) organiztion should start patenting things like this, under an "open source" patent. That is, your code can use it for free, but only if you release your code. If you choose not to release the code, you have to license the patent from the organization (and this is how the organization makes enough money to patent all the crazy new ideas its members have). All this just to be a prick and stick it to the companies that use their patents as weapons of evil...

    The organization could offer someone like, say, Microsoft, a license for $5 billion :). Oh wait, I said non-profit.

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
  50. Glicks by ChrisMul · · Score: 1

    There was a shareware package you could get that would do basically the same thing. They called the gestures "glicks" and it was targeted primarily at users of touchpad type input devices (eg. Cirque's SmartCat). I hope they're not trying to patent this or anything, because there is DEFINATELY prior art :P

    1. Re:Glicks by ChrisMul · · Score: 1

      http://www.tcbnetworks.com/strokeit/shots.shtml

    2. Re:Glicks by ChrisMul · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is the exact one I was thinking of. They did this about four years ago... http://www.cirque.com/products/cruise.html

  51. The mouse-wheel by garoush · · Score: 4, Interesting

    After the buttons on a mouse, I find the mouse-wheel to be the most attractive and useful feature. Just think how much you save yourself by using the wheel to scroll up/down in your application and keep the arrow focused on the screen not to mention, using one finger.

    You can take away all mouse-gestures and I won't complain, but I will get mad as hell if you give me a mouse without a wheel.

    --

    Karma stuck at 50? Add 2-5 inches.. err.. 2-5x Karmas Count to your pen1es.. err.. Karma all naturally and private
    1. Re:The mouse-wheel by distributed.karma · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Who needs a scrollwheel or scrollbar when there are arrow keys on the keyboard?

      IMHO the best combination is to use the left hand for the mouse, and the right for keyboard. The keyboard and the mouse both have their advantages, so why not enjoy them at the same time?

      <rant>
      Adding lots of bells and whistles to the mouse seems like an evil M$ plan. They want you to do everything with the mouse, it's so fun an easy just to click your way through the computing experience. Now if you really think it's so great to use the mouse, why don't you ditch the fscking keyboard and get a virtual, clickable keyb instead?
      </rant>

      --

      --
      If you moderate this, then your children will be next.

    2. Re:The mouse-wheel by snol · · Score: 1

      Who needs a scrollwheel or scrollbar when there are arrow keys on the keyboard?

      I do. I do a lot of things (web browsing not least) with just my mouse hand.

      IMHO the best combination is to use the left hand for the mouse, and the right for keyboard. The keyboard and the mouse both have their advantages, so why not enjoy them at the same time?

      Cause that's how YOU like to do it. I like to sit back with only my right hand on the desk for webbrowsing.

      Adding lots of bells and whistles to the mouse seems like an evil M$ plan. They want you to do everything with the mouse, it's so fun an easy just to click your way through the computing experience. Now if you really think it's so great to use the mouse, why don't you ditch the fscking keyboard and get a virtual, clickable keyb instead?

      uhhhh... evil MS plan, the mouse. ok, where were we? Using a mouse as a keyboard? That would suck, for obvious reasons. Mouse is good for intuitive UI's that require clicking one button at a time and don't require doing commands fast enough so that memorizing the keyboard shortcuts (and putting a hand on the keyboard) becomes necessary; they're also good for interfaces that don't have a set number of options that correspond nicely to predefined keyboard shortcuts: for instance, web page links, file manager icons, etc. etc. Gestures are a way to make the mouse more versatile; I think of them as keyboard shortcuts for my mouse hand. I also find it appeals more to my laziness to keep my right hand on the mouse and lazily gesture with it, than to use the keyboard for tabbing around (blech!) to links and pressing alt-left, alt-right all the time. Clear enough? Ditch the conspiracy theories, the mouse is there cause it's a useful user-input tool.

    3. Re:The mouse-wheel by Timothy+Chu · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree...navigating /. without a mouse wheel is just creating a fertile environment for carpal tunnel and other nasty pains to set in.

      However, my next favorite feature (though not nearly as popular) is the wheel button. Assign it to doubleclick (which you do much more often then click-scroll) to give your index finger a few more years of life.

      <tim><

  52. Mouse Gestures.....Masturbators rejoice! by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mouse gestures are the best thing for masturbators since baby oil/lotion/vaseline/

    Use the right hand for navigating and the left hand for.. err you know...

    At least this is what I heard. It isn't like I do it or anything.

    My Mom caught me watching a movie once starring the famous Russian actor Kotcha Jackinoff

    1. Re:Mouse Gestures.....Masturbators rejoice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why it's worth the extra time investment to learn the mouse gestures left-handed...

    2. Re:Mouse Gestures.....Masturbators rejoice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, my right hand is both my mousing hand and the hairy one.

  53. taps better by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    I have been thinking about this. there was a discussion about this a while back here on slashdot talking about the gesturing as seen in minority report.

    it was stated by myself and others that the gestures that good 'ol tom was using were too exagerated and that nobody would want to use such large flailing movements to navigate through files, video etc...

    it seems to me that the most efficient way to "gesture" your way through information would be more along the lines of morse code.

    I would much rather just ahve a touch sensitive mouse pad (better than the touch pads we see today on laptops etc) and you would tap in certain patterns to acheive what you want.

    this could also be placed on the tops of keys on the keyboard.

    what if you tapped out "J J J" (not hard enough to depress the J key - but enough to register the tap on the sensor on the J key... this action would then do whatever you assigned it to.

    the other option is chording buttons on the mouse.

    I have the MS intellimouse which I love. the two thumb buttons are assigned to forward and back and I cant stand it when i use a mouse without these functions.

    If you were to add more buttons to the mouse - you could then chord certain actions.

    I am just very dexteritous with my fingers - and using them in tapping and chording formations just makes more sense to me based on my particular preference.

  54. Multifinger gestures are cooler. by JamesUD · · Score: 1

    At UD (where I am attending), I have been able to try out a device that can do multi-finger gestures on the same surface that does typing and mousing. It has does gestures for back, forward and scroll all the requisite browser movements for reading Slashdot, plus most other conceivable hotkey combos! Here is an article about it in our school newspaper: http://www.mis4.udel.edu/udaily/index.html

    --
    There are two types of people in this world, those with loaded guns, and those who dig. You dig. 001010011 001110101 00
  55. Opera definitely not the first by skinfitz · · Score: 1

    Alias Poweranimator on SGI used to use mouse gestures (before it was A|W then Maya) and so does 3DS MAX.

    1. Re:Opera definitely not the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been using Alias products for awhile and I love the way they have implemented mouse movements. While I am programming I couldn't be bothered to take my hands off the keyboard but in cad packages like Alias offers it is a huge timesaver. The first time I watched an expert user working in Studio it looked like magic what they could accomplish, I barely saw them move their hands and they had a scene opened/setup...

  56. Im gonna have to vote no on this one... by rosewood · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am comming towards the end of my moz experience (check my other posts on that) and one of the first things I did was load up optimoz and added mouse gestures since it was so highly raved about.

    My experience was ugh to bad. The first big problem I had was copying text from webpages. For some reason, moz always thought I was gesturing. Well, no. Then, outside of that accidental gesture, I found myself making them a lot more, including the close gesture. Then, when I really wanted to make one, it never worked right :

    For back and forward, I have my intelimouse explorer. For scrolling I have a wheel, but the no autoscroll bug in Moz is kinda anoying. If mouse anything needs to be added, that is it. Anything else I can do w/ quick menus, like opening a new tab. Years of FPS mean I can quickly move my mouse and click w/ deadly acuracy.

    1. Re:Im gonna have to vote no on this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care what you think.

    2. Re:Im gonna have to vote no on this one... by duckie13 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, to stop any problems with copy-and-paste, you can go into Mozilla's Preferences, Advanced, Mouse Gestures, and change the default mouse button to the right mouse button (or middle / wheel, but I'm without one of those here at work). Since I've switched buttons, I've had no problems at all, even with right clicking for any reason.

      --
      "My days are less enjoyable because of people." ~ Johnny the Homicidal Maniac
    3. Re:Im gonna have to vote no on this one... by marick · · Score: 3, Informative

      My experience was ugh to bad. The first big problem I had was copying text from webpages. For some reason, moz always thought I was gesturing. Well, no.

      Nice troll?

      Seriously, I don't know what planet you're on, but for me, mouse gesturing only happens when I click the RIGHT mouse button. I select text with the LEFT mouse button. I scroll with the MIDDLE button. I'm surprised you don't complain about getting the "context pop-up menu" when you try to select text as well.

      The situation you're describing has (literally) NEVER happened to me and I've been using mouse-gesturing/pie-menus for a few months now.

      -Michael

    4. Re:Im gonna have to vote no on this one... by Dstrct0 · · Score: 1

      Besides the other post on this thread about switching your default mouse buttons (which I am trying when I get home tonight), you might also want to check out the new(ish) Pie-Menus to make your gestures a little easier.

      I've been using them for a couple weeks now, and it has made a huge difference in the number of accidental gestures I do.

      --
      Build boards not bombs
    5. Re:Im gonna have to vote no on this one... by jeti · · Score: 2

      AFAIK you can't use the right mouse button on Linux
      systems. On Windows, the context menu pops up when
      you release the button. On Linux the menu appears
      when you press it.

      So the left button is likely the default one for
      Linux.

    6. Re:Im gonna have to vote no on this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I don't care what you think. So we cancel each other out.

    7. Re:Im gonna have to vote no on this one... by pteaxwa · · Score: 1

      My experience was ugh to bad. The first big problem I had was copying text from webpages. For some reason, moz always thought I was gesturing.

      You can always cancel a mouse gesture by pausing the gesture. I now use the right button for gestures, but before when it was the left... I just made sure to pause slightly before copying/pasting.

      Check the mouse gestures FAQ. It answers some of your complaints. http://optimoz.mozdev.org/gestures/faqs.html

    8. Re:Im gonna have to vote no on this one... by rosewood · · Score: 2

      Switching buttons makes it unintuitive, and I still run into problems

      As for pausing, I had the setting at 500ms, but yet this was not forgiving enough. Any less it would seam, and if I stopped and thought, then the gesture was denied

      I just have to say my preference is NO on mouse gestures. I guess thats whats good about moz, is that you can have them and use them and I can say fuck that

    9. Re:Im gonna have to vote no on this one... by leuk_he · · Score: 2

      I vote for opera.

      I learned gestures on opera. On mozilla they are different, I want my opera settings under mozilla, and i don't want to spend time programming it, if that is possible. (I want to save time).

      Why are the gestures under mozilla different from opera? don't blaim XUL!

  57. gestures period by non · · Score: 1

    the idea that the future of the man-machine interface might be gestural has been around for a while. bruce sterling mentions it in "Holy Fire."

    with the current state of voice recognition i'm relatively certain that i could sign to my computer better than i can speak to it. and i wouldn't need fancy headphone/microphone setups.

    --
    ...vividly encapsulates that post-Watergate/pre-punk/coked-up moment when you could trust no one, least of all yourself.
  58. FUNNIEST. THING. EVER. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  59. Opera's Alternate Gesture by lostchicken · · Score: 2

    The best mouse gesture I've seen in Opera would not work under the current development of MozGest. To go back under Opera, first right-click, then quickly left click, like you are tapping your fingers on a desk. Go the other way for forward. Hard to explain, but very useful. It just feels right. There is no dragging involved.

    --
    -twb
  60. I love it by skubalon · · Score: 1

    I love mouse gestures in Opera. The problem comes when I have to use IE because a page doesn't render correctly and I forget that I am not using Opera. I end up popping up a menu or clicking on something that I don't want to.

    I want to see more apps with mouse gestures.

  61. Re:Check out the radial context thingie from optim by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

    That's why when u hold the mouse still for 2 secs it shows what each button means...

    I do agree that the pictures are a bit confusing, but I give it another shot (it advanced alot since the first time I saw it..)

    --
    ^_^
  62. Great stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was introduced to gestures when I was working as a PCB designer on a CAD package called Pantheon, a clone of Mentor BoardStation, or at least it tries.

    I liked them a lot. When designing PCBs, you rarely need the keyboard and are constantly staring at the screen. Anything to make accessing commands faster with the mouse is great.

    The only thing is, you can get RSIs fairly quickly as a PCB designer. I don't know of any other job where you use the mouse exclusively, and a LOT.

  63. Pray tell by pclminion · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Which web browser had gestures before Opera?

    "Introduce" != "Invent." Sure, lots of CAD/CAM/CAE tools had gestures forever ago, but how many regular users run those programs daily?

    Opera "introduced gestures" to the web browsing world.

    1. Re:Pray tell by Bat_Masterson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A better word would've been "popularize".

      The word "introduce" gives a sense of possessiveness to the thing being introduced. That may be unintentional, but that's the way many people view the word.

  64. gesturing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my intellimouse spasmed and then disconnected itself while i was reading this. i guess you could say i made some obscene mouse gestures at that point.

  65. Alternative Input by digerata · · Score: 2, Informative
    This may be a bit off topic mod me down if you wish, but I am just talking about another alternative input method.

    What if we had the ability to assign keyboard shortcuts to links on a web page?

    Let me explain my reasoning and then what I am talking about. Our company is in the process of converting its HP3000 database to Oracle and its terminal applications to web applications. One of the drawbacks to switching from a terminal application such as Reflections is we lose all of the custom shortcuts that people use to navigate through the system.

    As an example, a web application has a row of navigation across the top that stays the same throughout. We could say that any link that matches this description from this URI: domain.com/ or domain.com/app/module maps to Ctrl-F3 or Ctrl-Alt-F.

    Let's take it a step further and say that we can add shortcuts to not just links, but form elements as well. We can already tab to form elements, but this would make the process that much faster.

    Not only would this be an absolute hit with people that hate taking they hands off the keyboard, but I believe that whatever browser would implement this would make great inroads into corporations that are converting their terminal applications to web based applications.

    --

    1;
    1. Re:Alternative Input by Christopher_G_Lewis · · Score: 1

      Actually, the accesskey attribute will help...

      accesskey

    2. Re:Alternative Input by digerata · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info, I tried to setup an example, however, was unable to get the accessKey attribute to work. The browser (Mozilla and IE) keeps intercepting the Alt and Ctrl key.

      --

      1;
    3. Re:Alternative Input by Christopher_G_Lewis · · Score: 1

      Here's a link to the HTML docs at MSDN.

      MSDN

      There's a SHOW ME button that launches a new window. ALT-1 highlights the text in the text box.

      pretty cool.

    4. Re:Alternative Input by TillmanJ · · Score: 1

      The trick is to use keys that the browser has not already (probably) bound to shortcuts. For instance, the UK Goverment Standard on ACCESSKEYs specifies that designers should use the following:

      • S skip navigation
      • 1 home page
      • 2 what's new page
      • 3 site map
      • 4 to the search facility on the site
      • 5 frequently asked questions (F A Qs)
      • 6 help page/facility
      • 7 complaints procedure
      • 8 terms and conditions (including privacy statement)
      • 9 feedback page
      • 0 the menu page of accesskeys detailing the accesskeys are being used within the website and the information or services they link to.

      What I would really like to see is a good method for binding ACCESSKEYs to Alt+Left Arrow and Alt+Right Arrow for / navigation.

      Lots of good ACCESSKEY info can be had here.

    5. Re:Alternative Input by flonker · · Score: 2

      For a working example of this, see:
      http://labs.google.com/keys/index.html

    6. Re:Alternative Input by benhaha · · Score: 1

      Alt+Left and Alt+Right do History navigation in IE by default. Actually, I'm not sure why I said by default, because you can't change them.

      You are correct to suggest that you ought to use access keys which are not already used by the browser. This probably restricts you to Alt+Number or Alt+Letter, where letter excludes [FEVATHD] as those are used to invoke menus by IE, or [SGB] additionally used by Netscape, and Alt+Shift+Key combinations. Ctrl+Letter combinations are generally used as shortcuts (Ctrl+C for copy etc).

      Another thing really underused is tab order/tabstop, and labels.

      Browsers already allow you to navigate through links using the Tab key (and Shift+Tab for the reverse direction, with Ctrl+Tab and Ctrl+Shift+Tab to move between frames, in IE at least). However it is very popular to have links at the top and left of web pages (see here at /., or just about any other large website). Since tab order is document order by default, this means that you would have to tab through all of these links before getting to the form you want to fill in.

      Use of the HTML 4.0 tabIndex attribute allows you to put the form elements at the beginning of the tab order, as well as putting the initial input focus on the first item. The HTML 4.0 label element allows you to operate checkboxes and radio buttons by clicking on the label, as happens in Windows, and additionally, if you bind an accesskey to the label, that accesskey will give the focus to the associated control.

      Long lists of links can't be given their own access keys (you will run out) But groups can be given accesskeys, and then tab used to select within the group.

      Just a little thought and a little knowledge will make almost any page easily navigable by keyboard, with no change to the appearance, and no degredation to the experience of mouse users.

      --
      NO ID: BEING FREE MEANS NOT HAVING TO PROVE IT
  66. P0rn and closeup zooming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

    Up and down, up and down.

    That's my gesture for: Zoom in on that tasty bush so that I can climax.

    (-> ahhhhhhhh.

  67. oops... by edrugtrader · · Score: 2

    i just gave my boss a gesture and now i'm looking for a new job. what do you think of this one? its in the bay area so i wouldn't have to move!

    Web Developer II

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
  68. Re:Check out the radial context thingie from optim by egghat · · Score: 2

    Hmmm,

    for me they aren't laggy.

    And I think learning pie menues is easier than gestures cause you have visual feedback. Wait 1 second and it shows you what the icons mean.

    Therefore I don't need months to memorize them. I just need 4 or five (next/previous tab and reload to name the three most important).

    Of course one can argue, that the normal right click text menu is enough. Perhaps I'm just happy, cause the pie menues give me exactly those functions that are missing (for me) in the normal right-click-text-menu.

    As I've said before: YMMV.

    Bye egghat.

    --
    -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
  69. Lots of people need gestures! by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    Ah, but you have to use both hands to browse the web -- they only need one. The initial target market for this is compulsive masturbaters. If penetration is deep enough, they expect to move to one-handed Vietnam veterans and people trying to make good on "I could do that with one hand behind my back" bar bets.

    Other potential markets include users of hand-crank-generator-powered computers (which have one hand tied up at all times) and computer users too dense to manage a keyboard.

    1. Re:Lots of people need gestures! by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      if penertration was deep enough, I doubt they would be masterbating.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Lots of people need gestures! by SablKnight · · Score: 1

      but you have to use both hands to browse the web

      dunno about you, but my browser, has this bar at the top, and it has these buttons, and if you use the mouse on them, this stuff happens, and you don't need your left hand at all!

      (said in best one-time-at-band-camp voice, don't know why, it seemed somehow appropriate)

      Seriously, though -- do you really need the extra speed when web-browsing to need keyboard shortcuts? Navigation buttons are usually a fairly large target, any good mouse has a scroll wheel, and there are drop-down menus for anything really complicated. Keyboards are for data entry, for navigation all you need is a wheel-mouse. All hail the GUI.

      SablKnight

    3. Re:Lots of people need gestures! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mouse gestures have the best of both worlds: they are faster than navigation buttons AND they only require one hand.

  70. Mod the coward up to the sky :) by Pac · · Score: 2

    And let it teach him/her how much mojo can get wasted by writting informative comments while not logged...

    Incidentally, their notion of "custumize" is jolly Linuxian, isnt it? A text associative array of keypad keys translated into coordinates. Joe User, keep away, you are not welcome here... :)

  71. MultiTouch gestures are even faster! by MrFastTouch · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sorry all you mouse gesture devotees out there, multi-finger gestures on a touch surface are even better than mouse gestures 'cause you don't have to draw a whole symbol!

    With multi-touch gestures, the finger combination and direction of motion at the beginning of the slide immediately determine the command. See:

    http://www.fingerworks.com/gesture_demo.html

    Plus you can mix them in with typing and pointing as well, all in the same space!

    1. Re:MultiTouch gestures are even faster! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using computers for over 20 years and I sure don't need some new fancy multi-finger gesture input contraption to do my work. I get along just fine with my old mouse and clackity keyboard. The very idea of combining key entry, mouse input, and gesture input on a smooth surface is just horse manure. Why should I learn something new, it'll just make me tired.

  72. The beauty of open source by ibbieta · · Score: 1

    While reading the article, I read that Optimoz's Mozilla gestures have "Easter Egg" gestures. Since I use this little app I wanted to see the hidden features. Unfortunately, my google search turned up nothing useful but then I thought, "Wait, the code is there for all to see."

    I'm hardly a programmer but a quick look and I found the file the sets the actions for various gestures and looked through it for new and exciting gestures.

    The only Easter Eggs I found were (for those that use gestures in Mozilla):

    Right - Left - Down - Up - Right : this will give pages an "Exploding Backgrownd" which worked best on Google's home page. It is just an animated image of an explosion tiled in the background. Caused my little 450MHz to slow way down but everything was back to normal after exiting that page.

    The other is a "V" shape for "Validate" which, I think, sends the page being viewed off for wc3 validation. This is cool because I didn't even know that gestures could handle diagonals.

    1. Re:The beauty of open source by WhiteKnight07 · · Score: 1

      Actually if you do down - right - down - right - up - right - up - right it sends it off to be validated. It doesn't actually sense a diagonal, just a pattern of right angles that resembels a diagonal. Although if you just do a V shape it's pretty good about recognizing it since the motion of the mouse is aproximated to the nearest compass direction anyway. Or in the this case, the nearest pattern of compass directions. Thanks for the easter egg info though, I think that's pretty cool.

      --


      We're going to make information free Mr. Anderson, whether you like it, or not.
  73. And KDE has mouse gestures too! by sultanoslack · · Score: 1
    By way of KHotKeys you can map many useful KDE things onto gestures, or any DCOP call. DCOP is KDE's interprocess communication/scripting interface that really has a lot available. And Seli (the author) promises that this will find its way into the KDE 3.2 distrobution.

    KDE users/gesture lovers give it a whirl! I currently have gestures mapped to start up Konq, Konsole and to lock my screen.

  74. Ditto for UCB KIC (IC Layout App) in 1980s by JGski · · Score: 1

    UC Berkeley KIC (an IC Layout App) used gestures also - probably a knock-off of the Applicon app.

  75. Re:Check out the radial context thingie from optim by Drakonian · · Score: 1
    Wait 1 second and it shows you what the icons mean.

    True, but I can move my mouse up and click the back/refresh/home/whatever a hell of a lot faster than 1 second.

    --
    Random is the New Order.
  76. quicktime VR, acrobat reader, Mac finder, etc. by codeonezero · · Score: 1

    Quicktime VR also incorporates some mouse gestures.
    Note the ability to click and drag left or right, up or down to move in a Quicktime VR movie.

    There are other example on the Mac that I can think of.

    Holding down option(?) + click drag to scroll through a finder's window (havent tested in Mac OS X, and this is using a one button mouse of course, probably just a simple button click + drag in a multi-button mouse)

    Also Adobe Acrobat Reader has a similar scroll mode when you select the hand tool.

    Nevertheless great to see this being extended and embraced in web browsing :)

    Can't wait to try it out :)

    Mr. David Every had a previous article on MacKido.com regarding mouse gestures (specifically wheel mouse scrolling vs. click drag type scrolling)

    http://www.mackido.com/Interface/CounterPoints.h tm l

    There are some other nice articles about interface you can find on his website.

    -codeonezero

    --

    ....
    int main (void) { ... }

  77. You already can... by _anomaly_ · · Score: 1

    Unless you build your own custom browser (using Mozilla, which is why this isn't off topic ;-), you need code to execute on client-side... which lends itself towards javascript.
    You can easily capture key events (presses, "downs", "ups", etc.) and process them accordingly. I've already had to do this to allow users to use the Enter key to "tab down" a spreadsheet type interface, instead of submitting the actual HTML form or doing nothing. It's actually very easy.
    You could generate this javascript dynamically even, based on the links for a certain page and whatnot, or just have static javascript if that meets your needs.
    At any rate, just wanted to point out that it's presently quite possible, and given the nature of the internet, I don't see how there'll be any other way to do it that doesn't involve some kind of client-side script like javascript.

    --
    "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:You already can... by digerata · · Score: 1
      I never thought about the JavaScript event method. Good idea! This is good if the developer wishes to provide a default shortcut system. But it loses its power if a user wants to customize the shortcuts.

      I was thinking more along the lines of a feature built into Mozilla. Say for instance, you right click on a link or form element and from the context menu select, Keyboard Shortcut'. However, this way lacks the ability to have a default configuration for a particular site. (Unless, of course, you have access to Novell's ZENWorks and just blow down a new configuration image.)

      --

      1;
  78. mouse gestures gain what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit, mouse gestures are for spastic asswiped with the Delerium Tremens. Homos might use them while wacking off, but on real person would ever think about employing this crap. Get lives and stop gesturing with your mice.

  79. pfft by MikeDX · · Score: 1

    Master Yoda says I've been "mouse gestering" my way out of trouble for years.

    These are not the files I am looking for

  80. Re:Check out the radial context thingie from optim by Fizgig · · Score: 1

    The point of pie menus is that the menu waits to pop up on purpose so that you don't see it if you don't need it. The idea is that after using "back" two or three times, you've memorized where it is in the menu and don't need to see it anymore. The tradeoff is having to wait 1 second the first few times versus having to see the menu when you don't need it later.

  81. Mostly the keyboard by sbeitzel · · Score: 3, Informative

    When I'm surfing, I tend to visit text-heavy pages, so I do a lot of scrolling. I use the mouse to click on a link and then I get it out of the way. I use the arrow keys on the keyboard to scroll through the page and to go back. My hand gets cramped up when I hold a mouse for long, and this works for me. Besides, it keeps me in practice for those occasions when I still use lynx to browse.

    --
    Oh, go on, check out my job.
  82. Touch-screens by piotrr · · Score: 1

    I don't believe in touch-screens for the same reason lightpens flunked: You do not want to keep your hand suspended in the air in front of the monitor, nor do you want to keep bringing it up, for everyday work. In fact, you don't want to do it for any longer period of time at all.

    --
    / Per
    1. Re:Touch-screens by Cervantes · · Score: 1
      If you'd paid attention to the post, you would have noticed the part where I said I mounted it next to my chair, facing up. This negates the neccessity of lifting of hand, and indeed, the suspending thereof. Instead, it would, to a cognicent person, evoke an image of a monitor facing up next to the arm of a chair. In reality, I found it more comfortable than a standard mouse, though I am a trackball man by trade. The main advantage was that I could see exactly where and what I was pointing at, and when I tried some drawing (in MS Paint, admittedly) using a stylus, it worked impressively well. It is nice being able to see what I'm doing on the small screen, while not being bound to it 24/7. And, for surfing, it was mightly convenient... just tap a link I want, just wave my finger to evoke mouse-gestures... very easy, and if I'd been in a position to hold on to the equipment, I would have added an armrest that left my hand dangling above the screen. Quiet comfortable, I imagine.

      There, wasn't that nicer than "RTFP, jackass"?

      --
      If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  83. bah! by rash · · Score: 1

    Blender has had mouse gestures for a very very long time.
    Opera did not introduce this.

  84. Ditto for Emacs by Bat_Masterson · · Score: 1

    Although it didn't get wide usage, Emacs used to have (still has?) a "mouse gestures" add-on that allows you to map any unique mouse gesture to a key-sequence (which Emacs can then map to pretty much any command -- including user defined ones).

    Always meant to try it out, but never got around to it. Wonder if it's still around?

    1. Re:Ditto for Emacs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you need to memorize four hundred mouse gestures rather than four hundred key sequences?

    2. Re:Ditto for Emacs by Bat_Masterson · · Score: 1

      Only if you need four hundred mouse gestures or 400 key sequences to get your job done.

      Remember that you could easily program (if you know "Lisp" ;-) an Emacs key sequence (and, thus, mouse gesture) to do pretty much anything you want. If you really need 400 separate "sequences" to do what you want (highly doubtful), you could always create a 401st to bring up a (set of) help screen(s) to remind you of the other 400. Also, remember that Emacs is "mode" based (C mode, C++ mode, Java mode, Text mode, etc.), so you could reuse "sequences" (and "gestures") in each mode and, thus, put "similar" commands in the different modes on the same "gesture".

      How many "gestures" do you have to remember to use Palm's grafitti(sp?) effectively?

    3. Re:Ditto for Emacs by deenoman · · Score: 1

      hey,

      Both Emacs and XEmacs have `strokes-mode' which works pretty well, and which (in XEmacs) is highly graphical. You can just do:

      M-x strokes-mode

      and then go nuts.

      I think:

      http://mit.edu/cadet/www/strokes-help.html

      will help if you have trouble figuring out how to use this mode. But it's very easy. The basic premise of strokes-mode in (X)Emacs is that 3-button mice don't have any usage assigned to *dragging* the middle mouse button. So strokes-mode uses that for gestures, and it works well. Moreover, you can easily define your own new strokes, and assign them to whatever commands you want, just like:

      M-x global-set-key

      --dave

    4. Re:Ditto for Emacs by paxil · · Score: 1

      Although it didn't get wide usage, Emacs used to have (still has?) a "mouse gestures" add-on that allows you to map any unique mouse gesture to a key-sequence (which Emacs can then map to pretty much any command -- including user defined ones).
      Always meant to try it out, but never got around to it. Wonder if it's still around?

      You are thinking of
      strokes-mode, which is alive and well in emacs 21

      M-X strokes-mode

  85. The Mouse is a crutch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mouse gestures are fine but.... the mouse in general is a problem. I personally hardly use my mouse at all except for specific applications which there is no other choice. (graphics, games, web browsing). It is absolutely painful for me to watch an average computer user slowly clicking and dragging to highlight text when we have perfectly quick and accurate keyboard shortcuts to accomplish the same job instantly. (shift-home/end/cursors). The mouse is crippling the mind of users... they feel they must use it for EVERYTHING even when the cursor is right beisde the word they want to delete they take the trouble of moving their hand off the keyboard and highlighting the text instead of just hitting the backspace key 5 times. It's just dumbing it down unnecessarily. We don't want dumb computer users.. make them learn to use their system properly.

    1. Re:The Mouse is a crutch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a virgin, right?

  86. (slightly OT) - Surf Google using the keyboard by nautical9 · · Score: 1

    Another proof by example that Google is a Good Thing, they're working on keyboard shortcuts for quickly getting to your search results without needing to pry your sticky fingers from the keyboard. Best of all, it uses the familiar k and i for all us vi[m] users.

  87. mouse gestures rule by Jaeger- · · Score: 1

    mouse gestures are awesome. first experienced them in some game a while ago and then discovered Opera supported them too -- haven't looked back. Moz + Optimoz is a great combo too. makes using IE so boring.

    i just wish i could specify my OWN gestures instead of using the built-in ones. i've accidentally closed so many windows i can't even count them all.

    --
    E V E R Y T H I N G I W R I T E I S F A L S E
  88. totally confusing users... by Traicovn · · Score: 1

    Eh... personally, I am not a big fan of 'gestures'. Honestly these would probably be more hurtful then helpful to me (I tend to just play with my cursor while I'm reading or if I'm bored). It's a neat idea, but I have to agree with StefMeister, I'm almost completely keyboard-dependent. Honestly, except when I'm 'browsing for fun' it's not uncommon to find me using lynx instead of a traditional desktop browser (Mozilla, NS, MSIE, Konqueror). But I guess some users will find this useful, then I sorta have to wonder how many people it will just totally confuse... (Think 'Joe Average' user)

    --

    [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
    {Traicovn}
  89. gestures in movies by i0lanthe · · Score: 1

    The moment that, to me, made Minority Report worth watching is when the dude using gesture-gloves to sort through some data goes to shake the hand of someone who just walked in, and all the stuff on his virtual desktop basically falls off the edge of the world. Ohhh yeah.

    --
    "The Crystal Wind is the Storm, and the Storm is Data, and the Data is Life"
  90. Black and white??? Bluck by victim · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So your playing B&W, you are half way through a gesture to create water on your poor people and the game decides to autosave, freezing input in the middle of the gesture. So you try to recover and complete the gesture or at least make it do something sane, but no. You get a fireball or something and incinerate your people. Bad god. Maybe the PC version of BW is better, but the Mac version could inspire one to injure the programmers.

    Galeon on the other hand has nice gesture support.

  91. Galeon's got 'em by l00sr · · Score: 1

    Galeon has them, although they are not enabled by default.

  92. Re:Check out the radial context thingie from optim by Stween · · Score: 1

    Pie menus are a concept I've liked the look of for a while. Yes, when I tried the mozilla pie menus for the first time, they weren't the speediest things on the planet.

    However, people get far, far quicker at using them when they remember *which direction* the option they want is in, whereas for a normal pop-up menu you'll always need to look at it.

    It's quite impressive when you see a man blindfolded and asked to select options from the menu, and he doesn't miss a single one. Memorising the most frequently used options is not a problem for most folks.

  93. SNES supported gestures... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... It's true, the Super Nintendo had basic support for gestures. It's documented in the manual: "Starting the Game, 1.) flip off the power switch..."

    My unit was defective, though...

  94. Stroke It user review by abhinavnath · · Score: 1

    Stroke It truly rocks. I've gotten so accustomed to it in three days' use, I already miss it badly on other computers. I highly recommend it.

    --
    My other sig is also a .Porsche
    1. Re:Stroke It user review by goldcd · · Score: 1

      Yep, I love it to bits. At first it was just a cool thing, now on PCs without it I find myself trying to flick open windows back onto the toolbar and just blinking gormlessly when they just stay there.

    2. Re:Stroke It user review by rpresser · · Score: 1

      Apparently in 2 weeks the site went down. Slashdot strikes again. Anybody got a copy of the installer?

  95. Keyboard binding configuration ability is better by analog_line · · Score: 2

    ...though I've nothing personally, religiously, or otherwise against mouse gestures, I personally have no interest in using them. I try to keep my hands as far away from the mouse as possible, while still within a graphical environment, and making the computer even more dependent on the mouse just isn't going to swing me.

    What I really wish more people would do is allow for greater user configuration of keyboard shortcuts. I'm not talking about a macro tool like the old Tempo II Plus for the old MacOS (which my father still runs on his MacOS 9 partition and is very very sorry to see go away in 10). I'm talking about being able to rebind any command to whatever key combination you want, within the OS, like rebinding keys under Q3. I don't see why this stuff has to be hard coded all the damn time. I remember MS Word used to let you (if I recall correctly) but the last time I used Word often enough to need to worry about changing the keybindings was a very long time ago, and I don't know if the feature is still there.

    I haven't found many pieces of software aside from game software that lets you do it. Default configurations are fine, but I want to be able to reassign useful key combinations that are assigned to commands I'll never use, to ones I will, without having to edit the source code to do it.

  96. Also on MSNBC by maf212 · · Score: 0

    this story was also covered by MSNBC @

    http://www.msnbc.com/news/816049.asp

    --
    --Note to self. Add witty sig here, someday...
  97. galeon by nnd · · Score: 1

    the back and forward without even moving themouse was my favorite thing about opera. mozgest doesnt do em, but if you are running galeon you can get the right-click, left-click to go back. going forward isnt supported, but i seem to use back the majority of the time anyways.

  98. Re:Check out the radial context thingie from optim by ism · · Score: 1

    I suggest giving the new build a try. After hovering over the pie menu for about a second (I think it's configurable), tooltips will show up telling you what each icon does. After a day of normal usage with this, I memorized the locations of the things I use. It's almost like a gesture in that I bring the menu up and nudge it in the appropriate direction.

    However, I use radial menus in conjunction with gestures. I use gestures for the most part, and radial menu usually for links (open in new tab, save as, etc.). Together they have sped things up considerably.

  99. Re:Check out the radial context thingie from optim by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

    doesn't this just cry out for an option for the delay time (or no delay), or even whether or not the menu ever becomes visible?

    Of course, it seems the most cited example of what this is good for (back/forward in history) are exactly the things I have 2 of my mouse buttons already dedicated to, and would not want to do any other way at this point. CTRL+R will always be better, for me, to reload the page, so all that really remains are things like changing text size (keyboard shortcuts are made primarily for the right hand on that, which is pointless, and the IE shortcut of alt+mousewheel to change font size goes through the history in phoenix) and cycling through tabs.

    --
    -PainKilleR-[CE]
  100. Its too late by Tikiman · · Score: 1

    I already patented mouse gestures. Not just for web browsing either, for menus and stuff as well. Y'all can expect to hear from my lawyers soon.

  101. What's wrong with keyboard shortcuts? by bodin · · Score: 2

    Why introduce another risk?

    Mouse use is already a risk for persons: RSI. Making more movements with the mouse, with gestures, I feel that this is heading a road we don't wanna go.

    Use the keyboard and love your hands/wrists for a long time.

  102. Re:Check out the radial context thingie from optim by egghat · · Score: 1

    Good idea!

    --
    -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
  103. what i want by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

    is an OS that uses gestures and has handwriting recognition so i can get me one 'o them tablet pc's. screw keyboards/mice. i want to sit on my couch, connected to the net over 802.11b, and surf with a tablet on my lap. i wonder who'll make it first?

  104. mentor graphics by kirn_malinus · · Score: 3, Informative

    many CAD/EDA type software packages have had mouse gestures for a while. i know mentor graphics has had some extremely useful gestures since i started using it.

    --
    All circuits busy.
    1. Re:mentor graphics by duplicate-nickname · · Score: 1

      Yea....mouse gestures certainly make mentor easier/quicker to use.

      New wire - New wire - New wire

      --

      ÕÕ

  105. mouse gestures and pie menus by rplacd · · Score: 0

    Mouse gestures in the form of pie menus have been around for a while now. See, for example:

    • piewm -- a tvtwm-based window manager for X.
    • Don Hopkins' pie menu site.

    You can even find pie menus in real life -- look at home entertainment appliance remotes.

  106. Re:Check out the radial context thingie from optim by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 5, Informative
    Not at all, that's what I thought until I realised I wasn't using them properly. A quick guide to the Mozilla pie menus:

    1) Hold down the right mouse button. I can't stress this enough. Don't click once, then move the mouse, then click again.

    2) Use the tooltips.

    3) Don't feel you need to use the pie menu for everything, just a few things like switching tabs, refreshing a page etc is good. Keep doing it, and after a few times you'll find it comes naturally.

    4) Throw the mouse around. If you're wondering why the pie menus follow you around, it's so you can be very vicious with them. Hold down right, throw the mouse to the top left, the throw it to the right and let go. You can do this very quickly, because you don't have to aim, and the movements can be very vague indeed. Then let go.

    5) Don't think about it. If you constantly look at the menu while using it, you lose the speed advantage. If anything, just defocus for a moment while you start, that way you remember the motion rather than what's on the screen.

    To be honest after getting used to them, I love them. I wish GTK/Qt had an option to do this. It's one of those cool hacks you want to do but never have time for....

  107. Re:Check out the radial context thingie from optim by Suppafly · · Score: 1

    the IE shortcut of alt+mousewheel to change font size goes through the history in phoenix

    Its control+mousewheel in IE. Normal windows behavior in any app for the alt key is to do things in the menu bar.

  108. Mouse Gestures and radial context menus by carlmenezes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Though radial context menus are supposed to be faster than mouse gestures, I disagree for one simple reason :

    You need to click twice - once to start the radial menu, and once more to confirm your choice. Also the fact that the menu moves with the mouse is a tad dis-orienting when you're trying to learn them (compared to this, mouse gestures have a much smaller learning curve).

    I've tried both for quite some time now and gestures definitely win. Ofcourse, that's because I'm using a mouse.

    I could definitely see trackball users getting a lot of good use out of radial context menus.

    Anyway, both these features go a LONG way in bringing converts into the mozilla camp and that's a good thing for Open Source.

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
    1. Re:Mouse Gestures and radial context menus by jeti · · Score: 2

      Radial menus are not supposed to be faster than
      mouse gestures. But they are faster than linear
      menus. They also offer a better learning curve
      because you can see the available options.

      Oh - and RadialContext is actually supposed to
      be used like a mouse gesture. It's the very
      reason the menu follows the mouse. Simply try
      to hold the button down and drag.

    2. Re:Mouse Gestures and radial context menus by SilentTristero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The idea of radial context menus is they are self-documenting. You can start by looking at the menu, and then after a while the ones you use become second nature. You don't even really have to "learn" them, as opposed to gestures, which, while obviously not so difficult, still have to be looked up somewhere until you get used to them.

      And if there's a rarely used gesture, it's utterly useless. In a radial menu, you can at least wait for the menu to show up and then follow its cues.

      If a radial menu is well-designed, it becomes pretty similar to a set of gestures. Unfortunately the Mozilla radial menus use tiny hard-to-read icons and so are much too slow to actually use. But in other systems with text menus, they're quite fast to use and learn.

      -- Tristero

  109. Re:Check out the radial context thingie from optim by Suppafly · · Score: 2

    However, people get far, far quicker at using them when they remember *which direction* the option they want is in, whereas for a normal pop-up menu you'll always need to look at it.


    With a normal right-click style popup menu, you also ten to remember where the option you want is. For instance, if you right-click on a link in IE, the open in new window option is the second one. I could and do do that with out really looking at it or even really thinking about it.

  110. Re:Check out the radial context thingie from optim by Stween · · Score: 1

    Distance is a difficult thing to judge when using the mouse without looking. I'd like to see you hit that second option every time blindfolded.

    Another factor which determines how quick a menu system is would be the distance the mouse has to travel -- using a standard menu system we all know and love (or hate), we have to move further to get to some options, less for others. With a radial menu system, the distance to each option is the same.

  111. Mouse in Mandake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a mouse/bug in Mdk90? I received this a minut ago:

    "A program called 'konqueror' is slowing down the others on your machine. It may have a bug that is causing this, or it may just be busy.
    Would you like to try to stop the program ?"

    Never received it before.

  112. Re:Check out the radial context thingie from optim by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

    Its control+mousewheel in IE.

    Oops, I was just going from memory because, either way, it doesn't work in phoenix and I don't have a quick IE shortcut available on this machine any more. Still, the ALT+mousewheel behavior is as I described in phoenix.

    --
    -PainKilleR-[CE]
  113. Thank You Radial Context! & Slashdot! by MrBlic · · Score: 1
    From this story, I followed a couple of links about pie menus to Radial Context

    Where they have a pie menu plug-in for Mozilla. I am a huge pie-menu fan. They are so much faster than a right click menu where you have to look down through all the options, and find the one that you want, and position the mouse just right, and then click. What a waste of motor control.

    With pie menus, you can internalize the movement, and do it without even looking at the screen. I'm loving Radical's back and forward are just click, drag left (for back) or click drag right (for forward) When I want to full screen, I drag diagonally up and to the left, then curve around to the right. They've done a great job.

    Another beautiful pie menu implementation is in Natural Selection the mod.

    Now I just want to zip around web pages all day.

    -Jim

    --
    Celebrate Excellence!
  114. Re:geek snobbishness by Quill_28 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gads get a life. That fact it the using the keyboard in general is quicker than using a mouse. Ask any old-school word perfect secretary how much they like using the shortcuts instead having to use a mouse.

    But you're right I would certainly call 50 year old ladies named "Nancy" super geeks, because they prefer clicking keys rather than a mouse. Go away now.

  115. gestures in Emacs by patro · · Score: 1
    Emacs has programmable mouse gestures since 1997:
    ;;; strokes.el --- control Emacs through mouse strokes
    I wonder if VIM has them too. ;)
  116. Not that great by E-Rock-23 · · Score: 1

    When I first started using Opera (I use it exclusively now, save for .NET things like FastCounter and Hotmail), mouse guestures were really tough to get used to, all the way to the point where I just turned them off. Every once in a while, I'll fumble around and hit the wrong button, move the mouse a little, and end up backing up or something annoying like that when I'm trying to read, say, an NYT article.

    If they kept it down to just a few guestures, I'd consider using them again. But there are just too many ways for it to get in my way right now.

    --
    Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
  117. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's just, wrong.

  118. Did anybody else notice this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "personally, I use the keyboard almost exclusively"


    "becuase mouse gestures sux0rz!! I am 3l337 hax0r smarty man!!!11!"

  119. RadialContext tips by jeti · · Score: 2

    This is also mentioned in the tips section of
    the download page. Did you know that you get
    extra functions when holding Alt?

  120. Mouse gestures==greatest recent interface advance by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2
    You know, Mozilla's implementation of mouse gestures are so incredibly useful, that every computer I use which doesn't have them seems hopelessly crippled.

    Please, can't you Window Manager coders hack something together so that I could use my mouse gestures on ALL the windows? You can't imagine how many times I click-r-l-r on a window and get momentarily puzzled when I notice it's not closing.

    Mouse gestures make so much damn sense that I want to spit on all the so-called "user interface experts" who don't see them as the absolute #1 priority for general implementation. As far as I'm concerned, those guys are frauds. Mouse gestures should have been in everything for a decade now.

  121. StrokeIt by Durk · · Score: 2, Informative

    After using it for a couple months... I couldn't possibly live without it.

    http://www.tcbnetworks.com/strokeit/

  122. Opera mouse gestures by obdulio · · Score: 1

    This is the help page for Opera gestures.

    http://www.opera.com/windows/mouse.html

    They are great. Also Opera is a much better browser than the others. And runs in Linux and Windows.

    --
    PENAROL: Seras eterno como el tiempo y floreceras en cada primavera.
  123. mouse gestures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's the innovation here?!?!?

    I would own a palm-pilot if I wanted to use graffiti. (No thanks.)

    I'll stick with normal menus.

  124. Aw, crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's just what I need. Windows that will do things I don't want when my Tourette's Syndrome is acting up.

    ; )

  125. Optimoz gestures rule! Challenge me! by tommut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you configure the mozilla gestures to best suit you, they can make you more productive than just using shortcut key combinations I think. I would like to see a challenge between my setup with optimoz gestures and someone solely using their keyboard or any other mechanism (radial menus, etc). I seriously think gestures (when configured correctly) can be quicker than most anything.

    The configuration can is key. It should be suited to what you as a user can do most efficiently. I have the left mouse button mapped to do the gesturing because that's where my finger naturally rests and I'm quicker with the left button than the right button (don't know why.)

    Left and right gestures are mapped to back and forward in the browser history. I have the intellimouse with the back and forward buttons, but I honestly find that the gestures are faster. Just make a quick, slight milisecond movement and you go back a page. Sweet. When I use a browser without gestures and I am actually forced to move my mouse up to click the Back button, I now get so frustrated because it feels like going back to 56k after getting used to a T1.

    I have UP mapped to open a new tab, and DOWN mapped to close tab. I like this a lot because I'm always opening up new tabs. With just a quick flick, I have a new window open. And I can quickly close down any tab when I'm done looking at it, and I'm right back at the previous tab. All this without having to move my mouse location.

    That's what I love most about gestures is that I can keep my mouse cursor at it's original location; I don't have to move it to close a tab or open a tab. I don't even have to have my hand on the keyboard.

    Another important key is to keep the gestures short. None of this Right-Down-Up-Left stuff. I like clean, simple, one-or-two direction gestures. I have all my oft-used functions as short gestures. Reload (Down-Up). Add bookmard (Down-Right)...

    Here is my favorite optimized gesture experience. I gesture up once - a new tab is opened. I gesture Left-Right, and Google opens in the new tag. That is, I have Left-Right mapped to go to my home page. So with 3 quick movements I can have google open in a new tab window. That's pretty damn cool.

    In closing, my mozilla browsing experience has certainly skyrocketed after I discovered gestures. I would seriously like to see a Mozilla Browsing Efficiency Challenge (MBEC). I think the person armed with the right gestures would be a serious contender.

  126. Re:Check out the radial context thingie from optim by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 1

    "Pie menus could be optimal if you want to spend months memorizing exact movements to get where you want, but a lot of people don't have the patience."

    so youre saying its easier to memorize movements that arent even shown on the screen rather than ones that are displayed right in front of you??

    right.

  127. Trackballs, mice, pens, gestures and pie menus by ConnectedTV · · Score: 1
    Trackballs are much noisier, lower resolultion input devices than mice or pens, so they're not very good for gesture recognition. Pie menus are much more reliable than gesture recognition, especially with trackballs and touch screens, because they don't depend on the path of motion, only the endpoints.

    Pie menus enable you to change and refine the selection during tracking, by moving around the menu to different items. You can also move out further to gain higher angular precision. On the other hand, gestures have no natural built-in way to cancel, change or refine the gesture, and no obvious prompting and feedback mechanism. So gestures are also harder to learn and remember than pie menus.

    Once you've messed up a gesture, there's no way of controling how the computer will interpret it, cancel it, or correct it in-flight. You just have to hope your gesture mistake isn't interpreted as the wrong command, then undo the effects of the mistake (if possible), then try over again from the start.

    Since pie menus allow you to easily browse the items, reselect, refine or cancel the selection at any time during tracking, they have much lower error rates than gesture regcognition, and are more appropriate for mission critical applications, use in noisy environments, and with low resolution input devices like trackballs or touch screens.

    Compare the pie menus in The Sims to the gestures in Black and White: Pie menus can support many more distinct commands than gestures can, plus they're also self revealing (so they're easy to learn), and it's much harder to make mistakes with the pie menus.

    Another practical example is ConnectedTV, a Palm application that lets you browse and personalize your TV guide, and automatically speed-dial channels by remote control (by "touch tuning"). ConnectedTV incorporates pie menus that you can quickly and reliably operate with your fingers. It's designed to be robust and easy to use when held in one hand, so you won't lose the pen behind the couch cushion, or miss the beginning of your favorite show because you were fumbling around with grafitti in the dark.

    In 1993, Kurtenbach, Sellen and Buxton published a study comparing the speed and error rate of track balls, mice and pens, combined with pie and marking menus with different numbers of items. A link to the paper and the abstract are below. Their results are extremely interesting, especially comparing different numbers of items. (They showed that 8 items is the magic number, even better than 7!)

    -Don

    An empirical evaluation of some articulatory and cognitive aspects of marking menus.

    ABSTRACT

    We describe "marking menus", an extension of "pie menus". Pie menus are circular menus subdivided into sectors, each of which might correspond to a different command. Marking menus are pie menus in which the path of the cursor leaves an ink trail. Thus, selecting a sector from a marking menu creates a visual mark similar to a pen stroke on paper. Marking menus are also unique in that they ease the transition from novice to expert user. Novices can "pop-up" a menu and make a selection, whereas experts can simply make the corresponding mark without waiting for the menu to appear.

    This paper describes an experiment designed to explore both articulatory and cognitive aspects of pie and marking menus. "Articulatory aspects" refers to how well subjects could execute the physical actions necessary to select from pie menus, given three different kinds of input devices (mouse, trackball, and stylus), and as the number of items in the menu increases. Articulatory aspects were investigated by presenting one group of subjects with the task of selecting from fully visible or "exposed" menus. To investigate the cognitive aspects, two other groups of subjects used invisible or "hidden" pie menus: one group with an ink trail, and one without. In order for marking menus to work effectively, users must be able to mentally represent and associate Selection from hidden menus was designed to reveal Both number of slices per menu and input device were systematically varied. We discuss the findings with respect to menu size, input device, analysis of markings used, and learning.

    --
    ConnectedTV turns a Palm handheld into your personal TV guide and remote
    1. Re:Trackballs, mice, pens, gestures and pie menus by mesocyclone · · Score: 2

      Like so many human characteristics, I suspect that individual differences affect the relative merits of track-balls vs. mice.

      I have used both and prefer track balls. Many other folks do also, but most seem to prefer mice.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

    2. Re:Trackballs, mice, pens, gestures and pie menus by ConnectedTV · · Score: 1
      The performance speed and error rate differences between input devices are not simply a question of user preference. If you'd bother to read the paper, you will realize that it greatly depends on the physical characteristics of the input devices themselves and how the human body interacts with them. The controled experiments measured the effect. It's all there in the paper.

      Amateur armchair rationalizations aside, the rewsearch emperically demonstrates that trackballs are much less accurate and more noisy than mice. The illustrations of the paths in the paper make it quite visually obvious, if you don't believe the numbers. These are provable, unavoidable facts of life, not speculation subject to opinion.

      -Don

      --
      ConnectedTV turns a Palm handheld into your personal TV guide and remote
    3. Re:Trackballs, mice, pens, gestures and pie menus by mesocyclone · · Score: 2

      Actually, my armchair rationalization is also informed by my experience of some years as a consultant to the military in the human factors area. One thing I learned is how much BS is published in the field.

      The paper may indeed show that the next time I am marking pie menus, I may want to use a mouse. Of course, this is assuming the research is valid and replicable, and more important - applies to me - a specific individual with specific physical and mental characteristics, which is my point. Humans are variable.

      Regardless of what the research shows for the specific subjects selected to do the specific task in the research, the Kensington Expert Mouse trackball that I use works better, for this individual human, doing what this particular human does with a pointing device, than a mouse does.

      If I want to sign my name on the screen, I'll use a mouse. If I want to use a pie menu, maybe I'll use a mouse for that.

      I rarely do either!

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

    4. Re:Trackballs, mice, pens, gestures and pie menus by ConnectedTV · · Score: 1
      That paper was co-written by Bill Buxton, who has published more CHI papers than anyone else in the world, last I heard. Since you claim to be experienced in the field, I'd be surprised if you don't know about Bill Buxton or ACM SIGCHI. Or do you know who he is, but think his research is invalid and not replicatable? Have you read the paper I refered to? Can you refute its findings? If so, then please tell us how!

      What hard evidence is your opinion based on? Have you done any controlled experiments comparing the speed and error rates of track balls versus mice or other input devices? (Buxton has published many, and is recognized as an expert in that field.)

      Please give me references to any results you have published, or that anyone else has published which supports your armchair rationalizations. Otherwise they're just your unsupported amateur opinions, that disagree with the facts.

      -Don

      --
      ConnectedTV turns a Palm handheld into your personal TV guide and remote
    5. Re:Trackballs, mice, pens, gestures and pie menus by ConnectedTV · · Score: 1
      Please give some references to published peer reviewed papers that support your anecdotal "suspicion", which disagrees with the results published in the paper I refered to: An empirical evaluation of some articulatory and cognitive aspects of "marking menus by Gordon P. Kurtenbach, Abigail J. Sellen, and William A. S. Buxton.

      Human factors should not be based on opinion polls or popularity contests. That is not science, that is merely fashion. I don't care about your unsupported "suspicions" and subjective "preferences": I'm talking about objective, measurable PERFORMANCE.

      -Don

      --
      ConnectedTV turns a Palm handheld into your personal TV guide and remote
    6. Re:Trackballs, mice, pens, gestures and pie menus by mesocyclone · · Score: 2

      You persist in missing the point.

      Has it ever occurred to you that a paper on properly done research may not be applicable to every possible situation? That there are not only variations in situation, but also in individuals?

      I don't have to read Bill Buxton's paper to know that track balls work better for me, for what I do. After all, I am quite capable of carrying out the experiment myself, and have done so.

      For you to continue arguing, you will find yourself in the position of asserting that a mouse is better than a trackball for my situation, since that is what I have been talking about. Somehow I doubt that you really would like to assert that.

      There was nothing in his paper that addressed my particular situation. It is utterly irrelevant that a mouse is superior to a trackball for the tested circumstances, isn't it?

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

  128. Re:geek snobbishness by boarder · · Score: 2

    I'm not so sure about that...
    I read somewhere (no link, sorry) that using a keyboard for shortcuts and stuff only SEEMS faster, but isn't. You also have to consider the type of application. For an old-school word perfect secretary, they are typing pretty much nonstop and keyboard shortcuts are right there where their hands are. For someone browsing the internet, they have one hand on the mouse most of the time and are clicking links, so it is faster to keep that hand there and do motions rather than moving the hand to the keyboard and then doing motions.

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
  129. Joy Buttons by ConnectedTV · · Score: 2, Funny
    Ted Selker, the guy who invented and developed the trackpoint for IBM, originally called it the "Joy Button". But IBM was just too conservative to call it that.

    I saw a prototype thinkpad he made with TWO Joy Buttons, one for each hand, positioned just like nipples! I think it would have sold very well -- it was certainly very appealing!

    -Don

    --
    ConnectedTV turns a Palm handheld into your personal TV guide and remote
    1. Re:Joy Buttons by neitzsche · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the tiny nubbins on your F and J keys have the jargon term "nipples" locked up. I think on some wierd keyboards the nipples were on D and K instead.

      --
      "God is dead." - Frederik Nietzsche
  130. laziness by boarder · · Score: 3

    yes, this is definitely for people that are lazy. I am too lazy to move my hand off my mouse after I just clicked a link to hit ctrl+- or backspace or whatever. Since my hand is already on the mouse for almost all of required web browsing, it is faster (and less effort intensive) to just keep it there.

    as for learning equally confusing gestures... is moving the mouse back to go back confusing? or forward to go forward? what about tracing the letter 'b' for bookmark? now, some of them aren't intuitive (moving up to open a new tab), but how freakin hard is it to learn 'up'? the zig-zab movement to close a window isn't intuitive but it's fun to just shake the mouse violently to close a window you want to get rid of.

    I've been using gestures with tabbed browsing for a month or so and it's definitely faster for me. I even mouse and gesture left handed just fine (I'm right handed and usually mouse with my right, but after awhile my wrist and shoulder like a break so I switch). If a righty can gesture and browse efficiently with his left hand, I would say this works pretty well.

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
  131. Re:Check out the radial context thingie from optim by ConnectedTV · · Score: 1
    Here's a description of the features of ActiveX pie menus, which have been around for many years, and work in Internet Explorer and other applications supporting ActiveX. Of course the source code for ActiveX pie menus and other implementations and information about pie menus is freely available, at http://www.piemenu.com,

    -Don http://www.piemenu.com/PieMenuDescription.html

    A Description of Pie Menus, By Don Hopkins (don@DonHopkins.com).

    Pictures of Pie Menus. [See the web page http://www.piemenu.com/PieMenuDescription.html for illustrations.]

    ActiveX Pie Menu Features: The ActiveX Pie Menu component is designed to be robust, general purpose, and easy to integrate into all kinds of web pages and user interfaces. The graphical layout is dynamic and adaptive, and the look and feel can be adjusted in many ways, but pie menus come with reasonable defaults, so they should work well in a wide range of situations.

    ActiveX pie menus support any number of items per menu, and arbitrarily nested submenus.

    The items can be layed out in reading order (left to right, top to bottom), as well as circular order (clockwise or counter-clockwise).

    The number of pie slices can be limited to a user-friendly even number like eight or four, so the slices are always big and easy to select. Extra items are grouped into clusters above and below the pie menu, with the same number of items. You can select any extra item by pointing directly at its label. You can also scroll the pie menu up and down the "totem pole" of clusters, centering the pie on any group, so the items in that group are very easy to select, and the other groups are compact clusters further away from the cursor.

    This helps you to mentally chunk items into a few recognizable groups: instead of a tall undifferentiated column of items, you have several stable clusters of eight (or fewer) items. One of the groups is the pie part of the menu, which you can page between groups, and the others groups are displayed as more compact (but harder to select) rectangular menu labels. You can scroll the pie menu from group to group, by pressing the Page Up and Page Down keys, or clicking in the center of a cluster.

    Pie Menus come with a set of property pages for easy configuration, that user interface designers can use to create and edit pie menus with tools like Visual Basic.

    You can plug pie menus into web pages, by configuring them with HTML properties, and programming them with JavaScript or Visual Basic Script.

    You can also plug them into applications supporting ActiveX controls, with tools like Visual Basic, Visual C++, Java, and the ActiveX Control Pad, interactivally configuring them via tabbed property sheets.

    There are seven tabbed property pages for documentation, menu outline editing, menu property editing, visual menu tree previewing, font selection, color selection, and image selection.

    Simple nested menu description format. Just type the menu items into a text editor or html property as an indented outline, with optional tags for overriding default layout properties and actions.

    The indentation of the outline specifies how the items are grouped into submenus, as you would expect. You can use a semi-colon to separate a list of items at the same level of indentation.

    Each menu item can have a label as well as an optional action string (that defaults to the label), that may be used as a convenient argument to the menu handler. This is so you can have a descriptive label meaningful to the user, as well as an associated numeric or symbolic action meaningful to the menu handler.

    Intelligent dynamic menu layout. Menus are automatically sized and layed out so they're as small as possible with no items overlapping.

    Several user interface styles with dynamic window shapes. As well as popping up in traditional rectangular windows, pie menus can also pop up in pie shaped round windows, minimal blob windows, thought balloons, speech balloons, and spoked windows.

    Dynamic window shape tracking. The popup windows can dynamically reshape during tracking, to hide all but the selected menu item, reducing clutter. This feature can be enabled or disabled for speed.

    Visual control over font, point size, foreground color, background color, light and dark beveled edge colors. Preview property page for browsing the menu tree and seeing how each menu will look.

    Beveled edges around any shape of window. This makes overlapping menus easier to see, and fits in nicely with the Windows desktop. This feature can be enabled or disabled for speed.

    Mouse-ahead display pre-emption. You can quickly click through nested submenus without popping them up on the screen. The popup delay can be adjusted, which defines how long the cursor must be still before the menu pops up.

    Double buffered flicker-free drawing. Menus are drawn into an offscreen buffer, so there is no flashing on the screen. This feature can be enabled or disabled for speed.

    When you use a pie menu, preview and selection events are sent to the web page or application. Event handlers can track when an item is selected, when the selected item changes, and whenever the direction or distance changes, to provide continuous feedback of the selection.

    Defered menu layout and window creation. Menus are not layed out and windows are not created until the menu is actually used.

    Graphical background and target images. You can specify bitmaps to use as the menu background and the target window. Or you can use solid color backgrounds.

    Press down and drag, as well as click-up operation. Supports quick "press-move-release" interaction, as well as "click-move-click" interaction, so you don't have to hold the button down.

    Supports all three mouse buttons, IntelliMouse wheel, and keyboard. You can pop pie menus up under program control, or in response to any of the three mouse buttons, and even pop them up and navigate all the items and submenus from the keyboard.

    Sub-menu browsing is supported, so you can click the other button to pop down a submenu and go back a level, or cancel the whole menu tree.

    Pie menus are not patented, proprietary, or restricted. You are free to use them in your own products and web pages. The source code is free, and you may modify it or use it for any purpose you want, provided that the copyright is left intact.

    If you make any changes, you are encouraged but not required to send them back to xardox@mindspring.com so they can be integrated back into the official source code.

    If you find any bugs, want to suggest new features or enhancements, or would like to find out more about pie menus, please look at the pie menu web page at http://www.piemenu.com.

    If you have problems, please check the web page to make sure you're got the latest version, then send email to the author, don@DonHopkins.com.

    If you use pie menus on your web page or in a product, I would enjoy seeing it, and would appreciate it if you sent me the URL or a copy of your product.

    I've written some papers about pie menu design, available on the pie menu web page, and I'd like to link to other people using or writing about pie menus, so please send me any interesting URLs.

    --
    ConnectedTV turns a Palm handheld into your personal TV guide and remote
  132. Pie menu instructions by ConnectedTV · · Score: 1
    Here are the instructions for using ActiveX pie menus, from http://www.piemenu.com/PieMenuInstructions.html:

    Pie Menu Instructions

    By Don Hopkins (don@DonHopkins.com)

    How To Choose With Pie Menus

    Mouse Control

    There are two ways to use a pie menu with a mouse: with or without holding down the mouse button. You can start by going "click move click", but with experience, you'll learn to go "press move release". The relaxed "click move click" way to use pie menus is to click the button (press and release without moving), move the cursor, then click the button again. The accelerated "press move release" way is to press down and hold the button, move the cursor, then release the button.

    When you first pop up a pie menu, the cursor begins in the menu center, and the selection depends on the direction you move. Each pie menu "item" is shaped like a slice of pie, arranged around the cursor in different directions. The center of the pie menu is an inactive area, which doesn't select any items: so you can click once to pop up a pie menu, then click again in the center without moving, to cancel.

    The further out from the menu center you move the cursor, the more precisely you control the direction, and the easier it is to select a particular item. You can move the cursor far out to the edge of the screen, for very exact control.

    It doesn't matter what path you take to select a pie menu item, the only thing that counts is the direction between the first and final click. This allows you to reselect different items any time before the final click, by moving the mouse around to different slices of the pie.

    Mouse Ahead

    If you click the button, the pop-up window will appear on the screen instantly. But if you hold the button down and move, the menu display will be pre-empted until you pause. Once you're familiar with the directions, you can press the button and move without hesitating, selecting from the menu very quickly.

    You can "mouse ahead" through a pie menu, by smoothly pressing, moving, and releasing the button without hesitating, and the window will never be displayed on the screen!

    Even before its window pops up, an invisible pie menu gives you instant feedback by changing the cursor shape to show how many items there are, and which item is selected.

    If you want to be sure of the selection, just stop moving, and the pie menu will pop up. You can always change the selection by moving around the menu.

    With experience you will be able to reliably "mouse ahead" and even select items from nested pie menus, without looking at the screen.

    Nested Menus

    A pie menu can have any number of submenu levels arranged in a nested tree. Any item can pop up another pie submenu, that itself can contain items with submenus.

    Clicking in an item with a submenu pops it up, centered on the cursor, on top of the previous menu. Clicking again in the center of the submenu cancels the whole tree. But clicking the other button goes back to the previous level.

    When you press the other button down, the cursor moves back to the current menu center. When you release the other button in the menu center, you go back to the previous menu, positioned in the same place you were when you left it. But you can also move the cursor out of the menu center before releasing the other button, and you will stay at the current level. This is convenient if you just want to get back to the menu center and select another item.

    Scrolling Menus

    Pie menus may be limited to a certain number of slices (like 8), so that the pie slices are wide and easy to select. If there are extra items, then they are clustered into groups of the same number outside of the pie. You can select any of the extra items by pointing directly its label.

    Each group of items is arranged like a compact pie menu of the same number of items (or fewer). You can scroll the pie menu to any group by clicking in the center of the group, and the menu will center on the labels. The "Page Up" and "Page Down" keys also scroll the pie from group to group.

    Keyboard Controls

    Pie menus support several keyboard accellerators.

    Escape or Delete: Cancels the entire menu tree.
    Backspace: Moves back to the previous menu in the tree.
    Home: Centers the menu on the current cursor position.
    Return: Selectes the currently highlighted item, or cancels the menu if nothing is highlighted.
    Arrows: Points to the top, bottom, left, or right slice. If you press two orthogonal arrows at once, it points to a diagonal slice.
    Numeric Keypad: Selects the item in the direction of the key on the keypad. The 5 key selects the menu center.
    Tab: Select the next pie menu item. Shift-Tab selects the previous.
    Page Up: Scroll to the previous menu item group.
    Page Down: Scroll to the next menu item group.
    First letter of a menu item: Typing the first letter of a menu item selects the first item that begins with that letter. Typing that letter again selects the next and subsequent menu items beginning with the same letter.

    --
    ConnectedTV turns a Palm handheld into your personal TV guide and remote
  133. Re:Black and white??? Bluck by Dog+and+Pony · · Score: 2

    Was some while ago, but on the PC I think B&W still recorded the gesture through the autosave, which means that when you trained your reflexes to not stop the movement when saving occured, it worked out alright.

  134. Hand gestures with a webcam by littleRedFriend · · Score: 2

    Would it be possible to use hand gestures through a web cam? That would be easier and more fun than using a mouse.

    Just think about sticking out your middle finger and have someone mod down as a troll.

    --
    IANAL, but imagine a beowulf cluster of in Soviet Russia all your belong are base to us welcoming the new SCO overlords.
    1. Re:Hand gestures with a webcam by sithlord2 · · Score: 1


      Would it be possible to use hand gestures through a web cam? That would be easier and more fun than using a mouse.

      Think about all the cool jedi-mindtricks we can perform :-)

      --
      ...You are over-qualified and under-paid. If we give you a raise, we will break the cosmic balance of the universe.
  135. SENSIVA by exhilaration · · Score: 1
    I don't suppose anyone's got the older Sensiva lying around their hard drive?

    I searched Google, and after 15 minutes the only thing I was able to get was the French version 1.07.

    Anybody got the freeware ENGLISH 1.07?

    1. Re:SENSIVA by exhilaration · · Score: 2, Informative

      Looks like 2.5 is also freeware. Download it here

  136. Gestures are even older than Black and White by sporri · · Score: 1

    I remember a windows utility called Pointix Scroll+ and later Pointix engine and then pop mouse. (http://216.128.205.5/shareware/apps/98/mouse.html #2831).
    It was really generic mouse gesture program which popped up menus if you wiggled your mouse about. I liked it but people who started working on my computer could not understand it The company who made it has gone to dotcomhell or something but maybe we will see more of them trying to sue Mozilla and opera. If anyone wants to try it I found a version here

  137. When I am beating off to dirty dirty p0rn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I am beating off to dirty dirty p0rn I love mouse gestures. One handed browsing has never been easier. I can use left hand on a regularly right handed mouse, while my right hand is busy doing "IMPORTANT THINGS!" I only need to let go of the mouse to invoke the Taoist $10,000,000 spot. (If you don't know what I mean you have wasted a lot of Hankes...)

    "The Internet, bringing your more porn faster."

  138. Masterbation faciliatated by internet & gestur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The best most consistant sex of your life will be with yourself."

    If you are a NERD the ONLY consistant sex of your life will be with yourself.

  139. Re:FP by F34nor · · Score: 1

    CAD CAM wins by about 10 years.

  140. Explorer Supports Voice Recognition! by roesti · · Score: 1
    Explorer Supprts Gestures! I give it gesture every day...

    It supports voice recognition as well. Every time I tell IE to fuck off, it crashes and disappears. Proof positive!

  141. Optical Trackballs by Franky+Hollywood · · Score: 1

    such as Logitech's Marble offering are great for browsing, 3-D and many games, however frustrating it is to do certain gestures and "drawing," I'm far more frustrated by mice, nubs, and fingerpads (electronic, optical, and biological). Now by optical, I mean the ball is read by the optical pickup directly and not through an opto-mechanical "middleman." Has anyone played with a Magellen?? I mean the cast iron (or some satisfactory equivalent) version...

    hambientthememusic = "hummed://mine_eyes_have_seen_the_glory.foo";

    If only more programs that make themselves dependant on a were as fluent as Opera or otherwise had a manual like that of Deluxe Paint 3 (Amiga days, kiddies) I would enjoy using the programs as much as the their marketing departments would like me to believe I would. Long live Opera and good programs like Tron.

    end hambientthememusic;

    FH - the otherwise reticent madman

    Down with the MCP!

  142. are you a Mac user? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modern mice normally have two or even *gasp* three(!) buttons!

  143. Requisite Beowulf reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine controlling a Beowulf Cluster with mouse gestures!

    You could tell it to slashdot a windows server with a single finger (guess which one)

    1) Hold the right button and draw a $
    2) ???
    3) Profit

  144. blender interface by Hoarse+Whisperer · · Score: 1

    The blender interface has an interesting variation on this theme. To rotate/size an object you click and drag the mouse either elliptically or in a straight line and the program goes into the mode that you have indicated. It's a little bit like the shorthand you use on a palmtop.

  145. Keyboard vs. Mouse vs. Dial Up by kaladorn · · Score: 2

    Keyboard shortcuts versus Mouse Gestures... both have their strong points. Good browsers (Opera comes to mind) should support both.

    OTOH, throw in slow dial up and it doesn't matter what the hell kind of control you have.... you're surfing is limited by the bps of the link rather than your own twitch rate... :)

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
  146. And yet... by kaladorn · · Score: 2

    I use Opera, but I don't use gestures for precisely that very reason - I don't like to train myself into using something I won't have available on all my workspaces.

    OTOH, I broke my own rule and wired 2 of the 5 buttons on my mouse to fwd and back and use them to flip through web contexts. And Good Lord do I miss the scrollwheel when I don't have it or an app doesn't support it.

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
  147. Another fun place for gestures... by nedric · · Score: 1
    Emacs has gestures. They're called "strokes."
    M-x strokes-mode
    A little more involved than Mozilla, I'm afraid...
    --
    evolution IS god.
  148. Why not adjust the mouse? by Dj_Unna · · Score: 0

    From the article:

    "The motion of performing a gesture is more natural than sliding the mouse over to a button or menu," he said. "And because it works anywhere in the window (not just on the button), it saves a bit of time and effort, especially as screens get bigger and you have to move farther to reach a button."

    "as screens get bigger"?? Wouldn't it be easier to adjust the mouse sensitivity?

    I just hope these gestures are easier to control than the ones in black & white (Where you had to get them pretty spot on, or your creature starts eating your followers.)

  149. Re:Check out the radial context thingie from optim by IamNotWitchboy · · Score: 1

    in those two seconds i could have had already accomplished what i wanted to to at least 3 times.

    --
    The best cure for insomnia is realizing that it is already time to get up. EsteEncanto.com - Blog on technology, urban
  150. Mouse Only Browsing by Eyecannon · · Score: 1

    I've been mouse gesturing for a few years now... I barely ever touch my keyboard to navigate, I do all the following with my mouse: Open to new window Forward Backward Close Esc (stop) Home (top of page) End (bottom of page) Reload People who don't use mouse gesturing have no idea what they're missing!

  151. Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Mouseassist.com that and yahoo had one of those browser customizing downloads that was geared to work with IE, but worked with most for managing gestures with your mouse. This is nothing new, and has been around for at least two years..just search google.

  152. Mice too, now? by merriam · · Score: 1

    I've just read about mutant mules developing thumbs and making gestures with them. Now it's mice...

  153. 'Fraidy Kay by 'Fraidy+Kat · · Score: 1

    Hi, I believe "mouse gestures" are a good idea for people, like me, who tire of sore hands, wrists and forearms from using the mouse too much. 'Fraidy Kat

  154. Gestures at the X (or WM) level -- done in Lisp by deenoman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    hey,

    If anyone has even used the strokes-mode in (X)Emacs, I have taken that to the X level by writing what is a higher-level application of gesture recognition. Consider this:

    Why should each application implement gestures differently? For example WM commands (close, kill, iconify, maximize, resize, etc.) apply to all windows. Then, within each application, you might imagine some application-specific gestures. This can all be done at the X level. I decided to take the elisp code that's been doing gestures in (X)Emacs since '97 and ported it to Common Lisp (using GNU CLISP). This implementation if CL is GPL'd, and has an implementation of Xlib (called CLX) that plugs right in.

    Anyway, CLISP is just about as portable as gcc is, so the same goes for the CL version of strokes.

    What I havn't done, though, is to build a nice GUI for editing all the different strokes bindings for all the applications.

    I've been playing with the idea of releasing this for years so that people could control all their applications using gestures. I figured that someone probably has done this (though probably not in Lisp, which is a shame).

    Are people interested in X-level gestures?

    dave

    1. Re:Gestures at the X (or WM) level -- done in Lisp by bindster · · Score: 1

      I most certainly would like to see a simple, open framework that allows users to add and customize this kind of functionality within XFree.

      --
      WARNING: DO NOT LET DR. MARIO TOUCH YOUR GENITALS. HE IS NOT A REAL DOCTOR.
    2. Re:Gestures at the X (or WM) level -- done in Lisp by deenoman · · Score: 1

      send email to: cadet@alum.mit.edu

      --dave

  155. Re:Check out the radial context thingie from optim by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

    Obviously, but that's only for training.

    Also, it might be noted that Gestures and Pie Context have alot in common, because getting to the right menu is a kind of gesture, but you also have feedback on what is going to happen.

    --
    ^_^
  156. Gestures for BeOS (and your own programs) by stew77 · · Score: 2

    I implemented gestures for BeOS on a system-wide level, you can get the GPL'd software here:
    http://www.bebits.com/app/2281
    It is based on libstroke which can be easily used in any applications.

  157. Re:Keyboard binding configuration ability is bette by Ryandav · · Score: 2

    most of the linux desktops have this incoroprated, and its one of the reasons I stick with KDE, is for this very feature. Its not limitless, but its an excellent start.

    --
    Check my Go-related blog for beginners: DGD
  158. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    ... of course, this probably only happens for tcsh which uses wait4(),
    which is why I never saw it. Serves people who use that abomination
    right 8^)
    -- Linus Torvalds, about a patch that fixes getrusage for 1.3.26

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...