Slashdot Mirror


22lb Ice Blocks From the Sky

cavedwler writes "An article http://www.msnbc.com/news/814100.asp?0dm=-23ET over on MSNBC has an interesting writeup about large ice blocks forming in the upper atmosphere on CLEAR days. Pretty interesting read." The article talks about how this could be a harbinger of massive climactic change. Either way, I'd prefer to not have one of these things smack into my house.

348 comments

  1. Smash into your head by entity0110 · · Score: 0

    Smash into your house ?? how about smash into your head ? thats much worst

    1. Re:Smash into your head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like a great white turd from a man who eats too much fiber.

  2. what do we do with ice blocks....? by dylan.ucd · · Score: 1, Funny

    build igloos of course!

    1. Re:what do we do with ice blocks....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how many beowulf clusters we could keep cool with that!

    2. Re:what do we do with ice blocks....? by GoogolPlexPlex · · Score: 1

      When I read this article, it was not until the end that I realised that I had in my mind the image of large cube-shaped "blocks" of ice falling from the sky. Of course this is not what they are reporting, but does anyone else equate "ice blocks" with this particular geometry?

    3. Re:what do we do with ice blocks....? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2

      Yes. Chunks would be a better description.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    4. Re:what do we do with ice blocks....? by baudbarf · · Score: 1

      Same here, I was thinking of the kind you get at the store. Huge ice cubes.

      If anybody mods this comment as anything other than "waste of bandwidth", it just goes to prove that user moderation doesn't work.

      --
      You can run but you can't hide, except, apparently, along the Afghan-Pakistani border.
  3. Just what you need for your redneck party... by dghcasp · · Score: 0, Funny
    Just what you need for your redneck party...

    Have one of these hit the ol' chevy on blocks and hey, ice for your beer.

  4. First grammar cop post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Climactic": relating to climaxes.
    "Climatic": relating to climate.

    1. Re:First grammar cop post by athlon02 · · Score: 1

      possibly a grammar problem, more likely a spelling problem.

  5. oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe I had to wait 20 seconds to post this! all I needed was 5, but nooooo

  6. Insurance Policies by pandemonia · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the rest of the world, but here in Brazil, insurances (at least Car Insurances) don't really cover accidents due to forces of nature.

    --
    -mz
    1. Re:Insurance Policies by kingOFgEEEks · · Score: 0

      in the US (oh, here it comes) it depends on the amount of coverage you have. For instance: minimum coverage only protects you from being held financially liable for the damage you have inflicted on some one else ('s vehicle). If you opt for more coverage, act of god/force of nature coverage is quite common. Of course, the price you pay is proportional to the amount of coverage you have.

      --
      mechanicos ergo cogito
    2. Re:Insurance Policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      take a look at "The Man Who Sued God" movie sometime! it's exactly about this..

  7. Let's hear it: by jlowery · · Score: 5, Funny

    I scream!
    You scream!
    We all scream for ice-- SPLAT!

    --
    If you post it, they will read.
    1. Re:Let's hear it: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      AAAAAAAAAAH!

    2. Re:Let's hear it: by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      >I scream!
      >You scream!
      >We all scream for ice-- SPLAT!

      Hmph. At least you got to scream. Most of us just get "Mind that ice cube what ice block splat!"

      - With apologies to Red Dwarf.

    3. Re:Let's hear it: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm not worried that a block of ice might fall on your head..."

      I'm worried about that block of ice falling on my head while I'm "enjoying" some pr0n. I have a hard enough time explaining myself when OTHER things fall on my head during these events. I mean, how the hell am I going to explain how a megacryometeor fell on me while I was pulling my wire? Note that this statistic applies to me more than others because I'm always wacking it to the porn. Disregard.

    4. Re:Let's hear it: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they were cream'd....

  8. Ice blocks are not falling from the sky by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 1, Insightful
    because there are no ice blocks in the sky.

    The Spanish "scientist" is obviously a green whacko. He even contradicts himself. Are the skys clear or are they filled with ice blocks and ice clouds? And what's with the sizes jumping around, from 10 kg to 16 kg to 300 kg?

    I think it's clear from inspection that this is just not happening and we don't need to investigate any further.

    1. Re:Ice blocks are not falling from the sky by leviramsey · · Score: 1

      Another amazing post from DesiredUsername. Hip Hip Hurray!

    2. Re:Ice blocks are not falling from the sky by flyneye · · Score: 1

      OK OK, nobody said it ,i'll say it.
      "Just another nutty environmentalist saying 'the sky is falling,the sky is falling!'".
      You see theres a lot of confusion about this global warming and ice age stuff.Both seem to be going on in different parts of the world simultaneously.at least 3 months of the year in most places.In fact the equatorial region seems to get warming and the jungle huggers are betting its gonna be global.Meanwhile the more penguin of the environmentalist species is in arctic and antarctic zones that golly gosh darn just seem to be cold all the time. so they measure ice cubes and how long it takes to freeze your nipples off and declare ICE AGE! This is the reason for the confusion environmentalists are still placing their bets on which way its gonna go.But when it does it just isnt gonna matter cause we're all gonna die with hail stones lodged in our brainpans.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    3. Re:Ice blocks are not falling from the sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right...and rocks don't fall from the sky because it's just empty space up there above the atmosphere.

      Charles Fort had a massive collection of newspaper clippings of this kind of odd event going back well into the 19th century. It's an odd, infrequent meterological quirk that's been recorded occasionally for at least the last 100 years. So what's it got to do with global warming, other than nothing at all?

  9. Best line from the article by medeii · · Score: 3, Funny

    "But geologist Roger Buick of the University of Washington in Seattle told the same publication ..." Somehow I think that the guy from Colorado should back off, seeing as someone from Washington would be much more familiar with rain.

    --
    got standards? --- http://www.w3.org/
    1. Re:Best line from the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientists (specially Geologists -- who are not real scientists) seem to put a lot of cruft when writing shit. Like these double "_much_ _more_".

    2. Re:Best line from the article by EvanED · · Score: 2

      Why aren't geologists "real scientists"? And what's wrong with "much more"?

    3. Re:Best line from the article by rlk · · Score: 2

      Geologist != meteorologist.

    4. Re:Best line from the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is much more something.

      vs.

      He is anything anything something.

      99% of anything anything wins

  10. Run in terror! by kwj8fty1 · · Score: 1

    I hope the mainstream press doesn't find out about this - - it will be pitched as YANTA (Yet Another Terrorist Act).

    1. Re:Run in terror! by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

      I hope the mainstream press doesn't find out about this - - it will be pitched as YANTA (Yet Another Terrorist Act).

      I can see it now...

      Professor Ali has created a device that produces large blocks of ice from thin air. When asked if he thought this would help turn the middle east into a lush paradise he responded... "I would rather cast my weapons of mass destruction into the heart of the serpent."

      Dispite his recent invention, Ali denies involvement in the Ice Block attacks.


      Sounds like CNN coverage to me.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    2. Re:Run in terror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I hope the mainstream press doesn't find out about this - - it will be pitched as Yet Another Terrorist Act.

      To which we'll say, "YATA, YATA, YATA."
    3. Re:Run in terror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will CNN buy a cache of "terroist training videos" showing a cwute widdle Golden Retriever being hit in the head with falling ice chunks?

  11. sorry, that fell from my giant scotch glass by chimpo13 · · Score: 3, Funny


    I was swirling it above Spain trying to look down Xui Xuis top.

    Sincerely,

    --Galacticus

  12. My fair ice block by markwusinich · · Score: 5, Funny

    The ice in Spain falls mainly on your windshield.

    1. Re:My fair ice block by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha. Watch the illiterate Slashdot masses totally miss that one...

    2. Re:My fair ice block by pcardoso · · Score: 1

      well, I remember that about two years ago, maybe three, when I was spending a semester in spain studying I saw this being mentioned on the news. strange ice blocks kept falling from the sky smashing windshields and hoods.

      another thing being mentioned was that at the time Mir was still in orbit, and the ice was a way for the russians to say "we're out of vodka but we still have ice, so please send more!"

    3. Re:My fair ice block by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Ha. Watch the illiterate Slashdot masses totally miss that one...

      Why would they? "My Fair Lady" was talkie, you know.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    4. Re:My fair ice block by evilpenguin · · Score: 2

      Of course, it couls have been a reference to "Pygmalion," the source material for "My Fair Lady."

    5. Re:My fair ice block by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Of course, it couls have been a reference to "Pygmalion," the source material for "My Fair Lady."

      Well, it could have been, but take a look at your Re: line... "My fair ice block". :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    6. Re:My fair ice block by evilpenguin · · Score: 2

      Are you kidding? I never read the titles of comments! ;-)

  13. Are you sure... by cicatrix1 · · Score: 1

    that this isn't some test system by the RIAA to stop piracy? Take that, thief!

    --

    I know more than you drink.
  14. So by teslatug · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anybody contacted Taco Bell yet?

    Hey hey, put that chunk of ice away *ducks*

    1. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it

  15. Space junk by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1

    Are they sure they're not just ice chunks falling off of MIR? ;-)

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    1. Re:Space junk by aerojad · · Score: 1

      Hate to burst your bubble but MIR fell from the sky a long time ago. Good morning. Wake up and smell 2002.

      --

      SecondPageMedia - Wha
    2. Re:Space junk by Timmeh · · Score: 2

      MIR is no longer in orbit, it was brought down in March of 2001. Remember? Fiery blaze over the South Pacific? Free tacos for every American?

    3. Re:Space junk by Jonny+290 · · Score: 2

      How do we know it wasn't just a giant flaming ice block?

      --
      Hey Taco! Looks like you're using the "infinite monkeys and typewriters" scheme to generate Ask Slashdots again...
  16. Understatement of the year by capt.Hij · · Score: 5, Funny
    provides an explanation for a spectacular phenomenon.

    A quick look on mathsci.net shows other papers that they have published:

    "Lake Superior: Gosh it sure is a lot of water," Journal of Hydrologic modeling.

  17. "worse", damnit! by RatBastard · · Score: 2

    GRRRRR!!!

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  18. Wait... by TheDanish · · Score: 1

    Didn't we have all kinds of doomtalk about the climate change and a mini-ice age happening?

    I wouldn't deny it. I mean, I live in southern California and it's less than 100 right now. As a matter of fact, it's less than 70 right now -- even the daytime high wasn't much warmer. THAT is scary. :p

    --
    Danish != nationality
    1. Re:Wait... by Miguelito · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't deny it. I mean, I live in southern California and it's less than 100 right now. As a matter of fact, it's less than 70 right now -- even the daytime high wasn't much warmer. THAT is scary.

      Not only that.. it's rained a few times over the last week (at least here in San Diego). It even rained hard the other night... just glad I wasn't on the road then. Too many people seem to wonder what that weird water falling from the sky is and lose what little driving ability they might've had.

      BTW about your sig.. you're not the only one that's wondered about that. Those ITT (I think it's ITT) commercials always make me laugh. Perhaps it's the person that will take your computer, vacuum it out, and wax the case so it shines.

      --
      - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
  19. You are the stupidest person I've ever met by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    First of all, you mean "Xuxa". Second of all, she isn't Spanish (not even ethnically), she's Brazilian. Third, what the hell does swirling a scotch glass have to do with looking at women?

    In short, IF I EVER MEET YOU I WILL NOT LAUGH AT ANY OF YOUR JOKES!

    1. Re:You are the stupidest person I've ever met by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      I am rather dumb, ain't I? Sorry, I haven't been too funny after the stroke.

      I mispelled her name, and I knew she was Brazilian (hey, aren't we all), but try naming a Spanish pop star who anyone outside of the Iberian Peninsula knows about.

    2. Re:You are the stupidest person I've ever met by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enrique Iglesias?

  20. Isn't this in the Bible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Not to be the fundie alarmist, but I could've sworn there was something about big heavy hailstones (ice blocks) being one of the plagues somewhere in Revelation...

    Anyone care to look that bit up?

    1. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh, you're right, it is in there... I'll come back to you with the reference when I find it.

    2. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

      I believe it was nuclear warefare. If you read the verses, you find people's skin rotting( sign of radiation sickness) and big fires. Hydrogen bombs typically blow air so high into the atmosphere that the nuclear winds compress and condense into ice and fall back to earth. This was documented numerous times during testing at the Atoll reefs.

    3. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by voisine · · Score: 3, Informative

      "And huge hailstones, about one hundred pounds each, came down from heaven upon men; and men blasphemed God because of the plague of the hail, because its plague was extremely severe." Revelation 16:21

    4. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how the weight is translated differently. Some say 10 pounds, others 20, here 100...

      Hmmmm....

    5. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how the weight is translated differently.

      Gee wow... that's a real knee slapper that one. I can't stop laughing. That's so freaking halarious.

    6. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      1. List all known natural phenomena
      2. Exaggerate them all big time
      3. Incorporate the exaggerations into stories
      4. Gather the stories into one book
      5. Look like a Prophet! to zealots during bad weather.

      There ain't no question marks in this gag

    7. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and men blasphemed God because

      I'll be goddamned...

    8. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by evilviper · · Score: 2

      The single most amazing thing about the bible is that, despite the extrodinary stories written thousands of years ago, not a single one has been proven to be impossible. Now that is the amazing feat

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my god (oops, sorry big guy), look, Revs was right, we ARE using "pounds" as a unit measure of weight.

    10. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by cp99 · · Score: 1

      A global flood....

      --
      Warning: Some ideologies on the Net are smaller than they appear.
    11. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by Tsar · · Score: 2
      The single most amazing thing about the bible is that, despite the extrodinary stories written thousands of years ago, not a single one has been proven to be impossible.

      Really? Wow, what a bummer. I thought all those things were miracles.

      Seriously, are you implying that it's possible to:
      • make a living man out of clay?
      • flood the earth to a depth of over 29,000 feet?
      • turn a staff into a snake and back again?
      • stop the sun from moving in the sky?
      • raise a man from the dead after three days?
      The significance of the Biblical story is not that it's never been proven impossible, but that it's never been proven incorrect. Archaeological discoveries have time after time reinforced the historical accuracy of both the old and new testaments. If all the miracles were mere inventions, why would the rest of this massive text have been kept so accurate? There's no reason at all, so I'm inclined to believe that the miracles occurred as well.

      One that truly amazes me is the miracle at Bethsaida (Mark 8:22-26), where Jesus healed a blind man. Suddenly the man could see, but he perceived people to be like "trees, walking around." Jesus touched him again, and he could see clearly. Not until John Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding is the concept mentioned in literature, that vision might require experience to be properly interpreted. A writer in the first century would have naturally assumed that someone whose eyes were healed would immediately see, regardless of how long they'd been blind. This story, however, presents a man who was healed twice, for reasons that would not become clear until the mid-twentieth century. Anyone reading this passage without an awareness of the neurological basis of sight would simply believe that, for some unknown reason, Jesus at first healed this man only halfway (something not done anywhere else in the Scriptures). Only a modern reader can see what the ancient writer could have only understood by inspiration: Two miracles had occurred, and the second was even more astonishing than the first.

      Was it possible? Of course not. Did it happen? I am convinced that it did.

      Now, as for the hailstones... in the book of Revelation, the original Greek indicates that they weighed one talent. According to a handy dictionary, "A talent of silver contained 3,000 shekels (Exodus 38:25,26) and was equal to 94 3/7 lbs. avoirdupois. The Greek talent, however, as in the LXX., was only 82 1/4 lbs. It was in the form of a circular mass, as the Hebrew name kikkar denotes. A talent of gold was double the weight of a talent of silver. (2nd Samuel 12:30)"

      So if you've been reading the apocalyptic Left Behind book series and you're afraid of being pelted with hundred-pound hailstones, relax. They may only be 82-pounders.
    12. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But wait, the conspiracy goes even further..the researcher's name is JESUS!!!! IT'S THE SECOND COMING!!!!!!

      You "fundie" alarmists can wrap your dicks in your Bibles and go fuck yourselves.

    13. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by superyooser · · Score: 1
      How many times is this going to be posted? I feel like the Troll Police this morning. This example of verse-plucking is a gross misrepresentation of the biblical text. To connect these sporadic ice blocks to the events of the seventh plague of the Great Tribulation is laughable. Btw, Armageddon is the sixth plague! Somebody clue me in as to when that happened. Oops, that also means I missed the rapture. I must be Left Behind (tm)!

      The main thing I need to say is: Read the context!

      Look here if you really want to know how biblical prophecy relates to modern times.

    14. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how did the blind guy know what a tree looked like?

    15. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I am not saying here that Bible was an accirate description, but the things you described are called miracles, acts of God. They are quite possible, if you think that God is almighty. Certainly it is not possible to prove them impossible. However, it is possible to use the four books describing the life of Jesus and compare them, pointing out the logical errors. With that, you can prove that at least some of the details (or stories, or the whole book) are impossible. QED. Try it yourself, or check the web.

    16. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* The single most amazing thing about the bible is that, despite the extrodinary stories written thousands of years ago, not a single one has been proven to be impossible. *)

      The amazing thing is: NOTHING has been proven impossible about anything. For example, just because we currently don't know how to physically travel faster than the speed of light does NOT mean that it is impossible. But, that is not the point.

    17. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Do you have a reference?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    18. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      The significance of the Biblical story is not that it's never been proven impossible, but that it's never been proven incorrect.

      A self-contradictory story is, by definition, incorrect.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    19. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by evilviper · · Score: 2

      Seriously, are you implying that it's possible to:

      * make a living man out of clay?
      * flood the earth to a depth of over 29,000 feet?
      * turn a staff into a snake and back again?
      * stop the sun from moving in the sky?
      * raise a man from the dead after three days?

      By definition... If it happened, it is possible.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    20. Re:Isn't this in the Bible? by evilviper · · Score: 2

      Sure... there are plenty of instances where we've learned more about a subject, and stated that reported event could not have happened in the way described.

      Meanwhile, biblical stories go the other way. We've had the story of bringing down the walls of Jerico with trumpets, for thousands of years now. It was not until recently that we discovered that sound can indeed be incredibly destructive.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  21. Holy.... by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jesus [...] has spent the last two and a half years investigating so-called megacryometeors

    Cut the guy some slack, you think it's easy being the son of God?

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:Holy.... by Swaffs · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, having not read the article, just the comments (the short ones at least), if I follow correctly, large blocks of ice keep falling from the sky which are coming from giant meteors that are crying, but we shouldn't worry because Jesus is investigating this.

      Well, good. I was worried for a bit there.

      --

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." - Homer Simpson [1F10]

    2. Re:Holy.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The researches in question is Jesus Martinez-Frias, not Jesus Christ the son of God. The latter died nearly two thousand years ago and rose from the dead. The former just happens to share his first name; Jesus is a common name amongst Hispanics.

      Glad to be of help

    3. Re:Holy.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, yeah, thanks for the help, I'm sure the fucking retards that didn't figure the joke out will thank you.

    4. Re:Holy.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joke? I didn't think it was funny. Yawn.

  22. Like a bad sci-fi movie by Marijuana+al-Shehi · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "It's not water from airplane toilets. ... Its isotopic composition bears the signature ... of Iberian rain"

    What's with the dramatic pauses? I was expecting a violin crash after he uttered "Iberian rain".

    Back to the topic, what are we to glean from such a shallow article from an entertainment company? Can we get an article from a scientific journal next time? Is this really a new phenomenon, or is it that accounts of ice falling from the sky are discounted? After all, you can't expect the evidence to last very long on a balmy summer day...

    --
    "I think all foreigners should stop interfering in the internal affairs of Iraq"
    -- Paul Wolfowitz, 7/21/2003
    1. Re:Like a bad sci-fi movie by PhoenixK7 · · Score: 1
      dictionary.com:

      ellipsis Pronunciation Key (-lpss)
      n. pl. ellipses (-sz)

      • 1.
        • The omission of a word or phrase necessary for a complete syntactical construction but not necessary for understanding.
        • An example of such omission.

        2. A mark or series of marks (... or * * *, for example) used in writing or printing to indicate an omission, especially of letters or words.
  23. Let me get this right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Global warming is causing large blocks of ice to form in the upper atmosphere. Does this fail to make sense to anyone else? Hey Doc ... lay off the LSD already

    1. Re:Let me get this right... by Capsaicin · · Score: 1
      Global warming is causing large blocks of ice to form in the upper atmosphere. Does this fail to make sense to anyone else?

      Only to people with a modicum of knowledge of atmospheric science.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    2. Re:Let me get this right... by Thud457 · · Score: 0
      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  24. Eud de porta-potty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not water from airplane toilets. ... Its isotopic composition bears the signature ... of Iberian rain.

    I want to know which lab assistant had to sample the isotropic composition of airplane toilet water!

    "Hey kid, we have an exciting experiment for you to do!"

  25. This is quite easily explained... by pyman · · Score: 1
    Obviously someone in a 747 flushes as the aircraft flies overhead...

    Ice doogies plummet to the earth!

    --
    a ^= b; b ^= a; a ^= b;
    1. Re:This is quite easily explained... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      i think the standard term is boeing bomb

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  26. Another Slashdot formula crapsule... by Wraithlyn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't they get sick of using the same template? To wit:

    "An article over at [some news site] has an article about [some subject]. Pretty interesting read. They talk about [cut n paste something from article]. Either way, [say something stupidly obvious]."

    Sorry. It's monday.

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    1. Re:Another Slashdot formula crapsule... by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      It's really hard to come up with something else when your article trolling. Most of the actual articles are particularly boring by themselves.

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    2. Re:Another Slashdot formula crapsule... by MobileC · · Score: 0

      No it's not, it's Tuesday.

      --

      Fran
      :):):)
      1st 1st Poster of the new Millennium!

    3. Re:Another Slashdot formula crapsule... by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

      What else are the rejected Google search pigeons going to do? Even with the distributed power of their brains, coming up with interesting article descriptions is too complex; filling in a pre-made template is more efficient.

  27. Acts of God by sssmashy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm not a religious man, but you ever get nailed by a 30kg block of ice falling from a clear sky, you can be pretty sure God was trying to tell you something.

    1. Re:Acts of God by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why? its just one of those random things bound to happen.

      I bet somwhere out there there is a free standing rock weighing exactly 666.666kg. That doesn't mean its satan's rock, it means randomly its bound to happen.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Acts of God by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      Random ice blocks falling from the sky, though? Golf ball sized hail is rare enough...

    3. Re:Acts of God by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      Bleh, posted too quickly.

      Of course I realize that the measuring units are pretty arbitrary (it must be 666 of *some* unit...) but you have to admit that it's *wierd* that huge blocks of ice are falling from the sky, whether or not you believe that the end of the world has anything to do with it...

    4. Re:Acts of God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hard to ignore hard scientific facts but there are many things in the Bible that are hard for me to shrug off as just being coincidental or whatever. I think it depends on your predisposition. For example, the Bible could have said "President John F. Kenedy of the United States of America will be assassinated on Friday, November 22, 1963." and many people would have dismissed it as nonsense prior to that date, and just "dumb luck" after that date.

    5. Re:Acts of God by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, he's telling you you're out of scotch (or some other alcoholic beverage you enjoy with ice, pick your favorite)

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    6. Re:Acts of God by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the Bible could have said "President John F. Kenedy of the United States of America will be assassinated on Friday, November 22, 1963."

      Er, no. If the Bible said anything that clear and specific, yours truly and vast legions of other agnostics would be filling the Churches to the rafters by now.

      Unfortunately the Bible is about as specific as your typical astrology column. I'd do much better to worship the Weather Channel on TV.

    7. Re:Acts of God by moogla · · Score: 2

      If you read the article, what it's "trying to tell us" is that we are fucking up our climate and/or we are due for that mini ice-age which is coming Real Soon Now.

      --
      Black holes are where the Matrix raised SIGFPE
    8. Re:Acts of God by hagar� · · Score: 1

      if god hit me in the head with a 30kg chunk of ice, i know what he was trying to tell me.

      "Tag! You're it."

      --
      Insert something insightful here, or I'll insert something painful there.
    9. Re:Acts of God by geenj · · Score: 1

      yep, and the americans voted for the right president so our climate can be messed up.

    10. Re:Acts of God by taxman_10m · · Score: 2

      Tell you something? No, I think he was trying to make you dead!

    11. Re:Acts of God by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1

      Or that you really should move away from the flight path for the international airport...

  28. warm drink by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1

    Man ... I wish I had some ice ... wha ... ahhhh..

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  29. i make a funny by t0qer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What did the farmer think when the ice landed in his lettuce field?

    Iceberg lettuce.

    1. Re:i make a funny by unicron · · Score: 1, Troll

      Die.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:i make a funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol

  30. Lava by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What happens if one of these lands in a pool of hot substance like lava?

    1. Re:Lava by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2

      I'm going to go out on a limb and say it'll melt. Glad I could be of assistance.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    2. Re:Lava by geogeek6_7 · · Score: 2

      It Melts.

    3. Re:Lava by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Actually surprisingly your wrong. Try throwing ice in a fryer at McDonalds next time your out.

      The suddent change in temp. causes the ice to explode....

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    4. Re:Lava by f97tosc · · Score: 1

      I think you are right. The correct term is sublimation - transformation immediately from solid to gas.

      Tor

    5. Re:Lava by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ice doesn't explode.. trust me i'm not at aburger joint but i throw ice in our fryiers all the time, nothing explodes, ice melts vapoizes, i get more of an explosion from clams and squide when we cook em, throws out some greese burning me a couple times care to explain that one?

    6. Re:Lava by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The suddent change in temp. causes the ice to explode....


      The water evaporates but because it makes a lot of vapour quickly and it's by then under the oil it throws oil out of the fryer.


      I don't expect the ice block to sink into the lava so it won't be as spectacular.

    7. Re:Lava by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa! HEY, KID! Get off that limb! You could fall and hurt yourself!

      Next time if you're going to do that you should bring a bit of rope. Wrap it around the sturdiest nearby branch at any moment, that way if you fall or a limb breaks you'll have something to catch your fall. You got any rope at home, son?

  31. Could this be airplane shit ? by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Could these blocks of "ice" in fact be frozen piss and turds dropped from the washrooms of 747's ? This seems a bit more plausible to me.

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    1. Re:Could this be airplane shit ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Could these blocks of "ice" in fact be frozen piss and turds dropped from the washrooms of 747's ? This seems a bit more plausible to me.

      Well yeah it could, if it weren't for the difference in colour and smell.

      Hint: contrary to what you might think when you live in certain big cities, water does not contain piss and turds naturally. Most people will see the difference.

    2. Re:Could this be airplane shit ? by Deadstick · · Score: 3, Informative

      There was a run of just that sort of thing in the 1970s.

      The chemical toilets on airplanes are emptied by connecting a big hose to a fitting on the bottom of the airplane, opening its valve, and pumping the contents out. The valve has a rubber seal, and the toilets occasionally collect small metal objects -- jewelry, coins, keyrings, OJ's knife and so forth -- which can damage the seal on the way out.

      So once in a while the seal springs a leak, and since the airplane is pressurized in flight by as much as 8 pounds per square inch, a lot of the water can leak out. At jet cruising altitudes it immediately freezes, and a ball of ice collects on the outside of the airplane. Then when it lets down into warmer air, the ice gets dislodged and, well, bombs away.

      After three or four of these incidents over a couple of years, the industry worked out some design changes and inspection requirements that seem to have pretty well stopped it. But if one hits your property, you should immediately note the time and location, put the biggest chunk in a baggie, and stick it in your freezer for proof. You can count on a rather nice settlement from the airline, especially if keeping it quiet is part of the deal.

      rj

    3. Re:Could this be airplane shit ? by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      Yup, hasn't read the article and neither have the people who modded it up.

      Kudos.

    4. Re:Could this be airplane shit ? by krogoth · · Score: 2

      Could you make it a little more obvious that you didn't read the article?

      --

      They that quote Benjamin Franklin on liberty and safety deserve neither.
    5. Re:Could this be airplane shit ? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Also, rather large chunks of ice sometimes fall from commercial aircraft wings during winter flights in bad weather.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  32. Global Warming disproven! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Global Warming HAS to be a joke if ICE is forming in the sky.

  33. Re: "dammit", dammit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (see subject)

  34. was this a guess at 10kg by baomike · · Score: 1

    I am glad they got rid of the 21 and 23 lb blocks.

    I am always suspicious when I see something is 2.2 lb or 22 lb etc .

    It usualy is false accuracy. The guy said somthing like " they weight about 10 kg and viola
    22 lb.. 20 lb would be a more likely conversion since the first figure was an estimate.

    How many times in the paper have you seen a
    report of a 22 lb bomb going off. How did they know? Maybe it realy was a "10 kg bomb" ie an
    estimate.

  35. Re:The Rapture is upon us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The risin Lord loves everyone

    He doesn't love homos.

  36. Are they sure it isn't by leviramsey · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Frozen masses of piss and shit being dropped from commercial airliners?

    1. Re:Are they sure it isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for the last time, NO!

    2. Re:Are they sure it isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your website: http://levi.crystalorb.net/

      Says username/password required. How does one go about getting one?

    3. Re:Are they sure it isn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA, you dork.

  37. Re:hey diddly ho diddly neighborinos by aerojad · · Score: 1

    well thank god you posted that... i really understand the ice thing now.

    --

    SecondPageMedia - Wha
  38. Kinda fishy by sawilson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article talks about hail, but they fail to
    mention that hail ONLY comes from thunderstorms.
    Just like tornadoes ONLY come from thunderstorms.
    And almost all lighting comes from, you guessed it,
    thunderstorms. They also fail to talk about the
    freezing level. That's how a thunderstorm becomes
    a thunderstorm. A cumulus cloud that's growing
    upwards because of vorticity (air rising fast)
    grows past the freezing level. The top of the
    cloud and the bottom of the cloud get different
    charges and blammo, you have a big floating battery in the
    sky. The hail forms because there are rapidly
    moving columns of air moving up and down
    in the cloud and water trapped in that column
    gets frozen, recoated with water, frozen again,
    etc.

    The ice clouds he's talking about are
    cirrus clouds of some kind. That's basically
    any cloud made up of super tiny ice crystals
    because they are above the freezing level.
    a VERY VERY rare type of cloud is called
    cirrocumulus. This is ice crystal clouds in
    the shape of the puffy white clouds called
    cumulus that sometimes turn into thunderstorms.
    The reason these clouds are so rare is because
    they are unbelievably heavy. It takes an
    incredible amount of 'vorticity' to keep
    them up there, and they don't last long.
    If you ever see very high puffy cottonball
    looking clouds, there's a great chance you'll
    have a thunderstorm soon (24-48 hours) because
    vorticity (air rising fast) is one of the major
    things needed. There is NO WAY upper atmosphere
    vorticity is going to hold water in the air
    long enough for it to weigh 10 friggin pounds.
    There is no way that ice clouds would clump
    together and form ice. There is simply no force
    there to do that work. You might get a ball of
    something more like snow, but definitely not
    ice. I'd be more willing to bet some smartass
    with a catapult is having fun at the ice factory.
    If they said this was related to thunderstorm
    activity, I might buy it. But on a clear day?
    No way.

    1. Re:Kinda fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if the ice has been in the solar system for awhile and the earths gravity is grabbing these ice blocks from time to time.

    2. Re:Kinda fishy by rlk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Both cirrus and cirrocumulus are formed from tiny ice crystals (cirrocumulus is when small convective cells form within the cloud). A lot of cirrus is actually of convective origin, the blowoff from thunderstorms.

      Vorticity actually means rotation (turning) of the air, not lifting. However, positive (cyclonic) vorticity near the surface is associated with lifting of the air. That doesn't necessarily mean dramatic convective lifting that produces thunderstorms, but air will be lifted in those regions.

      Hail forms in thunderstorms with strong updrafts. These updrafts are needed to keep the hailstones from simply falling out of the cloud. In order to get giant hailstones, the updraft has to be very strong indeed.

      A 35 pound chunk of ice is on the order of a 10-inch cube (if it's really solid). That's much bigger than any hailstone ever recorded; the biggest known was about 7 inches long and 4-5 inches on the short axis; hailstones are rarely that solid, and it probably didn't weigh more than 5 pounds or thereabouts. I think it fell in Coffeyville, Kansas during a severe thunderstorm (surely a supercell, with a very persistent, rotating updraft, that may well have spawned a tornado). This isn't rocket science; think about what the terminal velocity of a 35 pound chunk of ice is, and the updraft has to be close to that in velocity.

      Any situation where the air is rising that violently is either going to have a very obvious cloud (read: thunderstorm) associated with it; the heat released by the condensation of the water makes the air more buoyant, and hence increases the lift. A dry thermal isn't going to approach that kind of velocity, and even if it did, it would be...well...dry.

      What all of that basically amounts to is...well...that dog don't hunt. The only realistic source of that kind of thing is water being dumped by airplanes at high enough altitudes so that it has time to freeze before reaching the surface. A chunk of ice that big should be easy to save long enough to be examined; they should give a few samples to NOAA, say, and let them inspect it.

    3. Re:Kinda fishy by matman · · Score: 2

      But geologist Roger Buick of the University of Washington in Seattle told the same publication that a model created by Martinez-Frias and his team showing ice can form on a clear day was an "important advance in that it thoroughly documents and provides an explanation for a spectacular phenomenon"

    4. Re:Kinda fishy by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "I'd be more willing to bet some smartass with a catapult is having fun at the ice factory."

      It must be some monster catapult, considering that these ice hunks have hit in Spain, Australia and Mexico. Or perhaps it is the mutual hobby of ice factory workers all over the world.

    5. Re:Kinda fishy by sawilson · · Score: 2

      Yup. A geologist. That would be like having a
      dentist give me his expert opinion on some
      matter related to brain surgury.

    6. Re:Kinda fishy by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      And almost all lighting comes from, you guessed it, thunderstorms

      Err, I think you will find that when there is lightning thunder will invariably follow, unless of course the two events coincide at a point you had chosen to occupy in space-time.

      Ergo all occasions at which lightning is present will be definition be classified as thunder storms and no event in which lightning is not present can be so classified.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    7. Re:Kinda fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on... if you worked in an ice factory (??) wouldn't you be downright keen to fling some chunks of ice at your least favourite customers? I know I would.

    8. Re:Kinda fishy by matman · · Score: 2

      While that is true, they likely have more knoweledge to base an opinion on than the poster. That would be true, if at the very least, the geologist had read the explanation given by those studying the 'ice blocks'.

    9. Re:Kinda fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the poster 'sawilson' was a weather
      forecaster at Dover AFB in deleware for 4 years
      and would know a hell of a lot more about this
      than a geologist. :)

      =sawilson

    10. Re:Kinda fishy by sawilson · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not true.

      I said almost, because there are other events that
      can cause lightning. Volcanic eruptions and massive
      smoke clouds from forest fires come to mind.

      However, in accordance with the FMH-1b
      (Federal Meteorlogical Handbook) that I had to use
      as both a weather forecaster, and weather observer,
      YES. In the interests of flight safety, any lightning
      observed will generate an immediate SP or (special)
      observation to be automatically taken and
      recorded as a thunderstorm. (if my memory serves
      me correctly. It's been a while)

    11. Re:Kinda fishy by isorox · · Score: 3, Funny

      And almost all lighting comes from, you guessed it,thunderstorms.

      Y'know, I always thought that lighting came from computer monitors and the sun

    12. Re:Kinda fishy by jelle · · Score: 2

      "The only realistic source of that kind of thing is water being dumped by airplanes ..."

      How about Louis Franks ice comets?

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    13. Re:Kinda fishy by GuidoDEV · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > What all of that basically amounts to is...well...that dog don't hunt. The only realistic
      > source of that kind of thing is water being dumped by airplanes at high enough altitudes so
      > that it has time to freeze before reaching the surface. A chunk of ice that big should be easy to
      > save long enough to be examined; they should give a few samples to NOAA, say, and let them inspect
      > it.

      Agreed. I'd like to see some hard evidence of this given our present knowledge of precipitation formation and cloud physics (which admittedly is pretty limited, but certainly precludes events of these kinds).

      The problem I have with the airplane theory, however, is that the instant that the water is ejected from the plane it will break up into thousands upon thousands of tiny drops which will instantly freeze at that altitude. A large mass of water would not freeze instantly due to its large heat capacity, yet at the same time it will not remain together due to the various forces yanking it apart (esp. friction).

      So in other words our "megacryometeor" would (for it to form in the 4-9km AGL range) have to grow from a infinitesimally small nucleus (since allegedly the composition of these things is similar to the composition of rain) to the size of at least a basketball before it strikes the earth. Keep in mind that it can't simply start out as a mass of water the size of a basketball (as mentioned earlier), and thus must grow slowly enough to have all the water freeze/vapor condense onto it without losing it all, and yet somehow stay up in the air without the support of a strong upward current of air to balance out its terminal velocity, which will be on the order of 50 m/s (110mph) by the time it is the size of a baseball, let alone a basketball or more. Note that these upward currents of this magnitude occur *only* in the presence of strong thunderstorms.

      The only thing I can think of that might remotely be able to do something like this is a very strong jet stream placed favorably next to a mountain range. You could then possibly have very strong vertical winds (this is very favorable for cloud formation, however) up to and even exceeding 50 m/s, and under *just* the right conditions you could probably grow a chunk of ice from nothing other than vapor over a long period of time...however we're talking about growth rates on the order of days and even weeks in the absence of clouds for a chunk of ice of any reasonable size. Thus even this highly idealized setup is not realistic, as it would have to persist steady-state for weeks.

      In short, there could be some really weird process out there we haven't the foggiest notion about that is causing this, but I'll believe it when I see it...

    14. Re:Kinda fishy by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      In the interests of flight safety, any lightning observed will generate an immediate SP or (special) observation to be automatically taken and recorded as a thunderstorm.

      The way I would see it, a volvano erruption could cause a thunderstorm...

      Actually, one event that you do list might be the exception is a nuclear explosion. Lightning has certainly been observed in mushroom clouds, however you are not going to be hearing any thunder 'cos there is another noise thats a lot louder....

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    15. Re:Kinda fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that "terminal velocity" is the same for all objects, no matter size/weight (disregarding wind friction for size; and since these are somewhat round...).

    16. Re:Kinda fishy by GuidoDEV · · Score: 1

      > I thought that "terminal velocity" is the same
      > for all objects, no matter size/weight
      > (disregarding wind friction for size; and since
      > these are somewhat round...).

      As you say, terminal velocity *is* the same for all objects in the absence of friction. However, friction is a pretty important factor, and cannot be disregarded.

    17. Re:Kinda fishy by Preposterous+Coward · · Score: 2
      As you say, terminal velocity *is* the same for all objects in the absence of friction. However, friction is a pretty important factor, and cannot be disregarded.

      Uhhh, terminal velocity is TOTALLY dependent on friction. Without friction, the object would just keep accelerating until it reached relativistic velocities or (much more likely ;-) impacted the surface of the attractor. F = ma = GmM/r^2 and all that...

      --

      "Biped! Good cranial development. Evidently considerable human ancestry."
    18. Re:Kinda fishy by GuidoDEV · · Score: 1

      *laugh* Right...not sure what universe I was coming from with regards to that comment. Just a *little* bit of a difference between "constant acceleration" and "constant terminal velocity". ;-)

    19. Re:Kinda fishy by ScottBob · · Score: 4, Informative

      The problem I have with the airplane theory, however, is that the instant that the water is ejected from the plane it will break up into thousands upon thousands of tiny drops which will instantly freeze at that altitude. A large mass of water would not freeze instantly due to its large heat capacity, yet at the same time it will not remain together due to the various forces yanking it apart (esp. friction).

      One news report that I saw not too long ago was that an ice block smashed through the roof of a house, and investigators on the scene said it came from an airplane. Indeed, it was the same color of blue as the disinfectant in the airplane toilet flushing water. IIRC, they said that the holding tank had a slow leak, and the water made its way to the exterior of the fuselage (sucked through a hole from a popped rivet, perhaps) where it was broken up into a spray by the air rushing past. The spray collected and instantly froze directly behind the leak on the cold aluminum skin where one of the tail fins joined to the fuselage, collecting and forming a sizeable ball of blue ice. (Heating due to friction would have been negligeable here.) As the plane approached for a landing, slowing down and descending into a warmer layer of air, the aluminum skin conducted just enough heat to cause the blob of ice to separate from the surface and fall, crashing through the roof. Into the bathroom of the house. Imagine the odds.

    20. Re:Kinda fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      vorticity (air rising fast)

      Vorticity: the amount of spin or rotation an object has about a local vertical axis. The faster it spins, the greater the vorticity.

    21. Re:Kinda fishy by GuidoDEV · · Score: 1

      Ok, that makes more sense--I hadn't considered faulty equipment (obviously you don't want stuff freezing onto the fuselage ;-) ). Once you've got the stuff frozen on there, however, it is not at all surprising that it would fall off in a chunk--it was probably daylight and as the plane was descending the metal, likely being warmer than the rest of the surface (esp. considering evaporation/sublimation), rose above the melting point of the solid and caused the whole thing to come crashing off. Of course, the odds of it landing in someone's bathroom are still pretty slim... ;-)

    22. Re:Kinda fishy by jguillaumes · · Score: 1

      A chunk of ice that big should be easy to save long enough to be examined; they should give a few samples to NOAA, say, and let them inspect it.

      Oh my... we poor spaniards don't know how to do a chemical analysis of a block of ice, isn't it? ;)

      This is old news to me. Two years ago we had a real "storm" of those ice blocks failing from our skies. The vast majority of those events were... err... jokes (one of the ice blocks had a "peculiar" form, which corresponds to a mineral water bottle sold here ;)). A few of them (the first ones which were found) were determined NOT to be jokes, and were analysed by the CSIC and the INM (National Institute of Meteorology. Dr. Martinez Frias was the head of the CSIC research team. His team came to the conclusion that some unknown atmospheric phenomenon was the origin of the so-called "ice stones"; this point was rebated by the meteorologists, and there was some ugly name-calling between both research groups.

      The results of Dr. Frias investigations can be found at this page (it's in spanish, but there is an english version here.

      To find the original news reports of the "ice stones" impacts just do a search for "aerolitos hielo" on google. You'll find a lot of references (in spanish), including a HOW-TO build your own ice stone, and some points about the argument between the CSIC and INM teams.

    23. Re:Kinda fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ice will evaporate if the water vapour pressure
      in the ambient air is below the saturation level.
      In the case of liquid leaking from the aircraft (freezing as the resulting spray hits the fuselage
      downstream), the supply may dominate the
      evaporation and accumulation could result.
      In the atmosphere the water vapour is commonly
      super saturated, and there may be no visible
      clouds. It is therefore not unthinkable that
      water vapour could also accumulate on a suitable
      part of an aircraft travelling a long distance
      in super-saturated air...
      -frank
      "I'm not a meteorologist, I only work here..."

    24. Re:Kinda fishy by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      And all this time I thought it was what happened when you didn't feed tornadoes for a week!

      Huh. Oh well, anyone have a trailer parks that they're not using? These puppies are famished!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    25. Re:Kinda fishy by abreauj · · Score: 1

      You left off the punchline: "The house was struck by and Icy Blue Mass, or Icy B. M. (ICBM)".

      This is not actually a "news story", it's just an old pun that's been going around for ages. I first heard it when I was in grade school, back in 1977.

    26. Re:Kinda fishy by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

      Y'know, I always thought that lighting came from computer monitors and the sun

      Actually, lighting comes from falling electrons.

  39. It's started by rjamestaylor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It has started:

    • And great (excessively oppressive) hailstones,

    • as heavy as a talent [between fifty and sixty pounds],
      of immense size, fell from the sky on the people;
      and men blasphemed God for the plague of the hail,
      so very great was [the torture] of that plague.
      (Revelation 16:21)

    Trust me; Fundamentalist sermons will be referring to this story for a long time to come.

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    1. Re:It's started by isorox · · Score: 2

      Wasnt the bible written thousands of years ago? Why is this passage
      © Copyright 1954, 1958, 1962, 1964, 1965, 1987 by The Lockman Foundation
      ?

    2. Re:It's started by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
      • Wasnt the bible written thousands of years ago? Why is this passage

      • © Copyright 1954, 1958, 1962, 1964, 1965, 1987 by The Lockman Foundation?
      It wasn't written in English. How well do you read Common Greek of, say, 2000 years ago? But you knew that and were trying to make a funny...
      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    3. Re:It's started by jedwards · · Score: 5, Funny

      And lo, the lord decreed that 22 is now in between 50 and 60. And all those whose salary is $22K rejoiced. And all those who are 22 years old suddenly went all baggy in all the wrong places and there was much wailing and gnashing of false teeth.

    4. Re:It's started by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well-executed humor. -rjamestaylor

    5. Re:It's started by superyooser · · Score: 1
      *yawn* Click on that link, and read the context, people. The hailstones in this verse are to fall during a storm and are one part of the seventh plague to occur after the rapture.

      Surely, biblical prophecy is being fulfilled today, but the subject of Martinez-Frias' investigation very doubtfully has anything to do with it.

      Any preacher who tried to claim that these ice blocks had anything to do with Revelation 16:21, in particular, would be laughed off the pulpit and sacked by the deacons (in a Protestant church).

    6. Re:It's started by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1
      Who cares? I mean, no-one noticed the first six plagues. Or have I just missed the ulcers, death of everything in the seas, rivers turning to blood, the Sun increasing in temperature to the extent that people are burned, the river Euphrates drying up, and the largest earthquake in history?

      The Fundies can refer to this story for as long as they like, as nothing is going to happen.

    7. Re:It's started by isorox · · Score: 2

      It was written in english back in the 16th or 17th century. In fact, the bible being available in english in a progressive country like england led to standardisation of the language, and skyrocketed england ahead of the rest of europe by decades in culture and science.

    8. Re:It's started by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After being translated from the orignal Greek and Hebrew texts... which were written long before the 1600's

  40. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see how far out to the right we can get this thread? ok? well at least if you're viewing everything nested.... sounds like a plan? reply here if you'd like to help.. or if you need more info, reply here and I will reply explaining the plan.

  41. Metacomment (OT,Troll,Flamebait...) by Marijuana+al-Shehi · · Score: 1
    • The liberal treehuggin' whackos are at it again!
    • Imagine a beowulf cluster of these. Thank you, Patrick "Shithook" Bateman
    • I bet the metric conversions were done by NASA. LOL!!
    • (1)Catch falling blocks of Ice (2)??? (3)Profit!
    • Heidi Wall read this post!
    • Maybe one of these blocks will land on my AMD! LOL!!!
    • What does the Senator from Disney think about this?
    • Jesus? Jesus stole my fukkin' car, man!
    --
    "I think all foreigners should stop interfering in the internal affairs of Iraq"
    -- Paul Wolfowitz, 7/21/2003
    1. Re:Metacomment (OT,Troll,Flamebait...) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe one of these blocks will land on my AMD! LOL!!!

      lol

  42. If one fell near a party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hey, I wanted ice in my drink, but I didn't ask for this!"

  43. Obvious solution ..... by binaryDigit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just get everyone to run dual proccie Itanium2's. The things will melt before they get within a 1000ft of any suitably equipped home.

  44. No, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Climactic": relating to climaxes.

    The word you are looking for is "orgasmic".

  45. Old Lady & Meteor by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 2
    Depends, of course. You'll find it difficult to get Act of God coverage for your house. I recall reading - probably an urban myth - about an old lady in Flordia whose house burned to the ground. The cause of the fire was determined to be a meteor which had plowed through the roof of her house. The meteor apparently started the fire.

    Allegedly, her insurance company balked and said that her policy - which included everything from fire and flooding to sinkholes - did not cover Acts of God. Clearly, a meteor hurtling through the atmosphere to striker her house was an Act of God. However, the company ultimately paid, bowing to public pressure.

    Ran keywords against google, but couldn't find a reference - so it's probably bullshit.

    1. Re:Old Lady & Meteor by c.derby · · Score: 2, Funny

      Food for thought: "Acts of God" clauses for athiests. Hmmmmm....

      --
      -- derby
    2. Re:Old Lady & Meteor by Thud457 · · Score: 0

      That would be the "shit happens" clause.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    3. Re:Old Lady & Meteor by tHiNk411 · · Score: 1

      I am buddhist, and about 3 weeks ago the tree in my front yard fell onto my brand new 30k truck. The insurance claims its an act of god, both auto and homeowners. I don't believe in god, so what act is this? You pay all your insurance bill every month, and when it comes time to get some of that money back, they give you a tube of vasaline and ask you to bend over for them AGAIN!

    4. Re:Old Lady & Meteor by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I find it interesting that insurance companies - said by some to be the devil - don't cover acts of God!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  46. First Office Space Post by LighthouseJ · · Score: 0

    Looks like somebody's got a case of the Mondays.

  47. Nope! by Timmeh · · Score: 1, Informative
    While Martinez-Frias said he was far from certain as to why the ice meteors formed, he said they were neither hoaxes nor blocks of ice falling from the bars or bathrooms of passing aircraft, as skeptics have suggested.
    Mmmmmmmmmmmm.... you can give me some karma now please.
  48. oh please by cca93014 · · Score: 1

    God. Prove yourself. The address is:

    Dubya,
    A ranch,
    Crawford,
    Texas

    PS. I know it's asking a lot, but if you could add Ruport Murdoch to the list that would be great. You could do it after you've given loads more poor people AIDS.

    1. Re:oh please by superyooser · · Score: 1
      God... already came down.

      Yeshua (Jesus),
      A stable,
      Bethlehem,
      Israel

      The address He wants to come to now is [your name]'s heart. You have to invite Him in first, though.

      P.S. I'm quite sure that Dubya and Yeshua have already met. Even their names rhyme. :-)

  49. Sky + Falling = Bad News by guttentag · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I heard this one before. And the big bad wolf is going to come eat us all, right? You go hide in your cave. OK, see you later. Have fun. What the hell is--
    ::BONK!::

  50. RTFA by Marijuana+al-Shehi · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you were to Read The Fucking Article right now, you--like the rest of us--would realize what a dumbass you sound like. Too bad whomever modded you up also didn't RTFA.

    --
    "I think all foreigners should stop interfering in the internal affairs of Iraq"
    -- Paul Wolfowitz, 7/21/2003
  51. Precision vs. Accuracy by shking · · Score: 1

    Just to wax pendantic for a moment: an estimate of "10 kilos" isn't precisely "22 lbs". A more *accurate* translation would be "20 lbs".

    --
    -- "At Microsoft, quality is job 1.1" -- PC Magazine, Nov. 1994
    1. Re:Precision vs. Accuracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just to wax pendantic for a moment: an estimate of "10 kilos" isn't precisely "22 lbs". A more *accurate* translation would be "20 lbs".

      No, a more accurate translation would be "22 pounds, zero ounces, 11 drams and 22 4/5 grains". THAT'S 10kg in the beloved Imperial (God save the Queen) system.

      If you insist on using that bizarre Imperial (God save the Queen) system, you may as well go all the way. To really be consisten I think the USA should also switch to the old British monetary system, with pounds, shillings, pence, crowns, guineas, groats and farthings.

  52. If an ice block falls and nobody hears it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does it make a sound?

  53. The Real Question by istartedi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    for me is not whether or not ice can form. Of course it can form. The question in my mind is what kind of wind can sustain such a large glob?

    Traditional hailstones form in the updrafts of thunderstorms--the more forceful the updraft, the larger the hailstones. This begs the question of what kind of wind is keeping these things aloft and allowing them to form. The answer could be easily found in a wind tunnel. What you need to know is the terminal velocity of these ice "blocks". I assume they are not actually blocks. That would just be too wierd.

    Perhaps, there is some kind of ice structure that forms and has a very low terminal velocity... ice parachutes with thick centers? Then, as it falls through the atmosphere whatever it is that reduces the terminal velocity melts, leaving the "payload".

    Also, is there any correlation between these things and anything else (like contrails?). If there is, then maybe we could use doppler RADAR to look for clear-air updrafts, and a telescope to view these things as they form. Of course, maybe these things are highly localized--little tornados in the upper atmosphere... maybe they are smaller than the resolution of the RADAR.

    At any rate, I just hope these things stay away from my head.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:The Real Question by landtuna · · Score: 2, Informative

      Radar wouldn't really be able to help you much here. Weather radar's resolution is on the order of tens of meters, and the stuff you're looking at would need to be somewhat reflective to radar.

      The wind that's holding up the block wouldn't be very visible either if it really was in a clear sky. Rain reflects back to the radar, but plain wind isn't very easy to see.

    2. Re:The Real Question by GuidoDEV · · Score: 1

      Once you get more than 50-100km away from a NEXRAD system, the resolution is pretty bad--basically it's averaging everything over a roughly 1km^3 volume, and even more than that the farther away you go.

      The ice structure is a good thought, since if these things exist there must be some way they stay up in the air while forming. Never heard of any atmospheric ice structure that would fit the bill, though, but who knows...

    3. Re:The Real Question by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      So, you figure .. BuckySnowBalls?

      If these things were forming in clear skies, I'd figure that an airplane or three would have hit a swarm by now.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  54. Re: was this a guess at 10kg --- Yeah like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When somebody says -40 C when they actually meant -40 F . UHh I mean like when someone says 4 liters when they MEANT to say 1 gallon. DAMNit I'll get it right. someday.

  55. Oh yeah? by Marijuana+al-Shehi · · Score: 0, Troll

    I place as much faith in your infidel superstitions as I place in "you're" grammar. By the way, how were you able to post your drivel in post-Columbine, post-911, post-RAPTURE America? I guess you got Left Behind, sucker.

    --
    "I think all foreigners should stop interfering in the internal affairs of Iraq"
    -- Paul Wolfowitz, 7/21/2003
  56. Re:The Rapture is upon us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you faggot.

  57. Green whackos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Spanish "scientist" is obviously a green whacko.

    I agree! It's about time all this global warming propaganda is exposed for what it is. A plot to destroy the American economy. Did you know Greenpeace received generous funding from Osama bin Laden? No they don't advertise that, do they?!

    Anyways, we should all burn more fossil fuels. Fossil fuels are a safe and pollution free form of energy. I mean people, C02 is not a pollutant, c'mon! So anyway don't let all those towel heads stop you consuming more oil. Remember what is in your countries best interests!

  58. So THAT'S what that was... by jrwillis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have seen one of these things. Last Spring I was outside doing yard work when I head a loud thunk. I walk over to where the noise came from and there was a LARGE ball of ice about the size of a basketball. The odd thing was, it was a clear day. I'm glad to finally know it wasn't just God trying to smite me or something. :-)

    --
    Keep Austin Weird!
    1. Re:So THAT'S what that was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .... and how does this prove that God wasn't trying to smite you (except for the fact that he probably wouldn't have missed.....)

    2. Re:So THAT'S what that was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was me cleaning out my freezer! ;-)

  59. The ice in Spain.... by quakeroatz · · Score: 1

    falls mainly on your brain...

    (yes, I suck)

  60. Actual Martinez-Frias Research Site Link by meehawl · · Score: 5, Informative

    I see lots of people asking basic questions such as "What about...?" and "What if...?" and "How come...?" Come on people, get past the popsci article and go straight to the source from the guy himself.

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:Actual Martinez-Frias Research Site Link by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      I see lots of people asking basic questions such as "What about...?" and "What if...?" and "How come...?"

      Yeah, well I went and looked at those links and while the first one contains lots of explainations as to what didn't cause the ice blobs to form, there was no clear theory as to what did. There was, however, quite a number of links to sites and reports by the various Chicken Little departments of the UN, NASA, etc.
      So, as far as I can tell, this dude says "it's not meteors, comets, or frozen piss from planes, so it must be global warming."

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  61. Deja Vu? by TitusC3v5 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm...this sounds familiar....maybe these guys could back them up....

    --
    And the masses cried out, "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0!"
  62. Either Way by nihilogos · · Score: 3, Funny

    i will be outside holding up a large bucket of cointreau

    --
    :wq
  63. Re:MSNBC uses cookie exploits ...read on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    this exploit was mentioned http://online.securityfocus.com/news/83 here too

  64. But seriously by thelexx · · Score: 5, Informative

    From his website:

    Martinez-Frias has also published around 130 articles in scientific and technical publications (mainly specialised in Earth Sciences -- Geology, Economic Geology, Mineralium Deposita, Computer and Geoscience, Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogy, Geotimes, GeoMarine Letters, Episodes, Geological Magazine, Applied Geochemistry, Journal of Chromatography, AMBIO, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, Meteoritics and Planetary Science, etc.), in high profile multidisciplinary publications (Nature), high prestige international books (Springer-Verlag, Geological Society) in popular magazines, (Mundo Cientifico, Fronteras de la Ciencia y la Tecnología) and in the Scientific supplements of national newspapers (ie El Pais, El Mundo, ABC).

    Martinez-Frias is the author of the book "Sulfuros y Sulfosales de Metales Nobles" and co-editor of several books, among which are; "Recursos Minerales de España" (CSIC 1478p) (Spanish Mineral Resources), "Geologia y Metalogenia en Ambientes Oceanicos. Depósitos Hidrotermales Submarinos (Geology and Metallogeny of Seafloor Hydrothermal Deposits) (IEO, 162p) and "Esto es Imposible" (Aguilar, 320p).

    --
    "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
  65. MSNBC uses Cookie Exploits so stop linking to them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting


    You see that msnbc link ? seems innocent huh

    when you click it though you are actually sent to msn in order to transfer your cookie from any of msn's domains which includes hotmail (any of the *.msn.com domains) in order to track you personally (if you use hotmail notice hm is actually a subdomain of msn)

    so while you click on the story link of

    www.msnbc.com/news/814100.asp&0dm=-23ET [msnbc.com]
    you are actually sent to here

    http://msid.msn.com/mps_id_sharing/redirect.asp?ww w.msnbc.com/news/create_p1.asp?URL=www.msnbc.com/n ews/814100.asp&0dm=-23ET

    why ? so they can steal your hotmail/msn cookie and transfer it to the msnbc domain and track you across any of microsofts domains (hence the msid = microsoft id or guid), this gets round all browser cookie privacy limitations that browser manufacturers (including mozilla/msie/ns) implementation so websites cannot read cookies from other domains and is a blatent privacy breach,
    whats happening is msid server is reading your cookie and passing it to the create_p1.asp page via a GET which then creates a new cookie with your old cookie values then finally redirects you to the story complete with transfered cookies contents, clever but not clever enough for those that spot it

    of course all this cookie sharing happens in the blink of an eye so the average user doesnt see it (dont believe me look at the 302 redirect headers sent when you click the msnbc link) and has no idea they have actually visited msn.com in order to steal their msn cookie

    more information about this exploit can be found here
    http://www.pc-help.org/privacy/ms_guid.htm

    http://online.securityfocus.com/news/83

    i really wish that the /. would not link to msnbc stories as every reader is being exposed to this no matter what browser they use

    of course if you block msid.msn you cannot access the msnbc site , basically if you wont let msn track you they wont let you in the site

    yeah im anon cos who iam doesnt matter

  66. One word... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 3, Funny

    MicroVax.

  67. Ice Blocks at Mach Speeds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about flying into one of these at mach speeds? That could get really nasty, really quick.

  68. Revelation 16:21 by voisine · · Score: 1

    And huge hailstones, about one hundred pounds each, came down from heaven upon men; and men blasphemed God because of the plague of the hail, because its plague was extremely severe. -Revelation 16:21

    1. Re:Revelation 16:21 by superyooser · · Score: 1
      This is probably a troll, but I'll bite anyway.

      Context is everything. The hailstones are to be preceded by (or in the midst of) a thunderstorm and an earthquake. And when did the first six plagues happen? Of course, the rapture hasn't even occurred yet. I don't think these ice blocks fulfill any biblical prophecy whatsoever.

      Anybody want to try to work Nostradamus into this somehow? ;-)

    2. Re:Revelation 16:21 by photon317 · · Score: 2


      IANABB (I am not a Bible Basher), but for argument's sake - If revelations predicts a plague of 100lb ice blocks falling from teh sky all over the place late in the sequence (when thunderstorms and earthquakes are apparently also rampant?), this could just be a sign of it coming. Perhaps these "plagues" are meant to come about by somewhat natural means, and the atmosphere is just getting warmed up for swarming us with 100lb blocks a few years down the road.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    3. Re:Revelation 16:21 by superyooser · · Score: 1
      The plagues may very well occur by natural means under God's direction, but they will come in a specified order. The big hailstones are part of the seventh and final plague during the Great Tribulation. Armageddon is the sixth! Have we experienced Armageddon?? Besides, all of the plagues come after the Rapture. Jesus has not bodily returned to Earth again, so this can't possibly be part of any plague prophesied in Revelation.

      To my knowledge, not a single person has been killed in these ice incidents. I don't see how this can qualify even as a minor plague, much less one of literally biblical proportions - the final one of the seven-year Tribulation period. Furthermore, the ice blocks, while abnormally large, are still a long way off from 100 pounds.

      I do agree with you that this may be a sign of the prophesied things to come. There will be/is much turbulence leading up to the plagues.

    4. Re:Revelation 16:21 by photon317 · · Score: 2


      I'm not saying that the current ice blocks could be a sign... what I'm saying is that perhaps the 7 plagues and all actually start 10 years from now, and God wills them to come about in "natural" ways like climactic changes (I like to believe that even God makes things play out by the laws of physics, he just messes with probabilistic outcomes to get the desired result).

      So if this 100lb ice storm is to come about naturally as the 7th plague of a series that starts a decade from now, would it not be possible that the climactic changes leading up to this would induce rarer and smaller chunk today?

      --
      11*43+456^2
  69. Massive climactic change? My ass. by ccmay · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The article talks about how this could be a harbinger of massive climactic change.

    Pfft. The media talks about how EVERYTHING could be a harbinger of massive climactic change, and furthermore how it's OBVIOUSLY the fault of technology and Western democracy.

    I've quit listening to their made-up crap. It's blips of statistical noise overlying a long-term cycle of temperature variations that pre-existed any human life.

    Climate change has become grant-grubbing junk science harnessed to the service of failed leftist political ideologies.

    Pay no attention to the watermelon wackos. Buy that SUV if you want one and drive on without guilt!

    -ccm

    --
    Too much Law; not enough Order.
    1. Re:Massive climactic change? My ass. by Ghoser777 · · Score: 1

      Even if I grant most of the arguments that global warming is good or not happening, there's plenty of reason to have some guilt.

      #1) The oil supply on earth is mainly controlled by other contries, some of which we're not exactly friendly with. Because our economy is so dependent on oil, this has two implications. One, the US is vulnerable to oil shocks that could originate from the Middle East, and two, we could be funding the countries who want to see us burn in Hell.

      #2) The oil supply on earth is finite. I'll not argue how soon, and I'll grant that science does a good job of meeting developing needs, but it is distinctly possible that exhausting the oil supply on earth before science can develop efficient alternative source (renewable energies, astroid mining, etc), then we could see the world economy take a serious hit.

      #3) When a person uses more oil than they normally would, that makes the supply of oil lower. In turn, that can cause oil prices to go up, hurting not those who drive the SUVs, but those people who can barely get by, or are starting to get their feet on the ground. Plus, being dependent on oil not only makes the US economy vulnerable to instability, but it's instability that uniquely effects those in the US (and other countries) that don't have a lot of leeway in their finances.

      #4) I really don't like the smell of smoke (personally) or exhaust from vehicles. If everyone took your philosophy (stretching it to its logical limit), I'm sure a great deal of the population would at least be uncomfortable, and more likely suffering from chronic lung disease. There is an idea of doing some things for the good of others, not just for your own good. Capitalism is only works well if people aren't always out for themselves; otherwise we not only end up with great competition, but with poor workers being sent down coal shafts with no safety precautions and meat sold with rats and feces.

      F-bacher

      --
      James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
    2. Re:Massive climactic change? My ass. by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      You're wasting your time- that guy isn't interested in reality, he only wants what he wants and will deny anything that gets in the way. It's annoying, I wished I could smack him. Copping an attitude like that is no sort of virtue.

      I live on a mountain in Vermont, and even then there are days when I have to be careful what I do- because I'm asthmatic, and believe it or not we get dangerous levels of SMOG occasionally. Worse than LA, sometimes. It comes up from New York and New Jersey when the weather conditions are a certain way.

      We also get to have meat with feces again, Bush has rolled back some of the FDA regulations thanks to lobbying from meat packing corporations, and people are already getting sick. The tainted meat, when discovered, is not destroyed- it's just cooked and resold.

      Sure, there are people out there who are as utterly irresponsible as the original poster. And some of them are completely shameless. There's also a mental illness called 'schizoid' which is similar, as it's about complete disregard for society and for others.

      Nobody said this was a virtue, or even socially acceptable- nobody worth listening to, anyhow.

      So the next time you see someone spout off with some 'go buy your SUV, dammit, no guilt!', think to yourself: if it wasn't for the social responsibility that YOU scorn, buddy, I would gladly beat the crap out of you, or simply off you to improve the species.

      These guys DEPEND completely on OTHER people being socially enlightened enough to not kick their asses...

  70. It actually happens (link enclosed) by swb · · Score: 2

    This happened last month in the New York area. Crashed through some woman's house. I read it in the NY Post, featuring pictures of the ice chunk. Check it out.

    Since the airlines use some kind of blue dye in their toilets the ice was blue, which I'd imagine prevents me from pissing in a coffee can, freezing it and asking the airlines for money.

    I seem to recall the article (sorry, the above link is only a free preview) mentioning that airlines "weren't supposed to do this until they got out over open water" (paraphrasing). As if it was standard operating procedure to eject the holding tanks out in the middle of nowhere in the ocean; who knows, maybe on a 747 doing the Kennedy to Johannesburg route you *have* to eject the crap at some point to avoid overflowing tanks.

    1. Re:It actually happens (link enclosed) by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      Since the airlines use some kind of blue dye in their toilets

      It's not just blue dye; it's Sodium Hydroxide (or something similar) added to the waste tank to keep the stink down and to prevent stuff from growing in the effluvia. Also, it's not just the airlines-- all chemical toilets use it.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  71. Let's add a melody by Mind+Socket · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ice blocks keep falling on my head
    And that prob'ly means concussion soon will make me dead ...

    1. Re:Let's add a melody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, if I had mod points (alas, I did yesterday), I would give you a big old +1 Funny.

  72. Where is Charles Fort when you really need him? by dpbsmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Stories about weird stuff falling from the sky have been with us for millennia. Charles Fort (1874-1932) devoted his life to collecting newspaper clippings of rains of fungi, formless masses of protoplasm, hatchets, masks, the ceremonial regalia of savages, and stones--with and without inscriptions. One of his accounts, The Book of the Damned is online here. (By "the damned," he means data that science refuses to accept).Written in an almost poetic, tart, prose style, it is very readable. He talks of rains of "Butter and beef and blood and a stone with strange inscriptions upon it." Most of his information was obtained from newspaper accounts.

    I'm inclined to take a very skeptical view of any stories about weird stuff falling from the sky. Maybe it's true about the blocks of ice, and maybe Fort's falls of frogs and fishes were true, and maybe other accounts of worms, snails mussels, snakes, turtles, and even a whole calf are true.

    But I'd want to see heavier evidence than an MSNBC story.

    Anyway, Fort would have loved this one.

    1. Re:Where is Charles Fort when you really need him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Charles Fort seemed to be saying that all questions should be considered permanently held open. For every theory, there must be a body of data that will fit and another body of data that will fail. When the theory improves, those sets of data will have to be reshuffled.

      There have been lots of reports of falling ice blocks for a very long time.

      I even have heard a personal report by a fellow meteorologist, but well before he became a meteorologist when he was just a farmboy.

      He was alone on the Canadian Prairies at the time and said that the ice falls sounded like incoming artillery shells and he was dodging back and forth to keep running away from the sounds. Fortunately, there was only one every few seconds, so he was able to dodge them all.

      He said that he didn't realize at the time how unique his experience was!

      Charles Fort would be particularly amused about the lame connection to global warming. These reports seem to date back to prehistory, so my conclusion is that our ancestors should always have been worried sick about global warming, right back to prehistory!

      Fort would be equally amused about the modelling claims.

      The model would have to allow for updraft velocities equal or greater to the terminal velocity of a 20+ pound block of ice, and the updrafts would have to be sustained in place long enough for 20+ pounds of ice to deposit on each freezing nucleus! At the same time the atmosphere would have to be supersaturated but be in clear air! Then the block of ice would have to fall gently enough so that it would not be shattered into small pieces when it hit the ground, so that a large block of ice could be discovered! I guess that means that the updraft velocity would have to remain almost but not quite at terminal velocity, right down to where the ice blocks hit the ground! Or, maybe levitation could be invoked!

      Yes indeed, Charles Fort would be amused. This really is a damned fact, but a fact nevertheless!
      By the way, reports of falling fish and frogs seem to be about as numerous and as well documented as the falls of ice blocks. I guess that we just can't win them all!!!

    2. Re:Where is Charles Fort when you really need him? by SparkyTWP · · Score: 1

      Tell that to my dad.

      My dad has told me many stories about his youth in rural Hungary. One story stood out in particular. He told about one day when just playing around outside, on a clear day, small frogs (Probably no bigger than a quarter) just rained from the sky. He said he never saw anything like it.

      I know a lot of the skeptical people here will just say that he was making it up, and I wouldn't blame them. My dad, however, is not the type to make up stories.

      Now whether it was a natural occurance or if there was a human element involved, that's anybody's guess. However, one explanation I've been given is that a tornado had hit somewhere not far away, and it just "deposited" everything when it fizzled out. Any meteorologists care to prove/disprove that theory? I figure if that were the case, there would be at least some clouds or some kind of storm around.

    3. Re:Where is Charles Fort when you really need him? by Frank+Sullivan · · Score: 2

      You know what's weird? Rocks falling from the sky. Obviously, rocks can't fall from the sky, because there are no rocks in the sky. Therefore, any claims that rocks fall from the sky are unscientific nonsense.

      As Charles Fort points out, that was the unanimous opinion of the scientific community through most of the 19th century, and their explanation for meteorites.

      Of course, ice doesn't fall from the sky. That's impossible, because there is no ice in the sky. Keep telling yourself that.

      --
      Hand me that airplane glue and I'll tell you another story.
  73. Blue Ice... by cyber_rigger · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's "blue ice". Hints: Toilet water in airliners is blue. Airliners flying at 30,000 feet are at a temperature of about -40. Airliners can release this stuff... go figure.

  74. Why not dump it in the ocean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not like your neighborhood humpbacks have a portapotty to go to...

  75. "damnit", for the sake of the damned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note to all posters:

    Please don't correct spelling unless you're fucking literate in the first place. Failure to observe this request will result in you making yourself (and the rest of us, by association) look stupid.

    Thank you.

    1. Re:"damnit", for the sake of the damned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Shpank you", damnit!

      Illiterate bastrad!

    2. Re:"damnit", for the sake of the damned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey fucking literate poster:

      http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=damnit

    3. Re:"damnit", for the sake of the damned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because it's technically two words, damn and it. Capisce?

    4. Re:"damnit", for the sake of the damned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then he should have written "damn it", obviously

  76. Ice blocks might be climate change? by mesocyclone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems that every news article about weather events these days mentions a possible connection to climate change! Has it occurred to anyone that since there is a lot of money for climate change research, scientists, in response to the inevitable reporter question, will of course say it *might* have something to do with climate change.

    It is time for a new fear. Climate change is getting trite!

    --

    The only good weather is bad weather.

  77. Re:MSNBC uses Cookie Exploits so stop linking to t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ted? Is that you Ted? Damn, I haven't seen you in ages, since what, them days up at the cabin, you fashioning little bombs in wooden boxes and me brewin up some mash and watchin out for them black choppers.

    Damn man, how you been?

  78. A clear sky maybe except by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for the airplane the ice broke off of?

  79. Priorities? (Re:Smash into your head) by phorm · · Score: 2

    Despite for some reason being marked 0, I do believe this user echos what many of us think. Unless most /.'ers have harder heads than roofs (maybe only the moderators). Reminds me of a line from Harry Potter:

    We could be killed, or worse, expelled!
    She has *got* to get her priorities straight

  80. Roger Buick is a scary looking guy by SiliconEntity · · Score: 3, Informative
    But geologist Roger Buick of the University of Washington in Seattle told the same publication that a model created by Martinez-Frias and his team showing ice can form on a clear day was an "important advance in that it thoroughly documents and provides an explanation for a spectacular phenomenon"
    Take a look at Roger Buick. I don't think I want to argue with him. But as a specialist in Pre-Cambrian Life, Environments, and Astrobiology it's not clear that he would know much about cloud formation.
  81. What are you swimming in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about you, but I don't want lava or any hot substance in my pool.

  82. Someone has to say it by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Offtopic
    It's a good thing that it wasn't airplane toilet water. (Used)

    After all, you would want someone to be dropping Icy BMs on Europe, would you?

    Yes, it was used in one of Spider's Calahan stories [Or maybe a Lady Sally one]. It's people like him that cause good pun shortages, and we have to get by on stupid Xanth level stuff. Those kinds of dangerous memes should never be published.

    "Dangerous Memes", hmm, I'll suggest that to Keith Henson as a title if he ever writes a book about his experiences with the Co$ merry-go-round. Harlan Ellison wouldn't sue over that, would he? (Okay, he would, but after Co$, who cares!)

    You in the back, say it slowly and think of the letters while you're saying it. Sheesh!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Someone has to say it by geekoid · · Score: 2

      thank you, you made my day.

      hehe Icy BMs hehe.
      I should go back a re-read some of Spider's stuff.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  83. It's the environmentalists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're not creating enough CO2!!!

  84. Re:Wait...[OT] by TheDanish · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's ITT. "I'm self-employed in a computer detailing service." I've looked through some web pages and none of them offer any clues. I figured /. has the most educated people in computer professions, and so could tell me what this is. Afaict, everyone's just as clueless. "Shine your computer, sir?" I forget who said that, but I think I'll update my sig with that.

    --
    Danish != nationality
  85. WOW by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 2
    Let's do the math. If the ice falls from 6 mi, and assuming no friction and melting (the perfect physics world), then:

    6 mi * 1600 m/mi = 9600 m
    Kinetic Energy = Potential Energy, so 0.5*m*v^2 = m*g*h, and the m's cancel, and then we solve for v:
    v=sqrt(2*g*h)
    h=9600m, g=approx. 9.5 m/s^2 at that height.

    Therefore, the ice will hit the ground at about 430 m/s, almost the speed of sound!

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
    1. Re:WOW by chenzhen · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, with friction, a k*v drag term will slow it to a measly 180mph or so. Which will still kill you dead.

      That's a lovely thing about physics. You can do the calculations with a spherical cow and you'll still get the same result.

      P

    2. Re:WOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it is actually vk for fast moving objects.
      And the speed of sound is more like 333m/s.

      "Do not underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups"

  86. ROTFL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Gosh, now I understand it! If some guy happens to be called Jesus, then of course he could be confused with Jesus Christ of Nazareth!

    Fuck, that's funny! I think I bust my gut laughing at that! "Jesus" could mean either one!! I'm sure that researcher Jesus guy has never heard a Jesus joke in his life. I hope he read that original joke; I think I'll email it to him just in case!

    PS: have you heard of something called "dry wit"? As in, "perhaps that guy doing that straight-laced Jesus correction was actually just mocking the original poster's flat-as-piss-on-a-plate joke?"

  87. it all started by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It all started with the fucking moon landings !!!
    It's over... its all over !!!!

  88. Final Fantasy's been doing this for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey scientists,

    The cause is Guardian forces - idiots!

  89. Re:Wait... [OT] by ItsBacon · · Score: 1
    Too many people seem to wonder what that weird water falling from the sky is and lose what little driving ability they might've had.

    It's just as bad in Florida. You'd think with the amount it rains here people would know how to drive with water falling from the sky...

  90. OT: It's started by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2

    By "It's started" do you mean the "end times" as you intrepret in the bible, or some new wave of fundamentalist teaching?

    Would it interest you as much if the passage you found was from old greek myth, or Native American pagan stories?

    1. Re:OT: It's started by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the laugh.
      --rjt

    2. Re:OT: It's started by Daniel · · Score: 2

      Would it interest you as much if the passage you found was from old greek myth, or Native American pagan stories?

      Speaking of which -- forget Revelations; between this and the ice age story the other day, I'm looking out for the Fimbulwinter and the giants..

      Daniel

      --
      Hurry up and jump on the individualist bandwagon!
  91. Chicken Little by Webmoth · · Score: 2

    The sky is falling! The sky is falling!

    The above opinion has been created without basis or research into the referenced articles.

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  92. Bad Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Either way, I'd prefer to not have one of these things smack into my house.

    I'm sure your parents would be disappointed too, but you should be safe in the basement.

  93. ice age coming, ice age coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we're not scaremongering
    this is really happening

  94. liberal bias! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ice blocks falling from the sky are a liberal plot! anyone who believes this is a commie mutant liberal traitor

  95. Re:Wait... [OT] by leeward · · Score: 2

    Having lived in both LA and Florida, the drivers in LA in the rain are a lot worse. I knew this place had a different view of rain when during the first year after arriving here (from southern Louisiana in '88) after a small rain, there was a front page headline on the LA Times (the biggest LA paper) the next day that read "Rain in the Southland".

    Okay....

  96. YHBT by moogla · · Score: 1

    YHL HAND

    (see his post history)

    --
    Black holes are where the Matrix raised SIGFPE
    1. Re:YHBT by Thud457 · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but he couches his specious argument in the same terms as the (French Academy of Sciences (?)) dismissed reports of meteorites in the 18th century. That is: "rocks obviously can't fall from the sky, because there are no rocks up there".

      Charles Fort made great sport of this attitude in acadamia in "Lo!" (or was it "New Lands"?).

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    2. Re:YHBT by flyneye · · Score: 1

      get a clue.its humor based on the ineptitude of years of neer-do-well environmentalist arguments that defy basic sensibility.
      "its like if you put kittens in the oven,that doesnt make 'em biscuits" - harry anderson

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  97. Dubious Science by Webmoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Martinez-Frias said only around a fifth of the ice meteors are ever found."

    Ermm... how do they count what they haven't seen?

    "Martinez-Frias suggests that because global warming involves one level of the atmosphere getting colder while another gets hotter, some ice clouds now remain longer."

    Logic dictates that if global warming causes one level to get colder while another gets warmer, that global cooling would cause one level to get warmer while another gets colder. Am I repeating myself? And besides, this is a suggestion, not a formulated hypothesis based on evidence. At least not yet.

    Scientific fact is that water vapor and carbon dioxide are the most abundant greenhouse gas. As our combustible-fuel appliances become more efficient, there are less hydrocarbon emissions and more H20 and C02 emitted; the net effect on greenhouse gases is the same. Besides, it has been argued that a single volcanic eruption has a far greater effect (neg or pos, you decide) on the atmosphere than the entire history of mankind burning stuff.

    One more thing: there's no such thing az a ZEV (Zero-Emission-Vehicle). Electric is displaced emissions -- unless your power is hydro (and "we all know how bad that is for the fishies"). The manufacture of solar cells and batteries/fuel cells require the use -- and disposal -- of tons of toxic chemicals. Nuke also involves toxic waste (nevermind it's the cleanest and safest form of electricity, it's gotten a bad rap by the actions of irresponsible people).

    To say that man (woman too!!) is causing global warming is a crock. If we all went back to eating wooly mammoth cooked over teradactyl dung, I don't think we'd notice any difference in the rate of global climate change.

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
    1. Re:Dubious Science by LadyMedb · · Score: 1

      Hey - kiss General Motors for me, huh?

    2. Re:Dubious Science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, it has been argued that a single volcanic eruption has a far greater effect (neg or pos, you decide) on the atmosphere than the entire history of mankind burning stuff.

      Well, I've heard this quoted a lot but I've never seen a reference to back it up.

      But anyway, the crap we've put into our atmosphere might, as you suggest, have no major effect - when taken on its own. But surely you'd agree that dirtying the atmosphere is not the only thing we are doing. It might well be, for example, that in the past the earth could cope with events like major volcanic eruptions because systems like the rainforests helped to clean the air of CO2. But within 50-100 years there will be virtually no more rainforests. What if (and you have to agree that it is a possibility) the destruction of the rainforests combined with the pollution of the atmosphere is a dangerous combination?

      The truth is, we don't know what is going on. Nobody knows, not you, and not me. Research in general is good because that is one of the ways in which we learn.

      I think its a bit naive though to still be thinking that mankind's activities can only have a negligible impact on the environment. Of course our activities have an impact. The questions that need to be answered are (a) might that impact be destructive enough to destroy ourselves, and (b) regardless of the answer to (a), we need to know how we can modify our behaviour in such a way as to create a system on earth that will sustain our existence for thousands of years to come, not just hundreds.

      These questions need to be answered anyway, regardless of whether or not global warming exists. Why? Because even if our impact right now is negligible, it won't always be. In just 100 years time (about 4 generations) there will be nearly 25 billion people on earth, and by then technology will really have given us the ability to wipe ourselves out, or cause major climate change etc. So the sooner we can answer these questions the better. Its not about stopping progress or getting rid of technology etc, obviously we cannot do that. Its about learning to use our technologies intelligently so that the world of 100 years from now is still worth living in. And 200 years from now, and 300, and 400 etc. The only way forward is with technology, and the only hope for sustainable development on earth is technology. We can never go back to the "unspoiled paradise" that Earth was 100,000 years ago, and "greenies" must realise this. We must cut our losses and try focus on "what do we want the world to be like 1000 years from now".

  98. Barbra Streisand sings! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Onnnnn aaaaaa Cleeeeear Daaaaay, Riiise and look around yoooou! And yoooou'll seee... ::bonk::

  99. Off topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when did the side menu in MSNBC work in Mozilla? I thought it only worked on IE...

  100. at this pace by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    What's next, penguins raining down on Redmond?

  101. Scareing open the money bags by ElectricRook · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Is chicken little going to become a /. category, or just a daily annoyance?

    Since we are dusting off the 1970's shoes styles, we might as well pull out the good old fashioned scare mongering too.

    For those who have not seen a good example of history repeating itself, sit back and watch the 70's replay themselves. But I must warn you, the stories have to get much more spectacular before the trend comes to a close.

    The whole scene can be put into perspective if you view it from a great distance. This should be fodder for some great flame wars on motives.

    --
    - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
  102. scenario 4 by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Hey Bud, we forgot the ice for this kegger party.

    No problem, Joe, I'll be right b....

    SPLAT!

    Damn your good, Bud! Bud? Were'd ya go?

  103. ice happens (was: Could this be airplane shit ?) by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    But if one hits your property, you should immediately note the time and location, put the biggest chunk in a baggie, and stick it in your freezer for proof.

    My wife would absolutely kill me if I put frozen passenger turd in our freezer, regardless of container. Big no no. Whoever wrote that must be single.

  104. End of World Doesn't Meet Expectations by iabervon · · Score: 2

    The weather is always like that; they predict 50-60, and you only get 22. And the people who have to shovel it still swear about it.

  105. Re:MSNBC uses Cookie Exploits so stop linking to t by Xenographic · · Score: 1

    Bleh, I just delete their cookies.

    Or you can have fun & enter crap into them, instead.

    I wonder what they'd think if the web server met someone with the MS GUID "TuX 0wnz j00@!#!@"? :]

  106. Airplane Ice? by byteCoder · · Score: 1
    Are we sure that the ice isn't from landing gear or from an airplane lavatory?
    Excrement from aircraft hits car (January 13, 2000) MADRID, Thurs. - A Spanish man narrowly escaped injury when a four-kg ball of ice thought to be frozen human excrement ejected from a passing aircraft fell on his car near the southern city of Seville, authorities said. The man was about to enter the vehicle when a friend stopped him for a chat. The ball of ice, measuring 20 centimetres then plummeted out of a cloudless sky and crushed the car's bonnet. - Reuters (http://reuters.com)
    1. Re:Airplane Ice? by Segador · · Score: 1

      That was the incident that started it all. Later they discovered that wasn't from an airplane. In a month 5-10 ice blocks like this fall from the sky. Some of them were pure hoax (you know, in Spain we have a wicked sense of humour), but the rest were very dificult to explain.
      It was a strange thing that occuped Spanish TVs for 2 weeks, every day discovering other strange ice block somewhere.
      I suppose that article is the result of later investigations.

      --
      ==
      That's the time harvesters,that's the time to be care
      get back all this people, so ostentatious and arrogan
  107. Not the best line from the article by SkulkCU · · Score: 2


    "I'm not worried that a block of ice might fall on your head," said Martinez-Frias, "but that one might fall on mine."

    ok, he didn't say the last part, but I'm sure that's what he was thinking.

    --
    .sig last updated Jan. 14, 2000
  108. In Mexico too? by asalazar · · Score: 1

    All right!
    One more excuse for showing late to work!

    "I'm sorry boss, but the ice balls shower was specially heavy this morning"

    --
    Slashdot: Where the sig outsmarts the comment
  109. Another one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Someday, something will happen that IS NOT a "harbringer of massive climactic change."

    ..."massive catastrophic climate chage", either freezing or burning, has been due for more than 20 years now. The burning kuwati oil wells after the first Gulf War were supposed to cause Nuclear Winter. Cow flatulence was supposed to bring back the Jurrasic.

    Here you could have legitimately said, "The SKY is FALLING!". But no. Had to trot out the same old crap...

  110. TOP SECRET! by Alsee · · Score: 2

    The ice is really falling off of a new US military stealth aircraft that uses UFO technology! Unknown Freezing Objects.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  111. Hi there, bigot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, you're a prejudiced bigot. Congratulations. You know it all, he knows nothing. ...and to think assholes like you claim to keep an open mind...

    1. Re:Hi there, bigot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you're a prejudiced bigot. Congratulations. You know it all, he knows nothing. ...and to think assholes like you claim to keep an open mind...

      And you are just full of useful information and evidence. Just really full of it. We're talking brimming here.

  112. experiment by dbay · · Score: 1

    Anyone know the latitude longitude coordinates for the RIAA? I would like to (cough) conduct an experiment with ice forming clouds :)

  113. Re:So (taco bell) by kyletinsley · · Score: 1
    > > Anybody contacted Taco Bell yet?

    >I don't get it

    When it was announced that Mir was going to crash into the Pacific Ocean during a certain month period, Taco Bell as a publicity stunt put up a bunch of floating markers all over the Pacific and said that if Mir landed on one of them, they would give everyone in America a free taco. I guess "teslatug" still wants his free taco...

  114. Then you would get hit by an Icy BM. by ashitaka · · Score: 2

    Thanks Spider.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  115. Come on, everyone knows it drops from jetliners... by 109+97+116+116 · · Score: 1

    Where do you think your spent Mountain Dew goes on those long flights?

  116. chicken little warned us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the sky is falling!

  117. Well here's a stupid theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if a small ice meteor flew through the atmosphere on a humid but clear day (water doesn't have anything to condense on), and just picked up lots of pieces of water on the way, which all instantly froze seeing how the ice meteor was phenominally cold from just being in space. Ice built up around it, making it bigger.

    Much more likely, it was just that size to begin with when it fell out of space.

    Or wait a second: Doesn't the shuttle burn hydrogen and oxygen? Doesn't that make water? Wouldn't water vapor in space freeze?
    And wouldn't it all come back together for no real reason after being shot apart at a phenominal speed out of a rocket?

  118. The real meal deal by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    Ok, I've read that the terminal velocity of a man falling is somewhere around 120mph. Since I never see the weight of these falling people mentioned, lets say he weighs around... 180 lbs sound good? Maybe 200 for kicks and grins. So lets divide 120 by 200 ... That's approximately .6 mph per pound. It's looking like (if my busted math is correct) that it'd take a sustained updraft of at least 13.2 mph to keep the thing aloft (keeping in mind it doesn't start out at 22 lbs), probably more given the density of a 22 lb block of ice. I'll cheat and say 20-25mph to keep it aloft. if I were just looking at the numbers I'd say it could work, but then you have to figure in crap like stability of the airmass, how long a 20 mph updraft can be sustained while the thing froze, ambient temperature, etc, etc... It seems pretty damn unlikely conditions would stay stable long enough for it to form. But then, I'm far from a meteorologist... I could see the ice parachute thing, but the conditions required to form such a delicate structure... Yeesh...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:The real meal deal by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Reality check: A bowling ball weighs 16 lbs, and its terminal velocity is a heck of a lot more than 20 mph. You've made the mistake of assuming that it's proportional to weight. Remember Galileo's famous experiment?

      An object is at terminal velocity when the aerodynamic forces acting upwards exactly cancel the gravitational force acting downwards. So, while weight does matter (compare beach ball and equally sized ice ball) It's not the only factor (compare goosefeather and b-b shot of equal weight).

      That's why I speculated about the shape of the objects as they form. The density of the ice is going to be within a fairly confined range, so we have to consider some kind of weird shape thing. I don't think he can rule out thunderstorms either. If a thunderstorm produces a large ice glob with an airfoil shape, it could get carried a considerable distance by the jet stream before reaching low altitude and losing its "wings". I'd love to get my hands on the kind of computer that could simulate something like that.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  119. not a new phonomenon... by int_ii · · Score: 1

    What have ice-blocks to do with climate change? nothing, because this is not a new phenomenon. ice blocks keep falling down for years... even way back.

  120. What are the odds??? by sssmashy · · Score: 1

    The surface area of the earth is 5*10^14 square meters. Assume that 1 square meter is occupied by each of the 6 billion humans on the planet.

    This means that every time a massive chunk of ice hurtles randomly from the sky, the chance that it will actually hit someone is about 0.000001, even if the unlucky bastard happens to live in Spain.

    Further assume that a huge chunk of ice falling from clear skies, for no apparent reason, is a pretty rare phenomenon. So rare, in fact, that it has never before been documented.

    Imagine witnessing, on a sunny day in the park, an oblivious bystander being splattered by a boulder of ice that plummeted five miles down from nowhere. You wouldn't dismiss it as a "random event". Hardened atheists would be fumbling for their rosary beads.

    1. Re:What are the odds??? by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2


      If you read the article, you would note the following:

      Three others were found later, bringing the world total over the last decade to more than 50. But Martinez-Frias said only around a fifth of the ice meteors are ever found.

      That would make, by his estimation, 250 such events over the last decade. So, in fact, this event is not "So rare, in fact, that it has never before been documented."

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    2. Re:What are the odds??? by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 2

      I would have thought it fell out of a plane but not that God found a new amsuing way to smite people.

      Maybe if a giant glowing hand popped out of the clouds and threw it at some unfortionate soul then with a booming voice shouts "That'll learn ye!" I might reach for the rosary beads. Then again, with a god like that, the differences between heaven and hell probably arn't that great.

    3. Re:What are the odds??? by gaj · · Score: 2
      Um, no, they wouldn't. Neither would most of the rest of we non-believers.

      It would suck, of course, but at no time would I think "God struck her down" or anything like that.

      Further, your assumptions are bogus.

      1. People are not spread evenly accross the surface of the planet. They are concentrated in urban areas; those living out futher are spread out widely.
      2. Huge chunks of ice falling from the sky are pretty rare. But a) we have no idea how rare, because the evidence tends to disappear, and b) according to the article (you did read the article, right?), 50 were found in the last decade, and that is an estimated 1/5 of the total in that time. I question how the estimate was reached, but it is probably conservative.
      3. Atheists don't generally carry rosary beads. We're kinda funny that way, not believing in God and all. I think I may have a rosary somewhere back at my mom's place, as I was raised Catholic sorta half heartedly as a child. I don't remember for sure if I ever got a rosary, though, as that was close to thirty years ago, and the whole Christian thing didn't take, anyway. Regardless, they're just not common fasion accessories amongst non-believers, be they atheist, agnostic or just apathetic.
    4. Re:What are the odds??? by f97tosc · · Score: 1

      People are not spread evenly accross the surface of the planet. They are concentrated in urban areas; those living out futher are spread out widely.

      But this does not affect the probability of one person being hit - unless falling ice chunks are more (or less) common in urban areas.

      Tor

    5. Re:What are the odds??? by gaj · · Score: 2

      Well, though I have no idea whether they would be more or less common over urban areas, it certainly would make sense that their formation might well be affected by the heat island effect. In addition, the particulates from industry may well have an affect as well. Please note: IANACNAMNDIPEOT.

    6. Re:What are the odds??? by f97tosc · · Score: 1

      So say that this is approximately right. Furthermore let's assume that as other have pointed out this happens 250 times a decade.

      Then the probability of one person being hit in this period is around 0.00025.

      So what if it happens? Does it indicate divine intervension? I would say no, but the reason is somewhat subtle. The set of all conceivable freak accidents is very large. I could list quite a few ways to die which are extremely unlikely. If any one of them were to happen, we would immidiately see it in the news, and perhaps people would calculate the odds. It is easy to forget that one would have reacted exactly the same way for a large number of other weird accidents. The probability that one of them happen might not be small at all.

      Tor

    7. Re:What are the odds??? by tomhudson · · Score: 2
      As an athiest, I agree ... unless it struck my ex ... then I might consider it an "act of God".

      Actually, I would consider it more along the lines that sometimes the universe gets it right, along the lines of the million monkeys at a million keyboards...

    8. Re:What are the odds??? by gaj · · Score: 2
      I though /. disproved that whole "million monkeys at a million keyboards" thing?

    9. Re:What are the odds??? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Nah! There's not a million of us monkeys typing at a million keyboards for a million years ... not yet, anyway.

  121. That's 10kgs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (For everyone outside of the US).

  122. 22 pounds? You mean 10 kilograms. by asciimonster · · Score: 1

    Next time, could you please remember that there are still people out there using the metric system!

    But 10 kg is a really large block of ice. When melted it would give a litle bit less then 10 liters (2 gallons) of water. If it would fall into your house you would not only have a hole in the roof, but also a flood!

    You think we could get a rocket up there, grab them and send them to the sahara?

    1. Re:22 pounds? You mean 10 kilograms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Next time, could you please remember that there are still people out there using the metric system!

      You wanted to say: Most people out there are not using ancient medievel units based on body parts, plant semen and the like anymore.

    2. Re:22 pounds? You mean 10 kilograms. by asciimonster · · Score: 2, Funny

      > You wanted to say: Most people out there are not using ancient medievel units based on body parts, plant semen and the like anymore

      True, but it's always better to put these things delicately. We wouldn't want the Americans to believe there is something (or someone living) outside their vast continent? ;-P

    3. Re:22 pounds? You mean 10 kilograms. by geekoid · · Score: 2

      We know your there, thats why we'e positioned to dominate you, bitch.

      We know of another measurement called 'grains'. What to see?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  123. The art of incontextual quoting by richie2000 · · Score: 2
    "I'm not worried that a block of ice might fall on your head"

    Well Buster, I'm not so worried about YOUR head either!

    "It's very easy to tell real and false ice blocks apart."

    False ice? I have heard of people forging money, IDs, painting and even dog poop (for their percieved entertainment value, not their nutritional value) but this has got to take the fake cake. Fake ice? Does he mean one of those clear plastic ice cubes with a fly inside you dropped into the lemonade glasses of your friends when you were a kid?

    "Glad you came professor, we need to know if it's real ice or just an imposter."
    "This *holds it up to the light* is a block of fake ice."
    "Ohh, but Professor, how can you tell?
    "It has a fake fly in it!"

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  124. Would've been good if... by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

    ...that block of blue ice had landed in the toilet. Now that would have been some aim.

    I remember reading a while ago that, if the toilet drain point leaks, you can get toilet waste building up behind the hatch. This then freezes, expands, and pushes the hatch off. When the aircraft descends into warmer air, and the ice starts to melt, there's no hatch to keep it in place and gravity kicks in.

    Now, *really* rotten luck is to stow away in the undercarriage, fall out at the other end when the wheels come down, land in a haystack... and have a lump of blue ice land on top of you.

  125. ICBC? by jolshefsky · · Score: 1

    Perhaps someone has an Intercontinental Ballistic Catapult. I was reading about them in the 1123 issue of Jane's.

    --
    --- Jason Olshefsky

    Karma: Poser (mostly affected by adding this line long after everyone else did)

  126. Hole lotta warming going on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another tired reference to Global Warming. Check out this article at from the AP stating that the Ozone hole is actually "Shrinking". What are they going to do if they can't point to the ozone hole as the cause of all the worlds problems? http://www.canoe.ca/EdmontonNews/es.es-10-01-0092. html

  127. Mess by MoogMan · · Score: 1

    I seem to recall aircraft dropping their sweage as big frozen blocks. Make sure you dont get them mixed up, because otherwise its gonna get real messy hehe...

  128. why 22? - maybe should be 20 by danny · · Score: 2
    I assume the "22 pounds" was translated from an original "10 kilograms". But "10" there is a kind of generic number - maybe meaning "between 5 and 50" in this context - so I think "20 pounds" would actually have been a better translation.

    Danny.

    --
    I have written over 900 book reviews
  129. use the simplest explaination by taxman_10m · · Score: 2

    UFOs.

  130. Ming the Merciless by bjb · · Score: 1
    Hmm.. Flash Gordon (the 1980 movie) intro..

    Ming the Merciless sending fire and brimstone on the earth.. sitting back and watching it all.. Klytus says, laughingly, "Most effective, your majesty! Shall we destroy this.. Earth?"

    Ming the Merciless (played by Max Von Sydow) comments "Later.. I like to play with things a while".

    I guess someone out there has us in the palm of his/her/its hand?

    Ok, too much sci-fi for me this morning. back to work..

    --
    Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
  131. I shave with Occam's Razor by PD · · Score: 2

    I think that it is a simpler explanation and thus MORE likely that this is just a bunch of kids who are testing a trebuchet.

  132. Wha da ya mean? by Martin+S. · · Score: 2

    Don't they get sick of using the same template?

    Wha da ya mean? it beats thinking about it!

  133. As long as my plane doesn't hit one! by Ocelot+Wreak · · Score: 2
    As long as the plane I'm flying in with 200 other people doesn't hit an ice block at 500 miles per hour two miles up, then I'm not too worried.

    Your odds of winning the lottery are probably about the same as being hit on the ground by one of these babies...

    --
    "I figure you're here 'cause you need some whacko who's willing to stick his finger in the fan. So who are we helping?
  134. The answer is clear: Iberian terrorists by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 2

    Didn't anyone see the part that said that the ice had Iberian isotopes in it? everyone knows that isotopes are part of nucular bombs. it's obvious that this stuff is coming from iberian terrorists and that they already have the ability to make atomic weapons of mass destruction, because there wouldn't be isotopes in their rain if they didn't. this must be some kind of small test of a deadly terrorist ice weapon. i'm no geology expert, so i don't know exactly where iberia is, but it must be in the middle east near indonesia, because they are terrorists. we shouldn't be worried about iraq when we don't have any evidence of there nucular weapons when we already know the iberians have isotopes. we should invade them right now and kill them all unless they accept jesus christ as their lord and savior, or else someone is going to get killed by the dirty ice chunks they are dropping everywhere. we can worry about saddam later, if we find out he has isotopes too.

  135. Tales of Lemuria by Everach · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it is time to refresh our memories of Lemuria, the Pacific OCean's version of Atlantis. Their legends tell of a sheet of ice hanging in the sky... http://www.lemuria.net/thefirmament.html

  136. Cosmic invasion by kinnell · · Score: 1

    Climate change? Open your eyes! Ming the Merciless is coming to invade the Earth. Only Armadillo Aerospace can save us from utter destruction...

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
  137. You can't please an environmentalist!!! by Toone_Town · · Score: 1

    According to this article, "Components of the atmosphere, like ozone and water, are changing in different levels of the atmosphere." According to Martinez-Frias, these changes are BAD

    However, did you know that the change taking place is not what you thought??? The ozone hole is actually getting SMALLER!!!

    So we hear for 10-20 years that we are ruining the environment, damaging the ozone layer, and that this damage is irreparable (OK, so it takes a long time...but I don't want to wait 50 years). However, come to find out that it is reparable. I'm going back to using AquaNet!

    But that's not enough for those environmentalists out there...they need to have something to whine about. Since they can't complain that the ozone is getting bigger, they'll say that "changes" (they won't specify for the better or for the worse) are causing the "sky to fall!"

    The only thing that this teaches me is to never trust an evironmentalist. Not only was the "irreparable" ozone hole, in fact, reparable, it is BAD to fix it...it causes ice to fall out of the sky.

    Now, I don't know much about weather or the environment, and I don't doubt that changes in the environment are causing some weird things to happen, but I do know that some really freaky stuff has happened in the past, and will probably continue to happen in the future.

    Just stop complaining about it!!! :)

    1. Re:You can't please an environmentalist!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...Now, I don't know much about weather or the environment...

      Perish the thought. Troll.

  138. The Rain in Span Falls Mainly... by sgtpudding · · Score: 1

    in large 22lb ice chunks into your living room. my fair lady never saw it coming...

  139. This is not strictly a tale by Ektanoor · · Score: 2

    A few years ago a large block of ice fell not far away from where I'm living. It made some headlines and it was even shown on TV. Several analysis were made to study the origin of this thing. Well the main startling thing was that this big boulder had an unusual high level of titanium, so most speculated that this came from some rocket booster. Meanwhile many noted that this could be barely the fact as our region is not in the direct lift-off trajectory of any base. There was never a final conclusion, so this piece of ice is a small mistery of the skies.

    As far as I have seen on TV the boulder looks is a ice with a blue tone, with a volume nearly to 3 cubic meters. However, some earlier news claimed that the original boulder was no less than 500 cubic meters.

  140. It's "climatic" change, not "climactic", dammit. by anaplasmosis · · Score: 1

    Climactic is to do with orgasms.

  141. Interesting Counting by sirvalence · · Score: 1

    I'm especially fascinated by this bit:

    "Three others were found later, bringing the world total over the last decade to more than 50. But Martinez- Frias said only around a fifth of the ice meteors are ever found."

    How exactly does he count the 200 or so ice meteors that no one found?

  142. ZEVs (OT) by "Zow" · · Score: 2

    Okay, it's a little off-topic, but I have to take issue with this statement:

    One more thing: there's no such thing az a ZEV (Zero-Emission-Vehicle). Electric is displaced emissions -- unless your power is hydro (and "we all know how bad that is for the fishies"). The manufacture of solar cells and batteries/fuel cells require the use -- and disposal -- of tons of toxic chemicals. Nuke also involves toxic waste (nevermind it's the cleanest and safest form of electricity, it's gotten a bad rap by the actions of irresponsible people).

    Solar can be clean when converted to electricity by means of a solar array used to heat water for a steam turbine (or other similar configuration). Alternatively, geo-thermal energy is, AFAIK clean, although I would grant you that there are potential negative side-effects there that we don't fully understand (similar to the effect of hydroelectric generation on fish). In any case, there is such a thing as clean electricity, it's just not that efficient or readily available in most populated areas.

    -"Zow"

  143. Crap! I won yesterday! by Echo5ive · · Score: 1

    That's it, I'm not leaving the apartment for a while.

    OK, I only won 10 bucks, so I suppose the ice blocks won't be much larger than tennis balls. Yay.

    --
    Leveling up builds character.
  144. OT:Where is Charles Fort when you really need him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a web site at http://www.forteantimes.com . They publish a magazine with all kinds of goodies.

  145. Re:happened before? by AkkarAnadyr · · Score: 1
    Back in the early 70s, I had a pop book of mysteries and weird happenings called 'Strangely Enough!' which mentioned large milky-white ice chunks falling from clear skies over Kansas. The book was full of ghost stories, UFO booga-booga and such, so I don't have anything like reputable references for it.


    It did, however, prime me for the work of one Charles Fort, to which I direct your attention. If it's anywhere, the biggest record of such anomalies is probably there - http://www.forteantimes.com

    --

    I bought this house and you know I'm boss
    Ain't no h'aint gonna run me off

  146. I find you ideas intruiging, sir... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how may I subscribe to your newsletter?

    Truly a worthy idea! Somebody should toss a project up on sourceforge to do just that! (and figure out how to hack cookies so I can get my camel pr0n for free!)

    1. Re:I find you ideas intruiging, sir... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody should toss a project up on sourceforge to do just that! (and figure out how to hack cookies so I can get my camel pr0n for free!)
      ---->

      In NS, just open up cookies.txt & type away. It's quite an unimpressive hack, but knowing MS, it just might make their server barf (highly doubtful, but they rarely account for things they don't expect; hence their poor security rep).

  147. Frozen condensation from alien space toilets by mnemotronic · · Score: 1
    This is a well known phenomenon -- The pesky aliens don't have decent plumbing, so "fluid" (you really don't want to ask) leaks from the on-board toilets, then collects and freezes on the outside of the space ship, forming large clumps. These occasionally break loose and fall to earth where they can damage cars and houses, stun the occasional whale, or run for Congress.

    Several have shown up on Florida ballots, but the frozen alien turd electorate hasn't coalesced as well as the candidates. The Democratic party has filed a protest in behalf of the lumps, claiming fraud and abuse.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  148. Don't be an idiot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody knows what a tree looks like!

    sheesh!

  149. Complete misnomer? by gsfprez · · Score: 2

    two straight days of articles bemoaning the fact that "global warming" is causing an ice age in the next 10 years and ice blocks to rain in Spain today.

    Since wtf did WARMING cause all sorts of problems with ice? Maybe it would be better called "global warming leading into a sudden ice age?"

    --
    guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
  150. Just the preliminary stage... by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

    ...of the coming invasion of the penguins.....

    --

    --

    As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  151. Check w/your attorney by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 2
    Tell your insurance agent(s) you're checking it out with your attorney. File complaint with your state (province) FTC and insurance regulatory agency. A tree falling on your truck should be covered, if you have full coverage insurance. Weather isn't an Act of God.

    BTW, I'm an atheist, so Act of God isn't fitting for me either. Perhaps for you it could be considered karmic consequences. However, as another poster noted "shit happens."

  152. Mod parent up as informative... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    because I just realized... Neither do I!

  153. Knowing what a tree looks like... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    He was the first eviromentalist tree-hugger. after hugging all those trees, when he had to guess what they might look like, and saw people, his brain said to him- "Hey, that about the shape trees felt like."

  154. fake ice would be by geekoid · · Score: 2

    cubic zirconia

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  155. Re:MSNBC uses Cookie Exploits so stop linking to t by geekoid · · Score: 2

    turn your cookie directory to read only.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  156. Re:ice happens (was: Could this be airplane shit ? by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    The check will buy her a new fridge, contents, and a kitchen addition to put it in. rj

  157. Irreparable blow to paranormal research. by lethargo · · Score: 1

    We had problems with crop circles until the yeti that was making them got hit on the head with a 22 pound block of ice from outer space. ...
    The truth is out there.

  158. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    You'd better beat it. You can leave in a taxi. If you can't get a taxi, you
    can leave in a huff. If that's too soon, you can leave in a minute and a huff.
    -- Groucho Marx

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...