Incidentally, this yacht was built for Jim Clark, the founder of Silicon Graphics and Netscape, and featured the first carbon fiber mast and computerised sail system. I'm not a sailing geek, but I want to be!
Based on your comments, you are not even considering other points of view. Sad. I think it's better to get you to read it up for yourself and decide yourself, rather than have us argue, and still get nowhere. If you don't even want to find out for yourself, well then, that's too bad.
I take it you haven't read the book. It gave specific examples where America installed tyrants who were "business friendly" to American companies. Also overthrown leaders who were popular but were not buying in to American corporate interests. Yes, what I'm saying is, the leaders who seem so strong against tyrants now may actually have imposed this tyranny on others and maybe even brought some grief on the people they are supposed to protect.
To put this very plainly, what I am saying is: educate yourself, check out other points of view. Verify facts. Start by checking out developing countries who did open themselves to American interests and see what happened to them. Then make up your own mind. It may not be as black and white as you believe.
For me, I live in a developing country, and watched as my country's economy and that of neighbouring countries collapse 9 years ago. Having had some economic training, a lot of things didn't make sense to me. This book however, tied everything together for me. So yes, I'm convinced, but please check out these facts for yourself.
Basically the author, John Perkins, makes the case that: in it's own interest, America has actively promoted corruption, tyrannical governments and human rights abuses in developing countries around the world. The author says he should know, he was one of those doing it.
While I have spent a little time in USA, and have met many wonderful Americans, the actions of those in power in the US make it a target for many in other countries. If you are really interested in "make sure we dont loose what we have gained through so much hardship. It is your duty to intervene, and take it upon yourself to fight the corrupt, the tyrants and the fanatics from taking over"., then start by educating yourself and others around you.
This is just 10 minutes of searching in one news site in one muslim country. Leaders are taking a visible stand, but you got to know where to look. Also, never assume a particular definition of civilization as the best or only solution. Look closely, read between the lines.
Instead of re-inventing the wheel, get involved in open-sourced solutions. You can find a good list here.
From this list, I have personally only seen VistA which has been used by the Veteran's Affairs Department for a very long time. Certainly long enough to mature. It's scalable and will work with groups of hospitals. It's designed by Doctor's to fit the way they work and it's easy to use (so Doctor's have told me). It's open source, and there's a community web site.
There are cons though: It uses a little-known programming language called M, and although otherwise complete, does not have a module for paediatrics (it's very hard to find child veterans!). The people I have met have been extremely helpful, however, and will help you with any customization or new capabilities.
With any loan there is a significant possibility of default. Profit is not guaranteed, and the interest provides economic motivation for people with surplus cash (the "rich") to loan money to people who need it.
Most financial institutions lend only to those with minimal risk of default (those with a lot of capital). To those with a higher risk of default, they will lend only with collateral. Therefore, lending becomes a no-risk business. So the rich lend to the rich, but the poor who do not have assets have much less opportunity.
Those who can't borrow from licensed banks and such will probably have to go to the loan-sharks, who have their own methods for minimizing loan defaults.
Short answer: completely different technologies, to cater for different needs.
The typical ethernet LAN is a collision domain. When one host transmits, the packets go to every host on the network. This is because of the limited number of hosts on the network, it's a lot faster for one host to just transmit without waiting to find a route like on the Internet. However, there is a risk that 2 or more hosts may transmit at once, and therefore garble the transmissions. The protocol includes measures to detect these collisions. The measure here is to have a minimum size packet, big enough so that it will only finish transmitting after the beginning of the message has arrived at the furthest host.
For the Internet, there are huge numbers of hosts, covering a very wide area. If one were to transmit to all other hosts like on a LAN, imagine one of the other hosts having to wait in a queue of millions for a break in traffic before being able to transmit. Not to mention having a packet size that would arrive at the furthest possible host before you finish transmitting: I'm too lazy to calculate how big it needs to be, but it's gotta be huge. The Internet may seem slower and more complex than a LAN, but at least it's usable.
I'm really surprised no one has replied to this yet.
For those curious, our head engineer tells me that there is a cubic relation between engine RPM's and stress. Stress causes wear, and that's not a linear only relationship either.
When stress exceeds a certain value, BANG + expensive crunching noises happen.
Seems to be a little oversimplified. What causes a turbo'd engine to go BANG is not stress/wear, it's detonation.
Also remember that these engines were designed for performance from word one.
Most manufacturers tune stock engines for driveability, not performance. While they do a good job and spend a lot more time on the parameters than an aftermarket tuner to get the best compromise, power and performance are not the goals. High performance cars are difficult to drive on normal streets, especially high horsepower small engines.
The engines in today's cars are built to handle a specific amount of power, and when the power is increased the wear on components is exponentially increased.
Depends on the engine, I guess. I know for a fact that certain engines are built to handle a LOT more power than stock. Mazda's BP-D, for example, has been used in 400-500HP applications (up from 210HP stock) without any change in internals. This is an engine out of production since 1994/95, so no exotic parts are available for it, btw. Nissan's SR-20DET also has a good reputation with engine builders, though I can't quote you any figures on that one. And I'm not heavily into the modding scene, so there must be some others. These are just some I've come to know.
As to the "Premium Fuel" thing, I'm doubtful, since all engines i've ever worked with use knock sensors, and are always running at the ragged edge of detonation anyway.
Well, the higher the octane, the more the ECU can advance the ignition timing (more output) before engine detonation occurs, so you do get more power.
Like our head engineers always says: It takes a lot of work to outsmart factory engineers. And several million dollars.
Nobody's trying to outsmart them, just that some customers have different priorities. Like overclockers.
Actually the author said Apple gave him a new unit, which then blew up again. So dropping a Mac drive into another Mac is still not a good solution.
In a PC, if you know which component is giving you trouble, get a replacement from another vendor which has a better record of reliability. You don't get this choice from Apple.
But why would a peon willfully include code he knows is proprietary into Linux? He would only do so if he was trying to harm SCO, or Linux. Difficult to prove.
Even if it was proven to be done without the knowledge of the management, the fairest remedy to SCO would be for the Linux developers to replace the code.
But why design something so complex in the first place? Why not design a flexible electrical system with clear labels to where aftermarket installers can plug in their equipment? It's just like having closed API's. So yes, I do agree with the sentiment: BMW is a good fit with Microsoft.
Someone I know had exactly this sort of trouble with a Mercedes (custom wiring harness). The wiring actually split it's insulation in hot weather. To replace the wiring, he had to read the chassis number and send off for a new wiring harness from Germany! And it ain't cheap.
Expecting customers who buy cars never to add equipment is like expecting customers who buy computers never to upgrade hardware or install new software.
Dr Mazlan said although the selection was open to those interested in space exploration, the person who knew the Russian language or had a doctorate in the field of science would score higher points during the short-listing process.
My colleauges and I do try to fit in, but because of the bosses "I'm paid more so my opinion counts" attitude, he has repeatedly ignored our opinion and plunged ahead, making some pretty bad decisions that kept our company in red. But yeah, he's soooo much more believable to clients and investors and such.
I think the ideal should go both ways: employees who can communicate their knowledge and bosses who are receptive and respectful. Otherwise, why hire anyone at all, right?
Slashdot Mirror
Endorsed? How about actually training dictators in human rights violations? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Hemisphere_Institute_for_Security_Cooperation
When was the last time the Palestinians tried non-violent protests?
How about this time?
It would be very hard for Israel to justify a military response against people who openly acknowledge they have no desire for violence.
They would probably do it anyway, but world opinion would be decidedly different I suspect.
Not when the mainstream press ignores the thousands of non-violent protests that have happened.
Instead you get geniuses who bring a knife to a machine gun fight, and complain that they're getting shot at for firing rockets into civilian areas.
If this was your community, and non-violent protests over years brought no result, instead members of your family died regularly, what would you do?
"Insightful" my ass. More like "ignorant".
Without a wiimote? Won't be as much fun as it could be.
All guys have wii's, no?
It's way too much even for this yacht.
Incidentally, this yacht was built for Jim Clark, the founder of Silicon Graphics and Netscape, and featured the first carbon fiber mast and computerised sail system. I'm not a sailing geek, but I want to be!
Based on your comments, you are not even considering other points of view. Sad. I think it's better to get you to read it up for yourself and decide yourself, rather than have us argue, and still get nowhere. If you don't even want to find out for yourself, well then, that's too bad.
I take it you haven't read the book. It gave specific examples where America installed tyrants who were "business friendly" to American companies. Also overthrown leaders who were popular but were not buying in to American corporate interests. Yes, what I'm saying is, the leaders who seem so strong against tyrants now may actually have imposed this tyranny on others and maybe even brought some grief on the people they are supposed to protect.
To put this very plainly, what I am saying is: educate yourself, check out other points of view. Verify facts. Start by checking out developing countries who did open themselves to American interests and see what happened to them. Then make up your own mind. It may not be as black and white as you believe.
For me, I live in a developing country, and watched as my country's economy and that of neighbouring countries collapse 9 years ago. Having had some economic training, a lot of things didn't make sense to me. This book however, tied everything together for me. So yes, I'm convinced, but please check out these facts for yourself.
I encourage you to read this book.
Basically the author, John Perkins, makes the case that: in it's own interest, America has actively promoted corruption, tyrannical governments and human rights abuses in developing countries around the world. The author says he should know, he was one of those doing it.
While I have spent a little time in USA, and have met many wonderful Americans, the actions of those in power in the US make it a target for many in other countries. If you are really interested in "make sure we dont loose what we have gained through so much hardship. It is your duty to intervene, and take it upon yourself to fight the corrupt, the tyrants and the fanatics from taking over"., then start by educating yourself and others around you.
Your mean like this or this?
This is just 10 minutes of searching in one news site in one muslim country. Leaders are taking a visible stand, but you got to know where to look. Also, never assume a particular definition of civilization as the best or only solution. Look closely, read between the lines.
Nah you're wrong. Consultant is derived from two words: Con + Sultan
Instead of re-inventing the wheel, get involved in open-sourced solutions. You can find a good list here.
From this list, I have personally only seen VistA which has been used by the Veteran's Affairs Department for a very long time. Certainly long enough to mature. It's scalable and will work with groups of hospitals. It's designed by Doctor's to fit the way they work and it's easy to use (so Doctor's have told me). It's open source, and there's a community web site.
There are cons though: It uses a little-known programming language called M, and although otherwise complete, does not have a module for paediatrics (it's very hard to find child veterans!). The people I have met have been extremely helpful, however, and will help you with any customization or new capabilities.
Most financial institutions lend only to those with minimal risk of default (those with a lot of capital). To those with a higher risk of default, they will lend only with collateral. Therefore, lending becomes a no-risk business. So the rich lend to the rich, but the poor who do not have assets have much less opportunity.
Those who can't borrow from licensed banks and such will probably have to go to the loan-sharks, who have their own methods for minimizing loan defaults.
"Your mistletoe is no match for my tow missle!"
Not marketing, but the UN does have an interest in local development and technology transfer. Or it should anyways.
Short answer: completely different technologies, to cater for different needs.
The typical ethernet LAN is a collision domain. When one host transmits, the packets go to every host on the network. This is because of the limited number of hosts on the network, it's a lot faster for one host to just transmit without waiting to find a route like on the Internet. However, there is a risk that 2 or more hosts may transmit at once, and therefore garble the transmissions. The protocol includes measures to detect these collisions. The measure here is to have a minimum size packet, big enough so that it will only finish transmitting after the beginning of the message has arrived at the furthest host.
For the Internet, there are huge numbers of hosts, covering a very wide area. If one were to transmit to all other hosts like on a LAN, imagine one of the other hosts having to wait in a queue of millions for a break in traffic before being able to transmit. Not to mention having a packet size that would arrive at the furthest possible host before you finish transmitting: I'm too lazy to calculate how big it needs to be, but it's gotta be huge. The Internet may seem slower and more complex than a LAN, but at least it's usable.
I'm really surprised no one has replied to this yet.
For those curious, our head engineer tells me that there is a cubic relation between engine RPM's and stress. Stress causes wear, and that's not a linear only relationship either.
When stress exceeds a certain value, BANG + expensive crunching noises happen.
Seems to be a little oversimplified. What causes a turbo'd engine to go BANG is not stress/wear, it's detonation.
Also remember that these engines were designed for performance from word one.
Most manufacturers tune stock engines for driveability, not performance. While they do a good job and spend a lot more time on the parameters than an aftermarket tuner to get the best compromise, power and performance are not the goals. High performance cars are difficult to drive on normal streets, especially high horsepower small engines.
The engines in today's cars are built to handle a specific amount of power, and when the power is increased the wear on components is exponentially increased.
Depends on the engine, I guess. I know for a fact that certain engines are built to handle a LOT more power than stock. Mazda's BP-D, for example, has been used in 400-500HP applications (up from 210HP stock) without any change in internals. This is an engine out of production since 1994/95, so no exotic parts are available for it, btw. Nissan's SR-20DET also has a good reputation with engine builders, though I can't quote you any figures on that one. And I'm not heavily into the modding scene, so there must be some others. These are just some I've come to know.
As to the "Premium Fuel" thing, I'm doubtful, since all engines i've ever worked with use knock sensors, and are always running at the ragged edge of detonation anyway.
Well, the higher the octane, the more the ECU can advance the ignition timing (more output) before engine detonation occurs, so you do get more power.
Like our head engineers always says: It takes a lot of work to outsmart factory engineers. And several million dollars.
Nobody's trying to outsmart them, just that some customers have different priorities. Like overclockers.
Actually the author said Apple gave him a new unit, which then blew up again. So dropping a Mac drive into another Mac is still not a good solution.
In a PC, if you know which component is giving you trouble, get a replacement from another vendor which has a better record of reliability. You don't get this choice from Apple.
I thought SCO sued IBM. Shouldn't the burden of proof be on SCO to prove that these files are in fact stolen from the UNIX code base?
But why would a peon willfully include code he knows is proprietary into Linux? He would only do so if he was trying to harm SCO, or Linux. Difficult to prove.
Even if it was proven to be done without the knowledge of the management, the fairest remedy to SCO would be for the Linux developers to replace the code.
But why design something so complex in the first place? Why not design a flexible electrical system with clear labels to where aftermarket installers can plug in their equipment? It's just like having closed API's. So yes, I do agree with the sentiment: BMW is a good fit with Microsoft.
Someone I know had exactly this sort of trouble with a Mercedes (custom wiring harness). The wiring actually split it's insulation in hot weather. To replace the wiring, he had to read the chassis number and send off for a new wiring harness from Germany! And it ain't cheap.
Expecting customers who buy cars never to add equipment is like expecting customers who buy computers never to upgrade hardware or install new software.
You lucky so and so...I only ended up with a poster size sheet of blank paper with a letter-sized win98 test page in one corner!
The paragraph in question:
Dr Mazlan said although the selection was open to those interested in space exploration, the person who knew the Russian language or had a doctorate in the field of science would score higher points during the short-listing process.
There are good bosses, and there are bad bosses.
My colleauges and I do try to fit in, but because of the bosses "I'm paid more so my opinion counts" attitude, he has repeatedly ignored our opinion and plunged ahead, making some pretty bad decisions that kept our company in red. But yeah, he's soooo much more believable to clients and investors and such.
I think the ideal should go both ways: employees who can communicate their knowledge and bosses who are receptive and respectful. Otherwise, why hire anyone at all, right?
Mohd. Binatang bin Goncang
This story is a fake. The name translates literally to: Mohammed Animal son of Masturbate.
Read that as someone set us up the slashdot
I need my caffeine...
Maybe she didn't even say it. It's just included in a press release.