Slashdot Mirror


China's Space Launch Near; Malaysia Wants One, Too

Enoch Root writes "According to an article on People's Daily Online, a Chinese news service, the first Chinese manned space launch is set to take place in the next few days, between October 15th and October 17th. Space.com has an interesting article on the subject, including a satellite snapshot of the Jiuquan, strongly suggesting the imminent launch." And alphaque writes "Malaysia is calling for interested applicants aged 21 and above to be its first cosmonaut aboard the International Space Station. The ability to speak Russian and prior space exploration experience is a definite plus, they say. Applications can be made online at your nearest astronaut recruitment site. Light sabres optional. Now the floodgates are open. Boldly go where no Malaysian has gone before -- to space, the final frontier." Offer is for Malaysians only, though.

240 comments

  1. damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bloody proprietary media viewers! BTW, fp

  2. Manual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I managed to get a copy of the chinese launch computer setup instructions...

    Welcome to Microsoft's Windows 3.11 Install step by step (Text Only). This will give you an idea on how to do this when and if the time arises for you to either reinstall the operating system, install for the first time or upgrade your present operating system.

    Well for this I will show you the install for Microsoft Windows 3.1. Now follow the following steps.

    1. Install MSDOS first using the 3 install disks.
    2. Once this is done boot up using hard drive.
    3. Now go to the A: prompt by typing A: and hitting enter
    4. Now type Setup

    The "Welcome to Setup" screen will now appear. Hit enter to continue.
    You will now be prompted for custom or express setup. Just hit enter for Express
    Windows will start copying files to the hard drive, let this continue.
    You will then be prompted for disk 2, insert disk 2 and hit enter to continue.
    Windows will continue to copy files.
    Then the screen looking for "Name" and "Company" will appear and the mouse will become active. Fill in your name and company, click on continue when finished.
    You will then be asked to verify the information, click on continue
    If using a boot disk to install you will get message about copying system files, click cancel to continue.
    Now you will be prompted for Disk 3. Insert before clicking on "Continue"

    Windows will continue to copy files..

    Now you will be prompted for Disk 4. Insert before clicking on "Continue"

    Windows will continue copying files to the hard drive, let this continue.

    Now you will be prompted for Disk 5. Insert before clicking on "Continue"

    Windows will continue copying files to the hard drive, let this continue.

    Now you will be prompted for Disk 6. Insert before clicking on "Continue"

    Windows will continue copying files to the hard drive, let this continue.

    You will get the a warning about config.sys and autoexec.bat changes, click ok to continue.

    And now you have an option to install your printer. Use no printer attached (you may install a printer from windows itself) and click "Install".

    Windows install is finished. You may now watch the tutorial on using windows and a mouse or you can skip it. Select as needed

    And that is it all finished. Return to dos and reboot the computer to access windows 3.1

    1. Re:Manual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm... if this is a joke, I don't get it.

  3. Hey! by Rhinobird · · Score: 1

    I live in a general state of malaise. Does taht make me Malaysian?

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
    1. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My ancestors are Japs. Does taht make me Japanese?

    2. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, wanker

  4. Ermmm... by mmonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... between October 15th and October 17th

    That would be October 16th, then...

    1. Re:Ermmm... by borgdows · · Score: 0

      chhhhh....

      it's a secret!

    2. Re:Ermmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL... that's pretty good Johnny... but that ain't the way I heerd it. The way I heard it, the nominal launch time is 6 a.m on 15 Oct

    3. Re:Ermmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless otherwise specified, ranges are inclusive to allow an additional fourty-eight hours for government inaction.

    4. Re:Ermmm... by addaon · · Score: 1

      No, no, this is the chinese government. The 15th to the 17th means they release the film on the 15th and, when everyone is suitably distracted, actually try it on the 17th.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
  5. Way to go China! by PakProtector · · Score: 5, Funny

    Congratulations and Thank You, China.

    Here in the US our Space Program is hampered by whiny politicans who complain about its cost and by people who don't seem to understand that anytime you make people sit ontop of a several story tall candle and light it under their asses there's a big risk involved.

    But if there's one thing we hate more than spending money and risk, it's being shown up by Godless Communist Heathen Scum like you. So this will spur the Republicans to have a Moon Base in no time!

    --

    Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
    man: no entry for woman in the manual.
    "Qua!?"

    1. Re:Way to go China! by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1

      No, it's not being hampered by "whiny politicians". Rather, the space program, not being the driver for the military industry any more has fallen back in the priorities of your government. Why test military technology in space when you can bomb Iraq / Afghanistan / Serbia etc? OT but you bet your ass it's true.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    2. Re:Way to go China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Thank you, China"? For what? I'm not too sure how much you know about history, but the LAST time the Chinese tried to send a man to the moon, his wooden chair exploded in an impressive fireworks display. The only advances in space exploration that October 16th is going to bring is a fairly concise reliazation on how NOT to build a rocket. Mark my words, I do not look forward to the event, but ... BOOM!

    3. Re:Way to go China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in the US our Space Program is hampered by whiny politicans who complain about its cost and by people who don't seem to understand that anytime you make people sit ontop of a several story tall candle and light it under their asses there's a big risk involved.

      I think the same thing happens in China, but our friends at Xinhua news agency aren't going to tell us about it (or about what happens to 'em).

    4. Re:Way to go China! by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      I think you are a little confused. The Republicans support the space program--- its the Democrats who whine about the cost. Pay attention.

    5. Re:Way to go China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any sort of manned space venture is, at this point in the game, a show piece and a waste of money. When countries start to indulge in this kind of stuff, you really have to wonder about how they're investing their money. I mean, what has the US manned space program netted us in scientific and economic terms? The Soviets were able to do this stuff with an economy that didn't work, so China, with something approaching a free-market economy, should be able to do it. But really, this is an investment with no payoff, other than domestic politcal support. This might look like a huge white elephant if China's economy sours.

      Meanwhile, unmanned space exploration has lead to an enormous scientific payoff at low cost.

      China really is in sort of a bubble right now, with property values in some cities going right through the roof. This event could be interpreted in a very different light a few years down the road.

    6. Re:Way to go China! by weave · · Score: 1
      You can make a safe bet that if other countries start going into space, the U.S. will suddenly get a renewed interest in it. We can't have someone scoping out space on the moon or building weapons of mass destruction up there...

      Remember, the only reason we went nuts in the 60s to get someone on the news was that the USSR was trying to do it and launched a human into orbit first.

    7. Re:Way to go China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm are you trying to jinx them??

      They havent gotten the dude into space yet, nor brought him back safely. After they do that, congratulate 'em.

    8. Re:Way to go China! by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1
      I don't want to get too political in slashdot but, basically, no, the US has missed the space challenge unless huge changes can be made. Yes, in the 60s it was a matter of prestige - two superpowers you see. Now, there is only one. What if China even puts a man on the moon? The US put one 40 years ago, they will say. In the meantime, "space age" technology is developed directly for war time without the pretext of the "space race" as it was in the 60s.

      One of your greatest presidents, also, had advanced the idea of a joint US/USSR space program. Here's a question: who was it and what happened to him?

      The military already has a lot of the government's business without having to deal with actual accidents that receive worldwide attention. If a spaceshuttle blows up and 5 people die, people will remember it for ever. If something goes wrong while testing some other kind of military technology (depleted uranium, for example), that might kill thousands of people, nobody will care.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    9. Re:Way to go China! by isorox · · Score: 1

      people sit ontop of a several story tall candle and light it under their asses there's a big risk involved.

      Especially after a curry and a few cans of lager

    10. Re:Way to go China! by isorox · · Score: 1

      100 years ago, flight wasn't exactly a useful thing, however because people used flight it slowly got cheaper, faster, more reliable and safer. Dont use it you dont learn from your mistakes.

    11. Re:Way to go China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who was it and what happened to him?

      Ideas for joing space programs were mentioned enough times that the question isn't worth answering. But here it goes:

      It was Kennedy, and he was shot in the head and killed.
      It was (forgot, Ford or one of them in there) and they actually got a joint Apollo-Soyuz mission off the ground, then abandoned it and went back to whining about the Russian Salute program eclipsing US space station technolgoy (if you can call a modified fuel tank a space station).
      It was Reagan and he was shot in the head, but survived.
      It was Clinton, and he got a blowjob from an intern (Granted the USSR was gone, but US-Russian space station plans were all over the place thorughout the late 90's, but kept getting put off because both governments seemed to think Mir would last forever).

    12. Re:Way to go China! by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1
      I was going for Kennedy really since he actually tried for a joint moon landing in a public speech, during a UN session, at that. Here

      Didn't know about the others really. Reagan famously wanted the "star wars" program to be a joint US/USSR one since he was certain that Earth would be invaded by aliens. Where others scorn the man, I call him a visionary.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    13. Re:Way to go China! by linzeal · · Score: 1

      We have been broadcasting radiowaves for awhile. Taking precautions against alien invasion may be prudent. I suggest we use the asteroid belt for ore and begin creation of early warning systems and weapons seriously.

    14. Re:Way to go China! by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1
      What if they're already there?

      The fact that this statement makes the people feel as if it's a joke and the other half extremely scared, gives you the answer to why it will not be a reality until it's too late.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    15. Re:Way to go China! by rifter · · Score: 1

      It was Reagan and he was shot in the head, but survived.

      IIRC Reagan was gutshot, which is why he survived.

    16. Re:Way to go China! by weave · · Score: 1
      Sigh, s/news/moon/ in original post. Anyway...

      Anyway, you obviously don't understand how fickle American politicians are. If a critical mass of rednecks in Florida or South Carolina get upset about something, you can bet politicians will be falling all over themselves to make it happen or pay serious lip service to it.

      Right now, not too many people here care about the space program, hence no real support. What we* care about is avenging 9/11 (or 11/9 for depending on what side of the pond you're on). And by golly, if our President makes a claim that Portugal is somehow involved, you can bet there will be popular support for invading it too.

      * We means majority, not me, myself, nor I.

      btw, your comment about the unequal weight given to the lives on the shuttles is spot on. If those people died in a van on I-95 whilst driving to the site, no one would care.

    17. Re:Way to go China! by rifter · · Score: 1

      Didn't know about the others really. Reagan famously wanted the "star wars" program to be a joint US/USSR one since he was certain that Earth would be invaded by aliens. Where others scorn the man, I call him a visionary.

      Actually, the reason the Russians opposed Star Wars (which was underreported at the time) was that having adequate defense against nuclear attacks is an unfair advantage. (It screws up Mutually Assured Destruction if one country is not so assured to be Destroyed!) Reagan's answer was to share the technology with the Russians so it would be fair, but according to him, they did not believe him.

      The Russians were also concerned that space-based weapons would be used for attack purposes. There have been several movies which played off this fear, with satellite-based lasers used for assassinations and satellite nukes for that element of surprise!

    18. Re:Way to go China! by rifter · · Score: 1

      You can make a safe bet that if other countries start going into space, the U.S. will suddenly get a renewed interest in it. We can't have someone scoping out space on the moon or building weapons of mass destruction up there...

      Remember, the only reason we went nuts in the 60s to get someone on the news was that the USSR was trying to do it and launched a human into orbit first.

      My concern has been that China has promised a moon base, but no one else has one. What if the Chinese decide they own the moon? Just imagine the war that would start.... And what the hell happened to our Mars base anyway?

    19. Re:Way to go China! by mcflaherty · · Score: 1

      It was Reagan and he was shot in the head, but survived.

      IIRC Reagan was gutshot, which is why he survived.



      The Day Reagan Was Shot has a decent account of the wound. Apparently the man was an inch of death, with a bullet lodged in his chest, very close to his heart. But the White House staff told reporters he was fine. Signed a bill from bed even.

      --
      -- I am become sig, destroyer of posts.
  6. Re:blafasel is here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Du bisch de Chef

  7. creator's newclear power plan, we all want it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's right. you won't be needing any shoddily engineered vehicle/model rocket cam to go for this ride/see the light.

    lookout bullow.

    the daze of the felonious phonIE georgewellian fuddite southern baptist freemason payper liesense softwar gangster corepirate nazi stock markup FraUD execrable, is WANing into coolapps/the abyss.

    consult with/trust in yOUR creator....

    for each of the creator's innocents harmed, there is a badtoll that must/will be repaid by you/US, as the aforementioned perpetrators of the life0cide against humankind, will not be available to make reparations, after the big flash.

    1. Re:creator's newclear power plan, we all want it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey - are you the same guy who writes liner notes for Radiohead CDs?

  8. Note to future posters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mentioning geopolitics on Slashdot will be considered flamebait and modded as such.

  9. The way to go ... by foobsr · · Score: 1

    ... for all /. heroes :) CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  10. Re:blafasel is here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Auso !?
    Gruessech !

  11. Light sabres optional... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't have a light sabor, but I have a cool golfball retriever. I do a mean Darth-Maul impersonation too. I made a video application here

    Thanks for your time,

    Star Wars Kid

  12. Cooperation: Good to see by ajensen · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Honestly, this initiative from Malaysia is good to see. Much of the spirit behind the international space station effort is international cooperation, which, so far, has included a relatively tight group of nations. There are very bright and promising individuals in Malaysia whom I hope can bring some fresh ideas into the works.

    -a

    1. Re:Cooperation: Good to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Malaysia is a one-part state that practices active discrimination against it's minorities. All three races (Malay, Chinese, Indian) are as compliant as posible with the demands of authorities, and always buy into the government party-line. A fair bit of consumer-grade products are produced in Malaysia, where bribes and a compliant workforce make most difficulties go away. "Bright and promising" sounds like government propaganda - none of the Malaysians I know fit that description. They import pirated, mass-produced VCDs and DVDs, spend themselves into poverty to "keep up appearances", flunk out of engineering and technical fields and go to business school, pressure their children to go to medical school so they can rub their children in their relatives faces, cheat on their pregnant wives. The upper classes who control all commerce in Malaysia never take any responsibility for dragging the country out of it's third world ways - they just try to emulate the appearance, not the substance, of Singapore's development plans. Malaysia's "space plans" are PR, just like flying school teachers into space (and not even on their own transport system).

  13. No applications being accepted by the ISS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, no terrorists need apply. The last thing we need is a fucking extremist blowing up the ISS. Get rid of your extremist leader, Malaysians, before you expect the Int'l community to take you seriously. Religion is a fucking fairy tale, so if you want to play with 21st century technology, leave your 14th century superstitions behind.

    By the way, whenever I see that television commercial on CNN Int'l for Malaysia tourism ("Malaysia is a land of tolerance, people living in harmony, etc.") I almost bust a gut laughing. Yeah, whatever. Terrorists.

    1. Re:No applications being accepted by the ISS by plumby · · Score: 1

      Unlike the US's (or the UK's) extemist Christian leader, huh?

    2. Re:No applications being accepted by the ISS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, no dumbfucks need apply. The last thing we need is a fucking idiot blowing up the ISS. Get rid of your extremist leader, Americans, before you expect the Int'l community to take you seriously. Religion is a fucking fairy tale, so if you want to play with 21st century technology, leave your 14th century superstitions behind. By the way, whenever I see that television commercial on CNN Int'l for American tourism ("America is a land of tolerance, people living in harmony, etc.") I almost bust a gut laughing. Yeah, whatever. Terrorists.

    3. Re:No applications being accepted by the ISS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I (the original poster) am not an American, nor do I live in America, nor have I ever lived in America, nor do I have the slighest desire to ever live in America, so your US-bashing rinses clean away without the slightest bit of offense. Nice try, however. :-D

    4. Re:No applications being accepted by the ISS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, no dumbfucks need apply. The last thing we need is a fucking idiot blowing up the ISS. Get rid of your extremist leader, non-Malaysians, before you expect the Int'l community to take you seriously. Religion is a fucking fairy tale, so if you want to play with 21st century technology, leave your 14th century superstitions behind.

      By the way, whenever I see that television commercial on CNN Int'l for non-Malaysian tourism ("non-Malaysia is a land of tolerance, people living in harmony, etc.") I almost bust a gut laughing. Yeah, whatever. Terrorists.

    5. Re:No applications being accepted by the ISS by alphaque · · Score: 1

      i shouldn't be replying to an obvious troll, but i think your grasp of world leaders is truly out of whack. you seem to be mistaking the current prime minister for someone else. he's definitely not extermist religious. google for mahathir mohamad if you will.

    6. Re:No applications being accepted by the ISS by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

      Quite right! Never confuse being a twat with being a religious extremist!

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    7. Re:No applications being accepted by the ISS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While 'old Tone might go to church every now and again, and Queeny is head of the Church of England...have you ever been to a CofE service? Its less religion and more old duffers Sunday morning sleep in. There's more religion on the streets of any major city than a CofE church service.

      "Extremist Christian in the U.K" is just as silly a concept as Extreme Ironing.

    8. Re:No applications being accepted by the ISS by sebol · · Score: 1

      he's definitely not extermist religious

      Dr Mahathir *is* extremist, not relegiuosly but nationalistly....
      he promoted "extreme nationalism" in Malaysia...

      --
      -- Hasbullah bin Pit (sebol)
    9. Re:No applications being accepted by the ISS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chinese manned launch means the ISS can now get chinese food delivered.

    10. Re:No applications being accepted by the ISS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its better than having a homo as the PM

    11. Re:No applications being accepted by the ISS by plumby · · Score: 1
      The problem is that he still tries to justify a lot of his actions by claiming them to be driven by his Christian beliefs.

      "Extremist Christian in the U.K" is just as silly a concept as Extreme Ironing.

      Have you ever been to Northern Ireland, or Glasgow?

  14. Capitalism at its best by gorbachev · · Score: 1

    Competition is good.

    If the Chinese launch succeeds, it should kick some NASA executive bootie.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
    1. Re:Capitalism at its best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NASA "executive bootie" should be concerned that the Chinese are going to do something the U.S. and Soviets did over 40 years ago based in no small part on the grunt-work of the Soviet space program? That's a little overly optimistic of just what they are presumably about to achieve, isn't it?

  15. Re:This pussyfooting business is making me sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do we ever kill anyone? Of course not.

    Oh come on, you're being overly negative. It isn't that hard to find pictures of many of the tens of thousands of innocent civilians lately slaughtered in Iraq. Somewhere like The Memory Hole has lots of piccies of dead little kids, for instance, if that's your kind of thing.

    Just don't go saying you never get your money's worth.

  16. Pictures? by ptomblin · · Score: 1

    Does anybody have a source for those pictures that *doesn't* require the Viewpoint Player (which isn't supported on Linux)?

    --
    The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    1. Re:Pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe you should mail them to thoughts@hq.space.com - which is open for criticism etc and tell them that you don't use won/macos. i did.

    2. Re:Pictures? by ferkelparade · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's two jpegs captured from the viewer:
      First one shows an overview of the launch site, the other one is a zoomed-in view of what appears to be the launch tower.
      Please be kind to my poor server...

      --
      frotz grue
    3. Re:Pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's two jpegs captured from the viewer:
      First one shows an overview of the launch site, the other one is a zoomed-in view of what appears to be the launch tower.
      Please be kind to my poor server...

    4. Re:Pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beware, Viewpoint is spyware. Don't believe me? Read the privacy statement when asked to install it, especially the very bottom section - privacy.

    5. Re:Pictures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks man

  17. Basically a tourist trip by in7ane · · Score: 1, Funny

    ""It is not that expensive,'' he said, adding that the plan to send a Malaysian into space was part of a RM3.42bil deal to purchase Sukhoi SU-30 MKN fighter jets from Russia. "

    Basically it's like the tourist trips before (once again only to the Russian part of the station?) - this time bundled with some fighter jets (wtf?).

    Guess the Malaysian part is quite significant (developing country and all)... but do you realize how much troll food has just been provided?

    1. Re:Basically a tourist trip by Red+Pointy+Tail · · Score: 1

      Well, a coupa of months ago Mahathir (our megalomaniac prime minister, who'll be stepping down in a few days) purchased a bunch of aging Sukhois for quite a tidy sum, and in deep gratitude Putin agreed to buy shitloads of our palm oil produce, and knowing Dr M's penchant for ego projects, throws in a bonus of shooting two of our guys into space. Sold! :)

      Malaysia is already infamous for squandering their oil riches on pet prestige projects such as building the world tallest building, and sinking loads of money into developing their own national car (moderate success, but poor in qc and selling only with crazy tariff on imports), local silicon valley (kinda bombed but called a success) and regional hollywood (bombed big time) -- so this kind of shit isn't really a precedent.

      To be fair, there have been some good advances in the last few decades, but one wonders if this sort of money is well spent esp. when there are other pressing needs in healthcare, education, and rural development. Thankfully, Malaysia has done quite a good job with infrastructure though.

      Anyway, it's election time soon and there's nothing like a bit of malaysia-can-do breast-thumping to galvanize the pollsters!

    2. Re:Basically a tourist trip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "regional hollywood" you say? So where is all the Malaysian porn I've been searching for? All there is is the Thai stuff.

  18. Malaysia Wants One, Too by donnacha · · Score: 0


    Me too, me too!!!

  19. Oh cool!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More crap in suborbital space to fall on our heads whilst we are not looking. When will the madness stop. There is too much trash in space already, does the world really need any more? The answer, is an emphatic NO!.

    1. Re:Oh cool!!!! by ajensen · · Score: 1
      You're being rather senseless. Something as small and combustible as a person would not survive re-entry but would instead burn up quite quickly.

      In general, if you've been paying attention to what they do aboard the I.S.S., you would know that much (if not most) of their work is geared toward the advancement of our civilization's knowledge -- normally through experiments, but also through space exploration and so on.

      You're an A.C., so I probably just wasted my breath -- but your somewhat common viewpoint, IMO, needs to be expelled.

      -a

    2. Re:Oh cool!!!! by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      I agree. People don't realize how often they use things like cell phones that were developed in space. There will always be people against it who refuse to do the research. One big example is the space pen. People thought it was a waste of $$ when they could use pencils. They don't even stop to think about all the lead pieces floating around getting in your eyes and the instrumentation.

      Don't get all upset over what I say tho. I'm still upset over the supercollider being cancelled when it was well under construction & being sent overseas along with our 7 best physicists. We're selling our technological edge and it's not even mentioned to the citizens who funded it until it's a done deal.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. Things may change soon in the US by apsmith · · Score: 1

    See this sciscoop article on a new proposal for the future of US human spaceflight - I'm told this was prepared at the request of the White House, so both the administration and Congress are looking seriously at what to do next.

    --

    Energy: time to change the picture.

  22. Beware.... by locarecords.com · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is more than about a space launch. This is about China telling the world that it has arrived and that things are going to be different in the International arena.

    They have their own rapidly growing technology sector, including china developed chips and Red Flag linux and they are building their own space agency. Investmenting in technology is crucial to challenging the US lead economically, politically and militarily.

    They have little or no foreign debt and growing economic power...

    This rather than being the New American Century is likely to be Chinese!

    --
    ---- The Open Source Record Label : : LOCARECORDS.COM
    1. Re:Beware.... by Jesse9 · · Score: 1

      Interetsing point, but why a space launch?

    2. Re:Beware.... by pubjames · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Beware...

      China becoming an economic superpower would be a good thing, both for its citizens and potentially for the rest of the world (they'll have more money to buy our stuff).

      Your assumption is that China will "do bad things" if it becomes a superpower, but I don't think that is a given. The neo-Cons in the current US administration don't want any country to threaten the USAs current economic pole position, and are willing to do whatever it takes to keep the USA there. I think that view is narrow minded, and could be damaging for everyone in the long term. Fortunately it looks like the neo-Cons are finding that their gung-ho attitiude to world affairs don't actually get the results they expect.

    3. Re:Beware.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      A mere 34 years after an American walked on the Moon, a Chinese will leave the atmosphere.

      I for one welcome our new Chinese Overlords.
      </sarcasm>

      Honestly I'm disappointed, I was hoping Carmack et al would make it up there first.

    4. Re:Beware.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Your assumption is that China will "do bad things" if it becomes a superpower, but I don't think that is a given."

      Given the things they've already done, they don't need to become a superpower to do bad things - ask a Tibetan.

    5. Re:Beware.... by dumllama · · Score: 1
      On the good side, China is already making some real contributions to modern science, and a lot of their best and birghtest are doing some good science here in the states. I assume that a lot of these scientists will take their expertise back to China, where they will eventually have major funding, and then we'll see major advances coming out of China.

      On the bad side, China does have some outstanding international disputes, (Tiawan being the biggest hot spot) so I wouldn't want them to be able to challenge the US there. However, that might not be an issue since they seem to be liberalizing. But they are also experiencing some major economic dislocation, which could set the stage for all types of madness.

      --
      "eternal vigilance is the price of liberty" Wendell
    6. Re:Beware.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They have little or no foreign debt and growing economic power...

      I guess that since the Clinton hush money stopped with the Bush administration, China felt compelled to improve their first-strike capabilities disguised as a "space program". If this works, I guess China can sell this technology and hardware to countries like North Korea. This could further reduce their foreign debt by increasing their economic power.

      Does this remind anyone else about Johnny Chung, China Aerospace International Holdings, and the Clinton campaign contributions? Or is this just my imagination?

    7. Re:Beware.... by davejenkins · · Score: 1



      Feh. We`ve been hearing this same story about future Chinese domination since 1850, and China always comes up short:
      - China is certainly making great strides in manufacturing, R&D, and IT, but this is only remarkable because they are starting from such a backwards position. Do you honestly think Chinese IT are going to beat Intel, HP, Motorola, IBM at advanced development? No. If anything, those US and EU companies will outsource some manufacturing to China.
      - China, for obvious political bragging rites, is putting a man in orbit. This is aimed more at thumbing their nose at the Russians than the Americans: all those non-aligned and non-US puppets need an older brother to look to-- Beijing is telling them that they are the new hotness, Moscow is old and busted
      - GDP per population is the guiding indicator for a reason: as governments must assume responsibilities and costs from their respective populations, the total income per population becomes important. China`s economy may grow rapidly for another 10 years straight, but the 1.2 BILLION people (mouths to feed) will always keep China in the permanent poorhouse.
      - China`s military cannot project power. Hell, they cannot even take back an island right off their coast.

    8. Re:Beware.... by geoswan · · Score: 1
      We`ve been hearing this same story about future Chinese domination since 1850...

      Earlier than that. Wasn't it Napoleon who called China a "sleeping giant"?

      Do you honestly think Chinese IT are going to beat Intel, HP, Motorola, IBM at advanced development? No. If anything, those US and EU companies will outsource some manufacturing to China.

      I heard Adam Osborne say this -- before he lost his fortune building the Oborne 2 computer -- "those who ride technologies cutting edge are frequently sacrificed upon its blade..." Letting the US industries continue to break the ground, and then build joint ventures to develop them in China is a smart move. It is a good way to acquire high technology at low cost.

      This is aimed more at thumbing their nose at the Russians than the Americans

      Didn't they buy Soyuz technology, and update it?

      China`s military cannot project power. Hell, they cannot even take back an island right off their coast.

      Launching unprovoked attacks on other nations is kind of frowned upon. Yes, you can get away with it if the target of your attack is a little tiny place no one has ever heard of, like East Timor. But, when Iraq attacked Kuwait -- a tiny little place that did matter, there was an international reaction.

      The USA, UK attack on Iraq eight months ago was a very provocative one. WMD ready to launch in 45 minutes? There weren't any. I never believed there were. So did much of the world. So, I think, did some of the more wily USA journalists. But few of them were prepared to say so loudly -- that "politically incorrect" host being one of the exceptions -- the USA was caught in a mad patriotic fervour.

      Will the USA get away with it? Will Bush get impeached for lying?

      Can the world expect to see more nations launching unprovoked attacks on other nations, if Bush gets away with it?

    9. Re:Beware.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scaled Composites will go up before Carmack does. Why are people so excited about Armadillo, almost more than over Scaled? And Scaled wont even beat China, how then is Carmack going to do that?

    10. Re:Beware.... by SoupaFly · · Score: 1

      It's not just a space launch, but sending a living human being into space and returning him/her safely to the Earth's surface. It doesn't seem like a really big deal because America and the USSR/Russia have been doing it for nearly 4 decades. But when China does make it happen, it will become only the 3rd country to send a person into space. Hmmmm. The only other two nations to do it were both considered SuperPowers. Hmmmm.

      Keep an eye on China, they will be an increasingly important player in the years ahead.

    11. Re:Beware.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the purpose is the same as ours (I'm in the US) and the soviets was: to improve rocket & guidance technology for use in ICBMs.

    12. Re:Beware.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Nastradamous (sp?) said Mongolia would rise again.

    13. Re:Beware.... by egommer · · Score: 1

      You should be weary of China's possible true intentions.

      Here is a sample.

      Now it appears that this strategic partnership with China is over. In recent years, China has threatened the United States over our support of Taiwan, including raising the possibility of nuclear war. China is also pursuing a significant strategic forces modernization program, and is greatly increasing the quality of its conventional force for the explicit, officially stated, purpose of challenging the United States in the China Seas, waters that are crucial to the United States for sustaining its relationship with Taiwan, South Korea and Japan, among others.

      China is also recognized by the intelligence community as one of the most serious proliferators of weapons of mass destruction technology in the world today. Moreover, China is strengthening its political and military ties with Russia in ways that seek to isolate the United States diplomatically and limit United States influence in the region. These do not appear to be the actions of a strategic partner.

      In light of these actions, I am perhaps most troubled by the Administration policy with respect to Taiwan. The Administration's obvious reluctance to arm Taiwan, a democratic friend of the United States, sends a dangerous message to Beijing. Similarly, the Administration's failure to sanction China for its proliferation practices and its failure to discourage China from pursuing stronger security ties with Russia represent further examples of dangerous miscommunication.

      In sum, I am concerned that China's intention toward the United States may be more threatening than is widely accepted. If so, current Administration policy may be reinforcing China's behavior and setting the United States and China on a collision course.

      --
      Two Towers-Two Worlds.One seeks triumphs and freedom for man.The other deems man unworthy and wrecks them.
    14. Re:Beware.... by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Can the world expect to see more nations launching unprovoked attacks on other nations, if Bush gets away with it?

      Bush DID get away with it. This is nothing new. USA, as well as other large powers, have gotten away with illegal and immoral invasions. The only difference now is that the countries will make pre-emptive wars (also known as preventive wars) a part of their military strategy. In other words, they will publically admit to such a stance. In the past, no one publically said anything. Any sort of invasion was always under the banner of "freedom" or some other propgandist term.

      Already, Isreal seems to have adopted such a policy. Their recent attack on Syria, which the US backed, is an indication of openness. Russia has also openly said they follow a pre-emptive war strategy. I expect Britain to formally adopt such a strategy soon, followed likely by several Asian nations.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    15. Re:Beware.... by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      China hasn't changed anything recently. Everything you said was true before, as is now. For instance, its alliance with Russia isn't something new. It was always like that and will likely reamin that way (since Russia is the main supplier of weapons to China).

      China is the #1 long-term enemy of USA according to CIA reports. The reason China is not important to the US government right now is because it is isolationist. As long as China doesn't get in the way of US imperialism, it won't matter to USA. USA considers the axis of evil, Iran, and North Korea, along with the "minor" axis of evil Libya, Syria, and Cuba to be greater threats. These smaller countries pose greater threat to US empire building.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    16. Re:Beware.... by penguinlust · · Score: 1

      You bet your booty they will. And they are doing all on American dollars. Shop at Wallmart and put a china man into space.

      Sounds like a new advertising campain to me. I hope all you out of work programmers are listening in.

    17. Re:Beware.... by penguinlust · · Score: 1

      Nothing is remarkable about it at all. American companies are giving them all this technology for two reasons.

      First they think they can save a buck and beat the competition on price. This is a falacy. When everybody does the same thing it is self defeating. It is just driving profits down for everybody and eleminating the people who buy their products here.

      Secondly, and you can yell its not true all you want, it is for all practical intents required to relocate to China to sell there. Just look at the trade imbalance and it shows the truth. What the american companies have not yet realized is China will take the technology and use it else where. They are trying to design their own CPU, where did they learn how to do this? They have a space program. Who has given them the technology to maybe be successful?

      Intel, HP, Motorola, IBM are the culprits along with the Walmarts, Kmarts and american citizens that insist they should have a house full of useless trinkets that do not cost much.

    18. Re:Beware.... by egommer · · Score: 1

      So, you are saying you choose communism, dictatorships, and despots over democracy and freedom. I see your point. If that's called imperialism then imperial me. You can rob, steel off the work and ideas of others without worrying about moral responsibility. Good job. Oh here's your rations and your welfare check. Bon Appetite

      --
      Two Towers-Two Worlds.One seeks triumphs and freedom for man.The other deems man unworthy and wrecks them.
  23. Re:You Slashbots Are Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your cries of 'Hooray America!' will only empower the Nazi Rulers to continue to ironhold grip on power in that country You only enable them to continue to torture and repress Iraqi's, and other nations, and maintain their country as a owner and user of everybody's slave labor. You guys make me sick.

  24. Re:You Slashbots Are Pathetic by desitter · · Score: 0

    Yes i completely agree.
    This is just as America was at the height of its righteous campaign to clear all them commies from its civilians, and then started a space program....
    Erm
    Decisions made in one part of decision space are not necasserily of influence on those made in others.....

  25. Unfortunately.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...your post is +1000 Insightful.

  26. Flaw? by SnowWolf2003 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The ability to speak Russian and prior space exploration experience is a definite plus, they say

    How can any Malaysians have prior space exploration experience, if no Malaysian has ever gone to space?

    1. Re:Flaw? by kerb · · Score: 1

      i heard they also require 10 yrs in java experience and 15 years in oracle.

    2. Re:Flaw? by quigonn · · Score: 1

      And must not be older than 25.

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    3. Re:Flaw? by alphaque · · Score: 1

      "How can any Malaysians have prior space exploration experience, if no Malaysian has ever gone to space?"

      welcome to the wonderful world of malaysian bureaucrat speak. :)

    4. Re:Flaw? by jjon · · Score: 1

      How can any Malaysians have prior space exploration experience, if no Malaysian has ever gone to space?

      Ground support (e.g. for unmanned probes) or even astronomy probably all count as "space exploration", even if they don't actually involve going there.

    5. Re:Flaw? by BobRooney · · Score: 1

      Consider that most of the world's best and brightest travel to the US to attend school and study such things as astronautical engineering and the like.

      I knew a Malaysian guy at the AF Academy who i'm pretty sure was an astro major. Any sort of Space ops training would be desireable in any Malaysian astronaut candidate, so while the request for "previous space exploration experience" seems a little odd, it actually entails more than just being in space. Mission control, orbital dynamics, etc. are also essential to a space program and I'm sure they need people with experience from that arena.

    6. Re:Flaw? by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      How can any Malaysians have prior space exploration experience

      Maybe these are the same people on dice asking for 8 years of dotnet experience.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    7. Re:Flaw? by sebol · · Score: 1

      How can any Malaysians have prior space exploration experience, if no Malaysian has ever gone to space?

      I am a Malaysian.

      hmmm
      Exploring space using Telescope, Software like celestia, starry night

      for me, having an astronut for a country is not important.
      the important thing is space technology & astronomical knowldge.

      anyway I've submitted aplication at angkasawan.gov.my , candidate #633
      I dont know russian, but i know cyrillic. The learning curve will become shorter if I'm chosen...

      --
      -- Hasbullah bin Pit (sebol)
    8. Re:Flaw? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can any Malaysians have prior space exploration experience, if no Malaysian has ever gone to space?

      Perhaps someone's father kicked his ass to the moon? Does that count?

    9. Re:Flaw? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can any Malaysians have prior space exploration experience, if no Malaysian has ever gone to space?

      We all, Malaysians included, are in space, you insensitive clod!

      Any /.ers currently in exception to the previous statement, please report to the Consulate for Transdimensional visas.

    10. Re:Flaw? by Dumbush · · Score: 1

      you can create your own experience in that online submition form!

  27. Re:Rook rook! Silly Roundeyes in space for 40 year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No they did that esca-later.

    Har har.

  28. They just might get one too by krystal_blade · · Score: 1

    If China's rocket misfires...

    --
    It will be easy to motivate our fellow man; there is hardly anything people treasure more than not being annihilated.
  29. Something I don't get... by LeoDV · · Score: 1

    All Malaysians can apply to be the first Malaysian in space, and experience in space is a plus?

    That's like Columbus hiring sailors saying "Experience in traveling to America is a plus".

    Yes, I know he was trying to reach India.

    1. Re:Something I don't get... by el_flynn · · Score: 1
      That's just like the job opening that says "C programming engineer - Fresh Graduates welcome... some working experience with C programming would be helpful"... haven't you come across one of those ads before? I think they just put that qualifier thing in there just for show.

      --
      The Wknd Sessions - Malaysian and South East Asia independent music
    2. Re:Something I don't get... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was a fresh graduate with working experience in C programming. I had vacation work.

    3. Re:Something I don't get... by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      I worked my way thru college & paid my own way. By the time I graduated I had 4 years of networking/administration experience.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
  30. Not just Malaysia... by CGP314 · · Score: 1

    I want one too!

  31. launch won't be live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    according to the bbc, the telecast of the lauch will not be shown live.

    here is the link http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3189416.st m

  32. Twin Giant Rockets Boosters... by Yousef · · Score: 2, Funny

    I knew there was something suspicious about the Petronis Towers! :-)

    --
    -- "To ask a question is to show ignorance; Not to ask a question means you'll remain ignorant."
    1. Re:Twin Giant Rockets Boosters... by sxltrex · · Score: 1

      Twin Giant Rocket Boosters: good! Malaysian Prime Minister: BAD!! You must kill the Malaysian Prime Minister!!

  33. Aldrin recommends US and China cooperate by apsmith · · Score: 2, Informative

    Buzz Aldrin has some comments on how we ought to behave in this article. Also note a new position paper on human spaceflight from the National Space Society, and Congres is meeting this Thursday morning (session to be webcast!) to discuss The Future of Human Spaceflight. Should be an interesting week...

    --

    Energy: time to change the picture.

    1. Re:Aldrin recommends US and China cooperate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let's see... For years the US has been saying what a crappy country China is, how it's the root of all evil and how it'll never amount to anything. Then they realize that word is getting out, that people are seeing that China can be successful, and all of a sudden the US wants to be buddies with China.

      My word of advice to China, Europe and all future powers to be: ignore the US, they're following the path of the Romans and will be a dead empire soon.

    2. Re:Aldrin recommends US and China cooperate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our new Goth overlords!!

    3. Re:Aldrin recommends US and China cooperate by penguinlust · · Score: 1

      I think you are right. When will the citizens of of America wake up, kick a bunch of polotician ass and stick a red hot poker up corperate sell outs?

  34. Your sig by jdfox · · Score: 1

    ---- The Open Source Record Label : : LOCARECORDS.COM

    I cannot visit this Open Source site, because it's only visible using a Closed Source technology. Perhaps you could ask your friends there to consider creating a non-Flash version for the rest of us? Thanks.

    1. Re:Your sig by locarecords.com · · Score: 1
      Yes we know. We are trying to get our web-designers to sort this out... but it takes time... They tell me they are on the case.... it obviously has to be snazzy and excitingly designed before they will let it on the web... ;-)

      in the meantime you can listen at DOWNLOAD LOCA MUSIC..

      Cheers

      --
      ---- The Open Source Record Label : : LOCARECORDS.COM
    2. Re:Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking spamming cocksuckers. Since when does a web site have to be "snazzy" and "excitingly designed" as opposed to actually WORKING!? The web is about content, not flashing colours, moron.

      Yeah, "snazzy" is nice but not if your users get a "Unable to view this page, please ``upgrade'' your browser to the latest Microsoft Innovative Technology known as MSIE" error when they try to view a fucking page.

      My GOD man, GET SOME PRIORITIES!

    3. Re:Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Holy shit dude, you really need some time off. It's just HTML FFS!

  35. Re:Rook rook! Silly Roundeyes in space for 40 year by HarryCallahan · · Score: 1

    You said it, in the 1400s they had rockets. At what stage was the US space race back then?

  36. Re:blafasel is here by theolein · · Score: 0

    Nei stimmt nod. ich bi de chef!

  37. Hopp Schwiiz by theolein · · Score: 0

    Mir want au es racketli! Erschti Auguscht fur alli!

  38. Insert some racist xenophibic comment here by theolein · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It never ceases to amaze me how much hate some people reserve for any other nation than America, be it in Europe, Asia or Africa that achieves any goal in science or technology. Wouldn't trying to achieve something with your own lives possibly make you happier? (Hmmm, scratch that, it probably wouldn't)

    I am amazed at the very well paced programme that the Chinese have concentrated on. In some ways it's very simple, in that the technology is known, but in another light that same simple technology allows them to proceed almost flawlessly (compared to the more messy NASA high tech experimentations that have gotten exactly nowhere) and to achive a working human launch capacity that is both affordable and robust.

    I hope this will be a kicck in the butt to both NASA and ESA to actually do something themselves instead of wallowing in self pity and fear. Here's looking to a revival of the Hermes spaceplane and a robust and cheap NASA human launch capacity. Competition is good.

    1. Re:Insert some racist xenophibic comment here by BobRooney · · Score: 1

      I take exception to your remaks! I also reserve hate for nations in South America, Scandanavia, Oceana and Australia...

    2. Re:Insert some racist xenophibic comment here by SpectreGadget · · Score: 1
      You're point is well taken, but I do take issue with one of your statements:

      • compared to the more messy NASA high tech experimentations that have gotten exactly nowhere
      That sure is assuming a lot. You are assuming that the researchers/scientists/whomever doesn't learn anything from failures. How would anyone get anywhere without trying and failing sometimes?
      --
      Jim Harry
    3. Re:Insert some racist xenophibic comment here by andy1307 · · Score: 1

      chill out...This is no different from the anti-American comments you find on most topics of this nature...

    4. Re:Insert some racist xenophibic comment here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm what hateful racist or xenophobic comments are you referring to? I haven't seen any here. But I did just see a bit of knee-jerk hatred towards the US.

      As for your statement "In some ways it's very simple, in that the technology is known, but in another light that same simple technology allows them to proceed almost flawlessly..." It's much easier to proceed when others have blazed a path and when one of those trail blazers is helping you out (the Russians). And that's not being xenophobic, racist, or taking away from the Chinese gov's achievement but rather putting it in perspective. And if it matters, I'm Chinese and my uncle worked on several of the Apollo programs.

    5. Re:Insert some racist xenophibic comment here by theolein · · Score: 1

      It would certainly give you more credit not post as an AC, Chinese or not. And so what if their technology is based on Russian technology. The electronics and computing are almost certainly more modern than that in the Space Shuttle, notwithstanding the fact that the whole entire complete US space programme was based on German technology and ideas from WWII taken from Germany and transplanted into the US along with the German rocket team people under Werner von Braun.

  39. China's Space Program is America's Space Program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China's space program, America's tax dollars at work.

  40. except by Rhinobird · · Score: 1

    Except that space programs are government run and not really capitalistic in any sense.

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
    1. Re:except by Cleon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the thing is, if there's one thing a Republican-run government will be happy to compete with, it's the People's Republic of China. :)

      --
      Gifts for Geeks - Stuff that really matters!
  41. Re:Rook rook! Silly Roundeyes in space for 40 year by MrBlint · · Score: 0

    If it was an achievement when the Rusians and Americans did it then it's still an acheivement now. They are just not the first to do it that's all. But then again neither were the Americans.

    --
    That's very perceptive of you Mr Stapleton and rather unexpected in a G Major
  42. Re-Invernting the wheel! by POds · · Score: 1

    The way i see it, the goal of humanity is to continually improve life for our species. Its totally non logical to try to do that yourself. That is, two heads are better than one, or in this case 6 billion or so heads are better than 1 billion or so heads. But im not aiming this at China, I'm also aiming it at rusia and the US, which are basiclly the only countries (that i know of) to have mad a significant impact on space travel. Because if they had thought about it before they made their great triumphs, than we'd prolly had done what they planned to do a lot earlier and maybe more.

    Some call it the space race. It is not a race. Who cares what country got to space first, or what country got to the moon first, we're humans or beings. And i know some may be thinking im like this cause i am Australian, and we havnt committed anything to space travel but seriously, if Australia tried to get to mars first, without outside help, I'd be pissed off at the mismanagement of the whole thing.

    The facts are, as i said, if funding and expertise came from around the world, we'd all have a better chance at getting where we want to be, a lot faster and maybe with a smaller rate of fatalities. Put aside the pride of your nation for one moment and lets pool together the pride we have of being human.

    The only times when we seem to come to together is to kill someone such as in a war. Lets do something GOOD together! That way, we'll be come better more quickly and everyone will have the same advantages as everybody else.

    Its a dream anyway. The fact that some people might agree with me doesnt help. This message needs to be sent to our presedents, prime ministers or "rullers" to show them that we dont care who makes it first, just that it should happen for the good of all humanity!

    Another point. This is ultamatly something that will help everyone, and the fact that a specific group of tax payers (chineese) are paying for something that has already been completed is a shame. The old saying, re-inventing the wheel. A very important rule of engineering, yet we're still doing it.

    --


    Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
    1. Re:Re-Invernting the wheel! by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      The problem is... you can't have cooperation under captitalism. Capitalism is based on competition and intrinsically rewards it. Cooperation is always looked upon as suspect, undesirable, and ultimately inefficient. Even with so-called "government projects" like NASA, that is the case. For example, the vast majority of the construction, maintenance, and supplies to NASA are carried out by private companies. Can you see company X which supplies wing A work with another company, let alone a foreign one? Even in military projects, where the govt forces companies to work together, things don't fly well. For example, Lockheed-Martin and Boeing are the two big aerospace suppliers to the US military. They bid competitively on many things. THe US govt forces them work together on large contracts. So when they are "billing" the govt, they work "together" but once that's done, they are competing with each other. I suspect the CEOs, as well as many key employees of each firm, hate each other. How will this be any different for space exploration?

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  43. space.com by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mozilla/Konquerer on Linux:

    Trying to view the image link results in a popup window (in addition to the advertising one) containing this:


    Unsupported Configuration

    We're sorry, but you're using either an unsupported browser or operating system. Please review our system requirements.

    You may still download the player, but must install and use it with a supported system configuration.

    Instructions

    1) Download the Viewpoint Media Player Installer for Macintosh or Windows.
    2) When the download is complete quit all running applications and launch the installer.
    3) After installation is complete launch your browser and return to the page that contains Viewpoint content.


    Oh, really? Install your proprietary image viewer to look at *pictures* on your website? "Quit all running applications"? Sounds suspiciously like spyware to me...hmm. Google...first link....Yup.

    permlink

    Yeah, I know, it says "A CUID is never connected to a user's name, email address, or other personal contact information. "

    I don't care. There is no reason in the Seven Hells that I should have to install a third party viewer to look at pictures from anyone's website. It's not paranoia; why should I have to interrupt my browsing experience, even once, to install more unnecessary clutter on a system?

    Space.com didn't used to be this bad. One more website I won't bother to go to anymore.

    Sigh. /end rant

    (I couldn't see the image at all in Mozilla, where I had popup off; so I tried in Konq and saw the popup; this note just to head off the people trying to tell me about the anti-popup feature in Moz)

    SB

    --
    It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    1. Re:space.com by s-orbital · · Score: 1

      Insert mod here...

      --
      Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
  44. The answer... by acehole · · Score: 0

    I believe that exposure to 'Star Trek' counts in that area.

    (Extra credits for Dr Who, Reddwarf, Farscape, Babylon 5 and star wars)

    --
    Be you Admins? nay, we are but lusers!
  45. China scraps live TV space plan by amightywind · · Score: 1

    CNN.com: China scraps live TV space plan

    All those years ago the dicey first flights of Alan Shepherd, John Glenn, Apollo 8, and STS-1 were broadcast live. In the US our technical successes and failures are there for all to see. What's your excuse China?

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
    1. Re:China scraps live TV space plan by dcphoenix · · Score: 1

      Maybe JFK had it right.....

      .....Whatever man must undertake, free men must fully share.....

      Or something to that effect. This little quote was from a speech JFK made to congress about the space prgram.

    2. Re:China scraps live TV space plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably they dont want to turn chinese into body-count hungry arm chair strategists, who get high watching people getting blown to pieces, sitting thousands of miles away.

    3. Re:China scraps live TV space plan by Beebes · · Score: 1

      This was something that set the US Space Program apart from the Soviet space program. The Soviets only announced program successes after they were fait accompli. The U.S. Program survived many years of negative press over rocket failures, near disasters, and actual catastrophes. Throughout it all and even to today, the program is transparent. Our failures are out there for the world to see so that can improve. The world press listened to every capsule ground-communication, and every problem and every glitch There are some that criticize this as being a high-tech NASCAR race where we wait for the crash. However, if you read the memoirs of those involved, it becomes apparent, this was done because they felt they owed it to the American people to be open. As well, they had a commitment more than the program but to the astronauts. We are only beginning to learn of the fatalities of the cosmonauts in the Soviet program. These were mostly hidden from public view. The eyes of the American public provide the greatest oversight in the world. While we've had our accidents and losses of life and NASA has made mistakes, imagine how much worse it could be if there were 'no public to answer to'. Despite the replication of the feat, it was the courage to do it plain sight that makes the accomplishment what it was and is.

  46. Malaysia is government sponsered racism! by inteller · · Score: 1

    Offer is for Malaysians only...

    probably just for Malays....that country discriminates heavily against all minorities. If you aren't Malay and muslim you are trash.

    1. Re:Malaysia is government sponsered racism! by Red+Pointy+Tail · · Score: 1

      They call it 'positive discrimination'. Your post is flamebait so some objectivity is needed here. Malaysia is probably the only country where discriminatory practices favouring the ethnic majority (the bumiputeras, which are largely malays) is enshrined in the constitution (plus a whole slew of laws).

      A sampler:

      - Preference in university places (last year, made slightly more merit based, but many uni. entries still through MARA matriculations which are only open to malays)

      - Subscription to bumiputera-only saving schemes with high govt guaranteed returns

      - Preference for all government contracts (this accounts for a *lot* of wealth... since the govt has been on a spending spree)

      - Discounts on all housing developments

      - Public listing requirement requires minimum of 30% bumiputera shareholders, and a certain number of employees.

      - Bumis also get perferencial allotment in various other stuffs like IPO shares etc.

      To take it properly into context, this discrimination is to redress the economic balance where the urban businessmen (mostly chinese minorities) are far wealthier relative to the malays (many rural malays, but with much political control) - causing disaffection, instability and racial riots in the early 70s.

      30 years since the implementing these drastic policies, the gap has narrowed a bit but the general consensus is that it hasn't quite achieved its objective of equalizing the playing field in such a long time. A few reasons bandied about are:

      - The malays become used to being spoonfed by the govt, lose even futher their drive to thrive, whereas the chinese under discrimination strove even harder to succeed

      - The hasty implementation of the bumi-enrichment projects (through privatization programs, preferential govt contracts) resulted in firesales where just a handful of well-connected bumiputeras became filthy rich while most still languish in relative poverty,

      - Lack of competitiveness and transparency results in cronyism and corruption,

      - Lack of meritocracy results in inefficiencies in the economic and job market.

      - There is even more disaffection and distrust between the races, and racial integration hasn't improved (recent surveys show that even 95% of university students stick to their own ethnic groups)

      Well it remains to be seen how successful these policies would be in what is ultimately a compromise for peace. The government is also finding out now that it is very hard to force the genie back into the bottle and reverse certain damaging policies (the malays will be furious if their rights are touched in any way). BUT, bear in mind that for a developing country, there are hardly any other countries that have a diverse composition like malaysia (60% malays, 27% chinese and 10% indian) and with severely imbalanced political and economic control that have not resulted in a hutu-vs-tutsi like anarchy, but still lives in relative harmony, despite the low-simmering dissatisfactions.

    2. Re:Malaysia is government sponsered racism! by inteller · · Score: 1

      Malaysia is a wellfare state for lazy, apathetic Malays. I cannot BELIEVE that they would think about putting someone in space when their majority doesnt even care as long as they are getting their government subsidized paycheck. All you have done is put a cutsie spin on what is a horrible situation. The Malays are spoiled brats created by their defunct theocracy.

    3. Re:Malaysia is government sponsered racism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it'll be for a Malay and Muslim. Imagine a Malay and Muslim in space. wow all the Malaysian ministers will jack off and cum at that thought.

      Oh wait, they're not supposed to jack off..

  47. And the link is... by DarthVeda · · Score: 0

    Right Here

    It probably wasn't a good idea to show a first attempt at manned space flight. If something does go wrong, China would have to admit that it still couldn't duplicate the success of the late 1950's even after purchasing their whole space program from the Russians.

  48. Prior Space Xploration Experience??!! by tigersha · · Score: 1

    Does playing Elite count?? Otherwise, how the hell are you going to get that one on your resume?

    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  49. Carrying Capacity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no way, on current trends, that China will be able to challenge the US as an economic power. There aren't the resources on the planet to raise China to the economic level of the United States or Europe.

    1. Re:Carrying Capacity by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      In this free trade agreement we're sending our jobs there, buying their products, sending our $$ there for payroll, and buying our own products back. Somehow this agreement does not allow U.S. to sell to China tho. Sounds like they've got a definite advantage to me and the only ones cashing in over here are the CEO's.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    2. Re:Carrying Capacity by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 1

      An AC wrote:

      > There is no way, on current trends, that China will be
      > able to challenge the US as an economic power.

      China alone, perhaps not.

      > There aren't the resources on the planet to raise China to
      > the economic level of the United States or Europe.

      There are two resources actually: international cooperation and courage.

      Last month, at the WTO (World Trade Organization) meeting in Cancun Mexico, the US (the world's sole superpower), the EU (an emerging superpower) and Japan (an economic power in its own right) were confronted by the G21, a group consisting of Brazil, China, India, South Korea, South Africa, and other developing nations. At issue was a proposal put forth by the big powers that would harm small farmers worldwide. The G21 put up their own proposal, and negotiations (hello, this isn't the USTO) began. Negotiations consisted mostly of a series of bad compromises, bribes and attempts at coercion on the part of the big powers, with poor Mexico trying to play good host. Some of the African delegates said they wavered, but the sight of the activists cheering them on gave them the courage to stand firm.

      At the end of the meeting, the G21 members got up and left. Because of their united opposition, the proposal of the big powers, that only benefited the big multinational corporations, was defeated. The future of the WTO itself is in question. Small farmers from Wisconsin to South Korea cheered. And a lesson was learned.

      The G21 of course learned that they could wield some serious clout if they banded together against the superpower. But the rest of the world was watching, and they want to try it too.

      The APEC (Asian Pacific Economic Cooperative) Summit is meeting in Thailand later this month, and against tradition, the WTO Director isn't invited. The Thai prime minister said "the WTO has nothing to do with APEC summit" (Japan Today).

      It's not just nations banding together. Grass roots groups are doing it too. The nice folks who brought you the world wide peace protests earlier this year are back, and putting tens to a hundred thousand people on the streets in several countries. It takes a bit to organize the big ones, but they will no doubt will be back to millions before you know it.

      Say hello to the new world's biggest superpower: the people of Earth.

      "The path of peace is yours to discover for eternity."
      Japanese version of "Mothra" (1961)

    3. Re:Carrying Capacity by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      It's not only the CEOs that are cashing in. The capitalists (i.e. owners of the corporations) are cashing in more.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  50. its not xenophobia by Richthofen80 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While I loathe to respond to the nation bashing that weaves this thread, I think that there is a valid reason to speak against China. I think that China's policy towards human rights is horrible. From Tianamen Square to Falun Gong oppression (and no, I don't believe in religion, but I believe you should be able to practice,) China has abused its citizens. And I think history had proved that the communist governments tend to act this way. So when a rocket is built by a nation paid for by the taxes of citizens, who never got to vote for the people who decided the rocket should be built... It is hideous. It is very hard to be celebratory.

    No, the US isn't perfect. But we don't arrest people for their religion, we allow people to vote, we honor personal achievement, science, etc etc etc. When we went to the moon in 1969, there were ticker tape parades, spontaneous celebration... heck , people camped out in Florida to see the launch. In china there might be state sponsored/forced events, but I doubt you'll see anything like what happened in the US

    Do you believe the chinese are as enthusiastic? do you know why?

    I love science, achievement, technology... but what good are all those if we don't have the freedom needed to create and use those things?

    --
    Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    1. Re:its not xenophobia by meadowsp · · Score: 1

      You don't allow ex-con's to vote (which in your country is quite a large proportion of the population).

      And you arrest people for their religious views (camp x-ray).

      Freedom to use technology, DMCA.

      Take off your blinkers.

    2. Re:its not xenophobia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      No, the US isn't perfect. But we don't arrest people for their religion,


      Unless they are SAND-NIGGERS!!

      Open your eyes.

    3. Re:its not xenophobia by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      I disagree with your characterization.
      We allow convicts who have served their time to vote, they just can't vote while incarcerated.

      We haven't detained those in camp x-ray for religious beliefs. If that were the case, we wouldn't allow religious chaplains to visit them and counsel them. Those people are detained from Afghanistan as combatants in a war, which was authorized by the U.N., no less. The more we can learn from them about worldwide terrorist cells as well as who the remaining leaders are in Afghanistan, the safer the world is.

      As far as the DMCA, I may not agree with all tenets, but I believe in copyright. Either you do or you don't believe in the concept of ideas having ownership for a specific amount of time. You can take issue with that concept, but by no means can you call the DMCA a tyranny for tyranny's sake. it is there to protect a concept that the United States supports, and that is copyright.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    4. Re:its not xenophobia by ghuw · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Too right the US isn't perfect. China's human rights record may suck, but at least they don't claim it to be otherwise.

      US on the other hand has kidnapped and detained without trial, pressing charges, or providing legal access to a group of Muslim citizens from many countries. They've been there for two years!!

      Yea, you'll allow people to vote.. but only if they haven't been sent to jail (for such harmless things as being caught with a bit of grass).. Then you'll do all you can to screw the system to get an idiot like criminal like Bush elected.

      US will forcibly drug criminals just so they are 'sane' enough to be executed

      It's one of only a handful of countries who will execute people who were juveniles when the crime was committed (others are places like Iran, Saudi)

      Such things are positively barbaric... and all we get from them are nonsense slogans such as 'Liberty', 'Justice', 'Democracy'.

      w.r.t forced events, don't kid yourself that you are any less brain washed than Chinese, or the rest of us for that matter. You all seemed to be hyped up into supporting the invasion of Iraq based upon spoon-fed fear (phoney alert levels, duct tape, dirty bombs, and other such nonsense).. Chinese may be given a little media based push to celebrate a successful launch. You guys were conned into supporting the invasion of another country!!

      At least we know where we stand with China.

    5. Re:its not xenophobia by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
      But we don't arrest people for their religion,
      Really? So executing people for the colour of their skin is the only human rights abuse the US gets up to? Well I guess that's okay then.
      we allow people to vote
      Tell that to the hundreds of blacks and latinos who turned up at the polls in the 2000 Florida election only to be told that they had been scrubbed from the electoral rolls by the Bush family. Tell that to the people who cannot unseat an incumbant because of the ludicrous situation that allows politicians to gerrymander their own electoral districts.

      The day when capital punishment is abolished in the US and when elections are not rigged will be the day when anyone stateside is in a position to criticise China for its human rights abuses and lack of representative democracy.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    6. Re:its not xenophobia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No where in this do I say that china is a nice place. The point is only that your assumptions about the US are flawed

      Branch Dividians were murdered by the gov.

      The US has the largest prison population in the world (not per capita)

      The US has the highest youth* exicution rate

      The US has had death marches, genocide, and death squads**

      The facts are the US has a bad record as you admitted, and worse then you seem to think.

      All your arguments apply to the US as well as China. The people of the US did not vote to go to the moon, but the gov went anyway.

      Yes I believe the chinese are as enthusiastic. This is a symbol that after years of oppression and obscurity the "new china" (tm) is taking its previous place as the most advanced nation in the world. After the problems they have had it is certainly a reasin to celebrate.

      If you are basing development on human rights, you have a problem, because most major inventions happened in countries with bad human rights records.

      oh and you missed stuff like resettlement programs and attempts at cultural genocide in your assesment of chinese human rights. Ironically enough right now the largest abuse is against workers rights

      * commited crime before 18 yrs old
      ** death squads have only been used outside the US states.

    7. Re:its not xenophobia by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      No, the US isn't perfect. But we don't arrest people for their religion, we allow people to vote, we honor personal achievement, science, etc etc etc. When we went to the moon in 1969, there were ticker tape parades, spontaneous celebration...

      In 1955, Rosa Parks was arrested for sitting in the wrong seat in a bus. Two years after the Montgomery buses were finally desegregated, the Pioneer 4 flew by the moon.

      In 1963, Dr. Martin Luther King marched in Washington DC and gave his famous speech. In the subsequent years, President Johnson signs the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act, and the Apollo 1 was lost in a launch pad accident. Six years after the march, Apollo 11 lands on the moon. In that same year, the Supreme Court rules that women meeting the physical requirements can work in many jobs that had been for men only.

      It wasn't until 1989, twenty years after Americans first landed on the moon, that an African-American was elected as state governor for the first time.

      Your criticisms against China are valid, but do read a bit of your own history and get off that high horse.

    8. Re:its not xenophobia by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      As I cannot let your accusations stand unaddressed , I will address each to the best of my knowledge.

      Branch Dividians were murdered by the gov.
      The Branch Davidians were not exactly law abiding citizens. They illegally stockpiled weapons without a license (weapons which, in most nations outside the US, are illegal), and treated children in a questionable if not outright illegal manner (from what was stated in subsequent reports, the leader of the davidians took preteen girls as 'wives' and he had sexual intercourse with them). When the authorities went to address those claims, the Davidians refused to cease and desist. they were killed because they took arms against the government, which sought a trial against them. the government did what it was supposed to do.

      The US has the highest youth* exicution rate
      If a youth is someone under 18, then you're probably right. Although, I don't know any specifics, people tried as adults, assumed to be in the proper mental state at the time of their crime, can be executed. Most crimes bearing death as a penalty are murder of children, murder of a peace officer, murder of multiple victims. Premeditated assault of one individual by another deserves the punishment of death. You may disagree, but I'd hardly call the US approach capricious.

      The US has had death marches, genocide, and death squads** I don't know what specifics you allude to, but certainly not this century, which is my major point. 200 years ago almost all governments had the above. every nation save for a few has abandoned these. China CONTINUES HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES. The abuses you claim have been apologized, attempted to be reconciled, and rebuked. We cannot travel back in time to change these things, but we can stop todays. and today, china is in a sorry state, and the US is in a grand state, one of the freest nations on the earth.

      The people of the US did not vote to go to the moon, but the gov went anyway.
      No, we elect officials, who act in our stead. Hence our republic. The Chinese 'republic' is hardly legitimate. there is no constitution that outlines the rights on men. We don't vote on every single issue. we vote for policy makers.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    9. Re:its not xenophobia by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

      *sigh* Hijacked election. Thats all anyone can ever say.

      There is a law in Florida. The law says that ex-felons cannot vote. This law was in place before the 2000 election.

      No one challenged the law prior. Nor would it matter. ex-felons are the least likely group to vote regardless. out of 57,000 felons, would even 10 percent vote? I doubt it, since only 33% of Americans vote. I'd expect maybe 3% would vote, if that. whats that, 1500 votes? not enough to turn the election after the military votes and absentee votes were counted. Which, by the way, were motioned to be discounted by the Gore legal team. Now , its one thing to make a law prior to any election, but its another to change the rules after the fact. Anyone could have challenged that law in supreme courts. No one did.

      stop spewing FUD. the rules were laid out prior to that election.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    10. Re:its not xenophobia by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      You have a right to say the stuff you say--even if your country wasn't that great. Everything you say about China is true for the most part. BUT you are passing off USA like its some utopia. USA may not treat its OWN citizens badly but it has a horrible habit of killing innocent people all over the world. You need to look no further than your imperialistic pursuits and other non-sensical "freedom" wars in Guatemala, El Salvador, Haiti, Panama, Chile, Colombia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, etc...

      As far as local incidents are concerned, the only major one worth mentioning are Kent State, and Waco. Nowadays, I would only be concerned with the Guantanomo Bay issue. This is totally unacceptable since you are jailing someone FOREVER ("war" on terrorism is open-ended) without any charges. And I'll bet at least 20% of the people there are innocent (due to US tactic of rounding up anyone that falls into a profile).

      You have the right to criticize regardless of the circumstances...and I accept your criticism. But don't for a moment assume that you are living on a plane above the rest...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    11. Re:its not xenophobia by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      The Branch Davidians were not exactly law abiding citizens. They illegally stockpiled weapons without a license...and treated children in a questionable if not outright illegal manner...they were killed because they took arms against the government, which sought a trial against them. the government did what it was supposed to do.

      The government does not have the right to kill INNOCENT people. It is a highly contentious matter as to who set the fire, but the govt is party--if not fully--responsible for the deaths of many people.

      Some of your observations are nothing more than government spin. The child incest stuff was most likely govt propaganda--or possibly disinformation. It never even came to issue until AFTER the attempted arrest. If you ask me, some govt official introduced the propaganda once things got out of hand. As far as the weapons charges are concerned, FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND (WHICH ISN'T MUCH), the initial charge wasn't that they had illegal weapons but that they were SELLING them illegally. Basically, Koresh and his buddies were buying weapons and selling them at a profit. That part is illegal and the govt had the right to go in. But it is highly questionable of the stuff that happened afterwards. For instance, if I'm not mistaken, the govt deployed TANKS. Name a non-totalitarian or non-dictataorship that deploys tanks against citizens.

      And no, I'm not a David Koresh sympathizer. I'm on the far-left and could care less about those right wingers. However, I claim that there was a massive government coverup!

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    12. Re:its not xenophobia by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
      *Sigh* indeed. "Ex felons?" If you'd followed my link you'd have seen that people removed from the electoral rolls had committed misdemeanors out of state like littering and jaywalking. Others had been removed just because they shared the same name as an ex felon. Gore lost by 537 votes. This had every impact on the election.

      Oh, and what state did this list of "criminals" come from? I'll give you a clue. It's a big state with lots of oil wells and cowboy hats.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
  51. Awesome! by NetNinja · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The more countries who have the me too attitude the better the chances of the U.S. getting off thier asses and going to mars. If we don't establish a larger presence in space first the other countries will militarize it first.

    it's not to say that the U.S. won't do it.

    reminds me of the political cartoon of Pakistan developing Nuclear weapons and they had thier bomb strapped to the back of a donkey to deliver thier payload.

  52. Brilliant. by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
    We know China has been refitting some of their missiles to reach U.S. military bases in Japan. Now that China is about to test technology that can send a payload to reach Washington D.C., how is this in any way a positive thing? Some say that China will not reverse its policy on not using its missiles first. However, the U.S. has broken its policy in not attacking other countries first, so why be surprised when a new arms race is about to begin?

    Science fiction is often a glimpse of the things to come. If so, I'd hate to live in the world of The Middle-Kingdom.

    = 9J =

    1. Re:Brilliant. by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      duh, china already got ICBMs that can reach the states. This doesn't change a thing except to the better. i prefer them to send people into space than spending all the money on their military.

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    2. Re:Brilliant. by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
      If you don't think its their military who just sent that manned missile into space, I recommend reading further about it.

      It seems you didn't read my post carefully (or look at the maps in your own link). The U.S.'s capitol is currently outside China's reach. Yeah, now with secret launchings, they have a better platform to stage negotiations from. Its a whole different world when the missiles comes straight down on top of you. And, from space, you don't need alot of fuel to drop something. Just enough to guide a small nuke.

      They're still a few years away (they just launched successfully this evening) from having anything to worry about. On the other hand, they have two critical things on their side: 1) Someone else has already laid the difficult ground work for them (U.S. and Russia), 2) technology today is a thousand times of what the U.S. and Russia had in their attempts to master space. These two factors should shave quite a few years in allowing them to mature their space program.

      As for strategy, the chances that they'll try to bully the U.S. directly is not likely their goal. However, surrounding neighbors will be more pliable as trade deals are re-negotiated. And, if I were Taiwan, I'd be sweating as their protector, the U.S., weakens due to a loss of technological momentum to India and China. Those are the two major benefactors and repositories of technical experience who are gaining the momentum from us due to offshoring by "U.S." companies. Hell, the PCs we're both typing on are imported from countries where our jobs have gone to.

      While I applaud another enterprise by humanity to venture into space, please don't mistake this as a anything other than a political move. There's nothing humanitarian about it. Hence, the "secrecy" and not a joint mission to reduce the cost and risk. Its funny how history repeats itself. The U.S. is apparently doomed to continuously misunderstand and underestimate Asian countries. Aside from all the war related blunders, our private sector did it with Japan, and now it appears our public sector is about to do it with China. The Chinese play a game they invented thousands of years ago. And, if they didn't invent it, they were certainly the first to formalize the rules. We're the new kid on the block in their philosophy. Yeah, we're tough (for only the past 60 years), and yeah they've had their ups and downs for the past 3,000 years. But, we've only been an Imperial power for a blink of an eye in comparison to China's experience of being one for 300 centuries.

      As the U.S. overexposes and overplays its hand across the globe, rudely making waves and painfully highlighting our weaknesses. The Chinese avoid all these things and watch. So far, we've been successful in countering their moves (particularly in oil) as they've probed our weakspots and have made agreements with nearly all our enemies (and there are quite a few). But, these are merely feints on their part in what is going to be a long (if we're lucky and keep our wits), protracted campaign in a game of economic and political expansion.

      They've decided that it's time for the sleeping giant to stretch, and the Soviet Union was nothing like what we're about to face in economical and political presence.

      = 9J =

  53. Malaysia's at it again... just nod and smile, yah? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, this is the country that seems to have adopted "Hey, I can do that!" as its national motto.

    Just wait and see. Come launch time it'll be "Hey Singapore, watch this!11!!" (those who know the love-hate competition between those two neighbouring countries will get this).

    ... and yes, I'm Malaysian, and I know exactly what I'm talking about.
    ... and I think this is cool too. :-D

  54. Priorities by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

    Really, considering the state of the economy and all the crap going on with Iraq/Afganistan I think the US has something better to do than do something on the Moon. They (China and US) need to work on things here on Earth.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    1. Re:Priorities by isorox · · Score: 1

      :rolleyes: /me inserts "fix europe before exploring the new world" reference /me inserts "fix the trees before moving to the plans" reference /me inserts "fix the sea before moving on land" reference

      etc.

    2. Re:Priorities by Urkki · · Score: 1

      That's the nasty thing about capitalistic systems. Your own problems are no excuse, only thing that matters is if you have better offer than your competitor.

      Just as an example of what could be, if China (or Russia or India or California) is able to offer orbital microgravity manufacturing facilites to companies in 10 years when nobody else can, there's no question that US companies will be very busy investing a lot of their capital to China, and leaving a lot of the profits to China as well.

      And who has most money, rules the world. There is no room for "let's work on making world a better place".

    3. Re:Priorities by xv4n · · Score: 1

      would bombing Iraq FROM the Moon make you feel any better? =)

    4. Re:Priorities by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, it's possible that the time of national governments spending huge amounts of money just to complete proof-of-concept space projects is over.

      It's possible that entrepenurial private entities will lead the way in future space-based tech advances.

      It's entirely possible that if there were money in space, private companies would probably be there already.

      Finally, if by some freakish good fortune the Chinese government does find money in space, it's entirely possible that private companies will rapidly catch up to and then surpass whatever the Chinese government manages to do about it.

      Seriously, China is going into space? What do they know that Boeing, Lockheed, and NASA don't?

      Answer: Probably nothing.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  55. Re:Rook rook! Silly Roundeyes in space for 40 year by Subotai · · Score: 1

    Of course whoever does something first is better and smarter. IS that is why we have Linux and are now educating the bassackward US businesses how to use it?

    --
    "The only way to catch tiger cubs is to go into the tiger's den."
  56. HR people are the same in Malaysia too.... by magarity · · Score: 2, Funny

    Malaysia is calling for interested applicants ... to be its first cosmonaut ... prior space exploration experience is a definite plus ... Offer is for Malaysians only

    This is like a recent help wanted ad demanding at least six years of experience for a Windows 2000 Data Center admin.

    $#%^ing HR...

  57. Jiuquan images, no wacky plugins required by 21mhz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here and here you can see the image taken on Oct. 4, in a more conventional format.

    --
    My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  58. Petronis? by sebol · · Score: 1

    s/Petronis/Petronas

    fixing typo...

    --
    -- Hasbullah bin Pit (sebol)
  59. Re:You Slashbots Are Pathetic by antirename · · Score: 1

    No, the Chinese are probably going end up making a big crater somewhere in Mongolia. This IS their first try, you know, and they have had major quality control issues with their submarines. I would imagine a manned space mission would be even more complicated than a boomer.

  60. Obligatory "Wants One Too" Reference by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1
    This is what I thought of immediately after reading the headline. Of course, a space race is certainly preferable to nuclear proliferation.:)
    Who's Next by Tom Lehrer

    First we got the bomb and that was good,
    'Cause we love peace and motherhood.
    Then Russia got the bomb, but that's O.K.,
    'Cause the balance of power's maintained that way!
    Who's next?

    France got the bomb, but don't you grieve,
    'Cause they're on our side (I believe).
    China got the bomb, but have no fears;
    They can't wipe us out for at least five years!
    Who's next?

    Then Indonesia claimed that they
    Were gonna get one any day.
    South Africa wants two, that's right:
    One for the black and one for the white!
    Who's next?

    Egypt's gonna get one, too,
    Just to use on you know who.
    So Israel's getting tense,
    Wants one in self defense.
    "The Lord's our shepherd," says the psalm,
    But just in case, we better get a bomb!
    Who's next?

    Luxembourg is next to go
    And, who knows, maybe Monaco.
    We'll try to stay serene and calm
    When Alabama gets the bomb!
    Who's next, who's next, who's next?
    Who's next?
    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  61. Read Space.Com with a grain of salt by jlamorie · · Score: 1

    All major news sites are filled with small technical mistakes and oversights. However, just because a website is called 'Space.com' doesn't mean it is any more accurate.

    In the text associated with the image of the launch site they state Also take note of a neighboring and comparable launch pad. I assume they are refering to the large tower in the bottom right.

    However, if you look closely, there are no tracks going to the tower (tracks have curves, not 135 degree angles). Instead there are a heap of pipes leading to the launch tower.

    This second tower should be the LOX processing and storage plant. I'm not an expert, but it's just a little annoying when a 'space' site goes overboard on the tech pr0n.

  62. Prior experience by Surak_Prime · · Score: 1

    To all those griping about the Malaysian "help wanted" - prior space exploration experience doesn't HAVE to mean they've been to space. Support, logistics, engineering, etc, done from the ground would fit that description, too - and NASA, for one, has plenty of foreign nationals working in positions like that. Possibly even Malaysians.

    --
    :::The Spear in the heart of the Other is the Spear in the heart of You; You are He - Surak of Vulcan:::
  63. Re:You Slashbots Are Pathetic by magarity · · Score: 1

    This IS their first try

    First MANNED try. There have already been four launches of the same model vehicle unmanned. Compare this with the US only launching two Gemini (Titan II) unmanned before strapping Gus Grissom inside the third.

  64. Untrue. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
    Malaysia is probably the only country where discriminatory practices favouring the ethnic majority (the bumiputeras, which are largely malays) is enshrined in the constitution (plus a whole slew of laws).
    India has an affirmative action programme up as well, addressing demographics that are officially called "backward", "scheduled" castes and "scheduled tribes", the sum total population of which would actually constitute the majority.

    Not that there's anything patently wrong in affirmative action programmes (if implemented in the right spirit), but just to point out.

    There is even more disaffection and distrust between the races, and racial integration hasn't improved (recent surveys show that even 95% of university students stick to their own ethnic groups)
    Well, Malaysia is not alone in that. I can cite research on this, but it's a facet of every multi-ethnic { region | country }.

    A simple observation:- Ethnic Indians in Singapore, which is usually considered more meritocratic than the abang up north, often complain that in public buses and MRT's, the seat next to theirs is the last to be filled. Latent racism? I don't know; mmmmay be not. But that's a phenomenon that you'll find in other multi-racial cities as well; if I'm not wrong, there was a study in London that showed exactly that. People tend to stick with people of common ethnic descent. Deal with it.

    BUT, bear in mind that for a developing country, there are hardly any other countries that have a diverse composition like malaysia (60% malays, 27% chinese and 10% indian) and with severely imbalanced political and economic control that have not resulted in a hutu-vs-tutsi like anarchy, but still lives in relative harmony, despite the low-simmering dissatisfactions.
    I would have agreed with you had you said affirmative action is necessary for social justice or something, but this, sorry, is plain stupid.

    Malaysia hasn't seen a racial flare-up mainly because of strong governance, and perhaps, the fact that the ruling coalition has representation from all three major races. That is, not many feel dis-enfranchised from the political process; not much cause for dissent from the Union. That the region saw an electronics boom in the 90's only helped the cause.

    More to the point, the bumiputra policy, as you said, is to mostly keep the majority population happy at the expense of the minority. So why haven't they rebelled? Scroll above.

  65. Re:Rook rook! Silly Roundeyes in space for 40 year by Knunov · · Score: 1

    "Of course whoever does something first is better and smarter. IS that is why we have Linux and are now educating the bassackward US businesses how to use it?"

    And you have Linux because of UNIX. And UNIX was created by...

    Anyone?

    AMERICANS!

    WOOOOOOH! U-S-A! U-S-A! U-S-A!

    --
    Why do users with IDs under 100,000 or over 700,000 usually have the most worthwhile comments?
  66. Launch is today at 2 PM EDT by cshotton · · Score: 1
    According to Aviation Week and Space Technology, the launch is scheduled for 9 AM, Oct. 15, which is 2 PM EDT, Oct. 14th here in the US. That means that it's slated to go off in just under 2 hours from now.

    Allegedly, there will be live television coverage of the launch. Anyone know how to get a peek?

    --

    Shut up and eat your vegetables!!!
  67. H1B? by KenDaMan · · Score: 1

    Boldly go where no Malaysian has gone before -- to space, the final frontier." Offer is for Malaysians only, though.

    What, no H1B visas accepted?

  68. Re:You Slashbots Are Pathetic by antirename · · Score: 1

    Ok, first manned try is what I meant. If the others had failed, it wouldn't be as embarrassing as the manned one going splat. After the problems China has had manufacturing very small numbers of fighters, submarines, etc. I wouldn't want to be the poor sucker they strap into it.

  69. The space race is over.. by LrdHlmt · · Score: 1

    ..so no hurry is going to happen at NASA I belive.

    Capitalism (coporate interests) I do think will go on with the most obsolete, useless, bloddy and expensive space program in the world.. yes ladies and geeks... the Space Shuttle!!. The hurry now is to get the suttle back in space so all of NASA suppliers keep earning thier buck.

  70. Unfair moderation by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1


    What is the deal with this bullshit moderation? -1 flamebait isn't fair at all. This is a legit post...

    1. Re:Unfair moderation by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      Note my sig. I get alot more out of slashdot now that I turned off my filters.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    2. Re:Unfair moderation by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Unfair moderation? On SLASHDOT?! You're kidding, that never happens.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
  71. this could be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps this will bancrupt their communist economy and then their people might just be freed.

  72. Yes by pubjames · · Score: 1


    Yep, that's what I thought. Especially considering it started life as +2.

  73. Are they intending on building a space station? by johnjay · · Score: 1

    I noticed this interesting observation in today's nytimes article on the upcoming launch:

    The Chinese named their spacecraft Shenzhou or Divine Vessel. Weighing more than 8 tons and almost 30 feet long, it was slightly larger and heavier than the Soyuz. The main difference is the forward unit, which on the Shenzhou has solar panels and can remain in orbit after the piloted module descends back to Earth.

    Why would you want to leave a powered section of your spaceship in space every time you do a launch? Possibly so that after hundreds of launches you have hundreds of building blocks up there, floating around and ready for assembly?

    That's a quantum shift in space strategy. Hopefully the U.S. will adopt a similar policy.

  74. Re:This pussyfooting business is making me sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are the kind of stupid asshole I hope never rises to power. Even in our disarmed state, the US has the potential to cause global catastrophe - we have by orders of magnitude the largest operational arsenal of weapons of mass destruction. The Chinese aren't exactly scratching for bombs either, and they're far more likely to use them. All we need is to piss off China or Korea to the point that they nuke Japan and bring the world economy to its knees.

  75. Paper tiger by amightywind · · Score: 1

    This is more than about a space launch. This is about China telling the world that it has arrived and that things are going to be different in the International arena.

    It is difficult to guess how. China is no more a strategic threat then it has been. They have no global military reach and unlikely to obtain one in the near future. US carrier groups steaming through the Taiwan Straits are symbolic of that. Except for Tibet China and the derelict DPRK China exerts very little political influence and has nothing to offer the world idealogically.

    I wouldn't read to much into the space launch either. The Chinese space program consists of a repainted Soyuz sitting on top of a Long March rocket. It would have been far more impressive if Chinese industry had developed the spacecraft themselves.

    They have their own rapidly growing technology sector, including china developed chips [zdnet.co.uk] and Red Flag linux [redflag-linux.com] and they are building their own space agency [yahoo.com]. Investmenting in technology is crucial to challenging the US lead economically, politically and militarily.

    All true. But politically China is run by a bunch of gangsters trying there best to keep a lid on revolution and placate a freedom starved population. Can China's leadership ever be comfortable projecting power on the world stage when they have so many skeletons in the closet at home.

    They have little or no foreign debt [uscc.gov] and growing economic power [cato.org]...

    They have a non-market currency whose low value gives them a temporary trade advantage, but is not sustainable.

    This rather than being the New American Century [newamericancentury.org] is likely to be Chinese!

    I wouldn't say that this is a new American Century, just another American Century.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  76. Re:China's Space Program is America's Space Progra by tjw · · Score: 1
    China's space program, America's tax dollars at work.


    If by 'tax' you mean 'retail', then I agree.
    --

    XJS*C4JDBQADN1.NSBN3*2IDNEN*GTUBE-STANDARD-ANTI-UB E-TEST-EMAIL*C.34X
  77. divine seeds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Though, I expect this launch to be successful, let's please stop kidding ourselves that China will put a man on the moon anytime soon, let alone ever build a space base up there.

    Those who take such pronouncements as something more than government propoganda should read about the real Chinese space program:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A337 -2003Oct8.html

    China's space program also has a madcap side. Since 1987, for example, its scientists have been sending seeds and seedlings aboard rockets. When Russian and U.S. scientists have done this, their goal generally was to test the environment in a spaceship or probe the possibilities of raising plants in outer space.

    But China's scientists have hitched rides for thousands of seeds as part of a program to mutate them and turn them into high-yielding crops on Earth, viewed as unusual by Western scientists because seeds can be irradiated more easily in a laboratory. So far, according to Liu Luxiang, the director of the Center of Space Breeding at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China has approved for farming 11 types of seeds that are descended from those irradiated in space -- six types of rice, two types of wheat, one green pepper, a tomato and a sesame seed. China's state-run media have also heralded cucumbers from space, saying they taste better and resist diseases.

    Boy, this kind of irrationalism mixed with China's current political situation is more dangerous than dynamite. The leaders there have been promoting a virulent form of nationalism since communism was abandoned as a viable ideology 20 years ago. China right now is basically 2nd Reich Germany- a resentful, up-and-coming power that feels it's been denied its place in the sun for too long. I hope that when their space program meets with its inevitable first disaster they do not decide to lash out by invading Taiwan or something.

  78. Why is this surprising? by Animats · · Score: 1
    Why not? Launching is expensive, but boosters capable of this are, after all, half century old technology.

    As for becoming an astronaut, NASA takes applications. Fewer people want the job as the years go by. Starting salary for astronauts is grade GS-11, at $42,976 per year, and maxes out at GS-13 and $79,629. Anybody who can qualify can do better elsewhere.

    Given what ISS crew really do, which is assemble and fix stuff, NASA should be hiring people with A&P (airframe and powerplant) training, licenses, and experience. NASA's had to give basic shop training to their fighter-jock astronauts.

    In the end, it's a blue-collar job with some glamour.

    1. Re:Why is this surprising? by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1
      Fewer people want the job as the years go by. Starting salary for astronauts is grade GS-11, at $42,976 per year, and maxes out at GS-13 and $79,629. Anybody who can qualify can do better elsewhere.

      It sure would give you better stories to tell your grandkids though. If your grandfather was an aeronautical engineer, which would you rather hear about? "Well, little Johnny, you see, I managed to reduce the drag coeffecient of the wings by ..." or "... and then the main rockets engaged, and it felt like I got hit by a semi."

  79. Who is the contractor??? by WasteOfAmmo · · Score: 1
    So is it just me or does the picture of the chinese astronaut in this news story look suspiciously like a lego mini-fig?

    If the news clips of the actual lift-off show a red/black/yellow/blue/white rocket and launch tower with surpisingly blockish looking lettering, I'm selling my shares in China Aerospace International Holdings Ltd.!

    Merlin.

  80. Taiwan helped China's aerospace industry. by reporter · · Score: 1
    The Taiwanese transferred key technologies to mainland China and enabled the Chinese to achieve their first manned space flight. Much of China's aerospace work comes from Taiwan's IDF (indigenous defense fighter).

    The Taiwanese have a history of transferring sensitive/military technology to mainland China.

    ... from the desk of the reporter

  81. Mixed Feelings by Sir+Altitude · · Score: 1
    On the one hand, I mostly agree with all of you that this may finally get those lazy you-know-whats at NASA off their sofas and back to work...Then I remember that we have a true nincompoop running NASA.

    It's time we put ENGINEERS back in charge of NASA instead of appointing politicians and, more recently, a bean-counter as its administrator.

    Case in point: On Sep 10, Congress cross-examined said bonehead about an intriguing idea that a Joe Ordinary engineer published in an op-ed which can be read here. It's breif, very well-versed and I definitely recommend reading it, but the ghist of it is instead of completely scrapping the shuttle (referred to as STS) and all of its infrastructure and personnel, that it is technologically and financially (read as cheaper) possible to take those people and task them to refitting existing shuttle hardware to go to Mars. Jobs are saved, progress is made, and all for cheap--irresistable, right?

    Not to our resident killjoy administrator Sean O'Keefe. At the hearings, Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) entered the full text of the op-ed into the Congressional Record, and then asked NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe what he thought of it. Mr. O'Keefe responded defending NASA's current approach, saying that the ideas in the op-ed represented "wrong headed thinking."

    It would seem, ironically enough, that NASA is behaving the way we would expect a communist regime to--CYA tactics. We saw this same behavior prior to the Soviet Union's fall (cheer): shunning innovation and new ideas in a desperate bid for self-preservation.

    To complete the irony, China is doing the opposite in their design for their spacecraft, going with the new school of thought in space travel: Using inexpensive off-the-shelf technology and using unconventional engineering and logistics. The former, make fun of it all you want, but the Soyuz is a tried and tested spacecraft. It beats spending billions on dollars of money wrenched from the hands of peasants to make a new bigger craft when a Soyuz is all you need for the job.

    By the latter, I refer to this detachable portion obviously meant for space station construction. This sort of approach has been called for by several engineers recently, most notably Dr. Robert Zubrin, the author of the op-ed. A few years ago, he sent NASA his idea for a Mars mission involving sending a return vehicle to Mars FIRST and have it make propellant from the chemicals in the atmosphere, and have the crew arrive in a separate "hab" craft. At the conclusion of the mission, they ditch the craft and leave in the return vehicle. Repeat several times, then can hook those unused habs together and--PRESTO! Instant Martian base! And all for the same cost as the shuttle.

    NASA didn't take too kindly to having someone challenge their plan, which involved huge orbital stations, orbiting shipyards, a lunar refueling base, and everything else logistically necessary to support it all. Price tag: $450 billion. It would seem though, that this sort of idea has found a new home with China, who are willing to adapt and accept new ideas like this.

    I certainly do hope that this will start a new space race that will end with the US on top, but I have my doubts. It's sort of a shame, we have everything we need to make, say, a mission to Mars possible.

    --Our economy is recovering.

    --We had the technology to do it (at least, if you take Zubrin's approach) back in the 80s, but political short-sightedness of the time kept us.

    --This incident I mentioned, plus this Congressional hearing Thursday suggests that our COngress will back a renewed space program.

    --Mission: SPACE, a new space themed ride at EPCOT just opened amidst much fanfare, and is receiving a lot of attention and popularity. Tourists are flocking in to experience the thrill of spaceflight, even if it is just a simulation. This coupled with statistics in a recent Popular Science special feature show that the public support is definitely there.

    If you've read this far, thank you for tolerating my ranting. This is my first time posting on Slashdot, and I consider myself very passionate about our future in space. As we space nuts say, "Ad astra!"

  82. Re:You Slashbots Are Pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you remember. Communism is a good thing on slashdot.

  83. Bollocks matey. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Ther are social and political reasons for that state of affairs.

    Your childish simplification does nothing to enlighten people that have not been in Malaysia.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Bollocks matey. by inteller · · Score: 1

      you should never resort to state run racism and discrimination because the majority of your population is made up of spoiled, uneducated bigots.

      Malay gov is just aparthied without the segregation.

  84. Re:China's Space Program is America's Space Progra by penguinlust · · Score: 1

    It is a tax if it goes to a government. How much of the "Retail" from walmart is ending in the Chinese governments coffers?

  85. chinesese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    chinese people cant make rocket ships because they would break to easy because its probably made by kids in their toy shop so they smell

  86. I don't know if you're really serious, but... by 00420 · · Score: 1

    We have been broadcasting radiowaves for awhile. Taking precautions against alien invasion may be prudent. I suggest we use the asteroid belt for ore and begin creation of early warning systems and weapons seriously.

    If they have the technology to get here then chances are they will have the technology to defeat any defense systems that we have.

  87. chinese people rock da house downtown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    chinese people are cool homie g's so dont be mean because i am chinese and dont like racisist unslanty eyed people they give me the willys

  88. THEY'VE LAUNCHED by flogger · · Score: 1

    Read about it here.

    --
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
    -- The Doctor, "Doctor
  89. FIXED LINK by flogger · · Score: 1

    It seems CNN changed their links around: Here's a fixed set.

    While we've been talking about the chinises space launch here, the Chineese have launched a fighter pilot into space. I wish him well on his 14 laps around the earth.

    --
    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
    "First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
    -- The Doctor, "Doctor
  90. RTFA pls by _Bucktooth_ · · Score: 1

    The paragraph in question:

    Dr Mazlan said although the selection was open to those interested in space exploration, the person who knew the Russian language or had a doctorate in the field of science would score higher points during the short-listing process.

  91. Do you know Malaysia ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1



    Malaysia is a country which practices OFFICIAL RACIAL DISCRIMINATION POLICY.

    It officially DISCRIMINATES against EVERYONE who is not a Malay, and/or a Moslem.

    If you are a Malay (and/or a Moslem), you get to enjoy ALL TYPES OF PRIVILEDGES - like you get discounts on purchasing houses, you get to study in universities even if your academic results sucks, and you get to call yourself "BUMIPUTRA" (aka Prince Of The Earth) and with that you can kill any non-bumiputras with the knowledge that you will get only a slight slap on your precious little fragile hand.

    And such a country is sending people into outer space ?

    Does that mean Malaysia is gonna extend its RACIAL DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES INTO OUTER SPACE ?

    Damn !

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Do you know Malaysia ? by sayuthi · · Score: 1

      Dude, go and take your medication. Plus get and education too. And it won't do you much harm either in finding out more about Malaysia instead of making yourself look like an ignorant idiot here.

  92. astronut, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for me, having an astronut for a country is not important.

    Yes, if they choose you, Malaysia will definitely have its first astronut.

  93. Do you know the REAL Malaysia ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1



    I see that you may have friends from Malaysia.

    They may be bright and promising individuals.

    But if they are NOT Malays, and/or Moslems, you can count out the possibility for them to be chosen by the RACIST REGIME that is controlling Malaysia as their astronaut.

    Everything in Malaysia is tainted by RACE. That is, if you are a Malay - the so-called PREFERRED RACE, you get all types of priviledges. You can get into universities even if your academic scores stinks. You get lots of discounts when you purchase houses. You get unending aids from the governments. You can even kill some non-Malays for fun, and you won't be punished.

    Yes, that's the TRUE PICTURE in Malaysia.

    South Africa's apartheid system is over, but Malaysia's own blend of OFFICIALLY CONDONED racial discriminatory policies are still VERY MUCH IN EFFECT.

    Plus, if you read the news for the past 2 years or so, you will see that Malaysia has A LOT of connections to the Islamic Terrorists, from Taliban to Al-Queda to all types of Jihad movements all over the world.

    The terrorist connection is nothing new, for the RACIST REGIME that controls Malaysia is also a TERRORIST-SUPPORTER.

    THe prime minister of Malaysia believes that the Moslems of the whole world must unite so that they can KILL ALL THE INFIDELS (especially those from the Western "satanic" countries.)

    That guy, Mahathir Mohammed, has said that the Moslems must obtain "world class and very destructive weapons" in order to "fight" the west - one has to wonder about the meaning of "weapons" and "fight".

    He also publicly condemned the WHITES for being "racists", and he made that comment as the HEAD OF THE RACIST REGIME IN MALAYSIA WHICH PRACTICES OFFICIAL RACIST DISCRIMINATORY POLICIES against everyone who is not Malays.

    That's the REAL Malaysia.

    So stop being so darn naive about the "goods" of Malaysia.

    In Malaysia, there is NO SUCH THING as GOOD. Everything here is rotten to the core !

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
  94. Islamist Medievalists have no place in Space by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1

    Here's a note I sent to the white-house on this:
    Given the recent bellicose and racist comments by the President of Malaysia, which indicate that Malaysia is squarely on the side of the Islamists we are currently at war with, I urge you to oppose, and prevent, Malaysia from sending an Astronaut to the International Space Station.
    The US is the largest, and almost the sole significant, contributor to the Space Station. Having a representative of a country that chooses to incite hatred and violence towards us and our allies, as well as provide a base of operations against us, be our "Guest" there, is unseemly.
    Malaysia must pay a price for its positions and behavior. Space is the final frontier for humankind, and we should make it clear that medievalism has no place in our future by preventing representatives of medievalist governments from setting foot there.