Slashdot Mirror


Hack Your Ride

LukePieStalker writes "Monday's Boston Globe has a story on the global market for car chippers. The article describes a global subculture of "drivers who reprogram their vehicles and the companies that keep them supplied with high-performance software and silicon chips". One nice hack: a car chipped-up for the race track can be set back to factory specs for the street simply by pushing the cruise control button."

368 comments

  1. That bowling ball! It's my wife by Monsieur+Canard · · Score: 5, Funny

    And the coming of warmer weather is bringing in a new wave of customers to KTR, which was originally owned by Boston rocker J. Geils.

    For some reason, I find that incredibly cool.

    Maybe the whole purpose of these new mod chips is so drivers can make back-up copies of their cars in case they crash.

    Sorry, I'll leave now.

    --
    He took a duck to the face at 250 knots.
    1. Re:That bowling ball! It's my wife by dr_dank · · Score: 3, Funny

      Also, it proves that more than his memory has just been sold.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:That bowling ball! It's my wife by ScottGant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember some time back that J. Geils actually left music because he was having a more lucrative career fixing Ferraris. Maybe not more lucrative, but certainly more fun for J. Geils himself.

      He started out just fixing his own...then friends of his with Ferraris would ask him to tinker with theirs...one thing lead to another.

      At least this is what I remember from memory. I think it's cool also.

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
    3. Re:That bowling ball! It's my wife by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Interesting
      > He started out just fixing his own...then friends of his with Ferraris would ask him to tinker with theirs...one thing lead to another.

      Ironic. My first "electronics" project as a child was abusing my dad's 4-track reel-to-reel tape recorder by opening it up twisting the belt around to force it to run backwards. I recorded the "strange foreign language" in J. Geils' No Anchovies Please, unhacked the tape recorder, and played the message backwards to discover the shocking secret:

      "It doesn't take a genuis to tell the difference between chicken shit and chicken salad."

      I've waited most of my life to use that line in context. I am complete! w00t!

    4. Re:That bowling ball! It's my wife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Play this backwards.

      Life is good

  2. Back to the Street by rwiedower · · Score: 1
    "We probably do about 10 cars a week," Diebold said. And the coming of warmer weather is bringing in a new wave of customers to KTR, which was originally owned by Boston rocker J. Geils.

    Um, so can we get the cars to play "freeze frame" now?

  3. Stupid question by maan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And what do you do when you want "normal" cruise control?

    1. Re:Stupid question by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Well, then you press the red button labeled "NO injection. DANGER", of course....

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    2. Re:Stupid question by dontbgay · · Score: 1

      I would make an "insensitive clod" joke here but it's getting kinda old so i'll bring up this point: What about the people who don't need cruise control? If you're driving a sports car for racing, but you still need a ride to and fro work, then it's not such a bad thing.

      --
      Sig not found.
    3. Re:Stupid question by tankdilla · · Score: 1

      You press that button on your dash that says "Factory specs/ race track", duh!

      --

      -Look lively. LOOK LIVELY!!! --Mr. Shmallow

    4. Re:Stupid question by Kyaphas · · Score: 2, Informative

      The article is a bit misleading. You don't use just the cruise control button alone, it's a sequence of presses to activate it.

      Check it out at http://www.goapr.com

      And watch that knee-jerk. ;-)

      --
      ---- The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. -Thomas Jefferson
    5. Re:Stupid question by PhuCknuT · · Score: 1

      I dunno about your car, but in every one I've driven the cruise control button only enabled CC, it didn't engage it. So, you could leave it on all the time without ever using cruise control.

      Now, assuming you don't need cruise control when you're in 'race mode', the button makes a good mode selector for race/normal. With it off, you're in race mode with no CC, with it on, you're in normal mode with CC enabled, and you can engage that as usual with the rest of the CC controls.

    6. Re:Stupid question by HungWeiLo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Take the stick shift and:

      up, up, down, down, left, right, left right, left turn signal, right turn signal, brake, gas

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    7. Re:Stupid question by dknj · · Score: 2, Informative

      And what do you do when you want "normal" cruise control?

      You press the button. I have an APR chip in my car, and all you have to do is hold the cruise control button until the check engine light flashes. After you have the mode set, light goes off and the new software takes control. I like it since I don't have to put the extra stress my turbo when I don't need it.

      -dk

    8. Re:Stupid question by dknj · · Score: 1

      I should also add, there is no need to hold the cruise control button for 5 seconds (if you don't have a modified ecu). Setting CC is a one touch thing...

      -dk

    9. Re:Stupid question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Might be funny, but some cars has that type of hidden "features" that will activate or disable a function. It is however not ment for the enduser

    10. Re:Stupid question by Professor_Quail · · Score: 1

      actually, it's not just one button pressed to switch the programs...I know for the APR chip, you use a sequence of commands on the cruise control stalk to switch the programs, so that normal cruise control functions continue to work properly.

      If you want to see an example, here's a video from APR's site:

    11. Re:Stupid question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a BMW once that could display internal error codes when you hit the brake pedal a certain number of times while turning on the ignition.

    12. Re:Stupid question by IanO · · Score: 1

      This explains what they guy I was following on the way to work was doing... and I just thought he was an idiot.

      --
      ------
      Objects in Mirror are Losing!
    13. Re:Stupid question by Johannes · · Score: 2, Informative

      You have to hold down one of the buttons for about 5 seconds before it recognizes the command. It also only recognizes the command when the engine is not running (atleast I think they changed that now).

      I have one of the APR chips for my Audi and use it regularly.

      In my case, I have 4 different programs for my ECU. Holding down one of the buttons on my cruise control stalk for 5 seconds, the check engine light starts flashing (yes, poor choice of lights, but it's one of the few the ECU has direct control over) once per second, then after another 5 seconds it flashes twice per second and so on up to 4 times a second. You release the button when the light is flashing the number of times a second that corresponds with the program you want to use.

      You could actually do this while the car was running too, but it was very much discouraged (imagine going from full boost on the race program, to nothing on the valet program instantly). I think the latest versions lock out the functionality when the engine is running.

      So, to answer your question, normal crise control functionality is not affected.

    14. Re:Stupid question by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      The whole idea of a turbo is that if you drive your car carefully, it never spools up (that sucking sound you hear around 2500 rpm). So if you keep it under 3000 rpm, you really hardly use the turbo. And the APR chip dynamically adjusts boost pressure...so at spool, you're only running a little bit more pressure than stock. Hence the improved fuel economy with the chip (2 mpg in my experience, with my lightweight flywheel I can get upwards of 37 mpg with the cruise set to 65, not bad for a car with 215 hp!)

      The only time you really stress your turbo with increased boost pressure is when you push it to the floor. Which is when you WANT to stress the turbo. The switch that's on newer APR chips was put in to give drivers peace of mind...I have 100,000 miles on my APR chip and both turbo and engine are wearing better than expected.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    15. Re:Stupid question by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Dumb question from me here.. as I'm relatively new to this (but considering chipping my new jetta)

      How does the chip control boost pressure? Is this particular to your model? Does it have some kind of electronically adjustable wastegate?

    16. Re:Stupid question by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Informative

      A chip adjusts the sensitivity of the wastegate (which is electronically adjustable, yes, it's apparently a solenoid), as well as controlling the fuel-air mixture. It also increases the rev limit, not that it matters since you'll never hit it (the shift point is in the late 5000s for the 1.8T). Here's some info from a Volvo turbo page...though the effect on VW/Audi cars is a bit more spectacular (due to heavily overengineered and underspeced engines...if only the steering and stabilization systems were so trustworthy!).

      The overengineered specs for the 1.8T mean HUGE boosts in engine performance can be had relatively simply. Generally, a chip in a normally aspirated car means at most 10 hp. In a turbo, it can be fairly extreme...with the Audi V6 2.7 biturbo seeing a boost of 65+ hp without adding new turbos or exhausts! VW noticed this overengineering as well (if they didn't do it on purpose) -- notice with the 1.8T that the same engine that was stock 150 hp in 1997 is now stock at 170 hp. They say it's due to DBW, but I say it's due to a better boost program.

      Either way, you'd be nuts to buy the crummy 2.8 V6, which actually puts out LESS power after a boost mod than the 1.8T. And it's heavier. And it's $1800 more expensive. But I guess you get more torque under 2k, meaning you don't sound like you're gunning it all the time.

      The chip is particular to the engine, but this usually amounts to being particular to model as well, because though Volkswagen uses the same basic engine, the 1.8T, on 4 models, each has a different exhaust and intake system and thus has different allowances for safe boosting.

      A quick primer in speed: your engine has three main systems: air intake, combustion, and exhaust. Your car can only be as fast as the weakest of these three. Chipping takes advantage of down-speccing that goes on with the intake and the engine to reduce warranty requests -- the exhaust, at least on modern german autos, is usually good enough for up to 230-250hp. Chipping is a much more effective AND cost effective means of gaining speed out of a stock automobile than slapping on a big exhaust system or a body kit. It's why my Passat has been known to smoke Integras and Mustangs (though, to be honest, that's more likely a combination of good reflexes and shitty driving on the Ford's part).

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    17. Re:Stupid question by IrRegEx · · Score: 0

      Not a stupid question...

      Newer cars have electronic blow off valves. These valves control how much pressure can build up in the intake manifold. If the valve is controlled by the computer, the MAP ( manifold absolute pressure) sensor can determine just how much pressure is considered within parameters. Aftermarket computers and "chipped" computers change the parameters so that the higher boost pressures are considered normal. Thereby making more power.

      --
      #|
    18. Re:Stupid question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      w00t, my camaro has instant 99 lives!! ... time to try jumping over that large ditch.

    19. Re:Stupid question by pyite · · Score: 1

      FWIW, the Audi/VW design does not have any sort of electronic blow off valve. They're controlled by manifold vacuum and are actually bypass valves, not blowoffs.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    20. Re:Stupid question by IrRegEx · · Score: 1

      then the computer doesn't control them...

      --
      #|
    21. Re:Stupid question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the Diverter valve ( or bypass valve ) IS controlled by the ECU. The N249 valve actuates the Diverter valve using the vaccum tank when a series of manifold and throttle input conditions are met. The old method you are talking about tends to flutter the DV which increases wear on the turbo. :D

    22. Re:Stupid question by IrRegEx · · Score: 1

      so the vacuum tank is more or less used as a buffer/regulator?
      Is this just the Audi/VW setup, or do other manufacturers use this system as well?

      --
      #|
    23. Re:Stupid question by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      That's got nothing to do with the boost pressure.. the diverter lets the output of the compressor go somewhere (back to the intake) when the throttle is closed.

      A blowoff does a similar thing, but vents the excess pressure to atmosphere, and sounds cooler.

      The wastegate is something totally different, and controls the maximum boost pressure allowed.

    24. Re:Stupid question by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      It was the bmw m3 iirc. It had some rpm limiter because everything was drive by wire, but a certain combo on the shifter would drop the clutch and rev the engine up to high rpms, allowing you to do a burn out.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    25. Re:Stupid question by BeerSlurpy · · Score: 1

      Actually the WG is still controlled by air pressure- the solenoid controls how much is bled off to atmosphere. By controlling what the WG flapper sees, the ecu can indirectly control boost.

      Thats how it is on my miata and how it is on every other electronic boost control car I have ever seen.

      The VW 1.8T is a great engine except the turbo and intercooler are too damn small. Its a high 13s capable setup with the right supporting mods, drag radials and maybe a little spray. With a bigger turbo from the factory it would probably be a bunch faster. Look at the SRT4.

    26. Re:Stupid question by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the key to the 1.8T is not so much the engine (which i'll admit is merely above average...nothing bleeding edge like that Nissan 6 banger) that they put it in some very nice cars, with great suspension, handling, sound, styling and features. I've yet to drive an American car that has the size of a German car without feeling claustrophobic...I mean, I'm a six footer and I can comfortably drive everything in the VW line, even the damn Cabrio. The Neon makes me cramped, the Focus is, well, a noble effort that falls flat, and don't get me started on the Cougar. I hate that fucking thing, it's got a cockpit like Apollo 13 and you'd think a car that looks like that would be, i dunno, fast or something.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    27. Re:Stupid question by DZign · · Score: 1

      Indeed, and it keeps count of how many times you do it, and if you do it 'too much' (which was very low, like 10 times or so) your car isn't under warranty anymore..

    28. Re:Stupid question by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      That's not as crazy as it sounds -
      Holden V8's with auto's start in "economy" mode by default - by going through a sequence like :
      Ign Off
      Select First
      Ign On
      Select Drive
      Ign off
      Select First
      Ign on ... or something like that - then it will default to "Power" mode on startup - there's no other way to do it other than to push the little "Pwr/Econ" button every time when you start up.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    29. Re:Stupid question by BeerSlurpy · · Score: 1

      Is this a troll?

      The VWs have so much interior room because they are FWD and have torsion bar rear suspensions. This is a straight up trading of handling prowess for packaging. Additionally, every recent generation VW I have ever ridden in the back of was extremely cramped, with my head hitting the ceiling. Great room in the front seats, torture chamber in the back. I personally think that honda and toyota do the best job of engineering interior space. At least those have equal room front and rear.

      The current selling point of VWs right now is that they appear well constructed and have lots of features. They are poor performers with weak reliability at best. The MK4 VWs (even the hatches) weigh about the same as a fully equipped v8 camaro. Even the super duper performance r32 model was a giant 3500 lb pig with an anemic engine. Compared to the STI, SRT4 and the Lancer, it is at the bottom of the high end performance sport compact market right now.

  4. My car... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... doesn't use chips you insensitive clod! (actually, it can run without any fuses installed as well...)

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    1. Re:My car... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to buy a new car real soon.

    2. Re:My car... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Lemme guess, it's an '80s or early-90s Diesel with a mechanical injection pump (probably a Mercedes, Volvo, VW, or Audi). -b.

    3. Re:My car... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Nope, '65 Porsche. VWs are the same too. Ignition isn't fused, it just goes thru the ignition switch to the starter/etc. All lights, horns, etc. are fused though...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    4. Re:My car... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Sounds scary...
      You might want to stick a fusible link (or fuse) somewhere in the system. Either in the wire coming off the battery feeding everything except the starter, or somewhere before the ignition switch. A 65' Porsche is quite a neat car, and having one burn down for want of a $5 part would be a shame.
      Either that, or get a fire extinguisher and some asbestos underwear. (g)
      -bosozoku

    5. Re:My car... by Archwyrm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mine too. Minus a few fuses. Pontiac 1970 GTO >=D

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. -- Mussolini
  5. "Chips" by swordboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    They aren't really chips anymore. The "firmware" can be revised but this is getting more and more complex. Short of reverse engineering the electrical system and creating a replacement ECU, it may not be possible to do this in the near future.

    There's actually a large market for programmable PnP ECUs out there.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:"Chips" by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would be especially true if we end up with one of those Volvo's with no hood.

      --
      Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    2. Re:"Chips" by Gumph · · Score: 2, Funny

      They aren't really chips anymore.

      what?? no more Erik Estrada and Larry Wilcox??!
      What is the world coming to????

      --
      'By the pricking of my thumbs, something wicked this way comes'
    3. Re:"Chips" by pll178 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hondata (http://www.hondata.com) has been doing this for years on Hondas/Acuras. Ever since Honda started using flashable ECUs in the most recent generation of cars, reprogramming Honda ECUs is a piece of cake. Just connect an OBDII cable to your programmer, press a button and your ECU is reflashed. One caveat is that Hondata spent a year or two decoding the fuel map codes. Unfortunately, they have to decode each model's ECU, but from what I understand, they are fairly similar (plus they have years of experience in hacking ECUs).

    4. Re:"Chips" by htmlgod · · Score: 1

      Hondata can turn these around in a day if you send your ECU to them. Of course, your car will be out of service for a while until they return it. The goal of an ECU flash, at least in my Acura RSX Type S, is to make torque more available throughout acceleration, with less lag.

    5. Re:"Chips" by pll178 · · Score: 1

      Yup. It's a one day turn around, or in my case, a 5 minute turn around. :-) I got a chance to meet the people at Hondata and they reprogrammed the ECU on my car while I waited.

    6. Re:"Chips" by meanween · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Hondas... check out: http://www.pgmfi.org Open source ECU firmware :) Yum.

      --
      http://www.guster.net : Mmmmm fresh Guster.
    7. Re:"Chips" by 3dr · · Score: 1

      swordboy is the only post I've seen that has injected the current state of the art into this discussion.

      There are still in-line signal modifiers that return back adjusted voltages from various engine sensors so that the stock ECU dumps more fuel/etc at different times that it otherwise would.

      However, the current state is to disassemble the actual program running in the ECU. This way, you not only get the tables of data (boost control if turbocharged, fuel/air ratios at rpm/loads, etc) but the logic that shows how it all goes together. Tuners using this technique then rewrite bits of the code or modify table data to change performance. It's really cool.

      Check out COBB Tuning's AccessECU; they specialize in Subaru WRX/STi (http://www.cobbtuning.com/) and give a good example of what's possible.

      Other applications would include increasing low-RPM torque for say, towing things.

      And other ECU modifications really do have the enable/disable/selector function mapped to headlight, defroster or CC switches. (Turn defroster on, mash gas to enable...)

      Next up, EULA's on new cars!

    8. Re:"Chips" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only cars. Digital FI is becoming more and more popular on motorcycles (yay! no more choke on cold starts!). Triumph sportbikes and some Aprilia bikes use Sagem fuel injection, on a reprogrammable ECU. On engineer found a way to reprogram the data (including remapping the fuel injection), and the results can be obtained here.

      The nicest feature of doing this is getting rid of the "hole" in the fuel injection that occurs in the 4000-6000 RPM range. I'm told that this was intentionally put there to pass EPA emission testing.

    9. Re:"Chips" by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      it may not be possible to do this in the near future.

      I call bullshit on this, it's just wrong. The firmware in ECUs is NOT getting more and more complex, at least not drastically so. My buddy wrote a new program for his Impala with basically no prior knowledge, and it worked well enough to control his supercharger. Sure, there's new stuff in there, but it is all built off the same basic premises as the old stuff. It's not making the leaps and bounds you seem the think it is, and it doesn't have to. Everything the ECU needs to do, it already can do.

      Of course, electronic control of other parts of the car is getting more and more complex, but that's generally not performed by the ECU. Nor would you want it to be. Radio, security system, navigation, etc, don't need the same tolerances nor the same reliability as ignition timing or knock sensing.

      And a most of chip tuners aren't amateurs, but rather contractors who write the software for the factory ECUs in the first place. Maybe not for the same car, but a chip tuner who writes programs for Ford may also write aftermarket code for Dodge. It's not like they're starting from scratch -- they've got the tools and the knowledge and they're building off an existing codebase. Furthermore, some chip tuners actually license the OEM program and build on that. NASCAR tuners do this for sure. OEMs don't care too much about aftermarket hacking, at least once a car is out of warranty, that is.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    10. Re:"Chips" by sr180 · · Score: 1

      Quite a few of them do actually use "chips". Instead of re-writing all the firmware, they simply adjust the sensor inputs going into the ecu to adjust the output. Want more fuel? Tell the ecu that there is more air going in.

      --
      In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
  6. News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We've been doing this for years. What's so special about custom chips? They've existed since cars come with electronic engine control systems.

    1. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's a special interest piece, get over yourself.

      Shit, I'm feeding a troll

    2. Re:News? by q-the-impaler · · Score: 2, Informative

      Over the past 30 years, the chips have become more powerful and have extended their control to more and more vehicle systems.

      The point of this article is to show that they have gotten better at it and they hope that we will sink our money into it.

      Not all chips deliver what they claim. I knew someone who had a JET chip installed in his Toyota Tundra. He had to send the whole ECU in and wait for it to be returned. It's not a simple switch of chips, but a total reprogramming of the ECU. And to boot, he hardly noticed any difference. It just tended to smoke more in the morning. My advice would be to deeply resaerch chipping your car before you do it. It's not as easy uprgrading a PC.

      --
      Sierra Tango Foxtrot Uniform
    3. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent down. i am sick to death of

      why is this new, X has been doing Y for years.

    4. Re:News? by dknj · · Score: 1

      What else did this someone modify on their car? If you are chipping a stock car then don't expect any noticable difference. You should reprogram an ECU after you do any kind of engine mods so the computer can take full advantage of the upgrade. The smoking part could be due to a lower grade gas used. You should use 93 octane gas minimum if you chip any car (96+ if you plan to race)

      -dk

    5. Re:News? by edrain · · Score: 1

      IIRC the ECU will gradually adapt to any changes you make after the ECU upgrade, just as the stock program on the ECU will adapt to a new (for instance) cold air intake. Granted, ideally I'd do all of my mods first and then do the ECU, but in terms of bang-for-buck, you can't beat a chip or firmware flash, so many do that first.

      Additionally, you can't even get 93 octane where I live. APR has a 93 octane program, but they also have a 91 octane program for those of us who can't get 93, and the gains seem to be roughly the same. Admittedly, efficiency probably wouldn't be as good as with 93, but what can you do?

  7. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cruise control, eh

  8. Re:Car chippers by coug_ · · Score: 5, Informative

    Having owned a car with this capability in the past, I can provide some insight. The chip supplier installs 2 or more "programs" that you can switch between (stock, chipped, valet, and race gas are some of the more common programs). To switch between programs you hold down your cruise control and after a few second a light will flash on your dash X number of times letting you know which program you're switching to.

    In short, your cruise control works just fine with the switchable programs.

  9. Mod chips by ThetaKestrel · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the RIAA gets its way, it may actually become necessary to get your car mod chipped to play bootleg CDs :D

  10. Beware Emissions Inspection by terraformer · · Score: 5, Insightful
    One nice hack: a car chipped-up for the race track can be set back to factory specs for the street simply by pushing the cruise control button.

    That "nice hack" is more than just a cute little feature, it is required to pass your emissions inspection if you happen to live in places like the NE and the west coast. This is not to be confused with the saftey inspection that most states do, wlthough the emissions inspection almost always occurs at the same time.

    --
    Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    1. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by macrom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's also required if you take your car in for warranty work. My neighbor has been looking at chips for his VW 20th AE GTI, many of which can be reprogrammed with the light switch, turn indicator arm, etc. Around here most of the guys who install stuff like that on the weekends work at the VW dealership, so they'll know your car when you bring it in, but on the off chance you get a strict tech working on your car, he's not gonna like the fact you changed the engine timings and ran 104 octane racing gas through your pipes. Switching the settings back to normal and keeping everything somewhat secretive can keep the dealership from using that reason to avoid warranty work on your vehicle.

      Not to mention that most of the higher performance settings can get expensive since racing gas down here in Texas can run $4-5/gallon. It may be more now that gas prices are starting to climb!

    2. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by Numeric · · Score: 3, Informative

      i have a chipped car (98 saab 900) and can pass inspection with it chipped with no problem. i live in PA where emissions are checked.

      --
      -- ladies and gentlemen we are floating in space!
    3. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by tankdilla · · Score: 2, Funny
      I'd like a chip mod that changes my car from factory specs to pimp mode. Something along the lines of an Autobot transforming.

      Seriously, has anyone seen that new show on MTV? I'd like to see whose pimped ride isn't stolen after a year.

      --

      -Look lively. LOOK LIVELY!!! --Mr. Shmallow

    4. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by NineNine · · Score: 1

      It's funny you say this, because VW int he past few years has become notorious for terrible electrical problems. A VW is the LAST kind of car that I'd ever consider puttnig a chip in A. Because there's no telling how the electrical system is going to react and B. Most people who buy new VW's these days have to bring them in for warranty work at least once.

    5. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by medscaper · · Score: 2, Informative
      can get expensive since racing gas down here in Texas can run $4-5/gallon. It may be more now that gas prices are starting to climb!

      Well, do what we do around here when fuel gets ridiculously expensive - go to a small local airport and fill up with AvGas. High octane, cool grounding strap whilst you fill, and you get to peel out on the tarmac on the way out if it's not too busy. And it's only a couple of bucks a gallon. You'll have to get permission at the flight control center before you just drive out there, but they usually get a kick out of it, and though it runs your engine awfully hot, it's fun once in awhile...

      --
      Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
    6. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by Dielectric · · Score: 2, Informative

      It all depends on how good the chip is. Strictly speaking, a good tune should put no more badness into the air than a factory ECU, once things warm up. Before the whole car is up to operating temp, you'll probably be spewing unburnt hydrocarbons out the tailpipe. Most tests are done hot anyway.

      Catalytic converter removal is where you get in trouble. CA will flat out fail you on the visual inspection.

    7. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      When I lived in NY there were no emmission tests. Then when I moved to Nevada there was no safety test, but there was emmissions. Now I live in GA, it's the same way.

      So it's more important to have low emmissions, but who cares if the vehicle is safe for you or other drivers?

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    8. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by terraformer · · Score: 1
      All depends on how much it was modded. The chipping you got was likely more along the lines of a tweak and not the full on overhaul some get. I just modded my bike a little (despite motorcycles being exempt from emissions inspections) as well and am happy with the performance boost. It is generally all you need.

      To get the most extreme modifications you need to make modifications to the engines exhaust system like removing the fuel return hose that returns unburnt fuel back into the intake manifold. That robs pressure so by removing the tube the chip needs to modded to account for the differences from stock and modded. Obviously an extreme example but I wanted to warn people of the risks. The warranty is an obvious one but the emissions one brings on the wrath of the government and can be a bigger issue.

      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    9. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by terraformer · · Score: 1

      Hehe. The feds mandate auto emissions based on air quality testing done in the state. They may have also moved off of that to mandate it across the board in the last few years but I have not kept up with it. Anyway, NY has had emmisions for a few years so it must have been a while. I am in MA now and the safety tests are the biggest pain in the ass. The smallest nick in the windsheild makes it fail. Be happy you have no safety tests. The cost to you is high for the testing but they rarely fail. The setup for safety testing is that it is cheap but they always find something wrong, no matter how small.

      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    10. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by jlv · · Score: 1

      You are confusing the VW of the 80s with VW today. The VW 1.8T engine (common to VW and Audi) is very popular for chippers, and is in the Bug, Jetta, and Passat (as well as the Audi A4 and TT).

      My 3 yr old Passat hasn't given me any electrical woes. I've installed an Alientech (http://www.alientech.net/) window controller, too.

    11. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by NineNine · · Score: 1

      I don't have a VW, nor would I base a comment like that on anecdotal evidence. The electrical problems come from multiple Consumer Reports reports on VW's. It's why my ex-wife decided not to buy one several years ago. (Also, as far as anecdotal evidence goes... everybody I know with a VW has had serious electrical problems)

    12. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by Mal-2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If for some reason you don't have to get an actual emissions test, yet are required to have a catalytic converter, there's quite a simple answer -- install an empty one. Nobody is going to be able to tell visually from the outside if there's actually any platinum inside the chamber, and since the cat is wider than the main exhaust, you could easily just run a tube straight through so that the pseudo-cat has no impact whatsoever on the exhaust system.

      I'm not advocating this of course. If you're required to have a catalytic converter in your area, there's probably a good reason why. Most of us like being able to breathe (relatively) hydrocarbon-free air.

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    13. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but if you "know a guy" you can always pass your inspection with flying colors

    14. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      Check Consumer Reports or JD Powers.

      Volkswagens made in Germany, like the Passat, aren't too bad. The Golf and Jetta sold in the US are made in Mexico, and had very poor reliability until 2003 or 2004.

    15. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by Dielectric · · Score: 1

      That's actually a relatively common thing to do on the WRX. They cut open the pre-cat and hog out the honeycomb, then weld the whole thing back together.

      I know there's a good reason for cats, but I don't have to like it, do I?

      I'm certainly not advocating planet rape or anything; in fact, I'm looking forward to the day when hybrid vehicles are common. Then we can start screwing with motor windings and exotic magnetics like on R/C cars, not to mention hot fuel cell action.

    16. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by red_dragon · · Score: 1

      New York, New Jersey, Mass., Connecticut, and perhaps all of the other Northeastern states have enacted emissions regulations based on the California Air Resource Board regulations. New cars sold there are thus equipped with so-called California emissions, in those cases where the manufacturer differentiates between CARB and Federal emissions; some manufacturers sell the same model across all 50 states, and just make sure that all of them comply with CARB emissions. I bought my current car in New Jersey late last year, and later discovered that its "CA emissions package" adds a second light-off catalytic converter upstream of the standard converter, which robs the car of 2 HP and makes upgrades to the exhaust system a PITA, since it's illegal to remove the cats; also, most aftermarket intake/exhaust parts are designed for Federal (single-cat) emissions cars, or don't have the necessary CARB testing necessary to obtain authorisation (an EO number) in order to legally use the parts on the road.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
    17. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The point of state emissions inspections is to check if your car is running cleanly EVERY DAY, not the one day of the year that you take it in for inspection.

      If you're running your car with different settings on testing day than on the other 364 days of the year, you're cheating -- and it's the environment, and all the rest of us that DO behave honestly, that suffer.

      Like your Driver's Ed teacher always said, operating a motor vehicle is not a RIGHT, it's a PRIVILEGE. Treat it like one. Respect your car, respect your fellow motorists, and respect the laws that govern what's allowed on public streets.

    18. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well, do what we do around here when fuel gets ridiculously expensive - go to a small local airport and fill up with AvGas.

      Anonymously, due to mod points:

      Yeah, AvGas is generally 100 Octane, and has a nice blue tint (may be green--been a while since I got in a Cessna). But when you buy it, note the designator on the truck--100LL. The LL is for 'Low Lead'. This might be true compared to the old-school red fuel, but compared with old leaded gas for cars, I believe 100LL had several times the lead.

      If you're the type that cares for such things, you are releasing a fair amount of tetraethyl lead into the atmosphere. Perhaps more importantly (depending on your views), it's going to kill your catalytic converter (if you still have one).

      --Ribald

    19. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leaded gas will screw up newer valve seats after a while... best to use in small doses.

    20. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by StarfishOne · · Score: 0

      "racing gas down here in Texas can run $4-5/gallon."

      That's the price for normal fuel in Europe :(

    21. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by pixel.jonah · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most "chips" these days still pass emissions tests - the only issue is if you remove your pre-cats - but then it's only a problem when the car is still cold - once things warm up, you're still ok. So, maybe a bit more pollution every time you start your car, but then quit smoking or something to compensate. ;)

    22. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      I have a 6 year old Passat- the first year with the 1.8T engine and build in (Emden) Germany.

      I have electrical problems, one of which is very common in early B5 Passats.

      However, I'm chipped (APR) and I have no worries about the Bosch ECU and Audi engine having anything to do with the electrical problems. In addition, the ECU doesn't have much affect on emissions. The catalytic converter is there to clean up your exhaust & the ECU mostly just keeps it alive by keeping the air/fuel ratio good. Run a little rich and you might kick up the emissions a bit but run very rich (so gas burns in the cat instead of the engine) or lean & you'll burn up the cat. Replacing the exhaust cat-back will have nearly no affect on emissions either.

      A cat-bypass lever like some Viper mods have for track work is totally different.

      Electrical problem: 1) trunk switch does't work so light doesn't come on & auto-relock if no door opened for 1 minute logic fires even if trunk opened 2) passenger side door switch also broken so auto-relock 3) driver's window switches flaky. It's $70 for a new switch module, but I blame the "convenience computer" that controls things also as it seems to have bad debounce logic & some "guessing" logic in case it misses the half-down or up on the way to full-down or up.

    23. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by AdamHaun · · Score: 1

      I too have a '98 Passat, and I've had the trunk and window problems. My passenger's side front door electric lock system is broken too.

      --
      Visit the
    24. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      You know what the good reason is because a Detroit needed them while Honda's didn't and they cost about a grand (at the time). Obviously we couldn't requre the local auto industry to be saddled with an extra $1000 cost when Japan was eating their lunch, so the rule was made that all cars must have a catalytic converter (not that all cars must meet a certain level of emissions) Honda was selling a CVCC that would meet California emmissons (prior to and stricter than federal emissions) with no exhaust equipment.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    25. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by ralphus · · Score: 1

      dealers cannot legally deny warranty work because of car modifications. The Magnuson Moss warranty act specifies this. Dealers often try to weasel out of their requirement to do warranty work because most people don't know of the act. The dealer is not liable if they can *prove* the failure was caused by the modification, but the burden of proof is on them.

      --
      Revolutions are never about freedom or justice. They're about who's going to be top dog. -- Kilgore Trout
    26. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Maybe a CVCC can meet emissions requirements without a catalytic converter... when it's new, and when it's warm. The cat doesn't help much with the latter (they don't work cold either) but they're great at minimizing the effects of wear and tear on the engine, at least as far as hydrocarbons go. My little Toyota Celica with 215k miles on it runs reasonably well, but it definitely has a blow-by problem. Not that I would expect otherwise, the rings don't last forever. But when I had to get it smogged, it failed because the catalytic converter was empty -- not due to any sort of deliberate act, it had just all been used up. This caused it to fail massively (I think it exceeded allowable HC emissions by a factor of 7). I mail-ordered a generic catalytic converter with the proper size tubes welded onto it from Discount Auto Parts for $63. It arrived four days later, I paid a muffler shop $45 to install it, and whaddya know? My HC emissions were now a TENTH of the legal limit! One relatively cheap part cut HC in the exhaust by a factor of 70. The tester who first failed, and later passed the vehicle said that even with all the junk that engine is pumping out, I should need a new set of wheels before I need another catalytic converter. He also pointed out half a dozen other small things that I should probably fix when I have the money, knowing full well that I didn't have the money. But I sure went away feeling that what I did pay was completely justified.

      And no, I have no idea how Discount Auto Parts can sell catalytic converters for half the price they are anywhere else, even if they are generic (platinum is platinum). But they do, I got mine, and it works beautifully.

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    27. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by pedrop357 · · Score: 1

      If for some reason you don't have to get an actual emissions test, yet are required to have a catalytic converter, there's quite a simple answer -- install an empty one.

      With an OBD-II ECU this will throw on the check engine light due to the rear O2 sensor seeing no difference in the free O2 level compared to the front O2 sensor, which usually isn't a big deal, but some people have complained of their cars (Seems to come from '95-'99 Mitsu Eclipse owners) running in a retarded timing/fail safe mode-possibly the OEMs way of punishing you for removing your cat.

    28. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by pedrop357 · · Score: 1

      A lot of mod chips run the car just as clean, if not cleaner, then they were stock. For instance, the EPA requires engines pass various emissions requirements using 87 octane fuel. This means that some manufacturers don't do any fuel mapping/timing advance to take advantage of the potential in higher octane fuel.

      Some cars specify 91 only, but legally they must run clean on 87. This generally involves relaxed 91 timings so as to not damage the engine when 87 is put in and means significantly lower mileage and power when the engine begins to knock on 87.

      Other areas of the car, such as intake and exhaust (which the mod chip can be programmed to take advantage of) may be designed for all climates and/or as the lowest cost part. If I modify my car to take an expensive, extensively tested and tuned intake and exhaust, and use a modified chip to take advantage of these higher efficiency parts, it may be more efficient and less polluting than it was stock.
      This is absolutely not cheating.

    29. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by pedrop357 · · Score: 1

      Some people have found that by wrapping their exhaust tubing down to the main cat with exhaust insulating material they keep their engine compartment cooler and their main cat lights off just as quickly.

    30. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by pixel.jonah · · Score: 1

      You'd think car companies would discover that this is cheaper than the expensive pre-cats!

    31. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by Anonymous+Slacker · · Score: 1

      The last time I was in for an emissions inspection (last summer), all they did was check the readout from the car's computer. Didn't even rev the engine at all. Changing your chip out for one day might not cut it anymore, if the chip messes with things enough to be a problem.
      The previous time (two years prior) they put it in neutral and ran it for a few minutes (my car's an AWD, so they couldn't use their 2wd dyno). I was told they now only do this for cars that don't have sufficient computers onboard (the older couple in line in front of me winced in pain as the Emissions tech tried to figure out their early-70's era Corvette -- grinding gearboxes are not fun things when someone else has their grubby paws on your baby).
      For me, all they did was plug it in, get the readout, and then scold me for waiting until 2 weeks before the deadline to get it checked.

      --
      "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!" -Rush
    32. Re:Beware Emissions Inspection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. That's why I drive a 32-year-old muscle car that's old enough to be grandfathered past the emissions requirements in my state. I bet it spews out two or three times more than any late model "mod-chipped" ricer, and it does it 100% legally. See ya in the rear view mirror!

  11. So, how long before by WormholeFiend · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How long before we can wi-fi-cluster cars, and let the network arrange speed and routing through congested urban areas?

    I want the future now!

    1. Re:So, how long before by B1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      They wouldn't be traffic jams anymore.

      They'd be rolling Beowulf clusters.

      /karma to burn

    2. Re:So, how long before by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

      How long before we can wi-fi-cluster cars, and let the network arrange speed and routing through congested urban areas?

      About the same time as you give up total control of your car (which is one step away from your day to day life) to a computer and to those who control the computer.

      Don't get me wrong I like the idea from it's beneficial standpoint but that convenience carries with it a huge amount of vigilence on the part of the public to ensure that the technology used is not abused by those in power. Quite frankly I don't think the public is responsible enough to give control of such a large aspect of their livelihood to a controlled system yet.

    3. Re:So, how long before by bobsled · · Score: 1

      Not to mention enabling the cop behind you to hit a few keystrokes on his laptop and set your top speed to 10 mph...

      There go all those exiting car chases on TV!

      --
      Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code...
    4. Re:So, how long before by haystor · · Score: 1

      I chipped-up and got emacs installed.

      M-x auto-drive-mode

      --
      t
    5. Re:So, how long before by mrzaph0d · · Score: 1

      hm. so what if they took the idea of tollroads further? what if they build some roads where you're required to give over control while you're on those roads so they can keep the traffic flowing?

      that'd be interesting..

      --
      this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
    6. Re:So, how long before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give it about 10 years. BMW is working on it. (Seriously. I know the parent was intended humorously, but this is actually true.)

    7. Re:So, how long before by cb122 · · Score: 1

      This was used in Cory Doctorow's book Eastern Standard Tribe to distribute music

    8. Re:So, how long before by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      you wouldnt have to give up control totally.

      imagine some sort of cruisecontrol with realtime indicators flashing up to tell you which direction to go to that is most efficient and fast.

      on the highway, the car-clusters could share the windbreaking load, like migrating geese, thereby increasing fuel efficiency. and at the push of a button, get full control again and opt out of the cluster.

    9. Re:So, how long before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we install car crushers at intersections so we can drop packets when congestions occurs?

  12. no no no! by maxbang · · Score: 2, Funny

    Han: That chip goes there and that chip goes there!

    Chewie: *Bwaaaaarrraaugh* (translation: Stuff it, honky.)

    --
    I also reply below your current threshold.
    1. Re:no no no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chewbakka? That did not make sense.

      - Johnnie C

    2. Re:no no no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its from empire strikes back where chewy is under the flight deck trying to repair some damage.

    3. Re:no no no! by Vindicator9000 · · Score: 1
      Wrong context. The grandparent is referring to a South Park episode where Johnny Cochran is attempting to use the Chewbacca defense. "If Chewbacca does not make sense, you must acquit!"

  13. Expensive boondoggle. by Hanzie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    According to the article, mod chip have two categories:

    Normally aspirated: Add a small bit of horsepower (normally less than you can feel in a double blind test) and lose significant mielage.

    Turbocharged: turn up the boost, wear out the engine in a hurry.

    What the article doesn't point out is that over-boosting your engine will cause it to wear out in a hurry. The engines in today's cars are built to handle a specific amount of power, and when the power is increased the wear on components is exponentially increased.

    For those curious, our head engineer tells me that there is a cubic relation between engine RPM's and stress. Stress causes wear, and that's not a linear only relationship either.

    When stress exceeds a certain value, BANG + expensive crunching noises happen.

    ----
    Back in the good old days, re-chipping your ride could actually help (though not always). However, as the engineers learned more and more, the cars got better and better. Also bear in mind, performance is very important nowadays. The factory is getting all the performance it can out of tuning cars, while keeping mielage and wear in check. Also remember that these engines were designed for performance from word one.

    The only reason to start reprogramming the engine controls is when significant hardware changes have been made.

    As to the "Premium Fuel" thing, I'm doubtful, since all engines i've ever worked with use knock sensors, and are always running at the ragged edge of detonation anyway. There's quite a bit more involved than just fuel octane. Different formulations of fuel from different gas companies burn differently (gas is actually about ~40 or so chemicals in a cocktail). Altitude, engine temperature, air temperature, humidity, air filter cleanliness, RPM, engine load, and spark plugs all play important roles in detonation.
    Consequently, the chips are continually adjusting for all that. Supposed octane levels are just one more factor. Granted, some cars, like the Acrua NSX :) demand 91 octane anyway, but that's due to engine compression issues. You don't need a chip to take advantage of premium fuel, just a good OEM computer.

    Like our head engineers always says: It takes a lot of work to outsmart factory engineers. And several million dollars.

    --
    ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
    1. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by Unnngh! · · Score: 3, Interesting
      That's not true at all. Many cars are built to handle way more HP than they come with from the factory. Why? Emissions.

      You can get an extra 30-35 HP out of the Evo 8 right off the lot with a reprogramming of the ECU. Many performance cars are the same way though this is an extreme example.

      My WRX has 3, count 'em, 3 catalytic converters. These are not needed, either. Many of the overseas versions come stock with one cat only. But if I take them off, I may be putting them right back on next time I have to get an emissions test.

    2. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by znaps · · Score: 1
      Chips for turbo charged cars usually don't control the boost pressure limit, they only allow you to do so. On a cool 50 degree night, turning up the boost from 9 to 12 PSI is not going to do any damage to the car. Many Toyota Supra or 300zx TT owners will attest to this.

      Of course, you need to be responsible enough to know what the limits are.

    3. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by vijayiyer · · Score: 1

      Increasing manifold pressure (i.e., turning up the boost), does not result in an exponential increase in wear unlike an increase in RPM. Moderate increase in boost, as long as it does not induce knock, can be done without an excessive drop in longevity (excessive being relative), depending on the vehicle.

    4. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by mhifoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought that Japanese sports cars were falsely restricted because of their export regulations?

      A friend of my Grandfather has a Skyline which can be chipped for an extra 100hp. This is because they are intentionally derated to allow them to be exported.

    5. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by JMandingo · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Even slapping a supercharger on your car will not decrease the life of your engine if you keep on top of the maintenance. Some jokers will reduce the pully size on the supercharger to max the boost, and at some point they can cross the threshold that can eat your engine.

      Nowadays mfrs like http://kenne-bell.com have supercharging down to a sweet science. Stick with one of their kits and in 8 hours you will have +100 hp on your car and you can drive it daily for its normal lifespan.

      Of course, if the added hp turns you into an idiot on the road and you are ragging your car out everywhere you go then that in itself will decrease the lifespan of your vehicle.

      --
      Vonnegut was right: Of all the words of mice and men, the saddest are, "It might have been."
    6. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by Dielectric · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Um, have you actually looked at reflashing in this millenium?

      The tuners are getting very adept at reclaiming the extra power that the factory left out due to emissions and fuel quality problems. They spend days reverse engineering ECUs and trying things out on the dyno. It's very complex, but the rewards are numerous.

      I have a Subaru WRX with a remapped ECU. With no other mods, I get 30 extra WHP from this. I do have to run 93 octane, but I did anyway because 89 is pure, unadulterated turpentine. The WRX is turbocharged, but interestingly enough they only increased the boost pressure by about 1PSI (from 15.1PSI max). Everything else comes from the timing and environmental correction maps. I also get slightly better gas mileage, as long as I'm not running wide open all the time.

      When an engine detects knock, it will retard the ignition timing, which decreases your power output. By running better fuel and reflashing the ECU to take advantage of it, you can run hotter timing and get around in a hurry.

      The Audi A4 1.8T is in a similar situation, where a chipped car will be significantly faster than it was from the factory, with no real decrease in engine life or reliability. The factories are leaving a lot on the table because they have to deal with a wide range of horrible fuels, awful drivers, and insurance companies.

      Note that both of these cars are meant to be fast. Reflashing a Taurus or Civic doesn't really do crap, because they were designed to be efficient and unexciting, so there isn't much left to do but add a lot of external modifications. There are also some cars that are tuned to the ragged edge, like the Nissan 350Z. No one has managed to get significant gains without major modifications, such as forced induction.

    7. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      Another reason why manufacturers limit horsepower is insurance costs. It's one of the reasons Toyota doesn't put the 180HP Celica engine in the MR-S, even though it should just drop right in (the engine in the MR-S is the same as the base engine in the Celica).

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    8. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by Hanzie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can also get a VW beetle to run an 11 second quarter mile on a stock engine, but it won't last much longer than that 1/4 mile.

      Your point about the WRX (essentially a factory rally car) is that Subaru engineers decided to add two extra cats for the fun of it. I find that doubtful. Subaru won't be adding platinum plated mufflers just for ballast.

      As to 35 HP in the Evo, aren't they turbo'd? That's a matter of trading engine life for power. An extreme example of this is in the more expensive classes of racing, where the life of the 1500 hp. engines is less than one mile.

      Meanwhile, to argue that the Evo doesn't have all the power the engineers could reasonably get out is flawed. The Evo even has lightweight body panels for extra speed. If you're getting extra power, your greatly shortening your engine's useful life. That car was built for speed and little else.

      --
      ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
    9. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by An-Unnecessarily-Lon · · Score: 0

      what the hell are you talking about? When done correctly and in a manner as not to abuse the limitations of the equpiment you will get 100K plus out of a turbo or supercharged engine. Thinking that factories do everything possible for fuels and performance is a really ignorant view. They dumb down certian things for extra padding on reliability and for cost cutting.

    10. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by Hanzie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, we tuned an aluminum Ford 427 side oiler with multi-port fuel injection. It has 623 horsepower at sea level, but we're in the mountains. Since the ECU maps are all for sea level, it took several days of driving fast on mountain roads to get the map sorted out for high altitude.

      I really like my job.

      --
      ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
    11. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by skaralic · · Score: 1

      Your argument may be true if your are talking about a highly tuned factory car but most cars are made for the "average" consumer and quite often the engines are severely de-tuned because soccer mom's don't want torque-steer on their Jettas. With regular maintenance most of todays cars could run for 500,000km, long after all the interior/exterior parts wear out and the car is scrapped. Chipping your ride might decrease that to 300,000km - still more than the average lifetime of a car... Again, the milleage lost and power gained with a NA engine depends heavily on the engine design. More often it's not important how much power is gained at the top end but how the new power is distributed. Shifting the torque curve to lower RPMs may provide for a greately increased driveability of your car with only minor or no fuel economy loss.

    12. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by owlicks58 · · Score: 2, Funny

      30 wheel horsepower from chipping... haaah.

      --
      -Alex
    13. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by Dielectric · · Score: 4, Informative

      False. The EVO has an extremely strong engine that can take insane boost pressures. It has a cast iron block and has been developed for many years now. 35HP is not unreasonable, and won't significantly reduce the car's life expectancy. You'd be far more likely to wrap it around a tree than blow the engine.

      Those two extra cats in our WRX-es are not needed, once the engine warms up. The first cat in the pipe up to the turbo charger is just there for cold start, as is the second cat. The sucky thing is that once it warms up and they aren't needed, they still present a parasitic loss in the exhaust that hinders performance in a big way.

      A VW beetle would run 11s with a JATO booster, maybe. Be reasonable here.

    14. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by Dielectric · · Score: 1

      http://cobbtuning.com/wrx/images/ae-stage1-dyno.jp g

      OK, 25.5. Let's call it a rounding error. 4.5HP difference could be attributed to different air temps or humidities or crappy gas or any number of things.

      This is also on an AWD car with relatively large (30%) drivetrain losses, so the increase at the crank is even higher.

    15. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by Dielectric · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Heh, that's why I'm starting to like forced induction. It's a little less susceptable to altitude changes.

      Either way, that's a cool job.

    16. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that premium fuel should improve things if the manual suggests using it, and even if the car can take the lowest grade at the pump. What an engine computer does with lower grades of fuel is detunes the engine timing and such so that it doesn't knock.

      With one car, my dad did find the most bang for the buck at midgrade, by I think 5% or so versus low and premium grades.

    17. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by Spoke · · Score: 1

      To follow up a bit more on the parent, for the WRX there are a number of options out there for "rechipping".

      One thing to keep in mind is that modern ECUs like the one in the WRX are quite advanced and are able to adjust for many things like fuel octane, temperature, altitude, etc, while trying to maintain maximum performance. However, very often they leave some performance on the table to leave a greater safety of margin. Generally, the number 1 enemy of an engine (especially a turbo charged engine) is detonation. Followed closely by that is running too rich. Detonation will physically break an engine by either cracking pistons and/or rings or flattening rod/crank bearings causing oil starvation and thrown rods. Running too rich allows too much fuel to wash by the cylinder rings which gets into the oil and fuel is a horrible lubricant. Too much fuel leads to high metal wear and eventually bearing failure and thrown rods. If you avoid these issues, modest power gains are available.

      One method is to reprogram the ECU or reflash it. A couple of companies (ECUTEK and Cobb Tuning) have reverse engineered the ECU in the WRX so that they can reprogram it.

      Another method is to plug in a piggy back ECU (TurboXS UTEC) which alters the stock ECU's outputs as the tuner desires.

      One drawback is that with a piggy back unit overriding the ECU's control, you lose a lot of the nice safety features of the stock ECU like being able to adjust for current running conditions unless the piggy back unit implements those adjustments itself. The other drawback is that sometimes the ECU will say "WTF, the car isn't doing what I'm telling it to" and switch into limp mode thinking that something is drastically wrong.

      Finally, another method is to completely replace the stock ECU with a unit designed to be programmable. A few examples of companies which make this is Link and Electromotive. The drawback of a replacement ECU is that often, they do not have all the features of the stock ECU which generally means that it's a lot more work to get a good initial tune, and there's a lot more work required to swap out your stock controls with the replacement.

      Most tuners for the WRX have found that they are able to get another 25hp or so out of the stock engine (227hp) without significantly affecting engine reliability by slightly adjusting fuel, timing and boost levels. However, once you start doing further modifications (like replacing stock cats with high-flow units or more efficient intercoolers) you will be able to further tune the engine to take advantage advantage of the engine's improved breathability and detonation resistance. With a setup like that you can get another 25hp without any significant reduction in reliability assuming that the tuning was done properly.

    18. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      It's one of the reasons Toyota doesn't put the 180HP Celica engine in the MR-S, even though it should just drop right in (the engine in the MR-S is the same as the base engine in the Celica).

      The other one is that, if they did that, they'd be embarassing the Us Lotus Elise, which also uses the 180HP engine. The solution, of course, is a 6psi turbo. You can go up to 12 or 14 if you redo your internals, but 6 is fairly safe.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    19. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by Hanzie · · Score: 1

      I am being reasonable. The VW beetle was dripping molten aluminum at the end of the drag, but he did run an eleven. I saw it and was amazed. Apparently, the guy would bolt on his turbos and nitrus to engines from wrecked bugs and thrash them down the strip. That much is hersay from guys who claimed to know him. I did see the run, and I did see the aluminum dripping onto the asphalt.

      I understand about drag losses in the exhaust. Mufflers on our sidepipes take about 100 HP off the top end from our 427's -- depending upon lots of other factors, of course.

      Drop a line to my username in the commercial domain of asguard, and I'll send you a link to pics of what we build.

      --
      ********* sig: If you don't like the law, get filthy stinking rich, and buy a better one.
    20. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Like our head engineers always says: It takes a lot of work to outsmart factory engineers. And several million dollars."

      or in MTM's case.. they were started by former AudiSport UK director Roland Mayer. What better way to start chip tuning than run a factory race team? Or Dr. Abt who is a sponsor of the new Audi A4 DTM cars. ABT chips are available as dealer installed options in many european dealerships.

      "What the article doesn't point out is that over-boosting your engine will cause it to wear out in a hurry. The engines in today's cars are built to handle a specific amount of power, and when the power is increased the wear on components is exponentially increased."

      APR sells a stage 3 turbo kit for Aud/VW that nets over 300 crank HP (150/170/180 stock depending on model) without changing any internals. The problem people are finding w/ this kit is not the engine wearing out... many people have close to 100K mi on this kit. But the stock clutch cannot hold the power and the wimpy brakes need an upgrade to haul the car back down from speed.

    21. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by arnie_apesacrappin · · Score: 1
      How did you go about remapping the ECU? Is it something you flashed yourself or did you have the work done? As a fellow WRX owner, I'd appreciate any links or recommendations you might have.

      d

      --

      Still, with a plan, you only get the best you can imagine. I'd always hoped for something better than that. -CP

    22. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh yeah? I got 35 whp from my magic resistor off ebay for $2.99!

    23. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by jmpvm · · Score: 1

      First off, more boost does not equal more wear. The only reason NOT to turn up the boost is detonation. Most cars are tuned to the shittiest gas they will come in contact with, and then a safety barrier is added. There is often ALOT of power to tune out of a car.

      A Toyota Supra, for example, 320HP, 12psi stock boost. You can safely up that to 18psi, fool the computer into not cutting the fuel at those boost levels, and you can easily get over 400HP out of the car. Some exhaust modifications and you can see over 450HP. All this with no loss of reliability or increased wear, provided you give it plenty of high enough octane fuel to prevent detonation.

      Detonation is what hurts turbo cars. If you can increase your dynamic compression ratio without inducing detonation, you can see big gains in most turbo cars without issues.

    24. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by Chazmati · · Score: 1

      Are these Cobra replicas you're talking about here? I thought all the 427 side-oilers were 60's vintage iron blocks. Are these the $25k Shelby engines? Where do you work? I'm totally envious.

    25. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Like our head engineers always says: It takes a lot of work to outsmart factory engineers. And several million dollars.


      Then your head engineer is a retard. I can point you to several people who have tuned the factory ECM to not only provide better performance, more power, but also better safety than what the manufacturer provided. The ability to tune the fuel and timing based on wide band 02 data.

      And I'm certain they didn't spend millions of dollars to do it either.
    26. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by reverse+flow+reactor · · Score: 1

      Does your car have three separate catalytic converters, or a "three-way catalytic converter". The difference? The three-way converter refers to three chemical reactions occuring on the catalyst (usually composed of Pt, Pd, and Rh, as well as other materials such as Al2O3...):
      CO + 0.5 O2 -> CO2
      2NO + 2CO -> N2 + 2CO2
      C3H8 + 5 O2 -> 3CO2 + 4H2O

      (of course, that is an oversimplification. Some researchers have as many as 150 reaction steps on the catalyst surface...)

      Of course, you could have a diesel with a cat and a NOx/particulate filter or such. I don't know, and you didn't really say in your post.

      --

      The significant problems we face cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created them. -Einstein

    27. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      The most significant influence on the performance difference between my ex-police force Crown Victoria and the one my grandfather drives is the chip that's installed. They both have V-8s, they both have suitable transmissions, and with the appropriate tires and a new chip, my grandfather's car would perform similarly to mine.

      Non-fleet cars of this model are intentionally performance-inhibited, while the fleet models take full advantage of the engine. There are performance chips that accomplish the same thing without damaging the car, because the car was actually designed to handle it.

    28. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by arnie_apesacrappin · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the links.

      d

      --

      Still, with a plan, you only get the best you can imagine. I'd always hoped for something better than that. -CP

    29. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by bbdd · · Score: 1

      The Audi A4 1.8T is in a similar situation, where a chipped car will be significantly faster than it was from the factory, with no real decrease in engine life or reliability. The factories are leaving a lot on the table because they have to deal with a wide range of horrible fuels, awful drivers, and insurance companies.

      not to mention that they "down-tune" the same engines for cheaper models in the lineup, so the cheaper cars don't compete with the more expensive models.

      the vw/audi 1.8t engine mentioned above is supplied as an engine option for the vw beetle, jetta, and passat, as well as the audi a4 and tt. the horsepower output of these cars has ranged from 150 to 225 across the models with essentially the same engine.

      the power output is basically "turned down" on the cheaper models as an approach to marketing. if i can regain the lost power with a simple software upgrade, more power to me! (pun intended!)

    30. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by zsz2k · · Score: 1


      Consider this: in some states you can only get 91 octane gas and cars intended for a specific market are tuned to accomodate all conditions within that market. So it is conceivable that the STi is tuned for 91 octane gas and a chip could improve performance a bit in other states where 93+ octane is available by doing nothing other than advancing ignition timing.

    31. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by zsz2k · · Score: 1


      It's called the "Gentlemen's Agreement" in Japan - which limits production cars to 280 HP or so (276 maybe?). Of course after the Euros (BMW/MB/etc.) started selling cars with 300+ HP in Japan, that agreement went out the window.

      The point though is - while it was still in place, you could get a ridiculously overengineered car like the Nissan Skyline, chip it, and unleash its true (and reliable!) potential.

    32. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by Dielectric · · Score: 1

      I've got the Cobb Tuning AccessPORT. It rules the school, as long as you're not going for 400WHP. It's a more conservative approach, which I like because I need to get to work every day with this car.

      The PORT lets you reflash the ECU through the OBD-2 port. Pretty damn slick if you ask me. You can also send your ECU in for flashing, but then you're not driving the car for about 3-4 days.

      http://www.cobbtuning.com/

    33. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by pyite · · Score: 1

      You're wrong, just plain wrong. Factory engineers design software to suit a particular purpose. That "particular purpose" is really the individual purposes of thousands of drivers. The factory is not catering to the tuner. As such, it is not capable of delivering 100% performance on whatever fuel you throw at it. The dyno does not lie, tuning for specific fuel types (i.e. 104 vs 93) does yield significant performance enhancements. A few aftermarket engineers pushing for max performance can achieve what factory engineers did not set out to do. It's not that one "outsmarts" the other, it's that they have different design goals. And evidence between moderately turning up boost and engine failure is pretty anecdotal. Maxing out boost, of course, will cause the engine to fail, but so will pouring sand in it.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    34. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      Those two extra cats in our WRX-es are not needed, once the engine warms up. The first cat in the pipe up to the turbo charger is just there for cold start, as is the second cat. The sucky thing is that once it warms up and they aren't needed, they still present a parasitic loss in the exhaust that hinders performance in a big way.

      And, from what I understand, could eventually pose a danger to the turbo much later in the car's life should the precat begin to break up and some debris enter the turbo. Plus, I've heard reports that removing that catalytic converter can have a noticable increase in throttle response. (Less restriction means the exhaust gasses are moving quicker when they hit the turbo, which means the turbo spools up quicker resulting in boost building earlier in the RPM range -- makes sense to me.)

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    35. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by Dielectric · · Score: 1

      True on both counts, although I haven't seen any lifetime-degradation problems on un-modded WRXes. There have been people who get chunks of platinum-coated honeycomb in their turbo when they run higher boost, like with an MBC.

      The turbo spools at about 2700 RPM w/o the cats, and around 3500 RPM with the cats. That is definitely noticeable, and the dynos show around 15HP peak gain just from a catless DP.

    36. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by pixel.jonah · · Score: 1

      the VW/Audi 1.8t is a very solid engine - way overengineered - I know people who've been running 2x the rated HP for thousands of miles with no problems.

      The Audi 2.7 biturbo is another incredible engine - you get 50-60+ additional HP with just a chip alone - and still pass emissions.

      The 350z and BMW M3 are pretty high-strung from the factory, plus they're both N/A, so to get a lot more power you'd have to add turbos or a supercharger which will push your engine even closer the the brink of death. ;)

    37. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by CatOne · · Score: 1

      The blocks on turbo cars usually have MORE than enough headroom -- they're not going to wear out "in a hurry." In fact the Audi block on the S4 (older, v6 twin turbo) can handle upwards of 450 HP, and the stock car has 250. Chips raise it to about 310... and lots of people throw bigger turbos on there.

      That's not to say some things may be affected, in particular it seems a fair bit more likely to blow a turbo with the higher boost. And the S4 basically requires you to pull the engine to swap the turbos, so you're looking at $6K (parts+labor) for a turbo swap, and no warranty there.

    38. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

      You must realize that all other things aside, higher-octane fuel has less energy/volume than lower-octane fuel. One will ALWAYS use more premium fuel than regular grade for the same power. Premium just doesn't make sense unless you HAVE to like on a turbo car.

    39. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by _Bucktooth_ · · Score: 1

      For those curious, our head engineer tells me that there is a cubic relation between engine RPM's and stress. Stress causes wear, and that's not a linear only relationship either.

      When stress exceeds a certain value, BANG + expensive crunching noises happen.

      Seems to be a little oversimplified. What causes a turbo'd engine to go BANG is not stress/wear, it's detonation.

      Also remember that these engines were designed for performance from word one.

      Most manufacturers tune stock engines for driveability, not performance. While they do a good job and spend a lot more time on the parameters than an aftermarket tuner to get the best compromise, power and performance are not the goals. High performance cars are difficult to drive on normal streets, especially high horsepower small engines.

      The engines in today's cars are built to handle a specific amount of power, and when the power is increased the wear on components is exponentially increased.

      Depends on the engine, I guess. I know for a fact that certain engines are built to handle a LOT more power than stock. Mazda's BP-D, for example, has been used in 400-500HP applications (up from 210HP stock) without any change in internals. This is an engine out of production since 1994/95, so no exotic parts are available for it, btw. Nissan's SR-20DET also has a good reputation with engine builders, though I can't quote you any figures on that one. And I'm not heavily into the modding scene, so there must be some others. These are just some I've come to know.

      As to the "Premium Fuel" thing, I'm doubtful, since all engines i've ever worked with use knock sensors, and are always running at the ragged edge of detonation anyway.

      Well, the higher the octane, the more the ECU can advance the ignition timing (more output) before engine detonation occurs, so you do get more power.

      Like our head engineers always says: It takes a lot of work to outsmart factory engineers. And several million dollars.

      Nobody's trying to outsmart them, just that some customers have different priorities. Like overclockers.

    40. Re:Expensive boondoggle. by pedrop357 · · Score: 1

      On my Infiniti G20, I turned the timing up 4 degrees (from factory 15 to 19) and used 92 octane in it. I definitely noticed the increase in power and throttle response.

      After the first tank, I got over the new power and stopped gunning it everywhere and started driving like I did it before. On subsequent tanks I noticed an increase of ~2.5 MPG. Other G20/Sentra/SR20DE owners have reported similar increases.

  14. Suping Up Cars by millahtime · · Score: 0

    Suping up cars is old news. Even doing it with chips. But there are some cool things...

    You can get an add on kit for a truck that connects up to the sensor inputs to the engine and has a console in the car. It allows you to adjust settings on the fly but telling the sensors certain things. You can run a 12 second quarter or double your torque with the push of a button.

    There is a device you can by for any modern car that connects up to the adapter onder the drivers side. It allows you to reprogram the on board computer based on what you want the car to do. It also stors the default program if you ever want to revert back.

    1. Re:Suping Up Cars by djh101010 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can get an add on kit for a truck that connects up to the sensor inputs to the engine and has a console in the car. It allows you to adjust settings on the fly but telling the sensors certain things.

      Sorry, but no "button on the dashboard" is going to give you the sensitivity and responsiveness of an engine management computer which is adjusting boost, fuel, and spark timing on an indivudual, every time the engine fires, time frame.

      There is a device you can by for any modern car that connects up to the adapter onder the drivers side.


      Any time absolutes like "every" are tossed around, that's a clear sign that the issue is being oversimplified. Likewise, the adapter on my car is on the _passenger_ side, and it's probably using a different connector, data format, and programming language as compared to your car. There is no quick fix on this; the carmakers don't cripple their product by making it less powerful than it can reliably be. If they could get more power from a given engine so easily, they'd be doing it, to use smaller engines, to reduce weight. They're not, because there's not the ability to get "double the torque with a push of a button".

    2. Re:Suping Up Cars by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      He's probably talking about the Turbo-Diesels, which as the main article states are the main beneficiaries of tuning.

      My father-in-law has an F-350 Powerstroke Turbodiesel with a plugin ECU programmer. He can dial up his torque from the factory 550 ft*lbs to well over 700 with the push of a button. In that setup he won't pass emissions tests by a long shot, because the thing will be spouting soot and his mileage will be cut in half. But diesels can take a lot of abuse, so he isn't affecting engine longevity.

      I'm not encouraging this type of behavior - a 60 year old man who already has a friggin dump truck doesn't need to be fooling around in an overpowered giant pickup. I'm just saying it can be done.

  15. Self Tuner by Fortress · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm waiting for one that puts a usb port on it so I can connect the laptop and make alterations on the fly. How about having a bunch of different settings saved so that I can switch between them easily?

    If you're a hardcore racer, you could have optimised settings for different humidity/temperature conditions, switchable at the touch of a key. Maybe save a set of baseline settings for each race locale and modify for the conditions on race day.

    We could be about to regain the tuning freedom that went away when cars switched from carburetors to fuel injection. Everyone can benefit from this, even if you don't race. Most cars today are comprimised for green emissions, even if you live somewhere without smog tests. With a little retuning, you can have more power AND better fuel economy. (Ohh, look out for flames from the green set ;-)

    1. Re:Self Tuner by syle · · Score: 1
      You mean like this one? I only know the Honda world, and this is very new there, but I imagine it can't be far off in the domestic aftermarket.

      It's a tuner's wet dream. What's that? Switched to larger injectors? No problem, let's load the program and update it for 550s....

      --

      /syle

    2. Re:Self Tuner by dr+bacardi · · Score: 1

      Get a WRX and one of these. Then head on over to wrxhackers and grab a map that matches what you want, or make your own. It is just a serial port though, not USB, sorry :)

    3. Re:Self Tuner by klui · · Score: 2, Informative

      Watch out. Self tuning is not for everyone. Haven't followed this area in a couple of years, but back then, MoTech was the high-end system to get. You can do all the self tuning you want but if you don't know what you're doing, get ready to kiss your engine goodbye. Too much air and not enough fuel? Say "hello" to detonation--fatal for a rotary. Tuning just the ECU is just a part of the equation. Your air and fuel subsystems must be able to supply what maps dictate.

    4. Re:Self Tuner by whitesn95GT · · Score: 1

      I'd check out http://www.eec-tuner.com/ or www.tweecer.com or http://www.andersonfordmotorsport.com/pms/pms-50.h tml... I'm a Ford (Mustang specifically) guy, but those are just some of the options I have. I believe other options are available for other manufacturers.

      Matt

    5. Re:Self Tuner by Narbo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This has already been done by at least a dozen companies. Motec, Pectel, Hondata, DTA, TEC and a whole lot more. You can control everything in realtime and the higher end systems will also allow you to do much more esoteric things like traction control, launch control, turbo anti-lag schemes and others. The trouble with full programmable engine menagement is that it does not suffer the incompetent. There are LOTS and LOTS of parameters which depend on eachother, the entire system operates in realtime and you had better KNOW what you are doing and how they interact with eachother before you start fooling around with stuff. Getting it wrong can have catastrophic consequences; a simple mistake like not supplying enough fuel or adding too much ignition can and WILL cost your engine. So in short if you have the knowledge and the tools (wideband O2, lots of guages like EGT, fuel pressure etc etc) programmable engine management is the best thing since sliced bread. I have a Pectel T2 in my Focus and its great stuff to be in full control. Just read up and UNDERSTAND what you are doing before going down that road. Just like you wouldent run your Athlon with no heatsink you dont want to be putting 40 degrees of timing advance at 20psi of boost!

    6. Re:Self Tuner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I'd avoid Vishnu or UTEC type ECU reflashes, and just wait for Cobb Tuning's AccessTuner. On the fly (well, stopped and in Neutral) map changing, and real-time laptop readouts. For self-tuning, or tried and proven maps.
      http://cobbtuning.com/wrx/accessport-faq.ht ml

    7. Re:Self Tuner by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      If you're a hardcore racer, you could have optimised settings for different humidity/temperature conditions

      It would seem better to have your car automatically adjust based on the humidity and temperature. Especially since your car might already have the hardware to know the latter.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    8. Re:Self Tuner by smashr · · Score: 1

      Well, surprisingly enough you arent too far from the truth. Especially on the DSM (Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, etc) tuning utilizing a data logger and laptop is not uncommon at all. One of my roommates drives a low 12s Eagle Talon and he has spent many a night with his laptop hooked up to his ECU driving around at alternately very fast and very slow speeds. His custimizations have made the real difference which gives him a signficant edge on the track.

    9. Re:Self Tuner by dr+bacardi · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm avoiding all of 'em since I auto-x in stock class. Which brings up another point about all the cool "on the fly" map changes; most aren't legal in competition (at least on turbo cars as the comp can alter boost). There are a couple of people that make non changeable ones... I think Cobb makes an STX legal map... Anyway, I'm sure this is boring as hell to all the people that don't race ;)

    10. Re:Self Tuner by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      > [...] so I can connect the laptop and make alterations on the fly.

      That's fine if you have Geordi LaForge in the co-pilot...engineer...er...passenger seat.

    11. Re:Self Tuner by robfoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you'll most likely blow your engine and for some reason the floor will fall out.

      And Vin Diesel will kick your ass anyway.

    12. Re:Self Tuner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might be able to get this from xpower (The folks that sell modified MGs).

      They are the only car company (even a limited output company) that sells a model with factory NOS.

    13. Re:Self Tuner by pen · · Score: 1

      All I want is an LCD display on my dashboard that I can customize to my liking.

    14. Re:Self Tuner by GianfrancoZola · · Score: 1

      The UTEC is not a reflash, it is a piggyback that actually offers standalone control of boost and timing, but still relies on the ECU for fueling, so it operates by altering the MAF signal (standalone fueling is only a couple firmware updates in the future, however). You can switch maps while stopped or on the fly...it won't make the changes until your RPMs drop below about 1000.

  16. My car needs to be rebooted by heironymouscoward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Seriously. It's flashing "Overspeed warning off" at me. But some days it says "Warning engine overheating" just as the car starts on a cold day. Or, "Immobilizer!!" when I try to start it. Then it occasionally acts normal, but switches the display from km/l to km-left-to-pump to average driving speed, randomly.

    Perhaps it's because it's a French car and takes itself too seriously.

    Anyhow, I'm now going to look for someone who can rechip it and give it a new personality, something a little less brie and baguette, more Yvette Lopez, "where d'ya wanna go today?"

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:My car needs to be rebooted by uberchicken · · Score: 1

      That's a Citroen, right? Perhaps even a Picasso. The "Overspeed Warning Off" is normal, just hit the button on the end of the wiper stalk to switch the display to something else. It just means you haven't set the speed alarm.

      The other stuff doesn't sound normal though :)

    2. Re:My car needs to be rebooted by heironymouscoward · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's a Picasso! Honestly, the "Overspeed warning off" message (which flashes in a most distressed manner) has come and gone for months, and I've never found out what caused it.

      "Dear Slashdot, how do I debug my car?" never seemed a worthy story submission, but now I'm glad I asked. I'm going to go and debutton the Picasso immediately.

      It's either amazing how much wisdom there is in Slashdot, or it's scary that there are millions of Picasso owners out there, all unable to manipulate their Overspeed Warning function.

      (Incidentally, how do you set the Overspeed Warning function to "on"? On second thoughts, forget that. I don't really want to know anything more about the Picasso User Interface than necessary.)

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature
  17. ... more than meets the eye ... by AppleTRON · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... so, it's not long before I have a taxi cab that turns into a giant robot with the voice of Casey Kasem at the touch of a button? I have been waiting for this day for so long.

    --
    *AppleTRON*
  18. When NOT to hack by Ubergrendle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'll hack something right up until the point where my personal body is in jeopardy.

    Medical instruments? Factory spec is good enough for me. Microwave? I like to keep the RADs down. Cars? I like arriving in one piece.

    I can understand this as a hobby, but why mod your day-to-day car so heavily? You probably break several laws in doing so, you definitely invalidate your car lease or warranty, and you probably invalidate your insurance as well. Besides, how confident are you that you'd never screw up?

    I'll take the bus thank you.

    --
    John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    1. Re:When NOT to hack by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      As long as they're playing with the engine and not the brakes or suspension, what's the worse that can happen? Then engine won't run. I've done lots of engine work and the worst thing is having to call a tow truck to take it back to the garage. But when it came to brakes or wheel alignment, I would take it to an experienced shop.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    2. Re:When NOT to hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Medical instruments?

      You are missing out. Many marathon runners have pacemakers installed. Then they "hop them up" in order to improve their times.

    3. Re:When NOT to hack by Dmala · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can understand this as a hobby, but why mod your day-to-day car so heavily?

      Basically, it comes down to: If you have to ask, you'll never understand.

      You probably break several laws in doing so, you definitely invalidate your car lease or warranty, and you probably invalidate your insurance as well.

      For the most part, modding your car is perfectly legal, as long as you use a little common sense. As long as you can meet the safety, noise, and emissions standards, you can pretty much do what you want.

      Modding a leased car is unwise, unless you plan to buy the car at the end of the lease. (Actually, leasing a car is pretty unwise in the first place, but that's another discussion.)

      Warranty issues are more of a grey area. Supposedly, a warranty company must prove that a modification caused the problem before the can reject a claim, but I suspect you'd have a hell of a fight if the warranty company really wants to dig in. A serious modder is most likely savvy enough to make his own repairs, and doesn't have much need for a warranty. I'm sure this is more of a problem, however, now that modding is getting more mainstream and popular.

      I'm not aware of anything in auto insurance policies about modifying a car, except they will only cover original equipment unless you get a rider for aftermarket add-ons. I'm sure if they felt it was a problem, insurance companies would start checking up and cracking down on modders.

      Besides, how confident are you that you'd never screw up?

      Modding anything holds the same risk. Screw up overclocking your Athlon, and you could fry the chip. You just use common sense, understand the risks of what you're doing, and don't run home crying if something goes boom.

    4. Re:When NOT to hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the worst that can happen is the engine will run, giving the cocksure teenaged driver an excuse to try to test its limits, driving at illegal speeds, and getting into a fatal accident.

      Ok, maybe there are worse things, but I'd say that one's up there.

    5. Re:When NOT to hack by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Modding anything holds the same risk. Screw up overclocking your Athlon, and you could fry the chip. You just use common sense, understand the risks of what you're doing, and don't run home crying if something goes boom.

      Yeah, but my fried Athlon won't kill anyone. My engine exploding while I'm doing 75MPH on a crowded interstate at rush hour, causing me to lose control of my car, is a little different.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    6. Re:When NOT to hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Which is worse: someone who mods the heck out of their car and pours love and attention into it, or the guy in the beater who never checks his tires and has a headlight out?

      Dangerous mechanical problems don't really plague that spectrum of car owners. A block exploding won't destroy your steering column (although maybe it'll lock up your wheels), but you hear a lot more about tire failures than you do engine explosions.

    7. Re:When NOT to hack by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      No, the worst that can happen is the engine will run, giving the cocksure teenaged driver an excuse to try to test its limits, driving at illegal speeds, and getting into a fatal accident.
      When I was 17, I learned how to drive on my mom's BMW 528e. The car has an engine tuned for economy that put out about 120hp (but gobs of low-end torque) and redlined at 4800rpm. The car would happily do 110mph, and the speed limit was 55mph in NJ at the time. My current ride is a Volvo 240 with about 110hp, and I've had it up to 95 - it felt like it would happily go faster. My point is that illegal speeds are easily attainable with stock hardware. You might get somewhat better acceleration by modding, though.
      Me, I'm leaving the Volvo's engine alone (well, maybe a high-lift cam to give it 135hp or so), but I'm modifying the suspension by replacing the bushings with harder ones and putting on heavier sway bars in order to make the car corner better. The brakes are already first-rate - 4-piston fixed calipers in the front and dual-piston rears.
      In a way, it's a shame that Volvo Cars (now a part of Ford - sigh) is coming up with some totally daft ideas like the hoodless wondercar discussed here earlier. Google for "Volvo YCC" if you don't know the sordid tale. They used to build good, simple, durable cars, and it's a shame that not many people appreciated that type of engineering and wanted the latest power electronic auto-zooming 5-way-adjustable widgets.
      -b.

    8. Re:When NOT to hack by nolife · · Score: 1


      Yeah, but my fried Athlon won't kill anyone


      You never know. A sidearmed throw with some spin at close range into some soft tissue of an unsuspecting bystander might cause some serious problems.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    9. Re:When NOT to hack by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      We aren't talking about strapping rocket boosters onto cars here.. the difference in power isn't THAT Much.. though it's enough to make it worthwhile.

      My car is 180HP. If I do some work to it and make it 220HP (which would be fantastic)... am I somehow being more dangerous? How about the guy with the 600HP ferarri next to me?

      Warranty, in the US anyway, is not invalidated unless they can prove the modifications you made contributed to the failure...
      Modifying your ride is not necessarily illegal. Simply making it faster is definately NOT illegal. Emissions and whatnot, yes, may be...
      You don't mod leased cars!
      Insurance? Not likely... but again, if the insurance company could show that you caused the damage you are trying to claim, they obviously wouldn't have to pay.

      these software mods are generally well and widely tested.... it's not like you go in and start tweaking yourself. The companies that create them test them rather thoroughy, and they are generally widely used and reviewed. Modifications that wreck cars and kill people don't tend to be very popular.

      The other reason, I guess, is that it's YOUR car... nobody said it had to stay the way it was from the factory. There are safety and emission rules, yes, but nothing at all that says you can't change your car.

    10. Re:When NOT to hack by Dmala · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but my fried Athlon won't kill anyone. My engine exploding while I'm doing 75MPH on a crowded interstate at rush hour, causing me to lose control of my car, is a little different.

      Sure, but if something is so wrong that it's going to cause your engine to "explode" like a bomb, chances are it's going to happen in the driveway when you first start the car. A more likely worst case scenario on the road is something like a blown piston, which will cause a sudden power loss but will likely still give you a chance to get safely to the side of the road. Still potentially dangerous, certainly, but no more so than a blowout or any number of things that happen all the time to totally stock cars.

    11. Re:When NOT to hack by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      Ford isn't all bad for Volvo.

      I want an S60R - 300 horsepower, 300 torque, AWD, in a safe car that nobody will expect to be fast.

      I'm not one for speeding and I definitely never, ever do stoplight racing. Still, it would be nice to turn onto an on-ramp and zip right up to 55 or 60 mph.

    12. Re:When NOT to hack by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Well, point taken, but I was thinking more along the lines of dropping a gear to pass by someone, causing the RPM to go way up.

      Still, given all the things that can go wrong, is it not bad to be adding yet another thing that can go wrong?

      So, sure, I may get a flat tire - but you may get "a blown piston" OR a flat tire.

      I like AC's counter argument better - it's better to have people who take care of their cars on the road than people who drive their rickety tin-cans of death until the wheels fall off.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    13. Re:When NOT to hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the whole point to mod your car so it runs at the track, but for everyday driving it runs as it did from the factory?

    14. Re:When NOT to hack by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      The S60R is still sweet design, and it uses a Volvo platform and Volvo drivetrain (engine/transmission). Ford had very little input into the design.
      I do wonder whether the car, with all of its closed-standard electronic gadgetry, will last 161,000 miles and 16 years as my 240 has so far, and still run virtually flawlessly. Only time will tell, I guess.
      I'm not bothered by the new S40 and V50 using a Ford platform - Volvo's low end cars (first the 340, then the S40/V40) have always been derivatives of another maker's cars. What worries me is that Volvo cars will end up using Ford's V-engines in FWD applications. On the new Taurii, changing the sparkplugs for the rear cylinder bank takes a two hours or odd bodily contortions. Ford's FWD transmissions don't have such a hot record for reliability either, what with late-80s and to late-90s Taurus transmissions dying at 60k miles. The RWD transmissions weren't much better, with our Lincoln Continental (made by FoMoCo) getting stuck in 1st gear at 100,000 miles. By contrast, my current Volvo has 161k mi. on it and is still on its original drivetrain (and clutch, for that matter).
      My next (new) car will be either a Subaru (nice, simple cars), Mazda Miata (awesome handling, also very simple) or motorcycle. I know that Mazda is Ford-affiliated, but Ford only owns 34% of their stock and has generally left them to their own designs - they share some platforms, but Ford isn't planning to produce an RX-8 or Miata any time soon:). Let's hope that Volvo will be allowed freedom in design as well.
      -b.

  19. Michigan by millahtime · · Score: 1

    Gotta love Michigan where we don't have those pesky inspections. Modup your cars Michiganders.

    1. Re:Michigan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gee, I wonder why Michigan doesn't have inspections =]

    2. Re:Michigan by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 1

      True, but we make up for it by having The World's Shittiest Roads. So, we can mod our cars all to hell and be damned, just to destroy our suspensions on I-96.

    3. Re:Michigan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never driven through Arkansas or Oklahoma, have you?

    4. Re:Michigan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never driven on I-96, have you?

      Actually, 96 is bad, but there are roads in the areas immediately surrounding NYC (New Rochelle, I am looking at you) that are worse.

    5. Re:Michigan by Game+Genie · · Score: 1

      Good luck breathing near a road though! There are emission standard for a reason. I really like living in Michigan but the one thing I can't stand is that the damned auto industry owns the government. The big three have done a lot for this state, but they have also damaged it just as much. Consider the following:

      > NO viable public trasportation
      > Pollution (look at the Detroit river, and everything downstream)
      > Flint?

      --

  20. Disappointing by kahei · · Score: 5, Funny


    I thought a 'car chipper' would be something like a wood chipper, only *much* more ferocious.

    Ah well.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  21. That's nothing... by Dishwasha · · Score: 5, Funny

    My mechanic hacked my car so the left blinker blinks faster than the right. He also put in that hanging wire below the dashboard hack.

    1. Re:That's nothing... by stealthmidget · · Score: 1

      Or your turn signal could just be burnt out =)

    2. Re:That's nothing... by Leon_Trotsky · · Score: 1

      That's what happens when you overclock your turn signal...

      --
      Ohhh! Pay Dirt! A pair of half-eaten choco-pants!
    3. Re:That's nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can fix it for $350. Bring it in next Thursday.

      Signed,

      Your Mechanic

      P.S. What's up with all of those bags of flour...oh...wait...wrong car

    4. Re:That's nothing... by sr180 · · Score: 1

      Its just running out of Halogen Fluid. Put some more into the slow indicator and every thing will be ok!

      --
      In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
    5. Re:That's nothing... by smallstepforman · · Score: 1

      When one set of indicators flash faster than the other set (left in your case), it means that you have a blown light bulb (she's dead, Jim) on the left side of the car. Rocket science, you see.

      --
      Revolution = Evolution
    6. Re:That's nothing... by Dishwasha · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't have a Cadillac...

  22. Drag Racing by FutureShoks · · Score: 3, Informative
    I doubt that you will find a single car at a dragstrip, either production based, "doorslammer" or a full rail which isn't controlled and tuned with a laptop in the pits nowadays.

    Take Andy Robinson's doorslammer Stude for example.

    --
    ___FutureShoks___
  23. Most chips are scams by vasqzr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Marketing, false claims, hype...

    Some cars react very well to them. Many cars don't.

    And if you get the wrong programming, you can ruin your car.

    When they claim 50hp you might only get 15. YMMV. Literally.

    1. Re:Most chips are scams by zsz2k · · Score: 1


      I got an Autothority program for my 1.8T engine; they promised 46 hp and I'd say based on the "butt dyno" that was about right.

      Keep in mind, the article does point out that aftermarket chips normally extract a lot more from forced induction engines than normally aspirated ones. This is because turbos are set to more conservative boost levels from the factory which can be doubled in some cases. For example, the K03 turbo in my car made 7 lbs of boost in stock mode and 14 lbs with the AA chip.

      OTOH, the new GT25 that I put in recently now makes as much as 20 lbs.

  24. DSM by Enigma_Man · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm currently involved in writing assembly for my car's ECU. It's a 92 DSM Turbo AWD. The difficult thing is it's a proprietary OEM variant of a Motorola HC11, with lots of unknown opcodes, but there's a good movement to try and figure them all out. Right now, I've written a stutterbox, and other people have figured out where all of the timing, and fuel maps are, and where the variables for injector sizes are. It's pretty great. Writing assembly is fun, and ha>0ring my car is even more fun :) -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
  25. Forget That . .. by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    Just bring me a car load of "Centerfold"s

  26. Reprogramming a mare... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now this is a challenge! But you can get amazing results. Whistle and she runs to you from behind the corner or stable,teach her to jump over obstacles, help developing the NI (as opposed to AI) to pick the right route when you are too drunk to drive and many more!

  27. obd-2.com by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 3, Informative

    www.obd-2.com

    The best 120$ I ever spent.
    I can now see everything happening in my car in real time, and if I get the right program and know what the hell I'm doing, I can reprogram it aswell.

  28. slashdot mod chips... by evenprime · · Score: 1

    We have several people on slashdot who are professional coders and engineers who work for companies making automotive mod chips. Hopefully some of them will weigh in here....

    --

    "Weapons should be hardy rather than decorative" - Miyamoto Musashi
    I think that goes for OS's too
  29. yes..... by Darth_brooks · · Score: 0

    And the coming of warmer weather is bringing in a new wave of customers to KTR, which was originally owned by Boston rocker J. Geils.

    "First I look at the chip?" nah, doesn't fit.

    "Because of this article, I can't do my homework....anymore...?" hmm, too obscure

    "Freeze Framedump?"

    "My blood runs cold, that Memory has just been sold..."

    I don't have any of my albums handy, i'll have to see which songs Giles actually wrote.

    GM offers a chip upgrade as part of a supercharger kit it sells for the Pontiac Vibe, a small car that's popular with street racers. Films like "2 Fast 2 Furious" have inspired young auto enthusiasts to buy cheap "tuner cars" like the Vibe, and muscle them up.

    The vibe is many things (chief among them is ugly), but it is definatly not cheap. There are a lot of other cars that better fit that class of vehicle. The Vibe is just a Toyota Matrix with a Pontiac nameplate. It looks "young and hip" but few of those who fit the "young and hip" catagory can afford them outside of a lease.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  30. are these chips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    chocolate chips?

    Potatoe chips???

    God, im hungry :)

    1. Re:are these chips by rocket97 · · Score: 1

      Potatoe chips???

      Dan Quail is that you?

      --
      "The two most abundant elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity." -Harlan Ellison
  31. lame article by syle · · Score: 3, Insightful
    But car buffs want more horsepower and better mileage.
    No, they want more horsepower. Mileage is a distant 2nd or 3rd concern. When that Civic owner throws a prefab Greddy kit onto his B18, does he care that his mileage just went from 28 to 17 mpg? Not in the least.
    "Normally-aspirated" cars like the Corvette
    You mean naturally aspirated? Maybe this is a regional thing, but I've never heard of N/A meaning "normally."
    Pontiac Vibe, a small car that's popular with street racers. Films like "2 Fast 2 Furious" have inspired young auto enthusiasts to buy cheap "tuner cars" like the Vibe, and muscle them up.
    Someone with a Vibe came into one of our local shops this weekend looking for aftermarket parts. There wasn't a single aftermarket part for it from any of their distributors. You have to go out of your way just to find intake/exhaust for those things. If they're going to use the example of a 2fast2furious car, maybe pick one people actually mod?
    --

    /syle

    1. Re:lame article by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

      Dude, "normally aspirated" is used all over the place. Actually, I've never heard anyone use "naturally aspirated" but whatever. Do a search on the web and I think you will find that "normally aspirated" is quite common.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    2. Re:lame article by James+Lewis · · Score: 1

      So what are some cars people actually mod?

    3. Re:lame article by syle · · Score: 1

      Anything other than a Vibe? :) In that class of cars... Civics, Accords, Eclipses, V6 Mustangs, etc.

      --

      /syle

    4. Re:lame article by geekboy2k · · Score: 1

      Not to sound too negative, but did you check hard enough? The Vibe has a Toyota motor and the Vibe GT has the same one as a Celica GT-S - which has quite a few aftermarket parts for it. Sure, you won't find any of those parts in a "GM" catalog.

    5. Re:lame article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhmm.. check your facts please.

    6. Re:lame article by Spoke · · Score: 1
      No, they want more horsepower. Mileage is a distant 2nd or 3rd concern. When that Civic owner throws a prefab Greddy kit onto his B18, does he care that his mileage just went from 28 to 17 mpg? Not in the least.
      I beg to differ. There's plenty of car nuts out there who want their cake and eat it, too. In fact, on the WRX a number of tuners build up efficiency maps which limit boost and maximize timing in order to increase fuel efficiency at the expense of power.

      I'm planning on "chipping" my WRX, and I'm planning to make use of the fuel efficiency map frequently. It doesn't hurt that the standard power upgrade map will also boost mileage a bit (it leans out the fuel mixture a bit under certain load patterns which can also increase power compared to running too rich), but in the end the mileage you get depends on how heavy your right foot is.
  32. Ah, but what OS to run... by JosKarith · · Score: 0

    Window$ based - it'll be crashing all the time. Linux based - you'll have SCOLawyerMobiles chasing you instead of the cops.

    --
    'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
  33. Why a chip ??? by THESuperShawn · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't those Japanese letter stickers work better and cost much less? Then there is always the 5 cent 'resistor mod' that everyone and their brother sells on eBay for 20 bucks......

    --
    Repant. Thy end is sheer.
    1. Re:Why a chip ??? by Dmala · · Score: 1

      Actually, I prefer the "Electric Supercharger" eBay scam. Imagine having a leaf blower hooked up to the intake manifold. Guaranteed 50hp... or not.

    2. Re:Why a chip ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds like it might actually work if you could get enough amps out of your electrical system to run the leaf blower. Are there reasons why this wouldn't work?

    3. Re:Why a chip ??? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Interesting

      his sounds like it might actually work if you could get enough amps out of your electrical system to run the leaf blower. Are there reasons why this wouldn't work? None, really. The problem is getting enough amps out of a 12V electrical system. 1hp = 64A at 100% efficiency, and a supercharger takes at least 5-10hp to run. Factor in losses, and you'll need one mean mother of an alternator. Maybe when makers move to 36/42V electrical systems ... Even then, 10HP at 80% efficiency will require around 260A.
      -b.

  34. Windows BMW by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 5, Funny
    While doing 60 MPH

    Windows Mobile has detected unidentified hardware, and is unable to find a driver for it.

    Restarting...

    1. Re:Windows BMW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha a BMW would crash without the help of microsoft.

    2. Re:Windows BMW by StarfishOne · · Score: 0

      It gets really scary when *you* are the driver in this case ;)

  35. Car chippers... by djeaux · · Score: 1
    ...may be seen in action at any auto recycling center. Car mashers, too.

    And yes, they're much more ferocious than wood chippers...

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
  36. The similarities escape some.... by Darth_brooks · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then there's the warranty issue. Reprogramming a car doesn't void the warranty -- unless it can be shown that a later breakdown was caused by the new software. Ford Motor Co. spokesman Glenn Ray says one buyer of a new 2003 Ford Cobra learned this the hard way. The Cobra is about as powerful a car as Ford makes, but not powerful enough for this customer. "He put a chip in it," said Ray, "and blew up the motor." The owner had over-revved the engine--something the original software would have prevented.

    Somewhere right now, a Slashdot reader is saying to himself "What a dumbass."

    And somewhere a Cobra owner is reading about an overclocker who cooked his Athlon and is saying to himself "What a dumbass."

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    1. Re:The similarities escape some.... by Bluetick · · Score: 1

      The similarities don't escape me, but neither do the two zeros.

    2. Re:The similarities escape some.... by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      My sympathy is with the Cobra owner :)

      The Athlon owner can replace the component for less than 200 dollars.

    3. Re:The similarities escape some.... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Not mine...

      The Cobra owner probably spent a smaller fraction of his income on the Cobra than the geek spent on his Athlon.

      Even if that's not the case, I have a harder time having sympathy for someone who can even afford a Cobra and fuck with it like that. I'm not anti-wealth or anything, I just find it hard to have sympathy for someone who should've realized the potential risk after spending that much money.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    4. Re:The similarities escape some.... by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      I just can't see someone spending more money on an Athlon CPU than an engine. Now if you had a cascade failure of hardware in your computer when the CPU blew, the I'd understand the extra expense.
      Even the bleeding edge AMD hardware isn't prohibitively expensive.

    5. Re:The similarities escape some.... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Smaller fraction... IOW, the guy that can justify buying a Cobra and messing with it like that probably makes a lot more than someone buying an Athlon and messing with it. $17000 to someone like that may mean a lot less than $200 to someone like me.

      The truth is, though, that I don't really have sympathy for either one. I mean, what does a 2.4Ghz Atlon get you that a 2.0Ghz doesn't?

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    6. Re:The similarities escape some.... by karnal · · Score: 1

      I had a z28 that I had reprogrammed (95 lt1, in case anyone cares...) with a power programmer 2 from Hypertech.

      Gave a noticable seat-of-the-pants improvement, along with about a 1-2mpg difference in fuel economy (which is practically useless, I could have been driving differently I know...)

      The one thing it WOULD NOT let you do is disable the rev limiter. It would let you raise it to 6250, I believe... but, the weird thing with the LT1 is that after about 5800RPM, you'd lose power. You could feel when you had to shift in the high end.

      The Rev limiter did save my butt in a race once. I wasn't paying attention to the gauges, and wasn't too used to the high end drop -- felt like the car was going to shake apart, but from that point forward, I was glad to have a rev limiter. Maybe this guy should have kept the rev limiter as well -- probably just opted not to have one, which is a VERY STUPID idea on a manual transmission vehicle.

      --
      Karnal
    7. Re:The similarities escape some.... by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      what does a 2.4Ghz Atlon get you that a 2.0Ghz doesn't?

      400 extra megahertz.

      And the bragging rights to go with it.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    8. Re:The similarities escape some.... by rocket97 · · Score: 1

      what does a 2.4Ghz Atlon get you that a 2.0Ghz doesn't?

      Chicks.... lots and lots of chicks....

      --
      "The two most abundant elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity." -Harlan Ellison
    9. Re:The similarities escape some.... by anno1602 · · Score: 1

      [...] but, the weird thing with the LT1 is that after about 5800RPM, you'd lose power [...]

      Not weird at all, perfectly normal instead. Every engine has a point where it outputs its maximum power, above that it declines again. Have a look at any RPM/Power charts,

      No, if some engineer could tell me why that happens... I would imagine that above a certain rpm, inefficencies start to creep in, but I'ld like to hear it from someone who is not talking out of his donkey.

  37. Obligatory Monkey Island quote by skurk · · Score: 2, Funny

    So how many chicks would a wood chipper chip if a wood chipper could chip chicks?

    --
    www.6502asm.com - Code 6502 assembly or.. DIE!!
  38. Weasels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    give better head than squirrels.

  39. Just got this for my WRX! by n3z0rf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Very cool i bought a device from cobbtuning that gave me a an additional 30+ HP and gobs more torque. Best $555 i think that can be spent on a vehicle. It can also ge selected to even have ecomny for those long trips i think it's jsut a great idea!

    Link to the ddevice http://cobbtuning.com/wrx/accessport.html

    1. Re:Just got this for my WRX! by Dielectric · · Score: 1

      Crap, there's a lot of WRX owners here. The AccessPORT rules.

  40. YMMV.... alot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not necessarily. I am posting as AC b/c I used all my mods pts trying to dispell some really bad myhs that are being posted to this thread.

    I have an 2001 Audi A4 1.8T with a GIAC ECU chip. The car passes emissions just fine, even with an aftermarket cat-back exhaust on it. The dealership just did warranty work on my car and replaced my camshaft tension adjuster. I have *NEVER* removed the chip from my car. The dealership has mentioned that they noticed it was in there and never gave me any problems (I have taken it to 2 different dealerships w/o issue).

    They have to prove that the damage is done directly from your modification, as the Magnuson-Moss Act states.

  41. MODS: Parent is TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    For those curious, our penishead engineer tells me that there is a cubic relation between engine RPM's and stress. Stress causes wear, and that's not a linear only relationship either.

    What the article doesn't point out is that over-boosting your cpu engine will cause it to wear out in a hurry.

    As to the "Premium Fuel" thing, I'm doubtful, since all pussies i've ever worked with use knock sensors, and are always running at the ragged edge of detonation anyway.

  42. An ad you won't see for this by JosKarith · · Score: 2, Funny

    To the tune of "Centerfold"

    The seals won't hold,
    My oil gauge is stuck on cold,
    This chip has cracked my manifold,
    This chip has cracked my manifold...

    --
    'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    1. Re:An ad you won't see for this by evdp · · Score: 1

      OMG now I'm gonna have this stuck in my head for hours.

  43. Retuning for maximum durability? by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is it possible to retune for maximum durability? I could give a shit how fast my car can go, but I really want it to last to 200,000 miles with minimal problems.

    It's a Honda Accord V6, so I'm guessing it already is tuned that way, and that manufacturers probably favor durability over high performance anyway.

    1. Re:Retuning for maximum durability? by Dielectric · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That car should last 200k with no problems, provided you keep up on maintenance. Use Mobil 1 synthetic, and a drain interval of 6-9000 miles. Keep the air filter clean and free. Make sure you replace your timing belt when scheduled; if that goes, so does your engine.

      It's already tuned for maximum mileage and reliability. You just have to keep up your end of the bargain.

    2. Re:Retuning for maximum durability? by nharmon · · Score: 1

      For most cars, 200k miles is no problem if the vehicle is properly taken care of.

      If you change the fluids at the proper intervals, take it easy on bumpy roads, and not rev the engine too much, you'll be fine.

    3. Re:Retuning for maximum durability? by silkySlim · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so sure that the factory wants your car to last forever. If certain things don't fall apart or need replacing just after your warranty expires, the service and parts department wouldn't be the cash cow it is today. Would it? ;o)

    4. Re:Retuning for maximum durability? by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't be so sure that the factory wants your car to last forever.

      Exactly, it's called "planned obsolescence."

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  44. Re:FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how about that Flamebait? Come on asshole, I'm flaming you!

  45. I have a chip... by NineNine · · Score: 1

    ... of course it's in my PS2. Works GREAT! Of cuorse, I have to hold down a button on the controller to get a DVD to boot, but hey, it runs my games... uh... faster?

  46. Why bother with chip mods? by djeaux · · Score: 1
    When Detroit has finally decided to revive serious muscle cars?

    A chip-modded turbo Civic on nitrous might hold up against 350 hp @ 5200 rpm for one pass at the dragstrip. (Sorry for the Flash animation, but it's pretty inspiring.)

    Of course, if money is unlimited, I saw one of these auctioned for around $150K on the "Speed" channel a couple weeks ago...

    The worst thing about hot-rodding front wheel drive cars is that no matter how hard you try, they simply won't pop a wheelstand. But those old 'Cudas would, right off the dealer's lot.

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    1. Re:Why bother with chip mods? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too bad that's such a crappy promo site for the car...

      8 pictures of it and I still don't really feel like I know what it looks like.

    2. Re:Why bother with chip mods? by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      The Cuda really should be plum crazy purple though!

    3. Re:Why bother with chip mods? by Wolfier · · Score: 1

      LOL. Disclaimer: I don't drive a Honda.

      First, there is no stock turbo Civic. All turbo Civics are modded, thus all of them have to be remapped. So your word "chip-modded" is bogus, since all of them must be.

      Second, a moderately modded turbo Civic with nitrous can EASILY hand the new 350hp GTO its ass, consistently. Why? Because most probably the Civic weighs less and makes more power (is 300 whp good enough?)

      The Cuda is interesting tho - with its 425 bhp maybe it'll beat that GTO and stand a chance with a "turbo Civic with nitrous". But that new Pontiac does not hold a candle.

    4. Re:Why bother with chip mods? by ogewo · · Score: 1

      You should also be careful with what you say about front wheel drive cars. Many people drag FWD due to its lower drivetrain power loss. More HP per dollar.

    5. Re:Why bother with chip mods? by djeaux · · Score: 1
      Ah, but chip mod that GTO & put a turbo on it & what do you have?

      Truth is, Hemi Cudas in general either get a full show treatment (not driven much) or they end up as SS/AA super stockers. Although the rules limit the modifications for SS/AA hemi cars, we're still talking about steel bodied cars doing 1/4 mi passes well below the 9.90 index.

      Of course, if we put equal mods on the hemi (supercharger, fuel injection, nitromethane fuel), we are talking about the engine in a Top Funny Car. And a Civic is going to be no match for a car that can make a 1/4 pass at 330 mph in under 4 seconds... :-D

      --
      "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    6. Re:Why bother with chip mods? by djeaux · · Score: 1
      More HP per dollar.

      Being an old time SS/MX fan, I think front drive drag cars are a lot of fun. But if rear drive is so much more efficent, one wonders why the front drive top fuel dragster has not yet appeared. (Actually, rear drive is also favored because when a 3,000 hp engine blows, the driver usually prefers for that event to happen behind the driver's seat ;-)

      --
      "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    7. Re:Why bother with chip mods? by Wolfier · · Score: 1

      In your original post nowhere did you mention a modded GTO - and I believe it was what you meant, because you said 350 hp.

      I concur, if you slap a turbo on the GTO you'll get more power - of course - more displacement, same way to breathe (FI).

      Similarly, if you compare 2 engines with the same displacement, different ways to breathe (one with FI and one without), you'll arrive at a similar conclusion.

      That is why chipping and FI have a point, even on 4 bangers like Civic - especially when we're talking about streeting those cars - since on the street, even a mere 300 HP at the crank is powerful enough.

      An increase of say 170 HP to 220 HP given by a chip on those Audis may mean nothing on the track, but on the road (no, not street racing, just ordinary driving), it makes a world of differences.

  47. bad info in that article - we use ls1edit, efilive by Ken+Williams · · Score: 4, Informative

    that was a crap article that was poorly researched. the pros use ls1edit and efilive for tuning corvettes. hptuners just came out with similar products too. and if you are building a high HP race corvette, you piggyback the whole system with a FAST or DFI system for engine management.

    i'm using ls1edit and efilive to tune my 580 HP blown c5 corvette.
    http://www.kcpimp.com/cars/c5.html
    htt p://www.kcpimp.com/gallery/c5
    http://www.kcpimp.c om/gallery/dyno

    links:
    ls1edit: http://www.carputing.com/
    EFILive: http://www.efilive.com/
    FAST: http://www.fuelairspark.com/
    DFI: http://go.mrgasket.com/
    hptuners: www.hptuners.com

    Regards,
    kw

    p.s. and only an idiot would pay $17k to replace a blown 03 cobra motor. you can get short blocks all day for well under $5k.

    --
    -- ken williams
  48. Not as bad as it really seems by SharkPork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    chipping a car is really not that crazy or extreme. Most cars come from the factory with "stupid-proof" setups, i.e., they run very very rich so you can't induce detonation and blow your engine easily, and they engineer in lots of understeer for safety reasons since 90% of the people on the road aren't what you'd exactly call performance oriented drivers.

    chipping a car mostly involves re-doing the fuel injector maps and spark timing control for certain rpm ranges to increase torque and horsepower. This has the added benefit of also increasing fuel mileage in many cases, since it's set to be very rich from the factory. When you lean it out a little, you use less fuel, get more power, and have fun in the process.

    Most factory turbo cars that I know of don't really use electronic boost control mechanisms, they actually use wastegates and compressor bypass valves to maintain boost in a mechanical/pneumatic fashion. Electronic boost controllers are pretty expensive, anyway.

    but just reprogramming the existing chip in a car is nowhere near as good as installing a complete standalone Engine Management System. With an EMS like a Haltech (produced in AU, btw), for example, you can actually adjust fuel, timing, boost, etc literally on the fly, unlike a reprogrammed ODBII type computer found in most cars. This allows you to fine-tune your car for maximum efficiency or power, or whatever you're looking for. (power, of course, duh!)

    You'd be really suprised how over-engineered a lot of cars are, and what they can take. Hmm.. sorta like overclocking a processor, really. If you take the proper precautions with each (better cooling, faster ram, good power supply, for the computer, or higher-octane fuel, good lubricants, and regular maintenance for the car)

    So before we get our panties in a bundle and start completely ranting on the car tuner demographic (but it wouldn't really be slashdot without it) just keep in mind that it's the same sort of compulsion for car tuners as it is for overclockers, or mod-chippers, or kernel-hackers...

    --
    If you can read this, you are most likely close enough.
    1. Re:Not as bad as it really seems by djeaux · · Score: 2, Insightful
      chipping a car is really not that crazy or extreme.

      Nope. But it's like overclocking without attending to CPU cooling.

      I'm going to show my age, but "back in the day," one didn't do serious cam or intake mods to a 2-bolt main small block Chevy. One sought out the tougher 4-bolt main blocks.

      Same applies to a Civic or Eclipse. You can get them to pump out horsepower far beyond what their little crankshafts & main bearings were intended to support. Throw a nitrous bottle in the back & you're talking serious lack of reliability.

      Heck, for optimum performance, you still have to get greasy, modify the cooling system, change cams, install close ratio gearing, etc. It ain't all "pull the chip" & bolt-on a K&N intake.

      Serious hot-rod mods are not compatible with reliability or longevity, especially if the mods aren't supported by yet other mods. High school parking lots are littered with proof of this.

      --
      "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    2. Re:Not as bad as it really seems by Blackaxis · · Score: 1

      You can get them to pump out horsepower far beyond what their little crankshafts & main bearings were intended to support. Honda cranks are very strong, considering they are forged, it's the rest of the package that goes to hell.

    3. Re:Not as bad as it really seems by booyah · · Score: 1

      Kinda funny, the F/I eclipses are built to handle about 26PSI boost from the factory by using forged pistons and connecting rods... as well as the crank.

      other cars like the VWAG 1.8t use excellent components except for the out of date K03 or K04 turbo that is factory. a little work on those and you can push close to 2 bar without engine issues as far as reliablity people have already put over 100k miles on a T3/T4 turbocharger modded engine pushing 350Whp. once they replaced their stock clutch (which is too light in the first place) they have had no issues

      for a car that weighs in at about 3k thats pretty dang mean

      --
      #include sig.h
    4. Re:Not as bad as it really seems by pedrop357 · · Score: 1

      Well, you're not as far off as you could be, but there's always tomorrow.

      Numerous car magazines have attested to the extreme capabilities of the factory honda and nissan engines. The factory cranks are capable of well over 500 hp, same goes for the blocks. Show me a Chevy of Ford engine where the factory block and crank can handle 2-3 times and/or 3-400hp over factory.

      Many racers run Hondas and Nissans with factory cranks and blocks well into the 11s.

      Optimum performance and reliability are not the same thing. I can have a very reliable overpowered car that doesn't run as fast it could because I didn't change gearing to match my new power curve, but this doesn't necessarily mean that my car is going to die an early death because my gearing is sub-optimal.

      Cams and gearing are important for maximum power, but they don't really do much for reliability unless your combination makes all its power up top and that's where you keep your revs.

      Serious hot-rod mods are not compatible with reliability or longevity, especially if the mods aren't supported by yet other mods. High school parking lots are littered with proof of this.

      A lot of 12 second civic and eclipse daily drivers would disagree with that, as well as all those 10 second daily driver camaro and mustang owners.

      As for high school parking lots, I've never understood why people feel the need to insult teenagers in order to make a point and/or compare certain people to teenagers (as if that's supposed to be an insult) when those people do something that another doesn't understand or agree with.

      People in my high school who modded their cars used as much, or more, caution as adults who modded their cars. The ones who owned their own cars didn't want to be without a car for a days/weeks/months because of a stupid move and the ones whose parents bought the car didn't want to explain to their parents that they blew the car up pushing 150hp of nitrous to their stock engine.

      In a thread about overclocking, I guess I could say that high schoolers bedrooms are littered with remnants of overclocking mistakes, that might rub more people the wrong way here as it's not necessarily true. There are people of all age groups who throw caution to the wind when it comes to tweaking but teens aren't guilty of anymore carelessness tweaking then their fellow over-the-magic-age tweakers.

  49. how these work ... by sir_cello · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's increasing complex business - I know someone that works in it - simply "rechipping" doesn't work in modern and complex engines.

    The new devices effectively clamp around your Engine Control Unit (ECU) by intercepting it's inputs and outputs: the box modulates the signals coming to and from the real ECU: for example, the ECU will usually consider it an engine fault if (say) emission is too high, so the purpose of the device is to (a) alter the fuel mix ratio output on the one hand, but (b) fool the input back into the ECU that the emissions aren't as high as they really are. There are many variables, the ones I've seen take up to (say) 16 different variables that can be manipulated.

    I'm told that the devices need to be tuned for the specific model of car, and preferably, the specific car itself: as individual cars each have different variances and tolerances within the scope of the model itself; and the tuning software isn't released to the public (even though it may escape ...) on the principle that the makers of these devices don't want people to buy the device then try to home tune it and blow their engine up. The tuning is done inside a workshop with appropriate monitoring tools (e.g. analysers), so they can trim the tables in the software, and observe the outputs on the tools to ensure that the best results are obtained without going too far as to break the engine. Naturally, there are some people who do have their own tools and workshops and are competent do this themselves, but a lot of these modders don't.

    This definitely voids your warranty, not to mention probably breaking environmental and other regulations, if you do it to street machines. That doesn't stop some people though. (there's a good analogy here to the issue over releasing drivers for 802.11g chips: because the software in the driver is part of the overall FCC emissions approval, so altering the software potentially voids the approval of the device -- similar concept here in that manipulating your ECU voids the grounds upon which various approvals were made)

    However, it also has more legitimate applicability to track machines (based on stock cars) where it's not an infringement of the regulations because these are on private raceways and with specific exclusions and so on (and, these cars are usually modded beyond the limits of the warranty in the first place).

    The manufacturers are getting wiser and building in measures to defeat the devices, but it seems to make these guys money, and in the same way that you can often safely overclock your CPU, you can often do it to your engine: just need to be aware that (a) it depends on the specific car itself, (b) it doesn't always work, (c) when you do it, you're taking a lot of risk as by definition you may be working outside of the engineering tolerances/limits of the engine [unless the engineering is there, but commerical and marketing considerations limited its scope].

    1. Re:how these work ... by coug_ · · Score: 1

      This definitely voids your warranty, not to mention probably breaking environmental and other regulations, if you do it to street machines.

      I'll agree with the latter, but not the former. Unless the dealership/manufacturer can prove that the alterations made on the car are directly related to the part being warrantied, then your warranty is still valid.

      For example - if your power windows stop working while the car is under warranty, you have every right to demand that they be fixed.

    2. Re:how these work ... by sir_cello · · Score: 1

      I was speaking generally, and what you say is correct when looking in more detail.

  50. Re:Car chippers by ryane67 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am a current owner of this "switchable" software and can verify that the cruise control works just fine with it. As for the horsepower gains, with a turbocharged car it is very significant. I go from 12psi to 20psi of boost when I switch from stock mode to the 93 octane mode. To comment on the engine wear babble, there are plenty of cars with my motor, running with my exact software that are lasting longer than their stock counterparts. It all depends on how well the motor is built to begin with.

    --
    ?SYNTAX ERROR IN LINE 42
  51. Arg! How many of these are we going to get? by haroldK · · Score: 1

    This is at least the 3rd posting in 6 months about changing the programming of a car's ECU. It's not new, it won't go away soon, and it won't let you network your car.

    1. Re:Arg! How many of these are we going to get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention that it's not interesting.

      99% of the "programming" is actually just people altering parameters. We don't get all worked up when somebody changes their mouse XY sensitivity, and that's roughly akin to most of the programming done by anybody who'd refer to their modifications as "chipping".

      Don't get me wrong -- there are real instances of programming out there, and people who do things to engines which are actually worthy of the term "hacking", but the crap in this article (and all the others /. has posted so far) ain't it...

  52. But can your chip do this? by moophus · · Score: 1

    Not only does this chip give you more power, it turns off your a/c for you when you get on the gas, it changes one of your gauges to have 5 other functions and lets you secure your car so you have to press your pedals in a certain order before you can start it! http://www.tmo.com/prod/eprom/conv.shtml

  53. It all depends on what you wanna do with the car by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

    By default, cars are driven differently when they are raced than when they are driven every day. During racing conditions, cars are put under an entirely different type of stress than when they are driven back and forth to the office or on the interstate at rush hour. What works for one will NOT work for the other.

    I drive a stock 6-speed C5 Vette, and it's got plenty of power to get off the line just about as fast as you want to, unless you are running competition 1/4 miles or something. It is my daily driver and absolutely wonderful to take extended road trips in. (It also gets 28+ MPG on the highway, in case you were wondering -- outstanding for a car with its level of performance).

    If you really must go faster, get one of these superchargers. Both come with a unit to flash your chip and reprogram the car's behavior for the supercharger. They both also have optional three year powertrain warranties available in case you are freaked out about destroying your engine etc.

    BTW, chipping is obviously just one of the many methods tuners use to make their cars faster and generally increase performance. Air intake, exhaust, braking, etc. are all also very important considerations which may or may not be affected by reprogramming as well as other mechanical mods.

  54. Old news...even for slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This topic was covered in a story with ALMOST the same title not 2 months ago on slashdot. Hack Your Car

  55. Dealer Authorized Bliss by Big_Al_B · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm lucky enough to drive a BMW M3. My local dealership is also the only regional Dinan (aftermarket mods) authorized dealer/installer.

    I've had them add some choice goodies, with no effect on my warranty. Dinan also warrantees their mods specifically. No problems yet. The "Ludicrous Speed" button is my favorite. For some reason, my wife still calls it the "accelerator".

    1. Re:Dealer Authorized Bliss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am lucky enough to have been born w/ an above average size penis, and therefore don't feel the need to brag about my fictious wife or M3. PS. which model e30, e36, or e46?

    2. Re:Dealer Authorized Bliss by Big_Al_B · · Score: 1

      Whatever. What's your problem?

      P.S. '97 E36 Sedan, from one of the two years (97-98) they made M3 sedans. In theory the Dinan toys add about 15-25 hp to the stock 240 put out by the inline six. Any more questions?

  56. Hacked 2004 Prius by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've "hacked" my 2004 Prius so to speak to include the EV Button which comes stock on the Japaneese and some European versions of the car. The American version not only doesn't have the button, but doesn't even have the wiring harness present to do this. Someone was able to figure out which pin on the engine computer triggers this function, and we took it from there. While some of us used the factory button imported from Japan, others have wired it using Radio Shack parts, or into the headlight flasher or the cruise control button as well for a more stealthy appearance.

    This purpose of this buttion button is to allow the driver to force the car into electric-only mode for short distances at speeds under 55km/hr (34mph). This is great for sneaking home at night in close quarters, saving gas till you back out of the driveway, or for sneaking up on the old ladies in mall parking lots before laying on the horn.

    If you could plug the car in, you'd even have a short range EV car. Now if only they had a button to improve gas mileage while making it do 0-60 in 4 seconds.

    --
    $ man woman *
    -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
  57. Why not? by QuasiEvil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I tinker with my car all the time. Back when I had an ECU I even understood (had the firmware source, complete with symbols and comments, don't ask how...), I actually tinkered quite a bit more. Blow up the motor? Oops. Not like I haven't done that before, and there goes a Saturday down the drain changing it out. I usually have a spare engine or two sitting around, or if not I know where the junk yards are or I know how to rebuild or repair them (if possible, depends on the failure mode).

    Car Lease? Warranty? What are these? I buy cars for cash (usually used, or occasionally built from 2-3 salvages) and drive the suckers into the ground, then repeat. My Blazer died at 190,000 miles (original engine, third tranny), my del Sol is still good at 160k and should live to well over 200k, and my Yukon is at 110k and is only three years old (only vehicle I've ever bought new). Yes, I drive a lot. Greatest feeling in the world to me - open road, open windows (or open top), radio cranked up, going places just to see what's over the next hill.

    Also, how exactly do I invalidate my insurance? I don't carry coverage for repair on any of these, except the Yukon, and that's only because it's new enough to be worth fixing. The rest, after any wreck my insurance would have to pay to fix, I'd either cut up for scrap or fix them myself anyway. If it's the other guy's insurance, obviously I'm going to make them fix it (or just take the money and scrap the car). It's not like I'm stupid enough to ask the insurance people to fix something mechanically that's my fault through stupidity.

    Chips are just a new piece of everything that's been done for years - overboring cylinders, performance cams, high flow exhausts, aftermarket blowers, etc. That said, though, chips on normally aspirated cars are usually a waste of time these days. Don't bother - work on the other upgrades instead.

    Guess it all comes down to if you know what the hell you're doing, go for it. If you don't, don't be a wannabe wanker that complains when it doesn't go right.

  58. My car doesn't have any problem passing emissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and it's chipped, and I live in Pennsylvania.

    Do you have personal experience to the contrary?

  59. Try that on a honeymoon! by medscaper · · Score: 1
    Seriously. It's flashing "Overspeed warning off" at me.

    Ha, ha, ha, ha!!!

    A bit off topic, but my wife and I rented a car on our honeymoon around Ireland a few years ago. We arrived on a Saturday, and that "Overspeed Warning Off!" warning started flashing on our rental (goofy looking French Minivan thingy) on Sunday morning. Driving in Ireland is...well...a little different for US drivers. The wrong side of the road, hedges and walls within inches of you every mile, and hairpin turns every few feet with tour buses barelling down at you going 65mph!

    So, we saw this warning flashing at us, and had no idea how to deal with it. We were nervous about driving as it was, so we pulled over in several towns, trying to find someone on Sunday who knew what to do about it.

    We found several auto shops, a couple that were open, but no one had ever seen anything like it before. We even saw a couple of the same vans and tried to track down the owners, to no avail.

    Finally, after about 3 hours at a phone booth calling the rental company, the manufacturer, and one international call to a friend who knows something about European cars, we were ready to give up. We stopped to get fuel and decided to just keep driving. How bad could it be?

    My wife was talking to one of the locals about our adventure, and the lady's little girl was standing there, listening and eating an ice cream cone. The little girl looked at our van, walked around, opened the driver's door, leaned in, and released a tiny recessed button in the turn signal wand.

    Doh!

    Stupid American tourists.

    --
    Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
  60. MINI One Tuning by Owen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm a MINI Dealer, and chipping a MINI will lift the little 1.6 litre petrol engine from 90Bhp to 130Bhp for about 500. We honour the warranty for it. It's quite safe indeed, and it's only downgraded at the factory so they can sell the more expensive model/meet emissions laws.

    Owen.

  61. Actually, I'd like replacement harnesses. by MickLinux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Quite simply, a while back I had an older car. It developed an electrical problem, and when I went in to get it fixed, they told me they'd have to start working through the whole electrical harness to find it. In the end, I decided to live with the problem.

    Now, these guys weren't great, I'm sure, but there is something fundamentally flawed with the current system of electrical harness. Ideally, the harness should be easy to maintain, not requiring you to rip out molding everywhere.

    So let's try some standards: First, let's have color coded wires. We need black for ground, pink for 5 V, red for 12 V, and Orange for anything higher. Negative voltages have a single black stripe along them. Positive are unstriped.

    Periodically, on the insulation wires, are resistor type markings that name the voltage.

    So that handles all the power. Next, there's data. Data doesn't travel in wires per se, so much as in shielded ribbon cable.

    Now, there's the switching. Get a simple chip like the 8051XA, program it to handle simple switching, pop on some Power Mosfets, and remanufacture the whole thing into a single thin, strong, electrically shielded box with a number of jacks for power and data. At about $20 per box, you could have 20 of them in and around the car.

    Now, data and power can route from any of them to any other, along the existing lines. Want to buy more? Fine. Hook it up to a few others, program your onboard computer to tell the others to recognize it, and you're in.

    Make it all easily user-programmable. You want to tie in some mega speakers into the back of your car? Fine. Hook them into the nearest switchbox, inform your car that they're there, and instantly you have Dolby BLAST(TM) Surround Sound. Or whatever.

    Suppose two wires short out? The nearest boxes figure it out, isolate the short, and inform you of the short, the location, and what needs to be replaced. You can then go in and fix it yourself, replacing either the wires, or the box.

    Anyhow, that's my basic idea.

    There'd be a wonderful market for these things as aftermarket items, too. If your current electrical system goes bad, it might be cheaper just to replace the whole harness, replace your radio with a onboard computer, insert a CD to program it to your used car, and go digital.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  62. more RPMs is fine with me by castlec · · Score: 1

    Not everyone can deal with compilation issues. RPMs make the average user's life much easier so if this "Chipping" thing makes more RPMs for everyone, I think the world will be a better place.

    --
    When I tell an object to delete this, am I killing it or telling it to kill me?
  63. Is there a chip mod... by djeaux · · Score: 1
    ... that will make my Accord coupe rear wheel drive?

    Burning rubber off the front tires is soooooo wimpy... And putting a line lock on the rear brakes just doesn't work the same for a burn out...

    --
    "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
  64. Overclocking your car? by p51d007 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought all you had to do, was put one of those idiotic HUGE spoilers, a bunch of stickers, and one of those stupid coffee can mufflers on your car to make it go fast? LOL, some of the cars I see around here sound like a motorcycle under water. Kids today....they don't have a clue what a GOOD motor sounds like........Heck, my stock mustang can out run them. Here's what I do.....I get to a stop light when one of those rice-a-roni cars pulls up next to me...he guns his engine, I gun and brake torque my engine.....Light turns green, he floors it, I quietly make a right turn....lol....Like I'm going to race down a BUSY street anyway.....

    1. Re:Overclocking your car? by sindarin2001 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Though I disagree with your scorn to all of today's tuner scene (at least that's how I interpreted it), it is fun to harrass the heck out of 'em too. I especially like to make sure there is a cop sitting up ahead (pretty easy to do in a small town that has two large roads...speed limit 25...filled with teenagers on a Friday night), and pull up next to one of them....then make like I want to race. They race ahead and catch the attention of the cop...whirling blue and red...and I get a good laugh.

      Cheers

    2. Re:Overclocking your car? by robfoo · · Score: 1

      The best way to make them feel stupid is to beat them, in a crappy old car.

      My mate has a 1961 Morris Minor with an old Datsun 1200 engine in it. The gear ratios are so low that first gear tops out at about 30 km/h. But that thing *moves* off the line, and still has the original paint (what's left of it).

      We used to go out every few weeks and beat all the little civics and mazdas in the usual Friday night 'traffic light drags' (ie, first-to-50km/h or first-across-the-intersection).

      I still remember the look on the face of the first punk-kid-driving-mummy's-civic-with-type-R-sticker s we whipped. The next time we stopped everyone in his car was staring, like 'what the fuck just happened?'. We replied with a look that said 'that's right, that's how shit you are'

  65. why is this news? by The+Unabageler · · Score: 1

    People have been chipping cars for years...might as well have posted a story about microsoft's "new" monopoly. recockulous!!!

    --
    perl -e '$_="\007/4`\cp%2,".chr(127);s/./"\"\\c$&\""/gees; print'
  66. did it on my Audi S4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did this on my audi S4 last winter: went from 250hp to 307 hp.
    I can use the cruise control to set it back to factory default before the state inspection or bringing it back to the dealer.
    Having a lot of fun with my car now :)

  67. High end car mechanic is a great job! by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 2, Informative
    He started out just fixing his own...then friends of his with Ferraris would ask him to tinker with theirs...one thing lead to another.

    A high-end car mechanic with a right-sized client list and his own garage can make a great living.... $100k is achievable, more in areas where the service is more in demand. (California, warm weather states, etc...) People that buy these cars will pay a premium to have an expert who knows the car inside and out work on it. For them, it is a no-brainer--make a large cash investment last longer by maintaining it with an expert--Well worth the money when needed. I mean, what, are you going to take your Testarossa to Pep Boys? Those little pimple-pusses would probably crack it up trying to take off in 1st gear...
    --
    Who did what now?
    1. Re:High end car mechanic is a great job! by nolife · · Score: 1

      This concept is not just for the exotics. You can find an expert that deals with a specific car line in almost any area. I've been able to find a great mechanic that deals with Mustangs at every place I've lived in the last 12 years. These guys know the mods, the car inside and out, and what does and does not work. Even relatively simple things are quick and painless. As a bonus, they encourage you to get the parts yourself and they will install them. Not many places will do that because they lose the markup.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  68. Engineers vs engineers by gosand · · Score: 1
    Like our head engineers always says: It takes a lot of work to outsmart factory engineers. And several million dollars.

    Hmm, I don't know about that. While it does take a lot of work, I doubt the million dollar argument.

    Case in point, one Jim Conforti. If you are a BMW enthusiast, you probably know who he is. He is a motronics expert, and has been programming chips (when they still used to use chips) for a long time. I have one of his in my '88 M3, and I appreciate his genius. He is generally accepted as one of the authorities on BMW reprogramming. And the BMW factory engineers are certainly no dummies.

    Normally aspirated: Add a small bit of horsepower (normally less than you can feel in a double blind test) and lose significant mielage

    Sometimes the gains aren't so small, and can definitely be felt on a "butt-dyno". Check out some of these numbers on his chips. Now these are on his chips, for pre-OBDII computers. But they are quite impressive.

    His software isn't as easy as plugging in a laptop and fiddling with some numbers, but I wouldn't want to do that on MY car anyway.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  69. I'd chip for the mileage by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

    With gas prices coming to an all-time high, the improvement in mileage sounds a helluva lot more attractive than the improvement in horsepower.

    Of course, I'm a commie pinko hippie tree-hugger who wants a TDI to burn fry oil in. Mmmm... french fries.

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  70. Ah, this is nothing. by Shoten · · Score: 1

    Chipping your car is one way to get the job done, but another way is to entirely replace the ECU with an aftermarket unit. Then, you can change variables on the fly, which has applications in aftermarket turbo and supercharging of cars. Some ECUs are total replacements (AEM, TEC), and some are piggyback units, which work in concert with the factory ECU (Link for '99+ model year Miatas). I've got a Link in my car, and it's part of an aftermarket turbo setup. A big part of setting everything up is tuning the car, which basically means either using a dyno while you make dynamic changes to fuel supply, wastegate settings, timing, etc. or having one person drive while another checks readings and makes changes. It's a lot of work, but you learn more about how a modern engine works than you'd ever have thought possible. It seems to me that this gives you more control and insight than you'd get just changing the relatively few things that chippers end up doing; mostly they end up altering timing, and not much else. By advancing timing, they get a bit more power, and you need to user higher octane gas to compensate for the increased risk of detonation.

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  71. What the Pro's Use by cblguy · · Score: 1
    I'm a GM guy. So all I deal with is GM.

    I own and use LS1Edit, LT1Edit, Tunercat, EFILive, AutoTap, CarCode, TTS Datamaster, and several other programs (freeware such as WinALDL, Freescan, and Craig's TPI software). Also played around with MasterTune, but that got bypassed by Tunercat & LT1Edit. And Diacom is OK, but its technology is outdated.

    A pro will have a whole bag 'o tricks up his sleeve. ;)

    Programming a GM vehicle depends on the the technology of the vehicle. For example, the 86-89 MAF TPI cars used a 128kbit EPROM (27c128) - which was easily hacked. The later LS1's use a 4MBit flash chip - which when you're faced with that much code, and it's not removable, makes for a much more significant challenge. Heck, Grand Nationals used a 32kbit EPROM. Talk about simple! ;)

    All a "hack" is - is tweaking the lookup tables. Lookup tables are FAST. A CPU doesn't have to crunch through an algorithm - just look at (X,Y) and grab the value there. MAP vs RPM for spark advance. No problem.

    In the future, CPU power is going to pass the lookup table, and we're going to be dealing with DSP algorithms. That will be truly challenging to the guys hacking the ECMs. No more tables - just formulas.

  72. Dupe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, haven't we seen this before?

  73. Buyer Beware: HP by silkySlim · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind HP numbers are wishy-washy... Is it HP at the crank or wheels? There's a loss of power as it travels through the transmission and to the wheels. Is factory HP numbers? Sometimes the factory fudges the HP for various insurance/financial reasons. Is it dynometer HP numbers? The baseline HP should acquired on the same exact dyno the mods were tested on. There's crank and chassis dynometers of various types. You also don't get any "ram air effect" on a dyno. So the motor has to do all the work of pulling air into itself. I can claim a 20% HP gain by just quoting the wheel HP versus the crank HP. To get the whole story, you need torque and power/weight numbers as well.

  74. So let me get this straight... by FrankieBoy · · Score: 1

    ...I'm going to trust that some guy with an EPROM burner in the back of some garage knows more about my cars systems interactions than the engineers that designed the car? Oh wait...that's generally describing the hacker movement. Never mind...

    1. Re:So let me get this straight... by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      This isn't some guy with an eprom burner. It is a company with real engineers who have repeatedly tested and benchmarked their modifications on real cars on a real dyno over and over and over again, and sell their modifications in volume, in an industry where selling things that break cars will quickly put you out of business.

  75. Can you trust them? by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

    Would you really trust someone named "Diebold" to hack your car?

    --
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  76. They are working on this by cornjones · · Score: 1

    something similar to this is in the works now. Cars w/ satellite navigation consoles are being tied into the traffic data so the route that is suggested is suggested to route around congested areas. This is similar to network routing in that capacity is maximized as you send traffic on all available roadways. Anybody who doesn't have the system will still be helped out b/c of the lesser use of the "normal" roadways.

    I read about tests of this, i don't think it is wide use, or indeed, i doubt if there is enough penetration of satellite navs to make much of a difference

  77. More interesting would be p2p chat mode. by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    So all the drivers stuck in traffic can swear at each other.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  78. Real performance by RedShoeRider · · Score: 2, Informative
    Sorry, but I've gotta throw my 0.02 in here. Finally, a topic I know something about:

    Chipping a turbo car (most of the time) involves re-timing when the wastegate kicks in. A turbo will produce boost just about forever (so long as you can spin the blades faster and faster), so at some point, you dump so much pressure in the cylinder that you start to blow head gaskets and all sorts of other nasty stuff like that. The wastegate kicks in at some point, dumping off the extra pressure at a preset psi. By modding the gate's setpoint, you make more pressure, and therefore more power.

    True, some engines can take the extra boost just fine (cast iron blocks are very good for abuse. Aluminum....eeeh), some will blow sky-high the first time you try it. It's a calculated risk, just like OC'ing your processor. It IS harder on your engine, no doubt. So while it make take it, the damn thing might go 20 or 30k miles before it should have otherwise. Of course, if you are doing mods like this, you likely don't care about the 20 or 30k. As for naturally aspirated engines, you don't have wastegates to play with. Sure, you can fuck with throttle response curves and the like, but it's not nearly as effective.

    You want real power? Go get a bike. Figure this:

    An Aprilia Mille weighs about 400 pounds. Puts out 140 horses. That gives me a hp/weight ratio of about 2.8. Cost: about 18 grand.

    A Pontiac Vibe weights about 2800 pounds. Puts out 127 horses. That gives me a hp/weight ratio of about 22. Cost: about 18 grand.

    A Dodge Viper weights about 3400 pounds. Puts out 500 horses. That gives me a hp/weight ratio of about 6.8. Cost: about 80 grand.

    And you get more chicks with the bike, too.

    --

    Chris Knight is my hero.

    1. Re:Real performance by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      An old Yamaha XS-650 weighs 400lbs. unladen and 580lbs. with rider (me). It puts out 55hp. Power/weight ratio of 11.6, which will still squick 90% of the cars on the road right now. Cost: $180. Insurance: $150/year. Of course, it broke down all the time, so I sold it, but I'm getting a Ninja 500 later this spring.
      -b.

  79. Research on vehicle wi-fi comm w/ infrastructure by kryzx · · Score: 1
    That is not as far off as you might think. Check out this proposal solicitation from DOT for "In Vehicle Collision Warning System Using Infrastructure Messages": Here's the link.
    (second topic from top)

    Okay, it's not vehicles talking to each other, it's about vehicles using wifi to talk to stoplights, stopsigns and other infrastructure. But it's just a small step from that to vehicles communicating among themselves and trying to coordinate.

    Some highlights:
    "The in vehicle system would utilize Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC), High Accuracy Nationwide Differential GPS (HANDGPS), and a handheld Linux based computer to acquire and analyze the infrastructure warnings to alert drivers."

    "The interface and data analysis programs would be copyrighted with the Free Software Foundation copyleft statement"

    --
    "I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
  80. Noooo, not WIndows! by Bitseeker · · Score: 1

    We must start the Open Source Car (OSCar) movement before it's too late. Vehicles must be built with all code stored in NVRAM and source code in a CVS tree at SourceForge.

    The only problem is that Windows XPe installed in gasoline pumps may either refuse to deliver fuel to or reformulate the fuel to work less efficiently for an OSCar than for a vehicle that's running Windows. *snicker*

  81. Apten Performance Chips by bsd_usr · · Score: 2, Informative


    Here's a few urls for those interested (this is slashdot so I'll probably be flamed for being on topic):

    http://www.apten-us.com/ - Ford performance chips
    http://www.hypertech-inc.com/ - Dodge, Ford, GMC performance chips
    http://www.jetchip.com/ - Domestic and Import performance chips
    http://www.diablosport.com/main.php - Dodge, Ford, GMC performance chips

    I've heard that the Apten chips are really good and they're custom programmed for the the stuff that you have already done to your vehicle (Intake, heads, headers, exhaust, etc). I've heard that the Jet chips suck. Hypertech is a well known brand though.

  82. Car Virus! by scovetta · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is anyone else waiting for the first Car Virus? "I didn't think I was driving 95 miles/hr, my digital readout said I was doing 55!" or worse,
    NEWS FLASH:
    The HondaVirus/B will be striking at Midnight, June 4th, causing infected brake systems to lock up (or fail).

    How about when they start adding WiFi systems in the car systems? Then you drive-by-infect.

    Ok fine, I'm a few years early, but does anyone **really** trust car company software any more than Windows?

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
  83. Which cars use which Micros? by Onnimikki · · Score: 1

    So is there a list somewhere that tells you what micros are used in which cars? Like which cars use 68332's, HC11's or MPC555's?

  84. Am I the only one... by cindy · · Score: 1

    ...who has a problem with people modifying their cars to get worse gas mileage and to produce more pollution? How many folks who've responded here go around bitching about global warming and the government's energy and environmental policies?

    1. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      All hail fascism.

  85. What a dumbass. by alkoholik · · Score: 1

    Seriously, you have to be a pretty bad driver to over-rev your engine and blow it up. Usually this does not even occur during normal driving. You have to downshift into the wrong gear with most cars to do $17,000 worth of damage. My car requires premium gas and has no rev limiter - it is a '93 Maxima SE. Not too unusual right? Many cars have require premium. My '94 STS was the same way - same thing with any LS1. Nothing changes there!

  86. "Our head engineer says..." by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    Turbocharged: turn up the boost, wear out the engine in a hurry.

    Your "head engineer" doesn't know what the hell he's talking about, and neither do you. Read on.

    The extent to which an turbocharged engine varies greatly with the engine, and generally after 2-3 years, everyone has figured out what the limits are. If you want to play it safe, simply wait until the warranty has expired, and THEN chip the car.

    The engines in today's cars are built to handle a specific amount of power, and when the power is increased the wear on components is exponentially increased.

    Bullshit. Engine blocks and main components are designed in with quite a bit of extra margin. Not for safety/reliability, but to keep the block from being obsolete within 2-3 years. Audi's 1.8 turbo engine block for example, hasn't changed much over the last near-decade...it has, however, gone from 150hp to as much as 220hp in factory trim. There were certainly changes, but the basic block stayed the same.

    Audi's old inline-5 block never really changed over almost 10 years, but was used in cars from 90hp to 220hp. It was the same block that was used in the Sport Quattro, which produced 330hp in factory trim, and 1200(yes, 1200) in full, Group B Rally form. I know people who have been running an extra 65+ hp in their 13 year old Audis, and have been doing so for 6 or more years, some since virtually the day they bought them. Intake hoses burst and you've got to keep things in good shape, but the engines will be in fantastic shape despite 200,000-300,000 miles on them.

    As to the "Premium Fuel" thing, I'm doubtful, since all engines i've ever worked with use knock sensors, and are always running at the ragged edge of detonation anyway.

    BullSHIT. The knock sensors are to prevent engine DAMAGE, not to let you run the cheapest gas possible. When the ECU detects knocking, it adjusts timing(and boost if turbocharged) until it stops. Adaptive ECUs(anything made in the last 10 years) will remember this and 'set the bar' lower, so to speak. HOWEVER, there's a timeout- with each start of the engine or over a certain period of time, the ECU goes back to what it considers normal. So you will be perpetually bouncing against the limit if running too low an octane.

    You don't need a chip to take advantage of premium fuel, just a good OEM computer.

    BullSHIT! If the car wasn't designed for anything over a certain octane, running anything higher will be a complete and utter waste of money unless you're running a modified engine(with raised compression or altered timing). Further proof you have NO clue what you're talking about...

  87. Get a bike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love seeing people talk about their car mods, gaining a few horses here and there. My bike was $5000 'like-new' and it can do 10sec 1/4ths completely stock. If you want real cheap speed, find a used Suzuki Hayabusa. I think it puts out 150rwhp stock, weighs 450lbs and costs $11k new.

    I have a beater car for getting groceries.

  88. Adding features (was Re:News?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Engine control isn't the only interesting area where cars are being chipped. Top Down Tech adds a bunch of features to the car by watching signals on the OBD-II bus. For example, triple-clicking the unlock button on the remote key fob lowers both windows.

  89. PCMforLess.com by theinfobox · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My nephew runs a website that sells mods for GM cars. He has been quite succesful at it and got started by tuning his own car. The list of mods that he can do is amazing:

    Change the fan turn on temperatures for a 160 thermostat

    Program the transmission to perform similar to a shift kit (1994 and newer)

    Power program the car for use with premium octane gasoline

    Remove the top speed limiter

    Correct the speedometer and transmission for gear and tire changes

    Correct for the use of a larger throttle body.

    Change idle settings and restore drivability with cam installs

    Correct for larger injectors

    Correct for larger displacement (383, 396, etc....).

    Unfortunately, he only does GM cars and I own a Ford. Oh well... If you do own a GM car, check out his site... He may be able to help you and and you may be able to help him pay for college! :)

  90. Re:bad info in that article - we use ls1edit, efil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a 03 Cobra short block with better forged pistons from Modular Madness for $3600 drop shipped to my door.

    Anyone who pays over 10k for a keyturn cobra motor needs to go do some homework.

  91. Even before 'chips' by baine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My 1986 Saab turbo has a 'tweaked' boost controller in it to alter the boost profile. You simply twist a couple of pots in the APC (Automatic Pressure Control) computer to adjust base boost, peak allowed boost, and knock sensitivity (the APC system listens for knock, and retards boost in small increments until the knocking subsides), and presto! 20+ extra HP. My '92 Saab 9000 turbo has an actual digital computer in place of the old APC system, and I have chips in that one too. Now here's the real deal : I'm currently in the R&D phase of installing a P-III 1GHz EBX format all-in-one motherboard in the car's dash, complete with 7" touch screen lcd. Not only will it play DVDs, MP3s, have GPS with moving map and wifi, but using the board's PC/104 connector and a digital IO board, I plan on integrating it into the car's electronic controls. This particular car is at the right age where all of the components are digital, but they are not so tightly integrated (later Saabs use an actual proprietary data bus for the different embedded controllers to communicate), so this should be fairly successful.

    --
    Need a simple, easy to use data tier generator? http://www.gryphinsoftware.com/
  92. Re:Car chippers by Odinson · · Score: 1
    Can you recomend a good general chip company? I had a bad esperiance with a crappy 88 blazer 4 cyl and Jet chip. Increased air flow and high fuel and increased spark just to get reasonable acceleration. Not my most shining moment.

    I ran a stage 1 86 5.0 monte carlo to 180k before with no problem. This was my first exeperince with a modded chip.

    It was nice for a month. :/ Then crunchies.

    I have a ford 99 Grand Marq 4.6 I'm thinking of tunning. Ford has got similar engines to 260hp from my 200 in four years.

  93. Re:Car chippers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha...'valet'? You can make it so it's not as cool for the valet? That's awsome!

  94. HP versus Torque by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, boosting HP, who cares...its boost in torque at low RPM that's the ticket, and a 6 will be better than a turbo 4. Not to mention smoother, quieter, and better fuel economy.

    1. Re:HP versus Torque by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite sure what you're smoking, but I think its all rolled up in the hundred dollar bills you overspend on your heavy engined vehicles. Why bother getting up a head of steam if you just have to brake to below 20 to take a turn? Oh wait, the torque is for *catching up* with the turbo'd four banger which is already a block and a half ahead of you and in the next turn.

      I've driven both types. I'll take the I-4 and the twisties. You can have the straight lines. I won't be very far behind.

    2. Re:HP versus Torque by Wolfier · · Score: 1

      If low RPM torque is the ticket, then a chipped 1.8T is going to absolutely blow any 6 cylinder.

      We're talking about 200 lb ft of torque at 2500 RPM and 240 lb ft at 3000 RPM.

      90% of all 6 cylinder engines (3.5L or less) do worse than that.

    3. Re:HP versus Torque by GrammarSpellingNazi · · Score: 1

      Yes, it will blow any 6 cylinder. It will NOT blow it away....unless you sit there at the light holding the clutch in and the engine at a dead-rev to 3000RPM, and then only if you can launch correctly and maintain traction. The 6 cylinder has torque from nothing up to 3000RPM fairly high and farily flat curve-wise. The turbo is peaky and needs to be pre-spooled or its a dog off the line. The specs don't tell the whole story in the real-world.

    4. Re:HP versus Torque by Wolfier · · Score: 1

      It depends on how big your turbo is. The smaller it is, the less lag you have (of course, there'll be less power to be obtained).

      But at a point, there exists an ideal turbo size that when given to a 4 banger, it blows most 6 cylinders out of the water in BOTH low AND high RPM.

      The stocker VW 1.8T makes 180 HP at the top, and 174 lb ft - read this - from 1950 RPM to 5500 RPM, flat.

      I challenge you to list 6 cylinders that can do that - and for each one you list, I'll list at least 3 that cannot.

  95. Somebody's got a 2x4 up their ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Like your Driver's Ed teacher always said, operating a motor vehicle is not a RIGHT, it's a PRIVILEGE. Treat it like one. Respect your car, respect your fellow motorists, and respect the laws that govern what's allowed on public street"

    Are you always this much fun? Cripes. I'll bet you're real hard to get along with.

  96. What does it feel like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be so worried about "the rules" all the time?

    Seriously.

    You're like a 80 year-old grandma worrying about what might happen instead of getting out there and enjoying yourself.

    Relax. Smoke a doobie, and have some fun.

  97. Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " No, they want more horsepower"

    The poseurs want horsepower to brag. The guys with balls want torque so they can actually be faster.

    HP is overrated. Torque is underrated.

  98. You've been lucky - it really depends on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who your dealer is, who your tech is, what kind of problem you're having - AC goes out? probably ok, blow turbos? good luck.

    It's a risk many people are not willing to take, so they put a stock ECU in before any service.

  99. Its good to know the law. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think back in early 80's GM (I think) got sued for not doing warrenty work on car for some stupid reasion (Like not using GM oil) anyway the court handed them there ass, and congress created a law where as long as what you replace is reasonable they must cover it. Anyway you should look it up, if you even threaten legel action dealer ships back down. Same goes for computers with the do not open stickers and such.
    -James

  100. Not the same thing. by mindstrm · · Score: 2, Informative

    The wastegate is not the same thing as a diverter/blowoff.. both exist at the same time.

    The wastegate serves to limit the boost pressure.. if pressure rises too high the wastegate vents excess pressure to atmosphere. By raising the release pressure on the wastegate, you allow the turbo to generate more boost. On some vehicles, this is electronically controllable, so in theory (and practice) the ECU can adjust the boost on the fly.

    A blowoff or diverter, serve to let air flow cleanly when the throttle is closed, so as not to create backpressure on the turbo... different thing entirely.

    1. Re:Not the same thing. by IrRegEx · · Score: 1

      They're all valves. The difference is where the valve is on the intake system. The valve in the turbo *before* the throttle - wastegate. The valve after the throttle ( in the manifold ) bypass. The bypass valve helps alleviate the "parasitic" effect while cruising ( keeps the manifold pressure under control ) not all systems have this valve. The wastegate maintains the turbo's internal pressure and impeller shaft speed I don't know of any turbo that doesn't have this valve.
      End result: I should have said wastegate to be clear.

      All things equal...I'd rather be blown!!!!
      There I said it, I'm not ashamed.

      --
      #|
    2. Re:Not the same thing. by foxdeman · · Score: 1

      In the US we have to divert the wastgate back to the exhast system, through the cats and the muffler(I saw a drag car that had a wastegate dump to the atmosphere, that was something else!). The blowoff valve will divert intake charge to the atmosphere in the charecteristic "woosh" of a turbo car, and a bypass valve will send it back into the intake(a cheap way around having the MAF read the air twice and run the motor rich). On cars where the diverter valve has been replaced by a blowoff valve you can hear the pop when the motor runs rich(like in rally cars).
      You can also have a mechanicly controlled wastegate, modifying those (manual boost controler) is a popular way to get cheap power(and a quick way to blow a motor).

    3. Re:Not the same thing. by BeerSlurpy · · Score: 1

      Not all cars have MAF sensors.

      The pop on the rally car is NOT from the car running rich, it is from the anti-lag retarding timing when they release the throttle. The ECU chooses to reduce power by retarding timing rather than by closing the throttle- this keeps the turbo spooled up. The popping and banging is because the fuel air mixture isnt entirely burned in the combustion chamber and instead inside the exhaust/behind the car.

      My car has a bunch of retard dialed into the high rpm vacuum zones so my car makes the same rumble-bang-bang-pop sound that the rally cars do when I let off the gas at high rpms.

      My car has a turbo, a tubular no-cat exhaust and a programmable ECU.

    4. Re:Not the same thing. by pyite · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know that. However, the parent wasn't clear which one he was speaking of. Since he specifically mentioned a blow off, I commented on that.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    5. Re:Not the same thing. by haroldK · · Score: 1

      Wow, are you ever mistaken. A wastegate is never before the throttle or anywhere in the intake. A wastegate controls boost by allowing excess exhaust gasses bypass the turbine when at or above desired boost pressures. The wastegate does not maintain the speed of the turbo, it limits it.

      A bypass valve routes intake air from in front of the throttle plate to the compressor inlet when there's manifold vaccum and is mainly touted as a device to keep the turbo spooled up and increase turbo life. A Blow-off valve serves the same functions, but vents to atmosphere instead of back into the compressor inlet.

      All of these valves have signal lines behind the throttle plate so they can open and close at apropriate times, but none of them vent the intake after the throttle plate in any way.

    6. Re:Not the same thing. by pedrop357 · · Score: 1

      Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but the wastegate is there to channel exhaust either through the turbo or around it and directly out the tailpipe.

      On another note, there is a difference between blowoff and bypass valve, both do bleed off boost when the throttle is closed.

      Bypass valves take the boost and divert it back into the intake stream before the turbo, this helps keep the turbo spooled and according to some OEMs, is better for the ECU as it has already metered that air. I don't know exactly what the purpose of metering air is when it gets recycled like this, but that's what they say.

      Blowoff valves vent that excess boost to the air.

      Some people with extremely high boost engines use both, esp. if their bypass valve can't handle redirecting large amounts of boost.

    7. Re:Not the same thing. by IrRegEx · · Score: 1
      Wow, are you ever mistaken. A wastegate is never before the throttle or anywhere in the intake

      Please read again. I said the wastegate was in *IN* the turbo. As for shaft speed...Maintains limits...just splittin' hairs.

      What you said is correct. I admit I was thinking of a supercharger not a turbo, small difference.

      --
      #|
    8. Re:Not the same thing. by haroldK · · Score: 1

      "The valve in the turbo *before* the throttle - wastegate."

      Looks to me like you said the wastegate is before the throttle. In fact, you emphasized that. What's above is a cut and paste from your post.

      As for the difference between a supercharger and a turbocharger being small, that's not correct either.

    9. Re:Not the same thing. by IrRegEx · · Score: 1

      picky picky...

      I realize it came out wrong. I should have used quotes instead of asterisks.

      But as far as the path of incoming air is concerned, the turbo comes before the throttle, no?

      Personally I prefer a screw type blower, but a centrifugal blower is nothing more than a belt driven turbo. You don't agree the difference is small? ie. the belt instead of the turbine...

      --
      #|
    10. Re:Not the same thing. by haroldK · · Score: 1

      The turbo comes before the throttle and after the exhaust manifold. The wastegate is one of the parts that comes after the exhaust manifold. If you want to say that the turbine is also before the throttle because it's attached to the compressor, go ahead. It's not right, but say whatever you want.

      I don't agree the difference is small. You have to make different considerations for a supercharger than you do for a turbo. Compressor maps are vastly different. There's no turbine on a supercharger, so no conventional wastegate. If you want to use a pop-off valve to control boost for a supercharger, go right ahead. Just don't try it for a turbo unless you want to buy new turbos all the time. A supercharger's shaft speed won't be affected by that, but a turbo will certainly over-speed and damage something if you try to control boost by venting anything on the intake side of the head.

    11. Re:Not the same thing. by IrRegEx · · Score: 1

      So...
      turbo: forces air into the engine
      blower: forces air into the engine
      turbo: limits boost via a valve
      blower: limits boost via a valve

      and the major difference i mentioned..
      turbo: spun by exhaust gas
      blower: spun by a pulley

      Doesn't sound like much of a difference.
      air/fuel maps are vastly different between all engines even two different turbo engines. I didn't say anything about tuning them.

      I'm I getting through?
      You're the type of person that if I said gasoline was flammable, you'd probably rant for three paragraphs about how that "was incorrect" and that only the vapors are flammable.

      I've seen your species before. BENCH RACER!!!
      Go read car and driver or something.

      --
      #|
    12. Re:Not the same thing. by haroldK · · Score: 1

      If you can't see the difference between the different types of boost control, fine. Venting compressed air to the atmosphere on the intake side is quite different from exhaust gasses bypassing a turbine.

      I never said anything about air/fuel maps. I said compressor maps, they're completely different things. A compressor map is a graph that you look at to see relative properties of a compressor wheel and has nothing to do with engine control modules.

      And I'm not a bench racer. Bench racers talk about things they've never done and will probably never do. I own and modify (myself, and I don't mean add stickers or body kits) a turbocharged car. I work on the turbocharged cars of others. You call me a bench racer, but it seems as though it's only because you want to over-simplify things and I don't.

      And just an opinion: Car & Driver sucks ass. I prefer something with more technical articles like Grassroots Motorsports or even Performance Ford.

    13. Re:Not the same thing. by IrRegEx · · Score: 1
      Venting compressed air to the atmosphere on the intake side is quite different from exhaust gasses bypassing a turbine.

      I didn't think we were debating that. I made the point that blowers and turbos were similar, you disagreed.

      A compressor map is a graph that you look at to see relative properties of a compressor wheel and has nothing to do with engine control modules.

      The compressor map helps you understand the characteristics of the intake charge. ie helps you tune the car

      ...because you want to over-simplify things and I don't.

      You are the one who jumped all over me when I said I make a mistake. So what if I generalized. The original post was only meant to simplify a technical system to someone who apparently is not very car savvy

      And yes C&D sucks... They pick the same damn cars every year for their top 10. Finally something we agree on. I'll leave you alone now.

      --
      #|
  101. MOD DOWN, DUMBASS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coincidence != irony, you fucking moron.

  102. some errors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They say it's due to DBW, but I say it's due to a better boost program.

    When Audi/VW switched to DBW, the 1.8T was still 150HP. Then, they changed the head to add VVT (along with a very slightly reduced compression ratio), and HP increased to 170. They also switched to a hybrid turbo (larger impeller) to get better efficiency, i.e. less heating of the intake charge when the turbo is flowing near peak HP (boost and flow rate).

    Most of the HP gain is higher boost. The VVT probably did more to impact emissions than to contribute to peak power.

    the exhaust, at least on modern german autos, is usually good enough for up to 230-250hp

    Then, kindly explain why most tuners require a low restriction exhaust with a turbo upgrade (at least for pre-2002 A4 and all Passat). It ain't for the purdy sound.

  103. Re:bad info in that article - we use ls1edit, efil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm not in america, but in australia this has been going on for ages, since we can import jap cars ourselves, ones that u americans aren't allowed this is a very common thing to do here and basically just about every man and his dog into autosports and cars does it. and most don't remap the ecu or "chip" it as u say, most just buy a whole brand new aftermarket computer for a slightly higher price where u can adjust it yourself on the fly with a hand controller. I should know :) i drive a nissan skyline myself :) about 130rwkw (rear wheel kilowatts) stock, now with 170rwkw just with an exhaust and a little bit of extra boost. looking for 200rwkw with a few other simple addons. jap cars are over engineered, this engine can take 250rwkw approx 400hp with a bigger bolt on turbo and stock engine :)!!! u americans dont' get that over there :)

  104. Emissions Inspection? Nah. by Wolfier · · Score: 1

    Emissions Inspections are designed for monster SUVs and F150s to pass.

    Small cars with modded ECU? Not a problem.

    I'm eagerly waiting for the day my modded ECU car fails an emissions test - it is also the day where we see SUVs disappear on the road.

  105. Re:Car chippers by pedrop357 · · Score: 1

    If I remember right, the Corvette ZR1 from the mid 90s had two keys, one for full performance and one for reduced.

    I read something a couple years ago about a car that had a valet key that not only reduced performance, but limited the top speed to 30mph and the top distance to 10 miles OR something to that effect, the distance and speed limitations were part of it.

    I don't think it was an OEM/factory thing,
    If anyone remembers?

  106. WARNING: EXTREME CONTENT by RMH101 · · Score: 1
    if you're reading this in the UK, hie thee to www.jabbasport.co.uk. ignore the iffy website, ring up mike and talk to him.
    he'll get your 1.8T up from 150-170 bhp to 211-225BHP for around 400UKP, by custom mapping your ECU with a laptop and a rolling road. I've driven the result, and it rules - doesn't flash up error codes on a VAG diagnostic, doesn't hurt economy unless you keep your foot down.

  107. Crap. by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    We don't all live in the US, either.
    If I rip my transmission and send the rods through the bonnet after fitting a huge nitrous system that pushes power way outside design spec, do you think the dealership should just fit me a new engine?

  108. Old Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For tuning late model GM cars I believe there are better solutions out there.

    I've seen a demo of the HP Tuners product and it seems to be very well developed. They support quite a few vehicles too.

    http://www.hptuners.com