Ars has a better story that makes it clear there are two parts, the dashboard above, and OS level system controls that disable certain types of data being sent in the first place:
Just because an article "clearly states" something doesn't make it gospel, unless you're watching Fox, then obviously I defer to your religious preferences.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 12:
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
You missed the rest of the quote, where they make it clear you can be required to have a licence, you just can't deny them to black people.
The exercise of such a common right the city may, under its police power, regulate in the interest of the public safety and welfare; but it may not arbitrarily or unreasonably prohibit or restrict it, nor may it permit one to exercise it and refuse to permit another of like qualifications, under like conditions and circumstances, to exercise it.
The regulation of the exercise of the right to drive a private automobile on the streets of the city may be accomplished in part by the city by granting, refusing, and revoking, under rules of general application, permits to drive an automobile on its streets; but such permits may not be arbitrarily refused or revoked, or permitted to be held by some and refused to other of like qualifications, under like circumstances and conditions.
If your (and their) assumption is correct the entire operation is pointless, where as I suggest the assumption is faulty, if you read the rest of the sentence you quoted....
This looks like a local setting, not a "web-based" setting at all.
The article says "(web-based)" including the "our interpretation parentheses" where as the screen shot looks decidedly the same as the existing FormerlyKnownAsMetro interface that the half the Windows 10 configuration options are in, locally.
I suspect their interpretation is incorrect, but regardless people will be watching tcpdump/wireshark/etc to see what if any effect the settings have so it's not like they can fool everyone.
Of the 4 billion, how many supported human life? What's the maths on how long your grandkids live when the planet can only support a small percentage of the current human population?
Cities don't have parking problems, they have public transport problems.
I don't even think cyclists should share roads with cars at all, but I think the solution in cities is banning cars from the CBD, so I'm sure both 'sides' hate me;)
Going to them when there's a problem is when white people start to hate the cops too, the minorities don't get the luxury of initiating contact.
I'm sure there's good cops, but even the good ones will lie to the public to make their life/job easier. From fooling the public into consenting to searches, to purjery because what they know and what they can prove are different things.
As for protection, if they're so efficacious why do rich enclaves hire their own patrols?
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah, Reddit isn't government, your first amendment rights to pretend you can combat radicalization by shitposting on forums do not apply.
Propaganda doesn't work well shared in secret.
Questions this stupid are why we need to get rid of AC.
^ This.
WordPerfect is far superior to Word for producing text documents.
Word is sold by marketing people to marketing people and forced on the rest of us.
Makes for some scary headlines though: Trump Dump wipes 15%
"Trash Flash Crash" will be the phrase of 2017, because Trump doesn't rhyme.
Seriously?
You can just invoke putty from the command line if you want...
c:\>putty ipaddress port
Peple wh really hate the letter h.
You clearly have some kind of reading disability.
Better story here: http://arstechnica.com/informa...
The screenshot was a future possible local settings panel, the "web-based privacy dashboard" is here https://account.microsoft.com/...
Probably the same AC, but here's a better story: http://arstechnica.com/informa...
This is what their web-based privacy dashboard looks like https://account.microsoft.com/...
Ars has a better story that makes it clear there are two parts, the dashboard above, and OS level system controls that disable certain types of data being sent in the first place:
http://arstechnica.com/informa...
Just because an article "clearly states" something doesn't make it gospel, unless you're watching Fox, then obviously I defer to your religious preferences.
I reckon the first periscoping narcissist will make the entire thing lag with buffer bloat.
It just keeps returning Google image results of DJT watching two hookers pee on the Constitution. I think you broke it.
Sorry, are you arguing with someone else? I was never disputing any of that.
Perhaps you have something relevant in your Google on illegal search and seizure?
Since you ask:
US Constitution, Fourth Amendment:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 12:
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home
or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has
the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
Anything else you'd like me to Google for you?
You missed the rest of the quote, where they make it clear you can be required to have a licence, you just can't deny them to black people.
The exercise of such a common right the city may, under its police power, regulate in the interest of the public safety and welfare; but it may not arbitrarily or unreasonably prohibit or restrict it, nor may it permit one to exercise it and refuse to permit another of like qualifications, under like conditions and circumstances, to exercise it.
The regulation of the exercise of the right to drive a private automobile on the streets of the city may be accomplished in part by the city by granting, refusing, and revoking, under rules of general application, permits to drive an automobile on its streets; but such permits may not be arbitrarily refused or revoked, or permitted to be held by some and refused to other of like qualifications, under like circumstances and conditions.
If your (and their) assumption is correct the entire operation is pointless, where as I suggest the assumption is faulty, if you read the rest of the sentence you quoted....
This looks like a local setting, not a "web-based" setting at all.
The article says "(web-based)" including the "our interpretation parentheses" where as the screen shot looks decidedly the same as the existing FormerlyKnownAsMetro interface that the half the Windows 10 configuration options are in, locally.
I suspect their interpretation is incorrect, but regardless people will be watching tcpdump/wireshark/etc to see what if any effect the settings have so it's not like they can fool everyone.
Of the 4 billion, how many supported human life? What's the maths on how long your grandkids live when the planet can only support a small percentage of the current human population?
Is that why my XPS13 turned into a BSODing doorstop when the internal WiFi is connected to anything?
Cities don't have parking problems, they have public transport problems.
I don't even think cyclists should share roads with cars at all, but I think the solution in cities is banning cars from the CBD, so I'm sure both 'sides' hate me ;)
Going to them when there's a problem is when white people start to hate the cops too, the minorities don't get the luxury of initiating contact.
I'm sure there's good cops, but even the good ones will lie to the public to make their life/job easier. From fooling the public into consenting to searches, to purjery because what they know and what they can prove are different things.
As for protection, if they're so efficacious why do rich enclaves hire their own patrols?
I'm surprised the various players don't have a "vinyl" mode; all you'd need to do is add some hiss and the occasional pop.