But, well, I'm gonna use the source and assets for evil. Ya know? 'cause, public domain means not having to say you're sorry.
Seriously though, this is awesome. I've never heard of the game, but the more art and source that's freed the better. Now if some community could pick this up and run with it, turn it into a decent game, I'll play it.
Further up I asked cold fjord to define communism for me. I'll ask the same for you. What do you think it is? If you think that North Korea, Cuba, China, and Vietnam (and the former USSR) are (and were) communist, could you explain what makes them all communist? Thanks.
Quick couple of questions. What's a communist to you? If it has something to do with authoritarian statism, I'd really appreciate a more detailed answer. Do you think that North Korea, Cuba, Vietnam and China are all communist? If so, could you detail the similarities between them that make them communist? Thanks.
Also re your sig: I'm committed to seeing you committed. Haha.
They need moar moneyz. Seriously. There are fans that would pay, even if just to see the same material repeated over again. I'm a fan, but I don't need to see the old stuff played again by, as you say, old men.
However, if they were to present some good new stuff, that would be a different story. I'd really appreciate some new stuff.
Joke time: How many surrealists does it take to change a light bulb? Two, one to hold the giraffe, and the other to fill the bath tub with multicolored power-tools.
I heartily accept the motto, "That government is best
which governs least"; and I should like to see it acted up
to more rapidly and systematically. Carried out, it finally
amounts to this, which also I believe--"That government is
best which governs not at all"; and when men are prepared
for it, that will be the kind of government which the will
have. Government is at best but an expedient; but most
governments are usually, and all governments are sometimes,
inexpedient. The objections which have been brought against
a standing army, and they are many and weighty, and deserve
to prevail, may also at last be brought against a standing
government. The standing army is only an arm of the
standing government. The government itself, which is only
the mode which the people have chosen to execute their will,
is equally liable to be abused and perverted before the
people can act through it. Witness the present [Afghani, and the previous Iraqi] war,
the work of comparatively a few individuals using the
standing government as their tool; for in the outset, the
people would not have consented to this measure.
The rest of the world doesn't (by and large) claim to be "land of the free". And yes, any place that outlaws victim-less activities, and claims to be free, is obviously not. But, apart from the drugs issue, there are plenty of places that allow the buying (and selling) of sex, and gambling.
Personally, I think it's not so much as stop enjoying what I don't, but more, that's bad for you, because I said so. And I'm obviously know better than you, because.
Unless you want to smoke some hash, snort some coke, gamble, pay for sex (or indeed, be paid for sex), or many of the other little things* that the government doesn't want you to do. But, feel free to be ripped off by the banks, insurance companies, and other financial institutions. And feel free to pay your taxes so that the government can export that freedom.
* Little things. Victim-less crimes. Suicide is not murder, and self-harm is not assault.
If I had mod points, you'd be getting a couple for redundancy. You mentioned that damn link too many times. Also, I sharpen my knives on my BF's cock. It's so tough it can take it. Yeah.
Except that I thought we discovered (thanks Snowden! I'm going to name my first born after you!) that everyone who uses the Internet is already on the NSA watch-list. Hmm?
Merely calling for world revolution to bring about an international communist* society would have put me on the watch-list years ago. So far nothing obviously negative has happened to me.
* I actually call for an anarchist society. But think that any long-lasting anarchist society will end up being communist (classless and free) anyway. Also, I've got my bombs and guns, and I'm going to kill Obama. Fuck you Obama! If I wasn't on the watch-list before, maybe I will be now. Make them waste their time.
I know that if I was offered 3 billion dollars for some fade chat program, I'd take it! Even if it was from arch-evil FaceBook. Of course, maybe they think they can get more. And more to the point, that 3 bil is not going just to one person, it's being spread out over the shareholders and vulture capitalists, as well as the founders (if they are still around). But still!
In none of the ancestor posts is the USA mentioned. Considering that the entire thread is about a British agency, for you to bring up the USA and related things (Congress etc.), suggests you're a fucking stupid idiot. If you are talking about another post, well, I can't be bothered replying to all your posts to insult you. Just the occasional one.
As for wit, I think I may have mentioned before: I'm not interesting in having an argument with you. Basically, I am happy to insult you. Also: I take to heart the comment about arguing with fools. I don't want you to drag me down to your level and then beat me with your experience. ^_^
You're still a cunt. Also, this is discussing the UK where theoretically the "[US] Congress, the courts, and the executive branch" have no power. So I guess I could say you're not just a cunt. You're a stupid cunt.
You're a moron. That quote, that quote's from 1975. People have been warning about overreaching government for a long time (long before 1975). I was just giving an example of that. You seem to imply that you think I'm crazy. It doesn't take a crazy person to recognize that "Western" governments have been getting more authoritarian and totalitarian as technology progresses. Soon enough we'll be at the stage of voluntary always on telescreens (c.f. Microsoft's Xbox and camera). The police state loves that sort of stuff. And "Silicon Valley" (i.e. the tech companies) are more than happy to help out, because they can sell more stuff, and make more money. All hail the almighty buck. No. Fuck that shit.
We should string the tech company executives up alongside the politicians and bureaucrats. And when the revolution comes, apologists will also be up against the wall.
More stringent security measures. Universal electronic surveillance. No-knock laws. Stop and frisk laws. Government inspection of first-class mail. Automatic fingerprinting, photographing, blood tests, and urinalysis of any person arrested before he is charged with a crime. A law making it unlawful to resist even unlawful arrest. Laws establishing detention camps for potential subversives. Gun control laws. Restrictions on travel. The assassinations, you see, establish the need for such laws in the public mind. Instead of realizing that there is a conspiracy, conducted by a handful of men, the people reason—or are manipulated into reasoning—that the entire populace must have its freedom restricted in order to protect the leaders.
Of course, I would sound like a paranoid if I invoked the Illuminati, so I won't. *cough*
Just because I'm paranoid, doesn't mean they are not out to get me.
You're a fucking retard. You really should do the world a favor: strap a large bomb to yourself, go and meet your masters, and blow yourself (and them) to hell.
I commit all my deicides in Narnia. Killing gods for fun and prophet*. Pity the bastard* keeps coming back...
Footnotes: * It's been a few years since I read the Narnia books, is there actually a prophet in Narnia? or just god? * Bastard in the sense of his parents not being married, amirite?
And then I'm going to slice your nipples off. And then tie you up, and subject you to Chinese water torture until you die (perhaps of starvation, or maybe of loss of blood, whatever, I don't care).
You just need to hit stop early enough. It is quite strange though. The text:
The Internet
Hack all the things.
Bounties provided by IBB
Some of the most critical vulnerabilities in the Internet's history have been resolved thanks to efforts of researchers fueled entirely by curiosity and altruism. We owe these individuals an enormous debt and believe it is our duty to do everything in our power to demonstrate how much this research is appreciated. To that end, the Internet Bug Bounty Panel will award public research into vulnerabilities with the potential for severe security implications to the public.
Simply put: hack all the things, send us the good stuff, and we'll do our best to reward you. The Fine Print
To qualify, vulnerabilities should meet most of the following criteria:
Be widespread: vulnerability manifests itself across a wide range of products, or impacts a large number of end users.
Be vendor agnostic: vulnerability is present in implementations from multiple vendors or a vendor with dominant market share.
Be severe: vulnerability has extreme negative consequences for the general public.
Be novel: vulnerability is new or unusual in an interesting way.
The Panel will gladly assist with the coordinated disclosure of any potential vulnerabilities. However, we recognize that we may not be the most effective avenue in all circumstances. We will gladly consider rewards for vulnerabilities that have been publicly disclosed through some other means, provided they adhered to our disclosure guidelines.
It's important to keep in mind that not all submissions will qualify for a bounty. The decision to award a bounty is entirely at the discretion of the Internet Bug Bounty Panel. Examples
We provide the following examples of publicly disclosed vulnerabilities that we would have rewarded:
SSL blockwise chosen-boundary attack, aka BEAST
DNS Insufficient Socket Entropy Vulnerability
Debian predictable PRNG
Sotirov, et al. MD5 Collision attack against PKI
Bounty Guidance
Minimum reward of $5,000 with significantly higher rewards granted at the Panel's discretion
So, take along a paper book to read during those times. It sucks, I know, to have to carry extra. But, you know, it's a solved problem... Maybe if you don't want to read two books at once (some people are like that), take along a trade magazine or something.
Reminds me of the jokes about mathematicians, physicists and engineers. Whereby, the mathematicians either say, "a solution exists" (and then go back to bed, or whatever), or reduce the problem to one already solved (by tipping out the bucket of water, for example). Exact jokes to be left as an exercise to the reader (unless you know what I'm talking about, in which case, don't bother re-solving that problem).
Android is Linux. Maybe you want a GNU/Linux with X? Names matter.
What? Nexus 5 released, Nexus 10 already released?
on
Android KitKat Released
·
· Score: -1, Troll
So, according to the summary, Google just released Nexus 5. And Android 4.4 will be rolled out to all Nexus 4s, Nexus 7s and Nexus 10s. What? So does that mean that the Nexus 7s and Nexus 10s have already been released? What a fucked up counting system.
Also, who the fuck needs 2GB of RAM on a fucking phone!? My old computer (which I was using until just a year ago) got by on 2.5 GB of RAM, and it ran just fine. I can't imagine doing many of the things that I do (and did on my old computer) on even a fancy phone. For one, the screen is too small, and there is no built in keyboard. Not to mention, I doubt my toolkit has been ported to Android.
Slashdot Mirror
But, well, I'm gonna use the source and assets for evil. Ya know? 'cause, public domain means not having to say you're sorry.
Seriously though, this is awesome. I've never heard of the game, but the more art and source that's freed the better. Now if some community could pick this up and run with it, turn it into a decent game, I'll play it.
Further up I asked cold fjord to define communism for me. I'll ask the same for you. What do you think it is? If you think that North Korea, Cuba, China, and Vietnam (and the former USSR) are (and were) communist, could you explain what makes them all communist? Thanks.
Quick couple of questions. What's a communist to you? If it has something to do with authoritarian statism, I'd really appreciate a more detailed answer. Do you think that North Korea, Cuba, Vietnam and China are all communist? If so, could you detail the similarities between them that make them communist?
Thanks.
Also re your sig: I'm committed to seeing you committed. Haha.
They need moar moneyz. Seriously. There are fans that would pay, even if just to see the same material repeated over again. I'm a fan, but I don't need to see the old stuff played again by, as you say, old men.
However, if they were to present some good new stuff, that would be a different story. I'd really appreciate some new stuff.
Joke time: How many surrealists does it take to change a light bulb? Two, one to hold the giraffe, and the other to fill the bath tub with multicolored power-tools.
I heartily accept the motto, "That government is best
which governs least"; and I should like to see it acted up
to more rapidly and systematically. Carried out, it finally
amounts to this, which also I believe--"That government is
best which governs not at all"; and when men are prepared
for it, that will be the kind of government which the will
have. Government is at best but an expedient; but most
governments are usually, and all governments are sometimes,
inexpedient. The objections which have been brought against
a standing army, and they are many and weighty, and deserve
to prevail, may also at last be brought against a standing
government. The standing army is only an arm of the
standing government. The government itself, which is only
the mode which the people have chosen to execute their will,
is equally liable to be abused and perverted before the
people can act through it. Witness the present [Afghani, and the previous Iraqi] war,
the work of comparatively a few individuals using the
standing government as their tool; for in the outset, the
people would not have consented to this measure.
The rest of the world doesn't (by and large) claim to be "land of the free". And yes, any place that outlaws victim-less activities, and claims to be free, is obviously not. But, apart from the drugs issue, there are plenty of places that allow the buying (and selling) of sex, and gambling.
Personally, I think it's not so much as stop enjoying what I don't, but more, that's bad for you, because I said so. And I'm obviously know better than you, because.
Unless you want to smoke some hash, snort some coke, gamble, pay for sex (or indeed, be paid for sex), or many of the other little things* that the government doesn't want you to do. But, feel free to be ripped off by the banks, insurance companies, and other financial institutions. And feel free to pay your taxes so that the government can export that freedom.
* Little things. Victim-less crimes. Suicide is not murder, and self-harm is not assault.
"Even if every bite gave me an orgasm I still wouldn't touch it."
I know what I'm getting you for your birthday. (Of course, it's more one of those, I bought it for my self presents...)
If I had mod points, you'd be getting a couple for redundancy. You mentioned that damn link too many times.
Also, I sharpen my knives on my BF's cock. It's so tough it can take it. Yeah.
Except that I thought we discovered (thanks Snowden! I'm going to name my first born after you!) that everyone who uses the Internet is already on the NSA watch-list. Hmm?
Merely calling for world revolution to bring about an international communist* society would have put me on the watch-list years ago. So far nothing obviously negative has happened to me.
* I actually call for an anarchist society. But think that any long-lasting anarchist society will end up being communist (classless and free) anyway. Also, I've got my bombs and guns, and I'm going to kill Obama. Fuck you Obama! If I wasn't on the watch-list before, maybe I will be now. Make them waste their time.
Hi Jono,
Just a quick question: when did you stop beating your wife?
Cheers.
I know that if I was offered 3 billion dollars for some fade chat program, I'd take it! Even if it was from arch-evil FaceBook. Of course, maybe they think they can get more. And more to the point, that 3 bil is not going just to one person, it's being spread out over the shareholders and vulture capitalists, as well as the founders (if they are still around). But still!
In none of the ancestor posts is the USA mentioned. Considering that the entire thread is about a British agency, for you to bring up the USA and related things (Congress etc.), suggests you're a fucking stupid idiot. If you are talking about another post, well, I can't be bothered replying to all your posts to insult you. Just the occasional one.
As for wit, I think I may have mentioned before: I'm not interesting in having an argument with you. Basically, I am happy to insult you. Also: I take to heart the comment about arguing with fools. I don't want you to drag me down to your level and then beat me with your experience. ^_^
Cheers.
You're still a cunt. Also, this is discussing the UK where theoretically the "[US] Congress, the courts, and the executive branch" have no power. So I guess I could say you're not just a cunt. You're a stupid cunt.
You're a moron. That quote, that quote's from 1975. People have been warning about overreaching government for a long time (long before 1975). I was just giving an example of that. You seem to imply that you think I'm crazy. It doesn't take a crazy person to recognize that "Western" governments have been getting more authoritarian and totalitarian as technology progresses. Soon enough we'll be at the stage of voluntary always on telescreens (c.f. Microsoft's Xbox and camera). The police state loves that sort of stuff. And "Silicon Valley" (i.e. the tech companies) are more than happy to help out, because they can sell more stuff, and make more money. All hail the almighty buck. No. Fuck that shit.
We should string the tech company executives up alongside the politicians and bureaucrats. And when the revolution comes, apologists will also be up against the wall.
Of course, I would sound like a paranoid if I invoked the Illuminati, so I won't. *cough*
Just because I'm paranoid, doesn't mean they are not out to get me.
You're a fucking retard. You really should do the world a favor: strap a large bomb to yourself, go and meet your masters, and blow yourself (and them) to hell.
I commit all my deicides in Narnia. Killing gods for fun and prophet*. Pity the bastard* keeps coming back...
Footnotes:
* It's been a few years since I read the Narnia books, is there actually a prophet in Narnia? or just god?
* Bastard in the sense of his parents not being married, amirite?
I'm'a ganna pissina youra corn flakes OK?
And then I'm going to slice your nipples off. And then tie you up, and subject you to Chinese water torture until you die (perhaps of starvation, or maybe of loss of blood, whatever, I don't care).
OK dickface?
You just need to hit stop early enough. It is quite strange though. The text:
The Internet
Hack all the things.
Bounties provided by IBB
Some of the most critical vulnerabilities in the Internet's history have been resolved thanks to efforts of researchers fueled entirely by curiosity and altruism. We owe these individuals an enormous debt and believe it is our duty to do everything in our power to demonstrate how much this research is appreciated. To that end, the Internet Bug Bounty Panel will award public research into vulnerabilities with the potential for severe security implications to the public.
Simply put: hack all the things, send us the good stuff, and we'll do our best to reward you.
The Fine Print
To qualify, vulnerabilities should meet most of the following criteria:
Be widespread: vulnerability manifests itself across a wide range of products, or impacts a large number of end users.
Be vendor agnostic: vulnerability is present in implementations from multiple vendors or a vendor with dominant market share.
Be severe: vulnerability has extreme negative consequences for the general public.
Be novel: vulnerability is new or unusual in an interesting way.
The Panel will gladly assist with the coordinated disclosure of any potential vulnerabilities. However, we recognize that we may not be the most effective avenue in all circumstances. We will gladly consider rewards for vulnerabilities that have been publicly disclosed through some other means, provided they adhered to our disclosure guidelines.
It's important to keep in mind that not all submissions will qualify for a bounty. The decision to award a bounty is entirely at the discretion of the Internet Bug Bounty Panel.
Examples
We provide the following examples of publicly disclosed vulnerabilities that we would have rewarded:
SSL blockwise chosen-boundary attack, aka BEAST
DNS Insufficient Socket Entropy Vulnerability
Debian predictable PRNG
Sotirov, et al. MD5 Collision attack against PKI
Bounty Guidance
Minimum reward of $5,000 with significantly higher rewards granted at the Panel's discretion
I'll call you. What's your number?
FYI: The USSR was the very definition of 2nd world. The more you know.
So, take along a paper book to read during those times. It sucks, I know, to have to carry extra. But, you know, it's a solved problem... Maybe if you don't want to read two books at once (some people are like that), take along a trade magazine or something.
Reminds me of the jokes about mathematicians, physicists and engineers. Whereby, the mathematicians either say, "a solution exists" (and then go back to bed, or whatever), or reduce the problem to one already solved (by tipping out the bucket of water, for example). Exact jokes to be left as an exercise to the reader (unless you know what I'm talking about, in which case, don't bother re-solving that problem).
Android is Linux. Maybe you want a GNU/Linux with X? Names matter.
So, according to the summary, Google just released Nexus 5. And Android 4.4 will be rolled out to all Nexus 4s, Nexus 7s and Nexus 10s. What? So does that mean that the Nexus 7s and Nexus 10s have already been released? What a fucked up counting system.
Also, who the fuck needs 2GB of RAM on a fucking phone!? My old computer (which I was using until just a year ago) got by on 2.5 GB of RAM, and it ran just fine. I can't imagine doing many of the things that I do (and did on my old computer) on even a fancy phone. For one, the screen is too small, and there is no built in keyboard. Not to mention, I doubt my toolkit has been ported to Android.