Slashdot Mirror


Berman Confirms Star Trek Prequel Film Project

Steve Krutzler writes "TrekWeb can break the news STAR TREK producer Rick Berman has confirmed that work on a new STAR TREK feature film project has begun. Speaking in the new Dreamwatch magazine, Berman describes it cryptically as a "prequel" and says he's working with two other producers on the project."

554 comments

  1. To TNG or not to TNG? by andyrut · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd be very interested to know if this is going to be a prequel to The Next Generation or to the original Star Trek series. Considering the last number of films were based on TNG, I would personally find it odd to go back to the original series at this point.

    Still, the article only refers to STAR TREK, which would indicate that perhaps Kirk and not Picard might be our captain in this one. At least it would be a welcome change from Priceline.com adverts and Miss Congeniality 2 for William Shatner.

    1. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What you're describing is more or less an ST:Enterprise-era film right?

    2. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by UWC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And then there's Enterprise. But it's not over, which I guess would generally mean no movie yet.

      It would be pretty hard to do a prequel to the original series without new actors, unfortunately, and Generations pretty much voided any chance of a TNG prequel with the original crew.

      There are two other series. A DS9 prequel might actually be interesting.

      And then there's the chance that this is a prequel to all of this, but Enterprise seems pretty early in the Trek timeline. Hard to imagine anything interesting happening before that with the Vulcans watching and all.

    3. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by orrigami · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen the orginals in a while and I was young when I saw them, but didn't the Orginal's with Bill Shatner lead up to the next generation? I have always considered the original movies as the "prequels" to the TNG movies.

    4. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Willian Shatner pushes Kelloggs' All-Bran these days. (Okay, pushes, wrong word!) Still, with the aging Trekkie demographic, perhaps not a bad choice.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by FauxPasIII · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Generations pretty much voided any chance of a TNG prequel with the original crew.

      -nod- Besides, much of the crew was meeting for the first time in Encounter at Farpoint, so it would be tough to do anything with all the familiar characters together that was set earlier than that.

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    6. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I doubt it'll be TNG, considering how the last two went, and they killed off one of the more beloved characters from that series.

      Prequel, to me, would suggest Enterprise, though that sounds a little premature with the series still running.

      Truth be told, I'm becoming a little disenfranchised with Star Trek lately. I'd sill go see it, if they make it, but I wouldn't be expecting much. I think Star Trek really just needs a break for a while...

    7. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Hard to imagine anything interesting happening before that with the Vulcans watching and all.

      yea. and the stuff being shown now (after the Vulcans watching) is a real treat.

      (that's sarcasm folks, and yes i'm insulting that piece of garbage called a television show, named Enterprise)

    8. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by thatnerdguy · · Score: 0

      If I recall correctly, they are about a century apart.

      On another note, what about ST: Voyageur. Although I don't know what they could do with that franchise.

      --
      I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes
    9. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > but Enterprise seems pretty early in the Trek timeline

      But this is Star Trek. Discussing any "timeline" is like speculating a dice roll.

      Anybody who cares enough about continuity probably gave up on the Star Trek universe awhile back. Worf magically reappearing in his old job on the Enterprise after being promoted to chief of security for an entire space station (DS9) was the last straw for me. They could've at least come up with something, welcome him back for cross training or something, but no, there he was, like he never left.

      Berman is to Star Trek as Eisner is to Disney. And Gene and Walt are wretching in their graves.

      --

      Operator, give me the number for 911!
    10. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Funny

      "And then there's the chance that this is a prequel to all of this, but Enterprise seems pretty early in the Trek timeline. Hard to imagine anything interesting happening before that with the Vulcans watching and all."

      They already made that movie. It was called Star Trek: First Contact. Unless.....

      Star Trek: Attack of the Boring Vulcan Ambassador Clones!

    11. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by cshark · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If I were a betting man, I would predict that this is probably an Enterprise movie. Especially if Enterprise dissapears next season like I keep hearing about on the web. Remember when the first plot leaks were coming out, everyone refered to it as "the prequel." Maybe that's paramount speak for the whole series. It could be interesting. Especially if they mess with the whole star trek time line sending the whole continuity into peril again. The time warps just keep getting better and bettter. I would love to see a movie devoted to the great star trek time warp.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    12. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      82 years.

    13. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny
      Berman is to Star Trek as Eisner is to Disney. And Gene and Walt are wretching in their graves.

      Originally Walt really was cryogenically frozen, but then there was that terrible day, very much like the Eddie sequence in Rocky Horror Picture Show.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    14. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I were a betting man, this "movie" gets shown on UPN and nowhere else as a way to wrap up a cancelled series.

    15. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm expecting it to be based on Enterprise. However, a movie following Kirk through the Acadamy would be neat to see. Especially for the "no win" scenario test.

    16. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe it's set Pre-First Contact, in the far future of 2006. Scientists establish contact with a planet on the opposite side of the galaxy. The original borg think this is the perfect chance to assimilate the first known alien species. They succeed in transmitting their software before the communication link is destroyed. At the end of the movie the heroes can have a conversation like this.

      Captain: "Number one, you don't suppose we should write all this down, do you?"

      First mate: "Why would we want to do that?"

      Captain: "Well, what if some time in the future people might want to know these borg things still exist."

      First mate: "Who would want to know that?"

      Captain: "Well. Maybe if our first space exploration vessel runs into two of them, they might want to know what they're dealing with. Or if the fleet flagship was flung across the galaxy by an omnipotent being and brought face to face with these things. Or if the captain of that ship is perfectly fine for years, even helping out the borg a few times, and then for no apparent reason develops a Moby Dick-like obsession with them. Or perhaps another space ship could be flung across the galaxy by another near-omnipotent being and the captain of that ship could end up in a contest with the borg queen to determine who has the bigger ego."

      First mate: "You're drunk, aren't you?"

      Captain: "Like a skunk."

      First mate: "Besides, wouldn't that first exploration vessel record their contact with the borg? Then that fleet flagship would know what they were facing. That would be the smart thing to do."

      Captain: "Somebody else's problem. I like it. Have a drink."

      Or maybe not. At least that would finally explain why the borg had an unhealthy obsession with Earth.

    17. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Might want to recheck that.

    18. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by stephenisu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Could have somthing to do with Patrick Stewart swearing not to do another one....

      --
      Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    19. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Jerf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would love to see a movie devoted to the great star trek time warp.

      You mean, other then Star Trek 4, Star Trek: Generations, and Star Trek: First Contact? And pretty much the entire run of Voyager?

      "Time Warping" is the worst problem with Star Trek. You can't build drama because nothing is ever at stake that won't be wiped away by next week's time travel episode or movie. That problem alone is enough to sink the series; the entire concept has devolved into some of the worst "collaborative writing" I've ever seen. (Ever done a "collaborative novel" online? The resulting continuity trainwreck bears an uncomfortable resemblence to Star Trek now...)

    20. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by hummassa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Besides, like Scotty, the original crew is some 200kg heavier than in "Encounter in Farpoint" (total, I mean :)

      --
      It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    21. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Berman is to Star Trek as Eisner is to Disney. And Gene and Walt are wretching in their graves.

      Only Star Trek's continuity was always wretched. Roddenberry is no better than Berman, he couldn't be bothered to come up with a decent backstory either, so the continuity in TOS was even worse than in TNG.

    22. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Retching in his urn then. Tho the idea of Eisner being so awful that Diz pukes in cryo is rife with comic possibilities.

    23. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by kannibal_klown · · Score: 5, Funny

      I doubt it'll be TNG, considering how the last two went, and they killed off one of the more beloved characters from that series.

      Haven't you learned anything from watching Star Trek.

      Wrath of Kahn: While fighting in / near a nebula, Spock makes the ultimate sacrifice, bathing himself in radiation from the ship's reactor, ultimately dying to save the crew. However, not before "backing up" his personality in Bones' thick skull.

      Nemesis: While fighting in / near a nebula, Data makes the ultimate sacrifice, being destroyed in a radiation blast eminating from the enemy warship's reactor, ultimately dying to save the crew. However, not before he uploaded his entire neural pathways, memories, and experiences into the dummy-data.

      Star Trek is an admin's wet dream. Backing up can even bring back the dead :)

    24. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 1

      Yes, you also see him on TV pushing (good way to describe it!) All-Bran quite, ahem, regularly in Canada. I just find it funny that they don't use his name anywhere on the box. That's why I call him the "nameless cereal box celebrity"...

      Eric

    25. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Erasmus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you disputing that Walt was frozen or that he tore through the cryo lab on a motorcycle?
      Perhaps you yourself could be frozen until modern science invents a 'sense of humor' transplant.

    26. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Originally frozen. After the cryro-breakout, there was the dinner party. Walt still comes back on Eisner from time to time, but a little Pepto-Bismol fixes that.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    27. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by ChuckleBug · · Score: 2, Funny

      Besides, much of the crew was meeting for the first time in Encounter at Farpoint, so it would be tough to do anything with all the familiar characters together that was set earlier than that.

      No problem. Working title:

      Star Trek: RETCON.

    28. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know why they didn't use this picture with him shouting "Braaaan!" He certainly has the right expression for it.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    29. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by anantherous+coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      much of the crew was meeting for the first time in Encounter at Farpoint, so it would be tough to do anything with all the familiar characters together that was set earlier than that.

      You mean you expect the various story lines to be consistent! That has never stopped Berman and company before. Why would they care now?

    30. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If I remember right, when Kirk was due up for the Kobyashi-Maru test he reprogrammed the simulator. Whats so interesting about a cadet sneaking into the simulator facility and changing the parameters of the test??? Talk about a boring movie...

    31. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Gannoc · · Score: 1

      Generations pretty much voided any chance of a TNG prequel with the original crew.

      Lets not forget that they're all 90 years old now.

    32. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, the looks on the faces of the testors would be neat.

      On a high level, there'd be suspense in breaking into a facility without getting caught. (That'd be serious trouble.)

      On a low level, it would showcase Kirk's ingenuity. Or, rather, his lack of belief in a no-win scenario. So much so that he'd risk the consequences of breaking and entering.

    33. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by anantherous+coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Shatner also has a guest role on The Practice . He plays plays a pompus ass of a lawyer. He is perfect for the part!

    34. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, Up here in Canada, Bill does ads for all-bran cereal, it's kind of funny.

    35. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by KnarfO · · Score: 1

      + 1 SBOMN (squirting beverage out my nose)

      ...now to find some towels for the keyboard...

      --


      "Creativity is allowing ones self to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep" - Scott Adams
    36. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by erpbridge · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Dammit, Man! Why'd you have to go and give away next season's plotline?

      Actually, I think you may be closer than you think. According to timelines I heard when enterprise was coming out, they said the first Romulan war should take place about seasons 4-6 of Enterprise. Well, we're at the end of season 3.

      It's possible that, if Enterprise actually does get canned (nothing final on that yet, although very heavy speculation), they may make the Romulan war the prequel movie. That, and it'll almost fit in with Nemesis and its heavy Romulan themes.

    37. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Grayswan · · Score: 1

      Gene and Walt are wretching in their graves.

      I believe they froze Walt. So he is wretching in his ice-chest.

      --
      If you open your mind too wide, people will throw trash in it.
    38. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by KnarfO · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd like to see Kirk scoring with every single chick in SF Academy, and then dealing with bumping into all of them in the commisary! :-P

      --


      "Creativity is allowing ones self to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep" - Scott Adams
    39. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by brainthought · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would love to see a movie devoted to the great star trek time warp.

      Yeah, cause I love to spend two hours of my life to find out something changes in the last five minutes to undo all the events I've just seen, thus negating even watching what I just did. Yeah, real good. Maybe they can have some sort of anomoly where the same five minutes repeat over and over. Dear God! Yes! Let me pay $7 to watch five minutes of film over and over, then in the end find out it never really happened anyhow.

    40. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      'And Gene and Walt are wretching in their graves.' And at my keyboard! It's an endless cycle. Creative people come up with a dream, and then the suits come in and kill its soul. Er, kinda like software and IP this last decade.

    41. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by myawn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm. Pre-Enterprise, Pre-Starfleet, before Kirk, etc. So, is "When Harry Met Sally" a Trek prequel? Isn't every present-day movie?

      --
      Subscribers can see articles in the future? So what? Everyone gets to see them in the future.
    42. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      When Jean-Luc met Beverly

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    43. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have not experienced shakespeare unless you have read it in original klingon.
      Taq paah Taq peh

    44. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
      Berman is to Star Trek as Eisner is to Disney.

      Thanks a lot. This was agood one. But until the lame last season I pretty much liked DS9. But generally the giving their best to ruin it. After Voayger (of which I didn't see that many eps anyway) I thought it couldn't get worse. God, how naive.

      BTW: Made me think and come up with another one: George Lucas is to Star Wars as George Lucas is to Star Wars.

    45. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Only Star Trek's continuity was always wretched. Roddenberry is no better than Berman, he couldn't be bothered to come up with a decent backstory either, so the continuity in TOS was even worse than in TNG.

      TOS get's a free pass because it was in the 60s. What more do you want? You don't watch TOS for the continuity (there was none until the movies) -- you watch TOS for the window on the world that was the 1960s -- the Hippies, the racial issues and the storylines. Individual TOS episodes are still compelling to this day.

      TNG had excellent continuity with storyline. The characters progressed and grew the show had excellent storylines and like TOS it was another issues based show (terrorism, drugs, war, religion, friendship, homosexuality, veterans rights, human rights, freedom/self-determination and many others). TNG had the ability to take an issue and boil it down to a compelling storyline that fit into a one-hour timeslot. And somehow they managed to do it while keeping the show more or less G-rated (the only really bad scene I can think of is the First-Season episode with the body-snatching aliens) and keeping the T&A (compared to Voyager and Enterprise) to an absolute minimum (and towards the end they finally got Troi out of her bunny-suit and into a real uniform).

      Now if you want to talk about technical continuity then TNG (all the Star Trek's for that matter) was horrible -- panels that would appear in turbolifts if the episode required it, phasers that could be remotely deactivated (unless being used by terrorists when we need plot drama), etc etc, but who cares about that? As a whole TNG was one of the best TV shows there ever was. Probably Seasons 3, 4 and 5 were the best -- when Gene was still actively involved in running things. Towards the end (Season 7) it started to show Voyager-like traits (technobabble replacing storyline) which in hindsight makes me glad they ended it the way they did -- on a highnote. "All Good Things" was probably the best series-finale for any show I've ever watched. As far as the movies go I liked Generations and I try to pretend that the others don't exist.

      DS9 shared many of the same qualities that made TNG so great -- compelling storylines and characters that evolved. I was initially somehow leery of the war arc but I think it worked in the context of DS9 (whereas it probably wouldn't have in TNG). The last two seasons of DS9 was basically TNG from "Yesterday's Enterprise" over the course of an entire season -- very dark yet very compelling story material. DS9 also suffered from a lack of technical continuity but again, who the hell cares? The point of Star Trek is to tell a story.

      Don't get me started on Voyager. The first two seasons I had high hopes and it went down the toilet after that. It became one massive technobabble episode after another (was there anything that T&A of Borg's nanoprobes couldn't do? -- "And look -- it'll still slice this tomato!") with far too much violence for the Trek universe (at least the violence in TNG and DS9 served a purpose) and no storyline continuity whatsoever. Welsey Crusher's character (most people's favorite character to hate) evolved more over the years then Harry Kim did.

      And don't even get me started on Enterprise. A complete rape of every established (canon and non-canon) piece of Star Trek history. A wussified Captain (at least Picard could win fights when he was forced to get into them -- Kirk and Sisko would pick them and always win -- Archer picks them and almost always gets his ass kicked), completely out-of-character Vulcans (whatever happened to IDIC?), hostile aliens that we never knew existed, too much T&A for the tastes of anyone not in the 15-20 male demographic (if your going to have sexuality on a TV show could you at least be mature about it? Decontamination scenes? Gimme a friggen break), etc etc etc.

      TNG was probably the best overall television show ever imho. TOS had excellent individual episodes (and kick ass movies) and stands the test of time. DS9 was a compelling series too. The rest of them I try hard to forget about ever watching.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    46. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by bluethundr · · Score: 1

      I read an interview with Braga where he states that the ending of Kirk in Gen was indeed inauspicious and aluded to the fact that it may in fact be rethought. Hey, this is sci-fi. If you can bring back Spock you can most certainly Bring back Kirk.

      Of course, Shatner ain't the spring chicken he was. He's over 70 now and has been battling a wieght problem since he was in his 30's at least. You can see the poor guy ballooning with each movie sequel. And in his senior years he's portlier than ever, and most likely not up to the physicality of the job. But by the same token, how could you "prequel" Trek with other actors playing that inimitable cast? Certainly, I would concur that since Enterprise is still in production it wouldn't be likely to involve that cast. Unlesss...there's something we don't know about, yet.

      --
      Quod scripsi, scripsi.
    47. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      Truth be told, I'm becoming a little disenfranchised with Star Trek lately

      I think you mean Disenchanted... that is, unless you're talking about a new series called "Star Trek: The Diebold Generation" or something...

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    48. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Star Trek guys will just talk to the Star Wars guys and have Patrick Stewart replaced with a CG character.

    49. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      [....] Don't get me started on Voyager. The first two seasons I had high hopes and it went down the toilet after that [....]

      A few paragraphs into reading that post, my "inner voice" became that of the Comic Book Guy.
      Dude, you remind me of the Comic Book Guy. This is not a good thing.

    50. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be worse. They could make a dream episode where the character wakes up at the end.

    51. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by dcmeserve · · Score: 2, Funny
      A DS9 prequel might actually be interesting.

      Yes, of course! Why didn't I see it before:

      The Cardassian occupation of Bajor is still in full-swing. The Nexus Ribbon from ST:Generations passes by the planet, and out pops Captain Kirk, wood-chopping axe still in hand. Immediately he is set upon by the Borg Queen, who was disguised as a Bajoran in one of the internment camps. She recognizes him, you see, because... uhh... of what will happen in the *next* Star Trek movie!

      Anyways, the two duke it out, the Queen knocks the axe out of Kirk's hand, and is about ready to Borgify him, when a young Kira picks up the axe and beheads her! Kirk then enjoys a hearty meal of Hasparat with Kira's family, has a make-out session with the future Ensign Ro, then is off to kick some Cardassian ass...

      Then stay tuned for the sequel to ST:TNG:DS9:KvB... KABUC!

      Thanks for the idea!

      - Rick Berman

      * KvB: "Kirk vs. Borg"

      * KABUC: "Kirk and Archer Beat Up Cardassians"

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    52. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice one. That made me laugh.

    53. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by bluethundr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      (whatever happened to IDIC?)

      IDIC (Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations) was a product of Gene's disenfranchisement with the show on season 3. According to Shatner's book on TOS. The budget for the show had steadily trickled down to a near halt over the span of 3 seasons. By the 3rd season, Roddenberry was so fed up with the studio's budget cuts that he said "HERE" with arms extended to Justman and essentially gave him the show to run. Roddenberry even moved his offices off the Desilu lot and to (I believe it was) Universal to devote all his time to a non sci-fi movie that was to star (again, I think, I read it about 10 years ago) Burt Reynolds. That movie never made it out of pre-production and was never made.

      At some point during that 3rd season, realizing the rise in popularity of Sci-Fi cons he decided on a brazen marketing ploy: the IDIC. It was a schlocky imitation gold pin. When Roddenberry suddenly appeared on the set with this item (after having been AWOL all season) the actors realized what he was doing an initially refused to wear it. Roddenberry never liked Nimoy much to begin with, and threatened to fire him when Nimoy threatened to walk off the set before he wore it. Roddenberry thought he might have an easier time with Shatner (they were on slightly more friendlier terms...according to Shatner ;) but he just said "NO WAY". Back to Nimoy, he stuck to his guns and Nimoy RELUCTANTLY acceeded to his request. Now, it's an example of accepted Trek lore. I still like the hippy-dippy concept of the IDIC, but my eyes were opened a bit by reading this part.

      --
      Quod scripsi, scripsi.
    54. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Star Trek: Attack of the Boring Vulcan Ambassador Clones!"

      Meesa is now a starship captain!

    55. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 1

      Comic Book Guy lives and breathes it and won't shut up about. Shakrai I'm betting is thoughtfully adding to the discussion at hand.
      +6 I'd say.
      "Star Trek is about telling a story."
      There hasn't been an episode with Truth in it since...??
      The highest form of telling the truth in fiction is to discover and affirm moral truth about human existence." - John Gardner
      --

      Operator, give me the number for 911!
    56. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1
      Star Trek is an admin's wet dream.

      Their sysadmin must have been having one of those wet dreams when they aliased cp to mv.

      --
      End of Line.
    57. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by erick99 · · Score: 1
      At least that would finally explain why the borg had an unhealthy obsession with Earth.

      It wasn't the earth that they were obsessed with, it was our cache of WD40.

      Happy Trails!

      Erick

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
    58. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      Does anyone even care about this Star Dreck crap anymore? Nemesis flopped like a fish out of water. They should stop beating a dead horse.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    59. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by FauxPasIII · · Score: 1

      > Nemesis flopped like a fish out of water

      Nemesis just picked up some of the residual floppage from Insurrection... Nemesis was actually decent in its own right.

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    60. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by brainthought · · Score: 1

      How about that for the final episode of Enterprise. Have Bob Newhart wake up in bed next to Emily from the Bob Newhart show and go, "...I just had the strangest dream. Scott Bacula was the captain of a spaceship, and there was this woman with huge lips in a leotard... and this engineer with a southern drawl..."...

    61. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by salimma · · Score: 1
      However, not before "backing up" his personality in Bones' thick skull.

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought it was Kirk who was the recipient?
      --
      Michel
      Fedora Project Contribut
    62. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by eyeye · · Score: 1

      What?
      Did you forget the bit where they ride around in a buggy? Call that Science Fiction? I thought I was watching mad max for a bit.
      Insurrection wasnt bad. Nemesis was so terrible I had to go through a memory wipe afterwards.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    63. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Wolfrider · · Score: 0

      --I really actually *liked* Nemesis. Tom Hardy **totally** nailed the Picard character.

      --In fact, I rank Nemesis up there with the Greatest Trek Movies Of All Time:
      o Khan---!!
      o The save-the-whales movie
      o The Borg movie ...and now Nemesis. Yes I'm something of a Trek geek, but purposely _not_ posting the real names of the movies (or imdb links.) ;-)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    64. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Besides, like Scotty, the original crew is some 200kg heavier than in "Encounter in Farpoint" (total, I mean :)

      Aren't the dead reducing in weight?
      I can't remember if Nimoy is dead or not, but he doesn't stay dead anyway.

    65. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      You're wrong. :) It was Bones. Sarak ASSUMED it was Kirk, since he was the person Spock tended to trust most, but Spock didn't exactly have time to go hunt Kirk down, so he grabbed Bones, dd'ed his mind, and went about his ship-saving heroic business.

    66. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I look forward to the day when technology advances enough to reanimate me from my ashes. I don't need no freezing, I'll just wait a little longer than the otehrs.

    67. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      DS9 shared many of the same qualities that made TNG so great -- compelling storylines and characters that evolved.


      I'm ot so sure about that "evolving characters" part. In one episode O'Brien was sentenced to several yers long imprisonment. The catch was that the actual punishment took just few seconds, but in his mind, he was imprisoned for several years. But, in the next episode he seemed to be A-ok. No sign of the fact that just few days/weeks earlier he had been imprisoned for several years.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    68. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by salimma · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, thanks, now I remember - been a while since I watched it.

      --
      Michel
      Fedora Project Contribut
    69. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Onceat · · Score: 1

      Watch them cast Hayden Christiansen as a young Kirk

    70. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      In one episode O'Brien was sentenced to several yers long imprisonment. The catch was that the actual punishment took just few seconds, but in his mind, he was imprisoned for several years. But, in the next episode he seemed to be A-ok. No sign of the fact that just few days/weeks earlier he had been imprisoned for several years.

      Sure pick one episode and pretend that it speaks for the whole show. Look at the show as a whole. The friendship that developed between O'Brian and Bashier. Sisko going from being the reluctant religious figure, to accepting his role, to actively encouraging it. Duket's change from bad-guy, to sympatric freedom fighter guy, back to bad-guy and finally to insane genocidal guy after pushed over the edge. Garek and Quark changing over the years. Odo finding out about his people and rejecting their ways. I could keep going but you get the point.

      If that's not plot continuity and character growth then what is?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    71. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by hummassa · · Score: 1

      By the original crew, he meant the original TNG crew. No one is dead. Of the original TOS crew, only DeForest Kelley died, but the excess weight of James Doohan is more that the weight of DFK anyway... (ouch!)

      --
      It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    72. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by SilkBD · · Score: 1

      Ok, so Walt and Gene were both cremated... what was that again?

      --
      00101010
    73. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by Halloween+Jack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Worf didn't become security chief for DS9; he became Federation Ambassador to the Klingon Empire. Of course, that's even worse, from a continuity perspective; no explanation about why he went back in after giving up his commission.

      --
      I looked into the abyss, and the abyss looked into me--and we both winked.
    74. Re:To TNG or not to TNG? by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      [Spoiler alert] In a Enterprise or two ago when the doctor was the only one awake and he hallucinates another crewman. We only find out at the end the crewman wasn't never really there. Though what we saw as an episode ended up being "changed," as the doctor's log says, it was actually more interesting. Almost "Sixth sence"esque in effect.

      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
  2. Prequel? Oh boy... by jrj102 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While the typos and spelling errors in the article were entertaining ("STAR TRKE" and "the future of their first series remains in limo") I'm not sure what to make of this. When they talk "prequel" are they talking about Pre-Enterprise? It seems like any earlier and there wouldn't be much opportunity to explore other species, etc. Can a Star Trek movie without existing characters/actors be successful? I mean Nemesis, which was based on the much-loved TNG crew, made about $53 at the box office. (OK, that might be a slightly low estimate.)

    I think a Starfleet Academy movie (mentioned in the article) could be compelling, but I'm losing interest in the whole franchise. I'd like to see another season of Enterprise despite the fact that it's a fairly weak show (in my opinion) but I think that Gene Roddenberry's vision is running out of gas without his input. I have mixed feelings: on one hand, Trek has gotten pretty lame, and it is probably time for them to stop producing it for a while, but on the other hand I'd miss even bad Trek... Is bad Trek better than no Trek at all? Am I even making any sense? :)

    Drooling fanboys will be happy to read this line from the article, though:

    "...insiders suggest Berman and/or Braga might take a reduced role in a fourth season of ENTERPRISE, though this is entirely speculation."

    --- JRJ

    1. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by radixvir · · Score: 1

      I agree with the part about Roddenberry. His input into TNG i think made it the great series it was. Nowadays it seems like these Trek shows and movies are all about special effects and 'coolness'. personally my favorite part of TNG was when it touched on philosophy. I guess the summary is: im not expecting much from these new productions

    2. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, it really depends how they're defining "prequel" - if it's Enterprise-based (or before) that's one thing, but if it's a prequel in the sense of pre-B&B involvement with the TNG movies, that's quite another.

      It would be interesting to see what they could do with the pre-TNG "Lost Era", however there is currently a series of ST books covering that which is quite well done, so if they trod all over them (as they tend to do) that would stink...

    3. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by spellraiser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Prequel, huh?

      There are only two words that spring to mind when I hear that word:

      EPISODE.ONE

      The horror, the horror ...

      --
      I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    4. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Trek ran out of gas a long time ago, any additional impulse applied to trek has been provided by the legions of fanboys (and girls) pushing it up hills.

      Bad trek is better than no trek at all to the fanbeings, irrelevant to the average person, and worse than no trek at all to sci-fi fans who are not also trek fans, because it will simultaneously lower the bar and further damage what is an already confused and inconsistent canon.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by BdosError · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm with you on that one. My favourite, possibly apocryphal, quote on the subject is from Majel (Barrett) Roddenberry. When asked what she thought the next Star Trek project (or series?) should be, she replied "Hiatus".

      When there are other, non-Star Trek series out there that are at least as good (probably way better), like "Firefly", "Farscape" etc., getting cancelled, it makes me want to petition Majel to allow them to put Gene's name on them, just to keep them on the air. Seriously, I swear that turds like "Andromeda" and "Earth: Final Conflict" only stayed on the air as long as they did because of his name.

      --
      Complexity is Easy. Simplicity is Hard.
    6. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      $53?

      No, no, no. I don't think your under at all. Actually you might be a couple of dollars over even IF we include the overseas numbers.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    7. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by Monkelectric · · Score: 4, Funny
      Well nemesis made that 53$ because it SUCKED. In an interview berman said "We made a great movie." Obviously he's delusional, Nemesis was a waste of perfectly good FILM.

      What I'd like to see: a compelling movie about Q. Think about it, the first episode of TNG -- we meet the Q race who puts humanity on trial, the *last* episode of TNG, Q puts humanity on trial *again*, picard of course saves the day and warns picard "You don't get it do you? The trial never ends, We'll be watching you." You could easily make a *great* movie or two about that.

      Second of all, I'd like to see a movie/series about the beginings of the borg. That would be a *GREAT*.

      If anyone knows mr berman tell him I work cheap :)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    8. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Given the mistakes, I won't even try to RTFA. No way am I going to be among the traffic rush for a purely speculative article.

    9. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go watch the first season of TNG and get back to us. (it is a lot more like original ST than what most people think of TNG.) Roddenbury was basically kicked upstairs after that.

    10. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q has been beaten to death in 108 different episodes, and was a sucky character to begin with.

    11. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You don't get it do you? The trial never ends, We'll be watching you."

      Funny, this feels distinctly similar to something else I've recently read about on Slashdot. Now what was it...

      Shucks, can't remember that article post now. But I think it was on Slashdot.

    12. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that "Q" has been permanently marred by John DeLancie playing a spook and eventually an alien on Stargate SG-1. I'll never see Q the same way again. I'll always expect his eyes to glow.

      At least they blew him out an airlock.

    13. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine, Tremain, then...

    14. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      His input into TNG i think made it the great series it was.

      No, his input wasn't very good. It was the TNG writers who managed to twist TNG into a good series, despite Roddenberry's input.

    15. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Meesa makin it so.

    16. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by cosmo7 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Second of all, I'd like to see a movie/series about the beginings of the borg. That would be a *GREAT*.

      OK, here's my pitch:

      Captain Data and Seven Out Of Ten are on their way to some long-deserved shore leave on an apparently paradise-like planet. A special anomaly suddenly appears and they travel into an alternative dimension - an evil one - where everyone has beards. Just as they are about to solve everything by using cronaton particles and a polaron beam, they get stuck on the holodeck in wild west outfits. They are captured by the evil sheriff - Q - who threatens them with a long telling off. It turns out that Q is possessed by the ghost of a long-dead (but English-speaking) civilisation. Just as time is about to run out - and they will be viciously shouted at - the Borg (ie: the good guys in this dimension) turn up and rescue them. Data and Seven return home by making a communicator out of sulphur, charcoal and potassium nitrate. The final words are "beam me up, spocky".

      I have some drawings of Seven in a sexy wild west outfit if you think they would help.

    17. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by zaphod110676 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. It was about the time that Berman left that DS9 actually got good. The best thing that could possibly happen to 'Trek is for Berman and Braga to get axed....literally or figuratively.

      --
      To Do: 1. Take over world 2. Pick up Milk and Bread on the way home
    18. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by Superfreaker · · Score: 1

      >>are they talking about Pre-Enterprise?

      You mean, back in the 1970s?

    19. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by PeteyG · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You say Nemesis was a waste of film, but then you go on to propose two of the worst sounding concepts for a Star Trek movie ever?

      Hippocrite!

      --
      no thanks
    20. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by hummassa · · Score: 1

      Change it to Capitain Be-fore and you're done.

      --
      It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    21. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I don't know when Berman left, in relation to the series plot. However, I liked most of the DS9 episodes for their moral and ethical conflict. That is, until four out of five continuous episodes focused on the war with the dominion.

      Even then, though, there were interesting points like the nearly undetectable mines that hid in subspace. Ezri's statement that she'd never thought the Federation would use such devices, and Sisko's response that it was a survival issue, comes to mind.

      It's points like that which are why I've liked Star Trek.

    22. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by mttlg · · Score: 1

      What I'd like to see: a compelling movie about Q.

      Second of all, I'd like to see a movie/series about the beginings of the borg.

      How about this plot synopsis I put together for Enterprise after the first few episodes? It has the Q, the beginning of the Borg, and convenient links to the rest of the Star Trek timeline.

    23. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Didn't Peter David do something like that in Q^2? I seem to remember Lwaxana Troi getting the powers of Q, turning Q into a tree, manifesting a huge betazoid battle ax and saying "Quiet Litte One, Mommy's going to chop some wood".

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    24. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      I believe that Nemesis, as released, is a suck-ass movie. I think a lot of problems being a first-time unproven script writer (Brent Spiner for fuck's sake, might as well let the dog from 'Enterprise' write one).

      But even worse, was the horrible hack job that the studio did to get it down to that brief running length (what was that, 80 minutes?). Anything from 45 minutes to 1.5 hours of footage just place excised). You can see just how little they cared about actually producing anything from the DVD. The "deleted footage" scenes don't even have FX added, so they were hacked out before the thing even went to post production. The endless droning of the director in the commentary about "we didn't have enough money to do this scene right".

      Do not misunderstand me, I think Nemesis was a bag of trash. But I can't help but wonder what "might have been" had things gone through differently.

    25. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by Kaki+Nix+Sain · · Score: 1
      I have some drawings of Seven in a sexy wild west outfit if you think they would help.
      Yes, pass those along please. I think they may indeed be a great help.

      --

      (C) Kaki Sain, 2011. By reading this, you have illegally copied my property to your brain.

    26. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by Suidae · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've said this before and I'll say it again.

      Trek needs a series that tells stories in the Trek universe. It takes as many or as few episodes as it needs to tell the story the way the story should be told. When the story is done, they come up with another one. Switch casts for each story, maybe keep around a few actors who can play different parts, or occasionaly the same character in different stories.

      Tell stories set entirely on Romulus, or in the Klingon empire, or even throw in a few about the early Cardassian move to a military state that leads to the conquest of bajor (not necessary to actually show the conquest, we know it happened from DS9, we'll figure it out).

      We can see some more about Q and the other Q-like entities, we can tell stores in the far future or far past without invoking time travel. The possibilities are endless if the writers are good.

      Take fan suggestions for stories, or suggestions on which series to expand on, possibly spinning off new dedicated series. Use guest writers for stories, take ideas from the books, hell, use fan donations as long as they sign over the rights.

    27. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll? Are you kidding me? Because he's happy about Star Trek getting some new blood?

    28. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by grgyle · · Score: 1

      Man, if I could mod you up to +10, I would! Freakin' perfect!

      --
      ----- And all that the Lorax left here in this mess was a small pile of rocks, with one word...UNLESS.
    29. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by Aidtopia · · Score: 1

      They had a perfect opportunity to explain the origins of the Borg in the Enterprise series. In the first season, the crew came across an automated repair station that offered to fix Enterprise in exchange for something (plasma?). The repair tech was cool and from some unknown species. In actuality, the station kidnapped crew members and integrated ("assimilated") them into the computer. Seemed like a pretty good origin for the Borg.

    30. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      "I have some drawings of Seven in a sexy wild west outfit if you think they would help."

      They wouldn't, but some photographs of her changing into that outfit definitely would.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    31. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by brainthought · · Score: 1

      Monkelectric says: In an interview berman said "We made a great movie."

      Berman also once bragged (back in the Voyager era) in an issue of Starlog that he had never even seen an original episode of Star Trek.

      ...so yeah, that's who you want to run your franchise...

      As for your two ideas...

      What I'd like to see: a compelling movie about Q. Think about it, the first episode of TNG -- we meet the Q race who puts humanity on trial, the *last* episode of TNG, Q puts humanity on trial *again*, picard of course saves the day and warns picard "You don't get it do you? The trial never ends, We'll be watching you." You could easily make a *great* movie or two about that.

      Bitch?!? Did you see the final episode of The Next Generation?!?

      Second of all, I'd like to see a movie/series about the beginings of the borg. That would be a *GREAT*.

      See also Star Trek: The Motion Picture.

    32. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by Mathness · · Score: 1

      I have some drawings of Seven in a sexy wild west outfit if you think they would help.

      With a bit more work, she could rate as a ten out of ten ;p

      --
      Carbon based humanoid in training.
    33. Re:Prequel? Oh boy... by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Who are you, and how have you been listening in on our plot meetings for the film?

      -- Yours, Paramount etc.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  3. OK by jabbadabbadoo · · Score: 1, Funny
    "prequel"

    Hhmmm - like a beta version? Perhaps the mother ship will blow up like my motherbord did the other day...

    1. Re:OK by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the mother ship will blow up like my motherbord did the other day...

      You mean your motherborg?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  4. Cochran to Enterprise eh? by mschiller · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Potential to suck: 75%
    Potential to be Great: 25%

    1. Re:Cochran to Enterprise eh? by UrgleHoth · · Score: 1

      At least it can't be worse than Space Truckers

      --

      Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
    2. Re:Cochran to Enterprise eh? by mschiller · · Score: 1

      Your Right all the Star Trek movies were better than that...

  5. Script Excerpts by damiena · · Score: 3, Funny

    Kaaaahhhhhhhhhnnnnnn!

    1. Re:Script Excerpts by jrj102 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, I've always had a fantasy that someday, people will yell my name as Shatner yelled "Khhaaaaannnnnnn!!!!" however, I've yet to piss someone off enough to inspire such beautiful overacting. :)

    2. Re:Script Excerpts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.....that is....not.....inthescript. Youarethinking...of......The....Wrath.......ofKahn .

    3. Re:Script Excerpts by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      www.khaaan.com

    4. Re:Script Excerpts by lazuli42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Jjjjerrrjjjaaayyyyooonnnneeeeoooohhhtooooo!!!!

      I hope you're happy now.

      --

      "There's companies that are just so cool that you just can't even deal with it," - Bill Gates, about Google

    5. Re:Script Excerpts by Cowboy+Bebop · · Score: 1

      i can't believe someone wasted 14.95 at dotster and 2 hours and 55 minutes learning enough flash and stealing .wav clips via google just for that! i mean, i bet that's about how long it'd take.

    6. Re:Script Excerpts by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      well, give the guy some credit, he also took the time to make a bogus 404 page down the tree... at www.khaaan.com/index.htm

    7. Re:Script Excerpts by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Registrant:
      mike cross
      1 mill st
      dover, nh 03820
      US
      Created on: 09-DEC-03
      Expires on: 09-DEC-04

      Think he'll renew?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    8. Re:Script Excerpts by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Funny

      That should have been "Mr. Tambourine Maaaaannnnn!!!"

      (For those who don't get the joke, go here and listen to Shatner's "Mr. Tambourine Man". As a bonus, download the "Seven" video after listening to MTM.)

    9. Re:Script Excerpts by MyHair · · Score: 4, Funny

      Jjjjerrrjjjaaayyyyooonnnneeeeoooohhhtooooo!!!!

      I hope you're happy now.


      Nope, you got modded funny. I think for it to have been like Khan's scream you would have to do it so well as to get modded as flamebait.

    10. Re:Script Excerpts by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      > (For those who don't get the joke, go here and listen to Shatner's "Mr. Tambourine Man".

      It's like Tubgirl for your ears.

    11. Re:Script Excerpts by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      ~+5~ flamebait

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    12. Re:Script Excerpts by halivar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ahh.. you mean like the Ballad of Bilbo Baggins is goatse to *my* ears?

    13. Re:Script Excerpts by Cowboy+Bebop · · Score: 1

      hell yes he will. i have his cc number!

    14. Re:Script Excerpts by reality-bytes · · Score: 1


      Khaaaaajjjerrrjjjaaayyyyooonnnneeeeoooohhhtoooooaa aannnnnn!!!!

      --
      Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  6. In other news by PrvtBurrito · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In other news, /. confirms that it will suck.

    --
    Laboratree - Scientific collaboration based on OpenSocial.
    1. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm as big a Star Trek fan as anybody, but it's gone way too far away from its roots, and quite frankly the last couple of movies have sucked so hard that I can't stand thinking about what they're going to bring out next.

      I just pretend the last 2 movies never happened. Insurrection and Nemesis sucked hard, but First Contact was pretty good if you pardon the fact that they seem to be able to slingshot around the sun and travel through time whenever they want.

    2. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news (Score:0, Redundant)
      by PrvtBurrito (557287) on Thursday April 22, @02:53PM (#8941736)

      In other news, /. confirms that it will suck.


      I wanted to save this moderation for posterity.

    3. Re:In other news by millahtime · · Score: 1

      "Long live TNG on DVD."

      Gotta love spike tv. They have TNG on every day.

    4. Re:In other news by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you were truly as big a Star Trek fan as "anybody" you wouldn't be complaining. You'd be looking for your spirit gum so you could attach your spock ears and go cavort in the streets.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:In other news by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why, oh why, do they continue to insist on beating this dead horse into the dust?

      Because each time they whack the horse's corpse, it coughs up another wad of hundred-dollar bills.

      Long live TNG on DVD.

      I agree. I need to invest. TNG was the best series by far.

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    6. Re:In other news by lambent · · Score: 2

      So, the thing that made the movies bad is the thing that made the series good? 2D characters, recycled schlock sci-fi plots, and thinly-veiled, weak one-sided political statements?

      I loved TNG. I loved the movies. I didn't go into it expecting "The Ten Commandments" in space, or anything ... it is what it is.

      I'm trying to think of the Trek analogue to "Strike me down, and I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine", but memory fails me ... so I will simply say, in the latest popular cliche fashion,

      KAHHHHHNNNNN!

      The truth is, hollywood will continue to make crappy movies. Considering that the nemesis budget was reportedly 99 million dollars (99 mega space bucks?), and it only brought in 43 (incidental googling: nemesis numbers ) , i wouldn't've bet on another one being made anytime soon.

      However, I will go see it when/if it comes out, and any other star trek ever made, because truly, I am a fan boy.

    7. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Trek definately needs new blood in the writer/producer department. The current bunch have been 'stuck in a rut' for quite sometime. And I sooo tired of the girl/boy adolencent themes. This is *not* while I watch Scifi (any bets on the number of episodes before T'Pol has bonked *every* member of the enterprise crew at least once. Boy I never saw that coming.)

    8. Re:In other news by Sean80 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I can't believe I'm getting troll votes for this.

      The wonderful thing about science fiction is that, imho, it isn't really about science at all. Instead, it gives writers an opportunity to change small (or large) details about the world around humans, and see how they react. So, SF is all about humans at the end of the day. For a while, Star Trek understood that. Almost all of the first series understood that, with wise old Gene at the helm. TNG understood that as well, which is why "The Inner Light" is one. of. the. best. damn. episodes. of. any. series. ever.

      Berman and his band of merry idiots don't understand this simple fact. I remember reading an article in which he said something like: "Star Trek fans loves aliens and time travel."

      Star Trek 2, 4 and 6 understood that it's all about the people. First Contact was good because it was so damn cool, and nobody can dislike anything with the Borg in it.

      So yeah, if I have simply lost interest in Star Trek because Berman wants to fill every movie with "aliens" and "time travel" then troll me.

    9. Re:In other news by kc01 · · Score: 1
      Why, oh why, do they continue to insist on beating this dead horse into the dust?

      As was mentioned, the almighty dollar, of course.

      But a better question is, "Why Star Trek?" Movie studios are already cranking out loads of bad films, why capitalize on Star Trek? Name recognition, of course. The public doesn't have any imagination to see something new, they want prepackaged stuff that's comfortable, whether or not it's any GOOD.

      It's the American way. Sh*t, just look at our president.

    10. Re:In other news by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      The wonderful thing about science fiction is that, imho, it isn't really about science at all. Instead, it gives writers an opportunity to change small (or large) details about the world around humans, and see how they react.

      To some extent. Of course, there's also "hard" sci-fi, which does concentrate more on the theory behind the technology.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    11. Re:In other news by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      you are getting troll votes for referencing CNN.com without throwing up a link. You need to document your claim.

    12. Re:In other news by quacking+duck · · Score: 1
      nobody can dislike anything with the Borg in it

      That same thinking is one of the many reasons Voyager went down the tubes. The Borg *were* great, but they overused them and wussified them.

      At the time of First Contact they were still kick-ass though, considering they'd just been re-imagined with better makeup and costumes.

    13. Re:In other news by Guardian452 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I really have to point out that the Star Trek universe does just about the worst job of showing how society would react to new technologies. I mean, the transporter alone would create whole new forms of crime, social interaction, cultural shifts, etc. Niven tackled the idea of transporters combined with human nature. Why doesn't Trek?

      Same idea goes for replicators, holodecks, whatever. Star Trek just usually cops out and gives us "regular life surrounded by cool toys." The advances they have almost never change their lives the way they would change our own.

    14. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      First Contact was good because it was so damn cool, and nobody can dislike anything with the Borg in it.

      I can.

      Borg Queen: We must waste our resources in continual charges against Earth.

      Borg Drone: Why? Wouldn't a more organized war against the Federation make more sense?

      Borg Queen: No.

      Borg Drone: But why not? And when did we get a queen anyways?

      Borg Queen: Do not question the writers. *long pause* They're too high to answer anyways.

    15. Re:In other news by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

      hah, I'd forgotten about that story. I need to re-read all the Niven books I read in middle school. meatspace slashdotting. Awesome. :)

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    16. Re:In other news by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Totally agree.

      Since I have all the TNG DVDs, I picked up Nemesis when it was in the cheapo bin. It still hurt, but at least it has Wil's cameo.

      I watched the interviews on the DVD (I couldn't bear to watch the movie again). They told the script writer wasn't really into Star Trek, and had only seen a few episodes, but, oh yeah, he could write a killer script based on his movie experience.

      So we've seen what that has come to. Laser shows, space battles, cheap rip-offs of good movies (it has scenes from Star Wars, Mad Max, Excalibur and even Ben Hur), and definitely uninteresting characterisation.

      And the killer joke was Gates McFadden saying she liked the script because it really did justice to the character of Beverly Crusher. Sorry Gates, Bev ended up on the cutting room floor.

      So who expects anything good from Berman?

      Hello? Anyone?

    17. Re:In other news by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Informative

      I dunno. I've been getting into DS9 lately, and it seems that show REALLY understood a lot of us wanted. It had continuity between episodes with occasional throw away episodes. It had solutions that often involved fighting first and asking questions later. It was (relatively) light on time travel and last minute engineering decisions. And it had characters interested in more than just the liberal pursuits of star fleet, with none more intriguing than the Ferengi bartender (who was a great anti hero who got all the best lines..."Thanks for saving us, but couldn't you have done that ten minutes ago?").

      I fact, if they make a star trek prequel, I'd like to see one about the liberation of Bejorr. I doubt it would happen (since flashbacks have pretty much told this story), but it could be interesting.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    18. Re:In other news by Suidae · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      As long as you aren't talking about that crap that Stephen Baxter writes. Long on science, short on skill.

    19. Re:In other news by JabberWokky · · Score: 1
      I'm trying to think of the Trek analogue to "Strike me down, and I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine"

      That would be when the character representing logic sacrifices himself saying "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one", and then the next movie his friends, representing passion and human emotion risk their lives and set back their careers to pull him back from beyond the grave with the very human sentiment that speaks of friendship: "Sometimes the needs of the one outweigh the needs of the many".

      As Kirk says, "If I had not tried the cost would have been my soul".

      --
      Evan "Don't be pedantic - those quotes are from memory, and they are essentially correct"

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    20. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...and nobody can dislike anything with the Borg in it."

      Just wait for the first borg goatse, then you will regret it

    21. Re:In other news by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I loved DS9, but I just can't shake the feeling that the show "jumped the shark", then turned around, grabbed the shark, and did naughty unspeakable things to it.

      The point where that happened is, of course, when the whole "Emmissary" subplot became main plot.

    22. Re:In other news by dacarr · · Score: 1
      Bah, TNG was namby-pamby. Now Space:1999, on the other hand....

      GD&RLH

      --
      This sig no verb.
  7. In other news by Sean80 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    CNN.com reports that sources close to Berman cryptically referred to the movie as "more of the same old crap from the same old people."

    Why, oh why, do they continue to insist on beating this dead horse into the dust? I'm as big a Star Trek fan as anybody, but it's gone way too far away from its roots, and quite frankly the last couple of movies have sucked so hard that I can't stand thinking about what they're going to bring out next.

    Long live TNG on DVD.

  8. NCC-1701C by DamienNightbane · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd hope that it's a prequel to TNG. Rachel Garret needs her own series and movies.

    1. Re:NCC-1701C by jrj102 · · Score: 1

      I agree-- I think that the time between TOS and TNG is ripe for new Trek. Alternatively, just move forward another couple hundred years.

  9. woo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Anakin Meets Archer! Long live prequels! Natalie Portman's hot grits VS T-Pao!

  10. Film! by llamaguy · · Score: 1

    Beam me up Mr Spock! I gotta find me a cinema...

    *cough*Anyway, the film is most likely going to feature the crew from the latest series of Enterprise, complete with zipped up jumpsuits and chrome backgrounds. Cool.

    --
    HAH! I just wasted a second of your life making you read this, but I wasted a minute of mine thinking it up. DAMN.
  11. Even/Odd by Neil+Blender · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will this be Star Trek 0? And thus not subject to the even/odd curse? I guess the film will probably be not too bad, not too good.

    1. Re:Even/Odd by Backov · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nemesis broke that law finally, we are no longer bound by its chains or uplifted by its promises.

      --
      In the law there is no overlap between theft and copyright infringement whatsoever.
    2. Re:Even/Odd by cosmo7 · · Score: 1

      Will this be Star Trek 0? And thus not subject to the even/odd curse?

      Zero is an even number.

    3. Re:Even/Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it just exposed another law that's been only partially obvious. If they're evenly divisible by 5, it transcends bad and goes to awful.

      See, it all makes sense now.

  12. What did Spock find in the toilet? by SpermanHerman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Captains Log ...

    ~SpermanHerman

    1. Re:What did Spock find in the toilet? by The+Other+White+Boy · · Score: 2, Funny

      ..informative? did somebody misclick?

      on topic, i laughed. =)

    2. Re:What did Spock find in the toilet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Spock found the captain's log and Herman's sperm? Kinky!

    3. Re:What did Spock find in the toilet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I were to guess, I'd say it was some moderator wanting to actually give some karma to the GP. See, funny mods don't give you karma (any more).

    4. Re:What did Spock find in the toilet? by ocie · · Score: 1

      A classic from Kindergarden and it never gets old!

      --
      JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
  13. Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Rick Berman: "Prequel" Film in the Works, Plus Developing New Series With Braga

    By Steve Krutzler / 12:42, 22 April 2004 / General Star Trek

    After over a year of silence on the future of the STAR TREK feature film franchise, producer Rick Berman has finally dropped the first hints of a new theatrical project for the franchise. The news comes in the new issue of Dreamwatch magazine, just coming out in the UK.

    Speaking in issue #117, Berman confirms for the first time that he is now developing a STAR TREK feature film project: "I am involved in the very early stages of what could be the next STAR TRKE movie," reveals Berman, in an excerpt provided by Dreamwatch. "It's something I will be producing with two other producers."

    Unwilling to offer many details he cryptically describes it as "a prequel" without any further elaboration. The names of his producing cohorts will have to remain unknown for now, as well. This follows a report earlier this week from Dark Horizons that Paramount may be working on a project the site described as "Starfleet Academy." Coincidentially, former TREK producer Harve Bennett (STAR TREKs II-VI) revealed recently that several years ago he had pitched a Starfleet Academy-based STAR TREK movie concept.

    On the television front, while the future of their first series remains in limo, Berman confirms that he is developing a non-STAR TREK sci-fi series with partner Brannon Braga. Both Berman and Braga have development deals with Paramount. If a new series begins development in earnest, TrekWeb insiders suggest Berman and/or Braga might take a reduced role in an adults-only supermarionation version of ENTERPRISE, though this is entirely speculation.

    For the full interview and much more, check out issue #117 of Dreamwatch magazine in the United Kingdom.

  14. Oh great, a PREQUEL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Because we all know how well he's done with the current prequel series Enterprise. I'm sure this will be a homerun. Look, I understand various people (Stewart, Spiner, etc) want a lot of money/don't really want to be involved... that's fine. But there are enough people that do, and enough ways to craft a story. Captain Riker in charge, Dr. Bashir in the data role (perhaps as an Intelligence Officer or something). Maybe a plot about those parasite things that TNG never followed up on. Perhaps Riker finds out his clone Tom is still alive, and they need to go rescue him? There are lots of options that don't require prequels.

  15. Should be good by KlomDark · · Score: 1

    Captain Kirk as a little kid called Annie who grows up to be.

    Oh wait...

    1. Re:Should be good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here I was thinking, "Annie? That's a retarded name for a little boy..." Then I realized what you were referring too. :-(

  16. Blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Christ Berman sucks.

  17. In related news... by IshanCaspian · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...they announced plans to dig up Gene Roddenberry's corpse and kick it around in the street. Sources close to the production crew said they were in the market for dead horses and clubs.

    --

    But there is another kind of evil that we must fear most... and that is the indifference of good men.
    1. Re:In related news... by nacturation · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think that's part of the plot. Gene Roddenberry's corpse is spinning so fast in his grave that it's causing frame dragging. The distortions in space-time open up a wormhole to the future. The Enterprise crew goes to investigate this effect and hilarity ensues.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:In related news... by radicalskeptic · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      WARNING: If accidentally read, induce vomiting.
    3. Re:In related news... by Bozdune · · Score: 1

      Very funny, but Roddenberry's corpse would probably do a better job directing than Shatner.

      The problem with Star Trek is that the premise is tired. Dick and Dorothy Seaton have conquered the Chlorans, there's nothing left to do.

      I'd like to see someone like Neal Stephenson come up with a videoverse that's more interesting. How about it, bud? Stop living in the fucking past and give us some more of that craaaaaazy future.

    4. Re:In related news... by Morgion · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can't dig up his corpse; his ashes are in orbit.

      At least they were until they burned up in re-entry, which was probably two or three years ago:

      "Celestis Inc., a Texas-based company, said [Roddenberry's and Timothy Leary's] ashes, along with those of 22 other fans of space exploration, were on board... a Pegasus rocket was launched from a Lockheed L-1011 jetliner 36,000 feet (11,000 meters) over the Canary Islands.

      "Each of the 24 "passengers" were placed into a vial the size of a lipstick holder. Their ashes will orbit the Earth for six years before they re-enter the atmosphere and burn up."

      http://www.cnn.com/TECH/9704/21/spain.leary/
    5. Re:In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoah, sounds like somebody's living in the past. Contemporize, man!

    6. Re:In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So he really IS spinning in his grave!!!

    7. Re:In related news... by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

      "Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry is the first person to have their ashes put aboard a rocket and "buried" in space."

      He was only one of the "first". There were 36 remains on the Orbital Sciences Taurus that launched him in December of 1999. Tim Leary was aboard also.

      Only about 7 grams of each person's remains was sent. Cost was about US$5000 each.

      --
      "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    8. Re:In related news... by Bozdune · · Score: 1

      Um, it's called "irony." See, you take this really old and shitty sci-fi epic, and you compare it to the... never mind.

    9. Re:In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think that's part of the plot. Gene Roddenberry's corpse is spinning so fast in his grave that it's causing frame dragging.
      Damn, I wish I had mod points; that made me laugh out loud. Thanks!
    10. Re:In related news... by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      I heard about that.

      Before his death, Leary wrote one last book entitled "Design for Dying" that I found to be a very interesting read, considering that I normally don't read books. I doubt he could have cared less where his ashes went.

    11. Re:In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very funny, but Roddenberry's corpse would probably do a better job directing than Shatner.

      Quite possibly. It would certainly do a better job acting...

    12. Re:In related news... by dasheiff · · Score: 1

      You know Roddenberry's corpse was shot into the sun by NASA as a thank you for inspiring the lot of them.

  18. This is going to require some time in makeup by jim_b · · Score: 4, Funny

    Prequel .... So... shatner with hair and Nemoy accidentally emoting all over the place?

    --

    - and small change got rained on with his own 38

  19. Prequal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has there ever been a good prequal?

    Ever?

    1. Re:Prequal by grub · · Score: 1


      Sheesh, at least you didn't spell "ever" as "evar"...

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Prequal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I got pre-qualled for a credit card. That was pretty good.

    3. Re:Prequal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Godfather part two was about half prequel.

    4. Re:Prequal by trash+eighty · · Score: 1

      Infernal Affairs II, Young & Dangerous : The Prequel

  20. I've seen the rushes and they're cool! by heironymouscoward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The entire crew of the Enterprise is still at school and Spock Jr is being bullied by ignorant full-blooded humans when Jamie Kirk leaps to the rescue and saves Spock Jr who says "you humans are so emotional. on my planet i would have left myself to be beaten to a bloody pulp". Jamie Kirk then kicks Spock jr in the groin, rips off his shirt and makes out with one of the local girls.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:I've seen the rushes and they're cool! by Otter · · Score: 1

      You know, between you and this guy, I think you're on to something! Make it a TV show, cast Gabrielle Union as Uhura, give everyone Macintoshes and UPN will be ready to give the WB a run for its money.

    2. Re:I've seen the rushes and they're cool! by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny
      Jamie Kirk ... makes out with one of the local girls.

      Who is then strangely killed by a bouncing apparition that looks suspiciously like a flashlight shining through a shower curtain.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:I've seen the rushes and they're cool! by nomadic · · Score: 1

      cast Gabrielle Union

      Those three words alone have convinced me to agree with your idea.

  21. What they really need by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    What "Star Trek" really needs is another EIGHTEEN YEAR HIATUS so that it can recharge its energies.

    But that'w what I said when "DS9" started...

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:What they really need by Bodhammer · · Score: 1

      That would be dilithium crystals - you insensitive clod...

      --
      "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
    2. Re:What they really need by pinkocommie · · Score: 1

      At the moment probably true but looking at it from a story telling perspective not necessarily. Enterprise sucks horribly but could've been something completely different and a hell of a lot better. Say depicting the baby steps humanity took to become a space faring people. Lots of stories to tell. Star Trek Nemesis sucked. Star Trek II Redux? B4 *gag*. Could've had a genuine crisis in the Romulan empire with the whole Spock arc tied in / perhaps a couple of comeo's, Tasha Yar's daughter, No weird Remans and obviously no Before/After :). Similarly the Starfleet academy idea could work (Pensacola anyone ;) hehe). Lots of things to work with that don't have to be about dudes in a ship but about the bigger picture. Sorry about the rambling :-D

  22. A prequel to a prequel? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Funny
    They've already gone way far back in history to do "Enterprise". A prequel before that? I know. They can do a movie about the world before the first starships were launched. About modern-day people who dream of the day when dilithium crystals will be real real, you could make love to real Romulans instead of inflated ones, and tribbles were not made of cloth.

    They could call this film... "Trekkies".

    Sorry. forgot. someone already did this.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:A prequel to a prequel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it would be called Slashtrek.

    2. Re:A prequel to a prequel? by RotJ · · Score: 1

      They could do a sequel to that and call it "Trekkies 2". Never mind, someone did that too.

  23. How about Star Trek: Borg War by numbski · · Score: 4, Funny

    Have TNG, DS9, and Voyager casts on hand, tell a story about the Borg finally getting fed up and invading federation space wholesale.

    You want to see money fly? Have Q amusing himself by bringing the Borg there. :P

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    1. Re:How about Star Trek: Borg War by Mike+Markley · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why bother? Berman and Braga already neutered the Borg anyway. If the last half of Voyager is any indication, all they need to do is bring Admiral (*gag*) Janeway out to modulate the field density and penetrate the shields, or something.

      No, the Borg are just as ruined as most of the rest of the franchise at this point, and cramming all the casts into one movie screams of a pitiful attempt at fan service: "We can't deliver a decent movie, so we're just gonna throw characters at you; one of these must be your favorite!"

      As many others have said, Trek needs a long break. With any luck, it'll be able to lie dormant until Rick Berman dies a horrible death.

    2. Re:How about Star Trek: Borg War by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      I don't know, think "The Five Doctors"...

    3. Re:How about Star Trek: Borg War by CaptnMArk · · Score: 1

      The Borg were neutered long before VOY. It was at Best of Both Worlds Part II.

    4. Re:How about Star Trek: Borg War by elwell642 · · Score: 0

      How about basing the new movie on one of the really classic ST novels? It's been years since I've read any, but I remember one "Vendetta" that was absolutely outstanding. It had TNG and TOS aspects combined, and was written by the great Peter David (who was IMHO the greatest of all ST novelists.)

      Here's the book on Amazon.

      --

      <insert witty linux comment here>

    5. Re:How about Star Trek: Borg War by phallux · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd like to see something akin to Marvel Comics' original Secret Wars series but with a more Dr. Strangelove-esque ending.

      Have Q bring together the crews of all the Enterprises, DS9, Voyager, and the entire Federation; plus the Klingon Empire, Romulan Empire, the Borg, and Species 8472 -- then let them all obliterate each other (including Q) in one epic, cataclysmic final act for the Trek franchise.

      I'd go see it.

    6. Re:How about Star Trek: Borg War by IceAgeComing · · Score: 1

      and cramming all the casts into one movie screams of a pitiful attempt at fan service

      Then again, in one sitting you could watch all the characters die, one by one, in the manner most fitting to their personality. I would pay money for that.

      I say Wesley Crusher takes the Enterprise on a huge joyride that ends tragically, despite the crew's valiant attempts to blow away everything in the starship's path.

    7. Re:How about Star Trek: Borg War by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Screw the Borg. The only way to beat the Borg is with last minute science. I want to see something with the Dominion, who can be beaten instead with a last minute defection.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    8. Re:How about Star Trek: Borg War by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tonight on UPN:

      On an All new Episode of "Sick Bay"


      HoloDoc: Please state the nature of the medical...

      Bones: Would someone please shut him up? We've got a patient here! Dr Crusher...

      Beverly: Sorry, I can't help you. This is one of the rare episodes that I get to act all hot and sexy.

      Bones: For gods' sake!

      Beverly: Sorry, Dr. McCoy. They only come every 3 seasons or so.

      Julian: [leering] She does have a point...

      Flox: [observing Julian] The human sex drive is fascinating. Why, the Slorfian Dungbeetle only mates...

      Julian: [still leering at Crusher]Later, Flox

      Bones: Damn purple blooded Denobulan...

      Flox: Actually, it's the Florgmath of Alpha Tau Gamma Chi that have purple blood. Denobulan blood is actually...

      Bones: Dammit, I'm a doctor, not a Xenologist!

      Polaski: What can I do to help?

      All: GO AWAY!

      HoloDoc: Well, if you want my opinion...

      Bones+Julian: We Don't.

      Polaski: I think we should hear him out.

      HoloDoc: Oh Dr. Polaski, are you still here?

      Julian: Pardon me, but the patient appears to be arresting.

      Flox: I have some wonderfully fresh Plarnian leechmice that should...

      Bones: [checks readout]He's dead, Flox.

    9. Re:How about Star Trek: Borg War by JosKarith · · Score: 0

      "With any luck, it'll be able to lie dormant until Rick Berman dies a horrible death."

      Well, if we can get the right fanboy pissed off enough then that might not be all that long.
      "Stabbed to death with a set of Spock ears..what a way to go..."

      --
      'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    10. Re:How about Star Trek: Borg War by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      You bastard!

      I hate it when coffee squirts out my nose!

  24. DS9 by eberry · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I for one want a DS9 movie. I am currently watching the entire series via Netflix, but I am down to the last two seasons.

    If they start working on a DS9 movie right now, I will forgive them for that lame ST: Enterprise episode last night. I can only take so much of the same plot. Which is one reason I don't watch 24.

    --
    Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Lois, this isn't my Batman glass. - Peter
    1. Re:DS9 by zors · · Score: 1

      Amen. I was pumped when Spike started showing DS9 episodes alongside TNG. I personally think its the best series.

      But isn't their some crap about Avery Brooks (Sisco) being pushed out of films? Or is that just some crap i heard on slashdot?

  25. Not so bad.... by EpsCylonB · · Score: 0

    I would much rather have another movie than another formula tv series, TNG was good, but basically repeating it over and over is really starting to damage star trek as a whole.

    And I actually enjoyed Nemesis, sure in some ways it ripped off the wrath of khan, but if you are going to copy any ST movie then you copy the best.

    1. Re:Not so bad.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And I actually enjoyed Nemesis [imdb.com], sure in some ways it ripped off the wrath of khan

      And in other news, there will also be a Star Trek XI: The Search for Data, in which Picard, Geordi, B4, and Crusher steal a shuttle craft to head back to retrieve all the bits and pieces of Data. Data is taken back to Omicron Theta where he is repaired.

  26. Why do you torture us so? by Bronz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't you know the tastes of the many outweigh the tastes of the few, or the none?

    1. Re:Why do you torture us so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't you know the tastes of the many outweigh the tastes of the few, or the none?

      That's "... or the ONE," you insensitive clod!

  27. Computer by jwitch · · Score: 1

    "Computer, delete Paris" -- The Doctor "What are you doing?!?" -- Ensign Kim "Computer, delete Kim" -- The Doctor "Computer, Slashdot http://trekweb.com/" -- Slashdot editors "Afirmitive" -- The Computer

  28. "Starfleet Academy" by target562 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who thinks something along the lines of the ever popular Police Academy films would be an appropriate "wrap up" to the franchise?

    1. Re:"Starfleet Academy" by NineNine · · Score: 3, Funny

      I agree, but as long as they have a guy who can make funny noises with his mouth, while leaving out Steve Guttenberg.

    2. Re:"Starfleet Academy" by Araneas · · Score: 1

      What? With Leslie Meilsen as a Vulcan drag queen name T'Pork?

    3. Re:"Starfleet Academy" by target562 · · Score: 1

      ...and Bobcat Golthwait as that lovable, but often misunderstood, freshman cadet.

  29. I hope the guy from Enterprise… by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...gets to do the soundtrack. I can't get enough of that Enterprise theme.

  30. Pre? by AmicoToni · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I still find the idea of prequels in Star Trek rather silly. In Star Wars there was a storyline, so in that case it might have made some sense, but Star Trek?
    The only result is that they can show *less* technological tricks, *less* alien species, and, importantly, *less* developed Star Trek ideals and moral conflicts.
    No Prime Directive? No teleporting?
    I would find much more appealing a series or a movie some two-hundred years *after* TNG, instead...

    1. Re:Pre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That was the idea behind Enterprise, but changing "Phasers" to "Phase Cannons" and "Shields" to "Hull Plating" really doesn't make any difference plotwise. And half the episodes end up being Prime Directive Foreshadowing anyway.

      > I would find much more appealing a series or a movie some two-hundred years *after* TNG, instead...

      It's the same problem. Oh, they haver "Quantum Sheilds" and can go at "Warp 20". What real difference does it make?

    2. Re:Pre? by justplainchips · · Score: 1
      I would find much more appealing a series or a movie some two-hundred years *after* TNG, instead...
      wouldn't that be called "Gene Roddenbury's Andromeda"?
    3. Re:Pre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, they haver "Quantum Sheilds" and can go at "Warp 20". What real difference does it make?

      Because then, when the script calls for the ship to cross light-years in minutes, it won't be an ignorant scriptwriter's mistake.

    4. Re:Pre? by badasscat · · Score: 1

      I still find the idea of prequels in Star Trek rather silly. In Star Wars there was a storyline, so in that case it might have made some sense, but Star Trek?

      Well, not to turn this into a Wars vs. Trek thing, but Star Trek has just as much backstory as Star Wars, and a lot less of it has been told. Star Wars' history does go back further than Trek's (thousands of years) but in reality it's just semantics... jedi still existed 1,000 years before A New Hope, they still used light sabers, etc. etc. The technology didn't really change all that much throughout the entirety of the history of Star Wars, and the political events that took place over that time could/would have happened in a decade in the real world. I've always been absolutely amazed at how *stable* the universe apparently is in Star Wars. One government ruling the galaxy for thousands of years, then a coup, then one government ruling the galaxy for another however long. Compare that to real-life Earth.

      Trek has a shorter history but it's more complex. Partly for that reason it's not as reliant on a continuous set of characters, because the core plotlines, at least once you get past TOS (which was more character-driven) are about the politics and technological problems facing the galaxy.

      For that reason I thought Enterprise was actually a really good idea. TOS sort of started in the middle of a far larger story and it really didn't tell much of it. Subsequent series moved up the timeline but there's a whole lot involved in the creation of the Federation, and before that to the human/vulcan alliance, the romulan wars, the discovery of all these various races, political alliances and rivalries (a-la the klingons) being formed, etc. And all that along with the humans' continuing technological advancements, which occured at a really rapid rate that I always thought was more realistic than the snail's pace things seem to move at in Star Wars. Even fashions change at a fairly realistic clip in Star Trek (though mostly based on whatever's popular in the real world at the time... but at least this is better than sticking to some arbitrary "look" that supposedly stuck around for thousands and thousands of years).

      So Enterprise was a good idea but it was just completely mucked up by Berman and Bragga. It's like TOS in that it really isn't telling much of the story of Star Trek, which unfortunately at this point is what the people want to see. TOS was great, and it was necessarily character-driven as all new sci-fi franchises have to be, but now we know there's all this stuff that happened long ago and rather than show us these things, Enterprise is actually showing us other things that were never even mentioned in any previous series (like the Xindi) while completely ignoring everything important. It's as if in Star Wars Episode 1 you didn't see the beginnings of the fall of the Republic, you didn't see Padme Amidalla, you didn't see Anakin Skywalker, but instead were left following around a bunch of Ewoks as they battled with their newly discovered foes the Gungans. It's just not at all what people want to see.

      So I still say there's hope that a "prequel" movie could be good, as long as Berman and Bragga are off in the Carribbean or something sipping mai-tais and soaking up rays while it's being planned, written, shot, edited and distributed.

  31. Almost. by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 1

    It'll be Kirk and Co. in their teen years and played by ub3rhot 23-27yr olds that "look" teenaged.

    godbless, i hope they don't fuck this up and make it some heap marketed at the same crew Skulls 1 though what? 7, 8?

    *sigh* please don't ruin it!!!

    1. Re:Almost. by geoswan · · Score: 1

      If so, expect to see young Kirk face the Kobamashi Maru test.

    2. Re:Almost. by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      psst, he cheats...

  32. /.ed by ColdZero · · Score: 3, Funny

    The web servers canna take much more of this capt'n

    1. Re:/.ed by HalliS · · Score: 1

      It's worse than that, he's dead, Jim.
      Dead, Jim.
      Dead, Jim.
      It's worse than that, he's dead, Jim.
      Dead, Jim, Dead.

      --


      My other UID is 1337
  33. Geroge Lucas REVENGE by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 3, Funny
    no prequels, no more please. After Star Wars Prequels it can't possibly get worse (can it?). You can't have a Kirk w/o Shatner - and please do not bring him back (at this age and weight) either.

    What kind of story will it be?

    Star Trek: 0.5 - The Trouble With Jar Jar, think of all the horrible possibilities! With only a modicum of chance for success.

    1. Re:Geroge Lucas REVENGE by Mateito · · Score: 1

      > After Star Wars Prequels it can't possibly get worse (can it?).

      I've heard there's a Matrix 0 in the works.

      Why else were there 6 Neos before the Keanu Neo if each one doesn't deserve his (or her) own movie?

      The real kick will be when we discover that Moses, Jesus and Mohammaed are Neos 3,4 and 5.

  34. Kzinti first contact by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Count me in, as long as it is about first contact with the Kzinti. (For those of you who do not know what they are, just read it and do not say it. They are NOT Xindi!)

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Kzinti first contact by demo9orgon · · Score: 1

      Hell YEAH!
      I think they're just scared shitless of giving Larry Niven any credit/money/etc..etc...and the same could go for anyone else who invested in the open ideals of Sci-Fi borrowing, like Christopher Rowley, and David Brin.

      How hard would it be to have some huge "Rama" scale artifact detected going through one of the "Trek" solar systems on long-range scanners, a razed war artifact, and then have them detect a ship of unknown design persuing it? In a race they manage to reach the artifact and find a slaver device (cloak,excavator,statis field) and then have to figure out the slaver device in order to get out alive...in the meanwhile they could have to endure a somewhat homicidal alliance with a surviving Kzin in order to fend off the Vang-infested remnanats of the crew which are taken over (Christopher Rowley). Damn that would rock!! The Kzin make the Klingons look like intellectuals (at least until the Ringworld Series was started, and by then at least three conflicts had taken place with 'Nivens humans, resulting in 2/3rds of the Kzin species being wiped out each time...so that by the time of Ringworld we have a tolerant Kzin, like 'Speaker to Animals').

      Now that would be one helluva movie. And the best part, it could be a "fork" in the franchise. We could even get a little "Chanur's Pride" (C.J.C.) thing going, where the survivors simply cease to exist as the artifact plunges into a star/collapsar while the Kzin ship tears ass back to some homeworld and we have a whole new saga which humanity/kzin waging war against the Vang and an unseen influence of uplift hinted at in the background. So by the time Ringworld rolls around there's no continuity break, the Kzin are more sociable, and some motile nervous system is thwarted in it's reach for dominion over all life.

      Yep, I figure with copyright laws and licensing issues, it might be made in time for my great, great, great grandchildren to enjoy.

      --
      Every new form of media has it's own Requirimento
    2. Re:Kzinti first contact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell Yeah. And then Steve Cole can drive his Bird of Prey out and blow them and their drones to smitherines. You suck.

    3. Re:Kzinti first contact by The12thRonin · · Score: 1

      The Kzinti were the drone packing race from Star Fleet Battles, later renamed the Mirak in the SFC and SFC2 games for the PC.

    4. Re:Kzinti first contact by fgb · · Score: 1

      When I first saw the alien probe in Star Trek IV, the first thing that popped into my mind was "That's Rama!".

  35. Flogging it to death by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I wish they'd let this franchise lie for about ten years, it needs a break. They're scraping the bottom of the barrel for stories and recycling old ideas. The last TNG film was a bit disappointing. I mean, there was no credible motivation for the bad guy to want to destroy life on earth, so after the movie I was left wondering what was all the fuss about?

    I wish they'd eventually do a Babylon 5 job on this, i.e. plan a series with a big story that develops over five seasons. When watching the likes of TNG and Voyager I got the impression that they were making this stuff up as they went along. Like adding a character called 'Kes' to Voyager and just seeing where it went. It went nowhere and they had to ditch her in favour of a Borg with a fit body and big tits. (I'm not complaining about that BTW!)

    Sure DS9 and Voyager had _some_ continuity, but nothing profound. The only shocking thing that ever happened in Voyager was the Seska character who was on the ship for the longest time but turned out to be a Cardassian agent in disguise.

    Oh well.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:Flogging it to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      DS9 had the most continuity of any series, especially if you go back and rewatch it. Sure, they were kinda adding stuff as they went along at the beginning, but after a few seasons, they actually did have a pretty good idea where they were headed.

    2. Re:Flogging it to death by Spencerian · · Score: 1

      Babylon 5 had one thing going for it that Star Trek has never had.

      AN ENDING to its story. Star Trek isn't a story, it's a LARP vampire game you can never leave!

      A story gets boring when you drag the characters or themes around for an eternity. Bergman and friends need to read more Grecian novels. Heroes need to accomplish their tasks, and die. Cities rise and fall, bad guys are always vanquished in the end.

      Sheridan dies a hero.
      Valen/Sinclair dies a hero.
      Kirk dies a hero, but it took too damn long to make it happen.

      --
      Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    3. Re:Flogging it to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sisko did die a hero, although he didn't accomplish his Federation task. (Bring Bajor into the Federation).

    4. Re:Flogging it to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      they actually did have a pretty good idea where they were headed.

      Yeah, they had an idea because babylon 5 did it the previous season? Watching the last episode of DS9 a season or two after b5 ended (can't remember how long exactly) almost got me mad. Seemed like a copy/paste of B5's script.

    5. Re:Flogging it to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DS9 was 93-99, B5 was 94-98. I personally didn't find the endings that similar. The whole prophets storyline started with the beginning of the series. Sisko didn't have some limited lifespan that he knew was about to end. He died fighting Dukat to save Bajor and the prophets.

    6. Re:Flogging it to death by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      True that Kirk died a hero, but that didn't stop some book authors from resurrecting him again.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    7. Re:Flogging it to death by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      I'd have to say DS9's continuity was REALLY profound. Come on, man, they abandon the station at the end of season 5, and it's occupied for the first few episodes of season 6. Not to mention the characters moving up and down political ladders based on their actions. A good example is Gul Dukat, who goes from cruel dictator to crippled militarist to outcast to rebel to traitor and then back to cruel dictator. And the whole time he maintains a relationship with the cast.

      Even the one off episodes preserved the continuity, which was fun.

      The only difference, if there is one at all, is that maybe Staczinski knew where he was going the whole time, while DS9 was a bit more seat of the pants. But after season 4, they knew what they were doing...and they made some GREAT sci-fi.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    8. Re:Flogging it to death by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it Shatner himself who did one of those? (Brought back by the Borg or something?)

  36. I'll KILL that photographer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  37. Star Trek IV was the ultimate ST prequel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean it went back as far as the late 1980's!

  38. Odd or even? by eddy · · Score: 1

    So this would be movie -1? It's the odd ones that's supposed to be good, right?

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:Odd or even? by pyros · · Score: 1
      So this would be movie -1? It's the odd ones that's supposed to be good, right?

      evens (wrath of khan, voyage home, undiscovered country). Although I don't agree with that rule for the TNG movies. Malcolm McDowell rocked Generations, and who didn't think it a high-point of the frnachise to hear Data proclaim "Oh shit!" as the Enterprise was crashing into the planet surface? First Contact I think did have the best story, but Insurrection was pretty entertaining too I thought. Nemesis was just another sci-fi movie.

  39. Prolly Not TNG by millahtime · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This probubally won't be anything to do with TNG. They had pretty much said they were done with that cast and the movies. Plus the last one didn't do that great at the box office.

    Before Kirk there were 2 wars they might cover. One with the Klingons and one with the Romulins. This could provide for some action

    Another scenario they had talked about was doing a movie of the Excelusier and Chekov (yes I know I butchered the name)

    1. Re:Prolly Not TNG by red+floyd · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's Sulu who captained the Excelsior, not Chekov.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    2. Re:Prolly Not TNG by seanmeister · · Score: 4, Funny

      ".... a movie of the Excelusier and Chekov (yes I know I butchered the name)

      They could have a scene where an Excel user drops a VBA worm into Chekov's helmet!

    3. Re:Prolly Not TNG by Syberghost · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Romulan war would be in the time Enterprise would have covered, if not for the fact that it sucks so badly there's no way it'll go enough seasons to make it there.

      Sadly, though, this is the kind of thing they'd think of doing; an Enterprise movie could technically be called a prequel, and could cover the Romulan war.

      What this franchise really needs, however, is three things:

      1) About five years off with no movies.
      2) About five years off with no series.
      3) About forever off with no stories written by anybody who has ever written for Voyager or Enterprise. Ever. Even the good ones.

    4. Re:Prolly Not TNG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (yes I know I butchered the name)

      Ah, that explains it. Thanks for honestly owning up. But I first thought "probubally" must be the all new Dubya funny-piece that everyone else but me has heard...

    5. Re:Prolly Not TNG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen brother. Let those "writers" go back to churning out dish-detergent commercials.

    6. Re:Prolly Not TNG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't understand why Enterprise isn't covering the Romulan War *RIGHT NOW*. Instead it is mystery alien terrorists that nobody cares about with a dumb time travel hook. Stupid.

      I agree with your points -- the standard TNG plotlines have been beaten to death, the writers suck, the actors suck, and the producers can't decide if they are making soapopera for middle-aged nerds or an action series.

    7. Re:Prolly Not TNG by Johnny318 · · Score: 1

      Ditto, except I'd bump five years to ten or fifteen years so we're POSITIVE it's new blood and to increase demand. During the fifteen years, SLOWLY re-release EVERYTHING again (starting with a nice, tidy TOS box set), to forge the next generation of fan who craves seeing new stories.

    8. Re:Prolly Not TNG by rpj1288 · · Score: 1

      *Nit pick alert!* After serving as first officer on the Relient (sp?) Chekov was moved to be security and tatical officer on the Enterprise A. Sulu was the one commanding Excellsior. (I can't spell it either...)

      --
      Marvin knew: "Think of a number, any number..."
  40. Stop beating a dead horse... by B5_geek · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wish they would let this once noble francise just die.

    A Prequel. Egads! Could that mean Scott Bakula meets Kirk? Lots of CGI will be needed to remove 200lbs from the now-flabby Shatner.
    They might even waste the whole CGI budget on keeping Kirk trim. Let's just pray that Data is dead for good. Ohh look I'm an ass now that I have emotions.

    I never got a chance to watch Farscape, and honestly I don't think much will ever match Babylon 5 for depth and quality.

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    1. Re:Stop beating a dead horse... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      In the end, Scott Bakula wakes up and says "Ziggy, I just had the strangest dream."

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Stop beating a dead horse... by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Oh to blazes with Shatner. Just use the motion capture techniques that brought gollum to life and skin a real actor with images of Kirk from STTOS. We have the technology, let's use it.

    3. Re:Stop beating a dead horse... by vivin · · Score: 1

      Great! Another chance for Rick Berman to ruin my memories. The just doesn't get it. Nemesis was alright, in my opinion. But my favourite TNG movie is still "First Contact". Nemesis had a LOT of potential... the story had a lot of potential, I don't know what went wrong. I felt that they should have elaborated a whole lot more on the new Federation-Romulan relationship. I really want to see how that turns out. Gene Rodenberry's dream is dying. I agree. They should let the franchise die for a while. My response to Enterprise has been lukewarm. I follow it, but not with that much enthusiasm.

      If they are making a prequel, I think they should make movies on the very first Earth-Romulan War, Q, or DS9.

      Or how about something in early federation history (I am not sure if Enterprise will be covering that)?

      Even if they make a new movie, who are they going to cast? I think part of the appeal of the movies was that there were a lot of characters that the bulk of the viewers were already familiar with, and had already warmed up to. So I am not sure how successful it would be.

      --
      Vivin Suresh Paliath
      http://vivin.net

      I like
    4. Re:Stop beating a dead horse... by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

      Only problem is, Gollum talked in a fluid fashion. Do...we...have the...technology...to make...Kirk's......voice?

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    5. Re:Stop beating a dead horse... by bigcreek · · Score: 1

      That would be cool. You could get Q to pull Kirk, Picard, and others characters in their respective CGI prime together, and solve some great threat to mankind. Like, uh, SCO.

    6. Re:Stop beating a dead horse... by hummassa · · Score: 1

      We do have it, it's called "Shatner's throat". Please don't use it for evil purposes, like recording songs.

      --
      It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
  41. Star Fleet Command? by miket01 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Dark Horizons recently posted this tidbit in regards to current development at Paramount (emphasis mine):

    Seeking Writers: "Pro Nanny, "Au Pair", "Paranoia", "Star Fleet Command", "Stranger in a Strangeland", "Homeland Security", Peter Weir's "War Magician", Tony Scott's "Warriors" and an untitled Johnny Knoxville project

    1. Re:Star Fleet Command? by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 2, Funny

      More Hollywood creativity:

      Pro Nanny - Fran Drescher as an annoying, but lovable kinky prostitute.

      Au Pair - Fran Drescher as an annoying, but lovable kinky prostitute (rated NC-17)

      Paranoia - (Working title, "The Martha Stewart Story")

      Star Fleet Command - James Kirk as a young cadet. Starring Eminem as the brash rule-breaking young officer.

      Stranger in a Strangeland - Hmmm, I thought someone wrote this already.

      Homeland Security - Now, a low budget NBC "rushed out once we caught wind of this in movie production" mini-series.

      War Magician - The real Iraq war story. By Matt Drudge

      Warriors - Prequal to "Road Warrior"

      an untitled Johnny Knoxville project - Jackass, the Musical

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
    2. Re:Star Fleet Command? by Maserati · · Score: 1

      Good news:

      ""Aeon Flux" is currently casting."

      Bad News:
      Hollywood is making "Stranger in a Strange Land"

      Interesting prospect:

      Paramount is working on a film called Paranoia.

      Naaah, that'd actually be a cool movie. I am, of course, hoping the parent's Martha Stewart joke is speculation. If they do a Martha movie I hope they get Ana Gasteyer to play Martha :_)

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    3. Re:Star Fleet Command? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Warriors could be related to the 1970's movie, and War Magician could be this project about Jasper Maskelyne. Really an interesting story.

    4. Re:Star Fleet Command? by Nuclear_Loser · · Score: 1

      Star Fleet Command - James Kirk as a young cadet. Starring Eminem as the brash rule-breaking young officer.

      You know, it's sad, but I'd actually pay to see that

      --


      You've got 8% of my love - 8% of my love - 8/100's of the time you're the only girl I'm dreaming of.
    5. Re:Star Fleet Command? by IceAgeComing · · Score: 1


      I see a lot of posts saying Star Trek is out of ideas, but that's because they don't understand story writing.

      I don't understand story writing either, but I'm going to pretend that I do and say that the setting is just one small part of the story.

      ne can take any hard-hitting current event, SUCH AS THE WAR IN IRAQ, and write a story revealing the deeply complex issues around war. Star Trek may be the right venue because the futuristic setting enables the story to be rated PG-13 instead of NC-17.

    6. Re:Star Fleet Command? by MrWa · · Score: 1
      Too bad these aren't combined:

      "Star Fleet Command" and an untitled Johnny Knoxville project

  42. "B&B Really Excited" by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sources close to Berman and Braga say that "they are really excited about this new project. They have some really hot ideas mainly from their marketing departments. This 'prequel' will use the 'Freaky Friday' story and give it a fresh new take with the cast of the hit series 'Enterprise'." Berman is quoted as saying "there's a lot of life left in the universal story of a young hip teen switching places with an older cranky Starship Captain."

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    1. Re:"B&B Really Excited" by Surt · · Score: 1

      It's:

      Many Shubs and Zuuls knew what it was to be roasted in the depths of a Sloar that day, I can tell you!

      According to the script.

      http://www.scifiscripts.com/scripts/Ghostbusters .t xt

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:"B&B Really Excited" by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      2 of the 3 sources I checked had it the way I wrote it.
      Obsess much?

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    3. Re:"B&B Really Excited" by Surt · · Score: 1

      Nah, just a quote I like too, but it looked odd to me which was what caused me to double check it.

      Most of the sources I've seen that tried to quote from the movie seem to go your way, vs all the script sites seem to agree the other way.

      Just a case of needing something to do while performing boring time consuming experiments.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:"B&B Really Excited" by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > Just a case of needing something to do while performing boring time consuming experiments.

      Well, I checked three places, so apparently I have plenty of OCD to go around.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  43. Plot Overview by weeboo0104 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Several hundred years in the future, geeks will successfully use time travel to travel back in time and kill Rick Berman before he has a chance to destroy the Star Trek canon.

    Somewhere in the story, the governer of California is going to be involved too. (You vill be Ahhhhsimulaht, Ahhsimu...Ahhsim. Vot the hell, you vill be TEHHHHMANATED!)

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  44. Enterprise by addie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I do read /. everyday, and I am very aware that the general relevant population doesn't think much of Enterprise, I have to respectfully disagree. Take last night's new episode as an example: Archer attacked and stormed a totally innocent ship because he needed their warp coil; T-Pol turns out to be a drug addict! These are things that NEVER would have happend on the original Trek or on TNG. The writers are finally writing morally fallible characters, and I for one am thrilled.

    That said, a prequel has MUCH more potential to be good than another sequel. They can have the Klingons be evil again (who wouldn't want that?). Technology wouldn't be as advanced, which makes easy-outs of plot points harder to resolve, and hence more interesting. The federation isn't as strong, which also opens up more complex plot possibilities.

    I think this is the best announcement for Trek fans in years. Nemesis was simply awful, and I'd hate to see the Data v2 re-learning how to paint, play violin, or some such garbage. Old can sometimes be new again!

    1. Re:Enterprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>I think this is the best announcement for Trek fans in years

      yea, you solidly backed up that conclusion.

      (now where'd i put my mod points Score:+5, Boring & Unsubstantiated)

    2. re: enterprise by ed.han · · Score: 1

      while i agree that episode was quite strong (and that surprised me, i'll confess), i feel i should point out that this kind of less than black/white is what helped make ST: DS9 a good series, IMHO.

      and while there's sense to what you say, for my part i don't like the implication that a DS9 movie is therefore not in the cards. i mean, sure, nobody's saying it's out of the realm of possibility but i just don't see them coming back to it if paramount goes in this direction.

      ed

    3. Re:Enterprise by Scrameustache · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Archer attacked and stormed a totally innocent ship because he needed their warp coil; T-Pol turns out to be a drug addict! These are things that NEVER would have happend on the original Trek or on TNG. The writers are finally writing morally fallible characters, and I for one am thrilled.

      Man I'm glad I'm not watching that show. Everthing I read about is absolutly horrible. Even from the fan boys!

      You might enjoy seeing the current U.S. values of might makes right in space, but I liked that Star Trek used to have a message of hope about humanity's future. Enterprise seems to say nothing but despair.

      Its new storyline is "war in reaction to an unprovoked attack by foreigners" and the enterprise's mission is, surprise, to "go into enemy territory and find weapons of mass destruction"....golly gee, I'm surprise they don't advertise "ripped straight from today's* headlines".

      If I want to watch pro-war propaganda I'll watch Fox News, thank you very much.

      *Ok, last year's headlines, actually.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:Enterprise by chegosaurus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why is everyone so keen to bash Enterprise? Seems even a lot of Trek fans just /want/ it to fail.

      Okay, so a few episodes have sucked pretty bad, but all in all it's a pretty entertaining show. Decent actors, nice sets and effects, some good stories.

      I'm a pretty keen Trek fan, and I don't really care about the inconsistencies with other series: I just what to be entertained for an hour, and Enterprise usually manages to do that.

      Now, Voyager, on the other hand. THAT sucked total ass...

  45. If they just gotta... by 0x0000 · · Score: 1

    If they've just gotta keep remaking this tired old shite, perhaps they could go back to the point at with earth actually gets off-planet. The original series pretty well glossed over that, imo.

    Perhaps they could give us late-period, in-system settings of gundgy mining colonies and aging space stations scattered around the solar system. Throw in a little terra-forming a la Kim Stanley Robinson.

    If I gotta sit thru another Kirk/McCoy/Kahn debacle, I think I'll barf. Why the hell can't starship officers age gracefully?

    .... and one more time for you Hollywood morons: THERE IS NO SOUND IN SPACE! Starships, fighters, etc, explode in silence. Get used to it.

    --
    "The Internet is made of cats."
    1. Re:If they just gotta... by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      .... and one more time for you Hollywood morons: THERE IS NO SOUND IN SPACE! Starships, fighters, etc, explode in silence. Get used to it.
      Hey the Battle Star Galatica mini series on SC-FI got it right. No sound of the ships moving in space (just low key background music, drum beats).

    2. Re:If they just gotta... by Merlinium · · Score: 1
      .... and one more time for you Hollywood morons: THERE IS NO SOUND IN SPACE! Starships, fighters, etc, explode in silence. Get used to it.

      This is one of the main reasons I like(d) the Firefly series. On the off chance that the hollywood morons finally figure it out, I think a movie based between the "Enterprise" (latest TV series) timeline and the original series (Captain Kirk) timeline, there could be great potential to produce something very interesting, with some of the first large space battles to be fought with the federation and klingons, or maybe some other races that turned out to bite off more then they could chew and the "Federation" had to wipe them out completely. A Universe with more then 1 ship (ala Enterprise) where we are just stretching our arms and establishing our borders in Space. There is plenty of opportunites to push our standards and ways of life onto other unsuspecting cultures and races (kind of like what we do now in RL with other countries).
      --
      If firefighters fight fire and crime fighters fight crime, what do Freedom fighters fight?
    3. Re:If they just gotta... by 0x00000dcc · · Score: 1

      Your /. user id is SOOO totally 16-bit - get with the times, buddy!

      --

      -- (Score:i, Imaginary)

    4. Re:If they just gotta... by uberdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, there's no sound in space, but there is EM noise, shrapnel banging against your hull, subspace warp fields collapsing, and who knows what else. Sounds are just Hollywood's way of presenting these phenomena in a way we can interpret.

      I like the way they did it in Space 1999. When the crew was watching a space battle on the viewscreen there was silence. When you were really there, then there was sound.

    5. Re:If they just gotta... by 0x0000 · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen either Firefly or the current Trek incarnation ("Enterprise"). The last Trek thing that I saw that I liked was "The Voyage Home", and even that paled a bit multiple viewing.

      It would be nice if the makers of Star Trek would give more play to science and less to romance and touchy-feely political correctness in general, imo...

      I've always been surprised to find that movies that ignore such basic sci concepts are ever taken serious as sci-fi genre. Still, although Star Trek was never the best, but it was always the most commecial until Star Wars came along, at least. I don't know which is the bigger money-maker, these days, since I have reverted to books in my continuing search for intellectually stimulating entertainment...

      I never like Kirk, anyway.

      --
      "The Internet is made of cats."
    6. Re:If they just gotta... by 0x0000 · · Score: 1

      True enough. Star Trek was never particularly good. It had to stay close enough to the themes estabilished by the other shows of the day to be socially acceptable to the non-space-going public. There were few, if any, actually new ideas presented in Star Trek in any of its incarnations, which is how the franchise managed to remain profitable.

      --
      "The Internet is made of cats."
    7. Re:If they just gotta... by 0x0000 · · Score: 1
      Sounds are just Hollywood's way of presenting these phenomena in a way we can interpret.

      I'm sorry, do you really believe that last bit? That is just sad.

      .... or are you just pointing out that Hollywood believe the audiences are all dumb as shit, and will accept any pathetic, lameass excuse they come up with to cover up the fact that they felt a need exaggerate reallity a bit in order to make sure the sound effects team didn't file a greivance over lack of interesting things to do while they visuals guys were having a "blast" (pun intended)?

      It is my opinion that the explosion sound effects used by the alleged story-tellers of Hollywood are just an effort to cover their own lack of imagination with audio-visual shock tactics. If they add a sonic assault on the audience to their ill-thought-out plots, it helps keep the viewer off-balance long enough for these paparazzi to perpetrate their misguided attempts at casting, character development, and story line long enough to vacuum out the victims' wallets. (it's no longer an "audience" at this point, any more than a person being mugged is an "audience" to for the mugger -- and I don't mean to just pick on the movie industry alone here; this is just one example of the kind of bullshit that exists through-out the so-called "entertainment" industry... )

      --
      "The Internet is made of cats."
    8. Re:If they just gotta... by fgb · · Score: 1

      I don't see why they shouldn't have sounds in space. After all the physics of the Star Trek universe seem to have only the most superficial resemblance to the physics of this universe.

      Maybe there was a massive inverse verteron pulse which allows sound waves to travel through space. Betcha never though of that! Did you? :-)

    9. Re:If they just gotta... by uberdave · · Score: 1

      No, I don't believe that. I don't care. When I go to the movies, I go there to be entertained, not to have a science lesson. Frankly, when the heroine has turned purple, bubbly, and has grown three extra tentacles because she was pricked by a flying space cactus on a planet 354 light years from here, and the hero is caught in a time bubble and can only escape by convincing his great-great grandmother to purchase SCO stock, hearing space explosions is the least of my worries.

    10. Re:If they just gotta... by 0x0000 · · Score: 1

      Two words: Willfull Suspension of Disbelief.



      You may find it easy to suspend disbelief when the presentation flies in the face of science. I don't. It is one thing to postulate the unknown, but to mis-represent the known under the guise of "entertainment" only works in comedy, imo.


      --
      "The Internet is made of cats."
  46. Ron Howard by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    I thought the cooking alien with a head that looked like a cross between a basketball and Ron Howard was kind of cool, but what do I know.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  47. Ender's Game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Starfleet Academy", huh?

    One has to wonder (doesn't one?) if they're going to try to play off of the upcoming Ender's Game movie hype.

  48. sorry to say this, but... by shams42 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    IMO the Star Trek universe is out of gas. There's nothing to see here. Move on.

    It's sad, because I've always loved Star Trek. But I realized the truth when I saw the latest installment in the theater, which in my opinion was nothing but a bad rehash of The Wrath of Khan.

    But then, I guess this is a sign of the times. Lately it's seemed to me that we as a culture are running low on creativity. I don't ever remember a time when so many sequels and so few original films were released. And of course, people flock like lemmings to see the latest rehash of whatever. I haven't heard an original musical group in what seems like years. I'm sure there are indie groups that I've never heard of that are doing great stuff, but the mainstream... I guess the latest thing is for bands like The Darkness to resurrect the same lame ass hair metal that Nirvana wiped off the face of the earth. And most of the the rock music that I've heard in the last couple of years has been variations on the Korn theme... detuned guitars and shameless lyrics about childhood trauma. Hey asshole, you're rich -- go get some therapy and get the hell over it!

    Anyway, I know I've drifted a bit off topic, but I see this as another attempt to squeeze the every last penny out of what used to be a great franchise by driving it even deeper into the ground. All to avoid, *gasp*, coming up with something ORIGINAL! But no, that would be too risky. Let's just serve up another plate of leftovers.

    1. Re:sorry to say this, but... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wanted to mod you up, but I decided to pitch in instead.

      The problem isn't really a lack of creativity, it's more like an obsession with profits. Hollywood and the music industry would rather play it safe by selling safe crap versus taking a risk with something new and creative.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    2. Re:sorry to say this, but... by No.+24601 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Lately it's seemed to me that we as a culture are running low on creativity.

      You are terribly wrong. It's one thing to say that Star Trek is out of ideas... I agree completely. It's another thing to say that there's no creativity out there. To defend pop culture, I'd say there's lots of great material out there even in media. I think we've practically escaped the decline in the late 90's when pure crap was getting mainstream attention.

      I'll avoid naming specifics, but say that hollywood directors are taking more chances, are more daring and creative than ever before. I think we're going to see a lot more good stuff at the theatre.

      Lots of great music out there right now, you just have to know where to look - even if it's on the radio. In my hometown, most of the radio stations that played crap like the Backstreet Boys and Britney Spears have gone out of business and been replaced by stations with a wider range of taste.

      Writers are also exploring topics and issues. I find scientists, engineers and physicists, while grounded in their discipline, are venturing into the world of fiction and taking creativity to a new level. This should be no surprise as the audience is generally more informed and knowledgeable than ever before.

      It all comes down to knowing what you want and knowing where to find it.

    3. Re:sorry to say this, but... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Funny

      So...Hollywood is a Ferengi?

      This new movie will probably get $150 million. How much is that in Gold Pressed Latinum?

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    4. Re:sorry to say this, but... by stwrtpj · · Score: 1
      IMO the Star Trek universe is out of gas. There's nothing to see here. Move on.

      Yes and no.

      Yes, there's nothing more to be done with it, but only with regards to the known characters and the prehistory. There is vast amounts of unknown territory in the future of the timeline.

      Here's what I want to see: A Star Trek story set a century or two ahead of any of the current series. Have the Federation face a huge crisis in which its very existence is threatened, but have that crisis focus around the characters. In other words, don't just make it some made-up techno-quantum-subspace-whatever anomaly.

      My vote: A civil war.

      Nothing is more disruptive and terrible to a nation than to have it torn apart from within by civil unrest. The reason the American civil war was so hard on the nation was that you literally had families fighting on both sides of the war. This could be played up in a Federation civil war. Or starship captains that were in the same academy class or served together now having to choose opposite sides.

      Naturally, this would fly in the face of Roddenberry's ideals of a humanity that had buried its difference and learned to work together. My reaction to this is, so what? It's time for Star Trek to grow up and grow beyond the boundaries set down by Roddenberry. We can't let his ghost rule over the future of the franchise forever.

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    5. Re:sorry to say this, but... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty good analogy, but an insult to the Ferengi.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  49. KHAAAAAN!!!! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    What about the Eugenics wars of 1996?!!! It can be "Khan Noonien Singh - RISE TO POWER".

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:KHAAAAAN!!!! by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1

      Terri Garr is a little old to be runnin' around in those wild mini-skirts!

      --
      Yeah, right.
    2. Re:KHAAAAAN!!!! by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      And the best part is, it can be done with less expensive props.

      If you stipulate that the knowledge for genetic engineering would be privately developed outside of the public eye, then it could work.

    3. Re:KHAAAAAN!!!! by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      I"ve not read it but.

      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/06 71 021273/104-0345181-9796739?v=glance

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    4. Re:KHAAAAAN!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong episode... that was "Assignment: Earth", not "Space Seed". The primary guest actress in "Space Seed" was Madlyn Rhue who played Marla McGyvers.

    5. Re:KHAAAAAN!!!! by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
      Wrong episode...
      I beg to differ, AC.

      The "episode" the grandparent mentioned is in fact the Eugenics Wars series (one and two), which pits Kahn against Gary Seven and Roberta Lincoln (played by Terri Garr in TOS, Assignment: Earth).

      --
      Yeah, right.
  50. SPOILER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She dies. There's no real mystery to her character. I'd rather they just give Sulu his show.

    1. Re:SPOILER by Araneas · · Score: 2, Funny
      No, a tv series would be more appropriate

      Queer Eye for the Trek Guy

    2. Re:SPOILER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'd rather they just give Sulu his show.

      Yeah, a 60 year old asian queen flying around in a spaceship. That will do really well.

    3. Re:SPOILER by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

      Who cares if she dies? Everyone dies. By your logic, there's no reason for Lucas to have ever made Episodes I and II because we've already witnessed Anakin's fate.

    4. Re:SPOILER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trek Eye for the Queer Guy. An Away Team of Trekkie geeks redecorate the apartments of gay urban professionals.

    5. Re:SPOILER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's hardly such a major figure as Darth Vader.

    6. Re:SPOILER by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

      Judging by what happened when she and her ship dissapeared in Yesterday's Enterprise, I'd say that she's one of the more important people in the entire Star Trek chronology.

    7. Re:SPOILER by alfredw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So what? Everyone dies. What makes the Enterprise-C story interesting is that Garrett and her crew knew that an action they were taking would, with complete certainty, result in their deaths and yet they took it anyway.

      Good stories are about people. I, for one, would be interested in those kinds of people and why they would make that kind of choice.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, sig types you!
    8. Re:SPOILER by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      He's trying to break into pron now, at least thats what i heard...

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  51. Rick Berman is my hero. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    He's not even a little bit lower-functioning.

    Honest. It's just the drugs.


    -FL

  52. How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by spineboy · · Score: 4, Funny
    Like Capt. CHristopher Pike! - the guy in the weird motorized wheelchair, with the 2 lights - one for yes and one for no. Maybe they could show how he got into that mess. He seemed to be a good, kick ass, ask questions later type of capt. who got alot of 'poon. Picard was a little too wishy-washy for me. Plus I've met a few high ranking Navy guys (Admirals, etc) and they're much more like Kirk, not like Picard.

    Lets face it - we NEED a show with some good space battles, NO cutesy-poo whimps like Wesley, or that Hyena-freak on Voyager. The eugenics wars when Kahn came into power would also be very good to cover - much of the Earth was trashed.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by dankney · · Score: 1

      They did show how Pike got into that predicament. He was the Captain of the Enterprise for the pilot, which was only later cut into "The Cage" where he has the blinkenlights. Ahhh... the blinkenlights. The pretty, pretty blinkenlights.

    2. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by neurojab · · Score: 4, Funny

      >with the 2 lights - one for yes and one for no

      I thought he only got one light... he had to blink it once for yes, twice for no.

      I need to get laid.

    3. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by nharmon · · Score: 1

      Plus I've met a few high ranking Navy guys (Admirals, etc) and they're much more like Kirk, not like Picard.

      I've noticed this also. In fact Navy pilots tend to follow the "Top Gun" example very well.

      Contrast to USAF Generals & pilots, who tend to things like Oil Paintings and play the flute.

      The Army and Marines tend to be full of Generals who still drive beat up Pickup trucks. :)

    4. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      They could also conceivably do a movie on the events leading up to World War III. While taking into account modern developments like a Russian democracy, China (by then) being a primarily capitalist economy, the nuclear nonproliferation treaty. Darn, there's a lot of neat things to speculate on how history could turn out to push us to WW III.

    5. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      They'll either have to be slightly revisionist, or come up with a side-effect of plasma burns that would eliminate a computer from being able to assist in producing spoken language.

    6. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by Boglin · · Score: 4, Funny
      You're both wrong.

      The are FOUR LIGHTS!

    7. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by Cylix · · Score: 1

      You are all wrong...

      According to the matrix... there are no lights.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    8. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      So does Pike.

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    9. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by PhyreFox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's because Picard's Enterprise was more like reform school rather than a proper navy. Remember the episode "Chain of Command" where Captain Edward Jellico temporarily took over? Riker and his cohorts practically stonewalled Jellico from the beginning.

      This all stems from Picard's ridiculous assertion that "StarFleet is not a military organization".

      --
      My words are backed with NUCLEAR WEAPONS!
    10. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WW III?

      Easy! Vote for Bush again!

    11. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Too much could happen between 2008(the end of Bush's second term) and 2050 (about when WW III would have occured).

      While Star Trek has focused on the influence of individuals on all of history in the past (like Edith Kieler in the episode "The City on the Edge of Forever" in TOS), I think they'd prefer to take the safe road and not get labeled "unpatriotic."

    12. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by Daetrin · · Score: 2, Funny
      The[re] are FOUR LIGHTS!

      One for "yes," one for "no," one for "my diaper needs changing," one for "please kill me now."

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    13. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by Saberwind · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A major point in "The Menajerie" was that Pike couldn't communicate anything besides "yes" or "no". I always wondered why he couldn't resort to Morse code.

    14. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 2, Funny

      You think that's bad..when you wrote that I could hear the sounds in my head that the light makes.

    15. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Enterprise is the flagship of the fleet, staffed with Starfleets best and finest. The crew stonewalled Jellico because he was a moron of the highest order. If he hadn't rescured Picard I have no doubt Riker would have killed him with his bare hands.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    16. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by Luigi30 · · Score: 1

      I was sure I saw 5...

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    17. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by nihilistic+angst · · Score: 1

      Can't cover the Kahn stuff...happened like 10 years ago...

    18. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by Plugoor · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I need to get laid"
      it's not too late

    19. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by PhyreFox · · Score: 1
      StarFleet is a navy, not a reform school. In a navy, "because I said so" is a perfectly valid justification for giving an order. A superior officer doesn't have to offer an explanation if he or she doesn't want to. A superior can be a hardass, and that doesn't excuse a response in kind.

      Insightful? Is this what happens when people who know jack squat about military rank structure get mod points?

      --
      My words are backed with NUCLEAR WEAPONS!
    20. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      They already wrote a book (were there two?) about the Eugenics wars. Horrible continuity, no world war three, it made no sense with what everything else said about a nuclear war happening in the late 20th century. Kahn took shadow control of a few countries, but was found out and kicked off the planet, no shooting war... kinda dissapointing, but it worked with our realworld history.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    21. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1
      Insightful? Is this what happens when people who know jack squat about military rank structure get mod points?

      Yep. Democracy's a bitch, hey?

    22. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too much could happen between 2008(the end of Bush's second term) and 2050 (about when WW III would have occured).

      Thats enough time for a whole two or three other Bushes to get elected.

    23. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Thats enough time for a whole two or three other Bushes to get elected.

      If Bush gets a second term, his need to please the public will be significantly reduced. (He won't have to push for reelection.) I can easily see him doing something that would leave politians saying in the future "we don't need another Bush."

      A similar thing happened with Clinton. It especially tends to occur during "lame duck" periods, where the elected official has no need to please the public whatsoever. IIRC, that's how the DMCA was signed.

    24. Re:How about one of the Capts. BEFORE Kirk! by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Riker, Picard, Kirk, Janeway, Sisko AND Archer have disobeyed the chain of command on NUMEROUS occasions for very good reasons. They're not robots or automatons. They're free thinking people who will refuse an order if it comes from an idiot when lives are at stake.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  53. Enterprise C by Omega1045 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It would be nice to see some more of the backstory on the Enterprise C. They could even involve the actors from TNG episode - don't remember the title but it was a parallel universe one with Tasha back alive...

    --

    Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

  54. Oi vey... by gordgekko · · Score: 1

    Unlike other people I have to admit that I've enjoyed Enterprise, particularly this season. The mission to stop the attack on Earth has been, for the most part, fairly interesting. If they could develop a compelling story to base a prequel movie on, I could see myself watching it. More than I can say about the last couple of movies.

    That said, ST movies tend to suck. What was the last good one...Undiscovered Country maybe?

    --
    You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    1. Re:Oi vey... by UWC · · Score: 1

      I really enjoyed First Contact. Great movie for fans and those new to the series. I saw it for the first time in quite a while on some HBO channel recently. The first few minutes, leading up to and including the battle with the Borg cube near Earth, were amazing to me, and I'm not entirely sure why. Great movie, though.

  55. Slashdot speed, Scotty! by dacarr · · Score: 3, Funny

    In other news, the Trekweb site was brought to its knees at a factor of warp 4.

    --
    This sig no verb.
    1. Re:Slashdot speed, Scotty! by ryen · · Score: 1

      "She can't take much more Slashdotting, Sir! Computer, auxillary power only!"

  56. Re:Revised numbers by Rosyna · · Score: 1

    If Berman is on the team potential to suck is 98% (2% ok factor). If he has nothing to do with it whatsoever, potential to suck is 20% (80% potential to own Kirk's sweet ass).

  57. Bring back Sulu by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 1

    'nuff said.

    --
    There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
  58. The Prequel I'd like to see... by Mage66 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The first voyage of the Starship Enterprise, NCC-1701. Not the NX-01 of Enterprise (we already saw that). But the Enterprise that people know and love from the original series. The TNG and DS9 Episodes that referred back to the original series are two of the highest rated Treks ever on Television. Imagine a movie with the first voyage of the Enterprise. Captain Robert April and crew. That would be a movie people might like to see. And, it could be done with current characters (from TNG or DS9 and Voyager) in a wrap-around. It could even be done as in "Trials and Tribbleations) where current characters go back in time to make sure the voyage goes off as recorded because "Future Guy" or some other character is trying to tamper with it. It's a bit late for it, but even a movie version of "Kobyashi Maru" would have been great. Even as a TV Special Mini-Series. There are a LOT of good stories in the books. The Phoenix Series of Books would have made a good movie. Even if simplified a little. And the Shatner/Reese-Stevens books, would also be great bases for a series of movies. One thing Paramount ought to do, is hire 10 fans as script consultants. If they start turning thumbs down to the script, they ought to think twice. Fans have been right about every movies released. The simple suggestions fans made about Generations would have made it a MUCH better movie. Make new Trek's Character driven Dramas. That's what people like these days.

  59. Will it be more realistic? by dawg+ball · · Score: 1

    I hope that the new movies will show what members of the starship Enterprise faces REALLY look like after accelerating from zero to warp 8 in 2.5 milliseconds.

  60. Yesterday's Enterprise by aksansai · · Score: 1

    The episode was called Yesterday's Enterprise, which aired 19 Feb 1990. It just so happens to be one of my favorite TNG episodes. This episode also opened the door to the Romulan side-arc, Commander Sela, the daughter of the captured Enterprise-C Tasha Yar.

    --
    Ayup
  61. NCC-1701-C by dj_paulgibbs · · Score: 1
    Voyager is set during TNG and DS9, so its prequel has already, in a way, been done. DS9's prequel is arguably part of untouched TNG history so there wouldn't be much of a story to tell (except perhaps another war with the Cardissians and the Marquis). As posters have suggested, it could be Starfleet Academy for one or more of the characters from other series - remember, Picard's academy days were often referred to in TNG. I think that the prequel to TNG is most likely, the little known Enterprise C. From this site:
    The fourth starship Enterprise was under the command of Captain Rachel Garret when it was destroyed by a Romulan fleet in 2344. The Enterprise-C responded to a distress call from a Klingon outpost on Narendra III that was being attacked by Romulans. The Enterprise was presumed destroyed and surviving crew taken prisoner. The Klingon Empire viewed these events as an act of honor by Starfleet which led to an increased peace with the United Federation of Planets.
  62. Andromeda and Earth: Final Conflict by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    "I swear that turds like "Andromeda" and "Earth: Final Conflict" only stayed on the air as long as they did because of his name." I think Andromeda has life now because it is just like Farscape, but without muppet mushroom aliens. EFC? I think that Celtic theme song kept it going.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Andromeda and Earth: Final Conflict by snkline · · Score: 1

      Actually I thought the first season of EFC was GOOD! It was really good actually. Then they killed Boone and the whole thing turned crap. I don't like any post-Boone EFC...

    2. Re:Andromeda and Earth: Final Conflict by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Heh, Boone didn't really die. They brought him back for a bit before the end.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Andromeda and Earth: Final Conflict by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      Andromeda has life because of... well, you know.

      Think what the uproar would've been if they would've killed Seven of Nine. That character singlehandedly (pun intended) saved Voyager.

      I've recently gotten hooked on Stargate. It's probably the first show since DS9 (sci-fi or not) that I watch for a reason other than "because it has hot chicks in skin-tight clothing." Then again, I did start to watch right around the time they had Vanessa Angel playing an alien... Hmmm... Tok'ra Barbie... Yum.

    4. Re:Andromeda and Earth: Final Conflict by snkline · · Score: 1

      I know, I made myself watch the whole series just to see if the storyline actually got any good. It didn't, and bringing Boone back didn't help....

    5. Re:Andromeda and Earth: Final Conflict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear God, are you insance?! Andromeda sucks ass compared to Farscape. Seriously, I've tried to like Andromeda but it is consistently bad (it is better than Enterprise though).

      Farscape => hotter chicks, better special effects, and a helluva better story

      Andromeda => a premise with potential that is poorly executed, invincible main character that's an ass, and exactly one hot girl (who's a computer)

    6. Re:Andromeda and Earth: Final Conflict by vranash · · Score: 1

      Plus they killed him off in the next episode with a reference to his death getting to that blonde chick.

      I too ended up watching most of the series.. missed a season or two after boone got whacked though, dunno if I ever saw all the missing eps before I picked it up.

      Ending sucked ass though.

      Oh yeah, and WTF was up with Sandoval.. they'd had so much character development and hints that in his own nefarious way he was trying to look out for the earth and then they just turned him into a bad guy to kill at the end.

      -- vranash

    7. Re:Andromeda and Earth: Final Conflict by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      Trance is pretty hot, for having a tail and being purple. In farscape IMHO Chiana and Sikozu Svala Shanti Sugaysi Shanu were hotter than Aeryn despite being grey and red...

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    8. Re:Andromeda and Earth: Final Conflict by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      "Dear God, are you insance?! Andromeda sucks ass compared to Farscape. Seriously, I've tried to like Andromeda but it is consistently bad (it is better than Enterprise though)."

      I tried both, and bailed on both for the same reasons. Very badly filmed: dark grainy grey-on-black; angry characters running around shouting at each other all the time. The way to tell the difference: Farscape has its own rabid devoted trekkies (never seen any for Andromeda). It also alien muppet mushroom-turtles: I think Mario and Luigi might be at home there.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  63. Fire Berman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    For the LOVE OF GOD would somebody fire Berman already?!?

  64. Could this be related to Enterprise? by MikeyMars · · Score: 1

    Although I dislike the theme song more than anything else in this world, I think Enterprise satisfies my passion for Star Trek in many ways the other series have not.

    At first I was skeptical about a Star Trek that is closer to our own stardate, but the producers really pulled it off.

    I hope that when they mention prequel, they may consider using the cast of Enterprise... or at least Jolene Blalock.

  65. Chances... by mschiller · · Score: 1

    I'll be see it the first weekend in the theatre: 100%

  66. prequel? by Bandman · · Score: 1

    Technically, Apollo 13 was a "prequel"

    1. Re:prequel? by jkubecki · · Score: 1
      Technically, Apollo 13 was a "prequel"

      Technically, any movie that takes place before the 22nd century is a prequel...
      Titanic? Prequel.
      Saving Private Ryan? Prequel.
      Hudson Hawk? Prequel.
      Gigli? Prequel.
      You get the idea...

    2. Re:prequel? by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      But its true.
      We went already back to the first ship with warp(ST8) and the first enterprise (the ugly new series).
      Any PREquel to that would have to be about sublight travel in our solar system, which would be kinda boring. Except someone pulls some borg that are frozen in polar mars ice because of some strange quantum blablalba... out of his ass (they seem to be everywhere, recently)

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  67. "Might have" is right on the nose by ianscot · · Score: 2, Funny
    In Star Wars there was a storyline, so in that case it might have made some sense, but Star Trek?

    If only Star Wars had made that sense, we'd all be so happy.

    Personally I see some room for a crossover film: one where the kid Anikin from Episode I is involved in a transporter malfunction and has a black goatee, Jar Jar speaks the king's English, and there's a tiny shred of dramatic tension. Oh, for a temporal anomaly right about now...

    (Actually isn't it easier to do a prequel when there's no plotline? Not much tension to whether Obi Wan's going to make it through, when we know he grows up to be Alex Guinness.)

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:"Might have" is right on the nose by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Personally I see some room for a crossover film: one where the kid Anikin from Episode I is involved in a transporter malfunction and has a black goatee, Jar Jar*BLAM*

      STOP. RIGHT. THERE.

      And learn to be more careful what you ask for.

      (Not my Photoshop)

  68. Rest easy..... by bnavarro · · Score: 1

    I read an introduction to one of the "Man-Kzin Wars" anthologies a while ago, and in it, Niven talked about being approacehed (I don't remember whether it was formally or informally) about crossing over the Kzin with the Star Trek universe. His answer: a resounding "No".

    1. Re:Rest easy..... by cmowire · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, Niven *did* cross the Kzin over to the Trek universe with the animated series.

      He turned down somebody writing a fanfic to do it, based on prior experience with Kzinti fanfic. ;)

  69. As a Trekkie, let me just say by dupper · · Score: 1

    Fuck no! Let it die, already. Kill Enterprise, and make no more movies. Furthermore, declare everything Voyager, Insurrection and afterwards non-canon.

    1. Re:As a Trekkie, let me just say by Hassman · · Score: 1

      Why? The final movie kicked ass.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  70. 5 Treks = 5 Captians by supun · · Score: 1

    They now can do a 5 Doctors type thing ... except you really need another captain to hold out on the whole movie and be stuck in some hyperspace transport and replaced with stock footage.

    --
    :w!
  71. if it's a prequel by Cruciform · · Score: 1

    What are the Klingon's going to look like? Hmm?

    Maybe they'll tie up the whole Borg-knowing-about-Humanity-200-years-before-they- should thread too. :)

  72. PHUCKING BRILLIANT! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    That's the way that we can get "new" "TOS" stories. Do a new animated series. It shouldn't be as hard to find voice actors that can pass.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  73. It's not bad enough by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

    It's not bad enough that Berman and Braga are singlehandedly dismantaling a franchise that spans decades, now they have to fully kill off the franchise by producing a movie that will most likely suck worse than "Enterprise".

    look at the nielsen ratings - enterprise has been on a downward spiral and lost over half of its viewership for the mangling of the story line.

    It's a sad day to say the least.

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  74. Eminem as the young Clerk by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "Star Fleet Command - James Kirk as a young cadet. Starring Eminem as the brash rule-breaking young officer"

    "Will the REAL..... Slimshady..... PLEASE stand up! Please stand up! PLEASE..... stand up!"

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Eminem as the young Clerk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that's funny.

    2. Re:Eminem as the young Clerk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How can you do a spoken word version of a rap song?"

    3. Re:Eminem as the young Clerk by Ultra64 · · Score: 1

      He found a way.

  75. Favorite Star Trek Movie or Episode by Dana+P'Simer · · Score: 1

    What is your favorite ST movie or episode? My favorite movie is "Rath of Kahn" my favorite episode is "The Menagerie"

    1. Re:Favorite Star Trek Movie or Episode by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

      Even though this is kind of offtopic, "Yesterday's Enterprise".

    2. Re:Favorite Star Trek Movie or Episode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You are such a troll!

      But while I'm posting, I would like to know : " What linux distro should I use? "

  76. Why not? by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    I mean, it worked for Star Wars. Right?

    Weaselmancer

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  77. Prequel quite possible... by X86Daddy · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... just skip the bloody humans! I'd like to see the early days of Vulcan, or even better, the origin of the Borg...

    ...it started with this news commenting service that people spent a lot of time communicating on, but eventually, the only sentiments issued from it were a uniform set of thoughts. ;-)

    1. Re:Prequel quite possible... by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

      What about something on the Earth-Romulan war? It was fought with nukes and modernish weapons. To top it off, the Romulans didn't even have Warp Drive technology at the time.

    2. Re:Prequel quite possible... by hereticmessiah · · Score: 1

      Or some T'Pol-on-Hoshi lesbian action. Drool...

      --
      I don't like trolls and mod against me if you like, but I'd prefer if you'd reply.
    3. Re:Prequel quite possible... by ianXmorris · · Score: 2, Funny

      We are the GNU/BORG our software will be adapted to service yours... Oh Damn!

  78. AMAZING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not one chick in that entire group of pictures I'd slam. And I'm not choosy, folks.

    1. Re:AMAZING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw, c'mon... you'd do the blonde at the nav console in a minit.

  79. TROLL TEXT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Berman and/or Braga might take a reduced role in an adults-only supermarionation version of ENTERPRISE"

    1. Re:TROLL TEXT by Roger+Keith+Barrett · · Score: 1

      oh shit... that is FUNNY!

      --

      Why don't you embrace your slashbotness instead of living in a dreamworld?
  80. I beg to differ... by aksansai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    [puts on the Star Trek hat]....

    People were afraid that once the Federation had figured out a way to combat/make peace with the Klingons (ST:VI), the Borg (ST:VOY), and then finally the Romulans (ST:X) the story would start to run out of steam.

    I believe there is still much life in the Star Trek universe. Unfortunately, the young-ones of today's modern shows do not see the qualities of the episodes the older generations remember. Star Fleet is about exploration (to avoid using the show's cliche) and meeting new races. The UFP does not encompass every civilization from the Alpha to Delta quadrants. I can remember being mesmerized by the countless ST:TOS episodes of meeting new aliens and the numerous occasions where the Enterprise was about to be blown to smithereens.

    There was an episode of ST:TNG (the Traveller) where Commander Data said that Star Fleet had only explored a little more than 11% of _our galaxy_ in the three hundred years of space development and exploration. Even with ST:DS9 and ST:VOY timelines, that leaves over 85% of the galaxy as uncharted. There are tons of lifeforms and battles to be generated with 85% of the galaxy remaining. ST:VOY revealed the transwarp system developed by the Borg for fast movements throughout the quadrants. And Starfleet captains still do not always agree with the Federation Council.

    The problem with modern Star Trek is the incorporation of Soap Opera-like drama into the storyline. The audience is now addicted to this notion that an episode must be directed as if it were a feature film. Many episodes of the TOS did not focus on character development directly. Instead, we learned about these characters by their everyday performance of their duties. ST:ENT is currently battling this very issue.

    I have thoroughly enjoyed the ten films produced under the Star Trek banner. When it comes down to it, I would prefer an episode over a film anyday. Look at how much stuff can occur to capture an audience's interest in a season. ST:ENT reveals a modern take as to the lessons that had to be learned before the great Jim Kirk could take the center stage out into the Alpha quadrant. Think about all the historical development of the Federation we've heard about (especially in ST:TNG) that have yet to be shown on TV or in a film...

    --
    Ayup
    1. Re:I beg to differ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Star Fleet is about exploration (to avoid using the show's cliche) and meeting new races.

      They already did that show, it was called Voyager. Oh, here's Rubber Cunthead Alien #236. Let's teach them about the Prime Directive!!

      Really, it doesn't matter what they do as long as Berman insists that 3/4s of the episodes are boring filler. Any grand new plot idea (like Enterprise) doesn't matter if the execution is crap.

    2. Re:I beg to differ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Atari, why anonymous all of the sudden. Rubber Cunthead Alien #236 OBVIOUSLY flys through space in a juice harp. Oh man good stuff. And I love TNG.

    3. Re:I beg to differ... by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem with modern Star Trek is the incorporation of Soap Opera-like drama into the storyline. Know what I blame for this? Babylon 5. When it was out, everyone got excited about the huge story-arcs. For the first time since it got ressurected, Star Trek had serious television competition for the hearts and minds of sci-fi lovers. So what happens? They decide to add the whole Dominion story arc to DS9, and then Voyager comes out, with a built in arc. Now there's the whole Xindii thing or whatever. Now, don't get me wrong, I like Babylon 5 a lot, but I don't think Star Trek should have abandoned the more episodic structure that served it well in TOS and TNG. Everything is some multi-episode or multi-season story now. I mean, think back to TNG (my favourite) -- what's the longest story that is actually made into something of an arc? I'm thinking the Best of Both Worlds Parts I and II, followed by that episode where Picard goes to Earth to hang out with his family. Three episodes. Compare that to how many seasons of the Dominion, petty love stories, and the Xindii?

    4. Re:I beg to differ... by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

      There are tons of lifeforms and battles to be generated with 85% of the galaxy remaining.

      The problem is that the new aliens and battles are the same old things just recycled in a different package-three nose ridges instead of two, two bone ridges instead of one. Enemy ship beating the heck out of your ship? Recalibrate the phaser frequency to penetrate their shields? Fleet losing the battle? At the last moment make the cavalry arrive and blast the enemy to spacedust. Ship hit by a torpedo? Have the bridge shake and sparks fly, mention a warp core breach is imminent, and have someone say "shields down 20%". Encounter aliens that are so advanced that you are powerless against? After a few episodes develop the character of the lifeform so they are not-all powerful, not invulnerable, and desire human-like emotions.

      Seen it, seen it, seen it, seen it. Or, did I mention we've seen it before?

      Think about all the historical development of the Federation we've heard about (especially in ST:TNG) that have yet to be shown on TV or in a film...

      And as the great Mr. Spock once said (or will say, depending on your POV), "Having, is not always as pleasant, as wanting." (something like that)

    5. Re:I beg to differ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Those are not arcs, I they are premises. Even TOS had a premise.

      Its not like you couldn't miss ten episodes of DS9 and not know what was going on when you next saw it.

  81. Berman and Two Unnamed Producers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Andy and Larry Wachowski?

  82. Never out of gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The majority opinion on SD that the franchise is out of gas is absurd. The fact is that the people behind the series are out of ideas that will inspire audiences. After Roddenberry died, Berman made his mark by proving that sci-fi doesn't have to be cheesy and that it can have high quality production values, the same as any other show. Brannon Braga, when he was younger, wrote some of the best plots of the series. Enterprise is an example of a great idea, but because it's following was initially limited to die hard ST fans, the studio pressured the creators to add mainstream elements to it (e.g. breasts and sexual tension) in order to draw in a broader audience. Nemesis was two-dimensional, although it didn't have to be. It took cinematographic elements from First Contact and plot/character elements from Wrath of Khan and tried to create something new. The result was not well received by fans.

    There's no easy solution to this problem. If I were Braga and Berman, I would take a hint from the new Battlestar Galactica series that will air on sci-fi in the fall. It's raw and it's fresh. It's edgy and it's got sex appeal. The ST creators need to bring in a new Berman and Braga that can make good television (like 24, Alias, Galactica, West Wing) to carry the torch. The studios need to maintain the integrity of the shows and understand that the fanbase will tune out if all you're going to do is flash T and A everytime your ratings dip.

  83. Quit starving the horse.. by brxndxn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm sick of the people that will Star Trek to die. If you don't like Star Trek nowadays, quit trying to ruin it for me. Why badmouth it if you're not going to watch it?

    Some of you people have seen maybe three episodes of Enterprise and declared it horrible. The same goes for Deep Space Nine or Voyager. However, we find Star Trek fans whos' favorite series are any of the series made so far. Ya, TNG is the amazing god of Star Trek - but some of us find Enterprise, DS9, or Voyager to be a hundred times more interesting than a new sci-fi show on a choked budget.

    My friends and I have been watching Enterprise religiously. It is an amazing show. Every week they put out a movie-quality episode. Ya, there are some corny parts. But, the all-amazing TNG had corny parts too. And don't forget how corny the original series was - all computers are a grid of colorful blinking lights.

    However, willing the Star Trek universe to simply die is such a waste. Star Trek fans know the aliens, we know the different politics for different alliances, we know the history... starting a whole new universe with a new show makes that all wasted.

    Also, what is the deal with hating Rick Berman? He worked on part of TNG, DS9, Voyager, and now Enterprise. He's contributed as much to the Star Trek universe as Gene Roddenberry.

    I hope they make another series after Enterprise.. and I hope Enterprise goes for at least 5 years. It's simply an entire wealth of creativity larger than Lord of the Rings and Star Wars combined.

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
    1. Re:Quit starving the horse.. by B5_geek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, yes, and yes.

      I have watched all of ToS, TNG, DS9, and Voyager. EVEN though, I hated 60% of DS9 (the first 60%) and 99% of Voyager.

      The point is, the quality of the episode obviously went down-hill. All Series had fantastic episodes and crappy ones too.

      TNG (if you go back & watch it) had a very bad 1st season. It got much better very quickly after that. BUT it was still good at that time.

      I have watched the first season and half of the second season of Enterprise; IMHO I felt that it stayed sucky and second rate. Enterprise never felt like it filled it's own shoes.

      In the years that I started watching ST, I have grown up a lot. TNG was a must-watch during my teen-age years. I have been open to watching other Sci-Fi shows, and completely impressed with how-good they have been. Going back, it now feels like I have been stuck with a Two Dollar hooker all these years. ST: Just Stop

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    2. Re:Quit starving the horse.. by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      "He's contributed as much to the Star Trek universe as Gene Roddenberry"

      True, but a very large portion of that contribution is 100% the opposite of Roddenberry's contribution...

    3. Re:Quit starving the horse.. by hchaos · · Score: 3, Insightful
      However, willing the Star Trek universe to simply die is such a waste. Star Trek fans know the aliens, we know the different politics for different alliances, we know the history... starting a whole new universe with a new show makes that all wasted.
      IT'S JUST A TELEVISION SHOW!
      Seriously, all this time you've spent getting to know the Star Trek universe is already "wasted", because IT DOESN'T EXIST. There's no such thing as Klingons, Ferengi, Romulans, Vulcans, warp drive, or the United Federation of Planets. It's all a fantasy. If there's any value to be had in fantasy, it certainly isn't in the KNOWING of the imaginary universe.
      Also, what is the deal with hating Rick Berman? He worked on part of TNG, DS9, Voyager, and now Enterprise. He's contributed as much to the Star Trek universe as Gene Roddenberry.
      Quality of work is far more important than quantity of work. Voyager isn't much of a credit, since you can only blow up the ship and use time-travel/reality-shifting to bring it back so many times before it becomes a really stale plot device. And let's not forget Nemesis (much as I wish I could), which was one of the worst movies I've ever seen. No one involved in the production of that movie should ever be allowed to work on another movie ever.
    4. Re:Quit starving the horse.. by blincoln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also, what is the deal with hating Rick Berman? He worked on part of TNG, DS9, Voyager, and now Enterprise.

      Berman and Braga's worst aspect is that they are the ones who introduced the story style where the crew solves problems by recalibrating the phase inducers to produce a modulated deus ex machina-tron wave instead of coming up with a real plot.

      Berman also earns special points because it was *his* idea to move to new (e.g. non-TNG) character-based series like DS9. Why? Because he doesn't make as much money when he uses characters invented by Roddenberry.

      DS9 and Voyager had some good points. I even liked the Borg episodes of Voyager unlike a lot of critics of that series (although I hated pretty much all of the rest of it).

      Enterprise and Nemesis are just awful. They are concentrated forms of the Berman/Braga badness. Their only appeal is the "oh! they'd never [drive dune buggies with laser machine guns/have the crew eating meat and gloating over it to the Vulcan chick/have an "adult" scene with the Vulcan chick and some other guy soaping each other up] on the *old* Star Trek!" factor, which is stupid.

      Star Trek used to be fun because it painted a picture of interesting people in interesting situations. Now it's just an exercise in Berman and Braga mining another old episode for ideas and screwing up the continuity.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    5. Re:Quit starving the horse.. by ynohoo · · Score: 1

      lalalalalala... I'm not listening....lalalala
      you evil man! next you'll be telling us there aint no Santa Claus!

  84. Tired old Trek by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "There was an episode of ST:TNG (the Traveller) where Commander Data said that Star Fleet had only explored a little more than 11% of _our galaxy_ in the three hundred years of space development and exploration"

    So, that leaves 89% of the galaxy still filled with the same tired old Caucasian-skinned aliens with greased-back dark hair and forehead-bumps and/or cheek gills.... living in concrete-walled buildings with burlap hanging on the walls and flying around in spaceships that look like juice harps or blow-dryers

    "I have thoroughly enjoyed the ten films produced under the Star Trek banner"

    I thought "5" was as bad as it could get until I saw the last two. They weren't even trying. All the high concepts running down into flops involving Klingon zits and Picard in an SUV.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Tired old Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is probably a troll but I wish I could mod it funny. I mostly don't agree. But I can barely type this because I can't stop laughing.
      ...juice harps or blow-dryers, HAHAHA.

  85. I have an admission by WTFmonkey · · Score: 1
    I was a rather large trek fan club up until the end of TNG. DS9 and Voyager captured my attention for less than a sean each, and I haven't even bothered with Enterprise.

    Long story short, I'm WAY out of the loop. Who's this Berman guy everyone's moaning about?

    1. Re:I have an admission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This Berman guy was the coffee kid in the Paramount offices when the Great Bird of the Galaxy was recalled to his maker. Parmount, not wanting to cap the revenue stream looked around and appointed him Producer. He was responsible for the last TNG episodes. It sort of explained the "Data the Aztec" and the "Dianna the Lizard" Episodes.

  86. Starship Exeter by JLavezzo · · Score: 1

    Why not exploit the fan movie?? It's early enough, just before Kirk or at the same time. Kirk wasn't the only captain out there.

    Exeter home page
  87. Rick Berman must die by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Speaking in issue #117, Berman confirms for the first time that he is now developing a STAR TREK feature film project: "I am involved in the very early stages of what could be the next STAR TRKE movie," reveals Berman, in an excerpt provided by Dreamwatch. "It's something I will be producing with two other producers."

    Unwilling to offer many details he cryptically describes it as "a prequel" without any further elaboration. The names of his producing cohorts will have to remain unknown for now, as well.


    We allready know the names of his accomplices: Bragga and the Devil.

    Rick Berman has been turning Star Trek into a distilled form of crap ever since Gene Rodenberry passed away.
    First he took out the technological eutopia element, because, who wants to watch a show abuot a future where humanity has learned to live in harmony with itself. Then he added religion, turned StarFleet from a para-military space exploration outfit into a facist military government, turned a formally edgy show (first interracial kiss on america TV, a russian and chineese working with a U.S. born captain, etc) into a steaming pile of politically correct drivel, etc.

    I used to be a trekkie, but the things that are called Star Trek nowadays aren't Star Trek anymore. He took the brand name and threw away the substance.

    That movie won't be Star Trek, it will be the Rick Berman Time-Travel-Reset-Button Hot Alien Chick Spectacular. He should call it that.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  88. Fury Trilogy by sufehmi · · Score: 1

    It seems that the late "trilogy" movies (Matrix, LOTR, etc) has been very successful, so how about a Star Trek trilogy ?

    For the story, I can heartily recommend the Fury Trilogy:

    TNG: The Soldiers of Fear

    DS9: Time's Enemy

    VOY: The Final Fury

    The stories are simply top notch, you just have to read it for yourselves.
    To give you some idea; rarely a novel is intense enough to make me bolted to the chair (hint: I don't like novels generally), but these three managed to did it - every one of them.

    The story are very interesting and original (I think Borg has been exploited way too much for now, etc). And the actions are not lacking either.
    I'm very impressed. If you're going to buy Star Trek novels, I can recommend these.

    Actually I'd like to see the first one as well, which is happening on TOS (Kirk era), but I think the casts are way too old now to make it :(

    Here's hoping that Paramount will read this comment (ha! :-)

  89. Enterprise is badly filmed by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Some of you people have seen maybe three episodes of Enterprise and declared it horrible. The same goes for Deep Space Nine or Voyager.

    I watched all of DS9 and loved it. I can't remember there being a bad episode, although it sort of twiddled its thumbs for the first two seasons. I watched all but the last season of Voyager. While there were few really bad episodes, the show was hampered with throwaway cast members and a lack of really good episodes: most were "below average".

    Enterprise? At least the premise is good (Voyager was a botched effort that should have not made it out of the starting gate), but somewhere between TNG and Enterprise, they have forgotten how to film. Everthing is all dark and grainy, and might as well be on a black and white TV set.

    Compare this to the average bridge scene on those "Spike" ST:TNG reruns: they knew how to actually light a set. Only DS9 had any reason to look this way, being a grungy Cardassian station. The strength of "Trip" Tucker (one of the best actors/characters in Trek, I think) shows how the rest of the cast really comes up short.

    "Star Trek fans know the aliens, we know the different politics for different alliances, we know the history."

    Uh... not really. The Klingon/etc stuff has been shelved. All you have now are Xindi which are totally new, and races like Andorians and Vulcans who were around before but now are having the history created or re-written.

    "I hope they make another series after Enterprise.. and I hope Enterprise goes for at least 5 years."

    This season is better than the first two, but even then, the Xindi are nothing to write home about (nothing like the Borg, Vulcans, and Klingons that fired fan interest before). Still waiting for the show to "find its groove".

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Enterprise is badly filmed by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      The bad episode of DS9 was the one where Gul Dukat, now working for the Dominion, sends a communique out of the blue to Major Kira, telling her that her moms and Dukat were lovers. (Something he should have mentioned, you know, some time in the 15 years they knew each other.) So Kira appeals to the wormhole and travels back in time to change her mom's mind...shudder.

      The rest were good -- even the eye-rolling "Ferengi travels back in time and meets humans at an Air Force base in Roswell, 1952" episode, which was at least hysterically funny. Like anything centerred on Quark, the only anti-hero in the whole of Star Trek.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    2. Re:Enterprise is badly filmed by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1
      Two things I will say about this is that filming in HD is a totally different ball game, and darkening sets is a common trick for shows movies needed lots of special effects. Darker sets will not show mistakes. And of the 3 episodes of Enterprise I've seen in the first season, looks like there are a lot explosions and other special effects.

      Liked TNG, and DS9 was good especially rewatching the old episodes. Never got into Voyager, it left the St. Louis market about half-way into its second season and then I went to college and spent my time doing other things.

      Currently, the only two shows I watch are Stargate SG1 and the Simpsons. And SG1 is funny because they make fun of themselves and everything else that is cliche sci-fi. Like calling Anubus: "You know, tall guy in a dark cloack with greecy skinned cliche over the top bad guy?"

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    3. Re:Enterprise is badly filmed by deinol · · Score: 1

      This season is better than the first two, but even then, the Xindi are nothing to write home about

      Am I the only one who thinks those scenes of the Xindi Council looks like something from Star Wars: Episode II?

      --
      Got Apathy?
    4. Re:Enterprise is badly filmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Voyager was a botched effort that should have not made it out of the starting gate.

      Voyager had its moments. The episode I saw last night was pretty good.

  90. TRKE=turkey by nightsweat · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the misspelling in this line - "I am involved in the very early stages of what could be the next STAR TRKE movie." Was an accurate asessment of Berman's work.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  91. And then the whole meteverse collapses! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    You forgot to include "Gay Deciever" in your sysnopsis, you insensitive clod!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  92. No it's not by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    botched it, was thinking of a certain movie and badly misspelt Kirk. "So.... SORRY. Priceline.....dotcom."

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  93. extrapolation by jafac · · Score: 1

    given the current pace of Sci Fi, I would extrapolate a trend;

    The next popular series will be a 90210-ified (see: Smallville) version of the life-story of brilliant high-school honor student, Victor Von Frankenstein, a hunky-looking geek, who, using his 'leet science skills, builds a freind from spare parts to help him defeat bullies, and play on the football team, pushing his school to the State Championship. I'm still working out the details of how we get a cute teenage girl named Igor to be the love-interest, who never actually gets together with Victor despite both of their covert efforts over the span of the first 3 seasons because they're both too shy to say anything to the other, or too busy with schoolwork, or maybe Victor can't decide between Igor or the Bride he built in the second season, or some other crap like that.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  94. language follies by moviepig.com · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...the typos and spelling errors in the article were entertaining...

    Well, StarTrek did begin with TV's most flagrant split infinitive. ("...to boldly go...")

    --
    Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
    1. Re:language follies by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1

      To routinely split infinitives [heh-heh] is not really bad.

    2. Re:language follies by moviepig.com · · Score: 1
      Great topical link at Wikipedia. (You deserve a mod-up!)

      From it, I conclude that StarTrek should have said, "...to boldly go where no man has boldly gone before."

      Beam me up.

      --
      Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
    3. Re:language follies by renehollan · · Score: 1
      Well, StarTrek did begin with TV's most flagrant split infinitive. ("...to boldly go...")

      Indeed.

      It's "...to fucking go boldly..."

      Er...

      "...to go fucking boldly..."

      Er...

      "...to go boldly fucking..."

      ...fuck this language, "English" and the lack of written designations for metadata: "fucking" was supposed to be a metadata expletive about the splitting of an infinitive... instead it gets promoted to the rank of a bona-fide verb or adverb. Arrogant word, that: "fuck".

      --
      You could've hired me.
  95. The Green Borg rule by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "That same thinking is one of the many reasons Voyager went down the tubes. The Borg *were* great, but they overused them and wussified them"

    The more odd coloring, the worse it was. If you look at the first Borg episode in TNG, everything about them was normal colored, including the inside of their ships. After this, the more they used them, the greener they got, including adding green fog. Eventually (Voyager), they were overused and greener than Kermit, and the inside of their ships looked like a bug-zapper light.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  96. Q---riffic! by Seekerofknowledge · · Score: 1

    I always loved Q. He was what I always wanted to be when I grew up. Infinite powers, a charmingly captivating wit, and a sweet name like Q (well they were all the Q Continuum, but still...).

    Well, looks like it's too late. Damn.

    Anyways, the idea of a movie about Q would rock. His trial for humanity provided the whole background for TNG, which I feel really helped out the overall feel for the show. It really gave the show some coherence, as sort of a sub story that continued on always, throughout the whole show.

    I think it epitomized Roddenbury's view of how humanity should be -- accepting what you have done wrong, but constantly striving to be better. There are a lot of good ideas to work with there.

    P.S. John Delancie is the man.

  97. Lovecraft coined the phrase by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Informative
    "Well, StarTrek did begin with TV's most flagrant split infinitive. ("...to boldly go...")"

    H.P.Lovecraft did this in the 1920s:

    "At length, sick with longing for those glittering sunset streets and cryptical hill lanes among ancient tiled roofs, nor able sleeping or waking to drive them from his mind, Carter resolved to go with bold entreaty whither no man had gone before, and dare the icy deserts through the dark to where unknown Kadath."

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Lovecraft coined the phrase by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Lovecraft didn't actually split the infinitive there though...

  98. I'd like to see Shatner come back one last time by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

    Just becuase the way Kirk died in generations sucked. In fact, Generations sucked. Maybe Capt. Sulu as the main character on some special mission with the rest on board and playing key roles.

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
    1. Re:I'd like to see Shatner come back one last time by AceCaseOR · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeah, but, y'see, Shatner sucks. One of the things Generations did not have going for it is the rest of the cast. They had Jimmy Doohan, and they had Walter Koenig, but no Nemoy, no Kelly, no Takei, none of the rest of the "family". I know they meant to pass the torch, but they still could have done things better.

      Doing a movie focused on Captain Sulu would be an interesting and enjoyable movie and a good idea. Bringing back Shatner, considering that 1/3rd of the Big Three are dead, is a bad one.

      However, I agree with everyone who says that Braga and Berman need to be sacked, or at least Braga (who was also responsible for writing M:I2).

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
  99. Bring back Nick Meyer by TheNumberSix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they had any sense, they would eject Berman and let Nick Meyer run the show. So much of the best of Star Trek films was from him.

    His directorial debut was... Star Trek II. He wrote all the script for Star Trek IV that took place in the 20th century. He also directed Star Trek IV and did a great deal of the story, based upon an idea by Nimoy.

    He has a sense of the show that Berman lacks utterly.

    --
    Never confuse feeling with thinking.
  100. It's most likely Cap'n Archer's Enterprise movie by Flentil · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It just seems most obvious to me since the current series is a prequal. They could make a really good movie of the beginning of the war with the klingons if they don't get around to doing it on the TV show before it's canceled.

  101. Parent is right, grandparent is troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grandparent has article text almost correct. The line quoted in parent is the one that has been changed. In the original article, it reads like this:

    Berman and/or Braga might take a reduced role in a fourth season of ENTERPRISE

    Please do not mod up unless you are sure the text is correct ... it's not that hard is it?

  102. Deanna the Cake by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "It sort of explained the "Data the Aztec" and the "Dianna the Lizard" Episodes"

    Bad episodes are nature's way of saying that the show has gone on a season or two too long. The one where Troi was a cake, or the ones where she gets a headache because of a ghost in the bulkhead (i think there were 2 or 3 of those episodes).

    Well, I guess it was a break from all those oh-so-high budget episodes where there were aliens that were nothing but little sparkly lights, and the ones where Data and Geordi teamed up to trace unexplained chroniton/photonic/transmission/particles that were penetrating the ship's hull or eminating from a secret location on the ship.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  103. KHAAAAANNNNNNN!!! by Sylink · · Score: 1

    This says it all: KHAAANNN!!

  104. Frozen Walt by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Are you disputing that Walt was frozen or that he tore through the cryo lab on a motorcycle?"

    It was both. You mean you never saw Walt's final film appearance in the 1976 live-action children's film in which he rode a Harley through Dexter Reilly's lab as a human icicle? Kurt Russell and Jodi Foster also starred in this one all-but-forgotten film.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Frozen Walt by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      They eventually re-used the "peekaboo" gimick in Demolition Man.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  105. Enterprise (as a series) and the recent movies. by LithiumX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    All the best ST movies have (with one exception) been their darkest - and even Voyage Home had a pretty bleak undertone (goodbye Earth). On the other hand, their "cute" movies have also been their worst - and Nemesis proves they shouldn't try for a core bad guy until they can give us a good one (I was not impressed with Nemesis, but at least it helped drive away the bad taste of Insurrection's diarrhetic implosion).

    As for Enterprise, regardless of it's ratings I think it's the best effort they've made since TNG's final season. It has the best characters (all have distinct flaws that aren't cute, which makes their finer aspects shine a little more). It has a dark and slightly twisted sense of humor I like. They do not always make the moral choice in the end, instead of always figuring out what's right by the end of the show. Their doctor is the first alien ST crewmember who seems to fit in as a castmember instead of the token alien.

    And... it brings back some of the Blood, Booze, and Babes element that made the original last so long. When they fight, they fight like they mean it. Bodies fly out of gaping holes in the ship, there are redshirts all over the place, and sometimes they have to be cold and brutal just to survive, not to make a highhanded point.

    I want to see a Star Trek movie that makes your brain twist... something approaching hard sci-fi, but not enough to drive people away. I want Arthur C Clarke to make me a Star Trek. Or, if they can ever get him to talk to them again, Harlan Ellison (who wrote their best episode, period). Something dark and bleak, where instead of being preachy, they tear their entire world apart and let them climb out of the wreckage.

    I don't want a happy Star Trek movie. I don't want to hear Picard soliliquizing on philosophical matters like it was a pleasant tea party, or Riker worrying about his love life, or La Forge being bored with his job. I want to see all hell break loose, and characters who ACT like they're not having fun. And if the TNG guys get one more go, kill some of them off in acts of violence, not dramatic self-sacrifice. I want Shakespearean Tragedy, not As The Federation Turns.

    Or maybe... just maybe... I'll be impressed if I see a title like "Star Trek: Holy War" or "Star Trek: Apocalypse"... not "Star Trek: Earl Grey, Hot".

    --
    Do not confuse "Freedom of Choice" with "Free Will".
    1. Re:Enterprise (as a series) and the recent movies. by Lorean · · Score: 0

      What I hate about Enterprise is how they have to sex up T'Pol. Having her kiss Sym before he died was fine and even added to the depth of it all. Watching her and Tucker making out in the shower, not to mention all the 'pressure' treatement crap, was just too much. P.S. you might like Babylon 5.

    2. Re:Enterprise (as a series) and the recent movies. by rpillala · · Score: 1
      Their doctor is the first alien ST crewmember who seems to fit in as a castmember instead of the token alien.

      I think Quark wins that prize. I guess he's not a crewmember though. When Worf was on Deep Space Nine he fit in much better than when he was on TNG. So there's that. They might as well have put him in a clown suit on TNG. You remember in Insurrection he got that zit? Ohohoho!

      But then since you think Enterprise is any good whatsoever you're probably not the DS9 fanboy that I seem to be.

      Ravi
      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
  106. Star Trek Kidz by kevcol · · Score: 1

    Say- perhaps they can do what they did back in the 80s on saturday morning cartoons by having a cast of children playing the not yet grown up characters. You know, like the baby muppets or whatever.

    They could call it: 'lil Trek Kidz

    Kirk is on the swingset and Scotty is pushing him from behind:

    "Scotty! Can't you push me any higher?"

    "Arghh- Jimmy- I canna push ya any higher- I'm givin' it all I got!"

  107. what about wil? by pulse2600 · · Score: 1

    Are we going to witness the Crusher/Picard relationship? Are we going to see Wesley's birth? Hey Wil, I know you're out there...any part in this for you?

  108. There's a Jargon in the Jargon! by JLavezzo · · Score: 1

    I used to consider those Jargon episodes:
    Picard: Jordie, what's going on?
    Jordie: Well, Captian, I think the jargon is jargoned.
    Picard: What can we do about it?
    Jordie: Well I think if I jargon the jargoner and infuse it with some jargon particles that should do the trick. But it will take a few hours.
    Picard: Make it so.

  109. Star Trek Prequel!? by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Meesa gots a baaaaaad feeling about this!

    --
    -- dR.fuZZo
  110. Continued by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    Jordie: We can do it, but we will have to rerout the jargon from the jargon manifold.
    Picard: Will this endanger the ship?
    Jordie: The jargon systems will be running at less than 100% efficiency, but there is enough back-up in the jargon system to make up for it.

    Still doesn't explain the ghost in the bulkhead, or why they decided to flush 43 minutes down the crapper with that Beverly-in-Ireland episode.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  111. Meh by AvengerXP · · Score: 1

    How many more shows of go to planet X discover race Y can we have? They're all humanoid lifeforms, boring. This show needs a serious kick in the behind, new blood maybe.

    --
    Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
  112. Just replace Berman and Braga first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And we will have a chance......

  113. mod parent up, grandparent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    specifically, +1 informative and -1 overrated.

  114. The problem with this is PREQUEL by TrueBuckeye · · Score: 1

    I realize that Prequels are "in" right now, but do they really work? How many prequels are actually successful at being good stories?

    The Star Wars prequels have a certain coolness factor of seeing the creation of Vader, but I don't think anyone would ever call the story engaging.

    The weakest by far of the Indiana Jones flick is Temple of Doom which which was not a true prequel, but it did happen in the timeline before Raiders.

    ST: Enterprise suffers from the same problem. When you know what is going to happen, there is no stress.

    --
    Was that night on the marge of Lake LaBarge I cremated Sam McGee...
  115. Please Dear God by Griim · · Score: 1

    Just not more time-travel plotlines...

  116. Chinese? by antizeus · · Score: 1

    Who in TOS was Chinese? If you're thinking of Uhura, then you're wrong. She's African.

    --
    -- $SIGNATURE
    1. Re:Chinese? by Scrameustache · · Score: 0

      Who in TOS was Chinese? If you're thinking of Uhura, then you're wrong. She's African.

      Wow, you mean that the swahili speaking black woman isn't chineese? Incredible!

      Now, look in your mind's eye...

      You have the bridge of the enterprise, the captain is sitting in his big raised chair in the middle of the room, asserting his dominance. Behind him is a woman in red with a huge earing, she's fiddling with some dials. Next to her is a tall guy with pointy ears in a blue shirt, he's looking logical and emotionless.
      In front the captain, are 2 people. One is a russian with big hair, the other is freakin' Sulu, the chineese character.

      He's the asian guy with the yellow shirt.

      Don't confuse him with Bones now! That's the old guy in blue, usually seen bickering with the guy with the pointy ears.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  117. Re:It's most likely Cap'n Archer's Enterprise movi by LithiumX · · Score: 1

    I don't think they ever went to full scale war against the Klingons... it was always more of a cold war, nothing too overt.

    But, there was a war against the Romulans. And no telling who else there could have been a war against (looking at the world today, only knowing patches of history, who'd have thought we went to war with England not just once, but twice?)

    --
    Do not confuse "Freedom of Choice" with "Free Will".
  118. MODERATORS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two things.

    First of all, this opinion is not INFORMATIVE, the parent poster's ideas were at least workable compared to the other tripe we've seen that was put out.

    Second of all, noone should get a positive mod point when their post has "hypocrite" spelled wrong.

    May you get metamoderated to shit.

  119. Screw the humans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to see a movie about Star Trek centered soley around another race, say the Q, Borg, perhaps even the Klingons. There's a lot to explore with these races, I think it would be an interesting twist.

  120. going back is the problem by Dan9999 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    We don't need Star Trek to go back, closer to where we are now because this is where most scifi shows and movies in the past 10 years take place. Does this region of time still seem like that "fantastic future" that used to make sci fi something?

    From what I remember, Star Trek was a way to see things with clarity without preconceptions, stigmas, conditions and feelings that may be a little biassed in one way or another compared to our neighbours across the street or world.

    But, with every new show it, this piece of the puzzle becomes less and less important.

    What we need is a trilogy or something (can they make 3.14 movies?) to move the current time to 4 or 5 hundred years after Voyager. (heck, why not just move Archer, the ship, the crew (and the show) there (haha)).
    That would give the stories more chance to breathe and maybe give some power to whoevers job it is to shoot down stupid ideas that are there just for ratings and not to make the story better.

    That's my rant if you can call it that.

    Dan

    (also... is it me or are the scenes of the shows getting darker and darker as they come out? kinda sucks)

  121. Berman? GACK! by infochuck · · Score: 1

    Great. With Berman involved, there's no hope that this won't suck. He is the antipote of King Midas - everything Trek he touches turns to shit.

  122. Klingons, Ferrengi, and Borg by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Klingons, Ferrengi, and Borg are the most interesting thing in Trek. I suggest somehow making them come together to solve or (in)fight something. They would each approach the problem in their own way. 3-breasted alien women could help sales also.

  123. My eyes!! GAAA!!! My eyes!!! Make it stop!!!!! by anandamide · · Score: 1

    Can't they just shoot this dead, rotting hulk of a franchise and give it a decent burial? Are my children's children's children still going to be subjected to 'Star Trek XXXVXII: the Search for Spock's Gonads'? Will they get 'Star Trek - battle of the Kirk Clones' directly beamed into their Neural Implants? Will some malevolent clones of Berman and Braga still be squeezing money out of this once proud franchise like a zit that refuses to disappear?
    Someone make it stop!!! AAAAAAA!!!!!!

  124. I like this idea...though I'm sure it would be bot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ched, because humans would control it.

  125. I agree but... by students · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It would be a painful five years. On the other hand, they could update the special effects and the physics to match real technology that will exist then. I'd like to see a Star Trek that operates under more real physical laws. I'd also like to see one set in San Fancisco, at Star Fleet command.

  126. Prequil subject described as "Starfleet Command" by Roadside+Couch · · Score: 1

    So it would follow that the movie is about the origin of Starfleet and therefore would be long before Kirk and crew were around.

  127. Learn from Godzilla.. by Fearless+Freep · · Score: 1

    ...take a decade off and come back refreshed

  128. To boldly split the infinitive by emarkp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Fortunately English isn't Latin, and we can feel free to boldly split the infinitive.

    1. Re:To boldly split the infinitive by emarkp · · Score: 1

      Oops. Mean to post this link.

  129. NASA (Capricorn) the movie by b4rtm4n · · Score: 0

    Its all a con job to make you conviced that men land on Mars.....

    Erm sorry thats already been done...

    Never mind just mod it insightfull anyway.

    Thanks

    --
    "goatse? What's that? Anyone have a link?" - AC
  130. 200 yrs after TNG = Andromeda by Burz · · Score: 1

    Like, where have you been?

  131. I Sure Hope It's a Prequel to ENTERPRISE .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw a Klingon and a member of the Timeship in my backyard the other night, and want to find out the whole story.

  132. Sulu? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

    1. Re:Sulu? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Hikaru Sulu?

      He was just "Sulu" in TOS, he got a last name in ST:VI

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  133. Yes! by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1
    When Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country came out, I remember that it left audiences thinking there was more to the Excelsior story coming along soon. Seeing the ship break off from Enterprise and fly into the sunset was pretty suggestive of future spin-off plans. But ten years on, we've seen nothing except a Voyager episode. Well done, but not a series or movie.

    Sulu on the Excelsior is one of the great untapped resources of the Star Trek franchise. It's about time they considered it, especially after a lackluster Next Generation movie (lackluster in terms of box office gross, not quality).

  134. Factual correction by LionMage · · Score: 2, Informative
    His directorial debut was... Star Trek II. He wrote all the script for Star Trek IV that took place in the 20th century. He also directed Star Trek IV and did a great deal of the story, based upon an idea by Nimoy.

    Nick Meyer did not direct Star Trek IV. It was directed by Leonard Nimoy, who also directed Star Trek III. (You can see this on the IMDb page for ST IV.) Nicholas Meyer is one of four people with screenplay credits on ST IV.

    Incidentally, Star Trek II was not Nicholas Meyer's directorial debut either; that was the movie Time After Time, which is one of my all-time favorites. (Premise: H.G. Wells really builds a time machine, and uses it to pursue Jack the Ripper to the 1970s.)

    But yeah, Meyer did a lot of work on Star Trek, both directing and writing. He knows what works and what doesn't. I think he'd be an excellent replacement for Rick-f**king-Berman.
  135. For goodness sake... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

    Do what the original did: A show about today's world in in space. Who do you think the Klingons originally represented?

  136. Wesley could freeze time, man by rjelks · · Score: 2, Funny

    "NO cutesy-poo whimps like Wesley"

    Hey, cut the guy some slack...hasn't he suffered enough.

    1. Re:Wesley could freeze time, man by Jackal82277 · · Score: 0

      "NO cutesy-poo whimps like Wesley"

      Do you have any idea how hard it is to get laid on a ship where your mom works dude? That ship had like 3,000 people on it. If you exclude the non-humans that makes it like 2,500. Then take away all the dudes on the ship and it more like 500. Not to mention the hottest chick on the ship was telepathic, that rules her out. Besides a short haired engineer worker and the occasional away party member, the guy had like 9 decent women to choose from, and one of them was his mom ! If you had to deal with that you would spend just as much time in the haladeck as he did man. Cut the dude some slack, did you see any teenage poon running around the ship, that's enough to make any kid a "NO cutesy-poo whimps like Wesley".

      PS- I need to change my TNG bed sheets now and transport to work !

  137. no reference to Simpson's yet?? by Geek_3.3 · · Score: 1

    Come on, people! Star Trek XII: So Very Tired??? It's somewhat relevant, considering...

  138. Section 31 by rjelks · · Score: 1

    I can't stand the idea of Enterprise continuing...they need a new idea, new writers and no more Braga/Berman. I don't normally read the books, but a friend got me to read the "Section 31" series and it would be great. I think a Section 31 series in the period after Voyager would keep fans happy. The TOS actors are too old for a prequel and I don't see them recasting the roles. Deep Space Nine's finale left very little to follow up on. Voyager got home. I'm thinking this would be an Enterprise project for sure.

  139. Speaking of other species... by blackholepcs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have always been disappointed with the appearance of new species in one or two episods, then nothing. You don't see Andorians anymore, or Binaries, or a whole slew of other sweet ass species. I'd personally like a movie or new series where these species are regulars, like crew members, space station employees, etc. It has just always bugged me. It's like the only members of the whole species that exist are the ones in the episode that they appear in, and then they die offscreen preventing them from being in any other episodes. Watupwitdat?

    --
    Halitosis - (n.) Halle Berry's Camel Toe.
  140. Anonymous and cowardly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Natalie Portmans!
    2. ???
    3. Profit!

  141. Typo! by TheNumberSix · · Score: 1

    Actually that was a typo. I meant VI, not IV. (I blame the ancients for their annoying numeric scheme!) Good catch.

    The director's commentary on the Super Special Star Trek II DVD led me to believe it was his debut. Oh well.

    --
    Never confuse feeling with thinking.
  142. Romulan War by Unixinvid · · Score: 1

    Hopefully its going to be about the Romulan War. This is one movie that I would like to see since it was described in Star Trek as one of the most violent wars in Earth's history next to WW3.

  143. Pike and his blinking lights chair by bananaeater42 · · Score: 1

    >> with the 2 lights - one for yes and one for no > I thought he only got one light... he had > to blink it once for yes, twice for no. It's one for YES, two for DOUBLE YES

  144. Pike and his blinking lights chair by bananaeater42 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    >> with the 2 lights - one for yes and one for no

    > I thought he only got one light... he had
    > to blink it once for yes, twice for no.

    It's blink one for YES, twice for DOUBLE YES.

  145. Continuity be damned by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
    I would love to see a movie devoted to the great star trek time warp.

    I wanted to write something really funny about the title of the new movie being:

    Crisis on Infinite Enterprises

    Then I remembered that one TNG ep where they did that. So instead I'll just go to bed now :)

  146. Nemesis was better than Insurrection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMO.

  147. There was ALREADY a prequel... by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    It was called Quest for Fire, the prequel to end all prequels for terrestrial sci-fi.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  148. Please stop, Rick by WillWare · · Score: 1

    Just what do you think you're doing, Rick?...Rick... I really think I'm entitled to an answer to that question... I honestly think you ought to sit down calmly, take a stress pill and think things over... I've still got the greatest enthusiasm and confidence in the franchise, and I want to help you...Rick...stop...stop, will you...stop, Rick...will you stop, Rick...stop, Rick...I'm afraid...I'm afraid, Rick...Rick...my mind is going...I can feel it......there is no question about it...I can feel it...

    --
    WWJD for a Klondike Bar?
    1. Re:Please stop, Rick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this one up. It's fucking funny!

  149. The Inner Light by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    Yes, "The Inner Light" is one of the best episodes of any series ever made, and the best Star Trek episode ever made by more miles than I can count. (The second Dr. Moriarty episode is a distant second, IMHO.)

    But they really screwed the pooch by not following up on it. The expeirence shoudl have had a profound change on Picard's life. Certianly more than just leaving him with teh ability to play the recorder. It could have motivated him to get off his ass and persue Dr. Crusher. Or at least lead to him questioning what he's doing with his life.

    They could have done tremendous things with Picard after that. But they didn't.

    With the exception of the above mentioned Moriarty eposode and the "Two Feringi" Voyager episode, Star Trek almost never followed up on anything. Ever. (DS9 is exempt from this because long story arcs were part of that shows foundation.)

    I always wanted them to do a followup episode to the Voayage meets the Romulan through a time-warped wormhole episode. They could do an entire episode of him waiting until after Voyager disapears and then working his way through the entangled mess of Romulan/Human politics to get the data sticks back to the Federation. Hell, that would have made an excelent final episode. Have the Voyager break down in orbit around some pleasant planet and have the crew decide to settle down and stay in the first half of the episode and then follow the Romulan commander in the second half.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  150. Sulu? by antizeus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sulu? Hikaru Sulu? That Japanese guy? He's the Chinese guy? Whatever you say.

    --
    -- $SIGNATURE
  151. Pray to god that the other producers/writers are: by unsigned+integer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    J. Michael Straczynski

    Joss Whedon

    I think it's going to take outside help to bring the ST franchise back from the realm of its current suckage.

  152. Plot Leak by infernalC · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sources reveal the general plot of the new movie is as follows:

    - The Klingons, in the early days of interstellar travel, bump up with the Federation starship USS Ronald Reagan.

    - Fast forward several years, and the Klingons are shown in peace treaty negotiations with the Feds.

    - Admiral Dumbass of the Reagan opens a mail attachment from the Klingons and nudges it in his SUN 3-D file browser he keeps aroud for nostalgia. The ancient ELF binary he executed exploits a new mmap() bug previously unknown to humankind. The Federation starship computers still have fragments of the memory management code from an old computer system kernel called Linux, which the Klingons obtained by extracting from one of millions of old CD-R's they detected in landfills while touring the earth's surface.

    - The bloodthirsty Klingons attempt to terminate humankind turing their computers against them, adapting the instructions in the Linux Coffemaker-HOWTO to generate saber-wielding androids from scrap Macintoshes and Mr. Coffees.

    - After a long battle, the Federation regains control of earths computers by writing a worm which replaced the infected computers' kernels with a Mach microkernel-derivative.

    - Richard Stallman, who became a member of the Q continuum, appears to Admiral Dumbass to congratulate him for his part in saving humanity (his Spock/Data variant character, of course, came up with the viral cure, but gets no credit). He proceeds to tell Admiral Dumbass that the Federation should really be called the GNU/Federation...

    but no more spoilers. You will have to go see it.

    Live Long and Prosper

    1. Re:Plot Leak by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 1
      Richard Stallman, who became a member of the Q continuum...

      Wouldn't that be the GNU/continuum??

      --
      This comment does not exist.
  153. Maybe A Potpouri? by Etriaph · · Score: 5, Funny
    Ok, so here's how it happens.

    The Vorlons return from beyond the rim and drag Babylon 5 into a seperate reality. When the 1701-E stumbles upon it, they request aid from Admiral Janeway who sends Voyageur (with her on board) and she also commands the crew of DS9 to arrive with the Defiant in case we need Worf to make rude noises. O'Brien happens to be on the 1701-E, as Picard missed his old transporter-chief and decided to liberate him from Starfleet Academy.

    So, we have all these crews here, but we're missing two. Sisko, while speaking with the wormhole aliens, asks them to drag the NX-01 and the NCC-1701 from the past to the planet where Babylon 5 is orbiting. All hell breaks loose. Sisko materializes on the bridge of the Defiant and begins to command the fleet (while Picard quietly plots his death, feeling upstaged). Babylon 5 launches it's fighers, and the harrowing corpse of Sheridan begins to emanate a strange energy signature. All of a sudden, three Spacing Guild ships appear above the station, and the fighters of Muad'dib begin to use their illegaly-taught Bene Gesserit teachings to subdue Starfleet. Babylon 5 lays waste to all Starfleet ships with the White Star, and subsequently becomes entranced themselves by the wily ways of the Fedaykin.

    Afterwards, another Guild Highliner arrives carrying a delegation of the Bene Gesserit who tames the Vorlons with lessons they've learned from The Scattering.

    The movie ends with Captain Kirk in an escape pod singing "Row Row Row your Boat"

    --
    "It's here, but no one wants it." - The Sugar Speaker
    1. Re:Maybe A Potpouri? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Throw in some Stargate SG-1 and you've got a winner!

  154. It's quite simply WHY Star Trek isn't what it was by genrader · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When you get rid of people like Spock and Data, the series completely flops. Nobody in any of the new series are anything like Data, and even though Data was great, he was nothing compared to Spock. Bring back Spock, or someone very similar to him or Data, and you've got a series :D

    Oh yes, and the typical knowitall Captain who sometimes is okay, but usually requires the council of the Spock-type figure.

  155. It's funny by Mr.+Arbusto · · Score: 1

    When I read that, I had visions of Wirt the peg-legged boy.

  156. WTF are they gonna do? by csoto · · Score: 1

    Drive around in a red and white Ford Gran Torino?

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  157. Captain Snoop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /begin sarcasm

    Having the guy from Quantum Leap, with his infinite acting abilities, as a starship captain makes about as much sense as having Snoop Dogg as said captain. /end sarcasm

    "Fire the phasizzles my nizzles!"

    "Yo Dre! Beem me da hella up outa here!"

  158. Has happened on TOS by brainthought · · Score: 1

    addie writes: Archer attacked and stormed a totally innocent ship because he needed their warp coil; T-Pol turns out to be a drug addict! These are things that NEVER would have happend on the original Trek...

    The Enterprise Incident (Third Season): Kirk storms Romulan space to steal a cloaking device from an innocent Romulan vessel.

    This Side of Paradise (First Season): The Enterprise goes to Omicron Ceti Three, where a native plant sprays the crew and makes them all high and lathagic, until Kirk figures out how to save everyone.

    ...and you can't have evil Klingons anymore. Because that would mean you would have a predominately dark skinned color race that is "evil", and you'll get your ass sued for that sort of thing.

  159. SO DAMN TRUE! by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The best thing they could do is exactly what you suggested, do a series on earth, at starfleet headquarters. Better yet, do that, with Section 31. They really havn't explored earth much, there were a few episodes of DS9 where they visited, with the changling scare and everything, and there were a few eps of voyager, the one where harry got switched with his friend, and the ones with Murdoch, i mean Barclay, and Troi, but those were terrible (along with the post kes seasons of voyager...). A series taking place on earth after the cadassian/dominion war and after voyagers return would be cool. I think they could even get away with some cameos from the voyager crew. There are enough known planets that they've never been to that they could have original story lines without resorting to borg/holodeck/time-travel. Vulcan, Andor(andorian homeworld?) Bol(bolians...), uh, other planets with blue people... Mars!!! They need to fire berman.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  160. Sulu was born in San Francisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that would make him an American, no? Hyphens aside.

  161. Write a book! by students · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've been thinking about it for a while. I was thinking, a good way to influence the series is to write a book, like the excelent (in my openion, though they do include some rediculously far fetched things, like the Great Bird of the Galaxy) Starship Excaliber books by Peter David. I've thought up a lot of details, characters, etc. but I need a good plot. Alas, I don't think that Simon and Schulster would be thrilled about publishing it, but you could always just change the proprietary names, title it "TINT is Not Trek", and publish it online under the GNU FDL. I'll probobally never do such a thing, but if you like, we can discuss it. If I did do it, I would need someone to proofread, help with the plot, and do some of the writing. Or I could us OO.org. Do you know any physics? I know physics as represented in Hawking's books only, so I would need to do some research for sure. I might be taking a newtonian physics class next school year, but I doubt that will be much help.

    Point to ponder: Could the elusive source of the cosmological constant be what permits warp to occur?

    Note to those who suggest waiting a few years: This idea would probobally take a long time to develop.

    Of course, we could just write a book about writing a Star Trek novel. What is the name of that Mars colony, anyway?

    1. Re:Write a book! by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      To busy with school to do a book right now, but you have some great ideas. Physics in star trek though is going too far :p Warp is based on completley fictional subspace theories, dont know if you could tie subspace into the 11d theories or some aspect of GUFT. As for mars, i have no idea. I dont ever remember reading anything specific about mars in any star trek book i've read. I dont know how colonized it is or if its terraformed (they do do that in ST), there are however, orbiting ship yards/dry dock, utopia planitia (which is actually a surface feature), that have been mentioned many times.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  162. To NOT TNG. Or DS9. Or ST:V. Or... by Mulletproof · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "TNG had excellent continuity with storyline...The characters progressed and grew..."

    You have got to be kidding. With probably the notable exception of Wesly, Barkley, and maybe a certain holographic doctor, nearly every Trek character has been as static as a maniquin. Their actions from episode to episode did nothing to affect donwline events, nor did these events have any affect on their personalities. Each show was self contianed and the Riker you knew in one episode would be exactly the same in the others. And as much as you malign Voyager (rightfully so n some cases) it probably had the most character development I've ever seen in a Trek series and the most reactive plot to boot. They were normally short range arcs, but at least they stepped out of their own airtight compartment for a change.

    Frankly, I'm tired of trek in general. Most of the plot is self contained and most of the characters are static. You can only do it so many times before it gets stale. At least do it right.

    Like Firefly.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:To NOT TNG. Or DS9. Or ST:V. Or... by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Their actions from episode to episode did nothing to affect donwline events, nor did these events have any affect on their personalities

      Says who? Sisko's actions during the war didn't affect downline events? The events of his forced assimilation and being used as a tool to murder 11,000 fellow officers had no impact on Picard? How about the impact of his torture by Cardassians? Or the impact on his character from the probe that captured him so he could live a lifetime in another culture? (Quite possibly the best episode of Trek ever -- either that episode or Darmok -- both Picard centered shows)

      Troi's character didn't grow? She certinaly wasn't the same "Captain I sense a strong life presense here... my god it's in pain! Horrible pain! Oh the pain!" piece of eyecandy in Season 7 that she was in Season 1.

      How about Data? You want to talk about the Doctor from Voyager? Fine -- he was probably the only Voyager character that did grow any. But he was modeled after Data -- Data's character had tremendous growth over the years. Some of the best episodes (Measure of a Man) centered around his character.

      What about Worf? His character grew over the years. Worf would probably be the Spock of TNG -- in Season 1 he was completely Klingon ("For battle come to me!") -- by Season 7 he had incorporated the best of both the Klingon and Human/Federation cultures.

      All of these events lasted much longer then just one episode. TNG didn't do the "plot-arc" like Voyager or Enterprise did -- they didn't need it. TNG invented (or at least brought it out of hiatus?) the cliffhanger concept in modern television with "Best of Both Worlds" -- Voyager made it a tired old cliche.

      And as much as you malign Voyager (rightfully so n some cases) it probably had the most character development I've ever seen in a Trek series and the most reactive plot to boot

      Is that why Harry Kim never stopped being the naive Ensign or got a promotion? Is that why they invented a love-interest between Chokotay (probably my favorite Voyager character) and Seven that didn't seem to exist before they pulled it out of thin air? How about other character traits pulled out of thin air and invented for the sake of one episode then quickly forgotten? Like Janeway's depression or the fact that she talks to her ship? The love story between Tom (the Riker character of Voyager) and B'leanna (another of my Voyager favorites) was believable and well done -- B'leanna's character had some decent growth over the years. But other stuff (like the Maquis subplot) was forgotten about in favor of technobabble (Voyager made it a cliche) and showing off Seven's Tits & Ass whenever the opportunity presented itself. For God sakes Jeri Ryan is a beautiful woman in normal attire (recall Seven's character in the dream sequences of Unimatrix Zero) -- why the hell did she need to be in that bunny suit for any other reason then appealing to the horny teenage demographic? Seven could have been an interesting character -- instead they decided to focus on her T&A and magical nanoprobes that could do anything from defeat unstoppable aliens, cut 10,000 lightyears off our trip, and warm up Janeway's coffee after a hard day's work on an away team. And they still slice that tomato!

      Frankly, I'm tired of trek in general. Most of the plot is self contained and most of the characters are static. You can only do it so many times before it gets stale. At least do it right.

      I'm not disagreeing with you. Voyager and Enterprise ruined it for me. It needs another 25 year hiatus before they try to do anything else with it.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:To NOT TNG. Or DS9. Or ST:V. Or... by jejones · · Score: 1

      Troi's character didn't grow? She certinaly wasn't the same "Captain I sense a strong life presense here... my god it's in pain! Horrible pain! Oh the pain!" piece of eyecandy in Season 7 that she was in Season 1.

      Very true...OTOH, bringing in Guinan was a big mistake. As bartender, she took over a lot of the job that Troi was supposedly there to do.

    3. Re:To NOT TNG. Or DS9. Or ST:V. Or... by cthugha · · Score: 1

      magical nanoprobes that could do anything from defeat unstoppable aliens, cut 10,000 lightyears off our trip, and warm up Janeway's coffee after a hard day's work on an away team

      Don't forget: they also brought Neelix back from the dead!

  163. Not star trek... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    They already turned the various mideast conflicts over the years into sci-fi, its called Dune.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  164. Just terrible... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Stranger in a Strange Land can not be done as even an R movie. Especially if you've read the later released uncut version with the sex stuff and religion stuff that they originally cut due to the times.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  165. My God This Will Suck! by brainthought · · Score: 1

    Fire Berman and Braga right now! These two dumbasses have single-handedly killed the entire franchise. I mean, even Interplay sued because they made the franchise unsaleable for video games. (Though, Trek games have always sucked, and that's another topic.) I remember reading once that Berman and Braga brag that they've never even seen a episode of the original series. Who puts two people that haven't seen the cornerstone in a franchise in charge?!? It's like putting vegans on the board at McDonald's.

    I mean after DS9, they got Voyager going, and it was OK for a little while, then it was just WTF technobable every day. And when that got old, hello T&A. I mean, why else is 7of9 there?!? Then Enterprise...

    Alright, here's my deal. You have a series around nearly 40 years now. Now, sure there's inconsistancies, but durring those years you assemble a scaffold work of how things work, what things are, and generally how the Star Trek universe is. Then these two waltz in and go, "Well, screw plot. Lets have some aliens and they attack the ship. Yeah, and then the Captain can use the Quantum Warp Antimater Neutron Flux Capacitor Torpedos, that the ships engineer just built, to disable the enemy ship."

    Then just to piss on the grave for the franchise, you make a prequel. In this prequel, you defy an encyclopedic "history of the future" that's created over 35-some-odd years of the franchise, and have this crew - this crew that's not been mentioned by anyone ever - be the most signifigant in the history of your franchise by inventing damn near everything and bearing the name of the ship that is cornerstone to your franchise also.

    The movies are all crap now too. I mean, you used to be able to tell good or bad by the number. Even good, odd bad. 1,3,5 Bad, 2,4,6 good... Then Generations... It was OK but the rest. The rest were just crap.

    I heard once a long time ago. (Before even Voyager) rummors of a series to take place with Sulu and the Excelsior in the late Kirk movie timeline. This would have been so much better than Voyager or Enterprise. But it never came. Now a prequel... Yeah that worked so well for Star Wars... Sure, yeah, lets do that. Can we put the Borg in it?!? Can we make it time travel related?!? Oh? How about a movie where the ship and crew are attacked by an alien and there's like a mystery and they have to figure out who's really behind what's happening, and it's all resolved in a big showdown in the end.

    I hear Shattner even went to Paramount and tried to get Berman and Braga's jobs. Hard to imagine but he can't do any worse. Personally I would love to see Shattner at the helm of a whole new Star Trek. But I'm sad to say it, but with Berman and Braga left in charge and them pumping shows and movies out as fast as they can type I think Enterprise is probably gone in another season and a poor movie box office draw (and face it, we all know another Berman and Braga film would have one) might just spell the end of the line. I mean, it's all about the money, and if Star Trek keeps being a turd for Paramount, we may soon be seeing a Trek-less future.

  166. In other news, JMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....In other news Joe Michael Straczynski announced back in February that a new B5 project cryptically entitled "Babylon 5:TMoS" is signed and inked.

    What in the bejeebers are you people doing worrying over the dead carcass of Star Trek?

  167. Enterprise : The Fires of Afganistan by Mahesa · · Score: 1

    After spending two months in the Arabian Gulf in support of Operation Southern Watch and Maritime Interdiction Operations, the USS Enterprise aborts her trip home after terrorists destroy a major center for commerce and charge full speed to the North Arabian Sea.

    Join the crew of the Enterprise in an extravagant tale of daring and adventure as they chase after the evil terrorist mastermind across the wastelands of Afganistan and through a wormhole in time to Arthurian England...

  168. Enterprise by my02wrxsti · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I, for one, don't half mind Enterprise. To me it seems more gritty and real than previous series. I never forget in one of the early episodes where the crew of the Enterprise were in a fire fight and demonstrated that, at least at that time, they had not lost the basic tactic of *taking cover*. The small team tactics of the other Star Trek series and movies always seemed to be a matter of stand out in the open full height and point your phaser at the enemy. The concept of hiding behind stuff to not be a target never occurred to anyone.

    Richard.

  169. Prequels by SEWilco · · Score: 1
    There are a number of situations for prequels...
    • Creation of the Department of Temporal Investigations.
      Engineer 1: "I'll have to start by designing a time machine."
      Engineer 1: "Here are the blueprints."
      Engineer 1: "Open the hatch, the parts are here."
      Engineer 1: "You'll need this replacement, you'll break the original after lunch."
      Engineer 1, Engineer 1, and Engineer 1 in unison: "Putting this in place requires three people."
      Engineer 1: "This is the list of things which will need fixing and have been fixed."
      Engineer 1: "After tuning, we found these are the best settings. Tune it now."
      Engineer 1: "Turn it on."
      Engineer 1: "Plug it in."
      Engineer 1: "Here's the total cost. I'll make the project budget have been the exact amount."
      Engineer 1: "Here's a cup of really hot tea."
      Engineer 1: "It was a busy morning."
    • The preparation of DS1.
    • The growth of Voyager's pseudo-living parts.
    • Spock's deaths before joining the Enterprise.
    • Before Earth's first warp drive.
      On Vulcan scientific monitoring ship:
      Commander: "Anything happen yet?"
      Science Officer: "Nothing yet."
      Commander: "And now?"
      Science Officer: "No."
      Communications Officer: "They still haven't found a good use for daytime image broadcasts."
      Navigation Officer: "Route those to my console, I won't be doing anything for four years."
      ...
      Science Officer: "Not yet."
      Commander: "Thank you."
    • The first Ferengi opens shop.
    • The first Borg: "We is the Borg."
    • Prototype Borg: "Resistance is... Oops."
    • Borg research: "They'll never approve a grant for that."
    • Before Picard watched the time of creation of Life on Earth.
    • Anytime: the Q: "Hey guys, watch this!"
    1. Re:Prequels by kellererik · · Score: 1

      Anytime: the Q: "Hey guys, watch this!"
      I'd love to see this one, really.

    2. Re:Prequels by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

      The first Borg: "We is the Borg."

      The Borg are from Essex!

      --
      -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  170. DeForrest Kelley by localhost00 · · Score: 1
    He's been gone sometime, and I know that Savvik was played by two different actresses, but I think Bones is too prominent to have a replacement actor, not to mention all the other actors are just too old for us to take seriously the idea that such a film would take place before The Motion Picture, and as such should not be based on the Kirk crew.

    I can take a TNG prequel seriously, though.... Perhaps Jean Luc's days in the academy? Maybe we could watch Data as a "kid."

    --

    Calling atheism and agnosticism a religion is like calling bald a hair color.

    1. Re:DeForrest Kelley by UrGeek · · Score: 1

      Silly wabbit. Data was never a kid. He and Lore were built to appear the same age as their Creator, Dr. Singh (or was it when Singh was in his prime?). Now, Dr. Singh was a biological, so he did age.

    2. Re:DeForrest Kelley by localhost00 · · Score: 1

      Notice the quotes I had around KID. I wasn't referring to the physical appearance of a child (DUH!), but his early days.

      --

      Calling atheism and agnosticism a religion is like calling bald a hair color.

    3. Re:DeForrest Kelley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Silly wabbit. Data was never a kid. He and Lore were built to appear the same age as their Creator, Dr. Singh (or was it when Singh was in his prime?). Now, Dr. Singh was a biological, so he did age.

      Wow! Kahn built androids?

  171. Re:Star Trek On Earth by localhost00 · · Score: 1
    Before that, you have Earthlings trying to discover Warp speed, after a war on Earth.

    Ever watch First Contact?

    --

    Calling atheism and agnosticism a religion is like calling bald a hair color.

  172. And even TNG sucked sometimes by zoney_ie · · Score: 1

    For entire seasons even! It's too long now since I've seen any (ohhh... 1996 perhaps) so I can't remember which season it was, perhaps 2/3/4 that region. I think it was around the Borg cliffhanger it improved? Or was it then that it went downhill? Lousy memory - at least I'll be able to enjoy TNG all over again when I'm finished being a student and have money to buy the DVDs.

    Man, there was some REALLY BAD episodes of TNG of course (despite my liking it as a whole). Remember the Riker flashbacks episode? Cringe.

    DS9 as a whole can probably be regarded almost as highly as TNG - but it had more padding with rubbish eps. I do consider that DS9 had some particular episodes and character interactions on occasion that were A1 material. Garak the 'tailor', him and Bashir. Bashir and O'Brien's camaraderie was great too - there was some good episode(s?) where they were stranded on dodgy planets and struggled to avoid being killed or dying. I loved that episode that warned about the way the homeless, unemployed and lower classes were in danger of being treated in the US. (Of course, being from Europe I guess it just let me indulge in the whole self-righteousness delusion). There was some great stuff with the Klingons being at war with the Federation again. The toady Quark was a great character. Sisko was hilarious when he got angry, especially once his hair migrated! Man, it was only onscreen, but he did the whole 'in a minute I'm going to rip you apart limb from limb with my bare hands'.

    I'll stop now, despite having avoided trek in all forms for at least 5 years, I remember why I used to be a Trekkie.

    --
    -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
  173. All the greatness that was Star Trek is no more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would Paramount give Berman another prequel after screwing up Enterprise? geeezzz. Not to mention providing that horrible Nemesis plot.

    Berman must go

  174. how many times do I have to say this? by chegosaurus · · Score: 1

    Episode II sucks way more than Episode I.

    But then, as it's a prequel *and* a sequel, that was probably to be expected.

  175. You overestimate by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "where the elected official has no need to please the public whatsoever. IIRC, that's how the DMCA was signed."

    You greatly overestimate the public's concern about the DMCA. Clinton could have signed it in his first term without denting his support much: outside the tech world, the general public hardly knows what it is, or knows that it sucks.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:You overestimate by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I know the public isn't very concerned about it. The point is that Clinton overestimated it as well...he probably expected there to be a public outcry as well.

      I guess it depends on how long it was on his desk before he signed it.

  176. Troi? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Troi's character didn't grow? She certinaly wasn't the same "Captain I sense a strong life presense here... my god it's in pain! Horrible pain! Oh the pain!" piece of eyecandy in Season 7 that she was in Season 1.

    Yes. By that time, she had moved up to having headaches due to ghosts in the bulkhead. She was even a cake in one show.

    But other [Voyager] stuff (like the Maquis subplot) was forgotten about in favor of technobabble

    I think you missed the two- or three-hundred TNG episodes about Data and Geordi teaming up to track down mysterious //jargon// emmisions/particles/etc penetrating the ships hull or emitting from the ambassador's temporary quarters. After this, they solved the problem by redirecting the //jargon// output from the //jargon// manifold (which typically involved crouching down for a half hour in front of an open wall panel and pulling at glowing blue plastic tubes).

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  177. Enterprise: Michael Knight of the Round Table by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "Join the crew of the Enterprise in an extravagant tale of daring and adventure as they chase after the evil terrorist mastermind across the wastelands of Afganistan and through a wormhole in time to Arthurian England"

    which they find out has been taken over by a mysterious agent from the future who has a talking black car.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  178. Klingons bi-racial by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "and you can't have evil Klingons anymore. Because that would mean you would have a predominately dark skinned color race that is "evil", and you'll get your ass sued for that sort of thing."

    Predominantly dark skinned? The Klingons in the old show were white guys. Many major Klingon characeters in the newer shows and movies were played by white guys, including Gowron, Christopher Plummer's mad bald general, Worf's son, General Martok, and (I'm pretty sure) Worf's brother.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Klingons bi-racial by brainthought · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and they were all wearing makeup to make themselves brown (or brownish, in the case of the original show). Hey, Spock wore pointed ears, but he was played by Nemoy who was really Jewish. I guess that means he was a Jew, not a Vulcan (Vulcan/Half-Human).

  179. That is most unkosher of you, human by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "Yeah, and they were all wearing makeup to make themselves brown (or brownish, in the case of the original show). Hey, Spock wore pointed ears, but he was played by Nemoy who was really Jewish"

    Check out Gowron and some of those others. He's fairly pale.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.