Do you any of you guys even own one? Haven't you guys wanted to hack it at least a tiny bit?
You don't have to reinvent the whole wheel, dammit! That Russian dude just patched the binary!
My gf got me a Canon EOS 20D for xmas. I love that camera! However, the one feature that forces me to carry two cameras is the lack of video recording that every cheap-ass point-n-shoot camera does these days. Not that I understand enough hardware to know this for sure, but I doubt there's a technical reason for that, it's a marketing reason. Anyone care to comment on that?
I fantasize about disassembling the firmware (I hear (from unreliable sources) that it's DOS-like running on an NEC embedded type x86 CPU) and find the place to turn the jne to a jz to enable me to record video with this thing.
Some of the buttons on my camera don't get much use and so some folks have taken to re-assigning them to things they use all the time. Surely you can see the value in that!
I don't see any use for retro games or a PDA functionality on a high-end camera, but I imagine that at some point we should see convergent device that'll satisfy me. Ha! Betcha that Korea and Japan will have a device next year with 5MP phone, 3x optical zoom 5GB MP3 player and a PDA and us americans will never see it. (I'm bitter cuz I've been spending too much time at gizmodo.com and engadget.com peeping me gadgets and phones that I cannot get here)
That's pages of text. How the hell is that supposed to sell anything to a suit or a PHB? If you're very lucky, a PHB will throw it derisively at the closest passing nerd to read. If the nerd renders an opinion in favour of Novell, the PHB will reject it because he thought Novell was the codename for a new microsoft product.
Just one 'generalization': You cannot, in fact, handle the truth.
You didn't see it and you won't see it. You're afraid of it.
More of my favourite quotes for you:
It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use and authority of reason as to administer medication to the dead.
- Thomas Jefferson
1) A strong belief is more important than a few facts. 2) The stronger the belief, the fewer the facts. 3) The fewer the facts, the more people killed.
- Milton Rothman
Serious rational criticism is so rare that it should be encouraged. Being too ready to defend oneself is more dangerous than being too ready to admit a mistake.
- Sir Karl Popper
It is especially important to encourage unorthodox thinking when the situation is critical: At such moments every new word and fresh thought is more precious than gold. Indeed, people must not be deprived of the right to think their own thoughts.
- Boris Yeltsin, _Against_the_Grain:_An_Autobiography_ (tr. Michael Glenny' Summit Books, 1990; p. 172)
Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it with religious conviction.
- Blaise Pascal
You got the hate part backwards. And the spin is not Moore's, it's mine.
Anyway, I don't know you. But, I know a lot of people who claim there are lies in F9/11. These people have had, in my experience, several things in common:
- they have not watched it and therefor don't realise that Moore cannot even be said to lie in it because he doesn't actually claim anything; F9/11 is just a ~2hour collage of public documents, very plain video footage, and a few people posing some very innocent questions. I can see why you're are afraid to see it. I have more respect for Michael Moore than ever before because he is one of the few people who lays out the plain truth: "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell For your information, Fahrenheit 9/11 isn't Moore on some 2 hour rant like on Faux news. Nor is it like some fundamentalist preacher yelling hellfire and brimstone at the top of his lungs. If you're truth comes to you that way, then you, the tooth fairy, the easter bunny, and santa claus will have a great time in heaven, won't you?
- they have a christian bumper sticker or some stupid counter-darwin emblem on their car; I wish these people were even half as skeptical about their religious bigotry as they are about documentary film making or fundamental science
- they ask that I trust the government of george war bush on his foreign policy. Trust. That's a pet peeve of mine. gwb might yet go down in history as the most corrupt and lyingest president ever. Here is another choice quote, courtesty of quotedb.com: "A man never lies as much as after a hunt, during a war, and before an election." -- Otto von Bismarck If you count "The hunt for bin laden", that's 3 out of 3!
Yes, it probably is a bit silly. I think it's fear, probably irrational, and it drives behaviour.
And, in my bad moods, the fear seems justified. I can't find the story now, but there was an NPR piece on how local district attorney were suddenly and unexpectedly being investigated by internal affairs type people if they even dare mention that they weren't being given any support to fight the 'war on terror'. I can only find this story http://www.freep.com/news/locway/probe17_20040117. htm right now. Doesn't that sound like it could be classic intimidation to you? Tell me straight out, have I gotten to jaded to be able to see the situation for what it is: an extreme swing in one direction of the political pendulum?
Did I mention I have my tinfoil hat on extra snug today?
The secret service prevents the media from interviewing Michael Moore. For what reason - security? The secret service ushers him out of the convention - for security? What else are they going to do in the name of security? They (the government) get court orders censored in the name of security. What are you gonna do when they knock on your door, insisting that national security interests take a higher precedence than your first amendment rights?
Wasn't it Nixon who got impeached for (among other things) using the secret service to further his and his party's agenda? I'm not old enough to have lived through that, but it seems to me that once people saw what he was capable of, they understood that his abuse of power could turn the USA into something like an oppresive communist dictatorship. Don't people see that today?
Go watch Fahrenheit 9/11 again. I don't think you fully understand the depravity that this government is capable of. Or maybe, a lot of us don't believe it can be this bad. Noone wants to believe that our present civil situation could even be compared to that of nazi germany.
Dude, you don't even have to go the supreme court. Just go to your local traffic court if you get a speeding ticket, or the like. I did. It's painful to watch a segment of society that is uneducated and helpless deal with the very real and cold reality that is a court room. It's also hysterical to listen to a generous and light hearted commissioner/judge issue instructions and inject humour into the proceedings. I couldn't do it justice if I tried to tell it.
In case you care, the officer withdrew the charges and so made my day, and maybe that's why I recall the experience so positively. And maybe that's also why my faith in the system received a welcome boost.
Disclaimer: I love Python, the programming language.
While it may be a generalisation to imply that someone who likes NT couldn't be a first-rate hacker, you miss the point.
Do you remember 1997? I do. In that year, every wannabe pundit proclaimed that NT is going to overrun Unix, the Mac, and anything else. I have these memories of self-styled industry watchers telling me to forget everything I ever new about the Mac and anything that wasn't directly related to NT. My career was obviously about to dead-end if I didn't get on the NT bandwagon. Being the weak-minded drone that I am, I did just that. There was a multitide of programmers betting their future on NT back then.
My Python experience was completely different. I tried it out because someone talked about it (during a Perl class, of all occasions) and once I used it for more than 1/2 hour, I never looked back.
I agree that any decent hacker can learn Python, and learn it quickly. The point is, the first rate hacker is the one who will take the initiative for no other reason than because she finds it interesting, not because it's a buzzword that'll get you hits on monster. Contrast this with the hordes of VB and Java programmers of which I have not yet met an idealist devotee. I can understand that because Java and VB (for different reasons) severely limit the kinds of programs you can write and the concepts you can reason about. Python is a lot more liberated.
If you don't know who to root for, then let me tell you: Lindows!
Here's the deal: MS has been playing the conniving bully it's entire existence. It abuses the courts to further its monopoly, it blatantly disregards the consent decree it signed, it represents the worst parts of corrupt capitalism. It produces terrible products that clog our internet with virii and worms, does not adhere to standards it professes to, yet you want everyone else to play nice? Do you want other companies to be able to play in this space or not? Regardless of the legality of ms trademarks (which I believe to be tenuous anyway), I hope Lindows wins.
The point is that it works! Not because people are idiots, but because they're muggles. They don't get it. To them, the act of sending email might as well be magic for all the understanding they might have, so promising them something that's technically infeasible is worthwhile and profitable. If it's presented well, if it uses cultural memes that are accepted and understood by the target audience, if it tells them something they want to hear, it'll work.
For the life of me, I can't figure out how you got moderated to 5. You said nothing at all. I've been trying for a while to figure out how the/. crowd rates things. I haven't really come up with anything except that if you sound self-righteous and superior, you'll get moderated up or become governer in California.
Obviously you've never gotten a frantic phone call from someone who looks to you to maintain their iMac about have deleted an application from the dock.
I'm going to start using the word "sucks". As in the dock sucks. The MacOS 9 UI rox, dude!! It's 1337!
I mechanical engineer, a civil engineer and a software engineer are driving in a car. The car starts down a steep grade when the brakes fail. The driver pumps the brakes like mad, and the brakes catch just before they come to a skidding halt at the edge of a cliff.
The three engineers get out of the car, happy to be alive. Being engineers, they start to analyse the situation.
The mechanical engineer says "The problem here lies with the mechanical engineer who designed these brakes. The brakes should have been able to handle a car with this mass and speed on this road."
The civil engineer disagrees. "The problem is that the civil engineer that designed this road is at fault here. He shouldn't have build a road that is so steep that ordinary cars would be in danger."
The software engineer says "Why don't we just push it back up the hill and see if it happens again."
First off, you might have preferred IE over Netscape. That was your personal preference. (Or maybe, you're a paid M$ shill, whatever)
However, I worked at a company that would not even let me install Netscape on my desktop because it didn't come from Microsoft. There was no debate about merit, cost/benefit, best use for my needs, anything of the sort.
It didn't come packaged with windows, I didn't have a choice even though I was informed and wanted one. People who didn't even know that there are other browsers available, didn't have a choice either. So, now you're going to tell me that had no effect on who won the 'browser wars?' If that's what you think, then you are a shill.
Re:You mean in only 3 to 4 years, Microsoft will .
on
Longhorn's Flash Killer?
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Sadly, selling your Macromedia stock right now might not be bad idea.
I think the precedent for this is IE. Look at the zeitgeist to see how many browsers use google: http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.html
Were the first few versions of IE better than Navigator? I don't remember it that way.
Sure, Navigator got bloaty and buggy as time went on, but that was only part of the reason that IE dominates. I think a bigger contributor to Navigator's loss was that IE came free, and was 'bundled' with the OS. That's what's going to happen to sparkle. Everyone who pays the M$ tax will get it 'for free', it won't be 'uninstallable' and of course front page will use it and tons more web sites will work with only IE.
Will Macromedia open-source flash? Or, will they decide to try and support whatever obfuscated and hidden API m$ will come up with?
Re:Translated for the America-Impaired
on
Who Needs Radio?
·
· Score: 1
Lemme see if I got this right...
FOX has towering intellectuals like O'Reilly offering his 'objective analysis' of current events. That's merely 'right wing?' I suppose you call hillbillies 'sons of the soil' too, don't you? Are other towering intellectuals like Ann Coulter 'right wing'?
Thanks for the "Insightful" and unbiased post. You deserve to get/. tenure for such even-handed commentary.
NPR has arts shows like "Selected Shorts" and insightful shows like "On the Media" and "Forum" presented by people who have a modicum of education, insight, and balance. Is that 'left wing?' Well then, colour me Left Wing!
You said it yourself: they're not going to get rich selling a linux version of HL2. That's the deciding factor.
Think about it from their perspective. From my experience, the PC industry does not put much emphasis on good design, maintainability of software or the even the assumption that the software base will need to be maintained for more than a few years. With those kinds of development practices, porting to another platform is hard, takes time, costs money, and might engender grumblings by the PHBs who wonder why the effort to port to such a small target.
I think it'll take at least one significant successful game on Linux to change challenge the idea that it's not profitable. Would HL2 (assuming it's as good as the first one) on Linux do it? You don't even believe it yourself.
Look at the GridShell sources
At version 0.97, the CVS repository has nothing in it but the files that CVS creates. All of that took only six months!
To quote the most eloquent Homer Simpson: BORING!
Yeah, I can't see why the rest of the world hates the west, can you? We turn war into a fuckin' video game, and relegate them to attacking us with swords while riding their camels.
I can take a guess at why 'they' hate 'us', but it wouldn't have that much to do with us relegating 'them' to anything.
The ones that I see do this to themselves by religion, oppression, and bigotry, and extreme luddism. Pure and simple. Contrary to popular opinion, the problems these poor nations have, have not been pushed on them nearly as much by others as by their own attitudes and beliefs. There is no mystery and no conspiracy here.
Slashdot Mirror
Do you any of you guys even own one? Haven't you guys wanted to hack it at least a tiny bit?
You don't have to reinvent the whole wheel, dammit! That Russian dude just patched the binary!
My gf got me a Canon EOS 20D for xmas. I love that camera! However, the one feature that forces me to carry two cameras is the lack of video recording that every cheap-ass point-n-shoot camera does these days. Not that I understand enough hardware to know this for sure, but I doubt there's a technical reason for that, it's a marketing reason. Anyone care to comment on that?
I fantasize about disassembling the firmware (I hear (from unreliable sources) that it's DOS-like running on an NEC embedded type x86 CPU) and find the place to turn the jne to a jz to enable me to record video with this thing.
Some of the buttons on my camera don't get much use and so some folks have taken to re-assigning them to things they use all the time. Surely you can see the value in that!
I don't see any use for retro games or a PDA functionality on a high-end camera, but I imagine that at some point we should see convergent device that'll satisfy me. Ha! Betcha that Korea and Japan will have a device next year with 5MP phone, 3x optical zoom 5GB MP3 player and a PDA and us americans will never see it. (I'm bitter cuz I've been spending too much time at gizmodo.com and engadget.com peeping me gadgets and phones that I cannot get here)
That's pages of text. How the hell is that supposed to sell anything to a suit or a PHB? If you're very lucky, a PHB will throw it derisively at the closest passing nerd to read. If the nerd renders an opinion in favour of Novell, the PHB will reject it because he thought Novell was the codename for a new microsoft product.
Just one 'generalization': You cannot, in fact, handle the truth.
You didn't see it and you won't see it. You're afraid of it.
More of my favourite quotes for you:
It is as useless to argue with those who have renounced the use and authority of reason as to administer medication to the dead.
- Thomas Jefferson
1) A strong belief is more important than a few facts.
2) The stronger the belief, the fewer the facts.
3) The fewer the facts, the more people killed.
- Milton Rothman
Serious rational criticism is so rare that it should be encouraged. Being too ready to defend oneself is more dangerous than being too ready to admit a mistake.
- Sir Karl Popper
It is especially important to encourage unorthodox thinking when the situation is critical: At such moments every new word and fresh thought is more precious than gold. Indeed, people must not be deprived of the right to think their own thoughts.
- Boris Yeltsin, _Against_the_Grain:_An_Autobiography_ (tr. Michael Glenny' Summit Books, 1990; p. 172)
Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it with religious conviction.
- Blaise Pascal
PS Didn't I see you at the Landover Baptist Church on Sunday? http://www.landoverbaptist.org/
You got the hate part backwards. And the spin is not Moore's, it's mine.
Anyway, I don't know you. But, I know a lot of people who claim there are lies in F9/11. These people have had, in my experience, several things in common:
- they have not watched it and therefor don't realise that Moore cannot even be said to lie in it because he doesn't actually claim anything; F9/11 is just a ~2hour collage of public documents, very plain video footage, and a few people posing some very innocent questions. I can see why you're are afraid to see it. I have more respect for Michael Moore than ever before because he is one of the few people who lays out the plain truth:
"Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
For your information, Fahrenheit 9/11 isn't Moore on some 2 hour rant like on Faux news. Nor is it like some fundamentalist preacher yelling hellfire and brimstone at the top of his lungs. If you're truth comes to you that way, then you, the tooth fairy, the easter bunny, and santa claus will have a great time in heaven, won't you?
- they have a christian bumper sticker or some stupid counter-darwin emblem on their car; I wish these people were even half as skeptical about their religious bigotry as they are about documentary film making or fundamental science
- they ask that I trust the government of george war bush on his foreign policy. Trust. That's a pet peeve of mine. gwb might yet go down in history as the most corrupt and lyingest president ever. Here is another choice quote, courtesty of quotedb.com:
"A man never lies as much as after a hunt, during a war, and before an election." -- Otto von Bismarck
If you count "The hunt for bin laden", that's 3 out of 3!
Oh, and, bon apetit!
Yes, it probably is a bit silly. I think it's fear, probably irrational, and it drives behaviour.
. htm right now. Doesn't that sound like it could be classic intimidation to you? Tell me straight out, have I gotten to jaded to be able to see the situation for what it is: an extreme swing in one direction of the political pendulum?
And, in my bad moods, the fear seems justified. I can't find the story now, but there was an NPR piece on how local district attorney were suddenly and unexpectedly being investigated by internal affairs type people if they even dare mention that they weren't being given any support to fight the 'war on terror'. I can only find this story http://www.freep.com/news/locway/probe17_20040117
Did I mention I have my tinfoil hat on extra snug today?
You think this is funny?
The secret service prevents the media from interviewing Michael Moore. For what reason - security? The secret service ushers him out of the convention - for security? What else are they going to do in the name of security? They (the government) get court orders censored in the name of security. What are you gonna do when they knock on your door, insisting that national security interests take a higher precedence than your first amendment rights?
Wasn't it Nixon who got impeached for (among other things) using the secret service to further his and his party's agenda? I'm not old enough to have lived through that, but it seems to me that once people saw what he was capable of, they understood that his abuse of power could turn the USA into something like an oppresive communist dictatorship. Don't people see that today?
Go watch Fahrenheit 9/11 again. I don't think you fully understand the depravity that this government is capable of. Or maybe, a lot of us don't believe it can be this bad. Noone wants to believe that our present civil situation could even be compared to that of nazi germany.
Dude, you don't even have to go the supreme court. Just go to your local traffic court if you get a speeding ticket, or the like. I did. It's painful to watch a segment of society that is uneducated and helpless deal with the very real and cold reality that is a court room. It's also hysterical to listen to a generous and light hearted commissioner/judge issue instructions and inject humour into the proceedings. I couldn't do it justice if I tried to tell it.
In case you care, the officer withdrew the charges and so made my day, and maybe that's why I recall the experience so positively. And maybe that's also why my faith in the system received a welcome boost.
Disclaimer: I love Python, the programming language.
While it may be a generalisation to imply that someone who likes NT couldn't be a first-rate hacker, you miss the point.
Do you remember 1997? I do. In that year, every wannabe pundit proclaimed that NT is going to overrun Unix, the Mac, and anything else. I have these memories of self-styled industry watchers telling me to forget everything I ever new about the Mac and anything that wasn't directly related to NT. My career was obviously about to dead-end if I didn't get on the NT bandwagon. Being the weak-minded drone that I am, I did just that. There was a multitide of programmers betting their future on NT back then.
My Python experience was completely different. I tried it out because someone talked about it (during a Perl class, of all occasions) and once I used it for more than 1/2 hour, I never looked back.
I agree that any decent hacker can learn Python, and learn it quickly. The point is, the first rate hacker is the one who will take the initiative for no other reason than because she finds it interesting, not because it's a buzzword that'll get you hits on monster. Contrast this with the hordes of VB and Java programmers of which I have not yet met an idealist devotee. I can understand that because Java and VB (for different reasons) severely limit the kinds of programs you can write and the concepts you can reason about. Python is a lot more liberated.
If you don't know who to root for, then let me tell you: Lindows!
Here's the deal: MS has been playing the conniving bully it's entire existence. It abuses the courts to further its monopoly, it blatantly disregards the consent decree it signed, it represents the worst parts of corrupt capitalism. It produces terrible products that clog our internet with virii and worms, does not adhere to standards it professes to, yet you want everyone else to play nice? Do you want other companies to be able to play in this space or not? Regardless of the legality of ms trademarks (which I believe to be tenuous anyway), I hope Lindows wins.
The point is that it works! Not because people are idiots, but because they're muggles. They don't get it. To them, the act of sending email might as well be magic for all the understanding they might have, so promising them something that's technically infeasible is worthwhile and profitable. If it's presented well, if it uses cultural memes that are accepted and understood by the target audience, if it tells them something they want to hear, it'll work.
This may not be a good example of it, but why not embrace FUD? Redmond is very good at it, why not counter FUD with FUD?
Not bloody likely. IBM is a bigger company with a much bigger patent portfolio and many more lawyers than Microsoft.
Sadly untrue. Microsoft boasts that they are the biggest law office in the world.
to be disdainfully helpful and push mozilla/linux/whatever and bash ms/outlook/whatever.
Try this:
"Well I don't have that problem because I use mozilla."
"In all the years that I've been on the net, not once have I been infected with a virus because I use Linux."
Not that I'm a condescending, anti-social geek without a girlfriend or anything like that...
For the life of me, I can't figure out how you got moderated to 5. You said nothing at all. I've been trying for a while to figure out how the /. crowd rates things. I haven't really come up with anything except that if you sound self-righteous and superior, you'll get moderated up or become governer in California.
Obviously you've never gotten a frantic phone call from someone who looks to you to maintain their iMac about have deleted an application from the dock.
I'm going to start using the word "sucks". As in the dock sucks. The MacOS 9 UI rox, dude!! It's 1337!
I mechanical engineer, a civil engineer and a software engineer are driving in a car. The car starts down a steep grade when the brakes fail. The driver pumps the brakes like mad, and the brakes catch just before they come to a skidding halt at the edge of a cliff.
The three engineers get out of the car, happy to be alive. Being engineers, they start to analyse the situation.
The mechanical engineer says "The problem here lies with the mechanical engineer who designed these brakes. The brakes should have been able to handle a car with this mass and speed on this road."
The civil engineer disagrees. "The problem is that the civil engineer that designed this road is at fault here. He shouldn't have build a road that is so steep that ordinary cars would be in danger."
The software engineer says "Why don't we just push it back up the hill and see if it happens again."
First off, you might have preferred IE over Netscape. That was your personal preference. (Or maybe, you're a paid M$ shill, whatever)
However, I worked at a company that would not even let me install Netscape on my desktop because it didn't come from Microsoft. There was no debate about merit, cost/benefit, best use for my needs, anything of the sort.
It didn't come packaged with windows, I didn't have a choice even though I was informed and wanted one. People who didn't even know that there are other browsers available, didn't have a choice either. So, now you're going to tell me that had no effect on who won the 'browser wars?' If that's what you think, then you are a shill.
Sadly, selling your Macromedia stock right now might not be bad idea.
I think the precedent for this is IE. Look at the zeitgeist to see how many browsers use google: http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.html
Were the first few versions of IE better than Navigator? I don't remember it that way.
Sure, Navigator got bloaty and buggy as time went on, but that was only part of the reason that IE dominates. I think a bigger contributor to Navigator's loss was that IE came free, and was 'bundled' with the OS. That's what's going to happen to sparkle. Everyone who pays the M$ tax will get it 'for free', it won't be 'uninstallable' and of course front page will use it and tons more web sites will work with only IE.
Will Macromedia open-source flash? Or, will they decide to try and support whatever obfuscated and hidden API m$ will come up with?
Lemme see if I got this right...
/. tenure for such even-handed commentary.
FOX has towering intellectuals like O'Reilly offering his 'objective analysis' of current events. That's merely 'right wing?' I suppose you call hillbillies 'sons of the soil' too, don't you? Are other towering intellectuals like Ann Coulter 'right wing'?
Thanks for the "Insightful" and unbiased post. You deserve to get
NPR has arts shows like "Selected Shorts" and insightful shows like "On the Media" and "Forum" presented by people who have a modicum of education, insight, and balance. Is that 'left wing?' Well then, colour me Left Wing!
You said it yourself: they're not going to get rich selling a linux version of HL2. That's the deciding factor.
Think about it from their perspective. From my experience, the PC industry does not put much emphasis on good design, maintainability of software or the even the assumption that the software base will need to be maintained for more than a few years. With those kinds of development practices, porting to another platform is hard, takes time, costs money, and might engender grumblings by the PHBs who wonder why the effort to port to such a small target.
I think it'll take at least one significant successful game on Linux to change challenge the idea that it's not profitable. Would HL2 (assuming it's as good as the first one) on Linux do it? You don't even believe it yourself.
Look at the GridShell sources At version 0.97, the CVS repository has nothing in it but the files that CVS creates. All of that took only six months! To quote the most eloquent Homer Simpson: BORING!
Create a 'Welcome to my LAN Party' sign. Hang it right at the front door. The sign includes some of the following:
1. Suggested donation $10 with an big coffee can recepticle for the money.
2. Bathrooms are here, here, and there. If you want to take a nap, bring your sleeping bag to the lounge over here....
3. Food is available at the following fine locations... and include a map of the area.
4. Please take a sticker, write down your name and moniker and affix it to your computer and monitor and other equipment you own and care about.
5. Rules of engagement are the following... age of admission, food, smoking, alcohol, pharmaceuticals, etc.
6. This is the network setup: DHCP etc.
7. The following games are at such a version:
i) quake3a, rev 1.34
ii) unreal, rev 2.1...
iii) etc
8. Patches, maps, updates, and other installables are available on this machine:...
9. We use ICQ and this is how to contact the important people at this LAN party...
Are you talking about this? "Peace Be With You: The All-Around Ergonomic Chair Has Arrived">