Actually we do know already. Since there are nation-wide laws against drug running, and that hasn't stopped drugs, why would anyone think that a nation-wide ban against guns would fare any better? (especially since some guns are easy to manufacture with a low-level technology, similar to that available to cartels.)
Agree on the "only 1-2 decent movies per year". But still like to see those old movies I missed out, or want to see again. Like mentioned multiple times above, Can't find them on streaming, but they usually have the disk.
"Fascist" is what you call the people you don't agree with. Even if you happen to be one yourself (see "antifa", which is following in the steps of an infamous Austrian).
Not everyone lives in a crime-infested neighborhood, so that may not be an issue for the "non-thinking" poster. On the other hand, it sounds like something very ugly (or very expensive if not ugly). I'd bet HOAs would have a fit. But then, not everyone lives in a HOA-infested neighborhood.
She is responsible for those under her. I don't care about her degree/qualifications/etc....her section failed miserably. When a wing commander loses a couple of planes due to maintenance issues, he's not the one who turns the bolts or even the supervisor of those who do--but ultimately he is responsible for hiring/training/etc of the chain that does. So he gets "early retirement"...Same here--she needed to go.
When the Nazis aren't as violent as the other side, yes, I would say "a pox on both your groups". If you're Polish in 1939, who's worse, the Germans or the Soviets?
I have seen good friends (not neccesarily both the same "race" either) use that word (and worse!) to refer to each other, neither taking offense. Just because an uninvolved 3d person takes offense doesn't mean the actual participants do. Maybe the 3d party is just being a busy-body. Reminds me of the U of Miami Indians being forced to change their mascot because some so-called indian activists took offense. While the real Miami tribe wanted them to keep the "Indians" name so that folks would remember the Miami where actually in Ohio and not S Florida.
1. Last time I checked, Biloxi was still there. Even after the storm (Antebellum houses still exist there). 2. Those trailing storms are likely to stay out at sea. 3. The global warming folks used to say AGW would shred hurricanes....until that didn't fit the narrative. 4. The last time serious hurricanes (not Nor'Easters (sp) hit US coast was 2005--And predictions of storm numbers have been mostly higher than actual storms since. 5. Grow up.
Sultana, 27 Apr 1865. 1547 dead (depending on who you talk to). A civilian ship, but hired by the Army to ferry POWs home. Maybe not combat, but could still be considered a military mission taking place during war (The war between the states didn't end until May 1865). It's all in the definition. Regardless, none of these examples detract from the (unnecessary) loss of life on the Indianapolis.
If I recall, there wasn't a US involved at that time. The US withdrew from the world after WW1 (see G. Washington's recommendations), and had to be dragged kicking and screaming (and have a major naval base shot up) to return. May still have been an Auschwitz/etc., but that's another speculative history project.
NYT has nothing on MSNBC. There was a mass-shooting in a "red" state, so on a lark I went to MSNBC to see how they would spin it ("gunz are evvviiiillll" was what I expected). All I got was articles on the latest so-called Trump/Ruzzia scandal.
what crimes? He beat Her Royal Clintoness. That's it. And that's enough to make all those on the left go wild and violent. And those on the (r) to be upset because a republican didn't beat her--a populist. So many (r)'s are going along. What illegal thing did he do? Beat's me. I've heard lots of things mentioned, but none even come close to what Comey said Clinton did.
Slashdot Mirror
That would be People's Republic of Korea. The whole country is the private property of the Kims, including the prisons.
Proof: What have they done about stopping black-on-black violence?
Listening to what BLM state, I'm pretty sure they really do mean other lives don't matter. ("Pigs in a blanket, fry em like bacon")
Actually we do know already. Since there are nation-wide laws against drug running, and that hasn't stopped drugs, why would anyone think that a nation-wide ban against guns would fare any better? (especially since some guns are easy to manufacture with a low-level technology, similar to that available to cartels.)
Agree on the "only 1-2 decent movies per year". But still like to see those old movies I missed out, or want to see again. Like mentioned multiple times above, Can't find them on streaming, but they usually have the disk.
But they were (and still are, if they come over here) "African Americans"
"Fascist" is what you call the people you don't agree with. Even if you happen to be one yourself (see "antifa", which is following in the steps of an infamous Austrian).
You ever look at the price of those mobile homes? Hint, They ain't cheap.
Ahhhhh, aged beef! with extra spice.
Not everyone lives in a crime-infested neighborhood, so that may not be an issue for the "non-thinking" poster. On the other hand, it sounds like something very ugly (or very expensive if not ugly). I'd bet HOAs would have a fit. But then, not everyone lives in a HOA-infested neighborhood.
If you were in the AF they told you to put "AF" in front of the ssn--that way it's not your SSN anymore...so they could get by privacy act rules.
She is responsible for those under her. I don't care about her degree/qualifications/etc....her section failed miserably. When a wing commander loses a couple of planes due to maintenance issues, he's not the one who turns the bolts or even the supervisor of those who do--but ultimately he is responsible for hiring/training/etc of the chain that does. So he gets "early retirement"...Same here--she needed to go.
and his accountants.
When the Nazis aren't as violent as the other side, yes, I would say "a pox on both your groups". If you're Polish in 1939, who's worse, the Germans or the Soviets?
I have seen good friends (not neccesarily both the same "race" either) use that word (and worse!) to refer to each other, neither taking offense. Just because an uninvolved 3d person takes offense doesn't mean the actual participants do. Maybe the 3d party is just being a busy-body. Reminds me of the U of Miami Indians being forced to change their mascot because some so-called indian activists took offense. While the real Miami tribe wanted them to keep the "Indians" name so that folks would remember the Miami where actually in Ohio and not S Florida.
Wondering why they didn't do that in the first place to reduce background noise.
1. Last time I checked, Biloxi was still there. Even after the storm (Antebellum houses still exist there). 2. Those trailing storms are likely to stay out at sea. 3. The global warming folks used to say AGW would shred hurricanes....until that didn't fit the narrative. 4. The last time serious hurricanes (not Nor'Easters (sp) hit US coast was 2005--And predictions of storm numbers have been mostly higher than actual storms since. 5. Grow up.
Finally, a post worth reading--and it comes from an AC!
And how do they compare to their (and my) relatives that are still over in Africa? You know one may actually become president one day...
And Hispaniola, too. Has messed up quite a few storms.
Sultana, 27 Apr 1865. 1547 dead (depending on who you talk to). A civilian ship, but hired by the Army to ferry POWs home. Maybe not combat, but could still be considered a military mission taking place during war (The war between the states didn't end until May 1865). It's all in the definition. Regardless, none of these examples detract from the (unnecessary) loss of life on the Indianapolis.
If I recall, there wasn't a US involved at that time. The US withdrew from the world after WW1 (see G. Washington's recommendations), and had to be dragged kicking and screaming (and have a major naval base shot up) to return. May still have been an Auschwitz/etc., but that's another speculative history project.
NYT has nothing on MSNBC. There was a mass-shooting in a "red" state, so on a lark I went to MSNBC to see how they would spin it ("gunz are evvviiiillll" was what I expected). All I got was articles on the latest so-called Trump/Ruzzia scandal.
what crimes? He beat Her Royal Clintoness. That's it. And that's enough to make all those on the left go wild and violent. And those on the (r) to be upset because a republican didn't beat her--a populist. So many (r)'s are going along. What illegal thing did he do? Beat's me. I've heard lots of things mentioned, but none even come close to what Comey said Clinton did.
Simple solution: Standard implant required for all "citizens". (I hope I'm being sarcastic, but I'm afraid I might not be.)