This is just the kind of brilliant insight you get after smoking weed all night, only to wake up the next day and realize that none of what you wrote down even makes any sense.
Oh, I forgot, the UK isn't a democracy. Her Majesty the Queen appoints all your leaders from a list of freshly-scrubbed virginal aristocrats who've been bathed in the finest milk beforehand (as is the tradition). Under no circumstances will citizens or party members "vote" on anyone, and no aristocrat must ever be made to answer to a filthy commoner, much less PANDER to one (I almost faint at the thought).
And this explains why Parliament is so civil and polite, and UK politics is so non-partisan.
Why wouldn't they continue to lie? Congress, the President, and the American public have made it abundantly clear that there will be no consequences for lying. So, why not?
What good is disappearing into a hole forever, with no further contact with the world, going to do for his cause? People will just forget about him. At least this way, he and Assange can blog and publicly comment. That's way more than Bradley Manning will ever be able to do again.
When I first heard about Bitcoin, I thought it might have been well-intentioned. But well-intentioned or not, the whole thing is a giant flashing sign for scammers, thieves, and money-launderers reading "Marks Here!" It was only a (very brief) matter of time before they inevitably started showing up in droves.
That's the standard form letter that you get in ANY state (except for maybe 2 or 3 swing states, where the outcome of any election isn't already predetermined).
If getting these things into people's laps gets them to buy a buttload of MS software or makes them so attractive to developers that everybody shifts over to RT, it could work. But I would call that highly unlikely. Otherwise, they're just taking an even bigger loss than before. It certainly didn't work for HP.
Movies have always been about making money. You people are a bunch of romantics. Every now and then a great movie gets made IN SPITE OF THIS, but the major Hollywood studios have always been about making money first and foremost. Any artistic accomplishment has just been regarded as either a side benefit or a means to garner a smidgen of studio prestige. If you're remembering any era as different than that, you're remembering it wrong.
No, 95+% of movies have, and will always be, shit. If you think there is any era that's different, just name it and I'll name at least 10 shitty, forgotten, by-the-numbers crapfests for every 1 great movie. People remember Casablanca, but they forget the 100 b-rated Roy Rogers-type westerns that came out that same year.
The Great Gatsby may well be doable for under $10 million. But I seriously doubt you could do The Lone Ranger for that price, and not have it look like complete b-rated schlock. Even the 80's version cost double that (in 1981 dollars, no less). And it didn't have any special effects at all, or even a big star.
Slashdot Mirror
If you're thinking you're going to get access to the unencrypted blu-ray disc stream, you can forget it sparky.
It's not Linux if I can't configure it the way *I* want!
This is just the kind of brilliant insight you get after smoking weed all night, only to wake up the next day and realize that none of what you wrote down even makes any sense.
Something tells me that there would be no shortage of people who would line up to kick this guy in the nuts.
He's going to overturn decades of experience, hard work, research, and language development because HE'S A REBEL!!!
Oh, I forgot, the UK isn't a democracy. Her Majesty the Queen appoints all your leaders from a list of freshly-scrubbed virginal aristocrats who've been bathed in the finest milk beforehand (as is the tradition). Under no circumstances will citizens or party members "vote" on anyone, and no aristocrat must ever be made to answer to a filthy commoner, much less PANDER to one (I almost faint at the thought).
And this explains why Parliament is so civil and polite, and UK politics is so non-partisan.
The Feds are requesting the private keys from the server operators themselves, not from the CA.
Something tells me that before this is over, we'll find out they've been requesting them (and getting them) from the CA's too.
It's not a "man in the middle" attack. It's the "government on top" attack.
You die for your principals
As the great General Patton once said, you don't win by dying for your principles.
Why wouldn't they continue to lie? Congress, the President, and the American public have made it abundantly clear that there will be no consequences for lying. So, why not?
What good is disappearing into a hole forever, with no further contact with the world, going to do for his cause? People will just forget about him. At least this way, he and Assange can blog and publicly comment. That's way more than Bradley Manning will ever be able to do again.
If he agrees to wear a muzzle and gag, they may even let him talk to his lawyer at Christmas.
What exactly is the problem this legislation is trying to solve?
Claire Perry is having a problem getting votes in her upcoming reelection.
FTFY
I'm pretty sure Samsung made a few bucks too.
When I first heard about Bitcoin, I thought it might have been well-intentioned. But well-intentioned or not, the whole thing is a giant flashing sign for scammers, thieves, and money-launderers reading "Marks Here!" It was only a (very brief) matter of time before they inevitably started showing up in droves.
That's the standard form letter that you get in ANY state (except for maybe 2 or 3 swing states, where the outcome of any election isn't already predetermined).
If getting these things into people's laps gets them to buy a buttload of MS software or makes them so attractive to developers that everybody shifts over to RT, it could work. But I would call that highly unlikely. Otherwise, they're just taking an even bigger loss than before. It certainly didn't work for HP.
if (FireFury03.penis >= 6) {
English.language = American.language;
};
It's been an important part since the beginning of EE. It's just that no one realized it until 1947.
No but H1-B visa employment in the U.S. has EXPLODED!
Movies have always been about making money. You people are a bunch of romantics. Every now and then a great movie gets made IN SPITE OF THIS, but the major Hollywood studios have always been about making money first and foremost. Any artistic accomplishment has just been regarded as either a side benefit or a means to garner a smidgen of studio prestige. If you're remembering any era as different than that, you're remembering it wrong.
No, 95+% of movies have, and will always be, shit. If you think there is any era that's different, just name it and I'll name at least 10 shitty, forgotten, by-the-numbers crapfests for every 1 great movie. People remember Casablanca, but they forget the 100 b-rated Roy Rogers-type westerns that came out that same year.
He wasn't a superhero in any sense of the word. He just had on a mask.
And that's different from Batman how?
The Great Gatsby may well be doable for under $10 million. But I seriously doubt you could do The Lone Ranger for that price, and not have it look like complete b-rated schlock. Even the 80's version cost double that (in 1981 dollars, no less). And it didn't have any special effects at all, or even a big star.