My FF laughs at chrome, tabs or not, but I deliberately don't run the latest, while I let chrome update to whatever retardation google wishes. I also mod out my FF (because FF lets you do that shit) so it's not rendering extra garbage. I require that Chrome renders it all, natively, because I keep it around for maximum site compatibility. Chrome is my internet explorer.
I keep hearing "chrome faster lol" but I greet it with an expectant gesture in my hands and face, only to get a blank one in return.
If your substantiation is "a friend/some guy said so" then all that says about chrome's strengths is they're like apple's.
Peeked at TFA, sounds like it amplifies an existing Van Allen belt. Probably doesn't work surgically. Probably impossible to set up a belt on other planets with known tech, but I don't know belts and maybe a mild one can be synthesized, then amplified. I imagine the scale/distribution of radio emitters required isn't too impossible since we did it accidentally.
You're putting the burden on whoever's in easy reach. Same shit as yelling at the messenger. Yelling at customer service to change something they don't have authority to access.
Meatspace operations are subject to those laws. Targeted operations are subjected to those laws.
I have zero obligation to put DRM or locks on my content published to the open internet. The "offenders" are the ones who get policed about their local laws.
Oh but it's hard to find out who's doing what? I don't care. You're the ones who wanted unenforceable laws about movie content or weird porn or whatever. You enforce them. Not me. Not google or cox or netflix or apple or windows or whoever.
>if they were employable How circular can you get?
You're obviously a basement neckbeard, because if you had anything better to do than ACing on internet forums, then you wouldn't be here in the first place.
You faggots immediately came running with halved prices and tripled bandwidth, knocking frantically on every door.
You don't have to call it "cheap" but you're gonna have to pick a word that means effortlessly handing it out because of easy margin. That's not an opinion, it already happened.
Visible-but-hard is still better than not visible at all. You've brought up a footnote, not a contradiction.
And while possible, it's quite the bluff. It's like trying to cheat with your cards visible. Publishing openly is a confident gesture, even without any discussion of malware.
X Xxx Xxxxxxxx xx Android Malware xx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxx xx Xxxxxx, xxx xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx xxxx X Xxxx xxxx xxxx x xxx xxxxx xx Android malware xx xxxxxxxxxx every 10 seconds. Xx xxxx xxxx, xxx xxxxxxx xx xxxxxxxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xx 3,500,000 xxx malicious Android files xx xxx xxx xx xxx xxxx. "xxx threat level xxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxx xxxxxxx xxxx xx Android xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxx high. xx xxx, xxx X XXXX xxxxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 3.5 million xxx Android malware xxxx xxx xxxx," xxxx xxxx. Xxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxx Xxxx xxx xxxxxxxxxx xx xxx xxxx xxxx xxxx x xxxxx xxxxxxxx xx xxxxx xxx xx xxx xxxxxx xxxxxxx xx Android.
I'm not wasting time discussing rights or origin of freedom. There's no need for semantics, because I'm going to discuss raw logistics. The reality, in any words, is that the owner of a password has 100% control and everyone can only "ask" (even with a blowtorch) for it.
This imbalance will (sooner than later if so pressured) manifest itself, no matter how hard the law stomps its feet and yells.
Off the cuff example of manifestation: A password (digital key etc) can send itself off to a random acquaintance, with instructions not to contact you because "an unexpected duress has occurred" and to wait until it passes. The trigger can be a deadman switch or what you will. Obviously the password is now the new unknown.
You can't demand something I don't have. Even with a $5 wrench. Go fuck yourself with the piece of paper you thought was magic. It doesn't matter what you think of Shoulds or Who Grants What or anything because the password is GONE, words will change nothing, discussing it will change nothing, torture will change nothing, you could use a brain slug and it's still G-O-N-E.
They can probably stomp their feet about destroying evidence or something, if they're in a punitive mood. The lawyers can argue about unconfirmed allegations constituting evidence, or measures that were benign when placed, or whatever. Still gooo~oooone.
This is the same stupidity that led to warrant canaries.
'87, I don't know what language the words "vacation" and "retirement" are from. Probably a lavish one.
Wait, I think I did see it in a foreign movie once. Some guy shouted a word that sounded like "retire" and everyone put theirs away.
Okay, never mind, I do have a retirement. It's in a locked drawer with 12 rounds. I can reliably expect that to be there waiting for me at 65. Because I'm so entitled.
This is the very point of Law. It's meant to be a fixed, predefined standard. It's meant to apply to all. It's meant to affect an action, not a person, sometimes the goal being to eliminate the action from existence entirely. Murder is addressed, murder is defined, murder is quantified, with no respect to who the particular Alice and Bob were. Justice is blind.
Selective enforcement and selective lawwriting are then the polar opposite. It is the antithesis of law. We have interpreters, arbiters, interpreting and being arbitrary. Justice is what the judge had for lunch.
That's not a joke, that's been studied. Parole rates are increased in the window after judges have eaten.
The rest is, as they say, algebra. When you have an influence'able factor in any given system, it will be influenced by the most influential influences. Obviously. The slightly-less obvious is what that means in practice: Justice to those who afford it, laws to those who lobbybuy them.
This is the same problem with the "free market" catch22. There will never be a free market because (even without malicious intent) capitalism leads to concentrated power. Capital begets capital. The balance will shift in favor of greater weights, naturally. Conditions will drift towards self-optimizing. Conditions will favor those that most influence them.
It's just nature - no, it's simpler, it's linear cause and effect. Evolution happens fastest with frequent breeding, and capitalism favors wealth concentration, naturally and then again artificially, through naturally-evolving effects.
I'm not proposing a solution to capitalism or justice-for-some, just observing inevitability, because sometimes I see people pretend reality is otherwise. Warm air rises and influences self-optimize. Of course they do.
(1) I see a grenade flying towards me. (2) I hit the teleport button.
Had (1) already happened anyway? Because of the artificial delay, the server hears my (2) instruction long after I've been a bloodstain. I don't even know about (1) until it's been in the air for ages.
Slashdot Mirror
The musical chairs are disappearing and you want to blame the players.
My FF laughs at chrome, tabs or not, but I deliberately don't run the latest, while I let chrome update to whatever retardation google wishes. I also mod out my FF (because FF lets you do that shit) so it's not rendering extra garbage. I require that Chrome renders it all, natively, because I keep it around for maximum site compatibility. Chrome is my internet explorer.
I keep hearing "chrome faster lol" but I greet it with an expectant gesture in my hands and face, only to get a blank one in return.
If your substantiation is "a friend/some guy said so" then all that says about chrome's strengths is they're like apple's.
Shareholders.
Peeked at TFA, sounds like it amplifies an existing Van Allen belt. Probably doesn't work surgically. Probably impossible to set up a belt on other planets with known tech, but I don't know belts and maybe a mild one can be synthesized, then amplified. I imagine the scale/distribution of radio emitters required isn't too impossible since we did it accidentally.
You're putting the burden on whoever's in easy reach. Same shit as yelling at the messenger. Yelling at customer service to change something they don't have authority to access.
Meatspace operations are subject to those laws. Targeted operations are subjected to those laws.
I have zero obligation to put DRM or locks on my content published to the open internet. The "offenders" are the ones who get policed about their local laws.
Oh but it's hard to find out who's doing what? I don't care. You're the ones who wanted unenforceable laws about movie content or weird porn or whatever. You enforce them. Not me. Not google or cox or netflix or apple or windows or whoever.
Is anyone going to post the XKCD? Alright, guess I'll grab it, here.
https://xkcd.com/1838/
Your computer plays FLAC.
If you're acquiring audio in FLAC, that's cool. If it's offered in FLAC, that's cool.
But I'm not advocating FLAC in your devices. It's for the master copy. In fact, your computer doesn't need to play the FLAC, just store and convert.
And I guess software will be allowed to house the codec natively now? Audacity's had to do that two-step legal jig, iirc.
It probably wouldn't take long to find somewhere in the CFAA to shove this, if an arbiter so wished. It's omnicompatible by design.
>if they were employable
How circular can you get?
You're obviously a basement neckbeard, because if you had anything better to do than ACing on internet forums, then you wouldn't be here in the first place.
We did deal with it. We let google fiber in.
You faggots immediately came running with halved prices and tripled bandwidth, knocking frantically on every door.
You don't have to call it "cheap" but you're gonna have to pick a word that means effortlessly handing it out because of easy margin. That's not an opinion, it already happened.
If I wanted to be pedantic about "best", a blank check could get you [better] ATVs, helicopters, jetpacks, whatever.
But no, this seems like a fine response. Especially if they're reasonable and not assholes about >tight timetable never mind.
I coasted all the way down to ~$5/mo while platinumtel was around. I just needed to be reliably on-call, very rare need for data.
If you guys favor a reliable alacarte, it's not like I'm contracted to anything.
>you make a claim you cite evidence
>"the progressive solution will make everyone sick"
lol.
Visible-but-hard is still better than not visible at all. You've brought up a footnote, not a contradiction.
And while possible, it's quite the bluff. It's like trying to cheat with your cards visible. Publishing openly is a confident gesture, even without any discussion of malware.
Because Android malware Android danger Android.
X Xxx Xxxxxxxx xx Android Malware xx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxx xx Xxxxxx, xxx xxxxxxxxxx
Xxxxxxxx xxxx X Xxxx xxxx xxxx x xxx xxxxx xx Android malware xx xxxxxxxxxx every 10 seconds. Xx xxxx xxxx, xxx xxxxxxx xx xxxxxxxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xx 3,500,000 xxx malicious Android files xx xxx xxx xx xxx xxxx. "xxx threat level xxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxx xxxxxxx xxxx xx Android xxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxx high. xx xxx, xxx X XXXX xxxxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 3.5 million xxx Android malware xxxx xxx xxxx," xxxx xxxx. Xxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxx Xxxx xxx xxxxxxxxxx xx xxx xxxx xxxx xxxx x xxxxx xxxxxxxx xx xxxxx xxx xx xxx xxxxxx xxxxxxx xx Android.
I'm not wasting time discussing rights or origin of freedom. There's no need for semantics, because I'm going to discuss raw logistics. The reality, in any words, is that the owner of a password has 100% control and everyone can only "ask" (even with a blowtorch) for it.
This imbalance will (sooner than later if so pressured) manifest itself, no matter how hard the law stomps its feet and yells.
Off the cuff example of manifestation: A password (digital key etc) can send itself off to a random acquaintance, with instructions not to contact you because "an unexpected duress has occurred" and to wait until it passes. The trigger can be a deadman switch or what you will. Obviously the password is now the new unknown.
You can't demand something I don't have. Even with a $5 wrench. Go fuck yourself with the piece of paper you thought was magic. It doesn't matter what you think of Shoulds or Who Grants What or anything because the password is GONE, words will change nothing, discussing it will change nothing, torture will change nothing, you could use a brain slug and it's still G-O-N-E.
They can probably stomp their feet about destroying evidence or something, if they're in a punitive mood. The lawyers can argue about unconfirmed allegations constituting evidence, or measures that were benign when placed, or whatever. Still gooo~oooone.
This is the same stupidity that led to warrant canaries.
Felt like a SNES game, sprites notwithstanding
'87, I don't know what language the words "vacation" and "retirement" are from. Probably a lavish one.
Wait, I think I did see it in a foreign movie once. Some guy shouted a word that sounded like "retire" and everyone put theirs away.
Okay, never mind, I do have a retirement. It's in a locked drawer with 12 rounds. I can reliably expect that to be there waiting for me at 65. Because I'm so entitled.
This is the very point of Law. It's meant to be a fixed, predefined standard. It's meant to apply to all. It's meant to affect an action, not a person, sometimes the goal being to eliminate the action from existence entirely. Murder is addressed, murder is defined, murder is quantified, with no respect to who the particular Alice and Bob were. Justice is blind.
Selective enforcement and selective lawwriting are then the polar opposite. It is the antithesis of law. We have interpreters, arbiters, interpreting and being arbitrary. Justice is what the judge had for lunch.
That's not a joke, that's been studied. Parole rates are increased in the window after judges have eaten.
The rest is, as they say, algebra. When you have an influence'able factor in any given system, it will be influenced by the most influential influences. Obviously. The slightly-less obvious is what that means in practice: Justice to those who afford it, laws to those who lobbybuy them.
This is the same problem with the "free market" catch22. There will never be a free market because (even without malicious intent) capitalism leads to concentrated power. Capital begets capital. The balance will shift in favor of greater weights, naturally. Conditions will drift towards self-optimizing. Conditions will favor those that most influence them.
It's just nature - no, it's simpler, it's linear cause and effect. Evolution happens fastest with frequent breeding, and capitalism favors wealth concentration, naturally and then again artificially, through naturally-evolving effects.
I'm not proposing a solution to capitalism or justice-for-some, just observing inevitability, because sometimes I see people pretend reality is otherwise. Warm air rises and influences self-optimize. Of course they do.
While in that pane, I have a dropdown that says "Save as HTML and image" or "Save as image only".
I run an old photoshop7.0 though. Has all the features I'll ever use but with instant bootup.
In all earnest, without any trace of cocked brow or wry grin, I submit that they have done more for our fear culture than most terrorists ever will.
Not that pointing it out helps much.
(1) I see a grenade flying towards me. (2) I hit the teleport button.
Had (1) already happened anyway? Because of the artificial delay, the server hears my (2) instruction long after I've been a bloodstain. I don't even know about (1) until it's been in the air for ages.
I asked about second, you clod!
Don't imply they implied it.
It's that thing that tried to DRM the lids and got a donut pillow grade pwning.