Slashdot Mirror


Murdered Woman's Fitbit Nails Cheating Husband (nydailynews.com)

BarbaraHudson writes: A murdered woman's Fitbit data shows she was still alive an hour after her husband claims she was murdered and he was tied up, contradicting her husband's description of events. New York Daily News reports: "Richard Dabate, 40, was charged this month with felony murder, tampering with physical evidence and making false statements following his wife Connie's December 2015 death at their home in Ellington, Tolland County. Dabate called 911 reporting that his wife was the victim of a home invasion, alleging that she was shot dead by a 'tall, obese man' with a deep voice like actor Vin Diesel's, sporting 'camouflage and a mask,' according to an arrest warrant. Dabate alleged her death took place more than an hour before her Fitbit-tracked movements revealed."

131 comments

  1. First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tall obese lives matter!

    1. Re: First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's always the tall, obese man.

    2. Re: First by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 3, Funny

      it's always the tall, obese man.

      That's what the short obese man wants you to think.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    3. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Tall obese lives matter!

      Tall obese man who sounds like Vin Diesel? Doesn't this sound made up?

      OMG I think the murderer sounded like Joe Pesci and was like skinny but had fat ankles you know?? Cankles is what he had yes.. in fact it might have been a transexual woman.. so Caitlyn jenner if Caitlyn jenner was originally Joe Pesci but got a sex change but didnt do anything about her/his fat ankles..

      only a human mind could come up with such stupid crap.

    4. Re: First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That guy's in league with Cancer Man.

    5. Re: First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The tall obese man was Barbara Hudson. Barbara submitted the article in an attempt to deflect guilt. There's even photographic proof clearly identifying the suspect.

      https://d3qvyul2tp4j8.cloudfront.net/i/Ws0-S1Zysrt.jpg

      Notice the "B" is for Barbara.

  2. Alllegedly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll wait for the jury to ring in on this one.

    Tall obese men are notorious for tampering with fitness trackers. It was one of the unfinished story arcs in the Fast and the Furious if I'm not mistaken

  3. Finally a good use for fitness trackers. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We've heard all about doctors not knowing what to do with fitness tracker data but now we're finally seeing a valid use case: recording your time of death! The police must be thrilled. ;)

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Finally a good use for fitness trackers. by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      This kind of thing was predicted long ago, though it was supposed to be a warning:

      "We'll know you're dead when you don't answer your phone".

      Well, we showed those prognosticators, and we ignored their warnings and went leagues beyond what they foresaw. We voluntarily wear electronics that spy on us regardless of whether we activate them or not.

    2. Re:Finally a good use for fitness trackers. by networkBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually....
      Tie fitbit tracker "heartbeat" data with a deadman switch...

      Fitbit says you died, time to delete the crypto keys to the computer.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    3. Re:Finally a good use for fitness trackers. by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2

      You're going to want a LONG fuse on that deadman switch, or any number of accidents or incidents of forgetfulness could cause you some serious annoyance.

      I have a friend who would wipe or destroy my digital media for me if I died, after migrating any family photos or videos my wife wanted to keep. My stuff is locked down for the sake of it, and not locked down well enough to keep law enforcement or a decent hacker out anyway.

      Security vs. convenience. By the time you've gone to deadman switches you're so far beyond 'inconvenient' you need a new word for it.

    4. Re:Finally a good use for fitness trackers. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have a friend who would wipe or destroy my digital media for me if I died

      I'm willing my collection of ASCII porn to the Smithsonian in the case of my death.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re: Finally a good use for fitness trackers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First rule of murder from now own-first cut off the fitbit.

    6. Re:Finally a good use for fitness trackers. by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      Fitbit says you died, time to delete the crypto keys to the computer.

      Fitbit says you died, time to delete my browser history, porn folder, and Google account.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    7. Re:Finally a good use for fitness trackers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fitbit says you died, time to delete the crypto keys to the computer.

      Great idea. That could not possibly go wrong.

      captcha: checks

    8. Re: Finally a good use for fitness trackers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First rule of murder from now own-first cut off the fitbit.

      Seriously this one reminds me of a murder where the guy who killed his ex girlfriend was caught because he buried her with her still running smart phone, whilst having his smart phone on him as well while driving the body to bury her and then went back again with his working smartphone to dig up her smart phone and then make a Facebook update telling all her friends that she ran away and that she was "so so sorry".

      What this guy was ignorant of is that the tower connection history of both phones showed that both phones travelled to the burial site together on the date she disappeared and then his phone went back to that location and then both phones traveled together back to his house where the message to all of her friends was sent from before it went dark, again at the ex boyfriends house. This idiot was busted before the investigation even began. It is funny to watch people thinking that they can get away with murder while they are literally being watched at every moment of every day and don't realize it at all.

    9. Re:Finally a good use for fitness trackers. by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Well yes...
      And actually I already have a system I use.
      Like you I have a friend(relative) who is responsible for my primary computer stuff, but there is one machine that requires a ping at least once a week or it goes dark, after a month it wipes its keys and my CA signed private key as well.
      I'll notice when it goes dark... and if I don't I have *way* bigger problems.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    10. Re:Finally a good use for fitness trackers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What could possibly go wrong?

    11. Re:Finally a good use for fitness trackers. by wasteoid · · Score: 1

      Make sure to include a 1541 floppy drive to read your box of floppy disks.

    12. Re:Finally a good use for fitness trackers. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Make sure to include a 1541 floppy drive to read your box of floppy disks.

      I have a 5.25" floppy.

      But I keep my ASCII porn on Bernoulli tape.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  4. DST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are DST adjustments automatic on a Fitbit? Asking as I don't own one.

    1. Re:DST? by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      Or time zones?

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    2. Re:DST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time zone adjustment is manual via the web dashboard and sync (at least for the Alta).

    3. Re:DST? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Found the defense attorney!

      Disclaimer: was thinking the same thing myself.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:DST? by EvilSS · · Score: 3, Informative

      Are DST adjustments automatic on a Fitbit? Asking as I don't own one.

      Very good question! Unfortunately for the husband they also have video of the woman leaving the gym at around the time she was supposed to have been murdered. So based on that it sounds like the time on the fitbit is correct. Well, unless the gym also didn't set their clock correctly on their video, but that would be easy to verify. The FitBit is just icing on the cake.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    5. Re:DST? by zlives · · Score: 1

      so the fitbit ... bit is just clickbait

    6. Re:DST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the husband was just wrong about the time. People do that.

    7. Re:DST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. It does update when syncing, but the device/software just update current time. Mine is set to manually sync and when the time changed, i had a whole day where activity was off by an hour :/

    8. Re:DST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or does the two dollar device actually have a reliable clock? They may just approximate time from the occasion of feeding the data to their spyware.

    9. Re:DST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On my two separate models of Fitbit devices, time of day and time zone are initially set on setup and first sync.
      My first one had an antenna that communicated with the device and would sync with the website. I lost that one.
      My current one syncs using explicit Bluetooth and gets its time zone and time zone from the connected host to update the device. I have traveled from the left coast to the Midwest and my device set the time according to my phone (Windows phone just to piss you all off). Since both my laptop and phone adjust for DST, changes are not a problem.

    10. Re:DST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately for the husband they also have video of the woman leaving the gym at around the time she was supposed to have been murdered.

      England has 73 survilance cameras per person. They are nanny-state communists.

      Therefore survilance camera evidence is unconstitutional. I'll bet half my software empire that he'll walk free.
      --
      roman_mir

    11. Re: DST? by mSparks43 · · Score: 1

      Do people have automatic DST adjustments? I ask because I don't own one.

    12. Re:DST? by GNious · · Score: 1

      I'd expect electronics like this to just record UTC/GMT, and not bother with timezones or daily saving.

    13. Re:DST? by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

      Except the user usually checks the time on it.

      Tap to activate it, and the time is either the first or second item displayed. Most people don't want to translate from UTC to local time when they glance at their timepiece.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    14. Re:DST? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Pretty much. I mean it gives the cops more of the timeline since they know when it stopped recording movement but it's not the key ..um.. bit of evidence here.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    15. Re:DST? by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Or the husband was just wrong about the time. People do that.

      Or he lied about it. Murders do that. I mean he said he got the notification for the home alarm on his way to work. I'm sure he would notice if he was running an hour late.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    16. Re:DST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most embedded devices I have worked with (that actually have a real-time clock) record time in UTC. This is especially true if they're working with a GPS (which is a feature on some FitBits), since "GPS time" is UTC time minus a leap-second correction (which is also broadcast periodically by GPS satellites); GLONAS satellites report UTC directly. Trying to set the system clock to local time just gives you unnecessary headaches: time that can jump backwards, or a "second" that looks like it's an hour plus a second long, etc. Just set the system clock to UTC, and apply the user's desired timezone correction when you have to display the time/date on screen.

    17. Re:DST? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Is that a rhetorical question or did you not know that police are able to pretty damn accurately determine the time of death when someone dies from fairly ordinary wounds and the body hasn't been excessively tampered with?

    18. Re:DST? by GNious · · Score: 1

      Pretty much all devices handle time as e.g. UTC, counting time-units since a defined Epoch, and then translates that into date/time for humans.
      I'd wager that this is also the case for everything FitBit.

    19. Re:DST? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Regardless he will hang for it.

      This is yet another reason why, no matter what, innocent as an angel or guilty as sin, never, ever, neverever talk to the police. Any misstatement is "changing your story." Any hazy memory is construed as obstruction.

      Anything you say will be used to prosecute you, whether you are guilty or not. Nothing you say to police will be used to help you. That's not their job.

      Get a lawyer. Shut your mouth.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    20. Re: DST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do people have automatic DST adjustments? I ask because I don't own one.

      Don't know why you got downmodded. I got the joke. I fucking hate DST too.

  5. Stupid cops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    DUNNo where this happened at, but it sounds to me like this guy is getting Deliverance'd by the cops. One hour discrepancy in his version of events doesn't mean anything at all, especially if he was traumatized. The cops on the other hand sound stupid so they're probably inbred.

    1. Re:Stupid cops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that the whole thing only took about an hour, an hour discrepancy means a whole lot. He e-mailed his boss (from home) at 9:04am saying that he had to go home to check on an alarm (though he told police that he went back because he forgot his laptop) and claimed that his wife was shot right after she arrived home a few minutes later. He called 911 at 10:11am, 6 minutes after his wife's movements stopped. And about half an hour after she posted videos to her Facebook page while at home (after supposedly being shot and killed). But sure, let's blame the cops when the guy's story is a complete lie that doesn't fit with any of the available evidence.

  6. 16 Months Ago! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This happened in December of 2015. This idiot and his pregnant girlfriend should have long since left the country to someplace hard to find and/or without an extradition treaty. What have they been doing for the last year and a third? Pretending they wouldn't get caught if they just acted as normal as possible???

    1. Re:16 Months Ago! by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      did you see the guy's house in the story? he clearly has money, and as such at least one of these applies
      1) arrogant in thinking he'd get away with it in the long term
      2) has much to lose by fleeing the US for some third world country (do any first world countries lack extradition?)
      3) he didn't do it, that whole presumption of innocence thing strikes again.

    2. Re:16 Months Ago! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Honey, I killed my ex-wife. We need to move to the Cambodian countryside and try to blend in!"

  7. Frame Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How do we know the killer didn't wear the fitbit himself for an hour and put it back on the corpse to frame the husband?

    Captcha: executor. LOL

    1. Re:Frame Job by jandersen · · Score: 1

      How do we know the killer didn't wear the fitbit himself for an hour and put it back on the corpse to frame the husband?

      Very often in any investigation, science- or criminal-, there isn't one clear "Proof" of what happened, but there are many, independant sets of data that all agree, and which together point to the same conclusion. It is quite possible that each data set is not all that conclusive, when they all point the same way, it would be amazingly hard to imagine that they would all be wrong.

  8. Detectives? by networkzombie · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It took 15 months to figure this out and now the guy is out on bail? His gun matches, he had major insurance, and the husband is always the prime suspect. This investigation should have taken weeks. Ellington seems to have had 4 murders in the past 12 years, including this one. Must have been a high priority case. I'll bet the crime scene had over a dozen cops onsite eating donuts. The next day they went back to their speed traps.

    1. Re:Detectives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
      So you have never been in trouble with the law before. Despite what you see on TV it takes a while for a case to be made and I promise you its longer then a commercial break.

      Wow I swear some people just need to watch a little less CSI.

    2. Re:Detectives? by Falos · · Score: 2

      In all earnest, without any trace of cocked brow or wry grin, I submit that they have done more for our fear culture than most terrorists ever will.

      Not that pointing it out helps much.

    3. Re:Detectives? by networkzombie · · Score: 1

      I don't watch CSI, but I do know quite a few cops. I vent here because if I criticized them to their faces they would put me in jail for resisting arrest. No joke.

    4. Re:Detectives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you have never been in trouble with the law before.

      Yeah, he's really missing out. Having a criminal record will vastly complicate every aspect of your life and ensure that you never really achieve any of your dreams, but at least you'll be able to use your superior knowledge of the criminal justice system to smugly talk down to someone on Slashdot.

    5. Re:Detectives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "but at least you'll be able to use your superior knowledge of the criminal justice system to smugly talk down to someone on Slashdot."

      I don't really need that knowledge to talk down to asshats here that talk out of school. It's just a bonus that I very much enjoy.

      So that being said fuck off and have a shitty day.

    6. Re:Detectives? by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      pfft shows what you know. 3 years prison, good job, family, and i have everything i need, including extra money to build pc's. nerd.

    7. Re:Detectives? by parkinglot777 · · Score: 2

      It took 15 months to figure this out and now the guy is out on bail? His gun matches, he had major insurance, and the husband is always the prime suspect. This investigation should have taken weeks. Ellington seems to have had 4 murders in the past 12 years, including this one. Must have been a high priority case. I'll bet the crime scene had over a dozen cops onsite eating donuts. The next day they went back to their speed traps.

      If you see at least some real investigation shows, you would have an idea that often times a murder case takes months to years to collect enough evidence in order to charge someone. I am sure that the husband was in their suspect list, but they did not charge him until now because they wanted to have as much evidence as they could to fight in the court. They might have asked their DA (or someone who has the authority to make the decision) whether they should charge him, and the person said NO and told them to look for more evidence. Circumstantial evidence is easy to collect (or make up -- logical sense), but that could easily fail to convince (to juries if it is a jury court) in court because the evidence, often times, would be struck down with doubt. You have to prove beyond reasonable doubt in order to convict on a murder crime.

    8. Re:Detectives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't watch CSI, but I do know quite a few cops. I vent here because if I criticized them to their faces they would put me in jail for resisting arrest. No joke.

      Which is an abuse of power and would open them to lawsuits if you can obtain evidence.

      I'll bet the crime scene had over a dozen cops onsite eating donuts. The next day they went back to their speed traps.

      On the other hand, you do appear to be a dick. And dicks, in my experience, seldom believe they are dicks. So it's entirely possible that you have a history of offenses you actually have committed and just don't want to tell us about in order to gain sympathy. You'll have to forgive me for treating internet bluster with inherent skepticism, but I find it to be the most prudent course of action.

    9. Re:Detectives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've always been annoyed that in the US showing half a tit is a criminal offense while showing people getting raped/murdered/abused/attacked is good entertainment.

    10. Re:Detectives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you mean that the ENHANCE! technique is not real??

      https://img.memesuper.com/a54f279e67222fa3b44c1d98b7597065_7-csi-enhance-meme_594-246.png
      and
      https://i.ytimg.com/vi/MRkS1u46tmM/maxresdefault.jpg

    11. Re:Detectives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems pretty clear cut. They should just execute him without trial since he's obviously guilty.

    12. Re:Detectives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show a girl's bare chest? BAD!
      Shoot a girl in the chest? OK!

    13. Re:Detectives? by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

      They probably wanted clear evidence that his claims were false before going to trial. Because if you don't, that's how guilty men walk. They must discredit his story beyond a reasonable doubt.

      And since the court system insists on fairness, both sides would have access to the Fitbit data. Both sides would have an opportunity to have experts examine it. Maybe they could agree on a single independent expert, but either way it takes time.

      If it takes a year or two to nail a murderer, I see that as time well-spent. If they rush it and he walks on a technicality, they don't get to try again.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    14. Re:Detectives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I vent here because if I criticized them to their faces they would put me in jail for resisting arrest.

      I know a few people who are also on bad terms with the local police.

      They range from shady to outright scum.

      I'm guessing you're cut from the same cloth.

    15. Re:Detectives? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      I was walking through our customer waiting area earlier this week and saw something very upsetting. There were roughly 10 people in the waiting area, sitting in chairs all facing the flat panel TV on the wall.

      On the TV: a guy in a business suit places a bag over another guy's head in the foreground. He then smashes the guy's head in with a bat. Not one hit mind you, but like 10 or 15 hits. The bag gets bloody, the body falls off of a chair to the floor.

      It was not what was on the TV that upset me. Well it upset me a bit. That aside, it was the vacuous and accepting looks in the eyes of everyone else who just witnessed the faux blunt object murder. No one cared. No one was surprised or upset. Not even a flicker of emotion passed their eyes.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  9. Kind of a pyrrhic victory, unfortunately. by mellon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The wife is still dead, whether this story is true or not.

    1. Re:Kind of a pyrrhic victory, unfortunately. by quonset · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The wife is still dead, whether this story is true or not.

      So every time someone is murdered we shouldn't look for their killers because the person will still be dead? We should let criminals roam free?

    2. Re:Kind of a pyrrhic victory, unfortunately. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're all made of meat and we'll all die. Doesn't mean we can't make the world a better place by catching murderers and making cool things.

    3. Re:Kind of a pyrrhic victory, unfortunately. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't "Pyrrhic victory" apply to the husband here? In that case, the "unfortunately" seems inappropriate.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Kind of a pyrrhic victory, unfortunately. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The GP is just mourning the loss of the woman. I guess that's a rather human thing to do.

    5. Re:Kind of a pyrrhic victory, unfortunately. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, did anyone say that? Or do you just want to argue?

    6. Re:Kind of a pyrrhic victory, unfortunately. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn this nigga on the spectrum

    7. Re:Kind of a pyrrhic victory, unfortunately. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time someone is murdered you should shut the fuck up. Go be stupid somewhere else.

    8. Re:Kind of a pyrrhic victory, unfortunately. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A pyrrhic victory would imply that the police somehow harmed their case by discovering this, intentionally.

      Pyrrhic Victory:
      noun
      1.
      a victory or goal achieved at too great a cost.

    9. Re:Kind of a pyrrhic victory, unfortunately. by freudigst · · Score: 1

      Your point being...?

    10. Re:Kind of a pyrrhic victory, unfortunately. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an impressive +5 Insightful straw man you have there.

      If you have an issue with mellon's statement you could argue about the usage of 'pyrrhic victory'.The Fitbit data wasn't part of her murder and only helped to get closer to the truth. If it's a remark on privacy issues, well... I think, in this case, it's likely she would gladly share the data with the authority. Dead or not.

    11. Re:Kind of a pyrrhic victory, unfortunately. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What flawed logic did you use to arrive at that, and who the fuck modded it insightful?

      I'm betting you're a Trump supporter, aren't you?

  10. How old was the fitbit holder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the holder is more than 2 months old, maybe the shitty overpriced, primitive holder broke right when she collapsed, a dog found the fitbit and then dragged it all over the neighborhood.

    1. Re: How old was the fitbit holder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On its leg. "And here, we guess she was being chased. Her heartbeat suddenly doubles and the GPS shows her running down the street, then through people's gardens, jumping over fences but then she stops outside the burger joint and just waits. Can't figure it out".

    2. Re: How old was the fitbit holder? by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      mod this up!

    3. Re:How old was the fitbit holder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While also posting videos to Facebook from her iPhone? That's one impressive dog. Maybe the dog is the real killer!

  11. LawAndOrder Plot by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    such possibilities

    1. Re:LawAndOrder Plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. On Law and Order, some old guys with skin sagging half way from their chin to the ground would just show up at a pawn shop and instantly get all the leads they need to solve the case, followed by 5 minutes of beer and tampon commercials.

  12. Jesus christ people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Haven't we all seen enough episodes of CSI to avoid making these mistakes?

    Summer is coming up. HINT: If you're going to murder your kids by leaving them in a hot car, wipe your browser cache after Googling "how to kill my kid in a hot car"

    1. Re:Jesus christ people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HINT: If you're going to murder your kids by leaving them in a hot car, wipe your browser cache after Googling "how to kill my kid in a hot car"

      Hey, thanks for the reminder!

    2. Re:Jesus christ people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wiping you cache won't do shit. Google will hand over that info lickity split.

  13. One things for sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the kids are killed, you don't need a fitbit to know it was mom.

  14. yup, sounds fishy to me too by FudRucker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    why would the home invader shoot the wife dead but only tie the husband up, when it would be just as easy to shoot him too which also eliminates him as a witness to the intruders identity and crimes

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:yup, sounds fishy to me too by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 2

      "why would the home invader shoot the wife dead but only tie the husband up"

      Perhaps the first death was an accident. People don't exactly behave cool headed and rational in these sorts of situations. Anything could have happened. The wife stepped up and got killed, the husband cowered in a corner. The killer realized what he did and didn't want to be in jail for the rest of his life. The killer hated women, or recognized her and knew she could ID him. Who knows.
      Thats why we have courts and rule of law. 'It wasn''t me, it was the one armed man' and all that.

      --
      -
    2. Re:yup, sounds fishy to me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The husband could be up to his eyeballs in mafia gambling debt, and this is how they pay visits. Bump your partner and patsy your ass.

      Seems quite simple really.

    3. Re:yup, sounds fishy to me too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To frame the husband because it wouldn't be logical? Maybe the husband is just bad at judging time. I know I am.

  15. Tolland County, got it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "...at their home in Ellington, Tolland County"

    Who wrote this summary, Forrest Gump?

    Seriously, I don't care what the county is, I just want to know the state. And I don't want to read TFA FFS.

    1. Re: Tolland County, got it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good point. What state could the New York Daily News possibly be talking about?

    2. Re: Tolland County, got it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So everything the New York Times prints is about New York. Thanks!

    3. Re: Tolland County, got it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What state could the New York Daily News possibly be talking about?

      They talk about events in all sorts of states. For example, this article is about an event that takes place in Ellington, Connecticut.

  16. Headline Parsing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when did Fitbit start making sex toys?

  17. I would have got away with it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If not for your pesky daylight savings time!

  18. People really sext like that? by bongey · · Score: 1

    "I'm ready for u big boy." Are we sure there was even another woman? Only time have seen messages like that is reading my spam messages .

    1. Re:People really sext like that? by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      "I'm ready for u big boy." Are we sure there was even another woman? Only time have seen messages like that is reading my spam messages .

      Well if you had a girlfriend other than your right hand, maybe you'd have seen a text like that.

  19. Murdered Woman's Fitbit Nails Murdering Husband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Who edits this crap anyway ?

  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. The all-new Fitbit VENGEANCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By Grabthar's Hammer-throw, you shall be avenged!

  22. Fitbit Nails? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm confused by the headline - what's a Fitbit Nails?

    1. Re:Fitbit Nails? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's what you use to "nail a fitbit" - darn cheating nails.

    2. Re:Fitbit Nails? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the Lenny Dykstra model. It comes with steroids and free financial advice.

    3. Re:Fitbit Nails? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Curse of the news' penchant for "First Letter All Caps" headlines.
      An unfortunate syndrome that is here to stay...

    4. Re:Fitbit Nails? by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      It's a type of Fitbit which won't fall off. They starting selling them a few days before Easter.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  23. Re:Cheating Husband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Murdering husband murdered wife would seem rather redundant, while "cheating" gives additional information.

  24. No, he should not have had a .357 Magnum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > So every time someone is murdered we shouldn't look for their killers because the person will still be dead? We should let criminals roam free?

    No, there should be effective laws in place to prevent murders rather than simply jailing murderers. I know you Yanks love your guns, but your murder rates are just insane. There seem to be three basic arguments in favor of an armed populous:

    1. Harm reduction: guns protect law abiding citizens from intruders.
    2. Political: guns are the last line of defense from a tyrannical government.
    3. Practicality: banning guns legally will not make them cease to exist.

    This case is a poignant illustration against the statistically falsifiable first argument. Even if you accept the premise that guns in private homes are an effective form of self-defense, guns are more likely to kill or maim their owners accidentally or be used in domestic violence than in self defense, as is the case here.

    A bit off-topic, but the other two are equally falsifiable: generalized violence begets tyranny. Saddam Hussein was a tyrant, and Iraq under his regime was awash in guns. This powder keg predictably exploded into to much harsher tyranny in the wake of his regime. The third point simply ignores all of the societies that once had an armed populous and moved to an unarmed one. It takes time, but it happens.

    1. Re:No, he should not have had a .357 Magnum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      armed populous:

      armed populace

    2. Re:No, he should not have had a .357 Magnum by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      I like my guns. Fuckoff.. Thats the only excuse i need.. so Fuckoff.

    3. Re:No, he should not have had a .357 Magnum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure that Connie Dabate liked being alive, which trumps your love of guns. So Fuckoff.

    4. Re:No, he should not have had a .357 Magnum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure that Connie Dabate liked being alive, which trumps your love of guns. So Fuckoff.

      Really, one person's life outweighs the rights of the entire country? I'd love to hear your defense of that.

    5. Re:No, he should not have had a .357 Magnum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll harder.

      If you want to lower deaths by pure statistics, I'll wait for your country (wherever you are from) to ban automobiles and force mandatory eating and exercising habits on the population (or at least mandate the advisement of such by a government sanctioned medical professional yearly)

    6. Re:No, he should not have had a .357 Magnum by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure I can strangle a woman to death with my bare hands, and I'm not very strong. A .357 is overkill, and risky: it makes noise, it leaves chemical residue on the user's hands, it requires disposal of clothing immediately (more powder), it leaves identifiable scratches on the bullet, it causes unaccounted bullets in the gun, it links a particular type of gun that the user possesses to a particular type of round which may be fired from said gun and which other types of guns may be incapable of firing, it splatters blood, and it creates a series of specifically-verifiable facts about ownership of a gun and ammunition. Literally everyone has hands, unless they've lost them to a genetic defect or a lawn mower misadventure.

      In other countries with high violent crime rates, blunt weapons and knives are implicated. The problem here isn't that this dude used a gun; it's that he fully intended and pre-planned the murder of his wife. How do you prevent that?

    7. Re:No, he should not have had a .357 Magnum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you Yanks love your guns, but your murder rates are just insane.

      Unfortunately, less guns does not mean less murders. Just as more guns don't equate to more murders. Factually speaking.

    8. Re:No, he should not have had a .357 Magnum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure that Connie Dabate liked being alive, which trumps your love of guns. So Fuckoff.

      Really, one person's life outweighs the rights of the entire country? I'd love to hear your defense of that.

      He's probably from some backwards European country where they don't have the right to anything, so they spend all day pretending that they have some culture superior to America.

    9. Re:No, he should not have had a .357 Magnum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      moron.

      death != murder

      he probably wants to lower murders... not lower deaths.

      if a lot of people were being murdered by automobiles, or murdered by being kept from a regular exercise regime then maybe your post would be relevant in some way. as it is it's not. goodbye.

    10. Re:No, he should not have had a .357 Magnum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are countries with higher violent crime rates than the US???

    11. Re:No, he should not have had a .357 Magnum by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      Duh?

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  25. The good news is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    she's still dead

  26. Fuck Off You Stupid Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck off you stupid troll. Nobody said any of that.

  27. Daylight savings time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never corrected for Daylight Savings Time? My car was still on wintertime until three days ago when I noticed it hadn't "spring forward"ed. And people are horrible under stress at getting details correct. But cool if they can verify all the details.

  28. Re:One thing's sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The technology angle exists regardless of perp/victim genders.

    I think we found the angry MRA.

  29. Re:Cheating Husband by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

    It hints at the motive. Based on that single word, I assume he was headed for divorce and humiliation.

    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
  30. Also detained for questioning was by jmcwork · · Score: 1

    The Iron Giant

  31. Re:Cheating Husband by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    He hasn't been convicted (yet).

    So really, it shouldn't really be saying he's been nailed for anything, not by the Fitbit anyway.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  32. Nails him for what? Innocent until proven guilty.. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Murdered Woman's Fitbit Nails Cheating Husband

    He's not been nailed for anything yet. Still got to get that pesky trial out of the way first.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  33. Interesting choice of words by Shepanator · · Score: 1

    It nailed him? It was shoved up his ass? Finally a real use for a fitbit.