Youtube already has content guidelines in place (nudity, violence, etc) -- great, enforce those. But circumventing a search because someone upstairs doesn't like the *message* in the video -- that's a whole other can of worms.
Google/Youtube didn't get to their position by playing censor, and it's questionable of them to start now that they've got a lock on so many eyeballs. If google wants to be a near-monopoly, they should act in as neutral manner as possible.
i don't know, it sounds absolutely fantastic to me. not having to roll out of bed super early, having more time at lunch to eat a proper meal, then time to relax before heading back into work -- letting the 'food coma' pass.
They probably think our obsession with time is silly too.
But really.. if something falls into the realm of a tradition, it certainly works on *some* level.
Well, look at OP's post -- what state of mind do you think he's in? If you were a reasonable, well adjusted woman, would you be attracted to that? (disregarding looks) Just reading it conjures up a fedora clad jackass with entitlement issues.
It basically reads as: "I can't land a woman, but it's utterly impossible that it has anything to do with me."
To your point though: a "worthy" woman? Sheesh, are you absolutely certain you yourself have anything of value to offer?
But regardless, Okcupid and match.com are probably hovering around a 60/40 gender ratio. Maybe more men use those sites, sure -- but no where near 85/15.
Side note: attractiveness is not just looks, which should be obvious.. but alas. You could be effron, pitt or whoever, but if you come across as an entitled man-child, you're gonna have a bad time.
I think he's saying that spending money developing new shows is better than resting on their laurels and collecting cash.
Basically taking the long view.. it's no different than investing in a factory that increases output over the next 30 years, despite the current quarter's balance sheet taking a hit. (exactly the opposite what the fucking MBA culture seems to suggest.)
If only more people were like this, there'd be far fewer of these parasitical companies out there -- there is hopefully a special place in hell for debt collectors.
but what's to stop visa from saying to businesses "hey, share the details of your transactions with us, and we'll cut our fee by X?
Google and FB have shown how profitable consumer data actually is (whether or not that's an incredibly inflated figure is another discussion.) VISA and MC are potentially sitting on a treasure trove of data that can be monetized to a degree that makes browsing/search look insignificant by comparison.
Also, FWIW, some grocery stores have done away with the loyalty programs, opting instead to track you by your card purchases (albertson's for example does this)
* if you mention hosts file in a slashdot thread, or in a dark room, say "apk" 3 times in front of a mirror, you'll summon... HIM -- and you'll get a very detailed explanation (whether you want it or not.) on how a hosts file can keep you safe from all sorts of shenanigans.
Hmmm, Well when you get bored read about the ashley madison hack, and how out of their thousands of users, there were only a handful of actual, real, live women using it -- the rest were bots.
Hence the joke: The man's wife was supposedly reading ashley madison, therefore there is a very strong chance statistically speaking that the wife in this case, was a bot.
Please PM me if that explanation doesn't make sense, I know it ruins a joke having it explained to you, but you seem like you needed a helping hand.
slightly ashamed to know this, but those 'fabletics' brand leggings are doing pretty well, she'll likely make more from that venture than her acting career.
Yoga pants sold columbia house style; god bless the USA.
Slashdot Mirror
Youtube already has content guidelines in place (nudity, violence, etc) -- great, enforce those. But circumventing a search because someone upstairs doesn't like the *message* in the video -- that's a whole other can of worms.
Google/Youtube didn't get to their position by playing censor, and it's questionable of them to start now that they've got a lock on so many eyeballs. If google wants to be a near-monopoly, they should act in as neutral manner as possible.
i first read that as "a ferret spinning a platter" .. disappointed :(
he lives in your local library, check him out sometime.
they'll kill it by every single governing body between and including those cities wanting their hands in the cookie jar.
i don't know, it sounds absolutely fantastic to me. not having to roll out of bed super early, having more time at lunch to eat a proper meal, then time to relax before heading back into work -- letting the 'food coma' pass.
They probably think our obsession with time is silly too.
But really.. if something falls into the realm of a tradition, it certainly works on *some* level.
i'd wager that a fair number of people do not read the news to stay informed, but to reinforce the views they already hold.
This is what happens when people vote for guys like Radovid.
Also the fact that once implemented, taxes are almost never, ever repealed. And who knows whatever new boutique taxes Salem will cook up next.
go away casey, you're drunk.
Well, look at OP's post -- what state of mind do you think he's in? If you were a reasonable, well adjusted woman, would you be attracted to that? (disregarding looks) Just reading it conjures up a fedora clad jackass with entitlement issues.
It basically reads as:
"I can't land a woman, but it's utterly impossible that it has anything to do with me."
To your point though: a "worthy" woman? Sheesh, are you absolutely certain you yourself have anything of value to offer?
But regardless, Okcupid and match.com are probably hovering around a 60/40 gender ratio. Maybe more men use those sites, sure -- but no where near 85/15.
Side note: attractiveness is not just looks, which should be obvious.. but alas. You could be effron, pitt or whoever, but if you come across as an entitled man-child, you're gonna have a bad time.
the 4chan is strong in this one; hah.
Maybe you're just not very attractive? Because.. yeah, that sounds more like sour grapes than the reality most people face.
I think he's saying that spending money developing new shows is better than resting on their laurels and collecting cash.
Basically taking the long view.. it's no different than investing in a factory that increases output over the next 30 years, despite the current quarter's balance sheet taking a hit. (exactly the opposite what the fucking MBA culture seems to suggest.)
If only more people were like this, there'd be far fewer of these parasitical companies out there -- there is hopefully a special place in hell for debt collectors.
Harmless joke -- just poking fun at your spamming; don't be so sensitive.
but what's to stop visa from saying to businesses "hey, share the details of your transactions with us, and we'll cut our fee by X?
Google and FB have shown how profitable consumer data actually is (whether or not that's an incredibly inflated figure is another discussion.) VISA and MC are potentially sitting on a treasure trove of data that can be monetized to a degree that makes browsing/search look insignificant by comparison.
Also, FWIW, some grocery stores have done away with the loyalty programs, opting instead to track you by your card purchases (albertson's for example does this)
i just use a *hosts file.
* if you mention hosts file in a slashdot thread, or in a dark room, say "apk" 3 times in front of a mirror, you'll summon... HIM -- and you'll get a very detailed explanation (whether you want it or not.) on how a hosts file can keep you safe from all sorts of shenanigans.
That's a rabbit hole no one wants to go down.
Drug dealers and terrorists use cash, surely you're not one of them, right? Says the friendly Visa man.
if it has thunderbolt 3, you could use an external GPU in there, and get about 80% of the desktop performance from the card.
Not perfect, but doable.
I'm sure that thanks to Google, a lot of Encyclopedia salesmen are out of a job too. Would you like to ban Google?
Yes I would, but not for that (implied) reason.
They're both Swedes though......
Hmmm, Well when you get bored read about the ashley madison hack, and how out of their thousands of users, there were only a handful of actual, real, live women using it -- the rest were bots.
Hence the joke: The man's wife was supposedly reading ashley madison, therefore there is a very strong chance statistically speaking that the wife in this case, was a bot.
Please PM me if that explanation doesn't make sense, I know it ruins a joke having it explained to you, but you seem like you needed a helping hand.
Cheers, and good try though.
slightly ashamed to know this, but those 'fabletics' brand leggings are doing pretty well, she'll likely make more from that venture than her acting career.
Yoga pants sold columbia house style; god bless the USA.
So what state allows marriage between man and bot? The times, they're a'changing for sure.