Well, as a certainty, whether a photon is regarded as a particle or a wave it is interacting in some way with the slits, that is, the slits are changing the light's trajectory. I contend that the slits' interaction with the light is altered and determined by the lights position relative to the slits as it passes them. The lens, light source, and all other components of the photon-emitting apparatus are certainly moving, enough to make a difference in the trajectory of the photon as it passes the slit. I think this is much more feasible than the idea of multiple universes for explaining how light can continue to behave as a wave in situations in which only one photon is involved.
I don't buy that one, really. I'm inclined to think that the photon emitting device, siply because it is not at absolute zero, cannot be perfectly still, I think it must vibrate in a way that a photon might notice. The results, in my opinion, are best described by chaos theory, and I think that in most circumstances it provides a more rational decription of our world than quantum theory.
Why do these wireless comunities need to be on clothing?
our most mobile and intimate technology
So that you can sell each user a unit for every day of the week? I suppose it would be more conveniant if my PDA was my pants instead of just being in them, but friends tell me I need more than one pair of pants, and I can't afford to have eight PDAs.
Mark my words, wearable computing is a doomed industry.
I was on Macrovision's website, reading their SafeAudio FAQ.
6) Is SAFEAUDIO compliant with the 'Red Book' standard? The SAFEAUDIO coding option is designed to be compatible with Philips Red Book CD audio standard. This design ensures that SAFEAUDIO has superior compatibility and playability across the worldwide installed base of CD players and PC drives.
Isn't it clever how they dodge the question my not repeating the word compliant in the response, but instead using a similar word, compatible? I guess one must be on one's toes all the time these days, even technical FAQs are no longer a haven from sneaky public relations propaganda.
There's a third option, they could try to buy it from him. Really, how much money do you think you could resist for the cause, or do you think his goal would be accomplished whether he resisted or not?
It would probably be less expensive than the costly projector required to use it. It should probably be sold seperate from projectors, becuase it really should work with any projector. Becuause the only thing it does that a regular canvass screen can not do is allow you to pass through it, I doubt it will be popular in laptops, as most people would opt to reach around their LCDs. Look for it in plays and other stage performances as well as physically interactive entertainment venues.
by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors
I think the biggest problem is that there isn't really a limited Time on the DMCA. My understanding is that should the games or DVDs you are buying today ever reach the public domain, if the DMCA is still in force nobody will be able to legally distribute or modify the work, as it will still be illegal to produce devices capable of removing the decryption. Additionally it will be illegal to publish research on such topics that might lead to fair use of the works whose copyrights have expired.
Well the stomach actually shrinks and grows as its lining is replaced. The shrinking and growing occurs in sync whith how full a person's stomach is on average.
I am just guessing here, but the skinny Japanese guy might have some sort of 'training program' which involves drinking a lot of fluids or eating sugar-free jello to keep the stomach expanded while not gaining any weight.
If absolutely everybody said that, the steady improvements would stop. I don't think industry would reduce pollution without the financial incentives ( fines ) that the whiners worked so hard to put into place.
It is all moot, however, because the whining will never stop and full productivity will never be realized.
Actually I think there was an arcticle on slashdot about how the paper consumption rate has actually risen. To summarize, more business models based entirely on information and general economic growth. Another point in the article which lends itself more easily to to a neat and tidy mental picture is the fact that it is much more difficult to get on-paper data into a computer than it is to get digital data onto paper.
It's the tearing apart that I don't like. Is the body to be transferred destroyed at the exact same time as the new body is created? Does it matter? More importantly, what becomes of the remains? Are they to be delivered to the new body in an urn? Or would that just be too weird?
So it can perform division by any number? With this variable division technology already developed, Bistromathic space travel must be nearly in our grasp.
Slashdot Mirror
It is mathematics like this that allows an Italian bistro to travel through space.
Well, as a certainty, whether a photon is regarded as a particle or a wave it is interacting in some way with the slits, that is, the slits are changing the light's trajectory. I contend that the slits' interaction with the light is altered and determined by the lights position relative to the slits as it passes them. The lens, light source, and all other components of the photon-emitting apparatus are certainly moving, enough to make a difference in the trajectory of the photon as it passes the slit. I think this is much more feasible than the idea of multiple universes for explaining how light can continue to behave as a wave in situations in which only one photon is involved.
I don't buy that one, really. I'm inclined to think that the photon emitting device, siply because it is not at absolute zero, cannot be perfectly still, I think it must vibrate in a way that a photon might notice. The results, in my opinion, are best described by chaos theory, and I think that in most circumstances it provides a more rational decription of our world than quantum theory.
I think the suit is actually not presently version one, I think the article said it was version III.
Well, that's just on the forums, I think we would all agree that the counterfeiter is also an asshole, so it's at least 102:2 = 51:1.
So that you can sell each user a unit for every day of the week? I suppose it would be more conveniant if my PDA was my pants instead of just being in them, but friends tell me I need more than one pair of pants, and I can't afford to have eight PDAs.
Mark my words, wearable computing is a doomed industry.
I suspect that street bum might have this to say.
Isn't it clever how they dodge the question my not repeating the word compliant in the response, but instead using a similar word, compatible? I guess one must be on one's toes all the time these days, even technical FAQs are no longer a haven from sneaky public relations propaganda.
There's a third option, they could try to buy it from him. Really, how much money do you think you could resist for the cause, or do you think his goal would be accomplished whether he resisted or not?
It would probably be less expensive than the costly projector required to use it. It should probably be sold seperate from projectors, becuase it really should work with any projector. Becuause the only thing it does that a regular canvass screen can not do is allow you to pass through it, I doubt it will be popular in laptops, as most people would opt to reach around their LCDs. Look for it in plays and other stage performances as well as physically interactive entertainment venues.
Allright, so this music is protected from copyright violation by glue. Does this mean that solvents are now illegal? Start stockpiling acetone now.
Despite all the jokes on here about it... scalpels.
In a relatively undeveloped country, this would make a lot of sense!
I think the biggest problem is that there isn't really a limited Time on the DMCA. My understanding is that should the games or DVDs you are buying today ever reach the public domain, if the DMCA is still in force nobody will be able to legally distribute or modify the work, as it will still be illegal to produce devices capable of removing the decryption. Additionally it will be illegal to publish research on such topics that might lead to fair use of the works whose copyrights have expired.
That is why the DMCA is unconstitutional.
Anyone notice the Xerox advertisement above the article? That's just bad placement.
I'm treating this as a put your jokes here thread.
Thank you, music geek. You get to keep your medal.
*butt, I noticed just after posting. I can spel butt. It's not like I'm stupid.
Is that a red toolbox strapped to his but?
I think I see drawers.
Well the stomach actually shrinks and grows as its lining is replaced. The shrinking and growing occurs in sync whith how full a person's stomach is on average.
I am just guessing here, but the skinny Japanese guy might have some sort of 'training program' which involves drinking a lot of fluids or eating sugar-free jello to keep the stomach expanded while not gaining any weight.
If absolutely everybody said that, the steady improvements would stop. I don't think industry would reduce pollution without the financial incentives ( fines ) that the whiners worked so hard to put into place.
It is all moot, however, because the whining will never stop and full productivity will never be realized.
Actually I think there was an arcticle on slashdot about how the paper consumption rate has actually risen. To summarize, more business models based entirely on information and general economic growth. Another point in the article which lends itself more easily to to a neat and tidy mental picture is the fact that it is much more difficult to get on-paper data into a computer than it is to get digital data onto paper.
Treachery!
This is slashdot, and the first company you noted missing from the list wasn't Microsoft!
I'd rant more, but I've got to go get a net and get tomorrows breakfast.
Next thing you know they'll be putting all the robots in reservations, and I know you humans won't honor those treaties you signed.
-Speaking as a brain in a robot body (sealab)
It's the tearing apart that I don't like.
Is the body to be transferred destroyed at the exact same time as the new body is created? Does it matter? More importantly, what becomes of the remains? Are they to be delivered to the new body in an urn? Or would that just be too weird?
Oh, and additionally: You Skinnarian Baboon, you.
So it can perform division by any number?
With this variable division technology already developed, Bistromathic space travel must be nearly in our grasp.