Slashdot Mirror


Solar Surgery

Chris writes "Scientists in Israel have developed a device based on a concave dish that intensifies sunlight by a factor of 15,000. By focusing this light into an optical fiber and delivering it to an operating theatre, the team says its solar-surgery setup promises to be a low-cost alternative to laser surgery." Everyone who used to operate on GI Joe figures with a magnifying glass is cheering for this to be commercially successful.

255 comments

  1. GI Joe? by slickwillie · · Score: 1

    I used to cook bugs with my magnifying glass.

    "I live the smell of burning ants in the morning."

  2. Poor anthills. by Typingsux · · Score: 4, Funny
    Will we see the eradication of ants by bored suburban kids?

    --
    The above post is an editorial, the poster cannot and will not be held responsible for all or in part for it's contents
    1. Re:Poor anthills. by antdude · · Score: 2

      Nooooooooo! Leave the ants alone! :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    2. Re:Poor anthills. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the eradication of suburban kids by bored scientists?

    3. Re:Poor anthills. by antirename · · Score: 2

      But, one question is unanswered: what happens when you put the ants, the rig, and an AOL cd in the microwave on high for a couple of minutes?

  3. Re:Right in the solar plexus! by KowShak · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Well, aren't you the big man.

  4. Bad weather by Mwongozi · · Score: 2

    And what happens when it's cloudy?

    1. Re:Bad weather by spudwiser · · Score: 2, Funny

      you die

      --
      .cig - what you do after winning a good flame war
    2. Re:Bad weather by rmadmin · · Score: 1

      This is a good question. Is your surgery going to get resceduled due to weather? This also eliminates these procidures during nocturnal hours..

    3. Re:Bad weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think suntan VS skin cancer.

      Whilst the IR that makes you feel wark will get scattered by the clouds some of the radiation will pass straight through.

    4. Re:Bad weather by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

      They resort to a special laser surgery that is controlled remotely via satellite.

      Oh wait...

    5. Re:Bad weather by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

      Well, you could always set up a large Floodlight array over the dish...

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    6. Re:Bad weather by Wumpus · · Score: 2

      This was invented in Israel, which has a long, sunny and dry summer. Winter's aren't that nuch different.

    7. Re:Bad weather by NetRanger · · Score: 2

      This gives a new meaning to having "cloudy eyesight" after RK...

      --
      -- We live in a world where lemonade is artificial and soap has real lemon.
    8. Re:Bad weather by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      This kind of beam would be useless for cornea modification. They use the excimer laser because it's completely absorbed in the first layer of cells, flashing them to puffy dust (it looked really wierd from the inside). Using sunlight, they'd have something more suitable for things like sealing leakers in diabetic retinopathy, for instance.
      Obviously, this tool gives doctors in remote field hospitals and in primitive areas an extremely high-precision scalpel that makes non-bleeding incisions, and should cut down sepsis substantially. Surgeries would have to be performed only on cloudless days. If you had a laser handy for backup, you'd use that instead, and wouldn't need this.

  5. Great.... by digitalamish · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I only have to hope my surgery doesn't get rained out.
    --
    "That's Homer Simpson sir. One of your drones from secotr 7G."

    1. Re:Great.... by mgessner · · Score: 1

      They didn't tell us, but I'm guessing that their NEXT invention is going to be some kind of "photon storage unit."

      Maybe they could trap them in those vapors like those folks at Harvard, who managed to trap photons for a while... like in this earlier story here on /.

      --
      "Sometimes the truth is stupid." - Lawrence, creator of Prime Intellect
    2. Re:Great.... by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      God I hope they don't try this in Portland.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Great.... by Shivster · · Score: 0

      Which Portland?

    4. Re:Great.... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Oregon.

      Although I'm reasonably sure Maine has the same problem I'm referring to heh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:Great.... by Moonshadow · · Score: 2

      Don't bring it to Arizona. Anyone they try to operate on will be instantly vaporized.

    6. Re:Great.... by Ethidium · · Score: 2

      Yeah, and hope they have a laser backup for when those unexpected storms show up out of nowhere:

      "We're sorry mister Smith, we got halfway through your emergency solar apendectomy, but it got cloudy, so we just decided to stitch you up and let you die"

      Or

      "We're sorry mister Smith, but we can't complete or SOLIK eye surgery until the sun comes out. We hope you don't mind being on the table for another couple of days"

      --
      \
    7. Re:Great.... by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      they didn't store the energy of the trapped beam. They stored the information, and added energy from another beam (at right angles) to reconstitute it.

    8. Re:Great.... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "Don't bring it to Arizona. Anyone they try to operate on will be instantly vaporized."

      "The good news is that we removed that mole on your chest, the bad news is you'll need to be fitted with a prosthetic abdomen."

      Heh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:Great.... by Jonny+290 · · Score: 2

      But it's a *dry* heat.

      --
      Hey Taco! Looks like you're using the "infinite monkeys and typewriters" scheme to generate Ask Slashdots again...
  6. Bad idea by afidel · · Score: 3, Funny

    Middle of surgery a cloud rolls in front of sun.
    Doctor:Oh shit!
    Nurse:Doctor, it looks like we won't have sunlight for another 20 mintues.
    Patient:Can I get some more anestesia then?

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Bad idea by Total_Wimp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can't help but wonder that if regular concentrated sunlight can produce good results then can regular concentrated incandescent or fluorescent lights also produce good results. It seems to me that this is a spread-spectrum vs. coherent light proof-of-concept since there's nothing particularly special about sunlight itself (other than being free and bright) My guess is that manmade lights would still save lots of money over lasers but you could work 'em in the basement at midnight. TW

    2. Re:Bad idea by Usquebaugh · · Score: 2

      _OR_ you could unplug the light array and plug in your normal surgical laser, KISS.

    3. Re:Bad idea by evilpenguin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm afraid there are several special things about sunlight. One of them is that, like laser light, it is a coherent beam (all the rays are parallel). Actually, it isn't really, but we are so far from the sun, its rays are effectively parallel; the divergence is so small as to not matter. This allows the light to be concentrated and thus the power effectively amplified. You can't do this with light from other sources. That light scatters in all directions and thus a lens or mirror will deflect the light at various angles. You can't concentrate it at a point. That's the whole reason the laser was such an important invention.

      On a totally different (but slightly relevant) subject: Does anyone else remember being subjected to a dopey little song in elementary school that began:

      "The sun is a mass/of incandescent gas/a giant nuclear furnace..."

      If you do remember a dopey little song like that, how does the rest of it go? (In case you are frightened of violating the DMCA, this would fall under fair use. If not, well, we could become a wonderful test case for the EFF or ACLU!).

    4. Re:Bad idea by gorilla · · Score: 2

      Incandescents MIGHT work, but you'd need a bank of them to replace the sunlight. The sun is over 83,100 lumens, and a 100W bulb is 136 lumens, so that's 612 bulbs.

    5. Re:Bad idea by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Or

      "Nurse, you never told me about this eclipse."

    6. Re:Bad idea by tandr · · Score: 1

      man... you haven't been in Israel during the summer, have you?

    7. Re:Bad idea by p7 · · Score: 1

      They Might be Giants does a cover of that song. I would look them up on google, and I bet you could find the lyrics.

    8. Re:Bad idea by mikecarrmikecarr · · Score: 1

      I can't help but wonder that if regular concentrated sunlight can produce good results then can regular concentrated incandescent or fluorescent lights also produce good results. It seems to me that this is a spread-spectrum vs. coherent light proof-of-concept since there's nothing particularly special about sunlight itself (other than being free and bright)

      Uhm... maybe the fact that the Sun has got a heck of a lot more wattage than any man-made light is significant?

      I know it makes a heck of a lot of difference to those outdoor ... tomatoes... that we grow here in British Columbia. There's really no comparing man-made light to sunlight...

      --

      ID-10-T is a way of life

    9. Re:Bad idea by Theom · · Score: 0

      ...all the rays are parallel...

      You really need to get out more, the sun is not a point and the rays are not even near to parallel: soft shadows etc.

      --

      mp3: l33t term for empty.
    10. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Where hydrogen is turned into helium, at a temperature of thousands of degrees" I was into science before this drivel put me off my feed. I went to a Catholic school, and thought no public schoolers were exposed to this kinda nonscience.

    11. Re:Bad idea by evilpenguin · · Score: 2

      Allright, I've already said I was a being sloppy. Of course they are not perfectly parallel, but they are close enough to it and the energy output of the sun is great enough that they can be usefully focused by convex lenses and concave mirrors to concentrate their energy. This was my only point. I was never trying to say that they were a perfect substitute for laser light; just that they were distinct enough from "common" light sources (read: light bulbs) that you could not substitute the one for the other.

      The real reason the sun is useful for this stuff is not so much its distance (giving us nearly parallel rays), but its prodigious energy output, which gives us about 1kW/m^2 at the earth's surface. Now if you had a 1000W light bulb handy and a convex lens, this would not be useful for surgery becuase the light is scattered all over the place, not basically in line from a source that is close enough to a point to be directed with a lens or mirror. A 1kW laser light source would be useful, but that's becuase it has properties similar to the sunlight.

      As for "soft shadows," try making shadow animals with the light from a flourescent bulb. Now try it with sunlight. Which one works? Now tell me which one is "not even close to parallel?"

    12. Re:Bad idea by Theom · · Score: 0

      As for "soft shadows," try making shadow animals with the light from a flourescent bulb. Now try it with sunlight. Which one works? Now tell me which one is "not even close to parallel?"

      A light bulb is a light source just as the sun, the diference is that the sun is at greater distance.

      --

      mp3: l33t term for empty.
    13. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the lyrics are:
      "Where hydrogen is turned into helium, at a temperature of millions of degrees"

    14. Re:Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      coherent does not mean the rays are parallel. what you mean to say is that it is a plane wave.

  7. Low cost alternative? by daemones · · Score: 1

    The bargain basement is not the place to hunt for surgeons.

    --
    Alas, Babylon.
    1. Re:Low cost alternative? by CyberBry · · Score: 1

      It says in the article that it's aimed at sunny developing countries. If I lived somewhere like that, I think I'd rather have surgery on a sunny day than no sugery at all.

      --

      ----
      Bryan Samis
      http://www.thesamis.net
    2. Re:Low cost alternative? by Acendreya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're not exactly talking about shipping this (after the obvious years of research ahead of it) to the Dr. Nicks of Springfield, USA--as the article stated, it's intended for third world countries, where people can't afford shoes, let alone high-tech medical care. The doctors in these areas are not necessarily any less skilled than the guy at your local hospital that charges a $150 consultation fee, they just have a sense of duty to *help* people as opposed to using their degrees to make wads of money. "...the something's connected to the...red thing...the red thing's connected to my...wrist watch...uh oh..."

  8. really? by micq · · Score: 1

    Everyone who used to operate on GI Joe figures with a magnifying glass is cheering for this to be commercially successful.

    And average-joe affordable... :)

    **runs to dig out old GI Joes**

  9. Oh great... by Gudlyf · · Score: 1

    The ants of the world have finally gotten their revenge on us all. Repent!

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
  10. Don't children kill ants this way? by BigGreen03 · · Score: 0

    Next time a bug gets in your eye you can hit it with the magnifying sunlight technique.

    ouch....

  11. Dependent on the weather? by wessto · · Score: 1

    Patient: Doctor, I need the operation NOW! I'm going to die!

    Doctor: The weatherman says no sunshine for a week! Sorry 'bout that!

    1. Re:Dependent on the weather? by tps12 · · Score: 0

      There are some potential bugs in your sig. What if yardsToFirst is one greater than tooMany? Then you should still punt, but your code would not. Also, By incrementing punt to indicate punting, you necessitate checking it against a stored previous value later in the execution, when the punt would actually be performed. If there are other conditions that might make you punt, then you end up incrementing it too high. Better to just have a flag punt that starts at 0 and gets set to 1 whenever you discover a punting situation. Then, when you actually make the call to doPunt(), or whatever, you won't need to do any math, and can just add the flag to the previous punt count (if, indeed, you still need the previous punt count). Thus:
      if(down==4 && yardsToFirst >= tooMany) punt = 1;

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  12. i thought this was old s***? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    apparently it wasn't then?

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  13. Skin Cancer by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2

    Humm... Sun Light? Does anyone else see a problem with this? This machine sounds like the Skin Cancer 2000.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:Skin Cancer by Bonker · · Score: 4, Informative

      If I undestand correctly, (and physics majors please correct me) UV radition is not transmitted along with color light radiation when light is reflected (by most reflective materials). Instead, it's absorbed by the reflecting material and transferred into heat. Therefore, what reaches the patient has no damaging UV component.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    2. Re:Skin Cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually its just a quick way to avoid skin cancer, since the UV rays are avoided (at least i'm assuming when it goes through the fiber, the fiber is UV treated, just as most windows are)

    3. Re:Skin Cancer by msgmonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just cover the lens with something that blocks the UV component.

    4. Re:Skin Cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why they recommend running it in the shade. Just kidding, the lens and fiber should absorb all UV. That is all of it except the stuff that gets by to fry the underlying tissue, table, and ground underneath. Hah, just kidding again! No I'm not! Yes I am!

    5. Re:Skin Cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever seen what a small reflecting telescope pointed at the sun can do to something placed in front of the eyepiece?

      There's not likely to be any tissue left in front of the beam to get cancer.

    6. Re:Skin Cancer by Xeriar · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are type of glass that aren't transmittive very far into the UV spectrum. Many materials we think of as transparent are merely 'filters' for our own visual spectrum, like a red light filter, for example.

    7. Re:Skin Cancer by saider · · Score: 1

      Also, since the UV rays have a different focal length than visible light, the device can arrange so that a select range of wavelengths are focused on the fiber end. All other wavelengths would not be focused on the fiber and their intensity would be greatly reduced.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    8. Re:Skin Cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahem, risk of cancer is proportional to the total radiation received, whether it's "focused" or not.

    9. Re:Skin Cancer by mblase · · Score: 2

      This machine sounds like the Skin Cancer 2000.

      In the sense that it vaporizes the targetted cells before they have a chance to become cancerous, yes, you're absolutely right.

    10. Re:Skin Cancer by pdp11e · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The article mentions "concave dish" signifying that we are dealing with the reflective optics. Assuming that the mirror is Al coated (very reasonable assumption), we are talking about 90% or more of UV reflectivity. Some posts in this thread were referring to a "different focal lengths" which is non-applicable to the reflective objective (there is no chromatic aberration in the absence of dispersive media). Now the fiber light guide is a completely different proposition. It is probably not UV transparent though it might be. Anyway it is trivial to filter out UV if desired. That finally brings us to the cancer risks associated with the possible UV irradiation. The mechanism that triggers cancer growth involves cell mutation due to the photo-dissociation of the DNA. But it is also necessary that the mutated cell survives and produces a new generation of (now) tumor cells. With highly focused radiation of the "light knife" it is highly unlikely that any of the irradiated cells can survive.

    11. Re:Skin Cancer by saider · · Score: 1

      The total amount of radiation will be affected by whether it is is focused properly.

      Light that is properly focused onto the fiber will be transmitted with high efficiency, say 90%.

      If the light is not focused on the fiber, then the transmission will be much lower because only a portion of the total radiation is transmitted into the fiber. The rest of it falls on the sheath, which does not get transmitted.

      So properly focusing it does make a difference.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
  14. At last. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Solex will be mine!

    Scaramanga

  15. Won't work by Mantorp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since operations now can only take place on sunny days, surgeons won't be able to golf as much.

    1. Re:Won't work by eaeolian · · Score: 1

      Since operations now can only take place on sunny days, surgeons won't be able to golf as much

      Actually, it could lead to a whole new era - "Meet me on the back nine of the Country Club and I'll get that appendix fixed up for you."

  16. This isn't really new by thelinuxking · · Score: 1

    You can take the hubble space telescope, point it at the sun, then put whatever you want to nuke in front of the part that views the images...

    1. Re:This isn't really new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just going to so damned expensive getting those patients and doctors up there in front of Hubble :-)

  17. Fifteenth post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Numba fifteen! suck it, beeyotch!

  18. Can I get Prior Art if they try to patent it? by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

    After all, cutting things in pieces with maginifying glasses is an age old rite of passage.

  19. Mount them on Sharks by tjensor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cheaper than Frikin laser beams!

    --
    <fnord>OBEY</fnord>
    1. Re:Mount them on Sharks by uberdave · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Although the parent post was meant to be humourous, the point may be valid. In areas where power is unreliable, and equipment is expensive, something like this might be (if you'll pardon the expression) just what the doctor ordered.

  20. It's a rainy day..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a great technology, but I'd rather not have to check weather.com before I went into surgery.

  21. ouch by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    I'm sure you'll all slam me if I'm wrong,
    but doesn't laser surgery use specify frequencies of light to localise the burning amongst other things?

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:ouch by AlaskanUnderachiever · · Score: 3

      well yes, laser surgury often does use a specific band of light to target types of tissue and avoid (and in fact in some cases pass strait through) other tissue.
      However, as an avid user of surplus crap, there are LOTS of materials that can filter all but a specific wavelength of light (say you ONLY want red light, or blue light, or maybe you JUST want red light filtered out) and I would think that if you wanted a specific spectrum of light, you'd just slap on the appropriate filters and KAZZAM you've got the correct wavelength for those difficult to treat tumors/warts/nasal cavity lodged cheesie poofs.

      --
      Find out about my new childrens book: SS Death Camp Criminal Batallion Go To Monte Carlo For The Massacre
    2. Re:ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sure, just throw a filter on it. They are doing about 8w/mm^2; filtering is absorption of the unwanted spectrum; so whaddya gonna do with the heat?

      The real way to do this is filter on the front end by "painting" (dying really) the dish. Moreover, you can always wack some of the spectrum by choice of fiber materials... plastic typically sucks large in the UV.

    3. Re:ouch by des09 · · Score: 1

      filter before concentrator.

      --
      .sigless since 2003
  22. great by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 3, Funny

    if you live anywhere but Seattle.

    1. Re:great by smcn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Reminds me of a t-shirt I had when I was a kid.

      "In Washington, you don't get a tan, you get rusty"

  23. Re:Get some PRIORITIES! by mgessner · · Score: 1

    Go away.

    This is a story with significant economical and scientific impact.

    Maybe it should have been filed under "Science" and not a front page story, but nonetheless it's got significance.

    Unlike *your* post...

    --
    "Sometimes the truth is stupid." - Lawrence, creator of Prime Intellect
  24. GI Goe! by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny
    Everyone who used to operate on GI Joe figures with a magnifying glass is cheering for this to be commercially successful.

    ...I used to 'operate' on GI Joe figurines with firecrackers wedged into the rubber-band spinal cord.

    When do we get to see the real-world equivalent of that?

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:GI Goe! by siphoncolder · · Score: 1

      Sadly, look to the Gaza Strip. Dozens of Palestinians are doing almost exactly that - to themselves.

      --
      i'm amazed that i survived - an airbag saved my life.
    2. Re:GI Goe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I used to 'operate' on GI Joe figurines with firecrackers wedged into the rubber-band spinal cord. When do we get to see the real-world equivalent of that?

      I think the Taliban had something like that. I hear they are hiring again after some personal reduction incidences.

    3. Re:GI Goe! by RadioTV · · Score: 1

      With me it was StarWars figures and puddles of gasoline.

      --
      I have great faith in fools - self confidence my friends call it. - Edgar Allan Poe
    4. Re:GI Goe! by Viadd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Lithotripsy is the use of shock waves from external explosions focussed on e.g., a kidney stone, to break it up.
      How it works.

    5. Re:GI Goe! by spacefrog · · Score: 2

      GI Joe?

      When *I* was a kid this is how we "operated" on any baby birds we found...

  25. operations by wretchedmage · · Score: 1

    what the hell are you talking about? I do my operations in the microwave, and the GI joes don't complaint either.

  26. Re:Get some PRIORITIES! by KowShak · · Score: 0

    If the world is in as bad a state as the picture you are trying to paint, why not end it all now. If you bit down on the cyandide capsule now, you'd be dead before you read to the end of this comment. Then we'd all be able to discuss laser eye surgery in peace.

  27. magnifying glass by winse · · Score: 1

    I used a "
    page magnifier when I was a kid....even on a cloudy day you could start a fire in about a second

    --
    this sig is deprecated
    1. Re:magnifying glass by winse · · Score: 1
      --
      this sig is deprecated
    2. Re:magnifying glass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah those fresnal lenses are something special, look it up in google ... they are much better at the job than ordinary magnifying glasses

  28. Re:Right in the solar plexus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like you are an idiot !

  29. Wavelength by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Doesn't seem to be any provision for selecting wavelengths. But I suppose if it works, it works.

    But if someone has access to this thing, they probably have access to scalpels as well. The question remains, is this evolved ant-burner better than a scalpel?

    1. Re:Wavelength by Salsaman · · Score: 2
      is this evolved ant-burner better than a scalpel?

      I believe so. You can dye a tumour a certain colour and then the light can be set to only burn dyed cells (I am sure that there will be some means to select certain wavlengths). Also, you can't switch a scalpel on and off, meaning you have to cut through healthy tissue to cut out unhealthy tissue below. Think keyhole surgery.

  30. And who will they use as ants ? by Zemran · · Score: 0, Troll

    Soon we will see film of Palestinians running around with smoke coming from the seats of their pants as they try to walk past hospitals...

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  31. Re:Get some PRIORITIES! by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1

    This device could help in countries where electrical power in unreliable and highly expensive, especially in war zones where nothing is reliable.

    Please mod parent up as insightful.

  32. exxxcellent. by mikeee · · Score: 1

    Soon, I will mount a Beowulf Cluster of these atop my observatory on the volcano in the park, and blackmail the city for one hundred billion dollars with my Death Ray!

    Bwah-hah-hah!

    1. Re:exxxcellent. by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      then get your ass kicked by the power puff girls...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  33. in...indoors?! by digitalsushi · · Score: 2

    They best be putting those giant "WARNING: Sunshine in use" sirens up everywhere they use this.. There's a reason we stay underground...

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
  34. Perfect Target Market! by cybermace5 · · Score: 3, Funny


    This is a great invention for Vegans...all their cooking must be done in the sun. Now they have a natural alternative to pollution-spewing lasers.

    Maybe now I can finally get that extra-dark tan I want.

    --
    ...
  35. Practice at home... by yorgo · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://www.channel4.com/entertainment/games/showca rds/A/ant_city.html

    1. Re:Practice at home... by kisrael · · Score: 2

      Learn to make a link, and to copy URLs without spaces...

      anyway, I was going to post it as well: Ant City.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  36. Re:Get some PRIORITIES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are YOU the editor? why do you freaking care where its placed! damn you people and your anal retentivness

  37. phase IV by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    Funny you should mention ants.
    There's an old film(1973) called phase IV that's exactly what your going on about!!

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  38. Mobile Surgery by InnovATIONS · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems to me that the real importance of this is the ability to be able to have a mobile surgery suite that can be taken to places where reliable electrical power does not exist, or perhaps field surgical hospitals in disaster areas. And yes, that IS big news to the poster that suggested that this was somehow misdirected priorities.

    1. Re:Mobile Surgery by MyHair · · Score: 1

      Better yet: they can use this in high-altitude zeppelins or space stations for surgery. (No cloud problems, more intense sunlight.) The Rocket Guy should be able to send people up cheaper than ground-based surgery; if not then we'll have that space elevator in 15 years, right?

  39. Rare occurence by T-Kir · · Score: 2, Funny

    What about the opposite?

    A surge in sunlight (solar flare, whatever else)...

    Doctor: Oh shit!

    Nurse: Doctor, it looks like you've gone through the patient, and through the operating desk, and floor. And the blood is pouring down into the coffee vending machine on the next floor! (sorry about the morbidness of that last bit)

    Patient: (not very well at the moment, and not saying anything)

    --
    Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
    1. Re:Rare occurence by ChuyMatt · · Score: 1

      I am sure that it would have some sort of electronic f/stop (cant spell today) that would make sure the beam was controlled. Surely they are not that stupid (doctors are very paranoid about malpractice suits).

    2. Re:Rare occurence by Moonshadow · · Score: 2

      That, and a surge would cauterize the wound, preventing bleeding.

      Kinda like a giant magnifying-glass lightsaber thingy.

      I want one to point at the shoes of unsuspecting pedestrian passer-bys. :D

    3. Re:Rare occurence by BoneFlower · · Score: 2

      Not a problem. Well, the blood wouldn't be. That much heat would sear the wound. Maybe a drop or two would seep out but a beam that powerful would seal the wound very well.

  40. Best where electrical power is questionable.... by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Despite all the jokes on here about it, I think it has applications in 3rd. world countries where reliable electrical power isn't a given.

    In countries like the United States, every hospital has backup power generators, uninterrupted power supplies, and so forth -- on top of being connected to a pretty reliable power grid. I can't see someone choosing sunlight over an electrically powered laser beam for surgery. The greater initial expense of the laser is quickly offset by money lost on surgeries that couldn't be performed due to weather conditions.

    In a relatively undeveloped country, however, this might make a lot of sense! It could give new options to doctors who simply couldn't count on a laser-based setup to function reliably, or couldn't afford it to begin with.

    1. Re:Best where electrical power is questionable.... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      not to mention this allows the military to move their hospital units a lot closer to the lines (which is good for multiple reasons, including helping humans survive), and gives them less of a logistical tail (who needs fuel for generators when you can use sunlight)

    2. Re:Best where electrical power is questionable.... by Raskolnk · · Score: 3, Funny

      In a relatively undeveloped country, however, this might make a lot of sense! It could give new options to doctors who simply couldn't count on a laser-based setup to function reliably, or couldn't afford it to begin with.

      Yes, like Palestine. The Israeli government could get PR points by making the technology available in the West Bank and Gaza.

      Of course, then they'd setup military checkpoints and not allow Palestinians access to it. Then they'd start bulldozing hospitals with the excuse that they housed military laser technology.

      Bush won't approve of the whole thing because it has something to do with solar technology. Long discussions with his advisors will then be required to explain to him why we can't just drill in national parks and focus petroleum for surgery.

      --
      Don't blame me, I get all my opinions from my Ouija board.
    3. Re:Best where electrical power is questionable.... by ScannerBoy · · Score: 1

      You still need reliable power to run the lights, respirator, heart monitor...and what not. I don't see how it being run off sunlight changes the requirements of a standard OR.

      --
      --Should work--
    4. Re:Best where electrical power is questionable.... by des09 · · Score: 1

      lights, heart monitors etc draw relatively low current, whereas autoclaves, lasers etc. draw much higher current.a small photovoltaic system could drive the low-power stuff.

      --
      .sigless since 2003
    5. Re:Best where electrical power is questionable.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still need eletrical power even to run just this system alone - note the line about automated sun tracking...

    6. Re:Best where electrical power is questionable.... by MulluskO · · Score: 2

      Despite all the jokes on here about it... scalpels.

      In a relatively undeveloped country, this would make a lot of sense!

      --

      Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
  41. Why not just use electricity by dprice · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is interesting to use concentrated sunlight for surgery, but electricity is still a more reliable way to generate light. I would imagine that some high intensity incandescent lights could be concentrated similar to sunlight, and woundn't be dependent on weather and the earth's rotation.

    Where this technology might be useful is in remote areas where electricity is not available. But where electricity is plentiful, this technology seems more like a novelty, like "Sun Tea".

    1. Re:Why not just use electricity by gnudutch · · Score: 1

      I think it's Israel where they don't use electricity or utilities on Sabbath?

  42. Wavelengths by barista · · Score: 3, Informative

    The article was a little short on details. I work for some ophthalmologists, and they use different types of lasers for different purposes. The way it was explained to me, the main differences were in the wavelengths they use. Excimer lasers are good for LASIK and such, while argon or krypton lasers are used for retinal repairs. Carbon dioxide produces an infrared laser for photocoagulation or for cutting.

    Since it's still in the nascent stage,it will be interesting to see what they eventually come up with, especially if they can isolate different wavelengths.

  43. I think it was that great philosopher ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Beavis, who first said:

    FIRE, FIRE, FIRE, he he he he he he
    That's cool.

  44. Reminds me of a science experiment... by NiTr|c · · Score: 1
    It was rather fun. We all had a nice stroll outside with a Parabolic mirror and flamable objects. Since the sun's rays shine in a somewhat parallel fashion, the parabola shape would focus the energy into the center of the mirror and whoosh, insta-flaming materials... Never thought they would turn it into a surgical procedure though. That seems a bit dangerous.

    --
    Try actually thinking for yourself. It's quite refreshing.
  45. Solar Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't this technology be used to enhance the effciancy of solar power?

  46. let's all get real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tortured Joe too, but he's as much of a doll as Barbie, enough with the figures/figurines stuff!

  47. common sense? by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To all you lame yuppy idiots replying with "oh its cloudy" here are some questions you should have asked

    1. What is the annual amount of sunshine where this is to be used? [hint: chances are its high]

    2. What is the cost of this device and its use say versus the laser setup [hint: chances are their low] .........

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:common sense? by avi33 · · Score: 1

      Yuppy idiots? Now where exactly did you get that generalization?

      Trolls, yes. Didn't notice 15 other identical posts, yes...but yuppy? and what's with that spelling anyway?

      Last time I checked, most technologists (and lots that read this site) are young, upwardly mobile, make over $50k annually, and spend money on the trappings of western society...Maybe not card-carrying yuppies in your eyes, but really, not far off.

    2. Re:common sense? by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 1

      hey, i'm a lame yuppy idiot and i didn't think either of those things. you make it sound like we're all european or something.

      Toujours reddition France!

    3. Re:common sense? by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

      Let's look at it this way:

      High power lasers suck up a lot of juice right?

      So for all the trolling yuppies (I can please everyone, really) out there with the "cloudy" jokes (thanks, by the way, for making known your expertise on convection currents) here's how it saves a United States hospital money. Pay attention now:

      Two high-intensity light beams!

      No, really they can have redundant systems. Use the solar power on a sunny day and the electrical on a cloudy day (or the late hours). They still save money while sacrificing no reliability.

      With all the database and server administration talk around here you'd think a few slashdotters would pick up the concept of redundant systems...

      (Okay so I didn't please everybody.)

  48. i was already a... by Hooya · · Score: 2

    sergon in the second grade. before i even knew it!! had i realized that i coulda made some serious lunch money. well, i guess i put in my pro-bono time.

    if it took them a med-school degree to figure that out maybe i need to start a med-school too. after all, i know all about mag glasses and insects, GI joes... by grade school. talk about the brains!! now all i need to add is the damn optical fiber. I even injected frogs with ink. how many years before *they* figure that one??

  49. I wonder how Dr Evil would feel about this... by pauly_thumbs · · Score: 1

    You know, I have one simple request...and that is to have sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads. Now evidently, my cycloptic colleague informs me that that can't be done. Ah, can you please remind me what I pay you people for?
    Honestly, throw me a bone here...what do we have?

    A giant magnifying glass....

    Sorry couldn't resist :)

    heck it's friday!!!

  50. Scientific American web award? I think not. by ubiquitin · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    A couple months ago, CmdrTaco complained about not being mentioned for SciAm's web awards. With comments posted by michael like "Everyone who used to operate on GI Joe figures with a magnifying glass is cheering for this to be commercially successful." he really should give up. Slashdot is a well-crafted repository for myth and urban legend much more than a conduit for anything remotely resembling the truly scientific. That being said, what do you do when some clouds blow over your hospital while in surgery?

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/4ny52
  51. High Availability Alternative by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Consider the possibilities this brings to field surgery in wartime or in developing countries.

    With this invention, certain surgeries that are not possible in areas without electricity or expensive equipment can be performed.

    It's not as though they will be replacing equipment in hospitals in a town near you...

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  52. Disecting chicken breasts by Gmerk · · Score: 1

    "The researchers have used this concentrated output to perform ex-vivo solar surgery on chicken breasts and livers, which has shown promising results." Didn't Alton Brown already do this?

  53. Just don't use it on a vampyr. by nexusone · · Score: 2, Funny

    Doctor: "Nurse what happened? I just hit him with a small burst of sun light and he went up in flames."

    --
    Wise men speak because they have something to say, Fools because they have to say something!!!!
    1. Re:Just don't use it on a vampyr. by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      that would be a true vam-pyre

  54. Overcast? by bobdole34 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That's just annoying when clouds blow over half way into the incision.

    --
    "Failure of Windows operating systems is extremely rare. If it happens, it is usually due to operating system file c
  55. Clouds? by jsimon12 · · Score: 2

    I think the obivous issues with clouds and night issues and such will cause some serious issues with the usefulness of this. What surgeon wants a tool that only works 4-6 hours during the day, assuming there aren't any clouds. I don't want my surgery to be schedualed depending on the weather.

    1. Re:Clouds? by avi33 · · Score: 1

      If you bothered to read the article, you'd see that it's intended for use as a "cost-effective alternative, at least for sun-belt climates and sunny developing countries."

    2. Re:Clouds? by jsimon12 · · Score: 2

      Yes I bothered to read the article and I understand that, but is this money well spent in a developing nation? Or would it be better to spend the money on basic medicines. I simply question the usefulness of a device used in something as mission critical as surgery being dependent on the weather to this extent. Sure it is a developing country, but is it far to open someone up and have to wait till the clouds clear before you can finish the surgery?

  56. Solar flare. by reality-bytes · · Score: 5, Funny

    All you need is a good size, unexpected, solar flare during an operation and 6 hours later the surgeons will be trying to explain to you why you now have a second rectum! :)

    You smell something burning?.......

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:Solar flare. by saider · · Score: 1

      Rectum? Damn near killed him!

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    2. Re:Solar flare. by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      All you need is a good size, unexpected, solar flare during an operation and 6 hours later the surgeons will be trying to explain to you why you now have a second rectum! :)

      Hmmm. I wonder if goatse was a test volunteer.

    3. Re:Solar flare. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not only the owner, but also a client.

  57. Obligatory Simpsons Quote by Raul654 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hibbert: This is such a beautiful day, I don't know why we don't operate outside more often.

    [Tennis ball falls from sky into open wound, ECG flatlines]

    Hibbert: Time of death.. 10:15.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  58. Ants? by anonymous_wombat · · Score: 2

    Forget about ants, I want to cook chicken. Do you think that those guys were practicing on dead chicken breasts, and not eating the results?

    1. Re:Ants? by antirename · · Score: 2

      Ants are cheaper :)

  59. Lighting your office by gouldtj · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've always wondered about the idea of having natural light in a large building. I wonder if you could concentrate the light this much, it would be economical to run one 'super fiber' down 30 stories, then split it out. I would love being able to get natural light instead of the flourecent stuff...

    1. Re:Lighting your office by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2


      Well that would require some sort of a Rebigulator which is a concept so ridiculous it makes me want to laugh out loud and chortle...

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    2. Re:Lighting your office by saider · · Score: 1



      It is done. I recall seeing an artile several years ago about how some Japanese company came up with a system that mounted on the roof of an apartment or office building. They would run fibers down to the units to provide some natural sunlight. They still needed regular lights because there just wasn't enough to go around, but bringing some natural sunlight into a breakroom gave it a little warmer feel. This device was inspiered by a study that suggests that exposure (or lack thereof) to sunlight can affect one's moods.

      I just wish I had some links.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    3. Re:Lighting your office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twenty years down the road, we'll wonder why all the leathery office workers are dying of cancer...

      I kind of like man-made lighting indoors...

    4. Re:Lighting your office by mbessey · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's something close -Mark

    5. Re:Lighting your office by gouldtj · · Score: 2

      A guy I work with has these in his house. He absolutely loves them. He says that the amazing part is how much light they concentrate to really brighten things up. Even at dusk they still put out alot of light. He also likes that they don't pull through alot of heat (we live in Phoenix) and that they are more private than skylights.

  60. Boon for the third world... sorta by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 4, Insightful
    So, as I understand it, we're talking about a laser analoge that needs no electrical infrastructure, should require little or no maintenance, and should be relatively cheap to mass produce. For certain procedures, this will be a real boon for poor countries.

    There are limits, though. The thing that a laser is real good for is high precision procedures (think Lasik) that will still require all the infrastructure to operate robotic machinery (computer, electrical power, etc.) Also, the big health issue in real poor countries is access to sanitation, trained health care workers, and vaccines (on that last, say what you will about Bill Gates, but he recognizes his philanthropy is better spent on vaccines than PDAs and gizmos for third world hospitals - the knee juerk techno solution I would've lunged at).

    Still, this is a great development. Will it completely change health care in poor coutnries? No. But it is another (very useful) tool in the toolbox for health care in poor countries.

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

    1. Re:Boon for the third world... sorta by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bill Gates, but he recognizes his philanthropy is better spent on vaccines [gatesfoundation.org]

      God always warned about gifts from Satan.

      In any case, Gates spends a few million a year on such charity endeavors. This is the equivalent to you or I spending about $3 a year on charity, scaling income and wealth down using a simple ratio.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Boon for the third world... sorta by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Actually, I've heard this argument before and crunched some numbers after hearing a story on NPR about modern philanthropy. He's well behind the number one philanthropist, a guy who is driven to spend as much of his few hundred million on charity (he was running around 50% of his income into causes every year). Gates ranked number three, giving a couple of percent (I can't remember the exact number but it was not "$3 a year") of his income each year. (And,yes, I only count income - I wouldn't expect anyone to give an anual percentage of their assets)

      My reaction was like yours... then I looked at my own giving. I don't go to church, so I don't put money in the plate every week like my folks did. I give stuff to Goodwill and gave my old Honda to Red Cross last year, but in truth that's just to get rid of clutter around the house. Yeah, I buy girl scout cookies, and susbscribe to PBS, but those are hardly acts of philanthropy in my book, 'cause I'm getting a tangible, immediate gain. Occasionally I cut a check to a charity, but it really isn't that much. Looking at my tax returns, it was well under 1%.

      The fact is, I believe my giving is representative of most Americans who don't regularly go to church or temple or are intimately involved with a specific charity (little league coach, etc). He's giving a larger slice than many people are and he's putting it towards a very sensible cause with the vaccines (and, no, I don't defend him giving Windows away in the schols, so don't harp on that). Even if Bill is just giving 5% for the tax write off, who am I to judge him?

      The moral: You can condemn Gates on any number of issues, bith as a businessman and a technologist, but he's a lot more complex than the simple good/evil labels we humans love so much.

      --

      "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

    3. Re:Boon for the third world... sorta by Gumber · · Score: 2

      Gates has said he will give away an actual percentage of his assets.

      His goal, I think, is to have given most everything away before he dies (though that will likely include endowing institutions which will outlive him)

      We will see what comes to pass, but I think he will go a long way to dispersing his wealth. He got a lot of bad press about his record with giving. Some people tried to shame him by comparing him to his late mother , but I am not sure it was fair. Gates strikes me as a very focused and involved person. I can't imagine him disposing of large portions of his capital without being very involved in the process. But at the time he was very involved with Microsoft.

  61. Hmm by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

    This is like a WMD against the ant community. (Then again, so is a shoe).

    1. Re:Hmm by antirename · · Score: 2

      No, no, no... a real anthill WMD is a REAL M80 duct taped to a can of Aquanet hairspray, and a long fuse :)

  62. Ah! The sun! by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    It burns!

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  63. Sorry Sir, by Quixadhal · · Score: 2

    We won't be able to perform that emergency bypass operation until daylight.

    But we're in Alaska!

    Yes Sir, and that means we only have to wait another couple of weeks.

  64. Prior ART by lostindenver · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Will they get a PATENT for this?

  65. Pi * 100mm(sq) - 1 mm = 15000x power? by avi33 · · Score: 1

    That's interesting. It seems like a mirror with a 200mm diameter, focused into a 1 mm should have a power of about:
    Pi * 100mm(sq) = 3141 mm(sq) units of sunlight.

    Though I know nothing of optics and how this power might be boosted.

    1. Re:Pi * 100mm(sq) - 1 mm = 15000x power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Check your math. Specifically the part where you square 100. There's actually a significant dropoff, probably related to efficiency.

  66. Neat idea... but... by MrIcee · · Score: 2
    I wonder how they keep problems like a sudden cloud... or worse yet, a roosting pigeon, from suddenly blocking the light.

    I'd hate to be *under the knife* when a bird suddenly cuts off my source of light.

    I'd also like to be assured, before they put me under, that they can complete the operation while the sun is still up. "I'm sorry sir... but there was this bird... and, well... and then the sun went down... and... well... oh well.".

  67. Cheaper?? by essiescreet · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, how about,

    Big Assed Laser (BAL)
    Metric Shitload of Fiber-Optic Cable (MSFOC)
    Assorted Routing and Switching Equipment to Get the Light Into the Operating Room(ARSEGLIOR)
    Very Large Concave Piece of Strudy Glass or Other Opaque Substance(VLCPSGOOS)

    Now, is the costOf(BAL) less than the costOf(MSFOC + VLCPSGOOS + ARSEGLIOR)
    ?
    This will not be much cheaper...

  68. Re:Get some PRIORITIES! by Wiseazz · · Score: 1

    Oh, it's YOU again. Go away.

    --
    My sig sucks.
  69. This is funny. by ForExportOnly · · Score: 1

    Are they asserting that the cost of laser surgery is centered around power consumption? I hope not. A laser powerful enough to vaporize a small turkey will only required a few tens of watts. You could get that from a lawnmower engine. What they really need is something that is easy to use with lots of idiot proofing. The cost of laser surgery is in the 6 years of medical school before anyone touches the device.

    1. Re:This is funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few tens of watts would take quite a while to vaporize a turkey, and you'd have to get someone to hold it down for you...

    2. Re:This is funny. by antirename · · Score: 2

      Actually, I built a CO2 laser from scratch. The (estimated) power output is 100 watts. Of course, that is coherent and focused, so it burns 1/4 holes in things quick :) I don't know what the efficiency is, since it runs on my general electric bill, but I'd be surprised if it was much over 5 %. Once you factor in the water cooling pumps, losses in the power supply, the amount the semitransparent front lense actually lets through, heat loss, etc. lasers (homebuilt, anyway) aren't real efficient. Fun project, just be real careful with used neon sign power supplies... they aren't always in the best of shape, and you don't usually get a second chance if you get zapped by one. Also, I had my lens holders cut by a waterjet shop... VERY nice. Self cooling; that rocks.

  70. I'll take the bus next time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Way to go Israel.

    Here we suffered our only major terrorist attack and we can't seem to get our country back on track. Israel lives with attacks everyday, but they're still turning out cool shit.

    These guys are hardcore.

    1. Re:I'll take the bus next time... by Abreu · · Score: 2

      Sure, they have learned to live with terrorist attacks.

      They know its only the natural side effect of a plan where they have to slowly anihilate an entire people with blockades and settlements, slowly robbing them of even more land and resources.

      To make a cake you have to break some eggs, dont you? So if you dont mind getting 3-9 dead civilians every couple of weeks or so, you can use them as a justification to decimate entire towns "looking for terrorists"

      This is the only way they can get a "final solution" to the palestinian problem without getting too many unconfortable accusations of genocide.

      So the answer is yes, they are hardcore... and the only thing they are causing is more death and destruction of innocent lives, galvinizing both populations and making them even more hardcore...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  71. What about the legal problems? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 2, Funny

    Would someone doing a rain dance during surgery be charged with attempted murder?

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  72. Another application by alphabet26 · · Score: 1

    When you think about it, if the laser is hot enough you can use it in army situations. ie, soldier get's his arm shot off, you can use it to cotterize the wound and stop the bleeding. Heck, strong enough you could be packing a laser to blind the opposition or paint a building for a laser guided bomb. I suppose it's only good for day attacks, or at least perhaps they can use a bunch of those really strong search lights and hope for the best...

    --
    -AlPhAbEt
  73. Get some PRIORITIES yourself. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Offtopic
    [Litany of six off-topic "important" long-term news items deleted] and you people have the gall to be discussing scientists in Israel developing a device for solar eye surgery???? My *god*, people, GET SOME PRIORITIES!

    If all other news reporting had to stop except the top six news items of the day we wouldn't have HEARD of:

    The bombing of the asprin plant in attempt to hit Bin Laden - precursor to the attack on the Twin Towers.

    Israel's handling of the Palestinian Occupation and the "Suicide/Homicide Bombers" - until the middle east was ACTUALLY at open war (which they aren't quite, unless you count the bombers and the missiling of the Palestinian infrastructure as war).

    The friction between India and Pakistan until they were at actual war (which they also aren't yet).

    Argentina's financial troubles (or Japan's, or Korea's, or ...)
    let alone what attacks the US might be THINKING about.

    The way you hear about what YOU consider important is for people to talk about EVERYTHING that THEY consider important - separated into appropriate venues for each class of topics, so you can find the ones you are looking for.

    THIS venu is "News for Nerds - Stuff that Matters" (to Nerds).

    It is for recent news - and time-limited discussions - about technical issues and other things that will immediately affect MY life (some of which MAY change the ground rules underlying regional and global wars as a side-effect).

    It is NOT for an endless 15th-generation rehash of the establishment media's top six propaganda pieces about recent developments in decades, centuries, or millenia-old conflicts halfway around the world.

    If you want a venu where slashdot-style discussions can be held on THOSE subjects, by all means START one. The slashcode is free and can be found here, or by following the "code" link on most pages of this site. Hosting is cheap until your traffic gets large - after which you have a lot of people you can dun for contributions or whose attention you can rent to interested parties to cover your costs.

    Meanwhile get out of OUR faces. The imminent death of mankind has been predicted continuously for at least two millenia, and probably since language was invented. It hasn't happened yet. Most of us are only interested when an issue for Nerds arises in the latest developments, while the rest will visit other, more appropriate, venues when they ARE interested.

    Once you get your site set up, its existence will be "News for Nerds" and suitable meat for an item announcing its presence, and an advertisement in a sigline on YOUR postings - which will remain visible if your postings here are on-topic for THIS venue and thus don't get moderated down.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  74. Implications on solar power generation? by Celandro · · Score: 0

    As I understand it, currently standard lenses are used to focus light onto solor cells to get more power out of them. If the current lenses were replaced by this 15000x focusing lens, would the extra power generation offset the more expensive lens? Even simply using it to heat water and spin a turbine might be useful. They mentioned the laser on the other end was measured at 8 watts which seems a bit too low to be useful for power generation.

    Dont suppose solar panal manufacturers read slashdot and could answer my question? ;)

  75. Catch Bin Laden by TibbonZero · · Score: 1

    Catch Bin Laden and we can try it out...
    I personally thought it would have been a good idea for Timothy McVey to have attached 288 (or however many people he killed) small bombs all over his body (ranging from firecrackers, to pretty large cherry bomb/m80's) on timers, and make them go off over three days or so at random occurances. Make a few of them stronger, so they would take off a limb or something eventually. Pretty sick, but wasn't he?
    Think of all the fun things you could do to Bin Laden if you caught him. Forget taking him to the authorities, kill him yourself. Would any jury convict you? NOPE, do whatever the hell you want- and people will just think that you didn't go far enough.
    Ok, that's sick, but really, perhaps that's what Isreal has for us next, bombs to operate GI Joe style on Bin Laden.

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Catch Bin Laden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to make the punishment fit the crime. For /bin/laden, simply tie him to a whipping post, but don't whip him. Fly 288 model airplanes over the period of 9 days and 11 hours, each with increasing size class. Create two teams, one representing each tower. The winning team is determined by who causes him to topple first. In the case of extra planes left over, a grand finale may be exhibited.

  76. Isn't it ironic? by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    You could get skin cancer while having skin cancer removed.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  77. the proper Obligatory Simpsons Quote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Homer: I see the light! It burns!!!

  78. Commercial success by asrb · · Score: 1

    Everyone who used to operate on GI Joe figures with a magnifying glass is cheering for this to be commercially successful. Especially me, as I hold Patent# 32419281411: "A method for melting and burning stuff with magnified sunlight." I'm gonna be filthy rich as soon as I sue them for patent infringement!!!

  79. Does it work on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...ants?

  80. Solex Agitator stolen! by ByTor-2112 · · Score: 3, Funny

    This just in. Device prototype stolen by lone assassin who charges $1 million her hit. British secret service sending their top agent to retrieve.

  81. Link to the lyrics by p7 · · Score: 1

    http://www.leoslyrics.com/listlyrics.php?sid=%A0C% C9H5%B9%A8H

    1. Re:Link to the lyrics by evilpenguin · · Score: 2

      Cool. So have "They Might Be Giants" covered every dopey science filmstrip song from the 60's and 70's? I'm an old guy -- They Might Be Giants are kinda after my music years...

    2. Re:Link to the lyrics by litui · · Score: 1

      Not that I know of, but they have some quirky other stuff. Very strange band. You might like their version though. Quite wonderfully silly. Their latest CD is actually for children. Great band.

      --
      I send you this message in order to have your advice.
  82. Parabolic dish discovered !!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats next ?! the wheel ?

  83. The Sun is a Mass... by cqnn · · Score: 2

    I don't know about elementary school, but it looks like a They Might Be Giants Song. http://www.crosswinds.net/~lyricsarchive/round7/gr eg7.html

  84. Clever way to select the frequency of light by bbc22405 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are several ways to solve this, and one of them is extremely clever. Let the light pass though a lens (rather than strictly using mirrors for all your lenses). Different frequencies (colors) of light will refract slightly differently (well, the ones off-axis), unless you have chosen the lens material carefully to avoid this. (Yes, think of the pretty rainbow that a prism makes from sunlight.) These different colors will focus at different distances from that lens. By positioning the end of the optic fiber at different distances from the lens, you selectively pick up different wavelengths.

    There was a Japanese company, which made (makes?) large sun-tracking Fresnel lenses, for placement on rooftops. At the focus of the lens, an optic fiber (maybe more of a light-pipe) collected the light, for piping into your building, so that you could have sunlight in your house. They took advantage of this spectrum-separating effect to exclude UV and IR as desired from the pipe.
    (Those systems, although certainly quite a fine nerd-toy, were ghastly expensive, IMO. Sorry.)

    1. Re:Clever way to select the frequency of light by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      Would the correct frequencys of light be strong enough in sunlight though or will the atmosphere filter them out?

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    2. Re:Clever way to select the frequency of light by bbc22405 · · Score: 1
      Would the correct frequencys of light be strong enough in sunlight though or will the atmosphere filter them out?

      That I do not know. Murphy's Law would suggest no. :-)

      I'd be worried about somebody doing something like eye surgery on me with this thing. I'm guessing a fancy laser for eye surgery has all sorts of fine control over intensity and duration. The fastest fine controls for sunlight would involve stepper motors adjusting the angle of crossed polarizers, I guess. That's not quite as fast as electronic switching...

  85. Coherent != parallel, and sunlight isn't parallel by forii · · Score: 1
    One of them is that, like laser light, it is a coherent beam (all the rays are parallel).


    "Coherent" light means that all the photons have a definite phase relationship to each other. Sunlight doesn't have this property.


    And while we are far from the sun, the sun still takes up about half of a degree of arc in the sky. That's a pretty sizeable amount, it is not at all the case that "the divergence is so small as to not matter."

  86. So where's a guy go to get... by lowy · · Score: 2


    SPF 15,000 Sunscreen??

  87. Re:Coherent != parallel, and sunlight isn't parall by evilpenguin · · Score: 2

    You're right of course. Parallel rays and phase coherence are not the same thing. I was sloppy. Coherence and parallelism are properties of laser light, but coherence isn't a property of sunlight.

    A half a degree of arc is significant for some of the precision applications of lasers, like holography and laser guidance and navigation, but they are close enough to parallel to be concentrated by a lens or a concave mirror and the light from a flourescent or incandescent bulb cannot be so concentrated. This is more than adequate for a solar substitute for laser surgery.

    My high school physics teacher became a bit of a laughing stock when he left a concave mirror in the back seat of his car and left his sunroof open. The focal length of the mirror was pretty close to the height of his car roof. The burned line from the front to the rear of his car roof is fairly ample proof of this property of sunlight.

  88. Some answers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laugh all you want at the invention, but consider this scenario:

    Patient: Doctor, I need lazer surgery but can not afford it.
    Doctor: Well, you're in luck. Instead of screwing you over because you can't afford it, you can use this new low-cost technology

    Also, it's in development. How do you know it will need direct sun contact and it wont just charge some solar batteries or something instead? Once the solar-source is charged then it can be used in cloudy conditions.

  89. 007 by 1134 · · Score: 1

    Wasn't this something that happened in "Man with the Golden Gun"?

  90. How about 50,000 by Carbon+Unit+549 · · Score: 1

    I read up on this a while back.
    Now, if I could just get my hands on one :)

    --

    nohup rm -rf ~/. >& zen &

  91. You beat me... by cr0sh · · Score: 2
    You are correct - such a system was done in Japan - I remember seeing a demonstration of it on "That's Incredible" or "Beyond 2000" back in the 1980's - I remember that the rooftop device was really large (or at least it looked that way to me as a kid) - a couple of meters across - and I don't think it concentrated the sun as much as this surgery device.

    Which brings me to a question - just how "hot" would the temperature be at the focus of the device? I would think you would need an active water cooling system to keep from melting the glass of the fiber optic (unless the temp is below that of melting glass) - not enough technical details in the article to know for sure.

    Also, as far as this device is concerned, could such concentrated sunlight be used to optically pump a dye (or similar) laser?

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    1. Re:You beat me... by antirename · · Score: 2

      Given a big enough mirror or lens, and another mirror or prism flipping fast enough, it might work. Flashbulbs would probably still be cheaper though... light is light, the trick with pumping a solid laser like a ruby or yag is pumping it in at the right rate. Solar powered Q-switch? Sure, but why? Hey wait a minute... you want to mount these onto SHARKS, don't you?

  92. Brings to mind a Jimmy Cliff song... by evacuate_the_bull · · Score: 1

    I can cut cleanly now the rain is gone
    I can laze allll the tu-umers in my way
    Gone are the dark clouds that stole my sun
    It's going to be a bright, RICH sunshiny day...

    --
    Satanists get good grades too...suspiciously good grades
  93. Ubiquitous Simpsons quote by evacuate_the_bull · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Smithers: Well, Sir, you've certainly vanquished all your enemies: the Elementary School, the local tavern, the old age home...you must be very proud.

    Burns: [stuffing money into his wallet] No, not while my greatest nemesis still provides our customers with free light, heat and energy. I call this enemy...the sun.

    --
    Satanists get good grades too...suspiciously good grades
    1. Re:Ubiquitous Simpsons quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the earliest of days mankind has wished to extinguish the sun...

  94. And another you might have missed! by evacuate_the_bull · · Score: 2, Funny

    Smithers: Well, Sir, you've certainly vanquished all your enemies: the Elementary School, the local tavern, the old age home...you must be very proud.

    Burns: [stuffing money into his wallet] No, not while my greatest nemesis still provides our customers with free light, heat and energy. I call this enemy...the sun.


    And now Monty can add free surgery to the list of services provided by his nemesis!

    --
    Satanists get good grades too...suspiciously good grades
    1. Re:And another you might have missed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever since the beginning of time... man has yearned to block out the sun!

  95. Surgery in Space by Robo+Dojo · · Score: 1

    This discovery has many useful applications in space, as well. When the dish is facing the sun directly, you will get much more power than you could get on Earth. This has a wide area of applications, including:
    1. Laser tag! (sports)
    2. Water heater (relaxation)
    3. Space surgery (medicine)
    4. Blinding sattelites (punk activities)
    5. Putting materials under extreme heat stress(science)
    6. Cook food/paste (very handy)
    7. Mini steam turbine (energy)
    8. non-contact soldering with auto shut off (no mistake repairs)
    9. It sounds very light, too (cost effective)
    10. Blasting space dirt (national security)
    NASA should definately throw this on the next craft and have some fun.

  96. solar cells? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not sure how they work, but could this be used to super charge solar cells?

  97. Re:Right in the solar plexus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Look like you are correct !

    -- 20721

  98. The Sound by march · · Score: 1

    Remember when your G.I. Joe's arm was melting and pieces of it were dripping off?

    Will your skin make that same cool sound as it drips to the ground using this machine?

  99. wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bloody good lateral thinking!!!!
    an *excellent* solution

  100. PHYSICS: this is nonsense by slashnot007 · · Score: 1
    This is all sort of silly, the sun is a 10 watt light bulb!... Why not just couple a light bulb in to the fiber. some Math:
    200mm dish
    sun = 1KW/M^2

    so power available is:
    0.01*3.14*1000 = 31 watts

    but you will only couple about 30% of this energy into the fiber in a useful spectral range so that gives a 10 watt lightbulb.

    you can run a ten watt light bulb off a battery and you could even charge the battery off a solar panel or a car.

    as for precision. once the light is in the fiber, it makes little difference whether its froma laser or a light bulb. in fact the broadband light bulb will be easier to focus reliably than the monochromatic laser (due to the absence of speckle).

    what you lose by going to a buld is the pulsed light source that you can get from a laser. Pulse light is better for some applications like retina welding.

    1. Re:PHYSICS: this is nonsense by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1
      I can't talk to the physics, but on precision, I was refering to aiming the thing, not the tightness of the focus. Automating the placement of the beam (as in Lasik) allows you to do things that are a lot different than a guy weilding the beam manually. Instead of needing a highly skilled, steady surgeon to make all those cuts you can have a GP (with proper training) set up the machine, monitor the patient, and turn the crank.

      In any case, it's probably moot. Lasik is the last thing anyone in a poor country is worried about.

      --

      "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  101. Can't trust that weatherman! by phorm · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, but how do you predict the weather conditions... the weatherman isn't always 100% accurate, and it would be hell if something went bad partway through.

    Scalpel...
    Probe...
    Solar ampli... oh crap where'd that cloud come from. Can anyone get me some duct-tape, or maybe a little epoxy?

  102. Why not a photovoltaic cell? by GlobalEcho · · Score: 2

    Why not just use the sunlight for powering a laser via solar cells instead? You get just the wavelength you want, and could conceivably have a battery backup.

    1. Re:Why not a photovoltaic cell? by Zazm · · Score: 1

      Probably because if you're using this at all your a woefully equipped butcher working in some dirt poor country somewhere on the wrong side of the world. If you're going to have any tools at all they'd better be cheap, portable and not need to be plugged in 'cause the only power station in town is a smoking ruin.

  103. wavelength issue by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

    What about the fact that medical lasers are set to a specific wavelength because of the properties of its interaction with skin tissue vs. diseased tissue? sunlight is "broadband" if you will. If they put a filter in there to restrict it to a narrow range of wavelengths they'll lose out on power.

  104. Re:Get some PRIORITIES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get your own priorities, and look up that word before you use it again. You are rambling about people dying in the middle east, when this technology could very well save them. You shout on a medium where everyone has the same voice, expecting to be heard more clearly. If you think something should be done, then you are clearly not doing anything. And you're yelling in outrage about the attacks nearly a year later? You've definately put yourself at the wrong end of your priorities. Get some friends to talk to and cool down. Making snide posts will do nothing but shut off the world to you.

  105. Can I have sunlight in my office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really!? Why can't they pipe some real sunlight into my cubicle? Into my lab? Especially on those bitterly cold, Great White North winter days when the sun shines so bright and glares off the snow it hurts? Or beautiful Friday afternoons like today? I don't need a surgical laser, just some more ambient so I don't have to turn on another flourescent over that dead-tree copy of the API or scematic I'm using. Is it too much to ask to cut my power consumption on sunny days?

    1. Re:Can I have sunlight in my office by Etcetera · · Score: 2

      I remember seeing something on TV a long time ago about some Japanese company that had done just that.

      It placed solar collectors similar to those in the article on the roof and piped the sun down fiber optics into rooms. Cheap natural lighting even if you're in the middle of an office block.

  106. Jeesh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any real trouble making geek fried ants with their large eyeglasses. Thats what I did anyway... you posers... :)

  107. Re:Coherent != parallel, and sunlight isn't parall by des09 · · Score: 1

    right, I wasn't going to bring it up, but the whole "parallel rays" thing kinda bites the dust as soon as they are concentrated by a concave mirror, and on the other side of the argument, a point source of light like a lightbuls can also be directed, and focused by cunning parabolic mirrors, witness those big-assed search lights.

    --
    .sigless since 2003
  108. Gates Foundation (O/T) by swfranklin · · Score: 1
    He funded the foundation with $24 Billion... depending on whose numbers you look at, anywhere from 30% to 50% of his net worth. As another poster said, apparently the 3rd largest philanthropist in terms of percentage of worth... but the LARGEST in sheer dollars, by several billions (according to Newsweek, Feb 4, 2002). I don't know about you, but that scales to a bit more than $3.00 out of my wallet.

    I've never been a Gates basher (don't bite the hand that feeds you - I don't work for M$, but I make a living as a programmer in ASP/COM+). I have a lot of respect for a guy who can start out as a simple millionaire's son with 3 years of Harvard behind him and become the richest man in the world.

    That said, the Newsweek 02/04/02 article is still worth a read (even for those pre-disposed against Mr. Bill) - the logic behind his endowments is excellent, he's not just dumping money and hoping for the best. He's requiring that the countries receiving funds invest in themselves as well, and he pulls funding if they fail to keep their end of the bargain.

    1. Re:Gates Foundation (O/T) by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      start out as a simple millionaire's son with 3 years of Harvard behind him

      Oh yeah, rags to riches, rags to riches. :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  109. Re:Coherent != parallel, and sunlight isn't parall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always wondered if laser output directed through a convex lens was still parallel.

  110. Not totally independent... by skookum · · Score: 1

    Note that the article states that the collector must track the sun as it moves, and this implies some sort of motor. Hence I would not go so far as to say that this could be used anywhere without power. Sure, it could run on batteries, but for a military application why not just use the laser medical pen from this slashdot story? It seems that keeping a supply of small 3V lithium batteries (probably industry standard) would be a lot easier than keeping batteries for a motor that must move a somewhat bulky device.

    Also, I don't think this will ever see use in poor countries. First, the geography must be just right for there to be enough sunlight, this eliminates a lot of places. But also, the article states that these things will cost about $1000 USD. Now if you're trying to budget the supplies for a operating room and have little to spend, do you buy a bunch of $5 scalpels and hemostats, or a single $1000 device that works under limited conditions and with which hardly any surgeons have experience? I'm not a medical professional, but the field has operated just fine for a very long time without (sunlight|laser) beams, so I'm pretty sure that everything this does can be done with plain old sterilized surgical stainless steel, for a lot less cash.

    1. Re:Not totally independent... by funky+womble · · Score: 2
      Also, I don't think this will ever see use in poor countries. First, the geography must be just right for there to be enough sunlight, this eliminates a lot of places.
      There's actually quite a lot of places this would be viable. Large parts of the world have good sunlight for enough of the year this could be well worthwhile (in fact, on average I think many economically poorer countries have a lot more sunlight than richer countries - there could be some interesting changes when the oil runs out!).

      IANAMedProf either but I'm sure that some types of surgery carried out by laser can't really be done any other way.

      The cost of sending people to train others how to use the equipment is probably much greater than the cost of the equipment itself... some organisations do think it's worth it for other solar technologies, so it's quite possible it could work here. $1000 for something reusable without need of sterilization at very high temperature for extended periods of time (*how* much fuel is needed each time?!) isn't that excessive.

      plain old sterilized surgical stainless steel
      In some circumstances sterilizing and reusing isn't deemed enough. (Though of course there are big problems with cheap reusable instruments too).
      the collector must track the sun as it moves, and this implies some sort of motor. Hence I would not go so far as to say that this could be used anywhere without power. Sure, it could run on batteries,
      In the UK I have seen chicken-sheds using solar power for heating incubators. (No doubt this is used in other countries too). The power from PV arrays is plenty to drive a motor to track the sun so that optimum lighting is maintained throughout the hours of daylight. Much better than using batteries containing fairly toxic chemicals don't you think?
  111. Correction by Stoutlimb · · Score: 2

    Light only has differing focal lengths when passing through a refractor (eg. a lens). Reflection (eg. mirrors) (which was mentioned in the article as the method of collection) has no different focal lengths for various wavelengths. I hope this clears things up.

  112. Solar Power... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could something like this be used to make solar power more efficient?

    1. Re:Solar Power... by reezle · · Score: 1

      That's kind what I was wondering, too...

      Somewhere there's a natural limit to how much energy a blop of silicon can turn into electricity, but where is that limit, and is anyone studying other materials that can convert larger amounts?

      Even if the material was 14999 times more expensive, it might be a going proposition if the refractive/reflective setup was cheap to build and mantain...

      I even remember a story where they used plants with white foliage to track the sun naturally, and reflect the light from a small valley to a central location. (No I'm not talking about Ringworld... {GRIN} ) Using plants, it was easy to maintain, and there was no cleaning of surfaces necessary, although the level of reflection was pretty low.

      There is even quite a few alternatives to the whole silicon setup that seem largely ignored, like a solar-powered steam turbine. It should be cheap and elegant. Perhaps it's not as sexy as expensive solar panels?

    2. Re:Solar Power... by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      You mean somethng like this?

      http://www.ecoworld.org/Air/articles/articles2.c fm ?TID=288

      Took less than a minute to look up on google. Probably less time than to type in your question to slashdot.

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  113. Operating on GI Joe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does that count as prior art when they patent it?

  114. Re:Coherent != parallel, and sunlight isn't parall by dunc78 · · Score: 1

    Of course they weren't parallel after hitting the mirror, because then the mirror wouldn't be concentrating just redirecting. The point was that if they are parallel when they hit the mirror, then can all be directed to the same focal point thus concentrating the light. If they weren't parallel when they hit the mirror, they would reflect off in various directions.

  115. It's a cover. by sideshow · · Score: 1

    TMBG found it on a educational record that would have been played in an elementary school.

    --

    Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

  116. Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck that! pipe it into high effiency low density solar cells! Maybe then even the UK can use the sun's energy (uh patent pending (TM)(C) GPL! you money grabbing fuckers)

  117. Dang! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I just got me a load of fido optics off ebay!
    Looks like I can now set up a bono fiday sergury!
    Thanks Slashdawt!

  118. Rock on! by spazoid12 · · Score: 1

    Yes! I *am* cheering for this GI Joe Magnifying surgery. Insightfully clever. The humor was both subtle and heartwarming. It is the author's natural exuberance that makes him so darn endearing. However, I will truly be excited when, finally, the AMA endorses surgery techniques based on my research which involved firecrackers and gardner snakes.

  119. Light obstruction = botched surgery by Jon+Howard · · Score: 1

    If there's anything that temporarily obstructs the sunlight during surgery, I could imagine things getting pretty bad for the patient.

    Nevertheless, it's a hell of a lot better than no (pseudo-)laser surgery at all ;)

  120. Err.... by _RidG_ · · Score: 1

    Hrm. It seems like we still don't know what the long-terms results of laser eye surgery are. Shouldn't we at least find *that* out before jumping on the next bandwagon? ...that is, assuming this technology can be used for eye surgey. Ahem.

    --


    "The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who don't have it." - G.B. Shaw
  121. Re:Get some PRIORITIES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're an idiot, so I'll spell this out:

    mgessner@yahoo.com, You Have Been Trolled. You Have Lost. Have A Nice Day.

  122. Soft Shadows by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    I am not sure on this on, so if any of you know what I am talking about help me out...

    I recall a wave table experiment from my 2nd year high school physics class where plane waves were generated at one end of the table and there was a half barrier at the other end, and the waves refracted at the corner, the point was that the degree of refraction was dependant on the frequency fo the wave...

    Is this partly responsible for soft shadows as well?

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  123. This is essentially useless by spineboy · · Score: 1

    Just my 2cents
    I'm an orthopaedic surgery resident and as far as I know the only specialty using lasers are the opthomology guys (eye surgeons) mostly for LASIK and zapping bleeders in diabetic retinas. Some of the liver transplant guys use it also, but this is kinda rare stuff.
    We (orthopods) used to use it , but discontinued its use since it kills the cartilage (thermal necrosis).
    In most cases a simple knife or scissors works very well

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  124. The ants are my friends by DoctorFrog · · Score: 1
    "The ants are my friends, blowin' in the Windows, ants are us, blowin' in the wind."

    (Sorry Bob, couldn't resist!)

  125. Other Implementations by Snover · · Score: 1

    How about using this amplified light and focusing it on, say, a solar panel? It seems to me that the reason there are great spanning arrays of solar panels is because they don't receive enough light (due to their design, not due to the lack of sunlight). If something like this was used to amplify the amount of light that went into a solar panel, what would stop solar power from becoming a widespread reality?

    --

    [insert witty comment here]
  126. uv? by ddt · · Score: 2

    Doesn't that increase your UV radiation exposure by a factor of 15,000X, too? Sounds like a cancer risk to me unless they have a filter for that.

  127. The Bris in Eight Days - Weather Permitting by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

    Way to go Israel.

    This solar scalpel is gonna be a boon to mohels. Reduce the rate of infection by having the ultimate scalpel, a beam of light, anywhere in the world.

    "The Bris will be in eight days... weather permitting."

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.