Slashdot Mirror


Radio Waves Employed in Space Construction

CDeity writes "Researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology claim that radio waves could be used to shape and fuse debris in space to form massive structures according to this article. Scientists have in the past employed sound and light waves to position small particles, and every expectation indicates these techniques could work on a large scale. One engineer estimates " it would take approximately one hour to form a rubble cloud into a 50-meter long enclosed structure.""

195 comments

  1. Perhaps by kaoshin · · Score: 5, Funny

    They could seek the advice of street bums. They have lots of experience with forming structures from rubble and may provide valuable insight!

    1. Re:Perhaps by coryboehne · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah but then everything in space would start to look like a soda can.... wait,, it already does! :)

    2. Re:Perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the state of the IT job market, I suspect a lot of those bums read /.

    3. Re:Perhaps by MulluskO · · Score: 2

      I suspect that street bum might have this to say.

      --

      Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
    4. Re:Perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Look, it's everything2! Mod him up!

    5. Re:Perhaps by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

      Do you mean like this?

    6. Re:Perhaps by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Umm, doesn't every force have an equal and opposite force ? What holds the sattelites in place ? Where does the energy come from to move a few billion tons of rock around. Did someone change the rules of inertia ? Why does the asteroid form a passive cloud ? Call me a skeptic but I wouldnt buy "off the plan".

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    7. Re:Perhaps by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      The energy comes from radio waves.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    8. Re:Perhaps by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      duh,...but where does the energy to generate the radio waves come from ? You can't just plug a satellite into the wall. Even if you could I'm sure the electricity bill would be astronomical.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    9. Re:Perhaps by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      It comes from two giant wires: one touching our charged atmosphere and the other grounding out in the moon, duh!

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
  2. I've seen this done on a smaller scale by faeryman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    and its very cool! At the Space Camp center, there used to be an exhibit where you could suspend in midair some little white polystyrene (?) balls with sound waves. After about 10 seconds the sound would sto and the balls would fall. I was always amazed at it, and always wondered if there were any practical uses for this.

    --


    ,
    faeryman
    1. Re:I've seen this done on a smaller scale by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      I wonder if those radio waves can somehow manage to spontaneously create some gaseous fluid capable of carrying these sound waves in space...

      Food for thought...

      If someone farts in space, does it make a noise???

      ~Loren

    2. Re:I've seen this done on a smaller scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idiot. sound wavesradio waves.

    3. Re:I've seen this done on a smaller scale by LineNoiz · · Score: 2, Funny

      If someone farts in space, does it make a noise???

      Yes. But the only person who would hear it is the guy in the suit it was released in. Unless he has his transmitter on...

      Once the sound wave leaves the suit, it would be silent, but deadly. To the guy in the suit anyway...

      --
      "Quotation is a serviceable substitute for wit." --Oscar Wilde
    4. Re:I've seen this done on a smaller scale by gregorio · · Score: 1

      I was always amazed at it, and always wondered if there were any practical uses for this.

      Not in space... You know why...

    5. Re:I've seen this done on a smaller scale by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2

      We move debris into useful shapes on Earth, too.

      It is 2002 you know. In all the movies set in the 21st century they use "sonic shapers" for construction.

    6. Re:I've seen this done on a smaller scale by TheZapman · · Score: 1

      Yes, because you release a gas. The antennuation is a pain tho'...

    7. Re:I've seen this done on a smaller scale by lkeagle · · Score: 1

      Well, if you're going the speed of light, you ARE, in fact, light. However, if you're going very, very close to the speed of light, the light coming from your headlights will be constrained to a tight cone projecting in the direction of travel. Sort of a relativistic tunnel vision.

  3. just make sure you get the right channel by Wantok · · Score: 5, Funny

    OK, just tune the megatransmitter to a hiphop station for the structural elements...

    classical for the smooth solar sails...

    and talkback for all the crap that has to be cleared off the building site.

    --
    mi save tingting long peles bilong mi long Niu Ailan.
    1. Re:just make sure you get the right channel by JM_the_Great · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps this could be used to disrupt some "crap" (silent 'c' ;)) stations down here on earth...

      "...our tower is, um, being pulled into space!"

      --

      --Justin Mitchell
      "2nd Place is a fancy word for losing" --Bender (Futurama)
  4. Neat-o by Vraylle · · Score: 2, Funny

    I imagine results visually akin to a Borg sphere. Does this work on all matter? If so, can we ship up all the stupid people and finally put them to good use?

    --
    Mutant Freaks of Nature: "Frighteningly Addictive"
    1. Re:Neat-o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean as drones? Wouldn't that be dangerous?

      I'd rather by assimilated by an intelligent, good looking person like 7 of 9... Please ;-)

  5. new fight song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a ramblin' space 'reck from Georgia Tech, and a hell of a space station...

  6. In Space no one can hear you build by codeonezero · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hehe,

    Lets just hope the engineers aren't big Star Trek fans or they'll try building these structures with sound in outer space. :-)

    --

    ....
    int main (void) { ... }

    1. Re:In Space no one can hear you build by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      You do of course understand that the article is about *radio* and not sound. Don't you?

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    2. Re:In Space no one can hear you build by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "You do of course understand that the article is about *radio* and not sound. Don't you?"

      Snippet from article: "Scientists have in the past employed sound and light waves to position small particles, and every expectation indicates these techniques could work on a large scale."

      You do of course understand that the parent poster was well aware of that, which is why the joke was funny. Don't you? It's called a joke.

    3. Re:In Space no one can hear you build by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "You do of course understand that the parent poster was well aware of that, which is why the joke was funny. Don't you? It's called a joke. "

      Heh perhaps he didn't watch that episode where Data learned the human value known as 'humor'.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:In Space no one can hear you build by rossifer · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I was to design a combat spacecraft control system, you would hear the other spacecraft exploding because the system would note that the spacecraft was exploding and would make the noises in your headset.

      I probably wouldn't make the bridge chair shake however.

      Regards,
      Ross

    5. Re:In Space no one can hear you build by nounderscores · · Score: 2

      That's a good idea. Link the radar to dolby spatialized sterio and have "engine noises" doppler shift around you so you can be queued as to where other craft are without turning your head...

      You should join the airforce. Or take out a patent.

    6. Re:In Space no one can hear you build by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      They might do this already for jet pilots. With the engine noise of your own jet, there's no way in hell you'd hear another plane, even if it were two feet away from your cockpit.

      Some poster on /. said they simulate the sound of nearby objects for exactly this purpose.

      The UI innovation *I* want is for this guy to start talking to these guys and get me a complete computer interface that fits in my hand. It'd beat the hell out of a blackberry...

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  7. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mankind's very first (multi-piece) space microwave oven - used to cook rocks! (i knew the damn things were useful)

  8. 1 Hour Eh? by Malicious · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just imagine the billboards we are going to see....

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
    1. Re:1 Hour Eh? by extagboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      For those of us who have trouble reading binary.

      Binary to Text converter

    2. Re:1 Hour Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you are batman?

      Sheesh, why would the space billboard say that? :)

    3. Re:1 Hour Eh? by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2

      You don't watch Cartoon Network, do you?

    4. Re:1 Hour Eh? by tmuka · · Score: 1

      hmm- i'm betting this 1 hour estimate doesnt include the time to plan, prep, and position the equipment in space to do the cleanup...

  9. Hello there! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut the fuck up.

    --
    Yours truly,

    the stupid people

  10. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A rubber that will fit!

  11. And by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Radio waves can be used to repair goatse.cx's ass.

  12. What's the Dept? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note the 'From the --- dept.' thing just below the headline.. why is there no specific dept named? Couldn't think of something funny?

  13. Been there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New Scientist had a long article on this a few weeks ago.

    1. Re:Been there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weeeelllll, aren't you special. I guess there is no point in discussing it here, New Scientist posted an article about it a few weeks ago...

      Shove it up your ass and smoke it.

  14. energy? by sploxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm really wondering where all the energy should come from.... energy to move these "bricks"...

    1. Re:energy? by SailorFrag · · Score: 1

      When there's no gravity, *any* amount of force will start someting moving. In space, I guess the electromagnetic waves have enough force to overcome the tiny amounts of gravity out there. Once something's moving, it doesn't stop until another force acts on it. So there really isn't a lot of energy that needs to come from anywhere. It's all in the radio waves.

    2. Re:energy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is gravity up there, a whole lot more than a tiny amount. It's just that everything is in freefall, so it *seems* like there is no gravity. If there were no gravity in orbit, there would be no orbit - everything would just shoot off, away from the Earth.

    3. Re:energy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not because of lack of gravity, it's lack of frictional forces. Without air there to slow objects down, objects lose very little kinetic energy.

  15. Burn by nocomment · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why don't they just fill up a 50 meter long enclosed structure here on Earth with money, and burn the building down. It would cost the same and give similar results. I say send the rubble cloud on a trajectroy course for the sun, and let it burn up in a few years when it gets there.

    If the scientists jsut wanna have fun, they could put sensors in the rubble cloud and watch the toilet bowl effect as is starts it's deteriorating semi-orbit around the sun before it bursts into an inferno.

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    1. Re:Burn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you stop to think for a nanosecond,
      you'll realize that all the money
      for space projects is spent on Earth,
      as wages for somebody or other ...

      I look forward to the day when we'll
      be able to really spend money in space.

  16. Duuuunnnn...dunnnn..... DUN DUNNNNNNNN! by Mythias · · Score: 1

    As a tribute to one of the great scientific minds of our time (Arthur C. Clarke), all radio waves used in space contruction should be derivatives of Also Sprach Zarathustra

    Thusly ACC would be a part of the space exploration movement that he himself helped to bring about. I'm sure everyone by now has heard about the Jupiter slingshot effect that he devised and was then used by NASA.

    1. Re:Duuuunnnn...dunnnn..... DUN DUNNNNNNNN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad it was Stanley Kubrick's idea to use "Zarathustra" for the 2001 movie... Then again, for Clarke-inspired music check out "The Songs of Distant Earth".
      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0 00 002MZ6/qid=1037405491/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/103-861408 3-6507007?v=glance&s=music

      Cool instrumental album composed by Mike "Tubular Bells" Oldfield and based on Sir Arthur's novel of the same name.

  17. Obligatory Post by CatWrangler · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Imagine a beowolf of these things... Damn. On topic too.

    --

    ---
    When you come to a fork in the road, take it! --Yogi Berra--

    1. Re:Obligatory Post by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      No no, here is how you do obligatoria:

      1. Patent garbage
      2. Put garbage in space
      3. Use radio waves to melt garbage into a beowulf cluster
      4. ???
      5. Profit!!!

  18. Hmm... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Noob Astronaught: We appear to be flying towards that small moon.

    Seasoned AStronaught: Thats no moon....

    1. Re:Hmm... by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 2, Funny

      Noob astronought and seasoned astronought were flying in the millenium falcon when that happened.

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    2. Re:Hmm... by glwtta · · Score: 2

      What, is it a Budong?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    3. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd mod you up if you could spell.

    4. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Astronaught"? What's that, a space zero? Or did you mean "astronaut"?

  19. Can the opposite be done as well? by codeonezero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok,

    So I haven't quite read the article but it occured to me.

    Is it possible to demolish such a structure with radio waves? Or do the laws that lets you do things one way, prevent you form doing things the other way?

    if you can't demolish the structures with radio waves, then what changes once you have built the structure that prevents you from doing so?

    --

    ....
    int main (void) { ... }

    1. Re:Can the opposite be done as well? by D4Vr4nt · · Score: 1

      ya.. just play some Britney Spears.. BURN IN FLAMES! mwhaha.. Um.. ya.

      --
      R4NT.com - A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices.
    2. Re:Can the opposite be done as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's easy to protect the structure once you've built. I've studied this.. They fabricate and anneal a thin Sn-based alloy. Then, they shape it into a semi-conical, logarithmically-pitched manifold, which is then affixed to the perimeter of the structure. This creates an area where impinging radio waves create surface currents, which then create radio waves of their own. The two waves cancel, thus protecting the internal structures.

      This theory also has medical applications: you can fashion a similar device to keep certain extraterrestrial radio signals from interfering from your neurotransmitters. There isn't much medical literature about this yet, but it's a growing field and doctors are beginning to appreciate the dangers of these radio waves.

      I wear such a device myself.

    3. Re:Can the opposite be done as well? by girish · · Score: 1

      Dune came to mind when I read that comment...

    4. Re:Can the opposite be done as well? by LineNoiz · · Score: 1

      Or do the laws that lets you do things one way, prevent you form doing things the other way?

      Of course it does. It's called the DMCA.

      Oh, you mean the laws of physics? nevermind...

      --
      "Quotation is a serviceable substitute for wit." --Oscar Wilde
    5. Re:Can the opposite be done as well? by einhverfr · · Score: 2

      Is it possible to demolish such a structure with radio waves? Or do the laws that lets you do things one way, prevent you form doing things the other way?

      Entropy increases. Therefore, I would assume that you could easily do the opposite if your structure was not robust enough.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    6. Re:Can the opposite be done as well? by johnalex · · Score: 2

      OK, so I'm breaking my cardinal rule and replying to a comment I modded.

      Hilarious. I remove my own Sn cranium covering in deference to your wit.

      I'd mod you up again, but drat, I'm out of points now.

      --
      JA
      http://www.johnalex.org/
    7. Re:Can the opposite be done as well? by Have+Blue · · Score: 2

      You really should have read the article. They are not claiming that radio waves can be used to support the structure forever. They are using the radio waves to move the raw materials into position and hold them there while they are fixed in place with something more permanent.

    8. Re:Can the opposite be done as well? by Usquebaugh · · Score: 2

      Since when moderators post to stories they've moderated?

    9. Re:Can the opposite be done as well? by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Since forever. But it removes any moderation done to comments in that story.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    10. Re:Can the opposite be done as well? by johnalex · · Score: 1

      They don't. I've never done it before, and I had forgotten that by posting my moderations were wiped out.

      My mistake. Next time I post to something like this, I'll break another cardinal rule and do it AC.

      --
      JA
      http://www.johnalex.org/
  20. moon manipulation by EEgopher · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Quite a cool idea. But consider how much output power would be required -- more than any earthly transmitter; and the zappers would require jets and fuel to keep them stationary while they zapped, and an extensive control system for the jets would be needed to shape the rubble into the astroid-sized bust of Jaromir Jagr.
    What if his smiling face was looking down at us from orbit? Imagine how many astronomers we could scare!

    --
    hi, I like pancakes -.-- -.-- --..
    1. Re:moon manipulation by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      Quite a cool idea. But consider how much output power would be required -- more than any earthly transmitter; and the zappers would require jets and fuel to keep them stationary while they zapped, and an extensive control system for the jets would be needed to shape the rubble into the astroid-sized bust of Jaromir Jagr.

      There are other ways to do stationkeeping if you have this technology down. Mostly I would be thinking of putting them on a frame, and using any materials you wouldn't want to include in your structure along the frame to add mass. You can also throw it away to give yourself a push to keep balance.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:moon manipulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "-.-- -.-- --.." (err... you may want to check that morse code ther... it seems to translate to YYZ ???)

    3. Re:moon manipulation by Biffer4810 · · Score: 1

      You might want to brush up on your knowledge of good music.

      --
      -.-- -.-- --..
      One fish / Two fish / Red fish / Blue fish
      ShyaOS - Think Differently!
    4. Re:moon manipulation by EEgopher · · Score: 1

      YEAH BOIIIEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      Hey Bevis, I'm going to see Jagr play tonight at the Excel Engergy center. Go Wild. (How lame.)

      --
      hi, I like pancakes -.-- -.-- --..
  21. Re:First Post! by unicron · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'd like to give a shout out to all my sci-fi peeps.

    --
    Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. could be exploited for explosions by Sarin · · Score: 2

    When you create a dustcloud in a closed room and ignite the dust with a simple light, it gives a big boom, because the air expands rapidly.

    I bet some malicious devices could be created with this technology.

  24. good for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Radio Waves Employed in Space Construction

    At least somebody's finding work in this economy!

    *rimshot*

    THAK YOU I AM TEH FUNNNYMAN!

  25. What about weapon uses? by phillymjs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since I'm currently watching a TiVoed episode ot The Outer Limits where this is a common theme, I have to raise the question of "the promising new technology being perverted into a weapon."

    If you can form structures out of crap floating in space, why couldn't it just be compressed into a large enough object to survive re-entry, and sent on its merry way, aimed at what the aggressor wants to obliterate here on Earth?

    Imagine if GWB suddenly backed down on all his we-gotta-git-Saddam rhetoric because it was getting hom nowhere and the American people were firmly against attacking Iraq, and then two or three months later Baghdad was mysteriously leveled by an nearby meteor strike one morning.

    ~Philly

    1. Re:What about weapon uses? by freuddot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Human have known, for the last 35 000 years ( at least ) that a rock is an efficient weapon to throw at the head of your ennemy. There's just no way you'll prevent weapon discovery, big or small. Put more than 1 person in a group and noone can both enjoy freedom and be sure not be killed by another one.

      That's why we have society. And culture. And laws. And morale. Preventing the technology use/discovery or whatever is pointless. You have to acknowledge that you are living in a big spaceship with 6 000 000 000 other living being. Jettison is not an option.

      The solution is a social one, not a technological one. I do not claim to know it. I just claim that it is not by saying this XYZthingy could be a weapon that anyone's gonna solve anything.

      If you want to solve problems, just take away the reason that LeaderXYZ has to kill others/invade country/destroy environment.

    2. Re:What about weapon uses? by unicron · · Score: 2

      "The earthlings have won; we were no match for their board-with-a-nail-in-it. But they will continue to make bigger and bigger boards until they make a board so big it will destroy all of them!"

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    3. Re:What about weapon uses? by freuddot · · Score: 2

      Or, in the words of Einstein :

      I do not know with what weapons World War 3 will be fought, but World War 4 will be fought with sticks and stones.

      The problem is, there's no known way of raising the global IQ of a planet.

    4. Re:What about weapon uses? by Myco · · Score: 2

      Sure there is -- the parent poster had it. World War 3. It's called "nowhere to go but up."

    5. Re:What about weapon uses? by snake_dad · · Score: 1
      The problem is, there's no known way of raising the global IQ of a planet.

      Yes, there is!

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    6. Re:What about weapon uses? by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2

      That assumes that the Bad Guys have easy access to space while the Good Guys sit here on the ground praying (literally, where GWB is concerned) that nobody drops anything heavy. The military advantages of having easy access to the upside of Earth's gravity well, particularly if you have some level of industry up there, are amazing. In some future era where spaceflight is commonplace, any country that a) is capable of establishing a presense in space and b) chooses not to, is being foolishly lax and will almost deserve what it gets.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  26. Weapons Research by N8F8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And how long would it take to push debris into an enemy satellite? Or form a large enough mass to plunk down on an unsuspecting enemy?

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Weapons Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No, why waste energy moving debris when you could just laser them instead at a fraction of the power?

      Oh, and why hurtle debris when you could simply destroy the orbit of your target and make it feel the burn like Steve Balmer.

    2. Re:Weapons Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember an old joke:

      No matter what discovery a scientist makes, it's going to be a weapon.

    3. Re:Weapons Research by dupper · · Score: 2, Funny

      Umm... what enemy satellites? Unlike whatever fiction you've integrated into your view of reality, the US is pretty well uncontested in the satellite area. No current enemies (Iraq, Afghanistan, even friggin' Mexico) have space programs, much less useful satellites, much less useful satellites which could possibly pose a threat to anybody.

    4. Re:Weapons Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some Xinhua report a few months ago said that China supposedly has developed kill satellites - if you believe that state propaganda mouthpiece, of course.

  27. I used one of these once... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was using one of these radio wave generators to construct my own personal spacecraft last week.

    My friend and I were sitting there in the station, and were getting real tired of the annoying noise being picked up by our stereo. We were getting really bored bored, and as you know these things take hours, so we decided to see what would happen when we broadcast some hard rock via the device.

    And it worked... mostly. All was going well until the end. All of a sudden, about 3/4 of the way through Jimmy Hendrix playing "All along the Watchtowner", the craft started spinning around wildly, and smashed itself to the moon where it shattered into a million pieces, and then it set itself on fire.

    I can't figure it out...

    And then my sister put in some Michael Jackson, but I don't even want to talk about that...

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    1. Re:I used one of these once... by yRabbit · · Score: 1

      It might work better to try using a vacuum cleaner, alcohol, and a joystick controller for spaceship parts; don't forget your helmet, and steer clear of Mars.

    2. Re:I used one of these once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah... A fellow Commander Keen player :-)
      I thought I was the only one who played it anymore;-)

  28. Clean up the space junk by p3d0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Could this be used to solve that nasty space junk problem? As I understand it, there is no known way to clean this stuff up.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    1. Re:Clean up the space junk by crimoid · · Score: 1

      This was my first thought. I could imagine an automated sonic bulldozer of sorts going around pushing things down into the atmosphere where they'd be destroyed during re-entry.

      Of course a massive orbiting wall of space junk would protect us from aliens, which is nice.

    2. Re:Clean up the space junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how do you expect use a sonic bulldozer to push things into the atmosphere where there is not enough air to have a sonic anything?

      next i suppose you will be telling me that it is powered by cold fusion?

    3. Re:Clean up the space junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok, a radio wave based bulldozer!

    4. Re:Clean up the space junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nuh, uh. The aliens have deflector dishes. Duh.

  29. My neighbor is an expert at this by Reggie+Funk · · Score: 1

    He has harnessed the power of his stereo system and can actually *make my walls shake*. I just sit there on my couch marvelling at his ingenuity. I've never met him, but I picture a singular genius toiling away at his workbench, wiping sweat from his haggard brow as Mother Inspiration taps him on the shoulder yet again. What will he think of next?

    1. Re:My neighbor is an expert at this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a difference between the stuff coming out of a speaker (i.e. SOUND - compressed AIR), and what the article is talking about (i.e. RADIO - A.K.A LIGHT!). Get a clue, they're not that expensive.

  30. what about? by perrin5 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Newton's 3rd law (equal and opposite reaction...), according to their nifty little diagram, this would require satelites surrounding the object, and pushing them from all directions, so:
    1) how do you keep the satelites around after they start generating their waves?
    2) how do you keep them symmetrical? (the requirement is that they set up a resonator, I think, in which case, spacing is VERY important).

    --
    hmmmm?
    1. Re:what about? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      inthe case of cleaning up space junk...you have a location that 2 satelites meet where there are 4 more satelites waiting...you send of one satelite in one direction pushing space junk, and another in the oposite direction pushing space junk...then they meet at teh location where you have 4 more waiting all teh junk gets pushed into the center of all 6, and they go to work at moulding it.

      you manuver the junk, not the satelites...like driving cattle.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:what about? by freakinPsycho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You forget two things: intertia and mass.

      If I have a rather large satelite using waves to push rather small objects, the satelite won't move, much.

      It would be very simple to counteract the marginal amount of force generated by pushing the particles around.

      --
      "All the things I really like to do are either immoral, illegal, or fattening."
      - Alexandar Woolcot
    3. Re:what about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      inthe case of cleaning up space junk...you have a location that 2 satelites meet where there are 4 more satelites waiting...you send of one satelite in one direction pushing space junk, and another in the oposite direction pushing space junk...then they meet at teh location where you have 4 more waiting all teh junk gets pushed into the center of all 6, and they go to work at moulding it.

      you manuver the junk, not the satelites...like driving cattle.


      Your typing/spelling is sub-par. Wlecome ot Slashdto!

    4. Re:what about? by Have+Blue · · Score: 2

      1) Read the article. They use the radio waves to temporarily hold the raw materials while they lock them down with more permanent measures.

    5. Re:what about? by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 2

      Maybe the satellites could also be pulling & pushing on each other, in order to maintain their relative positioning.

    6. Re:what about? by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      OR won't move at all... every action has an equal and opposite reaction... with regards to energy involved.

      Radio transmission doesn't tend to move the satellite. RF energy being absorbed by some rock and having some surface debris boiled off into space DOES.

    7. Re:what about? by LWolenczak · · Score: 2

      Well... what we're going to do is put the satelites in a warp bouble... so they are displaced from the real world...

  31. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  32. Testing Post Capabilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time I tried this, I kept getting an error message. Now I try again.

  33. Hah! by SlimFastForYou · · Score: 1

    You think that's a long time to rearange matter? Get it to clean my room!

  34. Since when do radio waves move things around? by cardshark2001 · · Score: 1

    I've never heard of this concept. Why can't we use super-concentrated radio waves as force fields to guard against space debris?

    How can it be that just flashing a light wave at something will cause it to move?

    The article just assumes that we all knew about radio waves having force, whereas I was laboring under the impression that they had none.

    --
    WWJD? JWRTFA!
    1. Re:Since when do radio waves move things around? by girish · · Score: 1
      Radio-Wave Controlled Electric Field Drive System

      He talks about the same type of a principal, but explains a bit more about the radio waves. http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ufophysics/twinwave.h tm

    2. Re:Since when do radio waves move things around? by inburito · · Score: 2

      They do have force.. or more exactly momentum!

      E=hf=mc^2 -> m=hf/c^2
      v=c, p=mv=hf/c

    3. Re:Since when do radio waves move things around? by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 3, Informative

      All electromagnetic waves, including light, are made up of photons and they do excert a force. The momentum of light can be calcuated via its frequency. The smaller the wavelength the more momentum and energy it has. According to Einstein: E^2=p^2c^2 +(mc^2)^2 Since the mass of a photon is negligable, if it even has one, E=pc where the energy is dependant on the momentum. C is a constant, ~ 3.0e8 m/s P is the momentum of the photon. Light is both a particle and a wave. P = h/(wavelength) where h is plancks constant. In fact P = h/wavelenght is true for all matter as well. If you want to learn more do some reading on quantum physics.

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    4. Re:Since when do radio waves move things around? by spike+hay · · Score: 2


      The article just assumes that we all knew about radio waves having force, whereas I was laboring under the impression that they had none.


      Photons do have force. In fact, probably the most viable concept for intersteller travel at close to the speed of light is a laser or microwave sail. (You shoot lasers or microwaves at a gossamer sail. This is actually better than antimatter for intersteller travel)

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    5. Re:Since when do radio waves move things around? by pfalstad · · Score: 2, Informative

      As several people have mentioned, photons have momentum and do exert pressure (called radiation pressure).

      Looking at it classically, though, electromagnetic waves are made up of electric fields and magnetic fields. Electric fields exert a force on charged particles. So if you point a radio wave at an object that reflects waves, then the wave's electric field will push the electrons in the object back and forth. The moving charged particles then interact with the wave's magnetic field, pushing them in the direction the wave was traveling.. Which is the same thing we could have predicted from conservation of momentum. (Warning: IANAP.)

    6. Re:Since when do radio waves move things around? by Jus+ad+Bellum · · Score: 1

      Slashdot posting needs LaTeX...

      Or anything that gives suave notation for math and natural science.

    7. Re:Since when do radio waves move things around? by artificial-intellect · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine demonstrated the effect of electromagnetic waves exerting a force by showing me a little gadget that he kept by his window.

      It consists of a small sealed glass sphere, and inside it is a rotating axis with pieces of very thin aluminium foil attached to it (i.e. like a windmill but with light). Amazingly, it spins round even on a moderately overcast day.

  35. Heh by Sacarino · · Score: 1

    Sorry to break the news to Georgia....

    No matter how much they shout at the roaches on the table, they won't combine to form another blunt.

    Sadly.

    --
    -- El Sacarino tiene gusto de la chocha
    1. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, thats what the children are for :)

  36. What about on earth, in water? by btempleton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Could this technique be used to take building blocks that have been tuned to be neutrally boyant, and then assemble them into structures using sound in the water, then slowly lower the water and weld each layer as it comes out of the water?

    Of course neutrally boyant requires no gasses in the objects that can be compressed, though I could imagine you might have metal building blocks with a gas bladder inside that can be filled by computer controlled pump to make it neutrally boyant to some degree.

    Imagine building the frame of a house in a big
    tank.

    Anybody done this?

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    1. Re:What about on earth, in water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could this technique be used to take building blocks that have been tuned to be neutrally boyant, and then assemble them into structures using sound in the water, then slowly lower the water and weld each layer as it comes out of the water? Sure it can. Of course neutrally boyant requires no gasses in the objects that can be compressed, though I could imagine you might have metal building blocks with a gas bladder inside that can be filled by computer controlled pump to make it neutrally boyant to some degree. Good point. Imagine building the frame of a house in a big tank. Okay. Anybody done this? Yes. Hope I've cleared this up for you.

    2. Re:What about on earth, in water? by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

      Imagine building the frame of a house in a big tank

      But how would you build the tank?
      Inside a larger tank?
      But then how would you build the larger tank?
      etc.

      You would have to build the tank using conventional methods.
      It seems to me that it would be easier to just build the frame normally.
      Just because something is cool, doesn't mean that it should be used for everything.
      The only way that I can think of that this method may be useful in homebuilding is for prefab homes (e.g., trailer homes), because once the tank is built, it can be reused.
      But even there, it seems to be more trouble than it's worth.
      Anchoring or holding things in place is much easier on a planet's surface than in space.

      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    3. Re:What about on earth, in water? by btempleton · · Score: 2

      Well, actually tanks are fairly easy to build, but yes, this would be for factories mostly.

      And being able to design buildings in CAD, and then just push a button and have the building rise out of your tank with no labour would be a revolutionary principle.

      Or any other structure. No labour, just software turned into structure.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    4. Re:What about on earth, in water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uuh...dude. what about turbulence, coriolis forces, forces caused by the physical act of welding large chunks together, force caused by lifting the object and therefore changing its bouyancy etc etc

  37. And in other news by PsychoElf · · Score: 2, Funny

    And in other news: I shaped my mash potatos into a fort using only a spoon. One scientist was quoted as saying, "It took him 4 hours, but with enough practice and a bigger spoon, it could be done in an hour."

  38. Asteroids by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 2
    So they are going to send robots out to pulverize an asteroid in the asteroid belt. Next they are going to take the particles remaining and use radio waves to create... a ball in space. Sounds almost like an asteroid.

    Yes I do realize that they are attempting to create a more useful structure with the debris, but this just reminds of the innate human drive (of which I fully admit guilt) of breaking things in order to put them back together- only better!

    Maybe there is a use for that satellite radio service now...

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  39. sound waves? by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 1, Redundant

    how can you use sound waves in space? I thought that in space there is no sound. With no atmosphere, how would sound travel at all?

    Maybe there is sound in space on tv but it's not so in the real world.

    --
    GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
    1. Re:sound waves? by broken_bones · · Score: 2

      What I gathered from the article is that they have done proof of concept testing/research using sound waves but would plan to use electromagnetic waves in space.

      --

      Never disturb your enemy while he is busy making a mistake.
    2. Re:sound waves? by foniksonik · · Score: 2, Redundant



      This has been a fallacy that has urked me for a while.... now tell me how the hell do we use RADIO telescopes to do research on extraterrestrial phenomenae?

      No sound in space huh?! Well, maybe nothing you or I could hear, WHILE in the VACUUM of space.

      The only reason we can't hear in a vacuum is that OUR ears need a media such as air or water to carry the sound waves to them. Radio waves which BTW != "sound waves" can travel though space or a vacuum just fine. Again this is why we can 'listen' to natural events like supernovas via our radio telescopes.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    3. Re:sound waves? by LineNoiz · · Score: 1

      No sound in space huh?! Well, maybe nothing you or I could hear, WHILE in the VACUUM of space.

      Are you implying that a sound wave can be created in air, travel through a vacuum, enter another body of air and be heard? My understanding of sound is that it travels as compressed air. This to me implys that once a sound wave hits a vacuum, it can no longer travel.

      I'm not trying to troll or flame, I'm just wondering if there is something more to sound waves than what I understand.

      --
      "Quotation is a serviceable substitute for wit." --Oscar Wilde
    4. Re:sound waves? by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 3, Informative

      What is your point? Of course you can send sound through space encoded in some form of radio transmission. But radio is not sound. There is no sound in space. Saying that there is sound in space is like saying there is sound inside the telephone wire. Sure there is information about sound waves traveling through the wire, but there is no sound. Sound is a vibration of matter. There is no matter in space to vibrate. Hence, no sound. (if you want to be pedantic about it, there is matter in space but the amount is so incredibly tiny, on the order of a few atoms per square meter, that it is not worth talking about. Certainly not enough matter there to carry sound).

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    5. Re:sound waves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, to be technical even a small amount of matter can carry sound, just that you'll have a huge drop-off in volume (i.e., it carries sound less well). Start with a big enough speaker and you can send sound waves to the space station!

    6. Re:sound waves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK then, saying that space can carry sound is like saying a 6-foot thick lead wall can transmit light. Due to quantum mechanics, there is a tiny probability for any particular photon to get through the wall, so a lead wall must transmit light, right? You just have to shine enough light on it. At some point it becomes rediculous to say that a lead wall can transmit light. Similarly, it is rediculous to say that space can transmit sound. It is not measurable.

  40. Radio waves by MongooseCN · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dude: Dude, nice techno.

    Technician: Actually I'm sending out the construction sequence for the storage module for the ISS.

    Dude: Woaw.... Rock on.

    1. Re:Radio waves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guh. Sound != Radio. Sound will not travel in a vacuum. Radio (a form of light) will travel in a vacuum. Space is a vacuum. The end.

    2. Re:Radio waves by Monkelectric · · Score: 2

      and now for a *funny* joke involving techno ...

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  41. Refreshing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, you read about all of the horrible things going on in the world -- and think that there's no hope -- and then you see something like this.

    Nice to see intelligent people doing -intelligent- things.

    Perhaps there is hope after all.

    Very cool.

  42. Quality Control by broken_bones · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would have to imagine that quality control on something like this would be a nightmare. I didn't see anything in the article that talked about refining the pulverized asteroid. One would think that if you had a non uniform mix of materials it would affect the structural integrity of whatever you're building. Still the idea is really intriguing:

    1. Break Rocks
    2. Compress with radio wave "force field" (now how cool is that?)
    3. ???
    4. Profit

    I know it's an overused joke but, in this case, it seems to me to be exactly what they're talking about.

    --

    Never disturb your enemy while he is busy making a mistake.
    1. Re:Quality Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, it's just an overused joke.. so fuck off.

  43. I don't get it... by DraconicFae · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't building, using only radio waves and debris, require an absolutely monstrous amount of energy? How is this helpful compared to some other approach?

    1. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few billions miles away from the Earth is a big, shiny yellow ball of fire. This big shiny yellow ball of fire emits ENORMOUS amounts of energy. This energy can be captured and utilized for this approach, with plenty to spare.

      Oh, yeah. That big shiny yellow ball of fire is the Sun, and the process of capturing and utilizing the energy is called photovoltaic.

  44. The moral... by Quaoar · · Score: 3, Funny

    When Earth is threatened by a large asteroid, everyone should turn their radios on and play loud, annoying music until the rock explodes.

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
    1. Re:The moral... by Myco · · Score: 2

      Been working so far. Doesn't mean it's worth it.

    2. Re:The moral... by limekiller4 · · Score: 2

      Quaoar writes:
      "When Earth is threatened by a large asteroid, everyone should turn their radios on and play loud, annoying music until the rock explodes."

      That, more or less, worked against Manuel Noriega...

      --
      My .02,
      Limekiller
  45. Wattage? Chicken & Egg? by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 2
    An interesting idea, but the article seems to skim over just how much power would be needed to manipulate physical objects over and great distace (even in a perfect vacuum). I don't know enough about the physical processes involved, but from what I know about solar sails (several meters of reflective surface to move a gram or two), it'd likely take a phenomenal amount of energy to do this. (Someone please correct me if my numbers are wrong and/or there is a different mechanism is being suggested here, please...)

    The only way I can imagine gathering this much energy would be with a massive solar array, one of incredibly large porportions...

    ...so massive that it would be best built using directed radio energy.

    PS - I leave issues of inertia of the transmitting station and also the subtantial risks of a misfire/hijack of one of these transmitters into an inhabited settlement as exercises for the astute reader...

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  46. Mod +1 by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

    Funniest comment ever.

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  47. Is this the terrible secret of space??? by Liquidity · · Score: 1

    I am the Pusher Robot: I use radio waves to shove around the blind people.

    1. Re:Is this the terrible secret of space??? by SpelledBackwards · · Score: 1

      And we can use our radio waves to push bread down their throats!

  48. Tailored Force Fields by magic · · Score: 1
    The team named their idea "Tailored Force Fields". I prefer "Tractor Beam" :)


    -m

    1. Re:Tailored Force Fields by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Force fields repel/push. Tractor(s) (beams) pull.

  49. Douglas Adams lives on..... by FuddChuckles · · Score: 1

    Isn't that what his supercomputer Deep Thought did to forge the space ship on the planet Kricket, thus causing the eventual near destruction of Life, the Univers and Everything?

    Sigh. No new ideas.

    -FC

    1. Re:Douglas Adams lives on..... by spike+hay · · Score: 2

      Exactly my thought. But it wasn't deep thought.

      It was Hactor, built by the Silastic Armorfiends of Striterax.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  50. Tides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much stuff in orbit would it take to mess up the tides?

  51. Crumbs! by Cally · · Score: 2

    Pardon our dust?

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  52. Quick Q. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 4, Funny
    So, would that mean they'd use some Nine Inch Nails to fasten the structures together?

    I like the sound of that.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  53. Maybe Billy could help. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since he hears radio waves. (Radio KAOS)

  54. you sick fucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grown men do not watch Sailor Moon. Jesus Christ, it is a show for pre-pubescent young girls!

  55. Don't try this at home, kids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -- Mr. President?

    -- Now?

    -- Yes, Sir, it's ready.

    -- Ok, then... 1-2-3... "To the left! To the riiight!"

  56. Supergun Materials Into Space And Then... by limekiller4 · · Score: 2

    Oh, this is fantastic! Instead of launching building materials into space, you could simply supergun material into orbit or, safer, Lagrange points for longer-term parking, and then coagulate and shape them as needed. Of course space material could be used but if that was impractical for the need -- such as not providing the type of radiation shielding needed, for example -- this would be a cheap alternative.

    This is the best news I've heard all day.

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  57. GEORGIANS ARE HICKS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is all a ploy to invent a better redneck fishin rod.

    First, we had the "usual" fishin rod. Then, ol' joe came up with the idear of hangin wire off a bridge. Then billybob con-cockted the current hi-technological rod -- a stick-o-dynamite.

    With a microwave mover, though, we could cook the fish 'n fish'em at the same time!!!

    Just wait 'til the buster brothers from suthern' alabamer get ahold uh this.

  58. haiku by bobtheprophet · · Score: 1

    The power of sound
    Fusing debris into more
    Truly, such is truth.

    --
    Don't give me none of this "nature theme" business.
    1. Re:haiku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, sound waves and radio waves are two completely seperate types of "waves".

      Sound waves are compression waves. They're bascially a bunch of molecules vibrating back and forth.

      Whereas radio waves are electromagnetic waves and have nothing physical about them. Sometimes they can be photons and some times they can be electromagnetic waves.

  59. Already used in manufacturing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this is already being used in manufacturing, to fuse plastic.

    You know those bloody annoying "crisp plastic" shells around stuff at the hardware store, with the cross-hatched "welds" keeping you from opening the package without breaking it?

    I ?think? those are sonically welded, not heat-welded.

    If not for that type of plastic, then for vinyl (ie. waterbeds and three-ring binders).

    Anyone able to confirm?

  60. Buy space junk by Cheese+Cracker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Could this be used to solve that nasty space junk problem? As I understand it, there is no known way to clean this stuff up.

    From the link above: The oldest debris still on orbit is the second US satellite, the Vanguard I, launched on 1958, March, the 17th, which worked only for 6 years.

    NASA should take it down with one of the shuttles and sell it on Ebay... I bet some billionaire would buy it.

    1. Re:Buy space junk by saskboy · · Score: 1

      I thought you meant they should crash the shuttle into the junk in order to bring it down. I'm sure someone on eBay would buy that even.
      Hey, they bought my rocks and empty candy wrappers, so why not a smoldering shuttle with Vanguard impact damage?

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  61. This looks fairly interesting by shaitand · · Score: 1

    maybe we could use this technique in teraforming mars, from my understanding really all we need to do melt part of the surface of mars to start a chain reaction that will eventually recreate the martian atmosphere, when you melt part of the surface obviously this forms water, but it also releases gases into the atmosphere, which in turn hold in more heat, which melts more surface, which releases more gases, which holds in more heat, etc. Well with this we could form a large dome on the pole of mars, dump a few nukes under the dome, and thus intensify the explosion when we set the nukes off and hopefully give that teraforming a kickstart, the radiation should be negliable since by the time mars is ready for people to live on it will be gone or if not, right now we have none of mars to live on, so if we lose part of mars to gain the rest, sounds like a good deal to me. Double bonus, if we miscalculate and blow mars up, we can use the debris to create our homes everywhere else in space.

    1. Re:This looks fairly interesting by foniksonik · · Score: 2

      Problem is Mars has also lost it's Electro-Magnetic Field so as soon as you do this the sun's radiation will blast it into space... atmosphere isn't enough. You also need the EMs of an active planet.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  62. Who cares about building with rubbage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clear Channel is already defying laws, both humane and scientific, by creating rubbage out of nothing using radio and sound waves.

  63. Re:Wattage? Chicken & Egg? by opaqueice · · Score: 2, Informative

    I _do_ know about the physical processes involved, and while I'm a physicist rather than an engineer (and hence less quick at estimating these things), this idea sounds completetly loony. You'd need to transmit an enormous amount of power to move a big chunk of rock even a small distance, because the power radiated by your transmitter will fall off rapidly with distance, and the rock will only absorb a small part of the radio wave anyway (for the same reason the walls of your house don't block radio reception).

    And don't forget - NASA is funding research into an anti-gravity machine too, so the fact that they may be taking this seriously is no sign that it makes any sense....

  64. Re:Only one thing to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all that energy from sun's light does no good if you can't cover the surface area needed to gather a practical amount of energy in a efficient manner. That's the problem with solar energy; you need surface area. Lots of it.

  65. idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jesus christ. Reading slashdot comments when the topic is physics really shows how dumb the general slashdot community is.

  66. Frank Herbert already thought of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know.. the voice guns they had..

    Yaaaa!!! *BOOM*

  67. don't build, clean up the space junk mess by marvinglenn · · Score: 1

    Instead of using such technology to build something, how about cleaning up the space junk mess first. If a radio wave can be used to apply a force against an object, then instead of precision manipulating it, just push it into a decaying orbit. That'll be a good start in learning to manipulate objects in such a fashion, and will help clean up the space junk mess.

    --
    The whores get mad when the sluts give it away for free.
  68. Re:what's that i hear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear.. failure!

  69. Sound as a shaping device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using sound to clear up rubble and infuse structure and order; I imagine parents all over the years have tried this with "clean up your room!" and failed. Another breakthrough on the homefront for space technology!

  70. One hour? by ComaVN · · Score: 1

    That's pretty neat, considering it took Hactar millions of years to do this kind of thing.

    --
    Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
  71. Re:Wattage? Chicken & Egg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not create some kind of transmitter that transmitted radio waves straight, like a LASER does?

  72. All we need to do now... by valisk · · Score: 1

    Is find out what royalties RIAA will charge us...

    --

    Economic Left/Right: -0.62
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.69
  73. suck +dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shut the fuck up, bitch

    the moderators are fuckwitted enough without you making it worse

  74. yeah, you are a big fucking mistake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    damn, you are such a tool.. first for admitting that you moderate (FUCK YOU ASSWIPE), and second for not understanding how the mod system works.

    thankfully, though, you're out of points. and you'll get a surprise if you try to post AC on something you modded.

  75. this post is an alien... by kylecito · · Score: 1

    it has no department!! hemos, what were you thinking about? should we call mulder and scully right now? :-)

    --

    --
    Backup not found: (A)bort, (R)etry, (S)uicide

  76. Re:i would have to guess... by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

    You can send energy using any form of electromagnetic radiation, except you'd want to keep the frequency extremely high to keep the signal from diffusing to much.

    --
    Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
  77. Completely Different Idea by serutan · · Score: 2

    How about this: we capture a small asteroid into Earth orbit, and equipped it such that we could nudge it into different orbits. Then we could steer it into the path of an incoming killer asteroid -- not to smash it but to barely miss it, gravitationally dragging the bad boy off course to miss the Earth.

    Remembering an earlier /. posting about using force fields to assemble objects in space, maybe we could even build our own guardian asteroid from bits and pieces rather than going out and getting one.

  78. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    Dear Mister Language Person: What is the purpose of the apostrophe?

    Answer: The apostrophe is used mainly in hand-lettered small business signs
    to alert the reader than an "S" is coming up at the end of a word, as in:
    WE DO NOT EXCEPT PERSONAL CHECK'S, or: NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ITEM'S.
    Another important grammar concept to bear in mind when creating hand- lettered
    small-business signs is that you should put quotation marks around random
    words for decoration, as in "TRY" OUR HOT DOG'S, or even TRY "OUR" HOT DOG'S.
    -- Dave Barry, "Tips for Writer's"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...