Slashdot Mirror


MacAddict Tracks Down eBay Scam Artist

OS24Ever writes "A future high school history teacher, Jason Eric Smith, sold an 867MHz PowerBook G4 on eBay right before finals. He found out the hard way that people are out there to rip you off, and he went to great lengths to catch this guy with the help of Mac heads everywhere. A great read and agreat way for us little guys to get back at these scammers."

787 comments

  1. something's rotten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    there's a lot of rotten apples on ebay.

    1. Re:something's rotten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>pay for it COD

      DOH!

      He was kind of asking for it. "Oh, PLEASE! F*** ME!"

      You don't ship UNTIL the check clears.

    2. Re:something's rotten by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 2

      I've never sent anything COD, but wouldn't FedEx be partly to blame for accepting a phony/counterfeit cashier's check?

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    3. Re:something's rotten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's due to the auction lasting too long...

    4. Re:something's rotten by ShdwStkr · · Score: 5, Informative

      No.

      From FedEx's COD Policy (here)

      quote

      D. Checks (including cashier's, official, certified, business and personal checks) and money orders for the C.O.D. Amount will be collected at the shipper's sole risk, including, but not limited to, all risk of nonpayment, fraud and forgery. FedEx has no liability with respect to any such instrument.

      end quote.

    5. Re:something's rotten by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 2

      Note to self: Never rely on FedEx for a C.O.D.

      Seriously though, you mean if I wrote "Sertifyed Chek" on a piece of brown paper with a crayon and handed it to the delivery guy, it would still be the original shipper's fault for getting screwed?

      Hopefully at the very least, FedEx and UPS keep a database of names/addresses when people report crap like this so they don't keep accepting bad checks from the same guy day after day and then claiming no responsibility... of course they probably don't keep a database for that very reason, they can just claim ignorance and point to their disclaimer...

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    6. Re:something's rotten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Actually, I think it's a open source business-model.

      1: Write free software.
      2: ?
      3: Track Down eBay Scam Artist.
      4: Profit!

    7. Re:something's rotten by derch · · Score: 4, Informative

      The article's slashdotted, so I'm replying under the assumption the fake certified funds looks legit on first glance.

      First, it's a question of reasonably expectations. If the Fedex guy accepted your "Sertifyed Chek," you'd probably have a case of incompetance against the delivery man.

      On the other hand, if it looks like certified check, what do you really expect Fedex to do? To verify that it was valid, you'd have to get the funds and then call the issuer before handing over the package. That's going to add several minutes per COD package. In the case of some businesses, Fedex would have to schedule 15 - 45 minutes for delivery.

      I worked for a company that was burned by a fake cashier's check once. The check looked real. Our bank accepted the check without problems. It wasn't till several days later that the bank found out it was a fake. In our case, the receiver had called his Fedex station and asked them to hold the package at the station, and he picked it up there. The address he had given us was actually a vacant lot.

      Essentially, the carrier acts as your agent when collecting the funds. It'd be the same as if someone walked up to the counter and passed you a bad cashier's check or counterfiet money.

    8. Re:something's rotten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ebay itself is a rotten apple. Right to the core.

    9. Re:something's rotten by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 0

      I always ship COD, cash only. If they aren't willing to do that i.e. give cash when they receive the product you can be assured that something isn't right.

    10. Re:something's rotten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      First, it's a question of reasonably expectations. If the Fedex guy accepted your "Sertifyed Chek," you'd probably have a case of incompetance against the delivery man.

      Just wondering...where did you get your legal degree? I think I have a "case of incompetance" against them.

    11. Re:something's rotten by derch · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not a lawyer, but if FedEx accepted a brown piece of paper with "Sertifyed Chek" written in crayon, then I'd speak to a lawyer and sue the devilery man and Fedex as surely as I'd sue my bank if they let someone close my accounts just because he was wearing a hand written name tag with my name on it.

      Like I said, the article is slashdotted, I couldn'r read the specifics. I was replying to the guy with the hypothetical "Sertifyed Chek." Whatever you do, dont' take legal advice from Slashdot. Opinions expressed here are as valid as those at your corner bar - the bullshit factor is the same.

    12. Re:something's rotten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it very odd that FedEx just took the guy's name at face value. Here in Australia, we'd have to pull out some form of ID (often more than one; e.g. driver's license + a bank card) to get away with this sort of thing.

      Okay, you can fake ID too, but at least it raises the barrier of entry. If you can pull a scam like this by printing some phony cheques and lying about your name, that's pretty slack.

    13. Re:something's rotten by derch · · Score: 1
      Just found a copy of the aticle further down. If you're the one who wrote the article, you said:


      At 10:21AM on November 21st, a man going by the name of Paul Smith signed for my two packages and gave the driver an official cashier's check from LaSalle Bank for $3052.78 in return. The check made it back to my doorstep the next morning. I went to the bank, deposited the check and withdrew enough to go ahead and pay my rent and pick up a couple of household items. I sent an email to Steve to make sure he got everything ok and to check that nothing had been damaged in shipping. No reply. As the old saying goes, no news is good news, right?


      Like I said above, if the certified funds look real, what do you really expect the delivery person to do? How was he/she supposed to tell it was counterfeit when even your bank accepted it and credited your accout for almost a week? It looked real. It wasn't the hypothetical "Sertifyed Chek" written in crayon.
    14. Re:something's rotten by kesuki · · Score: 2

      I guess they should start requiring a quick Scan of a Valid state driver license for CODs -- when payment is not by cash. At least then they'd have a scan of all the data on the drivers license/State ID Card (for people who don't drive) to turn over to the victims/police.

    15. Re:something's rotten by Joe5678 · · Score: 3, Funny
      From the same page:

      E. The maximum C.O.D. Amount is $9,999,999.99 per shipment. THE C.O.D. AMOUNT IS NOT THE SAME AS, AND SHOULD NOT BE CONFUSED WITH, DECLARED VALUE. (See "Declared Value and Limits of Liability" section.)


      Why do I get the feeling that their maxiumum amount is based on some entry field that only takes 9 characters?
    16. Re:something's rotten by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I guess they should start requiring a quick Scan of a Valid state driver license for CODs -- when payment is not by cash. At least then they'd have a scan of all the data on the drivers license/State ID Card (for people who don't drive) to turn over to the victims/police.

      This in no way gaurantees that the check is not counterfeit. The business I work for, and many of the other stores in our chain, have recently gotten several counterfeit checks all from the same person. Every time, they have been for a significantly large amount that store policy says we must check 2 pieces of ID and verify funds with the bank. However, the guy is good enough that he has matching (counterfeit) state drivers licenses and second form of ID, and he uses a different name every time. He also steals account numbers to put on the checks, so when we call the bank to verify funds, everything seems alright. By the time the check actually tries to clear, the person has realized their account has been compromised, and the check comes back as stolen. So if the scammer is sufficiently careful/advanced, no amount of ID checking will do you any good.

    17. Re:something's rotten by derch · · Score: 1

      In the case of picking up a package at the station, you usually have to show ID. The only time I haven't is once I got to be a regular at the station and everyone knew my face.

      When delivered to a physical address, what'd be the use of the ID? The person has access to the delivery address.

      And at least in the US, a fake ID isn't that much of a barrier. Even college kids have fake ones.

    18. Re:something's rotten by kesuki · · Score: 2

      True, but you make it harder for less sophisticated scamers. As it is now, some sophisticated criminal could take advantage of less intelligent ones, by having them run this relatively simple E-bay COD scam. They'd take a percentage, and if the patsy got caught they wouldn't know enough about you (maybe) to finger you... If you don't even need a fake ID it's far too simple. At least requiring a Good fake-id adds perhaps a hundred dollar fee to get one that doesn't look fake. if they have to use a new one for every crime, they'd have a hard time making any money at all!
      Remember, if they're liquidating the Laptop same-day they're probablly getting $600 at most, especially if they're using some place that doesn't care if they really own it. yes, it can still be done. but it still would make a minor improvement.

    19. Re:something's rotten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I've never sent anything by cod. Sole, haddock and halibut perhaps, but never cod. Not even to Newfoundland.

      Does FedEx use cod?

    20. Re:something's rotten by derch · · Score: 1

      What is so sophisticated about a fake ID? College kids know where to get a decent fake ID. A criminal will, too.

      Using your numbers, you criminal right now is making an easy $600 on a scammed laptop. Now you require a good fake ID, costs $100, now he's making $500 per scam. Of course that's assuming he goes to a fence or shady pawn shop. What's to stop him from turning around and selling it eBay for $3000?

      Yah, if I were a criminal, I'd definitely stop scamming because I'd only be making $100 less.

      You don't need a new ID for every crime, either. It takes one to two days for FedEx to return a the funds to the shipper. It takes another five to ten days for the fake funds to bounce back to the bank. You have a one to two week window. Make a ton of purchases to be delivered within those few safe days. Use the ID for those deliveries, then skip town a full business week before the fake funds bouce.

    21. Re:something's rotten by lemkebeth · · Score: 2

      unless the bidder can't be there to pay in person then your COD requirment for biddrs falls through.

    22. Re:something's rotten by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      Damn... u mean my 10 million dollar deal is not going thru?

  2. I had a farfetched thought... by Dimensio · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...how about, when shipping something, trying to hide a GPS transponder somewhere in the object. Make it well-hidden, but also give it a limited-lifetime battery so that it won't be traceable after about a week.

    If you get ripped, just follow the signal or keep track of where it last vanished (perhaps it went into a basement where it couldn't be tracked any further). Meet the crook at his/her door with a .45.

    Well, okay, maybe not a .45 but be ready to inflict physical violence, since the feds are rarely helpful.

    1. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about, when shipping something, trying to hide a GPS transponder somewhere in the object

      I bet you don't support Palladium or DRM, do you?

    2. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Dimensio · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No. Does that have anything to do with my incredibly farfetched suggestion? It isn't as though I was suggesting federally mandated GPS tracking devices in shipping packages.

    3. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Denito · · Score: 5, Funny


      What a fantastic idea. Instead of losing your money to scams, you can instead use it all buying GPS devices that you ship away and never get again.

      I haven't heard such great idea since my meeting with accounting 10 minutes ago.

    4. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Dimensio · · Score: 1

      I did call it farfetched, didn't I?

      Anyway, it might be just a good idea to track down known scammers. Someone looks shady and has a reputation, make a deal, track them down and beat them to a bloody, unrecognizable pulp.

    5. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't be surprised if some other 'packages' that were recently delivered to Yemen had some GPS transponders hidden in them.

    6. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol you are such a nerd.

    7. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      What a deal, they get charged with wire and mail fraud, and you get charged with breaking and entering, assault and battery.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    8. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's called lojack, and due to the expense of the transponder itself, you wouldn't dare use it on anything less than $10K.

    9. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      God you are such an idiot.

      You just need one GPS that you recover after beating the scammer to a bloody pulp.

      You can then re-use the same GPS the next time someone rips you off on ebay.

    10. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Dimensio · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      That's why you do it as secretively as possible and you kill them so that they cannot identify you.

    11. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .....or maybe hide a continum transfunctioner on it..........DUDE, WHERE'S MY PACKAGE

    12. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by CommieOverlord · · Score: 1

      You just need one GPS that you recover after beating the scammer to a bloody pulp.

      You can then re-use the same GPS the next time someone rips you off on ebay.


      And what happens if no ever rips you off? Then you're out the expenditure on X GPS units.

    13. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd modify that slightly:

      If you get ripped off, send the scammer a 2nd (unsolicited) package, with something they'll like. Embed the GPS in the 2nd item.

    14. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by mgs1000 · · Score: 2

      The problem is that GPS receivers don't work to well indoors. (They can't see the satellites)

    15. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by capnjack41 · · Score: 2

      Wait, let's see. That "violence idea" is making me think. If it's ok for feds to draw guns on people who steal cable, then it's certainly ok to meet the laptop-stealin' crook at his/her door with a .45. Right??

    16. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by beens · · Score: 1
      Well, okay, maybe not a .45 but be ready to inflict physical violence, since the feds are rarely helpful.

      Scammers aren't the real problem in the world. People who think of physical violence as their first line of retribution are. Go ahead and show up on that guys doorstep with your gun. I hope he calls the cops on your neanderthal ass so we have one less idiot roaming the streets with such wonderful ideas about how to deal with their problems in life.

    17. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by N3WBI3 · · Score: 2

      I think he is suggesting you use it after someone rips you off (ala put up a similar item and hope he bites again..

      --
    18. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by raddan · · Score: 1

      How 'bout this? It's running OSX, right?

      Write a perl script that is triggered by cron at some point everyday to send you this guy's IP address, like via sendmail. He obviously uses the internet, since he scammed someone off of eBay. How many people take the time to reinstall the system on a used computer? (I have no idea, really)

      Would be funny if he actually did this. I can't read the article since it's been /.'ed.

      This is possibly illegal. I really wouldn't know.

    19. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

      I think he is suggesting that his accouting department are idiots.

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
    20. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or malicious.

      Or malicious idiots.

      Maybe the whole baseball bat scenario could be better directed ?

      What's the prognostic on Market Analysts and Auditors ?

      o:>

    21. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Dragon213 · · Score: 1

      But if people were smart enough to not try to scam us gun-toting and trigger-happy Americans, then there would be no cause for us to use physical violence.

      It works about the same way as Capital Punishment for crimes.

      Disclamer READ before bidding!
      Scam me, or attempt to scam me, and you will be beaten sevearly about the head and body with a water-soaked rattan cane!

      --
      --CypherDragon
    22. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by iocat · · Score: 2

      Commercially GPS receivers don't work indoors, or when hidden in boxes. And they cost a lot. Instead of a GPS receiver, you could try using an escrow service or PayPal to get the money upfront.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    23. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      going to the scammers house with a .45 isnt nearly enough. you need to track down his extended family.
      eliminate the gene, then future generations dont have to worry about scams.

    24. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by sPaKr · · Score: 1

      Peace through Superior FirePower
      ....and IM Not a FBI agent

    25. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the people selling on Ebay (and especially /. engineer types) are notoriously cheap. I don't think the added expense of any tracking device or especially travel expenses to exact revenge are even remotely likley to happen.

    26. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Zzootnik · · Score: 1

      Hellooooo??

      Spidey-Tracers! Small, inconspicuous, and probably a bit cheaper....

      Okay...too bad they're not real either...

      --
      Sig currently under construction. Mind the gap....
    27. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      Well, since I'm discussing preventative measures, it would do to make it a temporary solution. Perhaps have it run for only a month, then delete itself.

    28. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by spike+hay · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Better yet, why not just password-protect the bios? Once they pay you, tell them the password.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    29. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      It works about the same way as Capital Punishment for crimes.

      You mean like in Illinois, where half of death row got off because of DNA evidence?

    30. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to be rude or anything, but it wasn't really in the first place and now it's just stupid, eh?

    31. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, if you get ripped off send the scammer a 2nd package with something they like, like maybe explosives?

    32. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are what? 10, 11 years old?
      Oh, I'm sorry 11 and a half!
      dick.

    33. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right, what are the chances that your never going to be ripped off?

    34. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Dragon213 · · Score: 1

      Touche......I was not aware of that particular fact.

      --
      --CypherDragon
    35. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by EvanED · · Score: 2

      Well, considering you can't start either Windows or Linux on my box without my 10-character, dictionary-attack impervous, mixed alpha-numeric password, anyone who stole my system wouldn't have much of a choice but to reinstall...

    36. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt you would be selling it in such condition.

    37. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by esper_child · · Score: 1

      So I should get lojack, then sell a car on ebay and report it stolen as soon as it gets to it destination (or a day or two later).

    38. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Kissing+Crimson · · Score: 2

      Wire Fraud: Class 3 Felony (probably federal if you cross state lines.)
      Mail Fraud: Class 3 Felony (definitely federal)
      Defense: good luck.

      B&E: Avoidable, just knock.

      Assault and Battery: reducible to a single misdemeanor.
      Defense: extenuating circumstances.

      Of course, IANAL.

      --
      What's that smell? Ah, that's my karma burning...
    39. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by TheCaptain · · Score: 1

      Hey...with a GPS transponder, we can make missiles home in on it pretty darned accurately.

      Rip me off on ebay, and your part of MY axis of evil...

    40. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Word.

      "An armed society is a POLITE society."

      --If you really get to know me, you'll probably eventually realize that it's NOT a good idea to piss me off. I'm a nice guy and all, but I get REAL touchy, REAL QUICK when I get to feeling screwed over...

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    41. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by i+chose+quality · · Score: 1
      How many people take the time to reinstall the system on a used computer? (I have no idea, really)
      ugh...
      i would _never_ (as in ...uuh... NEVER EVER) work with the existing system on a used computer!
      on the other hand, i'm of the pc fraction and maybe a bit more paranoid, though... :)
      --
      the computer is online
      i am not at it
      what a waste of ressources
    42. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by andyt · · Score: 1

      "An armed society is a POLITE society."

      --If you really get to know me, you'll probably eventually realize that it's NOT a good idea to piss me off. I'm a nice guy and all, but I get REAL touchy, REAL QUICK when I get to feeling screwed over...


      Uh huh. So basically, you're saying that you're quite prepared to be violent if you think you are in the right?

      Well OK then. Good to know that we don't have to worry about being randomly shot... unless of course you get offended in which case fire away! pop a cap in their ass, they deserve it! After all, they pissed you off! And you being such a nice guy and all...

      WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE??

      "This guy scammed me." "Hit him with a bat!" "Smash his face!" "Break his legs!" "Hurt him!" "Shoot him!" "Kill him!"

      Jesus Christ...

    43. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Apple's case, this would be open firmware. Do a search here for "Password Open Firmware"

    44. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think Americans are polite? And that makes for less crime? hahahahahhahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
      bwahahahahahahahaha
      Pardon me while I die laughing.

    45. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by ickle_matt · · Score: 1


      Well OK then. Good to know that we don't have to worry about being randomly shot... unless of course you get offended in which case fire away! pop a cap in their ass, they deserve it! After all, they pissed you off! And you being such a nice guy and all...


      Congratulations, you've just summed up US foreign policy.
    46. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      p0Om0nKeyS?

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    47. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Or they can just take out the battery and not pay you.

    48. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      type: AWARD_SW

      it'll get you past most Bios passwords. Scammers know all the tricks.

    49. Re:I had a farfetched thought... by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Actually, I have *tremendous* self-control. I haven't hit anyone in anger since probably grade school, and that was back in the 80's.

      --I just feel that it's fair to warn people that they shouldn't provoke me to the point where I *could* get pushed over the edge. I actually like resolving and forgiving things quickly - but most other people don't seem to share my views on that.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  3. My Favorite quote is..... by neurostar · · Score: 5, Funny

    "That night I dreamed of Mr. Christmas and a baseball bat, some duct tape, and roofing nails."

    neurostar
    1. Re:My Favorite quote is..... by Dimensio · · Score: 2, Funny

      Honestly, that would have been my method, especially since there was little chance of recovering the stolen goods. I prefer the kind of vengence where I can take personal satisfaction with the feeling of hard metal or wood repeatedly slamming against flesh. I like to hear the crook whimper and beg and sob like a small child as I crush his legs.

      Of course, fun as it would be to let them live and leave them crippled for life, I would know the importance of ending it so that I could not be identified by them later.

      Yes, I am a very disturbed person, but I'm not that bad if you haven't tried to screw me over.

    2. Re:My Favorite quote is..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *yawn*

    3. Re:My Favorite quote is..... by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      Never turn your back on an enemy who is still alive...words to live by.

    4. Re:My Favorite quote is..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, you're pretty scary in text! I can imagine what you'd be like in real life... hmm... better roll a D6 for charisma...

    5. Re:My Favorite quote is..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol!!

    6. Re:My Favorite quote is..... by fidget42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      This was best described in "The Princess Bride" with the definition of "To the pain."

      --
      The dogcow says "Moof!"
    7. Re:My Favorite quote is..... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 3, Funny
      Is this the correct spot to insert an inappropriate comment about correctional facilities and large men named "Bubba?"

      * Please note that this is not intended as any form of discrimination against anyone with the name of "Bubba."

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    8. Re:My Favorite quote is..... by kmellis · · Score: 4, Funny
      "That night I dreamed of Mr. Christmas and a baseball bat, some duct tape, and roofing nails."
      I have this recurring dream every year about this time. Weird.
    9. Re:My Favorite quote is..... by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      Possibly, but do keep in mind that I addressed the issue of why the person should be killed with the intended implication that there would be an evasion of law-enforcement implied (mind you, I don't think that law enforcement should get involved when it comes to someone taking action against a scammer after the police have refuse to investigate).

    10. Re:My Favorite quote is..... by Backov · · Score: 1

      And to think, when I advocate the violent murder of spammers, I get modded as flamebait.

      Cheers,
      Backov

      --
      In the law there is no overlap between theft and copyright infringement whatsoever.
  4. Would a Windows User? by Slack0ff · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Would a windows user go through all that trouble? I bet not... a windows pc is a dime a dozen. A Mac is somthing on a whole different level. Also the "new" mac users who are attracted to OSX seem to be more geeky then previous macaddicts and there more ready to do this kind of stuff.

    --
    Everyday You see me is the worst day of my life -Office Space
    1. Re:Would a Windows User? by Slack0ff · · Score: 1

      That Last post sounds like flamebait to me. Its not very often you see someone stand up for windows around here. But hey every circus has its freaks.

      --
      Everyday You see me is the worst day of my life -Office Space
    2. Re:Would a Windows User? by MoneyT · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mac users are very protective of their computers, and will go to great lengths to ensure that people don't steal them. Theres a similar story floating about how one person had their mac stolen from thier house and used tibuktu and some funky apple scripts to trace the mac to a house. Long story short, police show up, find stolen computers, guy gets his computer back.

      Just cause PC users are accustomed to losing money in bad investments doesn't mean that mac users are.

      [Yes, that last statement is a troll]

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    3. Re:Would a Windows User? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, Mac people like to get their money when they sell something, but PC people don't mind being scammed. That's a stupid statement.

      I'm a PC user, and I think most would also track someone down. It's not my computer that I'm worried about; after all, I've made the decision to sell and so removed any emotional attachment or important data. What I want is my money. I don't care if I sold you a Mac, a PC, or an old Cray, I want my money!

    4. Re:Would a Windows User? by angle_slam · · Score: 1
      Would a windows user go through all that trouble? I bet not... a windows pc is a dime a dozen. A Mac is somthing on a whole different level.

      That is silly. He went through all the trouble because he lost $3000, not because it was a Mac.

    5. Re:Would a Windows User? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i speel good. windowes rooles.

    6. Re:Would a Windows User? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the words pot, kettle, and black mean anything to you? You post flamebait and get upset when somebody posts flamebait back at you?

    7. Re:Would a Windows User? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Nice Troll. Whether it was a PC, a Mac, or a Hummel figurine, $3000 is $3000. The author also made it seem like the Mac community was special but I think there are lots of other communities that would go through the same effort. I even think you might find a few slashdotters who would help on a good cause. I love how the Mac Addicts think they are part of some elite community. What makes you elite is the fact that you are willing to spend extra money for an image.

    8. Re:Would a Windows User? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PC are a dime a dozen? Maybe they're common and generic, but the money you pay for them is just as green as the money you pay for a Mac (okay, maybe there is less green since Mac's are so over-priced, but you get the point).

      I don't care what it is I sell, the bitch better have my money!

    9. Re:Would a Windows User? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Windows user would be smarter. He wouldn't implicate himself by telling others the story. He'd be able to track the criminal down by himself, then he'd take permanent revenge personally.

      That's what I've done, several times. You don't see me in jail for multiple murders, do you?

      Oh crap, now I have to kill everyone who reads this...

    10. Re:Would a Windows User? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you elite is the fact that you are willing to spend extra money for an image.

      ...and a better computer.

    11. Re:Would a Windows User? by Slack0ff · · Score: 1

      A Mac is more than a image. It is BSD Unix Meets aret gallery. All the power, all the compatibility and all the GUI. Thats what a Mac is!

      --
      Everyday You see me is the worst day of my life -Office Space
    12. Re:Would a Windows User? by Slack0ff · · Score: 1

      I belive he was refering to being scammed into paying for an inferior operating system. Just to clarify. ;)

      --
      Everyday You see me is the worst day of my life -Office Space
    13. Re:Would a Windows User? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A MAC IS CRAP

    14. Re:Would a Windows User? by Slack0ff · · Score: 1

      Sir/Madam you are entitled to your own opinion in thinking that Macs are crap however wrong you may be.

      --
      Everyday You see me is the worst day of my life -Office Space
    15. Re:Would a Windows User? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy, when I get more moderation points, I will search your comments and BITCHSLAP you! Your karma will drop down to minus and nobody will ever hear from you again. ..And guess what? You deserve it.

    16. Re:Would a Windows User? by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    17. Re:Would a Windows User? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here I thought we could go ten minutes withot hearing any santimonious mac bullshit. Now we know better.

    18. Re:Would a Windows User? by Software · · Score: 5, Insightful
      >Mac users are very protective of their computers, and will
      >go to great lengths to ensure that people don't steal them.

      Fine, I'm with you, BUT this guy wasn't protective of his computer - he sent it to someone else! He was protective of his money.

      OK, the Mac heads helped him out, Mac users are all one big team, wonderful. But some of the lines in the article puzzle me: "It's hard to sleep comfortably knowing some asshole has your Mac and is doing god knows what with it."

      Was it easier for him to sleep when he thought the cashier's check was good?

    19. Re:Would a Windows User? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it was. I took his statement as meaning he didn't want the Mac to be in the hands of an asshole. If someone buys it legit, it will probably be in good hands, based on his experiences with the typical Mac user.

    20. Re:Would a Windows User? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A (by "Windows" I assume you are grotesquely over-generalizing x86 platform) user wouldn't have to replace his computer every 6 months just to keep up with the Jobs's. Even Windows will keep on running fine (processing power wise) with older boxes (about a 2+ year upgrade cycle is overdoing it with x86 boxes and can be considered a "technophile" or an uneducated consumer being suckered into buying extra processing power not necessary).

      Perhaps if our friend with the Ebay (who can't afford his tuition now) would just buy a computer and stick with it... Not that what happened to him doesn't suck! I'm glad he nailed that crook!!!

    21. Re:Would a Windows User? by rworne · · Score: 1

      If the cashier's check was good, then the sale is complete, and it is no longer his Mac.

      Since he was scammed, his property was stolen, not sold.

      Possession != Ownership

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    22. Re:Would a Windows User? by Fat+Casper · · Score: 2
      "It's hard to sleep comfortably knowing some asshole has your Mac and is doing god knows what with it."

      Was it easier for him to sleep when he thought the cashier's check was good?

      When the cashier's check was still "good," it wasn't his computer anymore. When the check turned out to be bad, the computer turned out to have been his all along. And it had been boxnapped (is that an appropriate term for a laptop?). You've got to rescue it!

      --
      I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
    23. Re:Would a Windows User? by Stalyx · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that it did not matter whether it was a Mac, a Windows or a minature Rudolf with a shiny red nose (batteries not included) This guy would have tracked him down. In the immortal words of confucias - "You take my sh*t, you die mofo"

    24. Re:Would a Windows User? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man. Are there any mac users out there who don't sound like a friggin' commercial? You keep using your "aret gallery" and I will use my powerhouse.

    25. Re:Would a Windows User? by MobileC · · Score: 1

      "Was it easier for him to sleep when he thought the cashier's check was good?"

      No - from what he was saying he would have slept easy knowing his Mac went to a good home.

      --

      Fran
      :):):)
      1st 1st Poster of the new Millennium!

    26. Re:Would a Windows User? by harveyswik · · Score: 1

      WHO TOLD YOU!?!?!?!

    27. Re:Would a Windows User? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you STFU and go whinging back to Mummy, you little 14-yo biatch? get the hell out of here before I ask Malda to track you down by IP address and block yer candy ass.

    28. Re:Would a Windows User? by 10Ghz · · Score: 2

      A Mac is more than an image! It is overpriced yet underperforming hardware! It is untweakable hardware! It is a group of people who all suffer from superiority-complex! It is a community that believes Steve Jobs is Jesus reincarnated! That's what Mac is!

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  5. A smart mob / posse? by certron · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think this is interesting for the sole fact that a whole lot of people who owe no direct kinship to each other elected to cooperate for a common cause.

    I was listening to a presentation about different pagan holidays, and one component of one of the rituals was to honor / remember your ancestors. What made me remember this was that the presenter said that the ancestors didn't have to be biological, instead could be cultural, intellectual, or spiritual ancestors.

    In this case, it seems that these 'artificial' families are willing to stick together and cooperate on a common goal, even if they themselves will not directly benefit. I suppose this is just a regular community, with enough people in it that a few would be motivated to assist. Then again, I could just be amazed by my own insight, marvelling at a fact that others have known for ages, and so think that I am smarter than I actually am. :-)

    --

    fair.org counterpunch.com truthout.com indymedia.org salon.com
    eff.org guerrilla.net debian.org gentoo.org
    1. Re:A smart mob / posse? by mjolner · · Score: 1

      You are actually as smart as you think you are. :-)

      The discovery that Apple is in fact a religion is fairly recent.

      Apple is religion:
      http://www.wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,56 674,00.html

    2. Re:A smart mob / posse? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      I think this is interesting for the sole fact that a whole lot of people who owe no direct kinship to each other elected to cooperate for a common cause.

      What's interesting about that? Americans have been doing that since, oh, 1700 or so. And Europeans were doing it even longer than that.

      I was listening to a presentation about different pagan holidays, and one component of one of the rituals was to honor / remember your ancestors. What made me remember this was that the presenter said that the ancestors didn't have to be biological, instead could be cultural, intellectual, or spiritual ancestors.

      Must... resist... urge to... point out... self-intersted religion...

      In this case, it seems that these 'artificial' families are willing to stick together and cooperate on a common goal, even if they themselves will not directly benefit. I suppose this is just a regular community, with enough people in it that a few would be motivated to assist. Then again, I could just be amazed by my own insight, marvelling at a fact that others have known for ages, and so think that I am smarter than I actually am. :-)

      Yep, that's it. :)

    3. Re:A smart mob / posse? by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Maybe it had something to do with the fact that most people willing to participate in such idiocy don't have ancestors that preceded them in the traditions.
      Maybe it's a way to let anyone participate. Maybe the children of genuine pagans / Druids / whatever realize that it's a bunch of garbage and won't join in the fun.
      I see it as a way of allowing all to join since most won't.

      But that's just my opinion.
      And I'm a dick.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    4. Re:A smart mob / posse? by bricriu · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's a Vonnegut novel, "Slapstick," that involves the plot point of the President of the US giving everyone new randomly-from-amongst-a-certain-set-of-words-and-n umbers-assigned middle names. The idea was exactly what you say -- that now everyone has a new "family". Typically loopy Vonnegut, but ultimately an interesting idea (which is also typical Vonnegut behavior).

      --

      AHHHHHHH! I'm burning with goodness again!
      - Reakk, Sluggy Freelance

    5. Re:A smart mob / posse? by lysander · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I had just finished reading some Vonnegut and remembered this same book.

      Here's choice quote from another Vonnegut book about a similar sort of "family":

      ... I learned the joke at the core of American self-improvement: knowledge was so much junk to be processed one way or another at great universities. The real treasure the great universities offered was a lifelong membership in a respected artificial extended family.
      --Rabo Karabekian, protagonist of Bluebeard
      --
      GET YOUR WEAPONS READY! --DR.LIGHT
    6. Re:A smart mob / posse? by aulendil · · Score: 1
      What's interesting about that? Americans have been doing that since, oh, 1700 or so.


      Something those pagan redskins would never do, or what?

      The parent post was propably posted in a hurry, but this thing really pisses me off. And yes I'm a european (swedish) and a lawyer and seen this exact argument used against our aborigines (the sápmi) to which we 'brung' law and order. As if they didn't hav any...

    7. Re:A smart mob / posse? by Draoi · · Score: 2
      The discovery that Apple is in fact a religion is fairly recent.

      And of those of us who work there?

      Priesthood (and all its hierarchy)??

      Devoted, brainwashed lackeys??

      (I'm thinking the latter! It's 10:30pm where I am & I'm still here ... :-)

      --
      Alison

      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

    8. Re:A smart mob / posse? by Genoxide · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I live in Denmark, and while I would never consider danes to be pagan in any way, we do do celebrate a national holiday called "Sankt Hans", which means "Saint Hans" (isn't danish easy) :) well.. this day is celebrated each year on the 23rd of June, which is usually the day after summer solstice. And on this evening we light BIG fires on all our beaches.

      Furthermore, it is custum that every fire has a mock witch on top (real live witches are surprisingly hard to come by these days). We say that we, by doing this, are sending all the witches to a town called "bloksbjerg" which is actually a place in germany where we believed that the witches would have a sabbat and meet with the devil on this very night! We then congregate around these massive fires and sing songs about the time when we were vikings, and how much we were able to eat and drink, and how many people we killed, how proud we are of all those things, and how we will still fight back any intruder (with swords, mind you), and at the same time honor our warriors of the past!...

      Now in the communications era, we don't have relatives of that kind around the world, but many of us still have one thing in common. Not the past, but the now! We all share our common interest in computers, and my experience tells me that 99% of all nerds are really friendly and helpful, as opposed to many other "normal" people, and most of us would gladly help out a fellow nerd who was ripped off/cheated/decieved etc.

      I think it's a good and comforting message a story like this is sending out in todays world that can, at times, be a horrifying and cruel place, with little to no fellowship among men. "Nerds of the world, unite!" :)

    9. Re:A smart mob / posse? by uberbrownout · · Score: 1
      I don't think this case, and the participation of third parties, have anything to do with caring or a sense of family. "Cops" gets great ratings because everybody likes to see some asshole get taken down. A chance to be part of something like that is very tempting. I'd like to think that I'm above it, but I'm not.

      As far as people actually wanting to directly help each other, tell it to Kitty Genovese.

    10. Re:A smart mob / posse? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hell no the American Indians would not band togeather across Tribal boundries, except for a few notable exceptions to drive off a common enemy.

      Little Bighorn was one of the few times tribes hooked up to take out Whitey.

      The Aztecs were taken down by a mix of other native tribes (names of which I don't recall and can't spell) fighting WITH the Spanish.

      Hell the Spanish in Mexico had more problems with other Spanish coming to take out Cortez than the Spanish had with the Aztecs.

      If you look at the Inidan Wars, tribes would go to the French or English/American side in the same division which marked the intertribal warfare that exsisted before the Europeans settled in the Americas.

      Some have argued that the US-Plains Indians Treaties should be voided because the agreements to stop fighting between the tribes were broken when the Tribes would go at it within weeks of returning from the Treaty signing.

      Even today, there is alot of mistrust between bands of Lakota and the Crows sure don't like the Lakota.

      If you are from Cheyenne River Reservation, you are not always welcome on Standing Rock or Pine Ridge, and you really don't want to go over to the Crow Reservation.

    11. Re:A smart mob / posse? by killmenow · · Score: 1
      (I'm thinking the latter! It's 10:30pm where I am & I'm still here ... :-)
      Yeah, on slashdot.
    12. Re:A smart mob / posse? by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Offtopic
      Something those pagan redskins would never do, or what?


      The native americans in upstate NY did indeed work together as one nation. But, AFAIK, it was something that the leaders of the five tribe-nations organized, and not something the "common folk" suggested and implemented. I could be wrong--I've only got at most 1/8th native blood and (sadly) little cultural interaction, and the details are so sparse as to be irrelevant.

      Democracy--that is, the concept of people working together for a common good and a common purpose not decreed by "the wise" or "the noble"--is something whose earliest-continous (and most famous) example is the people of the Untied States of America.

      The "pagan redskins", to use your slurs, were all "kin" within a tribe and so naturally worked together. The best examples to the historical nature of the orignal parent's noted "discovery" are periods of either high mobility or sudden shift in geographic location. Something that, thanks to the relatively peaceful life (compared to Europe, anyway) of the native americans made a rare event.

      The parent post was propably posted in a hurry, but this thing really pisses me off. And yes I'm a european (swedish) and a lawyer and seen this exact argument used against our aborigines (the sápmi) to which we 'brung' law and order. As if they didn't hav any...


      Am I missing something, or is Sweden one of those country's who's "civlization_by_conquest" events were so far back in time that they're either prehistorical or, at least, solidly the Romans' fault?

      You're reading a statement into my post that I simply isn't there. I never stated anything about any of the native american tribes, nor would I intend to.

      Allow me to clarify...

      I was listening to a presentation about different pagan holidays, and one component of one of the rituals was to honor / remember your ancestors. What made me remember this was that the presenter said that the ancestors didn't have to be biological, instead could be cultural, intellectual, or spiritual ancestors.
      Must... resist... urge to... point out... self-intersted religion...


      The only people in the world who refer to themselves as "pagans"* are the largely american polytheists, who can also very often be mixed in with the same general religious morass as wiccans or "druids." (Some of my best friends are wiccans, though we disagree on their historical peroggative.)

      Now, these "pagans" have a tendency to claim a historical background that, allegedly, predates my own faith (non-denominational Christian). As far as I can see it, those that make the claim essentially take a history of religious rebellions and historical interest in the occult and prop it up as "historical proof." (Which, of course, ignores the fact that even if they DID stretch back to the time of the pre-roman druids, the jewish roots of Christianity would still have a few thousand years on them.)

      Given this viewpoint I have, I'm sure that you can see why a discourse on "pagan" holidays that eliminates the definition of "relative", leaving the concept as "anyone you looked up to", could be called "self-interested."

      Were I the sort of Christian who runs around damning pagans**, I'd probably damn these polytheists for being too mob-minded to use proper words for themselves and their holidays.

      NOTES:
      *: "Pagan" is derived from a Latin word that does roughly mean "people of the wild", and no doubt got its meaning as a reference to those outside of the Roman city-states who worshipped different gods.

      But we're not speaking Latin, we're speaking English--and up until the 60s, "pagan" was an equivalent term to "gentile" and meant "not christian" rather than any specific religion. It strikes me as rather insulting to the finite dieties that they worship to name themselves as "not Christian."

      **: The only people who use the word "pagan" properly anymore are overly-zealous ministers of my own religion (see why I'm non-denominational?). I only use it here to emphasisize a joke.
    13. Re:A smart mob / posse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose this is just a regular community, with enough people in it that a few would be motivated to assist.

      Hmmm Never lived in "small town" America (STA)have ya?
      In STA you can't sneeze without someone saying g** bles you. Here in STA we take it as a responsibility to look out for others. I am not talking about tattling on your every move but in STA everybody knows everything about everybody else; but has enough common sense not to open their mouths at the wrong time.

      It is nice to be able to let your child play in you front yard and have the neighbors keep an eye out for anything suspicious. This is one favor that I will gladly repay any chance I get. Look out for each other and the whole world is a much "safer" place. People, get involved with your fellow citizens/neighbors/hell even enemies and maybe you can all find a common ground to agree on.

    14. Re:A smart mob / posse? by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      really? I think the message is "It's all well and good until you lynch the wrong man."

      "Madness in the individual is the exception, in groups, the rule."- a wise philologist once said.

      --

      -pyrrho

    15. Re:A smart mob / posse? by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      Doesn't it seem a bit unwise of them? They didn't really know who was right or wrong and just believed what was told to them. The Witch Trials proceeded similarly with the whole community behind the innocent victims (bewitched little girls).

      But oh, the group was wrong. Imagine that.

      --

      -pyrrho

    16. Re:A smart mob / posse? by kmellis · · Score: 1
      "...is something whose earliest-continous (and most famous) example is the people of the Untied States of America."
      This is false in so many ways, I don't know where to begin. How about the Greeks?

      Okay, so you perhaps meant continuous up to today. Or perhaps you meant in North America. Either way, you're still wrong. And your main point was to defend your contention that Native Americans weren't democratic. Nope, you're still wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong.

      May I introduce you to the people of the Iroquois Confederacy, known as the "Oldest Living Participatory Democracy on Earth"? The Taos Pueblo has been continuously inhabited and democratic through most of its history, beginning in the 1400s.

      Your objection that democracy needs to be substnatially pan-ethnic and pan-cultural is just silly. It's prima facie silly, but it's also silly because this doesn't describe the people who founded this country.

      Also, by the way, no, Sweden's history as a "nation" is not prehistory and the Scandinavian countries mistreatments of the aboriginals exists in modern times. People like to make a big deal out of the American mistreatment of its aboriginies--and they should make a big deal out if it--but they somehow seem to overlook the not so wonderful treatment of aborigines elsehwere, such as in Scandinavia, Japan, Australia, Russia, and, of course, Canada. None of these have anything (except perhaps very recently) to be especially proud of.

      Anyway, you might want to do a bit more reading on the history of aboriginal Americans. You've obviously done some reading on "paganism", and I have no quarrel with your correct criticism of its silly newage-ish distortion of history. But you're acting no better than they.

    17. Re:A smart mob / posse? by aulendil · · Score: 1

      Also, by the way, no, Sweden's history as a "nation" is not prehistory and the Scandinavian countries mistreatments of the aboriginals exists in modern times.

      Oh yes...

    18. Re:A smart mob / posse? by aulendil · · Score: 1
      Am I missing something, or is Sweden one of those country's who's "civlization_by_conquest" events were so far back in time that they're either prehistorical or, at least, solidly the Romans' fault?

      No, Sweden was never conquered by the romans nor civilized by conquering (though perhabs indirectly by the romans). Sweden where civilized by cooperation by the ethnic swedes working together with sápmis and (by lacking other term) ethnic finns. Although this is an oversimplification, the following is mostly indisputable.

      Problems with the right to the land of the sápmi started during the 1920s when swedish government claimed right to ancient sápmi land and tried to refuse nomad passage of sápmi between Sweden and Norway. A right which was covered in a treatise in the 1600 by swedish and norwegian government (Intrestingly, the only government of the 1900:s who have honoured that ancient right of the sápmi is that of Nazi-germany, those evil gits ;-[).

      Still to this day, there is a large dispute around the land Sápmi, of which many swedes are unknowing. And to those I would like to say, sweep before your own doorway...

      You're reading a statement into my post that I simply isn't there. I never stated anything about any of the native american tribes, nor would I intend to.

      No you didn't. But you did indirectly state that there was no law and order in America before1700 or so. Something which I think is clearly wrong.

      As for paganism, my bad, but I didn't think my english was bad enough for anyone being able to think that I think paganism = the concept of people working together for a common good. I just oppose the common opinion that the concept of people working together for a common good is something inherited from the ancient greek and heritage of western civilization, it's not.

    19. Re:A smart mob / posse? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      No you didn't. But you did indirectly state that there was no law and order in America before1700 or so. Something which I think is clearly wrong.

      Not law and order. "people working together who are not kin." It's possible that it WAS that way prior to the coloinal settlement (especially for very broad values of "kin.")

      As for paganism, my bad, but I didn't think my english was bad enough for anyone being able to think that I think paganism = the concept of people working together for a common good. I just oppose the common opinion that the concept of people working together for a common good is something inherited from the ancient greek and heritage of western civilization, it's not.

      Ah. It's not the social aspect of the human pack instinct that could have originated from the "western civilization"--it's the version of democracy where the "pack" has no clear leader and nebulous membership requirements.

    20. Re:A smart mob / posse? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 2


      I think this is interesting for the sole fact that a whole lot of people who owe no direct kinship to each other elected to cooperate for a common cause.


      What a cool idea.

      What if we got a bunch of people on the common cause of processing SETI information?

      Or possibly processing information to cure cancer?

      Just imagine the possiblities?

      Nah, it would never work.

    21. Re:A smart mob / posse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :-) Sarcasm? :-)

      I think it was a bit of a 'wow, that's cool!' moment, even though it is nothing new. It just seemed to not quite fit into the direct self-interest method of people doing things.

      I think maybe the parent needs to get out more. That, and volunteer.

    22. Re:A smart mob / posse? by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      Like "karas"s and "granfaloons" in Cat's Cradle. Ahh...Bokononism :)

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    23. Re: A smart mob / posse? by Antity · · Score: 2

      my experience tells me that 99% of all nerds are really friendly and helpful, as opposed to many other "normal" people, and most of us would gladly help out a fellow nerd who was ripped off/cheated/decieved etc.

      Yeah, Just like this.

      (SCNR, but there's always the Dark Side. I can't stand such assholes in online games, too and against all reason I felt better after reading about this incident.)

      --
      42. Easy. What is 32 + 8 + 2?
  6. Good for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally

  7. I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first place by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I sell things on Ebay as well (usually old games that I'm done with) - and I don't do COD. Paypal - sure. Checks and money orders, but I wait until they clear before they ship.

    I know we should be more trusting of people, but I've become convinced that 20% of the population is made of Assholes that can be trusted only as far as they can be shot.

    Still, I have to admire his spirit tracking the guy down - if nothing else, that's one less asshole to worry about. Only 1 billion to go!

  8. Next Time Use Escrow (NT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Next Time Use Escrow (NT) by Vladequacy · · Score: 1

      This web site provides good escrow solutions for ebay users.

  9. Good read but by Mothra+the+III · · Score: 1

    this guy is going to wind up with his beer budget slashdotted.

    --
    Worst. Sig. Ever.
  10. The importance of a 'P' by Mr+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    If he was a spammer and not a scammer, he could have just posted it here and had the guy in hours.

    1. Re:The importance of a 'P' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be a open source business-model!

      1: Write free software.
      2: ?
      3: Get spammers.
      4: Profit!

    2. Re:The importance of a 'P' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it sure is good to get a P in once in a while.

  11. Re:Who care's by loginx · · Score: 1

    Hi,

    The guy was SELLING the Mac, not BUYING it.
    You are a morron.
    Good day.

  12. You can stop payment on a cashier's check? by EllisDees · · Score: 1

    I thought that there were like money orders in that once you paid for it, there isn't any way to get your money back without a long, drawn-out process. Did the guy pay for the cashier's check with a bad check or something?

    --
    -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    1. Re:You can stop payment on a cashier's check? by zer0vector · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the guy was forging the cashier's checks, which is why he tried to get the Secret Service involved.

      --

      ----
      Striving to put right what once went wrong, and hoping each time that his next leap, will be the leap ho
    2. Re:You can stop payment on a cashier's check? by Hayzeus · · Score: 1

      It was a counterfeit check.

    3. Re:You can stop payment on a cashier's check? by ivrcti · · Score: 1

      Nope. Far more likely is that the check itself was counterfeit. Not hard to do these days.

    4. Re:You can stop payment on a cashier's check? by .sig · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think the point was that they were counterfeit cashiers checks, which is why the secret service was involved. It was implied in the article, but nevere flat out said.

      --
      -Space for rent
    5. Re:You can stop payment on a cashier's check? by EllisDees · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Oops. Didn't read the whole story before posting. :(

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    6. Re:You can stop payment on a cashier's check? by PinkStainlessTail · · Score: 2

      The cashiers checks were counterfeit. SO the scammer either made 'em himself or acquired them from another crook. No actual bank was involved.

      --
      "Slashdot is about legos and staplers." -Cmdr. Taco
    7. Re:You can stop payment on a cashier's check? by JJAnon · · Score: 1

      Read the article: he created counterfeit cashiers checks.

    8. Re:You can stop payment on a cashier's check? by 4iedBandit · · Score: 2

      True to /. form.

      RTFL. (Read The F***ing Link)

      Then you might know what happend. Meet Mr. Clue stick. (WHAM!) The cashiers check was counterfit.

      How do I know that? Because I RTFL.

      --
      "The avalanch has already started, it is too late for the pebbles to vote." -Kosh
    9. Re:You can stop payment on a cashier's check? by darkpenguin · · Score: 1

      You CAN stop payment on a cashier's check. I don't know about all cashier's checks but if you get it from your bank, it's not a problem.

      I recently had to stop payment on a cashier's check for a payment I made to an ebay seller. The bank charged me around $7 to stop payment but it's much better than losing $100+.

    10. Re:You can stop payment on a cashier's check? by drightler · · Score: 1

      It was a counterfeit cashier's check.

      --

      blah blah blah....
      drightler@technicalogic.com
    11. Re:You can stop payment on a cashier's check? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fucking moron, didn't you read the article? It was a fucking counterfeit check. /.ers are becoming more stupid by the minute.

    12. Re:You can stop payment on a cashier's check? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clue sticks don't go "WHAM!", they go "thwap!". Actually, they really say "the author of this post is an arrogant dolt".

    13. Re:You can stop payment on a cashier's check? by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 2

      The seller made a common mistake assuming that the funds were truly his because his bank said the funds were available in his bank account.

      The cashier check in his case was a forgery and thus the deposited funds were not truly his and so his bank reversed the deposit so to speak and took the funds back.

      Without going into detail of clearing procedures, one should wait at least 10 business days when accepting any check regardless of type *unless* they are positive it's "good" *and* is drawn on an account that has sufficient funds to cover.

    14. Re:You can stop payment on a cashier's check? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, you know what you did, but you've still gotten off pretty easy.

      I think the proper thing to do is flame your ass. Every injustice I've seen, everything that has angered me, I will channel toward you, because as we know, you suck, EllisDees.

      EllisDees sucks. He or she sucks really hard. (He or she has silly name so I can't tell what gender he or she is. Let's assume he's a guy. To optimize flamage, we shall address him as a girl. This is a good idea because it casts doubt on her manliness and suggests she has a small penis or is gay.)

      EllisDees is such a stupid girl. Ha ha, she is too stupid to read the article! She is irresponsible and arrogant and enough of a bitch, to post about it before reading. Or maybe she read it but was too stupid to understand it. What a dummy!

      EllisDees is smelly! EllisDees walked by a pile of dogshit, and all the flies that were on the dogshit started coughing!

      EllisDees is ugly! Nobody would invite her to the prom! She never cought the guys indiscretely peeking at her!

      EllisDees is a moron. At school, she sits in the corner with a pointy dunce hat on.

      EllisDees' pet dog is ugly too. She should shave the dog's butt and teach it to walk backwards.

      EllisDees is a Communist. She likes it red, and thinks that everyone should contribute according to their ability, and take according to their need. Comrade EllisDees is part of the conspiracy to contaminate our drinking water with flouride.

      EllisDees is a Nazi. She murders innocent people for obscure genetic reasons. She likes to dress up in her SS uniform and goose-step around, chanting "Heil Hitler!"

      EllisDees is a stupid redneck. She has several cars up on blocks in her front lawn. The passenger side of her ugly unpainted pickup truck, is all full of empty beer cans!

      EllisDees is a terrorist. She clapped when she saw the attacks on 9/11, and she gave money to the people who did it. Then she went to the WTC rubble pile and urinated on a fireman's corpse.

      EllisDees is a necrophile. She likes to hang out in graveyards at night and dig up (mostly) fresh corpses and have sex with them regardless of gender. Sometimes she does this at pet cemetaries. Also, she had sex with that fireman corpse -- after she urinated on it. She did this in public while everyone was watching, even good christian children!

      EllisDees works at a pet store. Every morning, she goes to the dog pound and "adopts" all the puppies, and then makes them hang out in the front of her store in an area that she never cleans up so it smells like dogshit. The puppies are very sad in that part of the store. She tries to sell them at a very large markup in order to rip off nice innocent loving children who just want cute puppies. Then, at the end of the day, she takes the remaining unsold puppies (which is often all of them) out back, and turns on the puppy-shredding machine. One puppy at a time, she holds them above the machine. The innocent, trusting puppy licks her hand, wondering what is going on. Then she lowers it feet-first into the machine. It yelps as its paws are shredded. Then she pulls it back up and grins at it as it squirms in dying agony, and she makes solid eye contact so that the puppy knows who is doing this to it. Then she puts it into the puppy shredding machine, and it's time for the next puppy. What a horrible, sadistic, nasty person EllisDees is.

      EllisDees is a black, jewish, female member of the KKK. She likes to burn crosses in everyone's front lawns. Then when people get pissed off, she has them arrested for interfering with her right to free speech.

      EllisDees is a Slashdot karma whore. Taco's new wife has already grown bored with him, and has started withholding sexual favors unless Taco takes out the trash. So EllisDees offers to have sex with Taco, and in exchange, entries are made into the karma database as compensation. She does anything Taco asks, including illegal acts of sodomy!

      EllisDees is a drug dealer. Most of her business involves selling heroin and crack to children. She doesn't like marijuana because the markup isn't high enough and it isn't addictive. She doesn't really want the money; she just wants the children to have to pay it, so that they suffer and the people in their lives suffer.

      EllisDees is a Satanist! She worships the devil and spraypaints "666" and inverted crosses on people's houses, while listening to heavy metal music! She sacrifices puppies and babies to the Great Horned One, and drinks their blood. She mocks Jesus Christ our lord and Savior.

      EllisDees uses Microsoft Windows. She mails documents to strangers, in proprietary file formats so that they need Microsoft Windows in order to read it. The documents usually contain macro viruses.

      EllisDees also moonlights as a lawyer. She sends out threatening C&D notices for the RIAA and people who enforce software patents.

      EllisDees has poor fashion sense. She dresses in clothes that are out-of-style and in clashing colors!

      EllisDees never brushes her teeth. Her breath smells bad and her remaining teeth are "Bundy Yellow" colored.

      EllisDees does bad things and uses tricks so that other people get the blame for her misdeeds!

      EllisDees makes obscene and spews profanities in public. Even when children are around! Whenever she sees a nun or little girl, she screams "Cunt!" at them.

      EllisDees raises taxes. She is personally responsible for all that money coming out of everyone's paycheck. She also causes unemployment and low wages! She also causes inflation and interest rates to both rise at the same time!!

      EllisDees feeds the output of her puppy-shredding machine to stray dogs, so that they build up weird cannibalism-related diseases.

      EllisDees owns lots of stock in Wal-Mart and megacorp argricultural companies. She likes watching Mom'n'Pop shops and farmers go out of business. She likes to rub it in when that happens, too.

      EllisDees trolls Slashdot! She posts comments about Natalie Portman and Hot Grits and Soviet Russia and Beowulf Clusters! And with her +2 bonus but also as Anonymous Coward -- at the same time! This is a special power she got from Taco, thanks to her dirty home-breaking fornicating whoring!! Taco's neglected wife cries herself to sleep when she reads these score:2 AC troll-posts about Natalie Portman.

      EllisDees puts ActiveX controls on her web pages! And lots of Javascript too. Popup windows galore, all of them showing animated ads for stuff nobody wants. And there's always an icon at the bottom telling people that her page is optimised for a certain browser and screen resolution.

      EllisDees burns coal for power! And she murders whales and dolphins, preferably when they're still babies! She sprinkles pollution and poison on coral reefs, and scatters radioactive garbage in forests! She strip-mines! She pollutes streams with PCBs!

      EllisDees is personally responsible for everything bad in our world (and a few other worlds too), and just when a planet starts to get its shit together, she summons Yog-Sothoth to consume it all!! She is a destroyer of civilizations! What a bad, bad person!

      So are you going to read the articles before you post, from now on? Or shall I flame you again?

    15. Re:You can stop payment on a cashier's check? by EllisDees · · Score: 1

      Did you type that all out or do you have some sort of flame generating software?

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
  13. He used a *NIX tracking utility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    openDK() was used to takedown this scammer.

    1. Re:He used a *NIX tracking utility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello moderator. Why is this interesting? Nowhere in the article does it mention him using any such application. Please be more careful in using your Mod points or you may find that you won't have them anymore.

    2. Re:He used a *NIX tracking utility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey mods, before you mod something up as interesting, FOLLOW THE LINK FIRST.

    3. Re:He used a *NIX tracking utility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because the utility was not mentioned in the immediate article does not mean it was not used. Commentors, try looking it (openDK story) up then get a clue!

    4. Re:He used a *NIX tracking utility by GMontag · · Score: 2

      It was interesting because the utility was not mentioned in the immediate article does not mean it was not used. Commentors, try looking it (openDK story) up then get a clue!

    5. Re:He used a *NIX tracking utility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice job posting with your regular user name. Now we at least have a name to the troll who has been posting this link in every article. Too bad it is too late for the mods to find you.

    6. Re:He used a *NIX tracking utility by GMontag · · Score: 1

      You retard, I just thought it was funny and responded to it.

      When I post AC I tag it with my nic anyway.

    7. Re:He used a *NIX tracking utility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you defend an obvious troll unless it was you that was trolling? It just seems very suspicious to me. Anybody can go that site and see that it is just some stupid shit.

    8. Re:He used a *NIX tracking utility by GMontag · · Score: 1

      You idiot, that guy has been around for ages. I bust a gut every time I accidentally click the link.

      I made my response, if you can not read the words plain as day in front of your face then just ignore it.

  14. This is excellent news by TerryAtWork · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Although myself I have never had trouble on eBay - 15 positive feedbacks, and never been burned.

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
    1. Re:This is excellent news by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 2, Informative
      wish I could say the same, I have feedback score 81 with 0 negatives and i've been burned over $200. My money order went to a scammer in Ho-Ho-Kus, NJ.

      When I think about why I use eBay, I know that if I get ripped off, eBay won't do anything about it. They say they have fraud insurance, but when I filed a claim several years ago, I got no response. The reason eBay is popular, IMHO, is that it's fun. It's exciting to bid on stuff, and sell stuff, and compulsively check 'My Ebay' 20 times a day to see if anyone else bid on your stuff. Anyone else agree?

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    2. Re:This is excellent news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking loser.

    3. Re:This is excellent news by ianr44 · · Score: 1

      I've bought a good bit of stuff on ebay, and have sold a few items also. I've only had two bad experiences with ebay, once I sent payment for an item (~$150) and never got the item, and the other I 'sold' an item, but never got payment. In the first case, I filled out the form and got a check from ebay's insurance company (can't remember the name) for about $130 (price of item-$20.) In the second case, I lost only the listing fee $1 and will relist the item soon (giving the guy a couple days just in case.) Just my two cents.

    4. Re:This is excellent news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have 50 (buying) and 1 bad experence. That one for less than 25 dollars (the e-bay insurance deductable). He said he was waiting for payment to clear and after 25 days had the nads to try and have me leave a positive feedback (he had over 100) after 30 days he dropped off the face of the earth. Couldn't leave a negitive and he is still out there. Beware. I do have a address though but it is across the country. I keep it around in case the name or the address comes up again on anything else they won't let you do anything else.

    5. Re:This is excellent news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, you are.

      bitch.

    6. Re:This is excellent news by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1
      Just for your information, if you plan to sell often on eBay, I suggest you be prepared to fill out that form to get your $1 listing fee back many times as well, because there are numerous jerks on eBay who will bid on your stuff and then not pay, the result being that you have to relist your item. I would even guess that this happens somewhere between 1/4 and 1/3 of the time I sell something.

      I had an experience once where I sold an old laptop PC. The 'buyer' kept promising that he would send payment, and I was always courteous in replying that I would patiently wait for his check for several weeks, but eventually, I had to relist the item and he sent me a nasty e-mail. I guess I would mod his e-mails -1, bullshit; and -1, flame for the last one.

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
  15. All would've been different... by Anonymous+Cowtard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...if this guy had just waited to ship the item until the payment had cleared. If the buyer wasn't interested in that, then wait for another buyer who *is* willing.

    Would've saved him a lot more trouble and money in the long run.

    1. Re:All would've been different... by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1
      Read the article.

      It says he sent it COD. The scammer gave the check to the UPS man when the item was delivered.

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    2. Re:All would've been different... by ScuzzMonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And then we would have got the story from the [i]buyer[/i] about how he sent this check off and it got cashed and WHOOPS! the PowerBook never showed up and he then had to track down the seller and threaten him with a baseball bat. :)

      --
      No relation to Happy Monkey
    3. Re:All would've been different... by Anonymous+Cowtard · · Score: 1

      I did read the article. In this case, what good did the COD get him? A big load of nothin'. He was out a computer and the money. Had he insisted on a check or money order he could have waited for it to clear before sending off the merchandise, thus saving him all his trouble.

    4. Re:All would've been different... by Danse · · Score: 2, Redundant

      Like he said. That was dumb. Handing a check to the UPS man doesn't get him paid. He should have made the guy send the check and then waited for it to clear, and THEN sent the puter to the guy. COD is a bad idea.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    5. Re:All would've been different... by sporty · · Score: 2

      Ah, but it was done via cheque that the UPS took, in good faith, to be a payment. It wasn't cleared until he tried to deposit it.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    6. Re:All would've been different... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was COD.

    7. Re:All would've been different... by claygate · · Score: 1

      Actually in the long run it was better that this specific person sold it to the fraudster. Since he was one of many yet the only one to track him down the altruistic value of his actions benefited more then just him. The $20,000 of fake cashiers checks and already stolen computers are probably only a portion of what he was going to continue doing for the next couple years or has been doing.

    8. Re:All would've been different... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that mailing the check (via USPS rather than having Fedex/UPS deliver the COD check) brings the mail fraud statutes into play. You don't fuck with the USPS.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    9. Re:All would've been different... by LVWolfman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is why anyone who does this on a regular basis uses one of the escrow services for items of that amount. I've done it, the escrow service doesn't tell the seller that it is ok to ship until the check clears.

      The buyer is protected because the the escrow company doesn't release the money to the seller until the buyer says the item arrived as advertised or until a certain time period has passed if the buyer doesn't respond.

      In my book, anyone who wants to buy or sell an item for more than $1,000 and who won't do it through an escrow service isn't to be trusted in the first place.

    10. Re:All would've been different... by silverhalide · · Score: 2
      One word: PayPal. I know it's not terribly popular with some folks, but you have several layers of protection... If you send the money off your credit card directly, you can easily file a dispute with the credit card company and then PayPal will freeze said scumbag's account since the CC stiffed them of the money....

      Also, theoretically, you have some protection from Paypal itself, but I've heard that they don't always come through on that.

      Either way, be smart about your transactions, especially when big $$$ are involved!

    11. Re:All would've been different... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. That is why for EBay I only accept USPS Money Orders, sent through the USPS, with USPS priority shipping. Oddly enough, for a government organization, they never fuck around.

    12. Re:All would've been different... by Emmettfish · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yup. That is why for EBay I only accept USPS Money Orders, sent through the USPS, with USPS priority shipping. Oddly enough, for a government organization, they never fuck around.

      The United States Postal Service is not a governmental or federal organization, and they haven't been since July 1st, 1971. Prior to this date they were a government agency (known as The Post Office Department), but now they're an independent agency.

      Operational authority of the USPS rests with a Board of Governors and Postal Service management, instead of Congress. The US President is responsible to appoint nine of those Governors. So, there are still ties to the US Government, but they're independent.

      No one's gonna read this, but them's the facts. More information is available at http://www.usps.com/history/his3.htm. Enjoy.

      Emmett Plant
      Use Vorbis to listen to my music!

    13. Re:All would've been different... by emptybody · · Score: 2

      Yeah right...

      seller has positive feedback
      you put in max bid on auction.
      go away for long weekend.(don't watch auction pages)
      you win auction.
      email back and forth -
      "want paypal?"
      "yes please."

      user *HAD* positive feedback so you send paypal payment
      seller receives it. (now it is non-cancellable.)

      Seller drops off face of earth.

      You see that negative feedbacks started showing up the same day your auction ended.

      seller gets booted from ebay
      you try to get money back.

      ebay says scams from sellers with neg feedback are not covered.

      Get contact info from ebay - phone number and addresses from ebay, paypal, and post-sale email don't match and are all are now bogus.

      Buyer is screwed.

      ebay has a credit card and address that was used when they validated the seller.
      paypal has a bank account and address that was used to validate the seller.

      ebay owns paypal.

      neither company will work together to help.

      Ebay has a "verified user" service.
      (hidden deep in their pages) that verifies via equifax.com the person's identity.

      Ebay has an escrow system.

      use of both systems are optional AND must be negotiated before you win the auction.
      There is no way to list only verified sellers or escrow-able auctions.

      --
      comment directly in my journal
    14. Re:All would've been different... by stubblehead · · Score: 1
      COD? Come on. There's no way one party can pay over the $$$ at the exact moment the buyer decides the merchandise is good (this is why so many drug deals get botched). So a COD puts the buyer in control. I've been on eBay for years now, mostly as a seller, and I refuse to give such power over to the other party. For me, it's M.O. all the way (money order, not modus operandi, you legalites). If I'm selling, and you're coming to me, you're deciding to trust me. When an auction is over, and someone wins, there's NO choice but to sell to the highest bidder, so why would you leave everything up to some stranger? If you decide COD, the MINUTE you put something on eBay and someone bids, you lose ALL control. ("You gotta take the power back", to completely and inappropriately quote RATM.) Otherwise, you put your trust in any and every person on the face of the planet.

      "Oh, you're the only bidder? Well, whatever your winning price (regardless of reserve), I guess it'll have to do and I'll have to trust you. Here are the goods!"

      Please. "Here's my stuff. You want it? You send a M.O. to me, if you're ready to jump in and swim. Otherwise, stop wasting my time."

      [brain's note: pardon my vessel for typing such a rant; he's pretty intoxicated]

      -e

      --

      Rock!
  16. "doing god knows what with it"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "It's hard to sleep comfortably knowing some asshole has your Mac and is doing god knows what with it."

    Are we sure this guy sold a computer and not his pet or maybe his girlfriend? And what perverts (macphiliacs?) do with Macs?

    1. Re:"doing god knows what with it"? by hafidhahullah · · Score: 1

      And what perverts (macphiliacs?) do with Macs?... They still fantasize on their old Lisa's.

    2. Re:"doing god knows what with it"? by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1

      You really, REALLY don't want too know.

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    3. Re:"doing god knows what with it"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And what perverts (macphiliacs?) do with Macs?

      http://www.wired.com/news/mac/0,2125,56409,00.html

    4. Re:"doing god knows what with it"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      And what perverts (macphiliacs?) do with Macs?


      http://benbrown.com/switch/

    5. Re:"doing god knows what with it"? by tigga · · Score: 1
      And what perverts (macphiliacs?) do with Macs?

      Big Macs? just eat it..

  17. Re:Who care's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was selling it because Macs suck.

  18. FedEX Responsibility by rjstanford · · Score: 4, Redundant

    Doesn't FedEX have some responsibility in this case? After all, if you ship something COD and they accept a counterfit check, why is that completely your fault?

    I'm not saying that it isn't legally your problem, just that in an ideal world it shouldn't be. After all, presumably it would be FedEX's fault if they accepted something written in crayon on a brown paper sack ... where do you draw the line? Any ideas?

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    1. Re:FedEX Responsibility by Mandi+Walls · · Score: 5, Funny
      I dunno, man.

      Cashier's checks look different at every bank. You can't expect the FedEx guy to whip out his cel phone and call the bank right at the guy's doorstep to check out the legitimacy of the paperwork.

      He's just the messenger.

      's almost as bad as relying on the manager at McDonald's to catch counterfeit $20s.

      Mac users are a posse, man. They're like one big inbred family. They trust other Mac users 'cause they have some bizarre kinship for being on the short end of the tech stick.

      Like us here, only with the social stick...

      --mandi

    2. Re:FedEX Responsibility by jgg · · Score: 1
      I wondered that too.

      Also, this guy lost his mac, I understand that, but why is he worried about being able to pay his college tuition? Is he saying the overdraft charge on the fake check was for the whole amount? That makes no sense. Is the author subtly begging for help with his tuition?

    3. Re:FedEX Responsibility by KirkH · · Score: 1

      Also, this guy lost his mac, I understand that, but why is he worried about being able to pay his college tuition? Is he saying the overdraft charge on the fake check was for the whole amount? That makes no sense. Is the author subtly begging for help with his tuition?

      No, I think the idea was that he was out $2300 and also without a computer. As any good Mac user would do, he had to buy a new one. He said he was going to downgrade, so he probably only dropped $1500 or so on the new machine -- but that's $1500 that could've gone toward tuition.

    4. Re:FedEX Responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about reading the article. I hope that the Stanford in your username has nothing to do with the school because you definitely aren't very bright.

    5. Re:FedEX Responsibility by DoNotTauntHappyFunBa · · Score: 2, Funny

      ---
      Funny, I didn't see a swarm of orange ninjas...
      ---
      They wouldn't be very good ninjas if you could see them!

      --
      Well, hey, I didn't spend all those years playing Dungeons and Dragons and not learn a little something about courage.
    6. Re:FedEX Responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Cashier's checks look different at every bank. You can't expect the FedEx guy to whip out his cel phone and call the bank right at the guy's doorstep to check out the legitimacy of the paperwork.

      Actually, that's not a bad idea. The FedEx guys alreay carry around those snifty gadgets for tracking deliveries and signatures that interface to the company's computers; why not something for tracking COD paperwork and verifying checks, too?

    7. Re:FedEX Responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are apparently in posession of some secret knowledge that leads you to connect $tanford with brightness...

    8. Re:FedEX Responsibility by tchristney · · Score: 1

      I had a friend (not a friend of a friend - a real friend ;) who got FedEx to deliver his new PC. Well, they delivered it to the wrong house. Someone without the appropriate authority (my friend didn't even know them, as they lived down the street) signed for the package (ever wonder why they only ask for a signature and not for ID? It seems an obvious weakness in the security system.)

      FedEx refused to accept responsibility, the person who signed for the package oddly couldn't be found, and the computer store who sold it to him had neglected to add insurance on the shipping.

      It looked like he would be out the money and the computer until he contacted the local news who did a feature on his case on the 6 o'clock news. Then suddenly all of the parties (accept buddy who got a free computer) managed to get a replacement to my friend.

      The moral of the story is that never assume that FedEx will take responsibility for failing to provide the service that you think that you are paying them for. Read the fine print buy the extra security of insurance for big ticket items. Unless you have a friend who does the consumer protection section of the 6 o'clock news...

    9. Re:FedEX Responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, score 4 redundant! that's the most redundant thing i've heard yet.

    10. Re:FedEX Responsibility by mstyne · · Score: 2

      No, he explicitly asks for money at the *bottom* of the article, when he says "ooh, please, don't send me money -- well, if you feel you HAVE to..."

      --
      mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
    11. Re:FedEX Responsibility by dcmeserve · · Score: 1

      Hum, I wonder if ebay could have a new option: secure transfer. They'd act like an escrow agency:

      - ebay rents/buys some big warehouse in the middle of the country.
      - seller ships item to that location.
      - seller pays ebay the cost of shipping from that location to the buyer
      - seller also pays additional handling fee to ebay for this service
      - buyer sends check to ebay.
      - when check has cleared, ebay ships the item and gives the $$ to the seller.
      - if check bounces, well, perhaps ebay ships the item back to seller from seller's deposit, or
      seller has option to keep it there for up to some # of days, to look for a new buyer.

      Seems reasonable to me. The traffic wouldn't be *that* high, because of the extra costs involved for the seller (e.g. nobody's going to pay a $5 handling fee and an extra fedex fee to do a secure xation for a $3 troll doll). Seems like something a successful company like ebay could handle, and make some extra money off of.

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    12. Re:FedEX Responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be surprised to know that you can actually write a perfectly legitimate cheque with crayons on a brown paper bag, as long as you have all the relevant account numbers, amounts etc there.

  19. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 1

    Jesus, are people still bitching about that?

    Did microsoft give people free upgrades from 98 to ME? Has there been some sort of "free upgrades until the end of time" precedent set by any other commercial operating system vendor?

    If you want a free operating system, you know where to get it.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
  20. anyone notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how this guy bashed PC users quite abit?

  21. Re:In case of /.ing by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

    Dear lord....If you're going to karma whore, at least take 5 or 10 minutes to put some paragraph breaks in. That's painful to even begin to read.

  22. Find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    try catching him by his mac address

  23. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by oyenstikker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Surely you're not trying to say that there is only one asshole in every 7 people.

    --
    The masses are the crack whores of religion.
  24. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to break it to you, but you're a moron.

  25. Invalid form key: qxYpCm4NOH ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Form keys are teh suck!

  26. Naughty by Superfreaker · · Score: 2

    "It's hard to sleep comfortably knowing some asshole has your Mac and is doing god knows what with it."

    If he's a normal user, he's probably filling the various ports and orafices with various..uh..plug-like devices.

  27. Note to self by eclectric · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't fuck with the Mac Heads.

    this reminds me of an episode of South Park where a kid sold Cartman some pubic hair, and cartman got the kid back by tricking the kid into eating the kid's parents.

    1. Re:Note to self by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      "Scott Tenorman must Die!" is one of my favorite episodes.....

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  28. Every group has the zealots by clutch110 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's sad that, even to all the great lengths he went to, all PC users to him are bad guys. Congrats on getting the guy who stole your Mac, but maybe you will find time to realize it's the community your in and it has nothing to do the type of computer you use.

    1. Re:Every group has the zealots by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Where in the article did you get the impression he thought all PC users were bad?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    2. Re:Every group has the zealots by wolfgang_spangler · · Score: 5, Funny

      " I know in my heart that Mr. Christmas is really a PC guy. "

      that line from the article is a pretty big clue. And his other rantings about how stupid pc users are. This from a guy that sent a $2900 computer to someone. And HE is calling people stupid. Wow.

      He needs to be hit with a Clue-by-Four.

    3. Re:Every group has the zealots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I could hit people who say "clue-by-four" with an actual two-by-four.

    4. Re:Every group has the zealots by wolfgang_spangler · · Score: 1

      yeah?

      Wish in one hand and shit in the other...see which one fills up first.

  29. Why go through all that trouble to figure out... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

    ... where the guy lived?

    Didn't he know where he sent the laptop to?

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  30. Re:[ Cached Version ] by Latent+IT · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is a "just in case" post. No down moderations are necessary. If the site remains up, leave this post at 2. Otherwise (as I suspect), please mod this up just so that others can read his story.

    Seriously, since you're the THIRD person posting this, *and* the site is performing fine, I assure you, down moderations are *extremely* necessary for your karma-whoring ass. Please mod this up just so that others can read his story my ass. I'll put my +2 up here so I can get modded down right along with you.

    If you're really posting this so that other people (people who are not YOU, or YOUR KARMA) can benefit, please post AC. You contributed nothing, and don't deserve to be modded up.

    Cheers!

  31. Schizophrenic by Superfreaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "My girlfriend and I decided we would use the extra money to donate to some charities for Christmas"

    "but I'm not someone you want to have that happen to. I will get you. I will hunt you down, and I will bring a baseball bat with me."

    1. Re:Schizophrenic by jhunsake · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's really schizophrenic, wanting to hurt someone that screwed you, and at the same time wanting to help people in need.

      I think you're the one that's schizophrenic.

    2. Re:Schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you trying to say that charities rip people off and should be punished as such, or that scam artists should be treated as needy people who are hurting for help?

    3. Re:Schizophrenic by soulsteal · · Score: 2

      How can you call him schizophrenic? I'm sure that if the orphans had slighted him after he donated to their charity, he'd have tracked them down and removed their nasal columellas (skin between their nostrils) with dull scissors and rusty pliers.

    4. Re:Schizophrenic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's not very easy to concentrate on school when all you can think about all day is the fact that all of your student loans for the next semester are going to cover this counterfeit check"

      uh, donate the $$ to charity, yet his student loans are going to cover this? ok

    5. Re:Schizophrenic by j3ss · · Score: 1

      Do you even know what schizophrenia even is? Clue: Schizophrenia has absolutely NOTHING to do with split personality.

  32. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by bwalling · · Score: 1

    Surely you're not trying to say that there is only one asshole in every 7 people

    Everyone is an asshole in at least one person's mind. Think back - surely there's someone you have had an interaction with that thinks you are an asshole. I'm sure you have a few people you think are assholes. So, everyone is an asshole.

    There's a difference between an asshole and a criminal, though.

  33. Re:Why go through all that trouble to figure out.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he went through all of that cause he's a mac user and therefore a complete dumbass

  34. Go against ebay rules, get burned by Nefrayu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok, so it sounds like from this article the guy listed his system on eBay, but then sold it to a guy who "saw his ad" on eBay, but didn't actually bid on the item. This is 1. Against eBay rules for selling, and 2. Stupid. There's no way to get any kind of verification on who it was he was talking with (as he found out), no way to check out the guy's prior habits (via feedback), and no way to get back at the guy without a lot of effort. Every sale on eBay is insured up to a certain amount, with fraud protection offered through PayPal and through credit cards, COD is also the worst way to go.
    I tell everyone who contacts me in this manner to bid on my auctions. Period. There's a reason eBay has these rules, and this is one of them.
    But, no one ever said Mac users were the shiniest apples in the barrel.

    --
    Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
    1. Re:Go against ebay rules, get burned by Pedrito · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      1. Against eBay rules for selling, and 2. Stupid.

      Yeah, but what do you expect? He's a Mac user. (go ahead, mod me down)...

    2. Re:Go against ebay rules, get burned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really. It's not they have two or three buttons on their mice.

    3. Re:Go against ebay rules, get burned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you!

    4. Re:Go against ebay rules, get burned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you!

    5. Re:Go against ebay rules, get burned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ok, so it sounds like from this article the guy listed his system on eBay, but then sold it to a guy who "saw his ad" on eBay, but didn't actually bid on the item. This is 1. Against eBay rules for selling, and 2. Stupid.

      Mac users are immoral. They don't live in the same world we do, and they don't think they have to follow the same rules.

      His second problem is he's Christian. He can ask his false messiah for "forgiveness" and everthing will be hunky-dory.

    6. Re:Go against ebay rules, get burned by goofballs · · Score: 1

      um, you realize the reason ebay has those rules isn't to protect you, but so they can collect their commision, right?

    7. Re:Go against ebay rules, get burned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that is the reason why the rule exists, but it is also a side-effect of following the rules that brings an added layer of security to your transactions.

    8. Re:Go against ebay rules, get burned by Monkelectric · · Score: 2
      I think the real rule he violated was the "too good to be true" rule. Some guy offers him 600$ more then he paid for his computer -- THAT should have made him suspiscious.

      I'm not saying hes right, but the guy used his own greed against him.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    9. Re:Go against ebay rules, get burned by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      1. Not if he used "Buy It Now"; 2. You trust in feedback? This should be fun. Oh well, you also trust in eBay actually playing by their own rules.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    10. Re:Go against ebay rules, get burned by natet · · Score: 1

      My understanding (perhaps I was wrong) was that the guy responded to the "buy it now" price, which was set way above what he paid for the powebook in the first place. That is not violating ebays rules.

      --
      IANAL... But I play one on /.
    11. Re:Go against ebay rules, get burned by jred · · Score: 2

      I know he said the "buy it now" was gone, so it wasn't that. What I wasn't clear on was if the auction was over, and didn't meet the reserve, or if he cancelled the auction to sell to the guy.

      Johnny Cash doing Personal Jesus. That old guy rocks. (I know it's off-topic, but it's on my jukebox right now)

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    12. Re:Go against ebay rules, get burned by Nefrayu · · Score: 2

      Ah yes, but if you read the article, he clearly states that the Buy it Now option was not used.
      Reading is fundamental.

      --
      Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
    13. Re:Go against ebay rules, get burned by Lars+T. · · Score: 2
      Reading is fundamental.

      So is slashdotting.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    14. Re:Go against ebay rules, get burned by Pedrito · · Score: 2

      Send me your address, and I'll e-mail you a book on sarcasm and how to identify it.

    15. Re:Go against ebay rules, get burned by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I tell everyone who contacts me in this manner to bid on my auctions.

      Bummer. I've gotten most of my hard to find items (like a PrimeStar satellite dish and a busted coin-op game) by seeing something similar being sold by the seller and asking them wether they have what I'm looking for.

      Nobody seems to have any problems with this. However, I'm not impatient, and only pay by Money Order (PayPal sucks in so many ways... especially since they screwed up my account within seconds. I only get their spams now.) Unless their Post Office passes counterfeit bills, I would suggest this is even more "secure" than PayPal for the seller, assuming they do as I ask, and keep the item until they have the cash.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  35. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Diego had him killed for banging Frida and just set Johnson up to look like a sov agent.

  36. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't write comments containing the full text of an article...

    THE FULL TEXT OF THE ARTICLE WRITES COMMENTS CONTAINING YOU!

    Wait...that didn't make any sense whatsoever...

  37. If I were ekrout... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here's more links on ebay scammers from my personal links (not google!)!!! These ought to be informative! +5 Informative if you ask me! Give me karma! Give me friends! I guess the magic number of characters per line is 40! I can do that because I'm ekrout! I'm starting to sound like Frank Grimes berating Homer Simpson! Wow!

    Confessions of a scam artist
    ... Confessions of a scam artist. Before his 16th birthday, Hue had stolen
    $5,000 running auction scams on Yahoo and eBay. It was child's play, ...
    www.msnbc.com/news/790212.asp - 75k - Cached - Similar pages

    Charges filed in alleged eBay scam
    ... Click Here. Charges filed in alleged eBay scam. LA man charged with
    26 counts of grand theft. LOS ANGELES, Dec. 4 -- A Los Angeles ...
    www.msnbc.com/news/843312.asp?0si=- - 48k - Dec. 12, 2002 - Cached - Similar pages
    [ More results from www.msnbc.com ]

    Fool.com: Fools Team to Fight eBay Scam [News] May 2, 2001
    ... This way, every time a scam artist tries to take advantage of a seller ... eBay's response
    eBay spokesman Kevin Pursglove says this particular scam pops up from ...
    www.fool.com/news/2001/ebay010502.htm - 30k - Cached - Similar pages

    TechTV | Source of EBay Scam Found
    ... Ebay wants to protect its trademark, but says it's tough to find
    criminals like the email scam artist. It's very hard to track ...
    www.techtv.com/news/security/story/ 0,24195,3408892,00.html - 38k - Dec. 12, 2002 - Cached - Similar pages

    TechTV | EBay Spam Scam
    ... that's it.. Ebay wants to protect its trademark, but says it's tough
    to find criminals like the email scam artist. It's very hard ...
    www.techtv.com/news/security/story/ 0,24195,3408463,00.html - 39k - Dec. 12, 2002 - Cached - Similar pages

    Possible Ebay Scam - www.ezboard.com
    ... It looks like the scam artist is targeting bigger sellers-not small fry-so if
    any of you get an email asking for information-contact ebay about it first. ...
    pub131.ezboard.com/ fbliss51092frm48.showMessage?topicID=27.topic - 14k - Cached - Similar pages

    Ebay scam artists
    ... to conferm the info. Scam Artist email, Name, Ebay ID, Offence. mtracker@iland.net,
    Mark Campbell, tracker44, sells broken items as new.
    www.ctlinx.org/ebay/ - 7k - Cached - Similar pages

    A New eBay Bidding Scam?
    ... Then at the last minute, he writes, the scam-artist could withdraw his high bid ... But
    with the eBay system and other Internet bidding systems, that might not be ...
    www.auctionbytes.com/pages/abu/y200/m03/abu0009/ s05 - 19k - Cached - Similar pages

    Scam artist meets fraud hunter
    www.brockmoore.com/Scams/SkylineMovies.html - 7k - Cached - Similar pages

    PayPal - Internet Info for Real People
    ... a correction had to be added as MSNBC incorrectly reported the scam artist could
    access credit card and bank account information. The eBay community quickly ...
    www.thebee.com/bweb/iinfo217.htm - 18k - Cached - Similar pages

  38. The broken window theory by Fished · · Score: 5, Interesting
    One of the things he mentions is tha tthe FBI and Secret Service were not interested in anything less than $5000. Chicago police just weren't interested... This brings up something called "the broken window theory." It goes like this: some socioligists whose names escape me observed that, as long as no window was broken in a building, they tended to stay unbroken. However, as soon as one was broken, if it was not repaired every window in the building would be broken in a couple of weeks.

    The idea here is that, by ignoring small crimes, the police miss chances to prevent big crimes. The funny thing is that the people wanted for "small" (I don't think of $3000 as small, but that's just me) crimes are often pulling the same scam again and again - but no one ever turns them in. These "small" scams can add up to really large amounts of money and become big ones.

    A few years ago, we had a homeless man who we gave a household job to steal a check out of my wife's checkbook. We only found out when we got a call from the grocery store, asking if we had actually written the check. Of course we hadn't -- the reason the grocery store had called us was that the guy had pulled the same stunt, at the same grocery store, seven times before. No one ever pressed charges. Well, we pressed charges, and it turned out the guy was also wanted for 10 counts of car theft, forging, fraud, etc. etc. ad nauseam. The really nauseating part? The police never followed through on our theft and forgery complaints, even though this guy had dozens of similar complaints against him.

    So, the bottom line in my not so humble opinion is that, if you want to prevent crime, you don't need to outlaw guns or anything: just start enforcing the laws you already have.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    1. Re:The broken window theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      you should have planted a joint on him before calling the cops, that would have got them interested.

    2. Re:The broken window theory by ronfar · · Score: 1
      Wiggum explains, "Let me tell you what I tell everyone who comes in here: The law is powerless to help you."

      Astonished, Marge asks, "Do i have to be dead before you'll help me?"

      "No, not dead... dying."

      She gets up to leave.

      "No, no, no, no. Don't walk away," Wiggum insists. " How about this: just show me the knife... in your back. Not too deep, but it should be able to stand by itself."

      --
      All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
    3. Re:The broken window theory by psxndc · · Score: 5, Interesting
      This is also know as the tipping point. There is X point in a relationship where going just beyond that point causes a dramatic shift in that relationship. Example: Say crime in CityX is 5%. 6% is the tipping point such that if crime stays at 5% it will remain 5% indefinitely. By inching that percentage up 1% to 6% for some reason the reality is that crime will jump to say 12% the year after it hit 6%. It's just a weird phenomenom that has to do with people's perception of a reality becoming a self fulfilling prophecy. More info can be found here

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    4. Re:The broken window theory by mgs1000 · · Score: 2

      or complained that he was downloading mp3s, had removed the bandwidth cap from your cable modem, and linking to a site with the DeCSS code.

    5. Re:The broken window theory by vistic · · Score: 1

      It's interesting because it is true. I think about my own experiences where I feel sort of helpless to stop something that I clearly have control over. Sometimes you just feel like it's out of your hands because it appears to have a momentum of its own. However in reality you can stop and reverse it at any time. It seems like it pertains to lots of things in life including drugs, crime, apathy, eating disorders, gambling addictions, etc.

  39. They were counterfeit. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

    Hate to say "RTFA", but RTFA.

  40. Macs and baseball bats... by Wee · · Score: 2
    No doubt. Between the fixation on baseball bats and how evil "PC" (I assume his loathing extends to Linux and *BSD x86 users as well) that was a hard article to read. The guy's practically foaming at the mouth with his rabid Mac-ness...

    Get a grip, pal. It's only an operating system.

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    1. Re:Macs and baseball bats... by KirkH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The guy's practically foaming at the mouth with his rabid Mac-ness...

      Get a grip, pal. It's only an operating system.


      One might say the same about the way all the /. Linux geeks feel about their OS. To many Mac and Linux users it is certainly much more than just an OS.

      Besides, I think he was going for humor. He was probably expecting the vast majority of his audience to be Mac users. Don't take it personally.

    2. Re:Macs and baseball bats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The macintosh is not only an operating system, it's a lifestyle. Much like homosexuality is a lifestyle. The two are actually difficult to seperate.

    3. Re:Macs and baseball bats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The macintosh is not only an operating system, it's a lifestyle. Much like homosexuality is a lifestyle. The two are actually difficult to seperate.

      Mac is to homosexuality as linux is to beastiality.

    4. Re:Macs and baseball bats... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2

      This coming from someone on a Linux fanatic site

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    5. Re:Macs and baseball bats... by Wee · · Score: 2
      One might say the same about the way all the /. Linux geeks feel about their OS

      Most of the people who come to Slashdot use Windows, not Linux. That everyone here is a die-hard Linux fanatic is just a misperception. Although I will say that a lot of the younger ones do show some fanaticism. Everyone wants 3l337 bragging rights, I guess.

      Don't take it personally.

      I think you misunderstood me. I merely said it was hard to read through the close-minded bias, not that I personally cared one way or the other. I happen to use Macs, as well other operating systems; whatever turns out to be the right tool for the job. But my point remains: they are all still just operating systems, not lifestyles.

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    6. Re:Macs and baseball bats... by Wee · · Score: 2
      This coming from someone on a Linux fanatic site

      First, most people here use Windows.

      Second, I'd say the same thing if it was a Linux (or BSD, or Solaris, or Amgia, or ...) guy bashing Macs.

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    7. Re:Macs and baseball bats... by swv3752 · · Score: 2

      At least me personally, I browse Slashdot from windows because that is what is at work. I use Linux at home. I would use Linux at work if I could get away with it. At least I can get away with browsing /. at work.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    8. Re:Macs and baseball bats... by lavar78 · · Score: 1
      I think you misunderstood me. I merely said it was hard to read through the close-minded bias, not that I personally cared one way or the other.
      I think you misunderstood him. His point was that it wasn't close-minded bias at all, but merely an attempt at humor. Personally, I found it funny and thought it made the story much easier to read than just telling the facts. Obviously, YMMV.
      --
      "Dave, I stand still--the conclusions jump to me!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
  41. Awfully dangerous by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This story should be fowarded to everyone at the Chicago police. It should be an embarassment for them.

    The ho hum attitude of law inforcement regarding things done on the Internet is sad, and scary. If the young man hadn't finally been able to contact an agency that actually wanted to do their job (stop crime), who knows where it would have gone.

    Being a vigilante is never a good idea, but when the police don't do anything, it leaves the average person little choice.

    I suspect we'll start seeing this more and more in the future, as long as law enforcement refuses to act on these things. Why should a person have to spend their own time and money in order to stop criminals? Are we going to reach a point where the only way someone can get an investigation is if they pay somebody to do it? I thought that's what our taxes which paid for police departments were supposed to do.

    Just wait.. Withen a few years somebodys going to get killed because the police sat on their hands and a frustrated victim did their footwork and blows the person who scammed them away.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
    1. Re:Awfully dangerous by mmmuttly · · Score: 1

      Hey, the Chicago's enforcement folks are all about aggressively pursuing evildoers... as long as there's something in it for them.

      City boot crew strikes in Indiana, by 'mistake'
    2. Re:Awfully dangerous by hampton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The police are far too busy performing highway wallet rape^W^W^Wspeed enforcement (because it saves lives!) to worry about this sort of thing.

    3. Re:Awfully dangerous by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 2

      I don't know where you are from, but here in San Francisco, you can forget law enforcement caring about your little Internet fraud case. They don't even investigate Grand Theft here: when my motorcycle was stolen, I was given a case number and nobody was ever assigned. Oftentimes, they don't investigate rapes, assualts, etc. There was a flap recently when the local paper reported the police department's pathetic record on major crimes including homicide. I think if you approached the SFPD with a minor case like $3000 fraud, you would be dismissed with a chuckle.

    4. Re:Awfully dangerous by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      Withen a few years somebodys going to get killed because the police sat on their hands and a frustrated victim did their footwork and blows the person who scammed them away.

      If the person who gets killed is the scammer, I don't see this as a bad thing.

    5. Re:Awfully dangerous by anonymous+loser · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Put simply the average detective's case load is way too high to worry about a $3k fraud. When you have more work to do than you can possibly do, what do you tackle first? The case that gives you the biggest bang for your buck. I.e. cases involving fraud of *large* amounts of money, murder, drugs, etc.

    6. Re:Awfully dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I bet you'll find that the police are quite concerned about crime on the Internet if you just hang out in an IRC room and invite a few underage girls to cross state lines to have sex with you. But of course, being concerned about that is fashionable in law-enforcement circles these days.

    7. Re:Awfully dangerous by zapfie · · Score: 1

      As despicable as scamming is, it certainly doesn't warrant a death penalty. If you think it does, think about what happens when people start applying that logic to smaller and smaller crimes.

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    8. Re:Awfully dangerous by kiolbasa · · Score: 1

      In the article, it wasn't so much that the Chicago PD simply didn't want to help out, it's that they wouldn't be able to do so in the time frame the author would've hoped for. It was the FBI and Secret Service that wouldn't touch the case, and referred him to local authorities. Yeah, he had information already gathered, but the cops have to do their own investigation as well. Chicago is a big city with all the crime problems that come with big cities, and maybe they do need to hire more investigators to improve response time. But they did not all together refuse to investigate, according to the article.

      --

      Beer wants to be free
    9. Re:Awfully dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this isn't the best time for it, but I'd like to throw in the obligatory Simpsons quote.

      Apu: Well, if the police won't help us, we'll simply have to take the law into our own hands.

      Wiggum: Yeah, yeah! A lot of people are doing that these days.

    10. Re:Awfully dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the problem lies with the jackass who sold his shit to somebody without going through the actual ebay process (why the f*ck would he do that? stupid kid?) and then he took COD (generally a bad idea) and of course he didn't even wait for verification of the (bogus) cheque by his bank.
      so that's, what, three counts of nearly terminal stupidity. This guy is a waste. i can't believe you all think he's some kind of wonderful; is it just 'cuz he owned a Mac?? i'll just with-hold all comments about Mac lusers here.

    11. Re:Awfully dangerous by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

      How hard is it to take an address and say 'Oh, this isn't in our city. You should call the detective in the city it's in?'

      Sure, as many people have pointed out, police detectives, espically in big cities have an awfully large case load. But this implies that nothing was even looked at, just some guy on the phone who took the report without caring and throwing it in a pile of papers.

      The reality is, this wasn't something the Chicago PD should have handled. However, the fact that a very simple thing such as 'This actually isn't in our jouristiction' would take weeks to investigate is a little upsetting.

      And in a perfect world, they would have people assigned to this sort of thing, and enough of them to do something about it in a timeful manner.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    12. Re:Awfully dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Explain to me, dumbass, how he could have waited for the check to clear when he shipped it COD. You do know that the "D" stands for "delivery," right?

      The FedEx guy would get awfully tired of standing there, wouldn't he?

    13. Re:Awfully dangerous by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >> And in a perfect world, they would have people assigned to this sort of thing, and enough of them to do something about it in a timeful manner.

      In a perfect world, there would be no cranks or nutjobs who spend all day having the local cops run errands for them or otherwise bother them with trivial bullshit.

      I'm not saying this guy is one, but we have a bitchy old crank down the street who calls the cops every time a kid cuts across her lawn on the way home from school.

      I had the cops come to my door 5 nights a row at my old townhouse because the neighbour kept reporting my car as a 'suspicious vehicle parked out in front'. Luckily I work for a company that sells software to police, and my local county in particular, so the problem quickly went away.

      Then there's the drunks who go out and pick a fight, get their asses kicked, then show up at the station wanting to 'see the guy locked up'.

      And everyone who gets the short end of the stick on a business deal wants the cops to do something for them.

      My point is, forget the fact that there's an overwhelming amount of crime for a cop to be able to deal with each incident in a timely manner.. Theres so much bullshit and whining, they never get to the real incidents. And when they do, their hands are so tied with beurocracy and paperwork and bullshit procedures that you aren't going to see your 'eye for an eye' instant gratification.

      As I mentioned, I write and support software for the public safety industry. I can dial in to any one of hundreds of our CAD (Computer Automated Dispatching) systems and see the ratio of cranks/whines to actual incidents is literally 100:1.

      In a case like this, if you have the evidence of who ripped you off and how, it's much better to get a lawyer and drag it into a civil court.

      Disclaimer: Noone has more disrespect for cops than me, I work with 'em every day. There are many incompetent, arrogant, power-tripping douchebags with a gun and a badge out there. But they do have a pretty much impossible job to do. They write so many speeding/seatbelt tickets because thats all the system lets them do effectively.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    14. Re:Awfully dangerous by sweetooth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is flawed logic. By going after the big criminal you look good and stop one or two big thefts. If you let the small time fraud cases go you can ultimatly be letting a larger amount be stolen. The fact that it's taken in smaller amounts doesn't make it any less of a crime. In fact if you read the article you would see that the individual committing the fraud in this case was committing $10,000 in fraud that day. How many other times had he done this? Probably quite a bit. Is it worth it to go after one $100,000 fraud case and not 5 $3,000-$6,000 dollar fraud cases that may ultimatly add up to >$100,000? If small time criminals find out that as long as they keep the dollar amount down they won't be investigated by the police, they are basically provided incentive to continue committing the crimes in those small amounts. Over time it can add up to a lot of money. They are also likely to tell other people about it and the trend can increase.

    15. Re:Awfully dangerous by White+Roses · · Score: 2
      what do you tackle first?

      The case that someone else has cracked for you already and all you have to do is show up with a badge? They caught this guy with $10,000 in fraudulent checks and lord knows how many other victims. Just how big is large enough?

      --
      Do not touch -Willie
    16. Re:Awfully dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could say the same thing about big thefts. If the police go after more small thefts, then more big thefts go unpunished. Criminals learn that the risk/reward ratio of big thefts is better so they commit more big thefts and tell other people about and the trend can increase.

    17. Re:Awfully dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy said the asshole-nice guy ratio on the Mac boards was 1:100. It seems, with the anonymous coward who posted the parent to this article, that the asshole-nice guy ratio is much lower here.

      Did I mention that this anonymous coward is an asshole?

    18. Re:Awfully dangerous by Gleep · · Score: 1

      accept that in this case the one $3k fraud was part of a massive network of other frauds all performed by the same asshole...

      --
      get your dirty sig off me, you filthy APE!
    19. Re:Awfully dangerous by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      I didn't say that it warranted the death penalty (where the government would take the role of executioner), but if a jaded person decided to off the crook who ripped him off AFTER the police refused to investigate the matter (remember, that was how the train of thought turned to vigilante killing), I don't see that as a big problem. If the police refuse to go after scammers who are stealing thousands of dollars in merchandise and a pissed off victim gets sick of the lack of justice and takes matters into their own hands, I see it as justifiable homicide.

      If someone steals my stereo and I have concrete proof of who did it and the police refuse to act, I'll probably take matters into my own hands and the only 'charges' that I should be facing afterwards are the ones from the laundromat when I need to get the blood out of my shirt.

    20. Re:Awfully dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You people never should have fired detective Harry Callahan.

    21. Re:Awfully dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And in a perfect world, [snip]
      .. you don't need cops at all, because nobody tries to harm anyone else. We all just sit around campfires, holding hands and singing about how much we love one another.
    22. Re:Awfully dangerous by geekoid · · Score: 2

      You're right. I'm sure the CPD aren't really doing anything....
      It is about priorities. If someone was investigating something for you, are they supposed to just stop to take care of another equal or lower priority case?

      Yes a protion of are taxes are for the police, but God forbid the the expense of running a police deptartment goes up and taxes need to be raised.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    23. Re:Awfully dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Supreme Court has ruled that the police are under no responsibility to protect us, to investigate crimes, or to arrest those that break the law. I didn't know this until a few days ago when the "gun control" topic was posted here, and someone had a link to the Supreme Court ruling. The guy gave that as a reason to own a gun. Since the police aren't obligated to protect us, it sounds like a good idea.z

    24. Re:Awfully dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is slashdot, The thought of your avreage slashdoter even attemptig to beat the crap out of someone with "Kung Foo" (think geek) is a really really funny mental image.

    25. Re:Awfully dangerous by bboypicknick · · Score: 1
      This is silly. This fellow had all the information he needed to nail this guy for screwing him out of $5,000 dollars, and neither the FBI nor the Secret Service would even bother with it. The information was useless.

      Which brings me to my next point. This TIA business is out of the question. I can't put my finger on it, but it doesn't seem like my best interests are an interest at all when it comes to any of these US intelligence branches. Maybe I need to clarify more, but I don't think so. The feds don't seem to be appreciative of the information they already have.

    26. Re:Awfully dangerous by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      It wouldn't have mattered if he went through the ebay process or not. Ebay only insures up to $200 ($170 after fees) and they tell you to take it up with the banks and credit card companies first. Ebay really doesn't offer protection.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    27. Re:Awfully dangerous by djrogers · · Score: 5, Insightful
      But of course, being concerned about that is fashionable in law-enforcement circles these days.


      Umm, ok... I know it's really cool to use daddy's 1337 computer to make fun of cops, but how on earth can you bring yourself to question the motives of someone trying to save a child from rape, torture, murder, or worse?

      What gives you the balls to even _think_ that a man who has dedicated his life to protecting innocent children does it because it makes him look good?

      Tell you what, you sit in on an interview with a 9 year old girl after the fact, and then come back and tell me that cops just do what's 'fashionable'.

      shmuck...
      --
      Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
    28. Re:Awfully dangerous by Fat+Casper · · Score: 2
      If someone steals my stereo and I have concrete proof of who did it and the police refuse to act, I'll probably take matters into my own hands and the only 'charges' that I should be facing afterwards are the ones from the laundromat when I need to get the blood out of my shirt.

      And as an added bonus, you know for certain that the cops won't investigate!

      --
      I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
    29. Re:Awfully dangerous by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

      I can understand this argument in a case with little info to go on. But the Mac guy handed the cops all the info on a silver platter! It sounds like he gave them enough info that they could easily get a search warrant.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    30. Re:Awfully dangerous by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

      So what the hell do the cops do all day?

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    31. Re:Awfully dangerous by John+Harrison · · Score: 2

      Handing the cops info on a silver platter often seems to annoy them. My sister's purse showed up at a post office a few weeks after it had been stolen. The theives broke the window of the car it had been in and stole everything in the car including several purses (5 people had been in the car), wallets and cellphones. They called the police and a detective came down and said that he was interested in solving the case since it had been happening a lot in that area recently. So sister's purse, cellphone and id turn up at the post office. She brings it home and finds a receipt for gas from a local station with a partial credit card number on it and a timestamp that was about 30 minutes after my sister had discovered her purse was stolen. We checked to make sure that it the number wasn't from her card or any of her friends cards. I called the gas station to verify that they had surveillance tape from that night. They did but would only give it to the polic. I then called the detective and told him that I had a partial cc number and that the gas station would provide him with the complete number and video. He didn't care and seemed surprised that I was incredulous and angry. I just wish I had bothered to track the jerks that did it down myself.

    32. Re:Awfully dangerous by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

      I can't even think of a rational way to respond to this. The first thing that popped into my head was "let's go rip the cops nuts off". But no, if you DO annoy them, they will arrest you before the guy who took the purses (yes, personal story- I "interefered with an investigation" by giving them more info then they wanted.

      Fuck all you cops out there.b

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  42. Re:Who care's by loginx · · Score: 1

    Ok let's assume everytime someone sells something it means it sucks.
    Search for Macs on ebay:
    Then searching for PC :

    Using your very intelligent reasoning, come back when windows xp works on mac.

    I don't even use macs by the way, I just think you're acting really stupid.

  43. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 5, Funny

    Surely you're not trying to say that 20% comes out to 1 in 7 as a fraction.

  44. I'm glad.... by griffeymac · · Score: 1

    That the entire story has been reposted here eight times. Just in case. G.--

  45. Congratulations... by tuxracer · · Score: 1

    Nice job :) nuff said

  46. Fucking moron by Jennifer+Ever · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Yeah, I mean, good for him catching the guy and all, but let's be real for a moment--that's what you get when you ship a $3000 laptop COD.

  47. What a wimp by jsonmez · · Score: 1

    What a wimp, I would have definitely kicked the guy's ass and then blackmailed him for big cash.

    The American way!

  48. huh...what a moron by wolfgang_spangler · · Score: 1

    I'm glad he busted the guy, however the multiple comments like,
    "he didn't even know what e-mail was. Definitely a PC user"
    made the whole article pretty stupid.

    I mean, most of the mac addicts around here think OS X was developed from scratch by Apple and get confused when you present them with options on how to do something on a computer.

    I'm sure there are plently of intelligent mac users out there, this guy just doesn't seem like one of them.

    1. Re:huh...what a moron by edmo · · Score: 1

      I've seen many similar post on /., claiming that mac users are lowbrow monkeys that don't know the first thing about computers...
      now, most of the mac users I know are quite skilled with computers. Just because we like a logically organized and easy to use OS(not to mention it actually looks good) dose not mean we can't use a computer.
      When we complain about "PC users" we generally mean windows minions who think that Dell beats anything else out there. If you want to get technical macs are PC's to

      it's actually kinda funny how *nix nerds bash mac addicts for acting superior
      another serving of hypocrisy anyone

      As for COD...

      --
      Don't save your orgasms for Heaven; Heaven knows we need them here.
    2. Re:huh...what a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if there are so many intelligent mac users out there, then why doesn't Apple sell two-button mice yet? obviously there's no demand. the reason there's no demand is because mac users are gay, and prefer 'pretty mice' to useful mice. pussies are better than assholes, so gay==stupid. therefore mac users are stupid. QED.

    3. Re:huh...what a moron by wolfgang_spangler · · Score: 2

      I don't think that mac users are lowbrow monkeys and didn't mean to convey that.

      Most mac users I know (and working in the newspaper industry I know quite a few) are not skilled at computer use. That doesn't mean that macs suck however. I believe that the same people on Windows or Linux would be just as clueless. *I* don't like macs at all. I think the OS is ugly, I've never understood why people think it is so great looking.

      My biggest argument with macs is that it takes away options. If the mac doesn't provide a way to do it, then it must not need to be done.

      The mac OS is not easy to move around in and generally doesn't make a lot of sense. Now maybe you think it makes sense and looks good because you have used them for a while, but a person just sitting down to a computer for the first time will have just as much trouble with a mac as they will with linux as they will with UNIX.

    4. Re:huh...what a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ex-freaking-actly.

      You do business on Ebay, and ROUTINELY accept CODs, a form of doing business that nobody in their right mind recommends and the ONE TIME you get burned for it, the guy has to be a PC user?

      I'm glad they caught the guy, yay. But for the record, there's still another asshole in the story who's gone virtually unpunished, and that's jerk-off who wrote it.

      A better ending to the story would be him sending you back a picture of himself urinating on your "computer". 867Mhz Powerbook...whoopty-doo.

      To quote Jay:

      All you motherfuckers are gonna pay, YOU are the ones who are the ball-lickers! We're gonna fuck your mothers while you watch and cry like little bitches. Once we get to Apple and find those Macintosh fucks who are making that computer, we're gonna make 'em eat our shit, then shit out our shit, then eat their shit which is made up of our shit that we made 'em eat.

      Don't trash a bunch of people who had nothing to do with the situation you got your OWN dumb self in. I hope some PC user DOES burn they guy just to show him what an asshole he's being.

    5. Re:huh...what a moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Mac OS X is Unix, most of your comments don't make any sense anymore.

  49. Uhh... I would have called the police... by billnapier · · Score: 1

    Passing bad checks is illegal. Passing it across state lines has to worse. Possilby even mail fraud.

    1. Re:Uhh... I would have called the police... by ManoMarks · · Score: 1

      Uhh...Did you read the article? He did contact the police, and they basically said "We'll get to it someday".

      --

      That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

    2. Re:Uhh... I would have called the police... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally would have RTFA before calling the police. Then you would have known he called the police... And the FBI... And the Secret Service.

      So bottom line... RTFA!

  50. Re:In case of /.ing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would just like to say THANK YOU to those of you who are considerate of those of US who do not stare at this window religiously and refresh every two seconds. Because of c0dedude's consideration, I was able to read the article (despite his lack of formatting. =P ), even though it had already been slashdotted within minutes of being posted.

  51. Read the fucking article by greygent · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    This is hardly insightful. It was a COD order, dipshit.

    1. Re:Read the fucking article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit, dork. That's the point - cash in hand beats COD.

  52. I'm a Convert! by neurostar · · Score: 2

    Well, you definitely converted me! :D

    neurostar
  53. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think he means that each and every person has one asshole.

  54. this article is insulting by heff · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Mr. Christmas said he didn't even know what email was. Obviously a PC user.

    If PC users are so dumb, why are you writing a story about you shipping a $3000 laptop COD.

    Moron.

    --

    --

    |-_-| . o O ( bEef!)

    1. Re:this article is insulting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is Moron your sig, first or last name

  55. Here it is by smcavoy · · Score: 1

    Mac Addicts to the Rescue

    or

    How I Caught a Counterfeiter with a Little Help from my Friends

    a true story by Jason Eric Smith

    Check out the Forum

    in the interest of getting this out, no fancy layout, just hand coding. maybe i'll spruce it up later.
    the names of the innocent have been changed, the names of the guilty though...

    I am a college student (my second time around). Specifically, I'm studying to become a high school history teacher. I am a student with a lifelong habit though, Macintosh. I got my first Mac in 1986, a used Mac Plus with 1 megabyte of RAM a massive 40 megabyte external hardrive. Since then, I've always had to keep up, first it was the SE, then the IIsi, the Powerbook 140, and from there on, more Macs than you can shake a stick at (I missed the Mac TV). I usually keep my Mac for about 6 months, and then resell it and move up. I almost always buy used, so don't get any ideas about me being rich.

    Since I went back to being a student again, I've been selling Macs more regularly, picking up good deals on used Macs locally and then reselling on eBay. I've been doing this for about two years now, its relatively easy, takes about an extra hour of my day, and usually pays the rent. In November when the new Powerbooks came out I decided I was going to buy one for myself, to keep, an early Christmas present that would come in handy for taking notes in class and finishing up a presentation I needed to do on the New Orleans school system. The day they were announced I ordered a nice new Powerbook G4 867 and found it on my doorstep only a few days later.

    It was a beautiful machine, if you've never played with one in person, you won't believe it. I played with it for a couple of days, took it to school to take notes and do research on. The more I used it, the more I loved it. But, it was just too much to be carrying around, $2300 in my backpack had a tendency to make me a little nervous. I decided maybe I should turn it around and pick up an iBook. My girlfriend and I decided we would use the extra money to donate to some charities for Christmas. So on November 19th, up on eBay it went, along with an Airport Basestation and a bunch of other knickknacks. I set a buy-it-now price on a whim for $2950.

    The next morning I checked my auction, a couple of bids placed, and so the buy-it-now option was gone. Checking my email I got a couple of questions about the computer and much to my surprise, an offer to buy it for $2900 from Steve Matthews, a dad with a lucky son in college who was going to be getting a Powerbook for his birthday. Steve wanted to pay for it COD, no problem, its actually how I usually sell things. I called him on the phone number he gave me to ask a couple of questions and make sure everything was on the up and up.

    He reiterated that he was buying it as a last minute present for his son and since it was already setup as a package, he thought it was a good deal. Not to mention the Chicago Apple stores were still out of stock. I got home from school, packed up my Powerbook and accessories, and off they went Fedex overnight to Chicago, never to be seen again.

    At 10:21AM on November 21st, a man going by the name of Paul Smith signed for my two packages and gave the driver an official cashier's check from LaSalle Bank for $3052.78 in return. The check made it back to my doorstep the next morning. I went to the bank, deposited the check and withdrew enough to go ahead and pay my rent and pick up a couple of household items. I sent an email to Steve to make sure he got everything ok and to check that nothing had been damaged in shipping. No reply. As the old saying goes, no news is good news, right?

    My girlfriend and I went away for Thanksgiving, and when we got back on Friday, I had a message from my bank. The branch manager had called to let me know she had a returned item for $3052.78 and that my account was now in the negative. Seriously in the negative. No problem I thought, I'll just call Steve and see what's up.

    So I dialed the number I had. In the back of my mind I expected a "this number has been disconnected message". Instead I got an answer, the voice sounded identical to Steve, so I asked if Steve was there.

    "Oh, Steve, yeah, that's my cousin, he's out of town for Thanksgiving you know. He'll be back Tuesday"

    "Can I leave a message for him?"

    So I left my information and asked that he give me a call. That little voice in the back of my mind let out a sigh and an uh-oh. The voices were the same right? Was I being scammed? Well, if I was, I certainly wasn't going to let the weekend go by without doing a little investigating.

    I started off with the information I had. His AOL email address, his phone number, and the address I shipped the computer to. The AOL address didn't yield anything. Doing a reverse lookup on the address (thanks to Whitepages.com) I got three names and phone numbers, none of which matched anything I had. The phone number didn't give me anything. I finally found a way to lookup the exchange on the number to see if it was a cell phone or a landline (Fone Finder). It came back as Nextel and I wanted to scream.

    There really isn't anything you can do with a cell phone number. There are no directory services. The cell phone companies won't give out any information. And that's that. I called Nextel and pleaded with them. The customer service rep I spoke with seemed more confused than anything. He kept asking me what my Nextel phone number was and why I suspected someone was fraudulently billing to my account. I calmly explained at least three times that I was not a Nextel customer, that I was just trying to get an address for another customer I suspect has defrauded me, etc, etc. I finally gave up on Chris from Nextel, I've had customer service reps who don't even speak English who were more helpful.

    I was at a dead end. I'd just sent my $2300 laptop, my Airport basestation, and a load of stuff to somebody I didn't know and all I had to show for it was a bill from Fedex for overnight shipping and a returned cashier's check. It's hard to sleep comfortably knowing some asshole has your Mac and is doing god knows what with it.

    Sunday the first of December, I sprang into action full force. I called for help. I knew I wasn't going to get anywhere with this on my own, so I figured I might be able to get some help from some bulletin boards. I posted my tale of woe and call for assistance on every Mac bulletin board I could think of. I hoped that somebody who worked for Nextel, some fellow Mac addict like myself, might be willing to bend the rules a little. I wanted this guy's address and I wanted it bad. I was already pricing flights to Chicago and putting my professors on notice that I might have to miss a little class. I may have made an error in trusting this person, but I'm not someone you want to have that happen to. I will get you. I will hunt you down, and I will bring a baseball bat with me.

    I got more replies than I could keep up with. Everyone wanted to know what they could do to help or at least offer support. Well, everyone except one guy who just wanted to let me know how incredibly stupid he thought I was and that he would never have accepted a counterfeit anything. I think a 102:1 great person to asshole ratio is pretty good. Several people living in Chicago offered their assistance, be it in gathering information or even forming a tough guy squad if necessary.

    The most important reply I got was a pointer to an online PI service that does reverse lookups on cell phones. I was already beyond broke, but I figured $85.00 more wouldn't kill me. Twelve hours and $85.00 later, I had a name, an address, and a landline phone number for this guy. The name and his AOL email were eerily close, actually with a last name like Christmas, it would be pretty weird if it didn't match up. I couldn't believe it. A Chicago resident named Melvin Christmas had just ruined my Christmas. I was expecting William Faulkner to come popping out of the pantry at any moment and laugh at me.

    I was now ready to call the police. I called the Chicago police department and filed a report. I gave the operator all of my information, including the real name and address I had managed to get. "A detective will contact you within one to two weeks, thank you." One to two weeks?!? I had this guy, I'd done all the work already, all you had to do was go pick him up. I'd even gone ahead and called Fedex and spoken to the Chicago station manager and was assured that the driver would cooperate in identifying the guy if necessary. All they had to do was pick him up. In one to two weeks he could be gone. And all the while my precious Powerbook is sitting god knows where being used by somebody completely undeserving of a Mac. I know in my heart that Mr. Christmas is really a PC guy.

    I was furious. Chicago PD weren't going to do anything about this. If they were anything like the New Orleans PD, one to two weeks was likely to turn in to never. I figured I'd call Mr. Christmas myself. Let him know I was going to give him a chance to fix this, and I thought, maybe at least scare him. Let him know he was dealing with someone who would track him down no matter what, even if I had to make a deal with the Prince of Darkness to do it. Mr. Christmas said he didn't even know what email was. Obviously a PC user.

    I kept checking the message boards. Maybe someone would have a better idea. I called the local FBI field office. Agent Jones was very understanding, but let me know that even though this crossed state lines, the field office didn't take anything involving less than $5000. "Try the Chicago PD".

    I kept everyone on the Mac boards updated as best I could. On Tuesday I got a useful reply, try the Secret Service, counterfeiting is their jurisdiction. I made my way to the under-renovation Federal Building here in New Orleans. After walking many a dark, scary hallway, found myself at the door of Agent Keith Lopola. Keith came out and heard my case. I had brought copies of all the emails between myself and Steve Matthews/Paul Smith/Mr. Christmas, a copy of the check, and the call journal I had started keeping. Agent Lopola told me the same thing the FBI did, "It falls under our jurisdiction, but we can't take the case." He wanted to let me know that he really felt for me. Thanks. I left the office determined to call and bother him and the Chicago PD everyday for the rest of my life or at least until Mr. Christmas was behind bars.

    Finals were fast approaching. It's not very easy to concentrate on school when all you can think about all day is the fact that all of your student loans for the next semester are going to cover this counterfeit check. That and some grubby criminal has your Powerbook. It's enough to drive someone to the drink.

    Tuesday night I got an email from someone who had seen my story posted on O'Grady's Powerpage, a Powerbook enthusiast site. George Dunbar had seen the story and thought it sounded eerily similar to his. I called him, we compared notes, and turns out it was the same guy. George forwarded me all of his emails. Everything was the same, word for word, it was like Mr. Christmas just copied and pasted and magically made money. George was in it worse than I was though and had completely given up. He was out $6000 and two computers. He also let me know that there were more victims. He'd talked to at least three other people who had been taken by the same guy, all of whom had just given up. I was not going to give up. That night I dreamed of Mr. Christmas and a baseball bat, some duct tape, and roofing nails.

    Wednesday morning I decided I was going to Chicago. I set up another eBay auction under my girlfriend's account, this time for same computer, different city. Three hours later, lo and behold I received an email from eBay user videopro55 (the same one) asking me if I'd like to sell the computer right now for $2500. Oh yes, I'd love to sell the computer, I'll even be there when it gets delivered to make sure it gets "setup properly".

    He emailed me a new address and phone number, the phone number again traced back to the same address for Mr. Christmas. I called the Secret Service and the Chicago PD, pleading, all they had to do was be there when Fedex dropped off the package. It was a guaranteed hit, he'd have another counterfeit cashier's check, all you'd have to do is arrest him. Like shooting fish in a barrel. "Sorry, Detective McDonaugh will be out until next Wednesday, can I take a message?" Fine, if the cops won't do it, I decided I'd just Priceline a ticket and be waiting next door when it got dropped off. So I'd know what kind of neighborhood I was looking at, I asked for help again in the Mac boards. Two Chicago residents replied, and the next morning, courtesy of Tim, I had 23 pictures of the house, the cars in the driveway (with license plate numbers) and the neighborhood. I'd like to see a Dell user do something like that at 4:30 in the morning for a complete stranger a thousand miles away. I started planning my trip. I decided I'd leave on Saturday, have the package delivered on Monday, and make it back just in time to screw up on all my finals.

    On Friday in preparation for flying up I mapped the new address from the one for Mr. Christmas to see how close it was. As I looked at the map, it hit me. The new address wasn't in Chicago. It was in a suburb, Markham. I googled for the Markham police and 5 minutes later was talking to a very enthusiastic Sargeant Knapp. I had hit the jackpot, the new drop was outside of Chicago jurisdiction and therefore outside of their inattentiveness as well. Sargeant Knapp informed me he loved this kind of thing, even had a UPS and Fedex uniform ready. He'd call Fedex and they would set it up for Tuesday. I was certain I was dreaming. After talking to two detectives in Chicago, an FBI field agent, an agent in the New Orleans field office of the Secret Service, an agent with the L.A. Secret Service and having a conference call with a large group of agents from the Chicago Secret Service, I finally was getting somewhere. And I didn't even have to stand on someone's doorstep with a baseball bat to do it.

    I spent the entire weekend on pins and needles. What if Mr. Christmas figured something out between now and Tuesday? All would be lost. I wouldn't even get the chance to confront him on my own. On Monday I spoke with Sgt. Knapp to make sure everything was ready to go. I had sent him a package with all of my documentation (he didn't have email), and I tried to explain what all the email stuff meant as best I could. He had worked everything out with Fedex and they were set for the delivery on Tuesday.

    I called my brother in Nashville and had him send the package. I had set everything up to be coming from there so that Mr. Christmas wouldn't get suspicious. I could barely sleep Monday night. All I could think about was something going wrong and my only chance at getting this guy being missed. I wanted to update everyone on the Mac boards, but I had to keep it quiet until I knew something was going to happen.

    Tuesday afternoon Sgt. Knapp called. They had tried the delivery but no one was home. I just wanted to scream. The board users kept posting how the suspense was driving them nuts. Well, it was going to give me an aneurism. A million possibilities went through my head. Maybe he had somebody working at Fedex who tipped him off, maybe I worded something in one of my email a little off. Sgt. Knapp called me back to let me know they would try the delivery again tomorrow. He also wanted to let me know that they had intercepted another package that was being sent to the same address. Looks like he'd already struck again, thankfully the lady from New York will get her computer back. He also told me that he was definitely going to keep pursuing this, and that oddly enough, the address I'd given him was also related to another fraud case, but this one much bigger (hundreds of thousands) involving a certain Chicago franchise I won't mention. So maybe I had led them to something bigger than just some asshole counterfeiting cashier's checks.

    Today I had finals all day. I'm a 4.0 honors student. I've had a 4.0 all semester. I'm not sure if I'll keep that after today. I just couldn't sleep last night. All I could think about was Mr. Christmas and the delivery. I couldn't study either. So I winged it, I'll get my grades tomorrow. I called Sgt. Knapp at 2:45. He told me he was on his way back to the house. They'd already made the delivery and arrested the guy. He had more than $10,000 in counterfeit cashier's checks waiting for deliveries.

    *I* got him.

    I'm right now waiting on Sgt. Knapp to fax me a copy of his mug shot for posterity. Then I'm going to go celebrate. Sgt. Knapp said the guy was cooperating and he was going to try to recover my laptop. I'm hopeful, but I don't expect it. I might not ever get my computer back, but at least there is one less asshole on the street. When will criminals learn? You just shouldn't mess with Mac people.

    For everyone on all the boards who offered their help and encouragement, I thank you. This would have been a lot harder without you. If you're ever in New Orleans, look me up and I'll buy you a beer. I've still got to figure out how I'm paying to college next semester, but I'll keep some beer money set aside for ya'll.

    Oh yeah, and if there are any lawyers in the Chicago area who can file a civil suit against this guy for damages (yeah I know I'm not going to collect) please contact me, misterye a t yahoo d o t com

    1. Re:Here it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was feeling sorry for this guy until he made the ignorant and immature comment about a Dell guy not making the same effort that he did. Not that I'm a Dell guy but no one likes getting ripped off and I'm confident most people, irregardless of computer type, will go through great efforts to expose the thief and get their belongings back.

    2. Re:Here it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm an anonymous coward because I don't want to create an account for something I'm going to post once on.

      I was okay with this story until the Dell user comment. Wow, generalize much? I happen to be a Dell user, so does that make me crap? What is up with that?

      Pfft. I'd make the same effort because no one likes to be ripped off. And no one likes to be generalized against either... hint, hint.

  56. Re:Who care's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows 2000/XP actually already DOES work on Macs. Do you really think Microsoft would release it, though?

  57. Great, so what stops the buyer from getting scam'd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better to use an escrow service. Let them worry about counterfeit checks. Wouldn't have cost much more than the $85 to perform the reverse phone # lookup.

  58. Hired to steal checks? by Osty · · Score: 5, Funny

    few years ago, we had a homeless man who we gave a household job to steal a check out of my wife's checkbook.

    You hired a homeless man to steal checks from your wife? No wonder you got screwed.


    (Hint: Next time, try using decent setence structure to not confuse your point.)

    1. Re:Hired to steal checks? by overunderunderdone · · Score: 2

      LOL, That is EXACTLY the way I read it too. I had to re-read it once before figuring out that he wasn't testing his banks security features or something.

    2. Re:Hired to steal checks? by Kafka_Canada · · Score: 1, Troll

      Hint: Try not splittig your infinitives, you sound like a moron.

      --
      Fuck it
    3. Re:Hired to steal checks? by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      (Hint: Next time, try using decent setence structure to not confuse your point.)

      Next time, try to avoid using a split infinitive. It totally confused me for a second.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    4. Re:Hired to steal checks? by Osty · · Score: 1

      splittig

      Hint: Try running your post through a spelling checker, so you don't sound like a moron as well.

    5. Re:Hired to steal checks? by Osty · · Score: 1

      Next time, try to avoid using a split infinitive. It totally confused me for a second

      Uh ... I was trying to make my post readable by the Star Trek crowd. Yeah, that's it. Yeah ...

    6. Re:Hired to steal checks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hint(since we seem to be continuing with this pattern): that was a trap. being a spelling/typo nazi makes you a tool, people can fill in missing letters in their mind. Being a grammar nazi is much more acceptable.

      and you wanna talk about sounding like a moron? you're fuckin' advertising a pop-up blocker for MSIE for windows... what kind of moron would use that tripe software??

    7. Re:Hired to steal checks? by missing_boy · · Score: 1

      your spelling sucks.

    8. Re:Hired to steal checks? by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      Uh ... I was trying to make my post readable by the Star Trek crowd. Yeah, that's it. Yeah ...

      I know. I was splitting hairs. You were splitting infinitives.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    9. Re:Hired to steal checks? by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

      People who are confused by split infinitives should just give up reading altogether.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    10. Re:Hired to steal checks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hint: try smelling my bum.

    11. Re:Hired to steal checks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hint: It smells fucking great.

    12. Re:Hired to steal checks? by alienw · · Score: 2

      setence structure?

      If you are going to comment on other people's grammar, make damn sure that your post is free of grammatical and spelling errors.

    13. Re:Hired to steal checks? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Likewise, except I wondered if this was wrt some particularly nasty divorce :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    14. Re:Hired to steal checks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Uh ... I was trying to make my post readable by the Star Trek crowd. Yeah, that's it. Yeah ...

      how bold
    15. Re:Hired to steal checks? by spacefrog · · Score: 2

      try using decent setence structure

      Only on slashdot does someone who cannot use a spell-checker make comments about the grammar of others.

      Some little saying about a pot and kettle comes to mind.....

    16. Re:Hired to steal checks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hinterland: Tastes like ass though.

    17. Re:Hired to steal checks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only on slashdot does someone who cannot use a spell-checker make comments about the grammar of others.

      Sounds like you've never read any usenet!

    18. Re:Hired to steal checks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, next time check your hint for spelling errors and we may get your point.

    19. Re:Hired to steal checks? by AnalystX · · Score: 1

      This "human grammar/spelling check" session turns out to be much more entertaining than the post itself. I guess I should add my two cents by appending to the list of errors for this particular post, the punctuation fault in this "almost" run-on sentence. There are two complete thoughts stated, but separated only by a comma. They should be written as two sentences; or at the very least, a semicolon (as demonstrated in this sentence) should be utilized.

      Hint: It's established that Slashdot posters are not known for proper language usage. So, if you dare to correct another person's post, be certain your correction is without blemish.

    20. Re:Hired to steal checks? by vistic · · Score: 1

      I applaud your grammatically correct post, and I wonder how many times you reviewed it to make sure it was correct. I'd be nervous.

    21. Re:Hired to steal checks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who the fuck moderated this as troll?!? lol, dumbfuck.

    22. Re:Hired to steal checks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you guys make me giggle and pee my pants.......lol

    23. Re:Hired to steal checks? by shilly · · Score: 1

      The sentence you have written to demonstrate the use of the semi-colon is weak.

      You wrote:
      "They should be written as two sentences; or at the very least, a semicolon (as demonstrated in this sentence) should be utilized."

      You should not have used a semi-colon. Instead, you should have placed a comma at either side of the phrase "at the very least", as the phrase can be omitted without affecting the meaning of the sentence. You should not have included the bracketed phrase in your sentence, as it obscures your meaning. Finally, George Orwell recommended that you should never use a long word where a short one will do. For this reason, you should write "used" rather than "utilized".

      Your sentence, once rewritten, would read as follows:

      "They should be written as two sentences or, at the very least, a semicolon should be used."

      I am not sure if the word 'bracket' is standard usage in American English, as it is in British English. The bracketed phrase I referred to is "(as demonstrated in this sentence)".

    24. Re:Hired to steal checks? by AnalystX · · Score: 1

      I am not sure you fully appreciate the first response I received for my post. You should be nervous as well. The reason why one doesn't use a comma to separate in that situation is because they aren't parentheticals. They are two complete thoughts with different subject and predicate relationships. The first subject is "they" and the first predicate is "be written." The second subject is "semicolon" and the second predicate is "be utilized." If I omitted the phrase as you suggested, I would be left with no reason not to form two sentences since the two thoughts would no longer relate. Since when do you follow a conjunction with a comma?

      I was demonstrating the use of a semicolon. How does pointing that out in the sentence obscure my meaning? Your opening sentence proves my meaning was not obscured and precludes discussion on the matter.

      I "should" write using a specific style because George Orwell recommends it? Writers, however prolific they may be, don't have authority on their own to change the language or its usage. It must be adopted as a standard by the society to which it belongs. What you "should" do is pick up an English composition handbook. After reading it, you "should" then start advising others based on factual standards what they "should" write. "Utilize" implies practical use, rather than eloquent use.

      On the other hand, "(as demonstrated in this sentence)" is a parenthetical. Therefore, the use of parentheses is quite justified, and very much Standard English on either side of the "big pond." That's why it's called "Standard English." It's neither American nor British.

    25. Re:Hired to steal checks? by shilly · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.

      I am not sure what you mean by: "I am not sure you fully appreciate the first response I received for my post. You should be nervous as well". So far as I can see, you have (wrongly) conflated the two responses you received for your post. It was the other poster who mentioned being nervous, not me.

      Can you give me an example of what you mean by an "English composition handbook"? I have seen many style guides (I was quoting Orwell from the Introduction to "The Economist Style Guide", one of the most famous guides of all), but I've never seen a composition handbook. I've also never seen a book that claims to set down "factual standards". English grammar is notoriously elastic.

      I disagree that the phrase "a semicolon should be utilized" constitutes a complete thought. It makes sense only in relation to your preceding phrase, as it means "a semicolon should be utilized in writing the two complete thoughts". I also disagree that the phrase "at the very least" isn't parenthetical. By parenthetical, I mean that it can be omitted without changing the meaning of the sentence. This is clearly possible; you could have written:

      "They should be written as two sentences or a semicolon should be utilized."

      I cannot see how you could write your single sentence as two sentences merely by omitting the phrase "at the very least", as you suggest. You would have to change the wording as well. If you look at my suggested alternative sentence, you can see that I do not use the comma as a conjunction. You could omit that phrase entirely and preserve the sense of the sentence, without the need for any commas at all:

      "They should be written as two sentences or a semicolon should be used."

      This sentence does not need to be split into two smaller sentences; it is simple and direct as it stands.

      You asked why it was that, when you pointed out your demonstration of the use of a semicolon in your sentence, it obscured your meaning. The reason is that it led to a too-complex sentence. Your sentence didn't become impossible to decipher, but it did become more difficult than it needed to be.

      I am unsure what you mean when you write ""Utilize" implies practical use, rather than eloquent use". Utilize is just a longer-winded way of saying use.

      By the way, why do you describe George Orwell as being a prolific writer? It is the quality, not the quantity, of what he wrote that has led to the adoption of his principles of good writing. These principles have been quoted and used by journalists and civil servants all across the English-speaking world for the past forty years or more. There are few other figures who have been as influential in shaping modern formal written English.

      [Orwell listed six rules:
      1. Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
      2. Never use a long word where a short one will do.
      3. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
      4. Never use the passive where you can use the active.
      5. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
      6. Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.
      You can find these rules quoted all over the Web.]

      Finally, I think you misinterpreted my question. I wasn't asking whether the use of parentheses was part of Standard English. I was asking whether the term I used for them, "brackets", was recognisable to users of American English. You appear to have answered the question indirectly: users of American English use the term "parentheses" instead.

    26. Re:Hired to steal checks? by AnalystX · · Score: 1

      I believe this has already gotten out of hand, but I will try to explain a couple of things that should help understanding my position.

      By mentioning the first response to my post, I was simply conveying that you should be nervous about posting a correction to my correction. The previous poster relayed to me a feeling of nervousness about the whole idea, and I thought it was applicable to all that try the same as I. I have not lost my sense of information origin. I do know who posted the comment.

      It's generally referred to as a "Rhetoric and Composition Handbook," and Macmillan used to publish the standard reference used at the college level. A style guide has a similar purpose in this regard. I believe the more basic style reference from George Orwell was his "Politics and the English Language" essay. Strunk and White's, "The Elements of Style" is the most accepted, and largely influenced the Standard English standard. The rule is found below:

      II.5 Do not join independent clauses by a comma.
      "If two or more clauses, grammatically complete and not joined by a conjunction, are to form a single compound sentence, the proper mark of punctuation is a semicolon."

      The recognized conjunctions in Standard English for this rule are "and" and "but." My sentence contained neither, but it still had two independent clauses, as did the original post. I will admit I erred on the subjects of the clauses. What I meant to say was that each subject is an understood you in the passive voice. However, you did not point this out, which makes me wonder what your style is really based on. At least I can identify what are real errors. The complete thought is "at the very least, a semicolon should be utilized." I used "or" when I didn't really need to, but make no mistake, those are two independent clauses. I could also write the sentence as two:

      "They should be written as two sentences. At the very least, a semicolon should be utilized."

      You're right. The sentence does not need to be split. That's why I used a semicolon! You wrote: "you can see that I do not use the comma as a conjunction." Yeah, I would hope so, since punctuation marks can never be used as a part of speech.

      (Unrelated) In the fine print one can find the following: "Santa only gives toys to well behaved children." This is known as the "Santa Clause."

      Referring to your comment about obscuring meaning, do you really think you would have figured out that the sentence itself was an example of semicolon usage if I didn't point it out? I wouldn't have, and I'm the author. I would have read it as just another sentence, perhaps even overlooking over the punctuation.

      To help you with your quandary about the usage of the term, "utilize," look closely at the "Usage Note" on the following site: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=utilize

      I described George Orwell as a prolific writer because he is a prolific writer. Prolific doesn't only mean an abundance of work. It also refers to the results of the work. See the definition for this term at Dictionary.com as well. I could make the case that because William Shakespeare invented a large portion of the English vocabulary, that everything he said about the language must be followed exactly. That's a false presumption concerning standards. I agree that Orwell has contributed a great deal to the cause of professional writing, but his writing standards don't always apply to the "model for middle-class educated speakers." I don't see anyone on Slashdot writing fictional short stories or novels.

      The concise term is "round bracket." This is one of the most common misunderstandings in all of English language. A single parenthesis is a phrase. The plural form, parentheses, is the pair of marks surrounding the parenthesis. A single mark on either side of a parenthesis is a bracket. I'm glad I could indirectly help.

  59. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still didn't stop me pissing myself. God knows why the Soviet Russia posts are always modded down, admittedtly the jokes can be shite but some of them are great. I'm not the original poster, I don't do the '...' thing that makes me MAD.

    Idiot mods. Again.

    (-1) Troll awaits. Watch.

  60. Mod Parent Up. by Fished · · Score: 5, Interesting
    You know ... you've really got a point there. Maybe if we weren't putting all our law enforcement dollars into trivial, non-violent drug "crimes" (or would be non-violent if they weren't illegal) we would have time, money and energy to pursue things like theft, fraud, forgery, utterance, grand theft auto, etc.

    Never thought I'd see an Insightful AC.

    --
    "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    1. Re:Mod Parent Up. by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Maybe if we weren't putting all our law enforcement dollars into trivial, non-violent drug "crimes" (or would be non-violent if they weren't illegal) we would have time, money and energy to pursue things like theft, fraud, forgery, utterance, grand theft auto, etc.

      But then law enforcement wouldn't be able to buy themselves as many new toys from all the siezure money that they can generate from the so-called "drug war"!

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    2. Re:Mod Parent Up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you are forgetting that the money our kids use to buy marijuana from their friends is being used to fund terrorist cells all over the world, such as Osama Bin Laden!

      Atleast thats what Daddy Dubya tells me!

    3. Re:Mod Parent Up. by AugstWest · · Score: 2

      Well, a major reason for the War on Drugs was to gain reasonable legislation that erodes our privacy rights. Things like FISA warrants and on-the-spot car searches were brought to you by the War on Drugs.

      Now that we have an equally open-ended War on Terror, I wonder if the War on Drugs might soften a little....

    4. Re:Mod Parent Up. by jimmyCarter · · Score: 2

      Exactly. Last week's The New Republic had an article on America's Other Drug Problem on how the pharm industry in the US has tightened its grip on politics.

      Consumers vs. the pharm companies is the REAL War on Drugs.

      --

      -- jimmycarter
    5. Re:Mod Parent Up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is wrong with this?

      steal less than 5000 times 10 = nothing
      8 yr. old with a half z of pot at school = felony and no more education

    6. Re:Mod Parent Up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, with forfeit laws, Drug crimes do pay well, for the law enforcement agencies.

      If you live in Arkansas, carry 5 thousand dollars, then if you get caught with a joint, they will drop all charges, if the DA can keep the cash. (do a google search, its common practice)

      stupid people.

    7. Re:Mod Parent Up. by glesga_kiss · · Score: 5, Interesting
      And Budweiser wouldn't be to pleased with any legalisation. They are a primary contributor to Partnership for a Drug Free America.

      Isn't it ironic, don't you think? ;-)

    8. Re:Mod Parent Up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bible doesn't mention pot. It mentions alcohol though. Go figure...

  61. Re:[ Cached Version ] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    please refer to the FAQ.

    "Karma used to be a number, now it is a word, this sucks!

    People like to treat their Slashdot Karma like some sort of video game, with a numeric integer representing their score in the game. People who do this simply are missing the point. The text label is one way we've decided to emphasize the point that karma doesn't matter."

    See that-- "karma doesn't matter".

  62. Re:[ Cached Version ] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God I fucking love these meta-posts about karma whores that get modded up!

    ...please post AC

    Ahhahahahahahaha.

  63. Has anyone noticed how bad yahoo shopping is now? by pheph · · Score: 1
    I used to use auctions.yahoo.com and classifieds.yahoo.com all the time for purchases (maybe a year ago). Now it is plagued with unrated sellers selling 1 ghz Apple Titaniums. I even contacted a seller once, who claimed to be about 15 miles from my house (in his auction listing). His response was something to the tune of:

    "Sorry, I can't do local pickup, I'm helping my parents move in down here in Texas. And no, I don't have access to a phone to set up a voice call to talk about it, but if you'd like the laptop, can you transfer the money into my friend's swedish bank account? Thanks"

    I know in the article, the guy got screwed the other way, but some p2p e-commerce seems to be getting worse.

  64. PC? more like.. "AOL".. by miltimj · · Score: 1

    Mr. Christmas said he didn't even know what email was. Obviously a PC user.

    I think the more telling fact is that he used AOL..

    --
    "Truth is not decided by majority vote" consensus gentium -- Norman Geisler
  65. Punishment? by JThaddeus · · Score: 1, Troll

    Wasn't it punishment enough just to give someone a 867MHz PowerBook G4?

    --
    "Love is a familiar; Love is a devil: there is no evil angel but Love." --William Shakespeare ('Love's Labors Lost')
  66. Relevant with the times. by The+Jonas · · Score: 1

    Another example of eBay scammer fodder. But with a happy ending.

    The way this geek went after this guy one may assume he had bullied one_too_many times. We're mad as hell, and we're not going to take it any more! This scammer is lucky to be alive.

    And now, after his last update:

    Update 12/12/02 13:30 CST: For those of you wanting to donate to my cause, I urge you to choose a local charity. There are a lot of needy people and organizations out there this season, if you can't think of anything local, I'm a big fan of Doctor's Without Borders and Lambda International. If you really must, you can send money to my girlfriend's Paypal account, cranberry_coyote@hotmail.com. She's the one who's covering this check for me right now, so I guess she should get this. I'm still not entirely sure about this, but you've insisted. Thanks again.

    ...he is trying this.

    Good for him!

    1. Re:Relevant with the times. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you trying singlehandedly to slashdot the cnn search engine?

    2. Re:Relevant with the times. by The+Jonas · · Score: 1

      Ha-Ha. No, but it certainly appears that way. I was reading today's article on their home page about the Playboy games coming out soon and had /. open in another browser window. After reading this article, I just remembered the relevant articles from the past couple of days and whipped up a little blurb trying to tie it all in.

  67. Karma Whoring - Here's the Text by Mr+Fodder · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How I Caught a Counterfeiter with a Little Help from my Friends

    a true story by Jason Eric Smith

    Check out the Forum

    in the interest of getting this out, no fancy layout, just hand coding. maybe i'll spruce it up later.
    the names of the innocent have been changed, the names of the guilty though...

    I am a college student (my second time around). Specifically, I'm studying to become a high school history teacher. I am a student with a lifelong habit though, Macintosh. I got my first Mac in 1986, a used Mac Plus with 1 megabyte of RAM a massive 40 megabyte external hardrive. Since then, I've always had to keep up, first it was the SE, then the IIsi, the Powerbook 140, and from there on, more Macs than you can shake a stick at (I missed the Mac TV). I usually keep my Mac for about 6 months, and then resell it and move up. I almost always buy used, so don't get any ideas about me being rich.

    Since I went back to being a student again, I've been selling Macs more regularly, picking up good deals on used Macs locally and then reselling on eBay. I've been doing this for about two years now, its relatively easy, takes about an extra hour of my day, and usually pays the rent. In November when the new Powerbooks came out I decided I was going to buy one for myself, to keep, an early Christmas present that would come in handy for taking notes in class and finishing up a presentation I needed to do on the New Orleans school system. The day they were announced I ordered a nice new Powerbook G4 867 and found it on my doorstep only a few days later.

    It was a beautiful machine, if you've never played with one in person, you won't believe it. I played with it for a couple of days, took it to school to take notes and do research on. The more I used it, the more I loved it. But, it was just too much to be carrying around, $2300 in my backpack had a tendency to make me a little nervous. I decided maybe I should turn it around and pick up an iBook. My girlfriend and I decided we would use the extra money to donate to some charities for Christmas. So on November 19th, up on eBay it went, along with an Airport Basestation and a bunch of other knickknacks. I set a buy-it-now price on a whim for $2950.

    The next morning I checked my auction, a couple of bids placed, and so the buy-it-now option was gone. Checking my email I got a couple of questions about the computer and much to my surprise, an offer to buy it for $2900 from Steve Matthews, a dad with a lucky son in college who was going to be getting a Powerbook for his birthday. Steve wanted to pay for it COD, no problem, its actually how I usually sell things. I called him on the phone number he gave me to ask a couple of questions and make sure everything was on the up and up.

    He reiterated that he was buying it as a last minute present for his son and since it was already setup as a package, he thought it was a good deal. Not to mention the Chicago Apple stores were still out of stock. I got home from school, packed up my Powerbook and accessories, and off they went Fedex overnight to Chicago, never to be seen again.

    At 10:21AM on November 21st, a man going by the name of Paul Smith signed for my two packages and gave the driver an official cashier's check from LaSalle Bank for $3052.78 in return. The check made it back to my doorstep the next morning. I went to the bank, deposited the check and withdrew enough to go ahead and pay my rent and pick up a couple of household items. I sent an email to Steve to make sure he got everything ok and to check that nothing had been damaged in shipping. No reply. As the old saying goes, no news is good news, right?

    My girlfriend and I went away for Thanksgiving, and when we got back on Friday, I had a message from my bank. The branch manager had called to let me know she had a returned item for $3052.78 and that my account was now in the negative. Seriously in the negative. No problem I thought, I'll just call Steve and see what's up.

    So I dialed the number I had. In the back of my mind I expected a "this number has been disconnected message". Instead I got an answer, the voice sounded identical to Steve, so I asked if Steve was there.

    "Oh, Steve, yeah, that's my cousin, he's out of town for Thanksgiving you know. He'll be back Tuesday"

    "Can I leave a message for him?"

    So I left my information and asked that he give me a call. That little voice in the back of my mind let out a sigh and an uh-oh. The voices were the same right? Was I being scammed? Well, if I was, I certainly wasn't going to let the weekend go by without doing a little investigating.

    I started off with the information I had. His AOL email address, his phone number, and the address I shipped the computer to. The AOL address didn't yield anything. Doing a reverse lookup on the address (thanks to Whitepages.com) I got three names and phone numbers, none of which matched anything I had. The phone number didn't give me anything. I finally found a way to lookup the exchange on the number to see if it was a cell phone or a landline (Fone Finder). It came back as Nextel and I wanted to scream.

    There really isn't anything you can do with a cell phone number. There are no directory services. The cell phone companies won't give out any information. And that's that. I called Nextel and pleaded with them. The customer service rep I spoke with seemed more confused than anything. He kept asking me what my Nextel phone number was and why I suspected someone was fraudulently billing to my account. I calmly explained at least three times that I was not a Nextel customer, that I was just trying to get an address for another customer I suspect has defrauded me, etc, etc. I finally gave up on Chris from Nextel, I've had customer service reps who don't even speak English who were more helpful.

    I was at a dead end. I'd just sent my $2300 laptop, my Airport basestation, and a load of stuff to somebody I didn't know and all I had to show for it was a bill from Fedex for overnight shipping and a returned cashier's check. It's hard to sleep comfortably knowing some asshole has your Mac and is doing god knows what with it.

    Sunday the first of December, I sprang into action full force. I called for help. I knew I wasn't going to get anywhere with this on my own, so I figured I might be able to get some help from some bulletin boards. I posted my tale of woe and call for assistance on every Mac bulletin board I could think of. I hoped that somebody who worked for Nextel, some fellow Mac addict like myself, might be willing to bend the rules a little. I wanted this guy's address and I wanted it bad. I was already pricing flights to Chicago and putting my professors on notice that I might have to miss a little class. I may have made an error in trusting this person, but I'm not someone you want to have that happen to. I will get you. I will hunt you down, and I will bring a baseball bat with me.

    I got more replies than I could keep up with. Everyone wanted to know what they could do to help or at least offer support. Well, everyone except one guy who just wanted to let me know how incredibly stupid he thought I was and that he would never have accepted a counterfeit anything. I think a 102:1 great person to asshole ratio is pretty good. Several people living in Chicago offered their assistance, be it in gathering information or even forming a tough guy squad if necessary.

    The most important reply I got was a pointer to an online PI service that does reverse lookups on cell phones. I was already beyond broke, but I figured $85.00 more wouldn't kill me. Twelve hours and $85.00 later, I had a name, an address, and a landline phone number for this guy. The name and his AOL email were eerily close, actually with a last name like Christmas, it would be pretty weird if it didn't match up. I couldn't believe it. A Chicago resident named Melvin Christmas had just ruined my Christmas. I was expecting William Faulkner to come popping out of the pantry at any moment and laugh at me.

    I was now ready to call the police. I called the Chicago police department and filed a report. I gave the operator all of my information, including the real name and address I had managed to get. "A detective will contact you within one to two weeks, thank you." One to two weeks?!? I had this guy, I'd done all the work already, all you had to do was go pick him up. I'd even gone ahead and called Fedex and spoken to the Chicago station manager and was assured that the driver would cooperate in identifying the guy if necessary. All they had to do was pick him up. In one to two weeks he could be gone. And all the while my precious Powerbook is sitting god knows where being used by somebody completely undeserving of a Mac. I know in my heart that Mr. Christmas is really a PC guy.

    I was furious. Chicago PD weren't going to do anything about this. If they were anything like the New Orleans PD, one to two weeks was likely to turn in to never. I figured I'd call Mr. Christmas myself. Let him know I was going to give him a chance to fix this, and I thought, maybe at least scare him. Let him know he was dealing with someone who would track him down no matter what, even if I had to make a deal with the Prince of Darkness to do it. Mr. Christmas said he didn't even know what email was. Obviously a PC user.

    I kept checking the message boards. Maybe someone would have a better idea. I called the local FBI field office. Agent Jones was very understanding, but let me know that even though this crossed state lines, the field office didn't take anything involving less than $5000. "Try the Chicago PD".

    I kept everyone on the Mac boards updated as best I could. On Tuesday I got a useful reply, try the Secret Service, counterfeiting is their jurisdiction. I made my way to the under-renovation Federal Building here in New Orleans. After walking many a dark, scary hallway, found myself at the door of Agent Keith Lopola. Keith came out and heard my case. I had brought copies of all the emails between myself and Steve Matthews/Paul Smith/Mr. Christmas, a copy of the check, and the call journal I had started keeping. Agent Lopola told me the same thing the FBI did, "It falls under our jurisdiction, but we can't take the case." He wanted to let me know that he really felt for me. Thanks. I left the office determined to call and bother him and the Chicago PD everyday for the rest of my life or at least until Mr. Christmas was behind bars.

    Finals were fast approaching. It's not very easy to concentrate on school when all you can think about all day is the fact that all of your student loans for the next semester are going to cover this counterfeit check. That and some grubby criminal has your Powerbook. It's enough to drive someone to the drink.

    Tuesday night I got an email from someone who had seen my story posted on O'Grady's Powerpage, a Powerbook enthusiast site. George Dunbar had seen the story and thought it sounded eerily similar to his. I called him, we compared notes, and turns out it was the same guy. George forwarded me all of his emails. Everything was the same, word for word, it was like Mr. Christmas just copied and pasted and magically made money. George was in it worse than I was though and had completely given up. He was out $6000 and two computers. He also let me know that there were more victims. He'd talked to at least three other people who had been taken by the same guy, all of whom had just given up. I was not going to give up. That night I dreamed of Mr. Christmas and a baseball bat, some duct tape, and roofing nails.

    Wednesday morning I decided I was going to Chicago. I set up another eBay auction under my girlfriend's account, this time for same computer, different city. Three hours later, lo and behold I received an email from eBay user videopro55 (the same one) asking me if I'd like to sell the computer right now for $2500. Oh yes, I'd love to sell the computer, I'll even be there when it gets delivered to make sure it gets "setup properly".

    He emailed me a new address and phone number, the phone number again traced back to the same address for Mr. Christmas. I called the Secret Service and the Chicago PD, pleading, all they had to do was be there when Fedex dropped off the package. It was a guaranteed hit, he'd have another counterfeit cashier's check, all you'd have to do is arrest him. Like shooting fish in a barrel. "Sorry, Detective McDonaugh will be out until next Wednesday, can I take a message?" Fine, if the cops won't do it, I decided I'd just Priceline a ticket and be waiting next door when it got dropped off. So I'd know what kind of neighborhood I was looking at, I asked for help again in the Mac boards. Two Chicago residents replied, and the next morning, courtesy of Tim, I had 23 pictures of the house, the cars in the driveway (with license plate numbers) and the neighborhood. I'd like to see a Dell user do something like that at 4:30 in the morning for a complete stranger a thousand miles away. I started planning my trip. I decided I'd leave on Saturday, have the package delivered on Monday, and make it back just in time to screw up on all my finals.

    On Friday in preparation for flying up I mapped the new address from the one for Mr. Christmas to see how close it was. As I looked at the map, it hit me. The new address wasn't in Chicago. It was in a suburb, Markham. I googled for the Markham police and 5 minutes later was talking to a very enthusiastic Sargeant Knapp. I had hit the jackpot, the new drop was outside of Chicago jurisdiction and therefore outside of their inattentiveness as well. Sargeant Knapp informed me he loved this kind of thing, even had a UPS and Fedex uniform ready. He'd call Fedex and they would set it up for Tuesday. I was certain I was dreaming. After talking to two detectives in Chicago, an FBI field agent, an agent in the New Orleans field office of the Secret Service, an agent with the L.A. Secret Service and having a conference call with a large group of agents from the Chicago Secret Service, I finally was getting somewhere. And I didn't even have to stand on someone's doorstep with a baseball bat to do it.

    I spent the entire weekend on pins and needles. What if Mr. Christmas figured something out between now and Tuesday? All would be lost. I wouldn't even get the chance to confront him on my own. On Monday I spoke with Sgt. Knapp to make sure everything was ready to go. I had sent him a package with all of my documentation (he didn't have email), and I tried to explain what all the email stuff meant as best I could. He had worked everything out with Fedex and they were set for the delivery on Tuesday.

    I called my brother in Nashville and had him send the package. I had set everything up to be coming from there so that Mr. Christmas wouldn't get suspicious. I could barely sleep Monday night. All I could think about was something going wrong and my only chance at getting this guy being missed. I wanted to update everyone on the Mac boards, but I had to keep it quiet until I knew something was going to happen.

    Tuesday afternoon Sgt. Knapp called. They had tried the delivery but no one was home. I just wanted to scream. The board users kept posting how the suspense was driving them nuts. Well, it was going to give me an aneurism. A million possibilities went through my head. Maybe he had somebody working at Fedex who tipped him off, maybe I worded something in one of my email a little off. Sgt. Knapp called me back to let me know they would try the delivery again tomorrow. He also wanted to let me know that they had intercepted another package that was being sent to the same address. Looks like he'd already struck again, thankfully the lady from New York will get her computer back. He also told me that he was definitely going to keep pursuing this, and that oddly enough, the address I'd given him was also related to another fraud case, but this one much bigger (hundreds of thousands) involving a certain Chicago franchise I won't mention. So maybe I had led them to something bigger than just some asshole counterfeiting cashier's checks.

    Today I had finals all day. I'm a 4.0 honors student. I've had a 4.0 all semester. I'm not sure if I'll keep that after today. I just couldn't sleep last night. All I could think about was Mr. Christmas and the delivery. I couldn't study either. So I winged it, I'll get my grades tomorrow. I called Sgt. Knapp at 2:45. He told me he was on his way back to the house. They'd already made the delivery and arrested the guy. He had more than $10,000 in counterfeit cashier's checks waiting for deliveries.

    *I* got him.

    I'm right now waiting on Sgt. Knapp to fax me a copy of his mug shot for posterity. Then I'm going to go celebrate. Sgt. Knapp said the guy was cooperating and he was going to try to recover my laptop. I'm hopeful, but I don't expect it. I might not ever get my computer back, but at least there is one less asshole on the street. When will criminals learn? You just shouldn't mess with Mac people.

    For everyone on all the boards who offered their help and encouragement, I thank you. This would have been a lot harder without you. If you're ever in New Orleans, look me up and I'll buy you a beer. I've still got to figure out how I'm paying to college next semester, but I'll keep some beer money set aside for ya'll.

    Oh yeah, and if there are any lawyers in the Chicago area who can file a civil suit against this guy for damages (yeah I know I'm not going to collect) please contact me, misterye a t yahoo d o t com

    The sites with great users that helped out (you can sign up for the forums and read all about this as it was going on):
    MacRumors.com
    MacNN
    ThinkSecret
    O'Grady's PowerPage

    Update 12/11/02 18:58 CST: Sgt. Knapp is sending me a copy of Mr. Christmas's mug shot. I'll post it as soon as I get it.

    Update 12/11/02 21:39 CST: For those interesting in getting in contact with me, my email address is misterye at yahoo dot com, if you think you were also a victim, please call me at 504-894-1243 and I'll put you in touch with the appropriate people.

    Update 12/11/02 23:36 CST: I've gone back through and added links where appropriate. I'll try to reformat this tomorrow.

    Update 12/12/02 10:36 CST: Ok, so how's this for small world: Apparently this thing is getting posted everywhere. I just got a call from Matt of the Real World Season 9 (the New Orleans Real World). So anyway, the cast of the New Orleans Real World used to all work at 735 Nightclub. I moved down here to actually take-over their marketing right after the show ended. So I never met Matt or any of them until speaking to him today. Small, weird world.

    Update 12/12/02 12:03 CST: I've added a forum where everyone can talk about this. Here it is.

    Update 12/12/02 13:30 CST: For those of you wanting to donate to my cause, I urge you to choose a local charity. There are a lot of needy people and organizations out there this season, if you can't think of anything local, I'm a big fan of Doctor's Without Borders and Lambda International. If you really must, you can send money to my girlfriend's Paypal account, cranberry_coyote@hotmail.com. She's the one who's covering this check for me right now, so I guess she should get this. I'm still not entirely sure about this, but you've insisted. Thanks again.

  68. Re:[ Cached Version ] by Crispin+Cowan · · Score: 2
    Seriously, since you're the THIRD person posting this, *and* the site is performing fine, I assure you, down moderations are *extremely* necessary for your karma-whoring ass.
    Except now the site is not responding, so take your sanctimonious attitude and moderate it. Your post was mostly useful to lead me to the actually useful post with a cached copy of the article :-)

    Crispin
    ----
    Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.
    Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc.
    Immunix: Security Hardened Linux Distribution
    Available for purchase

  69. Pretty smart, but simple steps were missed by ManoMarks · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is always cool to catch a theif, and particularly someone who preys on people who don't have much money to pursue these things. And while I sympathize with those who say he shouldn't have sent it COD to begin with, we all make mistakes sometimes, and at least he did what he could to correct it. And if he had protected himself, this guy wouldn't have gotten caught. There's a couple of simple things he missed, though: 1) As someone else pointed out, he did have the delivery address. While that could have been a drop, it wasn't, and even if it was, someone lived there and could have been used to trace him. 2) As soon as the second person turned up with a $3,000 item, the total value was over the $5,000 minimum the FBI and Secret Service needed to go after it, so they could have been immediately contacted. Also, when they know there's a pattern, they're more likely to get involved.

    --

    That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

    1. Re:Pretty smart, but simple steps were missed by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "It is always cool to catch a theif, and particularly someone who preys on people who don't have much money to pursue these things. And while I sympathize with those who say he shouldn't have sent it COD to begin with, we all make mistakes sometimes, and at least he did what he could to correct it."

      A worse thing is to have the same last name as a crook. Back in the 80s, there was a drug dealer living in the same city as my family and had the same last name as us. We kept getting calls in the middle of the night ... "Is Duane there ... ? We're having a party and we need the stuff!" Eventually the guy got caught and was hauled off the jail. But not before we got our phone number unlisted permanently and for free by the police :-)

  70. Good luck collecting by billstewart · · Score: 2
    The best case is if the crook hasn't fenced your Mac yet so you can get it back. Otherwise good luck collecting. Sometimes crooks actually have money, but often the reason they're crooks is that they have expensive habits, like gambling or cocaine or rent or Mafia loans, that they can't finance legitimately.

    This guy probably took the computer (or at least some of the computers from other people he'd ripped off) and sold it for half the price he "bought" it for, maybe less, so even if he hasn't poured the money up his nose, he'd only have $1200, not 2500. Maybe he's got a car, though....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  71. Re:Who care's by MoneyT · · Score: 2

    They would if people would buy it. But mac user won't buy it. Hell they can't even get all the PC users to buy it.

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  72. in case of /.ing... by countzer0interrupt · · Score: 1

    ... take your pick. ;-)

    1 2 3 4

    Alternatively, don't check the comments already posted and post another incredibly long post containing the entire website Slashdotted.

  73. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by extra88 · · Score: 2

    As I put on my high school locker (briefly), "'Asshole' is in the eye of the beholder."

  74. Identity by Shamashmuddamiq · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    I guess everyone needs to find an identity. If this guy thinks that using a Mac somehow makes him intelligent, more power to him. After living in Texas (dealing with "Texas pride" bigots), I find this kind of sentiment really annoying and uncalled for. The article was good, but statements like "you shouldn't mess with Mac people" and "he must be a PC user" just amplify my suspicions of his ignorance.

    Personally, I know several Mac users, and I'm surprised that a few of them are even intelligent enough to tie their shoes. My own experience tells me that the ratio of stupid people to intelligent people seems to be much smaller for PC users. Does that make a PC better than a Mac? Probably not, but it certainly doesn't make a Mac user better than a PC user.

    Dunno why I bother. This is Slashdot!

    --
    ...just my 2 gil.
  75. Re:[ Cached Version ] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I really did expect to be modded down. If you can demonstrate why I give a shit about my karma, after being at the cap for over a year, keep laughing. Otherwise, please, kill yourself immediatly. You're too witty to live.

  76. Funny by cheezedawg · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think its funny that

    1) He no longer has his mac
    2) He is out $3000
    3) He failed his finals
    4) He spent a bunch of extra money tracking the guy down (plane ticket, PI, etc)
    5) He is still happy about it

    I'd guess he is a "Glass is half full" kind of guy.

    --
    "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
    1. Re:Funny by Trogre · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Hey!

      How come I'm on your 'foes' list?!

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    2. Re:Funny by Dan+D. · · Score: 1, Troll
      I'd guess he is a "Glass is half full" kind of guy.

      You'd have to be, as a Mac user. :)

      --
      People who quote themselves bug the crap out of me -- Me.
    3. Re:Funny by cheezedawg · · Score: 0

      Hmmm- I don't remember. Do you ever say dumb things? That's the most common reason :)

      --
      "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
    4. Re:Funny by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He may be out time, money, hardware, and grades, but he got revenge. Never underestimate the value of revenge.

      (If I had the chance to catch someone who defrauded me, I'd do so in a second. If I knew he had defrauded many other people and would continue to do so, I'd spend a fair amount of time and effort to track him down.)

    5. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And he asks people not to send money to him, but to a charity. If I wasn't a poor grad student, I would send some to the local LUG.

    6. Re:Funny by tigga · · Score: 1

      cheezedawg, did you read the story?
      It's not finished yet, he may recover money or Mac.
      He hasn't failed finals. It's kinda hard for 4.0 honors student ;))

    7. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're on my foes list because apparently you whine about being on foes lists.

    8. Re:Funny by Trogre · · Score: 2

      you're on my foes list because apparently you whine about being on foes lists.

      d'oh

      I'm not making many friends here, am I? :(

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    9. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If I had the chance to catch someone who defrauded me, I'd do so in a second.

      I did this when someone managed to spam me to an account I hadn't told anyone about. That annoyed me so much, I went after him. Got his name, address, home and mobile numbers and his real ISP account details (he used a free e-mail to send the spam). TOS violation, bye bye cable modem!

      Revenge is fun!

    10. Re:Funny by DaemonGem · · Score: 0

      He failed his finals? Hmm, if you read the article, you'd see that he got 2 A's, 1 B, and was still waiting on results for his other finals. So where did the "failing" part come from? -Dae

      --
      "Alle reden vom wetter. Wir nicht." - SDS Sozialistischer Deutscher Studentenbund.
      j00 4r3 3n73r1ng l337 w0r1d.
    11. Re:Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Why stop there? You've got his home address and phone numbers. Spam him back. Telemarket transvestite porn to him every hour, on the hour. Ship him a couple thousand Daikatana CDs (one at a time, of course). Post his info here and let the rest of us help out.
      Or at least bill him for unauthorized usage of your email server (assuming you own the server).

      He probably just got a new ISP, removed your address from his list, and went back on spamming. Unfortunately there's not much that would stop that from happening. Spammers generally don't give a damn about the side effects of their actions on others. If they did, they wouldn't spam.

  77. If we could mod the stories.... by bryhhh · · Score: 1

    then this guy would get modded -1 flamebait.

    Powerbook is sitting god knows where being used by somebody completely undeserving of a Mac. I know in my heart that Mr. Christmas is really a PC guy.

    Mr. Christmas said he didn't even know what email was. Obviously a PC user.

    1. Re:If we could mod the stories.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was pretty funny.

      People take things too seriously.

    2. Re:If we could mod the stories.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all know you can't run UNIX on a PC. And ABSOLUTELY NOT A SINGLE macintosh computer runs UNIX.

    3. Re:If we could mod the stories.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he mean 'windows' PC, that would mod it up by 1/5 a million neht ?
      Where is the visual studio ad.

  78. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by angle_slam · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I sell things on Ebay as well (usually old games that I'm done with) - and I don't do COD. Paypal - sure. Checks and money orders, but I wait until they clear before they ship.

    That is what I thought when I first read the article. But it was a forged cashier's check. Cashier's checks are usually as good as cash. I won't do COD either, but you can't really blame him for accepting a cashier's check. When I Ebay, if I get a cashier's check, I ship without waiting for the cashier's check to clear because, if legit, it is guaranteed to clear. (Of course, I normally don't sell things worth $2900.)

  79. Newsflash! Interesting story posted on /.! by linux+slacker · · Score: 1
    Wow, a /. story I actually had the interest in to read the whole way through. ;)

    Seriously, I'm somewhat jealous of the cult-like fraternity of Mac users mentioned in the story. I've always used a PC, and he's right - there's no way PC users would help a complete stranger like that for no reason other than he uses a similar system to your own.

    I guess that's part of the reason I run Linux - a desire to feel part of a 'small' community. Kinda like in the old days when I was part of the C-64 crowd. =)

    Sometimes I wonder if I really want Linux to "make it" as some might define it (ie. become as ubiquitous as Winblows). I don't think I'd like to lose that outsider feeling. I remember converstations I'd have in the old days of Linux (say, 4-5 years ago)..

    Winblows PC user: (looking at my Linux box) "What kinda system is that?!?"

    Me: "It's Linux."

    Win: "What's that?"

    Me: "It's basically a Unix for x86 systems. All the OS is open source, you can download and compile all of it yourself."

    Win: "Why would you want to do that? You must be some kind of anti-establishment geek!"

    Me: "Yep. I like it that way."

    --
    "Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it." -- Thomas Jefferson, 1801
  80. No, you read it incorrectly by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Funny

    "My girlfriend and I decided we would use the extra money to donate to some charities for Christmas"

    Clearly he was talking about the guy that stole his Mac.... Melvin Christmas.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  81. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by jmcneill · · Score: 1

    Surely you're not trying to say that there is only one asshole in every 7 people.

    I can't believe nobody got this joke! "Insightful"? oyenstikker is saying that everybody _has_ an asshole!

  82. On The Internet, Nobody Knows You're A Dog by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... unless you try to screw a Mac addict. Then you'll be hunted down in meatspace like a, like a, like a something-or-other.

    Serves the thief right for messing with a Mac type. Everybody knows they're unstable to begin with, and all it takes is a just a little push for them to go postal.

    (So, +1 Funny for the first paragraph, -1 Flamebait for the second? Worth the risk.)

    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:On The Internet, Nobody Knows You're A Dog by Trogre · · Score: 2

      Serves the thief right for messing with a Mac type. Everybody knows they're unstable to begin with, and all it takes is a just a little push for them to go postal.

      What, the Mac or the Mac user?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    2. Re:On The Internet, Nobody Knows You're A Dog by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 3, Funny

      My iBook is extremely stable. I, on the other hand ...

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  83. The moral of the story is .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you ever need help online then pose as a Mac User. Be sure to put down PC Users, because they just don't ever get it!!

    Also I would hope Mr. Christmas is stretching his ass using the goatse.cx method in preperation for his jail time.

  84. Re:[ Cached Version ] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, that's a great idea. I'm sure... that... well, there must have been a reason why I didn't moderate it...

    Oh wait. Perhaps I didn't have mod points? God, I'm bitchy today!

  85. Fix the fucking server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was hardly helpful. The server is down, dipshit.

  86. My kingdom for a comma by tswinzig · · Score: 2

    we had a homeless man who we gave a household job to steal a check out of my wife's checkbook.

    You got some homeless guy to steal a check from your wife? That's pretty low!

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  87. Not address by Allaria · · Score: 1

    He had the address, but he needed a name. You can't really call the PD and say something like "Hi, I need you to arrest some guy living at this address because he ripped me off." Any number of people could be living there, there were three name matches when he did a reverse lookup on the address.

    --
    If a and b in c, and a can create b, and a can create a, and b can create b, and b cannot create a, then a created c.
  88. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so then out of every 7 people there are 8 assholes...

  89. no police force by moosemoose · · Score: 1, Troll
    .. might be better than having any police force at all. ok that's a slight exageration, but lets face it, for most of us the police are simply another governmental agency which issues paperwork that we have to submit to our insurance company along with our claim and THAT'S IT. i would be interested in knowing the percentage of people who have been victims of property crimes who have had a situation where the police actually solved their case. (in my life 3 home burglaries, 2 car thefts: none solved. i don't even bother reporting the small stuff like vandalism or theft from a car).

    in the absence of a police force we'd have about 60 days of chaos, a fair amount of frontier justice and then things would settle down with community organizations that really got some work done. by the way, the fact that a small police force actually helped in his case once again illustrates the fact that the larger an organization becomes, the less likely it is to serve the interests of its 'customers'.

    rant over.

    --
    the real evil is not what people think - its how people think
    1. Re:no police force by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well, move to some 1 thousand people city-nation.

      or just make a revolution and have everything messed up, that works reeeeeeeeal well, for publics good! (umm, no. there's chaos in several parts of the globe in this area,not having adequate police forces/authority to keep people from doing anything they want. it's not pretty. you would end up with murders and rapes going unsolved, or solved by straight retribution)

      gee, i hope i could post at 0 without being ac..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:no police force by moosemoose · · Score: 3, Interesting
      well it was a rant and i do agree that some sort of structured law enforcement is desirable. but i think the two points that i wanted to make were (1) that behavior in our society is for the most part not moderated by the existance of police. in other words, most of us would continue to not murder and rape in the absence of a police force and conversely, those who do murder and rape today do not seem to be particularly deterred by the existence of the police and (2) small local groups (ala the post in question) seem to be more effective than large 'crime fighting' organizations. in the recent case of the theft of credit information of 30,000 people, the thieves were caught not by the police but in effect by the credit reporting agencies (after $2.7 million stolen). according to the news reports they would still be doing this today if they hadn't gotten greedy and started downloading 15,000 reports at a time. i used to practice law and i can tell you from personal experience that the police do not concern themselves with the small victim. steal 50% of a poor person's possessions and you get no police action. steal 1% of a rich person's and you get the crime lab.

      --
      the real evil is not what people think - its how people think
  90. Re:[ Cached Version ] by Trogre · · Score: 2

    ERROR
    The requested URL could not be retrieved

    While trying to retrieve the URL: http://www.remodern.com/caught.html

    The following error was encountered:

    * Connection Failed

    The system returned:

    (60) Connection timed out

    The remote host or network may be down. Please try the request again.

    Your cache administrator is root.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  91. Reminds me of New York by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As I seem to recall (and people from New York feel free to correct me on this), one of the things that Rudy Guiliani [sic] did was have the police start ticketing people who jaywalked.

    The result? Overall reduction in crime - since if you were going to be caught for the little things, odds are you were going to be caught for doing a big thing (selling drugs, etc). And it made the police highly visible - and the one thing I remembered from my old criminal law classes (before I ditched law) - the likelyhood of getting caught for a crime is a far greater deterance than the punishment of a crime.

    I have to agree - if we have a system that busted people for crimes - regardless of the "level" (no, I'm not suggesting death penalties for jaywalking, calm down, or a police state - just if a crime is obviously committed, like a bike theft **cough**like I went through once**cough**), go after it. Odds are, it would do more good in the long run by nipping these "small time" crooks in the bud before they ever become "big time".

    1. Re:Reminds me of New York by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had a similar thing in the UK in the 70s: the "suss" law - it gave police the right to arrest black people.

    2. Re:Reminds me of New York by lysurgon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually the Guiliani directive to crack down on "quality of life" crime went way further back than jaywaliking. In fact the aggressive prosecution of jaywalkers (and the outlawying of dancing in unlicensed city bars and clubs) is really where he went over the line.

      The basis of the quality of life program was to try to move in and bust kids writing graffitti, homeless people loitering and especially low-level drug dealers. Beat cops had previously been instructed to avoid drug deals for fear of corruption.

      The numbers largely speak for themselves (though there's a strong case that improved economic conditions do as much to deter crime as incresed police presence), but because of endemic flaws in the police system (e.g. a certain amount of ingranced racism) the whole campaign caused a lot of acrimony.

      People (more often than not minorities) were being stopped and shaken down for guns and drugs illegally, but since these shakedowns seemed effective, the department allowed it to go on. The high-profile beatings and killings of minorities around the city was causing a lot of civil unrest. Thankfully, since 9-11 the relationship between the police and the people of the city seems to be back on track. Too bad it took such a tragedy to set things right.

    3. Re:Reminds me of New York by michaelggreer · · Score: 1

      Yes, Giuliani did this.

      No, it was not related to the overall drop in crime.

      Crime dropped dramatically across the entire nation at that time, because the economy picked up. Cities with law & order mayors got a drop in crime. Cities expirimenting with community policing got the same drop in crime. Apart from making sure cops basically do their job right, nothing but the economy affects crime in a major way.

    4. Re:Reminds me of New York by neocon · · Score: 2

      Actually no -- crime in New York during the Giuliani years dropped at a substantially higher rate than in the nation as a whole, at a time when other Northeastern cities such as Boston saw slight increases in the crime rate.

      Quality of life enforcement was one of the two main components of this drop, the other was the Compstat program of tracking crims statistics on a precinct-by-precinct basis and transferring cops as needed to focus enforcement on emerging high-crime areas.

    5. Re:Reminds me of New York by wytcld · · Score: 2

      The jaywalking thing lasted for about a week. First off, it turned out the law only provided a $3 fine; second, the police felt ridiculous enforcing it. The citizens never stopped jaywalking, didn't even let up.

      --
      "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    6. Re:Reminds me of New York by neocon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm going to make a wild guess here -- you don't live in New York at all, right?

      If you do, you must not get off campus much, eh?

      You've just presented a remarkably inaccurate picture of the police program which turned New York around, and had already improved relations between police and communities (including minority communities) long before 9/11.

      See, `the minorities' aren't any different than the rest of us. Everyone wants to be safe in their home and neighborhood. By having the police fight crime in minority neighborhoods as well as rich neighborhoods, instead of just giving up on areas like East Harlem and Bed-Stuy, Giuliani did more for police-community relations than any of the hundreds of `outreach programs' ever had.

    7. Re:Reminds me of New York by funkdoctorspock · · Score: 1

      Kind of right ... Guiliani promoted Howard Safir, then police commissioner and former Federal Marshall, to seriously crack down -- the police ticketed people for jumping turnstiles (everybody jaywalks -- few people jump turnstiles ... anymore) with the theory that if someone had misdemeanors or bench warrants or had cold jumped bail, they would prone to jumping turnstiles.
      These activities rearly inconvenience law abiding citizens. It has alot more to do with "criminal character" than broken windows. Broken windows more or less argues for maintaining a "visual status quo" where people who debate performing criminal activities won't if there is no "encouragement."
      Shit -- look at NY -- back in the 80s when the trains were all bombed out with graffiti, crime was huge -- nobody gave a fuck! Look at litter in NY -- so many people litter as the streets are dirty and there is litter there to begin with ....

    8. Re:Reminds me of New York by dcmeserve · · Score: 1

      > ... the one thing I remembered from my old criminal law classes (before I ditched law) - the likelyhood of getting caught for a crime is a far greater deterance than the punishment of a crime.

      Hum, if this is true, that would put a serious dent in the death-penalty-as-deterrant argument, wouldn't it?

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    9. Re:Reminds me of New York by jbolden · · Score: 2

      Very little evidence argues the death-penalty-as-deterrant to people not in jail. In jail it seems work as an effective threat (i.e. for additional cooperation).

      In any case the main advantage of the death penalty is that it drastically reduces fear of crime among the population which creates behaviors (like being on the street) which do in fact reduce crime.

    10. Re:Reminds me of New York by I_redwolf · · Score: 1

      I was arrested and put into jail for a night infront of my house for telling an officer to "get off of my property". No exagerrations, no lies, no stretches of the truth; none of that. He came to talk to the chick upstairs, making my life miserable. Maybe this has only made me see the bad in cops. The most fucked up thing about it though is that I found out an officer of the law can throw you into jail for anything if they want, it's just that a large number of them don't like paper work. Silly shit like parking too close to a curb etc etc.

    11. Re:Reminds me of New York by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Odds are, it would do more good in the long run by nipping these "small time" crooks in the bud before they ever become "big time".

      One forgets that jails are but educational institutions and gatherings for criminals. It is much more likely (IMHO) that the crime "goes away" because now the criminal has been caught he spends much more time staying covert rather than risk the punishment again. Because even idiots can learn new and improved ways to be idiots.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    12. Re:Reminds me of New York by shepd · · Score: 1

      A handy guide I've reccomended before that you might want to read for next time (if you're that unlucky, that is)! Of course, it's probably highly inaccurate, but I'm sure it'll get you reading up on what your rights really are.

      Did you let the officer in? In that case you gave him warrant to do what he asked. If you stop him (such as by telling him to leave) you're now guilty of obstruction of justice.

      The answer? Never talk to an officer unless you can be sufficiently vague as to extract from them their true intent. If they poke and prod you into speaking, tell them you'd rather have a lawyer present. Unless you think you can weasel your way out of a traffic ticket, that is. ;-)

      But hey, if you can't think of anything better at the time, remember this:

      If you can't beat them, you should at least try to piss them off.

      On second thought, don't do that.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    13. Re:Reminds me of New York by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      I'm going to make a wild guess here -- you're not a minority, right?

      If you are, you must not get out of Queens much, eh? :)

    14. Re:Reminds me of New York by neocon · · Score: 2

      You're making the same mistake the previous poster did -- pretending that `the minorities' are a block who all think the same, and necessarily have the same views.

      It used to be well understood that to say you could tell someone's opinions by looking at his skin color was a form of racism. Just because we now call that view `diversity' doesn't make it any less racist.

  92. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want your asshole anywhere *near* my eyes.

  93. Hum-de-dum... by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    Connect failed

    Your request for http://www.remodern.com/caught.html could not be fulfilled, because the connection to www.remodern.com (63.111.83.1) could not be established.

    This is often a temporary failure, so you might just try again.

    So this cached post, which only drew my attention because of your highly moderated post, is the only way I was able to read the story. Granted, people should check to see if someone else has mirrored it first, but it still is useful.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  94. How about this... by SoSueMe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't send the power supply for the laptop.
    That way, "Battery not included".

    1. Re:How about this... by drive · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      haha, that made me laugh. pretty good idea

    2. Re:How about this... by drive · · Score: 1

      flamebait? moderators... why do you waste your points?

  95. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by kliment · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's a difference between an asshole and a criminal, though.

    Yes, a criminal is someone who shares music, or watches DVDs on a non-microsoft system

  96. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd hit it! Mmmm, Salma.

  97. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by stretch0611 · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think only about 5% of the people are Assholes, 93% are just morons that don't know any better. It makes it tough on the remaining 2%, but we lose all hope if we stoop to their level.

    --
    Looking for a job?
    Want your resume written professionally?
    DON'T USE TUNAREZ!!!
  98. Re:[ Cached Version ] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I really did expect to be modded down

    So did he, as you ever-so-cleverly pointed out.

    If you can demonstrate why I give a shit about my karma, after being at the cap for over a year

    Like the fact that you're bragging about being at the cap? Get a clue. Everyone who isn't a complete knuckle-dragger is at the cap.

  99. IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The stupid one is YOU!

  100. 20% huh? by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

    You're one of those people who think the glass is half full, arn't you?

    KFG

    1. Re:20% huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Optimist: the glass is half-full.


      Pessimist: the glass is half-empty.


      Engineer: the glass is twice the size it needs to be.

    2. Re:20% huh? by drmofe · · Score: 1

      In Glasgow: Who the **** spilled my beer??

    3. Re:20% huh? by Edmund · · Score: 1

      No no no, that's management. :) Remember, engineers account for tolerances and usually design things with a good safety margin.

      Engineer: the glass allows for a tipping angle below or equivalent to the inverse tangent of the quotient of the the glass' height and its width. :)

      - Ed.

    4. Re:20% huh? by hplasm · · Score: 1
      No no no, that's management. :) Remember, engineers account for tolerances and usually design things with a good safety margin. Engineer: the glass allows for a tipping angle below or equivalent to the inverse tangent of the quotient of the the glass' height and its width. :)

      Oi! Top this right up and give me a straw!

      And you can stop it with the lame excuses! Bloody half-measures!

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    5. Re:20% huh? by waspleg · · Score: 2

      actually i just don't give a fuck about slashdots many and varied totally-worthless-to-me features.. i support what the eff itself does..

  101. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've become convinced that 20% of the population is made of Assholes that can be trusted only as far as they can be shot.

    The 20% Rule: Any individual who proclaims that 20% or more of the population are a**holes immediately qualifies as...an a**hole.

  102. Then again..... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ....if we legalized drug use we'd have a lot more users/addicts who would eventually become desperate enough to commit those very crimes so they could afford their new habits.

    So as result we'd have a rise in those types of crimes you think are currently being ignored.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:Then again..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, just like all those winos that commit crimes to by a 40oz of malt liquor.

      If drugs were legalized, they'd be much cheaper. The "War On Drugs" is effectively price protection for dealers.

    2. Re:Then again..... by sweetooth · · Score: 2

      You are assuming the parent poster was arguing the point of making all drugs legal. It's much more likely that he was refering to the legalization of pot since that was the drug mentioned earlier.

    3. Re:Then again..... by White+Roses · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Well, (a) casual users aren't the problem. And (b) studies have shown that whether or not drugs are legal, you'll have similar numbers of addicts. An addict is an addict. AA's 12 step program is just a replacement addiction, albiet a safer and more productive one. Besides, drug legislation has historically been used for property seizures for the government, rather than as any kind of real deterrent to drug usage, going back at least to the seizures of opium dens in San Fransisco in the 1800's.

      Most crimes committed in the name of drugs are to keep profitable turf and eliminate competition. Make no mistake, drugs are illegal in this country because it keeps wallets fat. Think what the Mafia would be if we never had the 18th Amendment.

      --
      Do not touch -Willie
    4. Re:Then again..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, it's just like the situation with beer and cigarettes. People are constantly breaking into my house to steal things they can sell to support their tobacco habit.

    5. Re:Then again..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we legalized drug use, you could get your drug of choice at the grocery store for a fraction of the street value because of economy of scale.

    6. Re:Then again..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, but many people pick butts up off the street for a smoke. Why steal?

      And yes, personally I have stolen a small amount of money from my parents to buy cigarettes. I'm not proud of this, but it happened. If heroin cost $1-2 a bag, you could easilly get the money by legal means.

    7. Re:Then again..... by rossifer · · Score: 1

      Except that the number of addicts has gone up (as a proportion of population) under prohibition. Take a look at Amsterdam now. The number of users per 100,000 population is identical to the US and the number of addicts is lower. All that with free clean needles, legal marijuana, and a much lower police presence and enforcement effort.

      One of the neat and interesting effects of prohibition is that by making the drugs scarce and much more costly, users are forced to use higher risk means of injesting the drugs to maximize the number of highs per unit of drug.

      The higher risk is of addiction and overdose. Crack will get you more highs than freebase which will get you more highs than snorting which will get you more highs than spiking your whiskey and the risk of addiction follows the same curve. The amount of THC in marijuana can be directly correlated with enforcement effort. The more the police crack down the stronger the pot gets. When the police settle back, so does the pot. Far be it from me to imply causation.

      If the real goal is of the war on some drugs is to reduce the number of users or addicts, the current effort is an abject failure and should be immediately abandoned as too embarassing for anyone to pretend it's doing any good.

      Luckily for some, the goal of the war on some drugs is actually to make certain that substantial police forces around the country (and world) have constant employment and legislators have regular excuses to pass more laws eroding your Constitutional rights (you did know that the 4th Amendment is all but gone WRT search and seizure?).

      Regards,
      Ross

  103. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by edbarrett · · Score: 1

    See, now there's a statement that's just begging for a goatse.cx link, but nooooooo...

  104. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by Boone^ · · Score: 2

    Always use Delivery Confirmation (preferably FedEx, the USPS is too vague since they only track to city/state/zip) so if a credit card Chargeback is issued on a PayPal/Billpoint payment you should be covered by Paypal/Billpoint.

    If you can't prove that it was delivered to the billing address of the credit card, you're out money.

  105. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by JVert · · Score: 3, Funny

    ./ Enhancement request:
    Anything with certain kewords (ex: "in soviet russia") gets automatic -1 karma.
    Yes I realize that includes this post right here.
    And I'm willing to take the bullet for my country!
    In slashdot we flame our own posts!!!

  106. Re:in case of /.ing... The menu by Xandar01 · · Score: 1

    What a beautiful menu of choice you have provided us. Thanks!

    --
    Life moves pretty fast; if you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it. -FB
  107. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by speedeep · · Score: 1

    Quit calling me Shirley!

  108. Re:[ Cached Version ] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The site is not performing fine. I hate your guts, you slimy pus-filled bloated gas bag. I wish you would instantly die a horrible violent death, you fucking karma whore.

    Oh, almost forgot...

    Cheers! :)

  109. Re:LAMER AWARD GOES TO YOU! by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

    You're new here, aren't you?

  110. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of the saying:

    Opinions are like assholes; everybody has one, but no one wants to look at the other guy's.
  111. Addresses were not the same... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Read the story, or just use common sense. If you are going to be passing fake checks you are probably NOT going to be shipping to your home address!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  112. Entrapment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He made an ad on Ebay for another mac, and sent it to the same guy. Then the police got involved, pretended to be a fedex guy and delivered it to his house. IANAL, but as soon as the police got involved, doesn't that become entrapment?

    1. Re:Entrapment? by freek_daddy · · Score: 1

      Nope. Cause a non-police guy set it up. No such thing as entrapment if it's done between private citizens (who aren't directly acting for the police).

    2. Re:Entrapment? by asmussen · · Score: 5, Informative

      This wouldn't have been entrapment even had the police been the ones offering the item for sale on Ebay to begin with. All that happened was that an opportunity was created for him to use one of his counterfeit checks. Nobody even had to suggest to him that he illegally pay for the item with a counterfeit check, and even if somebody were to suggest it to him, including the police, it would not neccessarily be entrapment. (See the above link) He wasn't even approached asking to legally buy the item. He initiated the transaction himself in response to a publicly posted auction, which although admittedly posted as bait, was nothing even remotely resembling entrapment.

      --
      Shawn Asmussen
  113. Re:[ Cached Version ] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a reason you couldn't have used the two cache links posted before this??

  114. Yeah Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on!
    No kidding!
    (Actually, this is a test)

  115. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by mochan_s · · Score: 1

    that's one less asshole to worry about. Only 1 billion to go!

    The world population is 6.3 billion. If 1 billion was 20% of the world population, then the world population should have been 5 billion. Inconsistency, in the original post.

  116. Funny quote about 23 pics of the house.. by cOdEgUru · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine the butthead sitting with his buddy drinkin beeeer outside on the porch (assuming its out in the middle of nowhere) watching black cars and vw minis go by with strange white folk staring out through tinted glasses with cameras in hand snapping pics like crazy :) ..

    Had to laugh..

    1. Re:Funny quote about 23 pics of the house.. by Reziac · · Score: 2

      ...with the circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one telling what each one was, to be used as evidence...

      Hey, he even got the holiday right! :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  117. Re:Awfully dangerous - Already happened by Havokmon · · Score: 2
    Just wait.. Withen a few years somebodys going to get killed because the police sat on their hands and a frustrated victim did their footwork and blows the person who scammed them away.

    Not quite what you're referring to, but an example of what happens when 'authorities' don't do their jobs is here.

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  118. Re:Newsflash! Interesting story posted on /.! by RealSurreal · · Score: 1

    You'll love this then. Except of course being a Linux guy you'll have read it years ago.

  119. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by Golias · · Score: 2
    My own observation has been this:

    90% of the people in the world are complete idiots, and everybody thinks they are part of the other 10%.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  120. Your logic is faulty by PaxTech · · Score: 4, Offtopic
    if drugs were legal they wouldn't cost NEARLY what they do on the black market. Most of that markup is to cover the risks. If heroin was legal, most addicts would be able to afford it by working at McDonald's.

    I think possibly my biggest pet peeve is when people cite the negative effects of prohibition as a reason to keep drugs illegal.

    --
    All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    1. Re:Your logic is faulty by krlynch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not to be contrary or anything, but do you have references to any studies that show this? I imagine that this conclusion is NOT true. My reasoning is the following: pricing on addictive substances is generally highly inelastic (that is, demand and price are only weakly coupled). That is, producers can demand just about any price they want, and the users will continue to pay that high price. The same is true of many currently LEGAL addictive substances: alcohol, tobacco, gasoline, heating oil, food, etc (okay, I admit that I'm using "addictive" a bit loosely here). The demand for these substances has little to do with the current price (when the price of gasoline rises 50%, for instance, you don't drive substantially less ... you suck it up and pay the high price), and the current price has little to do with current end user demand. I don't see any reason that legalization of a currently illegal addictive substance would drive its price down. Nor do I see that driving down the price would greatly increase the number of users (the demand). I know that I, for instance, wouldn't run out and start to ingest cocaine or marijuana if it was suddenly legal...

      Please throw me some links if I'm wrong though; I'm quite curious if there is information contrary to my reasoning.

    2. Re:Your logic is faulty by PissingInTheWind · · Score: 2

      if you've ever done a basic microeconomy class you would know that it is probably true. Risk reduce offer, which make the price increase. No risk would probably means price would go down, but the consumption won't go up since demand is inelastical [sp?] in the case of recreative drugs. The phenomenon you describe ("sucking it up") is exactly that, inelasticity.

      sorry if I don't make much sense, I feel my English vocabulary about economics quite lacking.

      --

      A message from the system administrator: 'I've upped my priority. Now up yours.'
    3. Re:Your logic is faulty by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Look at Crack.

      It's cheap, easy to produce and distribute.

      A cheap and easy to make and distribute drug has lead to many many addicts and make petty crimes to get the money for a 10 dollar rock.

      Crank is similar, easy to produce, easy to move, and easy to cause nasty addictions.

      Why are there crimes associated with cheap drugs? Cause a frickin' junkie can't keep a job.

    4. Re:Your logic is faulty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly off the wall (certainly off-topic), but if drugs (any currently illegal drugs) were legalized, don't you think they would be prescription drugs, rather than over-the-counter, or unregulated? If so, is it reasonable to assume that the cost will go down, rather than up?

    5. Re:Your logic is faulty by egburr · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What you say would be true if "supply and demand" were the only force operating there. Competition has a huge effect, too.

      For your example about gasoline prices, the prices are directly affected by supply at the origin, but not much by demand at the end consumer. Most gas stations in an area are within a few cents of each other, because they are all maintaining prices as low as they can while still making a slight profit. Why? Competition. They don't get a lot of choice in the price, because (1) they do not determine the price they buy at, and (2) they have lots of competition.

      For drugs, the street dealers also generally do not determine the price they buy it at, but they do determine the competition (or lack thereof). In an area with a large organized group of dealers, how long does an upstart independent competitive dealer survive? What happens when two competitive dealers (or organizations of dealers) lay claim to an area? Lower prices or physical violence?

      Legalizing drugs may not be the complete solution, but it would go a long way towards lowering prices. When every gas station and grocrey store and drug store has a recreational drug counter, the competition will drive prices down to the point that the retailers are just barely making a profit. Also, a minimum quality of product will be assured. Taxes will be collected. The economy will benefit. (OK, so maybe I'm going a bit overboard there.)

      The people who can't handle their addiction will at least be able to get more for a lower price, and maybe overdose themselves out of existence. In the long term, that should cut down on the theft needed to maintain habits.

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    6. Re:Your logic is faulty by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      Alcohol pricing is pretty much rock bottom when you factor in bottling, distribution, etc. Have you ever brewed your own? The money you save is nice, but really it's all about control. Prices charged at bars is a different, and obvious, story.

      Tobacco is heavily sin-taxed in the US. You can buy cigs for dirt-cheap in Mexico.

      Gasoline is a PITA to dig up the raw materials for, let alone processing and shipping and eco-issues and all that. It's surprising it's as inexpensive as it is in The States at least. Go so far as Mexico to see a bit different, and probably more reasonable, market.

      Heating oil, food, etc. ? You're talking about basic capitalism here. Would you imagine that these things could be sold for any cheaper than they already are? I can walk out the door and buy pounds of chicken for just a few dollars. How much better do you want it? :)

      As for the drogas, almost all of the drugs that people want are easy to grow and distribute. The pricing for them, if legalized, would drop through the floor. It's simple economics. Marijuana is a weed, you can't _stop_ growing it unless you take drastic measures. Poppys for opium, etc. C'mon, we're talking basic industrial infrastructure to start cranking out kilos of quality, and most importantly, clean opioid products. LSD, meth, etc are all easily manufactured by relative idiots these days, how can you possibly think that they would be expensive to mass-produce?

      Think about it. The _only_ reason these things are so expensive is because of the black market aspect. It's as easy to grow quality bud as tomatoes, and we grow tomatoes by putting them in a planter and occasionally watering them. Why would anyone pay more than a buck or two for a pack of joints?

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    7. Re:Your logic is faulty by swv3752 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Check out the price of caffein. Caffein is more addictive than cocain, though the two used to be mixed together. The difference is that the effects are milder and the withdrawal is not as bad. the majority of headaches that people experience in the US and other Western countries are actually from caffein withdrawal.

      Anyways the price of caffein, or coffee, tea, and cola if you will, is kept in check by competition. Alcohol is also kept in check because there is competition. Oil is not a fair comparison as that is held mostly by a Cartel- OPEC anyone?

      Make it legal but controlled and most of the crimes associated with it would disappear. Just not overnight.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    8. Re:Your logic is faulty by chazbot · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely right. Wouldn't this be a great world if everyone could afford to buy heroin? There would be so many people in rehab that the burger flippers could afford that too.

    9. Re:Your logic is faulty by KaptajnKold · · Score: 1

      Check out the price of caffein. Caffein is more addictive than cocain

      Where do you get that?! Cocain is one of the most addictive drugs there is. Even though heroin is more physiquely addictive, cocain is worse because you can get psychologicaly addicted (I hope I'm using the right terms, though propably I'm not) from trying it just once. A person who has just one cup of coffee or even ten cups would, I imagine, not have a lot of trouble shaking the habbit.

      Caffeine more addictive than cocain? Puh-lease!

    10. Re:Your logic is faulty by N8w8 · · Score: 1

      I don't know how much marihuana costs in the US, but here in The Netherlands you can get 1 gram of weed for 5 euro. If the dealers charge you too much, no problem, you can always grow it yourself. Each adult can have 4 plants.
      With seed we got from friends for free, my sister and I put 10 (yes, a bit more than allowed :) pot plants in the front garden in a season.

      Though we only smoked once a month or so, and in the summer holidays about twice a week, we were able to smoke pot from it for 1,5 years (even though after a year it didn't taste as good as before :).

      So you don't have to be robbing people or buying Macs with counterfeit money to pay for your marihuana use. It's far cheaper than getting drunk. Apart from a few braincells, pot doesn't cost us anything at all.

    11. Re:Your logic is faulty by swv3752 · · Score: 2

      Addiction to cocain is more severe than caffein, I will grant you. But the ease of addiction to caffein is far greater.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    12. Re:Your logic is faulty by mosch · · Score: 2
      Well, let's take a drug that's available legally and otherwise: oxycontin.

      Oxycontin is available on the street, for prices ranging between $0.50 and $1.00 per milligram. By prescription it costs approximately $0.10 per milligram (at the retail level).

      That's a 5 to 10 fold increase in price, due to legality right there. And that's with a product that currently has a high markup due to there being no generic equivalent. Thus, a bag of heroin, if legalized, should be available for significantly under $2 (bags are currently $10 in major metropolitan areas)

    13. Re:Your logic is faulty by mosch · · Score: 2

      What he said is indeed true. Caffeine is more addictive than cocaine, gram for gram. As for cocaine making a person addicted after a single use, you've been DARE educated. It's addictive, but it's not that addictive, unless you're defining 'single use' to mean 'monthlong binge'.

    14. Re:Your logic is faulty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The street price of cocaine is approximately 500 times the cost of pharmaceutical cocaine. Some basic websearching can probably provide you with information regarding other drugs such as heroin.

    15. Re:Your logic is faulty by jred · · Score: 2

      Yeah, $10 is pretty cheap. The only problem is it lasts like, what, 10 minutes? "I have a friend" who smokes every day, and if he tried, he might smoke $10 worth of pot in a week. Granted, some people smoke more, some less, and some pot is more (much) expensive.

      Not to mention pot isn't addictive in the same manner as crack, crank, or heroin (are crank & h the same thing?). I have lots of friends who have quit pot for one reason or another (usually drug-testing/probation), and they might have been a little bitchy for a while, but they certainly weren't robbing ppl to get cash.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    16. Re:Your logic is faulty by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      Physchological addiction can be said for anything. You can be "addicted" in this way to getting out a certain side of bed each day, turning on a television set when you get home, sex (not generally a problem on /.), checking /. every two hours or just about any pleasurable activity

      It's hardly a reason to ban it. Hmm, people enjoy rollercoasters. They might get addicted to them...BAN 'EM! THINK OF THE CHILDREN!

    17. Re:Your logic is faulty by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      It's far cheaper than getting drunk. Apart from a few braincells, pot doesn't cost us anything at all.

      That just pisses me off, all the anti-drugs lies. Pot doesn't cause brain damage whatsoever. Getting drunk regularly can cause brain damage

      Research also show that the "memory loss" is only short term. "What was I talking about?", that sort of thing. Again, similar effects exist in alcohol. "I got so drunk last night, I can't remember half of what I did"

      Don't get me started of alcohol versus weed in a) teenage pregnacy, b) rape, c) violent assaults & murders, d) marital breakdowns. I could go on, but I got high...(another bull anti-drugs message)

    18. Re:Your logic is faulty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that the effects are milder and the withdrawal is not as bad.

      A gram of cocaine will get you high. A gram of pure caffine will kill you.

    19. Re:Your logic is faulty by rossifer · · Score: 1

      crank is methamphetamines (think super strong diet pills or ritalin which we soak unruly children with), while heroin is a narcotic in the same family with morphine and coedine.

      Regards,
      Ross

    20. Re:Your logic is faulty by shilly · · Score: 1

      In the late 1960s, UK doctors could prescribe heroin to addicts. At that time, there were about 500 such addicts in the whole of the UK. Following pressure from the US government, the prescription of heroin on the NHS was banned. As a result, addicts turned to street dealers for their supplies. The supplies became dirty (cut with paracetamol, drain cleaner, sand, sugar, starch, powdered milk, talcum powder, coffee, brick dust, cement dust, gravy powder, face powder or curry powder), and the suppliers got stinking rich. And demand? Today, the UK government estimates there may be as many as 1,000 times as many addicts! How about that for an effective policy?
      And here's a really dirty little secret: do you know what heroin's side-effect profile is? Possible nausea, possible constipation, possible addiction and (rarely, and only if huge overdoses are taken) respiratory failure. Paracetamol, which is considered safe enough to be sold OTC, is a more dangerous drug to overdose on -- it causes liver failure. So why do so many people die of taking heroin? Because the heroin is cut with impurities, needles are re-used and shared, and because dosages aren't consistent from batch to batch. None of those problems would exist with if doctors could prescribe heroin.

    21. Re:Your logic is faulty by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2
      I seriously doubt that anyone addicted to heroin would be reliable enough and in any shape to hold down a steady job, even at McDonalds. Drug addiction makes for very habit-expensive, non-productive citizens that rely on the generosity (or the theft) of others for survival. That's not something I want to encourage or promote.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    22. Re:Your logic is faulty by PaxTech · · Score: 1
      Ah, so let's make it illegal, that'll solve all our problems right? In fact, let's take all the heroin addicts and lock them up at the taxpayer's expense. That's what they get for being non-productive.

      As far as relying on generosity or theft, what do you think they're living on in PRISON?!? Yes, YOUR tax dollars.

      Prohibition isn't working. Can we PLEASE try something else? If it doesn't work it won't be hard to make it all illegal again you know..

      Yeah, I know I'm off topic. Like I care.

      --
      All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    23. Re:Your logic is faulty by KaptajnKold · · Score: 1

      I am not talking about what I (in lack of the correct medical term) call physological addictiveness of neither of these drugs. In terms of that cocain, I grant you, is not so scary.

      But the fact is that because of the overwhelming feelings of joy you feel when you use cocain for the first time (you actually feel like a much, much better version of yourself) It is very hard to resist the temptation to try it again.

      Of course you may not be addicted after trying it just once, and there are propably lots of people who have tried it just that one time. But cocain has something in terms of temptation going for it, that for examble heroin has not. It has been pointed out that taken under medical supervision, one can survive and even function in a normal life with a heroin habbit. But coke beats that. Coke let's people fuction twice as good as they would without the drug! Everything is better on coke.

      The reason coke is considered more addictive even than heroin is that of all the drugs you decide to try out "only once", it is the one that has the highest propability of becoming an addiction.

  121. SHHH!!! by ez76 · · Score: 4, Funny
    If you get ripped, just follow the signal or keep track of where it last vanished (perhaps it went into a basement where it couldn't be tracked any further). Meet the crook at his/her door with a .45.
    How many times do I have to tell you people?

    The first rule of GPS-based loss recovery retribution fight club is:

    You don't talk about GPS-based loss recovery retribution fight club!
  122. If you're going to be dishonest anyway... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    He said:

    I hoped that somebody who worked for Nextel, some fellow Mac addict like myself, might be willing to bend the rules a little

    In other words, he was counting on Mac users working at Nextel to be amoral and reveal customer information based on this guy's story. (How would the "Mac Users at Nextel" know that this guy wasn't trying to hunt the buyer down for some other reason?)

    I printed this out, highlighted this with a yellow highlighter, and dropped it into the mail to Nextel HQ. (Nobody reads email, so all serious complaints I send US mail or FED-EX). I'm hoping that Nextel will fire all the Mac user employees who got involved in this.

    So back to my point--if he's going to be dishonest anyway, like asking Nextel employees to give him sensitive information, I'm surprised he didn't just lie to the FBI--like saying that this guy emailed kiddie porn to his daughter--just to get him picked up. After all, to these dishonest "Mac Users", nothing matters except the promotion of Macintoshes.

    1. Re:If you're going to be dishonest anyway... by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1

      This is one of the best points in this whole thread, even though I think you sound a little wacky.

  123. As Homer Simpson says... by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

    "Thank God for those PAGANS"

  124. Modern Art by phyzik · · Score: 1

    Why is he an artist? Did he express himself in a new way?

    And if you catch an artist whose art is generally annoying to me, i would probably want to hit him with a bat as well.

  125. This has nothing to do with Mac's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry to burst your bubble but any decent group of people would have helped this guy out. And the Mac BBS people really didn't do much anyways, take a few pictures, big deal. Dell zealots would have certainly done the same thing.

    Why do Mac users think they are so special? What is it about these Macs that makes people so disallusioned?

    What. Ever.

    1. Re:This has nothing to do with Mac's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the first time in my life I have ever heard the phrase "Dell Zealot".

      I'm still waiting to hear "Gateway Zealot", "Hewlett Packard Addict", "E-machine Fanatic", or "Compaq Afficianado".

  126. Re:[ Cached Version ] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then why did you post +1?

    Your whole statement was trying to get more karma or avoid losing it. Seems like you give something about it. Looking at your posts and the age of your account, it seems that you are a semi-troll.

    You have been at the cap for only a year or so on an account that is over 3 years old?

  127. So what did the criminal do wrong? by airrage · · Score: 2

    Okay, I think we've hammered this guy for making a few minor mistakes, but what if anything did the criminal do wrong (in his MO -- not his legality)?

    I would suggest the following:

    a) PO BOX, physical address is a dead giveaway.
    b) Throw-away hotmail/yahoo account.
    c) Complete arsenal of fake documents.
    d) Reverse the scam, don't buy stuff sell it and just have to launder the money.

    I guess there's probably something I've missed ...

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
  128. In soviet russia... by carpe_noctem · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Scam artists track down you!

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
  129. The biggest scam yet... by polv0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This could all be a hoax, meanwhile people are reading the article and sending money to his girlfriend's Paypal account. Some of the things that struck me:

    We are set up to empathize with him:
    I almost always buy used, so don't get any ideas about me being rich.

    In case you didn't feel bad enough yet:
    I was already beyond broke, but I figured $85.00 more wouldn't kill me.

    Are you heartless???:
    all of your student loans for the next semester are going to cover this counterfeit check.

    He'd give to charity if he had money:
    I urge you to choose a local charity

    Make the check payable to:
    If you really must, you can send money to my girlfriend's Paypal account, cranberry_coyote@hotmail.com

    So now who's the sucker?

    1. Re:The biggest scam yet... by JVert · · Score: 1

      Incredible timing...
      I dont know if I should consider you a friend or an enemy...

    2. Re:The biggest scam yet... by polv0 · · Score: 1

      I called the Markham Police department's phone number, and got a Sargent Knapp's voice mail, so that checks out. However, it doesn't mean the author didn't just look this guy up to add more credibility to the story.

    3. Re:The biggest scam yet... by alfonsog · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Pretty obvious scam. And btw , not very well written for second time around college student, a wannabe "history teacher".

    4. Re:The biggest scam yet... by craw · · Score: 1

      Check this person out. Not bad for a six digit id /.er.:-).

    5. Re:The biggest scam yet... by Eamon+C · · Score: 1

      Clearly, you know nothing about education majors or the state of public high schools in this country.

    6. Re:The biggest scam yet... by alnjmshntr · · Score: 1

      have to agree with you.

      why does he need the money? surely its the charities that lost out here, not him, since he was going to donate the proceeds to charities (yeah right). so donate to a charity if you feel sorry for him.

      --
      If I had created the world I wouldn't have messed about with butterflies and daffodils. I would have started with lasers
  130. What if its still a scam? by JVert · · Score: 1

    What if we are all being scammed right now?
    Scam alerts:
    1. Playing on emotions
    2. Focused towards a specific audience (Mac users,^H^H^H^H^H^H obsessive mac users)
    3. Makes you feel sorry but doesn't ask for anything.
    4. Used the word 'charity' in his message (BIG RED FLAG!!!)
    5. Undergoing hardship (school, tuition, numerous refferences to that, off topic if you ask me...)
    6. Undeniable plausability, common places (ebay), direct evidence (photos of 'someones' house).

    You now assume that you could give this truely deserving person $3,000 and he would use it all to pay for school and give the rest to 'charity'.

    Nah I truely dont belive its a scam, but it would be funny, and I wouldn't send any money his way though. That dell remark made sure of that!

  131. this is funny mod up!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just because it has windows in the subject doesn't mean it can't be modded up.

  132. Wait At Least 10 Business Days to Be More Sure... by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 5, Informative

    The check *appeared* to clear. Many people figure that once the deposited funds are made available in their account - typically one or two business days, that the money is theirs...

    The problem is that a deposited check, etc can be canceled or not honored for upwards of 10 business days. So for one to be virtually sure that a check, etc is "good", they need to wait at least 10 business days (2+ weeks)...most folks don't wait that long, but they should or they run the risk of being scammed.

    Also, even if the check itself is real (lets not even get into forged cashier checks, etc - even a well seasoned banker would have difficulty detecting some forgeries), the account it's associated with may not be and/or lacking any funds.

    Bottom line is that waiting for clearing is critical...below is my understanding/experience with these things...not the gospel...

    Common payment methods and clearing/dispute time frames:

    Wire: Same day and very safe...they're not without risk though, but problems are rare. Some places that accept wires for payment impose a two day waiting period.

    Check: 10 business days for personal/business checks. Cashier checks, etc have much shorter clearing times - BUT that assumes they're real...if unsure/concerned, then one should wait 10 business days as with personal checks.

    Money Order: At least 10 business days if forged. It's best to wait, then be sorry if unsure.

    Direct deposit (ACH): 2 business days. Can be reversed/disputed for upwards of 60 days.

    Credit Card: Varies on circumstances and issurer, but can be reversed for upwards of six months later.

    The law and procedures are very complicated and full of exceptions, etc...the bank, acting an agent, must make deposited funds available within a short period time as dictated by law/banking procedures...but the point is one should NOT assume just because their bank says funds are available that the funds are truly theirs...because they may not be :-(

    Ron Bennett

  133. It seems the site is down! Here's the text ;) by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

    Mac Addicts to the Rescue

    or

    How I Caught a Counterfeiter with a Little Help from my Friends

    a true story by Jason Eric Smith

    in the interest of getting this out, no fancy layout, just hand coding. maybe i'll spruce it up later.
    the names of the innocent have been changed, the names of the guilty though...

    I am a college student (my second time around). Specifically, I'm studying to become a high school history teacher. I am a student with a lifelong habit though, Macintosh. I got my first Mac in 1986, a used Mac Plus with 1 megabyte of RAM a massive 40 megabyte external hardrive. Since then, I've always had to keep up, first it was the SE, then the IIsi, the Powerbook 140, and from there on, more Macs than you can shake a stick at (I missed the Mac TV). I usually keep my Mac for about 6 months, and then resell it and move up. I almost always buy used, so don't get any ideas about me being rich.

    Since I went back to being a student again, I've been selling Macs more regularly, picking up good deals on used Macs locally and then reselling on eBay. I've been doing this for about two years now, its relatively easy, takes about an extra hour of my day, and usually pays the rent. In November when the new Powerbooks came out I decided I was going to buy one for myself, to keep, an early Christmas present that would come in handy for taking notes in class and finishing up a presentation I needed to do on the New Orleans school system. The day they were announced I ordered a nice new Powerbook G4 867 and found it on my doorstep only a few days later.

    It was a beautiful machine, if you've never played with one in person, you won't believe it. I played with it for a couple of days, took it to school to take notes and do research on. The more I used it, the more I loved it. But, it was just too much to be carrying around, $2300 in my backpack had a tendency to make me a little nervous. I decided maybe I should turn it around and pick up an iBook. My girlfriend and I decided we would use the extra money to donate to some charities for Christmas. So on November 19th, up on eBay it went, along with an Airport Basestation and a bunch of other knickknacks. I set a buy-it-now price on a whim for $2950.

    The next morning I checked my auction, a couple of bids placed, and so the buy-it-now option was gone. Checking my email I got a couple of questions about the computer and much to my surprise, an offer to buy it for $2900 from Steve Matthews, a dad with a lucky son in college who was going to be getting a Powerbook for his birthday. Steve wanted to pay for it COD, no problem, its actually how I usually sell things. I called him on the phone number he gave me to ask a couple of questions and make sure everything was on the up and up.

    He reiterated that he was buying it as a last minute present for his son and since it was already setup as a package, he thought it was a good deal. Not to mention the Chicago Apple stores were still out of stock. I got home from school, packed up my Powerbook and accessories, and off they went Fedex overnight to Chicago, never to be seen again.

    At 10:21AM on November 21st, a man going by the name of Paul Smith signed for my two packages and gave the driver an official cashier's check from LaSalle Bank for $3052.78 in return. The check made it back to my doorstep the next morning. I went to the bank, deposited the check and withdrew enough to go ahead and pay my rent and pick up a couple of household items. I sent an email to Steve to make sure he got everything ok and to check that nothing had been damaged in shipping. No reply. As the old saying goes, no news is good news, right?

    My girlfriend and I went away for Thanksgiving, and when we got back on Friday, I had a message from my bank. The branch manager had called to let me know she had a returned item for $3052.78 and that my account was now in the negative. Seriously in the negative. No problem I thought, I'll just call Steve and see what's up.

    So I dialed the number I had. In the back of my mind I expected a "this number has been disconnected message". Instead I got an answer, the voice sounded identical to Steve, so I asked if Steve was there.

    "Oh, Steve, yeah, that's my cousin, he's out of town for Thanksgiving you know. He'll be back Tuesday"

    "Can I leave a message for him?"

    So I left my information and asked that he give me a call. That little voice in the back of my mind let out a sigh and an uh-oh. The voices were the same right? Was I being scammed? Well, if I was, I certainly wasn't going to let the weekend go by without doing a little investigating.

    I started off with the information I had. His AOL email address, his phone number, and the address I shipped the computer to. The AOL address didn't yield anything. Doing a reverse lookup on the address (thanks to Whitepages.com) I got three names and phone numbers, none of which matched anything I had. The phone number didn't give me anything. I finally found a way to lookup the exchange on the number to see if it was a cell phone or a landline (Fone Finder). It came back as Nextel and I wanted to scream.

    There really isn't anything you can do with a cell phone number. There are no directory services. The cell phone companies won't give out any information. And that's that. I called Nextel and pleaded with them. The customer service rep I spoke with seemed more confused than anything. He kept asking me what my Nextel phone number was and why I suspected someone was fraudulently billing to my account. I calmly explained at least three times that I was not a Nextel customer, that I was just trying to get an address for another customer I suspect has defrauded me, etc, etc. I finally gave up on Chris from Nextel, I've had customer service reps who don't even speak English who were more helpful.

    I was at a dead end. I'd just sent my $2300 laptop, my Airport basestation, and a load of stuff to somebody I didn't know and all I had to show for it was a bill from Fedex for overnight shipping and a returned cashier's check. It's hard to sleep comfortably knowing some asshole has your Mac and is doing god knows what with it.

    Sunday the first of December, I sprang into action full force. I called for help. I knew I wasn't going to get anywhere with this on my own, so I figured I might be able to get some help from some bulletin boards. I posted my tale of woe and call for assistance on every Mac bulletin board I could think of. I hoped that somebody who worked for Nextel, some fellow Mac addict like myself, might be willing to bend the rules a little. I wanted this guy's address and I wanted it bad. I was already pricing flights to Chicago and putting my professors on notice that I might have to miss a little class. I may have made an error in trusting this person, but I'm not someone you want to have that happen to. I will get you. I will hunt you down, and I will bring a baseball bat with me.

    I got more replies than I could keep up with. Everyone wanted to know what they could do to help or at least offer support. Well, everyone except one guy who just wanted to let me know how incredibly stupid he thought I was and that he would never have accepted a counterfeit anything. I think a 102:1 great person to asshole ratio is pretty good. Several people living in Chicago offered their assistance, be it in gathering information or even forming a tough guy squad if necessary.

    The most important reply I got was a pointer to an online PI service that does reverse lookups on cell phones. I was already beyond broke, but I figured $85.00 more wouldn't kill me. Twelve hours and $85.00 later, I had a name, an address, and a landline phone number for this guy. The name and his AOL email were eerily close, actually with a last name like Christmas, it would be pretty weird if it didn't match up. I couldn't believe it. A Chicago resident named Melvin Christmas had just ruined my Christmas. I was expecting William Faulkner to come popping out of the pantry at any moment and laugh at me.

    I was now ready to call the police. I called the Chicago police department and filed a report. I gave the operator all of my information, including the real name and address I had managed to get. "A detective will contact you within one to two weeks, thank you." One to two weeks?!? I had this guy, I'd done all the work already, all you had to do was go pick him up. I'd even gone ahead and called Fedex and spoken to the Chicago station manager and was assured that the driver would cooperate in identifying the guy if necessary. All they had to do was pick him up. In one to two weeks he could be gone. And all the while my precious Powerbook is sitting god knows where being used by somebody completely undeserving of a Mac. I know in my heart that Mr. Christmas is really a PC guy.

    I was furious. Chicago PD weren't going to do anything about this. If they were anything like the New Orleans PD, one to two weeks was likely to turn in to never. I figured I'd call Mr. Christmas myself. Let him know I was going to give him a chance to fix this, and I thought, maybe at least scare him. Let him know he was dealing with someone who would track him down no matter what, even if I had to make a deal with the Prince of Darkness to do it. Mr. Christmas said he didn't even know what email was. Obviously a PC user.

    I kept checking the message boards. Maybe someone would have a better idea. I called the local FBI field office. Agent Jones was very understanding, but let me know that even though this crossed state lines, the field office didn't take anything involving less than $5000. "Try the Chicago PD".

    I kept everyone on the Mac boards updated as best I could. On Tuesday I got a useful reply, try the Secret Service, counterfeiting is their jurisdiction. I made my way to the under-renovation Federal Building here in New Orleans. After walking many a dark, scary hallway, found myself at the door of Agent Keith Lopola. Keith came out and heard my case. I had brought copies of all the emails between myself and Steve Matthews/Paul Smith/Mr. Christmas, a copy of the check, and the call journal I had started keeping. Agent Lopola told me the same thing the FBI did, "It falls under our jurisdiction, but we can't take the case." He wanted to let me know that he really felt for me. Thanks. I left the office determined to call and bother him and the Chicago PD everyday for the rest of my life or at least until Mr. Christmas was behind bars.

    Finals were fast approaching. It's not very easy to concentrate on school when all you can think about all day is the fact that all of your student loans for the next semester are going to cover this counterfeit check. That and some grubby criminal has your Powerbook. It's enough to drive someone to the drink.

    Tuesday night I got an email from someone who had seen my story posted on O'Grady's Powerpage, a Powerbook enthusiast site. George Dunbar had seen the story and thought it sounded eerily similar to his. I called him, we compared notes, and turns out it was the same guy. George forwarded me all of his emails. Everything was the same, word for word, it was like Mr. Christmas just copied and pasted and magically made money. George was in it worse than I was though and had completely given up. He was out $6000 and two computers. He also let me know that there were more victims. He'd talked to at least three other people who had been taken by the same guy, all of whom had just given up. I was not going to give up. That night I dreamed of Mr. Christmas and a baseball bat, some duct tape, and roofing nails.

    Wednesday morning I decided I was going to Chicago. I set up another eBay auction under my girlfriend's account, this time for same computer, different city. Three hours later, lo and behold I received an email from eBay user videopro55 (the same one) asking me if I'd like to sell the computer right now for $2500. Oh yes, I'd love to sell the computer, I'll even be there when it gets delivered to make sure it gets "setup properly".

    He emailed me a new address and phone number, the phone number again traced back to the same address for Mr. Christmas. I called the Secret Service and the Chicago PD, pleading, all they had to do was be there when Fedex dropped off the package. It was a guaranteed hit, he'd have another counterfeit cashier's check, all you'd have to do is arrest him. Like shooting fish in a barrel. "Sorry, Detective McDonaugh will be out until next Wednesday, can I take a message?" Fine, if the cops won't do it, I decided I'd just Priceline a ticket and be waiting next door when it got dropped off. So I'd know what kind of neighborhood I was looking at, I asked for help again in the Mac boards. Two Chicago residents replied, and the next morning, courtesy of Tim, I had 23 pictures of the house, the cars in the driveway (with license plate numbers) and the neighborhood. I'd like to see a Dell user do something like that at 4:30 in the morning for a complete stranger a thousand miles away. I started planning my trip. I decided I'd leave on Saturday, have the package delivered on Monday, and make it back just in time to screw up on all my finals.

    On Friday in preparation for flying up I mapped the new address from the one for Mr. Christmas to see how close it was. As I looked at the map, it hit me. The new address wasn't in Chicago. It was in a suburb, Markham. I googled for the Markham police and 5 minutes later was talking to a very enthusiastic Sargeant Knapp. I had hit the jackpot, the new drop was outside of Chicago jurisdiction and therefore outside of their inattentiveness as well. Sargeant Knapp informed me he loved this kind of thing, even had a UPS and Fedex uniform ready. He'd call Fedex and they would set it up for Tuesday. I was certain I was dreaming. After talking to two detectives in Chicago, an FBI field agent, an agent in the New Orleans field office of the Secret Service, an agent with the L.A. Secret Service and having a conference call with a large group of agents from the Chicago Secret Service, I finally was getting somewhere. And I didn't even have to stand on someone's doorstep with a baseball bat to do it.

    I spent the entire weekend on pins and needles. What if Mr. Christmas figured something out between now and Tuesday? All would be lost. I wouldn't even get the chance to confront him on my own. On Monday I spoke with Sgt. Knapp to make sure everything was ready to go. I had sent him a package with all of my documentation (he didn't have email), and I tried to explain what all the email stuff meant as best I could. He had worked everything out with Fedex and they were set for the delivery on Tuesday.

    I called my brother in Nashville and had him send the package. I had set everything up to be coming from there so that Mr. Christmas wouldn't get suspicious. I could barely sleep Monday night. All I could think about was something going wrong and my only chance at getting this guy being missed. I wanted to update everyone on the Mac boards, but I had to keep it quiet until I knew something was going to happen.

    Tuesday afternoon Sgt. Knapp called. They had tried the delivery but no one was home. I just wanted to scream. The board users kept posting how the suspense was driving them nuts. Well, it was going to give me an aneurism. A million possibilities went through my head. Maybe he had somebody working at Fedex who tipped him off, maybe I worded something in one of my email a little off. Sgt. Knapp called me back to let me know they would try the delivery again tomorrow. He also wanted to let me know that they had intercepted another package that was being sent to the same address. Looks like he'd already struck again, thankfully the lady from New York will get her computer back. He also told me that he was definitely going to keep pursuing this, and that oddly enough, the address I'd given him was also related to another fraud case, but this one much bigger (hundreds of thousands) involving a certain Chicago franchise I won't mention. So maybe I had led them to something bigger than just some asshole counterfeiting cashier's checks.

    Today I had finals all day. I'm a 4.0 honors student. I've had a 4.0 all semester. I'm not sure if I'll keep that after today. I just couldn't sleep last night. All I could think about was Mr. Christmas and the delivery. I couldn't study either. So I winged it, I'll get my grades tomorrow. I called Sgt. Knapp at 2:45. He told me he was on his way back to the house. They'd already made the delivery and arrested the guy. He had more than $10,000 in counterfeit cashier's checks waiting for deliveries.

    *I* got him.

    I'm right now waiting on Sgt. Knapp to fax me a copy of his mug shot for posterity. Then I'm going to go celebrate. Sgt. Knapp said the guy was cooperating and he was going to try to recover my laptop. I'm hopeful, but I don't expect it. I might not ever get my computer back, but at least there is one less asshole on the street. When will criminals learn? You just shouldn't mess with Mac people.

    For everyone on all the boards who offered their help and encouragement, I thank you. This would have been a lot harder without you. If you're ever in New Orleans, look me up and I'll buy you a beer. I've still got to figure out how I'm paying to college next semester, but I'll keep some beer money set aside for ya'll.

    Oh yeah, and if there are any lawyers in the Chicago area who can file a civil suit against this guy for damages (yeah I know I'm not going to collect) please contact me, misterye a t yahoo d o t com

    The sites with great users that helped out (you can sign up for the forums and read all about this as it was going on):
    MacRumors.com
    MacNN
    ThinkSecret
    O'Grady's PowerPage

    Update 12/11/02 18:58 CST: Sgt. Knapp is sending me a copy of Mr. Christmas's mug shot. I'll post it as soon as I get it.

    Update 12/11/02 21:39 CST: For those interesting in getting in contact with me, my email address is misterye at yahoo dot com, if you think you were also a victim, please call me at 504-894-1243 and I'll put you in touch with the appropriate people.

    Update 12/11/02 23:36 CST: I've gone back through and added links where appropriate. I'll try to reformat this tomorrow.

    Update 12/12/02 10:36 CST: Ok, so how's this for small world: Apparently this thing is getting posted everywhere. I just got a call from Matt of the Real World Season 9 (the New Orleans Real World). So anyway, the cast of the New Orleans Real World used to all work at 735 Nightclub. I moved down here to actually take-over their marketing right after the show ended. So I never met Matt or any of them until speaking to him today. Small, weird world.

    Update 12/12/02 12:03 CST: I've added a forum where everyone can talk about this. Here it is.

    Update 12/12/02 13:30 CST: For those of you wanting to donate to my cause, I urge you to choose a local charity. There are a lot of needy people and organizations out there this season, if you can't think of anything local, I'm a big fan of Doctor's Without Borders and Lambda International. If you really must, you can send money to my girlfriend's Paypal account, cranberry_coyote@hotmail.com. She's the one who's covering this check for me right now, so I guess she should get this. I'm still not entirely sure about this, but you've insisted. Thanks again.

    Last update Thursday, December 12th 13:49 PM CST

    Copyright 2002 Jason Eric Smith

    1. Re:It seems the site is down! Here's the text ;) by chamenos · · Score: 1

      nice story, and congrats to the guy, but i did find the mac elitism a bit annoying. if he had approached me for help and i was able to help him, i wouldn't bother if he was a mac or pc user.

    2. Re:It seems the site is down! Here's the text ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe a Windoze use wouldn't...we all know how clueless a typical Windozer is. I suspect that Linux people, couched in the tradition of virtual beer, would be of great help to one another.

    3. Re:It seems the site is down! Here's the text ;) by chamenos · · Score: 1

      i'm a windows user, and i don't consider myself clueless. i don't use linux because the only things i use my computer for is browsing the internet, gaming, and reading slashdot. i would help someone else, whether he or she was a linux, windows, or mac user.

      elitism stinks.

    4. Re:It seems the site is down! Here's the text ;) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're a Windoze luser you're, by definition, a clueless idiot! Learn to think for yourself, and stop getting Billy Gates to make all your decisions for you! Get the fuck off my /.!

  134. This guy really has an IQ problem by eadint · · Score: 1

    I dont know how this guy can even get through school. 1) who in their right mind would cod a purchase of 3k
    2) counterfeiting is counterfitting. im not sure he made that clear to the police.
    3) i think he should be the one who goes to jail yea he got fraded but this guy is really stalker material.
    4) him and his ilk really give mac users a bad name
    5) i really really really hope that he flunks out of school, this is the last person i want my kids exposed to without me and a gun as protection.

    come on this guy is creepy. mail fraud is ilegal. what about ups and other things. this guy probably scred the authorities to the point of them probably wanting to investigate him.
    mac users are not like this. this guy isnt a mac user this guy is a phsycopath.

    to his girlfreind, run run far awway run as fast as possible. what do you think will happen when you piss him off. ever see the cell, this guy sounds like the real life thing.
    it will be you in a creepy room with macs , strange sexual devises a white dog. and you get the point

  135. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

    Just like "Opinions are like assholes, everybody's got one".
    Apologies to the cholostomy persons out there.

  136. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by saskboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    And if you live in Canada, you can neither send nor receive merchandise, and be covered by PayPal's seller protection, because Canadapost is not recognized as a shipper by PayPal.

    www.paypalsucks.com and if you use it for anything more than playmoney on the internet, you are a bafoon. PayPal is only for buyers with credit cards, not for sellers who are dumb enough to use it.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  137. There were funnier quotes than that... by Kafka_Canada · · Score: 2

    "I couldn't believe it. A Chicago resident named Melvin Christmas had just ruined my Christmas. I was expecting William Faulkner to come popping out of the pantry at any moment and laugh at me."

    "Mr. Christmas said he didn't even know what email was. Obviously a PC user."

    --
    Fuck it
    1. Re:There were funnier quotes than that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Mr. Christmas said he didn't even know what email was. Obviously a PC user."

      That's only funny because of the arrogant Mac user attitude ("I'm a special person! A sensitive artist, therefore better than everyone else!")

      That cold hard truth is, the people that buy Macs do so because computers are confusing to them - a Mac user is much less likely to know what email REALLY is. That's in general, not a blanket statement. God knows there are plenty of clueless PC users as well as knowledgeable Mac users.

      His holier-than-PC attitude really grates while reading his article - as if human kindness and compassion is somehow related to the computer you choose! What a self-righteous asshole.

    2. Re:There were funnier quotes than that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude.... take a chill pill

    3. Re:There were funnier quotes than that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah - how about the part where he said he was using macs since 86! i remember a sinking feeling, like i was trapped in mud, when i used a mac for the first time in 1984.

      when i got to the end of his article and saw the appeal for funds to a pay-pal account, i wondered if the whole thing was a troll.

    4. Re:There were funnier quotes than that... by Tim+Browse · · Score: 2
      "I couldn't believe it. A Chicago resident named Melvin Christmas had just ruined my Christmas."

      Well, for goodness' sake, why didn't he call Janie Porche? She saved Christmas!

      You'd think a Mac user would know that :-)

      Tim

      PS. But, by God, the smug "I'm a Mac user - aren't we the coolest?!" wank really annoyed me in that article. I know he probably didn't mean it like that and was just a bit of fun, but I've heard so many Mac zealots beat that tired drum so often that silly comments like "Try getting a Dell user to do that!" wind me up no end now. Oh well, breathe, breathe. At least I'm not out $3000 like the poor guy was - I'll let him off for that reason :-)

      PPS. But isn't it funny that the very people who noisily* claim that they 'Think Different' and are somehow better/more creative than anyone else who happens not to use a Mac are the very people demonstrating how foolish, prejudiced and intolerant they are? Hey ho.

      * I emphasise that part - there's plenty of people who use Macs who are actually creative, and don't bang on about how great they are because of the computer manufacturer they chose.

    5. Re:There were funnier quotes than that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but you're a dipshit........lol ;)

    6. Re:There were funnier quotes than that... by nbvb · · Score: 2

      #a) No, it isn't a troll. I watched this whole thing unfold over at the PowerPage (www.powerpage.org) .....

      #2) There's no "appeal". In fact, if you read it, he's quite resistant to the whole idea of giving him money. He pleaded to give it to some charities instead!

      A good man, in my book.

      --NBVB

    7. Re:There were funnier quotes than that... by scrod · · Score: 1

      I hope he keeps it up, if only to piss off more idiots like you.

  138. Repeat article, sort of? by Greedo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sounds a lot like this guy's story.

    Basically, stolen iBook has dynamic DNS and Timbuktu (VNC-like app) installed on it. Owner notes when stolen computer is logged into the net, runs Applescript to help track it, recovers it.

    I think I read about this on /. back in January.

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    1. Re:Repeat article, sort of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, it's not the same. He did not use the stolen item to track the thief. He used the 'Network of Brotherhood' in the Mac world to do surveilance, and to collect money for his girlfriend's bank account.

  139. I disagree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like totally disagree on the sharing assholes principle. I want my own asshole!!!

  140. Could you be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... any more of a loser to get this upset about a repost? NO, the site is NOT working fine (5:43 EST). Go waste your bile somewhere else.

  141. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by grungeman · · Score: 1

    Here's why there are 20% assholes on this planet. Thanks a lot.

    --

    Signature deleted by lameness filter.
  142. wtc2002.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I checked out your sig site. Lots 'o spelling errors (examples: stengthen and resepctively ).

  143. Re:[ Cached Version ] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You contributed nothing, and don't deserve to be modded up.

    Cheers!


    What's with the cheers? That's like saying "Eat horseshit, dumbass. Have a nice day."

  144. What a Dumbass by g_bit · · Score: 0, Troll

    Okay, sure I'll just ship ya that 3,000$ piece of equipment before your check clears, no problem.

    And he thinks PC users are stupid.

  145. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're a tool... he made a point and made it clear... stop being a stupid fag

  146. Who's the scammer here? by cybermace5 · · Score: 2, Troll

    I don't know why everyone here thinks this is SO COOL.

    This guy buys and sells laptops...ok.

    He buys ~$3000 laptop for himself, and then decides he doesn't want it. He sells it, C.O.D. for crying out loud, to someone with zero completed auctions.

    Oh wait, he sold it to this guy yet this guy still has no completed auctions? Yes folks, in the article, our Mac boy states that he sold the laptop to videopro55, who contacted him with an offer for $2900. That's outside of the eBay auction, and directly in violation of eBay policy to sell outside of auction. It's not fair to the people who placed bids (he said there were bids on it already) on the laptop...one of them won it, right? Where's their laptop they rightfully won?

    So in summary, we have a story of a guy doing triage work, because he went around eBay policy and essentially defrauded his own legitamate bidders. Remember, the auction is legally binding, and you agree to this when you sign up for an eBay account.

    I don't feel sorry for him. And notice how the Paypal donation fund is conveniently mentioned, along with how broke he is after the mean scammer guy took his laptop.

    --
    ...
    1. Re:Who's the scammer here? by tdrury · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are right that it is against eBay policy to sell off eBay - it's categorized as Fee Avoidance.
      This often occurs when you list one item on eBay and in the description you claim to have more that you are willing to sell. You are skirting the Listing Fee which is against eBay rules.

      However, you are allowed to cancel an auction at anytime - at _any_ time. It seems a little unfair but it does have legitimate uses. Often sellers will list an item locally (paper,signs,etc) as well as on eBay. If the item sells locally they can cancel the eBay auction by cancelling all bids then cancelling the auction (you must cancel the bids first or else the high bid at the time you cancel the auction does win the item).

      Remember - no bidder has won the auction until the auction ends. There is no contract until that time.

      Come and visit us on the Trust & Safety (Safe Harbor) boards. These sorts of issues get brought up daily.

      I am an eBay junkie.

    2. Re:Who's the scammer here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This posting shouldn't have been marked TROLL

      I, too, think the story is made-up, to bilk stupid mac people out of pay-pal donation dollars.

    3. Re:Who's the scammer here? by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 2
      Yes folks, in the article, our Mac boy states that he sold the laptop to videopro55, who contacted him with an offer for $2900. That's outside of the eBay auction, and directly in violation of eBay policy to sell outside of auction. It's not fair to the people who placed bids (he said there were bids on it already) on the laptop...one of them won it, right?

      I missed that part of it when I read the article. Yeah.... Just goes to show, like the old saying, "You can't cheat an honest man." Like the "419" scams; the people who bite on that think they're involved in smuggling, money laundering, getting a piece of money some third-world kleptocrat robbed from his starving people. What they think they're doing is something they know is illegal. It's hard to feel too sorry for them. (Still, someone does need to whack the scammers.)
  147. I had a similar experience with a Sony Clie by ssstraub · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I didn't use eBay. I used the Anandtech Forums. Kinda like a classified ad. Some guy swindled me out of the equivalent of $450 of PDA goodness and the authorities (Peoria, IL Police, FBI, etc) couldn't care less. Soon after I realized I was taken I found out that this guy had taken other people on other forums in the same way. Car stereos, computer parts, etc.

    There was much discussion and nothing happened for about 5 months. Then, out of the blue, I got a call from the scammer himself. It seemed that (Lucky for me!) someone convinced the Attorney General to take on the case and once he got the heat on this guy (we had his real address, obviously) the 23 year old kid made good on all his scams. I got my money and I read about other people getting theirs.

    I'm now of the opinion that the *only* way to catch people is if you can find others that they've ripped off and get a group effort rolling. The authorities simply do not care about single indiviuals.

  148. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, he's saying that one fifth of the population is nothing but pure, distilled asshole. This could very well be evenly distributed so that 20% of each person is asshole, but judging by a quick (1 sample) survey, I'd say that's not the case.

  149. This story seems fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The whole story seems fishy. The guy claims he was selling to laptop to buy a cheaper one and dontate the extra money to charity. Then he goes on to say how he had to use to cashier check money to pay his rent. And goes on and on about how broke he now was and how being so far in debt made him do poorly on his finals.

    Now if he was selling the laptop to get a smaller one and to donate the rest of the money to charity, then why was he relying on the selling of the laptop to pay his rent? How did it make him broke that he was scammed? Yes out a laptop, but how did that make him so broke he suffered in school.

    A laptop is a nice thing to have in college, but it is not neccessary. Yes it would suck to be scammed, but it shouldnt have made him miss meals etc.

    Either he was out of cash and needed to sell the laptop to pay other bills, or there is no way that this scam made him broke. And WTF did he have to even tell us about how he ws going to give money to charity? The whole story reeks.

    1. Re:This story seems fishy by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Plus the plane tickets.. don't forget the plane tickets.

    2. Re:This story seems fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have to agree. How could be out money for a laptop he already paid for? If anything he was getting money back that he had already spent. I don't see any mention of buying the laptop putting him in the hole to begin with.

    3. Re:This story seems fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes the story is internally inconsistent.

  150. Because it was a Mac? Uh, NO! by ssstraub · · Score: 1

    I had an experience similar to this with a Sony Clie PDA. I found out he scammed others as well for a variety of different things like computer parts, car stereos, etc. We got the guy too...through a group effort. I also had a contact in the guy's local area who checked out the house for me and stuff like that.

    It has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with "Mac fanatics" or whatever you want to call them. People generally WANT to help catch these crooks, because no one likes being ripped off!

  151. Gosh, no ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    That would be *illegal*, don't do it !

    Go to the trouble of doing it right, first !

    Rather, take out a perfectly legal Bounty Hunter's license, then bring charges against the guy (as a citizen) and get the police to raid him and catch him red-handed. If it's in another state, you get to watch the feds do it. Make sure the guy takes out bail and doesn't show up.

    Then, and only then, take out the baton, mace, '45, electric stunner, trained attack dog / cat / gerbil... You get the idea.

    Legally !

    Be a citizen ! :>

  152. Re:[ Cached Version ] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's this thing called sarcasm.

  153. Insurance is quite limited by durdur · · Score: 1

    >> Every sale on eBay is insured up to a certain amount ..

    I believe eBay's fraud insurance coverage is limited to $200, plus another $200 from PayPal if you pay a verified PayPal user through that service. If you pay with a credit card you may have recourse through the card vendor (but PayPal takes it out of your bank acct by default). For a high-value item, eBay suggests you use an escrow service.

    1. Re:Insurance is quite limited by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      It is $200 but there are some funky twists and turns in there that can cut it down a bit. I think the actualy ammount comes out to something like $170. It's not bad but it's still another $30 your'e out. Use a creditcard instead, when they don't deliver the goods, cancel payment.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  154. I'm sorry, but you didn't read carefully enough. by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Checks and money orders, but I wait until they clear before they ship.

    As others said, it was a cashier's check. Normally there's no reason to wait for a cashier's check to clear.

    From the article:

    I called Sgt. Knapp at 2:45. He told me he was on his way back to the house. They'd already made the delivery and arrested the guy. He had more than $10,000 in counterfeit cashier's checks waiting for deliveries.
    --
    Free unix account: freeshell.org
  155. Don't circumvent ebay's safeguards! by cardozo · · Score: 5, Informative
    Ebay has fraud protection program. Why didn't this guy go through them. Sure they're not going to go arrest the guy, but they'll certainly close him down on ebay. Even now he can get some of his money back from them... if it was an ebay transaction

    For that matter if Mr. Christmas had done this a lot, why didn't the seller look at the buyer's feedback? Certainly if Mr. Christmas has been ripping people off the sellers would leave negative feedback.

    Well, it turns out that videopro55 has no feedback!

    Looking on ebay for the transaction turned up nothing either.

    From a more careful reading of the story, I infer that the seller took it off of ebay and sold it privately. This was a bad idea. Yeah, you have to pay ebay a commission, but that's their business, and you wouldn't have sold it without them. It's also against ebay's seller policies to do this.

    So while I'm really very sympathetic about this guy getting ripped off, I think he could have been a little smarter about it.

    Lesson to all of us: Don't circumvent ebay's safeguards.

    1. Re:Don't circumvent ebay's safeguards! by Mitreya · · Score: 3, Informative
      Ebay has fraud protection program [ebay.com]. Why didn't this guy go through them.

      I am definately not going to support avoiding ebay auction fees (isn't that violating the auction? what did he tell to the person who was the highest bidder??). However, to your point I have one thing to answer -- Bullshit! The ebay fraud protection is useless. It does work but with $25 deductable and UP TO $200. So escrow service is your only chance with very expensive items.

    2. Re:Don't circumvent ebay's safeguards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ebay has fraud protection program [ebay.com]. Why didn't this guy go through them.

      Ebay's fraud protection *is* a fraud. I've been ripped-off on ebay 22 times so far. Four of the times, I filled-out Ebay's claim form at:

      http://pages.ebay.com/help/community/frs-claimfo rm .html

      and, I have never heard back from them. What good are ebay's safeguards? Besides, they only protect $175 of the first $200! That wouldn't do much good on an expensive laptop.

    3. Re:Don't circumvent ebay's safeguards! by sdo1 · · Score: 1

      He didn't go to ebay because if you read the aricle, the chain of events went like this...

      - Seller posted auction with "buy it now" option
      - Some bids were made, so "buy it now" went away.
      - Scammer/buyer contacted seller and offered to buy it for a fixed price.
      - Seller accepted (as a private transaction it would seem), thus screwing ebay and violating their rules.

      I'm not at all surprised he didn't go to ebay with his tale of woe.

      -Steve

      --
      --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
  156. Why didn't he HAVE the address already? by koko · · Score: 0
    Hm.

    How can you Fedex something somewhere and not have the address already?

    Is this a true story, or an inventive one gone ballistic.

    1. Re:Why didn't he HAVE the address already? by Qender · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sounds like a case of an idiot catching another idiot. All this "Sluething" is really quite silly.

      "Well, I had this guy's phone number and home address, and then I set out on the impossible task of figuring out who he was, I tried annoying the phone companies customer service..."

      Anyone heard of white pages?

    2. Re:Why didn't he HAVE the address already? by MoneyT · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As said in the story, the phone number he was given went to a cell phone, the adress whent to another phone. Do you have any idea how easy it is to scam fedex? Have an item sent to an adress fed-ex. Track said item. Stand outside of adress pretentding to do yard work during deliviery day. Intercept fed-ex man before he gets to the door. Sign for package. The adress had to be verified another way.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  157. Re:Wait At Least 10 Business Days to Be More Sure. by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2, Informative
    Many people figure that once the deposited funds are made available in their account - typically one or two business days, that the money is theirs...

    Although I've never assumed this with personal checks, I've usually assumed it to be true with a cashier's check. In this case, the issuing institution has already checked the availability of funds and deducted them from the account. In fact, my own bank treats the checks as though they are guaranteed. When I deposit a personal check, the money doesn't show up in my account until it clears. When I deposit a cashier's check, it always shows up pretty much immediately.

    Obviously, we are dealing with forgeries here, so all bets are off. But I would have thought that outside of forgeries, cashier's checks should always be good. Please tell me that I'm not wrong or I won't be able to sleep at night anymore. :-)

    --

    GreyPoopon
    --
    Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  158. Re:[ Cached Version ] by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

    Like the fact that you're bragging about being at the cap? Get a clue. Everyone who isn't a complete knuckle-dragger is at the cap.
    i can attest to that. I only drag the knuckles on one hand, and I am still at the cap.

    --
    Why not fork?
  159. Style note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    in the interest of getting this out, no fancy layout, just hand coding. maybe i'll spruce it up later.
    In other words: This is a great, easy-to-read web page that doesn't annoy anyone. Later, I'll make it suck harder than a "tornado in a can" so that no one will want to read it anymore, because right now, people enjoy it too much.

    I don't know what is more sickening:

    • That people think they need to apologize for doing the Right Thing
    • That people who do the Right Thing intend to make up for it by sinning in the future
    • That assholes try to rip people off
    Jason, FWIW in case you haven't already guessed, I like your page the way it is.
  160. IN SOVIET RUSSIA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Soviet Russia jokes insert you!

  161. My favourite line by Splezunk · · Score: 2, Funny
    "be it in gathering information or even forming a tough guy squad if necessary. "

    A bunch of computer guys forming a tough guy squad? Does anybody else see the humour in this?

    1. Re:My favourite line by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
      I don't know, I've met some well tough computer guys on the Internet - some even tried to kill me with energy weapons.

      /me confuses Quake with reality again

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  162. Re:Modded 'Insightful'?!?!?? by halo8 · · Score: 1

    Well.. you stupid fuck (thats the insulting part)

    IVE never used ebay.. so how aim i supposed to know that this is obvious?

    Thank you for posting
    and have a Great Day

    --
    The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
  163. great story! here's a few more from our board by schatten · · Score: 1

    We've got pictures of guy's homes as well.

    http://www.s2ki.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&thr ea did=91447

    Congrats on nabbing the guy!

  164. +1 for balls, -10 for no brains by freek_daddy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had a roommate who had a simliar experience - being a creduluous guy, he bought on eBay, for something like $650, a video tape copy of a Japanese Twin Peaks laser disc that doesn't really exist. Said seller pocketed the cash and abandoned the email addresses. The roommate, driven by a "very agressive" girlfriend made a several hundred mile detour on a road trip, showed up at the seller's house (googled it - the scammer used his real name) and browbeat him into returning the money.

    Of course, good for them. When scammed, getting the scammer back is a virtue. But the real virtue is not putting yourself in that position. Don't sell expensive items COD. Don't spend $650 for a tape of a laser disc which the fan community says doesn't exist. I'm happy the Mac guy got his satisfaction but a "4.0 Honor Student" (aside : my father always said - don't trust people who are always the heroes of their stories) should have enough brains to realize that COD is a dumb way to sell computers and he also should've realized that when you deposit a $3000 check from someone you don't know, you wait for it to clear before using the cash.

  165. slashdot dumbasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, dumbshits like you are getting really old. Outside of the stupid FirstPost!, beowulf blahblah, posts regarding grammatical and spelling errors are just INANE. Get a life (and a girlfriend), and maybe you'll stop caring that someone isn't as perfect as you.

    1. Re:slashdot dumbasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whereas insulting AC posts are ALWAYS fresh

  166. Re:Wait At Least 10 Business Days to Be More Sure. by tigga · · Score: 0, Redundant
    One more:


    USPS money order - you just receive cash in post office immediately. And they are not easily forged..

    Well - if somebody forge USPS money order - it is, I believe, treated as federal felony..

  167. Eligible for reward? by Fencepost · · Score: 3, Informative
    Keep track of the case as much as possible - you may be eligible for a reward from an organization like CrimeStoppers (Canadian?) or (International "Parent") or something similar. Unfortunately the sites don't seem to be particularly well set up for finding programs, but you've shown that you can be determined.

    The sergeant you worked with may be able to tell you if there's a CrimeStoppers or other program that might cover you - particularly if you're just hoping to cover what it cost you track everything down.

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  168. Only one side of the equation by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

    There's also competition on the supply side, which forces the price back down. Assuming we don't get a single corporate cartel to replace the various drug 'cartels'.

    --
    __
    Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  169. Re:[ Cached Version ] by Trogre · · Score: 2

    This is the third "cache" post though so it's f**king redundant as hell. STFU.

    Awww, somebody needs a hug. Poor widdle anonymussy cowardiddy.

    There there, trogre will make all the nasty repeating posts go away.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  170. C'mon. This is what happens with kindness. by AnonymousCowheard · · Score: 1, Insightful
    This man was stolen from and it was accomplished by a method of exploiting the weakness of the banking system.

    Good people are getting stepped on. It is just like the gun control article on slashdot a couple days ago...people being argumentive and preaching to eachother the scenarios that dis-prove eachothers ideas.

    A friend of mine does business on eBay and ever since September 11, 2001, he lacks sufficient identification to convert checks and money orders into cash. What does he do to get by, since he is morally apposed to identification marks? You would call him a moron for how he accomplishes his pocket change... He sends the bidder their package FIRST and asks them to send cash through the mail after they receive! He only does this with people with extremly positive feedback and so far only 1% of people have scammed him. The end result is there are people who are greatful and that are thankful for his kindness and trustworthy.

    It's this disease known as immorality that has ruined the free-market. I have always said, open the prison doors and let the captives free; they'll do their worsed no matter where they are. Vigilante justice has its fair share of accomplishments, yet when it comes to vigilante justice, there is no more Constitution of the united States of America to apply to the fool who scammed you: it's ballsack crushing time.

    --

    But I'm sure you already Gnu that.
  171. Re:Wait At Least 10 Business Days to Be More Sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about PayPal - is THAT safe?

  172. Another recent eBay fraud scheme: ebayupdates.com by mkweise · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's a story in today's Times of India on a newly uncovered scheme involving this fake ebay site.

    --
    Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the War Room!
  173. Future History?? by JebusIsLord · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does a future history teacher teach the present?

    --
    Jeremy
    1. Re:Future History?? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Hmm... makes me wonder how old an ancient history teacher has to be :)

      (Answer to your tagline: "Kill you and take it." :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  174. Wouldn't have happened to a PC user... by nortcele · · Score: 2, Funny

    because they don't know enough about graphics to make a counterfit check. Everybody knows the best counterfit checks are made on Macs....

  175. Would someone please post a "cache" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a "cache" of this report... Unfortinaately, the /. effect has hosed the server.

  176. Fedex cameras? by mbstone · · Score: 1

    Fedex/UPS/other similar freight co's are known for being technology leaders; their drivers all have fancy wireless gizmos that purport to capture the consignee's "signature" at the time of delivery.

    But they don't check ID nor do they look to see whether the proffered "signature" is even legible. You can get your packages using penmanship that would embarrass your doctor.

    Surely it would be cost-effective, as well as competitively advantageous, to install digital cameras in the gizmos and take the consignees' photos. I would prefer to use a shipping company that offered such a service!

  177. [ Cached Version of the Cached Version ] by rocket97 · · Score: 0

    This is a "just in case" post in case the cached version posted on /. gets /.ed. No down moderations are necessary. If the site remains up, leave this post at 2. Otherwise (as I suspect), please mod this up just so that others can read his story.



    ---------------

    This is a "just in case" post. No down moderations are necessary. If the site remains up, leave this post at 2. Otherwise (as I suspect), please mod this up just so that others can read his story.

    Mac Addicts to the Rescue or
    How I Caught a Counterfeiter with a Little Help from my Friends


    a true story by Jason Eric Smith
    Check out the Forum
    in the interest of getting this out, no fancy layout, just hand coding. maybe i'll spruce it up later. the names of the innocent have been changed, the names of the guilty though...

    I am a college student (my second time around). Specifically, I'm studying to become a high school history teacher. I am a student with a lifelong habit though, Macintosh. I got my first Mac in 1986, a used Mac Plus with 1 megabyte of RAM a massive 40 megabyte external hardrive. Since then, I've always had to keep up, first it was the SE, then the IIsi, the Powerbook 140, and from there on, more Macs than you can shake a stick at (I missed the Mac TV). I usually keep my Mac for about 6 months, and then resell it and move up. I almost always buy used, so don't get any ideas about me being rich.

    Since I went back to being a student again, I've been selling Macs more regularly, picking up good deals on used Macs locally and then reselling on eBay. I've been doing this for about two years now, its relatively easy, takes about an extra hour of my day, and usually pays the rent. In November when the new Powerbooks came out I decided I was going to buy one for myself, to keep, an early Christmas present that would come in handy for taking notes in class and finishing up a presentation I needed to do on the New Orleans school system. The day they were announced I ordered a nice new Powerbook G4 867 and found it on my doorstep only a few days later.

    It was a beautiful machine, if you've never played with one in person, you won't believe it. I played with it for a couple of days, took it to school to take notes and do research on. The more I used it, the more I loved it. But, it was just too much to be carrying around, $2300 in my backpack had a tendency to make me a little nervous. I decided maybe I should turn it around and pick up an iBook. My girlfriend and I decided we would use the extra money to donate to some charities for Christmas. So on November 19th, up on eBay it went, along with an Airport Basestation and a bunch of other knickknacks. I set a buy-it-now price on a whim for $2950.

    The next morning I checked my auction, a couple of bids placed, and so the buy-it-now option was gone. Checking my email I got a couple of questions about the computer and much to my surprise, an offer to buy it for $2900 from Steve Matthews, a dad with a lucky son in college who was going to be getting a Powerbook for his birthday. Steve wanted to pay for it COD, no problem, its actually how I usually sell things. I called him on the phone number he gave me to ask a couple of questions and make sure everything was on the up and up.

    He reiterated that he was buying it as a last minute present for his son and since it was already setup as a package, he thought it was a good deal. Not to mention the Chicago Apple stores were still out of stock. I got home from school, packed up my Powerbook and accessories, and off they went Fedex overnight to Chicago, never to be seen again.

    At 10:21AM on November 21st, a man going by the name of Paul Smith signed for my two packages and gave the driver an official cashier's check from LaSalle Bank for $3052.78 in return. The check made it back to my doorstep the next morning. I went to the bank, deposited the check and withdrew enough to go ahead and pay my rent and pick up a couple of household items. I sent an email to Steve to make sure he got everything ok and to check that nothing had been damaged in shipping. No reply. As the old saying goes, no news is good news, right?

    My girlfriend and I went away for Thanksgiving, and when we got back on Friday, I had a message from my bank. The branch manager had called to let me know she had a returned item for $3052.78 and that my account was now in the negative. Seriously in the negative. No problem I thought, I'll just call Steve and see what's up.

    So I dialed the number I had. In the back of my mind I expected a "this number has been disconnected message". Instead I got an answer, the voice sounded identical to Steve, so I asked if Steve was there.

    "Oh, Steve, yeah, that's my cousin, he's out of town for Thanksgiving you know. He'll be back Tuesday"

    "Can I leave a message for him?"

    So I left my information and asked that he give me a call. That little voice in the back of my mind let out a sigh and an uh-oh. The voices were the same right? Was I being scammed? Well, if I was, I certainly wasn't going to let the weekend go by without doing a little investigating.

    I started off with the information I had. His AOL email address, his phone number, and the address I shipped the computer to. The AOL address didn't yield anything. Doing a reverse lookup on the address (thanks to Whitepages.com) I got three names and phone numbers, none of which matched anything I had. The phone number didn't give me anything. I finally found a way to lookup the exchange on the number to see if it was a cell phone or a landline (Fone Finder). It came back as Nextel and I wanted to scream.

    There really isn't anything you can do with a cell phone number. There are no directory services. The cell phone companies won't give out any information. And that's that. I called Nextel and pleaded with them. The customer service rep I spoke with seemed more confused than anything. He kept asking me what my Nextel phone number was and why I suspected someone was fraudulently billing to my account. I calmly explained at least three times that I was not a Nextel customer, that I was just trying to get an address for another customer I suspect has defrauded me, etc, etc. I finally gave up on Chris from Nextel, I've had customer service reps who don't even speak English who were more helpful.

    I was at a dead end. I'd just sent my $2300 laptop, my Airport basestation, and a load of stuff to somebody I didn't know and all I had to show for it was a bill from Fedex for overnight shipping and a returned cashier's check. It's hard to sleep comfortably knowing some asshole has your Mac and is doing god knows what with it.

    Sunday the first of December, I sprang into action full force. I called for help. I knew I wasn't going to get anywhere with this on my own, so I figured I might be able to get some help from some bulletin boards. I posted my tale of woe and call for assistance on every Mac bulletin board I could think of. I hoped that somebody who worked for Nextel, some fellow Mac addict like myself, might be willing to bend the rules a little. I wanted this guy's address and I wanted it bad. I was already pricing flights to Chicago and putting my professors on notice that I might have to miss a little class. I may have made an error in trusting this person, but I'm not someone you want to have that happen to. I will get you. I will hunt you down, and I will bring a baseball bat with me.

    I got more replies than I could keep up with. Everyone wanted to know what they could do to help or at least offer support. Well, everyone except one guy who just wanted to let me know how incredibly stupid he thought I was and that he would never have accepted a counterfeit anything. I think a 102:1 great person to asshole ratio is pretty good. Several people living in Chicago offered their assistance, be it in gathering information or even forming a tough guy squad if necessary.

    The most important reply I got was a pointer to an online PI service that does reverse lookups on cell phones. I was already beyond broke, but I figured $85.00 more wouldn't kill me. Twelve hours and $85.00 later, I had a name, an address, and a landline phone number for this guy. The name and his AOL email were eerily close, actually with a last name like Christmas, it would be pretty weird if it didn't match up. I couldn't believe it. A Chicago resident named Melvin Christmas had just ruined my Christmas. I was expecting William Faulkner to come popping out of the pantry at any moment and laugh at me.

    I was now ready to call the police. I called the Chicago police department and filed a report. I gave the operator all of my information, including the real name and address I had managed to get. "A detective will contact you within one to two weeks, thank you." One to two weeks?!? I had this guy, I'd done all the work already, all you had to do was go pick him up. I'd even gone ahead and called Fedex and spoken to the Chicago station manager and was assured that the driver would cooperate in identifying the guy if necessary. All they had to do was pick him up. In one to two weeks he could be gone. And all the while my precious Powerbook is sitting god knows where being used by somebody completely undeserving of a Mac. I know in my heart that Mr. Christmas is really a PC guy.

    I was furious. Chicago PD weren't going to do anything about this. If they were anything like the New Orleans PD, one to two weeks was likely to turn in to never. I figured I'd call Mr. Christmas myself. Let him know I was going to give him a chance to fix this, and I thought, maybe at least scare him. Let him know he was dealing with someone who would track him down no matter what, even if I had to make a deal with the Prince of Darkness to do it. Mr. Christmas said he didn't even know what email was. Obviously a PC user.

    I kept checking the message boards. Maybe someone would have a better idea. I called the local FBI field office. Agent Jones was very understanding, but let me know that even though this crossed state lines, the field office didn't take anything involving less than $5000. "Try the Chicago PD".

    I kept everyone on the Mac boards updated as best I could. On Tuesday I got a useful reply, try the Secret Service, counterfeiting is their jurisdiction. I made my way to the under-renovation Federal Building here in New Orleans. After walking many a dark, scary hallway, found myself at the door of Agent Keith Lopola. Keith came out and heard my case. I had brought copies of all the emails between myself and Steve Matthews/Paul Smith/Mr. Christmas, a copy of the check, and the call journal I had started keeping. Agent Lopola told me the same thing the FBI did, "It falls under our jurisdiction, but we can't take the case." He wanted to let me know that he really felt for me. Thanks. I left the office determined to call and bother him and the Chicago PD everyday for the rest of my life or at least until Mr. Christmas was behind bars.

    Finals were fast approaching. It's not very easy to concentrate on school when all you can think about all day is the fact that all of your student loans for the next semester are going to cover this counterfeit check. That and some grubby criminal has your Powerbook. It's enough to drive someone to the drink.

    Tuesday night I got an email from someone who had seen my story posted on O'Grady's Powerpage, a Powerbook enthusiast site. George Dunbar had seen the story and thought it sounded eerily similar to his. I called him, we compared notes, and turns out it was the same guy. George forwarded me all of his emails. Everything was the same, word for word, it was like Mr. Christmas just copied and pasted and magically made money. George was in it worse than I was though and had completely given up. He was out $6000 and two computers. He also let me know that there were more victims. He'd talked to at least three other people who had been taken by the same guy, all of whom had just given up. I was not going to give up. That night I dreamed of Mr. Christmas and a baseball bat, some duct tape, and roofing nails.

    Wednesday morning I decided I was going to Chicago. I set up another eBay auction under my girlfriend's account, this time for same computer, different city. Three hours later, lo and behold I received an email from eBay user videopro55 (the same one) asking me if I'd like to sell the computer right now for $2500. Oh yes, I'd love to sell the computer, I'll even be there when it gets delivered to make sure it gets "setup properly".

    He emailed me a new address and phone number, the phone number again traced back to the same address for Mr. Christmas. I called the Secret Service and the Chicago PD, pleading, all they had to do was be there when Fedex dropped off the package. It was a guaranteed hit, he'd have another counterfeit cashier's check, all you'd have to do is arrest him. Like shooting fish in a barrel. "Sorry, Detective McDonaugh will be out until next Wednesday, can I take a message?" Fine, if the cops won't do it, I decided I'd just Priceline a ticket and be waiting next door when it got dropped off. So I'd know what kind of neighborhood I was looking at, I asked for help again in the Mac boards. Two Chicago residents replied, and the next morning, courtesy of Tim, I had 23 pictures of the house, the cars in the driveway (with license plate numbers) and the neighborhood. I'd like to see a Dell user do something like that at 4:30 in the morning for a complete stranger a thousand miles away. I started planning my trip. I decided I'd leave on Saturday, have the package delivered on Monday, and make it back just in time to screw up on all my finals.

    On Friday in preparation for flying up I mapped the new address from the one for Mr. Christmas to see how close it was. As I looked at the map, it hit me. The new address wasn't in Chicago. It was in a suburb, Markham. I googled for the Markham police and 5 minutes later was talking to a very enthusiastic Sargeant Knapp. I had hit the jackpot, the new drop was outside of Chicago jurisdiction and therefore outside of their inattentiveness as well. Sargeant Knapp informed me he loved this kind of thing, even had a UPS and Fedex uniform ready. He'd call Fedex and they would set it up for Tuesday. I was certain I was dreaming. After talking to two detectives in Chicago, an FBI field agent, an agent in the New Orleans field office of the Secret Service, an agent with the L.A. Secret Service and having a conference call with a large group of agents from the Chicago Secret Service, I finally was getting somewhere. And I didn't even have to stand on someone's doorstep with a baseball bat to do it.

    I spent the entire weekend on pins and needles. What if Mr. Christmas figured something out between now and Tuesday? All would be lost. I wouldn't even get the chance to confront him on my own. On Monday I spoke with Sgt. Knapp to make sure everything was ready to go. I had sent him a package with all of my documentation (he didn't have email), and I tried to explain what all the email stuff meant as best I could. He had worked everything out with Fedex and they were set for the delivery on Tuesday.

    I called my brother in Nashville and had him send the package. I had set everything up to be coming from there so that Mr. Christmas wouldn't get suspicious. I could barely sleep Monday night. All I could think about was something going wrong and my only chance at getting this guy being missed. I wanted to update everyone on the Mac boards, but I had to keep it quiet until I knew something was going to happen.

    Tuesday afternoon Sgt. Knapp called. They had tried the delivery but no one was home. I just wanted to scream. The board users kept posting how the suspense was driving them nuts. Well, it was going to give me an aneurism. A million possibilities went through my head. Maybe he had somebody working at Fedex who tipped him off, maybe I worded something in one of my email a little off. Sgt. Knapp called me back to let me know they would try the delivery again tomorrow. He also wanted to let me know that they had intercepted another package that was being sent to the same address. Looks like he'd already struck again, thankfully the lady from New York will get her computer back. He also told me that he was definitely going to keep pursuing this, and that oddly enough, the address I'd given him was also related to another fraud case, but this one much bigger (hundreds of thousands) involving a certain Chicago franchise I won't mention. So maybe I had led them to something bigger than just some asshole counterfeiting cashier's checks.

    Today I had finals all day. I'm a 4.0 honors student. I've had a 4.0 all semester. I'm not sure if I'll keep that after today. I just couldn't sleep last night. All I could think about was Mr. Christmas and the delivery. I couldn't study either. So I winged it, I'll get my grades tomorrow. I called Sgt. Knapp at 2:45. He told me he was on his way back to the house. They'd already made the delivery and arrested the guy. He had more than $10,000 in counterfeit cashier's checks waiting for deliveries.

    *I* got him.

    I'm right now waiting on Sgt. Knapp to fax me a copy of his mug shot for posterity. Then I'm going to go celebrate. Sgt. Knapp said the guy was cooperating and he was going to try to recover my laptop. I'm hopeful, but I don't expect it. I might not ever get my computer back, but at least there is one less asshole on the street. When will criminals learn? You just shouldn't mess with Mac people.

    For everyone on all the boards who offered their help and encouragement, I thank you. This would have been a lot harder without you. If you're ever in New Orleans, look me up and I'll buy you a beer. I've still got to figure out how I'm paying to college next semester, but I'll keep some beer money set aside for ya'll.

    Oh yeah, and if there are any lawyers in the Chicago area who can file a civil suit against this guy for damages (yeah I know I'm not going to collect) please contact me, misterye a t yahoo d o t com

    The sites with great users that helped out (you can sign up for the forums and read all about this as it was going on):
    MacRumors.com
    MacNN
    ThinkSecret
    O'Grady's PowerPage

    Update 12/11/02 18:58 CST: Sgt. Knapp is sending me a copy of Mr. Christmas's mug shot. I'll post it as soon as I get it.

    Update 12/11/02 21:39 CST: For those interesting in getting in contact with me, my email address is misterye at yahoo dot com, if you think you were also a victim, please call me at 504-894-1243 and I'll put you in touch with the appropriate people.

    Update 12/11/02 23:36 CST: I've gone back through and added links where appropriate. I'll try to reformat this tomorrow.

    Update 12/12/02 10:36 CST: Ok, so how's this for small world: Apparently this thing is getting posted everywhere. I just got a call from Matt of the Real World Season 9 (the New Orleans Real World). So anyway, the cast of the New Orleans Real World used to all work at 735 Nightclub. I moved down here to actually take-over their marketing right after the show ended. So I never met Matt or any of them until speaking to him today. Small, weird world.

    Update 12/12/02 12:03 CST: I've added a forum where everyone can talk about this. Here it is.

    Update 12/12/02 13:30 CST: For those of you wanting to donate to my cause, I urge you to choose a local charity. There are a lot of needy people and organizations out there this season, if you can't think of anything local, I'm a big fan of Doctor's Without Borders and Lambda International. If you really must, you can send money to my girlfriend's Paypal account, cranberry_coyote@hotmail.com. She's the one who's covering this check for me right now, so I guess she should get this. I'm still not entirely sure about this, but you've insisted. Thanks again.

    Last update Wednesday, December 12th 13:49 PM CST

    Copyright 2002 Jason Eric Smith

    -- I you prefer *nix/BSD, befriend me [slashdot.org] (503 fans)!

    --
    "The two most abundant elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity." -Harlan Ellison
  178. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by swv3752 · · Score: 2

    For many things, it sucks to live in Canada. Thanks for bringing that up. Of course FEDEX still ships to Canada...

    --
    Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  179. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by offpath3 · · Score: 1

    If there are 1 billion assholes in the world, then about 1 in 7 people are an asshole, world-wide. This is obviously less than 20%. What this _acutally_ implies is that Ebay users are more likely than non-Ebay users to be assholes.

  180. That explains why cigarettes cost so much.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Silly me, I was wondering why I had to sell my car to buy a pack of cigarettes this afternoon... Look at alcohol prices before, during, and after Prohibition. Take inflation into account. Realize that you are wrong.

  181. IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The formkeys troll YOU!

  182. We'll let you know how it goes by stygar · · Score: 1

    Since we'll be decriminalizing pot possession (up to 30 grams) after Christmas up here (in Canada).

    Pot penalties out of whack, MPs say

    1. Re:We'll let you know how it goes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it when you see it, and not a minute sooner. The Liberals have killed previous attempts to decriminalise three times in the last two years, Keith Martin's back in April or May was the most prominent of these.

      Bringing it up now was simply electioneering, something done to make up for the huge negative hits the government's been taking practically daily for the last two weeks.

    2. Re:We'll let you know how it goes by stygar · · Score: 1

      True, but the justice minister wasn't the one making the proposal on the other occasions.

  183. Re:Wait At Least 10 Business Days to Be More Sure. by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 2

    The clearing process involves more than just making the funds available to the depositor...the actual fund transfer and reconcilation process between financial institutions often takes longer than one or two business days; in essance the bank is making the deposits available on a provisional basis in many instances (as required by law) until the complete clearing process has run its course - banks should educate folks on this instead of burying it deep in fineprint.

    In regards to depositing a cashier check...if it's "legit", then very likely the financial institution its drawn on will have funds to cover it...the primary concern one should have when accepting cashier checks isn't fund availability, but rather is it real...some forgeries are very difficult to catch before-hand.

    On a related topic, even if your bank calls the other financial institution, that doesn't protect you because there are instances where a bank will be told the cashier check is valid or whatnot, but then later turns out it's not - yes, this really happens :-(

    If you are dealing with another financial institution or long-time customer who hands you a cashier check, then most likely it's going to be real and the funds are truly yours.

    Ultimately, it all comes down to trust of the parties involved in a financial transaction, not the physical check or whatnot.

    Ron

  184. I'd like to know the names and places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Of each and every person who said 'we won't take this case' such that if they fall under *MY* congressmen, I can write a letter explaining my position on them taking my tax dollars to 'protect' me, then not actually protecting me.

  185. you got it all wrong, mac by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was not going to give up. That night I dreamed of Mr. Christmas and a baseball bat, some duct tape, and roofing nails.

    Look, if you're going to have him retar up there, at least give him a hammer instead of the bat. He'll be up there all week! Jiminy!

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
  186. hahaha by penguin_punk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Black cars?

    You must have forgotten that these are Mac users. Remeber? These types drive Minis and New Beatles. I'll bet you that no matter what type of car it was, its colour was Aqua. (maybe teal) ;)

    --
    HURD - Hurd's Under Research & Development
  187. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if someone says 20%, they surely don't mean 1 in 7! Everyone in this thread is correct!

    Yay!

  188. IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's hard to sleep comfortably knowing some Mac has your asshole and is doing god knows what with it.

  189. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by DaytonCIM · · Score: 2

    I have to agree. A $2500+ sale and he accepts COD? Those annoying infomercial companies don't accept COD for $29.95, let alone 2 grand!

    That aside, it was nice to hear about so many people coming together to help this one person in need.

  190. Oh, the irony... by jim3e8 · · Score: 1

    when "Sgt. Knapp" turns out to be Mr. Christmas's brother!

  191. COD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I thought COD meant cash on delivery?

  192. Re:Wait At Least 10 Business Days to Be More Sure. by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Federal felony. Had I the points I'd mod you redundant.

    --

    --

    WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  193. grammar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hint: Try not splittig your infinitives, you sound like a moron. He didn't split an infinitive. The sentence can be cleared up by changingin "who" to "whom" and adding a couple commas.

    1. Re:grammar... by jerrytcow · · Score: 2
      >>Hint: Try not splittig your infinitives, you sound like a moron.
      >He didn't split an infinitive. The sentence can be cleared up by changingin "who" to "whom" and adding a couple commas.

      Huh? What the f*@# does who or whom have to do with a split infinitive? The post was referring to
      (Hint: Next time, try using decent setence structure to not confuse your point.)

      I even put it in bold so you can see what a split infinitive is.

      now we have to deal with grammar nazis who don't know basic grammar or spelling

  194. Re:Wait At Least 10 Business Days to Be More Sure. by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 3, Informative
    "What about PayPal - is THAT safe?"


    Well if you consider accepting 3rd party starter checks for payment, then maybe :-;

    Seriously, PayPal is NOT a bank and thus provides virtually no protection - there are many well documented instances of PayPal freezing funds, withdrawing funds from people's bank accounts, negative balances, issueing refunds and allowing the buyer to keep the product too, etc.

    PayPal is a very useful service, but anyone who trusts it for large amounts of money (of course that's going to be relative to one's financial worth, etc) is asking for trouble. They are not a bank and they basically play fast and loose with their policies - and good luck in contacting anyone there.

    PayPalSucks.com and PayPalWarning.com shed more light on the darker side of PayPal.

    http://www.paypalsucks.com/
    http://www.paypalwa rning.com/

    Don't get me wrong, PayPal works great and is very convenient for most folks, including myself...but still one should be aware of the risks they take on when using them to transfer money.

    Ron
  195. Read the Drama by digitalgimpus · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://forums.macnn.com/showthread.php?s=40e4fad22 665478b027629eb71768ab5&threadid=134279&perpage=50 &pagenumber=1

    Read as it unfolds.

  196. Advice on cheques/money orders. by mindstrm · · Score: 4, Informative

    With regards to certified cheques, anyway...
    certified cheques and money orders are widely considered as good as cash.

    The best way to deal with these things is NOT to put them in your bank account... but, if you can, to have them cashed on the spot. A postal money order can be cashed at the post office with ID.
    A certified cheque (or any cheque. for that matter) can usually be cashed at the bank it was issued from, with proper ID. Some banks will insist they only have to do this if you take it to the branch it was issued from. Some will let you do it at other branches, but will require a small wait for confirmation. This is because, by law, a cheque is simply instructions for a bank to give you money from someone's account. There is no requirement that the receiver must use a bank account.

    1. Re:Advice on cheques/money orders. by zaffir · · Score: 1

      Most banks won't let you cash a check unless you have an ammount equal to the cashed check in your account. That way if it's a fraudulent check, the money is deducted from your account (or never added in the first place) and treated like a cash withdrawl. It doesn't provide any protection at all.

      Not sure if this applies to certified checks though.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    2. Re:Advice on cheques/money orders. by Myxorg · · Score: 1

      But if you cash it at the issuing bank, you don't even need to have an account with them. Plus there are numerous check cashing places for people who don't have a bank account.

    3. Re:Advice on cheques/money orders. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      Please re-read what I said.

      I'm talking about cashing a cheque in-person at the bank it is written against, not depositing it into your bank account/cashing it at your bank.

      You see, we use banks so much people don't even realize this.

      A cheque is a negotiable insturment. It's an instruction for a given bank to give a certain person a certain amount of money from a designated account. They have to honor these.
      If I write you a cheque form my account at Bank Four International, you can walk into that bank, with ID, and they will give you cash for that cheque. Thta's what the cheque represents. When you cash it at your bank, it takes a while for them to do what you could have done manually.

      A bank cannot refuse to cash a cheque written on that bank because you don't have an account with them.

      Saying "We won't cash a cheque unless you have an equal amount in your account" is just twisting words.. even though all banks say it. They deposit the cheque, put the funds on hold, then give you cash from your existing funds. IT's not different than saying "You can't withdraw $X unless you have $X in your account"

    4. Re:Advice on cheques/money orders. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That works for postal money orders at the post office. However, with cashier's checks, you generally need to be a customer to cash the check. They verify you are a customer and then cash the check. If the check bounces, they call you and take the amount of your account with that bank. Otherwise you can take a check cashing fee of anywhere from $2 to 2% (some have a max fee of $10 or $20). Still, that extra bit may be worth it if you deal with sketchy characters.

  197. Re:Wait At Least 10 Business Days to Be More Sure. by mindstrm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That is where the 10 business days come from. After 10 business days, the bank can't backpedal and say the funds aren't yours. They have 10 days to complete their clearing process.

    They also have to notify you of NSF issues within 48 hours of finding out about it... not that you have any easy way of finding out if they followed this rule or not.

  198. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by Cyno · · Score: 2

    And those who might be part of that 10% are under constant pressure to conform.

  199. Re:Wait At Least 10 Business Days to Be More Sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...then 30 days is not long enough time to post a negitive on the buyer or seller!

  200. Los Angeles, too by clem.dickey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    San Francisco is well-known for tolerance of illegal parking. About 25 years ago the SF police wanted higher wages but were forbidden to strike. One day the police protested by ticketing all illegally parked cars, especially those around City Hall and the local newspaper offices. That night the Chief of Police appeared on local TV to apologize for the unprofessional conduct of his men!

    By comparison, there were - and are - Los Angeles suburbs in which police will ticket a car parked facing the wrong direction. The police infer that something illegal must have happened to place the car in that position.

    This difference broke the Patty Hearst case. While the Symbionese Liberation Army held Patty Hearst in San Francisco, police and FBI had no luck finding her. Then the SLA moved to Los Angeles - unfamiliar territory for them. They parked a van in a red zone, which would have been no big deal in SF. Police arrived to ticket the van, determined that it was stolen, and caught or killed a large part of the SLA.

    1. Re:Los Angeles, too by Unbeliever · · Score: 1
      By comparison, there were - and are - Los Angeles suburbs in which police will ticket a car parked facing the wrong direction. The police infer that something illegal must have happened to place the car in that position.

      Ummm, yeah. Something illegal DID happen. CVC 22502 (a) was violated. Not parking with your right side up against a curb or side of the road. Sub (e) is the exception for one way roads.

      --
      --Carlos V.
  201. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the story, the great person to asshole ratio is more like 102:1.

  202. Why? by TheRain · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the thing that struck me the most was the fact the whole thing read like an ad for apple computers with the community as the major argument for owning one.

    Most of this guy's reasonings for his actions seemed contrived as well as many of the events that occured in his story.

    It could also be that he just sees people in black in white. Like this story, either they helped him or they didn't and Mac users are good, PC users are bad.

    --
    Please help! I'm stuck inside my virtual reality headset!
  203. Stricter drug laws by bbqBrain · · Score: 1

    I had to take some simple sociology video course at the 11th hour to satisfy my graduation requirements, and the instructor told a very interesting story...

    A small-town politician in Oklahoma (or Nebraska, perhaps?) suddenly got all fired up about increasing the penalties for first-time drug offenders. Of course, there was much posturing about family values, protecting children, etc., and the bill was eagerly sped through the state's legislature by other politicians looking to win points with their constituents. One reporter thought the whole thing strange, that this guy should develop an interest in drug policy overnight. He did a bit of research, and it turns out that some other politician's (can't remember who, but someone powerful) son was arrested for posession of marijuana. Knowing that the public would certainly ask questions if attempts were made to reduce first-offense penalties, these guys decided to--in short order (before the trial)--make the penalties so ridiculously severe that no jury would even consider convicting a clean-cut, college-bound 18-year-old from a good family.

    Of course, it worked. I don't know what happened after the story came to light, though.

    --

    One of the reasons that I became a lawyer was to avoid ever having to hire one. -SPYvSPY
  204. warning - the story itself is a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this i-sold-my-mac-and-got-a-counterfeit-cheque story is another cleverly devised sympathy scam.

    the hoax is obvious:
    1. "mr. christmas"
    2. multiple people were scammed, totalling >$5000
    3. the sting sale could have been >$5000
    4. the police would agree to operate your sting?
    not a chance. it has to be done by the book.
    5. selling on ebay outside of standard auction
    need i go on?

    don't send the dude any sympathy money.
    it was a nice story to read at christmas,
    but it's undeserving of a free windfall.

  205. The desire to deal out Justice is well documented by fritzson · · Score: 1
    Check out this story in Nature called Prosperity through Punishment.

    In both natural and artificial situations people will spend their own resources in order to administer justice to those who "need" it.

    This desire contributes strongly to cooperation and the common good. If there's no outlet for it, and these days it seems like there are precious few except vicariously at the movies, cooperation unravels.

    This an excellent and easy-to-read story.

  206. The story on "Mac for free" by sugarmotor · · Score: 1

    Is there more evidence available about this story? I get the feeling it is fabricated, mainly because there are so many stereotypes.

    --
    http://stephan.sugarmotor.org
  207. Re:Who care's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to mention all the legal issues. Do you really think Apple wants Microsoft selling an operating system for Apple's hardware?

  208. ebay's safeguards MY ARSE.. by matt_wilts · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Here's the response I got from Ebay when I thought I detected shill bidding:


    To: Matt {matt_wilts}
    Subject: Re: Possible shill bidding on auction 1235911285 (KMM28339167C0KM)
    From: eBay UK Investigations {ukinvestigations@ebay.com}
    Reply-To: eBay UK Investigations {ukinvestigations@ebay.com}

    Hello Matt,

    Thank you for writing to us.

    I sincerely apologize for the delay of this e-mail and hope that it did not cause you any inconveniences!

    I have investigated your report regarding {{ insert user id }}, and can understand how this would be troublesome.

    Please be assured, if a violation of eBay policy has occurred, we will take the appropriate action in accordance with our site policies. Such action may include issuing a warning, temporary suspension, indefinite suspension or terminating the membership.

    Due to eBay's Privacy policy we are unable to provide information regarding the details of another user's account. We are equally
    concerned about violations on the site, and will thoroughly investigate each report we receive. However, the details of our actions cannot be
    disclosed with third party members. Please remember that this is for the protection of all eBay users.

    We appreciate your assistance in keeping eBay a fun and safe place to trade..

    I hope you have a wonderful week!
    Regards,
    Darcy
    eBay UK SafeHarbour
    Investigations Team


    Must be some new use of the word "safe" that I've not yet come across...

    Matt
    1. Re:ebay's safeguards MY ARSE.. by matt_wilts · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't normally reply to one of my own posts, but...

      I don't think I made it quite clear that the {{insert user id}} part was as it came in the email, i.e. it was a total form letter that they'd forgotten to fill in.

      Numpties.

      Matt

  209. Hard To Sleep by duck_prime · · Score: 2
    Mac users are all one big team, wonderful. But some of the lines in the article puzzle me: "It's hard to sleep comfortably knowing some asshole has your Mac and is doing god knows what with it."

    Was it easier for him to sleep when he thought the cashier's check was good?
    If some jerk hadn't stolen his money maybe the poor guy could've, I dunno, bought some sleeping pills!
  210. Exactly! by duck_prime · · Score: 2
    Surely you're not trying to say that there is only one asshole in every 7 people.
    That's why people are so full of crap.
    1. Re:Exactly! by oyenstikker · · Score: 2

      I kinda feel bad about starting the stupidest thread i've ever read. . .but this one is a gem. Thats got to go on my aim profile. (: kudos to duck_prime

      --
      The masses are the crack whores of religion.
  211. So why don't we pay heroin prices for food? by Gorimek · · Score: 2

    I think you'll find the fault in your logic if you try to figure out why we can buy a days supply of food for well under $10, while heroin costs much, much more.

    Food is after all even more addictive than heroin!

    Then there is the evidence of legal trade in these drugs (for medical purposes), where what costs $100 on the street can cost $1 on the legal side.

  212. Mark another one up by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2

    Well, everyone except one guy who just wanted to let me know how incredibly stupid he thought I was and that he would never have accepted a counterfeit anything.

    Make it two. I think you're an idiot for mailing anything worth more than five bucks before your payment clears.

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  213. Hey, he was thanking the Mac community by Gorimek · · Score: 2

    Yeah, it looks a bit bad out of context. But keep in mind he was writing this as a thanks to all the Mac people all over who went far out of their way to help him with this. Just think of it as a way to say "You guys are the best EVER!!".

  214. repeat? Not really, but who cares? by tres · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The sad thing is that this is a repeat story; it happens every day to countless people. You've probably had some asshole steal from you, and I know I have.

    Fact is, I'd be glad if there were a lot more stories like this on Slashdot. It's a well written first-person account.

    Nothing personal, but I'm quite tired of all the little ankle biters complaining about repeat stories. Yes, there's been cases in the past where the same story will be posted twice--big fricking deal. Get over it, move on to the next story, make your own message board, start submitting other stories--do something other than whine.

    In this case, to call it a repeat is a long stretch to say the least.

    --
    Notes From Under *nix: blas.phemo.us
    1. Re:repeat? Not really, but who cares? by jred · · Score: 2

      Get over it, move on to the next story, make your own message board, start submitting other stories--do something other than whine.

      First, *I'm* not bitching about repeat stories, ever. Second, I do have a little message board, with very small readership (maybe 5 active, 20-30 lurkers), and I still get bitched at for repeat postings :)

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    2. Re:repeat? Not really, but who cares? by tres · · Score: 1

      Sorry, didn't mean you personally. It really wasn't fair to respond to your post that way. It's just the last straw. I was just happy to see the original story & responded too quickly to what I thought was another "Slashdot Repeat" post.

      Again, my apologies.

      --
      Notes From Under *nix: blas.phemo.us
    3. Re:repeat? Not really, but who cares? by jred · · Score: 2

      NP, I was replying to your reply to someone else. I just butted in with my $0.02 :)

      But you're right, the original article was interesting, and all the "repeat story!!!" posters just fuck up the signal/noise ratio further.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  215. In case anybody thought that Apple doesn't care... by geddes · · Score: 1
    It turns out that "a senior apple executive" offered Smith the standard employee discount if he wanted to buy a new powerbook G4. This story is covered in the register, where we learn:
    But there's a happy ending: a senior Apple executive who Smith declined to name has offered him a coutesy employee discount on a spanking new G4 PowerBook. ®
    I bet there was a good chance it was Steve Jobs.
  216. eBay scams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a modem rack, paid with PayPal, and 3 weeks later I got an IBM 386 and a POS^2 (point of sale *and* piece of fecal matter) printer. The seller never replied, eBay and PayPal were no help. I finally did a Google search on the seller (who has been delisted from eBay). Seems she's got bigger problems than my little fraud charge I filed - she's awaiting trial for running a meth lab. You can't rely on eBay's feedback thing either, she had a 78 with no negatives until after I bought whatever I ended up with.

  217. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Surely you're not trying to say that 20% comes out to 1 in 7 as a fraction."

    Are we talking about my boss again?

  218. Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..that sees how ironic it is to have a soon-to-be History teacher not following the golden rule of "history will repeat itself if not studied".

    I'd fire him for incompetence!

  219. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

    But I thought Canada was just a state in the US? Don't you guys have USPS? Wierd.

  220. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Yes, and so does UPS. If you want to pay 5 times as much for a brokerage fee, a US courier is better than Canadapost.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  221. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by scotch · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure the asshole-to-people ratio is one-to-one unless there is common kind of birth defect or elective surgery I don't know about.

    --
    XML causes global warming.
  222. Just a note on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gor get the hackers http://www.remodern.com/ has just gone down ... sheeez

  223. Re:Wait At Least 10 Business Days to Be More Sure. by Whatsthiswhatsthis · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you would like to find out if a cashiers check is real, often you can call a number and punch in the serial number to see if it is valid. I know this is true for American Express cashiers checks.

    Also, don't be afraid to call the bank that made the cashiers check to see if it is genuine. All banks keep records of who bought what and for whom.

    The above poster is right--something may be "credited" to your account before it has been processed. According to Regulation CC, banks are required to make the funds from cashiers checks available on the next day. That's before they can be processed at the proof department to see if they are valid.

    So when you go to the bank, make sure that the check has been posted to your account--don't just ask for your account balance. Your account balance will reflect the check (counterfeit or not), but it will only be posted to your account after it has cleared.

  224. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by Fat+Casper · · Score: 2
    Those annoying infomercial companies don't accept COD...

    The infomercial audience isn't the most likely group to be certain of having the money on them at any given moment. If you don't have the room on a card, maybe you should put the purchase price toward paying off the card, no? If they don't have the money, the package gets returned- and the seller loses a sale that he thought he had, and has to pay two way shipping to boot.

    My company ships UPS a lot, and we'll do COD if you want. We buy things COD if we have to, too. Of course, a company's easier to find than a guy, and less likely to scam on one shipment.

    --
    I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
  225. Obvious by sparkleytone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think by now it is glaringly obvious that this story is true. Yes, the author seems to embellish thoughts and emotions. This is more the sign of a competent writer than a hoax. Of course the slashdotters expect a whitepaper on the scientific process of catching a thief. No thank you. It was a good read.

    This story has proliferated throughout the web now and made its way onto many well-regarded websites, one of them being the register. Judging by their article, it looks as if the information at the core of the story indeed checks out. So what if the guy is emotional? I would be too. I believe we all would be.

  226. Slightly misleading title... by unicorn · · Score: 1, Troll

    I think the editor should have called it MacBigot...

    The anti-PC rhetoric in a couple places was pretty tiresome.

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke
    1. Re:Slightly misleading title... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, yes, I AM familiar with another subculture that would be willing to go to an arbitrary address at 4:30 in the morning and take surveillance photos of houses, license plates and the like, and post them on the Internet; PSYCHOTIC STALKERS.

      Or something like that. "I'd like to see a Dell user get this done." Well, the Dell user would probably have cashed the check, THEN shipped the goods.

    2. Re:Slightly misleading title... by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

      As opposed to the anti-Mac rhetoric on /.?

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    3. Re:Slightly misleading title... by el_chicano · · Score: 2
      As opposed to the anti-Mac rhetoric on /.
      Actually, Slashdot has an anti-Microsoft bias, by and large we IGNORE mac users...

      Unless they are that stoned 14 year-old chick or that babe that "saved" Christmas! :->
      --
      A man who wants nothing is invincible
  227. Dammit! Stop modding this crap up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  228. Hero? by MeatMan · · Score: 0

    This thing reads like this idiot is some kind of hero, he's a mongoloid. Who in their right mind --especially a 4.0 College educated person-- would mail something worth $3,000 across the country to someone he doesn't even know before getting the cash in hand? (ie: get check first, check clears bank, Fedex the computer version of the gay retarded uncle to the buyer)
    And this guy's writing this thing like he's Tony Soprano... "I'll bring my baseball bat, some duct tape and a bucket of roofing nails". He's an old college student. I shudder to think what a badass this guy must be. Aside from the fact the cashiers check was a counterfeit, he shouldn't get diddley squat but a swift kick in his dumb ass. He even has the gall to *hint* at selling the movie rights to this whole thing that was almost entirely his own fault to begin with. I could make up a better story than this tripe. This guy reminds me of Popeye and Wimpy, "May I please have a dozen hamburgers for which I'll gladly pay you on Tuesday?"

  229. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most ROTFLMAO thred ever

  230. Tracking Projects? by phorm · · Score: 2

    This brings up an interesting idea. Does anyone know of any good projects that implement this, so that the computer, as soon as connecting to the internet - will dial home (or a home server) and instantiate some type of callback script.
    It would be great if there were a copy compatible with both win32 and 'nix. Maybe sourceforge or somewhere already has one?

    Scenario:
    User connects to internet (high speed or dialup)
    Computer detects internet connection, connects to equivilent homebase.com
    Homebase.com returns an indicator as to whether the computer should be in "theft mode"
    Computer, on entering "theft mode" subsequently tried tricks such as
    a) Sends owner/etc info to homebase
    b) Establishing a PPP/Dialup connection to a monitored line, providing phone # info
    c) Sending IP/username info the homebase
    d) Sending info on cookies, checking for variables indicating names - to homebase
    e) Checks for new email accounts on PC, sends email from them to homebase
    f) Pop up forms with "you won" asking for personal info

    Eventually, with enough tricks, homebase should be able to gather enough intel to track said computer. If not, then perhaps homebase can send a type of "timed destruction" sequence to the PC, which will result in erasure and whatever damage is necessary to disable it.
    Considering the amount of crap that goes into cookies, I wouldn't be surprised if one of these - or situation (f) - turns up personal info enough to track said machine.

    1. Re:Tracking Projects? by EllF · · Score: 2

      And how would this work? If I buy a machine, the *first* thing I do is wipe the hard drives and install *nix; even a non-technical user probably installed antivirus software, and your callback scripts would almost certainly fall under their definitions of what constitutes malicious code.

      Remember: given sufficient time and/or resources, hardware control implies complete software control.

      --
      We who were living are now dying
      With a little patience
  231. Re:[ Cached Version ] by Inthewire · · Score: 1

    Learn to skim and read at -1.
    Then you can ignore the moderations of the janitors, their fans and their enemies.

    --


    Writers imply. Readers infer.
  232. If you wait that long you'll lose the sale by martintt · · Score: 1

    If after a few days of the check clearing, the stuff hasn't arrived, most people get suspicious.

    Example: if some Buffy DVDs do not arrive in Bristol tomorrow then the check for them will be cancelled, as it was taken out of my girlfriends' account on Monday.

    I'm sure this is not an uncommon reaction. Certainly you will never get any positive feedback if you wait that long before sending the goods.

    All the posts here are from the sellers perspective, come on most of the ppl here buy on ebay too (or is /. now only populated by crooks who fence their stuff on ebay and are worried about being scammed).

    If you are selling something that expensive you do need to use some escrow service or trusted third party.

    What about fed-ex or local post offices (they used to exist in the uk anyway-don't know about USA) having credit/debit card machines so the buyer can pay on delivery, or you send the goods to a shop near the buyer who then collects them and pays there - ok the overheads would make it unfeasible but it was an idea.

    -no I haven't read the article (./ed) but good luck to the guy.

  233. International - Unverified by Vagary · · Score: 2

    Isn't part of the problem also that Canadian accounts are treated as foreign accounts and therefore not covered by some of PayPal's protections? I think a lot of the problem arises from the fact that PayPal isn't willing to set up country-specific bureaus like eBay or Yahoo! but wants to come up with an one-size-fits-all solution for the world. Obviously financial rules are going to be different in Canada compared to Carjackistan...

    1. Re:International - Unverified by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Yes, addresses outside the USA are not "confirm"able by PayPals laughable standards. This is why Canadapost cannot be trusted in their eyes to deliver material to and from Canadians, even though the Xpresspost works well for tracking, and delivery signatures.
      PayPal has just introduced nonUS currency accounts, and they trick people into sending money to Canadians in CAD, while slicing off an "exchange fee" on top of the exchange. Then if the person in Canada rightfully rejects the useless CAD payment, then the full payment is not refunded to the sender because it is converted back the USD where PayPal takes another cut. They are slicing the pie at both ends.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    2. Re:International - Unverified by jafuser · · Score: 2
      IIRC, you can have multiple balances on PayPal, each in a different currency. You only get charged when you convert between them.

      My suggestion is to leave it in CAD, unless it's a large amount that you need to withdrawl. Then the next time you send money to CA, you won't have to pay again for exchanging USD to CAD.

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  234. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hands down?

  235. Definition of "felony" by waterbug · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=felony

    or, from a more legal-sounding website:

    http://www.lectlaw.com/def/f021.htm

    It is a common fallacy that felony==federal crime.

    --
    Never refuse a breath mint.
    1. Re:Definition of "felony" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many federal misdemeanor offences are there?

    2. Re:Definition of "felony" by DrMaurer · · Score: 1

      Except that in the example he gave, it would be a federal felony. You don't want to screw with the mail.

      Then again, I've never heard of a fedeal misdomenor, so . . . redundancy in gov't? Wow!

      --
      Dan
    3. Re:Definition of "felony" by zora · · Score: 2, Funny
      I got one, two actually

      "Damaging a tree with a firearm" 16USC551;36CFR261.6(2)

      "Careless Shooting with a firearm" 16USC551;36CFR261.10(d)
      In short don't hang your targets on trees in a National Forest, It cost me $200 and 10 hours of picking up garbage and digging fence post holes.
      It's ironic because the forest I was shooting in burned up last summer so the trees would have been wasted anyways...

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet, and say to us, "Make us your slaves, but feed us." - Dostoevsky
  236. Wouldn't work. by j3ss · · Score: 3, Informative

    Because all they have to do is pull the CMOS battery or whatver is powering the BIOS long enough so that the BIOS resets.

    1. Re:Wouldn't work. by Edmund · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Depends on the laptop. IBM laptops are well-known for being notoriously hard to crack. The passwords are stored on a seperate flash RAM chip on the motherboard, which is backed by a CRC checksum. In addition, the password is replicated on the hard drive, and when the BIOS password is set the exact same password is set on the hard drive.

      If you simply wiped or tamped with the data on the chip, the CRC check would fail and the laptop would refuse to boot. Even if somebody managed to bypass the BIOS password by obtaining a "virgin" password chip (i.e. one that has no password set and a checksum to reflect that), they would still be unable to access the hard drive because they lack the password. If the hard drive was put into another computer, it would come up with a controller failure without the password.

      Note that there is a way to circumvent this. You could buy a third party security chip (several companies sell them) and solder it in place of the original one. Then you simply toss out the original hard drive.

      Apparantly a talented man from Australia has figured out exactly how the passwords are stored/encrypted on the chip and built a simple serial circuit and program combination to read it. The schematics and software are freely available on his website, and the idea is that you build the circuit, read the contents of the chip, send him the dump and pay him money to recover the password from inside the binary dump. This allows you to keep the hard drive.

      Unfortunately, I don't have the URL of his website off-hand. If anybody has used his services, does it actually work? :)

      - Ed.

    2. Re:Wouldn't work. by spike+hay · · Score: 2

      Because all they have to do is pull the CMOS battery or whatver is powering the BIOS long enough so that the BIOS resets

      Never thought of that. On my computer, it's as simple as pulling a jumper. But, what if the theif didn't know much about computers.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  237. Violated the Ebay Rules, eh? by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who noticed he violated the Ebay rules by completing the transaction outside of Ebay?

    It's known as "Fee Avoidance".

    Strangely, every time I have sold a Mac, I've gotten several emails the next day asking me to sell it outside of Ebay... but never with any other products.

  238. what?! by Transcendent · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Obviously a PC user.

    Suck it you bubble-lovin Mac faggot...

    Oh geez... "all Mac users are kind-hearted loving people who would never do anything wrong!" ...you make me sick...

    I can see the sequal to the Mac add "My name is ____ and I saved christmas":

    "I'm a PC user and I ruined christmas!!"

    Soon we won't have racial steriotypes, but it'll all be based on your operating system! Oooooo!!! BSD user's BEWARE!!! Linux will form a clan and burn penguins on your lawn!

    ....wait....

  239. Re:Wait At Least 10 Business Days to Be More Sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Ron,

    What you are saying, is to not keep very much money in my PayPal account, is that right? That's what I thought... I also hear other people complaining about it. I've been following that advice, by keeping small amounts in it, I use for small online purchases. It is HELLA convenient, I DO say that for them.

    J

  240. More impressive by harlequinSmurf · · Score: 4, Informative

    I still think that the story of the guy who tracked down his sisters stolen iMac using timbuktu. here: Mac Thief Caught Thanks To Applescript & Timbuktu [slashdot] and here: Turning Macs on Thievery [wired.com]

  241. For stolen laptops not bought. Geesh by phorm · · Score: 2

    Ummm, first of all...

    This has NOTHING to do with buying a machine. At least not from a legit seller. This is to put on your machine, in case it gets stolen, etc.

    Given the post about the Mac machine which was found using Timbuktu and some creative hacking, this woudld be a cool idea.

    And in this case, the thief was too dumb to format. Also worth mentioning is the fact that - being your hardware - you can put whatever you want on it to track it for theft.

    It might not protect you from professionals. For that some hardware can get GPS-type devices to assist in tracking - but they're expensive. And if it's an ebay scammer, it may very well be that he/she is too lazy to immediate wipe the OS (instead booting to see if it works first).

    1. Re:For stolen laptops not bought. Geesh by EllF · · Score: 2

      I wasn't referring to legally purchased laptops, either.

      I haven't read the story itself, as I've been unable to get to it all day (slashdotted), so I don't know about the stupidity of the thief. I was pointing out that were *I* to steal a computer, I'd wipe that baby clean immediately.

      My other point was that what you described is essentially a virus, and that any system with a virus scanner installed would most likely detect it as such. Sure, it's fine and dandy for YOU to install, but what if someone cracked a machine and installed a piece of software like this? Think of all the machines and information they'd be able to collect. Think of the children.

      A GPS solution wouldn't "assist in tracking" against a professional, either. Being professionals, they'd just rip it out, or put it out of commision.

      Sorry to be less than clear.

      --
      We who were living are now dying
      With a little patience
  242. Re:Wait At Least 10 Business Days to Be More Sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut the fuck up.

  243. Service? by TheBillGates · · Score: 1

    "And then I hired an ugly fat man to service my wife. Oops, I meant service my pool."

  244. Wrong! It was the The Greeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Democracy--that is, the concept of people working together for a common good and a common purpose not decreed by "the wise" or "the noble"--is something whose earliest-continous (and most famous) example is the people of the Untied States of America'

    WRONG! The most famous example is the Greeks (more precisely the Athenians) They came up with Democracy over 25 centuries ago.

    The US is nothinbg but a LATE ADOPTER who implemented Greeks ideas 23 centuries after their invention.(The US Founding Fathers borrowed a lot from the Greeks and the French Philosophers of XVIIIth century)

    Other nations implemented Demoracy MANY CENTURIES BEFORE the US (Switzerland is a well known example)

    BTW I am neither Greek nor Swiss.

    1. Re:Wrong! It was the The Greeks by Bernie+Fsckinner · · Score: 1

      You missed the point. Ancient Athens stopped being a democracy over 2000 years ago. The US is the oldest democracy that still exists.

    2. Re:Wrong! It was the The Greeks by muzthe42nd · · Score: 1

      sorry matey, but democracy that was around before the US is still around....like in iceland, which has the oldest democracy in europe, at 900 years old...

      --
      Pfft - Sorry, what?
  245. Re:[ Cached Version ] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you ignorant, or stupid?

    He said: If the site remains up, leave this post at 2. Otherwise (as I suspect), please mod this up just so that others can read his story.

    So uh... you've got two choices, according to him - don't mod down, or mod up. So... he expected to be modded down?

    I vote for stupid!

  246. All of your loans are . . . by achurch · · Score: 2

    Are you heartless???:
    all of your student loans for the next semester are [...]

    Am I the only one who filled in the end of this as "belong to us"?

  247. That's fantastic that he got the guy and all... by neostorm · · Score: 1

    But doesn't anyone have a problem with the fact that he had to go through ALL THAT to finally convince the authorities about this obvious criminal problem?

    He had how much paperwork and proof? He spoke with how many people? And they blew him OFF?

    Boy I looooove this countries justice system...

    1. Re:That's fantastic that he got the guy and all... by indefinite · · Score: 1

      It looks to me like they didn't just write him off. He just didn't want to wait a week or two, so he took it against them.

  248. Cashier's check by jbolden · · Score: 2

    A cashier's check is precleared. That's why this was such a nasty scam. I'm frankly shocked the banks didn't go nuts on a forged cashier's check.

  249. Man... by raehl · · Score: 2

    If some asshole was doing who knows what with my Mac, I don't think I'd WANT it back. I'd at least make sure to wipe it off good.

  250. dude by W32.Klez.H · · Score: 1

    he sure is pompous with his bigotry towards other-brand-lovers.

  251. Most crimes committed in the name of drugs... by raehl · · Score: 2

    Are "petty" shoplifting, fraud, forgery, breaking and entering, theft, robbery...

    To pay for the drugs you're addicted to.

    Drugs are not bad because they hurt the user. Drugs are bad because the user hurts people to get their drugs. Legalizing drugs won't stop people from committing other crimes to buy them.

    1. Re:Most crimes committed in the name of drugs... by DreamerFi · · Score: 2

      Legalizing drugs won't stop people from committing other crimes to buy them.

      Prices will go down dramatically by legalizing them, folks won't need to steal for them. Also, people do tend to commit crimes to get cocaine, heroin, and the like, pot is relatively cheap and non-addictive. If you're worried about people continuing to steal after legalizing, set up a program where you hand out free drugs or drugs replacements to registered addicts. Worked fine in Switzerland and several other European countries.

    2. Re:Most crimes committed in the name of drugs... by rossifer · · Score: 1
      Drugs are bad because the user hurts people to get their drugs. Legalizing drugs won't stop people from committing other crimes to buy them.

      What kind of crack are you smoking? Must be pretty good stuff. When cocaine costs what prescription morphine costs (a close relative and about 1/20th the street price of clean coke) you'll only have to steal 1/20th as much stuff to get your fix.

      That's a lot less crime from addicts stealing to get their next fix. And that's just one of the positive side effects from legalization to say nothing of reduced addiction rates, reduced o/d events, drugs sales generating tax revenue, money saved on smaller police departments, etc.

      Regards, Ross
    3. Re:Most crimes committed in the name of drugs... by raehl · · Score: 2

      Ah, so we're going to legalize it, and then NOT tax the crap out of it?

      Then the users are just stealing from the healthcare system.

      Either way, the cost for drugs is rarely born by the user of the drugs.

    4. Re:Most crimes committed in the name of drugs... by jafuser · · Score: 2
      shoplifting, fraud, forgery, breaking and entering, theft, robbery
      Don't the desperate addicts do that now? At least if most drugs were legalized, the drug prices would plummet and these crimes would decrease proportionally in frequency.
      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  252. As much as hate the idea of the suburb... by SuperMario666 · · Score: 1

    this story is just one more reason to evacuate our nation's cities.

  253. In Soviet Russia.... by raehl · · Score: 2

    Decent sentence structure confuses you!

    Well, maybe not if you know Russian.

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia.... by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

      Could you kindly tell me where this reverse Russian grammar joke started? I must have missed the origin, and it's bugging me.

      Thanks.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    2. Re:In Soviet Russia.... by raehl · · Score: 2

      Well, it originally started with some russian comedian back in the 80's, whose joke was "In Soviet Russia, TV watches you!"

      On Slashdot, someone butcherred the joke in a thread a week or so ago, which of course drew the obligatory "I know more than you" correction, which wasn't entirely correct, which drew the 'I know more than the guy who knows more than you (because I used google)' correction, and now...

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of 'In Soviet Russia' jokes.

    3. Re:In Soviet Russia.... by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

      Thank you, sir.

      You shall recieve 1 billion "thank yous" and zero mod points, since I can't help you here.

      Thanks,
      Bryan

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  254. Wrong, sorry by Scholasticus · · Score: 1

    Wrong, sorry. Yes, he was thanking the Mac community, but he did by way of saying that PC users are malicious (they steal, they ruin Christmas) and stupid (they don't know how to use e-mail). This guy did a stupid thing by sending his computer to someone he didn't know without being paid for it first, and then went to great lengths to catch the guy. So he has some guts and went out of his way to catch a thief. He also bashed a lot of intelligent and good people in his account of the events. I think this reflects negatively on his character (though not on the Mac community that helped him). In or out of context, some of his comments were at the very least insulting.

  255. This is cool! by sickboy_macosX · · Score: 1

    I am always glad to know Nothing comes between a Mac user and his Computer :-D I dont know what I would do, if I had this happen to me, I would be sad,

    --
    --- /* In Soviet Russia, the Mac OS X kernel panics you! */
    1. Re:This is cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct, you are sad, a sad piece of trash that has gaysexwithdogs, spread the word!

  256. Ironically... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    My Favorite quote is.....

    "That night I dreamed of Mr. Christmas and a baseball bat, some duct tape, and roofing nails."

    The detectives of the Chicago PD would actually show up, quickly, for this sort of activity.

    I've had a lesser run in with a scammer who decided he was tired of accepting money and sending things, so he stopped sending things. See my journal entries for the story. Over a $30 item they hauled the guy in, in Tseun Wan.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  257. Columbine et al by jbolden · · Score: 2

    Prior to the last 5 years with the teen shootings the image of geek high schoolers getting back at jocks was seen as funny. These things can change.

  258. I can't believe no one has questioned this yet... by lostguy · · Score: 1
    I am a college student (my second time around). Specifically, I'm studying to become a high school history teacher. I am a student with a lifelong habit though, Macintosh. I got my first Mac in 1986, a used Mac Plus with 1 megabyte of RAM a massive 40 megabyte external hardrive.

    • The Mac Plus was released in January of 1986. If he found someone to sell him a used one at a time when people kept their machines for years, he either found a sucker, or someone who tried a Mac and had to switch back. Possible, but not probable.
    • How the heck much was a 40M HD in 1986? As much as the Mac Plus? What kind of student spends $2-3k for a HD? Every student Mac geek I knew until about 1990 made do with floppies.

    More likely he's trying to establish Mac cred and fudging his dates, because that extra year or three matters so much. That, or he's the kind of idjit who would send off a bunch of stuff without getting paid, and can't remember. :-)
  259. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by DEBEDb · · Score: 2

    Then the other person must be trusting you
    to ship the thing once the money clears.
    Either way, one is a potential sucker.

    Can't we all just get along? :)

    --

    Considered harmful.
  260. Re: why not just... by cheekyboy · · Score: 0

    use gold, have the buyer send 9oz of gold to fedex to deliver to the laptop dude in exchange, he gets the gold only if he gets the laptop.

    Gold was 323$ 2 days ago, now its $332, what a profit.

    (www.gold-eagle.com)

    Federal Reserve Notes (ie cash) is useless, go go gold.

    also check out
    www.depresion2.tv

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  261. Right... by KinkyClown · · Score: 1

    "Mr. Christmas said he didn't even know what email was. Obviously a PC user." The idiot really is a dumb Mac fan... 1 PC user probably knows MORE of computers than 2 Mac users ever will... Windows isn't that slick in it's interface as MacOS; you really *NEED* knowledge to use it.

    1. Re:Right... by Intrinsic · · Score: 1

      LOL,my thoughts exactley

  262. Actually... no. by The+Tyro · · Score: 2

    The law would disagree with you in many jurisdictions.

    The distinction between "theft" and "grand theft" is typically determined by amount.

    Often there is a scale of theft amounts that garner different levels of legal sanction... fourth degree misdemeanor, third degree, second, and so forth, up to felony theft. Then there are fourth degree felonies, third degree, etc.

    Most big-city police departments are so overloaded and undermanned that I'm not at all surprised that this guy's case got the back burner. Honestly... would you rather have violent crimes prosecuted, or a few lower-level property crimes?

    As much as it offends the sensibilities of the tech population (you mean computers aren't everything??), there are far more-heinous crimes that go unsolved than an ebay scammer.

    I agree that it's wrong... but infinite resources and manpower are not on the radar screen of most police departments.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:Actually... no. by sweetooth · · Score: 2

      Ok, we are getting down to the political issues as to why items like this are on the back burner. I'm saying that they shouldn't be and trying to give a reason why. The fact that they are because there isn't enough man power etc is a result of poorly funded police departments and mismanagment of the funds they do have, IMO. If you have the staff to handle all of your crimes (or at least the majority of big and small not just the big) you have a good chance in seeing an overall reduction in crime due to the increased risk. Part of what makes crime appealing, especially small scale crimes, is the low chance of getting caught or prosecuted. If people get busted for the small crimes the feeling that it's not worth it to try a bigger crime may prevail.

      Ignoring the small crimes doesn't make crime go away. Yes there are more heinous crimes than fraud, but crime is crime period.

      Honestly I would like to see my police department with sufficient funding and manpower. I would also like to see that funding and man power being put to use solving as many crimes as possible big and small.

    2. Re:Actually... no. by The+Tyro · · Score: 2

      I agree with you... absolutely and totally.

      Crime is funny... it really does snowball. When somebody consciously commits their first crime, they probably are sweating the thought of a blue-clad policeman swooping out of nowhere to make the bust, just like on TV... when it doesn't happen, and they "get away with it," they become encouraged, even emboldened. They realize a fundamental truth... a huge number of crimes go unsolved, and unstopped. As long as they are even halfway careful... they can do whatever they want!

      A powerful thought, being able to do whatever you want... and it leads to more crimes, and bigger crimes.

      Like you, I think hitting the small crimes is important. Punks will always tell you "why'd you stop me for speeding? Don't you have rapists to catch or sumthin??" Well, yes... and sometimes we catch them by traffic stops.

      How'd Timothy McVeigh get caught? Traffic Stop.
      How about Son of Sam? Parking ticket (if memory serves)

      Stopping a person for a burned-out license plate light may seem like a chicken-shit stop... until you come up to the driver's window and smell the weed, or see the gun and ski mask on the back seat...

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    3. Re:Actually... no. by el_chicano · · Score: 2
      Stopping a person for a burned-out license plate light may seem like a chicken-shit stop... until you come up to the driver's window and smell the weed
      If all you get is someone smoking weed then that is still a chicken-shit stop. The sad fact is that many cops would rather bust a pothead than go after real criminals, as it is less work for them that way.

      And your anecdotes are not enough to prove your point. Unless you have hard statistics proving your point that you catch a substantial number of criminals through traffic stops it is just an opinion based on anecdotal evidence.
      --
      A man who wants nothing is invincible
    4. Re:Actually... no. by The+Tyro · · Score: 2

      "The sad fact is that many cops would rather bust a pothead than go after real criminals, as it is less work for them that way."

      You suggest that my "anecdotes" are not enough evidence to prove my point, and then have enough balls to make a sweeping statement like the above about cops? Where, sir, are your "hard statistics?"

      Heh... you sound like a troll of the first order... but I'll feed you.

      By your post, I'd guess that your only experience with law enforcement is from the wrong side. What's the matter? Angry at that last traffic ticket you got? Think you didn't deserve it?

      Let me just make a couple of points:

      #1: Don't burn a big fat joint while you are being pulled over by a police officer. A single joint is a minor misdemeanor where I live, but it gives probable cause to search your vehicle. You could probably avoid this hassle by smoking your pot in the privacy of your own home. Since pot is still illegal, it is stupid to smoke it in public... you deserve every fine you get if you insist on being that dumb.

      #2: Since pot is illegal, in my experience it is predominately smoked by partying teens, people who use it recreationally, and antisocial types who tend to committ other crimes. Most cops I know are very, very interested in the latter group, since they cause lot of crime, and it's a real "feather in your cap" to put one in prison. Most cops hate traffic duty, small-time pot busts, etc...they would like nothing better than to focus on the bigger crimes. Barney Fife is a fictional TV character.

      #3: While it may be cool to hate "the man," most cops are just trying to do their job, which is to enforce the law. If they don't, they get fired, and they have families to feed, just like you. If you don't like the law, get the law changed. Don't bitch at the cop; he's just society's messenger. If society doesn't agree with you... well... what can I say? You pay your money, you take your chances. You can flaunt whatever law you like, but you'd better be prepared to take it like a man when society sanctions you. That's a hard fact of life, but one you'd better understand if you want to stay out of jail.

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  263. Re:Who care's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are they going to do about it? Macs aren't Playstations. You don't need a licence to make software for it.

  264. Fantastic work - but what about eBay feedback? by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I'd be interested to know what Mr Christmas's eBay feedback was like. It doesn't say in the article. If he had been doing this for some time you'd expect some pretty scathing negative feedback, wouldn't you?

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  265. Stalkers R Us by Feniscowles · · Score: 1

    It also goes to show that, if you want to find someone who doesn't want to be found (for stalking / torturing / murdering purposes), you just have to pretend to be a wronged Mac user and a bunch of Mac do-gooders will come and help you track them down. Moral - pray your abusive spouse does not know the URL of any Mac user groups.

  266. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by MulluskO · · Score: 2

    Well, that's just on the forums, I think we would all agree that the counterfeiter is also an asshole, so it's at least 102:2 = 51:1.

    --

    Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
  267. Don't you guys have direct money transfers? by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 2
    Here in the Netherlands (and pretty the much the rest of Europe) one can directly transfer money from their account to some other person's account with the same or any other bank. You can give the order by mailing a transfer order or over the Internet, modem or telephone. It's free and it takes from one day (when it's the same bank, sometimes it's even instantaneous) to at most a few days. Once transferred the money is yours and there's nothing the sender can do about it anymore.

    It's been as easy and cheap like this here for as long as I can remember. What's the deal in the US that transferring money is so difficult?

  268. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by TriadMage · · Score: 1
    I sell things on Ebay as well (usually old games that I'm done with) - and I don't do COD. Paypal - sure. Checks and money orders, but I wait until they clear before they ship.
    But there are presumably also scamsters who promise to ship after payment clears and then don't. What's the relative proportion of fraudulent sellers to fraudulent buyers ?
  269. Re:Wait At Least 10 Business Days to Be More Sure. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    actually the BEST thing to do is if you are given a check CASH IT at a bank that is the same as the issuers. I.E. I get a 5/3 bank check I go over to the 5/3 bank and make the cashiere cash it. No they CANNOT charge you a fee, it's funds drawn off of their accounts and they must honor the check if there are funds available. this way you run a lower scam rate. if the check bounces it doesn't hit your accounts.

    second... NEVER EVER SEND ANYTHNIG COD. Duh!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  270. PC users are dishonest and evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're not necessarily stupid. But we're evil and dishonest. We buy cheap stuff, then overclock it to "increase" the value/performance ratio.

    Muahaha!

  271. Re:Wait At Least 10 Business Days to Be More Sure. by Bernie+Fsckinner · · Score: 1

    PNC Bank in Pennsylvania is now charging THREE DOLLARS to cash a check drawn on their own accounts if you don't have an account with them.

  272. That's one reason I... by edgedmurasame · · Score: 1

    ...refuse COD, checks, and Paypal. At least with a money order, I know that they at least are down the amount they paid, and that I've got a decent amount of information; they have to take the extra step of mailing it or somehow revealing some kind of return address.

    --
    "Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
    1. Re:That's one reason I... by sparkleytone · · Score: 1

      your point is lost in one contradiction. a cashiers check is just as good as a money order, which is just as good as cash. the fact that the cashiers check was counterfeit is really no different than if it was a counterfeit money order, or counterfeit $100's. he would still be out the same amount of money. having received payment in a different manner doesnt magically make the problem disappear. the guy was a counterfeiter.

    2. Re:That's one reason I... by edgedmurasame · · Score: 1

      Point taken, but you've made it significantly harder for the person if you dont go with the riskier payment methods(as in all cases, which you cannot totally prevent counterfitting 100%) to do their misdeed; which makes it more or less a job of checking (be it with escrow services, or personal knowledge, or some way of determining authenticity) the currency. I'd like to hear how this goes (especially when mugshots start coming in, and when convictions are reached for that group)

      --
      "Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
  273. Good Story by Besty · · Score: 0

    i think this is one of the best links posted on slashdot in a long time, nice one.

  274. Re:I'm sorry, but you didn't read carefully enough by jdreed1024 · · Score: 2
    Normally there's no reason to wait for a cashier's check to clear.

    Sure there is. It's called counterfeiting. It's a hell of a lot easier to counterfeit a check than cash. Largely because banks don't even look at checks anymore when you deposit them. So you lose, until it comes back as returned and you're overdrawn.

    --
    There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
  275. you are a disturbing person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Assuming this story isnt just some wild fabrication to ease money from our wallets, this guy was screwed. Fine the COD was a stupid idea, but give him a break. You are an asshole for being so harsh about it.

    If you were hard up and then conned for $3000 you would be pretty dammed pissed too!

    And remember, people are conned because they are gullible or stupid or too trusting, so when it happens to you, I wonder if you will be so scathing !

    Seb

  276. Re:Wait At Least 10 Business Days to Be More Sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's not legal for them do to so.

    simply stand there and pitch a bitch, mention how you are going to badmouth their bank all over town /etc...

    huntington tried that with me once. snd I said loudly "hunting bank doesnt honor it's own accounts?" the manager came over and quietly gave me the money.

    remember EVERY bank is based on scamming as much money out of it's customers as possible.

    moral of the story? Banks are ran by nothing but CRIMINALS and scam artists. do not trust banks EVER.

    the smaller the credit union the better and more honest they are.

  277. Insurance max is $175. I got burned this way. by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    I purchased a "complete" copy of Quark Xpress, that happened to not include the license or installation key. I paid a normal price for it -- about $550 for 4.0 -- and got burned. Fraud was provable in several ways.

    (1) Ebay came through on their bargain: They insure for $200 minus a $25 deductable (read $175) which -- after all the paperwork -- is about $150.

    (2) Paypal makes victims go through about $50 of paperwork, then doesn't pay on their "insurance". To date as of the time this happened, they had never submitted a SINGLE insurance claim, according to several web sources I read. I don't know if that is true. I do know that although I had several proofs of fraud, some involving their own system which they could check, and found another victim of the same guy, they still said "well, he shipped *something*, so we don't pay nuthin."

    This is system run by the guy who, if I remember, wants to start up a space hotel with the money he got from selling Paypal. My advice? Don't trust the windows of that space hotel: they'll be made from sugar, just like in the movies.

    Anyhow, your statement isn't quite accurate. It should read, "Do business for more than $175, get burned." That said, one other time since then, I purchased a Mac on Ebay, and got it without a hitch. But it was a PowerBook 190 parts computer, so I kept it cheap and my risk small.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  278. If you think that was a great story.... by eples · · Score: 2

    The guy was selling used Macs at a markup to people who didn't know any better. He got taken by a guy who did the same thing - took advantage of someone who didn't know any better. I'd give this creep not a single drop of respect or even a thought of heroism for catching the guy who one-upped him. They're both made of the same stuff.
    Plus, who's stupid enough to have their rent riding on a check from an eBay auction?

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
  279. Re:As Homer Simpson says... by Pope · · Score: 2

    It's "God bless those pagans."

    I used the .WAV as my new email sound for a year. Now it's "That's good!"

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  280. Is it just me or... by christopher240240 · · Score: 1

    does the whole 'if you must donate to my girlfriend's paypal account' thing sound like a scam in and of itself?

    1. Re:Is it just me or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you. This just sounds bogus from the get go. Playing on community spirit of Mac and just happens around the holidays.

      Where are the photos of the guy. How about a police report number? How about someone calling to see if this police offer with the spare fedex outfit exists. I doubt it severely.

  281. This is a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not believe a word of this. At the end he is asking for money to be put in his girlfriends paypal account. Just sounds like a scam based on a scam.

  282. Better than nothing though. by phorm · · Score: 2

    Not much will save you against professionals, unfortunately. But there are an increasing number of amatures out there, people who have figured out that it's easy to scam people... others that simple have light-fingers and snitch somebody's laptop while they're not looking.

    The guy in the article was operating on a fairly large basis, but by the sounds it was just one guy who found it's easy to scam people who are foolish (and don't use the ebay internal bidding system properly). A lot of crooks are clever in some ways, dumb in others, so a GPS solution might work.
    The software-enabled solution might still work too. , and while it might detect the nuking software it would not necessarily get the call-home. There are a lot of programs that delete files, nuke entries, but don't follow the patterns of virii. Also, if you preinstalled say, Mcafee... then you could probably find ways to make it *not* detect your own virus (is there an ignore list?).

    Another thing to think of is that a lot of criminals keep data on PC's so they can sift through. Oh, look, he's his banking info. Oh, he's saved his online banking password. A lot of smart crooks would avoid nukage just to retain this information, which is often worth more than the PC (how about the banking password to somebody's business bank account).

    Again, this probably won't work on organized crime, or those smart enough to nuke a hard-drive before ever plugging-it-in or turning it on, but it's better than nothing.

  283. Hey! IT made the Chicago Tribune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The story also made it to the Chicago Tribune.

    Congrats

  284. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by jafuser · · Score: 2

    Maybe he should have told the FBI/CIA/SS/NSA/etc that the laptop had mp3's on it. At least then he could have gotten some kind of response from them...

    --
    Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  285. Re:I'm sorry - but he was an idiot in the first pl by rew · · Score: 2

    I'm not from the USA, but "COD" means "cash on delivery", right?

    Cash as in "real money"? I thought that this was the way to ensure that you got the money provided that the item gets delivered.

    If FedEx doesn't bring you the cash it got for the item, then I'd say that FedEx has a problem. If FedEx is stupid enough to accept bouncable cheques, then that's FedEx's problem.

    I have to conclude that FedEx doesn't want to run around with loads of cash, and accepts cheques. But this defeats the whole purpose of COD, so why do this?

    Roger.

  286. Employee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It almost seems like the entire article was written by someone who seems to have a vendetta against PC users. Almost like a employee someones whos tight with an employee of Macintosh (Apple? Im a bit retarded from school right now) Call me the conspiricy theorist but this article just bashes PCs too damn much to be written by just some hardcore Mac user. Almost like he wants to see all PCs explode...or become stolen...or something...
    But I babble...

  287. Mainstream press has the story by netringer · · Score: 1
    It looks like the Chicago Tribune reads slashdot. They have a local followup on the story [Free registration required. The free link will probably be dead in a week.]

    Note that they classify it as a Mac story.
    "I've never seen anything like it," Markham police Sgt. Jim Knapp said of the Apple computer users nationwide whose teamwork led police to Christmas. "They have this strong bond that's about a lot more than their computers."
    --
    Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
  288. Move over, Rudolph! by sapporoitchy · · Score: 1

    He needs to get in touch with a TV studio that can turn this story into a claymation Christmas classic:

    Narration by Burle Ives, as 'the Snowman'

    Tobey Maguire, as the voice of our plucky Mac-toting sleuth, 'Jason
    Eric Smith'

    Brad Garrett (Everybody Love Raymond), as the audacious 'Sargeant
    Knapp'

    Victoria (MacinTalk Pro Voice), as the damsel in distress, 'Powerbook
    G4'


    and

    Jeremy Irons, voicing the malevolent 'Melvin Christmas' [I'll
    never get over that name]

    If made, this holiday classic will be destined to keep the kiddies glued to the set every Christmas Eve. I know I'll be watching :D

  289. Re:What an egotistical asshole by sapporoitchy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where do these people get the idea that owning a Mac makes them a superior human being?

    The author never said 'superior human beings' but according to this study and CNET article, we're smarter and make more money. I don't suggest you read this, however, since it may just make you angrier and hate us more.

  290. My (short) bad check story by ke4roh · · Score: 2
    In 1997 I sold some memory for about $250 via USENET, and the buyer wanted it shipped C.O.D. I went to the local office of the United States Postal Service to send it off, and explained to the clerk that I only wanted to accept cash for the payment. There were two blanks on the C.O.D. form to enter the amount for cash and for check, and in the check section, he wrote "NO CHECK" for me. The package went on its way, got delivered, and the postal clerk on the other end followed regulations by accepting a check. The check was rubber. The Bexar Co. Texas district attorney's office whose job it is to hunt down bad checks was no help - they just took the bad check and sat on it. The post office was no help - even though it was their clerk who made up regulations on his own.

    Moral: If you must ship C.O.D., set the amount for payment by check to the maximum - $10,000. That way, if it's a bad check, the clerk will remember it (to be a witness to the passing of a bad check), and the crime will be substantially worse if you do get a bad check, making it easier to pursue.

    --
    I hate call waitin`~+~~~
    NO CARRIER
  291. (A reply to the anonymous coward) by scrod · · Score: 1

    (A reply to the anonymous coward)

  292. Re:Another recent eBay fraud scheme: ebayupdates.c by hether · · Score: 2

    There was a story on this on slashdot last week:
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/12/13/033821 9&mode=thread&tid=98
    and the story actually broke about Dec. 6.

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
  293. Re:Another recent eBay fraud scheme: ebayupdates.c by mkweise · · Score: 1

    Does it shock you that six day old comments sometimes contain old news? Or do you have another point that I'm missing?

    Another recent eBay fraud scheme: ebayupdates.com (Score:2, Informative)
    by mkweise (629582) on Thursday December 12, @06:26PM

    eBay Customers Targetted by Credit Card Scam
    Posted by CowboyNeal on Friday December 13, @04:37AM

    --
    Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the War Room!
  294. Re:Another recent eBay fraud scheme: ebayupdates.c by hether · · Score: 2

    No, I just wasn't paying attention to post dates.

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.