To be fair, you may just be very drunk, instead of so retarded that you are unable to understand that accusing someone of spewing "irrelevant bullshit" is the opening move in the "for the children" gambit.
Speaking of which, you don't have the energy numbers, do you? It's OK, I'll wait while you try and find them, since they're the only thing that matter. Good luck with that.
Bingo. Hollywood Chatterati like to think they've got the inside scoop, but the real decisions are made by a cabal of dead-eyed accountants and lawyers who regard comic books, movies, and their own consumers [*] with - at best - a detached contempt.
They don't get excited, or swayed by passion, they just decide how much money they're going to make from the rubes, and add up the 'value' of their 'talent' until it meets the required number.
Whedon's last movie was 5 years ago, and bombed. His TV work since then has been small beer. Nobody wants to make a movie that 'only' grosses twenty five or even fifty million; I don't see this panning out any time soon.
[*] Plus their 'creative partners', from which I draw my knowledge of their charming ways.
Keeping people alive is "irrelevant bullshit"? See, that response is exactly why I am concerned that photovoltaic is a cult rather than a solution.
Curious that you think the "irrelevant bullshit" isn't a consideration for other forms of energy generation. Of course it is. Only a brainwashed retard would suggest otherwise. Our continued existence proves that fossil fuels provide more energy than they take to obtain, plus enough extra for super-"irrelevant bullshit", like the devices we use to have this enthralling debate.
So, does photovoltaic provide net energy? Show your working.
We know - from our continuing existence - that coal provides more energy than it uses to obtain it. Does photovoltaic? I'm concerned that it doesn't, and the problem is that it'll take us another 30 years or so to find out that we've committed to a Sisyphian task.
If you can't wait for Gears of War 3, then you won't be able to wait to start being unable to wait for Gears of War 4, so get started on that right away!
I guess if you know what you like, then you'll like more of what you know. It's just a little sad that so much effort goes into making games with a number in the title.
Energy costs, not dollar costs. You think photovoltaic pays for itself? Show me the energy costs, including extraction, installation, maintenance, oh, and keeping the people who do all those things alive so that they can keep doing them indefinitely.
And the obvious corollary is that with due process of law, any person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property. If you don't like it, go back to Communist Belgium, hippy.
"Programmers", you say? When's the last time you heard a programmer say "going forward"? I'd venture that this duo are doing the sucking in, rather than being the suckees. Er, suckers. But not the sucking-in suckers.
Look, can you explain it in the form of an analogy featuring drunken cheerleaders? Also, expand on the sucking.
By design. Ogre is creeping in fits and starts in the direction of being a game engine, but Irrlicht (if you can't spell it, how much do you know about it?) is explicitly a lightweight 3D engine, targeted at bulk hardware rather than cutting edge gaming systems.
As an active member of the indie game development community, let me be the first to inform you that indie "original game design" consists largely of "Team Fortress, with Boba Fett", or if you're in the Far East, "Team Fortress, with furries".
Comparing Starcraft to RPGs is apples to Bad Analogies
Fixed that for y-WHOOOOOSH!
Also: bah, 3rd edition? I was playing D&D when it wasn't Advanced the first time, and when "elf" was a character class. Hey, you zerglings! Get off my lawn!
Also known as cocaine. Or tetrahydrocannabinol, diacetylmorphine, methamphetamine or similar killers of children. What, don't you want your cellphone to be used to sniff out the murderers of children? What kind of monster are you?
They say they can't. How hard have they tried? Have they really tried at all? Chances are, it's been thrown into their bug tracking system (if they have one) and some tester has spent 5 minutes poking at it, then gone back to working on paid projects instead.
Thus, you have to help them understand what it is you're doing.
"have"? I do not think that word means what you think it means.
If you believe that you have a repeatable exploit, and you've given it to the vendor, and they say it's invalid, then what harm could you do by releasing it? Either they're right, or they need to be shown that they're wrong.
Slashdot Mirror
Bingo. I took one look at the plaintiff's name, and immediately thought of Invisible Sky Giant Syndrome.
Perhaps - and I mean this as sincere advice - you're doing poorly in the workplace because you're a self pitying whiner?
Waaaaiting for the Tweet. Pull up a chair, and we'll share a pouch of tobaccy.
That's disgusting and perverted. You just mixed a character and an actress. You broke the fourth wall and ruined the fantasy for all of us, heathen!
To be fair, you may just be very drunk, instead of so retarded that you are unable to understand that accusing someone of spewing "irrelevant bullshit" is the opening move in the "for the children" gambit.
Speaking of which, you don't have the energy numbers, do you? It's OK, I'll wait while you try and find them, since they're the only thing that matter. Good luck with that.
We need to get back to the Old Ways, where we invested all of time more wisely in Talking About Doing Stuff. We fear this new fangled "work".
I think the correct term is "payload", not "astronaut".
They don't get excited, or swayed by passion, they just decide how much money they're going to make from the rubes, and add up the 'value' of their 'talent' until it meets the required number.
Whedon's last movie was 5 years ago, and bombed. His TV work since then has been small beer. Nobody wants to make a movie that 'only' grosses twenty five or even fifty million; I don't see this panning out any time soon.
[*] Plus their 'creative partners', from which I draw my knowledge of their charming ways.
I like to think of Buffy as the love child of Emma Peel and Thor, so you see how it all ties together.
Pants: unmoistened. Wait for the Tweet before the nerdgasm.
Keeping people alive is "irrelevant bullshit"? See, that response is exactly why I am concerned that photovoltaic is a cult rather than a solution.
Curious that you think the "irrelevant bullshit" isn't a consideration for other forms of energy generation. Of course it is. Only a brainwashed retard would suggest otherwise. Our continued existence proves that fossil fuels provide more energy than they take to obtain, plus enough extra for super-"irrelevant bullshit", like the devices we use to have this enthralling debate.
So, does photovoltaic provide net energy? Show your working.
We know - from our continuing existence - that coal provides more energy than it uses to obtain it. Does photovoltaic? I'm concerned that it doesn't, and the problem is that it'll take us another 30 years or so to find out that we've committed to a Sisyphian task.
If you can't wait for Gears of War 3, then you won't be able to wait to start being unable to wait for Gears of War 4, so get started on that right away!
I guess if you know what you like, then you'll like more of what you know. It's just a little sad that so much effort goes into making games with a number in the title.
Energy costs, not dollar costs. You think photovoltaic pays for itself? Show me the energy costs, including extraction, installation, maintenance, oh, and keeping the people who do all those things alive so that they can keep doing them indefinitely.
They're exercising their Constitutional right to waste money on lawyers in order to force Apple to waste money on lawyers.
It's right there in the Fifth: No person shall be [...] deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law
And the obvious corollary is that with due process of law, any person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property. If you don't like it, go back to Communist Belgium, hippy.
Plus, if pirates preyed on lawyers, well, who'd argue with that?
"Programmers", you say? When's the last time you heard a programmer say "going forward"? I'd venture that this duo are doing the sucking in, rather than being the suckees. Er, suckers. But not the sucking-in suckers.
Look, can you explain it in the form of an analogy featuring drunken cheerleaders? Also, expand on the sucking.
By design. Ogre is creeping in fits and starts in the direction of being a game engine, but Irrlicht (if you can't spell it, how much do you know about it?) is explicitly a lightweight 3D engine, targeted at bulk hardware rather than cutting edge gaming systems.
As an active member of the indie game development community, let me be the first to inform you that indie "original game design" consists largely of "Team Fortress, with Boba Fett", or if you're in the Far East, "Team Fortress, with furries".
Fixed that for y-WHOOOOOSH!
Also: bah, 3rd edition? I was playing D&D when it wasn't Advanced the first time, and when "elf" was a character class. Hey, you zerglings! Get off my lawn!
Core Wars?
You know that in 24 hours, the top hit is going to be this page, right?
You know, if you manage to learn a rudimentary grasp of Earth humour and take it back to your home planet, you will be worshipped as a god.
Also known as cocaine. Or tetrahydrocannabinol, diacetylmorphine, methamphetamine or similar killers of children. What, don't you want your cellphone to be used to sniff out the murderers of children? What kind of monster are you?
They say they can't. How hard have they tried? Have they really tried at all? Chances are, it's been thrown into their bug tracking system (if they have one) and some tester has spent 5 minutes poking at it, then gone back to working on paid projects instead.
"have"? I do not think that word means what you think it means.
If you believe that you have a repeatable exploit, and you've given it to the vendor, and they say it's invalid, then what harm could you do by releasing it? Either they're right, or they need to be shown that they're wrong.