Slashdot Mirror


StarCraft Cheating Scandal Rocks Korea

dotarray writes with this snippet: "The largest scandal in e-sports history is currently unfolding in Korea, with revelations that a number of current pro gamers are involved with match setups and illegal betting. While the gamers are unnamed at this point, the story is said to touch many A-list StarCraft celebrities, including sAviOr, Ja Mae Yoon, one of the best-known and most successful players of all time."

471 comments

  1. How is this news? by allaunjsilverfox2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously, I was expecting something like a bot ring or involvement in a virus that spread via the game.

    --
    Restore the madness of youth's lechery
    1. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you, but I also want to know how this is cheating.

      Cheating the system, maybe, but if you want to go with that kind of sensationalism, why not go for broke and use "illegal betting scandal" instead? They also use the word "illegal" a lot, as though it would be legal without the word "illegal" there. This is helpful if it's there once or twice to indicate that it's illegal in South Korea, and that's why it's such a big deal, but this reminds me of "illegal pirate material."

      There's nothing non-sensationalist about this article.

    2. Re:How is this news? by Dalambertian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I started following Starcraft a couple years ago, mostly through YouTube commentaries like diggity, klazart, moletrap, and their ilk. Anyone following the scene knows this is seriously bad news for our fledgling sport, and for e-sports in general. Perhaps it's a sign of maturity, or maybe it's just in time for new blood - for StarCraft 2 to take root. Still, it's very disheartening to hear.

    3. Re:How is this news? by Decollete · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Koreans will react the same way if this was American Football and teams were fixing matches to screw over betting.

    4. Re:How is this news? by Dalambertian · · Score: 3, Informative

      For more info, you can follow the coverage at teamliquid's forums. Click to expand the "spoilers". http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=119403

    5. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get how big it is over there, I actually rather enjoy following the pro gaming circuits (MSL disaster and all that). I just don't get why they chose to use the term "cheating" when no actual cheating by the players has occurred - nobody was using programs or aides to modify their play. Furthermore, even actual aides - as in somebody once knew some cheese was coming because the crowd was going nuts - haven't been considered cheating. So it seems odd to me that "cheating" is the term to pick.

      Like I said, you can argue that it's cheating the system, and I'd buy that, but there are still better ways to phrase it to indicate that it's a Really Big Deal (tm).

    6. Re:How is this news? by Decollete · · Score: 1

      I guess so. Surprisingly, the word "cheating" only comes up twice in the Wikipedia article about Match fixing, and its localized to a single sub-article, which I assume is written by the same author.

    7. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      LOL! The "sport" of video gaming. Get a life you fucking dorks.

      Next up, the sport of watching TV...

    8. Re:How is this news? by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually I may be able to point out a reason why Koreans are having a shitfit. While I doubt anyone here is old enough to remember the quiz show scandals that hit in the early days of TV here in the US, but it pretty much killed the format for decades after it turned out that the games of skill were basically just pro wrestling, with the outcome decided before the contest even began.

      Now for those that don't know Pro Starcraft competitions are BIG business in Korea, with folks buying merchandise and tuning in to their favorites, a lot like the quiz shows we had in the 50s. Now it may turn out that just like those quiz shows the games were rigged, only by the contestants themselves instead of the networks.

      So I can understand why Koreans are seriously pissed. it would be like finding out the players were rigging our baseball and football games to win bets in Vegas. While it won't be a big deal to those of us here in the USA, to them it will probably cause as big a stink as our quiz show scandal did here back in the day. And of course you have to add the human element, as nobody likes to find out the athlete you're cheering for is a scumbag and rigging the games.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    9. Re:How is this news? by MancunianMaskMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      it would be like finding out the players were rigging our baseball and football games to win bets in Vegas

      you mean, like, they don't actually do that?

    10. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, considering Starcraft's age and the number of patches Blizzard has released, Starcraft is a contender for the title of most secure and bug-free game in existence. When a product receives patch after patch, you know that either its producer either rushed it out the door before it was ready and had to slap on fixes left and right, or it's being lovingly maintained with every tiny corner case addressed. When you look at the version history for a Blizzard game and see the minutiae they've been patching, you can tell that it falls into the second category.

    11. Re:How is this news? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      We had a huge scandal over massive bribery for bet manipulation in football here in Germany.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    12. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this a joke? I... can't tell.

      At least I can now bump Curling off my #1 spot of 'Human Embarrassments.'

    13. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually if professional [American] Football, Basketball turned out to be rigged I would shrug and think "I could see that."

      Now baseball that would catch me off guard.

      Now I am talking League as a whole rigging. Not individual players sandbagging.

    14. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      E-sports? Athletes? Good lord, people. I realize we're nerds, but we do all recognize that this isn't actually a sport, right? I think Dancing With the Stars is more of a sport than this.

    15. Re:How is this news? by ijakings · · Score: 0, Troll

      We had a huge scandal over massive bribery for bet manipulation in StachenBlachen here in Germany.

      Fixed that for you.

    16. Re:How is this news? by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      Try Association Football (soccer for us in America), since match fixing actually is a big problem in many leagues (I've not heard of NFL match fixing being common, though perhaps I missed it). We're talking arrests in Europe for Footballers who threw matches.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    17. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only in Europe.

    18. Re:How is this news? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the whole fiasco with the Italian league. A severe blot on the sport.

    19. Re:How is this news? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      it would be like finding out the players were rigging our baseball and football games to win bets in Vegas.

      And how would that matter?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    20. Re:How is this news? by jo_ham · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why is it any different than the "sport" of running into someone as hard as possible so another guy can throw a ball that is not even round for another guy to catch?

      Any game that features a competitive element can be raised to the level of a sport if it attracts enough spectators that become interested in the outcome.

      Blizzard worked very hard to tune the original SC (with help from players in Korea) to balance the 3 sides to enable it to be a stable enough base for a competitive sport (ie, there's no argument that the Terrans are better than the Zerg or the Protoss etc - they are evenly balanced). Some might say it's even more evenly balanced than a sport where the team with the most money can buy the championship (or at least make a very good go of it).

      I realise your AC post was nothing but a troll, but I thought it was worth saying. I've never followed competitive Starcraft, but I can fully understand how people could.

    21. Re:How is this news? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Nah, I think the fact that the milk for your coffee still comes from your mum's tit at 29 is #1.

      (shouting up the stairs) Mom, we need more milk!
      Mom: Ok honey, I'll squeeze some out later!

      I can;t be bothered to type it out twice, but I answered seriously here:
      http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1616158&cid=31830762

    22. Re:How is this news? by rjolley · · Score: 1

      You are an idiot if you do not see why people may care about this.

    23. Re:How is this news? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      "While it won't be a big deal to those of us here in the USA"

      I don't know, I know quite a lot of pro SC watchers.

      The instant I say the news I thought it was a very important story, and am surprised so many /.s do not agree.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    24. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's a sport, why doesn't the public education system recognize it as such? Why don't athletes recognize your definition of 'sport'? Why doesn't the general public recognize it as such? Why does historical interpretations of 'sport' dating back thousands of years contradict your definition? Ignorance? Ha! It's so easy to assume you are special.

      Stop trying to shoehorn your idea onto an already established term. Stomach your pride and call it a pastime, game, or activity. It will never be accepted. Fighting the world only makes you appear a rebellious teenager fighting for recognition of his undeserved worth.

    25. Re:How is this news? by Gabrosin · · Score: 1

      One of the differentiating factors between a "sport" and a "game" is the involvement of an athletic element. You could make an argument that operating a keyboard and mouse qualifies, but it would be highly tenuous at best, similar to saying that speed chess is a sport because one of the factors is how fast a participant can move his hand from the board to the button on the clock. I don't believe Starcraft or any "stationary" video game qualifies; you could make a case for Dance Dance Revolution competitions as a sport, though in my eyes they fail to meet other criteria.

      This is meant to take nothing away from the enjoyment or competitiveness of video game competitions and tournaments. But they're not sports. They're gaming contests. Big difference.

    26. Re:How is this news? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Rounding up slaves and making them fight to the death, literally, also used to be a sport.

      Times change.

      It's not my idea - I don;t follow competitive Starcraft (or football, or nascar, or basketball) but I have an open mind.

    27. Re:How is this news? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      What about something like fishing then, where hand-eye coordination and similar skills are what separate the good from the great.

      Or golf - you don't have to be all that athletic to smack a golf ball (although there's clearly a minimum physical requirement, and a need to concentrate for long periods of time).

      I'm not sure where I fall on the issue, but that it's not unique with the rise of "esport" - it has existed as long as there have been sports. Video games just brought a new medium to the table.

      Blizzard are trying to shoehorn PvP Arena into an esport (at the expense of the PvE side of the game in my opinion, due to the way class skills have to be changed), and they are still not going to be able to properly balance it because the classes are inherently imbalanced, making it a poor choice for a competitive tournament beyond the limits of the game itself, but they succeeded with Starcraft which was honed and tuned into balance.

      Darts and Snooker are considered sports, and those don;t have the same athletic requirement as football, or even car racing - F1 especially requires you to be in extreme physical shape if you are going to have any hope of driving that car on the edge for 2 hours at a time.

      I think the definition of sport is closer to a competitive game where the interest in the outcome exceeds the participants, such that even people who have never played it, or have no interest in playing themselves are fans.

    28. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't really see how slave fighting contradicts the underlying common theme to the general 'sport' definition. It's an activity ruled by physical prowess and endurance. I think horse racing is barbaric as well, but I cannot deny its qualification as a sport (the racing part, not the betting).

      Anyway, I was a douche in my last reply, and I apologize.

    29. Re:How is this news? by Gabrosin · · Score: 1

      I consider neither fishing nor golf to be a sport. You can make an argument that athletic skill (such as hand-eye coordination and sometimes raw strength) plays a sufficient role in fishing, and it's clear that precision and strength both play a significant role in golf. However, by my definition these are both athletic competitions, not sports. Darts is also an athletic competition, not a sport. Same for diving, ballroom dancing, and any stay-in-your-lane racing.

      Billiards I would consider a sport. There's clearly an athletic component which plays a major factor in the outcome; strength, accuracy, and precision are all important. In addition, there's a concept which I believe is crucial to separating sports from other competitions: defense. In any sport, you must be able to do something within the rules to defend against your opponent's ability to win. In baseball, players field the balls that are hit. In football, defenders tackle offensive players. Even in some races, you can position your body such that other competitors have to expend additional energy to pass around you. By contrast, the other athletic competitions mentioned above have no notion of defense. A 100m sprint could have one participant in New York and the other in Tokyo, and assuming that all event conditions could be accurately replicated the race would be completely fair. Same goes for golf; you can't block an opponent's shot with your own ball or do anything else (within the rules) to disrupt your opponent's ability to complete a hole.

      Car racing meets both of the above conditions: must have an athletic component, and must involve a notion of defense. I'm not certain whether to truly consider it a sport; you can make an argument that any competition which relies on a sufficiently complex piece of equipment (such as a car, a boat, or a computer) cannot be considered a sport. Same goes for equestrian sports like horse racing or polo; I'd be more inclined to call them sports than I would car racing, but it's clearly a gray area.

      I don't think your definition of sport works too well. After all, there are a lot of competitive games which might be watched with interest by someone who has no interest in participating themselves. Where is the threshold for your definition? If there are people who are sufficiently interested in watching poker that it could be called a sport, could you say the same of blackjack? Spades? Canasta? 52 pickup? Would you consider a collectible card game like Pokemon to be a sport? What about something like stamp collecting? I'm sure there are people who are interested in stamp collecting even though they don't collect stamps themselves (perhaps because of lack of funds), and it's definitely competitive. Is competitive eating truly a sport? What about two people sitting in a bar who are each trying to outdrink the other, with others watching as they go shot for shot? I feel that judging "sportshood" based on the interest level of non-participants would provide a very watered-down definition of what it means to be a sport.

    30. Re:How is this news? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      A well thought out post, but just to address the issue of cars and boats - driving an F1 car for a competitive race (even one that turns into a procession - the sport has its issues) is an extremely physically demanding task. The drivers have to be in excellent physical shape to stand any chance of being competitive, even if their car is excellent. It's also very hard to drive an F1 car well, as shown by Luca Badoa when he took over mid-season in Ferrari's 2nd car when Massa was struck on the head by a 200mph spring. He just couldn't drive the car anywhere close to its limit. (check a video of that freak accident by the way - you'll never look at an object striking your windscreen in the same way again - and he drove into this thing at over 150mph).

      For an indication of the sort of forces involved, the drivers are subjected to repeated 2 to 3 G forces in corners, with some circuits featuring 5G corners. So in this respect, I think it can be considered a sport - even if you're skilled you can't just show up and be competitive, even with a better car. You have to practice and keep in shape, and get used to your car.

    31. Re:How is this news? by Gabrosin · · Score: 1

      I'm not in any way disputing the athleticism needed to handle a professional racecar at high speeds. It definitely meets the athletic component standard of being a sport. I just wonder whether the use of sophisticated machinery by the participants should be considered another determining factor in sportshood. For example, I'd hesitate to call demolition derby a sport, even though there's athleticism (to control your vehicle) and defense (to avoid taking major damage from collisions). Same goes for games on the Wii, like Boom Blox or some elements of Wii Sports/Wii Sports Resort. There's definitely athleticism (hand-eye coordination, accuracy, precision) and defense. But few would say that these games should be considered a sport; any athletic ability involved is translated into success through a technological interface rather than through direct contact with the elements of the competition. I'd argue that this set of activities (racecar driving, demolition derby, video games with some demonstrable athletic component) should get its own category (technological competitions, or perhaps technological sports).

    32. Re:How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, video gaming definitely deserves its own category. It's the same old 'hacker' etymology argument. Each successive group that latched onto the word was less skilled than the last.

      I suppose video game 'sports' proponents would see being labeled a sport a victory, claiming the respect associated with the origins of the word. In actuality this is a shame, for it in an insult to their predecessors to take up that label and diminish the accomplishments of the past.

    33. Re:How is this news? by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      Total agreement. Especially seeing so many top name players potentially involved -- when I thought it was just Ma Jae Yoon it was bad, but then I read the list. My heart nearly stopped at Kim Tae Yong.

      If that list is comprehensive, Flash is going to destroy everyone in 2010.

    34. Re:How is this news? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Typically "sport" is reserved for things that require physical prowess of some form.

      Things that don't are typically called "games".

      So tennis is a sport, while chess is a game. Doesn't matter that there are in fact spectators for both that are interested in the outcome.

    35. Re:How is this news? by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Like car racing (NASCAR, Indy), bowling/pool, shooting, or any other number of sports that aren't particularly physically demanding?

      Incidently, I am not as good at Starcraft or most first person shooters specifically due to a lack of physical prowess (quick twich hand coordination). Oh I'd strategerize circles around the guys I'd play against, but that doesn't help when they can perform so many more actions per minute. Most competitive video games aren't simply mind games like chess, there is usually more emphasis on quick reaction times. Figure less like Chess and more like Chessboxing!

      Caveat - I do not follow competitive video gaming and have no intention to. I'd rather play than watch somebody play.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    36. Re:How is this news? by Vlado · · Score: 1

      If you think racing cars isn't physically demanding, think again.

      I invite you to go to your local go-cart track and drive 10 laps around it, as fast as you can. The first time you do that, I can guarantee, that your hands will hurt to the point where you might go slow on the last few laps, or risk crashing.

      Now try doing this for two hours in heat, without any power steering, while still keeping track of guys around you who want to overtake you or not let you overtake them.

      Car racing is probably at least on a par with running for the same amount of time.

    37. Re:How is this news? by Elky+Elk · · Score: 1

      There are only three sports; Hunting, Shooting and Fishing.

    38. Re:How is this news? by LaRainette · · Score: 1

      Well it depends on how you consider sports in general. If it's a show you watch on TV, and you don't really understand it I guess it doesn't matter at all, but in that case just watch Catch... If however you consider sports as it was meant to be i.e. a mach-up of honor, strength, skill, work, (team spirit) it does matter. Sports is not a show, it just happens that the beauty of it makes it TV-lovable, but in the beginning it's just a bunch of people who decided of some rules and then compete to determined who had most skill. It's a substitute to more brutal confrontation too. Anyhow I guess what I'm saying is : to ask this question, you must be the kind of guy who doesn't know the difference between boxing and catch so I'm sorry... I can't teach you anything.

    39. Re:How is this news? by AzuMao · · Score: 1

      I consider neither fishing nor golf to be a sport. You can make an argument that athletic skill (such as hand-eye coordination and sometimes raw strength) plays a sufficient role in fishing, and it's clear that precision and strength both play a significant role in golf. However, by my definition these are both athletic competitions, not sports. Darts is also an athletic competition, not a sport. Same for diving, ballroom dancing, and any stay-in-your-lane racing.

      Billiards I would consider a sport. There's clearly an athletic component which plays a major factor in the outcome; strength, accuracy, and precision are all important.

      And in Starcraft good hand-eye coordination, reflexes, and strategy are important, and it's pretty far from star-in-your-lane seeing as how you can only win by blowing up the other guy's base.

      In addition, there's a concept which I believe is crucial to separating sports from other competitions: defense. In any sport, you must be able to do something within the rules to defend against your opponent's ability to win. In baseball, players field the balls that are hit. In football, defenders tackle offensive players. Even in some races, you can position your body such that other competitors have to expend additional energy to pass around you. By contrast, the other athletic competitions mentioned above have no notion of defense. A 100m sprint could have one participant in New York and the other in Tokyo, and assuming that all event conditions could be accurately replicated the race would be completely fair. Same goes for golf; you can't block an opponent's shot with your own ball or do anything else (within the rules) to disrupt your opponent's ability to complete a hole.

      Car racing meets both of the above conditions: must have an athletic component, and must involve a notion of defense.

      This exists in StarCraft. Unless you don't mind letting your opponent kill all your units/structures and winning.

    40. Re:How is this news? by AzuMao · · Score: 1

      They didn't have StarCraft back then, AC.

    41. Re:How is this news? by Gabrosin · · Score: 1

      There's definitely a concept of defense in Starcraft (and almost every other competitive video game). The question is whether the level of coordination and reflexes required to manipulate the mouse is sufficient to meet the definition of "athletic". Personally, I say no. If there existed a thought-based interface to control the game, where your strategic decisions were instantly translated into actions without requiring the intermediary of moving a mouse, the gameplay would be no different. By contrast, even contests with relatively low athletic requirements (such as fishing) could not be performed without actual physical activity. So I don't believe that Starcraft's physical component meets the necessary threshold for it to be considered a sport.

  2. Oh my goodness by socceroos · · Score: 5, Funny

    My world has fallen to pieces!

    1. Re:Oh my goodness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ZERG RUSHED! Kekeke! ^_^ V

    2. Re:Oh my goodness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too. (yawn)

  3. A-list? What? by the_humeister · · Score: 1, Funny

    Do these people have the tabloids after them? Leaked sex tapes by spurned beaus? Drug rehab every other month? No? How are they A-list celebrities then???

    1. Re:A-list? What? by Some.Net(Guy) · · Score: 5, Informative

      In Korea, video gaming is a professional sport. These guys they mention are bigger celebrities to Koreans than, say, LeBron James is to Americans. You think I'm joking or exaggerating, but I assure you I am not.

    2. Re:A-list? What? by DreadPiratePizz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually yes, in Korea they do have the tabloids cover them. Some even date actresses. Everybody knows of Boxer, Savior and Bisu. Everybody.

    3. Re:A-list? What? by tensop · · Score: 2, Informative

      Starcraft is korea's national sport. they're most definately celebrities

    4. Re:A-list? What? by gowen · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh, yeah? Then why is the first google hit for "Ja Me Yoon" a link back to this slashdot article?

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    5. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Right, because everyone must be a native english speaker to make a point.

    6. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Probably because his name is typically written in Hangul?

    7. Re:A-list? What? by mwvdlee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Speaking as a non-American... who the f**k is Lebron James???

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    8. Re:A-list? What? by Dalambertian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For starters, try googling it in Korean?

    9. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hello, and welcome to the world! Despite what the crappy Disney ride says, the world is a big place, where many people speak any languages and, shockingly, use different characters for writing.

    10. Re:A-list? What? by EvanED · · Score: 5, Informative

      A couple posts (e.g. the top one on this page) dispute it's at that degree of popularity:

      bjornkavist:

      You over estimate the popularity of Starcraft. Since this is a Starcraft site that covers pro BW from a foreign stand point it seems like the biggest thing in the world. When sadly, when compared to Hockey in Canada, or Football in the States, its no where near as popular. Yes people know about it, tons do, compared to other countries but Koreand definately dont breathe Starcraft.

      PanzerDragoon:

      I would say SC is most comparable to MMA in the states; a niche sport with a decent sized hardcore fanbase, but not wide casual appeal.

    11. Re:A-list? What? by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      What he said...

    12. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some basketball player, I think.

    13. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ma Jae-Yoon: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma_Jae-Yoon

      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Ma+Jae-Yoon

    14. Re:A-list? What? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      It was an example for Americans. Perhaps someone more like David Beckham is more up your alley as an example?

    15. Re:A-list? What? by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Do these people have the tabloids after them? Leaked sex tapes by spurned beaus? Drug rehab every other month? No? How are they A-list celebrities then???

      In Korea? Yes.

      (Except maybe for the drug rehab...)

      Professional gaming in Korea is on a whole other plane than it is in the West. I mean, many of these guys ~live~ in dedicated training camps (i.e. they eat, sleep and game in a building with other gamers) in preparation for big competitions, with rigorous daily schedules. It's serious business. (And I say that completely non-sarcastically)

    16. Re:A-list? What? by syousef · · Score: 5, Funny

      Speaking as a non-American... who the f**k is Lebron James???

      Who knows. I haven't heard of him either. Best guess based on this story: He probably plays Warcraft instead of Starcraft.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    17. Re:A-list? What? by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      It's the name they gave Ja Me Yoon at Ellis Island when he moved to the US.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    18. Re:A-list? What? by pinkj · · Score: 1

      I don't know who LeBron James and Ja Mae Yoon are. Maybe it's because I'm Canadian. Go Gretzky!

    19. Re:A-list? What? by bennomatic · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gretzky? Wasn't he the guy who played on the LA Kings?

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    20. Re:A-list? What? by Razalhague · · Score: 1

      Right, because everyone must be a native English speaker to spell, capitalize, and punctuate correctly.

      For example, I'm not.

    21. Re:A-list? What? by SeeSchloss · · Score: 2, Informative

      The pics in http://images.google.com/images?q=%EB%A7%88%EC%9E%AC%EC%9C%A4 are more representative of his status.

    22. Re:A-list? What? by crossmr · · Score: 5, Informative

      mainly because you're a tool. Here is what a search of him in Korea looks like:
      http://search.naver.com/search.naver?sm=tab_hty&where=nexearch&query=%B8%B6%C0%E7%C0%B1&x=0&y=0

      news sites, images, magazine covers, videos, etc

    23. Re:A-list? What? by dushkin · · Score: 1

      Leaked sex tapes by spurned beaus?

      Sex? This is Starcraft we're talking about.

      --
      o hai
    24. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As an American, I have no idea who that is either. Bad example, perhaps.

    25. Re:A-list? What? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's it, you're going on my foe list... :)

    26. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NBA (American professional basketball league) star player for the Cleveland (a city in the U.S. State of Ohio) Cavaliers. That's probably more than you need or care to know.

    27. Re:A-list? What? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      That's an example Americans wouldn't get. They don't know what football is.

    28. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup yup. They have it on TV too. insane!

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embJbjOqt0g

    29. Re:A-list? What? by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      You're outside of the norm for non-native English speakers. You likely have much more practice than most others, along with better training.

    30. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude looks like a douche bag. Yeah, might be able to beat me at Starcraft, but I'll whoop his ass in pretty much everything else.

    31. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      I seriously hope you guys are just being facetious. Not that I like 'bron, but he's pretty much as big now as MJ was back in the day. The dude has as many fans in China as Beckham probably has in the rest of the world (although he probably doesn't have near as many fans as Yao Ming, who is pretty much to the Chinese what MJ was to Americans). Seriously, if you don't know who Lebron is you either don't know what the fuck basketball is, are just making shit up, or are a borderline retard.

    32. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      They were fornicating with a wicked Tape Drive (because what else are you going to do with that tape drive nowadays?)

    33. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe my browser's broken. I just see a bunch of squiggles on the screen when I click that link...

    34. Re:A-list? What? by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      don't think so, back in the day i'd actually heard of michael jordan, that is the first time i've ever heard of lebron. Not that i follow basketball.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    35. Re:A-list? What? by Razalhague · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Capitalization and punctuation don't vary that much across languages, so that's no excuse. If you're unsure of the spelling, you can check from a dictionary or enable spellchecking in the browser.

      I simply pay attention to what I'm writing.

    36. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Lebron James is pretty much the current poster boy for basketball in not only the US but the World. The only guy on the same level currently is honestly Kobe Bryant (and Shaq but to a much lesser extent than he used to be). Pretty much he's the Basketball equivalent of Peyton Manning (except without even the one Super Bowl ring or the hilarious commercials).

    37. Re:A-list? What? by mwvdlee · · Score: 0, Troll

      FYI, apart from the US, pretty much nobody in the world cares about basketball, american football (not to be confused with the other two types of football, both of which are more popular internationally) or baseball.
      I didn't know Michael Jackson played any sports either.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    38. Re:A-list? What? by SmileR.se · · Score: 1

      Starcraft is korea's national sport. they're most definately celebrities

      According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_sport their national sport is actually Tae Kwon Do.

    39. Re:A-list? What? by Ka+D'Argo · · Score: 1

      Boxer is friggin epic. I've never even come close to a competitive level in Starcraft but he truly is the Terran Emperor is there ever was one. The strats he came up with weren't just game shattering they were revolutionary.

      --
      Aw Frell this
    40. Re:A-list? What? by jimthehorsegod · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's Michael Jackson got to do with basketball?

    41. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basketball is even bigger in the Philippines than it is in the USA though. Never mind that most of us are too short to play the game effectively.

    42. Re:A-list? What? by imakemusic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aaah Jordan! I wondered what Michael Jackson had to do with sport...

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    43. Re:A-list? What? by plasticsquirrel · · Score: 4, Interesting
      As a resident of China, I can tell you that in this country, basketball is by far the number one sport. NBA is extremely popular, as are American basketball shoes from Nike, Adidas, etc. Considering this is the favorite sport of the world's most populous country, it's hardly an American sport. In China, there is even a Chinese nickname for LeBron James that everyone is familiar with. In fact, there are nine Chinese nicknames for him in common use in China.

      King James, LeBron, LBJ, LRJ, James the Great, Ray Pa dragon, The Great, James, Old Beijing

      Basketball is much more popular here than it ever was in the U.S.

      Also, when I was visiting Japan, baseball was by far the most popular sport, played by just about every boy after school.

      The world is a lot bigger than the U.S. and Europe.

      --
      Systemd: the PulseAudio of init systems
    44. Re:A-list? What? by Imsdal · · Score: 1

      So that link gave me ~16K hits. Searching for LeBron james gave me ~1.6M hits. I'd still say the guy who suggested this guy is a bigger celebrity to Koreans than LeBron is to Americans exaggerated just a tad.

    45. Re:A-list? What? by Imsdal · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's not like an NFL game in London would sell out or anything. And I hear that baseball is pretty big in Japan and Korea. And while basketball can't compete with football in Europe, it is still wildly popular in most countries. Suggesting that only people from the US care about these sports is silly and wrong.

    46. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking from the UK, and as someone who's never really followed sports (so I don't watch a lot of sports channels or read the sport pages, etc), I concur that, while I'd heard of Jordan back in the day I've never heard of Lebron - however, most of the stories about Jordan were about how much he was earning, who was sponsoring him, etc. It's not such big news anymore to hear those things, we have plenty of homegrown sporting celebs who earn big bucks for the media to follow, and when we do hear about high earning US sports celebs, it's usually Tiger Woods they're talking about.

    47. Re:A-list? What? by AMindLost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the UK, we call it netball and it's played by girls. Basketball here is ranked below dominos in popularity.

    48. Re:A-list? What? by mestar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In my book, game shattering is even bigger than revolutionary.

    49. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, lots of people care about basketball. I am in Singapore and I like Basketball. And MJ can also mean Michael Jordan (unless of course, you were trying to do the funneh, in which case, *whooosh*)

    50. Re:A-list? What? by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      For starters, try googling it in Korean?

      If you're an old person, ask your robot to do it.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    51. Re:A-list? What? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Troll

      Zhang Ziyi's name is typically written in Hanzi, and nonetheless my post here won't be the first result. I'm sure that romanized versions of Asian names exist, even on Google. Finding the story you started from as the first result on Google is always a bad sign that there's very little information available on your subject.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    52. Re:A-list? What? by eloki · · Score: 1

      Being able to sell out a single game doesn't mean it's popular; there's novelty value in it. Rugby union matches sold out in Hong Kong but that doesn't mean rugby is big there.

      I guess the question is about which countries basketball is big in. It's surprising to me that it's big in China but that is fascinating to read.

    53. Re:A-list? What? by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 1

      Probably because his name is Ma Jae Yoon?

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    54. Re:A-list? What? by rtbyte · · Score: 1

      ... american football (not to be confused with the other two types of football, both of which are more popular internationally) ...

      There is not such thing as 'american football'. It is some kind of weird handball with armored players trying to smash each others heads. And THERE IS NO BALL (other than their heads which might explain the head banging ?!). There is some kind of lemon shaped thingy that they chase around and I could only guess that they call it 'ball' because that much of head bumping will seriously distort one's sight and the lemon might start to look like a ball. Of course I'm not sure why that spectators call it foot ball as the players (more like crowd control police ..) almost never use their feet to play (excluding running) and there is no ball. It's kind of a mystery ;)

    55. Re:A-list? What? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Beckham has fans? I thought he just had people who ignore him and people who actively hate him.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    56. Re:A-list? What? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, netball requires more tactical thinking than basketball because you're not allowed to move with the ball at all, which makes it slightly more interesting to watch (aside from the fact that it's played by girls). Basketball is relatively common as an amateur sport, but in my experience tends to attract the hypercompetitive element who fail to realise that the point of playing a sport is to have fun.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    57. Re:A-list? What? by Angua · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, see, telling a non-sports-loving, non-American nerd (me) that Lebron James is the basketball equivalent of Peyton Manning doesn't help, because then my next question inevitably is: Who the hell is Peyton Manning?

      I suppose neither one of these guys has managed to have dozen mistresses at once, because I sure do know who Tiger Woods is.

      --
      I am not a vegetarian werewolf.
    58. Re:A-list? What? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you spend time looking at Slashdot posts in detail, you'll notice that the average level of spelling, punctuation, and grammar is slightly higher for non-native speakers. Probably something to do with actually being taught grammar at school...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    59. Re:A-list? What? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      The world is a lot bigger than the U.S. and Europe.

      In terms of population if nothing else, China is bigger than the US and Europe combined. (Population of China, roughly 1.3 billion; US, roughly 310 million, Europe roughly 731 million)

    60. Re:A-list? What? by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      A) he is not as well known or as popular as Micheal Jordan is now, much less than MJ in the heyday of his career. B)He has nowhere the near the skills Jordan has C) the only reason he got any publicity is because he skipped college and went pro from High School. Idiot should have went to college and honed his skills some. Then he wouldn't be as much as a suckwad as he is now. D) not everyone gives a fuck what some sweaty jackass does out on a sports field. I have not watched a sporting event of any type in probably 10 years with the exceptions of a couple of boxing matches.

    61. Re:A-list? What? by imakemusic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Then you I would wager you pay far more attention to detail in your writing than other people purely because of the practice you have had and the almost Pavlovian response to typos causing issues.

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    62. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have multiple channels on Cable TV there dedicated to gaming. Last time I had a layover in Seoul there was one channel playing SC matches non stop.

    63. Re:A-list? What? by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      When sadly, when compared to Hockey in Canada, or Football in the States, its no where near as popular.

      More like Hockey in the US or Football in Canada?

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    64. Re:A-list? What? by dominious · · Score: 1

      wow I can't even consider playing Starcraft all day as sport! I thought sports were good for your health.

    65. Re:A-list? What? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I have seen it on cable TV in Korea. Whole channels dedicated to computer gaming with commentators, etc.

    66. Re:A-list? What? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Korean SC players are usually called by their nicknames in the West.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    67. Re:A-list? What? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Gretzky has the ball on the top of the key!

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    68. Re:A-list? What? by Qu4Z · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not Michael Jackson. He means Mick Jagger.

    69. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adidas isn't american.

    70. Re:A-list? What? by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      I don't know who LeBron James and Ja Mae Yoon are. Maybe it's because I'm Canadian. Go Gretzky!

      Basketball was invented by a Canadian. Perhaps the best thing created by a Canadian next to maple syrup. Learn your history. :P

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    71. Re:A-list? What? by TheFakeMcCoy · · Score: 0

      Beckham more like Hasslehoff! Now that's a world wide celebrity

    72. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, really? Great. There are multiple channels - and TV REALITY SHOWS - on Cable TV dedicated to MMA as well, a fellow 'niche sport.'

    73. Re:A-list? What? by Jawn98685 · · Score: 1

      In Korea, video gaming is a professional sport...

      And therein lies the reason for all the derision, folks. It may be an over-generalization to so label an entire country as "badly needs to get a fucking life", but it isn't racism. I'd say the same thing about the U.S. (and especially Texas) and their obsession with football. Then again, at least football is a game involving real people on a real playing field with a real ball.

    74. Re:A-list? What? by Razalhague · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Not really. I pay attention to most things I do, not just writing and programming, and did so even before I started programming. Before you ask, no OCD or anything like that.

      Besides, I mostly program in statically typed languages, meaning that typos are usually caught early and aren't that big of a deal, not to mention that I've programmed a significant amount of time with autocompletion, which definitely wouldn't contribute to excessive carefulness.

    75. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's pretty much untrue. We have quite a few European's playing in the NBA, and have had for quite a few years. For that to happen there has to be extensive organized basketball in Europe too as that's the only way anyone from there would reach the skill level of the NBA is to play for years against high levels of competition.

      I've also watched highlights from professional European basketball and the basketball fans over there are as rabid as the fans of the game you guys mistakenly call football. They'll riot over games in the stands too, aptly demonstrating the wide-spread, and much-vaunted, European "sophistication" and smarts.

    76. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least we know the sweaty ass sports you do like are violent.

      Nice touch of typical European arrogance, btw....

      [paraphrased_quote] I look down on all your sports because people sweat in them. and because I'm so sophisticated and smart. I only watch sophisticated sports where the entire point is for two sweaty ass idiots to beat the living shit out of each other. That's how sophisticated I am. [/paraphrased_quote]

    77. Re:A-list? What? by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      I think he and Michael Jordan may have something to do with Bugs Bunny... or was it a music video or, maybe, an advertisement or something.

    78. Re:A-list? What? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Jordan is the one with the big tits.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    79. Re:A-list? What? by houghi · · Score: 1

      are American basketball shoes from Nike, Adidas, etc.

      If those shoes had anything to do with basketball or any sports for that matter, the Americans would be the leanest and fittest people in the world. Those shoes have NOTHING to do with sports, but everything with (street) fashion.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    80. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, I love obscure humor.

    81. Re:A-list? What? by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      I thought that was Bill Oddie?

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    82. Re:A-list? What? by crossmr · · Score: 1

      In the off-chance you're not a useless a troll,
      in firefox:
      view->character encoding->Korean (UHC) will show it properly. But unless you can read Korean it isn't much different.

      If it isn't on the list right away, go to more encodings, east asian, and find that one.

    83. Re:A-list? What? by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      1. I know what Basketball is.
      2. Not making shit up.
      3. Not a borderline retard.
      4. Profit?

      Sorry man. I recognize the name but before your post I wouldn't have been able to tell you the sport he plays. And I got that only by inference since you didn't actually say he played Basketball. And I assume professional vs some college hoops?

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    84. Re:A-list? What? by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      That's ok. I'm an American and while I know the guys name, like above I wouldn't be able to tell you which sport he plays. Sounds like football based on the Super Bowl ring reference above yours.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    85. Re:A-list? What? by cptnapalm · · Score: 1

      Lebron probably does have a dozen mistresses at once at least 3 times a week.

    86. Re:A-list? What? by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      I Thought he played with the new york rangers...?

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    87. Re:A-list? What? by amaupin · · Score: 1

      Also, when I was visiting Japan, baseball was by far the most popular sport, played by just about every boy after school.

      I've only been in China on vacation, but I lived in Japan for more than seven years. By far, soccer, not basketball, is the most popular sport.

      After school boys play whatever sport they belong to in their school's sports club. Those in the basketball club play basketball, those in the baseball club play baseball, etc. The only exception are the chubby kids in the table tennis club. They goof around for about an hour and then go home and play video games.

    88. Re:A-list? What? by slugstone · · Score: 0

      Okay, but who is LeBron James? After looking him up, now I know why I do not know who he is. Sorry I do not watch basketball.

    89. Re:A-list? What? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      I think you *grossly* overestimate the knowledge of Basketball outside the US, or even outside interest of the sport itself.

      I had no idea who he was either, and I lived in the US for over a year (just never happened to catch any basketball news).

      Without looking it up do you know who Lionel Messi is? Or Wayne Rooney? Or Carlos Tevez? Lewis Hamilton?

      Even if particular sports stars are international names, like the above four, it is very rare that they become known outside of their respective sports (especially outside of the country where the sport is big) - rare examples would be Jordan or Beckham, or Pelé.

    90. Re:A-list? What? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Bill Oddie was fired from Jazz FM for playing too much jazz.

      He went back to birdwatching.

    91. Re:A-list? What? by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      And to think we Canadians invented basketball.

    92. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada invented basketball, it's a Canadian sport

    93. Re:A-list? What? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      But why?

      Any game with a competitive element that attracts enough spectators that are interested in the outcome becomes a sport.

      You could even argue that Starcraft is a more "pure" sport than American Football - you can't just throw money at it to become better (beyond having a good computer, and Starcraft runs well on the Apollo CM computer built in the 60s).

      Just because video games are comparatively "new" shouldn't rule them out of being a sport if enough people are interested - at least to the same level as American Football.

      What about racing? Is the use of technology to build a car and race it round a track also worth of "get a fucking life" - I mean, what's the difference?

      Competitive pool - playing a bar game as a sport?! pfffffffff!

      Professional Scrabble, now that's just memorising a dictionary!

    94. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi! How is peeking over the great firewall?

    95. Re:A-list? What? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      That's nice... but to put it into perspective, the final match between Flash and Jaedong in the 2009 Nate MSLs (held back in January) was, IIRC, in a venue that seated roughly 1000. They took some flak for how small this was and would have been able to fill a much larger venue (especially given the matchup), so bump that up an entire order of magnitude and say that a venue of 10,000 would have been a good match. (I tried to figure out how large some of the other finals, say from the OSL, were, but I had no luck.)

      Compare that to the size of some stadiums here in the US. Heinz Field, the home of the Pittsburgh Steelers, has a capacity of 65,000. Soldier Field, home of the Chicago Bears, seats 61,000. Fenway Park, home of the Boston Red Sox, seats 37,000 (only slightly more than when it was built 100 years ago!). The rebuilt Yankee Stadium seats 50,000.

      To pick a AA baseball team, even Blair County Ballpark, home of the world-famous Altoona Curve, is roughly on par with what I said the MSL's venue should have been, seating 7,200.

    96. Re:A-list? What? by Aim+Here · · Score: 1

      Either that, or you're the most prominent news outlet to mispell the subject's name, as happened here. Ma Jae Yoon is Savior. 'Ja Mae Yoon' isn't.

    97. Re:A-list? What? by ChinggisK · · Score: 1

      I definitely agree with the other guy, Jordan was much, much bigger than Lebron James, at least as far as the US goes. If he was as big as MJ I'd at least know what team he plays for (and while I don't follow basketball anymore I do pay some attention to sports news in general).

    98. Re:A-list? What? by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      Zhang Ziyi's name is typically written in Hanzi, and nonetheless my post here won't be the first result.

      Yeah, but nobody is going to jack off over pictures Ja Me Yoon.

      Welcome to the Internet.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    99. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basketball is relatively common as an amateur sport, but in my experience tends to attract the hypercompetitive element who fail to realise that the point of playing a sport is to have fun.

      The point of playing non-competitively is to have fun. The point of playing competitively is to win.

      If you have fun losing then more power to you. Just know that they guys kicking your ass are having even more fun than you.

    100. Re:A-list? What? by brunokummel · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a non-American... who the f**k is Lebron James???

      Who knows. I haven't heard of him either. Best guess based on this story: He probably plays Warcraft instead of Starcraft.

      I thought he had mentioned Leeroy Jenkins! =D

      --
      What is best in life? To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you and to hear the lamentations of their women.
    101. Re:A-list? What? by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      I would say football seems more popular in China since I know far more people that like it than basketball, though I don't have any hard stats to back me up. I see basketball played on TV, but I don't know many people who watch it. The advantage basketball has is that China has some high profile international players. I think the local football league is OK, the ball skills are surprisingly good, but nobody seems to want the ball to be passed to them. There always seems to be a few people who watch Beijing Guo An play at Worker's Stadium, but most of the shirts I see are for Premier League clubs.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    102. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Old Beijing

      But... why?

    103. Re:A-list? What? by silentcoder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Capitalization and punctuation don't vary that much across languages

      WTF ?!?!?! Seriously dude... WTF ?!?!??!

      Let's just look at the small sampling of languages I can read (to a lesser or greater extent). And keep in mind three of these are all languages that share a COMMON Origin (Ancient West Germanic) and one is essentially a dialect of the another split of a mere 300 years ago. That makes this a pretty skewed sample. Choose any two languages randomly and the differences will get MUCH bigger.

      German: All nouns are capitalized.
      English: Capitals are used only for the names of Deities, Persons and the first word of a sentence.
      Afrikaans: Similar to English... oh unless the sentence starts with the non-specific article... then the SECOND word starts with a capital.
      Dutch: Same as English (the Afrikaans exception does not exist in Dutch).
      Portuguese: Fucked if I know... after several years, I STILL don't understand all of it.

      How about the Apostrophe:
      Dutch: Apostrophe is used to indicate missing letters.
      German: Same as Dutch.
      Afrikaans: Apostrophe indicates missing letters - but it's only allowed to be used for this when those letters are deliberately left out for an EXCEPTIONAL reason (such as accenting a quote or poetic freedom) and in the spelling of the Afrikaans word 'n (yes the word is an apostrophe and an small n but pronounced "uh" - derived from the Dutch word for "one").
      Portuguese: There is no apostrophe as we think of it, thoug the ' symbols is used in the spelling of some words.
      English: Used to indicate missing letters in (specifically in contractions) and to indicate possession. Moreover the rules on how it does both the above get very convoluted (especially where the uses overlap, as in a posessive contraction) and leads to continuous confusion among English speakers about the fact that it's, its and its' are three completely different words with exactly the same pronunciation (apparently we can easily tell them apart from context when LISTENING but when reading we have to create a stupid cosmetic difference to see which is which).

      Now those are small differences between languages of relatively common origins... if I start telling you how it works in African languages (I speak two) you simply wouldn't BELIEVE me, it has the following in common with the above: Sweet blue fuck all.
      That's despite the fact that no African language has a written language of their own and adopted a modified version of the English alphabet and punctuation to be able to write -they still had to change almost every rule just to make sense because their entire gramatical structure is radically different.
      It gets even more bizarre when you consider languages that have a history of writing, but radically different origins from English, such as the Slavic and Asian languages.
      In English a word with no vowels is unpronouncable. In Russian... that's about 3/4 of the dictionary. In Polish, it's more like 4/5...

      See... I'm actually a non-native English speaker, who has a degree in English literature. I can read Shakespeare with ease and joy, and both speak and write English quite a bit better than most Britons (let alone Americans) and I had Linguistics as a second major.
      And if there is one thing you learn very quickly when you study multiple languages on a professional level - it's that languages are as radically different as the cultures that produce them, reflect those cultures and become an extension of those cultures.
      What you say smacks back to the so-called romantic theory of linguistics. Which was a very Platonic theory that believed there is some perfect language we're all born with, and all human languages are imperfect attempts to implement it.
      The romantic theory is interesting in that it was the very first theory to ever exist in Linguistics... but it's also not actually been considered to have any basis in fact or reality for over 200 years now... hell even the Russian Orthodox theory of Linguistics have at least SOME provable reality to it and THAT came from 1916.
      Current linguistic theory as it applies to your statement can be summarized as follows: you're an idiot.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    104. Re:A-list? What? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised that nobody pointed out that most likely those Shoes are made in China as well. Do they ship them across the ocean twice?

    105. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Boxing is all but dead, bro. Anyways, pretty much any MMA guy (not that I like MMA, hate it actually) could beat the fucking shit out of almost any boxer currently fighting. And while I am not a Lebron fan (Spurs fan since 93, Tim Duncan is the fucking man), the guy is on ads all over the place so what this tells me is you don't have cable or are just jerking my chain. But I will agree he's nowhere near the athlete that MJ was, although to say he's a suckwad when he nearly single handedly got his team to an NBA Finals Series (in which my Spurs swept his team in 4 games) I think would disqualify him from suckwad status. If you are going to talk basketball, at least pretend you know what the fuck you are talking about. I love how you profess this profound knowledge of basketball and then in the same breath comment that you have not watched a sporting event of any type in 10 years with the exception of boxing. That pretty much makes you unqualified to comment as to whether he's a suckwad or not, eh? Go back to your boxing, loser.

    106. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      In other news, so does every other god damn A-List athlete on this planet in every sport known to man. I'm sure even the curling guys are getting pussy.

    107. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      I was being gracious to soccer fans. Beckham is a pussy and wouldn't last 10 minutes in a real sport. Hell, I'd bet some of these Starcraft Korean geeks could take him in an alley brawl.

    108. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Translation, your country fucking sucks at Basketball.

    109. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      At least someone in this motherfucker made me laugh today. Kudos to you my man.

    110. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but at least mma involves body and mind.
      the day a pathfinding AI can do a cage match is the day I stop dissasembling random electronic junk, for fear that the overlord will punish me

    111. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that in Latin America, Baseball is just as big if not bigger as a sport than even in the US nowadays. Hell, the US isn't even the dominate international baseball team anymore, I'd argue to say that many of the teams in Central and South America could easily handle us as half of the MLB players come from those areas.

      The Super Bowl is I believe the second most watched sporting event in the world after the World Cup, and Basketball is a huge sport in Eastern Europe, Asia, and South America. But most geeks on /. assume since they suck at sports, then those sports are gay and no one likes them. Poor butt hurt /.ers

    112. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      I love how you emphasize head banging and running around. You apparently have never taken the opportunity to actually watch an NFL game. There is more strategy in five minutes of American Football than there is in an entire Soccer match. And the NFL players don't flop around like dead chickens every five seconds like soccer players do.

    113. Re:A-list? What? by koreaman · · Score: 1

      Basketball is the most popular sport in France after soccer. (The third is probably foosball. I'm not joking about this.)

    114. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Then I'm sure you know who Tony Parker is, right? Not being facetious, just being a Spurs fan. By the way, all of this discussion about basketball and shit makes me want to go play some fucking Starcraft.

    115. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      I thought the name was Debbie, judging by his pics.

    116. Re:A-list? What? by koreaman · · Score: 1

      Fucking owned him. Wish I had mod points.

    117. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean handegg.

    118. Re:A-list? What? by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      Careful, or I'll go all Marty McSorely on you!

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    119. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Think larger than that. The new stadium for the Cowboys seats something close to 80,000 not including standing areas, and I'm sure other similarly obscene stadiums will soon follow in other big football cities such as Washington DC, Philadelphia, etc. And the Dallas Cowboys had no problem filling that venue. They also didn't have any trouble selling the luxury suites either. There's a reason the NFL is a multi-billion dollar business. It's a shame the owners and players may start fucking with that with a possible lockout next season (due to the lack of a new collective bargaining agreement that has resulted in no salary cap for the 2010 season). Not that I'm going to cry because millionaire players and billionaire owners are all butt hurt over percentage points of shit-tons of money. I'm just disappointed that my favorite sport may take a hiatus if they don't come to an agreement.

    120. Re:A-list? What? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Think larger than that. The new stadium for the Cowboys seats something close to 80,000 not including standing areas, and I'm sure other similarly obscene stadiums will soon follow in other big football cities such as Washington DC, Philadelphia, etc

      Oh, sure. I don't know a whole lot about football, and just looked up a few arbitrary teams.

      And your 80,000 Cowboys stadium is still a fair bit smaller than something like Beaver Stadium (at my undergrad alma mater, seating 107,000), Michigan Stadium (106,000; until recently the largest), Los Angleles Memorial Coliseum (the stadium USC uses; 93,000 capacity).

    121. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Technically Cowboys stadium (for the love of god don't call it my Cowboys stadium, I'm a Broncos fan) can hold in excess of 100,000, but some of that is standing room only and inside seats that have access to live broadcast of the game. But yeah, I think it's just the beginning of new obscenely large NFL stadiums to come personally.

    122. Re:A-list? What? by rtbyte · · Score: 1

      I was joking - mostly :) . And we don't use or have a word 'soccer'. It's Football and the other weird handball thing is called american 'football' ;)

    123. Re:A-list? What? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      While you have valid points, in my mind the OP is for the most part correct. I tried visiting the following sites to get an impression of each:

      http://news.google.com/
      http://news.google.fr/
      http://news.google.de/
      http://news.google.es/
      http://news.google.nl/
      http://news.google.it/
      http://news.google.es/

      The biggest difference I see is that the German site has way more capitals. That aside, everything else looks on the surface (ie: when not actually trying to read anything) to follow the same general pattern. From a linguistics perspective, I don't doubt you're correct and many alterations have been introduced into each language as it diverged from a common root... but to an untrained eye scanning over the text of the sites above I'm not seeing a lot of variance.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    124. Re:A-list? What? by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm thoroughly American... and I think I've heard that name before, but I would have no idea what sport he's associated with.

      If you're a sports fan, your friends are probably sports fans, and you end up thinking everybody is. Many aren't, though; to them, sports celebrities are passing trivia, as meaningless and ephemeral as the latest bubble-gum pop musician.

    125. Re:A-list? What? by rvw14 · · Score: 1

      I am an American and yes I know that Messi plays for Barca, Rooney for Man U., with Tevez at Man. City. Lewis Hamilton however is not a name I know.

    126. Re:A-list? What? by NotNormallyNormal · · Score: 1

      Curling - now your talking sports. I bet all the chicks are falling over Kevin Martin after his gold medal though Kevin Koe sure attracted fans after those world championships!

    127. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because of this.

      Try this instead.

    128. Re:A-list? What? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      You betray yourself as a football fan though, since you shortened it to Barca and Man U, which are the common names used in the sport and by fans.

      Lewis Hamilton drives for the McLaren F1 team.

    129. Re:A-list? What? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of Lebron James or Peyton Manning.

      I have heard of Kobe Bryant, and isn't Shaq O'Neal (however the fuck it's spelled) the one that cross-dresses?

      Cross-dressing is about the only thing basketball players do that's of interest. Excellent game to play, terrible spectator sport.

    130. Re:A-list? What? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but we have girls that play netball. Trust me, that's a win.

    131. Re:A-list? What? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      There's more action in five minutes of football than there is in an entire American Football match.

      Strategy? Sure, maybe not so much of that in the match. But strategy happens over the season. In the match, there are constant tactical changes and battles.

      Just because they're too subtle for you to realise doesn't mean they're not there. Just because someone has to write down the tactics in American Football doesn't make them strategies.

      And the NFL players do indeed take harder hits than football players. But not harder than Rugby players, and they wear rather less padding. So don't try waving your testosterone fueled ego sports at us, it just makes you look insecure.

    132. Re:A-list? What? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I like to think that as a native English speaker, I'm allowed to be lazy and skip some of the rules.

      After all, it's a living language and by changing how I use it, I can influence its future direction. It would be wrong of me to leave such an important contribution to the illiterate youth.

    133. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assure you that I have no clue who Labron James is, although I have heard the name once or twice. I actually watched the Final Four, but thats the first time I've seen a basketball game on TV in several years. I'm sure it will be another several years before I see another one.

    134. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Jokes, on slashdot?! *gasp* :P

      What next, are we going to discuss Beowulf clusters on slashdot or some other crazy thing like that hehe.

    135. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      And yet virtually anyone in this discussion knows who Michael Jordan was, and he was an athlete. If I asked you who Tiger Woods was, you'd know. If not for golf, than because his face is everywhere. If I asked you who Joe Montana was, I'd really hope you would know who I was referring to. I think people nowadays unfortunately compartmentalize themselves into a small area of interest and tune out the rest of the world. I like to keep my interests varied, as I'm probably one of the few people I know who simultaneously could name many starters on most pro football and basketball teams, some good starting economy strategies in Starcraft (although probably nothing to rival these geeks we started talking about), the purpose of pretty much any military jet that the US Military has (as I'm an aircraft enthusiast), etc etc. I guess I'm just eclectic. Although I admit, I couldn't name one soccer player not David Beckham, and I only know him because he's a douche bag, so I guess I see your point.

    136. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      LOL...umm no, that'd be Dennis Rodman. Shaq is the one the size of a bus that put out a horrible rap album and even worse movie, but pretty much is unstoppable in the paint (by anyone not named Tim Duncan anyways).

    137. Re:A-list? What? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Damn, my ignorance is exposed. I shall have to research transgendered basketball players in more depth!

    138. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, there aren't.

      There are channels with a lot of MMA programming, but none are 24-7 dedicated to MMA.

      OTOH, there ARE 24-7 dedicated Starcraft channels in Korea.

      Starcraft is bigger in Korea than MMA is here in the states. I know this because I've been involved with MMA in the states since ~93 and also happen to sponsor Korean Starcraft and DOTA teams.

    139. Re:A-list? What? by nigelo · · Score: 1

      Basketball was... the best thing created by a Canadian next to maple syrup...

      Don't suggest playing basketball next to maple syrup; please. It's very sticky, and the players' shoes are already squeaky enough, thank you.

      --
      *Still* negative function...
    140. Re:A-list? What? by Razalhague · · Score: 1

      Ah, forgive me my euro-centric and rather limited experience of other languages.

      But I think you're reading way too much into my post. The concept that we're all born with some perfect language built-in is just silly.

      Current linguistic theory as it applies to your statement can be summarized as follows: you're an idiot.

      No need to get personal. There's an enormous difference between lacking intelligence and lacking knowledge.

    141. Re:A-list? What? by syousef · · Score: 1

      I was being fcetious. But I honestly hadn't heard of him. I just don't care about basketball celebrities. AT ALL. That doesn't make me a retard, or make me unaware of the existence of the game of basketball. But I don't know the rules off the top of my head and I'd only care if I was going to play. That you feel like abusing people for holding this attitude indicates you've been brainwashed.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    142. Re:A-list? What? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      I don't know who Lebron is.

      I know what basketball is.

      I'm not making shit up.

      I'm pretty sure I'm not a borderline retard.

    143. Re:A-list? What? by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      yeah we do, he's married to Posh Spice!

      --
      +1 Disagree
    144. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh

    145. Re:A-list? What? by koreaman · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know who Tony Parker is. I'm not French, but I can say that he is very well-known in France. What's your point?

    146. Re:A-list? What? by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      >There's an enormous difference between lacking intelligence and lacking knowledge
      Those who seek out information before forming opinions are what we call "informed". I always use the word "idiot" to refer to those who persist in a position that is not supported by the facts and persist (often forcefully) in their ignorance of the facts, even going so far as to deliberately avoid any information which may taint their preset world-views.
      Making a statement which is clearly false to justify using an inconsequential matter as part of your judgement of others is a pattern of behavior that strongly correlates with this attitude.
      Personally - I think "grammar nazi" should be added to philosophy classes as one of the most common fallacies of our time. It's a variant on the ad hominem attack. Whether a person spelled the words in his argument correctly does NOT in any way relate to whether his argument is correct or not.

      >While you have valid points, in my mind the OP is for the most part correct. I tried visiting the following sites to get an impression of each:

      You're example is machine translations of the same source text ?!?!?!? Do you seriously believe that original write-ups of the same event in a Spanish and English newspaper would look that similar ? The point is that superficial resemblance of punctuation in text is completely insignificant here. It just means that those languages use the same basic symbols to represent punctuation. What those symbols actually MEAN and the rules for how to use them differ radically, but it's quite impossible to recognize that in a language you cannot read.
      In Afrikaans for example the " symbol is OFTEN placed on TOP of vowels, when this is done, it indicates a historic contraction where the missing letters are never pronounced. From the Dutch "vogel" - we dropped the g, it's neither written nor said. But "voel" would be pronounced like "fool" in Afrikaans (meaning "to feel"), bird is written "voël" (foo-ull).
      No such convention exists in English or any other Latin language and even in Germanic's it's rare (though the same symbol is frequently used in German for a similar but not identical use - and the German usage ALSO occurs in Afrikaans - it inserts a syllable where one wouldn't have existed otherwise - basically the Afrikaans usage is a derivative, we use it to retain the syllable that got lost when the word was contracted) on the other hand, the type of contractions English use all the time (one use of apostrophes in English) doesn't exist at all in Germanic languages.
      That's without even the fact that there are a multitude of extra punctuation symbols that are unique to some languages - and they solve the same problems with the Latin Alphabet in different ways.
      German, English, Polish and Afrikaans all contain numerous sounds that have no letter representation in the Latin Alphabet.
      English ignores the problem - they simply let each letter have several different sounds depending on what word you use it in (compare the T in "the" with the T in "cat").
      German and Polish solves it by adding extra letters - but importantly not the same ones. The German ß and Polish for example (both are basically the same sound that in English is written with the two-letter "sh" combination)..
      Polish is particularly confusing in the Latin alphabet because it's not the native alphabet of the language, it's really supposed to use the Cyrillic alphabet - so it has another compensation on top, the same one as Afrikaans. Stick a bunch of dots and stripes over letters which act as symbols and change pronunciation according to certain rules. So E, , and ê are all completely different (but related) sounds.

      Yes they look similar if you don't try to read... but that's a complete superficial thing. Same symbols - completely different uses and even more radically different rules about how those uses are applied.
      Try to actually LEARN at least one foreign language before forming opinions about it. The US and Britain are basically the only

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    147. Re:A-list? What? by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      Grrr... slashdot's i18n support is rather broken.. half my example symbols got dropped from the post... guess I should have previewed :S

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    148. Re:A-list? What? by Razalhague · · Score: 1

      I always use the word "idiot" to refer to those who persist in a position that is not supported by the facts and persist (often forcefully) in their ignorance of the facts, even going so far as to deliberately avoid any information which may taint their preset world-views.

      How am I persisting? I made a statement based on my own experiences, you corrected me, and I accepted the information. Just in case it wasn't clear in my previous post; I hereby admit that I was wrong.

      Personally - I think "grammar nazi" should be added to philosophy classes as one of the most common fallacies of our time. It's a variant on the ad hominem attack. Whether a person spelled the words in his argument correctly does NOT in any way relate to whether his argument is correct or not.

      I didn't question the correctness of his argument. I questioned the view that you need to be a native English speaker to capitalize, punctuate, and spell correctly.

      You're example is machine translations of the same source text ?!?!?!?

      That was nacturation, not me.

      Try to actually LEARN at least one foreign language before forming opinions about it. [...] In fact I was required to be Trilingual just to finish Highschool.

      As was I. Finnish, Swedish and English. But like I said, it's rather limited and euro-centric.

      Quite frankly, it's not that hard.

      You know what else is not hard? Reading the discussion you're replying to. If you had done that you would know I'm not a native speaker of English.

      Please, before you reply to me again, make sure I'm the person you should be replying to.

    149. Re:A-list? What? by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      I replied to two different people in one post, I quoted them separately and replied to them separately.
      My reply to you was short, and explained the context of my "idiot" comment only. I guess my implication (that you seem to be an exception to the rule) was not clear enough. Sorry about that.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    150. Re:A-list? What? by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      Anti-Whoosh... It adds to the joke you fool.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    151. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Until tested, who can be sure.

    152. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Didn't have a point, just thought you were French and was curious how well known he is in France. I'm just a Spurs fan ;)

    153. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      No, I just enjoy stirring the pot now and again.

    154. Re:A-list? What? by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      The ironic thing is he was one of the best defensive players in the last 10-15 years in the NBA. Too bad he was also a freak.

    155. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MMA has a huge production cost. What is the cost of airing a Starcraft competition? $100 for 2 hours? Korean Starcraft is the advertising network channels of the US.

    156. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but they're chinks!!!! That's like counting the population of women as meaning something.

    157. Re:A-list? What? by koreaman · · Score: 1

      I lived in France for ten months. They put Tony Parker's face on frosted flakes over there, if that gives you any indication of his level of fame. I would say that almost every young person has heard of him.

    158. Re:A-list? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because his name is typically transliterated to Ma Jae Yoon, not Ja Me Yoon

  4. In a way it's nice.. by blind+biker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is nice to be part of a demographic that couldn't give a rat's ass about the whole thing, including MMOs and the surrounding scene.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:In a way it's nice.. by Dalambertian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny, that's exactly what I thought when I heard about Tiger Woods.

    2. Re:In a way it's nice.. by bennomatic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but Tiger's /. ID is, coincidentally, 963809.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    3. Re:In a way it's nice.. by Punto · · Score: 5, Funny

      instead, you're part of the demographic that cares about "Dancing with the stars". Congratulations.

      --

      --
      Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

    4. Re:In a way it's nice.. by blind+biker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Me, too. I really can't be assed about a multi-million-earning sportsman, regardless of the sport. Golf, soccer, football, basketball... none of these guys are any role model (eccept on how to rake in the dough). Fuck 'em. Together with the dumb celebrities of all kind. Fuck 'em all.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    5. Re:In a way it's nice.. by SupremoMan · · Score: 1

      I prefer being part of the demographic that doesn't give shit about the US sports and surrounding scene... You know the non alcoholic part.

    6. Re:In a way it's nice.. by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      I don't know, after watching The Blindside, Michael Oher kind of seems like a good role model to me. I don't know how true to life the movie was, but if it's even half true, I'd say he's a good person to model your own kids after.

    7. Re:In a way it's nice.. by kiddygrinder · · Score: 5, Funny

      It must suck to be a part of the subset of those who care enough about not caring to make sure everyone knows how much they don't care.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    8. Re:In a way it's nice.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're trying to make a comparison to justify your sport, i.e., 'people cared about Woods,' but I didn't - so logically the dislike of the computer sports arena stems from personal taste.

      Except no one cared about Tiger Woods. His only fans are/were golf fans. His incident had no impact on his true fans - those who admired his abilities. Everyone else respected him because he was a Freak, a genetic anomaly. Like Yao Ming. Learning of Woods' incident revealed he was as human and fallible as everyone else.

    9. Re:In a way it's nice.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure if it is the same thing, but I just don't give a rat's ass about ANYTHING lately........
      I think that is good ?

    10. Re:In a way it's nice.. by apoc.famine · · Score: 2, Informative

      They're not even a role model for how to rake in the dough - your chance of having the skills and grooming to play a pro sport is approximately on par with your chance of getting struck by lightning. Seriously - how many pro golfers can you name? 600 people get hit by lightning in the US every year. We're not adding 600 world-famous golfers each year, that's for sure.

      It blows my mind how many kids are fed the lies that they can make it in pro sports. I your skills aren't better than 1 in 100,000, you're not going to make it into pro sports.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    11. Re:In a way it's nice.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It must suck to be a part of the subset of those who care enough about not caring to make sure everyone knows how much they don't care.

      I'm pretty sure this guy is a distant relative of his.

    12. Re:In a way it's nice.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      twitch..twitch

    13. Re:In a way it's nice.. by bonch · · Score: 1

      Golf involves being outdoors, while Starcraft involves drinking Mountain Dew and obsessing over your "APM." Its garbage interface makes it so the game is more about how much you can wrestle with interface actions than performing actual strategy.

    14. Re:In a way it's nice.. by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize 3 people could constitute a "demographic"...

    15. Re:In a way it's nice.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean this guy: http://slashdot.org/~the_harlequin ?

    16. Re:In a way it's nice.. by Dalambertian · · Score: 1

      You could make the same argument to disqualify any sport. Do you think a cylindrical lump of wood is really the best interface for directing projectiles?

    17. Re:In a way it's nice.. by Dalambertian · · Score: 1

      My comparison was not to justify starcraft as a sport. It was more like an emotional response to blind_biker. I don't believe starcraft needs any justification - it should be able to stand on it's own merits; anyone looking into the matter should be able to tell.

    18. Re:In a way it's nice.. by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      Me, too. I really can't be assed about a multi-million-earning sportsman, regardless of the sport. Golf, soccer, football, basketball... none of these guys are any role model (eccept on how to rake in the dough). Fuck 'em. Together with the dumb celebrities of all kind. Fuck 'em all.

      In the case of Tiger, it looks like plenty of women already followed your advice regarding sporting stars.

    19. Re:In a way it's nice.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, well, carry on then. Sorry for the mischaracterization.

      BTW, turn on the TV and flip to a golf channel sometime. Based on the media you'd think Woods was reviled. But the other day I turned it on just as Woods made an appearance: laughing, waving, audience cheering, commentators praising - it was as 2003 and no change. I thought it was amusing, anyway.

  5. Name is wrong - Jae Yoon Ma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    His first name is Jae Yoon, and his surname is Ma. Typically written in Korean with the surname first, as Ma Jae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon is wrong.

    1. Re:Name is wrong - Jae Yoon Ma by P1aGu3ed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Is that like Yo Ma Ma?

    2. Re:Name is wrong - Jae Yoon Ma by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      His first name is Jae Yoon, and his surname is Ma. Typically written in Korean with the surname first, as Ma Jae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon is wrong.

      Stop using the term "first name" to refer to a second name. It isn't helping. "Given name," works pretty much universally, without implying a correct order.

    3. Re:Name is wrong - Jae Yoon Ma by pcolaman · · Score: 1, Funny

      First Name. There, said it, whatcha gonna do about it

    4. Re:Name is wrong - Jae Yoon Ma by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      This:

      Ja Mae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon.

      There, whatcha gonna do about that?

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    5. Re:Name is wrong - Jae Yoon Ma by Aim+Here · · Score: 0

      Mod you down of course!

      Oh crap...

    6. Re:Name is wrong - Jae Yoon Ma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      His first name is Jae Yoon, and his surname is Ma. Typically written in Korean with the surname first, as Ma Jae Yoon. Ja Mae Yoon is wrong.

      This website is not in Korean is it?
      Great first Korean Grammar Naz...err I mean Juchi!

    7. Re:Name is wrong - Jae Yoon Ma by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Now you kids settle down! I will pull this thread over God help me if you don't......

  6. This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I played Starcraft for a while, and I was very impressed with how balanced the gameplay was and how thought out the interface was. Blizzard did a great job making that game.

    But it really stifles the creativity of the player by restricting actions to a very specific set of pre-programmed actions. You *must* farm for Vespene gas. you *must* collect crystals. There is little room for true creativity and adventuring. Today's FPS games are actually getting better at allowing this kind of freedom.

    But to really get the most out of a game, you have to use your imagination. There's nothing more challenging than interacting with your friends and working out puzzles with nothing more than paper, dice, and pewter figurines. Dungeons and Dragons (and other clones of it) is the ultimate game because it removes artificially created limits and depends completely on how much you are invested in it.

    If people are cheating and rigging game competitions, it's only because there is something to rig. Try cheating in D&D and you'll find that you only cheat yourself.

    BadAnalogyGuy (aka Black Leaf)

    1. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dungeons and Dragons (and other clones of it) is the ultimate game because it removes artificially created limits and depends completely on how much you are invested in it.

      If I play D&D can I not go out and fight monsters/dungeon crawl, spending my time being I dunno, a merchant or going around picking up chicks? Or will I be attacked by mythical creatures for no apparent reason and be forced to fight no matter what I want.

      What I ask is, if the scope of the game is adventuring, can I play it like a dating sim.

    2. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by sys.stdout.write · · Score: 1

      You *must* farm for Vespene gas. you *must* collect crystals. There is little room for true creativity and adventuring. There is little room for true creativity and adventuring.

      I can't tell if I'm being trolled or not.

      It's an RTS. Comparing Starcraft to RPGs is apples to oranges. That's like criticizing chess because you *must* move your pawn or *must* move your knight.

      The real question in all this is whether Starcraft 2 is hackable or not.

    3. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, you'd need a different set of rules and, presumably, a DM you're comfortable with sexually (depending what you plan to be doing with said chicks).

      "k, rolling for gender check."
      "You did that already."
      "Yeah, well, after last time, I feel like rolling again. Panties of Binding +5, my ass...."
      "I didn't make the tuckback rule. You got a problem? Take it up with the book!"

    4. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      Totally irrelevant. If there's a betting business targeting D&D there *will* be cheating, game fixing and fraud.

      As some /.er has said, you can't defeat a profit incentive.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    5. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Black Leaf

      Nooo!!!!

    6. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by Lueseiseki · · Score: 1

      Are you implying there's a computer game that's completely unhackable?

    7. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try cheating in D&D and you'll find that you only cheat yourself.

      Thank you for that public service announcement. Remember kids, stay in school!

    8. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by socceroos · · Score: 1

      What are your reasons for not playing 4th ed.?

      For me personally, I've been a bit disappointed with 4th edition because they're trying so hard to make all characters 'equal'. I don't care what you say, Gandalf will always pwn Aragon - he's the freaking white wizard for blinky's sake! Let him be!

    9. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by Samah · · Score: 1

      Try cheating in D&D and you'll find that you only cheat yourself.

      Cheating is fine until your DM notices. Then it's "hello 2000 XP penalty" and "your character is struck down by a curse where all actions must be announced in pig latin or you take 3 necrotic damage at beginning of your turn (save ends)".
      Actually, next time I DM I'm gonna use that. :)

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    10. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If you want that, go play Maid.

      No, seriously, go play Maid, it's an awesome RPG, the PDF version is like $8, and you get to be one of a household full of maids keeping their master out of trouble, beating troublesome NPCs senseless, and chasing each other with chainsaws.

      You can also play as a butler, but butlers are boring.

    11. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Are you implying there's a computer game that's completely unhackable?

      Core Wars?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    12. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! We must make the classes completely unbalanced so a level 5 wizard can trash a level 13 fighter, and creating a balanced encounter for them to fight is impossible because the enemies either steamroll the fighter or get Save-or-Lose'd by the wizard!

      You're an idiot, btw. Gandalf was far more powerful, yes. Ignoring that he was a bloody angel, there's already a perfectly good way to handle that in D&D - Gandalf is more powerful because he's HIGHER LEVEL.

      And a plot dmpc, but that's irrelevant here.

    13. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Comparing Starcraft to RPGs is apples to Bad Analogies

      Fixed that for y-WHOOOOOSH!

      Also: bah, 3rd edition? I was playing D&D when it wasn't Advanced the first time, and when "elf" was a character class. Hey, you zerglings! Get off my lawn!

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    14. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by gijoel · · Score: 1

      But think of the loot, man. The loot!!!

    15. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are mixing game types... Starcraft is a strategy game (RTS), First person shooters (FPSs) which you refer to are quite different with their gameplay. And on top of those, you compare them to roleplaying games (RPGs).

      Better would be to compare tabletop strategy games with the Starcraft, and computer RPGs(Mass effect, Elderscrolls) to D&D...

      Just my 2...

    16. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Try cheating in D&D and you'll find that you only cheat yourself.

      Thank you for that public service announcement. Remember kids, stay in school!

      And out of strangers' basements

    17. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      As popular as SC is, if they'd have put loot in, that'd be even cooler. They could call it Warcraft III. I'm gonna copyright that. Oh wait...

    18. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the fact that the DM has so much power just means he'll be the one who gets bribed. You can never rule out cheating in competitive play, so long as there's something of value at stake, someone will try to find a way to game the system, all you can do is anticipate their actions and try to develop a method of spotting cheating patterns.

    19. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      You do realize that half the levels in the single-player campaign were maps where scripts were set up where you *didn't* have to mine for crystals OR vespine gas. Although those particular levels were even more railroading than the regular maps, those scripts are available to any level designer using the included map building tools.

      That said. It's a completely different game than D&D. I don't know why you would compare them as if one was a replacement for the other.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    20. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      This is played on PCs provided by the tournament host and with your screen contents broadcasted to an audience so actual ingame cheating would be very hard. Conspiring to rig games only requires the human element to be compromised.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    21. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      Dungeons and Dragons (and other clones of it) is the ultimate game because it removes artificially created limits and depends completely on how much you are invested in it.

      If I play D&D can I not go out and fight monsters/dungeon crawl, spending my time being I dunno, a merchant or going around picking up chicks? Or will I be attacked by mythical creatures for no apparent reason and be forced to fight no matter what I want.

      What I ask is, if the scope of the game is adventuring, can I play it like a dating sim.

      That's the essence of a pen and paper rpg. You can have your character do anything the people playing with you will enjoy. If you want to turn it into a musical about algebra, you can do it. There are even game mechanics for it.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    22. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Core Wars? You went with that over Progress Quest?

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    23. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      Not to go on a big 3E vs. 4E tangent, but at the core, I would say the key difference is (and the reason some people strongly prefer one over the other):

      3E (and previous) are trying to strike a balance between being a good simulation (a kind of fantasy version of reality if you will -- the mechanics of the world 'make sense' and are consistent in some way even if they're fantastical) and being a fun game.

      4E largely says, we want this to be a fun and balanced game and if we have to give up on the simulation part in order to achieve that we will.

    24. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by Schickeneder · · Score: 1

      But it really stifles the creativity of the player by restricting actions to a very specific set of pre-programmed actions. You *must* farm for Vespene gas. you *must* collect crystals. There is little room for true creativity and adventuring. Today's FPS games are actually getting better at allowing this kind of freedom.

      Yeah kind of like Chess. Who came up with that lousy game anyway? In particular pawns! Whose brilliant idea was it that the stupid little thing can only (under most circumstances) move one space foward at a time! Why can't we just have a polygynous king with 8 queens on the front row? It's no wonder that game was such a flop--no opportunity for creative expression or adventure of any kind!

      I personally would much rather play a game with books full of rules on par with the IRS tax code and encyclopedias full of make-believe monsters and other elements that govern how my make-believe world will be run.

      It's a shame that only 0.0001% of the world population plays D&D.

    25. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      4e tries to simulate fantasy stories whilst being a fun game with fun combat, and was designed by people who thought about what they were trying to simulate and design. 3e tries to simulate fantasy stories and real physics and so on for about ten seconds before giving up and collapsing into a heap of incoherent rules, rousing itself from its stupor to claim that some of the stupider ones are absolutely necessary because SIMULATION, MAN, THAT'S HOW THE WORLD WORKSSSSS. Pathfinder was designed by Paizo, who dear god cannot for the life of them handle mechanics. Even pre-Pathfinder, their adventures were complete messes, mechanically speaking, saved only by hiring decent artists and being able to string together a better plot than most commercial adventure writers.

      And then they wrote higher-level adventures, with multi-page stat blocks for enemies doomed to die in the first two rounds of combat unless they wrote the adventure to flatly deny anything a spellcaster PC wanted to do, and still failed, because D&D 3.5 is the most broken and imbalanced version of the game, ever. At least in earlier editions the mundane classes turned into blenders with absurd saves against magical attacks, so weren't completely overshadowed.

      Incidentally, there's a full stat block for one of the D&D demon lord type things online, for 3.5. It includes all the abilities the game gives him, according to the rules. It's, ooh, about 50 pages long, and 99% of it will never, ever see play. Fuck 3.5.

    26. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by gknoy · · Score: 1

      This is also a symptom of a group of players (and DM) who are trying to "win" at the game, rather than "tell an awesome story".

      When your swashbuckler says, "I take a swig from my flagon of mead, kiss the saucy wench, climb over the table, and engage the ruffian in swordplay," your DM could hit him with a bunch of penalties (multiple actions, perhaps, movement penalties, acrobatics or atheletics checks, etc... or he could simply ask your character to roll to hit. When your players are in it to participate as protagonists in a story, they're less likely to try to "cheat" or fear that their DM is actively trying to kill them.

    27. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you buy a book for it, sure.

    28. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by sjwt · · Score: 1

      I so hate the current MMO for the same reason, no choice. Well sure you might be able to chose bettween two quests that are realy worth it at your current level, and sure thier might be 2 or even 3 kick ass combos to master, but in the end everyone ends up following the same X type clones.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    29. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by EdIII · · Score: 1

      I don't care what you say, Gandalf will always pwn Aragon - he's the freaking white wizard for blinky's sake! Let him be!

      Well as long as we are geeking out here, there is a plenty good fucking reason why Gandalf will always pwn just about everything in Middle Earth including Aragorn and it has nothing to do with him being a "wizard".

      Gandalf for all practical purposes is God like, being a lower level God himself.

      He is literally, a Lesser Spirit (of the Maiar) named Olórin and from Valinor, which you could liken to Gods on Mt. Olympus. Although he had many names after he arrived in Middle Earth, and was part of the group of "Wizards", the Istari, he was always the wisest and most powerful of the beings sent from Valinor to fight Sauron. Saruman was the 2nd choice to lead the Istari, and only did so because Gandalf refused to be bound by any other creatures on Middle Earth and only to Nienna, the Goddess of Mercy.

      Sauron was also of the Maiar, and both he and Gandalf were at the same level. So the most powerful being you really hear of in the book (other than Gods mentioned in passing), is at the same level as Gandalf.......

      The Elves especially, Men, and the Dwarves were all terrified of the Balrogs. The Balrogs were corrupted Lesser Spirits of the same order as Gandalf and Sauron. Gandalf still defeated the Balrog, something an entire civilization of Dwarves could not do...

      OF COURSE Gandalf is going to pwn Aragorn HARD..

      Gandalf is a lesser God walking on Earth....... +1,000,000,000HP, Roll 20 ten times in a row to save against his Pimpin' hand.

    30. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by socceroos · · Score: 1

      Haha, very true. My example was a bit extreme, I'll admit.

    31. Re:This is why I only play D&D (3rd ed.) by Vastad · · Score: 1

      The resource bottleneck is a limitation that only exists in tournament rules. Set up games where tournament rules specify that resources are infinite and Starcraft will play a lot differently (if the Zerg do not win early with a rush, they never win). Then it's down to knowing how long you can leap up the tech tree, how quickly you can build things, whether it's worth going for hordes of low-level squishies and doing a zerg rush or investing time in building a few top-tier superweapons and stomping all over the map.

      This has been done in Dawn of War multiplayer for ages now, with maps/matches set up with infinite resources and the only way to win is complete annihilation of the other player(s). That led to an interesting Eldar tactic. Infinite resource games that disabled squad and vehicle caps and had an Eldar player, usually led to the Eldar player leaping up the infantry tech tree as fast as possible and then spamming Warp Spiders with Wraithlords, pretty much crushing everything.

  7. As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Here's a weird quote from the article:

    As part of Korea's human rights laws, it is illegal to release criminals' names - they can only be implied - which means that as the police have now gotten involved, we may never be officially told who was involved in this drama.

    You can't know criminals' names in Korea? Kind of weird.

    --
    Qxe4
    1. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "You can't know criminals' names in Korea? Kind of weird."

      It has it's positives i.e. vigilante justice and not getting ones life ruined if accused of a heinus crime (pedophelia, sexual assault, etc).

      In america I find the fact they publish the names of sex offenders grotesque because rehabilitation and re-entering society to lead a normal life is impossible, this vigalante mob justice has never sat well with me.

    2. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by rebot777 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's most likely you can't know alleged criminals names for their protection. A concern I have with current US society is the media's influence on our views of 'alleged criminals'. If you're in a high profile case and it turns out you're not guilty the inertia of public opinion against you for being accused can haunt you for the rest of your life. I believe these laws are in response to such situations.

    3. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by DreadPiratePizz · · Score: 1

      Here's the list of the players. The source is fomos. Myung Soo (Yarnc), Chan Soo (Luxury), Sang Ho (SangHo), Jung Woo (EffOrt), Yong Hwa (Movie), Jae Yoon (sAviOr), Taek Yong (Bisu), Byong Goo (Stork), Jae Wook (BeSt), il Jang (hero), Myung Hoon (fantasy), Heui Seung (UpMaGiC), Jae Dong (Jaedong), Sang Moon (Leta), Jong Seo (Justin), Chang Hee (go.go)

    4. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by gzipped_tar · · Score: 4, Informative

      Criminals? I guess you mean criminal suspects, since it's the police rather than the court that "have gotten involved".

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    5. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Be careful just spreading that list around without any qualification.

      That is a list of players who are under investigation. It may not be complete, and it's highly likely to include many players who didn't participate.

    6. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by XiaoMing · · Score: 1

      You can't know criminals' names in Korea? Kind of weird.

      Yeah ditto on that weirdness vibe. Kind of makes one wonder how they handle something like America's Sex Offender registry.

    7. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're still better off than the Japanese. There, they'll publish where you work, who your family is, and everything.

      In that country, if you're even remotely associated with someone *accused* of a crime, you're tainted and deserve to be punished.

    8. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Anonymous must be huge there!

    9. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Cimexus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a similar principle as in the West, where you generally can't release the names of suspected offenders (or victims) who are minors (or at least that's how it is here in Australia ... you often hear 'the offender's identity cannot be revealed because s/he was under 18 at the time of the crime). This applies to both those merely accused and awaiting trial, as well as those convicted (or for that matter, exonerated).

      The Korean law just goes a step further and extends this protection to all people involved in criminal matters.

      I kinda like the idea actually, although there are some obvious caveats. The general public certainly has no right to demonise someone accused of a crime before it's been proved. And even once they are convicted, it is not really the general public's business to know criminals' names, other than obviously those connected with the crime (victims/families etc). They will pay a penalty under the law (a fine, community service, jail time etc) ... but once that debt is paid they have a right to move back into society without being discriminated against for the rest of their lives. And keeping their name out of the media is one way to do that.

      The counter-argument is made that people have a right to know if they are living near/employing/otherwise engaging with people who have been found guilty of serious crime (particularly sex offenders or murderers). And it's a good counter-argument. Perhaps we can draw a line and say "people convicted of the most serious crimes or those with no hope of rehabilitation can have their identities revealed, but for minor to moderate crimes, the criminals should remain anonymous". Either that or we toughen up sentencing so that serious criminals don't GET reintroduced into society in the first place ... then the whole argument becomes moot.

    10. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by crossmr · · Score: 1

      This article is all over the place. They write the guys name a couple ways. The one under the picture is the more correct romanization, and yes it should refer to suspects. The papers often print the names of convicted people here.

    11. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Cimexus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I doubt they have an equivalent. Even in other ~Western~ countries there is often no equivalent of such a registry. It's one of those things I always found a bit odd about America actually.

      Where I live, you either don't release a serious criminal who is going to have a tendency to re-offend, or tabs are kept on them in other ways (house confinement, surveillance, radio bracelets etc.). I mean sure, the people who live nearby to the to-be-released sex offender will be notified and have a right to object to/block the offender moving into that area. But that doesn't extend to the whole world being able to punch in a random address and see who's around.

      I'm not American so I may have misinterpreted what the Registry actually does. If so I apologise. But my impression was that ~anyone~ can search for nearby offenders ~anywhere~, even if that location has nothing to do with them.

    12. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by onefriedrice · · Score: 1

      In america I find the fact they publish the names of sex offenders grotesque because rehabilitation and re-entering society to lead a normal life is impossible, this vigalante mob justice has never sat well with me.

      That's now really what it's about. Personally, if I have small kids and I move into a new neighborhood, the lists are invaluable. It doesn't make rehabilitation impossible either because names expire from the lists, but of course (like any other felon), you have to be truthful to your would-be employers if they ask you. I have no problem with any of this.

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    13. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by pHus10n · · Score: 1

      YOU don't have a problem with this because it doesn't affect YOU. And having your name expire *twenty years or longer* after you've supposedly served your time isn't rehabilitation --- it's an extension of sentence. Ask any sex offender, including the ones on a list for say......statutory of a 17 year old. The mob mentality, the iPhone apps showing nice little maps where you live, etc.

      Many of them would tell you that prison is almost safer.

    14. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Personally, if I have small kids and I move into a new neighborhood, the lists are invaluable."

      No you feel like they are invaluable. It lets you find bad people who have been caught, not bad people.

      It only leads to a false sense of safety.

    15. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by protagonistic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, after that horrible story with Kira and everything, you know....

    16. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Dude that's like polar opposite of the US. We get daily updates in the newspapers of DUI arrests, Battery and Assault arrests, and if you are a pedophile, you might as well hand out business cards with all of your pertinent info to everyone you ever meet because they'll see it all online anyways.

    17. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by pcolaman · · Score: 0, Troll

      I do think they need to differentiate based on what type of offense (such as statutory rape) but honestly if it's a violent rape crime, I say fuck it, lock em up until their name would expire from the list anyways. I've known women who've been raped in a violent matter and 20 years later, trust me, they don't forget. Why let the dick fuck who did it to them off easy either? We've become a nation of PC pussies, to be quite honest. It's the one thing I think the Islamic Nations have actually done better than us. They make sure people go out of their way not to commit these sorts of crimes, because of the insane (but usually appropriate) punishments. Fuck a woman who didn't want you to fuck her. Death by stoning, motherfucker. Too bad the one thing they get right they still manage to fuck up by also punishing the rapee half the time too.

    18. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, you're absolutely correct.

    19. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by jimthehorsegod · · Score: 1

      I think, in fact, you give them rather more credit than they deserve... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7708169.stm

    20. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      It has it's positives i.e. vigilante justice [...] this vigalante mob justice has never sat well with me.

      Wait, are you for it or against it?

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    21. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like that in most civilized countries - criminal suspects are to be protected until convicted in court.

      The difference in the US law system is, that at the time it was created, the majority of citizens were convicted criminals :p

    22. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, if I have small kids and I move into a new neighborhood, the lists are invaluable.>

      Invaluable, hah! As in that without out them you would be unable to spot registered sex offenders such as Juan Matamoro who is registered because over 20 years ago he urinated in public when drunk? http://www.bakelblog.com/nobodys_business/2007/03/florida_banishe.html

    23. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I do appreciate your argument, but over here in the UK there has been at least one case of a paediatrician being hounded out of her house because the baying mob saw the "paed" bit and thought she was a paedophile. Recently with the media interest in John Venables people have again been circulating details that claim to be of his new identity; the guy who it really is has received death threats, despite not being Venables.

      Anything involving harm to kids (or potential harm) causes the average person to behave irrationally; publish the names and locations of convicted sex offenders and sooner or later someone is going to end up hurt or dead, and not necessarily even anyone on the list. Sucks to have a similar name and live in the same area.

    24. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But that doesn't extend to the whole world being able to punch in a random address and see who's around."

      http://www.familywatchdog.us

    25. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      The problem with this is you will get on the same sex offender list for raping someone with a baseball bat, as you will for peeing in public after a long night at the pub, or having sex with your 16 year old girlfriend when you are 18.

      If the list was somehow publicly audited it would not be such an issue.

    26. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      The lists are stupid. If I was 18 and got caught having sex with my 17 year old girlfriend, I would wind up on the sexual predator list... even if we got married. Would you avoid me if I was your neighbor, or just move without saying anything?

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    27. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by houghi · · Score: 1

      The counter-argument is made that people have a right to know if they are living near/employing/otherwise engaging with people who have been found guilty of serious crime (particularly sex offenders or murderers). And it's a good counter-argument.

      I do not think it is a good argument. Many of the crimes you mentioned happen within the family. Not all murderers are gun toting manics trying to kill everybody. In Europe at least most are crimes of passion.

      Why do I need to know if the person who lives next to me killed his girlfriend at the age of 16, did 10 years and has been a good person since 10 more? Why do I need to know the person next door slept with his girlfriend on his 19th birthday and he is just a week older?

      If these people are a danger to society, they should perhaps not be released. Telling me will hurt the innocent more then it will the guilty. Because if my neighbor once plays his music a bit too loud, I could call his job and he looses it.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    28. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Threni · · Score: 1

      Apart from the bit about `no other Western countries`, because the UK has one.

    29. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >In america I find the fact they publish the names of sex offenders grotesque because rehabilitation and re-entering society to lead a normal life is impossible, this vigalante mob justice has never sat well with me.

      It's like the plot of Les Miserables all over again!

    30. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You can't know criminals' names in Korea? Kind of weird."

      It has it's positives i.e. vigilante justice and not getting ones life ruined if accused of a heinus crime (pedophelia, sexual assault, etc).

      In america I find the fact they publish the names of sex offenders grotesque because rehabilitation and re-entering society to lead a normal life is impossible, this vigalante mob justice has never sat well with me.

      In America, I find the fact that most sex offenders are repeat offenders grotesque, because that means rehabilitation and re-entering society lead to more rapes and molestations which make normal life impossible for their victims. I am of the belief that with enough physical evidence, convicted violent criminals and their progeny should be removed from our gene pool.

    31. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I'm not American so I may have misinterpreted what the Registry actually does.

      Its main function is to get politicians re-elected for both being "tough on crime" and "thinking of the children".

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    32. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was you Ogive, I'd move... Anyone else and I'd be willing to hear them out over a beer and some BBQ. ;-)

    33. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by glassbeat · · Score: 1

      You're correct, but it's actually even worse than you make it sound because some of the registered sex offenders are people that did things like committing the "crime" of having sex with someone who is 16 while they're 18 or 19 or taking camera phone pictures of themselves naked and sending it to their boyfriend/girlfriend when they're both minors.

    34. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Personally, if I have small kids and I move into a new neighborhood, the lists are invaluable.

      Or, like they have been doing in my area, the real(non-urination) offenders just register as homeless and sleep in a van across from the school. Then the lists are kind of useless.

    35. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Like I said, there does need to be a differentiate between what constitutes a violent rape act and something that is only considered rape or a sex offense because of a technicality. Just like the issue with the young football player from Georgia that had been put in jail because he had consensual statutory rape with a girl that was barely under the age limit but he himself was also a minor at the time. I do think sometimes we lose our focus as to what constitutes rape, but really, if it's a through and through rape, seriously who gives a fuck about trying to make them a better citizen. They took a woman's life away. Boo fucking hoo if we take theirs away too.

    36. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The counter-argument is made that people have a right to know if they are living near/employing/otherwise engaging with people who have been found guilty of serious crime (particularly sex offenders or murderers). And it's a good counter-argument. Perhaps we can draw a line and say "people convicted of the most serious crimes or those with no hope of rehabilitation can have their identities revealed, but for minor to moderate crimes, the criminals should remain anonymous".

      And that is where the problem is, because the media and popular society in America has made the relationship "sex offender" == "hangs out at playgrounds, abducts children, and rapes them", which is a serious crime so these people need to be kept isolated and off our streets with the murderers. Aside from the often quoted "...but most instances of sexual on a minor is perpetrated by a family member of the victim or a member of the clergy", which is an obligatory afterthought of an addition since it is easily overpowered by the headline "Released Sex Offender Kidnaps Innocent Little Girl".

      ...but the core problem is that "sex offender" != "hangs out at playgrounds, abducts children, and rapes them". Have you ever seen the list of offenses that will get you labeled as a "sex offender"? Basically anything that could cause you to be questioned by a police officer that involves your dick is fair game. I'm sure there's some guy on a list as a sex offender because he tried robbing a 7-11 after coming out of the bathroom and forgetting to zip or a drunk guy that passed out on the sidewalk with his pants down. Obviously these nefarious individuals are after your children.

    37. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      They don't, which is as it should be.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    38. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem with this situation is that it encourages secrecy. It is very easy to make someone just disappear and then charge the media with a crime if they report it.

    39. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by mlush · · Score: 1

      The lists are stupid. If I was 18 and got caught having sex with my 17 year old girlfriend, I would wind up on the sexual predator list... even if we got married. Would you avoid me if I was your neighbor, or just move without saying anything?

      Its worse than that you can get on the (US) Sex offenders list for public urination

    40. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      I have no problem of releasing names of convicted criminals. Releasing the name of people accused I sometimes see as wrong (depends on the day). For certain things, they could be totally be proven innocent, yet carry the stigma the rest of their lives and have have their lives ruined without doing anything wrong. That is just wrong. Also people make judgments before the actual judgments come out, furthering this concern. In addition this can bias the legal proceedings, given enough political or public outcry as a judge/jury may feel more compelled to convict on less evidence than they might otherwise. Also the media and the public has a really short attention span. Many times a big deal will be made about a trial and not its eventual outcome (which could take years sometimes). Any example up here in Canada was there was a Native leader that years ago was accused of hate crimes, and had his Order of Canada (given to him for his work as Chief) taken away because of it. Anyway I heard a couple of weeks ago in the media that he had died, and I didn't find out until then that he had won his case and was innocent of his accused crime. No idea if he was re-awarded the Order of Canada, somehow I think likely not.

    41. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by sowth · · Score: 1

      You have to understand, there is a effort by many people in the US to recreate the Taliban here. Yes, there are some slight differences (such as being based upon Christianity instead of Muslim), but it is essentially the same thing.

      One of those aspects is to treat men as the Muslims treat women in the middle east. Here every man is considered an evil serial killing rapist who must be controlled. This registry is a first step to forcing all men into having to stay indoors at all times (unless escorted by a woman).

    42. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "vigalante mob justice has never sat well with me."

      Really, what crime did you commit ?

      Just kidding ; it's irony (I'm imitating the mob mentality of guilty-before-justice).

      As per the subject : Because of this tragic event, I'll never be able to play Starcraft ever again and feel clean,

    43. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't know criminals' names in Korea? Kind of weird.

      I take it you're American. No offence intended to you personally, but you can probably guess what I'm implying.

    44. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      If you are implying that I don't understand Korean culture, then no, I don't take offense, because that's exactly what I was saying. Why do they do this there? Hard for me to understand.

      --
      Qxe4
    45. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The counter-argument is made that people have a right to know if they are living near/employing/otherwise engaging with people who have been found guilty of serious crime (particularly sex offenders or murderers). And it's a good counter argument

      Personally I think there are serious issues with that kind of reasoning. In fact, I think such a system is only usefull in a society where such criminals aren't already contained and monitored, such as all modern societies today. Giving the means for people to point fingers doesn't really decrease the likelyhood that a criminal is going to commit another crime, it just makes it more difficult for him/her to enter a normal society again, and perhaps even encourage more disbihaviour by causing stress and paranoia.

      Public registries of criminals ultimately only serve as tools for gossip and discrimination. Knowing what bad things your neighbour has done does not really protect you in any way. However it gives you reason to shun him, to avoid him, and
      to stigmatise him. In return your neighbour would feel as he was the victim of a great injustice (which he would be), and thus potentially be given motivation for further "bad things". Furthermore, all that you as an individual would gain from this whole affair is fear and paranoia, two emotions which are not exactly pleasant and do no good whatsoever in the uttermost cases.
      On a societal level, I would say that open records of criminal acts would stigmatise a large portion of the population, causing discrimination and unrest, as well as promoting "blood thirst" in the population.
      So to sum it up, I disagree with the notion that publicising criminal information is good in any way, and I think the korean system is a fantastic idea.

      Obviously, the REALLY dangerous individuals should be contained indefinetely, but these are few and far in between. As far as I understand it, the sex offender list in the states have enables almost anyone to discover at least 10 or more sex offenders in their neighbourhood with the aid of a simple website. It is not only grotesque but also hypocritical to have such a system in the proclaimed land of opportunity and of the free.

    46. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      Why do you have a right to know if a convicted sex offender is moving into your area? I think it's a privilege and a dangerous one that should be removed from society. Knowing about where sex offenders live leads to people harassing them, assaulting them, vilifying them in the press and vigilante action. If someone has served has sentence and been released then justice has been done. The community should not be taking matters into their own hands, in addition to the justice of the courts.

    47. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You can't know criminals' names in Korea? Kind of weird."

      It has it's positives i.e. vigilante justice and not getting ones life ruined if accused of a heinus crime (pedophelia, sexual assault, etc).

      In america I find the fact they publish the names of sex offenders grotesque because rehabilitation and re-entering society to lead a normal life is impossible, this vigalante mob justice has never sat well with me.

      Meh. Shouldn't part of the deterrent to not be a grotesque monster preying on children or raping women be that EVERYONE WILL EFFING KNOW ABOUT IT IF YOU GO AHEAD AND DO IT ANYHOW?

    48. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rehab for sexual offenders??? :O What would Jesus say...

    49. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, Muslims and Catholics have been dealing with it for a long time. It's more of a media thing, not an American thing.

    50. Re:As long as it's not Boxer, I'm ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me exactly of the movie Freeze Frame.

  8. When money is involved by Kitkoan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some people will do anything to get even more money. Its also possible that some of the Starcraft players are seeing a dead end of their time playing gaming professionally. As in they might not be that great at most RTS games, but amazing at Starcraft. And with Starcraft 2 coming along closer and closer, it might be the writing on the wall for Starcraft 1's viability. Cash out while they can and all?

    --
    Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    1. Re:When money is involved by Decollete · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe aside from that, old players will never match the speed of young players. I guess this is them leaving their mark before their retirement, albeit a bad one. And also, that is, if Starcraft 2 does become popular. While what I know is mostly about fighting games, successors of the series really need to prove themselves in term of game balance and depth. Otherwise, these pro gamers will stick with the old version and leave the new games collecting dust.

    2. Re:When money is involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people will do anything to get even more money. Its also possible that some of the Starcraft players are seeing a dead end of their time playing gaming professionally. As in they might not be that great at most RTS games, but amazing at Starcraft. And with Starcraft 2 coming along closer and closer, it might be the writing on the wall for Starcraft 1's viability. Cash out while they can and all?

      because SC2 is an FPS?
      I'm in the beta, it's the same game with better graphics. All players of the original play SC2.

    3. Re:When money is involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well thats greatest weakness of "Professional Gaming" isn't it? The moment you move from one game to another, very few 'skills' actually translate over even within genres and even brand names.

      C&C:Tiberium Wars plays differently from C&C:Red Alert 3 which plays differently from C&C:Tiberian Twilight, even though they're all under the C&C brand name. Counter-Strike 1.5 plays differently from 1.6 and even that plays differently from Counter-Strike Source.

      Console gaming isn't immune either. Halo's multiplayer has always changed radically between the three games. CoD4 to CoD:MW2 was like playing an entirely different game due to the new perk and kill-streak system.

    4. Re:When money is involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people will do anything to get even more money.

      Yeah really, some of these guys even dope up on Mountain Dew and Cheetos just before a game. Wait till the news gets definitive proof of that scandal!

    5. Re:When money is involved by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      That's a good point. Although, I wonder if the differences between games in a franchise are more or less significant an obstacle to changing game than it would be for a professional sportsperson changing to a related sport.

      There's been quite a few high profile Rugby (League) players crossing over to Rugby (Union) in the past few years here in Australia, for example. The games are related and certainly share a similar skill-set, but the rules and strategies are reasonably different. Things like the relative importance of strength vs. speed vary etc. I think this is a fairly good analogy for changing between, say, Counter Strike 1.5 and 1.6 (the games 'feel' quite different, but share higher-level strategies).

      Apologies for the 'local' analogy with Rugby, but I was hard-pressed to think of two American sports similar enough to each other to make the analogy work. Maybe baseball and softball or something? Showing my ignorance here...

    6. Re:When money is involved by delinear · · Score: 1

      The problem from the gamers' standpoint is that it will be much more necessary to change games if they're doing this competitively and want to stay at the top of the game. For the most part people will want to see matches on the latest games, while traditional sports might have been largely unchanged for decades or even centuries, the landscape for the virtual gamer would be constantly shifting. I wonder if the reason we see sports people go from one sport to another with a certain degree of success isn't just because only the sportsmen who are confident of their abilities in the other sport would consider the move. If you knew you'd suck at RU, you'd stick with RL - virtual gamers might not have that luxury.

    7. Re:When money is involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It has nothing to do with SC2. "The drama all started several years ago – in 2006 – and exploded properly in 2008". At that time the development of SC2 was just announced(May 2007).

      One of the biggest questions is if Savior's loose to Bisu in their epic MSL final was because of bets. It was a 0:3 loose to a noname in the final of the second rated league.

      And it's very interesting who else was involved because all current stars including Jaedong and Flash were already on the scene at that time.

      Savior achievements:
      http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/players/135_sAviOr/

    8. Re:When money is involved by JThundley · · Score: 1

      Most pro players aren't afraid of Starcraft 2, however a progamers career doesn't last for long. Most progaming careers end around age 24. They say they can't play as fast as they used to.

  9. Re:Who cares? by Fluffeh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, if I was betting on the outcome of a contest between two people, I would sure as hell care if they were fixing the outcome and I wouldn't say I am stupid.

    Oh, I get it, you just wanted a first post and had nothing better to post than racism. Guess who looks stupid now?

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  10. Nooooo! Not Ja Mae Yoon !! TELL ME IT AIN'T SO ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ja Mae Yoon is da man !! If he goes down, it all goes down. This is number 10 !! Number 6? Who is Number 2?

  11. got caught using cheat codes by QuantumSlip · · Score: 3, Funny

    apparently someone used show me the money too many times...

    1. Re:got caught using cheat codes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you obviously never played starcraft online. No one uses money cheats, it's all Black sheep wall cheats.

  12. Sports analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reading this I couldn't help but think of the sports analogies from professional athletes getting caught cheating in other sports. The headline that I found humorous when thinking of this article would read something like this.

    "The players were caught injecting illegal performance enhancing packets to improve their gameplay."

    Hopefully somebody finds that comment as amusing as I did.

    1. Re:Sports analogy by EvanED · · Score: 1

      There are a couple mentions on the TeamLiquid threads about this scandal relating it to the 1919 Black Sox scandal in Baseball, where some members of the White Sox threw the World Series to the Cincinnati Reds. That incident led to a lifetime ban for eight White Sox players.

  13. e-sports? really? by swordgeek · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    When did playing computer games become a 'sport?'

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    1. Re:e-sports? really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If playing computer games isn't a sport, then Chess is not a sport.

    2. Re:e-sports? really? by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      Chung Mong-Joon, President of Korea's Football Association, head of the Hyundai group, and also member of the National Assembly, is a great supporter of professional computer gaming. News has it that he's trying to push computer gaming into the Asian Games. Perhaps the Olympic Games or something like a Computer Gaming World Cup is his next goal.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    3. Re:e-sports? really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not too long after walking around and occasionally swinging a metal stick at a ball did.

    4. Re:e-sports? really? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I was following pro-Starcraft for a while (I think it's great fun to watch a good match, and watching SC has made me understand more why someone would watch football or whatever) and am definitely not in a "why are we paying them to do that" category.

      I also used to play competitive chess (admittedly very poorly; my USCF rating was ~900).

      But I'm not sure basing an argument off of "chess is not a sport" is the most convincing argument you can make. ;-)

    5. Re:e-sports? really? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is Chess a sport? What about Go?

      If you said yes to both of those questions, why not any other game of strategy/tactics?

    6. Re:e-sports? really? by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Oh wow ... Google around for some documentaries on professional gamers in Korea and prepare to have your mind blown. These people are national celebrities and take home big fat paychecks.

    7. Re:e-sports? really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they are not. Next question please.

    8. Re:e-sports? really? by SupremoMan · · Score: 0

      It's called e-sport, hon. And it happened over a decade ago.

    9. Re:e-sports? really? by kramulous · · Score: 1

      When players were paid six figure salaries to do endorsements and became national idols. I guess that encouraged things to go big time.

      --
      .
    10. Re:e-sports? really? by delinear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It kind of depends on how narrowly you interpret the term. The narrow definition seems to be a physical activity in which athletes participate, which would suggest that both chess and computer games are not sports. The very wide definition seems to be any recreational or fun activity, in which case they would be sports. I guess the truth is somewhere in between (playing Wii, for instance, is more strenuous than playing snooker), but actually it's just a lot easier to say "sport" than "competitive computer gaming", so I suspect the usage will stick.

    11. Re:e-sports? really? by dnaumov · · Score: 1

      A bit over a decade ago. With the rise of online games like Quake/Quake2/Quake3 that gave birth to miriads of tournaments with players playing for real money and other big prizes.

    12. Re:e-sports? really? by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Well no, they're not. They're games and they're competitions, but they're not sports. Pretty much my point.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    13. Re:e-sports? really? by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      It's interesting, when you talk about mechanically-assisted sports. Time-sensitivity and pressure levels may also play a role. I was reading an article in a popular science magazine (I think it was Discover) some years back that talked about testing that was done on Formula 1 and other competitive racing drivers. Surprisingly, they had heart-rate/cardiovascular capacity alterations that were very similar to those of more physical professional athletes. Since you don't need to work out a lot to drive a car, my guess is that the body actually responds to the physical stress of high competition by enhancing cardiovascular performance.

      In that sense, anything that requires that level of competitive stress, under time sensitivity, is likely to be sport-like.

      Personally, my definition of game vs. sport is that in a game, participants' capabilities are limited entirely by the rules (and creativity). In sports, rules limit the game, but so does individual physical capacity. In games, there are no strategies which are in agreement with the rules but which many people physically cannot execute. In sports, there are legal plays which some people can make and others can't, based on the individual.

      This is why e-sports folks are obsessed with the more boring aspects of computer gaming, the ones that are based on physical capability that varies from person to person. Things like micromanagement and actions-per-second. That's why that StarCraft team was making a mod for SCII to remove a lot of the automation features and make it more SCI-like; they realized that once you automate away the tedious and demanding process of clicking on a bunch of stuff accurately and tabbing back to different views, etc., what's left is more of a game than a sport, and it becomes limited by rules more than individual capacity.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
  14. Coming soon, the Hollywood take by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

    Eight Terran Out

  15. Wait a minute! by billsayswow · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So that one player who kept typing "power overwhelming" every match wasn't just bragging about his skill in broken English? Wow, I thought it was just his catchphrase...

  16. I Feel So Betrayed... by Comatose51 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I feel so betrayed. This must be how Tassadar felt when Aldaris arrested him upon his return after discovering the key to slaying the Overmind. It is as though I am Kerrigan abandoned by Acturus Mengsk to be captured by the Zergs. Today I am Jim Raynor, a warrior cut loose from his own people.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:I Feel So Betrayed... by Kozz · · Score: 1

      Darmok and Jelad... when the walls fell.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    2. Re:I Feel So Betrayed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must construct additional pylons.

    3. Re:I Feel So Betrayed... by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Now I'm really scared. I understood both the parent and GP references.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  17. This does deserve a story by n_are_q · · Score: 2, Informative

    As someone who occasionally follows the SC happenings in Korea, I can attest to the fact that this is a huge story there. The fame of these players really is comparable to that of football or basketball stars in the states.

    More to the point, there is real talent, years of honing your skill, and real fans involved here. That's what makes this match fixing a real deal. That's too bad, this young sport deserves better.

    1. Re:This does deserve a story by jack2000 · · Score: 1

      It deserves more then the sports the US and Europe play anyway.

  18. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't feed the trolls.

  19. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Actually, if I was betting on the outcome of a contest between two people, I would sure as hell care if they were fixing the outcome and I wouldn't say I am stupid.

    If you were betting on the outcome of a contest, I'd say that you were stupid.

  20. Re:Who cares? by blackraven14250 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you were betting on the outcome of a football game, I'd say that you were stupid.

  21. Aaaaaand.... by Berkyjay · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ....the world yawns.

  22. Love is like Starcraft by dushkin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really like watching commentaries on SC games. I started watching them a few weeks ago and I'm HOOKED.

    Now I'm not a great RTS player. And I've never enjoyed watching sports on TV - basketball, football (English or otherwise) or even the way overhyped olympics - I just never cared.

    But Starcraft is something I can somehow relate to. Especially Starcraft 2. myself, not being a good player, I see all sorts of strange tricks I wouldn't have seen otherwise.

    Micromanagement tipping the results of battles in ways I wouldn't have even imagined. All kinds of strange tricks involved - it's mind-blowing sometimes, and really... really exciting.

    The other thing is the commentators are very useful. They call out the strategy, which really helped a not-so-good player like me. you get some insight into their thought processes.

    I knew Koreans were into Starcraft, but I didn't know they were THAT into it. I feel kinda sad now. As I see it, it doesn't matter who wins at Starcraft, I just like watching the game and could never imagine placing bets on it.

    --
    o hai
    1. Re:Love is like Starcraft by IorDMUX · · Score: 1

      Please do share! Do you know anywhere to find these commentaries in English? Any good sources that you enjoy?

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    2. Re:Love is like Starcraft by FsG · · Score: 1

      I'd love to try this, too.. Where do I go to get really good commentaries on Starcraft games?

      --
      I made a PHP/MySQL library that prevents SQL injection & makes coding easier!
    3. Re:Love is like Starcraft by supssa · · Score: 1

      As I see it, it doesn't matter who wins at Starcraft, I just like watching the game and could never imagine placing bets on it.

      That's because you aren't a gook.

      --
      Hatin' on products I don't like and getting modded up talking about tech I totally don't understand like it was 2005!
  23. Cargo Cults by lilooet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Something about Korea's obsession with Starcraft reminds me of cargo cults.

    1. Re:Cargo Cults by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      what, they're building their bases in the hopes that real zerg will return?

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  24. Further Information by ahaubold · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Nope, I think you mistook me for someone else.
  25. Re:Who cares? by McGuirk · · Score: 1

    That is clearly Nationalism, not racism.

  26. Sport? by jandersen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe I am just that ancient, but is it a "sport" to sit in a chair pushing buttons? When I grew up, apparently in the stone age, sport was something that involved not just skill, but physical excellence; even body-building wasn't considered to be a sport, and you wouldn't use the word "athlete" about them either. No wonder the world is coming to an end...

    1. Re:Sport? by SupremoMan · · Score: 1

      Sir, I beg you to try clicking the mouse 3 times a second for half an hour. I assure you it is quite physical.

    2. Re:Sport? by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      And while we're on the topic, does anyone else have an issue with the use of , "of all time"?

      I know it's technically correct to claim something like that, but jeez, at least have the "sport" in question going for 20 years - or a generation, say - before you start making such hyperbolic statements.

      For example:

      One can argue that Don Bradman was the greatest cricketer "of all time". Cricket, having been played in some form or another since the 16th century, has been around long enough that the use of the phrase, "of all time" is valid.

      Starcraft? Been around, what, 12 years, tops? Makes claims like, "one of the best-known and most successful players of all time" a little hard to swallow. Perhaps, "Of his generation" would be more suitable, or you could simply just drop the entire sentence. If they really are "best-known and most-successful", then you don't need to state the obvious.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    3. Re:Sport? by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      What about chess?

    4. Re:Sport? by NaCh0 · · Score: 1

      Chess is a game, not a sport.

    5. Re:Sport? by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_chess_a_game_or_sport
      Chess today is a recognized sport of the International Olympic Committee.

    6. Re:Sport? by Bugamn · · Score: 1

      Game and sport are not mutually exclusive.

      According to wikipedia, "Chess is a recognized sport of the International Olympic Committee, and is led by the FIDE."

    7. Re:Sport? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Informative

      The IOC are a group of corrupt, money-grubbing assholes who would gladly certify a non-sport as a sport for a shockingly low amount of money. You didn't hear about all the journalists who won awards for exposing them to the world a few years back?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:Sport? by dnaumov · · Score: 1

      By your logic, golf and chess aren't sports either. The world begs to differ, however.

    9. Re:Sport? by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      And while we're on the topic, does anyone else have an issue with the use of , "of all time"?

      No, not really. It clarifies that the people they are talking about aren't just the best active players but the best that have ever played the game. Sure, "all time" in this case only means the last 12 years or so but it still makes perfect sense.

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    10. Re:Sport? by selven · · Score: 1

      Maybe am I just ancient, but is it a "sport" to repeatedly fall forward and catch yourself with alternating legs as fast as you can for 42 kilometers? When I grew up, sport was something that involved skill, not just raw muscle power.

    11. Re:Sport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similarly sports TV channels show poker now. Poker, like video gaming, is not a sport. Sitting on your fat arse playing cards or getting a new high score on Dragon's Lair (or whatever the fuck the kids are playing now) is not sport.

    12. Re:Sport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it not a loftier goal to exercise your mind? This is Slashdot, after all. None of us have the biceps you'd drool over.

    13. Re:Sport? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      How about Global Thermonuclear War?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    14. Re:Sport? by kramerd · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a sport when you talk about, it's a game when you play it.

      Also you are very old.

    15. Re:Sport? by Aim+Here · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sir, I beg you to try clicking the mouse 3 times a second for half an hour. I assure you it is quite physical.

      He's on Slashdot. He probably clicks that fast normally.

      Actually, in all seriousness, 3 times a second, or 180 actions per minute) is fast for a starcraft player, but it is too slow for a Korean pro - only the slowest of them, such as Savior, average 200 over a game, while most average an APM Of 300-450 over the course of a 5-60 minute game, and peak at maybe 600 or so.

      I can maybe hit 300-400 if I mindlessly spam keypresses and mouseclicks while doing nothing at the start of the game. I can't evisage how anyone actually can click that fast that AND keep track of the units and the tech tree and the base layout and the production buildings and the workers and the scouting and the upgrades and the 2 dozen things you have to worry about in a normal Starcraft game AND try to outwit some other devious bastard at the other end of the internet trying to kill you off all at the same time.

      Anyone who says playing Starcraft doesn't involve a physical skill is probably assuming that it's like some other game they happened to play once.

    16. Re:Sport? by nottheusualsuspect · · Score: 1

      Actually, no, playing SC for a living would not be sport. The etymology of "sport" comes from the old French desport meaning "leisure," so anything that you do for leisure, or fun could be considered sport, but not something you do for a living. But then, as we all know, things change, Mox, words change.
      Currently, sport is defined as "any athletic activity that uses physical skills," and one could argue that pushing buttons is still a physical activity, only now you're not meeting the requirements of "athlete" (from the original Greek, to "compete for a prize," which fits, or "[US] A person who actively participates in physical sports, possibly highly skilled in sports," which does not).
      Therefore, I hereby move that we re-classify the StarCraft tournaments under a new heading: "eSports" (trademark, patent, and copyrights pending) or "Chair Sports," the latter of which would include all competition-level computer games, table-top games, and other activities.*


      * I currently hold the record for most consecutive UNO games won in our household. My prize? I get to sleep on the couch.

    17. Re:Sport? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's not a sport any more then computer trouble shooting is a sport. 'Sport' had become a term used to make people feel there activity is of higher importance then any other activity.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    18. Re:Sport? by kramerd · · Score: 1

      No, I'm quite certain I'm correct on this one.

      'a competitive activity involving skill, chance, or endurance on the part of two or more persons who play according to a set of rules, usually for their own amusement or for that of spectators'

      According to the dictionary, that's a game, not a sport.

      'diversion; recreation; pleasant pastime'

      That's a sport.

      Clearly computer trouble shooting falls under sport, not game.

      I'm gonna stick with my previous post, which unfortunately has been modded funny instead of informative.

    19. Re:Sport? by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      Chess is more fun.

    20. Re:Sport? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      For whatever it's worth, Starcraft does take intense concentration and physical skill. For an example of the concentration necessary, check out the end of this great game. The guy on the left basically had lost, but then managed to pull off an amazing victory with a gutsy counter-attack, incredible unit control, and some luck. That is Boxer. If you pay attention to how he is feeling you can tell how much energy he put into it. The guy on the right looks a little sheepish, but he knows he only lost because his opponent had some awesome moves, against anyone else he would have ended up winning.

      For the physical preparation, and to give you an idea of how hard it was to actually pull off that victory, check out the guy's hands. Not many people can do that kind of stuff. Sure, it doesn't require physical preparation of the entire body, but neither do many sports.

      --
      Qxe4
    21. Re:Sport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can confirm that you are in fact very ancient. You did in fact grow up in the stone age, before the dawn of chess games, cards, vocabulary, math, and similiar mental activities, all of which have been played for sport for a long long time.
      If you want to be pedantic about it, the words "competition" is more often tied to these activities, but in that case i'd like to point out to you that the word used here is in fact "e-sport", which proclaims its difference yet similiarity from regular sport with a very visible "e-" and thus not soiling your ancient definition.
      I can also confirm that your world at least is coming to and end, as you should be several thousand years old by now.

    22. Re:Sport? by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Well, there is such a thing as chess boxing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_boxing

    23. Re:Sport? by jandersen · · Score: 1

      The world begs to differ, however.

      "The world" also calls even the poorest pop-singer an "artist". "The world" is not exactly referring to the highest standards; what most people care about is simply entertainment, and a drunken karaoke evening will do for most; so is that a sport too - or art?

      Anyway, I am not employing any logic, only uttering an opinion with a hint of a wry smile, which unfortunately didn't show up clearly in text mode.

    24. Re:Sport? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sport

      So yes, a video game would definitely qualify as a sport by it's definition.

      A marathon game of starcraft does require a bit of stamina so I'd say the player still qualifies for the definition of athlete (as does a chess player)
      http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/athlete

  27. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You could say Starcraft is a shitty game, but to me Football, Hokey, and Baseball are shitty games. Oh and Basketball, too. Down on a 10 year old game,w ell these games have been around for much longer. Talk about dated gameplay.

  28. to put this in perspective... by xlsior · · Score: 1

    According to Wikipedia starcraft page, South Korea accounted for almost a third of the blitzards global 'starcraft' sales.
    Thanks to its enduring popularity there, blizzard first announced the upcoming Starcraft 2 at a South Korean gaming event.

    Finally, from Wikipedia's page on South Korea:

    In recent years online games have become a significant part of Korean culture. StarCraft, the real-time strategy game, is by far the most popular televised game in South Korea. Game tournaments, recorded in places like the COEX Mall are often broadcast live on TV stations such as MBCGame and Ongamenet. Professional StarCraft players can command considerable salaries in South Korea as members of pro-gaming teams that are sponsored primarily by cell phone providers.

    ...Whatever floats your boat, I guess.

    1. Re:to put this in perspective... by kramulous · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've travelled to korea a few times and I love going to a pub (every second shop) and watching the starcraft channel. And the cheap beer. And the cheap, excellent food. And just general good times to be had by all.

      Fascinating to watch competitive gaming. Mesmerising.

      --
      .
  29. Its easy to see which player is throwing the game by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    Instead of harvesting with their initial drones, they set all their drones to attack the hatchery.

  30. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or xenophobia?

    Being a member of the human race I've always had a slight problem with the catch all racism naming that gets bandied about.

  31. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you've watched the competitive starcraft scene in korea, this wouldn't be news. Nobody did anything when it was obvious at least a year ago.

  32. Cheating at digital games by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    Shocked, I'm completely and utterly shocked. There is cheating at competing, even when playing digital games.

    My world falls apart when hearing operators of apparatus do things with it that are perceived as dishonest. My respect for presentations of ordered bits lies smashed and shattered on the floor.

    Now pardon me but I'll carry on working.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  33. wow by neuroxmurf · · Score: 1

    ...and here I thought *baseball* was stupid.

  34. Money opportunities by dragisha · · Score: 1

    I think people are just playing blind and dumb here. Sport/betting scandals are everywhere and with computer gaming incentive is just too great to pass for many people. Especially when losing a game is just order of clicks or just a bit slower reaction.

    For people seeking some adrenaline and easy money, of course it doesn't matter.

    What I saw in this article, and what was esp fun - "retired players". Of course, PRO computer game playing is dumb for itself, together with "sports" part in e-sports, but... I think lots of people lost their lives somewhere on the road to PRO gaming league :).

    --
    http://opencm3.net, http://www.nongnu.org/gm2/
  35. Yeah, big surprise that where there's betting... by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Reminds me of a Woody Allen quote, "I was watching a ballet at City Center, and I'm not a ballet fan at all, but they were doing the dying swan, and there was a rumour, that some bookmakers had drifted into town from upstate New York, and that they had fixed the ballet. Apparently there was a lot of money bet on the swan to live."

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  36. Re:and this relates to /. how? by delinear · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're confusing the concept of "news for nerds" with the concept of "news which is personally interesting to me". Nerds cover a wide spectrum of interests and nationalities. The development of these competitive tournaments in the field of gaming are certainly interesting to me on one level, even though I'm neither Korean nor into Starcraft - it's interesting to see where this is headed, and similarly interesting to see the parallels with sports (in terms of the fame of the players and even match fixing scandals now). I don't follow this too closely, I'm mildly interested, but other people follow this passionately, for that particular group of nerds, this is definitely "stuff that matters".

  37. Re:Who cares? by B1oodAnge1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Rugby is where it's at. ;-)

    --
    RUGBYRUGBYRUGBY
  38. Re:and this relates to /. how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Really? You really can't see how a story about the biggest professional sport, that revolves around playing a video game, is news for nerds?

    Someone will be by to collect your nerd badge.

  39. Throw that boomerang a little harder next time... by rts008 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seriously, if you don't know who Lebron is you either don't know what the fuck basketball is, are just making shit up, or are a borderline retard.

    Despite your grossly misplaced arrogance, you left out the most popular option: D: none of the above.
    You are making some erroneous assumptions with that proclamation:

    I/we actually give a rat's ass about basketball, USA sports, or any sports....NOT!!!
    (BTW, I know what basketball is-I even used to play a lot of it-but have NEVER watched it, but I did not know who/what a 'Lebron' was. I was also wondering what Michael Jackson [MJ] had to do with basketball!)

    Maybe I am 'just making shit up, but if by not knowing who Lebron Whoever is makes me a borderline retard, I can assuredly take comfort in the fact that you are truly over the line, and outstanding in that field.

    BTW, who(or what) is a 'Beckham'? Another basketball player?

    This thread is getting more confusing than getting struck on the head with a football bat.

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  40. Muhahahaha!!!! by rts008 · · Score: 1

    Starcraft is korea's national sport. they're most definately celebrities

    According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_sport their national sport is actually Tae Kwon Do.

    Eureka!!! Full contact Starcraft!!!!

    I'll be rich! Rich! Rich I say!

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  41. Just a guess based on what I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    about Asian cultures. I believe that the reason is that since families and family names are so important, it would result in result in innocents being punished unfairly. So whilst their values on the one hand are like ours in the sense that only the perpetrator should be punished, their culture is such that releasing his/her name, would harm the entire family. That is, if someone is convicted of rape, should his cousin, who already must feel terrible, also have his career prospects permanently destroyed?

  42. e-sport? by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

    Look, I know that we call some competitive activities "sports" to make them appear more legitimate, but video gaming is as much as a sport as computer troubleshooting is, which is hardly at all...

    Just call it pro gaming and leave it at that.

    Go ahead and mod me down now.

    1. Re:e-sport? by MrCrassic · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I take that back. I read the article, and had no idea of the HUGE following that it has in South Korea.

      Sorry about that.

    2. Re:e-sport? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Why are you taking it back? you are correct, it isn't a sport. To use your own example, their are a huge number of people that do computer support...still not a sport.

      IT's a wildly popular, and IMO cool, activity.

      It is also pretty easy to cheat at; which is why only a sucker would make bets.

      Of course, the cheating can be mitigated by having a 'pro-gaming certified and refereed LAN set up. Something not on the internet.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  43. Richard Jewel comes to mind by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    The Atlanta Journal Constitution; the primary newspaper in Atlanta Georgia, basically declared his guilt in connection to the 1996 Atlanta Olympics bombing. It was a disgusting display of using the power of the press to make the public think one way.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_jewel

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  44. The largest scandal in e-sports history... by sarkeizen · · Score: 1

    ...only because e-sports doesn't have much history.

  45. Re:Who cares? by harrytuttle777 · · Score: 1

    Where do you live. It seems like a nice place, with much opportunity. I want to go.

  46. Blizzard's clever plan by Weezul · · Score: 1

    Blizzard succeeded with WarCraft III largely by improving upon the in-game RPGs developed players created in StarCraft maps, but you know WarCraft I & II were never anything special. StarCraft otoh was just too hard an act to follow. As Blizzard knows StarCraft II simply won't live up to the hype, they've set all this mess up to help transition the layer community. ;)

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    1. Re:Blizzard's clever plan by bonch · · Score: 1

      Warcraft 3 wasn't based on Starcraft RPGs. It was just Diablo II mixed with Starcraft, and it was never as popular as either game. Few people even play it these days other than for the antisocial freaks who can't handle controlling armies and spend every waking moment in DotA.

      Warcraft 1 and 2 (especially) were awesome. They were the fantasy counterparts to Command & Conquer. It was a good time to be an RTS fan.

    2. Re:Blizzard's clever plan by socceroos · · Score: 1

      I loved warcraft 1 & 2 dearly as well. I must say though - DotA is heaps of fun and makes for a great LAN game.

    3. Re:Blizzard's clever plan by LaRainette · · Score: 1

      You seem both to imply that Warcraft 3 was more of a platform blizzard gave to map devs so they can create mods like Dota. I disagree strongly. On one hand the War3 map editor is a great tool, and for sure blizzard was planning on using the huge community of fanmod devs that had been uncovered with starcraft. But War3 was a great game on its own. I consider it much richer and strategically interesting than Starcraft which is basically to me more about being able to manage your units in spite of the game limitation. War3's UI is much richer, and you get more time to focus on tactics and strategy, because you spend less time fighting against stupid UI limitation. Meanwhile you had a major strategic aspect : the heroes. I played starcraft for 3 years then war3 and although I sometimes play SC out of nostalgia, it was a one-way ticket for me.

    4. Re:Blizzard's clever plan by socceroos · · Score: 1

      Each to his/her own I guess. I was never interested with Warcraft 3 on its own. DotA changed that though.

  47. is a golf a sport? by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    you walk and hit a ball. any old duffer can do that

    is car racing a sport?

    like you said, you sit down and push a buttons. now you've added a steering wheel

    is poker a sport?

    you fiddle with chips and cards. but those poker players are athletes of mental endurance, that's for sure

    no, the simple fact is: a sport is anything you want to call a sport, a sport. and if enough people agree with you, it simply is the new truth

    why? because there is no linguistic authority that allows people to use words in only proscribed ways. the people own the language, and the people decide what a word means any damn way they please, in aggregate, with no authority. this is simply the evolution of language: all words shift in meaning, constantly. the way you use certain words would be looked at aghast by people from 1960, 1910, 1860, etc. the world is not ending, language is simply evolving, as it always has, and always will

    if enough people feel like the word "sports" is being dumbed down too much, a new word will evolve that will come to signify a sport of mighty physical endurance only, like football or cycling... if enough people deem that meaning important, and incorporate it into wide use

    why don't you go and invent that derivative word now, or coopt an existing word close in meaning to a new meaning. it happens every day, all the time. go, get the ball rolling, pun intended

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:is a golf a sport? by ram.loss · · Score: 1

      why? because there is no linguistic authority that allows people to use words in only proscribed ways

      Oh I get it, that's why you use the word proscribed to mean prescribed; very clever, specially when one is the opposite of the other. If you are looking for people supporting this new meaning count me in ;-)

  48. Re:Who cares? by houghi · · Score: 1

    So the bribing done in Belgian football (the one you play with a foot and a ball) was done by stupid people, because they did it so they could bet on the outcome. Betting was not even done in Belgium.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  49. Freakonomics by masmullin · · Score: 1

    If anyone has read Freakonomics, this headline will come as no surprise.

    1. Re:Freakonomics by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      If anyone has read Freakonomics, this headline will come as no surprise.

      I've not gotten around to reading Dubner and Levitt yet. In the interim, can you enlighten me with the ballpark notion behind your comment?

      Thanks!

      -FL

    2. Re:Freakonomics by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      I too am interested.

    3. Re:Freakonomics by geekoid · · Score: 1

      OR even better:

      "If anyone has ever looked at the history of any popular activity this would come as no surprise."

      Gambling and cheating? Well I guess you have to write a clever and myopic economic book to figure that would happen~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Freakonomics by masmullin · · Score: 1

      I forget the particulars, it was a few years ago that I read it... but basically the exact same thing happens with Sumo Wrestling in Japan. The sumo guys throw matches for the same sorts of reasons described in the article.

  50. Re:Throw that boomerang a little harder next time. by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

    See I know who Beckham is because of the movie, Bend it like Beckham. And I know who Michael Jordan is although like you, I immediately thought of Michael Jackson too and was trying to puzzle out what he had to do with sports :)

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
  51. recidivism by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    is high among sexual offenders

    rehabilitation is often impossible, because, unlike bank robbery, where the underlying drive is legal (desire for cash), but the methods are not, with sex offenders like pedophiles the underlying drive itself (desire for sex with children) is the actual problem. this underlying drive is usually organic: no amount of punishment or treatment can remove it

    therefore, i honestly believe that pedophiles should be permanently removed from society

    let me say this: i am a liberal. i believe in marijuana legalization, the right to abortion, universal healthcare, stricter control on guns, etc. on most questions you will find me to be leftwards of most

    but when i examine the problem of pedophilia, i see it as a "problem" like homosexuality: the desire is innate and organic. however, homosexuals can enter into relationships amongst consenting adults. therefore, there is no rational reason to take issue with homosexuality

    however, with pedophiles, you have their sexuality oriented towards children, who have no ability to make informed consent. you can see that pedophiles have basically been biologically cursed. its as if they inherited the gene for huntington's disease or tay-sachs disease: they have, through no fault of their own, been organically and genetically condemned to a life of suffering. they have been endowed with a desire that no society can ever rationally tolerate. i simply see no other way around the problem: pedophiles cannot be rehabilitated and they can not be tolerated. permanent banishment seems to be the only solution. through no fault of their own, pedophiles have been genetically made to be incompatible with human society

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:recidivism by g0del · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wrong. Recidivism rates are much higher for people who are driven by a desire for money than they are for sexual offenders. Evidence from http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/ascii/rpr94.txt
      "Released prisoners with the highest rearrest rates were --

      robbers (70.2%)
      burglars (74.0%)
      larcenists (74.6%)
      motor vehicle thieves (78.8%)
      possessors/sellers of
      stolen property (77.4%)
      possessors/sellers of
      illegal weapons (70.2%).

      What these high-rate offenders have in common is that they were all in prison for what are generally thought of as crimes for money. By contrast, many of those with the lowest rearrest rates -- persons convicted of homicide (40.7%), rapists (46.0%), other sexual assaulters (41.4%), other violent offenders (51.7%), and those convicted of driving under the influence (51.5%) -- were in prison for crimes not generally motivated by desire for material gain."

      Sexual offenders and pedophiles are a problem, but attempting to solve it with bad data won't work.

  52. Bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "...most sex offenders are repeat offenders..." is false.

    Sex offenders are less likely to show recidivism than most other folks jailed for felonies. It's one of the very few crimes where we do a good job of helping offenders control themselves.

    The parent is lying, plain and simple.

  53. Re:Who cares? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    Actually, if I was betting on the outcome of a contest between two people, I would sure as hell care if they were fixing the outcome and I wouldn't say I am stupid.

    Gambling on Starcraft, FFS?

  54. This is why I love /. by BaronHethorSamedi · · Score: 1

    I can come here and read a headline containing the words "scandal" and "cheating," and the underlying story deals with StarCraft rather than some public figure's extramarital adventures.

  55. i love this hypocrisy ;-) by circletimessquare · · Score: 0, Troll

    the hypocrisy of going out of your way to tell everyone how much you don't care about something. if you don't care, you wouldn't comment. commenting means caring

    so if you truly do not care, shut up, and go away, then you've proven you don't care

    or, admit that you care, and that you hate yourself for caring. work out your issues, and get back to us

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  56. Starcraft took many years to balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first year after it was released it was a mess. Crashes, no reason to play any but the zerg class and rush.

    It only took 10 years to get it polished.

  57. Another Perspective by manekineko2 · · Score: 1

    You can build a large stadium for Starcraft, but unlike pro sports, seeing it live on a screen strikes me as almost the same experience to seeing it at home on one of the Starcraft channels, which would significantly decrease demand to go see live matches.

    The fact that the market for Starcraft viewing there can support a (more than one I heard?) Starcraft channel seems quite significant.

    It's not dispositive, but I'd point out that South Korea's population is about 50 million, versus just over 300 million for the United States. I wonder if the US was that size, and there were only two significant cities were New York and Boston, if we would still need as large of stadiums for ours sports.

    1. Re:Another Perspective by EvanED · · Score: 1

      You can build a large stadium for Starcraft, but unlike pro sports, seeing it live on a screen strikes me as almost the same experience to seeing it at home on one of the Starcraft channels, which would significantly decrease demand to go see live matches.

      I can buy that somewhat, but at the same time, a lot of the reason you go to live sports matches (or at least a lot of the reason I'd go to live sports matches) is to experience the live atmosphere and support your team/player.

      In fact, I'd argue that a lot of the time you'd get a much better view watching it on your TV at home. Most seats are way too far back to have a decent view, and the cameras they have around the stadiums give a way better view. Nowadays you even get stuff like the first down line marked on the field... that's something that I actually missed when I went to the one college football game I've been to. Sports stadiums have large screens to show highlights, but at least from the little I've seen they don't show as much as you'd get watching on TV.

      The fact that the market for Starcraft viewing there can support a (more than one I heard?) Starcraft channel seems quite significant.

      True, and I suspect that the popularity is probably a bit more than MMA. That said, it does seem to me that it probably is still far less pronounced than, say, football is here.

      (BTW, there are three channels I know of OnGameNet (which runs the OSL), MBC GameNet (which runs the MSL), and GomTV.)

      It's not dispositive, but I'd point out that South Korea's population is about 50 million, versus just over 300 million for the United States. I wonder if the US was that size, and there were only two significant cities were New York and Boston, if we would still need as large of stadiums for ours sports.

      I suspect you'd see fewer teams but stadiums of the same size rather than smaller stadiums.

      This is somewhat supported I'd argue: the NFL lists 32 teams; the TLPD lists 12 teams for Starcraft. It's not quite diminished by the population ratio, but it's a little hard to compare too because so much of SC is the individual leagues.

      Also, we can look at other countries with big sports there. West Ham United (soccer) plays at Boleyn Ground; that seats 35,000. Lower than a typical (US) football stadium, but roughly on par with, e.g., Fenway Park. Manchester United plays at Old Trafford stadium, seating 76,000, larger than any of the US football stadiums I looked at. (Though still substantially smaller than a large college footbal stadium.) The UK also has ~60million people. There are five Australian Rules Football teams that have their home at Docklands Stadium in Melbourne; that seats 53,000. Australia only has a population of ~22 million.

  58. Re:Throw that boomerang a little harder next time. by pcolaman · · Score: 1

    Never heard of Bend it like Beckham. Sounds like a great porno flick though.

  59. Or worse yet, pissing outdoors by manekineko2 · · Score: 1

    Or some of them committed the heinous "crimes" of public urination.

    http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2007-03-21/news/VOFFENDER21_1_matamoros-deltona-incident

  60. Say it ain't so, Ja Mae! by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Ah, nuts to this! The fix is always in with these mugs.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  61. Uhhh....what? by manekineko2 · · Score: 1

    Cargo cults? I don't see it, at all.

    What are they imitating blindly in the hopes of achieving a result?

    The only thing I could possibly see an analogy to is that you're saying they're imitating the West in the hopes of achieving something (I dunno, success as a nation?) by lionizing pro sports players. Seems like a stretch to me though, since no one would say anything like that about the popularity of soccer in Korea.

    1. Re:Uhhh....what? by lilooet · · Score: 1

      No, I think you misinterpreted my post. In no way do I suppose they are imitating the west (in this instance, anyway). I suppose by the Cargo Cults analogy, I was referring to the fetishization of an antique/relic (starcraft is one, in terms of video games). It's just bizarre to me all around. Maybe I'm odd. As for this particular scandal, however, surely you would agree that it would be odd when, upon being asked why you were in prison, you answered "Starcraft"?

    2. Re:Uhhh....what? by Neoncow · · Score: 1

      If anyone is jailed for this, it would be for fraud or illegal gambling not "Starcraft".

  62. RTFA by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

    This is about an underground gambling ring that fixed Starcraft matches in order to make money off of the bets on those matches. There was no hacking involved, just social engineering. Various pro gamers have been accused of throwing matches as a part of what basically amounts to a conspiracy.

  63. Cheating and gambling in an by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Korean* Activity**? I'm shocked I tell you, shocked!

    *Not to imply it would only happen in Korea.

    **No, it isn't a sport.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  64. sex offenders in general by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    pedophile recidivism rates, which my comment referred to, are the highest

    sex offenders in general can be "treated" or "punished" because again, the disconnect is between the desire ("i want to have sex"), which isn't a problem, and the method ("gee i think i'll rape someone"), which is a problem

    but with pedophiles, the root desire itself is a problem, which cannot be treated or punished. its always there, no matter what you do. so such a person simply cannot exist with society. it is not conscionable for a society, once it finds out someone has this predilection, a predilection they know will never go away, to ever allow this person near children ever again. and since you can't turn society into a police state where children are lock away, it is incumbent upon you as a responsible society to lock the pedophiles away, forever. this is extreme suffering for their crimes. as if there were some other way. there isn't another way. pedophiles are simply born with an organic desire they must suffer their entire lives for, they have been make incompatible with human society. its a lot of suffering, as if they were born with huntington's disease or tay sachs disease, but it is what it is: is it fair that anyone is born with huntington's disease or tay sachs disease and they must suffer for that?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:sex offenders in general by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Can you back up your claim or are you just making it up?

      The post you are replying to links to some stats that possibly contradict it after all, and you provided no evidence.

      http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/crimoff.htm#recidivism also seems to contradict your claims.

      It reports that 24% of sex offenders were convicted of a new crime within 3 years, while 48% of non-sex offenders were. So non-sex offenders reoffend more often than sex offenders. And child molesters in particular have a reconviction rate of 20%.

      Of course that's for any crime, for sex crimes in particular 3.5% of the child molesters were convicted for a new sex crime (not necessarily aginst a child) - which is the same rate as the generic sex offender category.

  65. Obligatory Penny Arcade by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2010/3/29/

    I remember doing this fondly behind my DM screen. The great thing about imagination is that the guy making up the story/rules also has imagination, so when your "friends"/players try and break your game, you just break them... painfully.

  66. I've only heard of one basketball player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Spain there is precisely one poster boy for basketball: Pau Gasol. I'll leave you to guess why.

  67. Re:Throw that boomerang a little harder next time. by Cederic · · Score: 1

    Surprisingly good film. It's one of those 'coming of age' flicks with a racial tension included and made for a very low budget in the UK.

    The title leverages the name of an English footballer that has a degree of fame and to be fair does have the ability to bend in a cross better than pretty much any other player I've seen. Which if you don't follow football will mean as little as that lebron thing means to me.

    If you've heard of Keira Knightley, she was the supporting actress in it. Which will no doubt merely increase your desire to find out it was a great porno...

  68. Re:Throw that boomerang a little harder next time. by pcolaman · · Score: 1

    Why would he bend in a cross? They are usually used for crucifixions.

  69. Re:Throw that boomerang a little harder next time. by Cederic · · Score: 1

    It's to do with the inevitable contortions if you don't get the feet nailed in properly.

  70. OH that's interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheating is acceptable in Korea. This is not news.

  71. Why is this shocking? by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

    Really, now. Competitive gaming has been about gambling since there was competitive gaming. I'll never forget the naive youngster I was trying to reach the top in competitive Street Fighter when I see a couple of people taking bets on a match between some of the local best. I was appalled, intrigued and uncaring all in that order. It was kinda shocking, but it doesn't really surprise once you think about it and it doesn't even change the game all that much... maybe. Who cares besides haters?

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    1. Re:Why is this shocking? by Datamonstar · · Score: 1

      Nevermind. After RTFA I see they threw some games. This also happened at some major SF tournys, which I forgot all about. Still it's not surprising.

      --
      The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
  72. Friend in CA was harassed by courts using that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was put on a pederast list, when his common law ex-wife got angry over the years and bolted with the 3 kids. She told police he molested them over the years, despite him always working 15-hour days to come home to eat and just barely enough time to be around. Within a couple days of leaving him, she had a talk with the original police officer that she was very angry at him and the things she said were mostly false. However, the word already went into the system. Without a court trial, they put him on the list because they have him associated with that Black Israel and patriot movements, and they didn't like him calling them all "cock suckers" and "they muss be jesus, ooh I'm scared of you because you kill and steal everyone's property because you think you is jesus" whenver he went on the witness benches in unrelated matters.

    He lost his 2 houses that he owned outright, from working a gardening business with 15 employees under him. He moved into a RV camper that was under someone else's name, because someone that didn't like him now said he owed $50k income tax for being defficient of a thousand dollars they wouldn't confirm him to. He didn't get removed from that list for 5 years, but he's been living in that RV now for over 15 years to this very day despite the entire town knowing him.

    Santa Ana, California...since 1991.

    Whatever can be done to scare you into subserviance to cooperate and adapt to the allegations made against you, will be done.

  73. Corruption in Korea ?? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    Shocked! I'm shocked I tell you! Who'd have thought it was possible.

    (how about - anyone who has worked with Korean corporations?)

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  74. Re:and this relates to /. how? by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    "biggest professional sport"? seriously? SC1, a sport? thought it was one of the excuses used by certain crazed parents for abandoning their newborn at home or that other one where some dude died from playing too much SC1 (or was it WoW).
    now THAT's nerdy.

    this....this is more like news for gamblers/bookies

  75. Re:and this relates to /. how? by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    no, I'm not.
    "fixed games" and "betting" isn't nerdy...it's....hmmm...gambler-y (in essence, more like "news for gamblers")