Flag and EAC are essential for analysis. Sonic Visualizer has pretty much a pitch perfect log FFT (silvet iirc) with phase adjustment, and it can give different results with mp3 vs flac/wav.
If you're not doing wav you're doing flac, or you're doing it wrong.
You lot are off your nut. All of you. I expect an error rate around 2%, but within that margin, you have preconceived notions and genetically expressed predisposition With which I cannot argue. Nor compete. So fuck the lot of you with rakes until you have evidence based reasoning.
What the fuck? Who is paying for systemd? Initial release was "30 March 2010", Pottymouth started at RedShat in 2011. Was that the plan? To make a pile of shit and get hired by an ignorant open source company to keep at it?
RedShat is one of the very very few purely open source companies. They do not have proprietary products as their main focus, with contribution to open source as a side effect, like Adobe or Microsoft. Other than SystemD, they know what they are doing, not idiotic. Your idiotic cynicism on the other hand is not contributing anything of value.
Ask her to check out a livecd first, one that you can't install from so she can't screw that up. A distro that looks Windows like. Then proceed. With a business class hardware and warranty.
My customer mandated W10 for security reasons. 7 will not be supported forever.
I don't mind it other than using a keyboard is not an option in many places. That's maybe 5% of my needs, but it's weighted to 80% of my hate. Likely to get worse, too.
Oh good the first "I don't need it so no one needs it" post.
I owned an Evo 3D and liked it a lot. I also have a VR headset. I'm the target market for this. Note: the Evo 3D did not require any hardware to view in 3D on the device.
Atlas Shrugged was interesting until it devolved into a rant. I read it after Fountainhead, and I got the general point early on. You were young, most people with opinions are old.
No, one less coming. Browser development is way out of the realm of open source hackers. CSS and JavaScript are complicated, and that's ignoring optimization. Mozilla has fought this for years, and they were funded by Google all that time (clown shoes). Big money is where it's at now.
For the record, I've been calling out a lot of idiots here, and this response is the only non idiotic one so far. The question is about *YOU* and this answer pretty much summarizes the expected responses of a very large number of people.
Anyone hating me for my response to them below should ponder the above response.
Oh, you don't count here. Your smartphone never existed. You don't have a relevant opinion. You think you do, but no, you did not answer the question. You don't understand the question.
You actually don't understand people, but let's just start with words on a screen. You should understand them.
From the actual article, and you're really too old to qualify to answer. I'm sure my 90 year old grandparents are fine, and can live, without a cell phone. They still have AOL. They sleep with their phone because it's by their bed.
Anyway, here's the non read bit you dork:
John Moir is another refusenik, although he is quick to say, with a laugh, that he is not sanctimonious about it. He does have e-mail and Skype, after all, and a basic flip phone. However, the 71-year-old Vancouverite has the phone only because his cycling group requires it, and he has âoeonly ever used it to make sure it works.â Like Mr. North, he likes the freedom of being disconnected, especially when he is travelling. It means he is really experiencing a new location, âoerather than trying to be in two places at once.â
You're focused on the bad parts. The question is, could someone (not necessarily you, but feel free to answer) who owned a smart phone up to this moment, suddenly find a way to live without it.
You probably don't have one. Fine, you're not part of the question. Don't feel special.
You read the headline and nothing else, and responded to the literal meaning, without considering any context.
Could the 75% of Canadians who have experienced smartphones live without them?
I assume you will have a hard time parsing that, so do pause for a moment.
How do you define "live"? If you mean "Know that a technology is not available and be denied using it" then almost everyone on DashSlot would say no. If you mean "Voluntarily give up" for any reason, then obviously yes, for very small values of "yes".
If you intentionally misunderstood the entire topic to prove how much smarter you are than everyone else is, then you are what's wrong with humanity. Read that again if you are unsure.
You're obviously not in the majority. And, the question was not about "minimal usage". It was "not at all usage". You find it puzzling because you are waaaaaaay far away from average. Not that it's a bad thing, but you are NOT AVERAGE AND NOT REPRESENTATIVE.
Slashdot Mirror
Try it and let us know?
Flag and EAC are essential for analysis. Sonic Visualizer has pretty much a pitch perfect log FFT (silvet iirc) with phase adjustment, and it can give different results with mp3 vs flac/wav.
If you're not doing wav you're doing flac, or you're doing it wrong.
It's not much difference. Just enough to me.
The article concludes with many different possible explanations. You're attacking a straw man, not the article logic.
Yeah I've seen this movie before. Character growth was very slow, and the acting was wooden.
You lot are off your nut. All of you. I expect an error rate around 2%, but within that margin, you have preconceived notions and genetically expressed predisposition With which I cannot argue. Nor compete. So fuck the lot of you with rakes until you have evidence based reasoning.
It's only 10% - they are cutting the dead weight, with a valid layoff reason, not just arbitrary firing.
90% survives. I'd take that wager.
The folks filing a 13th amendment lawsuit agree.
What the fuck? Who is paying for systemd? Initial release was "30 March 2010", Pottymouth started at RedShat in 2011. Was that the plan? To make a pile of shit and get hired by an ignorant open source company to keep at it?
RedShat is one of the very very few purely open source companies. They do not have proprietary products as their main focus, with contribution to open source as a side effect, like Adobe or Microsoft. Other than SystemD, they know what they are doing, not idiotic. Your idiotic cynicism on the other hand is not contributing anything of value.
Ask her to check out a livecd first, one that you can't install from so she can't screw that up. A distro that looks Windows like. Then proceed. With a business class hardware and warranty.
You want new, with a business class warranty. I've worked tech support and we got so many calls. Broke computer, 6-10 days to repair.
"But I run my business off this!!!"
Well you got a consumer grade hardware and no business level warranty. Nothing I can do.
Go this route and buy 2, plus NAS storage to back up the whole thing so you can swap out to the backup when it breaks. That's expensive.
I'm skeptical that a tool can be as good as ida. I use the free noncommercial version, so it's not even the latest and greatest.
Ida and SoftIce/WinIce are hard to beat. I hope to contribute some fixes because ida has become less keyboard friendly. That shit needs to stop.
My customer mandated W10 for security reasons. 7 will not be supported forever.
I don't mind it other than using a keyboard is not an option in many places. That's maybe 5% of my needs, but it's weighted to 80% of my hate. Likely to get worse, too.
Oh good the first "I don't need it so no one needs it" post.
I owned an Evo 3D and liked it a lot. I also have a VR headset. I'm the target market for this. Note: the Evo 3D did not require any hardware to view in 3D on the device.
Plenty of VR headsets and glasses have been sold, many of those people want to be able to see their own content in 3d.
It's not a majority market. But I enjoy the clarity 3d gives. There's more context to know what is where in the image.
"It's in the phone book"
Can you put yourself in the place of someone who has a published number, who didn't get a call, whose response is "It's in the phone book"?
IT'S IN THE PHONE BOOK
Why wouldn't someone have his number if it was in the phone book? The number that is in the phone book?
And how do you surmise it's what OP would have done? He didn't know about the phone book. Or didn't remember at the time, which is not knowing.
And last, this guy had an appointment, no one showed up. How to you not get mad at that?
Atlas Shrugged was interesting until it devolved into a rant. I read it after Fountainhead, and I got the general point early on. You were young, most people with opinions are old.
No, one less coming. Browser development is way out of the realm of open source hackers. CSS and JavaScript are complicated, and that's ignoring optimization. Mozilla has fought this for years, and they were funded by Google all that time (clown shoes). Big money is where it's at now.
For the record, I've been calling out a lot of idiots here, and this response is the only non idiotic one so far. The question is about *YOU* and this answer pretty much summarizes the expected responses of a very large number of people.
Anyone hating me for my response to them below should ponder the above response.
"Could You Live Without Your Smartphone?"
Response: "I've never owned a smartphone"
Oh, you don't count here. Your smartphone never existed. You don't have a relevant opinion. You think you do, but no, you did not answer the question. You don't understand the question.
You actually don't understand people, but let's just start with words on a screen. You should understand them.
From the actual article, and you're really too old to qualify to answer. I'm sure my 90 year old grandparents are fine, and can live, without a cell phone. They still have AOL. They sleep with their phone because it's by their bed.
Anyway, here's the non read bit you dork:
John Moir is another refusenik, although he is quick to say, with a laugh, that he is not sanctimonious about it. He does have e-mail and Skype, after all, and a basic flip phone. However, the 71-year-old Vancouverite has the phone only because his cycling group requires it, and he has âoeonly ever used it to make sure it works.â Like Mr. North, he likes the freedom of being disconnected, especially when he is travelling. It means he is really experiencing a new location, âoerather than trying to be in two places at once.â
You're focused on the bad parts. The question is, could someone (not necessarily you, but feel free to answer) who owned a smart phone up to this moment, suddenly find a way to live without it.
You probably don't have one. Fine, you're not part of the question. Don't feel special.
Anyone paying more than 50/mo per plan is being robbed. That's $600. Family discounts add up. How in the holy fuck did you get $10k?
Seriously, show your work here or shut the fuck up forever.
Sure, are you an idiot or a fucking idiot?
You read the headline and nothing else, and responded to the literal meaning, without considering any context.
Could the 75% of Canadians who have experienced smartphones live without them?
I assume you will have a hard time parsing that, so do pause for a moment.
How do you define "live"? If you mean "Know that a technology is not available and be denied using it" then almost everyone on DashSlot would say no. If you mean "Voluntarily give up" for any reason, then obviously yes, for very small values of "yes".
If you intentionally misunderstood the entire topic to prove how much smarter you are than everyone else is, then you are what's wrong with humanity. Read that again if you are unsure.
You're obviously not in the majority. And, the question was not about "minimal usage". It was "not at all usage". You find it puzzling because you are waaaaaaay far away from average. Not that it's a bad thing, but you are NOT AVERAGE AND NOT REPRESENTATIVE.
"put down the phone" is not the same as "never use it".
"Never use it" is not the same as "never have used it".