Slashdot Mirror


RealNetworks To Introduce a Simple DVD Copier

langelgjm writes "The New York Times reports that RealNetworks will begin selling RealDVD today, a software program designed to make copying DVDs a trivial task for the average user. Unlike free alternatives, which generally require some technical knowledge and make it difficult to copy an entire DVD with extras, etc., RealDVD claims to be able to copy the entire DVD, menus and all. While sure to raise the ire of Hollywood, the program does have significant limitations: the DVDs it makes will only be playable on the computer where they were created; or, users can pay $20 per computer to play the DVDs on up to five additional computers."

244 comments

  1. Slashvertisement by bjourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Worst Slashvertisement ever!

    1. Re:Slashvertisement by monsul · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If this is a Slashvertisement, they've got the audience wrong. I'm pretty sure everyone here knows how to copy a DVD without having to pay 20 bucks to Real Networks

      --
      Make It Secret Protect your privacy
    2. Re:Slashvertisement by aliquis · · Score: 1

      The question is why one would use this program? And why Real think it's ok that they look your file to a single computer.

      Sounds like a pretty bad deal, why use this crap? Not that we already knew everything "real" suck.

    3. Re:Slashvertisement by Provocateur · · Score: 5, Funny

      The question is why one would use this program?

      The timing couldn't have been more perfect. I have these 4,000-odd clips I need to save from this website...

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    4. Re:Slashvertisement by electrictroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is nice software, but I don't usually copy the whole DVD.

      I only copy individual episodes, and store them as AVIs or XVIDs. What I need is a program that can automate that process so I can (for example) quickly and easily insert a Stargate DVD, and come back an hour later to 4 episode AVIs on my C: drive.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    5. Re:Slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... or without having to register to rtfa.

    6. Re:Slashvertisement by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      Handbrake will do that, I think. I like Toast Titanium on Mac, though; it converts damn near any format to another in a batch job. DVD to iPod, Blu-Ray to Xvid etc.

    7. Re:Slashvertisement by SirGarlon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wish we could mod articles down.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    8. Re:Slashvertisement by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I love my DVDFab Platinum. Best money I ever spent.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:Slashvertisement by jank1887 · · Score: 1

      "The question is why one would use this program?" well, depends how quickly the registration hack comes out, and if it really an easier interface. At a minimum, if it does something innovative, free alternatives can copy the idea and incorporate it into their own products.

    10. Re:Slashvertisement by morgauo · · Score: 1

      True, but there might be lots of Slashdotters whom have less techy friends/family they would be happy to see using this rather than constantly asking them to do it.

    11. Re:Slashvertisement by name*censored* · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you find it, tell me. So far, what I've done is used ddfmrip.bat, AutoGK, AutoGKAdd (it's a hacked-together AutoIt script) and some homebrew batch files tying these together. The downsides are;

      - I still have to tell it what VTS/PGCs I want done (honestly, I have no idea how any program could work this out - a lot of DVDs have 2 chains for some episodes and not for others, so doing it by approximate time is out)

      - It requires a lot of hard disk space

      - The programs aren't properly named (I can get as far as giving them season names and episode numbers, there'd need to be a DVDDB similar to CDDBs for proper automatic episode naming - maybe a homebrew IMDB scraper?)

      - It requires Windows (although AutoGK is the only usable program I've liked on either Linux or Windows, so my rip-box is stuck as Windows anyway).

      At any rate, it's still very dirty, a proper solution like Handbrake (but for Windows or Linux) would be nice.

      --
      Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
    12. Re:Slashvertisement by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      The question is why one would use this program?

      Because you want to watch movies on your laptop, but you don't want to carry around the original copies of your DVDs with you, both because you don't want them lost and because they're extra crap you don't want to have to carry around with you.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    13. Re:Slashvertisement by GuldKalle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Huh, AFAIK Handbrake is for both win, linux and OS X. Did I miss something?

      --
      What?
    14. Re:Slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can. Learn to Firehose.

    15. Re:Slashvertisement by Hairy+Heron · · Score: 1

      So why not just use the dozens of other utilities out there that already make either 1:1 or compressed DVD-5 copies?

    16. Re:Slashvertisement by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think anyone was questioning why anyone would want to copy DVD's - just why they'd want to do so with this program. Doing so with the free stuff out there isn't THAT hard. When you figure that this software introduces DRM, locks to a single computer, and then tries to extort out $20 for the right to play on more computers, it's a pretty lousy deal.

      PARTICULARLY nasty is the fact that Real seems to think that they can use DRM extortion tactics on content that don't own. That's a situation that is true regardless of whether or not the media is even pirated. If it's a major studio film, then Real has no legal ability to extra money from restricting rights to that. OR, even if it's just your wedding DVD you're copying - you are legally fine to copy it but you own the copyright yourself and Real has no legal right to restrict your usage of it.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    17. Re:Slashvertisement by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What I need is a program that can automate that process so I can (for example) quickly and easily insert a Stargate DVD, and come back an hour later to 4 episode AVIs on my C: drive.


      i=1
      for title in {3,5,7,8}; do
              mencoder "dvd://$title" -o "episode_$i.avi";
              i=$(($i+1));
      done

    18. Re:Slashvertisement by joocemann · · Score: 3, Funny

      If this is a Slashvertisement, they've got the audience wrong. I'm pretty sure everyone here knows how to copy a DVD without having to pay 20 bucks to Real Networks

      ....or install their garbage programs that are basically bloatware with little tricky adware-esque properties to them as well.

      Realnetworks have made *horrible* products in the last 8 years. I will never install realplayer again since it always bloats out into something much much bigger and worthless than most people ever intend. We just want something that will play an .rm because some guy hasn't figured out the concept of mp3 yet. We don't need all the other garbage and *usually* have all of those bases covered without bloaty mcbloaterson's special bloat formula.

      did I say bloat enough?

    19. Re:Slashvertisement by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      The part where the output looks like something that iTunes
      spat out rather than the raw output from cdparanoia or
      dvdbackup.

      A bunch of files like this:

              THEPRETENDER_S4_D4_A.1-1.vob

      just don't cut it for most people.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    20. Re:Slashvertisement by jedidiah · · Score: 0, Troll

      ...which shows that you have OBVIOUSLY never tried to do this yourself.

      There's a bit more to it to that. THAT is the part that this
      new software seems to be addressing. It looks to be the first
      proper DVD ripper ever.

      It's missing transcoding though.

      You make it sound like you tolerate an mp3 collection that looks like the following:

              cdrom923_1.mp3
              cdrom923_2.mp3
              cdrom923_3.mp3
              cdrom923_4.mp3
              cdrom923_5.mp3

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    21. Re:Slashvertisement by wolf12886 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wouldn't really consider the DRM to be a restriction of rights, since the only thing thats being limited is the functionality of the company's own program, gimping their own program was a stupid thing to do, but as long as their upfront about the functionality, I don't see why they shouldn't be able to.

      That being said, I'm sure there are numerous DRM free, nearly one-click dvd cloning programs available for free, so I doubt this'll be purchased by any but the ignorant, which kind of makes any debate of the fairness of this companies practices moot.

    22. Re:Slashvertisement by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      PARTICULARLY nasty is the fact that Real seems to think that they can use DRM extortion tactics on content that don't own.

      The worst thing about the software. Apple and MS don't add their DRM onto CDs you rip.

    23. Re:Slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to agree with you on everything except:

      you own the copyright yourself and Real has no legal right to restrict your usage of it

      Since you're running your data stream through their software, Real is entirely within their rights in limiting the usefulness of the result — you basically agree to that stipulation by using their software. It's still a joke, but they're not outside of their legal rights.

    24. Re:Slashvertisement by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      No, not OBVIOUSLY, because that's pretty much how I transocde DVDs. My example was simplified; you need to add a few options to specify bitrate, deinterlacing, etc.

      I also assumed that anyone who's not an idiot would understand that in the real world you would substitute a more meanginful title for "espisode_*".

      Mainly, I was pointing out that this whole thing is much simpler than people want to make it out to be.

    25. Re:Slashvertisement by IntlHarvester · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't think anyone was questioning why anyone would want to copy DVD's - just why they'd want to do so with this program. Doing so with the free stuff out there isn't THAT hard.

      The only 'real' advantage to this program is that you can go into a store and buy it. It comes from a semi-legit company and probably doesn't have too many spyware and popup modules included.

      Take an objective look at say "Doom9.net - The definitive DVD backup resource". The home page is covered with jibberish about things called "eac3to" and "DGAVCDec" and "AviSynth". Even aside from the vaugely hackerish feel of the site, this is hugely intimidating for the average dumbass.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    26. Re:Slashvertisement by alanthenerd · · Score: 2, Informative

      If your looking for simplicity FairUse Wizard (www.fairusewizard.com) is pretty good.
      It's been a while since I used it but I remember it being easy and quick with good output.

    27. Re:Slashvertisement by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter.

      It's still an O(n) process if it's not fully automated.

      The transcoding options aren't the problem. Even with
      something as "crude" as mencoder, the basic options
      aren't that bad.

      The problem is that the end user is left with a bunch
      of gibberish that they have to sort out themselves manually.

      I stand by my first remark: It's like you people have never
      really actually done this. Rip a whole season and you've got
      22 or 30 (or 60 if it's spongebob) files to sort out.

      I can automate this stuff myself. Most people can't.

      The current tools don't do it.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    28. Re:Slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. The term "both" applies to two things, not three or more.

    29. Re:Slashvertisement by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

      AFAIK Handbrake is for both win, linux and OS X

      Handbrake on some platforms cannot decrypt CSS. Can you name three new releases without CSS?

    30. Re:Slashvertisement by shnull · · Score: 1

      so, linux being open source and supposed to have all the world's greatest minds united behind one OS ... why is there so little decent free software available ? Maybe all those great minds have jobs at MS-related software development companies who take up too much of their time so they can't possibly help out on the open source end ? yes, if you take this personally, you ARE one of them :)

      --
      beware he who denies you access to information for in his mind, he already deems himself to be your master (SMAC-ish)
    31. Re:Slashvertisement by tepples · · Score: 1

      I wish we could mod articles down.

      I wish you'd register on Kuro5hin or at least check the Firehose.

    32. Re:Slashvertisement by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      No, simplicity is something more along the lines of...

              dvdrip.sh
              vob_rename.sh
              captions.sh
              convert-x264.sh ...but without it being a bunch of shell scripts
      and without the end user manually typing in all
      of the episode titles.

            The "dvddb" concept is what's really missing.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    33. Re:Slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Brilliant- I just sent that code to my mom so now she'll be able to rip all of her DVDs on her Dell. Couldn't be simpler.

    34. Re:Slashvertisement by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Copying a DVD isn't even hard anymore, contrary to the summary.

    35. Re:Slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is a Slashvertisement, they've got the audience wrong. I'm pretty sure everyone here knows how to copy a DVD without having to pay 20 bucks to Real Networks

      If stuff like this is so easy why do a lot of slashdotters buy Macs?

    36. Re:Slashvertisement by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      That's what the Firehose is for. Mod away to your heart's content.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    37. Re:Slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If stuff like this is so easy why do a lot of slashdotters buy Macs?"

      Because it is a certified UNIX system. It has geek appeal for people with Linux/*BSD experience.

    38. Re:Slashvertisement by zx-15 · · Score: 2, Informative

      apt-get install libdvdcss2

      k9copy is really nice to, and everything could be find in debian-multimedia repository.

    39. Re:Slashvertisement by tepples · · Score: 1

      apt-get install libdvdcss2

      Handbrake for Windows has no CSS support, unless you're talking about running a Debian-based distribution in a virtual machine or buying new PC components that have Linux drivers.

    40. Re:Slashvertisement by sootman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I also recommend the GUI and CLI versions of HandBrake. The CLI can be scripted and the GUI can create a queue. It just so happens I'm ripping Seinfeld; using the GUI to queue up the job (4 episodes and 8 extras ripped at 640x480 2-passs H264, and the four episodes ripped as 320x240 MP4s for iPod) took less than five minutes. To make it easier I just name each file 1.mp4, 2.mp4, 3.mp4, etc. to begin with and then rename the episodes when done. The GUI takes the guesswork out of figuring out what to do for title & chapter; I've only used the CLI for disks that crash the GUI (like 2 of the 4 discs in The Simpsons - Season 10 and The Legend of Drunken Master.) (Note that the CLI can return chapter info but the GUI gives visual previews so you can see exactly what you're getting.)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    41. Re:Slashvertisement by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      AnyDVD is pretty much the Windows solution to CSS.

      Using it, every disc appears to not be encrypted, so programs that only work on non-CSS DVDs (Nero Recode, boring file copy software, etc.) work just fine.

    42. Re:Slashvertisement by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      Just confirming, Handbrake will indeed do this. It's especially good on TV series discs and I wouldn't necc use this on feature film dvds because (IME) it wants to make each chapter individual files.

    43. Re:Slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, I'll take care of it the next time I'm over at your mom's.

    44. Re:Slashvertisement by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I'm sure MS for a while had media player setup to add some level of DRM to music it ripped from CD. No idea if it still does.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    45. Re:Slashvertisement by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

      You can use a regular DVD ripper to get rid of the CSS and then use Handbrake. That's what I do. It's not good to let Handbrake run your DVD drive for the whole time it performs its conversion anyway. Rip DVD to your HD first, then use Handbrake to rip to H.264.

      --
      "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
    46. Re:Slashvertisement by Phat_Tony · · Score: 1

      Well, if it didn't add DRM, it sounds useful to me. There are currently too many unnecessary steps involved in backing up a DVD. I've got two optical drives- it would be nice to have software that let me put a DVD in one drive, a blank in the other, and click the "copy" button and get an identical copy fast, without messing around with DeCSS ripping to my hard drive and then burning back to disc manually.

      Although there already is a program that does this or OSX, without any DRM crap, called Fast DVD Copy. Not only does it not add DRM, it DeCSS's and then can also de-macrovision, remove navigational restrictions, and extract tracks and recompress video to compress double layer DVD's onto single layer media. But the developer wants $100 for it, and ironically, the program itself is highly protected, calling home to its servers to check registration.

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    47. Re:Slashvertisement by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Is she hot? If so, propz for l33t MILFage!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    48. Re:Slashvertisement by Mike89 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Brilliant- I just sent that code to my mom so now she'll be able to rip all of her DVDs on her Dell. Couldn't be simpler.

      Your Mum watches Stargate AND runs Linux?!

    49. Re:Slashvertisement by collinstocks · · Score: 1

      True, but really? Add DRM when you can do the following?

      dd if=/dev/cdrom of=/tmp/deleteme

      replace dvd

      dd if=/dev/cdrom of=/tmp/deleteme

      (Device names may vary on your distro/hardware.)

    50. Re:Slashvertisement by syousef · · Score: 1

      You do know that the .VOB files can be renamed to .MPG or .AVI and will play just fine in windows media player (and others). Each item on a DVD menu usually triggers one VOB. (This all assumes you're using unencrypted DVD). Your only issues are then the legality of doing this, and renaming the VOB files. That'll be harder than just using a script to rename since some of the VOB files will correspond to the menu and copy warnings etc.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    51. Re:Slashvertisement by maglor_83 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It comes from a semi-legit company and probably doesn't have too many spyware and popup modules included.

      When did we stop talking about Real?

    52. Re:Slashvertisement by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      The only 'real' advantage to this program is that you can go into a store and buy it. It comes from a semi-legit company and probably doesn't have too many spyware and popup modules included. Take an objective look at say "Doom9.net - The definitive DVD backup resource". The home page is covered with jibberish about things called "eac3to" and "DGAVCDec" and "AviSynth". Even aside from the vaugely hackerish feel of the site, this is hugely intimidating for the average dumbass.

      That's why God made DVDShrink or at least allowed the author(s) to be born so they could write it.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    53. Re:Slashvertisement by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Actually, I sincerely appreciate the heads-up. I like to know what Real is pushing, so I can make an effort to protect my end users from it.

      This one sounds like it would be even more tempting to the gullible than most of the dross they've produced in the past, so I'll have to keep a sharp eye out for it. Indeed, it might be a good idea to preemptively deploy some halfway decent DVD copying software, even on business PCs that have no legitimate need for it, just to keep the users from thinking they want this thing.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    54. Re:Slashvertisement by jonadab · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > I don't think anyone was questioning why anyone would want to
      > copy DVD's - just why they'd want to do so with this program.

      It's simple, really. There are a lot of people out there who are sufficiently gullible and forgetful that they are simply not aware of Real's long history of overtly user-hostile schenanighans. The website says, "these audio clips are in Real format, which you can play with the Real player, download it for free [link]", and the naive user just *believes* that the website is giving them a way to listen to audio clips, without asking "What's the catch?"

      Of course, after they click the link they find out that it's a lot of hassle, and it has the worst user interface in the history of computing, and they never do actually figure out how to listen to the stupid audio clips on the website, but they do get prompted eighty times a month to upgrade the Real player, and the upgrade is a bait-and-switch in that there's a newer freeware version, but the upgrade thing tries hard to get them to buy the non-freeware version instead, and any audio you play with the thing sounds terrible, if you can ever even get it to play audio, which you often cannot, and the computer runs noticeably slower now, and...

      Sure, everything Real has ever produced has been like that, so people who have been around the internet for a while theoretically *ought* to know what they're like. You know it. I know it. Everyone knows, right?

      But normal users don't know. After a bad experience with RealAudio, when they see a website that has *video* in Real format, they come to me (since I'm the computer guy) all excited and say, "Can you install this video player for me? I need it to watch the video clips on [site]." And I say, "Umm, this is Real. Their software is terrible. You don't want this on your computer." And they look at me funny and say, "But I want to watch the videos!" End users don't think about things like who made the software, and what implications that might have. To them, that's highly technical, and they think it's irrelevant to their lives. All they want to know is what button they have to push to listen to the stupid audio clips, watch the stupid videos, or copy the stupid DVDs.

      My advice to sysadmins is to preemptively install some half-decent DVD-copying software now, even if it's not needed. Because you don't want your users trying to install a Real product. Nothing good can come from that.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    55. Re:Slashvertisement by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > The only 'real' advantage to this program is that you can go into a store and buy it. It comes
      > from a semi-legit company and probably doesn't have too many spyware and popup modules included.

      Umm, no. This doesn't come from a semi-legit company. It comes from RealNetworks, the same devious, inept, cretinous slimeballs responsible for RealAudio and RealVideo, among other things. Their software is always terrible in the uttermost extreme. I consider it to be a particularly egregious form of malware, worse in a lot of ways than a lot of the spyware that's out there.

      Software distributed under the Real brand always has an unbelievably horrible user interface, always does a terrible job at its supposed function, if the user can figure out how to make it work at all, generally makes the computer run noticeably slower, and frequently causes other problems (e.g., system instability). Typically their software regularly pops up prompts for the user to upgrade to a newer version, then tries to get money out of the user for the upgrade.

      Real lives on the fact that most end users don't know their track record and are too gullible to do much checking, so they believe the company's claims about what its software will do and so naively go ahead and install it. Which is ALWAYS a mistake.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    56. Re:Slashvertisement by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I think GP was trying to say that naming the episodes "Episode 1.avi", "Episode 2.avi", "Episode 3.avi" is about as helpful as naming the tracks from your CD "Track 1.mp3", "Track 2.mp3", "Track 3.mp3". They have names in addition to numbers, and if you don't have the whole series memorized you're going to need the name to figure out what the episode was actually about.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    57. Re:Slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, after they click the link they find out that ...it has the worst user interface in the history of computing

      Spoken like someone who hasn't used any of the software Apple has ported to Windows (Safari, iTunes, Quicktime)

    58. Re:Slashvertisement by seec77 · · Score: 1

      Damn... Can you say MILF?

    59. Re:Slashvertisement by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      It's not quite automatic, but autoGK (http://www.autogk.me.uk/) is normally what I use, partly because you can cue it up to do a nice big bunch of episodes overnight, but mainly due to the amazing compression that it can do.

      Yes, it's slower than many other rippers (It does two passes of the file) but considering that you end up with better picture quality every time you watch it afterwards, I am convinced about it.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    60. Re:Slashvertisement by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      No, actually, it lets Slashdotters feel special once again in that "makes you fuzzy inside" elitist way.

      It's all about evolution you see. Survival of the fittest.

      1) Girl looks for mate.
      2) Girl goes to muscle bound jock type.
      3) Jock cannot provide any entertainment prior to the act as he cannot afford to be spending that much money for a rip.
      4) Girl searches for another better suited mate.
      5) Girl happens accross geek who understands how to rip a dvd for free and has amassed a library of girlie flicks for just this occasion.
      6) Girl isn't pleased in bed, but at least the nerd got his bit in.

      Amirite?

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    61. Re:Slashvertisement by jonadab · · Score: 1

      I've seen QuickTime for Windows, and while the UI isn't very *good*, it's not nearly as bad as Real Player.

      Granted, I'm kind of at a loss for why QuickTime for Windows needs to exist, given that the main purpose of QuickTime in the first place is to be the default/bundled media player on the Mac (which is what Windows Media Player is on Windows) and that anyone willing to download and install third-party freeware can easily find a much *better* media player (than either QT or WMP). Still, the UI isn't really where QT falls down. (If anything, WMP has a worse UI.) QT's real failings are that it doesn't support enough formats and doesn't have enough modern features (e.g., freedb support, proper playlists, volume normalization, scrobbling, the ability to call external commands when changing songs, you know, the useful stuff). Also, for Windows users, there's the fact that it doesn't really have any compelling feature that makes it worth the effort to replace the bundled WMP with it. It supports a couple of formats that WMP doesn't, but the reverse is true too, so that's a wash. If you're going to download a media player for better format support, you may as well get one that supports both WMP and QT formats, plus others (e.g., Vorbis).

      But while QuickTime for Windows is certainly unnecessary, it's not as actively terrible as RealPlayer.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    62. Re:Slashvertisement by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Said program was also uploaded on demonoid not long time ago, or so I've heard ;/

      What I find even more hillarious is that little snitch also calls home and validates it's license, AND THE APPLICATION IS MADE JUST TO PROVENT THIS METHOD FOR ALL OTHER APPLICATIONS :D

      Sure one may have legal reasons to not let them do that, and therefor have licensed software, but I would assume most people use little snitch to run pirated copies with invalid licenses. I for sure do... uhm, would do ;/

  2. It's a good thing by rallymatte · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Even though it will have limitations to make the DVDs playable on a limited number of computers, the fact that the software cost you money and it isn't open source, because this sort of thing usually spawns free alternatives. I mean, it's not really rocket science to make a software that creates DVDs, but inspiration to make easy to use alternatives is needed.

    1. Re:It's a good thing by rootofevil · · Score: 4, Informative

      you mean like dvdshrink?

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    2. Re:It's a good thing by multisync · · Score: 2, Informative

      or k9copy?

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    3. Re:It's a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or k9copy, or k3b. It is nice to see how inovative is proprietary software.

    4. Re:It's a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The problem with DVD shrink is that development stopped even before ARCoSS, which means that many newever DVDs can not be ripper directly without additional software. You can eiuther use DVD Decrypter (which is free, but introdues a very cumbersome step into the mix) or you can buy AnyDVD which sits just above the driver level and makes the DVD in the drive appear as a normal unencrypted, non copy-protected DVD. So even with DVDShrink, which is probably the best thing out there in my opinion, you either waste time or money, which is really the same thing anyway.

    5. Re:It's a good thing by lysergic.acid · · Score: 3, Informative

      CloneDVD isn't free, but it does everything that this program claims to do, except without any DRM (AnyDVD, often sold together with CloneDVD, helps eliminate DRM and region codes). all it takes is a few mouse clicks on the "next" button after you've popped the DVD and a blank into your computer, and the program starts making a duplicate of whatever movie you want. works on any video DVD, and it will also strip out previews/warnings for you (AnyDVD will also automatically skip over previews/warnings for DVDs you watch on your computer) and let you select the language/audio tracks you want on the copy. if you have a dual-layer DVD9 burner, you can just click "next" without changing any settings at all.

      RealDVD is worthless plain and simple. it's not going to spawn anything except some suckers who are willing to waste their money on crippled software/DVDs.

    6. Re:It's a good thing by initdeep · · Score: 1

      DVD Decrypter development stopped years ago as well.
      About the same time as DVD Shrink

      however, utilizing AnyDVD, which as you said requires not involvment of the user, along with ImgBurn will create a direct 1-1 ISO copy of the DVD on your hard drive.

      which appears to be the same that this "new" program from real does.

      It takes about two minutes to learn how to do this.

      combine this with one of dozens of simple media center plugins which will automatically mount and play, through a nice visual 10 foot gui, and you can play any movie you want with a few clicks of a mouse or remote.

    7. Re:It's a good thing by BitterOak · · Score: 2

      DVD Decrypter development stopped years ago as well.

      I think the grandparent probably meant DVDFabDecrypter, which is a different product. But you're right, DVD Decryptor stopped before development of the latest anti-copy techniques.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    8. Re:It's a good thing by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      CloneDVD isn't free, but it does everything that this program claims to do, except without any DRM

      The problem is that CloneDVD isn't "legit" in the sense that using it to copy copyrighted DVDs probably isn't legal. I realize that many don't care about such things, and I'm not saying that I agree with the law, but nevertheless, many people do. At least RealDVD, with its $20 charge for each copy is legit. Personally, I think the price is a bit high, however, as many, if not most, DVDs cost less than $20, so you could simply buy a second copy for the same price. Might be worthwhile for DVDs costing more, however.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    9. Re:It's a good thing by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      if the $20 is going to the actual makers of the DVD, then i suppose it's legit, so it depends on what you're copying.

      i don't know how Real Network is handling this for things like independent films exactly, but i'm guessing it's probably the same way as how the ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC handle music royalties from bars/clubs/stores/etc.--charge everyone a standard royalty fee for playing music in a public venue, regardless of whether the actual copyright owners of the music is a member or even demands royalties or not (just to be on the safe side). so if you want your royalties, you have to pay ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC for membership. if not, they'll charge people for your music anyway.

      it's a rather brilliant system. they make tons of money on artists who don't make enough royalties to warrant the cost of membership and probably don't want royalties collected on their music. it also removes the potential incentive to play music by independent artists who aren't part of the ASCAP/etc. since you'll still be paying the same amount of royalties each year anyway.

      besides, who's to say that copying a non-DRMed DVD without having to pay extra money isn't legit? the same people who say that playing a DVD on Linux is not legit? or that ripping your CDs or DVDs onto your harddrive isn't legit?

      there's what's legal and what's illegal. and there's what's ethical and unethical. these two may not always be the same, but if something is both legal, and perfectly ethical, then why shouldn't it be considered 'legit'? because it pisses off certain corporations and deviates from dominant corporate attitudes?

      for the sake of this country i hope that most Americans don't feel the need to have the complete approval of corporate America for everything they do, and that they will learn to make moral judgments on their own rather than have industry lobbies tell them what they should or shouldn't do. it's bad enough that the RIAA & MPAA have already legislated laws restricting the rights of consumers, but do we have to capitulate our rights to them before they've even passed such legislations just because the industry frowns upon perfectly legal actions?

    10. Re:It's a good thing by Mushukyou · · Score: 1

      The best apps to use for burning, in my opinion, is AnyDVD HD and 1Click DVD Copy Pro. The bay of the pirate...

    11. Re:It's a good thing by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      or k9copy?

      That clones dogs.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    12. Re:It's a good thing by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      <nitpic> <joke type='karmawhore'>I dont know abot you, but Id rather record than burn stuff on my HDD. Id really fancy a opto-magnetic disk drive, or a large volume floptical (theres a difference), but I dont got one yet. </joke> </nitpic>

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  3. The summary is misleading by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it won't produce something that will play on a standard stand-alone DVD player, then IT'S NOT A DVD AND THIS IS NOT A "DVD Copier." This is just a ripper that adds an annoying layer of DRM to the files (umm...no thanks). And you get to pay for the privilege, no less. Woo hoo!

    There are any number of one-button DVD rippers that are just as good, just as simple, and produce an actual DVD. And many of them are free. DVDfab is just one example. It produces an actual DVD, it's as simple as it gets to use, and it doesn't cost a dime (unless you want the premium version).

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:The summary is misleading by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is just a ripper

      I don't think so. With regular ripped DVDs, I suspect you're at risk of having your laptop seized at the U.S. border. With the files produced by this tool, since it's supposedly fully licensed, you may be ok.

    2. Re:The summary is misleading by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      OS X comes with something better than this seems to be. It's called Disk Utility. Put in the DVD, hit the 'Make Image' button, and get a disk image out. You can play this in Apple's DVD Player (also included with OS X), or with VLC or any other DVD player. I don't think you can burn it to a DVD without removing the CSS (which Disk Utility doesn't do - it's basically a GUI on dd).

      Possibly this recompresses as well, but with hard disk space so cheap there doesn't seem much point (and recompressing at decent quality still takes some hours on even a reasonably fast computer).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:The summary is misleading by SCHecklerX · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's just the same as "dd if=/dev/$dvd of=my.iso"

      Nothing special. Any *nix box can do this, assuming you are dumping to a filesystem that can deal with file sizes > 4GB.

    4. Re:The summary is misleading by yincrash · · Score: 1

      DVD ripper, a computer application that copies the contents of a DVD to a harddisk

      I think what you meant was referring to "unlicensed" rippers. This is still just a ripper.

    5. Re:The summary is misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      Which the GP made clear when they said:

      (which Disk Utility doesn't do - it's basically a GUI on dd)

    6. Re:The summary is misleading by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm fairly sure I said that. Oh yes, I did:

      (which Disk Utility doesn't do - it's basically a GUI on dd)

      The difference between Disk Utility and dd is that one is usable by anyone barely computer-literate who is capable of clicking on a single button, and the other isn't.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:The summary is misleading by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know. I didn't hit escape fast enough after submitting :-). The mods, apparently, weren't paying attention either.

    8. Re:The summary is misleading by jitterman · · Score: 1

      SlySoft's AnyDVD and CloneDVD, used in conjunction, will allow you to back up DVDs and play them on any computer and any DVD player (at least, I've not had one NOT work yet on a device).

      --
      For conscience is the wound, and there's naught to staunch it
    9. Re:The summary is misleading by russotto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think so. With regular ripped DVDs, I suspect you're at risk of having your laptop seized at the U.S. border. With the files produced by this tool, since it's supposedly fully licensed, you may be ok.

      Right. Like the customs people will actually know the difference. Do you really expect them to distinguish between a legal copy of a DVD produced by this tool, and an equally legal copy of a DVD produced by another (illegal, according to the DMCA) tool?

    10. Re:The summary is misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After you make the ISO just use Xine or mplayer to play the .iso directly. No need to mount the file.

      So here are the steps:

      1) Copy to ISO 'dd if=/dev/$dvd of=my.iso'

      2) Play ISO with appropriate player 'xine my.iso'

      No DRM, no twenty dollars, no additional software.

    11. Re:The summary is misleading by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      All dd requires is someone to work out the necessary GUI hooks
      of the sort that have existed on operating systems other than
      the Mac since 1985.

      Just because the tool is a TTP, it doens't mean that it necessarily
      has to be user hostile. (This means you guys at Canonical)

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    12. Re:The summary is misleading by initdeep · · Score: 1

      they better be able too since studios are starting to send out movies with "digital copy" included.

      not too mention the ability from people to LEGALLY download and have on their computer movies, tv shows and the like through several sources including amazon unbox and itunes......

      if they were to try to take my laptop for this while i have files from those sevices on them, or even digital copies, They'd better be willing to have a fight on their hands.

      it's already stupid that i've seen someone pulled out of line for talking wiht someone else and using the term "that's the bomb" in conversation.

      because of course, someone who's trying to bring an exlposive device on board would be using words that are almost guaranteed to draw attention.

    13. Re:The summary is misleading by PPH · · Score: 1

      I'll sell you the professional version of that program for $50.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    14. Re:The summary is misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are we talking about the average computer user or the average linux user then? because those are two entirely different categories. i'm a pretty savvy computer user but the linux command you just posted is gibberish to me.

      lets try and stick with things that normal people without technical knowledge can understand (ie my grandma) and USE rather then push the envelope with linux on this one shall we?

    15. Re:The summary is misleading by sootman · · Score: 3, Informative

      And if the DVD has CSS you'll wind up with NOTHING of use by doing that. Simply copying the VIDEO_TS folder to a new DVD or disk image will result in CSS-scrambled content that can't be unscrambled because the key to unscramble it is in a non-normally-readable portion of the disk. Meaning, a program designed to read video DVDs can get at the key, but it isn't in the filesystem that the OS sees.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    16. Re:The summary is misleading by jimicus · · Score: 1

      if they were to try to take my laptop for this while i have files from those sevices on them, or even digital copies, They'd better be willing to have a fight on their hands.

      If you're seriously willing to fight either verbally (against someone who doesn't really have the intellect to understand the rules but sure as hell knows that the only answer they're allowed to give to someone trying to get a laptop back that they've impounded is "no") or physically (against someone who's got a whole team of burly knuckleheads, some armed, to support them) then I don't want to be anywhere near you when you're going through security at an airport.

      You won't change the system that way. All you'll do is give them someone to make an example of.

    17. Re:The summary is misleading by Velex · · Score: 1

      The difference between Disk Utility and dd is that one is usable by anyone barely computer-literate who is capable of clicking on a single button, and the other isn't.

      A lot of people I work with aren't capable of clicking a single button, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    18. Re:The summary is misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. But it is special for the average consumer. Typing that command at a command line is a lot more daunting than drag and drop in the Finder.

    19. Re:The summary is misleading by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      What on Earth is my laptop doing at the US border?

    20. Re:The summary is misleading by russotto · · Score: 1

      You won't change the system that way. All you'll do is give them someone to make an example of.

      So what do you suggest, just bend over and take it? Don't bother with the standard answer of complying then but working through the legal system later. You've already lost at that point; your efforts in recovering your property will no doubt exceed the cost of the property, you might lose, and you STILL won't change the system.

      In fact, you can't change the system. Best you can do is gum it up.

    21. Re:The summary is misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our computer has only one button... and we press it before it leaves the factory.

    22. Re:The summary is misleading by EvanED · · Score: 1

      ...THIS IS NOT A "DVD Copier." This is just a ripper...

      And what does a ripper do? Oh yeah... it makes a copy. Just not onto another media of the same type.

  4. Not really a DVD then? by Spazholio · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "the DVDs it makes will only be playable on the computer where they were created"

    Doesn't this make it *not* an actual DVD, but rather an encoded video on a disc that just happens to be shaped like a DVD with the capacity of a DVD? Kind of like how all those DRM'd CDs can't actually be called "compact discs" because they don't adhere to the red book standard?

    1. Re:Not really a DVD then? by Piranhaa · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's still a DVD and still a CD. However, if you add DRM to a CD it cannot bear the Compact Disk Digital Audio symbol since it violates the Red Book specification. DVD is also the same in the sense that it wouldn't allowed to be called DVD Video because it wouldn't be following the standard set aside for it. DVD (Digital Versatile Disk) is still the name of the actual medium being written to.

    2. Re:Not really a DVD then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because they don't adhere

      Don't confuse DVD with DVD-Video.

    3. Re:Not really a DVD then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Noooo. Compact Disc - with a 'c', coz it's round. Disk with a 'k' is for the hard or floppy varieties. Oh, and DVD is just DVD the Versatile stuff was dropped ages ago.

    4. Re:Not really a DVD then? by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's correct. Disc with a 'c' because the recording industry decided that was cool. The traditional spelling is with a 'k'.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    5. Re:Not really a DVD then? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I think they figured that one out with DVD.

      It's still a DVD, but it's not a DVD-Video disc. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD.

      Tricky, yes?

    6. Re:Not really a DVD then? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Mods: moderate this post up (+5 factually-correct-on-Slashdot-gasp). Some idiot scored it as offtopic.

    7. Re:Not really a DVD then? by Spazholio · · Score: 1

      Nice. I'd mod you up, but...well....you know.

  5. PCs? by oahazmatt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let me know when this DVD copier actually lets me copy DVDs that can be played on a DVD Player.

    --
    Those who believe the Internet is private,
    find their privates are on the Internet.
  6. Useless by monsul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People who want hassle-free DVD copying are usually the ones that like to watch DVDs in a DVD player, sitting on the couch of their living rooms. Why? Because they are not very computer literate (or can't be bothered, doesn't matter which).

    --
    Make It Secret Protect your privacy
    1. Re:Useless by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Or because they have a 52" or greater television to watch on in the living rooms. Some of us even own whole houses where the computer and television are in completely different rooms! Imagine that!

  7. Free are hard to use??? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    AnyDVD + DVD shrink is brain dead easy to use if you really want to copy all the crap on the DVD.

    Want just the movie on your laptop use handbrake. easy as pie.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Free are hard to use??? by hashax · · Score: 1

      and surely anyone who can pay for a software online can copy dvds using free software.

    2. Re:Free are hard to use??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DVD Decrypter and DVD2One offer similar functionality. You can have movie only, or the entire disc with menu structure and the "extra" shit you don't need / don't care about.
       
      The second one allows dual-layer / double-sided discs to be burned to a single-layer 4.7GB DVD.
       
      N.B. Using the former program is a breach of some idiotic UK law regarding "breaking of encryption / DRM", so don't let The Man see you using it.

    3. Re:Free are hard to use??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AnyDVD and IMGBurn for a "perfect" DVD9 copy with the original layer break preserved.

  8. How is this news? by purpledinoz · · Score: 2, Informative

    DVD copying has been trivial for many years now with DVD Shrink and DVD Decrypter. I'm sure there's already other programs out there that are even easier to use.

  9. Why Bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are better, non-crippleware solutions.

  10. I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    whether the buffer will run out while burning..

  11. This seems contraindicated by Verteiron · · Score: 1

    So, from the studios' point of view, not only is this facilitating piracy, but RealNetworks is profiting by it? That sounds like a real winner.

    This might be explained in TFA but I don't have time to Bugmenot the NYTimes right now.

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
    1. Re:This seems contraindicated by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      The files have an extra DRM layer that limits it to playback on 5 machines, and only by Real's software. Ripping CDs is legal, so the only issue with ripping DVDs would be css, which they've licensed (they don't strip it).

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:This seems contraindicated by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      This might be explained in TFA but I don't have time to Bugmenot the NYTimes right now.

      Or even attempt to click the link apparently, since it opens right up to the article. The NYTimes hasnt required a login for almost an entire year now.

  12. Legality, Major Limitation, DVD shrink by Cryophallion · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm assuming they get by the legality of selling it by stating it is for use for the single copy you are allowed to make. Still, I'm sure they'll see some pressure from the content providers.

    Most "average" users I know play they're dvds on their tvs, not their computers. I hope they explicitly state only plays on a computer on the label, or a lot of average customers will be rather annoyed.

    Finally, I remember something about dvd shrink (which is extremely easy for average users when used with dvd-decrypter, though not legal in the us) may be actually legal in the EU since CSS does not effectively protect the content. Here is a link to one of the articles. Any way we can push this through in the US?

    1. Re:Legality, Major Limitation, DVD shrink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm assuming they get by the legality of selling it by stating it is for use for the single copy you are allowed to make. Still, I'm sure they'll see some pressure from the content providers.

      I believe so, since the DMCA bans the distribution of all unlicensed DRM-crackers. Whether or not the mere use of such software to make backups is covered under fair use or not is a matter of debate, but there appears to be consensus that unless the DRM makers preapproved of the software, it's illegal to distribute in the US.

      IANAL, YMMV, etc.

  13. Countdown to FAIL... by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

    in 3....2....1....

  14. "Simple" by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It uses DRM. No way can it be simple.

    1. Re:"Simple" by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No way can it be simple.

      Think not?

      simple:

      4 a: lacking in knowledge or expertise <a simple amateur of the arts> b (1): stupid (2): mentally retarded c: not socially or culturally sophisticated : naive; also : credulous

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  15. Yeah, was going to say by Nursie · · Score: 1

    Insert Disk, start DVDDecrypter, hit "Go", burn iso to disk...

    Of course DVDDecrypter is not exactly legal these days. Which is a shame, because it strips all that nasty region coding and other crap out of the image as it goes along.

    1. Re:Yeah, was going to say by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1, Troll

      Insert Disk, start DVDDecrypter, hit "Go", burn iso to disk... Of course DVDDecrypter is not exactly legal these days. Which is a shame, because it strips all that nasty region coding and other crap out of the image as it goes along.

      It's been a long time since "being legal" was something to aspire to. The only actions that are legal in this arena are those that harm the average man on the street. Being criminal is the same as being a freedom fighter these days.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    2. Re:Yeah, was going to say by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's really lame that they make stuff like DVDDecrypter illegal but still insist on sticking to the region encoding crap. In the US, the only way I can get some foreign content is to purchase it from a foreign location and use DVDDecrypter to get rid of the region encoding so I can actually view it using my region 1 DVD player.

      Why is it that in a so-called "global economy" we are limited to buying and viewing DVDs produced for our own region without circumventing the encryption on the disc (thereby technically violating the DMCA)?

    3. Re:Yeah, was going to say by purpledinoz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Region encoding is the biggest bullshit ever. I moved from Canada to Germany, brought my DVDs over, and my friends can't play them because of region encoding. Great. And they wonder why people download? Fuck you MPAA.

    4. Re:Yeah, was going to say by Zymergy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I prefer use AnyDVD. It is based offshore and kept very current. :) http://www.slysoft.com/
      AnyDVD can strip region Coding too... plus it rips HD-DVD and Blu-Ray HD content too (removing all CCS, Region coding, and other DRM like BD+, etc..)
      You can burn back to a blank DVD (double or single layer DVDs, but DVD-R works best in most players) or to a blank Blu-Ray "BD-R" using the burner of your choice.
      Standard set-top players should play the burned disks just fine in most modern DVD drives. (I use CloneDVD2 for this)...
      I find taking one (or each type) of your burned disks to the store and trying it on the set-top DVD players *before* purchase (where DVD drive showrooms are available) makes pre-sales testing go smoother. Not all set-top DVD players are created equal nor are they all well-endowed by their creators...
      A Blu-Ray burner is way too costly at this time, but I have ripped a few Blu-Rays with AnyDVD HD (same program, but you can pay for the more expensive HD ripping key if desired) and they sure look good playing from their DRM-Free and Region-Free images off my HDD (at 1920x1200).
      Who says that HDCP (another hardware-based DRM schema) monitors are required to watch digital HDMI Blu-Ray content on my PC!
      I am SURE that rips of disks that have no region coding and no CCS and BD+ or any other DRM would play on about any flavor of *nix that had a media player which can handle the format...
      Blu-Ray "BD-R" burners need to come down in cost to a reasonable level and blank media needs to be under $1 per disk... then I'll just go to that. Business as usual.

      (Of Course, I purchase ALL of the disks that I "rip" and copy for MY PERSONAL USE ONLY, Ahem..) You know, for my Non-Windows and Non-OSX boxes and for use in other devices that I own...
      "Backup Copies". Also great for the typical destructive 2-18 year olds who want to "watch" a copy of my new movie and often return it scratched because apparently they used it as a slider to move furniture...
      I Purchased AnyDVD and CloneDVD2 two years ago (and later the HD upgrade for the AnyDVD ripper) and they are still going strong with frequent and free updates and it has worked on hundreds of DVDs and a few Blu-Rays and several HD-DVD disks too ever since.
      I NEVER pay Real Networks for anything...

    5. Re:Yeah, was going to say by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Region encoding is the biggest bullshit ever. I moved from Canada to Germany, brought my DVDs over, and my friends can't play them because of region encoding. Great. And they wonder why people download? Fuck you MPAA.

      Not so much the MPAA, but the film companies and distributors worldwide. We already had a region-free experiment ("HD-DVD"), and while consumer opinion was one thing, theatre owners worldwide were much more upset because the HD-DVD would be released in one region (e.g., North America) while it was still in theatres, or had yet to even premier in another region! (There apparently was a small bit of business importing and exporting HD-DVDs around) This led to studios refusing to release the HD-DVD version of a movie when the DVD came out, and was one of the many reasons for its demise (after all, the DVD was already out, who'd want to wait for the high-def version? Delaying the DVD release was a no-go, too).

      Can't say the DVD Forum folks didn't try in removing a number of the more objectionable parts of the DVD spec...

    6. Re:Yeah, was going to say by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      They wouldn't have been able to watch them anyways, because their TVs use a different standard than Canada's do (slower framerate, more lines per frame).

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
    7. Re:Yeah, was going to say by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure most reasonablly modern PAL TVs can handle the NTSC framerate/line count just fine.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    8. Re:Yeah, was going to say by pruss · · Score: 1

      That's not the only way you can play a non-R1/U DVD. Another way is to buy a cheap IDE DVD-ROM drive, hook it up to a cheap USB-IDE adapter, and watch the movie on a computer (e.g., a laptop hooked up to a TV). No legal problems of any sort. Standard DVD software will set the DVD-ROM drive's region to whatever the region of the disc is, so you may need to get more DVD-ROM drives for more regions. But DVD-ROM drives are cheap--you can get them for about the price of a DVD.

      It's a bit ridiculous to buy five DVD-ROM drives, and then one has to store them and hook them up. But at least it's perfectly legal. (It's also a reason not to throw out old DVD-ROM drives.)

      The possibility of doing this was one of the reasons the Copyright Office hasn't made a DMCA exception for DVDs not available in R1 or U.

      If one can get one's hands on one of the really early DVD-ROM drives where the region code was stored in software, one can also do this by having one DVD-ROM drive, but more than set of DVD player software. For a while I had two pieces of DVD player software on my Windows desktop for precisely this reason, each set to a different region.

    9. Re:Yeah, was going to say by Chaos+Incarnate · · Score: 1

      Interesting, given that the reverse isn't true...

      --
      Benford's Corollary to Clarke's Law: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
  16. Doesn't this still... by Coopjust · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...violate the DCMA, regardless of the limitations? It cracks encryption without permission of the copyright holder...

    Even so, I'll agree with other /.ers and say that I think that the title is deceptive- when people think of DVD movies, they think of movies that will play in their car or living room, not in a limited number of computers.

    1. Re:Doesn't this still... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Unless they have permission.

      Real probably has a CSS license kicking around somewhere, at the very least.

    2. Re:Doesn't this still... by MrZilla · · Score: 3, Informative

      It does not violate the DMCA, since they do not remove the CSS, and they have a license to use it.

      --
      mov ax, 4c00h
      int 21h
    3. Re:Doesn't this still... by Coopjust · · Score: 1

      But don't they modify the CSS in some form? Is it even still CSS, as it cannot be played in a standards compliant DVD player?

    4. Re:Doesn't this still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C:\>_

  17. Real shoots itself in the head again by DrXym · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Real just don't have a clue. If they had any sense their software would work like this:
    • You can rip any unencrypted DVD you like via a 1-click tool. For free. It takes 2-5 hours after which you have a lovely H264 or AVC file to do with as you please.
    • You can insert any encrypted DVD you like and instantly download a DRM'd digital copy of it for $2.
    • You can buy / rent movies from Real Network's online service.
      • The result is people would flock to Real Player just like they flocked to iTunes when it offered free CD ripping.

        Attempting to bilk people for $30 software that makes a DRM'd copy of a movie just isn't going to fly when free and non-free tools already exist that rip DVDs to any format you like. Especially when Real Networks is reknowned for producing bloated spyware laced crap. If you want to go free, find DVD Decrypter & Handbrake and you can rip and encode movies suitable for a variety of formats and devices. If you want non-free then use AnyDVD and Nero Recode. The tools are not as simple as they could be but they work and they work extremely well.

    1. Re:Real shoots itself in the head again by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      after which you have a lovely H264 or AVC file

      Wow, H264 or AVC? What if I want an MPEG-4 Part 10 file?

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:Real shoots itself in the head again by Trauma_Hound1 · · Score: 1

      So which Real Product currently has spyware in it?

      --
      Don't Vote for Norm Dicks! http://www.nodicks2008.com Another nutless dirtbag that voted for the FISA bill!
    3. Re:Real shoots itself in the head again by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Sorry I meant to say ASP.

    4. Re:Real shoots itself in the head again by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can rip any unencrypted DVD you like via a 1-click tool. For free. It takes 2-5 hours after which you have a lovely H264 or AVC file to do with as you please.

      Who would pay MPEG-LA and various other patent holders for a license to use H.264 and friends? Or did you mean s/H264/Theora/g?

    5. Re:Real shoots itself in the head again by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      No worries. I figured you meant something like that. I just couldn't pass up the opportunity for a little jab. : )

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    6. Re:Real shoots itself in the head again by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Who would pay MPEG-LA and various other patent holders for a license to use H.264 and friends? Or did you mean s/H264/Theora/g?

      Real would of course. Providing a free and useful ripping tool is how they attract people to pay for the digital downloads and other $$$ services that their product would contain. Let users rip their unencrypted content, but charge to rip protected content. Some people would of course know how to circumvent the whole protected / unprotected thing but many wouldn't and would pay up. It's likely that RealPlayer already has software codecs so I don't see it being a big deal. It's the smart thing to do. Sticking a pricetag of $30 on it is frankly ludicrous. If people want rip software they can get it for free, and may already have Nero Recode or something analogous bundled with their DVD rewriter.

      It's no different from how Apple did things with iTunes. They managed to provide free music ripping even though MP3 and I'm sure AAC are both patented. The player / ripper functionality of iTunes even used to be a separate commercial product called SoundJam.

      But then again, Apple seem to have more of a clue how these things work than Real. Maybe part of the problem is that studios are tying the hands of Real, Apple etc. in their digital download negotiations to keep ripping tools out of these things. Which would suck if true. Still, it's fairly straightforward to rip or backup DVDs if you have the time and inclination.

  18. It's not a DVD copier by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

    "the DVDs it makes will only be playable on the computer where they were created" - i.e., they are not copies of the original DVD's, and probably not DVD's at all.

    Looks like a completely useless product, and the fact that it got Slashvertised shows that some people have no sense of shame at all.

  19. Where does the money go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people who made the movies, or the software creators?

  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. TOTALLY worthless by v1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Two step process for me. Mac The Ripper to decrypt/rip the entire DVD (menus and all) to a VIDEO_TS folder on my hard drive. Insert CD, click a button. Not too technical.

    From there I can use VLC to play it as much as I want on any computer I copy it to. Can have a large HD full of complete DVDs immediately accessible. (and there are apps that will jukebox them for you)

    From there I have to use a commercial app like Roxio's Toast to burn it to a physical CD, that works in a real DVD player. But Toast has always been a very good product, worth the coin. Drag and drop the VIDEO_TS folder into Toast and click burn. Only slightly more technical procedure than MTR.

    Did I mention MTR strips out the NOOPs ("operation not permitted" when trying to FF past the FBI warning etc) and also removes region coding, during the rip?

    Who on earth would pay for REALcrap?

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:TOTALLY worthless by Karlt1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just an FYI, if you have Mac OS X 10.5, you can place the Video_TS folder into the Movies folder (or an alias) and use Front Row.

    2. Re:TOTALLY worthless by zaren · · Score: 1

      "One" step process for me.

      Fast DVD Copy to re-compile DVD and burn it to another DVD with my Mac. I only have a single-layer burner, so I get to walk through and de-select content like foreign language audio (like I can speak French!) to make some discs fit, but there's still things shipping these days on single-sided media that will fit with no re-compression.

      This is how I protect the investment I make on the DVDs I buy for the kids - make a backup, give the kids the backup, hide the original. When the backup gets trashed, just re-copy the original.

      --
      Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
    3. Re:TOTALLY worthless by v1 · · Score: 1

      oh that is good to know. I was going to ask around for jukebox software recommendations, but if front row works, that's just fine.

      I wonder when Disk Utility will support burning VIDEO_TS folders?

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    4. Re:TOTALLY worthless by Evardsson · · Score: 1

      From Mac The Ripper - you can use DVD2One to create a burnable image. (If you like.) That is the reason that all my import DVDs are stashed away safely in storage and I watch on copies burned on DL DVDs. That way when the disk gets damaged it costs me around fifty cents to replace (since I buy the discs in the 50 or 100 packs when they are on sale) rather than paying another 20 - 30 dollars for a new copy of the import.

      --
      Death looks every man in the face. All any man can do is look back and smile. - Marcus Aurelius
    5. Re:TOTALLY worthless by greed · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're willing to drive a commandline, you can use mkisofs to make an ISO out of that VIDEO_TS folder. Er, and install cdrtools either yourself, through fink, or through the other open-source repository thing that isn't fink but I don't use 'cause I already learned fink by the time it came around.

      % ls -F MyDVD
      AUDIO_TS/
      VIDEO_TS/
      % mkisofs -dvd-video -o MyDVD.iso MyDVD

      Pretty sure that's all that's needed. Now you can burn with cdrecord or DiskUtility.

      I'm NOT sure about getting usable dual-layer ISOs out of this. You'd lose the layer break location from the original, which was lost when MTR ripped the disc. That's part of why DVDDecrypter uses that meta-file in addition to the ISO file; since an ISO file is actually a headerless file containing exactly the data to go on the DVD. There's no control information, like layer break. (And that meta-file also keeps track of which files to use to make the ISO when splitting the rip into smaller chunks.)

      DVDPlayer is happy with the resulting ISO (as mounted by DiskUtility), though I must say, DVD playback over 64 colour VNC is really, really funny.

    6. Re:TOTALLY worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From there I have to use a commercial app like Roxio's Toast to burn it to a physical CD, that works in a real DVD player. But Toast has always been a very good product, worth the coin. Drag and drop the VIDEO_TS folder into Toast and click burn. Only slightly more technical procedure than MTR.

      Mac users have to pay for this basic functionality in a user-friendly form? ImgBurn, which does that and much more, is one example of free Windows software that doesn't have an equally good free equivalent in OS X. Picasa 3 (better than iPhoto) is another example.

    7. Re:TOTALLY worthless by MojoStan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      TOTALLY worthless

      Two step process for me. Mac The Ripper to decrypt/rip the entire DVD (menus and all) to a VIDEO_TS folder on my hard drive.

      Who on earth would pay for REALcrap?

      Maybe those that think that, unlike Mac the Ripper, REALcrap is "legal" software from a legitimate company? TFA even mentions Mac the Ripper and calls it "illegal":

      • "Since then, anyone who wanted to make a backup copy of his "Star Wars" or "Lost" DVDs had to turn to free but illegal programs on the Web, with names like Handbrake and Mac the Ripper. These programs are hard to legally stop because they have many creators who are typically overseas and have few resources. They are used mostly by sophisticated Internet aficionados who may just as easily download movies directly from illicit file-sharing services."

      Of course, most Slashdot readers have banned RealNetworks from their computers because of their past asshole-ish behavior. They're also "sophisticated" enough to use the free alternatives. However, some less sophisticated computer users may be scared by recent news headlines of home users being sued by content creators. Software from RealNetworks makes them feel safe from litigation.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  22. Seems inefficient by oneal13rru · · Score: 1

    Really doesn't seem like an efficient way to go about trying to be competitive in the digital content market... maybe if they were giving away software that let you do what it does, with an online store to download... oh right, ITunes, the product they're trying to compete with... I'm gonna go with this product being screwed from the get-go.

    --
    Never disregard the raw power inherent to stupidity... they call it "dumb luck" for a reason...
  23. I've never heard of a business model... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that involved publishing a product in order to get sued into oblivion.

  24. Unfortunately, it won't rip to an iPod by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1

    Of course. That would actually be useful. Can't do that...the movie studios/MPAA would get all upset.

    Guess I'll have to keep doing it myself...

  25. Not a chance I'd use it by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 0, Troll

    I would rather dive into a swimming pool full of Ebola, triple-edged razor blades, lemon juice, and pig doots than use any software from that "R" named firm.

    Every time I've been stupid and downloaded their crap, thinking, "it used to be sooooo bad, any improvement would be a treeemendous improvement", I've had to delete it within the hour. Way too much glop in there.

  26. How hard? by ledow · · Score: 4, Informative

    DVD Decrypter, DVD Shrink. How hard is it, really?

    I could teach my wife to do that in about five minutes. As an added bonus, it's free, it removes region protection, it removes UOP's (possibly the most annoying part of the DVD format to most people), keeps all the menus, shrinks it onto the cheaper single-layer DVD-R's with virtually zero visible difference and it doesn't have silly restrictions. A program with silly restrictions to stop a particular format from having silly restrictions?

    I just backed up a couple of my boxsets using this because they were slightly damaged when we took them on holiday with us and I don't want to pay for them again if we do damage them. The majority of the time was spent looking at a little window wending its way through the DVD and swapping discs (I only had the one DVD-writer drive plugged in at the time and had to swap original for blank constantly).

    I even did it using WINE because the PC with the writer was a home Linux server, and it worked perfectly. I very much doubt you could make it THAT much simpler, except possibly joining the two programs together and incurring the wrath of the DVD industry by doing so (does this software strip region-protection? It doesn't mention it).

    I can't see anybody using this... people "in-the-know" enough to distinguish between DVD-R, DVD+R, DVD-RW, DVD+RW, DVD-RAM etc. and who know that this "is possible" are probably already doing it. I can't even get my parents to copy their CD's before they scratch them and that's a one-click operation. I can't see them doing it for their DVD's even if it's a one-click operation with this software. And, to be honest, I'd rather show them the "two-click" method that gets rids of the UOPS because that would astound them and they would kill to have that feature on their existing DVD's.

    1. Re:How hard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I could teach my wife to do that in about five minutes.
      Why is this relevant, is your wife retarded?.

    2. Re:How hard? by tepples · · Score: 1

      DVD Decrypter, DVD Shrink. How hard is it, really?

      True, I can find DVDFab HD Decrypter just fine, but the first several results on Google for dvd shrink say "we're not allowed to host this nor tell you where it is hosted; use Google". So it is hard. That said, I use VirtualDub-MPEG2 and AC-3 ACM to turn DVDs into AVIs so that I can play them in a DivX player or use Avisynth to make remixes.

    3. Re:How hard? by Shagg · · Score: 1

      the first several results on Google for dvd shrink say "we're not allowed to host this nor tell you where it is hosted; use Google"

      That's OK. It comes as part of Nero now, so you don't have to look very hard.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    4. Re:How hard? by otherniceman · · Score: 1

      I could teach my wife to do that in about five minutes.

      Why is this relevant, is your wife retarded?.

      no this is Slashdot, he is bragging.

    5. Re:How hard? by Draek · · Score: 1

      Probably not, but is Real marketing this product to retards? no, they're catering to a large segment of the population that consists of perfectly normal people who just happen to be ignorant about technology. And if his wife fits that profile (as implied in his post), then it *is* relevant.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    6. Re:How hard? by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 1

      I even did it using WINE because the PC with the writer was a home Linux server, and it worked perfectly. I very much doubt you could make it THAT much simpler, except possibly joining the two programs together and incurring the wrath of the DVD industry by doing so...

      k9copy would be what you are looking for...

      --
      A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    7. Re:How hard? by ledow · · Score: 1

      Tried it. It was horrible. It crashed on several particular DVD's (despite having the latest version, and the DVD's reading perfectly in everything else) and it couldn't handle some feature that I wanted (I can't remember what off-hand - possibly UOP's, I can't remember). I think also that it just didn't like my Slackware installation because I had lots of unexplained, simple crashes despite having all the prerequisites.

      I spent hours looking for a native Linux program, mainly because I had used one on an older PC to do this the first time I heard it was possible. I spent several hours playing with vobcopy and friends trying to get it to do what I wanted, k9copy, a few others like DVD::Shrink etc. In the end, the dependency nightmare got the better of me and as I just wanted a one-click program that could do it simply I decided to go the "easy" route and just ran two point-and-click Windows programs in Wine instead. I hated myself for it, but the only point-and-click program (k9copy) just refused to run reliably. I was in no mood for debugging that day either.

    8. Re:How hard? by pedestrian+crossing · · Score: 1

      That probably says more about Slackware's (lack of) package management than anything else. I'm using k9copy (and DVD::Rip) on Debian without a hitch.

      BTW, xine happily ignores region coding and UOP's if you are set up to watch DVDs on your computer...

      --
      A house divided against itself cannot stand.
    9. Re:How hard? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      no, they're catering to a large segment of the population that consists of perfectly normal people who just happen to be ignorant about technology

      They'd say "catering to", I'd say "exploiting", since the software looks like a piece of useless hobbled crap that no-one who knew better would touch with a bargepole, let alone pay for.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  27. Real is not relevant by Huntr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When's the last time Real mattered? They chose the wrong path a long, long time ago and something as stupid as an automatic DRM inserter doesn't get them headed in the right direction. This company seems to have no clue about the realities of digital content use and management.

    1. Re:Real is not relevant by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 2, Funny

      When's the last time Real mattered? They chose the wrong path a long, long time ago and something as stupid as an automatic DRM inserter doesn't get them headed in the right direction. This company seems to have no clue about the realities of digital content use and management.

      I remember mocking its 1998 version as obsolete back in 1998, and since then they seem to have fallen farther behind their competition. So maybe 1997.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  28. Free tools are hard by digitalhermit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unlike free alternatives, which generally require some technical knowledge and make it difficult to copy an entire DVD with extras, etc.,...

    What??? Maybe you're right.. there are a ton of steps..

    Using DVDShrink and CDBurnerXP. Steps to copy a disk:

    1) Insert DVD.
    2) Launch DVDShrink.
    3) Select Open Disc.
    4) Select Backup.
    5) Choose Backup location (make note of this location).
    6) When complete, exit DVDShrink.
    7) Launch CDBurnerXP.
    8) Select Burn Disc from ISO.
    9) Eject the source DVD and insert a blank DVD.
    10) Select the source ISO.
    11) Press Burn.
    12) Wait

    Actual time outside of the wait is about 20 seconds of real work.. Of course, I've listed EVERY step. If I detailed how to save a file in Notepad it would take quite a few steps...

    1) Wait until the computer boots.
    2) Click on Start.
    3) Click on All Programs.
    4) Click on Accessories.
    5) Click on Notepad.
    6) Type your message into the editing window.
    7) Click on File.
    8) Click on Save.
    9) When prompted, select a location to save your file.
    10) Press OK. (or SAVE)
    11) Select File.
    12) Select Exit.

    1. Re:Free tools are hard by B1ackDragon · · Score: 1

      My mother used to make notes exactly like that when I showed her how to do stuff on the computer. She had half a notebook filled up. It makes me shudder just thinking about it.

      --
      The snow doesn't give a soft white damn whom it touches. -- ee cummings
    2. Re:Free tools are hard by Inda · · Score: 1

      Your list in DVD Shrink is too long. I don't have it installed here, nor have I used it in a while, but I'm 99% sure you do not need to save the ISO.

      Us power users like to save ISOs, but Joe Public does not.

      It is a one-click application. Maybe click "Next" to everything...

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    3. Re:Free tools are hard by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      Hehe... look at that.. you can do it all in one tool.

      But that would just completely destroy my argument that free tools are hard to use. :D

    4. Re:Free tools are hard by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      If she could actually remember how to find things in that notebook, be very, very glad. At least that way, you don't have to teach her how to do stuff like that again. And again. And again...

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    5. Re:Free tools are hard by swb · · Score: 1

      The later versions (IIRC, development stopped a couple of years ago) would integrate with Nero and burn the ISO more or less automatically, but you would need two drives to make it purely automatic and not include a swap-in-the-blank step.

      But it is about a simple as it can get, and at least to my eyes, the discs I've backed up really look about as good as the originals, at least on my 42" Grand Wega using a cheap up-converting DVD player. Serious videophiles I'm sure would object, but I've got too many other things to worry about to notice the difference.

    6. Re:Free tools are hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to be nit-picky, but with your example for burning copying a DVD it takes one step to open a program ( i.e. 2) launch dvd shrink) ... but in your example to save a file in notepad it takes five steps (i.e. 1) ... 2) ... 3) ... 4) ... 5) ...)

      although your actual point is semi-valid, your example is pretty bad

    7. Re:Free tools are hard by Shagg · · Score: 1

      My wife does the same thing, then she loses the notebook.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    8. Re:Free tools are hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2) Launch DVDShrink.

      vs

      2) Click on Start.
      3) Click on All Programs.
      4) Click on Accessories.
      5) Click on Notepad.

      Apples to oranges, perhaps? Also, do DVDShrink and CDBurnerXP not require the computer to be running?

    9. Re:Free tools are hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot something...

      9) When prompted, select a location to save your file (make note of this location).

    10. Re:Free tools are hard by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      DVDShrink is on the desktop. Notepad isn't. :p

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    11. Re:Free tools are hard by JDHowells · · Score: 1

      Dammit! That's virtually a terrorist handbook, right there! What is this? Some sort of Pinko propaganda site??

  29. Real?! by Fishbulb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They're still around?

    1. Re:Real?! by Kjella · · Score: 1

      They're still around?

      Old companies never die, their name is simply bought by someone that think delivering a completely different product under the same name will be better than making one for themselves. For example the new SCO had nothing to do with the old real SCO. Napster is still arond too, if only in name. I don't know why they do it, it doesn't bring out one bit of nostalgia in me it's more like they're walking on someone's grave.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Real?! by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      In the case of Napster, I can see John Q. Public being fooled. Napster was, after all, what started the whole music piracy thing. There's a certain quality of rebel-ness to it, and the logo is cool, too.

      Of course, I get the same feeling you do, since I understand how completely different they are, and how they've really got nothing to do with the original Napster.

      But in the case of Real, I really don't see the point. Anyone who would recognize the name would also remember it being nothing but pain. Unless your target market is techno-masochists, this seems like a really dumb idea.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  30. AnyDVD from Slysoft by WinterSilence · · Score: 1

    Slysofts AnyDVD (perhaps combined with their CloneDVD)can already very easily do that job for you backing up your DVD's to 1-1 images - if DVD-shrink or DVD-Decrypter fails to do the job. That one can also back up HD-DVD and Blu-Ray discs with an extra add-on package (which all is allowed for personal backups in Denmark where I live). I like those the most cause they make 1-1 images than aren't compressed and they are really easy to use. Just click rip DVD/DISC to image (or files if you would like so). And AnyDVD does the job on an old P-4 2.4 Ghz with 1 gig ram and XP Pro to a USB disk I have in 16-30 minutes per DVD.

    --
    What kind of dog barks "BOFH! BOFH!"? A rootweiler of course...
  31. They still in business? by Twyst3d · · Score: 1

    I mean really? These grossly incompetent idiots are still in business? I mean I cant have possibly been the only person to uninstall real player and avoid anything of theirs and never look back no starting years ago?

    --
    And this has been another installament of Captain Obvious! /whoosh
  32. handbrake is not a DVD copier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NYT article got it wrong re handbrake (http://handbrake.fr). Handbrake does not decrypt the DVD. You have to do that elsewhere. Handbrake only rencodes it, to MP4, for example.

    1. Re:handbrake is not a DVD copier by the+order+of+His+Maj · · Score: 2, Informative

      Only on Windows...
      Handbrake for MacOS X happily DeCSSs your dvds, in addition to having more options and profiles available.

      --
      __
      ipsa scientia potestas est
      "knowledge itself is power" - Francis Bacon
  33. Article doesn't say it goes on sale today. by Trauma_Hound1 · · Score: 1

    This is what the article actually says:
    "The software, which will go on sale on Real.com and Amazon.com this month, will allow buyers to make one copy of a DVD".

    Does not say it will be on sale today.

    --
    Don't Vote for Norm Dicks! http://www.nodicks2008.com Another nutless dirtbag that voted for the FISA bill!
  34. RealNetworks To Introduce a Simple DVD Copier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a joke right?

  35. Real Networks, wants to kill themselves. by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

    As if their crummy media player wasn't doing the job fast enough I guess they figure they could accelerate things by gaining the ire of the MPAA.

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    1. Re:Real Networks, wants to kill themselves. by PPH · · Score: 1

      It appears that they have copied the plot of this movie.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  36. free alternatives are hard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know, the sins of using linux, but...

    vobcopy to rip (encrypted? so what? extras? no problem). One command, one step, one rip

    all content remains, no shrinking, etc. The result can be:

      - played using xine (complete with menus, etc.)
      - burned using k3b and then played in any player

    This whole "article" is slashvertisement vs head-in-sand

    ripping (albeit normally with shrinking) is commonplace. movies get traded in the workplace (and I'm not talking about IT -- I haven't seen any of this where I work, but my friends in non-IT work do it all the time).

    The studios are still trying to pretend that the genie isn't out of the bottle. I discovered the existence of RCE recently. Too bad for the studios it doesn't affect my multiregion player. The improved DRM of HD-DVD and bluray are too little, too late. On Usenet there are bluray rips posted all the time. (I know, I just violated the first rule of Usenet...)

  37. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When there are plenty of progs that will rip in to free open standard formats like DivX.

    I want to rip my paid for DVDs and then dump them on my media server, ready for serving up on either the PCs, TV ( via console ) or pocket media players while down the garden.

  38. Does it run on Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Summary neglects to say whether it runs on Linux. Not that I'm willing to lock my entertainment to one device anyway, as I have three different video technologies in the house already.

  39. Seconded by hummassa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I fail to see DVD copying could be done simpler than with k9copy.
    Insert DVD, click "make DVD copy", wait, done.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:Seconded by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

      Not only is k9copy brain-dead easy to use, it makes it easy to customize your copy.

      Whole-disk copy is a single button click. You can also pick-and-choose titles, languages, and subtitles. It then automatically modifies the original menus, lets you create your own, or sets the main title to auto-play.

      I've never found a more simple to use / powerful DVD copier.

      --
      Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
  40. copy VTS----.vob to hd, play with VLC by RandySC · · Score: 1

    I just copied one the VTS____.vob files from the VIDEO_TS of a commercial DVD to my hard disk. I then played it with VLC player. Was this supposed to be hard?

    --
    Organization: alphabetical, sometimes numerical or messy
    1. Re:copy VTS----.vob to hd, play with VLC by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      If you're going to do that much work, you may as well copy the VIDEO_TS folder entirely, or the disk as an image, and play it with VLC. It just adds another step wherein you have to convince VLC to open the VIDEO_TS folder as a DVD.

      But if you do that, VLC will treat it exactly the same as it treats a real DVD. It doesn't always get the menus perfect (often starts from the wrong place in the menu), but they generally work.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    2. Re:copy VTS----.vob to hd, play with VLC by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Afaict if that works it means either the DVD wasn't protected in the first place (not all publishers bother) or you had some driver installed that was trasparently decrypting the DVD as it was read.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re:copy VTS----.vob to hd, play with VLC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register

      If I was known as "plugwash", I'm not sure I'd be advertising the fact ...

  41. E-paperment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The more interesting product is this one.

  42. Re:FOSS-tastic failure by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    1998 Called.

    It wants it's FUD back.

    The Linux tools are just as good as the Windows and Mac
    tools in this regard. You can have any degree of GUI
    shiny happiness you want.

    You can even do this stuff straight from you couch in MythTV.

    Does MCE support that?

    Don't lie, I have a copy. (need to install proper code support for it, oddly enough)

    As far as TV Series collections go: a cobbled together solution is better than none at all.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  43. Hellooooo? 1994 calling! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello, CD copier guy?

    1994 just called. It says your market window is closing.

  44. k3b plus mplayer or xine with Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can use k3b to copy the DVD to an ISO, then use mplayer or xine, to play the ISO just like a DVD. Two step process, very simple.

  45. ... Just wait till its cracked! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not going to be long before _somebody_ figures out how to modify it in-memory before its been burned (or even after its been burned, via ISO modificaiton) to remove a shitty DRM.

    And my _grandmother_ can use DVDShrink. its scary.

  46. The hell? by Lisandro · · Score: 1

    From TFA: "While sure to raise the ire of Hollywood, the program does have significant limitations: the DVDs it makes will only be playable on the computer where they were created; or, users can pay $20 per computer to play the DVDs on up to five additional computers."

    So, it does NOT create standard DVDs. Right? Meh. I'll stick to DVDShrink, thanks.

    1. Re:The hell? by rjejr · · Score: 1

      They should have called it UnRealDVD since it sure as hell doesn't make a real DVD.

  47. Netflix plus Dvd Decrypter = Heaven by vistahator · · Score: 0

    So easy even a caveman could do it

  48. How Un-Real by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that Real would prefer to pretend that SlySoft doesn't exist.

    Better luck next time...

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  49. What? RealNetworks? by zmollusc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How do RealNetworks stay in business? Are they secretly funded by Microsoft as a distraction? A front for CIA? What the heck is going on?

    I look forward to the advertising campaign:
    'Hey there, do you find the region encoding and DRM on DVD not restrictive or costly enough? Here at RealNetworks we have the answer to your prayers! Order today and we will double the price _and_ infect you with Hepatitis C!'

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  50. I use MacTheRipper even when I use Handbrake. by Neurotic+Nomad · · Score: 1
    Because it's not doing any re-encoding, MacTheRipper rips in one full sweep rther than the spin-up/spin-down/spin-up-again nature of Handbrake.

    THEN I drop the VIDEO_TS folder into Handbrake. It puts a lot less wear and tear on your DVD Drive's motor and the over-all rip/conversion time is about the same.

    I use MacTheRipper to time-shift Netflix rentals and get the most out of my 2-discs at a time membership. (I also have the $99 Roku player and stream old TV shows almost every night, but that's a tale for another thread.) MactheRipper rips to a folder (named after the DVD's Label) directly into my "Movies" folder, and Front Row treats it like a regular DVD.

    I get a DVD and mail back a DVD 4-6 days per week.

  51. Now if they have mp4 conversion that keeps menus.. by dczyz · · Score: 1

    I personally use dvd fab, and very happy with it for backup purposes.

    But what I really would like to find is a dvd ripper that will also convert to mpeg 4 - but in addition keep all of the extras. Allow me to play that off my media server, and keep the controls.

  52. Corporations undermining other corporations by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    You gotta love the state of modern capitalism.

    "Mr. Johnson, the consumers aren't adopting our products!"

    "Well, what can we do?!?!"

    "Perhaps instead of selling anything or contributing anything of value, we could undermine other products that act as direct competitors."

    "Isn't that, like, illegal?"

    "Fuck no. We live in a world where the rules make Ayn Rand look like a fuckin' pinko mole!"

    "Cool. Let's do it. WAIT!"

    "What now?"

    "What if someone does this to out product? Like, say a group of kids introduces a system that allows people to completely bypass our shitty formats and our worthless player?"

    "Aw, hell, boss. We'll sue them so bad their parents will have to sell the basement they code in."

    "Excellent."

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
    1. Re:Corporations undermining other corporations by PPH · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but you have just infringed upon Microsoft's business model. Their lawyers will be contacting yur lawyers shortly.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  53. Any way to transcode to divx on Linux? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

    While we're on the subject, is there any way to transcode DVDs to divx with a .avi container on linux systems?

    I'm trying to create .avi files similar to what I can download from torrents that will play on a DVD player that can also play Ultra Divx files. (see this player: http://www.amazon.com/Philips-DVP5140-Multiformat-Windows-Support/dp/B000F2KUK8/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1220573310&sr=8-1 )

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    1. Re:Any way to transcode to divx on Linux? by burndive · · Score: 1
      --
      ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
  54. They got it all wrong. by suck_burners_rice · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The studios and copyright holders have it all wrong, in my opinion. Instead of charging $20 for a movie with all kinds of copy protection that doesn't prevent piracy (the pirates will ALWAYS find a way around copy protection), they should take Steve Jobs' approach (where do you put the apostrophe on a name that ends with "s"?). Charge $5 for a movie on a media that contains all the copy protection in the world. Charge $20 for the same movie on a media that has NO copy protection. The average viewer doesn't have the technical prowess to copy either type of movie so it doesn't matter anyway. The low price for a movie will mean that it won't make sense to pirate some crappy quality movie and waste the time downloading and burning it onto a disc, so most viewers won't bother; they'll just pay the $5 and purchase it legitimately. For those who feel that non-DRM is somehow better, they'll pay $20. And for those who are going to pirate the movies anyway just because they feel they need a library of 10,000 movies they'll never get around to watching, well, what difference does it make? Suppose they copy the movie. Even if it were NOT available for easy copying, chances are they would NOT shell out any money, even if it were a penny, to buy the movie legitimately. So the studios don't really lose money in this case. Yes, an additional copy of the movie was made and they weren't paid for it, but they wouldn't have been paid for it even if the copy were not made. In other words, make the movies cheap to buy legitimately and the majority of the population won't bother to pirate them because there won't be any incentive to do so. Chances are the studios will make more profit even though the price per unit is lower because more movies will be sold. Would you pay $3 to rent a movie when you can buy your own copy for $5? Would you bother to burn a copy from a friend that costs $1 for the disc, more if the burn fails a bunch of times and you have to re-do it, and waste the time bothering with it and jumping through all the hoops to make a watchable disc? No way! You'd just drop five bucks and get the damn movie!! I think it's a win-win. Any economist will tell you that when prices are higher, demand is lower and vice versa.

    --
    McCain/Palin '08. Now THAT's hope and change!
    1. Re:They got it all wrong. by EvanED · · Score: 1

      (where do you put the apostrophe on a name that ends with "s"?)

      By almost all sources, either "Steve Jobs' approach" or "Steve Jobs's approach" is acceptable. I advocate the latter simply because I don't like exceptions and it keeps things consistent ("Steve Jobs' approach" isn't, after all, referring to multiple Steve Jobs instances), but whichever you use is up to you.

      (A better question is "how do you pluralize Steve Jobs so you don't have to say 'Steve jobs instances'?")

  55. Re:FOSS-tastic failure by initdeep · · Score: 1

    does MCE support that?

    mine does

    I can use MyMovies (which is a free plugin) to do exactly that, and while doing the rip, it will connect to the MyMovies online database (which is several orders of magnitude better than imdb, amazon, et al) to pull down all of the information about the movies as well.

  56. what kind of business sense does this make? by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    I think RealBuffering, Inc. is using a team of chimpanzees for their business development unit.

    They are selling a shit product that no one wants and tricking users into thinking it's good, though I can't even think of anyone who still thinks realplayer is good.

    They are a shit company who sells shit products and they are irrelevant to anyone who isn't completely ignorant.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  57. Winner! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not only is he correct, but he knows the original/real words that DVD stands for.

    1. Re:Winner! by flonker · · Score: 1

      Not that it matters, but DVD was originally Digital Video Disc. As it became apparent that DVDs were going to be used for more than video, they retconned the acronym to Digital Versatile Disc, and later because "Digital Versatile Disc" was so unwieldy, they simply became DVDs.

      http://www.dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html#1 is one possible reference.

  58. Does this mean that RealNetworks has finally... by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    Has RealNetworks finally figured out that lock-in protection schemes (such as the ones they were so fond of implementing in their RA products), are useless and instead are looking for some new way to make money at someone else's expense? Looks like a desperate move to keep themselves afloat...

  59. a graphical shell around dd by lee+n.+field · · Score: 1

    a graphical shell around dd

  60. What I want: by mightybaldking · · Score: 1

    I want to be able to simply copy my kids' copies of Baby Einstein and Thomas the Tank Engine. I want to be able to modify the content so that: Production and Distributor promos are gone. FBI warning is gone. Menu is gone. Essentially, I want my kids to be able to stick the damn thing in the player and have it play and have it stop playing when it is over. Essentially, I want to turn the DVD into a VHS tape. -- Stick it in and forget about it.

  61. The MPAA should love it... by DaveGod · · Score: 1

    ...because it competes with piracy-friendly alternatives.

    The existing software performs the same function whilst making piracy easy: it's a simple step from ripping to your movie library to giving a friend a copy. If those people instead use RealDVD, the purchaser gets to do what they wanted with the movie they paid for, but the avenue for piracy is removed.

    The net effect is to increase consumer satisfaction while competing with piracy. Unfortunately the movie industry seem opposed to doing either, instead opting to pay good money in order to diminish customer satisfaction with DRM and bludgeon piracy with lawyers.

  62. Here ya go Lunix Freaks by PenGun · · Score: 1

    #!/bin/sh
    rm stream.dvd
    mkfifo -m 666 stream.dvd &&
    sleep 1
    dd if=/dev/dvd1 of=stream.dvd &
    sleep 1
    growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/dvd=stream.dvd &&

        I call it 'dupedvd', /dev/dvd1 is the reader and /dev/dvd the writer. 'Sleep' keeps fast machines from tripping over themselves.

  63. FUCK Real networks by Brain+Damaged+Bogan · · Score: 1

    their products are all bloated with adware... and since when was copying an entire dvd difficult? dvdShrink takes all of 4 clicks to copy an entire dvd, menus and all, and two of those clicks are opening the shortcut on your desktop!

    --
    -- Sex is the antonym of pringles. Once you pop it's time to stop.
  64. Sounds very complicated by dezent · · Score: 1

    I use the lovely program dd on my macbook pro to copy dvd, works great the only problem is that you cant eject a cd after you used the other great program, umount.

  65. Legality by pruss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, if it turns out that RealDVD works legally, then that would be a reason to use RealDVD, given that most if not all of the free alternatives are illegal.

    IANAL, but I can kind of see how RealDVD might turn out to be legal, while the free options aren't. The free options mostly involve unauthorized DeCSS (a possible exception might be products that capture the output of licensed DVD player software), thereby violating the DMCA. RealDVD could, however, do what I understand Kaleidescope did: use a legally licensed DeCSS from the DVD-CCA folks, and then, because of a loophole in the DVD-CCA licensing, capture the decrypted video to a hard drive for playing back later. In effect, the claim could be that the computer running RealDVD becomes a complex DVD player with delayed playback--it decrypts DVDs perfectly legally using a licensed DeCSS, and then plays back the decrypted output later, using a DVD-R as an intermediary.

    I would have thought the DVD-CCA people would have closed this loophole in their licensing after the Kaleidescope case, but maybe RealNetworks got a license earlier or something.

  66. Re:FOSS-tastic failure by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    You know... I don't have a lot of confidence in something
    named "movies" to be very accomodating to those of us that
    might have 70 or 80 TV boxed sets sitting on the shelf.

    NONE of their examples seem to include what I am talking about.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  67. This is new? See Drive-In by iWiring · · Score: 1

    Sounds like Drive-In from Flip4Mac http://www.flip4mac.com/drivein.htm

    --
    -dhan
  68. Re:I'm questioning it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see your point, but anything I own on DVD I'd have already downloaded and burned-- no ripping necessary.

    While I *do* end up buying the stuff I like, I find downloading first and buying second to be a much better system for me than buying first and realizing it sucks second.

    Until comcast decides to come light me on fire, I'll continue to let my digital army of highschool-aged toadies do the ripping for me, thanks much.

  69. Alternatives have been around forever by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Just a few programs that can do the same, very easily:

    DVDShrink (free)
    RatDVD (free?)
    CloneDVD (commercial)

    Combine any of these with AnyDVD, or DVD43 (free) and you can rip or copy just about any disc in a matter of minutes.

    Throw in AutoGK and you can convert them to AVI with very little effort.

    If you're willing to install absolutely horrible software, Nero does it too, as long as you have AnyDVD or DVD43 to break the CSS encryption. This RealDVD app is very very late, they should have released it six years ago.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  70. Flame by wye43 · · Score: 1

    Posting this article on slashdot its obviously a troll action.