Cat IIIc refers to zero visibility / zero decision height landing conditions. Cat IIIc is not required for autopilot landings, just autopilot landings in zero visibility.
Autopilot landings are possible on any runway with an ILS system.
Don't fly then. Most commercial airliners and airports are equipped for it and it is used all the time. Pilots are recquired to make a certain number of manual landings to maintain their skills but otherwise there's no reason for them to land manually.
I don't think we're really talking about remote control here. Just a switch that once flipped prevents a terrorist or anybody else from disengaging the autopilot which will then proceed to land the plane at an airport which is equiped for automatic landings (most of them).
Pretty much all commercial airliners can and do land automatically. I'd be interested to hear of any that can be confirmed as not capable of automatic landing. Of course the more modern the plane the more capable the autopilot... for example I think the latest 777s only require a pilot to take the plane up to a few hundred feet before the autopilot takes over.
No - but generally business decisions should be geared toward producing a better product than your competition rather than looking for ways to eliminate the competition so you can sell your product no matter how bad it is.
Ever sent a CD out for duplication ? If you are the copyright holder you can't sue the duplicator for making copies after you instructed them to do it. Assuming Bob Dylan is the holder of the copyright on his recordings he really can't sue somebody for copying his work after he asks them to. Distributing copies without permission to somebody other than the copyright holder is a violation.
Third party or not he's doing this on behalf of the RIAA which means that it's as if the RIAA is doing it. The infringement does not exist because the RIAA can't infringe their own copyrights. Simply sharing the folder isn't infringement, the RIAA needs to provide some level of proof that a non-RIAA individual actually downloaded the file. Otherwise no copy has been made, copyright law deals in the right to copy.
I thought the main problem with validation was that microsoft had cancelled a number of volume license keys because of piracy. I've had HP computers that will happily install using the license key on the "Genuine Microsoft" sticker on the computer, only to have them fail at activation with "Your license key is invalid"
The problem for the RIAA is that their investigator can't download the song himself and then use that as an example of infringement because it is a legal impossibility to violate your own copyright. So the courts are being asked to find against somebody on the basis that somebody else probably downloaded the song. This is a poor standard of proof.
The other reason for making it required is to stop the insurance beancounters coming in and deciding they'd rather pay for 100 cases of cancer than 1,000,000 vaccinations.
As a person who has been through the process - it's not as easy as it sounds - it takes forever for an application to get processed. During the processing period you are deemed as authorized by the secreatary of state to remain in the US - but it's not like they give you a piece of paper that says that. You get a cash register receipt which I suppose is proof of a pending application and a work permit card that disclaims any use as proof of immigration status and they take your entry/exit receipt from your passport so you can't use that to prove legal entry.
I was actually told i couldn't open an account with a green card and had to go get a drivers license. The licensing office looked at me funny when I asked where the check writing test was.
The other problem with a green card is that it takes about 3 years to get one even though you are here legally for that time but have nothing to prove it other than a laminated employment authorization card which almost everybody claims is not valid ID.
I don't think the law spells out which forms of documentation you're required to produce to prove your identity. If it does then the banks don't know about it because they act really confused if you don't produce a drivers license.
Additionally - what does immigration status have to do with bank accounts ? there are a lot of people that spend a lot of time legally in the USA without ever obtaining permanent resident status (business visitors and such) should they be denied access to banks too ?
This clears up most of the methods. Also I've heard of discs deviating from the standard by reducing the error correction data in the audio tracks to leave room for the data track.
Oddly enough the perjury thing rarely applies because :
Big corporation owns ABC
You post XYZ
Big coporation serves notice saying that under penalty of perjury they own the copyright on ABC. XYZ appears to infringe this copyright and must be taken down.
See how it works? - they only thing they swear to is ownership of ABC, not that XYZ is in fact a copy of ABC.
Philips has been very clear informing trademark licensees that the words "Compact Disc" and the "Compact Disc Digital Audio" logos may not be used on discs incorporating DRM.
I'm getting bored of typing this stuff. Private industry is the one doing it and they're not doing it cheaper :
The united space alliance (Boeing & Lockheed) handles servicing and prep. on the space shuttle - Nasa runs mission control Orion & Ares will be built by the united space alliance. The Rovers on mars are operated by JPL - which oddly enough is a LAB at CIT operating under a contract with Nasa.
Slashdot Mirror
Cat IIIc refers to zero visibility / zero decision height landing conditions. Cat IIIc is not required for autopilot landings, just autopilot landings in zero visibility.
Autopilot landings are possible on any runway with an ILS system.
Don't fly then. Most commercial airliners and airports are equipped for it and it is used all the time. Pilots are recquired to make a certain number of manual landings to maintain their skills but otherwise there's no reason for them to land manually.
I don't think we're really talking about remote control here. Just a switch that once flipped prevents a terrorist or anybody else from disengaging the autopilot which will then proceed to land the plane at an airport which is equiped for automatic landings (most of them).
Pretty much all commercial airliners can and do land automatically. I'd be interested to hear of any that can be confirmed as not capable of automatic landing. Of course the more modern the plane the more capable the autopilot ... for example I think the latest 777s only require a pilot to take the plane up to a few hundred feet before the autopilot takes over.
After two years of Sirius I can't imagine why people would listen to XM so much. Seriously I have XM from directv - but it just lacks something.
No - but generally business decisions should be geared toward producing a better product than your competition rather than looking for ways to eliminate the competition so you can sell your product no matter how bad it is.
Actually a septic tank provides a home for bacteria & enzymes which break down the waste.
Ever sent a CD out for duplication ? If you are the copyright holder you can't sue the duplicator for making copies after you instructed them to do it. Assuming Bob Dylan is the holder of the copyright on his recordings he really can't sue somebody for copying his work after he asks them to. Distributing copies without permission to somebody other than the copyright holder is a violation.
I'm not the only stupid one then : http://www.joegratz.net/archives/2005/09/02/p2p-de fendant-riaas-own-downloads-cant-prove-infringemen t/ - lawyers who know more about this than me use the same arguments.
Those were two different observations .. I wasn't suggesting that the OEM sticker contained a volume license key - I should have made that clearer.
Third party or not he's doing this on behalf of the RIAA which means that it's as if the RIAA is doing it. The infringement does not exist because the RIAA can't infringe their own copyrights. Simply sharing the folder isn't infringement, the RIAA needs to provide some level of proof that a non-RIAA individual actually downloaded the file. Otherwise no copy has been made, copyright law deals in the right to copy.
I thought the main problem with validation was that microsoft had cancelled a number of volume license keys because of piracy. I've had HP computers that will happily install using the license key on the "Genuine Microsoft" sticker on the computer, only to have them fail at activation with "Your license key is invalid"
The problem for the RIAA is that their investigator can't download the song himself and then use that as an example of infringement because it is a legal impossibility to violate your own copyright. So the courts are being asked to find against somebody on the basis that somebody else probably downloaded the song. This is a poor standard of proof.
The other reason for making it required is to stop the insurance beancounters coming in and deciding they'd rather pay for 100 cases of cancer than 1,000,000 vaccinations.
You really don't need to have sex to get HPV - although the chances are much lower. Papillomaviruses can be contracted without skin to skin contact.
I don't like this because it forces young girls to get vaccinated against a disease that they can prevent by simply not having sex
Yeah that's realistic - other than nuns who never has sex ?
HPV can survive outside of the body for some time so it's possible to contract many HPV strains without any direct contact.
As a person who has been through the process - it's not as easy as it sounds - it takes forever for an application to get processed. During the processing period you are deemed as authorized by the secreatary of state to remain in the US - but it's not like they give you a piece of paper that says that. You get a cash register receipt which I suppose is proof of a pending application and a work permit card that disclaims any use as proof of immigration status and they take your entry/exit receipt from your passport so you can't use that to prove legal entry.
I was actually told i couldn't open an account with a green card and had to go get a drivers license. The licensing office looked at me funny when I asked where the check writing test was.
The other problem with a green card is that it takes about 3 years to get one even though you are here legally for that time but have nothing to prove it other than a laminated employment authorization card which almost everybody claims is not valid ID.
I don't think the law spells out which forms of documentation you're required to produce to prove your identity. If it does then the banks don't know about it because they act really confused if you don't produce a drivers license.
Additionally - what does immigration status have to do with bank accounts ? there are a lot of people that spend a lot of time legally in the USA without ever obtaining permanent resident status (business visitors and such) should they be denied access to banks too ?
Was he referring to size or taste ?
But have you considered that the ice cube would likely be freshwater (most of them are) which is itself less dense that salt water.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Book_(audio_CD_st andard)
This clears up most of the methods. Also I've heard of discs deviating from the standard by reducing the error correction data in the audio tracks to leave room for the data track.
Oddly enough the perjury thing rarely applies because :
Big corporation owns ABC
You post XYZ
Big coporation serves notice saying that under penalty of perjury they own the copyright on ABC. XYZ appears to infringe this copyright and must be taken down.
See how it works? - they only thing they swear to is ownership of ABC, not that XYZ is in fact a copy of ABC.
Philips has been very clear informing trademark licensees that the words "Compact Disc" and the "Compact Disc Digital Audio" logos may not be used on discs incorporating DRM.
I'm getting bored of typing this stuff. Private industry is the one doing it and they're not doing it cheaper :
The united space alliance (Boeing & Lockheed) handles servicing and prep. on the space shuttle - Nasa runs mission control
Orion & Ares will be built by the united space alliance.
The Rovers on mars are operated by JPL - which oddly enough is a LAB at CIT operating under a contract with Nasa.