I know we've seen worse in science reporting, but 'overzealous' is not a helpful term to use in describing the immune system.
They still saying acid produced by bacteria is the underlying cause, so nothing new there, *but* they've identified a mismatch between the immune system's strategy for responding to the bacteria and the altered chemical environment created by said bacteria, and that insight potentially could prove very valuable in determining improved treatments.
I honestly have no idea who you mean. Historians certainly have no consensus as to who was most responsible for the library's destruction, or even in which century the worst things happened. Or did you mean the founder, who was proabably one of the Ptolemies?
When I saw the headline my first thought was they were saying it was good news that it was only two out of three and not any higher. Maybe I'm too cynical.
I know the notion of "artificial intelligence" can really get stretched but this seems like they're conflating AI with "anyting on a computer". Definitely you want computers doing this (because of the volume of data), but aside from a little bit of classifying building types or land use there isn't much more than simple counting involved.
I am unsurprised by the notion of taking away a free service that is really not encroaching on the private sector to many meaningful degree, but what's with the Orwellian langauge? No-one is fooled about who this is putting first.
Now, I realize even humans are not 100% perfect at recognizing faces, but is facial recognition really good enough for this kind of application? You know it will get it wrong at least some of the time.
I hate the time changes but it may be going a little too far to completely abolish it everywhere. At high lattitudes, it does make a certain amount of sense. Daylight at 9:00pm really is more useful than daylight at 4:00am.
The problem has been politicians doing it for show (2005 US Congress, and a bunch of weak-willed Canadian politicans who followed suit for no reason) for locations where the benefits were minor if not outright imaginary.
Slashdot Mirror
I know we've seen worse in science reporting, but 'overzealous' is not a helpful term to use in describing the immune system.
They still saying acid produced by bacteria is the underlying cause, so nothing new there, *but* they've identified a mismatch between the immune system's strategy for responding to the bacteria and the altered chemical environment created by said bacteria, and that insight potentially could prove very valuable in determining improved treatments.
I think it's just a rumour for now.
Lucas couldn't make it worse.
(Not something I would have said after the prequel trilogy, but times change.)
It's not like they were subtle about it. They even have "con" in their name.
Before the printing press the scarcity was not artificial. Intellectual property wasn't even an idea until the modern era.
But you REMEMBER him, that was his entire point.
I honestly have no idea who you mean. Historians certainly have no consensus as to who was most responsible for the library's destruction, or even in which century the worst things happened. Or did you mean the founder, who was proabably one of the Ptolemies?
From the summary I can't tell if I'm supposed to mock Google for re-inventing message boards or mock Google for re-inventing e-mail.
I really hope that's irony but shocking number of people actually think like that.
The deaf are very obviously not being distracted by anything they hear.
If taxation is theft then using any government service is also theft.
When I saw the headline my first thought was they were saying it was good news that it was only two out of three and not any higher. Maybe I'm too cynical.
I know the notion of "artificial intelligence" can really get stretched but this seems like they're conflating AI with "anyting on a computer". Definitely you want computers doing this (because of the volume of data), but aside from a little bit of classifying building types or land use there isn't much more than simple counting involved.
Why facebook?
Remember who Facebook works for. (Advertisers if you forgot.)
I am unsurprised by the notion of taking away a free service that is really not encroaching on the private sector to many meaningful degree, but what's with the Orwellian langauge? No-one is fooled about who this is putting first.
He fooled a fingerprint reader using... an exact reproduction of his fingerprint. On the fourth try.
That seems incredibly unsurprising.
Are we sure this is from a "futurist"? People were saying the exact same thing about industrialization 200 years ago.
That sounds like a description of the Pentagon.
Who also have an interest in drones that can approach homes silently.
...how much harm a politician would suffer from the truth.
You can't trademark ordinary English words, thus, Grammarly the proper noun. They got that one right.
Now, I realize even humans are not 100% perfect at recognizing faces, but is facial recognition really good enough for this kind of application? You know it will get it wrong at least some of the time.
A quantum leap is a leap that cannot be made incrementally.
Employers treat employees pretty badly, but is it really asking so much to expect people to behave like professionals while at the workplace?
You mean... we're not earning interest on the daylight we're saving?
Daylight saving time is about the summer, not the winter.
I hate the time changes but it may be going a little too far to completely abolish it everywhere. At high lattitudes, it does make a certain amount of sense. Daylight at 9:00pm really is more useful than daylight at 4:00am.
The problem has been politicians doing it for show (2005 US Congress, and a bunch of weak-willed Canadian politicans who followed suit for no reason) for locations where the benefits were minor if not outright imaginary.