The newer boxes do. That's how they implement the power saving mode. When the TV has been off for a certain amount of time then the box shuts off unless a recording is scheduled.
Who cares? I want an accurate fast cheap diagnosis.
The human will not stop at looking at a picture. Anything that's suspicious will be tested. The 95% for the CNN, by itself, is not good enough. That remaining 5% is quite a large percentage of the non-obvious portion.
They are the ones who will benefit the most. Taxis and buses will become much cheaper. Owning a car will be relatively uncommon. No need to maintain "an old manual beater" when hiring a car is so inexpensive.
There will be problems during the transition. But once they're all autos and talking to each other that type of problem goes away. My guess is that once people become comfortable with them that will happen quickly. The advantages are too compelling.
it would be useful to tally the number of times that conspiracy theory has become conspiracy fact.
Considering that there is always a conspiracy theory about anything even mildly unknown, then the number of times they became fact would be equal to the number of actual conspiracies. (Unless it isn't, in which case I have a theory about that.)
The text clearly conveys what the author intended, so as language it has succeeded.
ok. But presumably you do concede that the proper way to compare in these case is with "as fast", not faster. Why support doing it incorrectly when the correct way is so simple and clear?
Oh, and be careful with Apple '0%' monthly payments. If you take a second to multiply it out, it's no 0% at all, you end up paying something like 20% more!
It is 0%. You're probably not including Apple Care in your calculation. If you don't want Apple Care, don't do the deal.
It will be all computers anyway. It's just a matter of time here and probably everywhere else too, and the computers won't care about the meat creatures.
Anyway I don't know how it works in the whole world but in the EU corporations don't pay sales taxes.
You're saying that if a corporation buys, for example, a desk, there's no VAT or sales tax in the price? That they would get a better price than an individual would?
It's not like they stop showing ads on demonetized videos, they just stop sharing the profits.
Really? I was under the impression that no ads were run. Didn't this get stirred up because advertisers didn't want to be seen against certain types of videos? And what is the point of demonetizing them? Simply to not have to share? That's short sighted. The most important thing for you tube is preserving their near-monopoly.
Slashdot Mirror
The newer boxes do. That's how they implement the power saving mode. When the TV has been off for a certain amount of time then the box shuts off unless a recording is scheduled.
The human will not stop at looking at a picture. Anything that's suspicious will be tested. The 95% for the CNN, by itself, is not good enough. That remaining 5% is quite a large percentage of the non-obvious portion.
Why are you so rude without making a point? It's obviously going to happen.
They are the ones who will benefit the most. Taxis and buses will become much cheaper. Owning a car will be relatively uncommon. No need to maintain "an old manual beater" when hiring a car is so inexpensive.
There will be problems during the transition. But once they're all autos and talking to each other that type of problem goes away. My guess is that once people become comfortable with them that will happen quickly. The advantages are too compelling.
What a strange statement.
Add some gator-misspellings to that sign and it would be a Far Side comic.
From which language was your comment translated?
It's not required at all. Fingers will work just fine. They've just added support for it.
Not even Apple thinks it's a feature, knee-jerk. Only those other phone makers think that.
What about when your hands are wet? For me the fingerprint never works then.
Amazingly, they are copying the notch , just not the faceID.
Charging for a service is your definition of "greedy"?
Considering that there is always a conspiracy theory about anything even mildly unknown, then the number of times they became fact would be equal to the number of actual conspiracies. (Unless it isn't, in which case I have a theory about that.)
ok. But presumably you do concede that the proper way to compare in these case is with "as fast", not faster. Why support doing it incorrectly when the correct way is so simple and clear?
You're right, it's not ambiguous. In this case it's clearly wrong.
This is good news indeed, as there's plenty of legislation in need of repair.
I'll bet you're a fan of imperial weights and measures too.
Stop missing the point.
It is 0%. You're probably not including Apple Care in your calculation. If you don't want Apple Care, don't do the deal.
Well, obviously it's not meant to be taken literally. It refers to any manufacturers of dairy products.
It will be all computers anyway. It's just a matter of time here and probably everywhere else too, and the computers won't care about the meat creatures.
You're saying that if a corporation buys, for example, a desk, there's no VAT or sales tax in the price? That they would get a better price than an individual would?
Really? I was under the impression that no ads were run. Didn't this get stirred up because advertisers didn't want to be seen against certain types of videos? And what is the point of demonetizing them? Simply to not have to share? That's short sighted. The most important thing for you tube is preserving their near-monopoly.
Maybe they can create a pre-release review phase.