sure, it generally nets less than that, for 1 person.
Now...how many people were on the plane? So thats...100 counts of attempted murder? 25 years sounds light to me...that would only be 3 months for each count.
I was poking him since he didn't understand. You don't understand either, but you're closer. As a dba, I'm quite well aware of how indexes work.
If you're organized, then your docs will be on one general area. As such, running an egrep in there for a phrase really doesn't take much time at all. 20 minutes? hardly. A second, maybe 2. Try it some time.
What it allows me to do is make my/own/ algorythm for what I want displayed.
Is this practical, or even easily plausible, in windows? No. Does everyone know regular expressions? No. Am I saying that no one should use these tools? No. I'm just commenting on the poster that said grep couldn't do what these tools do - they were wrong.
locate doesn't search your emails, nor let you know which files containt things, you could recursive grep, but that doesn't find stuff in pdf files, and takes up a ton of cpu.
Locate - doesn't need to search my emails. gmail does that just fine. Egrep tells me what contains whatever I want. Can google's tool find files that have a line that starts with a number, has 2 words, then repeats the number again? No. Simple regex can blow away anything the google tool can do. I can most certainly find stuff in any binary or doc file, without taking up "a ton of cpu."
See? not saying my way is better for everyone else. Just saying someone who says my way doesn't work, is wrong - my way not only works, its more powerful.
if every document you have is cached, then there are two copies of every document, which is a serious waste of space. I think what you mean to say is that its indexed, but I'm not going to answer all your questions for you.
there's no reason to grep your entire damn harddrive for a single phrase. Use some degree of organization. The business world has limited use for someone who can't keep themselves organized.
finally - egrep will easily find patterns in all sorts of binary files. Creating a tiny little happy gui to search for things in your folders with DOCUMENTS (instead of searching your whole damn hard drive) is easy enough, if typing egrep "Thing I Want" * proves to just be too darn complicated.
I don't need something to search my emails; gmail does that for me. As far as searching my documents on my system...what do you think the google desktop tool (or any other brand) does? They do a recursive grep. So...what's the difference? There is none.
since when are forums blogs? Forums have been around for ages. I was posting in forums nearly 20 years ago, on various BBS's.
Re:to all the nay-sayers out there...
on
Re-Pet a Reality
·
· Score: 1
good point - but there is some good out of this, and the only way to get to that good part is through this method. I'd be *so* much more impressed if each of the people would just give $50k to the research, and then go get a dog or cat from a pound. People won't do that, though.
My point is just that not everyone involved is a bad person. Dr Kraemer is a great guy, for instance...and my wife is tops. Biased opinion that it may be, we are vegetarians, we don't buy anything from a company that does animal testing (you'd be suprized how limiting that is), we don't buy any products made from animal parts. We're not driving a lexus suv and wearing fur, or something.
telomeres (had to have my wife remind me the name) are the major thing clones have to worry about. Each time a cell splits, one is lost...it effectively gives "age" to a cell. So when you clone an animal, you're having an animal that is brand new as a whole organism, but on a cellular level is old. Really, its because an exact clone really *is* an exact clone - of whatever age the animal was when you took the sample.
If we could figure out how to fix that problem, we'd have cloning licked. The key will be in finding the best cell line to use to make the clone.
to all the nay-sayers out there...
on
Re-Pet a Reality
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
My wife worked for Dr Westhusian and Dr Kraemer at Texas A&M for the Missyplicity Project. They founded Genetics Savings and Clones with a couple others, but have since split with them. She has played with CC (Carbon Copy...NOT "CopyCat"). Dr Kraemer is the one that has CC, and named her, so...its his call. Argue with him.
My wife actually cultured the cells that they used for CC. All very cool, and all as a 485 class she was doing for her senior honors thesis (in undergrad!).
ok, now that that is out of the way...
My wife is interested in conservation medicine (which she will be studying after finishing her DVM). When she began the actual work that yielded CC, I can tell you she wasn't doing it as a horrible person. When we got the cat we have, we picked one that had been taken back to the pound 3 times, and was going to be killed. However...for the proceedure/technology to be perfected, it needs to be *used*. For us to figure out how to mitigate the cloning problems for the purposes of endangered species, we have to have a large test pool - like people's pets. And if people pay for it, helping offset the research cost - all the better. There just isn't enough real money out there available in grants without commericializing it for supplimental income.
Just a little background for the teeming masses. Not everyone involved in this stuff are terribly people that ignore the rights of cats and dogs in pounds to have happy homes. Quite contrary, really - my wife could have taken her undergrad degrees and made more with them in human applications than she will after she gets her 2 graduate degrees (DVM and PhD). There's no money in it, for the most part. Most of these people (no, not all) have at least some degree of conservation background.
I wasn't stating that as the assumption - I was stating that they wouldn't be interested in reading a/book/ about it enough for it to be "classic," no matter how well it was written.
"Moby Dick" is a classic. "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn" (sp?) is a classic.
The *lay person* won't find a *math book* worthy of being a "classic" anything. It will be, at best, something they read when they're feeling like dorks.
That being said, don't project your own interests onto the masses. The lay person simply isn't interested in math, really. My wife is extrodinarily intelligent, is a scientist, and knows enough calculus/statistics to do what she needs with it. She has no interest in math - and she's a smart one! The lay person, on the other hand, is definately not going to be interested.
I mean, even if I weren't happily married, I would at least need to have some feelings for the other person. If I just "plain don't like" them, then...
Well, depends on the situation, I guess. If I know for a fact that they're really good, I could get into some rough stuff with them. Hard to say.
It harms the reputation of ALL online schools, and American schools in general. If a person is born poor, and works his ass off to go to a good school that he can afford...one that isn't well known...then that school is much more likely to be dismissed as worthless by a prospective employer now.
The point isn't that the people who started this online "school" might (since its only "might") go to prison, the point is that the damage is already done, and for every one of these you remove, another dozen will have found a loophole in the unrestrainted market and will be doing the same thing again. A cat got a degree? Ok, so the next fake online school will simply have you verify age, and species. Maybe take a test that any 4th grader could pass, and give you a "MBA" if you pass it. Tada.
The damage is still done. Maybe not to those who can afford to go to internationally reknown Ivy league schools...but not everyone can afford to go to those. There is a happy medium between complete government control, and none at all.
sure, it can usually find a solution...one that costs the pleebs what little money they have.
Does what you're proposing sound *efficient* to you? Who do you think would pay for that certification? The student who becomes a worker. Why? because either the school pays for it directly (which filters down, with a surcharge, to the student), the student pays for it directly, or the employer pays for it directly (which filters down, in the form of it costing more to hire the student, thus the student is worth less pay).
OR...and this is just an idea...the inefficient "free market" BS can be muzzled a little by having places that call themselves "universities" slammed and their owners put in prison.
Want to see the economy do well? Improve *efficiency*. There's a reason the worker production figures are so important, you know.
Meanwhile, Toyota announced that Honda owned "mid sized SUVs," when comparing their vehicles.
Mr Fujio Cho, president of Toyota, was quoted as saying "Honda's mid sized SUV no good." Clearly, Mr Cho was saying Honda owns all that is, in essense, the mid-sized SUV.
Good lord, people...
Sun has their own Linux platform as well, ya know. All Schwartz was doing is comparing the enterprise-ready offerings that appear to be dominant in the market. It was a freaking COMPLIMENT, if anything at all. And really, AIX is still a strong contender, and if it weren't for IBM making it obvious they're moving to Linux, AIX would be just as strong a contender as Solaris.
There's "Redhat's Linux," theres "SuSE's Linux," there's "Gentoo's Linux," etc etc. SuSE has a very strong desktop presense, but RH is definately the strongest linux distro in the enterprise market, and in the US desktop market.
Knee-jerk, anyone? Can people stop trying to find weird ways to twist what others say for just a moment, collect their bearings, and realize for once that they're silly?
if there are more than 1 PTR records for a single IP, then the response given when something does a reverse (PTR) record lookup will round-robin and give the requester a potentially "wrong" response.
Actually, it gives all the records as a response, its just that most PTR lookups only look at the first one, so since the order does the round-robin, the correct one will at best be the first response only 50% of the time (and that's if you have only 1 PTR record).
This begs the question: why would someone have more than 1 PTR record for a single ip? Because they are stupid, that's why.
Don't let yourself be confused. Its not "medical grade antifreeze." That, and stuff you inject into yourself damn well should have higher standards than antifreeze for your car.
if you have a lot of users already set up on the system, its a bit more complicated...if its just one, its easier. I have done it before myself though on a system with 5 users set up - if it can be done for 5, it can be done for 500.
It involved editing the registry, and wasn't fast by any means, but...it is possible.
Slashdot Mirror
Now...how many people were on the plane? So thats...100 counts of attempted murder? 25 years sounds light to me...that would only be 3 months for each count.
If you're organized, then your docs will be on one general area. As such, running an egrep in there for a phrase really doesn't take much time at all. 20 minutes? hardly. A second, maybe 2. Try it some time.
What it allows me to do is make my
Is this practical, or even easily plausible, in windows? No. Does everyone know regular expressions? No. Am I saying that no one should use these tools? No. I'm just commenting on the poster that said grep couldn't do what these tools do - they were wrong.
locate doesn't search your emails, nor let you know which files containt things, you could recursive grep, but that doesn't find stuff in pdf files, and takes up a ton of cpu.
Locate - doesn't need to search my emails. gmail does that just fine. Egrep tells me what contains whatever I want. Can google's tool find files that have a line that starts with a number, has 2 words, then repeats the number again? No. Simple regex can blow away anything the google tool can do. I can most certainly find stuff in any binary or doc file, without taking up "a ton of cpu."
See? not saying my way is better for everyone else. Just saying someone who says my way doesn't work, is wrong - my way not only works, its more powerful.
there's no reason to grep your entire damn harddrive for a single phrase. Use some degree of organization. The business world has limited use for someone who can't keep themselves organized.
finally - egrep will easily find patterns in all sorts of binary files. Creating a tiny little happy gui to search for things in your folders with DOCUMENTS (instead of searching your whole damn hard drive) is easy enough, if typing egrep "Thing I Want" * proves to just be too darn complicated.
caches it? so a document I opened 2 weeks ago...its not cached, right? Then what'd the difference?
And if it takes you 20 minutes to grep through the files in your documents folders, you need to stop using a 386 with a parallel port hard-drive.
I don't need something to search my emails; gmail does that for me. As far as searching my documents on my system...what do you think the google desktop tool (or any other brand) does? They do a recursive grep. So...what's the difference? There is none.
since when are forums blogs? Forums have been around for ages. I was posting in forums nearly 20 years ago, on various BBS's.
My point is just that not everyone involved is a bad person. Dr Kraemer is a great guy, for instance...and my wife is tops. Biased opinion that it may be, we are vegetarians, we don't buy anything from a company that does animal testing (you'd be suprized how limiting that is), we don't buy any products made from animal parts. We're not driving a lexus suv and wearing fur, or something.
she adds that mice have really long telomeres, so for them it is not an issue. Sheep don't, thus Dolly's problem.
if they choose to do it, its not automatic. That's the point. They can choose to continue to use GPL v2 still, if that's what it was released under.
If we could figure out how to fix that problem, we'd have cloning licked. The key will be in finding the best cell line to use to make the clone.
My wife actually cultured the cells that they used for CC. All very cool, and all as a 485 class she was doing for her senior honors thesis (in undergrad!).
ok, now that that is out of the way...
My wife is interested in conservation medicine (which she will be studying after finishing her DVM). When she began the actual work that yielded CC, I can tell you she wasn't doing it as a horrible person. When we got the cat we have, we picked one that had been taken back to the pound 3 times, and was going to be killed. However...for the proceedure/technology to be perfected, it needs to be *used*. For us to figure out how to mitigate the cloning problems for the purposes of endangered species, we have to have a large test pool - like people's pets. And if people pay for it, helping offset the research cost - all the better. There just isn't enough real money out there available in grants without commericializing it for supplimental income.
Just a little background for the teeming masses. Not everyone involved in this stuff are terribly people that ignore the rights of cats and dogs in pounds to have happy homes. Quite contrary, really - my wife could have taken her undergrad degrees and made more with them in human applications than she will after she gets her 2 graduate degrees (DVM and PhD). There's no money in it, for the most part. Most of these people (no, not all) have at least some degree of conservation background.
its not automatically retroactive.
"either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version"
"Moby Dick" is a classic. "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn" (sp?) is a classic.
The *lay person* won't find a *math book* worthy of being a "classic" anything. It will be, at best, something they read when they're feeling like dorks.
That being said, don't project your own interests onto the masses. The lay person simply isn't interested in math, really. My wife is extrodinarily intelligent, is a scientist, and knows enough calculus/statistics to do what she needs with it. She has no interest in math - and she's a smart one! The lay person, on the other hand, is definately not going to be interested.
Ummm...what would its peers be? Just how many "classic" math books does the lay-person have now?
Could it be that the lay-person wouldn't be interested in any book about math, no matter how well written?
I dunnnoooo...almost sounds completely probable.
why aren't you modded as funny?
You were just being funny...right?
you so funny ;)
I mean, even if I weren't happily married, I would at least need to have some feelings for the other person. If I just "plain don't like" them, then...
Well, depends on the situation, I guess. If I know for a fact that they're really good, I could get into some rough stuff with them. Hard to say.
It harms the reputation of ALL online schools, and American schools in general. If a person is born poor, and works his ass off to go to a good school that he can afford...one that isn't well known...then that school is much more likely to be dismissed as worthless by a prospective employer now.
The point isn't that the people who started this online "school" might (since its only "might") go to prison, the point is that the damage is already done, and for every one of these you remove, another dozen will have found a loophole in the unrestrainted market and will be doing the same thing again. A cat got a degree? Ok, so the next fake online school will simply have you verify age, and species. Maybe take a test that any 4th grader could pass, and give you a "MBA" if you pass it. Tada.
The damage is still done. Maybe not to those who can afford to go to internationally reknown Ivy league schools...but not everyone can afford to go to those. There is a happy medium between complete government control, and none at all.
Does what you're proposing sound *efficient* to you? Who do you think would pay for that certification? The student who becomes a worker. Why? because either the school pays for it directly (which filters down, with a surcharge, to the student), the student pays for it directly, or the employer pays for it directly (which filters down, in the form of it costing more to hire the student, thus the student is worth less pay).
OR...and this is just an idea...the inefficient "free market" BS can be muzzled a little by having places that call themselves "universities" slammed and their owners put in prison.
Want to see the economy do well? Improve *efficiency*. There's a reason the worker production figures are so important, you know.
Mr Fujio Cho, president of Toyota, was quoted as saying "Honda's mid sized SUV no good." Clearly, Mr Cho was saying Honda owns all that is, in essense, the mid-sized SUV.
Good lord, people...
Sun has their own Linux platform as well, ya know. All Schwartz was doing is comparing the enterprise-ready offerings that appear to be dominant in the market. It was a freaking COMPLIMENT, if anything at all. And really, AIX is still a strong contender, and if it weren't for IBM making it obvious they're moving to Linux, AIX would be just as strong a contender as Solaris.
There's "Redhat's Linux," theres "SuSE's Linux," there's "Gentoo's Linux," etc etc. SuSE has a very strong desktop presense, but RH is definately the strongest linux distro in the enterprise market, and in the US desktop market.
Knee-jerk, anyone? Can people stop trying to find weird ways to twist what others say for just a moment, collect their bearings, and realize for once that they're silly?
only 50% of the time (and that's if you have only 1 PTR record)
That should obviously say "if you have only 2 PTR records"
Actually, it gives all the records as a response, its just that most PTR lookups only look at the first one, so since the order does the round-robin, the correct one will at best be the first response only 50% of the time (and that's if you have only 1 PTR record).
This begs the question: why would someone have more than 1 PTR record for a single ip? Because they are stupid, that's why.
ah, sorry...no. If I had a windows box in the house still, I'd just find it and tell you the location in the registry. Sorry :/
Don't let yourself be confused. Its not "medical grade antifreeze." That, and stuff you inject into yourself damn well should have higher standards than antifreeze for your car.
It involved editing the registry, and wasn't fast by any means, but...it is possible.