Slashdot Mirror


New Treatment Helps Cure Spinal Injuries

wap writes "Researchers have found that an injection of polyethylene glycol (PEG) into the site of neural injury was very effective in saving neurons in dogs, allowing them to recover their movement after the injury. This is an amazing development. PEG is a simple, safe chemical. Using it as a post-injury treatment could prevent paralysis in thousands of accident victims every year, if hospitals start using it. This doesn't mean we don't need stem cell research, but it is a simple and potentially cheap way to get many of the benefits for spinal injury."

193 comments

  1. Safe? by xanthines-R-yummy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wasn't aware that PEG was safe. Don't you use that stuff punch holes in cellular membranes? Like when making hybridomas (antibody-producing cells used in research).

    1. Re:Safe? by xanthines-R-yummy · · Score: 3, Informative

      For those that want a link.

    2. Re:Safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      LOL.....everyone thought vioxx was safe and look what they are now ......

    3. Re:Safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I wasn't aware that PEG was safe.

      It isn't! I knew this one guy who had a hot girlfriend. And she was really into pegging. My buddy was squimish about it, of course, but she was treatening to dump him and find someone who'd let her do it. Anyhow, she just rode him silly. He was so torn up that he had to go to the Emergency Room that night and tell them what happened! Man, talk about embarrasing! I would never let my girlfriend ... what? Oh. I thought we were talking about something else. Nevermind.

    4. Re:Safe? by chemicalsno · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you google it it comes up with numerous references to it being used in cosmetics and cleansers, is make-up hazardous? It's probably safe

    5. Re:Safe? by obiwanjabroni · · Score: 5, Informative

      PEG is already used in a number of treatments as "PEGylation". PEGylation, or the addition of the polyethylene glycol group, to interferons are already being tried as therapy for Hepatitis C. The advantage lies in the ability of the pegylated compound to resist excretion in the kidneys and to increase solubility.

    6. Re:Safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Is that the same stuff that is in Dr. Pepper.

    7. Re:Safe? by Muhammar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      PEG linker is attached to some injectable drugs to modify (prolong and delay) onset of their effect. PEG is also part of some IV formulations. I don't remember that safety of PEG would ever be a big concern. Besides, these patients with spinal injury have to take only one or few doses, it is not like they would be on it for lifetime.

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    8. Re:Safe? by Synbiosis · · Score: 3, Informative

      PEG is used to alter a solutions viscosity in lab. By itself it has no detrimental effect on cells I'm aware of, which is why it's used for that purpose.

    9. Re:Safe? by iocat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, so I'd rather take the chance of long-term damage and be able to walk, versus being super safe and in a wheelchair...

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    10. Re:Safe? by Psychofreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll take a temporary increased risk of a severe heart attack to sure death or paralysis. That may be just me, but I also plan to never have more nerve damage done than I already have. Not having full feeling in a few fingertips because of a drift-fence post is unpleasent, but tolerable (sliced through 2 fingers to the bone). Not having any ability to move on my own would be a fate worse than death I think.
      Phil

      --
      Laugh, it's good for you!
    11. Re:Safe? by Psychofreak · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe, but I think you are thinking of propolyne glycol. It is an alternative to Ethylene Glycol as an antifreese agent.

      --
      Laugh, it's good for you!
    12. Re:Safe? by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      Just because something is used in a safe product doesn't mean that, used alone, it will be safe. For example, salt is composed of two chemicals, chlorine and sodium. Chlorine is deadly to humans. Salt is not.

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    13. Re:Safe? by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      A drift-fence post attacked you in your sleep?
      Or you caused yourself serious injury by physically assaulting a drift-fence post.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    14. Re:Safe? by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Informative
      I wasn't aware that PEG was safe. Don't you use that stuff punch holes in cellular membranes? Like when making hybridomas (antibody-producing cells used in research).

      As they say, the dose makes the poison. Apparently they've got a working concentration of PEG that can be IV injected that is sufficiently low to not harm healthy tissues--the effect is confined to the location of spinal trauma.

      Actually, I'd strongly recommend looking at the linked article. As with making hybridomas, the scientists here are deliberately fusing cells together. In this case, the idea is that even if a cell is fatally damaged, fusing it to an adjacent healthy nerve cell can allow it to survive.

      Apparently, the PEG also mucks with signalling so that the death of a few cells doesn't lead to apoptosis (cell death) in nearby structures. That's a great bonus. Altogether a very neat result. I'm kind of surprised that this works, actually--I would have expected a lot of fusions between axons and Schwann cells, or something equally useless...very interesting.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    15. Re:Safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PEG is hydrophilic - it isn't going to affect membrane integrity.

      Further down is some information from a chemist, and a botanist about using PEG as a inert solvent and as an osmotic modifier.

      So, basically it would seem to make the surrounding plasma hyperosmotic, which reduces nerve cell volume, which for some reason appears to stabilise the cells and prevent necrosis or apoptosis.

      Interesting stuff :)

    16. Re:Safe? by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      How many ACs does it take to put in a lightbulb?
      One, but it takes a surgical team to remove it.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    17. Re:Safe? by crush · · Score: 1

      PEG is used to facilitate the uptake of DNA into eubacterial cells among other things. I wonder what this will do for transposing pathogenic bacteria with random DNA from patients. Sounds dodgy to me.

    18. Re:Safe? by arivanov · · Score: 0

      Seconded. In a few more years a significant proportion of the dogs will have cancers where it has been injected. PEG is not a strong carcinogenic substance, but carcinogenic substance nonetheless.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    19. Re:Safe? by tonyr60 · · Score: 1

      Chlorine in not half as deadly as sodium, but salt is not exactly a safe product, if used to excess, ask any cadio specialist.

    20. Re:Safe? by Angostura · · Score: 1

      Scaremongering at its best. I love the attention to detail in the post, the suggestion that a substance is carcinogenic, if not *strongly* carcinogenic - and what measure are you using in this case, eh?

    21. Re:Safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But aren't the eubacterial cells already permeabilised by electroporation or calcium treatment?

      PEG is use as a hydrophilic "coater" because it can reduce non-specific interactions of charged molecules like DNA (or liposomes or proteins) thus keeping them more soluble.

      So in the above case, isn't the only point of the PEG to allow more efficient transfer of the DNA through the already permeable membrane, by reducing charged interactions with cell membrane proteins?

      I don't see how it could allow transfection of human DNA into bacteria during a standard treatment - this just seems a little extreme as a worry to me...

    22. Re:Safe? by aurispector · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree. Someone should tell Stephen Hawking.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    23. Re:Safe? by torstenvl · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is false.

      First of all -- tangentially -- 'salt' is not chlorine and sodium. There are many different types of salt, including CaCl2 (used often on sidewalks and roads because it dissolves to three ions as opposed to the two of NaCl which lowers the freezing point even more, thus being more effective in de-icing).

      Secondly, NaCl (standard table salt in the United States) is not composed of two 'chemicals'. Its molecular composition is that of two elements. I realize the distinction is minor but you are either misled or purposely trying to mislead by this single word 'chemical' which just *happens* to be how PEG is described. Na+ and Cl- are not chemicals. They are ions. Na+ would need to lose its positive charge to become a molecule, and Cl- would need to pair with another Cl atom before it could become Chlorine (yay for shared electrons). Cl- is not Chlorine, it is Chloride.

      This is very important, because when a *chemical* is safe or unsafe, it does not usually stop being safe or unsafe unless its molecular composition is changed. Your example was talking about a molecular change. I doubt this is what happens in make-up. I find it inconceivable that making cosmetics requires a series of chemical reactions complex enough to render a harmful drug safe; you would have to have near 100% dissociation of the deadly compound, and near 100% reassociation with different atoms. A chemical is dangerous because it reacts in our body; if you have enough undissociated molecules, they will still dissolve and react, and if you have enough dissociated ions, they will still react. To make something like this safe would be very very difficult. So I would have to guess that it's just as safe as an injection as it is in make-up.

    24. Re:Safe? by Entropy2016 · · Score: 1

      "...the PEG also mucks with signalling so that the death of a few cells doesn't lead to apoptosis (cell death) in nearby structures."

      Now all we need is an Umbrella Corp. and we can finally realize our dream of fighting an army of pissed off, murderous, bioengineered undead.

      Resident Evil, here we come!

    25. Re:Safe? by crush · · Score: 1
      So in the above case, isn't the only point of the PEG to allow more efficient transfer of the DNA through the already permeable membrane, by reducing charged interactions with cell membrane proteins?

      Yes, it increases the uptake of DNA by competent cells. Competence can be induced artificially by the methods that you mention, or it can occur naturally (eubacteria snag bits of DNA from each other when environmental conditions prompt it and it seems to be a succesful evolutionary strategy). PEG increases the likelihood of a succesful uptake, it doesn't guarantee transfection. It's a numbers game....

      I'm not calling it as a definite possibility and saying the method shouldn't be used because of it, just considering it as a potential problem.

  2. Wow! by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 1

    Wonder if it act like a support for the cels to regrow on. Darn intersting!

    1. Re:Wow! by mikael · · Score: 1

      They can actually do that already. I was watching "Impact" tonight, and there was this story of a teenage girl who was in a car-crash, in which an accident cut all the nerves in her upper arm. The only solution was for the doctors to use nerve tissue grafts from a dead donor. This didn't give her immediate nerve cell regeneration, but it did provide a support for the existing nerves to regrow. Eventually, she regained most of the control of her hand.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  3. Too late... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    ...to cure Superman!

  4. Yes, but... by k4_pacific · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, but, does it work if you are paralyzed from the neck up?

    --
    Unknown host pong.
    1. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir are an ass. As a uniplegic I find your post to be very offensive.

    2. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only if you're over 65 and you live in Korea...

    3. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, well, as a pentaplegic (don't ask) I find your lack of humor unsettling.

    4. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well as a person being dependant on a extracorporeal membrane oxygenation machine I find your lack of faith disturbing.

    5. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean: "Well as a *huuuuuuu* person being dependant *shhhhhhh* on a extracorporeal membrane oxyge*huuuuuuu*nation machine I find your lack of *shhhhhh* faith disturbing.

      *huuuuuuu*

  5. Flamebait and Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This doesn't mean we don't need stem cell research, but it is a simple and potentially cheap way to get many of the benefits for spinal injury.

    Christ, why does everyone feel the need to stick in their two cents about some marginally-related issue? Must everyone try to link every article they submit to some kind of larger issue? I'm starting to think Jon Katz is submitting all these articles under pseudonyms.

    ...The new treatment holds great promise for those suffering from spinal injuries. Interestingly, the mother of Eric Harris, one of the killers in the Columbine massacre, was engaged to be married to Mr. Jeffery Jackson until he fell victim to a spinal accident. She broke off the engagement and married the man who would become the father of one of the most ruthless young killers in our nation's history.
    1. Re:Flamebait and Offtopic by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      actually, you should have started to take offense at the mention of sallying forth on the basis of this research on dogs and injecting thousands of humans in hospitals.

    2. Re:Flamebait and Offtopic by helix400 · · Score: 1

      I'm starting to think Jon Katz is submitting all these articles under pseudonyms.

      No, its just michael. This is normal for him.

    3. Re:Flamebait and Offtopic by tftp · · Score: 1
      the mother of Eric Harris ... was engaged to be married to Mr. Jeffery Jackson until he fell victim to a spinal accident. She broke off the engagement ...

      No surprise that Eric ended up a killer. His mother dumped "her love" probably within milliseconds after he met a misfortune...

  6. I read 20 years ago... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That an injection of DMSO would halt swelling and stop nerve and brain damage in trama injuries.

    As far as I know, nothing came of it, alledgedly because nobody wanted to do clinical trials since it couldn't be patented.

    History repeating itself?

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:I read 20 years ago... by nido · · Score: 4, Interesting
      DMSO is wonderful stuff. I once took a divot out of my forehead (stood up into the corner of a cabinet door). I could feel the blood starting to pool up, so I went to look in a mirror. "Yeah, that's going to scar up nicely..." Fortunately I'd heard that DMSO can prevent scars from forming, so I poured some onto a cotton pad and put it on my forehead. It burned a little bit, but it slowed the bleeding down by 90%. Nice. If I look real close I can see a tiny scar. It could've been much worse.

      DMSO takes stuff right through the skin. You can dissolve asprin in dmso and apply it topically, and that asprin will go right to where you need it. I did that for a while, but stopped when I realized I couldn't tell the difference between DMSO+Asprin and straight DMSO.
      It was also shown to relieve pain and swelling, relax muscles, relieve arthritis, improve blood supply and slow the growth of bacteria. It relieves the pain of sprains and even of broken bones. It enhances the effectiveness of other pharmacological agents. If you apply DMSO to a bruise, the bruise dissolves and disappears in a matter of minutes! If you apply it to the jaw after wisdom tooth removal, all pain and swelling is prevented! The pain of acute gout can be handled with the application of 5 cc of seventy percent DMSO in water four times each day. Application to a fever blister results in rapid resolution of this problem. DMSO also relieves the pain of minor burns and if applied soon after the burn happens, will decrease the tissue damage suffered. DMSO speeds all healing, approximately doubling or tripling all healing responses.
      - http://www.medical-library.net/sites/_dmso_dimethy lsulfoxide.html
      I love DMSO, and in fact am about to break out a new bottle, 'cause I've spent too much time on this stupid laptop computer, and my shoulders and forearms are all inflammed. Bathe/dry off/apply/wait 10 minutes/rinse.

      Everyone who's considering using DMSO thing should get a book on the topic, 'cause it's possible to do some stupid stuff. I know a guy who soaked a cotton pad in DMSO and put it on his foot with an ace bandage. His nerves were firing painfully for days... :).
      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
    2. Re:I read 20 years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Everyone who's considering using DMSO thing should get a book on the topic, 'cause it's possible to do some stupid stuff. I know a guy who soaked a cotton pad in DMSO and put it on his foot with an ace bandage. His nerves were firing painfully for days... :).

      True enough. DMSO was originally used as an engine degreaser. It's a pretty powerful chemical solvent. Now, a lot of people are rubbing it all over themselves because they saw Dr. Weil chuckling on TV about how it's some kind of miracle cure. Read up on it before doing anything. If you decide you want to try it, you'll probably have to go to a horse-supply store to get some. Or the local automotive store.

    3. Re:I read 20 years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know whether DMSO is safe or not. But one thing that is clear is that if you use it at all, you want it to be ultra-pure (medical grade): DMSO gets around the normal skin barrier, and it will carry a lot of nasty impurities with it. So, leave the engine degreaser alone.

    4. Re:I read 20 years ago... by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

      And just add a little to a cola and you've got a mind numbingly good drink!

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    5. Re:I read 20 years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. According to some reading I've done, a variant/derivative of DMSO (I'm not a chemist, I'm not sure of the technical details) is the commonly available supplement called "MSM" (methyl-sulfonyl-methane).

      For a lot of people, myself included, taken in pill or capsule form it noticably reduces general inflammation in the body (back inflammation/pain, in my case). I don't bruise or bleed much, so I can't compare that to DMSO effects, but it has been a tremendous help for me.

      Any comments on whether MSM is safer or more/less effective than DMSO? Does it have any demonstrated neurological benefits?

    6. Re:I read 20 years ago... by Knetzar · · Score: 1

      Anyone else think this sounds like bacta (the liquid cure all) from Star Wars?

    7. Re:I read 20 years ago... by dsouth · · Score: 1

      Quick note of caution --

      DMSO has been proven to cause cataracts in animal studies. Though this hasn't been observed in humans (yet), it's worth considering before you start swabbing yourself with random industrial solvents. It also gives you really bad garlic breath, so if you're one of the /. minority that has a spouse or significant other, you might want to stick with asprin.

  7. cheap? not when it's made by glaxosmithklinemerk by johnpaul191 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i am sure medical grade antifreeze will cost even more than injet ink....
    kind of like how superglue can close wounds from razor sharp objects, but hostipal grade liquid bandage probably costs about $200/tube.

  8. alright by utopianfiat · · Score: 1

    this coupled with the earlier report that there would be "advances that would extend the age of a person to 1,000 years of age" sounds like I'll be alive for a looooooong time.

    --
    +5, Truth
    1. Re:alright by FredThompson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but imagine how boring it would be to live to 1000. The human male's production of testosterone starts to drop at age 30. Slowing aging won't change that unless you're somehow put into a super-slow metabolic state in which case you'd think the world went into hyper-speed. 950 years or so of no ability to have sex without a penis support and no real ability to have orgasm? Blech!!!

  9. with advancement comes obsolescence... by viva_fourier · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and we now sadly bid adieu to the doggy hind-leg cart.

    --
    and now back to the fallout shelter...
    1. Re:with advancement comes obsolescence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some reason people on Segways remind me of dogs with the hind-leg cart.

  10. Re:What not Stem Cells? Have we been lied to? by johnpaul191 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    this is also to be given right after the accident.... the stem cell work is for people with conditions that have set in, let alone all the other possibilities.

  11. cool, but not quite... by moosesocks · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    it looks like stem cell research will continue to be a necessary evil.

    this treatment is no good for patients who are already injured. it does not repair or rebuild nerve cells. it simply prevents them from being killed after injury.

    granted, it is an important step, but we need to develop further treatments for the 25% of cases it doesn't work in. while 75% success is astoundingly good in this field, it isn't enough

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    1. Re:cool, but not quite... by MBCook · · Score: 1
      Stem cell research is also important because it could also be used to cure/treat other things from Alzeihmers (bad sp, I know) to maybe even regrowing organs (way in the future).

      That said, I agree. This is pretty cool and could give benefits soon and cheap. I wonder how long it will be before this treatment becomes common (assuming it's found safe, etc.)

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:cool, but not quite... by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      Necessary, yes, evil ... well, that's somewhat subjective.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    3. Re:cool, but not quite... by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Stem cell research is also important because it could also be used to cure/treat other things from Alzeihmers
      Uh, no, it can't. Stem cells have no applicable use in the treatment of Alzheimer's. This is a common misconception perpetuated by people like Ron Reagan.
      While stem cell research is important, bad science is bad science.
      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A295 61-2004Jun9.html

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    4. Re:cool, but not quite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Necessary, yes, evil ... well, that's somewhat subjective.

      1) No one is sure if the technique is "necessary". The technology is pretty over hyped, and over sold.
      I mean the claims that the blind will walk, the lame will see, and old man Lazarus will be able to boogie like never before get a little old.
      We'll get something out of the technology, but in 10 years "the next big thing" will replace it. And that "next big thing" will be "necessary" because its supporters will claim that "the blind will walk, the lame will see, and ..."

      2) The evil part comes from ...
      Well, look at it this way.
      And I know this arguement is higly definitional.

      Abortion, euthanasia and the death penalty are all essentially murder, but (on the whole) we're OK with that.
      It is like if you get out of jail on a Murder wrap because of Self Defense, technically you still committed Murder we just gave you a pass. In each case of abortion, euthanasia, and the death penalty someone committed murder but society gives them a pass on that.

      Stem cells are the consumption of another human being's cells to aid your own life. That is cannibalism.
      Some people have a problem with that. Some people what to give that a pass.

    5. Re:cool, but not quite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adult stem cells have already yielded some big successes in this area. Dr. Lima from Portugal is doing the work with olfactory cells, more info.

    6. Re:cool, but not quite... by blackpaw · · Score: 1
      Stem cells are the consumption of another human being's cells to aid your own life. That is cannibalism. Some people have a problem with that. Some people what to give that a pass.

      So are you going to pass on any blood transfusions, even if they would save your life ?

      That has to be one of the more dumb ass reasons against stem cell research I have ever heard.

    7. Re:cool, but not quite... by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      When you obtain embryonic stem cells, you're already killing off the embryo ... at least it died for something, ya know?

      Not that you need to use embryonic stem cells; there are other sources that work just as well, like cord stem cells, that don't have all these negative religious connotations.

      As for society 'giving a pass' on various forms of sanctioned killings, it was society that decided that killing isn't allowed in the first place. Same thing with the police impounding your car; society sanctions them taking it, but society decided grand theft auto was wrong to begin with.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
  12. PEG by nootoochee · · Score: 1

    How strange. This very same stuff is used as a green wood preservative. Maybe it could preserve brain cells too. Or not.

    1. Re:PEG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It is also used in stage smoke machines.

    2. Re:PEG by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 1
      > How strange. This very same stuff is used as a green wood preservative. Maybe it could preserve brain cells too. Or not.

      While it might work, the difference likely wouldn't be noticeable in most people, since they weren't used in the first place.

  13. Excuse me but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about doing at least 1 test on actual human before declaring this a solution to all trauma injuries. Thanks.

  14. Another recent story on recovery from nerve damage by F13 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The other day there was a Sciencedaily article on a guy who recoved from nerve damage after a liver transplant.

    Although his problem was due to "a 20-year history of drinking more than 100g of alcohol per day who had end-stage liver disease and weakness in both legs."

  15. Young Scientists by Lucky_Pierre · · Score: 1

    Hmmmmm......sounds like some of the experiments the 13 year old kid next door tried on the neighborhood pets.....only he used Windex.

    --
    "Whenever the cause of the people is entrusted to professors, it is lost." ~ V.I. Lenin
    1. Re:Young Scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windex by itself won't work. Have them try adding a cup of Krusty Brand Cough Syrup to it, then give it a "shot".

    2. Re:Young Scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and his name was Jeffrey Dahmer.

    3. Re:Young Scientists by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      Or that mad scientist guy in The Man with Two Brains.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
  16. Re:cheap? not when it's made by glaxosmithklinemer by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, in all fairness, there is a reason for that, to a degree. Medical stuff has to be very, very, very sanitary.

    --
    TODO: Something witty here...
  17. wiener dogs make another contribution to mankind.. by dvd_tude · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... besides eating and burrowing under the covers in one's bed.

    (I'd wish they had tried this on my Roxy when she blew a disk a couple of years back.)

  18. Re:cheap? not when it's made by glaxosmithklinemer by dAzED1 · · Score: 4, Informative
    polyethylene glycol != ethylene glycol

    Don't let yourself be confused. Its not "medical grade antifreeze." That, and stuff you inject into yourself damn well should have higher standards than antifreeze for your car.

  19. Re:cheap? not when it's made by glaxosmithklinemer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, because there can be all kinds of evil bacteria floating around in antifreeze?

  20. Re:cheap? not when it's made by glaxosmithklinemer by EvilStein · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think that you're thinking of propylene glycol, commonly used in de-icing/antifreeze fluids.

  21. Too late for the last election but ...... by Dark+Bard · · Score: 1, Funny

    the conservation right is very interested. This condition has reached pandemic proportions among their ranks. Maybe this treatment can avoid the ethical delemia that has left so many right wingers untreated.

    1. Re:Too late for the last election but ...... by CelloJake · · Score: 1, Troll

      That would be interesting if there were any promising fetal stem cell treatments. But there are not. The most promising stem cell research is on multipotent stem cells from adults or umbilical cords.

    2. Re:Too late for the last election but ...... by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      Ha! That would be just as funny if you had said the same thing about liberals!

      Wait, this is Slashdot.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
  22. Re:cheap? not when it's made by glaxosmithklinemer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no joke, each tylenol given in a hospital is at least $12

  23. Dr. Pepper Contains PEG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ithe ingredients on a can of Dr. Pepper says that it constains Polyethylene Glycol.

    Isn't that the same miracle drug.

  24. Dogs by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

    I wonder where they found this nice group of injured dogs to test that stuff on. I can just see, "get the bat Bill, swing hard and crack its spine, then we'll cure it with PEG". I know it will help people but still makes me wonder.

    1. Re:Dogs by Justice8096 · · Score: 1

      Notice that they said they used it on dogs carried in by their owners for emergency treatment after they proved it on the 19 dogs, and took care to only use it on animals that had similar injuries to the animals in the original study - they aren't this nice to people in clinical studies (remember the double-blind studies on interferon, where some terminal cancer patients got placebos?), let alone the studies done on people on welfare (there was a medicine used on me as a child that caused a severe allergic reaction - and the doctor refused to let me know what it is, or what it's effects were supposed to be)
      I think that the ethical considerations given in the larger clinical study outweigh the potentially bad things done in the smaller study.

    2. Re:Dogs by ithicine · · Score: 1

      Popular Science ran an article about just that in November with their "Worst Jobs in Science" sequel. Read the cute and cuddly here: Lab-Animal Veterinarian.

    3. Re:Dogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they aren't this nice to people in clinical studies (remember the double-blind studies on interferon, where some terminal cancer patients got placebos?)


      First: Everyone who is participating in a double-blind study KNOWS, that he will get the placebo with a 50% probability and he agreed to that

      Second: Would you consider it nice if everyone just got this new "cool" drug without testing?
      You know, these tests are there for a reason, because some of the drugs end up killing more people than they cure.
      Would you like it if you had cancer with a 40 % 5-year survival rate and got a new drug which lowered it to 20%?

      The point is double-blind studies HAVE to be done or you could stop doing medicine or just give random stuff to people
    4. Re:Dogs by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
      Vets in cities that have universities that do this kind of research get regular requests to refer certain problems to the University research clinic studies.

      I took a kitten with an eye infection (of the rare, hard to treat, and sight-threatening kind) to the vet and the kitty ended up being the first in the state to be cured with a new drug they were testing. It had been animal-tested (in rabbits), approved for humans, proved in humans, and was making full-circle to being tested in various other species.

  25. Polyethylene glycol is used for... by IO+ERROR · · Score: 5, Informative
    liquid body armor, tattoos, to treat constipation, as a cleaning agent, to stabilize green wood, in cosmetics and many other applications.

    Material Safety Data Sheet

    --
    How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    1. Re:Polyethylene glycol is used for... by quetzalc0atl · · Score: 1

      it is also used in cryopreservation of cell lines

  26. We have stem cell research by KrugalSausage · · Score: 1

    We just don't have any federal funding for the subset of "embryonic."

    1. Re:We have stem cell research by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cause that's just where they are harvested from.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:We have stem cell research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, we do have federal funding for embryonic, but limited to existing stem cell lines. Privately funded research can do whatever the hell it wants, and otherwise smart scientists bitch about Bush banning the research.

    3. Re:We have stem cell research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Big Pharma can reap the rewards from their privately funded embryonic stem cell research that isn't in the public trust.

      Correlate private US concerns doing embryonic stem cell research with GOP donations. Note the RNC here states as much, "[Bush] placed no limits on private funding..."

      The GOP is gladhanding the religious right while simultaneously doling out handjobs to corporations who stand to profit immeasurably from their orwellian policies.

      Wake up and smell the stale coffee. The real axis of evil is Wal-Mart, McDonald's, Big Pharma and Big Oil. Supported by their obedient cast of Republican fluffers, they're the ones doing the fucking, and pious Christian middle america is the one getting fucked.

  27. This is what happens when I read /. at midnight by deathazre · · Score: 5, Funny

    confused polyethylene glycol with ethylene glycol and wondered what they were doing injecting antifreeze into dogs (and wouldn't it be easier to put it in their water dish?)

    --
    Karma: Negative (Mostly affected by dorm trolling)
  28. Bingo by TheBurrito · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I worked in the spinal inury repair field for a number of years, and I think you've hit the nail right on the head. At least one of the nails.

    A while ago, literally about a dozen papers would come out each month professing some miraculous breakthrough in the field. Usually all pretty well done, almost always in big peer-review journals. Very few of these methods have been followed through to clinical trials. The skeptic in me says it's because, as you said, there wasn't always a clear way to profit from it.

    My even-more-skeptical side says that a lot of these results get fudged quite a bit because, thanks to recent attention paid to Christopher Reeve/stem cells et al, there's a lot of money floating around and many opportunities for researchers to make a name for themselves. That's why they never pan out -- they don't work.

    This isn't to discredit anyone working in academic sciences, almost all of whom are grossly overworked and underpaid. However, the trend in NSF funding in the last five years has been to limit the number of researchers receiving grants, and dole out much larger grants to those few promising studies. It creates very cutthroat competition, forces researchers to overhype their studies, and ultimately causes a lot of scientific dead ends. Worst of all, it gives a lot of false hope to people suffering from a number of injuries/diseases that a cure is just around the corner (as long as you write your congressman to give us more money).

    It's really quite sick, and was one of the reasons why I left the field.

    1. Re:Bingo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry you're no longer in the field. If you were, you'd realize that patents are not the currency of academic medicine (whose practitioners are paid pretty well- at least I am). Making paralyzed people walk again? You could be a Department Chairman.

  29. Re:cheap? not when it's made by glaxosmithklinemer by scheme · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Yes, because there can be all kinds of evil bacteria floating around in antifreeze?

    Well that and there might be all kinds of random chemicals mixed in with the antifreeze. I prefer my medical supplies to be free of lead, benzene and other potentially toxic chemicals.

    --
    "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
  30. cool, but not quite...Polio. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "granted, it is an important step, but we need to develop further treatments for the 25% of cases it doesn't work in. while 75% success is astoundingly good in this field, it isn't enough"

    Kind of like when the Polio Vaccine was developed.

  31. Bummer... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 0, Troll

    This, the recent stem cell/paralysis breakthrough, living to 1,000 all coming a few weeks after Christopher Reeves dies? Wow, talk about quitting playing just before your lottery numbers come up.

    If I didn't know better, I'd say that these guys were all lining up to announce the moment he died. Either that or that whole "curse of Superman" shit is more powerful than anyone first thought. Quick, let's all take out life insurance policies on Brandon Routh.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  32. So what your saying is by oliverthered · · Score: 0

    Superglue's far to unclean a product, Yeh right!

    How many deaths are there a year due to contaminated super-glue?

    How many people catch xyz because they cleaned a cut with toilet tissue instead of millspec glaxosmithkline tissue paper?

    I'm sorry you can used dental floss and sutures if you want, but hell it's not made by a licensed qualified professional company, so you'll just have to pay glaxo to do a bit more lobying.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:So what your saying is by MoggyMania · · Score: 1

      "Superglue's far to unclean a product, Yeh right! How many deaths are there a year due to contaminated super-glue?"

      Super-glue generally isn't used on small cuts that don't require medical intervention, and if it were, the cut was nowhere near deep enough for an infecton to be much of an issue.

      In a clinical setting, however, the medical grade stuff is used on open/surgical wounds -- "cuts" that if infected could cause a person to lose a limb or their life.

      (Would you seriously want non-sterilized instruments used on you in surgery? No? Then why would you want potentially bacteria-laden adhesive lining the wound?)

    2. Re:So what your saying is by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      I don't think anything can survive in 'super glue', and pureish alcohol will kill of most things.

      The point is, unless you've got some kind of immune problem the amount of contamination in 'skivie' grade products as apposed to big fat drug company grade products is negligible, especially when compared to how dirty everything else is.

      You know those people who ware long sleved tops in the summer? check out there arms if you don't believe me, Jesus you have to be putting a mean amount of very dirty smack in you arms to get a nasty infection.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    3. Re:So what your saying is by BrianGa · · Score: 1

      The reason that all of these expensive precautions are taken is to prevent lawsuit...not because of some lobbyist.

      If County Hospital uses non-sterile instruments on you, odds are you're going to sue. If not, the next bozo would. I'm sure the hospital would love to buy cheap stuff too, but the cost of paying off all of those malpractice and negligence lawsuits might get to them.

    4. Re:So what your saying is by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      In other countries you wouldn't get very far trying to sue. I think the high costs of medical care, which is partly spent on lobbying the government to make the cost higher, is partly to blaim for the risk of getting sued. Kinda a visious circle.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  33. Just a bit too late :-\ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for the best dog I ever had. Paralyzed at five years old. I was shocked to read this, and am glad that something has finally come out to help those paralysis victims. May our steps forward continue!

  34. Uh, what? by mcc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There isn't really a "larger issue" here; spinal injuries are one of the most immediately promising applications of stem cell research, and there was an article just like a week or something ago here about curing certain spinal injuries in rats by injecting cordal stem cells.

    Since stem cells are currently in the news as a directly competing potential technique for doing the exact same thing the technique in this article does, it seems mentioning them here is both reasonable and germane. If nothing else I think that saying that new experimental spinal cord research techniques are only "marginally related" to new experimental spinal cord research techniques is perhaps not quite fair.

    1. Re:Uh, what? by Deoxymoron · · Score: 1

      Agreed. There are 2 major issues with neurogeneration. 1. Getting the damaged CNS motor Neurons to regenerate instead of dying. If a CNS neuron perceives through various cell signals that it has sustained enough damage, it will undergo Apoptosis(cell suicide). The degree of damamge and the type of damage(crushing vs transection)will make a difference. So the PEG might have some effect here if it indeed has one. 2. Getting the damaged CNS Motor Neurons to connect back to the right place! There is a huge amount of distance the axon will have cover as it regenerates. There isn't a long range cell signaling system for the adult human neuron. chances are, the more distance you have to cover, the less likely the axon will get back to where it was. Even in short distances regenerations, loss of detexerity is possible. BTW, when they talk about spinal regeneration, I think most of them are talking about axonal regeneration, if the cell body is toast there isn't much you can do.

  35. even more offtopic... by SolvayGuy · · Score: 1

    I'm starting to think Jon Katz is submitting all these articles under pseudonyms.

    No I'm not! i mean.. um... polyethylene glycol is l33t, yo, and has no crucial meaning to further investigate the nuances of the reticulation of ruthless mass murdering killers.

  36. Times have changed by Bill_Royle · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does that mean we'll have to refer to these recovered dogs as PEG-legs?

  37. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was the Dec 1 news...

  38. Could someone inject Bush's brain by relaxrelax · · Score: 1


    Could someone *please* inject Bush's brain, or at least the brains of the international observers of the elections (assuming they're not "enemy combatants" in jail without trial already)?

    I sense a great need.

    --
    Microsoft is pure dog-ma. FreeBSD is pure cat-ma.
    1. Re:Could someone inject Bush's brain by khrtt · · Score: 1

      Oh, fuck, get a life already. We're not the first country around to have a moron president, and, what, people usually live through this. I mean, he can't put, like everyone in jail.

  39. DMSO not so great it seems by DoubleReed · · Score: 5, Informative

    A bit of googling turned up the following:

    DMSO
    William T. Jarvis, Ph.D.

    DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) is derived from lignin, the binding substance of trees. The Crown Zellerbach Corporation, a mammoth lumber company, holds a number of patents on DMSO for use as an industrial solvent or liniment for treating pain in horses. Crown Zellerbach licenses DMSO exclusively to Research Industries of Salt Lake City for marketing as a drug called Rimso-50. Topically-applied DMSO has the unusual ability to act as a "chemical hypodermic needle" which is to say that it is rapidly absorbed through the skin and can take with it other substances that ordinarily would not cross the skin's barrier. Topically-applied DMSO produces a garlic-like taste in the mouth and a breath odor. Topical use can cause a rash, blistering, itching, hives, and skin thickening. Intravenous use can cause kidney damage and other adverse side effects.

    DMSO was approved by the FDA in 1978 for only one purpose, the treatment of a rare bladder disorder, interstitial cystitis. However, scandal surrounded the FDA's approval of DMSO and some still believe that a cloud hangs over it. Stanley Jacob, MD, served as an supposedly unbiased medical monitor of DMSO between 1974 and 1979, but for three of those years (1974, 1978, and 1979), he was on the Research Industries board of directors. In addition to getting consulting and director's fees, Jacob is said to have bought 50,000 shares of the company's stocks. The medical officer charged with reviewing data from clinical trials of DMSO, K.C. Pani, accepted $36,500 in gratuities from Dr. Jacob during the time. A detailed account of the dubious FDA approval of DMSO is provided by Howard Rosenberg in "The DMSO Affair." [1 ]

    DMSO became a darling among the promoters of quackery after CBS-TV's 60 Minutes portrayed the substance as a medical breakthrough [2]. Some arthritis sufferers testified that DMSO had provided relief. The Arthritis Foundation says that DMSO can act as a liniment with a counter-irritating effect temporarily relieving pain, but it does not reduce inflammation as do truly effective arthritis remedies (Arthritis Foundation, undated). A detailed Public Information Memo was issued to the Chapter Executive Directors of the Arthritis Foundation on November 13, 1981, following the publication of a popular trade book.

    Mildred Miller, owner/administrator of the Degenerative Disease Medical Center in Las Vegas, Nevada, promoted DMSO for a variety of disorders including arthritis, mental illness, emphysema, and cancer. Miller wrote a book touting DMSO entitled A Little Dab Will Do Ya! (Quality Advertising, 1981). Miller also published Preventive Health News, a tabloid-sized newsletter in which she promoted DMSO and carried on a harangue against the establishment (Miller published another book with the disrespectful title Up Yours FDA). Miller was eventually convicted of Medicare fraud and went to prison [2]. The American Cancer Society issued a statement advising against the use of DMSO for cancer [3].

    During its heyday, black market DMSO could be purchased in health food stores, military surplus stores, hardware stores, at swap meet booths, or even from vendors working out of the trunks of their cars parked along highways. Very often black market DMSO is industrial grade, not medical grade. A problem with industrial grade DMSO is that companies bottling the substance as an industrial solvent use the same equipment to bottle other substances. Residual toxic materials can contaminate industrial grade DMSO and may be taken into the body by DMSO's action as a "chemical hypodermic."

    Because of DMSO's dangers and legal status, the FDA has had a running battle with DMSO distributors. In 1980, the agency discussed the controversy surrounding the drug in the FDA Consumer [4]. In 1982, the agency reported on actions taken against companies distributing DMSO in the Pacific Northwest [5]. A book touting DMSO, The Persecuted Drug: The Story of DMSO, by Pat McGrady became the

    1. Re:DMSO not so great it seems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Crown Zellerbach Corporation, a mammoth lumber company, holds a number of patents on DMSO for use as an industrial solvent or liniment for treating pain in horses. Crown Zellerbach licenses DMSO exclusively to Research Industries of Salt Lake City for marketing as a drug called Rimso-50.

      The patents are from the late 1970's, so they have expired.

      Furthermore, these seem like stupid patents: DMSO's properties as a solvent and something that carries substances through the skin have been well known for a long time, so it's not clear that those applications can be patented.

  40. Why was this modded up? by DoubleReed · · Score: 1

    Look at that list of supposed benefits in parent post:
    It was also shown to relieve pain and swelling, relax muscles, relieve arthritis, improve blood supply and slow the growth of bacteria. It relieves the pain of sprains and even of broken bones.

    That is completely utterly absurd. The only was you could possibly imagine that such a useful substance would NOT be in widespread use is if the medical establishment is either completely retarded or some kind of vast conspiracy.

    Most /.'ers would look down on an idiot who got some trojan on their machine by downloading a file from some random website because it promised to "maek your machine run 200% better!!!". Same thing.

  41. DMSO and veterinary medicine by rumentrocar · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a veterinary technician, I can attest to DMSO's anti-inflammatory properties. We use it frequently in dogs to reduce swelling and sclerosis at injection sites in dogs undergoing chemotherapy and in dogs and horses to treat shock. While DMSO is commonly used in veterinary medicine, it is not frequently if at all labeled for such use. Most containers of DMSO explicitly say "For solvent use only." We have to warn owners that studies indicate that DMSO has anti-inflammatory properties, but we are in NO WAY responsible for anything bad that might happen.

    Also, whenever we use DMSO as a rub or an injection, we triple glove. Like other posters have said, it is readily absorbed through skin. Within about 20 seconds of skin contact a distinct garlic or oyster taste develops and last several hours. The isolation unit at our hospital assumes a rather distinct an unpleasant odor when we have to place a dog on a DMSO IV drip. The fact that it is self-sterilizing in concentrations above 90% is also a bit worrisome to some.

    While DMSO has some very real and effective uses in animals, human use is a whole other matter entirely. It would be very interesting to see DMSO undergo testing and its efficacy, as well as side effects, especially long term.

  42. A little discussion by maximilln · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I didn't know that PEG had therapeutic uses. I've always seen it as a solid support for reagents used in chemical reactions. As a chemist, I like PEG because it's inert to a majority of chemical reactions and is insoluble in many common laboratory solvents.

    In this study I imagine they're using a solubilized form of PEG. It's probably a lower polymeric weight and in a polar/protic solvent--probably aqueous.

    There are a few parts of the article which struck me as questionable, though:

    PEG is able to stop this cascade of injury by repairing initial membrane damage

    I don't think PEG so much repairs anything as it insulates the cells from each other so that they can all repair themselves without the toxic necrosis products causing further harm. I imagine that PEG also helps to moderate pH and prevent further damage that way.

    or by fusing two damaged cells together into a larger functional nerve cell.

    That's a neat theory. I doubt it.

    Significantly, the polymer is attracted only to damaged nerve cells and tissue when it's injected into the blood stream. It doesn't move into undamaged regions nearby.

    That's another neat theory. The pharmaceutical industry would love to know how a molecule with no particular shape or form manages to distinguish between "good" and "bad" cells. I'd be interested to see where the authoring reporter received this idea. I doubt highly that this is from a study of "inject in arm, observe in spine". Most likely the injection site was very close to the damages area and the injected aliquot had a mass and volume low enough to make distribution arbitrarily interpretable.

    --
    +++ATHZ 99:5:80
    1. Re:A little discussion by Blittzed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, I used to work in plant science, focusing on salt tolerance work in particular. Although I didn't personally use PEG, I know from my readings that it is used in for some aspects of salinity and water relations. It is used for research into how plants deal with water deficit because it can be used to lower osmotic potential without causing toxic effects to cells. Using salts and other ionic compounds does also lower the potential, but it can have bad side effects. PEG allows water potential to be investigated without these side effects. I would be interested to find out the actual mechanism by which it interacts with nerve cells. Buffering does sound a likely effect.

      --
      "They looked deep into my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined"
    2. Re:A little discussion by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In this study I imagine they're using a solubilized form of PEG. It's probably a lower polymeric weight and in a polar/protic solvent--probably aqueous.

      Yeah, the solubility depends a lot on the molecular weight of their PEG. I've done a bit of work in drug development, and one of the techniques used to improve the solubility of certain very nonpolar drug candidates is to stick a nice, soluble PEG group on. As you say, it's well suited to work in aqueous systems--like blood.

      That's a neat theory. I doubt it.

      Yeah, I thought that was pretty cool, if it happened. I too am skeptical on further reflection. If you got cell fusion taking place, wouldn't it mostly be useless--and destructive--fusions between axons and Schwann cells, and that sort of thing? I can't look up their original paper because I'm not at work, but it looks like they were working with pets in a veterinary clinic setting. I presume that the pets' owners weren't keen on having the animals sacrificed to do histology, so I'm quite curious as to how they reached this interesting conclusion.

      That's another neat theory. The pharmaceutical industry would love to know how a molecule with no particular shape or form manages to distinguish between "good" and "bad" cells.

      I'm willing to give them the benefit of the doubt here. It may be that the newspaper article's author was simplifying or got it plain wrong. There could be a significant change in the membranes of these damaged cells, rendering them more susceptible to a given concentration of PEG. A localized effect may in this case have been misinterpreted by someone (either the researcher or perhaps more likely the writer) as a localized delivery.

      Then again, injury and inflammation will increase the permeability of nearby blood vessels. The localization wouldn't be due to any special property of the PEG; it could just be taking advantage of that preexisting physiological response.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  43. Hospital? EMT's in the field by The+Fifth+Man · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IIRC when I first saw this study (the article makes only oblique reference) PEG can be given via IV. This should be studied in the prehospital setting, so that eventually, we won't think of it as a "hospital" thing, but as a prehospital treatment modality by EMT-Intermediates and Paramedics (after all, you don't hurt your cervical spine at the hospital, you do it in the car wreck, or in that fall, or in that shallow dive...)

    1. Re:Hospital? EMT's in the field by jborho · · Score: 1

      Speaking from experience only (medic 10 years), I can count on one hand how many people presented to me on scene with obvious neuro and motor deficits. Alot of the time, it is many minutes/hours later that deficits are noticed by the ER staff. This is usually due to the swelling crushing nerves descending down the spine. We have steroids to counter those affects. Also the mechanism of injury to cause such trauma is usually sufficent enough to cause more critical and life threatening injurys. Those injuries would be addressed first of course.

      --
      http://www.freeiPods.com/default.aspx?referer=1123 0619
  44. I agree entirely... by The_Real_MrRabbit · · Score: 1

    Sick of this kind of sleight of hand shit with remotely related crap...

    And isn't it odd how the poster tossed out the general term stell cell research...instead of clarifying adult or embryonic...

    Kinda reminds me of the post way back about one topic and suddenly half-way through it suddenly goes the "Bush evil" or "Republican's bad" crap.

    Keep your side politically motivated comments to yourself people. Post the fucking commentary and article...stick to it or don't bother.

    This kind of behavior is worse than trolling on a BB...

    =8-(

    1. Re:I agree entirely... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      instead of clarifying adult or embryonic

      So you complain about somebody injecting political debate into a medical debate by bringing up medical research in an article about medical research, then demand that they should have injected political debate into it by specifying whether they were discussing the kind you (apparently) consider "bad"?

      Whatever. Scientific advancement only comes from pushing the boundaries of what we know. You can either allow science to advance by allowing them to push the boundaries of what we know in the area of stem cell research, or not. Period. You can try to push some imaginary arbitrary distinctions somewhere but in the medical sphere all it comes down to is are researchers going to be allowed to do their jobs, or not?

    2. Re:I agree entirely... by Psykosys · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem with stem cell research is that it has been so politicized, partly by the people who object to "'Republican's bad' crap" as you call it. A rehabilitative technique such as this, which is very feasible and makes use of already-available source content and can potentially help a great deal of people needs to be researched; that is the whole purpose of science. The problem is when people step in and inject politics into such an issue. If you don't like stem cell research, let's see some studies showing that it's not going to be useful and the research is a waste of money, or some indication that it would require an abandonment of medical/scientific ethics (besides the assertion that a tiny cell has a soul, which you can think if you wish but this has no place in science). And the "adult or embryonic" difference- most people who aren't fans of paralysis just don't care.

    3. Re:I agree entirely... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1
      And isn't it odd how the poster tossed out the general term stell cell research...instead of clarifying adult or embryonic...
      ...Keep your side politically motivated comments to yourself people. Post the fucking commentary and article...stick to it or don't bother.

      What the FUCKING FUCK are you going on about? He said stem cell research, as that another possible medical technology that could be used for treatment. That is related.

      He did NOT say "Stem cell research that evil Bush wants to ban." Furthermore, he did not say any of the following:
      "Spinal Stem Cell Research, the good kind..." or
      "Embryonic Stem Cell Research, the evil kind that kills babies..." or
      "Embryonic... the kind Bush would ban..." or
      "Spinal... the kind that is still allowed..." or
      "Embryonic... who needs babies anyway..."
      or any fucking other thing.

      To use anything more than a general term would be a politicization, because it would have NOTHING to do with the issue at hand, would NOT be in any way a clarification, but instead would serve only to introduce some opinion or bias.

      Get a fucking grip.

      --
      This space available.
    4. Re:I agree entirely... by The_Real_MrRabbit · · Score: 1

      Love how all three in reply danced around the simple note: Stick to the topic...don't inject politics are remotely related crap into it. Post it...comment on IT!. Got a problem with that folks? As to the "well look who's pointing out the guys failure to clarify which type of stem cell" reply... Didn't think about the point I was making did you? Does the phrase "purposely misleading representation of an issue" ring a bell? =8-)

  45. Re:cheap? not when it's made by glaxosmithklinemer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Antifreeze is *ethylene glycol*.

    The article references *polyethylene glycol*

    Two different beasts.

  46. I don't understand by jborho · · Score: 1, Funny

    "This doesn't mean we don't need stem cell research, but it is a simple and potentially cheap way to get many of the benefits for spinal injury."

    What exactly are the benifits of a spinal injury? A

    --
    http://www.freeiPods.com/default.aspx?referer=1123 0619
  47. Re:cheap? not when it's made by glaxosmithklinemer by EvilSS · · Score: 1

    Do you really want to find out by having it injected into your body?

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  48. Stem Cell Research by bruthasj · · Score: 0

    This doesn't mean we don't need stem cell research, but it is a simple and potentially cheap way to get many of the benefits for spinal injury.

    Nice disclaimer. We do need stem cell research. What we do not need is fetal stem cell research.

    It's funny that we now live in a time where we worry more about Bic poking bunnies in the eye with pens than harvesting fetuses for so-called research. One day, I hope that everyone gets their head on straight.

    1. Re:Stem Cell Research by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's wrong with using placental stem cells?

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    2. Re:Stem Cell Research by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Do you feel the civil rights of your snot are somehow violated when you blow your nose, or if someone took a used kleenex and did medical research with it? The blastocysts being used for fetal cell research are only a few dozens of cells, they have never even had a single neuron or organ and simply do not deserve the same consideration as a person. Unless, of course, you believe in the "magic soul" business where somehow, at conception, a mystical and indetectable or verifiable "soul" is somehow deposited. And there is a huge difference between fetal stem cells and so-called "adult" stem cells, for technical reasons involving their numbers of cell divisions, resulting telomere lengths, and the environments they've been exposed to. While adult stem cells are potentially useful for various treatments, the possibility of using the non-rejected and highly adaptable tissues of fetal stem cells is quite amazing.

    3. Re:Stem Cell Research by m3j00 · · Score: 0

      Nice disclaimer. We do need stem cell research. What we do not need is fetal stem cell research.

      I wasn't aware anyone was pushing for fetal stem-cell research...

      The hot topic seems to be embryonic stem cell research. I don't know what benefits embryonic stem cells have over adult stem cells, but I do know that thousands of embryos are discarded all of the time from fertility clinics, so I don't think using them for science instead of fertilizer is that bad.

    4. Re:Stem Cell Research by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      What we do not need is fetal stem cell research.

      That, of course, is a matter of opinion. Your opinion. And ... depending upon what country you live in, you are probably entitled to it. On the other hand, the relative minority of people that have actually bothered to get any facts about the issue (rather than the usual reflexive response of the uninformed) have a different opinion.

      Your comment is somewhat, well, conflicted. You say we need stem cell research, yet in the same sentence you say we don't need foetal stem cell research. Unfortunately the scientists involved in this research disagree: most of the promise of this line of inquiry will be lost if we limit ourselves to the few remaining lines of immortalized cells. Another one of our President's half-truths (apparently his much-vaunted morality doesn't require him to be particularly truthful), there are far fewer viable lines than he originally claimed. This is one case where you can't have your cake and eat it too. You just can't.

      Funny how we live in a time where people are more concerned about a few non-viable clumps of non-differentiated tissue already on the way to the incinerator than we are about alleviating the pain and suffering of actual people. People who, if asked, might wonder why they have to die or stay confined to a wheelchair so that our President, and others who share his "vision" of the future, can feel good about themselves. You may feel that you're taking the moral high ground here, by defending what might have become a living, breathing human being. And perhaps you are. But, I ask you, why am I, or any other person, so much less deserving of that defense?

      At best, societies abide by the morals they can afford, and I submit to you that we cannot afford to allow the promise of stem-cell research to go unfulfilled. If I were one of these "harvested" foetuses, I would hope that in my brief existence I would serve to help others, rather than simply being thrown away.

      Ultimately, the question of whether Mr. Bush's "morals" are being properly applied in this matter is irrelevant. The rest of the planet doesn't necessarily share his moral stance ... here in the U.S. we seem to have this idea that if we think something is morally reprehensible that everyone else automatically does as well. Stem cell research (foetal or otherwise) will be carried out, medical treatments will be developed, and they will become available. Maybe not here in the United States, so you may have to do some travelling to get that spinal cord injury fixed. But either way, it's just a matter of time, so I wouldn't worry yourself too much about it.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  49. Benefits? by Agret · · Score: 1

    but it is a simple and potentially cheap way to get many of the benefits for spinal injury.

    There are benefits to spinal injury?

    --
    Have you metaroderated recently?
    1. Re:Benefits? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Disability payments?

  50. yeah but can it do anything useful? by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

    The important question is, if you mix some of this stuff with LSD and put it in a squirtgun and go around squirting people, will they hallucinate?

    1. Re:yeah but can it do anything useful? by totipotentsoul · · Score: 1

      An old Dead Kennedys song

      DMSO:
      D. M. S. O.
      Crypto Wonder Drug
      In vogue
      Some people say
      It cures arthritis
      Maybe that's why
      It keeps getting banned
      It's absorbed
      Directly through the skin
      Mix it with lemon juice
      Touch your fingertips
      You'll taste the lemon
      The police
      Started a riot
      Down at the courthouse
      Again
      Running amok
      Spilling blood
      Bashing heads
      I do my part
      Behind the lines
      Swabbing door handles of cop cars
      With D.M.S.O.
      Mixed with L.S.D.....

      --
      The best posts are both flamebait and informative.
    2. Re:yeah but can it do anything useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, LSD can be absorbed directly through the skin and because of minute doses, not much has to get in for there to be a noticeable effect.

      Not much point to dolling it up with DMSO. LSD up and squirt away.
      http://www.erowid.org/ask/ask.cgi?ID=2838

    3. Re:yeah but can it do anything useful? by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Swabbing door handles of cop cars
      With D.M.S.O.
      Mixed with L.S.D...

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  51. Re:In other news... by Descartes · · Score: 1

    Who the hell modded this up? Not only off topic, but as my hidden anonymous friend mentioned it was on the front page of /. on Dec 1.

    Now, to save myself from offtopic: I'd be interested to see if this treatment could be used to repair long damaged spines. As I understand it PEG is basically glue in this situation, maybe you could cut out the dead part of the cord, sand the edges a little a squirt some of this stuff in.

  52. Head Injury Too? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if this would work for head injuries too. the same problem occurs with cascading neural damage after the injury. I don't know if I'd be inclined to inject some PEG directly into my brain though. We seem to have a natural aversion to injecting anything into our brains.

    God knows what I would have done if I had noticed this article before my accident. I wonder if I would have been crazy enough.

    wrt head injuries it has been found that progesterone also provides some protective effect if administered within 48 hours of the injury. Of course, women have less need for this and typically recover better from head injuries. I wonder if this would be true for spinal cord injuries as well.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  53. Go To The Source by Eponymous+Mallard · · Score: 5, Informative
    Whenever I read such an article in the popular press I always try to access the actual scientific journal article about the study. In this case the study was published in the December 2004 issue of The Journal of Neurotrauma which is available online. Just click in the link labelled "Scientists Reverse Paralysis in Dogs" and you can download the complet pdf file of the research paper. (I hope they don't mind being slashdotted.)

    Here is the abstract of the article:

    Lavert, PH et al. A Preliminary Study of Intravenous Surfactants in Paraplegic Dogs: Polymer Therapy in Canine Clinical SCI. Journal of Neurotrauma. December 2004, Vol. 21, No. 12, Pages 1767-1777

    Hydrophilic polymers, both surfactants and triblock polymers, are known to seal defects in cell membranes. In previous experiments using laboratory animals, we have exploited this capability using polyethylene glycol (PEG) to repair spinal axons after severe, standardized spinal cord injury (SCI) in guinea pigs. Similar studies were conducted using a related co-polymer Poloxamer 188 (P 188). Here we carried out initial investigations of an intravenous application of PEG or P 188 (3500 Daltons, 30% w/w in saline; 2 mL/kg I.V. and 2 mL/kg body weight or 300 mL P 188 per kg, respectively) to neurologically complete cases of paraplegia in dogs. Our aim was to first determine if this is a clinically safe procedure in cases of severe naturally occurring SCI in dogs. Secondarily, we wanted to obtain preliminary evidence if this therapy could be of clinical benefit when compared to a larger number of similar, but historical, control cases. Strict entry criteria permitted recruitment of only neurologically complete paraplegic dogs into this study. Animals were treated by a combination of conventional and experimental techniques within 72 h of admission for spinal trauma secondary to acute, explosive disk herniation. Outcome measures consisted of measurements of voluntary ambulation, deep and superficial pain perception, conscious proprioception in hindlimbs, and evoked potentials (somatosensory evoked potentials [SSEP]). We determined that polymer injection is a safe adjunct to the conventional management of severe neurological injury in dogs. We did not observe any unacceptable clinical response to polymer injection; there were no deaths, nor any other problem arising from, or associated with, the procedures. Outcome measures over the 68-week trial were improved by polymer injection when compared to historical cases. This recovery was unexpectedly rapid compared to these comparator groups. The results of this pilot trial provides evidence consistent with the notion that the injection of inorganic polymers in acute neurotrauma may be a simple and useful intervention during the acute phase of the injury.

    Eponymous Mallard. "It it quacks like a duck, it may be the Eponymous Mallard."

    1. Re:Go To The Source by djmurdoch · · Score: 1

      Reading the original is a great idea, because there's pressure on the original to present the results honestly. For example, the title is "A Preliminary Study", and the conclusion in the abstract is that this study "..provides evidence consistent with the notion...".

      The Slashdot title is wrong when it says this treatment "helps cure". There's very little evidence that the effect will be reproducible. There was no control group in the study, so the possibility is very great that a selection bias was entirely responsible for the better outcomes in this trial than in historical measurements.

      As the abstract says, the primary purpose of this study was to determine whether PEG treatment was safe. Only secondarily was this study trying to determine whether there might be clinical benefit.

      A better title for the submission would be "New Treatment Not Immediately Harmful, May Be Helpful"

  54. Safe and Effective within Time Window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The treatment is safe and effective within the time window. PEG appears to inhibit the body's defenses from killing the neurons in the spine.

    PEG would be most effective in healing the spinal injuries inflicted by Chinese soldiers against Tibetan women and children, but how can we deliver PEG to the Tibetans within the time window?

  55. Alzheimers Prevention by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 1

    The question this raised in my mind was: can this be used to prevent alzheimers. Would a daily dose of this stuff (since it reputedly does not have any adverse effects on healthy nerves) help prevent degeneration in brain cells. Even if it couldn't cross the blood-brain barrier could older people get weekly or monthly injections as a preventive measure? Or would this have no effect? Perhaps someone should investigate this (now where is an email link to the researchers ...)

  56. I wonder if this could be used to treat by multiplexo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    neurodegenerative diseases such as ALS (Lou Gehrig's disease), Parkinsonism or Huntington's Chorea. I recall reading somewhere that one of the reasons these diseases are so damaging is that as they kill neurons chemicals are released which cause further neuronal apoptosis in a chain reaction.

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    1. Re:I wonder if this could be used to treat by museumpeace · · Score: 1

      Probably not. If you look it up polyethylene glycol is a "stabilizer/thickener" and relatively inert. ITs function in spinal injuries is to , in effect, coat the injured nerves in a way that prevents some unhelpful things ["glutamate cascade"? in the case of strokes] that the body does for injured nerve tissue...its effect may almost be mechanical more than biochemical.

      --
      SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  57. Re:Muslims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate all muslims, and wish they would all die.
    Why?

    Islam is a religion of peace.
    They would never harm anyone.

  58. Lower barriers to entry by yorkpaddy · · Score: 1

    The response to the problem of less clinical trials being tried isn't more funding of reserch. The answer is to reduce tho barriers to entry for medical research. The FDA needs to get away from restricting new medicines. More clinical trials would be conducted if they were less expensive. The FDA has a lot to do with that expense.

    --
    "brxref .k.p ,.by xprt. gbe.p.oycmaycbi yd. cby.nci.bj. ru yd. am.pcjab lgxlcj" don'
  59. I read that at first as "New Testament helps cure by DrLawyer · · Score: 1

    spinal injuries" - I mean, how many times have I heard that from the friendly sunday morning evangelist! -LINKOVICH

  60. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is old news, but I'd be careful about throwing the term vaccine around with this one - people outside the area are used to thinking of vaccines as some kind of preventative agent, which this certainly is not. It is still a pretty amazing development, however.

  61. And here I though PEG was.... by CokeJunky · · Score: 0

    also known as antifreeze! Could this also be the cure for brain freeze from sucking down a slurpee too fast?

    --
    More Caffeine. NOW
  62. Re:cheap? not when it's made by glaxosmithklinemer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Super glue=cyanoacrylate, which is hard when it dries. It was invented as an adhesive for the eardrum. for which it is a poor choice. The "hospital grade liquid bandage" is 2-octyl cyanoacrylate, which is flexible when it dries. It costs ~$40 per tube.

  63. obligatory Monty Python Reference by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    What is the motive velocity of a swallow's stem cells.

    Adult or Embryonic?

    I... I don't know. ... AHHHHHHHH!!!!!

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  64. Re:cheap? not when it's made by glaxosmithklinemer by b1scuit · · Score: 1
    That, and stuff you inject into yourself damn well should have higher standards than antifreeze for your car.

    I'm a car, you insensitive clod!

  65. Better by bryan986 · · Score: 1

    I prefer the homer simpson garbage can treatment

    --
    There is no sig
  66. New Treatment by Kerstyun · · Score: 0

    You mean New Testament. Only the power of God can truley cure. Amen.

    --
    Keep the whitehouse white, vote Trump & Palin 2020.
  67. Don't do it! by thygrrr · · Score: 1

    PEG stands for Personal Entertainment orGanizer. A series of PDAs manufactured by Sony, dubbed "Clié".

    All PEG will do is replace your spine with a Memory Stick. So much for flexibility... %-)

  68. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what would cure us of a bad case of Spinal Tap???

  69. 153 posts... by nxtr · · Score: 2

    ...and no jokes about anti-freeze?!?

    1. Re:153 posts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there were, but alas, it is a different chemical. Thusly, those that posted, undoubtedly by now, have realized thier mental shortcomings and with luck reached for the POLYethyline glycol for help and not the ethyline glycol.

  70. This is insightful? by sean.peters · · Score: 1, Informative
    It's funny that we now live in a time where we worry more about Bic poking bunnies in the eye with pens than harvesting fetuses for so-called research.

    This isn't a strawman, it's more like a straw-giant. No one has EVER proposed "harvesting fetuses" for their stem cells. What HAS been proposed is taking stem cells from discarded embryos at the blastocyst stage, left over from in vitro fertilizations, that will NEVER be implanted. These embryos are doomed anyway, so there's no point in denying society of the research benefits involved in using them.

    Sean

  71. Just to get it straight by DynaSoar · · Score: 2, Informative

    They're not injecting antifreeze, they're injecting a food additive. Ethylene glycol is antifreeze. Polyethylene glycol is what makes your Mountain Dew syrupy.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  72. Re:cheap? not when it's made by glaxosmithklinemer by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2, Informative

    The reason the hospital grade is so expensive is often things like testing, purity, and sterilization. Something clean enough to hold in your hand is not necessarily clean enough to embed in the glued together bone or skin tissue of someone with a suppressed immune system due to illness.

    And the hospital grade costs about $20/tube, with a fancy applicator designed to put it on thinly, last I looked on a hospital bill.

  73. Ummm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds good but isn't it a little scary that they sell this chemical at a woodworking site?

  74. Soft Drinks? by Don+Faulkner · · Score: 1

    I was certain that Dr. Pepper had PEG as an ingredient. However, I've just read the contents on a can from my fridge, and it's not there.

    Am I imagining things? Did they change the formula? Am I thinking of a different soft drink?

    1. Re:Soft Drinks? by DelawareBoy · · Score: 1

      Nope. Polyethylene Glycol is in Dr. Pepper. It's also used as a Bowel Prep before many medical Procedures (I.E. Provides mucho liquid bowel movements).

  75. Re:Interesting idea.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You didn't get comment #11000000?

    Ha ha ha ha ha :-P

  76. PEG is used in woodworking too by somers96 · · Score: 1

    do you realize that PEG is used to stabilize green wooden products, so they can be machined and not crack or warp when dried!!

  77. Re:cheap? not when it's made by glaxosmithklinemer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought modern antifreeze was actually PROPYLENE glycol. That should be different from polyethylene glycol.

  78. PEG used in medicine already, preserving cells by Tsu+Dho+Nimh · · Score: 1
    When you are preparing blood for freezing (long term storage of rare types) or freezing cell cultures, or sperm and probably even embryos, the cells are mixed in with PEG because it stabilizes the cell memnranes.

    It's not much of a leap to go from this to trying in in live animals.

  79. Oh really? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

    >any promising fetal stem cell treatments. But there are not.

    The popular media isn't exactly a scientific journal. Don't make absolute statements, unless you're willing to back them up.

    The following are written above the soundbite 5th grade level:

    search1

    Or just type "embryonic stem cells" here and be ready for some surprises.

  80. Benefits by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

    it is a simple and potentially cheap way to get many of the benefits for spinal injury

    I didn't know that there were any benefits to a spinal injury...

  81. IT DOES NOT CURE SPINAL INJURIES by SauroNlord · · Score: 1

    If you read the article, it speaks of neural tissue. Spinal injuries due to breakage or arthritus is different than a spinal injury due to damaged neural tissue.

  82. If Stem Cell Research is So Great by tjstork · · Score: 1

    Then why isn't it being privately funded? The only thing Bush did was to allow an extremely small number of stem cells to actually be studied WITH FEDERAL MONEY, more than any previous president ever did. That doesn't mean a private firm could not do stem cell research themselves. Why can't a Pharma company do it, for example? In fact, if stem cells are so great, then, how come half the people bitching about studying them aren't doing it themselves, or donating to groups that do support them?

    The entire stem cell research issue is a left wing fraud.

    --
    This is my sig.
  83. Re:cheap? not when it's made by glaxosmithklinemer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sanitary enough to clean yer wallet eh? hehehehehehehehehehehehehehe

  84. Re: Philosopher King by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

    Well, if had to make a database or class diagram, then, "chemicals" would include "atoms". Maybe I should just shut up, because you are right in all other respects about chemicals.

    However, if a chemical is safe to use on the skin, it still can be harmful inside the body. Example: air. So I believe when I hear it said PEG is not safe (inside the body).

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  85. Re: Philosopher King by torstenvl · · Score: 1

    Hmm. Well your right, my reasoning is flawed there. I guess I was working on the unspoken assumption that dangerous substances (to ingest) aren't put in cosmetics on the danger of there being children who might ingest them. And direct insertion into the blood stream could have other complications. Still though, I don't think that they would have injected it unless they knew what was going on (better than we do anyway). It sounds like a great discovery, and if it's handled safely and responsibly, it could be really cool.