Slashdot Mirror


High School Dropout, Self-Taught Chip Designer

circletimessquare writes "The QVC television shopping network has recently found a hit in its product the C64, which emulates the classic Commodore 64 in a small form factor, a joystick. But the story of the designer of the product is more interesting than the product. Meet Jeri Ellsworth [NYTimes. You know what that means], whose life story emulates the golden age of garage-based computer design. She is proof that the passion of the homebrew electronic hobbyist is still a viable force in an age when well-funded and well-staffed corporate design teams dominate chip design."

816 comments

  1. No Reg Required... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The soul-saver strikes again (Karma Free, for your pleasure):

    Reg Free Link

    1. Re:No Reg Required... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She could play with my joystick!

      SHE OWNZ nasty ass CEREN

    2. Re:No Reg Required... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NY Times:
      Two years ago she showed it off at the Hackers' Conference, an annual meeting of some of the nation's best computer designers.

      What is this "Hackers' Conference" that the NY Times is referring to? They clearly state that it is the "Hackers' Conference" not a "Hackers Conference"

      ?????

    3. Re:No Reg Required... by Pompatus · · Score: 2, Informative

      and for all other registration required stuff....

      bugmenot

      Even has extensions for firefox and ie. I'm sure most of you already know about it, but in case you didn't, here it is.

      --

      ----
      Squirrel ... It's not just for breakfast anymore
    4. Re:No Reg Required... by iamhassi · · Score: 4, Funny
      sorry for the troll but.... damn she's cute!!!

      Even if she wasn't a 30 yr old high school dropout self-taught chip designer and was just a normal person I'd still consider her cute.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    5. Re:No Reg Required... by dAzED1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      why aren't you modded as funny?

      You were just being funny...right?

    6. Re:No Reg Required... by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

      Impressive what passes for cute. I'd give her a 5/6 out of 10.. max.

    7. Re:No Reg Required... by pHatidic · · Score: 4, Funny

      So .8333 out of 10? Dude that's harsh.

    8. Re:No Reg Required... by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 4, Funny

      she really is pretty cute... but look at all the stiff competition you'd find if you tried to pick her up at a hobby show: http://home.earthlink.net/~randy128/expo2002/pix5/ MVC-304S.JPG

    9. Re:No Reg Required... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just say that because she's looking up at you.

    10. Re:No Reg Required... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      The lady in the purple sweater looks nice but I am disturbed that everyone else in the room appears to be just staring at her holding their crotches.

    11. Re:No Reg Required... by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Duh... "stiff" competition. Get it?

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    12. Re:No Reg Required... by JPriest · · Score: 1

      Here is the link to the bugmenot firefox extention.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    13. Re:No Reg Required... by iamhassi · · Score: 0, Troll
      "You just say that because she's looking up at you."

      true... I do like that view best of women.... cuz there's usually only one thing they're doing when they're looking up at me... and no, not tying my shoe....

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    14. Re:No Reg Required... by lostguy · · Score: 1

      My first reaction to that picture was to wonder who screwed up the color balance to make everyone look so pallid.

      GO OUTSIDE OCCASIONALLY, PEOPLE!

    15. Re:No Reg Required... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, that's what a woman looks like up close!

      That picture is hillarious and yet a sad surreal reflection of our industry. Sigh.

    16. Re:No Reg Required... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm... Given the wall paper, the hair styles, the clothing styles, the lighting, the image quality, etc... am I the only one that thinks that this picture looks like something from the early 1980s. She's probably actually 50 years old now, at the very least, look at the monitors on the desks, they're color, but they look like 14" VGA at best.

      As for the girl, she's not ugly, but someone please tell me why it is that women in these types of clubs always tend to wear camouflage. If this woman were to get a hair cut, stop fidgiting and maybe get a nice skirt suit or something along those lines, she could be the one on QVC selling her own toy. Noone hit her with an ugly stick, but the years spent helping dad at the mobil station are painfully obvious.

      BTW, I often work with young ladies (25-30) with the same type of skill set as hers that know how to use their looks in the business place to make the men do whatever they want. Let's face it, in a room full of nerds, money isn't nearly as valuable as a good looking woman. So they're obviously smart enough to know that even though they are smart enough to merity respect with their brains, they're also able to get people to recognize them more easily if they're enjoyable to look at.

    17. Re:No Reg Required... by Negatyfus · · Score: 1

      She's not butt-ugly, but come on. I think the horrible color-design of the games section on Slashdot finally screwed up your eye-sight. That, or you're a 28-year-old virgin living in your parents' basement. Or both.

    18. Re:No Reg Required... by wrw · · Score: 1

      I've met her, and it's a current picture. She just hangs out with Commodore 64 geeks who really do look like that. I think the picture was taken at the recent World of Commodore expo in Toronto.

      Can we get off her looks for a minute and consider the fact that she's fucking brilliant and made a really cool toy?

    19. Re:No Reg Required... by unitron · · Score: 2, Funny
      But she has her own temperature-controlled soldering station, how can you not fall in love?

      I'll bet she even does wire-wrap.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    20. Re:No Reg Required... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's your mommy, fastening up your coat's buttons for you.

    21. Re:No Reg Required... by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      Can we get off her looks for a minute and consider the fact that she's fucking brilliant and made a really cool toy?

      If she wasn't brilliant and hadn't made a really cool toy, we wouldn't be talking about her at all. There are plenty of gorgeous women in the world who would bore slashdotters to death after the first week. (Though that first week would be pretty sweet). We're talking about her because we DO respect her accomplishments, in addition to her looks.

    22. Re:No Reg Required... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no because she is cute, brilliant, made a really cool toy, and will be the mother of my children. I will only have to meet her and she will beg for me to fullfill the last item on the list. I'm positive of it.

  2. Yes but... by _PimpDaddy7_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    is she HOT?

    1. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'd say pretty "regular" looking... though doesn't look 30 to me...

    2. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes.

    3. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      actually... yeah..

    4. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, looking at the picture included in the article, yes she's pretty darn cute IMHO.

    5. Re:Yes but... by ValourX · · Score: 1
    6. Re:Yes but... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

      She's pretty good looking, even if she wasn't a female hard-core geek who designs and fabricates CPUs for the hell of it.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    7. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask Google. This AC finds her hot.

    8. Re:Yes but... by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      well, better than some of the nasties that nerds slobber over - but that's not saying much

      Interesting:
      She gains geek cred for owning an old pinball machine
      She loses it for having a Compaq laptop

    9. Re:Yes but... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Considering she fit a C64 + games into a joystick, she could have an AOL account and still have geek cred.

      And since everyone's giving an opinion on this; I give her a 6.5.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    10. Re:Yes but... by MrRuslan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      she needs some makeup in my opinion.....

    11. Re:Yes but... by gUmbi · · Score: 4, Funny

      is she HOT?

      6 beers.

    12. Re:Yes but... by caluml · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, she's slim, which in my book is 75% :)

    13. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but she's allso a lesbian iirc.

      Then if that's a bad thing or not depends on your level of patheticness[is that a real word?] I'd guess. I mean if all you can do is fantasize about girls then why not add a little spice to it? ;)

    14. Re:Yes but... by schmu_20mol · · Score: 1

      well actually ...she reminds me of Magrat Garlick (Discworld, Terry Pratchett)

      --
      "Nae Kin! Nae Quin! Nae laird! Nae master! We willna be fooled again!"
    15. Re:Yes but... by krumms · · Score: 1

      I think she looks like a gremlin in the pic from the article. A cute gremlin, but a gremlin all the same.

      But I guess that's what you get for being a great big fucking nerd like the rest of us. ;)

    16. Re:Yes but... by Phu5ion · · Score: 1
      --
      Slashdot is kind of like Playboy; we aren't here to read the articles.
    17. Re:Yes but... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      Well, everyone has a different definition of 'hot'. As far as what does she look like... there is your answer.

      http://images.google.com/images?q=jeri+Ellsworth&h l=en&btnG=Google+Search

    18. Re:Yes but... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even more remarkable than a hot girl designing microchips, is the fact that QVC is selling something I would actually buy.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    19. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you are measuring that in 40 ouncers...

    20. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am waiting for a high school drop out to invent the ugly stick so I could hit it too.

    21. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd hit it.... ... with a bat!

    22. Re:Yes but... by ATN · · Score: 0

      In hope that she reads /. my number is
      555-7372 :D

    23. Re:Yes but... by SLot · · Score: 1

      Little bit of leg:
      http://homepage.mac.com/kznight/.Pictures/Ph oto%20 Album%20Pictures/2002-09-28%2008.24.07%20-0700/P00 04076.JPG

      Little bit of up the skirt:
      http://homepage.mac.com/kznight/.Pictures/ Photo%20 Album%20Pictures/2002-09-28%2008.24.07%20-0700/P00 04075.JPG

    24. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I thought the same thing.

      I actually saw this being peddled on QVC one night as I was channel surfing, and it caught enough of my interest to make me stop and look. However, since it was sold on QVC, I had to assume it was a piece of junk, and moved on. I have also seen a similar product for Nintendo, and many of the games were knockoffs or really crappy games you had never heard of.

    25. Re:Yes but... by freshman_a · · Score: 4, Funny

      Even more remarkable than a hot girl designing microchips, is the fact that QVC is selling something I would actually buy.

      even more remarkable is that this is prolly the only article in /. history where a post by an AC consisting only of the word "Yes", in reponse to the question "is she hot?", got modded as "insightful"

    26. Re:Yes but... by iamhassi · · Score: 1, Informative
      i know you're a Mac user so you're not required to know a damn thing about anything but it'd sure be nice if you guys would learn how hyperlink properly WITHOUT spaces.

      Little bit of leg FIXED

      Little bit of up the skirt FIXED

      typical slashdot: they post a story about a C64 in a joystick and what are we concerned about? Looking up the skirt of the developer ;)

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    27. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, Jeri, but you know this is /. where most of us never ever had a date... just to place al the remarks in the right context.

    28. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd hit it.

    29. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that was intentional to avoid a slashdotting.

      Nice job dumbass

    30. Re:Yes but... by Esteanil · · Score: 1

      Ahh, the joys of surfing with ISDN.
      For a second there I actually got to imagine what the picture with the text "jeri ellisworth giving a b..." might show... ;-)

      --
      I'm a dreamer, the world is my playpen. But hey, I'm a serious person, I can't dream all the time.
    31. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I give her an 8.

    32. Re:Yes but... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 4, Funny
      is she HOT?

      She's female and she knows VHDL. That makes her pretty hot as far as I'm concerned.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    33. Re:Yes but... by talmagwa · · Score: 1

      Yes she is http://images.google.com/images?q=Jeri+Ellsworth&h l=en&btnG=Google+Search

    34. Re:Yes but... by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Yes. Not in a Kate Beckinsdale style of hot, but she is pretty good looking. Cutest pic ever (computer fans over 20 will understand!).

    35. Re:Yes but... by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Yes, C64s are such hugely complicated devices...

      I'm still waiting for an Amiga on a chip.
      Something that can address more memory than the equivalent of a pile of paper stacked a half inch high.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    36. Re:Yes but... by c64cryptoboy · · Score: 2, Funny
      QVC is selling something I would actually buy

      I'm sure the small print says "Jeri not included".

      --
      I put the 'fun' in fundamentalism
    37. Re:Yes but... by Dasein · · Score: 1

      For me, a diet coke and .. well, I guess I wouldn't need the diet coke really.

      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
    38. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is 6 beers how many it takes you to forget that you are a homosexual?

      A few Red Bulls because it would be on all night!

    39. Re:Yes but... by Zedrick · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Aaaargh! It's like this in the C= community too. When discussing the Commodore One (basically a new improved C64 designed by Jeri), 50% of the posts in comp.sys.cbm and the mailinglists is about that computer itself, the rest is Jeri this and Jeri that...

      I can understand why there are so few females in the business, most of them probably gets overwhelmed by the attention they get because of their gender, and not their merits.

    40. Re:Yes but... by ShawnDoc · · Score: 0, Troll

      Jeri was not born female. Sorry guys. (And no this is not a joke or a troll. I'm just trying to save people from embarassing themselves more)

    41. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, when you make your (surely vastly superior) version, do let us know about it, won't you?

    42. Re:Yes but... by Talez · · Score: 1

      For anyone that doesn't understand the joke, the license plate reads "MOS 6502".

      This chip was used in the Apple II and a number of consoles in both in slightly modified forms. The Nintendo had an 2A03 which was a 6502 with no decimal mode and 23 more memory mapped registers, The Atari 2600 had a 6507 with a slightly modified pinout and only able to address 8KB of RAM.

      It was a kickass CPU at the time given that it had a feature where there was a delay with the CPU accessing the bus and you could guarantee that the CPU was not touching it. During this time you could shift video information over the bus without having to pause the 6502.

      It went on to a few successors to. The 6510 was in the C64, the 65816 was in the SNES and the 65xx architechture was the inspiration for the StrongARM architechture.

    43. Re:Yes but... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Cite?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    44. Re:Yes but... by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Sure, hold your breath while you wait.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    45. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure you are mistakenly thinking of Dani Bunten, who wrote M.U.L.E. while Dan Bunten.

    46. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I'm still waiting for an Amiga on a chip.
      So, design one! What?!? You can't? So STFU and stop denigrating someone else's accomplishments, even if it is "only" a C64 on a chip.

      I HATE seeing comments like this on Slashdot: "That wasn't so great - this would be better... I can't do it myself, but it would still be better".

      WTF is that all about, anyway?

    47. Re:Yes but... by animus9 · · Score: 1

      Ummm.. the beer scale is mine dude. I invented the beer scale. So, being the inventor I'll describe how it works and why your use of it is completely wrong:

      1. -1 to -12 beers = good to mega hot
      2. 0 beers = neutral
      3. 1 to 12 beers = meh to gorgon

      The first range (in the negative) demonstrates how many beers you would be willing to give up in order to score. The 2nd range (0) is neutral and means you wouldn't give any up, but she's not so bad you'd have to drink any. The last stage is how many beers you'd have to drink before you'd get with her.

      Now that we know the rules we'll re-evaluate her:

      1. physically attractive: YES
      2. smart & interested in computers: definitely adds to percieved attractiveness
      3. commodore 64 = cool

      So, my sober rating of her would be -8 beers. It's not often that you find a hot computer chick. It pretty much falls into the same category as a "smart jock" or all those other wonderful stereotypes.

      --
      I eat bees -- they taste stingy.
    48. Re:Yes but... by _randy_64 · · Score: 1
      I actually RTFA, so I had seen her pic already, but I clicked your provided link anyway. The second pic that comes up has the truncated caption "Jeri Ellsworth giving a b" ...

      'nuf said!

      --
      I mod down all the "free iPod"-sig losers.
    49. Re:Yes but... by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1, Troll
      I went to school with Jeri. Then known as JJ or Jay. He went to Dallas High School. He was a huge C64 nut, and wrote his own BBS software of which I used to help him beta test. I don't believe he ever finished it. He was the one who introduced me to the local Commodore 64 UG in Salem. His dad owned the local BP gas station, and JJ built his own race car there. He got a sex change a few years back.

      It's not big deal. I just hate seeing people objectifing him and posting links to wanna be up-skirt photos. I just figure it's easier to mention he used to be a guy then it is to try and convince the people posting these things that its wrong to objectify a woman like they are doing.

      And for the curious, Jeri has a live in girlfriend/wife who could probably kick the ass of the typical slashdotter.

    50. Re:Yes but... by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 1

      I think I speak for the entire slashdot community when I say:

      Jeri, will you marry me?

      --
      Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
    51. Re:Yes but... by abdulla · · Score: 1

      You'd love the electrical engineering department of my university then. Beware, some of them look like they haven't seen the sun in a few years.

    52. Re:Yes but... by Frogbert · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, and I'm sure her girlfriend thinks so too

    53. Re:Yes but... by Loualbano2 · · Score: 1

      You must be from Milwaukee.

    54. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > She's female and she knows VHDL. That makes her pretty hot as far as I'm concerned

      I KNEW there had to be something wrong with her. All I ask for is a hot chick that writes Verilog. Is that too much to ask? Is it?

    55. Re:Yes but... by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      So, design one! What?!? You can't?

      As I told the last respondant. I can, just hold your breath for a bit. :-)

      Actually I mention Amiga-on-a-chip because that was one of the Amiga's many unrealized future designs, that one being codenamed Hombre or somesuch.

      So STFU and stop denigrating someone else's accomplishments, even if it is "only" a C64 on a chip.

      Me, STFU? Well fsck you pebcak, and double dumbass on you. No, triple dumbass on you!

      Reality though, I wasn't claiming her work was uncool. I was responding to someone who inferred the act of fitting it all in a joystick was a feat. Which I'm pretty sure it wasn't hard to fit so many transistors in one unremarkably dense modern chip.

      I HATE seeing comments like this on Slashdot: "That wasn't so great - this would be better... I can't do it myself, but it would still be better".

      WTF is that all about, anyway?


      I dunno, its not my comment, ask the person who wrote it.

      I'm wondering why so many people are picking the darkest light to read my messages in. Do I need more smiley emoticons in my messages or something? :-)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    56. Re:Yes but... by paedobear · · Score: 2, Funny

      Feh - still hot. Or is there a rule that we can only objectify real women now?

    57. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please post pics of the gf/wife as proof!

      You're going to have to give better documentation than that, though, this is slashdot where there's hundreds of trolls that would love to convince everyone people are of the other gender. There's posts like that about CmdrTaco and CowboyNeal all the time, so photographic documentation is essential here.

    58. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Left side or right?

    59. Re:Yes but... by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Most of the good hardware people I've met have been hot chicks. Margaret St. Pierre, for example.
      I'm hoping against hope that this post will cause "hot chicks" to be associated forever with "Margaret St. Pierre" in the collective memory of the Internet.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    60. Re:Yes but... by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

      Even more remarkable than a hot girl designing microchips, is the fact that QVC is selling something I would actually buy.

      Wait... QVC is selling hot girls designing microchips?

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    61. Re:Yes but... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      *Hot chick that designed product not included.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    62. Re:Yes but... by dextroz · · Score: 1

      Umm... could you post a linky to her (Margaret St. Pierre) picture? Have looked all over google but couldn't find one darn image! Got her addy and stuff though...

      --
      Where's my free iPod!? Until then, I'll settle for a kiss...
    63. Re:Yes but... by dextroz · · Score: 1

      Are you crazy! Check out those hot nails of hers! And to think that she codes with them :-/

      --
      Where's my free iPod!? Until then, I'll settle for a kiss...
    64. Re:Yes but... by dextroz · · Score: 1

      Both those images have gone, maybe you can dig them from your cache and repost them somewhere for the unfortunate ones ;-) ?

      --
      Where's my free iPod!? Until then, I'll settle for a kiss...
    65. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Jeri

    66. Re:Yes but... by stevedekorte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ShawnDoc, even transexuals have adam's apples. where is it?

      Btw, I met her at the Vintage Computer Feastival in Mountain View last month. She's a very nice, intellegent (obviously) and beautifully woman (even more obviously).

    67. Re:Yes but... by sahonen · · Score: 1

      IIRC, Magrat had zero curves at all and extremely frizzy hair.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    68. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A little phonebook searching provides strong, although not conclusive, evidence that you are correct.

    69. Re:Yes but... by jaelle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What really gets old is that none of the guys have the slightest interest in talking tech with us. All they're actually interested in is getting laid. A girl with geek cred adds points, evidently, but you guys really don't give a rats about her or her gadget.

      The reason girls don't do tech? Because there's no one to freakin' talk to, that's why! Millions of guys who do the same thing, and they'll all talk to each other endlessly about it. But not to girl techs. What *we* get is "do you like to..." fill in a whole bunch of blanks about sex.

      Frankly, about the 1000th time, it gets boring.

      --
      You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
    70. Re:Yes but... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      There are at least as many decent males in technology as there are females.

      The uber-dorks annoy me too.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    71. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Sorry, but no

    72. Re:Yes but... by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 1

      You are just bitter because your chick isn't as smart.

      Go sit in the corner you insensitive clod.

    73. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very funny.

    74. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's only a cheap surgical procedure, as well.

    75. Re:Yes but... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Bah, being a poor kid exposed me to the 6502, even though I'm under 20 ;-)

      The 65816 was a 16-bit version of the 65C02 (which was a CMOS version of the 6502), and it was the processor selected for the SNES, as Nintendo already had experience with the 2A03. Also, you kinda forgot that ARM begat StrongARM (begat XScale, but that's another story).

    76. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >So, my sober rating of her would be -8 beers

      So, what are you saying here... you'd have to feed her 8 beers to get her to look at you twice?

    77. Re:Yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  3. text! by ack154 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Enjoy:

    YAMHILL, Ore. - There is a story behind every electronic gadget sold on the QVC shopping channel. This one leads to a ramshackle farmhouse in rural Oregon, which is the home and circuit design lab of Jeri Ellsworth, a 30-year-old high school dropout and self-taught computer chip designer.

    Ms. Ellsworth has squeezed the entire circuitry of a two-decade-old Commodore 64 home computer onto a single chip, which she has tucked neatly into a joystick that connects by a cable to a TV set. Called the Commodore 64 - the same as the computer system - her device can run 30 video games, mostly sports, racing and puzzles games from the early 1980's, all without the hassle of changing game cartridges.

    She has also included five hidden games and other features - not found on the original Commodore computer - that only a fellow hobbyist would be likely to appreciate. For instance, someone who wanted to turn the device into an improved version of the original machine could modify it to add a keyboard, monitor and disk drive.

    Sold by Mammoth Toys, based in New York, for $30, the Commodore 64 joystick has been a hot item on QVC this Christmas season, selling 70,000 units in one day when it was introduced on the shopping channel last month; since then it has been sold through QVC's Web site. Frank Landi, president of Mammoth, said he expected the joystick would be distributed next year by bigger toy and electronics retailers like Radio Shack, Best Buy, Sears and Toys "R" Us. "To me, any toy that sells 70,000 in a day on QVC is a good indication of the kind of reception we can expect," he said.

    Ms. Ellworth's first venture into toy making has not yet brought her great wealth - she said she is paid on a consulting basis at a rate that is competitive for her industry - "but I'm having fun," she said, and she continues with other projects in circuit design as a consultant.

    Her efforts in reverse-engineering old computers and giving them new life inside modern custom chips has already earned her a cult following among small groups of "retro" personal computer enthusiasts, as well as broad respect among the insular world of the original computer hackers who created the first personal computers three decades ago. (The term "hacker" first referred to people who liked to design and create machines, and only later began to be applied to people who broke into them.)

    More significant, perhaps, is that in an era of immensely complicated computer systems, huge factories and design teams that stretch across continents, Ms. Ellsworth is demonstrating that the spirit that once led from Silicon Valley garages to companies like Hewlett-Packard and Apple Computer can still thrive.

    "She's a pure example of following your interests and someone who won't accept that you can't do it," said Lee Felsenstein, the designer of the first portable PC and an original member of the Homebrew Computer Club. "She is someone who can do it and do it brilliantly."

    Ms. Ellsworth said that chip design was an opportunity to search for elegance in simplicity. She takes her greatest pleasure in examining a complex computer circuit and reducing it in cost and size by cleverly reusing basic electronic building blocks.

    It is a skill that is as much art as science, but one that Ms. Ellsworth has perfected, painstakingly refining her talent by plunging deeply into the minutiae of computer circuit design.

    Recently she interrupted a conversation with a visitor in her home to hunt in between the scattered circuit boards and components in her living room for a 1971 volume, "MOS Integrated Circuits," which she frequently consults. The book concerns an earlier chip technology based on fewer transistors than are used today. "I look for older texts," she said. "A real good designer needs to know how the old stuff works."

    Several years ago Ms. Ellsworth cornered Stephen Wozniak, co-founder of Apple Computer, at a festival for vintage Apple computers and badgered him for the secrets of his Apple I

    1. Re:text! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The text is no good alone. People here are going to want to see her picture! You know how geek guys are. I recommend the Reg Free Link provided in the first post.

      BTW- She is cute in a geeky, chip-designing young chick kind of way ;)

    2. Re:text! by spac3manspiff · · Score: 1

      yes, but wheres the hot girl?
      someone convert the pic to ascii art!

    3. Re:text! by iocat · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Jerri rules. All you have to do is see her at Classic Gaming Expo , or Vintage Computer Festival, to know she's got more passion than just about anyone there.

      At CGE this year she practically bowled over a kid on her way to see Al Alcorn , who I guess she hadn't met yet. It was awesome.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    4. Re:text! by Octagon+Most · · Score: 0, Troll

      What is this garbage?

      (The term "hacker" first referred to people who liked to design and create machines, and only later began to be applied to people who broke into them.)

      Bah, hackers are pure evil. It's right there in the Mainstream Media Technology Usage Guide. Although admittedly some of the rules are brazenly flaunted lately, like the requirement to preface all references to Apple with "embattled computer maker." But still, one would expect better from the NY Times.

    5. Re:text! by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      I can't get past the "Lamness Filter" pasting in ASCII Art. You can make some yourself... :-)

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  4. Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe in 20 years she can design a P75. That will show those corparte giants who is boss.

    1. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe she could put Pro Tools HD on a joystick chip for me...

      Whoa.... that would be sexy.. I'd love this girl...

    2. Re:Maybe by Tmack · · Score: 1
      Maybe in 20 years she can design a P75. That will show those corparte giants who is boss.

      Especially when her's does NOT have the fdiv bug..

      tm

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  5. Sighted ahoy... by nickleeson · · Score: 1, Interesting

    the open chip design movement....

    1. Re:Sighted ahoy... by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      Sighted about 5 years ago... opencores.org You can get a old-skool-compatible 6502 core.

      p.s. opencores is a bit slow & looking for a new server -- they are looking for donations.

  6. Forgot one key to success by TrollBridge · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "She is proof that the passion of the homebrew electronic hobbyist is still a viable force in an age when well-funded and well-staffed corporate design teams dominate chip design."

    You forgot well-lawyered, for when an uppity innovator dares challenge the corporate status quo. Sadly, all it would take is one lawsuit (ore even the threat thereof) to shut her down.

    --
    There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    1. Re:Forgot one key to success by Desert+Raven · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, the one thing that's keeping her from raking in the really big bucks is also what's protecting her.

      She's doing the design as a contractor.

      It's the companies who are making and selling them that will have to take the big risk of lawsuit. By legal standards, she's just a hired gun.

    2. Re:Forgot one key to success by Surt · · Score: 1

      And we all know, that as long as you're paid to commit a crime, you can't be held liable for it.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:Forgot one key to success by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      More or less, yes. Nothing direct, like murder for hire, but when it comes to infringement, it's the employers responsibility to make sure its legit. The employee isn't responsible for checking on patents, or to see if the company has secured the proper license fees. That's what legal departments are for. So the company assumes all risk and responsibility. They can't pass the buck to the engineer if they fail to properly license a product.

    4. Re:Forgot one key to success by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Except when it's a working falling off the empire state building. or your a doctor doing an op that you think will probably kill the patient.
      Hell you even told then there's a 90% change I'm going to kill you, premeditated or what.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    5. Re:Forgot one key to success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if she isn't an employee, then she isn't protected by the corporate shell. As a contractor, she is responsible for her own work. (This is one of the reasons some of us don't want to be our own boss.)

      The one thing protecting her, really, is her lack of money. This isn't something millions of people are going to do, or they would want to make an example of her. They'll sue for the money, and she doesn't have it.

    6. Re:Forgot one key to success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to comment on your .sig, but it's great!

    7. Re:Forgot one key to success by wrw · · Score: 1

      The Commodore technology and games are duly licensed. IP never goes away; a company called Tulip in the Netherlands owns the Commodore IP and most of the games were licensed from Electronic Arts and possibly one or two other companies that are still around (or have bought the rights to companies that aren't).

      Anyone who wants to know more about this device check one of the many "DTV" threads in comp.sys.cbm.

    8. Re:Forgot one key to success by dunric · · Score: 1

      Yup, and before Tulip, Escom owned some Commodore
      patents, too.

      I'm pleased that Jeri has succeeded. She's at most of the Commodore shows and works hard at developing all this fantastic stuff.

      She's also the brains behind the Commodore One Reconfigurable Computer (C-1 for short). That's another thing she's developing, too.

      I think I mentioned that in my Byte magazine article, "The Commodore Comeback".

      Paul

      --
      Few cats act their age, while most just cough up fur balls.
    9. Re:Forgot one key to success by wrw · · Score: 1

      Escom sold them to Tulip.

  7. eureka! by bLindmOnkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems as though nostalgia always sells. I went to a local mall recently and there was a stand that was selling something similar to these-it was an N64 shaped controller with a decent collection of SNES games right in the controller. I know if I had money I'd buy it for a young relative to experience the joys of my own childhood. Wouldn't you?

    1. Re:eureka! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      My kids love of the SuperNintendo emulator I stuck on the computer. They play SuperMario World more than the play their actual console games.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:eureka! by narcolept · · Score: 1, Informative

      that exact thing was the topic of a recent /. post about Nintendo lawsuits..
      http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/02/ 1928240&tid=159

    3. Re:eureka! by Gr33nNight · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, there has been some Slashdot articles mentioning this exact same device. Its an illegal copy of Nintendos roms, usually at horrible quality.

      Buyer beware

    4. Re:eureka! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure if the company making the C64 licensed the software ( I hope so) but I do know that the ones you saw in the mall were not legal and no fees have been paid to Nintendo.

      This is such a great idea, but I hope the people who are stealing the games from their legal copyright holders for their own profit are amongst the first against the wall when the revolution comes.

      Share, but don't profit. If you profit you are stealing from those who made. Or so things seem to me.

    5. Re:eureka! by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      How does one make a low quality copy of a ROM? Or do you mean the physical device is low quality?

      Regardless, I want one.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    6. Re:eureka! by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      Overrip, bad checksum, incomplete or bad header data, etc. In emulators, these types of ROMs tend not to run on everything.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    7. Re:eureka! by Adrilla · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't buy them because they're terrible quality and I really can't believe that they're still in malls as they're illegal (but we've been down this road before).

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    8. Re:eureka! by James+Turpin · · Score: 1

      Actually, I bought a couple of the 40-game controllers. (Actually, each game has many, many different versions, so that you get something like 1200 game-versions in total.) I gave one to my girlfriend. I don't think she really appreciated the nostalgia value. I need to find a girl like this chip designer chick - somebody with taste.

      --
      Mathematics is not a crime.
    9. Re:eureka! by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      I bought several of these in Taiwan a few years ago. The games are of course pixel perfect, since they are using the ROMs and running a NES on a chip. The controllers are terrible. They have a cheap feel to them, work inconsistently at first and then buttons or directions go out entirely after a while. Very sad.

    10. Re:eureka! by MasterOfMagic · · Score: 1

      A lot of the NES clone controllers that you can find in malls in the US are running about 20% faster than the actual game on a North American NES. My guess is that they're using PAL ROMs, since the refresh rate for PAL television is 50 Hz and the refresh rate for NTSC television is 60 Hz, causing the speedup.

      Plus the controller is constucted from very flimsy materials. Most certainly not worth the price that they sell them for. Yet people snap them up anyway.

    11. Re:eureka! by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      You mean you've never replaced the 'ALPS tact switch' pushbuttons in a favorite mouse before? You've never pulled the electronics out of something and put it in a better housing, with improved controlls??

      This is Slashdot, in case you thought you'd wandered onto a gamer's site.

    12. Re:eureka! by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      I gave away all ten of them that I bought as presents. I am reporting on the feedback I have received from those that received them. My brother has refurbished his (repeatedly) and it works last I heard.

    13. Re:eureka! by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      The infamous NES on a chip is far from pixel perfect. There are documented graphical and sound inaccuracies with regards to a real NES. Just because you use the original game ROM does not mean that the game is "pixel perfect". You also need to recreate the original system correctly (in software or hardware) or you could just burn ROMs to carts and use them on a real NES. The problem with the NES is that each cart has special memory mapper and co-processor chips. This means that making a universal flash cart (like the popular gameboy advance flash carts) is very difficult, which is why it has yet to be done.

      HOWEVER, there is a guy, Kevin Horton aka Kevtris, that is currently recreating the NES (check out the pics), and not just a pixel perfect recreation, but also a sound perfect and even "cycle-perfect" recreation of the entire Nintendo Entertainment System and all of the mappers for the system!

      Hence this re-created NES will be able to play any NES or Famicom game, and it will be exactly identical to the original... not just close to the original like software emulators of the NES. Compare a real NES and any software emulator of the NES. It doesn't take long to learn to be able to tell the difference, even ignoring the controllers you use to play the games.

      Kevin's recreation of the NES will be just like the real thing down to the CPU-cycle and it will be able to use the original NES peripherials such as the original controllers, Zapper lightgun, paddles, spinners, power pad, power glove, and even R.O.B. the Robotic Operating Buddy! Kevin's recreation will be a must own for NES fans, as you will no longer have to worry about blowing on carts and managing a large library of carts: every game could be placed on a small flash card. You also won't have to worry about buggy, inaccurate software emulators running on a large noisy $2000 PC.

      The casual NES gamer will be satisfied with the inaccurate software emulators, as they have probably never played a real NES or haven't done so in a decade. Hardcore NES fans will prefer to own Kevin's recreation... well, in addition to the real thing and a room full of real carts, but it will be allot easier to manage thousands of games stored on a postage stamp sized flash card.

    14. Re:eureka! by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      I forgot to say that I demo'ed the N64 NES-on-a-chip device at my local mall, and to anybody that has played a real NES... even if they haven't done so in over a decade... should be able to tell how horribly inaccurate the audio recreation is on that device. Sure the NES had a very primitive audio processing unit, but those cheap clones make it even worse!

    15. Re:eureka! by autophile · · Score: 1
      It seems as though nostalgia always sells.

      Yeah, look at those new Pac-Man T's that are selling for $20 a pop :(

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    16. Re:eureka! by wrw · · Score: 1

      The C64 games are licensed. Jeri said at VCF that they wanted to include more but had trouble securing the licenses. The contract was for 30 games. Not 29, not 31. So they had to extract several (but not all) of the California Games as separate games to make the number be exactly 30.

    17. Re:eureka! by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      I do not classify myself as a hardcore NES fan. However I have compared some games with the original hardware and I didn't notice any difference on the games that it came with that I had played before (Contra, Super Mario Bros, Duck Hunt, etc) other than the crappy controllers. I would guess that the recreation of the system would satisfy all but the most hardcore of NES fans.

    18. Re:eureka! by yyttrrre · · Score: 1

      Actually I thought those Nintendo knock off controllers looked very poor quality. What I did instead (im sure its also been talked about) was buy a used dreamcast, second controller and memory card from EXB for 23 dollars and make a nesterdc disc with my favorite games using the software from dcemulation.com.

  8. that noise you are about to hear ... by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 3, Funny

    keep your pants on boys ... she's kind of cute

    --
    vodka, straight up, thank you!
    1. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by JaffaKREE · · Score: 4, Funny

      Definitely cute, but standing next to a male skull with RAM sticks lodged in the cranium serve as an effective deterrent to sexual advances.

    2. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're new here, aren't you?

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    3. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by anethema · · Score: 1, Insightful

      My god you people have low standards.

      She is a 4-5/10 at best, maybe a bonus point for knowing how to program a FPGA.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    4. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by JaffaKREE · · Score: 1

      RAM in cranium = turn on ??

      You guys are into some weird stuff.

    5. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by fraudrogic · · Score: 1

      again....you're new here aren't you?

      --
      I only mod up parents of "mod parent up" posts...
    6. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of? The second I saw her I was like BOOOOING! :D

    7. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by JaffaKREE · · Score: 1

      No... no... I love... cranium RAM...

    8. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well it's more about ramming the cranium really, you see there's...

      nevermind.

    9. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 1

      skulls and bones, yada yada

      keyword: vagina

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
    10. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      going back to my college days:

      she's engineering cute.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    11. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by dimator · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pants officially off!

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    12. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe, but I prefer the brunette standing next to her.

    13. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I honestly feel sorry for anyone who would consider her cute or hot. She's not mangled, but she is definitely leaning more towards that way than not. You actually CAN get hot girls if you don't act unfunny, gross, show-offish in public situations. And don't underestimate dressing well and paying more than 20 bucks for a haircut. Damn.

    14. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree cute is not the word, rating a person on */10 scale is about as pathetic as it gets. I'm sure you cruise the net and masturbate nightly, but the standards of those girls hardly match real life.

    15. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by krumms · · Score: 1

      keep your pants on boys ...

      He's not kidding sonny. She's old enough to be your typical teenage Slashdotter's mother.

    16. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by excaliber19 · · Score: 1

      You forget you are talking to the /. crowd...

    17. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      That's worse than death by snoo snoo.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    18. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by databyss · · Score: 0

      The vagina (from the Latin for "sheath" or "scabbard" ) is the tubular tract leading from the uterus to the exterior of the body in female mammals, or to the cloaca in female birds and some reptiles. Female insects and other invertebrates also have a vagina, which is the terminal part of the oviduct.

      For the purposes of anatomy, a vagina can also be any structure that serves as a sheath (or theca), as in, the vagina of the portal vein. Another example is the fibrous sheath around tendons, called a vagina fibrosa when solid or a vagina mucosa when it contains a fluid-filled cavity around the tendon.

      Do I get a prize? Where do I place my sword?

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    19. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      You forget that the women with the Mensa brains are disproportionately likely to be the ones with really creative sex drives. :)

    20. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by lack1uster · · Score: 0

      put a dick in your ear and fuck what you heard

    21. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by Dasein · · Score: 2, Funny

      And I'm practically old enough to be your typical slashdotter's father. Seems okay to me.

      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
    22. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn I wish there was a mod option for "gross"

    23. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      standing next to a male skull with RAM sticks lodged in the cranium serve as an effective deterrent to sexual advances.

      Speak for yourself. I dig artzy geek girls.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    24. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by bladesjester · · Score: 0

      What about Asia Carrera? The thought of a porn star that's in Mensa is just kind of weird...

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    25. Re:that noise you are about to hear ... by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      The RAM chips have obviously been destroyed by ESD, having been shoved into that styrofoam head.

      Us who are into vintage hardware find that kinda disturbing, actually.

  9. don't mod up :( by ack154 · · Score: 5, Funny

    damnit - i really did mean to post as AC ...

  10. NO way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    She is NOT a self-taught CHIP DESIGNER. She is a self-taught FPGA programmer. There is a world of difference, the former is impossible, the latter is trivial.
    The good thing from this story is that I hope employers will open their ears and eyes to the fact that university is USELESS to form engineers when the drive is not there, and that university is just a replacement for forced military service.

    1. Re:NO way by dennisr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Your an asshole. It's so trivial and you have how many products on the shelf? God sometimes I hate Slashdot between this AC post and the reaction to suprnova.org going down I am getting ill reading comments.

    2. Re:NO way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But no floppy drive built-in?! Darn...

    3. Re:NO way by Gannoc · · Score: 1

      She is a self-taught FPGA programmer. There is a world of difference, the former is impossible, the latter is trivial.

      I wouldn't call it trivial, but yeah... when I read "Self-Taught Chip Designer", I was surprised.

    4. Re:NO way by taniwha · · Score: 1

      bull crap - I'm a self taught chip designer done about a dozen from 30k gate gate arrays by myself up to SOC custom/semi custom designs done with groups - and FPGA design (which I haven't done but have watched others struggle over) is not always trivial

    5. Re:NO way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No WAY you're self taught! At some point, you needed access to the software and the industry. There's always an outside requirement to become an IC designer, did your employer just let you loose on a CAD system and said, "hey, just be ready for the next run, do whatever you want, learn by yourself!"???
      How did you test your first 'self taught' IC designs? We're not talking 50$ PCBs here!
      I call shenanigans!

    6. Re:NO way by mekkab · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is a world of difference, the former is impossible, the latter is trivial.

      How is it impossible to be a self-taught chip designer? There are these books like "Principles of CMOS VLSI Design" (Weste, Eshrahian) that are used to TEACH people how do design these chips! Cedra and Smith is another good one for learnin' about transistors and semiconductors.

      I'm not saying you can set up a chip-fab in your closet but you can learn all this stuff.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    7. Re:NO way by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      I was programming FPGA's in school (Computer Engineering) without much trouble. Put a transistor in my hand, and I was lost.
      Granted, I specialized in software, and was terrible in hardware, but had no trouble with an FPGA and tons of trouble with chips. Sure, there's always a 'hard project' for any technology, but I'm guessing a hard FPGA project will be plenty easier than a hard chip design project.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    8. Re:NO way by adeydas · · Score: 1

      um... not exactly. you see she learnt stuff at her own pace which the university teaches anyway. the only difference is that a uni student hardly gets any time for free thinking with all the schedules to keep whilst she had all the time in the world and thus we have a chip...

    9. Re:NO way by Mongo222 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? The point the original poster was making is that setting up a FPGA is a lot more like coding, than it it ship designing. The skill set, methods and tools are nearly the same. In fact I wouldn't be entirely surprised to find that the joystick/C64 is heavily based on a number of the opensource C64 emulators that are around. Not that I think this subtracts from the coolness factor of what she came up with, but it's not like she layed out a 6502 gate by gate by hand.

    10. Re:NO way by LordNimon · · Score: 1
      It's probably impossible because it costs too much money to buy the required software and manufacture the chips. There's no way you can learn chipd design without actually designed, building, and testing chips.

      I remember doing chip design in college back in 1990, and the software cost thousands of dollars. My puny chip cost $500 to manufacture, too.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    11. Re:NO way by mekkab · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's no way you can learn chipd design without actually designed, building, and testing chips.

      Not true; you use the software. Now, I know you said the software was expensive; but where there is a will, there's a way.

      Ledit student version came with the book; so for under $80 you can start laying out a chip; go to a college campus and you could pick this up used for a song. I'm sure you could also get evaluation and free versions of Verilog, too.

      As for the fabbing, yep, you gotta shell out some bucks to get your design implemented. But $500... thats do-able. No wife, no kids, no other hobbies... you can cough up that kind of money, just not too often! ;)

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    12. Re:NO way by mekkab · · Score: 1

      of course I didn't even mention less savory methods of getting the software because you and I are strictly above the board, right?

      But the good software will model your design and you can run inputs and test the outputs; strictly in the digital domain. This takes out the surprises when you get your chips back from the fab.

      It is kinda funny to think that you can design an 8-bit micro and it'll cost hundreds, versus going to the dump and getting a 486 for free!

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    13. Re:NO way by Fizzl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Umm... That might be your opinion.
      For you, FPGA programming might be trivial but you are lost when it goes down to hardware. However, not everyone in on the globe have the exactly skillset as you.

      I have education in electrical automation (mainly analogue processes, logics (CS21 et.al.), instrumentation and so forth. Lot of electronics and hardware thou...)
      I'm a self taught programmer in several languages and currently earning my salary at the software side on ARM9 processors.

      To me, both chip design and FPGA design seem quite plausible but too laborous to even try to pursue on my own. Jack of all arts you might say...

      Mathematics and physical phenomenons involved in electrical science are not too complicated anymore. Many before us have already figured much out, and much of that information is available to everyone.

    14. Re:NO way by taniwha · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I built hardware as a ham at school (back when micros were still becominbg available) - I did do a CS degree that inclued exactly 0 hardware/electronics (but I'd been programming for years before I hit college anyway). I worked doing OS stuff (porting unix) thru the 80s and hacking hardware (pals and the like) in my own time - from which I fell into doing architectural design of 2d graphics hardware (pulling apart people graphics libraries and figuring out how to make hardware to do the same things - specing datapaths and state machines for others to build and making C level models of how it should work - that chip grossed $120M) eventually it became easier for me to code in verilog rather than C and cut out the middle man, around the same time I started running Synopsis on my own designs and a while later driving a router and back end timing on them too and doing the occasional hand edit to polygons to fix timing problems.

      You get the idea - it is possible to be self taught - you just have to be smart and work hard - certainly coming in from the architecture side has really helped me - I understand stuff about the software side the hardware guys don't (and vice-versa) I get to sit on both sides of the fence - more recently I've made a deliberate decision to move back to the software side of the biz - for me at least there's more day to day creative work to do on the software side of the house (vlsi tends to be one month of creative design and 11 months of grind making it work - not as much fun as coding up something new every day)

    15. Re:NO way by khrtt · · Score: 1

      Just because you can't do it doesn't mean it can't be done, you know:-).

      Most college EE programs would only have a semester or two of chip design, with a stupid silly project at the end. It wouldn't be much help when you start working on your first real project.

      Besides, chip design is not all that different from FPGA design, unless you get into the really hard stuff, like, maybe, analog, RF, or high-speed digital. A C64 is neither high-speed, nor analog, so I'd say, an ASIC design could be even easier than an FPGA, 'cause you'd have better routing flexibility and more gates available. The chips could be harder to get fabricated, though, and VERY expensive to debug.

    16. Re:NO way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he was saying that to be a chip designer, she'd probably have to have her designs fabbed into actual chips, which is something that no single person has the technology available to do.

    17. Re:NO way by metroid+composite · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The good thing from this story is that I hope employers will open their ears and eyes to the fact that university is USELESS to form engineers when the drive is not there, and that university is just a replacement for forced military service.
      I'm not sure what University you attended, but the purpose of a university degree is to teach you how to think and research, and to give a broad view of of a field. It's easy enough to be a self-taught programmer without having touched object oriented programming, for instance. Engineering and Software Engineering teach building processes that tend to be robust and have a lot of checks along the way. Sure, if you're good you either come up with your own checks, or maybe you just read a programming style manual from cover to cover and get all the info anyway.

      Point is, University students shouldn't have holes in their knowledge, and should be forced to do creative thought (yeah, there's sucky universities out there, but that's an asside). There's obviously people who learn to think on their own, and people who can get all the info they need for one area of programming or FPGA or whatever, so it's not useful for everyone, just a lot of people. On the other hand, military service teaches a less relevant kind of knowledge (for programmers) and values obedience over independent thought. It's really not the same thing at all (though this may depend on the university I suppose).

    18. Re:NO way by taniwha · · Score: 1

      I think it depends on the project in both cases - if you're pushing timing and the technology it's hard in both cases - in general it's been my impression that FPGA timing tools are just not as accurate as the ones we use for VLSI (or maybe have to leave a lot more slack because the long wire delays are so variable). I think this sort of stuff makes doing agressive FPGA designs as hard as VLSI to make reliable timing on - I'm not talking about student designs here - I mean trying to squeeze down to the cheapest package, getting the fastest clock you can for a particular generation of parts, multiple clock domains etc etc these are hard problem no matter what the underlying technology is (I watch the analog designers here at work working at GHz with awe) ... I do think you're pretty much at the mercy of your tools and how much experience you've had using them

    19. Re:NO way by fitten · · Score: 1

      Well... by far and away, people like you are the exception rather than the rule. (Congrats, btw... sounds like you've had a lot of fun in the process.) The problem is that many folks tend to use the exception as the norm and think that everyone can be self-taught and that college is a waste of time (that attitude is actually more common among the self-taught than other groups).

      College and similar forms of instruction work because it works for most people. There are folks who 'work differently' and can't get much out of these generalized instruction methodologies and there are people who are just sharp and grok what they do. Both cases are minorities no matter how easy it is to point to them as examples of what should be the majority.

    20. Re:NO way by SSpade · · Score: 1

      Actually it would be possible to become a self-taught chip designer, though not quite trivial. And it'd be cheaper and faster to do a quick college course (I learned enough about mask level design in one fifth of a one-year undergrad course to get a job in the industry...) to pick up the basics.

      Anyone who knows some basic electronics can design complex gate-based circuits very easily (it's just 74xx design, which is so not rocket science). Gate level simulators are easily available (and not too hard to write from scratch if you're not concerned about the details of timing too much). At that point you can easily do FPGA design, especially if you learn some Verilog.

      Want more? Static CMOS transistor level design is trivial (as long as you're not overly concerned about area or performance). Mask level design of those transistors is a little trickier, but given the mask level layout tool, a netlist extractor and a copy of spice anyone who's good at SimCity could pick it up with not much more than a copy of Weste and Eshragian

      Fabbing them, now, that's much trickier.

      So a consultant gate array designer is... not terribly exciting, and were she doing anything of the low level of complexity other than retrocomputing, noone would care.

      Not that retrocomputing isn't cool, an' all, but there are hobbyists who have made new CPU designs for new architectures, got them fabbed, developed software for them and so on.

      There are some very nice open-source schematic capture tools being developed out there (at least one of them in python - and it's more than competitive with the commercial tools already.). There are a bunch on sourceforge too. gEDA is one of the better known toolchains. There are still some backend tools for which there aren't good freely available equivalents but you can cobble together most of a toolchain already.

    21. Re:NO way by Sandbox+Conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Right on. Dropping out: the newer and more better career option.

      --
      Why am I on Slashdot? I'm bored. Why am I bored? I'm on Slashdot.
    22. Re:NO way by Surt · · Score: 1

      Except you can pay to have your chips fabbed, and it's not horrendously expensive. You can get a 1-of in the $100,000 range.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    23. Re:NO way by svirre · · Score: 4, Informative

      L-edit is a polygon pusher. You are going to be pretty damn persistent to do anything more than a puny digital design in that.

      For real digital layout you want to use Astro/Synopsys, Encounter/Cadence, Blast Fusion/Magma or Pinnacle/Sierra (Just maybe). None of these are going to cost you less than a few $100K.

      Of cource before you to the point of doing layout you likely want to do synthesis (Although it is not beyond human capability to hand generate netlists). Design Compiler/Synopsys is pretty much the defacto standard but both cadence and magma has credible alternatives.

      After layout you want to check your design for timing. To do this you want a Static Timing Analysis tool (Primetime from Synopsys is pretty much the only choice here for sign-off quality, though you might live with what your back-end tool has built in if you feel brave). To feed the STA tool with good data you need to extract the circuit: StarXTRC/Synopsys, Fire & Ice/Cadence, CalibreXRC are the prime contenders.

      In addition you might want/need to do:
      - Formal verification (To verify your final netlist conforms to your design)
      - Rail analysis (To verify your power grid is adequate)
      - Thermal analysis (To check your device won't melt of fail due to too high junction temperature)
      - Crosstalk analysis (Check for parasitic effects on timing. Required for designs on 0.13um and better)

      A complete tools suite for digital design will likely set you back $1000K. Naturally a lot of smaller designhouses will outsource the the implementation, but they will at minimum require simulators (minimum $5000 a seat) and synthesis ($100000 pr. license)

      As for fabbing, $500? That would be a mighty sweet deal, even for a shared MPW run. With academic discounts and on an old process you might be able to get a slot on an MPW for $5000. On a reasonably modern process (like 0.18um) a engineering run with 6 prototyping wafers (i.e. not a MPW) will set you back somwhere between $50K to $200K

    24. Re:NO way by taniwha · · Score: 1
      I certainly don't think that college was a waste of time for me (just didn't teach me to do chip design) and would certainly encourage any and everyoen to go - I was mostly just protesting the AC's assertion that there was no way someone could be a self taught vlsi designer.

      On the other hand one thing in my (now long 30 year career) in this biz that's kept me going is that I can keep learning and change what I do - doing new interesting stuff is what I like about my job - to just do the same thing day to day every day for ever would be terrible

    25. Re:NO way by minator · · Score: 1

      Guess you've never heard of Jay Miner then.

      Did the Atari 2600 chip, dreamed up the Amiga and personally designed the Agnus chip.

      Probably rather different today though...

    26. Re:NO way by SenorCitizen · · Score: 1

      Not only that, he created the chipset in the Atari 400/800 computers.

    27. Re:NO way by mekkab · · Score: 1

      Ledit is a starting point; I think we designed a CCD on it for a class lab. I also think it had some checks that looked for some basic rules violations; was there enough contact are for vias, how wide was your poly, etc.

      As for the bigger and better software: Yeah, CADENCE, thats what we used! a few 100K, eh?

      So how many 5 1/4 floppy disks is it? ;)

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    28. Re:NO way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, it wouldn't be Slashdot if someone didn't point to this as proof that formal education is useless.

      University isn't for everyone. Some people will self-educate to university levels, or beyond. These people are VERY few until they have 10+ years experience. Some people will pass through a University without actually learning what they are supposed to. Usually, but not always, they can be weeded out through grades.

      One of the important things about formal education is that it hits a lot of topics that you would be unlikely to study otherwise. The self-taught usually learn the things they care about really well, better than the academics. The self-taught often don't know many things that would help them do their job well, because they aren't required so they never realized they should learn them. There's also those one in a million things that you learn in school that you can't (or don't want to) learn in practice.

      All the material provided in school is available outside of school. The content providers haven't figured out how to keep a monopoly on facts yet. It is certainly possible for someone to study the same books and learn everything a University educated person knows. There are very few people who will really do that. There are a whole lot that will skim one or two books and sell themselves as experts.

      University provides, among other things:
      A. a forced curriculum, hitting every subject that the accreditation board thinks is important (plus non-technical courses, to make educated people.)
      B. some sort of evaluation of how well the person learned and applies that information.

    29. Re:NO way by ballpoint · · Score: 1
      To me, both chip design and FPGA design seem quite plausible but too laborous to even try to pursue on my own.

      I agree on the chip design, but FPGAs definitely should be within your capabilities. With modern tools, some knowledge of digital electronics and software experience, 'designing' an FPGA is a breeze, and not really laborous.

      I've you ever get the chance, try it. You might like it.

      --
      Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    30. Re:NO way by svirre · · Score: 1

      L-edit isn't a starting point for digital layout. Never was. It is a polygon pusher, and as such eminently capable to do analog designs like f.ex. CCDs.

      Tanner has a besic DRC checker built in (It just got upgraded to understand calibre DRC rules so it is much more useful now). It isn't good enough for sign-off though so you propably want to have Calibre (or possible Hercules) as well.

      Cadence is to the best of my knowledge the largest EDA house out there, but are notorious for following the philosophy 'When the going gets tough, the tough goes shopping'. As a result they have anamalgamation of tools, some which overlap other tools in their inventory and others which just don't fit very well. They are strong in Analog full custom design and silicon virtual prototyping with light place & route tasks. (I.e. Encounter)

      For digital design Synopsys is generally the big dog, owning both the synthesis and STA market and are strong in pretty much every other part of the back-end analysis/verification side.

      Mentor and Cadence got better simulators though.

    31. Re:NO way by m50d · · Score: 1
      It's easy enough to be a self-taught programmer without having touched object oriented programming, for instance.

      And you'll be far the better for it :)

      --
      I am trolling
    32. Re:NO way by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1
      Umm. I doubt many people would be able to get a handle on the mathematics required to become an Aerospace or Mechanical engineer without taking a class or being tutored. So no, a university is definitely not useless to teach engineers.

      Computer programming of any type, OTOH, can be easily self-taught. Engineers do *that* on their own all the time (I know that I did). Coding is just one tool of many that an engineer will use.

    33. Re:NO way by mekkab · · Score: 1

      L-edit isn't a starting point for digital layout. Never was.

      Well... it was for us? But given that the learning environment at our university was learning out of spite for the professor, it doesn't surprise me.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    34. Re:NO way by hazem · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This woman has something that so many engineers are lacking, and that's a focus on what she can accopmlish.

      So many engineers focus on what can't be done, how it's impossible, or how it can't be done with tools/budget available.

      I'd be much more inclined to hire her because she has shown that she has drive, motivation, and a can-do attitude. Those traits easily overcome years of education.

      I can give her education, but there's no way I can give her those other things.

    35. Re:NO way by svirre · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong. L-edit is a nice enough tool for analog full custom stuff, and it also have a bit of a following in the MEMS world. It does however not have an autoplacer, autorouter or netlist capability that is required to do digital layout.

      Oh sure you can do full custom digital layout in it if you like (I assume you then are also into things like whips racks, iron maidens and other instruments of torture :-) ), but you will have to do pretty much everything manually.

      On larger deigns it tend to choke a bit though.

    36. Re:NO way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does help that she's 30 and university students graduate at 22...

    37. Re:NO way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent post. But it doesn't touch on the other major benefit of universities: exposure to other people in your field. It's a lot easier to learn from experienced experts than a book, you'll find people you can have intelligent conversations with and collaborate on projects with, and you get social connections that could take a couple decades to develop purely through work.

    38. Re:NO way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Digital] Chip design isn't that hard unless you're doing full custom, have custom analog sections or have some very unique requirements.

      90% of FPGA design is VHDL/simulation, 10% is timing and dealing with place/route issues (at least in my experience with huge chips that some researcher thought was cool).

      50% of ASIC design is VHDL/Simulation, 30% is closing timing, 10% are dealing with analog cores & power issues, the other 10% is funding and extra project management because of the investment factor (yes I'm serious, most ASICs I've work on are blown right there).

      Whoever said you can go from a working FPGA -> ASIC "easily" must have had a very good experience. I have not found this to be either economical or free of technical concern.

      You can "teach yourself" chip design easily enough if you are hardware minded. Get an undergrad text on digital logic (Wakerly I think is what we used), it's easy to understand and accesible to anyone literate and with basic algebra background. Then go read up on VHDL and buy one of those XESS kits from XILINX and go make something. Now practice that on some application you thunk up and go through it.

      Now go get a job doing it if you can find one (hard to find now). If you get a job with a company doing chip design you'll be a seasoned pro in 5 years. This won't qualify you to produce your own asics without oversight of a schooled engineer, for that you probably should have a formal engineering background, but I'd say it's a waste of time if you just have an idea you want to put out, get an MBA instead.

    39. Re:NO way by jaelle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suspect that university tends to lock people down creatively. Cripes, you *can't* force 'creative thought'!

      My son, who is now 25, has been designing circuits and programming microproprocessors for years now. He hasn't been in any school since 4th grade. He has never once questioned whether he could do something he wanted to do, he just did it. His latest invention is going to manufacturing now with the support of several VC's, who also have had no problem with the idea that he's 'uneducated'. The fact that he's designed and built working prototypes of a very novel and complex design is proof enough.

      Like Jeri--passion and interest--and knowing that you can--is all you need.

      --
      You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
    40. Re:NO way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - Rail analysis (To verify your power grid is adequate)
      - Thermal analysis (To check your device won't melt of fail due to too high junction temperature)
      - Crosstalk analysis (Check for parasitic effects on timing. Required for designs on 0.13um and better)


      Oh come on... this thing probably runs at a few dozen MHz - with such a tiny desing, even on a now-obsolete .25u process you're HIGHLY unlikely to have to worry about those kinds of things.

    41. Re:NO way by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Ah, that usually weeding out on grades part is right. USUALLY. Someone with common sense, good learning skills and a BAD instructor can EASILY pass a class, without understanding it (thanks to the bad instructor). This is the first time that I had a class that I didn't grasp, yet I still got an A- (it was C++, FWIW). Unfortunately, I've got Advanced C++, and most likely with the same instructor :-(

    42. Re:NO way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's all true, but let's face it, you also need to do this stuff when you just design an analog radio for commerce. That doesn't mean companies haven't shortcutted a lot of this stuff to get products out, because a lot of it is unnecessary. Especially in the digital circuit case, when you can simply beta-test an FPGA and get the same warm feeling proper validation gives you at a fraction of the cost.

      This is why software is cheap, btw.

    43. Re:NO way by hereticmessiah · · Score: 1
      A C64 is neither high-speed, nor analog


      You're right on the speed bit, but not the analogue: consider the SID. Now, the reason why that's such a bitch to emulate effectively is because it's almost horribly analogue.

      --
      I don't like trolls and mod against me if you like, but I'd prefer if you'd reply.
    44. Re:NO way by hereticmessiah · · Score: 1
      And don't forget Sophie Wilson, who essentially designed the first ARM processor cores in her head, which is only one amongst her many achievements.

      Me? Sophie Wilson fan and former RISC OS user? Surely not! ;-)

      --
      I don't like trolls and mod against me if you like, but I'd prefer if you'd reply.
    45. Re:NO way by khrtt · · Score: 1

      You're right about that. I wonder how she did that bit. Anyone know?

    46. Re:NO way by hereticmessiah · · Score: 1

      I don't think she did, really. She probably did something similar to what the PlaySID guys did and made the closest digital emulation she could.

      --
      I don't like trolls and mod against me if you like, but I'd prefer if you'd reply.
  11. Jeri...ooh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    We've covered this before, and everyone debated the included game list. But, it does pose the question...what sounds does an army of salivating nerds make? ;-)

  12. A girl-geek and slashdot by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Start rolling out the "She is hot" and "I'd like her to play with my joystick" comments.

    One more thing, can Slashdot's editors please stop whining about NYT's registration? To read their news for free just for filling in some info seems like a generous trade.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:A girl-geek and slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Can Slashdot's editors please stop whining about NYT's registration? To read their news for free just for filling in some info seems like a generous trade."

      Please... please... stop whining about Slashdot editors... To submit your views for free, without filling out some info seems like the real generous trade.

    2. Re:A girl-geek and slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:A girl-geek and slashdot by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      "To submit your views for free, without filling out some info"

      Actually I did fill out some info when I started this /. account as opposed to going as an AC.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    4. Re:A girl-geek and slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not the editors that put that nytimes blah blah etc there, it's the article submitters.

    5. Re:A girl-geek and slashdot by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, but there's nothing forcing you to have an account to simply read the articles and comments here on /.

    6. Re:A girl-geek and slashdot by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      To read their news for free just for filling in some info seems like a generous trade

      As opposed to reading it in the doctor's office, diner, Starbucks, etc for free without having to do anything? Print media survives solely on advertising. The price of most magazines/newspapers (at the newstand) just about covers the cost of the paper.

      When I buy a $2 a week subscription for the NYT, they don't ask ANY of the information that they ask online. Why is it that discussing income on the job can get you fired, but giving it to the NYT is OK? CLEARLY the information can not be so important that they don't care to have it from their paying subscribers.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    7. Re:A girl-geek and slashdot by mottie · · Score: 1

      there's also nothing forcing you to sign up for your own account, when you can use http://www.bugmenot.com/

    8. Re:A girl-geek and slashdot by HeghmoH · · Score: 2, Informative

      One more thing, can Slashdot's editors please stop whining about NYT's registration? To read their news for free just for filling in some info seems like a generous trade.

      I don't think the editors care. However, people used to get up in arms about the registration back when slashdot didn't warn people about it. In fact, many people still complain about NYTimes links even with the warning. Your beef is with the complainers, not with the editors.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    9. Re:A girl-geek and slashdot by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "To read their news for free just for filling in some info seems like a generous trade."

      So they turn off the ads after you register?

    10. Re:A girl-geek and slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the fact that you have to give them that info means it isn't free. it is only free if you view the information you give them as being worthless. you can darn well bet that they wouldn't be asking for it if it were worthless to them

    11. Re:A girl-geek and slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      peek and poke are C64 basic features. How in the world is this offtopic?

    12. Re:A girl-geek and slashdot by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. I submitted a story with a link to the NY Times, and Taco added a snarky comment.

    13. Re:A girl-geek and slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The information itself is useless to them. What's worth it though is that they don't get Slashdotted because Slashdotters are paranoid and won't read the article, thus saving bandwidth.

    14. Re:A girl-geek and slashdot by JohnsonWax · · Score: 1

      So they turn off the ads after you register?

      No, but $10 says that your browser does. Can't expect to have it both ways.

    15. Re:A girl-geek and slashdot by jackbird · · Score: 1
      When I buy a $2 a week subscription for the NYT

      Where do you get that? Last I checked, the introductory rate was $16-something a month, and went up after 6 months.

      they don't ask ANY of the information that they ask online.

      YOU PAY THEM MONEY when you get the print edition.

    16. Re:A girl-geek and slashdot by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      Unless you're in New York, the subscription changes depending upon who is the partner for delivering the New York Times. In Cincinnati it's $2 a week.

      http://homedelivery.nytimes.com/HDS/SubscriptionAF E.do?mode=SubscriptionAF&ExternalMediaCode=W31XX

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
  13. I hope she can build a better mail server... by dickeya · · Score: 0

    ...to replace the one she is using now when it is overrun with marriage proposals from /. users.

  14. Finally I can get a Comadore 64... by Socrates+Demise · · Score: 2, Funny

    and see what all of the fuss was about.

    --
    I hate stupid rules... Rules that make sense I don't mind... But the stupid ones just really bug me!
    1. Re:Finally I can get a Comadore 64... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you spell it COMMODORE like anyone who is above grade 3 literacy, you will have better luck.

    2. Re:Finally I can get a Comadore 64... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read the sig ;)

    3. Re:Finally I can get a Comadore 64... by arose · · Score: 1

      w00t, t3h zig i's ra11y !nsigful!

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    4. Re:Finally I can get a Comadore 64... by operagost · · Score: 1

      You must have been in a coma to never have seen a "comadore" in action.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  15. But what about Porn? by DeathFlame · · Score: 2, Funny

    When will someone create a 'joystick' with 30 different kinds of porn, instead of having to use that old 'internet' thing.

    1. Re:But what about Porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this "porn" you mention? Perhaps you misspelled "Pr0n"?

    2. Re:But what about Porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's supposed to be your imagination.

    3. Re:But what about Porn? by Sarge-001 · · Score: 1

      But then you would have to let go of your "joystick" to... erm...play

  16. re: "NYTimes. You know what that means" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you use firefox, check out the extension bugmenot - it let's you bypass all this registration crap.

  17. SHE? by nycsubway · · Score: 3, Informative

    She?? did this? That is great! I believe this is the first woman I've heard of who has dropped out of school and started a garage-computer company. I'm not being sexist, but it really is the first time I've heard of it.

    1. Re:SHE? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      She was being given a C64 when child (like me ;-) ). She also happens to be a high-IQ person (i.e. geek).

      The fact that it's a "she", is irrelevant. Might as well have been a boy and achieved the same goals.

    2. Re:SHE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      I believe this is the first woman I've heard of who has dropped out of school and started a garage-computer company.

      If you're that interested, maybe you'd like to try reading the article. Here's part:

      Her first business foray came during high school when she began designing and selling the dirt-track race cars that she had been driving with her farther. Using his service station as a workshop, she was soon making so much money selling her custom race cars that she dropped out of high school.
    3. Re:SHE? by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The fact that it's a "she", is irrelevant.

      It's not irrelevant whatsoever - society puts differing forces on males and females, and as the GP points out it is extraordinarily rare to find a woman excel outside of "the system" (you'll find a good number of examples of men who persevered against the odds, pursuing success in non-traditional ways, but almost no women doing the same). This says more about society than woman, and I think it's largely because society encourages women who don't academically excel to become homemakers and baby machines (no I am not saying that homemakers and parents didn't academically excel, just that it does end up being the "default" profession of many woman in that situation).

    4. Re:SHE? by Trinn · · Score: 1

      I rarely reply to AC posts, but this one caught me as an important misconception.

      Gender and sexuality are not the same thing. I would be a grand example of this. I am a transsexual, a "woman trapped in a man's body", but I also am a lesbian, that is, I am sexually attracted to women (and not men).

    5. Re:SHE? by AdrainB · · Score: 1

      So what? I'm a lesbian trapped in a man's body.

    6. Re:SHE? by dosius · · Score: 1

      And there's more such people out there like that. Not every transsexual prefers people of their birth sex, I know I don't.

      Moll.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    7. Re:SHE? by QueenOfSwords · · Score: 1

      The homemaker and baby-machine options are not just a way to drop out, they're a socially-acceptable alternative realm that women can excel in. I don't think there's any sort of equivalent for men (not until the man-as-primary-caregiver meme gets better established).
      Nothing *wrong* with that, but this woman has provided an excellent example that there are amazing things girls can do in geeky fields and that if you want to do it badly enough, it *is* possible, even if school/college wasn't for you. Having a living breathing example to point to is so very important for girls.

      --
      -- INTX Grouch. http://www.midnightblue.net
    8. Re:SHE? by Dasein · · Score: 1
      I have a little girl at home who, at 19 months old, is *FAR* ahead of where she should be developmentally. So, I'm looking into the future thinking that she may have to deal with this crap.

      This seems relevant:

      Meine Herren, I do not see that the sex of the candidate is an argument against her admission as a Privatdozent. After all, the Senate is not a bath-house.

      David Hilbert of Emmy Noether
      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
    9. Re:SHE? by Tekoneiric · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I totally agree, I'm also a ts and a lesbian. I'm in a long term relationship with one woman; she and I are at the beginning of a relationship with yet another woman. Why is it that some guys insist on belittling intelligent and assertive women? The main reason why there aren't as many woman in the computer and electronics field as men is because people in the education system do what they can to prevent women from choosing those fields. Thankfully things are changing but not fast enough.

      --
      *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
    10. Re:SHE? by core_dump_0 · · Score: 1

      But that would make you a "manbian."

      "What's a 'manbian?'"

    11. Re:SHE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, so you're biologically male and psychologically a lesbian? With no hormone therapy or operations? (not to pry but this is slashdot, it's a matter of honor that we stalk you and gather every embarrassing detail, with pictures if possible)

      It would be interesting to study how independent the self-assigned gender and desired sex are, a psychological female in a male body should be subject to male hormones and social influences that would push towards desiring women.

    12. Re:SHE? by Pinback · · Score: 1

      Oh come on. Cisco was cofounded by Sandy Lerner.

    13. Re:SHE? by Tekoneiric · · Score: 1

      Ok, here's the sexuality 101 of it as I see it. The various elements of human sexuality are distinctly separate. There is physical sex, gender, sexual preference, brain body map and possibility a part that has a tendency towards a specific social adherence to what's expected of you by society; which I like to call the rebel factor. None of those are binary by nature. Female, male or feminine, masculine aren't like zeros and ones in binary but more like fuzzy end points on a number line. It takes a unique specific set of conditions for a person to be a transsexual. Based on my experience, it has mostly to do how a person's brain maps their sexual body image. While there is a tendency for the various factors to fit to the male/female norms, sometimes they do not come out that way. Just like it's possible for a straight male to be feminine or a straight female to be masculine, it's possible for a ts person to have a gender of their birth sex but because of the body mapping, have an intense desire to correct their body to fit the way the brain maps the body image. That person would probably be confused and possibly at a high risk for suicide.

      Where do I fit in on that? At birth, my physical sex wasn't totally male, my gender is definitely on the female side of neutral but not extremely feminine and somewhat dynamic, my sexual preference is bi although life experience has pushed me less into liking males but that nature is still there, my brain maps my body as definitely female and I have a tendency to rebel against the social hive mind.

      --
      *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
    14. Re:SHE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a little girl at home who, at 19 months old, is *FAR* ahead of where she should be developmentally.

      Oh god, that is absolutely pathetic - some lame opportunity to toot your horn about your child. Having seen a lot of children develop, let me help you out a bit: Early development, or the perception thereof, has remarkably little to do with future success. This is especially true because parents focus in on the excelling points (relative to other kids) while ignoring the failings, such as a kid that can recite the alphabet but has no problem solving skills. In fact it's rote memorization (an absolutely irrelevant skill in this century) that most parents coo about.

    15. Re:SHE? by Dasein · · Score: 1

      I'm proud of my little girl -- is that so bad?

      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
  18. There will always been room for the underdog by suso · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was just telling my wife about this last night.
    Even when you think that any industry is too hard to break into because there are big companies dominating it, one can still create something that is better or worthwhile to people. Even for the sake that some people want to shop somewhere else, or buy a different brand.

    I mean, think about it, for 50 years cars were being made and the corporations that made them became big 800lb gorillas. But then look, here comes Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Geo, Saturn, Lexus, Kia and now Scion.

    So there is room, just take a look at the history of open source software.

    1. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by AlphaOne · · Score: 1

      But then look, here comes Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Geo, Saturn, Lexus, Kia and now Scion.

      Just for future reference, Lexus and Scion are both Toyota brands.

      --
      All opinions presented here aren't mine.
    2. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by acomj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cars are a bad metaphore. Mostly made by large comglomerates.

      Lexus and Scion are made by Toyota.
      Saturn made be General Motors,
      Geo, was GM rebrand of cars made by Toyota I beleive
      Subaru - Fuju Heavy Industries
      Kia is from Huyndi (large comglomerate.)

      But your right, software/computers are still places were an individual can make it with hard work and good design.

      Also she is working for a NJ toy manufacturer not out on her own.

    3. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by syrinx · · Score: 1

      Scion is just a division of Toyota. Saturn is a division of GM. I think Geo is a division of something too.

      And Kia sucks, but then, they're successful at it, so, hey, good for them. I only wish I could make $millions by selling plastic death traps.

      But, yes, I still agree with your point. :)

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    4. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, think about it, for 50 years cars were being made and the corporations that made them became big 800lb gorillas. But then look, here comes Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Geo, Saturn, Lexus, Kia and now Scion.

      Well, it's the same 800lb gorillas making the cars buddy, they just rebrand them to fool innocent consumers like you.

    5. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by boodaman · · Score: 1

      ...and Saturn is a GM brand. And most "foreign" (non-US) automotive companies have substantial investments and/or joint ventures from the American "Big Three".

    6. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Socrates+Demise · · Score: 1

      I would only consider Kia an underdog of all those you mentioned. Maybe Honda. Lexus and Scion are both part of Toyta and Geo and Saturn are part of GM

      --
      I hate stupid rules... Rules that make sense I don't mind... But the stupid ones just really bug me!
    7. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by hfox · · Score: 1

      Or the rebadged gorilla:

      Geo = GMC
      Saturn = GMC
      Lexus = Toyota
      Scion = Toyota
      Kia = Hyundai (though they were producing vehicles independently and for other companies such as Ford for ~50 years)

    8. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      Saturn is owned by GM
      Scion is owned by Toyota and was started last year.
      Geo was a Chevy brand, made by Suzuki
      Toyota owns Lexus and was started in ~1990 (at least here in the US)

    9. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by suso · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, well damnit. I guess we should just forget the inspiring words I said and go sit back down in our depressing little corners and never make a difference. ;-)

      I think that's what a lot of us here need.... motivation. There are so many smart people with great ideas on this forum and in the community who never take their ideas out into the world. Its a shame. That's really all it takes sometimes to be the next Jeri Ellsworth, Linus Torvalds or Steve Jobs. Those people are simply people who took that extra step, swallowed their doubt/pride and brought their ideas to the attention of others. Take the risk.

    10. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Umm, Geo and Saturn are (were, in Geo's case) both parts of General Motors. Toyota, Lexus, and Scion are all part of the same huge Japanese company. Honda and Nissan are hardly small companies, either. Hyundai/Kia is pretty small compared to GM and Ford, but they're one of S. Korea's biggest companies and are hardly comparable to some girl building electronic toys at home.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    11. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition to the sibling post to this, Saturn is a GM brand. Geo IIRC, is a joint venture between GM & a Japanese company.

    12. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      clarification: Lexus was started in ~1990

    13. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can't mod us all redundant that would just be a waste

    14. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by hab136 · · Score: 1
      But then look, here comes Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Geo, Saturn, Lexus, Kia and now Scion.

      Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Geo(a subdivison of Chevy), Saturn (GM), Lexus (Toyota), Kia, Scion (Toyota).

      Revised: Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Kia.

      Apparently it's all too easy for the 800lb gorillas to make people think they're small startups by making a new subdivision with a new name.

    15. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      Honda also owns Acura, don't forget... They also make F1 engines. Maybe Subaru could be considered an underdog but I think they're Fuji related.

      --
      -mkb
    16. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Even for the sake that some people want to shop somewhere else, or buy a different brand.

      That's basically what most of the list you included is, just marketing "brands". Saturn, Lexus, Scion, Geo are/were basically partnerships and brands that big companies used to expand their markets.

      Toyota, Honda and Nissan (formerly Datsun), were all big companies in Japan prior to entering the US car market, I believe most grew large during WWII, though Honda seems like it was started later, if I recall doing small engine motorcycles.

      Geo was a joint venture with GM and Toyota I believe. Saturn is a GM experiment, Lexus basically a highend spinnoff for Toyota. Kia, was already a large Korean manufacturing company and Scion is a Honda brand.

      None of these were a guy (or gal) in a garage taking on GM. There was the movie about the "Tucker" in the 50's who tried to taken on the big boys, but that was 50 years ago.

      Autos and the computer industry cannot be compared. This article is about a niche product, that is a toy. We're not talking about a rival to AMD or Intel.

    17. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, some of the Geos (Metros and Trackers come to mind) were actually rebranded Suzukis. The 4 cylinder Metro LSi engines are incredibly reliable and fuel-efficient, typical of the light Suzuki engines.

    18. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Bishop · · Score: 1

      here comes Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Geo, Saturn, Lexus, Kia and now Scion.

      Your analogy is poor. (don't worry most analogies are pretty bad.)

      Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and Kia are all car companies that did break into the North American market. All four were also pretty big companies elsewhere in the world before setting their sights on the "big three." The other brands you list are just sub-brands. Geo and Saturn are GM. Lexus and Scion are Toyota. Kia is now part of Hyundai, but that acquisition took place after Kia broke into North America. The car companies want consumers to think that the subbrands are different. It is part of "branding." It gives consumers the sense that they have more options then they really do.

    19. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I was you wife I would have said "you are dumb."

      c'mon buddy, you think some start-up company called 'Scion' just sprouted up with a massive marketing budget, facories, and market penetration? Same goes for everything else you listed.

      Since you wife didn't say it, I will. YOU ARE DUMB

    20. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't it be Jeri Ellsworth, Linux Torvalds or Steven Wozniak?

    21. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think "Scion" is Japanese for "butt-ugly".

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    22. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by pqdave · · Score: 1

      Geo, was GM rebrand of cars made by Toyota I beleive

      Geo was GM rebrand of lots of different makes--Toyota, Suzuki and Isuzu that I know of, maybe more.

    23. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      You're right. Motivation is the key. After having spent that last decade or so focusing on computers (mostly in the free/open source world) I've kind of dropped the ball on my electronics hobby. I have a ton of project ideas that I'd like to do, but haven't gotten off the ground with one. This article was certainly a motivator. Must get my soldering iron out...

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    24. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1

      Geo, was GM rebrand of cars made by Toyota I beleive

      I am fairly certain that it was Isuzu (sp?) but I guess it doesn't really matter. Your point is well made.

      PS. See sig.

      --
      Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    25. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My thoughts exactly!! Then I realized this guy is so dumb if you told him how dumb he was he'd try t rationalize it somehow.

      I feel bad for this guys wife is all. She must be sick of him by now and probably deserves better.

      mind you, if she bought that crap from him, maybe she is just as dumb - a match made in heaven, let's just hope they don't reproduce!!

    26. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geo was cars that were either jointly assembled with Toyota, or cars made by Suzuki or Isuzu, both of which GM has interest in.

      KIA and Hyundai are not owned by the same company. KIA is affiliated with Mazda and Ford. Hyundai is a large conglomerate on its own, and has businesses in electronics in addition to autos.

    27. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      Even in those cases, many of those names were not household names in the USA 30 years ago.

    28. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly, the Metro had a 3-cyliner engine, not 4.

    29. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. I had to read that twice. are you serious or being sarcastic?

      I won't repeat what others are sure to point out to you.. but I sure hope you were being sarcastic somehow when you said that stuff.

      If not, then please think before you speak for the sanity of all around you.

    30. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how the hell did this guy get modded up? Nothin he says holds any water - in fact, it's entirely innacurate.

      In addition to being kind of funny its so wrong..

      what 'industry' is being dominated here? It's a toy. Period. The toy industry is probably the least 'dominated by 800lb gorillas' industry you can find.

      She's not trying to compete with computer manufcaturers. In fact, all she did was program an FPGA - woopee, but package it and sell it as a toy.

      And guess what, that wasn't even her idea - it was 'Mamoth Toys' idea and they copntracted her to program it. woopee.

      you make an inspirational story out of a very uninspiring one because you read the [always] inacurate /. summary. Then you make an inacurate analogy to the auto industry that is so dead wrong it made my laugh to read.

      Get a life, a new wife, and a brain. You're not welcome here.

    31. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by DaveJay · · Score: 1

      Just wanna clear this up, seeing as how I'm a car guy more than a computer guy these days:

      >Geo was a Chevy brand, made by Suzuki
      (and various other incorrect comments)

      Geo was a Chevy brand that resold the following cars:

      Toyota Corolla == Geo Prism
      Suzuki Sidekick == Geo Tracker
      Suzuki Swift == Geo Metro

      Eventually GM figured out that the additional branding was pointless, and dropped the "Geo" in favor of "Chevrolet".

      Upshot: if you want a really reliable used car for rock-bottom prices, buy a used Prism. Mechanically identical to the Corolla of the time, but usually heavily incentivized by Chevrolet because people were too foolish to realize the cars were identical -- brand new, you could get Prisms for a few thousand less than an identical new Corolla. For the same year used, same options, and same condition, you can get the Prism for thousands less than the Corolla, too. Proof positive that people base their purchasing decisions more on branding than on tangibles.

    32. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by ad0gg · · Score: 1

      Yup, It had an inline three.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    33. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      4-cylinder was optional and, I guess, part of the LSi package. I think it was 1.3 liter though. One of my old coworkers had one. (At least the current Japan-only Suzuki Swift is 1.3 liter)

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    34. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The foreign brands were pretty established in their own countries before they tried to break into the NA market.

      I don't think there has not been a single surviving new car brand in the last 50 years that wasn't started by a major company with deep pockets. Certainly no one that started out as one man to eventually build a high volume carmaker. Of the US brands, I think Chrysler was the last to do so in the 30's.

      Saleen is now a low volume, and I think there are a few others like this.

      Delorean tried but he was hit by politics, conversion costs and the first year's worth of cars had some problems. I think he was indicted on false charges of drug running, despite the released video, the jury completely exhonorated him because it turned out the evidence was fake.

    35. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by stupidfoo · · Score: 1

      Geo was a Chevy brand, made by Suzuki
      (and various other incorrect comments)


      Sorry, forgot the Prism. What else was incorrect?

      Saturn is owned by GM - true
      Scion is owned by Toyota and was started last year - true
      Geo was a Chevy brand, made by Suzuki - true, plus toyota
      Toyota owns Lexus and was started in ~1990 (at least here in the US) - first US models were 1990 (I believe) - true

    36. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original Geo Metro had a 3-cylinder engine. Suzuki's version of the car, the Swift, also had an optional 4-cyl engine, but that was not available on the Metro. The next generation of the car was a bit larger, and was powered by a 4-cylinder engine. At some point GM dropped the Geo brand and started calling it the Chevy Metro.

      Prior to the introduction of the Geo brand (mid-late 80's), GM also sold an earlier version of the car as the Chevy Sprint.

      Somewhat funny story, I used to work with someone who had one. One day she said she would never buy a foreign car, and that she loved her "Chevy". She didn't believe me when I told her she owned a foreign built car rebadged by Chevrolet. Oh well. ;)

    37. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hyundai grabbed KIA a while back in order to turn KIA into a "budget" line to complement their existing Hyundai lines (which went from pathetic to quite good indeed in only a few years).

    38. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Blrfl · · Score: 1

      And GM owns a chunk of Fuji, hence the Saabaru 9-2.

    39. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      I mean, think about it, for 50 years cars were being made and the corporations that made them became big 800lb gorillas. But then look, here comes Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Geo, Saturn, Lexus, Kia and now Scion.

      Besides the rebrands, most of the more recent car companies' success was based on the opportunity of American ones sucking too much at the time (80's) as well as economic issues (70's fuel crisis). (At least now the quality surpasses many European cars).

      Unfortunately, people's tolerance for crappy tech products seems to be much lower.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    40. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by tekunokurato · · Score: 1

      The further reason cars are a bad example is because all the asian car companies operated under heavy gov't subsidy (specifically, usually a high tariff on imports) until they reached enough of a critical mass to be self-supporting, at which point they began competing in the global market without barriers.

      Just some knowledge :)

    41. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by bob65 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not to mention that

      Lincoln, Mercury, Mazda, Volvo, Jaguar, Land Rover, and Aston Martin are all owned by Ford;

      Chevrolet, Pontiac, Buick, Cadillac, GMC, Oldsmobile, Saturn, Hummer, and Saab are all owned by General Motors; and

      Jeep, Chrysler, Dodge, Mercedes-Benz, Maybach, and CSmart are all owned by DaimlerChrysler.

      Also note that many cars are simply re-brands - i.e. the Saab 9-2 is a Subaru Impreza Wagon, the Mazda Tribute is a Ford Escape, etc... and did you know the Subaru Forestor is sold a Chevrolet Forestor in India?

      and of course as mentioned, Lexus and Scion are just brands of Toyota, Infiniti is just a brand of Nissan, and Acura is just a brand of Honda.

    42. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      I thought they just licensed the design? but no, google says gm owns 20 percent of FHI.

      Crap, I just lost a bet :(

      --
      -mkb
    43. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Geo, was GM rebrand of cars made by Toyota I beleive

      toyota and suzuki as i recall (toyota for the prism and suzuki for ... everything else, i think)

    44. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Geo, was GM rebrand of cars made by Toyota I beleive

      Toyota and Suzuki, actually. But I'm offtopic.

    45. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by lechuck80 · · Score: 1

      Land Rover might be a good underdog... Comparatively speaking.

      --
      "Mr. President, we cannot allow a mineshaft gap!"
    46. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Y2K+is+bogus · · Score: 1

      You're wrong. Ford bought Kia when Ford and GM were drooling over the deaths of Kia and Daewoo, both Korean car manufacturers. Ford got Kia, but Daewoo had too much debt, so they didn't buy them. GM eventually purchased portions of Daewoo, skating around the massive debt. Incidentally, look under the hood of Daewoo cars and you'll see an awful lot of stuff made by Delphi, a subsidiary of GM.

      The Kia Sedona mini-van is nothing more than a Ford Windstar, even the grill is identical, they only bothered to install a different emblem.

      Those big companies were tripping over themselves to buy up Kia/Daewoo because it offered them ready manufacturing facilities in the Asia-Pacific region, cutting down on costs to serve those markets.

    47. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by amembleton · · Score: 1

      I just took a look at the history section on the Kia website. It clearly states that Hyundai finalised the takeover of Kia in December 1998. Its a link from their index page. Its some flash thing so I can't post a link.

    48. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Delphi isn't a subsidiary of GM; they're a spinoff of GM's old automotive electronics group (A/C Delco). I believe GM still owns a major share of their business, but they are a seperate company, not a subsidiary.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    49. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Cu · · Score: 1

      GM owns Saab as well. That, coupled with what your mention of the Subaru/Chevrolet Forester implies a growing relationship between GM and Subaru.

      Also, I believe Ford does not own Mazda, but rather a large chunk of it.

      --
      I'm Abram Bender. You're not.
    50. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by SoupGuru · · Score: 1

      I bought an xB a couple weeks ago. Originally, I wasn't crazy about the looks of the "toaster", but now I *kind of* like it. But the things is, I'm 6.5' and I wanted a compact car for the mpg it would get me on my 30 minute San Diego commute. And when you're six and a half feet looking at Civics and Corollas it's a dream come true to sit in an xB. I've got headroom... HEADROOM, for god's sake!

      --
      What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
    51. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by bob65 · · Score: 1
      That, coupled with what your mention of the Subaru/Chevrolet Forester implies a growing relationship between GM and Subaru.

      Hopefully it's not a growing relationship - so far GM only owns 20% non-voting shares or something in Fuji Heavy Industries, of which Subaru is only one of its divisions.

      I don't know about the Ford-Mazda relationship, but Mazda is listed as one of the brands on www.ford.com.

    52. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I haven't sat in a recent Civic, but my '85 Civic hatchback always had more than enough for me at 6'4". Toyotas (at least from that period) always made me feel claustrophic. My 2001 Accord could use a couple inches more leg room, but it's pretty good for me. I've driven it fairly long distances and had no problems.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    53. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention Sunni insurgents in Iraq. Not commenting on the validity of their cause or the morality of their tactics, but they certainly qualify as an underdog having success against an 800-lb gorilla.

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
    54. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, think about it, for 50 years cars were being made and the corporations that made them became big 800lb gorillas. But then look, here comes Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Geo, Saturn, Lexus, Kia and now Scion.

      Toyota and Honda are Japanese powerhouses that own Nissan and Lexus. Geo and Saturn are GM cars. Scion is a new Toyota model. Kia's some Korean outfit that used to make really crappy cars, not makes somewhat crappy ones.

    55. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by ZenFu · · Score: 1

      Cars are a bad metaphore. Mostly made by large comglomerates.

      I think you may have over simplified the industry. Toyota does make cars. But Toyota buys parts from suppliers are and are more of an assembly then a manufacturing operation. I think the big car companies may be more "Dell" like and less "Intel" like then you imply. Maybe not too much alike, but directionally, they're pointed in the same way - shorter product cycles, lower inventory, product differentiation for yield management, etc. etc.

      I also don't think it's all that far fetched to say that as manufacturing batch sizes shrink, information improves, and outsourcing increases, that the opportunities for a new car company the serves a niche that the larger companies consider a joke increases, not decreases, over time.

      Interesting to me, the whole series of posts that have followed the parent post hopefully exhibit the sort of complacent arrogance that precedes the unforeseen industry upset.

    56. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to mention, Geo and Saturn are GM brands... :-)

    57. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Pinback · · Score: 1

      Flash forward to the future. Any retro product you reverse engineer will get you some jail time?

    58. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Gandalf_007 · · Score: 1

      If not 100%, Ford owns a majority stake in Mazda.

      GM owns 49% of Isuzu, and they have done some sharing -- the (no longer made) Isuzu Hombre pickup was an S-10 clone, and the Duramax Diesel engine in the Chevy pickups is an Isuzu design.

      --

      "It's better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt."
    59. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by dododge · · Score: 1

      Another one: Audi, Bentley, Bugatti, Lamborghini, Seat, and Skoda are all owned by Volkswagen AG.

      According to Wikipedia, Volkswagen and BMW have some sort of joint agreement regarding the Rolls-Royce business and trademarks.

    60. Re:There will always been room for the underdog by Gumber · · Score: 1
      I mean, think about it, for 50 years cars were being made and the corporations that made them became big 800lb gorillas. But then look, here comes Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Geo, Saturn, Lexus, Kia and now Scion.


      Geo = GM
      Saturn = GM
      Lexes = Toyota
      Scion = Toyota
  19. just think by Bishop · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Just think what Ms. Ellsworth could have achieved with a proper education. If anything this story shows how the education system fails for smart people.

    1. Re:just think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're contradicting yourself, why would a system that fails for smart people benefit a smart person?

    2. Re:just think by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      "A proper education" doesn't necessarily refer to anything she would have gotten from the failed system if she hadn't dropped out.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    3. Re:just think by jsin · · Score: 1

      Yes imagine; she could have a CS degree and be like the other two-thirds of /. readers who obtained an impossibly high standard of living only to suddenly become unemployed.

    4. Re:just think by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just think what Ms. Ellsworth could have achieved with a proper education.

      Maybe not as much... she might have ended up as the employee of some big computer company designing games or the like.

      Maybe it was the *lack* of education that put her in the difficult situations that made her give the best from herself. It was her efforts to go against the tides that made her outstand from the average geeks like us. Maybe that was the pressure needed to turn her into a full-fledged diamond.

      I wish i had her courage to go against the tides and established principles. *Sighs*

    5. Re:just think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wanted to reply to all of grandparent's replies just to pipe in. I am not a product of ANY edumicational system, and I'm in the same space I would be if I had a Masters from CMU -- unemployed in Pittsburgh.

    6. Re:just think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, how arrogant.

      You overvalue your education. But then again, you're probably still making payments on it.

    7. Re:just think by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      Makes me wonder what I could be doing if I could have afforded a proper edumication (or any edumication at all).

      There are those of us who are not amused by what this country calls "Edumcation." Personally, the many schools I went to would not let me take computer classes, in favor of the remedial math and history classes assigned to me. Like most geeky people reading this, I would go home and program after school.

      Thing I wish I could have understood much earlier on: When people told me no, I should have done it anyway.

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    8. Re:just think by bedouin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just think what Ms. Ellsworth could have achieved with a proper education.

      A four to six year delay (depending on if she wanted to pursue a MA/MS) in doing what she really wanted to do, only to work as a code monkey in a cubicle? $100k in debt? If she went to school this likely wouldn't have happened for her.

      She's done something pretty practical, that exemplifies she has some skills most people don't. That's worth way more than some printed scraps of paper with her name on it. This is coming from an overeducated bastard, by the way.

    9. Re:just think by Bishop · · Score: 1

      There is no contradiction. A proper education, and the education system are linked, but not the same thing. The education system failed by not giving Ms. Ellsworth a proper education.

    10. Re:just think by Bishop · · Score: 1

      Of the handfull comments yours one of the few with good points. I just thought I would point that out.

      Your argument is well taken. I think that there is some truth to it. I don't think that a proper education would have precluded the types of pressure Ms. Ellsworth may have needed.

      For the record I didn't mean to suggest that Ms. Ellsworth would have benefitted from a CS degree. (Many respondents to my original post seem to think that this is the case.) There are many fields of study includeing non techinal ones. May be she would have found a love for Sumerian Architechture?

    11. Re:just think by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      A thirst for knowledge and having a passion
      for what you strive for means far more than
      a "proper education". A "proper education"
      that adheres to a rigid format could stifle
      the creative juices. And a "formal education"
      that costs tens of thousands of dollars in
      student loans could kill that passion, when
      the job HAS to pay off the student loans AND
      doesn't encourage those creative juices (brings
      to mind the previous posts about the code-monkeys
      at EA).

      I salute Ms. Ellsworth. Her quest for knowledge
      has brought her some well deserved success, and
      her passion for things geeky is inspirational.

    12. Re:just think by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      Ritalin worked for me. :) The reason most smart people have the system fail them is that they are bored by the system. They need to be intellectually challenged. I was lucky that I had a lot of good teachers that pushed my intellectual boundaries and encouraged me to learn beyond the textbook.

    13. Re:just think by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      yeah, she would have More debt.

      sorry bot a "proper" education means nothing.

      I know of many that changed this world that were considered worthless and were failed out of their "proper" education.

      Fools think that college makes better thinkers.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    14. Re:just think by Com2Kid · · Score: 1
      • in favor of the remedial math and history classes assigned to me.


      Remedial math is there so you can understand the higher-level math. If you get a CS degree from an accredited university, that means the University has put their name behind you in saying you are capable of living up to the expectations of a CS graduate, which include knowing higher mathematics, a variety of branches of science, and having at least a passing familiarity with your own nation's, and the world's, history.

      Oddly enough this stuff is useful. They all consist of different patterns of thinking, different paths of logic and exploration.

      Maybe on your own you can do all of this by yourself, self taught, good for you. A degree certifies that (at least in theory) you have been taught all this stuff.

      • Like most geeky people reading this, I would go home and program after school.


      A true geek/nerd is interested in knowledge of all types, and does not have the ego to think that their own profession is the best one isolated from all others, or that only programming has meaning.

      Solving equations, or learning about how historic peace treaties were hammered out, are all valuable skills.

      Yes, knowing how to learn about something is a skill. Learning history is different than learning to paint is different than learning the piano is different than learning mathematics.

      If you get assigned a job where you are working with one or more vastly different cultures than your own, you might want to know how to do a Google lookup of data about different cultures. What phrases to use, what search terms to look up, who wrote books on different topics. I guess that "stupid" liberal arts course in communications could have come in handy.

      If your hired to write a historic battle simulation game, history class might be nice. Sure you can look it up on your own, but things go a lot faster if you have already has prior exposure to the material, even if it was years ago, the pathways are still lying dormant somewhere in your brain.

      The overall point here is, college has many topics seemingly "unrelated" to CS for good reasons, a Computer Scientist, (or Engineer, or Electrical Engineer, etc) may be expected to work in a wide variety of situations, and must be equipped to not necessarily completely handle those situations, but be able to teach him/her-self how to handle those situations.

      Also you wouldn't have to take remedial math if you'd paid attention the first time around. (I made the same mistake! oops!) Mathematics does has a ton to do with programming, and learning CS and Mathematics together is a very valuable experience that changes the way you think about how to approach problems.

      Taking a Differential Equations course and a Functional Programming course together at the same time, you begin to realize that they are both talking about the same (or at least similar) things, in DQ you study functions that take in functions, functions that take in functions and a constant, functions that take in multiple functions, and functions that take in multiple functions and constants,

      then you walk on over to your next class, and do the same darn thing on a computer.

      All of a sudden those math courses don't seem so useless anymore.

      All those remedial math course are because everybody needs to be speaking the same language, going at at least the same minimal speed. When the Professor writes out a two line equation on the board, and next to it simplifies it to half the size, you have to have followed along in your head that he rearranged the terms, factored some of them out, wrote some terms as one over their reciprocal, and then canceled those out, and so on and so forth.

      You have to have done it many times over, until it is second nature to you, because that is the only way for the classes to go at a reasonable pace.

      I do agree that Algebra is a bit over taught in schools, but heck, you need to know it, need to get used to it, and need to be able to do it insanely fast, just to keep up in the higher math courses!
    15. Re:just think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason most smart people have the system fail them is that they are bored by the system.

      That's definitly part of it. Personally, I was turned off to school in a big way by its institutional nature and the strict hierarchal social order (meaning relations between students, teachers and faculty, not the popularity contests).

    16. Re:just think by pilgrim23 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have had a couple of conversations on geek subjects with Jeri. She is a brilliant person. Her education in the subject matter has little to do with it. She naturally has the curious mindset and the self-developed tools to achieve. What formally recognized union card (or as they say in the military: ticket punched) you get may mean something to the middle managers, but it means diddly in the reality of life. The truly brilliant shine no matter what their background, what their training. I personally majored in history yet work in IT and as a hobby I am one of those retro computer nerds the article speaks of. Jeri has done wonders with limited resources in areas the majors developers would not find worth looking into or commercially viable. We of the Retro world salute Jeri Ellsworth for her accomplishments!
      oh and PS: speaking to a post above: in person, Yes, she IS Hot! :)

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    17. Re:just think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wah wah wah... Sorry, life's never been fair. Maybe in some magical future with flying ponies and gumdrop lanes, we'll achieve it. But the "institutional nature" and "strict hierarchal social order" seems to be a big part of the human condition, like it or not. Maybe instead of being "turned off" you could live your life like your life and not like you're playing a part... ...posting anonymously so my mod points were not wasted in this thread...

    18. Re:just think by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      If you think that it's a waste of time to inspire rather than to bore, our conversation ends here.

    19. Re:just think by Dasein · · Score: 1

      I'm old -- at least for a college student. I'm 34. I started working in the computer industry when I was 17, so I've been in a lot of different development shops, shipped a lot of commercial product and generally had a pretty good career.

      A couple of years ago, I decided to go back to school part-time and get a math degree. The interesting thing is that I've noticed that I'm much more able to handle algorithm analysis and puzzle questions in an interview.

      So, at least for a very small sample set (one -- me) on some very particular types of problems, college has made me a better thinker. However, I don't think that going to school at the traditional time would have had nearly the impact nor would a CS degree.

      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
    20. Re:just think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU NASTY SICK MOTHERFUCKER, go fuck your anime and children porn collection that you have on your computer!

    21. Re:just think by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Wow. Aparently the AC that responded to you *really* doesn't like math heh.

      Back on topic, though, I agree with the opinion that you have to be exposed to different fields than just your own (wether you think they are related or not). In fact, a lot of the things most people don't see as being related to their field are often the most useful because they give you insight into different ways to look at things.

      Keep in mind though that the person saying this graduated with a degree in CS and has way too many hobbies and interests (language, philosophy from several periods and regions, history, anthro, blacksmithing, etc etc - most of which led to me being offered side projects by profs that I didn't have the time to pursue due to also working my way through college). I also trained martially from the time I was a kid and even helped teach fencing while in college as a way to both feel productive and work my way through some personal problems (relationship changes sometimes suck).

      Having said that, one of the things that the people I have worked with have commented on and enjoyed is the fact that I tend to think "outside the box" and relate to other cultures rather well (It has been my pleasure to know a lot of people from many different parts of the world. Amusingly enough, the ones from Asia tend to get me to help them with their English. In return, I pick up more of their language - be it Chinese, Japanese, etc). Not to mention the fact that I can speak "normal person" as one of my co-workers called it.

      It's not just what you know, but how you look at the things that you *don't* know...

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    22. Re:just think by jaelle · · Score: 1

      The education system is actively destructive.

      When I was in school, I was just like her, tho that was way before computers became available. Actually, I wanted an Altair so bad I could taste it, when I was..10? Somewhere around there. As a female farm kid in the late 60's I simply could not find a way to accumulate the hundred bucks.

      In school I scored a 99% on mechanical ability and abstract reasoning on aptitude tests,yet they made me take shorthand and typing and bookkeeping...even though I scored a 2% on "clerical speed and accuracy" on those same tests.

      I finally got to take a a year of drafting--after I mentioned "Title 9" to the counselors. I missed a lot of it tho, because I wasn't allowed to take it before. I was not allowed to take physics or chemistry either, because of math scores. They'd told my mother when I first started having trouble with it (when they changed back from "new math" to "old math") that I'd never need it because I was a girl. I corrected those deficiencies as quickly as I could as an adult, but by then the usual survival stuff took up all of my time. It was too late.

      My son, however, also was nearly destroyed by the education system. They kept confiscating his "RadioElectronics" magazines in first grade. Then in 4th, his teacher told me he was retarded because he became totally unresponsive in class. He'd just 'go away'.

      I pulled him from school and let him do what he pleased from then on. He's an electronics engineer and inventor now, and is doing very well.

      And he's not the only homeschooled kid I know that's done things like that. Schools destroy more motivation and creativity than they ever foster. Kids need *time* and access to information, and they'll do the rest all by themselves. Locking them up in institutions wastes their time and limits their access to knowledge.

      Kids are wired to learn. What they learn should be their choice, not some institution's. No matter what they choose, they'll be passionate experts in it, and that's a skill that's in very short supply.

      --
      You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
    23. Re:just think by Bishop · · Score: 1

      A true geek/nerd is interested in knowledge of all types

      Sadly these geeks are in short supply.

      I am dismayed by the number of people who think that university is a place to learn facts and job skills. It isn't. A university is a place to learn about learning. The more learning one attempts, the more one will learn about learning.

  20. All the flame... by Thunderstruck · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is starting to have an effect! From the article:

    Her efforts in reverse-engineering old computers and giving them new life inside modern custom chips has already earned her a cult following among small groups of "retro" personal computer enthusiasts, as well as broad respect among the insular world of the original computer hackers who created the first personal computers three decades ago. (The term "hacker" first referred to people who liked to design and create machines, and only later began to be applied to people who broke into them.)

    This column actually notes the distinction between hackers and crackers, well, sort-of... Anyway it sure is refreshing!

    Now if only we could come up with different words for good lawyers and bad lawyers. How about Clawyers?

    --
    Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
    1. Re:All the flame... by MrDomino · · Score: 1

      Good... lawyers?

    2. Re:All the flame... by Dayflowers · · Score: 1

      I approve your suggestion. Henceforth I shall use the term "Clawyers" when referring to "evil lawyers". I hope others will follow.

      --
      I am a speak english. Do you not? - Saroto
    3. Re:All the flame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is easy, there are no good lawyers therefore they are all bad.

    4. Re:All the flame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A simple check for a death certificate should be all that is needed, since the only good lawyer is a dead lawyer.

    5. Re:All the flame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent Redundant

    6. Re:All the flame... by Cheirdal · · Score: 1

      Now if only we could come up with different words for good lawyers and bad lawyers. How about Clawyers?

      That remind me of a joke. A texas oil billionaire is at a party and he propositions a pretty young woman. "Hello Miss, I'm J.R. Moneybags. Would you like to come back to my mansion for some wild sex?"
      The woman is appalled and says "No, of course not! I don't even know you!".
      To this the billionaire replies "Ok, would you sleep with me for ten million dollars then?".
      The woman ponders this offer for a moment then says "Yes, for ten million dollars I will."
      The billionaire replies "How about for one hundred dollars then?"
      To which the woman replies "What kind of woman do you think I am?!"
      And the billionaire replies "We've already determined that. Now we're negotiating for a price."

      There moral here is that there are no good lawyers. Their prices may vary but they've all sold their souls for the greater bad when it comes to make society a better place.

    7. Re:All the flame... by Diabolical · · Score: 1

      There allready is a name for bad lawyers, sharks.

      Too bad it is reflecting badly on the real sharks (the fish) who aren't nearly as bad in comparison...

    8. Re:All the flame... by the+hermit · · Score: 1

      you mean there's such a thing as a good lawyer??!?

  21. dyke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a picture of her "girl"friend in another story.

    1. Re:dyke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Found a pic of her girlfriend too here She's cute as well. Here's a picture of some guys from the same conference. Which might help you understand why she's a lesbian.

      As to whether she's hot... I don't think she's going to be the next supermodel but she's attractive and has a nice body. Think of the smart geek girl in your IT dept that people from other depts also hit on. If this geek chick wanted some hot photos, I've made women not half as hot as her look good :)

    2. Re:dyke by ZB+Mowrey · · Score: 1
      Here's a picture of some guys from the same conference. Which might help you understand why she's a lesbian.

      Hey, the big guy in tie-dye looks like Leo Laporte on his day off!

      --

      Self-referential sigs are rarely entertaining.

    3. Re:dyke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus who knew cheech was an amiga geek!

    4. Re:dyke by essreenim · · Score: 1
      Here's a picture of some guys from the same conference. Which might help you understand why she's a lesbian.

      that she's a lesbian would once have bothered me but I have to say, it adds up and it makes sense. Sometimes I wish my little sister was a lesbian so that in the future I would know she would not associate with little rat boys. I am a not a typical geek either - Im a more prim kind of male...I am tough...yet soft..and NO Im not gay but sex doesn't mean allot to me.

  22. Let us hope by boodaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let us hope there are many more people just like her here in America. If there are, the future will be very interesting. If there aren't, we'll find ourselves a nation of passive consumers without any initiative.

    1. Re:Let us hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let us hope there are many more people just like her here in America.
      Yes we need more people reinventing the wheel

    2. Re:Let us hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "...we'll find ourselves a nation of passive consumers without any initiative."

      Why do you say this as if it's in the future?

    3. Re:Let us hope by krumms · · Score: 1

      ... If there aren't [others like her], we'll find ourselves a nation of passive consumers without any initiative.

      Gee, that's a stretch of the imagination :P

    4. Re:Let us hope by Dan+D. · · Score: 1

      Yeah ... there are. Although many of us are not nearly as succesful or talented :)

      --
      People who quote themselves bug the crap out of me -- Me.
    5. Re:Let us hope by EhWhat · · Score: 1

      Play with toys like this & you might just end up with a nation of passive consumers without any initiative!

  23. Told you So by dshaw858 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, I know it's a tiny bit off topic, but I wanted to reinforce something that seemed to be overlooked. In a previous Slashdot article, everyone was wondering how to get kids into tech, and how important it is to push extra (and internal) curricular activities at school. I said that that wasn't necessary, and this story goes to prove it. I gotta say, this is a really interesting read... what I wonder is how much more she could have done if she had gone to college and been an electrical engineering major...

    - dshaw

    1. Re:Told you So by boodaman · · Score: 1
      what I wonder is how much more she could have done if she had gone to college and been an electrical engineering major...

      She probably would have been worse off, unless she was lucky and found a program that encouraged entrepenurial and innovative thinking.

    2. Re:Told you So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I wonder is how much more she could have done if she had gone to college and been an electrical engineering major..."

      She would have wasted her time doing trivial assignments, get her work copied by the 30% of students who cheat to get their degrees, and gotten into debt, and NOT made this device.
      You're a fucking GENIUS man. Great idea!

    3. Re:Told you So by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More schooling may or may not help her. Formal education is useful for learning the basic concepts, but it sometimes stiffles the creative impulse to do something brand new with those concepts that most people won't consider since it haven't been done before.

      She seems to have the classic "I don't have time for this sh*t since I got better things to do" attitude of so many of the big movers in the computer industry (i.e., Steve Wozinak, Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, and John Carmack). If she needs more education to help her solve a problem, she'll seek out on her own.

    4. Re:Told you So by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1
      what I wonder is how much more she could have done if she had gone to college and been an electrical engineering major...

      Yeah, it's great that she succeeded and all, but I really hate these "High school drop-out does good" stories. They just attract the regular high-school drop-outs and give them more ammo to validate their stupid mistakes. "See, that guy dropped out and he's super rich!"

      I was standing in line in a grocery store the other day, and I overheard 2 woman talking about how successful Spongebob squarepants was and how it's marketed on everything. One woman says to the other "And you know who the creator was before he made up Spongebob? [dramatic beat] a surfer." Sure Stephen Hillenburg might be a surfer, but that's not the extent of his background training.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    5. Re:Told you So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Let us hope there are many more people just like her here in America.


      Yes we need more people reinventing the wheel

      "...we'll find ourselves a nation of passive consumers without any initiative."
      Why do you say this as if it's in the future?

      ... If there aren't [others like her], we'll find ourselves a nation of passive consumers without any initiative.
      Gee, that's a stretch of the imagination :P

      ..this is Gupta. How may I help you?

      Yeah ... there are. Although many of us are not nearly as succesful or talented :)


      Thanks! Pessemism wins!
    6. Re:Told you So by csbruce · · Score: 1

      everyone was wondering how to get kids into tech, and how important it is to push extra (and internal) curricular activities at school. I said that that wasn't necessary, and this story goes to prove it.

      Still, her story is from a previous era, when Commodores and Ataris roamed the land, but this is the era of welded-hood prepackaged clickamajigs. Kids with a general interest in technology may learn entirely different things from programming.

      LOAD"*",8,1

    7. Re:Told you So by jedrek · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's great that she succeeded and all, but I really hate these "High school drop-out does good" stories.

      I'm one of those stories, and I agree with you fully. For everybody I know who dropped out and made a successful career, there are dozens who can't find a job and still live with their mom at 27. Whenever someone younger asks me about my education, I tell them what happened, then I tell them to stay in school because lightning rarely strikes twice.

  24. hot, red-head, self taught, retro video game chick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cmdr Taco would hit it!
    I'D hit it!

    time to kill some kitties

  25. Apple ][ in a joystick...? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The C64 was based on the 6502 processor. So was the Apple ][. Maybe someone will come out with an Apple ][ in a joystick. If Apple was really smart, they would put an Apple ][ inside an IPod.

    The problem with the IPod, you can't claim that your joystick is bigger than anyone else's joystick. :P

    1. Re:Apple ][ in a joystick...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Laser made an Apple II based handheld 14 or 15 years ago. I can't be certain but I think it was called a PC4. No floppy drive, but it did have some basic word processing / spreadsheet apps and a basic editor. Ran forever on 2 AAs.

      For some reason I think it had a phone tone emulator too.

    2. Re:Apple ][ in a joystick...? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Geez... I barely remember that. Back then I was still on my third C64 (they seem to last only three years).

      A phone tone emulator usually meant a Captain Crunch whistle to access the phone networks. I wonder if that still works with today's phone equipment?

    3. Re:Apple ][ in a joystick...? by tzanger · · Score: 1

      The C64 was based on the 6502 processor.

      Actually it was the 6510 that was in the C64.

    4. Re:Apple ][ in a joystick...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No it wasn't.

      THe C64 was based on the 6510 (a 6502 compatible).

      The Apple II was a 1MHz 6502.

      The Atari 800 and 400 used 1.8MHz 6502A.

    5. Re:Apple ][ in a joystick...? by doppleganger871 · · Score: 1

      Three years? I don't think I've ever had one just "shit the bed" on me. I always kept acquiring more, actually. Though my main 2 systems, a 64c and a c128, worked fine until I had to dismantle them due to space. I WILL have my c128 system back up and running soon, though, maybe even use my 128D. Just have to transfer or buy JiffyDOS for it.

    6. Re:Apple ][ in a joystick...? by slungsolow · · Score: 1

      dismantle them due to space?

      Did you live in a breadbasket?

    7. Re:Apple ][ in a joystick...? by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > Actually it was the 6510 that was in the C64.

      Close enough.

      You'll spend more time with the undocumented op-codes of either chip (and their revisions) than you will the differences between the published interfaces and timings when developing a core for either chip.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    8. Re:Apple ][ in a joystick...? by tzanger · · Score: 1

      You'll spend more time with the undocumented op-codes of either chip (and their revisions) than you will the differences between the published interfaces and timings when developing a core for either chip.

      I agree it will be close enough but I believe the zero-page differences are big enough to warrant my pedantism. :-)

    9. Re:Apple ][ in a joystick...? by Rico_Suave · · Score: 1

      Heh... I just fired up my 1983-model C64 last night - still works like a charm. The 1541 is a little out of alignment, but not to the point of making disks unreadable.

  26. Well placed side note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, a non-geek news entity getting their termonology somewhat accuarte:

    Her efforts in reverse-engineering old computers and giving them new life inside modern custom chips has already earned her a cult following among small groups of "retro" personal computer enthusiasts, as well as broad respect among the insular world of the original computer hackers who created the first personal computers three decades ago. (The term "hacker" first referred to people who liked to design and create machines, and only later began to be applied to people who broke into them.)

  27. Netcraft: Commodore is dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sadly, all it would take is one lawsuit (ore even the threat thereof) to shut her down."

    Suit from whom? Commodore is no more. Sue based on what? Patents? Trademark? Copyright? I don't think you even know, and just want to live up to your moniker.

    Also while what she did is nice. What she did is easier using old chips as templates, as opposed to a brand-new chip.

    1. Re:Netcraft: Commodore is dead. by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      Commodore is maybe nomore, but dollars to designers _someone_ still owns the IP.

      Anyway, this product is licensed. Always a good idea when sinking $$ into hardware.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    2. Re:Netcraft: Commodore is dead. by Rev+Wally · · Score: 1

      Yeah, these guys http://commodoreworld.com/

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
  28. LOL... tons of lesbian references thrown in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dont mod up, it's some kind of warped karma whoring troll

  29. Re:eureka! plus legality? by narcolept · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Actually, you are right if you are discussing the same device I linked to. If you're talking about the Commodore 64 emulator that this thread is about, I don't know about the legalities involved with C64 roms, due to them being atleast 20 years old or so. It would be interesting if someone could shed some light on legal issues that Miss Ellsworth could possibly face regarding this, if any?

  30. Sounds like she got screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She gets a consultants fee for something that very few people could do and she could do it quickly? I'm no business person, but she should have seriously tried to get a percentage of these joysticks.

  31. I'd hit it! by beldraen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh, wrong site.. Sorry.

    --
    Bel, the mostly sane.. "Of course I can't see anything! I'm standing on the shoulders of idiots." -- Me
    1. Re:I'd hit it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank you for getting the reference. if I had mod points I'd give you "+1 reads more than slashdot"

    2. Re:I'd hit it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's a trap!

    3. Re:I'd hit it! by pragma_x · · Score: 1

      [OBVIOUS]

    4. Re:I'd hit it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh-hu-huh-hrrrrr grrr *stampa stampa*.

    5. Re:I'd hit it! by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      I see that you are a mobog regular, too.

    6. Re:I'd hit it! by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      She's got sharp knees.

      (doh!)

    7. Re:I'd hit it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score: Infinity, Funny)

  32. College is a waste of time by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    If you spent as much time and effort doing independent projects in computing and research as they have you doing off the wall homework and cookie cutter projects, you'd be well on your way to writing sentences this long.

    1. Re:College is a waste of time by CK2004PA · · Score: 1

      Huh?

      --
      "I believe today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator"-Adolf Hitler or George W Bush?
  33. she did and found it counter productive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    smart people don't need school. only dumb people. I'm dumb too, so don't feel bad. some of the very best in IT have no college degree at all. They just pick it up on their own. These aren't your normal programmer and they don't fit in the normal definition. There are also plenty of idiots in the IT field with no degrees, so having no degree doesn't meant anything.

    1. Re:she did and found it counter productive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just becuase you are smart does not mean you don't "need" school. It is a matter of personality and learning style. Some people do alot better when they have a well-structured learning environment rather than just picking up books or other materials and learning on their own.

  34. Well by paranode · · Score: 5, Funny

    She looks like a conniving elf in the picture. So in Slashdot terms, yes she's hot.

    1. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A conniving elfbabe?!!! And a geek?!! Rawr!!!!

  35. All the flame...What's in a position? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Now if only we could come up with different words for good lawyers and bad lawyers."

    Plaintiff. Defendant.

    1. Re:All the flame...What's in a position? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Now if only we could come up with different words for good lawyers and bad lawyers."

      How about

      "mine" and "yours."

  36. Don't Need School to be Educated. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    School is only a method of pointing you in the right direction to become educated and if you learned enough they give you a piece of paper that says you have learned stuff. If it weren't for regulations in such areas almost every job could possibly be done by a person who never graduated from high school or college. A person who is motivated enough will learn without the need of school. They can go the the library them self and learn information. They can read stories about how other people did things, they can educate themselves without the need for school.

    I would like to think school is more a Map to show you were you can go for success. But just like driving on the road you don't always need a Map common since and some exploring will help you get to your location as well, sometimes (usually) a little longer then normal but sometimes a lot quicker. As well with schooling like driving with a Map if you don't know where you are or where you are going the Map is useless.

    That said dropping out of school is still often a bad idea, because while you may get there by chance if you had a better education it will give you at least basic directions to start out on, training people with good research skills and the ability to learn for themselves.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right.
      You don't need math because you have calculators, you don't need to read because you can watch TV without it, you don't need to know history since you'll never repeat the mistakes of the past, etc.
      Do please note that even if you forget the stuff you memorized, school teaches you HOW to learn, how to research, why information is important.
      Anyway, go out there with your beliefs and prove Darwin right. You know, that dude who said something about the natural selection - might remember something about it from school. Oh, wait...
      Have fun posting.

    2. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by Zebano · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "I never let my schooling interfere with my education"

      -Mark Twain

      --
      You hate your job? There's a support group for that. It's called "everybody" and they meet at the bar. -Drew Carey.
    3. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Huh? That has nothing to do with that the grandparent said. He did not say you need not education, he said you need not school to become education.

      If you're designing chips for a living on your education then I think that is rather blatant proof that you don't need school to become educated. Exactly how does this tie in with Darwinism? Did Darwin address going to school as a means of avoiding evolutionary extinction?

    4. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by pdxaaron · · Score: 0, Troll

      But just like driving on the road you don't always need a Map common since and some exploring will help you get to your location as well, sometimes (usually) a little longer then normal but sometimes a lot quicker.

      Your map must have led you on a detour around Grammarsville, straight through Run-On-Sentencetown.

    5. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by tetsuji · · Score: 1
      For some people, school is only about learning how to learn and finding direction. For others, like myself, school, and specifically the lecture environment, is the best way to learn domain-specific material. It all has to do with whether or not you're an auditory learner.

      The ability to succeed outside of the school environment depends heavily upon how easily one can learn from a textbook. For me, texts are excellent reference materials but are almost useless for learning; instead, I learn by listening. In college I almost never missed a class, because my recall ability for things I hear is much greater than for things I read. If I'm trying to learn a new concept from manuals or texts, I have to read the material numerous times before I'm able to apply it. On the other hand, if I have the material explained out loud, I can grasp the concept immediately. This doesn't just extend to technical subjects, either - for example I can remember the lyrics of just about every song I've ever heard, even if I've only heard it a single time.

      That being said, I have a lot of envy for people who can learn quickly from reference materials. With the decline of mentorships and apprenticeships, school is just about the only way I can effectively advance my learning, and a lot of the things taught in school are not directly applicable to the workplace.

    6. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I found that college was more of an atmosphere and an enabler to follow studies. college is a way to make it easier for you to not have to work to feed and house yourself and focus on learning and discovering instead of focusing on survival.

      Some people are forced to do both, the full time student that also worked full time commands much more respect from everyone than the guy that daddy had enough money to pay for everything or the person that was lucky enough to receive a full ride.

      College enables you by providing resources that normally you would have to pay for... it's hard to study Chemistry on your own because the first step is to build a lab.

      Those are the ONLY advantages to college. you can learn EVERYTHING they teach in a college without ever setting foot in one or ever listening to a "professor".

      You do not receive a better education at a college, you receive a better opportunity to learn in an atmosphere that is conducive to learning.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by gordgekko · · Score: 1

      > He did not say you need not education, he said you need not school to become education. Words fail me.

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    8. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by nuknuk · · Score: 1

      The statement I've found most true about schooling is thus :

      "People don't hire you because of the things that you learned in school. Having a (diploma/degree/insert cert here) simply shows that you are capable of learning and have the determination to finish a difficult task"

      --
      You can pick your nodes, and you can pick your friends, but you can't pick your friend's nodes
    9. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by SewersOfRivendell · · Score: 1
      "People don't hire you because of the things that you learned in school. Having a (diploma/degree/insert cert here) simply shows that you are capable of learning and have the determination to finish a difficult task"

      Where did you get that idea? A degree shows nothing. Even Dubya has a degree (from Yale, no less!). Means nothing.

    10. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Those are the ONLY advantages to college. you can learn EVERYTHING they teach in a college without ever setting foot in one or ever listening to a "professor".

      Yep, just like I learned that

      • I actually like some liberal arts subjects, like political science, economics, and philosophy.
      • You only think you know how computers do arithmetic until you've been made to study CPU architecture.
      • Normalizing databases is a good thing.
      • A simple O(n^2) algorithm can be much better than a complex O(log n) algorithm in certain situations (and what that means in the first place).
      • Functional programming corresponds very well to how I naturally think of certain solutions.
      • Although I'm a super-genius and God's gift to the programming world, I don't know everything and I still have to do what my professor^Wboss tells me to.
      • Geek girls have a built-in "attractiveness bonus".
      ...all without ever going into a classroom with scores of other students who were struggling through the same problems, building connections, and learning how to work with others (even outside the dreaded "group projects") to get through some of the hard stuff.

      OK, I'm lying. If it weren't for college, then I'd still think I was Hot Stuff and be an insufferable (and ignorant) toolshed. I'm probably still a pain in the butt, but at least now I know what I don't know. I also have quite a few extra skills that I never would have picked up on my own because they just didn't sound interesting. Finally, I actually got enough of a liberal arts education along the way to understand a little more about the world around me than I would have otherwise. I can flat-out guarantee you that I never would have cracked a poli-sci or economics textbook if it hadn't been required in order for me to get a diploma.

      If someone's been telling you that college is all about learning things in the classroom of your major, then they're lying to you.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    11. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by SewersOfRivendell · · Score: 1
      You shouldn't be advising anyone on book-larnin', son. Your grammar is atrocious.

      I don't care if you go to college or not, but you absolutely need to go to an English class.

    12. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well I am not book learned. I learn by more hands on and experimenting.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    13. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      No a lot of people are under the impression that if you have a Degree then you are smart. Otherwise you are dumb. Heck I have seen some jobs that required a Degree from a top 10 school thinking if you graduated from Harvard University you know so much more then a a graduate from the University of Hartford.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    14. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Some people when they get older actually find learning more interesting so they will learn some history, Read books and other sources and usually if to understand something needs math they will learn the math as needed.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    15. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by pdo400 · · Score: 1

      I dont know about you, but I found most of my "professors" to be incredible resources for learning. And most of them loved when a student would come to office hours with a question that went beyond the scope of the standard curriculum. Oh sure, I COULD have went to the library or the internet to research that problem I had about the decidablility of root-finding algorithms on the real numbers, or whether it was possible for a function to be continuous but non-differentiable, but I'd say it was much faster, more enlightening, and more fun to work with a professor on them.

      Oh, also I got laid a lot in college and became 1000x more well adjusted socially. But, nah, that's no big deal compared to learning some CS and Math.

      --
      --
    16. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      without social distractions you could have studies and researched more. you might have discovered something amazing.

      Most peop[le that go to college get trapped by the social aspects and really waste their years of freedom to only learn.

      Im agine being given 3 years and every possible item you need to research something. now Imagine putting that aside because you are more interested in seeing how quickly you can get to screw that redhead in ypur physics lecture.

      Invent a new power source or get laid....

      I know what your hormones at that time told you.....

    17. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He did not say you need not education, he said you need not school to become education.

      I am become education, the enlightener of minds!

    18. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the solution is to leave the environment that forces you to pay some attention to learning? And, being a not-very-self-motivated person who gets distracted by girls, try to learn everything on your own, doing everything yourself, with no institutional support, while still surrounded by all the distractions available wherever you live?

      Or perhaps you're saying that being a loser who never gets out of his basement forces you to learn technical things because you have nothing better to do?

      Somehow, I think being a lazy student is a better idea for all the unmotivated people out there. Being a lazy working guy or a shut-in loser usually won't help much.

    19. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because as we all know, that guy SewersOfRivendell on slashdot is a much more capable person than the guy who was elected president of the united states twice. Certainly the most powerful man in the world is dumber than the average high school dropout.

    20. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by Hast · · Score: 1

      You know, I've always found it strange that so many in the US work on the side while they are going to college. It seems to me that if you can actually do that then you're not getting your moneys worth from your college.

      Studying should be a full time occupation if you ask me. And during the first few years of college it sure was for me. Going to classes 8-5 each day didn't really leave much room for work on the side. (Though the Swedish system doesn't require you to either.)

      And you sure can learn the stuff that they teach in schools on your own. Typically it will go a lot faster in school though.

    21. Re:Don't Need School to be Educated. by Vulcann · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of an old saying that seems appropriate here :

      "Those who can, do. Those who cant, teach" :-D

  37. Re:should of stayed in school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, she should have (it's pretty funny to see basic mistakes coming from someone telling someone else to stay in school) gotten into debt to get a boring, mind-numbing cubicle-drone job, AND get into debt for it?
    Fuck, you're a GENIUS!

  38. correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  39. impossible? by i41Overlord · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "She is NOT a self-taught CHIP DESIGNER. She is a self-taught FPGA programmer. There is a world of difference, the former is impossible, the latter is trivial."

    Impossible? What about the guys who invented the first chips? Did they go to some class that taught how to build chips which will be invented in the future?

    You can buy the same books that they have at schools. You can learn the same things on your own that you'd learn in schools. Some people (such as myself) are tinkerers, and we learn better by experimenting on our own than we do sitting in a classroom.

    I find it funny that I've also heard people saying you need to go to school to be a programmer or work in the computer industry. Most of us geeks know that's also false.

    1. Re:impossible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy who onvented the first chips had access to a lab full of chemicals and people. NO WAY can anyone, even today, do that all by themselves. WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT installing a FPGA design suite and downloading code into an already made chip! There's just no way you can become a self taught IC designer!
      Yes, you CAN buy all the books you want, you can get the software, but there's NO WAY you can get that chip built on your own and test it!

    2. Re:impossible? by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      mpossible? What about the guys who invented the first chips? Did they go to some class that taught how to build chips which will be invented in the future?
      No, but they had the resources of the US government and their academic institution to back them up. Chip fabrication is not cheap, therefore it really is difficult to get into the chip design field.
      Tiny little rant time: And for the last time, would people quit comparing everything to programming!!! In order to program(not necessarily program well) all you need is a cheap computer and you can use Linux/gcc or Sun's jdk or mono or whatever to compile your programs. You don't need a lab, you don't need a fabrication plant etc. so your parallel fails miserably.

    3. Re:impossible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy who onvented the first chips had access to a lab full of chemicals and people. NO WAY can anyone, even today, do that all by themselves

      Yes, because people and chemicals no longer exist, right?

      There's just no way you can become a self taught IC designer!

      As you have said, therefore it must be so, because thou art omniscient, right?

      You keep saying it, but providing no real reason - I just wonder who it is you're trying to convince - others or yourself?

    4. Re:impossible? by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Informative

      You haven't worked much with FPGAs, have you?

      FPGAs are programmed in Verilog or VHDL; it's not much different from programming a computer. All you need is a development board with the FPGA plugged in (the FPGA makers make eval boards specifically to support this), and a connection to your PC so you can download the compiled design into the FPGA.

      The problem with FPGAs is that they're very similar to SRAM, and when they lose power, they lose their programming. So they have to program themselves every time they power on, meaning you need a separate ROM chip on the board for it. Worse, because of this and because of the sheer cost per chip of FPGAs, they aren't very good for designs with large production volumes (they are good for small volumes, though, because you don't have to get a custom chip made, which has a high initial cost). So, all you have to do is get your FPGA design converted to an ASIC; there's several companies that specialize in exactly this.

      Basically, all this girl had to do was do the actual HDL design at home, test and debug it on a prototype board, then when it was finished send it to a manufacturer to have them make ASICs in large volume from it. You don't need your own fabrication plant any more than you need your own photo developing lab to make photos.

    5. Re:impossible? by prockcore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In order to program(not necessarily program well) all you need is a cheap computer and you can use Linux/gcc or Sun's jdk or mono or whatever to compile your programs.

      Sure now, but it wasn't too long ago that you had to spend a large amount of money on a compiler, and a very expensive harddrive, since your sourcecode would take up more space than the floppy your program would eventually live on.

      I remember spending $500 on the Merlin assembler so I could write Apple][ games.

      Plus, all you need to *design* chips is a piece of EE software. There is a difference between designing a CPU, and actually manufacturing one.

      We designed 8bit CPUs in college classes.

    6. Re:impossible? by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      I actually was talking about chips, not FPGAs(the grandparent argument is that calling her a chip designer is misleading, as all she did was design an FPGA then produce it) You are right, FPGAs are relatively cheap to design and produce.
      Not saying she doesn't deserve praise for finding a creative niche and making a business out of it, but calling her a chip designer is misleading. She is a good business person with a self-taught head for technology.

    7. Re:impossible? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You still don't get it. ASICs are "chips". In fact, most chips made these days probably are ASICs, not standard generic chips like 555s, 7400s, or Pentium 4s. FPGAs are just a convenient way of testing a design before sending it off to an ASIC fab. Calling her a chip designer is entirely accurate. You don't have to be a designer of the latest 4 GHz microprocessor to earn the title "chip designer", any more than you have to write an operating system kernel to be called a "software developer".

    8. Re:impossible? by harrkev · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Xilinx Spartan family has some very nice FPGAs clocking in at well under $10 right now. So, for small low-speed things like this, they are perfect!

      And as far as the "all this girl had to do" line, no way. All she had to do was:

      1) Implement a 6502 processor. There is a free core or two floating around, which she likely used. Still not exactly trivial, though.

      2) Reverse-engineer and implement the DRAM circuitry. The design does not use DRAM, but you still need to emulate certain portions of the hardware for timing reasons. When DRAM refreshes, the processor has to snooze.

      3) Reverse-engineer and implement the SID sound chip. Fairly major headache.

      4) Reverse-engineer and implement the video circuitry. Major headache. This system even had hardware sprites.

      5) Reverse-engineer and implement the different hardware ports.

      6) Include a bridge that would allow a PC keyboard to emulate a C64 keyboard.

      7) Emulate a cassette drive and load it with warez.

      8) Implement the analog bits of the video and sound circuitry. Maybe somebody else did this.

      In short, I am impressed.

      I have been through an ASIC tape-out. It costs in the neighborhood of $100K. MUCH cheaper to go with a cheap FPGA and serial-EEPROM for stuff like this. Once you get well over 10,000 units shipped, it is time to start looking at an ASIC. Until then, a cheap FPGA is probably your best bet.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    9. Re:impossible? by i41Overlord · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, but they had the resources of the US government and their academic institution to back them up. Chip fabrication is not cheap, therefore it really is difficult to get into the chip design field.

      On the contrary, I made an advanced chip fab in my kitchen using only twine, sticks, matches and an old pair of reading glasses. Of course I had an outside contractor (MacGuyver) help me.

    10. Re:impossible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      chemicals no longer exist, right?

      Having tried (and failed) to buy fucking DISTILLED WATER the other week, it sure seems that way.

      Heaven help you if you want a nitrate compound in any reasonable quantity.

      Apparently only authorised Party members are allowed do chemistry nowadays. And I'm not in China...

    11. Re:impossible? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I never meant to trivialize the work this girl had to do. Just like a big custom programming project is a lot of work for a single software developer, this was a pretty major undertaking for one FPGA developer.

      I just wanted to point out that the "chip designer" label was entirely valid. You don't need to own a fab or have the resources of AMD or Intel to design a chip, as long as you're not working at > 1 GHz or whatever. Just like it's relatively easy to acquire all the tools you need to write software at home (cheap PC, Linux, gcc, etc.), it's relatively easy to acquire the tools you need to design chips at home (cheap PC, FPGA eval board, used O-scope perhaps, FPGA design software (which some companies give out for free), and web addresses of companies that take your FPGA design and make an ASIC from it). It's not that the work is trivial, but that it's perfectly feasible for an individual to get all the tools to do this.

    12. Re:impossible? by svirre · · Score: 1

      FPGAs are programmed in Verilog or VHDL; it's not much different from programming a computer.

      I have seen the results of software people trying to design hardware thinking HDL design is pretty much like software. It isn't, and the results weren't pretty.

      If you don't realise what the hardware does, and what hardware your code will infere you will likely get a rather rude shock And crap/expensive hardware)

      Also, I won't recomend using a FPGA as a development platform for something that will ultimately be an ASIC. It is OK for prototyping but for the actual development a simulator will work much better as there is much less overhead in getting up and running and much better visibility.

      FPGAs are ok for prototyping though, but you will se results pretty late in the process.

    13. Re:impossible? by harrkev · · Score: 1

      OK. Point taken. Designing this sort of thing from home is easily possible with only $5000 or so to start with. This assumes buying a functional, but old used logic analyzer and a cheap analog scope.

      If you skip the logic analyzer, you can get started for around $1000 or less.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    14. Re:impossible? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      >FPGAs are programmed in Verilog or VHDL; it's not much different from programming a computer.

      I have seen the results of software people trying to design hardware thinking HDL design is pretty much like software. It isn't, and the results weren't pretty.


      The act of programming them isn't much different from programming a computer, especially an embedded system.

    15. Re:impossible? by Jason+Mitcheson · · Score: 1

      "Impossible? What about the guys who invented the first chips? Did they go to some class that taught how to build chips which will be invented in the future?" Nobody 'invented' the computer chip. It was a combination of efforts from many persons/institutions - much like cars and space rockets and quantum theory.

    16. Re:impossible? by svirre · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that developing a design for a FPGA and developing software for a uC is similar? I beg to differ. The only similarity is that the final result is uploaded to a hardware device. The design process is vastly different.

    17. Re:impossible? by MagerValp · · Score: 5, Informative

      > 1) Implement a 6502 processor. There is a free core or two floating around, which she likely used. Still not exactly trivial, though.

      No, she did her own core, which is both smaller and faster than the free cores out there.

      > 2) Reverse-engineer and implement the DRAM circuitry. The design does not use DRAM, but you still need to emulate certain portions of the hardware for timing reasons. When DRAM refreshes, the processor has to snooze.

      The NTSC unit is SRAM based. The C64 uses transparent DRAM refresh during the VIC's half of every cycle. The PAL unit will use SDRAM.

      > 3) Reverse-engineer and implement the SID sound chip. Fairly major headache.

      MAJOR headache.

      > 4) Reverse-engineer and implement the video circuitry. Major headache. This system even had hardware sprites.

      Yes, it took her years, and there are still timing glitches. It's amazingly compatible though.

      5) Reverse-engineer and implement the different hardware ports.

      I believe this was fairly easy though.

      > 6) Include a bridge that would allow a PC keyboard to emulate a C64 keyboard.

      IIrc that's a small state machine and a matrix, nothing too hairy.

      > 7) Emulate a cassette drive and load it with warez.

      That was done in software by Adrian Gonzalez. The NY Times article concentrated on Jeri herself, so I guess it's forgivable that they didn't mention that there was a software team as well (Adrian and Robin Harbron were the main programmers, plus me and Mark Seelye helped patch games).

      > 8) Implement the analog bits of the video and sound circuitry. Maybe somebody else did this.

      Nope, all Jeri.

      Those people doubting her hardware skills really shouldn't talk without checking facts, and if you think that designing things in VHDL is as simple as programming in C you need a clue. No, make that two. And for the record, it's designed with a mix of VHDL and schematic capture.

      --

      READY.
      #
    18. Re:impossible? by kb · · Score: 1

      3) Reverse-engineer and implement the SID sound chip. Fairly major headache.

      Impossible even, at least with an FPGA. The SID uses a lot of analog trickery to produce its sound (even without even looking at the filter circuits) and there has been no single 100% emulation so far.

      Tho, for a bunch of mid-80s games it's no real problem to code/implement a fully digital emulator that's faithful enough.

    19. Re:impossible? by towad · · Score: 1

      1) Implement a 6502 processor. There is a free core or two floating around, which she likely used. Still not exactly trivial, though.

      The 6502 design is her own. At VCFe a few months ago I asked about her implementation of Binary Coded Decimal (which the open core I looked at lacked) and she was very happy to show off and discuss her design.

      Jeri has also designed the C-One, which is a much more interesting and complex system.

    20. Re:impossible? by ElysianAudio · · Score: 1

      It is true that many FPGA's are SRAM based and therefore require configuration upon startup. However, a number of FPGA's by various vendors are anti-fuse based and/or Flash based.

      An anti-fuse FPGA is programmed once and is forever locked to that configuration. This works really well for high-volume or high-reliability applications at the expense of future configuration. Flash devices are like a mix between SRAM based and anti-fuse based FPGAs. But as other posters have mentioned, there are some very cheap SRAM based FPGAs and start-up configuration time is usually under a second for the small ones.

      Sorry, haven't RTFA yet.

    21. Re:impossible? by Chiisu · · Score: 1

      thank you

      i've taken a few CS classes, but i've learned all about programming and such on my own. most of us prefer it that way.

    22. Re:impossible? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, the design process is vastly different. But it's similar as far as being able to cheaply acquire the needed equipment, do the work at home, and upload the result to a hardware device in a similar manner. That's all I'm getting at.

      I'm just trying to overturn this notion that some people here have that you need to work for Intel or IBM, designing state-of-the-art microprocessors, and producing them in multibillion dollar fabs, in order to be called a "chip designer", and that someone designing FPGAs at home with VHDL somehow doesn't qualify for that term.

    23. Re:impossible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      > ... if you think that designing things in VHDL is as simple as programming in C you need a clue.

      Just what I was thinking. If you read a book on VHDL, then you may well get the impression that chip design with VHDL is easy, but what most VHDL books neglect to mention is that most of VHDL's high-level features are only meant for simulation and test-benches, and that such features aren't supported by the tools that actually program the chips. After personally having this painful revelation about a year ago, and having had to throw away my nice simple VHDL code, which worked fine in simulation, but couldn't be programmed into firmware, I personally ended up ditching VHDL, and now concentrate on schematic entry instead (ie. drawing logic circuit diagrams).

      Note that synchronous logic design requires a completely diferent way of thinking about things than traditional computer programing. In computer programming, even with threads, you have at most a few linear sequences of operations, with each step of the sequence of instructions starting the moment that the last one finishes. In logic design, on the other hand, one usually has thousands or millions of gates all simultaneously doing something on every single clock tick. These operations are all synchronized to the clock, not to the moment when a previous gate finishes doing its thing. In normal computer programming, the code does exactly what you tell it to, due to the skill of the CPU designers. In logic design, unanticipated delays or unintentional asynchronous design can make a seemingly simple and well behaved circuit behave completely non-deterministically.

      I am personally in awe of somebody who can build the system described in the article, and have it work reliably.

    24. Re:impossible? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I haven't worked with FPGAs in a while, so my knowledge may be a little dated.

      The anti-fuse based device you're thinking of is a "CPLD", or Complex Programmable Logic Device. It's fairly similar to an FPGA in that you can program it (much like an EPROM in fact), and the tools are the same or similar. However, the operation, and the internals are entirely different. The CPLDs are really decendents of the PLAs and PALs, like the venerable 22V10. FPGAs (field programmable gate arrays) are not equivalent to CPLDs, and the names shouldn't be used interchangeably. Things may have changed since I worked with them, but around 1999, CPLDs were on the way out, because FPGAs were cheaper, faster, and were available with a much larger gate count. The only downside was the need for start-up configuration.

      I haven't heard anything about Flash-based programmable logic devices, so I really can't say anything about those.

    25. Re:impossible? by Westacular · · Score: 1

      "I find it funny that I've also heard people saying you need to go to school to be a programmer or work in the computer industry. Most of us geeks know that's also false."

      Most of us also know that most of those programmers who didn't go to school aren't very good.

      Yes, there are exceptional people out there who are very good. There are also a great many people who did go to school but are very incompetent when it comes any sort of practical application of their disciplines. When we, as a culture, celebrate an unschooled person, we do it not because they lack a formal education, but because of what they were able to achieve despite that. We celebrate them, because this is exceptional -- yes, of course, you don't need to go to school, but if you want to do it well, school can really, really help.

      Learning and working on your own teaches you things you won't necessarily learn in school. Going to school teaches you things you wouldn't necessarily come across or address effectively on your own. These are not mutually exclusive ideas. The End.

    26. Re:impossible? by DeputySpade · · Score: 1

      Okay... If you don't like that analogy, here's a better one. Chip making requires fab plants that you don't have access to as a dork in his basement, therefore a dork in his basement can't teach himself to be a chip designer. That is your basic argument. I will counter it with this analogy: You need lots of heavy equipment, materials and teams of laborers to build a skyscraper that you don't have access to as a dork in his basement, therefore a dork in his basement can't teach himself to be a skyscraper designer.

      Your argument is flawed in that you don't have to "produce" something in order to "design" it. You can design all the chips you want without ever building a single one. You can design skyscrapers, airplanes, nano-bots, rocketships, and toothpaste tubes all while sitting comfortably in your basement. You can teach yourself to build any of these things by reading the appropriate books, trade journals, etc... You might not be great at it, and your designs may suck, but you can teach yourself to make the designs and that's really all "self-taught chip designer" means.

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
    27. Re:impossible? by svirre · · Score: 1

      I certanly don't hold with the idea that chip design is reserved for the big boys only. There are plenty of small chip design companies out there. You don't have to be big, but you do have to be able to raise the capital to support the design and tape-out.

      FPGA development is definetly closely linked to ASIC development (much more so than to software), and you can indeed do that fairly reasonably. You will still need to get a simulator, a FPGA synthesis tool (like Synplicity or Precision) and implementation and analysis tools from the FPGA vendor, which will still set you back some $10-20K. (Which is cheap considering that a decent design seat in an ASIC flow will cost approx $50-150K, assuming you share licenses for batch tools)

      You might think that you can live without the simulator (bad idea), but then you are going to need something like chipscope and a supported logic analyzer which also cost a fair penny.

      Also remember that you are going to pay approx 15% maintenance annualy on your EDA tools.

    28. Re:impossible? by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      True, but what you say clearly shows that 'chip designer' has become a cheapened title. It's not like the old days when a chip-god like Jim Williams was desiging op-amps for National Semiconductor anymore.

      It's 'Visual Basic for Silicon' these days. Which isn't a bad thing, necessarily.

    29. Re:impossible? by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      Huh? A functional but older Logic Analyzer is one of the cheap parts. I paid $200 for my HP 1630G, which is a 100MHz 80-bit analyzer, and it was a lowball price, but not an unspeakably lowball price. And you can do a hell of a lot with a 100 MHz state timing analyzer.

    30. Re:impossible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get a chip fabbed for $1130 per chip with a minimum of 5 chips. Its not the fastest process but its there if you need a full-custom analog solution.

      http://www.mosis.org/Orders/Prices/price-list-do me stic.html#ami07

    31. Re:impossible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Impossible? What about the guys who invented the first chips? Did they go to some class that taught how to build chips which will be invented in the future?

      Most of the people that invented computer technology were PhD's. They went to lots of classes that taught them how to do research.

    32. Re:impossible? by Lproven · · Score: 1
      This may be so, but then, she's used that to give the design more flexibility - as is mentioned several times in the story.

      The "full machine" - as opposed to the joystick toy - is the C-One reconfigurable computer. It does rather more than emulate a C64 - from its site:
      The FPGA programs - so-called 'cores' - turn the C-One into clones of famous 80's computers like the C64, VIC-20, plus/4, TI-99/4a, Atari 2600, Atari 400/800 series, Sinclair Spectrum, ZX81, Schneider CPC and many more.
      That version has a 65c816 CPU and a slot for adding other chips. I suggest you read the site. Ms Ellsworth is rather more than just an FPGA programmer, and frankly, even if that were all, it's still a pretty damned impressive bit of programming - even given the number of C64 emulators there are.
      --
      Liam P. ~ "Intelligence is a lethal mutation." (me)
    33. Re:impossible? by andreyw · · Score: 1

      No, he specifically said anti-fuse FPGA.

      Here is one-
      http://www.phnx.co.il/Index.asp?ArticleID=25 6&Cate goryID=277&Page=1

      Flash based FPGA? Sure.
      http://www.phnx.co.il/Index.asp?ArticleID=2 60&Cate goryID=278&Page=1

      I think Flash-based FPGA provide the best of both worlds - they are reprogrammable, but hold their configuration between power-ups.

      Thats awesome though... You worked with PALs/PLDs/CPLDs. Thats old skool.

    34. Re:impossible? by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Here is a question: Which skyscraper would you prefer to live in: The one that a dork who has taught himself how to design a skyscraper designed or that of someone who was professionaly trained, and who has worked smaller parts of skyscraper design before, been involved wtih mentors who are experts in the field, and frequently submits their work for peer review?
      Guess what, everything there is to know about skyscrapers cannot be found in a book, lots of it has to come from hands on experience. Anyone who thinks they can "teach themselves" without getting a chance to actually work firsthand with what they are doing is a fool.
      Yeah, I can take a course on chip design, I can "teach myself" chip design, but until I get a chance to participate in the whole process of creating something from start to finish, all I can do is do whatever everyone else has done. Chip design/programming/skyscrapers/whatever is as much art as it is science. An appreciation for that art only comes with experience. The reason there are good programmers without formal educations(and I'm clumping in FPGA in that catagory, yeah I know, another flame war) is that the barrier to entry to programming is so low that one does not need the resources of an academic institution/government/corporation to make useful and interesting programs. However, that is hardly true of skyscrapers. ....
      If books contained all the wisdom one would need to make these things, well then we wouldn't need humans would we?

    35. Re:impossible? by MilenCent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're involved with this project too? Sir, allow me to tip my hat to you and the rest of the team. This is just so cool.

      It's almost enough to make me want to watch QVC to see about picking one up.

    36. Re:impossible? by Gob+Gob · · Score: 1

      Ok fair point & well done. ...one other thing are you HOT too???

    37. Re:impossible? by blakespot · · Score: 1
      > 4) Reverse-engineer and implement the video circuitry. Major headache. This system even had hardware sprites.

      Yes, it took her years, and there are still timing glitches. It's amazingly compatible though.
      ...how bad are the glitches? I just ordered a C-One today and am hoping to have a rather clean, better-than-emulation Commodore experience. Is that a wise thing to hope for?

      Could you drop me a line? -> blakespotSPAM@gmailSPAM.com (remove the SPAM!)

      Tnx


      blakespot

      --
      -- Heisenberg may have slept here.
      iPod Hacks.com
    38. Re:impossible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FPGAs are programmed in Verilog or VHDL; it's not much different from programming a computer

      This comment betrays that in fact it is you who has not worked much with FPGAs. It's just a leetle bit more complicated than this. There are floor layouts to consider, for a start, and the tools do a lousy job. Making a chip for a toy is all about optimization. You can't make a cheap toy by blasting a crappy piece of VHDL onto an FPGA and then using the manufacturers breadboarding process to spin them off 10 at a time.

    39. Re:impossible? by hereticmessiah · · Score: 1
      Chip fabrication is not cheap, therefore it really is difficult to get into the chip design field.

      Tell that to Chuck Moore. He designed his MISC processors on a shoe string, and managed to fab them quite cheaply.

      The difference is he used an inexpensive fab process as he didn't need to scale things down quite as aggressivly as the likes of IBM, Texas Instruments, Intel, &c. need to. There are independent fabs out there, and the software for designing the chips is freely available: you don't need to use SPICE as there's plenty of cheaper alternatives.

      --
      I don't like trolls and mod against me if you like, but I'd prefer if you'd reply.
    40. Re:impossible? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      Those people doubting her hardware skills really shouldn't talk without checking facts, and if you think that designing things in VHDL is as simple as programming in C you need a clue.

      Sorry, but that's exactly as simple as it is.

      I've done FPGA designs AND I've actually done a REAL "VLSI" chip design (one of the neatest things I did as an undergrad). Doing an actual chip design means dealing with things like the actual W/L ratios of your transistors, manually routing your busses, etc.

      VHDL or "schematic capture" (basically grapical VHDL) are really simple by comparison.
      In a VHDL design if you want to XOR two signals it's a simple one line command JUST LIKE C. If you're doing the actual "chip design" you're acually laying out the size, position and interconnection of individual transistors.

      I'm not disrespecting this girl or her talents, but you're distoring the complexity of HDL's like VHDL. When working in one of these languages you can almost prentend it's a normal computing language, with the caveat that saying "A+B=C" means A+B=C ALWAYS, rather than just after an instruction is executed.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
  40. Has anyone used one of these things? by Over_and_Done · · Score: 1

    Just curious really, the article said that you could play the games without changing cartridges, so I assume that its a HD in there, but I was wondering if any of the QVC watching slashdotters has played with it.

    1. Re:Has anyone used one of these things? by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      You can buy a CompactFlash card larger than the biggest hard drive anyone ever connected to a C64 for less than $10. Why would it need a hard drive in it?

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    2. Re:Has anyone used one of these things? by MC6809 · · Score: 0
      I assume that its a HD in there,

      I am uncertain whether you are trying to be funny, or if you just didn't exist back in the day.

      Even baseline modern flash memory will hold dozens of C64 apps. That was back when you had to have imagination to enjoy the games. No double CDROM game installs. No stupid compilers getting in the way of your assembly code...

    3. Re:Has anyone used one of these things? by Over_and_Done · · Score: 1

      Sorry, stupid thing to say. Wasn't really thinking, but that really wasn't my point anyway. I was just wondering if someone has played with this and what their impressions were.

    4. Re:Has anyone used one of these things? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. But why a HD? The atari800, in the same era had 8k and 16k cartridges. 30 * 8k = 240k. A typical BIOS rom on a laptop PC is 1meg.

    5. Re:Has anyone used one of these things? by KewlPC · · Score: 1

      No, it probably just switches between ROM banks.

    6. Re:Has anyone used one of these things? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did at a store. Crashed within 30 seconds of start-of-play (locked up making a terrible tone). Needless to say I didn't buy it...

    7. Re:Has anyone used one of these things? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      C64 had Hard Drives???

      --

      Gorkman

    8. Re:Has anyone used one of these things? by harrkev · · Score: 1

      I get the understanding that the cassette drive is emulated. Then, there is a giant chunk of ROM which emulates the data stored on the cassette. Obviously, since silicon is used, you can have software think that it is a cassette, but still run a LOT faster.

      To me a neat trick would to have the clock speed up ten times whenever the cassette motor is engaged. That would REALLY make the thing fly. I wonder if she did something like this?

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    9. Re:Has anyone used one of these things? by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Xetec Lt. Kernal drive was a 20 MB drive that plugged into the C-64's serial port. It was slow and expensive, but the fact that you could eliminate the need for a huge stack of 5.25" floppies really made it worth it. Especially considering the 1541 disk drive was the sort of electronic device that really did work better if you hit it really hard.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    10. Re:Has anyone used one of these things? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did at a store. Crashed within 30 seconds of start-of-play (locked up making a terrible tone). Needless to say I didn't buy it...

      You are lying. These are only available through QVC at the moment, and will not be available in retail outlets before the first of the year.

    11. Re:Has anyone used one of these things? by VanessaDannenberg · · Score: 1
      You can buy a CompactFlash card larger than the biggest hard drive anyone ever connected to a C64 for less than $10.

      I had no idea that there were CompactFlash cards that exceeded 8 gigs, let alone ones that large that were that cheap!

      (The old CMD hard drive could store about 4 GB using standard 50-pin SCSI drives, IDE64 can do 8 GB I believe, using ordinary IDE disks)

      --
      Karma: I don't care too much, but it's 0.0% (mostly due to lack of interest)
    12. Re:Has anyone used one of these things? by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Ok, maybe I should have qualified that as the biggest that anyone connected to it while C-64s were still being produced, except maybe one person with way too much money who for some reason wanted a really impressive C-64 instead of buying a better computer.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    13. Re:Has anyone used one of these things? by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the CBM D9060 and D9090; they were built for the PET but could plugged in the the C64 with an IEEE-488 adaptor card. In fact, I still have my. BusMaster(?) II around here somewhere, made by Batteries Included (of Paperclip fame).

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    14. Re:Has anyone used one of these things? by wrw · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's a great toy. The games are in ROM, not HD. It's got fast DMA to load them instantly into memory, so no delays waiting for the disk.

      Jeri also put in a lot of easter eggs, and solder points for hooking up a PS/2 keyboard and a Commodore floppy drive. You can get into BASIC too!

  41. Re:hot, red-head, self taught, retro video game ch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the quote at the bottom of the page:

    How can you think and hit at the same time -- Yogi Berra

  42. Geos are rebranded suzukis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geos are rebranded suzukis

    1. Re:Geos are rebranded suzukis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and used to be rebranded toyotas before that.

  43. and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  44. Its a computer emulation, not just games. by acomj · · Score: 2, Informative

    What I found interesting about it was that the article hints that you could hook up a keyboard to the device and a drive and have a computer. They keep getting better and better games in these things. Pretty soon PS one in a gamepad.

    Slashdot covered the release of the device here.

    slashdot coverage of the device commodore game device
    I discovered..
    (when I submitted the story 12 hours ago .. cough..cough)

    1. Re:Its a computer emulation, not just games. by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      Pretty soon PS one in a gamepad.

      The PS One is already pretty small and not all that much bigger than a gamepad. Main problem is CD media is BIG, both in size and storage capacity.

      In most game systems what takes up the most space is poor design.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    2. Re:Its a computer emulation, not just games. by hiroshi912681 · · Score: 1

      yeah, I'm surprised that no one else has mentioned it. I'm curious to find out how you find the hidden games and see what other secrets you can do with it that weren't specifically mentioned. Maybe you can upload more programs to it?

    3. Re:Its a computer emulation, not just games. by csbruce · · Score: 1

      What I found interesting about it was that the article hints that you could hook up a keyboard to the device and a drive and have a computer.

      What I found interesting about the article and the C-1 project is that they aren't just hard-wired C64 emulators, but general-purpose user-programmable hardware-based hardware emulators. They can make the same piece of hardware emulate a number of different gaming systems just by changing the ROM.

      It seems to me a bit like how Intel started out: they had a contract to make several different chips for the various functions of a calculator and they eventually said to themselves, "This is stupid; let's just make one general-purpose chip that can be programmed to do what these special-purpose chips would do and also sell it to other customers."

      I have a few of these game-in-a-joystick devices, including this one, but I suspect that in the future, they will all have the same (Jeri's) hardware inside of them. Too bad it sounds like this was all a "work for hire" for her.

    4. Re:Its a computer emulation, not just games. by acomj · · Score: 1


      >I have a few of these game-in-a-joystick devices, >including this one,

      Do you like it?

    5. Re:Its a computer emulation, not just games. by csbruce · · Score: 1

      Do you like it?

      Yeah, it's pretty cool. I'm not a big game player, so I bought it for the coolness factor, and it is cycle-for-cycle exactly what you see on a real Commodore-64.

    6. Re:Its a computer emulation, not just games. by Rico_Suave · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the two I purchased had some pretty significant sound issues (I'm not the only one, Jeri herself has acknowledged it) - I returned them to QVC, and might buy them again once the bugs are shaken out. Other than that (and the somewhat wonky joystick), it's a neat gadget.

  45. Oh by dr_d_19 · · Score: 1

    ...and she's pretty too! :D

  46. "30 video games, mostly sports, racing and puzzle" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You see? That's exactly what's wrong with geek chicks... Not a single shot for anything sexy...

  47. High school dropout by mboverload · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm tiured of people saying to need to pass high school. I didn't and I am making 60k a year. Ok, mainly because I'm a fricken genius with this shit, but still.

    1. Re:High school dropout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm tiured of people saying to need to pass high school. I didn't and I am making 60k a year."

      You're on the far right hand side of the bell curve for high school dropout income, and you hold your experience up as evidence that it's not necessary to finish school?

      How will the interview go at your next job? Or the next one? Maybe you have some skill that nobody else has; again, that makes you pretty unique.

      You're satisfied that you're a "fricken genius." Good for you. Don't pretend like your experience will be shared by anyone else, merely because they chose to drop out of school!

      Now, granted, I don't think most high school education is worth a crap. But on the other hand, I appreciate working with people who have studied and *retained* math at least through Vector Calc, Physics, at least basic mechanics, and who have had at least one course in critical thinking.

      I really don't care what you did in school, or whether you graduated, but these are the areas that turn out to be important in my corner of the real world.

    2. Re:High school dropout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he is making 60k a year, I would say that is rather painfully obvious proof that he did not need to finish high school.

      It is not like he cannot use references and work experience to get himself a job - he got himself this far, I do not see why it will become a problem all of the sudden.

      It seems to me that you are just a tad envious of his success - he got to somewhere successful in life doing less work than what you had to do to get to wherever you are now.

    3. Re:High school dropout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God I hate people like you. 1) You're probably lying 2) People like you are all the same "you don't need high school" "you don't need college" mainly because you're too fucking lazy to put in the effort to get a degree.

    4. Re:High school dropout by mboverload · · Score: 0

      NOTE: I posted this as a joke, lol, I can spell people!

    5. Re:High school dropout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As Some Random AC On Slashdot, I'd like to inform you guys that:
      1. I'm pretty sure that guy was being sarcastic. Even before I saw his reply to his own post.
      2. 60k is not a lot. You seem to think that constitutes success, but, if you have a family to support, it's hardly even middle class unless you live in a region with a low cost of living.
      3. If I could make $1 million/year without high school, and $2 million with it, do I need it?
      4. ????
      5. Profit!!!
      6. you=troll

    6. Re:High school dropout by Rico_Suave · · Score: 1

      Only 60K a year? If you were as smart as you claim, you'd be making at least twice that.

  48. New York Times? by michael+path · · Score: 5, Funny

    [NYTimes. You know what that means]

    That they're just making shit up?

    1. Re:New York Times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [NYTimes. You know what that means]

      This comment is a waste. It adds zero value to the post. If you do, indeed "know what that means," then you don't need to be told. If you don't "know what that means," then the comment doesn't give you a clue. Why bother? Another in-joke between the annointed and their sycophants. And a worn-out joke at that. If you're going to try to be cute, Slashdot editors, at least show some originality.

    2. Re:New York Times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This comment is a waste. It adds zero value to the post. If you are, indeed an "Anonymous Coward" then you shouldn't speak so boldly. If you aren't an "Anonymous Coward," then the comment as lacks conviction. Why bother? Another trolling to vent between bouts of fraternal exclusion and insecure snobbery. And a bland trolling at that. If you're going to try to be cute, Anonymous Coward, at least show some originality.

    3. Re:New York Times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This comment is a waste. It adds zero value to the post. If you are, indeed an "Anonymous Coward" then you shouldn't speak so boldly. If you aren't an "Anonymous Coward," then the comment as lacks conviction. Why bother? Another trolling to vent between bouts of fraternal exclusion and insecure snobbery. And a bland trolling at that. If you're going to try to be cute, Anonymous Coward, at least show some originality.

      This comment is a waste. It adds zero value to the post. If you are, indeed an "Anonymous Coward" then you shouldn't speak so boldly. If you aren't an "Anonymous Coward," then the comment as lacks conviction. Why bother? Another trolling to vent between bouts of fraternal exclusion and insecure snobbery. And a bland trolling at that. If you're going to try to be cute, Anonymous Coward, at least show some originality.

      Let the recursion begin. :)

    4. Re:New York Times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This comment is a waste. It adds zero value to the post. If you are, indeed an "Anonymous Coward" then you shouldn't speak so boldly. If you aren't an "Anonymous Coward," then the comment as lacks conviction. Why bother? Another trolling to vent between bouts of fraternal exclusion and insecure snobbery. And a bland trolling at that. If you're going to try to be cute, Anonymous Coward, at least show some originality.

      Let the recursion begin. :)


      This comment is a waste. It adds zero value to the post. If you are, indeed an "Anonymous Coward" then you shouldn't speak so boldly. If you aren't an "Anonymous Coward," then the comment as lacks conviction. Why bother? Another trolling to vent between bouts of bong hits and reading at +5. And a bland trolling at that. If you're going to try to be cute, Anonymous Coward, at least take some better drugs so you _feel cute_.

      Let the recursion continue ;)

    5. Re:New York Times? by KrugalSausage · · Score: 1

      This comment is a waste. It adds zero value to the post. If you are, indeed an "Anonymous Coward" then you shouldn't speak so boldly. If you aren't an "Anonymous Coward," then the comment as lacks conviction. Why bother? Another trolling to vent between bouts of fraternal exclusion and insecure snobbery. And a bland trolling at that. If you're going to try to be cute, Anonymous Coward, at least show some originality. Let the recursion begin. :) This comment is a waste. It adds zero value to the post. If you are, indeed an "Anonymous Coward" then you shouldn't speak so boldly. If you aren't an "Anonymous Coward," then the comment as lacks conviction. Why bother? Another trolling to vent between bouts of bong hits and reading at +5. And a bland trolling at that. If you're going to try to be cute, Anonymous Coward, at least take some better drugs so you _feel cute_. Let the recursion continue ;)

    6. Re:New York Times? by csbruce · · Score: 1

      That they're just making shit up?

      Unless it's a story about U.N. corruption--then they'll bury it.

    7. Re:New York Times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can't continue. You didn't post anonymously!

  49. Darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dont you hate it when you're looking for -1 Martyr and you get Funny?

  50. Re:Yeah But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh she built race cars for profit too.
    That is REAL engineering not the geeking off BS you homos do between checking out all male porn and posing as teenage sluts on chat sites.
    Give her her props she deserves 'em.

  51. Bills Gates, too. by i41Overlord · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Just think what Ms. Ellsworth could have achieved with a proper education. "

    How do you know she doesn't have a proper education? Who says that learning on your own isn't proper?
    Maybe Bill Gates should have stayed in school and got a degree. He could have been rich, I tell you!

    1. Re:Bills Gates, too. by schon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe Bill Gates should have stayed in school and got a degree. He could have been rich, I tell you!

      You do realize that Bill was rich before he founded Microsoft, right? His father is a millionaire.

    2. Re:Bills Gates, too. by Bishop · · Score: 1

      Maybe Bill Gates should have stayed in school and got a degree. He could have been rich, I tell you!

      You sarcastic comment only holds if you believe that the only measure of achievement is money. Personaly I don't believe real achievement can be measured in money. Nor do I think Bill Gates has achieved anything meanifull.

    3. Re:Bills Gates, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nor do I think Bill Gates has achieved anything meanifull.

      Tell me, what do people breathe on your planet?

    4. Re:Bills Gates, too. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      While I agree that BillG hasn't achieved anything great, and has actually been a negative effect on society with his unethical business tactics, forcing crap software onto the world, etc., I would like to say that I don't think a college education is much of an achievement, either. It's just a piece of paper saying you fit into someone's idea of how people should be educated.

      I think achievement is best measured by the legacy you leave.

    5. Re:Bills Gates, too. by Bishop · · Score: 1

      We are on the same page. I don't think a college education is an achievement either. It is what one does next that matters.

    6. Re:Bills Gates, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. If I wasn't smart enough to make good money, I'd say that too.

    7. Re:Bills Gates, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh!

    8. Re:Bills Gates, too. by Drantin · · Score: 1

      I say we get his father and family using linux, then we go public with it *cue maniacal laughter*

      --
      Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
    9. Re:Bills Gates, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously.

      If it wernt for billy-g, there wouldnt be so much internet porn.

      Think about it.

    10. Re:Bills Gates, too. by Fnkmaster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rule #1 of business: It's hard to make a billion bucks without starting with at least a few million (or 10) first.

      It takes more than just brains and business sense to make money, it takes capital, and it's hard to get capital without taking smaller amounts of capital and making larger amounts of capital (well, banks are willing to loan you some money, but ironically, only if you have money or assets to back the loan first).

      Most people who make a billion dollars in their lifetime start with a base of some wealth to work from. It's not impossible to go from zero, it's just much harder, since you have to get to a few tens of millions first - in other words, you need that many more lucky streaks, brains, business sense, whatever, without any big busts or screwups in the middle.

      Ya know Donald Trump? His father was a successful real estate developer in the outer boroughs of New York in the first half of this century. Donald took his fathers business, and had the courage and built the connections needed to take it into Manhattan and pursue bigger projects. In other words, he brought something to the table, but no, he didn't do it all from scratch.

      In any case, this is pretty obvious stuff. We can't all leave our children billions of dollars, but you don't need to, to give them the tools to be financial successful. It's not so hard to make and save a few million dollars over the course of your career, by always underspending your earnings, saving money, making smart investments and so on. And giving your children a financially stable platform gives them the opportunity to explore career options and take bigger risks in general, which is a good thing for more than just financial success, it gives you more opportunities to find a career that is rewarding and in tune with your goals in life.

    11. Re:Bills Gates, too. by Culture · · Score: 1

      I often hear this mistake from my friends. Bill Gates's parents were rich. Bill was not. Bill's rich parents's were able to help him start a business. Most of my do-nothing friends who think they are rich becuase their parents ARE rich would drink, smoke, inject, or snort any money they were given to start a business. Bill is a aberation (unfortunately).

      --
      ----- There are two kinds of people in this world, my friend; those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
    12. Re:Bills Gates, too. by gordgekko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > You do realize that Bill was rich before he founded Microsoft, right? His father is a millionaire.

      No, that means his father was rich.

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    13. Re:Bills Gates, too. by corngrower · · Score: 1

      That means he had connections to people in IBM so he could work out a deal with them to use his Basic Interpreter (and Seattle Computing's O.S)

    14. Re:Bills Gates, too. by telemonster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is rumored Bill's parents had connections with IBM, which led to the contract for MS-DOS. It's all in who you know.

      --
      Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
    15. Re:Bills Gates, too. by schon · · Score: 1

      No, that means his father was rich.

      Yes, and rich people *never* give any money to their children - that's why there are so many millionaire children working at McDonalds.

    16. Re:Bills Gates, too. by Samus · · Score: 1

      His mother served on the boards of many charitable organizations. Of which one fellow board member was also an employee of IBM. Thats the story I heard anyway. I'm sure its been noted before but B.G. is a much better business man than geek. After all he sold (licensed) DOS to IBM and he hadn't even bought it yet. That guy eventually sued but I think the amount of money he was awarded was certainly a pittance when compared to the networth of B.G. today.

      --
      In Republican America phones tap you.
    17. Re:Bills Gates, too. by grumbel · · Score: 1

      Wasn't Linus sister still using Windows or has she switched in the meantime?

    18. Re:Bills Gates, too. by No.+24601 · · Score: 1
      It is rumored Bill's parents had connections with IBM, which led to the contract for MS-DOS. It's all in who you know.

      Sure, Microsoft's success is all due to IBM. We all know that IBM played a large role in making Microsoft what it is today. Oh wait, they shut them down when they started to get hot.

      Yep it's definitely all in who you know.

    19. Re:Bills Gates, too. by gordgekko · · Score: 1
      It doesn't matter how much money Bill Gates' father gave him. The fact of the matter is that it was his father's money to give. If the tap had been shut off, Bill Gates would have learned very quickly how rich he personally wasn't.

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    20. Re:Bills Gates, too. by Drantin · · Score: 1

      Last I heard (from Just for Fun) she was... it could have changed, but I sincerely hope that if she does she gets someone else to do the bulk of tech support for herself...

      --
      Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
    21. Re:Bills Gates, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice post. I agree I could save a million by the time my daughter is 18, but by then I'm not sure if a million would be the step up it was to Donald Trump :-(

  52. I, for one, by dannyelfman · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't kick her out of bed..... Unless she wanted to go at it on the floor: http://www.hal-pc.org/~bbaker/kfest2003-4.html

  53. Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This nerd crowd must surf FuglyNasties.com for porn or something if they think she's hot.

  54. I think I'm in love. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    She's pretty hot, she's smart and ONLY a geek would even think of bringing back the C64 like this.

    The important question, is she single?

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:I think I'm in love. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does this have to do with "News for Nerds"? Please, this isn't the place for this kind of stuff.

    2. Re:I think I'm in love. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The important question, is she single?

      No, and she is a lesbian.

    3. Re:I think I'm in love. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If she is single, i'd like to set her up with spock from star trek.

    4. Re:I think I'm in love. by jxyama · · Score: 2, Funny
      >The important question, is she single?

      from the lack of the ring... i believe she is...

      but you missed the more important question first:
      is she straight?

      (of course, i assumed the question to the question that comes before that: are you a male?

    5. Re:I think I'm in love. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The important question, is she single?

      Important how? Do you suppose she's attracted to horny, undersexed, drooling morons who post on slashdot?

    6. Re:I think I'm in love. by alanwall · · Score: 3, Informative

      no her boy friend is also a geek.Joe Torre if you know of him.An Amiga person.I first met Jeri 6 years ago at AmiWest-and no that girl in some of the old pics links to her is a "friend"

      --
      Amigian and proud of it!
    7. Re:I think I'm in love. by alanwall · · Score: 1

      so can you prove that ? or just your sex fantasy ?I have known Jeri for 6 years and she is NOT

      --
      Amigian and proud of it!
    8. Re:I think I'm in love. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :( All of the good ones are taken.

    9. Re:I think I'm in love. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Do you suppose she's attracted to horny, undersexed, drooling morons who post on slashdot?

      Undersexed? Drooling? Morons? Speak for yourself.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    10. Re:I think I'm in love. by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

      She's pretty hot, she's smart and ONLY a geek would even think of bringing back the C64 like this.

      The important question, is she single?


      Find out on an all-new ,"The Slashdot Bachelorette" (sponsored by Commodore and QVC) for the most shocking Mod-Chip VHDL Subroutine -- EVER!

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    11. Re:I think I'm in love. by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

      What does this have to do with "News for Nerds"? Please, this isn't the place for this kind of stuff.

      "Female Geek Has Geek Boyfriend".

      That would qualify as news around here. Almost apocalyptic.

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  55. Re: "NYTimes. You know what that means" by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

    if you use firefox, check out the extension bugmenot - it let's you bypass all this registration crap.

    That's nice but it should be automatic done when you click submit for Slashdot.
    Come-on guys!
    We have a way to keep spammers at bay from our slashdot accounts but we are stumpped for NYT reg-BS?

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  56. Who can blame her? by Marquis+de+Sade · · Score: 1
    She's not a woman, but a lesbian, ie a man's brain in a woman's body.

    Men are usually fat and hairy, they're rarely hygenic, they fart in public, they care not for others' feelings... just what do women find attractive in men? Thank God they do though. I especially thank the lord some desire my proclivities. For I am the Marquis de Sade, and you are just a loser geek. More power to the lesbian babe with a hardon for hardware!

    SMACK!

    1. Re:Who can blame her? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Men are usually fat and hairy, they're rarely hygenic, they fart in public, they care not for others' feelings
      Hah. Maybe you've been looking at the Internet's "lesbians" for too long, but that's a pretty generous description of the average lesbian.

    2. Re:Who can blame her? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You are a looney." -Monty Python

      "You're not fooling anyone!" "Shut your hole, Mr. Hat." -South Park

    3. Re:Who can blame her? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ooh. Oh! Jesuth Chrith! Oh!" -Mr. Slave

  57. Re:Fristpsost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your piss is far from frosty, sir.

  58. Re:I'd hit it! [I wouldn't] by tyrione · · Score: 1

    Of course some guys like that 70's hair with no bangs look. We all have our preferences. She's just not mine.

    So she designed a joystick. Big deal.

  59. Cue the "Liberal Arts" Crowd.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    This is for all of you people who have said you need to be institutionalized in an education system with a forced curriculum of subjects that have nothing do to with what you want to do in life. This is proof that motivation, willpower, and talent are perfectly acceptable ingredients to successfully building your own education and career path.

    I'm only in college because I do not have the motivation to go out and learn all the stuff by myself. I enjoy having structured (but not overbearing) objectives to my learning path. I could probably be done a lot quicker if I did not have all these boring and uninteresting "liberal arts" program classes (you know, literature, humanities, etc.) that do not relate to my degree or build on skills useful for becoming at what I want to do.

    Remember, there is no one path to success. This person built her own success without listening to the majority of voices that say you have to follow a certain path to succeed.

    1. Re:Cue the "Liberal Arts" Crowd.. by vhold · · Score: 1

      Given the fact that I'm a college drop out, I'm probably not the best person to be advocating liberal arts requirements. But either way, looking back, what english courses I did take probably have stuck to me more then anything else, particularly anything CS related.

      Every interview I've been in, the ability to communicate clearly and pleasantly really has been the single most important factor. From working experience, people that can't articulate well without being vague are one of the biggest sources of mistakes and frustration. The only job interview I was turned down on was because I wasn't talkative enough, so perhaps that's skewed my perspective some.

      To me the main failure of college wasn't unneccesary curriculum, it was that my own personal studies into my major were way more educational. I can count on my fingers the number of times I actually learned something I hadn't already studied. I suppose that makes my situation quite a bit different, don't Heald and Devry offer to some extent what you are looking for?

      My ideal situation looking back would have been able to gain all the computer science prereq credits, all the way up to a graduate program for the most part, with personal study and my own resources. At the time I wouldn't have tried to set something like that up because I figured that the computer classes being so insanely easy was a good thing.

      I'm not sure if I'll ever get back to college, the reason I dropped out was because of a fairly nice job offer in the early stages of the dotcom boom. Had I not dropped out, I'd most likely have graduated right into the trailing end of the boom, a less then ideal prospect.

    2. Re:Cue the "Liberal Arts" Crowd.. by mr.mighty · · Score: 1

      I agrew with the inclusion of liberal arts courses, especially with the other poster who suggested that english sticks with you longer.

      I'm currently in university, and I've noticed that a lot of my colleagues can't write in a comprehensible manner. My opinion is that if you can't pass english 1000 with a decent mark, you aren't ready for the workforce.

    3. Re:Cue the "Liberal Arts" Crowd.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've failed more English courses than I've passed, yet my prose is easy to understand and grammatically correct. I rarely make spelling errors and have an elephantine vocabulary. Also, I am fairly well read. Is my prose incomprehensible or not ready for the workplace?

      The fundamental problem is schools do not allow individuals to test out of all required subjects. If given the opportunity to do so, I would have successfully tested out of all my required general studies, because I had already learned the material during high school. However, I was forced to take courses I concidered remedial with a great deal of busywork which I just couldn't motivate myself to complete, hence the bad grades.

    4. Re:Cue the "Liberal Arts" Crowd.. by vhold · · Score: 1

      Ideally the test would include the question "Does anybody want to ever hear the phrase 'elephantine vocabulary'?"

      Sorry, just messing with you, but it just vaguely reminds me of something one of my all time favorite teachers taught me. Not about the phrase itself, but the claim to having a large vocabularly.

      We had an ongoing assignment where we had to write penpal letters my senior year in high school to random freshmen, about anything at all. I filled my letters full of 64 dollar words and was rather proud of myself for being over the head of whoever the other person was.

      My teacher would simply grade the return paper "Building a wall," which I ignored at first.

      Eventually I bit and asked, what do you mean? "What do you get out of people not understanding you?" It changed my entire perspective on what it meant to write.

      A large vocabulary is definitely a good thing, but it has to be used with prudence.

  60. More links by vasqzr · · Score: 2, Informative

    She's turning up a ton of hits on Google

    Here she is at the XGamestation booth: http://www.xgamestation.com/view_media.php?id=109

    Here's another article on her:

    http://home.att.net/~rmestel/articles/on_road_ells worth.txt

  61. Re:Yeah But by hrieke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Intel hired knitters for wiring the first set of chips back in the day.
    Cobol was designed by a Grace Murray Hopper.
    Frances Elizabeth Snyder Holberton was involved in Fortran's development.
    Ada Lovelace wrote first program to calculate Bernouli numbers.

    If you're going to troll, learn how to troll right.

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
  62. Re:Yeah But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, as a woman, she's not limited by having her brain between her legs.

  63. My bad by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    Sorry. I meant to say that you can really do something in software. The sentence wasn't that long. Came off flat retarded. It just seemed to me that College was incredibly difficult and in specialized areas I'd never use in order to "round off the education".

    I would have been much better off doing independent projects that forked over the $100,000 I paid to do a bunch of hoop jumping.

    It feels so much nicer to focus on work and drive research than it does to do all sorts of random tasks in order to make you a Renasance(sp) thinker.

    I'm all for this girl, and Bill Gates, showing that college isn't necessary. At the same time, I think its highly important that people never stop their education. If you can't do lots of independent research, and learn on your own, you should definately keep up with college.

    1. Re:My bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and Bill Gates

      There's nothing like a guy that attended Harvard for a while, and who says that college is very valuable, to show how useless it is.

      I'd say the moral should be more like, "You should go to a good college unless you're in truly extraordinary circumstances, but you should avoid bad schools."

  64. I am not so sure she is done just yet by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    College is a good thing, so let's get that off the table right out of the gate.

    She clearly has a different way of learning and passion for what she does. Who's to say secondary school would help at this point? The biggest thing she has going for her right now is her view of how things work. The schools are going to take her down a path already taken by lots of people. It's a good path, but not the only one for sure.

    In a few years, she will have a very interesting mix of current thinking mixed with old school stuff sprinkled with creativity and passion. We just might see some very good products come from that mix.

    All I am saying is that what she can get done is not limited in any way by not going to school.

    Your other point rubs me the wrong way too. She dropped out of school because it did not address her interests well enough. Getting kids interested in the tech means getting them the means to access and make use of it. In her case, she had other access. (I too was sucked in by HAM radio operators --good crowd if you are technically inclined --thanks guys!)

    Lots of kids drop out because their passion lies outside the school. This tells me our high schools need some work. For every story like this we don't hear about the 100 dropouts that don't connect and end up making minimum wage or enter crime / drug scenes.

    Good for her, but we can't hold her story up and say our schools are fine, that's all.

  65. Walla by asadsalm · · Score: 1

    She moved to Walla Walla, Wash., and began attending Walla Walla College

    Wallahi?!

  66. Finally someone I can relate too by jdjdac · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Being a graduating electrical engineer, ham radio operator, and of the female persuasion....IT IS ABOUT FREAKING TIME I've had someone to truly look up to in terms of technical skill and passion. Her life story is very similar to how I grew up and how I experimented with electronics other 'boys toys.' I always felt like an outcast for enjoying tinkering, be it with trebuchets or radios.

    It really makes you question your role in society...especially when it seems that women are portrayed like idiots or dumb blondes in the media. Or that all I should care about is makeup, clothes, and hair (trust me I'm not that obsessed - just ask my husband). Sometimes even today I ask myself "what they hell am I doing?" "Why didn't I do elementary ed like every girl I know?" It is still something I struggle with even today.

    I always wished I could have had another woman to look up and admire for their technical achievements. I almost never thought it would happen in my lifetime. Congratulations to her on her long list of achievements, and hopefully she can encourage another generation of woman to get into tech....especially engineering!!

    1. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Males have similar doubts and negative influences. We're supposed to be playing sports and sucking on kegs of beer. Who are we supposed to look up to?

      Quick answer: Yourself.

      Stop caring about what other people think you should do. Let them live their own little cookie-cutter life.

    2. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by NullProg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I always wished I could have had another woman to look up and admire for their technical achievements.

      You mean to say you've never heard of Grace Hopper? Hell I'm male and she's one of my favorite inspirations:

      Grace Hopper

      Enjoy,

      --
      It's just the normal noises in here.
    3. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your point about social influences as a whole are true, I guess. It does seem like men are supposed to be the dumber of the sexes by a margin (if you watch any television, that is. e.g., Everybody Loves Raymond).

      However, if you're looking for actual influences, as in real flesh-and-blood specific people (instead of general social influences), men do have more to choose from. The Woz, John Carmack, Nikola Tesla, Alan Turing, etc. Yes, the ladies do have Grace Hopper, and...Ada Byron (who was pretty poor with the technical details by all acounts), and...that's about it?

    4. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by vtolturbo · · Score: 1

      so, what did you launch in your trebuchet?

      oh, and I love the guy asking "uh.. how do you feel about dating ppl from /." despite the husband reference. i am male and always had support for the tinkering i did. too many of the girls i knew had negative support. it bothers me, too. my wife is a perfect example. she was pushed into "girly" stuff even though she really wanted to learn science and math. now, she's a graphic designer, which is one of the most technically inclined jobs women are "allowed" into.

    5. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

      Your point about social influences as a whole are true, I guess. It does seem like men are supposed to be the dumber of the sexes by a margin (if you watch any television, that is. e.g., Everybody Loves Raymond).

      I think that it's become accepted that a "dumb shallow guy" is funny and so when dealing with TV sitcoms thats all your going to get. (Also look out for the "wacky but forgetful professor" who lurks around as well. e.g. 5th Rock From The Sun)

      However in a lot of more thoughtful media the men still hold the title for being the "smart ones" while the women are supposed fade demurely into the background and look sexy. It is very rare indeed to see a forceful intelligent woman get to play the lead such as in Contact but as you pointed out I think writers in general have less subject matter to go on even from a historical standpoint.

      It is just the fact of history that women have not had the opportunities and or desire to pursue fields that more technical in nature. And this is reflected in most of todays shallow media.

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    6. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by pete-classic · · Score: 1
      I could have had another woman to look up and admire for their technical achievements.


      We've reached a new low of pronoun abuse. The sex of person represented by the noun isn't in question, so you don't even have that weak excuse.

      Depressing.
    7. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by darkstar949 · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!

      I just find it amusing that people seem to forget that women were some of the major pioneers of the computer industry - need I mention who Ada was?
      Many of the early names in programmering and computer science are indeed females.

    8. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahahahahahahaahha... that's actually really funny.

      Girls are dumb.

    9. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by mekkab · · Score: 1

      need I mention who Ada was?

      Ada, and her strong typing, are currently the bane of my existence. Why can't you be more like C?!?!?!

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    10. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by zoeblade · · Score: 1

      Yes, the ladies do have Grace Hopper, and...Ada Byron (who was pretty poor with the technical details by all acounts), and...that's about it?

      And Dani Bunten (of M.U.L.E. fame). I'd love to know who else, there have to be more role models than that...

    11. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      I always wished I could have had another woman to look up and admire for their technical achievements.

      There's always Marie Curie. Granted, she wasn't a chip designer, but she was the first person to win two Nobel Prizes, and one of only three people to ever win two Nobel Prizes in the sciences. The first was in Physics (1903) for her investigations into radioactivity; it was shared with Henri Becquerel and her husband Pierre Curie. The second was in Chemistry (1911) for the twin discoveries of polonium and radium; this was a solo Prize.

      In an interesting twist, one of the other double Nobelists was John Bardeen, receiving prizes for the discovery of transistors and for a theory of superconductivity--both subjects near and dear to the hearts of many a Slashdotter. If Marie was the sort to be smug (she wasn't) and if she had been alive (she died in 1934), she could have gloated--Bardeen had to share both of his prizes. :D

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    12. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's what's important right? Sigh, looks like a big no, http://www.stealthpegasus.com/album/hawaii/aax.jpg

    13. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1

      Being a graduating electrical engineer, ham radio operator, and of the female persuasion....
      [snip]
      It really makes you question your role in society...especially when it seems that women are portrayed like idiots or dumb blondes in the media...
      [snip]
      I always wished I could have had another woman to look up and admire for their technical achievements.

      May I ask how then you feel when there are dozens of posts from people saying "I'd do her!", "Check out the legs!", "Here are pics of her...", "6 beers!", etc? I'm glad you found inspiration in her acheivements, it seems to most around here, shes just T&A.

    14. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, how about Marie Sklodowska Curie, Lillian Vernon, Oprah Winfrey, Golda Meir, Jane Fonda, Estee Lauder, Madonna, Ayn Rand, Gloria Steinem, Margaret Thatcher, Mary Kay Ash, Liz Claiborne, Linda Wachner, Sally Ride, Florence Nightingale, Sophie Germain, Jane Goodall, Mae Jemison, Ellen Ochoa, and Maria Callas.

      Those are a few that come to mind, I'm sure there are plenty more. I think it's stupid all this woe is me shit, men don't look pretty, women do. They are meant to garner attention. It's fucking biology that gives us those traits. God damn I hate feminist fundamentalists. I do have a hell of a lot of respect for all those women I just mentioned. But they are an exception.

      JFTR (Just for the record) I'm a guy.

    15. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Larch · · Score: 1

      Except she didn't start out as a woman.

    16. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She posted to /. do you think she's hot? Of course not, why do you think you were modded troll. If she replied back to your comment with a pic of herself and she was hot as hell, you would be modded funny. She has boobs alright, but good luck finding them in all the folds.

      I would like to take a moment to draw attention to this, http://www.stealthpegasus.com/album/album18/DSC016 55.jpg It's her daughter I'm guessing, but WTF is that on her knee? I mean good god, it's a ball travelling at most 30 mph. Jeezus. I played soccer and baseball growing up hardcore. You should have seen the bruises. What do females have a condition of losing appendages after getting hit?

    17. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, do you think their would be as much intrest in her if it weren't for her accomplishments? Maybe a self-made, pretty girl with a technical backgroung might inspire some infatuation among the geek crowd (especially considering its rarity)?

      Nope, she's just T&A.

      How deep of you.

    18. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol. that was even funnier

    19. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by zoeblade · · Score: 1

      Except she didn't start out as a woman.

      No one did; we all start out as babies and grow up from there. Besides, this is about gender, not sex.

    20. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      My god! You haven't heard of Grace Hopper? Now there's an awe inspiring woman, a bit old for me tho.

    21. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by geekychic · · Score: 1

      I think this is an appropriate place to express my admiration for Hedy Lamarr -- a Hollywood actress, she also co-invented a frequency-jumping mechanism for radio control of torpedos. Unfortunately, the Navy rejected the idea at the time, but it has served as the basis of many subsequent patents in the same vein.

      I think her life illustrates an important point: beauty and brains are not necessarily mutually exclusive.

      I also admire her because she's a counterbalance to this weird geek girl sub-culture backlash against all things traditionally girly. Honestly, pink is a viable sartorial choice (well, as long as it's in your color palette). Glitter is not an allergic substance. Wearing a floral skirt does not mean you have surrendered to the dark side.

      I honestly wonder how many girls are driven away from math and science not because of the boys but the girls. It's hard enough to brave the fact that a profession you're interested in features a 7:3 ratio of males to females -- it's even harder to deal with the reality that your female co-workers will most likely not be the type that would visit the mall with you during lunch hour to check out a sale at your favorite clothing store.

      Yes, part of the blame lies in the implicit pressure on girls in predominantly male professions to play down their sexuality. I don't think that explanation completely absolves us.

    22. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get back in the kitchen and make me a sandwich, woman. NOW!

    23. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      It doth depress thee? Verily, hast thou not known? Yea, hast thou not perceived that thy language doth alter? Ye who read my words, know that I alone have written correctly; for I alone ken the second person pronoun.

      So if you're going to gripe about how language changes, why not complain that "you" is used for both singular and plural, for objective and subjective? Why not complain about how conjugation has changed in the last 400 years? The pronoun "their" now functions in English as both the third person plural and the second person neuter singular. It's not accepted as standard written English, yet, but it will be.

      ObGrammar correction: shouldn't that be "The sex of the person..."?
      ObStyle complaint: Wouldn't it be more precise to say "gender" instead of "sex"?

    24. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Honestly, pink is a viable sartorial choice (well, as long as it's in your color palette). Glitter is not an allergic substance. Wearing a floral skirt does not mean you have surrendered to the dark side.
      Wrong, all pastels suck all of the time and pink is the worst. Glitter is great for business reply mail envelopes since it fucks up Pitney-Bose letter opening machinery. And a floral skirt would really be on the dark side for me since I'm a male.

      Seriously, I thought alot of the gender bias in math and science is the dominance games in grade school by the males stomping on the cooperative concensus meme of the females. And once you are behind in math or science, you have more work since everything is cumulative.
    25. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't include Margeret "I falsified all my research" Mead in that list. And what did Hanoi Jane Fonda do besides pernicious acts in the face of the enemy.

    26. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Grace hopper was a mathmatician hired by the Navy.

      She did not design computers in her garage nor became famous by learning things on her own.

      I am not saying she is not important. I am saying what this woman did by designing systems without a degree is pretty impressive and much harder and a much broader scale.

    27. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by deek · · Score: 1
      • I always felt like an outcast for enjoying tinkering, be it with trebuchets or radios.


      This is the most heartbreaking sentence in your post. (Well, besides the one mentioning you have a husband, but that's beside the point ;).

      And we wonder why there's such a derth of female techies. It certainly doesn't help when most of them are frightened off because they feel like freaks. Let's hope that the women that have already joined the field, will lead more to join as well.
    28. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by miskate · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not long after I got by comp sci degree, I discovered Systers - an "informal organization for technical women in computing". It's not a bad place to start if you're looking for female inspiration - there're some very smart ladies in that group.

    29. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by spywarearcata.com · · Score: 1

      I really liked Hedy Lamarr. A high school dropout at 16. She was both a 1930-1940s glamorous movie star but she *also* invented frequency hopping spread spectrum to foil WWII jammking efforts. She was awarded U.S. Patent # 2,292,387 for her work. But in the spirit of the /. neandertals, she was also one hot lady: http://www.rtspecialties.com/tobar/conex1/hedy4.jp g

    30. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a f'ing break. I never needed a male engineer to look up to. I had confidence in myself. Do you think only females got called "nerd" for enjoying computers and electronics or reading literature? Guess again. Guys get it just as much as women, especially from their "friends" who want them to go party instead of finish up some project you've been working on. Women being struck down in engineering/math/science is self fulfilling prophecy. I'll grant you it's probably a little tougher. Probably no tougher than the poor kid in school (me) or the chubby kid (another kid :) ) had it. I certainly know my share of most excellent female engineers, and they all seem to share one trait, "fuck the world, this is what I like". Quit worrying about the herd and start your own pasture, and before you know it, they'll be following YOU.

    31. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate females who need to brag anytime there's competition.
      Can't you just do your thing and quit trying to impress?

      Many other girls (myself included, and I only want to make a point without bragging by telling who I am) actually have good technical skills but they aren't all screeming on tops of roofs.

    32. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I forgot to mention:
      The reason why I'm attacking you is because for some reason, your comment strikes me as utterly INSINCERE

    33. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Yo! a shout out to Hedy Lamar - looks and brains!

      http://people.deas.harvard.edu/~jones/cscie129/n u_ lectures/lecture7/hedy/lemarr.htm

    34. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by dasunt · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia states some problems with Ada Lovelace's claim as the first programmer:

      "However, biographers have noted that Lovelace struggled with mathematics, and there is some debate as to whether Lovelace understood deeply the concepts behind programming Babbage's engine, or was more of a figurehead used by Babbage for public relations purposes. As an early woman in computing, Lovelace occupies a politically sensitive space in the canon of historical figures in computer science, and therefore the extent of her contribution versus Babbage's remains difficult to assess based on current sources."
    35. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      Well, I am a female with a degree in software engineering and personally, I don't need anybody to look up to. I know I'm good at what I do and I'm sure my time to shine will come. When that time comes, if it gets mentioned on slashdot, I hope there aren't any pictures of me on the internet.

      For Jeri, I can relate to her too. I hope she is enjoying all of this attention and taking it for the flattery it is, rather than focusing on how much the people overlook the accomplishments and relish in the fact that there is a female who knows a bit from a byte.

    36. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just don't include Margeret "I falsified all my research" Mead in that list.

      Are you kidding me? It was anthropology in Samoa, a social science. Not exactly a science now is it? Besides her perspectives at least gave other people things to argue about. I think that is more important than anything. The fact one foster growth within a subject area.

      And what did Hanoi Jane Fonda do besides pernicious acts in the face of the enemy.

      Umm, would you have gone to live in Baghdad back here in the spring of 2003 for the sake of pointing out the pathetic nature of war? I guess you are right if you are trying to state she didn't have to do derivatives in her head, but her strength of character can be emboldening regardless the avenue you take down life. If you really like math as a kid, who the fuck cares if people make fun of you or call you a nerd. Do it because that is you. Think of the world if we were all pussy ass mother-fuckers as George Carlin would say it. We wouldn't be discussing this, that's for sure.

    37. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Uh, but why do you need another woman to look up to? I don't get it.

      I don't hear many of the famous guys needing someone to look up to. Most of them are where they are because they wanted to do something. Not because they wanted to follow/emulate somebody. (Heh in a way even this lady is emulating something, but nevermind - Linus was also rewriting Unix ;) ).

      If most women need/want someone to look up to, then it shouldn't be a surprise if fewer women are at the "top".

      Seems many women are pretty happy to be in the background or play supporting roles, but some people seem to think it's wrong. Nowadays there's little stopping women from doing what they want (at least in non-Saudi-style countries). So why encourage women to do what they aren't interested in?

      Maybe similarly, someone should encourage a generation of guys to get into nursing. Greater upper body strength does help for moving bedridden patients. The last I checked there are very few male nurses.

      Don't get me wrong, I sure don't mind more women in tech.

      Could be great if they took the "I can't be wearing this tonight! I/Ms XYZ wore this last week! I have to wear something different/better", to "I can't be coding this tonight, I/Ms XYZ already coded it last week. I have to code something different/better". *LOL*. Was quite surprised my friend actually did that stereotype thing the other day "I can't wear this...". I thought it was a myth! Or only happened in certain subcultures...

      Sure in the great scheme of things it's probably all vanity of vanities anyway. But still - the new code/product can be enjoyed by millions. In contrast, apparently a new dress can only be best enjoyed by the first one to wear it ;).

      --
    38. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by pete-classic · · Score: 1
      It doth depress thee? Verily, hast thou not known? Yea, hast thou not perceived that thy language doth alter? Ye who read my words, know that I alone have written correctly; for I alone ken the second person pronoun.


      That was cool!

      So if you're going to gripe about how language changes, why not complain that "you" is used for both singular and plural, for objective and subjective?


      Those may be legitimate complaints. If so, the battle is already lost. If not, it is already won. In either case it seems to be a fait accompli.

      Why not complain about how conjugation has changed in the last 400 years?


      I clearly don't have the level of knowledge regarding the history of English that you do. Would you explain these changes?

      The pronoun "their" now functions in English as both the third person plural and the second person neuter singular. It's not accepted as standard written English, yet, but it will be.


      Time will tell. If that does come to pass it will be to the loss of the language.

      I am really complaining about lack of precision. Natural languages inherently lack precision. Willfully discarding what precision English possesses does not benefit anyone.

      That depresses me.

      Anyway, does any of this relate to OP's blithely substituting "their" for "her?"

      ObGrammar correction: shouldn't that be "The sex of the person..."?


      Yes. That was a typo on an edit. Thanks!

      ObStyle complaint: Wouldn't it be more precise to say "gender" instead of "sex"?


      Absolutely not. With your helpful edit above we have, "Sex of the person," which is correct. Had I said "Sex of the word woman" you would have a point.

      Jesus. I just noticed the subject line. Maybe the OP can relate "too" the woman in the article because she is a dropout too.

      -Peter
    39. Re:Finally someone I can relate too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but she was a MAN, baby... Just cause you got your bait and tackle whacked off doesn't make you a woman...

  67. High school dropout ... by coldtone · · Score: 1

    but only after she was making money running her own show (Selling remote controlled cars). This is a very important point.

    So many kids get jobs in school doing things they don't like, (Restaurant, Gas Station, etc) but they don't try to make money doing what they like. Why not do what you like? You're not going to make a ton of money anyways, so why not make it doing something you like.

    Start up a business, do something you enjoy. Don't worry about being old enough, or the possible legal obligations, just do it! Sure it can fail, but once you learn how to make money on you're own your set. There's no need to jump though these bureaucratic hoops once you can make your own way.

  68. C-One by FiSHNuTZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really think that it's worth mentioning Jeri's other much more interesting and complicated project, the C-One. If you think the C64 joystick/computer is amazing, take a look at the C-One and you should be substantially more impressed:

    http://c64upgra.de/c-one/

    1. Re:C-One by Zenmonkeycat · · Score: 1
      I knew I recognized that cute geeky face from somewhere!

      I think the C-One is going to be a pretty fun hacker's box once everything gets wrapped up and can be sold, but it still won't have a true, original version of Bob Yannes' analogue/digital sound chip, the MOS6581 SID.

      Not like that'll keep me from buying one of the first C-One boards that ship!

      --

      *****
      Dear Mary,
      I yearn for you tragically,
      A.T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.

    2. Re:C-One by PaytonByrd · · Score: 0

      Actually, the C-One has sockets for not one, but two real 6581 SID chips. I have one in my C-One board and it sounds and acts just like a C64.

    3. Re:C-One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just curious, what is the major draw for someone looking to get a C-One board?

    4. Re:C-One by blakespot · · Score: 1
      I just 5 minutes ago ordered a C-One from its product site. I can't wait to get my hands on it - should be quite a new adventure for a retro computer freak.

      Have a look at an MPEG of the bare-board C-One booting.

      Will give the full report on my site ByteCellar.com when I receive it in a few weeks. FYI.


      blakespot

      --
      -- Heisenberg may have slept here.
      iPod Hacks.com
    5. Re:C-One by blakespot · · Score: 1
      PaytonByrd,

      As I said elsewhere in a post to this thread, I have just ordered a C-One, today. I would like to ask you some questions about it if I could. I see your e-mail is not posted here - could you e-mail me at:

      blakespotSPAM@gmailSPAM.com (remove the SPAM)

      Thanks.


      blakespot

      --
      -- Heisenberg may have slept here.
      iPod Hacks.com
  69. Hey, wait a minute. by Gannoc · · Score: 1


    She's CLEARLY reading this...

    Why did you drop out of high school?

    1. Re:Hey, wait a minute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're CLEARLY not RTFA.

    2. Re:Hey, wait a minute. by Gannoc · · Score: 1

      You're CLEARLY not RTFA.

      Thanks AC. I read the article. People don't usually drop out of high school because they're making so much money. I doubt her dirt racer customization store in middle-of-freaking-nowhere Oregon was making her millions.

  70. Of course, stupid. by Lethyos · · Score: 1

    Dude, the chick designs microprocessors. Where the fuck is your head? I think the better question is: what do you do in your spare time?

    --
    Why bother.
    1. Re:Of course, stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sure as hell don't spam slashdot with my Ponzi schemes like some fuckheads here.

  71. what about the ip? by bvdbos · · Score: 1
    A daughter of Tulip is marketing a similar product. Tulip is the owner of the C64 trademark.

    Nevertheless, nicely done...

    1. Re:what about the ip? by wrw · · Score: 1

      That's the same product, not a similar one. The C64 DTV is the 30-in-1 Commodore 64 joystick, designed by Jeri.

  72. So, what the hell does she do? by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

    That was the vaguest article I have ever read. She is a consultant who makes things go and does stuff. Got it.

    So, did she really design a custom IC all by her self with no tools and then get a fab to spend millions/billions on her custom chip based on her paper drawings that had never been simulated?

    Or, did she design an ASIC?

    Or did she simply program an FPGA?

    Her "C-1" computer sounded like it was either an FPGA, or an emulator, but certainly not a custom chip.

    If I am wrong and she really did design chips, what CAD programs was the high-school dropout able to afford, or were chips so small back then that you really could do it on paper?

    1. Re:So, what the hell does she do? by spacedx · · Score: 1

      Who cares? She's kinda hot!

    2. Re:So, what the hell does she do? by i7dude · · Score: 1

      i'm not gonna try and argure your point only answer you on the CAD software questions...

      IC Layout: MAGIC
      Simulation: BSIM
      Technology models and libraries: MOSIS
      Verilog: Icarus Verilog

      It is possible given these tools to head down the right path to homebrewing a cpu given the level of intelligence and passion is there...however, without corperate backing there are two huge hurdles to overcome...a free(beer) program to translate an HDL(hardware description language) to a gate level description, and an auto place and route program to help layout the synthesized gate level description. But with a sound design, working verilog and spice simulations of various blocks, and the energy to show off and shop your design around, you could easily find financial backing to meet you halfway and finish the project.

      maybe she didnt have all the tools, but you can definately learn ic design on your own...you just have to be highly motivated, very patient, and intelligent.

      dude.

    3. Re:So, what the hell does she do? by FiSHNuTZ · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've already posted this, but since you seem to not know much about the C-One, feel free to see the homepage for the C-One which has, among other things, schematics, pictures, and ordering information for the beta boards currently available to any interested parties (for about US$400). The C-One is an entire ATX form-factor motherboard.

      http://www.c64upgra.de/c-one

    4. Re:So, what the hell does she do? by harrkev · · Score: 1

      The article was "New York Time," not "EE Times." The average joe does not even have the faintest idea what an FPGA is. Clearly, this was written more for the "human interest" and "uneducated woman makes good" type of thing, rather than being a technical article.

      And FPGA sofware is free for the downloading from FPGA vendors. Low-end FPGAs can be had for under $10 now (in large quantities).

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    5. Re:So, what the hell does she do? by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

      AHA! So it is an FPGA.

      When I think "chip designer" I think of really smart people designing custom IC or ASIC, not FPGA. Mostly because I've done a bit of FPGA design. But then again when I'm telling the non-techies what I do I usually say something like chip design...

      To whoever said it was the NYT not the EET, point taken.

  73. I'll venture a guess: by seanadams.com · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just think what Ms. Ellsworth could have achieved with a proper education.

    MUCH LESS

    For the really creative problem solver types like her, school is a dangerous reconditioning of one's mind and social outlook. If you're not suited for it, excessive schooling/socialization can kill both your entrepreneurial spirit and your creative talent.

    It is NOT ironic in the slightest that so many great innovators were drop-outs.

    1. Re:I'll venture a guess: by 3Suns · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think what the parent post was trying to say was that the "proper education" would be one besides our current system, that provides extra resources to smart and inventive people who want to experiment and learn on their own.

      Yeah, you might be able to argue that struggling to make it on her own drove her (and people like her) to excel, but there are definitely many untested and experimental methods of education geared toward the very talented in hopes of boosting their potential.

      Unfortunately, our current educational systems (public and most private schools included) are focused almost entirely on raising the lower bound of aptitude, rather than pay any attention on the best and brightest.

      --

      -3Suns

      ~~~~
      The Revolution will be Slashdotted
    2. Re:I'll venture a guess: by PenguiN42 · · Score: 1

      Wow, if it's in all caps, bolded, and on a line by itself, it must be true!

      Saying that school would have "reconditioned her mind" is a bit patronizing, don't you think? She may have been bored by school; but reprogrammed by it? I think not.

      --
      The following sentence is true. The preceding sentence was false.
    3. Re:I'll venture a guess: by zoeblade · · Score: 1

      Please don't call Bill Gates and Steve Jobs great innovators. You're making me cringe.

      Steve Wozniak, yes. His recent speeches at The Fifth Hope were very inspiring, just listening to him enthuse about getting a theoretical computer he'd invented down from needing many chips to just a few because he couldn't afford to buy many chips.

    4. Re:I'll venture a guess: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh, the crippling effect of the current educational system is highly overrated and nothing a little LSD in college can't fix.

    5. Re:I'll venture a guess: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reprogrammed by it? I think not.

      Really, and look at what our universities churn out. please... you're probably one of them.

    6. Re:I'll venture a guess: by Kupek · · Score: 1

      And yet, there are many brilliant people that were helped by a formal education. Think of all of the scientists you know of - if you know of them, chances are they were, among other things, a "really creative problem solver." I say scientists, because at least during the past century or so, they all had lots and lots of schooling.

    7. Re:I'll venture a guess: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is manifest nonsense. None of these people dropped out because school was stifling their creativity. They dropped out because they had better things to do right then. If school was so shit then these people who have never had to attend and would still be geniuses, but somehow I guess they learned basic arithmetic and reading at school, in fact.

      The only people who take the line that school "crushes your spirit" are the kind of school dropouts who are still dropouts 20 years later, because jobs also "crush their spirit". These people are losers who can't deal with adversity, not geniuses awaiting the perfect environment in which to blossom. Geniuses can deal with adversity very well, unsurprisingly.

      Also, the existence of 4 or 5 individuals who were highly successful after dropping out of school is statistically insignificant compared to the millions of individuals for which school success was a reliable indicator of future success. No, it's not ironic, it's just irrelevant.

  74. Beware the sig by Rufus88 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sadly, all it would take is one lawsuit (ore even the threat thereof) to shut her down.
    -- Just like it happened to this poor sap [tinyurl.com].


    Beware the sig in the parent post. The link is not work-safe, and the context makes it look like it's relevant to the discussion:

    1. Re:Beware the sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm?

    2. Re:Beware the sig by Rufus88 · · Score: 1

      The sig has since changed. Originally, it pointed to something scatological.

  75. Is Stroker on the joystick? by hal2814 · · Score: 2, Funny

    With all the girl-geek comments going around, has anyone checked to see if Stroker is on the C64 joystick?

    1. Re:Is Stroker on the joystick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was king of that game. Too bad I didn't have a C64 back then :)

  76. Re:should of stayed in school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks, but my name is not Fuck.

  77. Absolutely (grits?) by drenehtsral · · Score: 1

    She is gorgeous (Where's "Grits Boy" when you need him), but I think the fact that she hacks around with hardware and brings video games to kids makes her extra-attractive. *sigh*

    --

    ---
    Play Six Pack Man. I
  78. Hello, NURSE! by Guano_Jim · · Score: 1

    Large photo here.

    Apparently she works from prison. Note what she's holding up as a sample of her work.

  79. Re:should of stayed in school by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not only that, but even with an engineering degree from a recognized school, you won't create anything worth having while you're slaving away at your mind-numbing cubicle drone job. You'll just attend meetings, work on some tiny part of a huge project that ultimately gets cancelled before it's ever released, and then finally get canned.

    Sorry, but a silly joystick running 20-year-old video games is a far greater achievement than most individual engineers will ever achieve working for large companies.

  80. But does it run Debian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am just waiting for the mod of this to run sarge.

  81. Let's see if I get this right by Zorilla · · Score: 1

    Respectively, it was the Prism (Toyota Corolla), Metro (Suzuki Swift) and Tracker (Suzuki Escudo and later the Vitara for the post-Geo model), and Storm (Isuzu Impulse)...?

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  82. Gee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She should learn VHDL and design the program the whole C64 on FPGA :D

    The day of mask design is long gone

  83. FREE KEVIN MITNICK by zoftie · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Or look at the author of the article. Isn't he was the one responsible for whole kevin mitnick public affair? I guess something to ponder.

  84. Well-funded, well-staffed...???? by inkswamp · · Score: 4, Interesting
    well-funded and well-staffed corporate design teams dominate chip design

    One only need to have been part of one of these mythical "well-funded and well-staffed" corporate teams (or to know someone who has been part of one) to know that the garage-based tech hobbyist is nowhere near extinction. High-power staffing and funds are nothing--NOTHING--next to the power of a real vision. A single person with a great idea and a little know-how can lay waste to any corporate team. Don't get so caught up with the corporate facade that you start to doubt it. Watch how many little companies with great ideas that corporations buy up. They do it so regularly that it hardly makes the news anymore. The real ideas aren't coming out of boardroom discussions.

    And remember that IBM was once the indomitable corporate force and Apple and Microsoft were the little start-ups. That's why people who talk about how Linux won't change anything make me laugh. I don't even use Linux, not even a big fan of it, and I know it has yet to make its biggest impact. That's how this stuff works. Give it time. History repeats itself.

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    1. Re:Well-funded, well-staffed...???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Exactly, Look at the Altiar 8800. Developed by a small company called MITS and look how big that turned out to be.

      There was nothing quite like it at the time.
      It still was a starting point for the garage engineer. It changed how people viewed technology(from being evil and bureaucratic) and showed people that home computing COULD be done, you no longer needed acces to a university with a DEC/IBM $100,000+ machine.

      The community that was built on the altiar(mainly homebrew computer club) upheld the hacker ethic like nothing else. If it wasn't for these guys, I don't think home computing or open source would have quite turned out the same, I don't think it would have strived as it has.

      ~MR (not cool enough to have a /. account)

    2. Re:Well-funded, well-staffed...???? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      A single person with a great idea and a little know-how can lay waste to any corporate team. [...] Watch how many little companies with great ideas that corporations buy up.

      So you "lay waste" to the corporations by getting bought up? Truth is, not many such little companies are truly indispensable. Many such purchases are simply cheaper than the alternatives. Consider what happened to Netscape (yes, illegal, but little consolation now) when they refused Microsoft. And Netscape had perhaps the best idea of its decade.

      Yes, there's still plenty of creativity going around, and great minds are capable of great things. However, there are areas whose state of the art is essentially out of reach to anybody without a lot of money. So while it might be wrong to say that one person can never accomplish something, it's more often wrong to dismiss a well-funded team in favor of "a great idea and a little know-how". Corporations manage to attract some very smart people too.

    3. Re:Well-funded, well-staffed...???? by inkswamp · · Score: 1
      So you "lay waste" to the corporations by getting bought up?

      That's not what I said and not what I meant. A person with a great vision and a little know-how can (and do) lay waste to corporate teams. A corporate boardroom did not dream up eBay, for example. A corporate boardroom did not dream up blogging. A corporate boardroom did not dream up Yahoo or Web search engines. A corporate boardroom did not dream up 3D gaming. A corporate boardroom didn't dream up the Web and browsers. A corporate boardroom didn't dream up open source. But these are all great ideas that have fundtamentally changed the landscape. Corporate boardrooms don't usually come up ideas like that and instead resort to buying them up (which is the point of what I was saying. I wasn't saying that "laying waste" meant being bought up.)

      Corporations manage to attract some very smart people too.

      They attract them but what usually happens to people like that? Talk to some of those people. I know many. In most cases, they felt oppressed by the atmosphere and impeded by the corporate culture, so they milk it for all the cash they can get and bail out.

      I'm not saying all companies are bad, but the great ideas aren't coming from corporate America. This presumption that the garage tinkerer is history is ludicrous. Corporations usually take a good idea and make it bigger and better. I'll give them that, but the basic Great Ideas that really change things almost never come from corporations.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    4. Re:Well-funded, well-staffed...???? by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      One only need to have been part of one of these mythical "well-funded and well-staffed" corporate teams (or to know someone who has been part of one) to know that the garage-based tech hobbyist is nowhere near extinction. High-power staffing and funds are nothing--NOTHING--next to the power of a real vision. A single person with a great idea and a little know-how can lay waste to any corporate team.

      And all the major corporations know it. That's why they're busy patenting everything under the sun. It's not to hinder their major corporation competitors as they'll also have patents and it all will end in a stand off with both companies trading patent rights. No, it's to keep the small operations down. They cannot afford patent attorneys/technicians to screen their competitors for patent infringement all the time. The major electronics corporations of the world can.

      About the only industry (with low financial barriers to entry, i.e. the ones where you don't have to build much of a factory) where this hasn't happened yet is of course the software industry, as there traditionally hasn't been many patents there (yet). Witness Microsofts problems with garage open source operations as a result. As that's changing, expect to see lots more patent problems for the little guy in the pure software field.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    5. Re:Well-funded, well-staffed...???? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      A person with a great vision and a little know-how can (and do) lay waste to corporate teams.

      I think you missed my point. Indeed, many (maybe even most) seeds of wonderful ideas have come from independents or small teams. However, unless the idea is heavily protected by patents, they are very vulnerable to competition from established players. The reason they frequently get bought up is because that costs the corporations less money, not because the corporations can't compete. In fact, if there's any "laying waste" to be done, it's usually in the other direction. Netscape was the first real player on the web, enabling the eBay, blogging, Yahoo!, and Google examples you listed. What happened to them (and they already had far more than a little know-how)?

      Also, in the rare occasions that the small guy does win, there's usually superhuman will, very hard work, a boatload of know-how, and probably some money to begin with. Can you actually cite a case where it was literally just "a great vision and a little know-how"?

      This presumption that the garage tinkerer is history is ludicrous.

      The original post you were responding to was specifically limited to "chip design", as you quoted. It was not a general statement about "garage tinkerers". Anybody designed a viable alternative to the P4 in a garage lately?

    6. Re:Well-funded, well-staffed...???? by inkswamp · · Score: 1
      Netscape was the first real player on the web

      Not my point. The basic ideas didn't come from Netscape.

      Anybody designed a viable alternative to the P4 in a garage lately?

      No, of course not for many reasons. Like I said, corporations are good at making things bigger and better; they excel at that. Also we currently live in a culture that informs young people that they can't singlehandedly outdo corporations so a lot of potential garage tinkerers are probably put off by that premise. (I wonder how Steve Wozniak would have fared in today's society.)

      However, the next great idea that fundamentally changes how you (and I) view "viable alternatives" to the P4 will not come from a corporate team. I can guarantee you that. It never does.

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    7. Re:Well-funded, well-staffed...???? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      Not my point. The basic ideas didn't come from Netscape.

      Netscape was a small company that refused to be bought out, and eventually was crushed by the giant. Did they not have "great vision", or did they not even have "a little know-how"?

      My point is that it takes far more than "great vision and a little know-how" to ultimately succeed against a big corporation. I'm still waiting for your counterexample.

      No, of course not for many reasons. Like I said, corporations are good at making things bigger and better; they excel at that.

      So who's going to "lay waste" to them?

      (I wonder how Steve Wozniak would have fared in today's society.)

      Wozniak was working for HP before he quit to form Apple. He had more than "a little know-how", and his work on the Apple computers was regarded as a work of art by many.

      But, to address your specific question, I expect that even in the late 70s it was unusual to quit a stable job at a big company to form a small one that might change the world.

      the next great idea that fundamentally changes how you (and I) view "viable alternatives" to the P4 will not come from a corporate team. I can guarantee you that. It never does.

      Possibly, but neither will it come from a person who only has a "great vision and a little know-how". I would also not be surprised if that know-how was honed while employed by a corporate America.

  85. Female geek, engineer? by l4m3z0r · · Score: 0, Troll
    Being a graduating electrical engineer, ham radio operator, and of the female persuasion...

    So.. uh.. how do you feel about dating guys you meet on /.?

    1. Re:Female geek, engineer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez, with an opening line like that - you're gold!

    2. Re:Female geek, engineer? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      "just ask my husband"

      I'd say you are too late.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  86. Spelling Mistake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Jeri"? Shouldn't that read "Jerry"? Almost looks like a girl's name or something.

  87. Key quote by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

    "A real good designer needs to know how the old stuff works."

    I won't argue with that!

  88. I actually agree with you. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    You sarcastic comment only holds if you believe that the only measure of achievement is money. Personaly I don't believe real achievement can be measured in money.

    I had to make that sarcastic comment. It was there for the taking and sounded funny.

    But I agree with you that money is not the ultimate measure of success.

  89. ...someone who can do it and do it brilliantlly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "She is someone who can do it and do it brilliantly."

    Ah yes, the entire Slashdot audience can now play Stroker-64. What, it doesn't include that gem of a C64 game? Somehow I don't think that is going to matter... ;->

  90. Public schematics for the C64. by BigZaphod · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I love this story, but I have to wonder something here... Didn't the C64 come with schematics? I don't remember for sure, but I know that computers of that era commonly came with them or had them available. If that is the case, did she really reverse engineer it or was it most of a... "hmm.. I have schematics, I can understand them, how about I just translate them to an FPGA and see if I can make it go?"

    Even if that was the case, she still deserves props for thinking of doing it in the first place and then making it happen. I don't mean to make light of her accomplishments or anything.

    Consults Google... Yep, there were schematics available. here is one place to see them.

    1. Re:Public schematics for the C64. by tachyonflow · · Score: 1

      The C64 itself did not come with schematics, but the invaluable and mandatory _C64 Programmer's Reference Guide_ provided a schematic. Mmmmmm, the C64PRG... that was one well-worn book when I was a kid.

    2. Re:Public schematics for the C64. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There were no "schematics" for the chips inside the computer, which, after all, are the real brains of the system.

      The fact that she reverse engineered the 6510, the 6567 (VIC-II) video chip, the 6581 SID chip, the 6526 CIA chips, and the the C64's PLA chip is nothing short of amazing. If she had done nothing else at all, she would deserve our wonder and praise.

      - Bo Zimmerman
      (Moderator, C1 Mailing List)
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/commodoreone

    3. Re:Public schematics for the C64. by harrkev · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, schematics of the BOARD were available in the advanced programmer's reference guide.

      But the schematics just show how the board itself is wired up. Yup, this pin of this chip goes to that pin of that chip. You now have about 10% or less of the design. All of the magic happens IN the chips themselves. THAT was the hard part. There is a free core or two for the processor (assuming that it is accurate). However, the sound and video chips are an entirely different story. Those must have been a pain in the butt.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  91. legal issues by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know what she did (or did not do) on the legal issues of recreating the C64 and building in not only 30 games (where it would likely be very hard to find the owners of those games and obtain the ights), but the Commodore kernel code as well?

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:legal issues by Rico_Suave · · Score: 1

      The C64DTV has a large # of Epyx games - a company went under over a decade ago. In the manual it's mentioned that all the Epyx games were there courtesy of some corporation, but it wasn't a name you would have heard of - just a small IP holding company, as far as I could tell.

      The remains of Commodore is owned by Tulip ( http://tulip.com ), who had a hand in creating the C64DTV

    2. Re:legal issues by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
      In the manual it's mentioned that all the Epyx games were there courtesy of some corporation, but it wasn't a name you would have heard of - just a small IP holding company, as far as I could tell

      Well, it is interesting that they tried to at least do something, but it is far less clear that this holding company really had all rights to do this (assuming 30 or more original authors wre not contacted).

      --
      I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  92. Yeah, but the real question is... by MikeMacK · · Score: 1

    will it run Linux?

  93. Jeri Ellesworth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hot grits!

  94. I'm in love. by capilot · · Score: 2

    Looks or no looks, she just made sexiest geek alive for 2004 in my book.

  95. Re:Yeah But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhhhhh Why do fucking people put that in their posts? It's not witty or clever, it just makes you look like a stupid asshole. STOP DOING IT!

  96. And Toyotas too by mangu · · Score: 1

    The Geo Metro was a Suzuki Swift.

    The Geo Prizm was a Toyota Corolla.

  97. That's a porn site by capilot · · Score: 1

    Beware. I was at work, jerk.

  98. Slashdot Certified? by adolfojp · · Score: 1

    How many "she is hot" posts are required to give her the Slashdot Certified certification. With a NY Times article about her skills and a Slashdot story that comments endlessly on her looks, she must be walking on air. And I must say that these 15 minutes of fame are more than well deserved. :-)

    Cheers,
    Adolfo

  99. She's not the first or only by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Stephanie Kwolek is probably one of the better known female engineers, though she's materials not electrical. She is one of the two people directly responsible for the creation of Kevlar. Got on the order of 28 patents before retiring,a nd these are all real patents for innovative products, not software BS.

    While women are still fighting the stereotypes of the past, there are examples of women excelling in almost every field, even traditonal male only roles such as CEO (eg Carol Bartz, CEO and president of Autodesk).

    1. Re:She's not the first or only by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      eg Carol Bartz, CEO and president of Autodesk

      And don't forget Carly Fiorina, who, as CEO, turned a minor electronics company into one of the most interesting companies around.

      Yes, I am trolling...

      --
      That is all.
  100. No.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The young lady in question is a major, major (*major*) exception. School has killed the creativity of too many bright stars, true. But far more people have failed by not getting an education than the other way around.

  101. bad link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ur links are busted.

    found the right ones through google

    those pics are on this page:

    http://homepage.mac.com/kznight/PhotoAlbum4.html

  102. the best word for this woman is by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    autodidact

    i admire her, the successful self-taught person is an inspiration to any of us toiling away on a part-time hobby, with big dreams

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  103. Re:should of stayed in school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a greater achievement than what she would have designed in school. She really designed an FPGA of the now extinct 6510 processor, really a trivial task. That processor is very simple compared to a mips. It's 8-bits and CompE worth his salt would be able to re-implement the proc in less than a month including substantial design verification. Hell we had 7 weeks to implement a compaq alpha compatible integer processor, with all the goodies, Out of Order execution, 2-way superscalar, caches, and branch prediction. Now other than that the difficulty of re-implementing the VIC chip and SID(I think) would be the most difficult but still not terribly hard considering much of the tedious reverse engineering has been done in the software projects.

    Still it is impressive for someone with no formal training although it comes as no surprise. Plenty of people have the desire to learn and in my mind that is what is really important. I believe that most people have the capacity to anything if they desire it badly enough. This does not only apply to technology either.

  104. Asshole. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You're a prick, gumbi. Nice to make fun of a girl on what's probably one the happiest moments of her life. Hopefully she won't read the comments from /.'s virgins and shut-ins.

    1. Re:Asshole. by Tyler+Durden · · Score: 1

      Hey, here's a quarter. Go buy yourself a sense of humor.

      --
      Happy people make bad consumers.
  105. Scion: by caveat · · Score: 1

    scion Audio pronunciation of "scion" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (sn)
    n.

    1. A descendant or heir.
    2. also cion (sn) A detached shoot or twig containing buds from a woody plant, used in grafting. ...i like your definition better though, those things are HIDEOUS.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Scion: by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I couldn't figure out how the real definition of the word could possibly have fit for a car.

      Why not call it the Hircut, the Fiduciary, the Woody Plant?

      Other than the fact that it's a plesant-sounding word, it's just weird.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:Scion: by caveat · · Score: 1

      Heir apparent to the entire Toyota empire perhaps? Although if they plan on going that route, I don't see them staying in business Stateside for much longer.

      --

      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    3. Re:Scion: by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Well, it was like that hideous Aztek that you saw everywhere for about 6 months, then they all disappeared.

      I know companies need to break free from the utter monotony of most current car design but mkaing your vehicle look like industrial HVAC machinery isn't the way to go in this poster's opinion.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  106. WTF, no OGG support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would I ever want to be locked-in into this joystick????

  107. Bzzzt...wrong by WebCowboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    It appears that it's properly licensed.

    Commodore isn't exactly the big juggernaut it was 20 years ago...I'd venture to say that the owner of the brand is not exactly "well lawyered". Rather than aim to shut her down, I think they gladly paid her for the idea in hopes of finally making money off the brand for the first time in ages.

    Of all the big names of the past I'd say Commodore is the safest bet on the emulation scene. The other big players 20 years ago? Apple, Atari, IBM, perhaps you could include Tandy and TI in there as well. There are still big companies behind all those brands, and in some cases they have demonstrated a willingness to defend their rights to those brands even if they no longer support those old products.

    Jeri's a sharp cookie, she has gotten in on the leading edge of a craze. Those retro joysticks (a lot of them pirate NES knockoffs) are all over the malls this Christmas...it's quite possible they will be a real craze next year. Whether they'll remain popular in the long haul I'm not sure. In any case, the original NY Times article is right, Jeri has all the hallmarks of becoming another Woz or Burell or Dr. Roberts. I'd ventrue to say there'll be more neat stuff to come from here in the future.

    1. Re:Bzzzt...wrong by hyphz · · Score: 1

      > It appears that it's properly licensed.

      Who said it has to be a justified lawsuit?

  108. mixed signals? by katharsis83 · · Score: 1

    Chip designer?

    This title implies that the designer also has knowledge of analog systems. Fine, you can design logic/FPGA's. Digital systems are possible to learn by reading a book or two; Analog/mixed-signals design requires intensive schooling.

    Let's see you design a moderate-gain opamp with even a decent bandwidth that doesn't go into crazy positive feedback.

    1. Re:mixed signals? by crgrace · · Score: 1

      Chip designer?

      This title implies that the designer also has knowledge of analog systems. Fine, you can design logic/FPGA's. Digital systems are possible to learn by reading a book or two; Analog/mixed-signals design requires intensive schooling


      Are you an analog designer by any chance? If so, my company is looking for analog designers in orange county, California. Email me at crgrace@ieee.org

    2. Re:mixed signals? by paganizer · · Score: 1

      About 40-50% of the Technicians trained by the navy circa 1985-1989 via the AFTA(A1) program for rates AT/AQ/AW would probably fit the bill.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
  109. Where is all of the free chip design software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About 2 years ago, I posted to ask slashdot about free chip design software. A friend had recently started to turn his life around (after jail, etc.) and went to school for chip design, but was having trouble finding a job using those skills, and was starting to forget the skills he learned. I was looking for either Windows (he has a PC) or Solaris apps (I would give him a Sun U5). Specifically he trained on Cadence's packages. So, what free software are they referring to? (btw, my ask slashdot was never picked up). Cadence doesn't offer a "student edition" of their software. Indeed, most of the vendors didn't.

  110. Analog? by katharsis83 · · Score: 1

    Digital systems are indeed possible to learn by yourself. It is much harder to learn the compensation, stability-analysis, and frequency response of analog chips however.

    Industrial quality mixed-signals systems still require rooms of MSEE's or PhD's to design.

  111. NO way-Overlap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I wouldn't call it trivial, but yeah... when I read "Self-Taught Chip Designer", I was surprised."

    Think of the difference between CS and code monkey.

    FPGA designer can be thought of as a subset of chip designer. There's some skill overlap, and I think that's were the confusion is coming from.

    There is however a difference, and if you're a money making enterprise? Getting the wrong tool for the job, will hurt you in the end.

    There's another thing to keep in mind, as far as differences between hardware and software. Software is more tolerant of mistakes, and amiable to the compile-recompile that learning incurs.

    Hardware is less tolerant of mistakes, and the design-test-redesign-retest process can get expensive. FPGA's minugate some of this, but only within the limitations of the technology.

    Go outside, and you'll see the limits of self-taught. At least with a good university program with fabbing capability, one can learn beyound what self-taught would give you.

    That's why universities and colleges haven't disappeared, in the face of self-taught.

  112. Not impossible...just nearly so. by katharsis83 · · Score: 1

    Yes, you can buy the same books that Universities use to teach, but you will never learn from someone who's been in the field you want to pursue for 20-30 years at least. That's the key difference.

    Also, there are certain subjects that require a good Professor to explain. C/C++ syntax, basic Verilog, can all be picked up by reading a book and trying things out. It is MUCH harder to design RF systems, high-speed digital systems (where you basically have to being modeling analog effects into digital systems), and apply the various EE-theory classes that you thought were useless. You can't just go into the lab and tinker around and come out with a stability compensated high-frequency amp...it requires years of schooling and theory courses.

    This is not to belittle digital designers; designing cost-effective and fast digital systems is also extremely difficult, but it's easier to learn the ropes of.

  113. the first computer programmer by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Informative

    was a woman

    ada lovelace

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:the first computer programmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is she now?

    2. Re:the first computer programmer by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Worm buffet.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    3. Re:the first computer programmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmmm ... worms. I like worms.

  114. Success HS is about doing what you're told by mc6809e · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wish it were different.

    Clever kids get bored out of their minds doing "busy-work", but that's what you're graded on.

    Welcome to socialized education.

    1. Re:Success HS is about doing what you're told by GlassHeart · · Score: 1

      A lot of times, getting something actually done is also "busy work". Consider the testing and bug-fixing phases of software development, which most programmers would consider tedious. How do you like the programmers who are too clever to be fixing their own bugs?

  115. Why the C64? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note: This is not meant to be a troll. All the kudos goes to her for doing this and I'd get one m'self except for.... ...what is it about the C64 that people still find so facinating years and years later? I ask because, while I did some standard BASIC programming on it, I did the same thing with the Apple ][ and the TI-994/A. I thought the graphics and sound were pretty good on them too, so it's clear I never "got" the C64, but just want to know what makes it special.

    Note, I'm not saying "I don't think it's special", I'm saying "I know it's special to a lot of people...tell me why."

    1. Re:Why the C64? by greywire · · Score: 1

      I remember back then pretty well. Like many others, I learned to program on Apple II's, TI's, Sinclairs, Ataris etc. The thing about the C64 was that it had great sound and video (though arguably perhaps not the best), a real keyboard, real peripherals (floppy), and it had a real good price. How much was an Apple II back then? For a lot of people (and remember the C64 is one of, if not the, most popular computers ever in sales) the c64 was the right balance of looking and sounding great at a price we could reasonably afford.

      Its really representative of a golden age of PC's that lots of us fondly remember.

      --
      -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
    2. Re:Why the C64? by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      well since the original C64 used a TV for a monitor, and so does this I imagine it saved her the step of having to put something in between.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    3. Re:Why the C64? by Rico_Suave · · Score: 1

      Well, it's the biggest-selling single computer model of all time (somewhere in the area of 20 million units sold), so obviously a lot of people saw *something* in it.

  116. Re:Yeah But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about Radia Perlman?? !!

  117. ding ding.. you've been brainwashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All those feats were accomplished by men and then presented as having been done by women. Those women basically rode in on the coattails of men who did the work. Read the book !

  118. Apple 2+ Emulator to TV by cdtoad · · Score: 1
    I'm waiting for an Apple 2+ Emulator that connects to your TV. I loved that machine! I just can't find any discs that I can read twenty years out! The games were AMAZING for the time and STILL (the ones that I can boot) challenging. Why is it I can I go out and buy Doom 3 play it for about 2 hours and get bored to tears... yet play Ultima I, Hard Hat Mack, or Choplifter for days on end?

    I weep silently in my cube for the good ole days...

    --
    when they ban enctryption only criminals wi$21*J *#JF$%!@#$':
  119. Sexism by believekevin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm halfway through the responses and haven't yet encountered a single comment about the greatness of this project!

    /. disappoints once again.

    1. Re:Sexism by itistoday · · Score: 1

      You trying to deny the extremely small percentage of female "geeks"? Sad but true, and the reason why this got so much attention in the first place.

    2. Re:Sexism by LittleGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm halfway through the responses and haven't yet encountered a single comment about the greatness of this project!

      So, is the project HOT?

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    3. Re:Sexism by msgregory@earthlink. · · Score: 0

      Could that be because it really isn't? How many people have shoved Nintendos and things into weird boxes? What's so special about this project? Because a woman did it?

    4. Re:Sexism by msgregory@earthlink. · · Score: 0

      What I mean is, it's good, obviously, but I don't think we are morally obligated to acknowledge its "greatness."

    5. Re:Sexism by essreenim · · Score: 1
      7 beers of hotness for that project.

      It's just that any geek doesn't really aspire for a stunning super model - a cute elvin chip designer is what we long for...

  120. So schools not that great for some by kn0tw0rk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that this inllustrates the fact that schools are not for everyone, and also speaks volumes about the support her father gave her in raising and educating her and giving her the confidence to achieve her goals.

    --
    See my art -> http://herbevore.deviantart.com
  121. Role Model by Hexydes · · Score: 1

    These are the types of people that young girls in school should be pointed towards as role models, rather than idiot actresses and trendy pop stars. This is a girl who actually accomplished something in her life besides just looking pretty.

    And yes, it did take me three tries to type "pop stars" correctly (came up with "porn stars", "pop tarts", and "pop starts" before doing it right).

  122. Smoker? by henrycoderm · · Score: 0

    Check this.

    Notice the yellow front teeth.

    1. Re:Smoker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      But what else does she smoke?

      (Dropping conversation to a new low, thank you thank you ;) )

  123. A PSOne hand-held has already been done. by RenaissanceGeek · · Score: 1
    The "PSOne in a gamepad" thing has already been done. (or, at least, in a hand-held, portable, self-contained unit.)

    http://www.benheck.com/
    -or-
    http://www.classicgaming.com/vcsp/

    It's not just the PSOne, though: he also has handcrafted hand-held NES, SNES, a brand new PS2, and (the source of the URL and the beginning of all of this madness) a plethora of hand-held VCS units (AKA the Atari 2600.)

    This man is amazing! And if I had a few extra hundred dollars just lying around, I'd probably try and buy one of them from him.

    --
    What is the difference between a small revolutionary change and a large evolutionary change?
    1. Re:A PSOne hand-held has already been done. by andreyw · · Score: 1

      Slight difference. Not to belittle his achievements, but he hacked existing systems to fit a certain smaller format.... much like the Apple iBook-tablet guy. However this Jerri individual has designed a complete C64 from the ground up - and not only that - but designed an entire system (in ATX format) that can emulate a C64, Atari 2600, ZX Sinclaire or whatnot. Thats pretty freaking cool. I've been to C=1's site a couple of years ago and it impressed the hell out of me. The fact that THAT SYSTEM was designed by a highschool drop-out geek grrl just does it in for me - I am simply speechless. Kudos. /me goes back to breadboarding my Z80 micro.

  124. Most interesting... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    "Her hobby produced a chameleon computer called the C-1. Changing its basic software could make it mimic not only a Commodore 64, but ultimately more than nine other popular home computers of the early 1980's, including the Atari, TI, Vic and Sinclair."

    Best Buy happens to be selling just such a device that is designed to play old Atari games. It's sold by Atari but I wonder if they are using her design.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  125. Hello... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..this is Gupta. How may I help you?

  126. Re:Yeah But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intel hired knitters for wiring the first set of chips back in the day.
    Cobol was designed by a Grace Murray Hopper.
    Frances Elizabeth Snyder Holberton was involved in Fortran's development.
    Ada Lovelace wrote first program to calculate Bernouli numbers.


    I just wish that the pictures that they stick in text books were the "young" versions. Have you seen any of the pictures of those women? They all are ancient grandmothers! Couldn't they have found some pictures of when they were younger?

  127. the ny link by micromuncher · · Score: 1

    http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/20/technology/20joy stick.html

    is a better link (no password)

    and yes, she's something ain't she

    --
    /\/\icro/\/\uncher
  128. Re:impossible? -- No eBay.. by telemonster · · Score: 1

    Obviously you haven't seen the chip fabrication category on eBay!

    ( http://business.listings.ebay.com/Semiconductor-PC B-Equipment_Semiconductor-Manufacturing_W0QQcatref ZC4QQfromZR13QQsacategoryZ45043QQsocmdZListingItem ListQQsocolumnlayoutZ3QQsojsZ1QQsosortpropertyZ1 )

    It said she had a barn.... . . .

    --
    Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
  129. DRAM by spdt · · Score: 1
    they're very similar to SRAM, and when they lose power, they lose their programming
    You mean DRAM.
    1. Re:DRAM by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, I mean SRAM. I said "SRAM", not "Flash". SRAM loses its contents when it loses power. DRAM loses its contents if you don't refresh it. FPGAs don't need to be refreshed, they only need power supplied.

      You must be thinking of Flash or some other nonvolatile memory.

  130. 1200 Wilson Dr. - Commodore & QVC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Commodore Business Machines, LTD was located for many many years in the building at 1200 Wilson Dr., West Chester, PA. Today, that building is occupied by QVC. I find it interesting that QVC is hawking a machine that has the name of the product built in the same building that QVC is in now.

  131. Bullshit. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    If you have a map, are in the wilderness and don't know tthe area you can die. As simple as that.

    You need a guide that has been there, done that, and got the T-shirt.

    Those guides are called teachers.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  132. Yeah, bloddy insightful. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Now tell us keemosabee, how do you educate millions of people cost effectively in the real world (you could stop invading countries half world away and using the money on education, but note I said real world ).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  133. more C64 DTV details by goon · · Score: 1
    heres some circuit board and internal shots [1]. According to Robert Renardo (Fresno Commodore Users Group) on comp.sys.cbm [2] it looks like:
    • *made in China

    • *250,000 units for sale
      *NTSC only (forget it if you have a PAL TV)
      *games include ~ 30 original legally released games ported
      *128K RAM, 2M ROM
      *256 colours
      *SID sound, 3 voices

    Robert also suggests enterprising hackers can "... solder on a serial port ..." for that true C64 feel keyboard and drive

    References
    [1] www.aroundmyroom.com/blog/images/c64dtv/index.html
    [2] groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.sys.cbm/msg/7e62 094b92f78cc8
    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  134. Enough links, Here are Pics of Jeri :-) by Xoo · · Score: 1

    Look, I'll get down to it....
    We all love geek chicks.
    Yadda, yadda, yadda...
    Congrats to Jeri on her success, and now here are some pix of her, enjoy. :-)

    pic 1
    pic 2
    pic 3
    pic 4

    --
    Karma police, arrest this man, he talks in maths....
  135. Separated at Birth? by vivin · · Score: 1

    this vs. this . (Claire Forlani)

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
  136. What other machines besides C64 are supported? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the article:

    "Her hobby produced a chameleon computer called the C-1. Changing its basic software could make it mimic not only a Commodore 64, but ultimately more than nine other popular home computers of the early 1980's, including the Atari, TI, Vic and Sinclair."

    I assume that the "could" is a theoretical "could" and that not all of these have been developed.

    The disclaimer on the C-one site seems to indicate that there is much work to be done:

    http://c64upgra.de/c-one/disclaimer.htm

  137. I got nothing. by mekkab · · Score: 1

    [obvious]

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  138. While in China, she tired easily of the food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the newsgroup article:

    "In her quest to get the C64 DTV just right, she traveled to China and stayed there for a week ... While in China, she tired easily of the food."

    She got tired of food in Hong Kong in only one week? Surely this must be a typo. The food there is most excellent. All you single geeks lusting after her better look into this one.

  139. ohhh yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ^_^ shes my type, also a drop out, heading for a 400K+ a year salary ^_^

    fuck american schools :)

  140. Re:Yeah But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elizabeth Rather http://www.forth.com/

  141. NOT she by thewindsofthor · · Score: 1

    sorry to break this but, at least according to this post http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=133384&c id=11141509 she is not biologically a female. That post was in the context of talking about how hot she is, but I think it's relevent here too. Of course that guy might've been making it up but what would be his motivation?

  142. History of Female Geekdom by jd · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Women have been geeks, nerds and even corporate bosses, for all of recorded history and probably far earlier than that.


    Here is a moderately comprehensive index of women scientists throughout history. Some names are linked to biographies.


    The woman who commands most of my respect, geek-wise, was Mary Annings. She discovered her first new species of dinosaur at age 12, and a second at age 20. She made a living collecting
    (and extracting as necessary) fossils, which she sorted and indexed. It is said that she inspired the tounge-twister "she sells sea-shells by the sea shore". Anyone who can run their own business at age 12, AND make enough to feed herself and her siblings, AND have enough time to recognise a new discovery, is deserving of enormous respect.


    There are two women in history I respect as leaders. Margret Thatcher, although I despised her policies, has few equals when it comes to getting things done.


    However, Britain has had one female ruler who was stonger still. Bodicca (also known as Queen Bodaccea) was betrayed, abused, molested and torured and her father (the King at the time) was savagely murdered in front of her. The tribe she belonged to (the Icini) were scattered and - if caught - butchered. She managed to gather the survivors up, get herself accepted as ruler, turn them into a near-invincible fighting force, and kicked the Imperial Roman army very nearly out of Britain entirely. Most British currancy today bears the figure of a woman in iron-age battle-dress. This figure is derived from the historical Bodicca. Even the legend of "Robin Hood" hasn't had that kind of a grasp on society.


    To me, it seems obvious that women have been significant in many disciplines, throughout history. It begs the question of how much further along society could have been if more had been encouraged. Given the sheer number of names on the list, it also begs the question of why feminists are NOT pointing to such an established, proven history to push for greater equality. The future isn't known, but the past is.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  143. How about heart surgery? by BugBlatterBeast · · Score: 1

    My father always said anyone could do heart surgery. He's dead now. I was recently prosecuted for taking my children to the vet instead of a real doctor. Actually he wasn't a real vet either, he was a self taught taxidermist. For some reason all our pets have died young, but we have a lot of stuffed animals to play with. Luckily for me, the judge was a self taught carpark attendant, and I got off.

    --
    If you steal this sig, the only people who will profit are professional criminals.
  144. Interesting link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
  145. Totally wrong! by TheOriginalRevdoc · · Score: 1

    It's a common myth that formal education somehow stifles the entrepreneurial urge. This line is usually supported by counting the number of high-profile billionaires were high-school dropouts.

    However, it ignores the fact that there are actually *two* areas where people with a lack of formal education are common: one is the billionaire's club. The other is prison. I can tell you which place the uneducated are likelier to end up.

    Also, it ignores the fact that most billionaires went to the best schools and universities that money can buy, anyway. The likes of Gates and Wozniak are always the anomaly, not the rule.

  146. Mulletts are back? by holysin · · Score: 1

    I know UPN ran a show on them, but the mullett is back? I see at least two mulletts, and a couple possibles.

    Personally I think she's beautiful, but then again I go on brains before I'll even consider the beauty.

  147. Trivia: QVC HQ/studio is former Commodore site by robo45h · · Score: 1

    Just passing along this bit of trivia. The QVC HQ and studios are on the site of the former Commodore plant in West Chester, Pennsylvania (outside Philadelphia).

  148. Explain this by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How can she design chips without a frabrication plant?

    Sure you can fiddle around with autocad and many other cad electronic design tools but that does not make someone an electrical engineer or chip designer.

    It makes me wonder how she got started and how she got hired and who invested in her idea's and got her work to the fabrication plants that built her products.

    1. Re:Explain this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      She was designing boards and FPGAs and getting some press. So somebody approached her about making a cheap toy version of her stuff.

      It happens. For example the guy below was making a 2600 FPGA and was bought out:

      http://protectedfromreality.com/2600OnAChip/

      In my experience an ASIC designer doesn't get anywhere near the fabs unless they request to get a tour.

      Typical ASIC designers don't ever get access the physical database for the chips they are working on, this is done by "back-end" people. For example many people go to Faraday when the are planning to fab chips at UMC. There are companies that perform FPGA to gate array conversions. (BTW, if you see the words "Structured ASIC" think gate array.)

  149. For the ladies by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    Many male geeks here joke that they hack or make case mods to gain chicks.

    But in reality its yourselves who get all the attention here.

    So this means making case mods and building chips or hacking code will have men knocking on your doors.

    Just do not let their long hair, bears, and unsanitariness bother you.

  150. Mod down this libelous idiot by Mal+Reynolds · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    That's so awfully wrong it truly qualifies as libel. Your statements make it ridiculously clear you did not go to school with Jeri. And that you have never met, known or even talked with someone that has every spoken with her.
    Perhaps, as another poster indicates, you've confused Jeri with an entirely different person. If so, you should stand up and apologize. Whatever the case, what you've written is libelous and it's on you now.
    Sex change? Jeri a him??? Please.... She may play for the other team, but she's as XX-chromosome a female as you're ever going meet. Something you've quite obviously never done.

    1. Re:Mod down this libelous idiot by csbruce · · Score: 1

      Sex change? Jeri a him??? Please.... She may play for the other team, but she's as XX-chromosome a female as you're ever going meet. Something you've quite obviously never done.

      Maybe this person has the same silly notion as this AC:

      "She's not a woman, but a lesbian, ie a man's brain in a woman's body. HTH."

      Of course, this photo and this one are kind of interesting in that she is giving subtle clues that she likes the guy... or maybe that's just wishful thinking. :-)

      [coyly looking away, subtle smile, playing with lip, hand laid out near his, tilting head to the left while looking him in the eye]

      "I am an expert witness, because I say I am!" -- Don Henley, Garden of Allah

  151. YES way by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

    For all you know she had the money to buy the software and equipment. The article mentioned TWO prior businesses that she was successful at (race car customization and PC sales), so while she isn't Bill Gates, she probably has enough cash to finance appropriate equipment for her current profession.

    --
    We are the 198 proof..
  152. Re:Mod up Playboy by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

    that being said, and considering that any woman that greets 10 seconds of fame....she will be in Playboy next month?

    --
    We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
  153. Re:hot, red-head, self taught, retro video game ch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CmdrTaco would only have hit it before "Jeri's" sex-change. Now that He is a "She", Taco's lost all interest.

  154. Emulate a tape drive?! by multipartmixed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Obviously, I don't know squat about the desgin of THIS unit, but I *am* familiar with the C64's design!

    Why in God's name would you emulate the tape drive as a means to load software?

    It would be one hell of a lot easier to just have the program loader (you know, the piece that lets you pick what game in the joystick you want to play) swap in the right bank of ROM (for a cartridge game), or RAM image, point the virtual 6502's program pointer at the right place (or just twiddle the magic address up there in page $FF and "hit" the "reset" line) and boom! Software running, no extra crap in the way. And you can use the tape buffer. :)

    The "live image" for disk-based, copy-protected games could be scooped easily from a running C64, using.. oh what the hell was it called.. there was some cartridge, possibly by Epyx, where you hit the reset button and BOOM! It dumped RAM to disk, including the position of the program counter, so you could restore saved games in games which didn't save.

    Damn, why can't I remember the name of that cart?

    Anyhow. You'd think it would be more worthwhile making save-to-disk games work (whoever heard of save to tape??!) by backing up data to RAM... you could probably get away with just writing some custom code and point the kernel jump table at it.. I'd be willing to bet that most games (even heavily copy-protected ones) didn't bother doing anything fancy when *writing* to disk. The "proper" kernel API for disk I/O would be trivial to emulate.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    1. Re:Emulate a tape drive?! by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1


      Damn, why can't I remember the name of that cart?


      There were a couple I remember, Action Replay was the main contender, Final Cartridge it's less known cousin.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    2. Re:Emulate a tape drive?! by wrw · · Score: 1

      Emulate a tape drive isn't really accurate. A better way to say it is, rip out the cassette drive code from the C64 ROM image and replace it with new code that triggers the DMA to transfer stuff into active memory.

      You can't LOAD "$",1 in a real Commodore 64, you know. Yet that's just what happens in the DTV.

  155. Electrical Engineering is pretty broad topic by ufnoise · · Score: 1

    A BSEE exposes you to a wide range of subjects and you don't really have enough time to learn much about them. The degree is more about teaching you how to think like an electrical engineer. It does not teach you creativity, intelligence, or motivation.

    All of the specialized knowledge comes with doing projects. As a hobbyist, she was able to identify and acquire all of the knowledge required to complete this project. I think this is a great accomplishment.

  156. Wrong, parent is correct by nt7s · · Score: 1, Informative
    No, I think the parent is correct. I read the story and was shocked because Jeri is the same age as I am and went to Dallas High, the same school that I did.

    Dallas is a small town, but I could not remember Jeri; which I should because I would have remembered a female geek of such cailber in the same class as me. :) The last name sounded familiar, and when I read the parent's post I knew he was correct. I remember JJ as a big C64 fan and very talented with electronics. I haven't lateley had much contact with anyone I went to high school with, so I had no idea he had a sex change.

    So basically, I really think you are wrong about this being libel. If you doubt me, check my slashdot username in the FCC database. I'm a ham and I was first licensed while in high school in Dallas, OR.

    1. Re:Wrong, parent is correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This _is_ your first ever post to slashdot right?

      http://slashdot.org/~nt7s

      How could anybody trust you on this?

    2. Re:Wrong, parent is correct by nt7s · · Score: 1
      This _is_ your first ever post to slashdot right?

      http://slashdot.org/~nt7s

      How could anybody trust you on this?

      Yes, this is my first post on Slashdot. So fucking what? I have been reading for years, but chose not to post because I don't care for the politics of the majority of the posters here. I gave you my call sign (NT7S), look in the FCC database. Don't believe me if you don't want to. I don't have an axe to grind with anyone, but I wanted to set the record straight. The parent post was not bullshit and the poster was not trying to smear Jeri.

  157. In another reality.... by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    Just think what Ms. Ellsworth could have achieved with a proper education. If anything this story shows how the education system fails for smart people.

    Hmmmm. Dropout with insightive computer knowledge capitalizes on industry standard. so, a Slashdot comment in an alternate reality might be....

    "Commode-Door announced yet another security bulletin. So much for Scari Jeri and a bugfree system."

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  158. Jerri Fan Site by Stopher2475 · · Score: 2, Funny

    My question is which one of us is gonna be nerdy enough to collect all the pics of her and make a fan site?

  159. Oh Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It really makes you question your role in society...especially when it seems that women are portrayed like idiots or dumb blondes in the media. Or that all I should care about is makeup, clothes, and hair (trust me I'm not that obsessed - just ask my husband). Sometimes even today I ask myself "what they hell am I doing?" "Why didn't I do elementary ed like every girl I know?" It is still something I struggle with even today.


    Well, I don't know what to make of your statement. There was a famous female electrical engineer, Lynn Conway, who along with Carver Mead at Caltech wrote an influential book on VLSI design.

    Conway looks quite attractive, no? See http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&lr=&q=lynn+c onway+&btnG=Search

    Except for one thing: Conway was born as a male, and underwent a gender transformation in 1968.

    Now I ask you: If you claim that society discriminates against females and that females are brow-beaten and brainwashed into looking a certain way and behaving a certain way, why would a person born as a male who fathered a child bother to cross over to the "weaker" side and engage in the very stereotypes you despise?

    Conversely, when you say

    "Why didn't I do elementary ed like every girl I know?" It is still something I struggle with even today.


    maybe it says something biologically about you.
  160. Re:Outcast issues for males by xtermin8 · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, males with the same interests also often feel like outcasts. My ex-wife thought of electronic hobbies as a typical male weakness, and she was a physics major who I assumed would be more sympathetic. Also don't overestimate the "fellowship" of male geeks, because its often a fragile and a shallow comraderie. Just be clear that some of the messages from society are because you are a "geek" and not just because you happen to be a woman.

  161. College yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    College degrees only serve as a marker to make money by. But most that money is used to pay off college debt.

    Library, used book store. YOu can finance your own education within a year.

    ala Good Will Hunting...

  162. Re:BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a male who got a lot of "negative support" I also know of women who got extra encouragement in science and math because their female. Of course, maybe your from one of the "red states" which we expect to be socially backwards.

  163. Re:Not the first computer programmer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm tired of this revisionist crap. She "programmed" a hypothetical machine, she did not do electronic computer programming as most people understand it. I give credit to Grace Hopper, but Ada Lovelace deserves more credit for being a mathematician, and less for her "programming."

  164. Re:impossible? NOT at all, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    98% of programmers these day hold degrees in Business Administration.
    1% hold degrees in Engineering, math..
    1% hold one in Computer science.

  165. I call bullshit. by alizard · · Score: 1
    Inventors of the Modern Computer
    Intel 4004 - The World's First Single Chip Microprocessor http://inventors.about.com/library/weekly/aa092998 .htm
    Intel 4004 cpu
    Inventors of the Modern Computer Series

    Microprocessors - The Chip - Federico Faggin, Ted Hoff and Stan Mazor
    interviews with and biographies of the inventors - Federico Faggin, Ted Hoff, and Stan Mazor.
    By Mary Bellis

    In November, 1971, a company called Intel publicly introduced the world's first single chip microprocessor, the Intel 4004 (U.S. Patent #3,821,715), invented by Intel engineers Federico Faggin, Ted Hoff, and Stan Mazor. After the invention of integrated circuits revolutionized computer design, the only place to go was down -- in size that is. The Intel 4004 chip took the integrated circuit down one step further by placing all the parts that made a computer think (i.e. central processing unit, memory, input and output controls) on one small chip. Programming intelligence into inanimate objects had now become possible.

    rest at the URL.

    1. Re:I call bullshit. by Jason+Mitcheson · · Score: 1

      "In November, 1971, a company called Intel publicly introduced the world's first single chip microprocessor..."

      A company is not the same as a single person working independantly, which is what the article text was saying. It's not as if someone just said "I'm bored, I think I'll design a new processor archeticture!".
      Those engineers where hired by Intel and worked together with the rest of the company (many, many people) to produce a chip.

  166. Walla Walla by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

    Wow, little suprised to see Walla Walla college listed on New York times. Most of my friends chose to go there, unfortunate it got a a bad light from a highschool dropout though considering it is one of the best computer engineering programs in the state.

  167. Re:eureka! plus legality? by wrw · · Score: 1

    Tulip owns the rights to all the Commodore 8-bit IP, but they have ignored all the Commodore emulators and ROM images out there on the Internet. They supposedly do monitor comp.sys.cbm so I'm sure if they felt like it, they could probably issue a cease-and-desist order. After all, anything newer than Steamboat Willie will never go out of copyright ;-)

    But Jeri does have the rights to the C-1 hardware and was duly commissioned by companies that had duly licensed the rights for the DTV joystick.

  168. Great for her. Here is a possible next project: by master_p · · Score: 1

    A home computer for the new millenium, only in the style of the home micros of the previous decades, but with none of their disadvantages:

    • Portable form. I just loved that I could take my Spectrum to my friend's house. It was more difficult with the Amiga, and nearly impossible with the PC.
    • optional connection to a TV set through SCART or SVideo. Most TV sets now have far superior quality than those 15 years ago.
    • 2 joystick ports, 1 mouse port. It was really frustrating to have to unplug one of the joysticks in order to use the mouse on the Amiga.
    • a CPU with a really simple and consistent instruction set, with full 32-bit address bus. One reason people that are willing to do assembly stay away from it is because the 6502, Z80, 68000 and most importantly 8086 assembly is really thorny.
    • put real hardware sprites, sprite scaling and rotation, parallax scrolling and multiple playfields in the hardware. All these things were present in the coin-ops of the 80s/90s, but most were missing from home computers. The Amiga had a blitter and some primitive hardware sprites, but that's about it. Programming could be really fun if one has plenty of hardware effects. Missing those effects meant that coin-op convertions were mediocre at best.
    • Put some decent 3d hardware in it.
    • Put the floppy, cd rom/dvd rom and hard disk inside the unit.
    • Put the main operating system in upgradable ROM, so as that boot time is 0.

    The purpose of this project would be to bring back the fun of home computers, where hardware was standard, the O/S did not block access to the hardware, you could just take the computer with you and operate it anywhere.

    I am willing to help writing the operating system, the window system and the compilers. Of course it would use Unicode inside out, so there shall be no language problems.

  169. Re:QUESTION by wrw · · Score: 1

    The company that hired Jeri had aquired rights to the ROM's and other Commodore IP already. Commodore 8-bit IP is owned by a Dutch company named Tulip.

  170. OK, here is some proof by nt7s · · Score: 0
    You all want pictures, well here you go. I don't have any of my high school yearbooks, but I did manage to find my 8th grade yearbook. You will find a picture of young Mr. Ellsworth at the following link:

    LaCreole Middle School, Dallas, Oregon, 1989
    (Sorry about the editorial comments on the other pictures, that was my sister's doing and that's why I don't have any of my HS yearbooks any more)

    I'm not trying to embarass anyone, but Slashdot demands proof, so there you go. As far as I'm concerned that does not diminish Jeri's accomplishments one bit. It should however, give all of you guys making comments like the upskirt stuff something to think about. Oh, and Mal, I expect you to apologize.

    1. Re:OK, here is some proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh.

      The article claims that she learned using a C-64 originally purchased for her brother. Is that so or was the C-64 bought for her when she was a boy?

    2. Re:OK, here is some proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could that not be her brother?

      Just an "Occam's Razor" thing. The chances are if her brother was into C64s then so was she!

    3. Re:OK, here is some proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first J stands for Jerry, a name awfully close to Jeri. Check the phonebook. Jeri is definitely transgendered.

    4. Re:OK, here is some proof by NuclearDog · · Score: 1

      Comparison (NY Times picture & yearbook picture side-by-side)

      Just look and compare parts of the face. Look at the chin, the way the cheecks go when they smile, the nose, etc.

      If you ask me they look pretty damn similar, and the fact that they are "J.J. Ellsworth" and "Jeri Ellsworth" make this seem all the more likely.

      Of course that's just my opinion. I could be wrong.

      ND

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
  171. Why the project is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because (RTFA) she, from scratch, created a single chip that performs all the functions of the multiple chips that were in a Commodore 64, including customized extensions, as the C=64 didn't have games built in. This is not an "old computer in some strange box". And this chip fits inside a joystick, is powered by a battery, and, unlike some other hobbyist work (the GPL'ed sparc implementations anyone?) this has seen real-live production, in a system that costs $30ish. Oh, and she hid easter eggs (BASIC, keyboard/periph support) in it to boot.

    (yeah yeah ihbt ihl hand)

  172. Re:should have stayed in school by sandlin_j · · Score: 1

    Your comments imply that the only jobs for BS/BA's are cubicle jobs! Cubicle jobs are actually in the minority (even if I do have one - I didn't need a degree to get it). Her achievement is remarkable because of her lack of formal education.

    Perhaps you should consider that the ability to make billions (or even the relatively paltry millions) in this type of person is because of something they have regardless of education. They'd have it whether they completed third grade or have a PhD. No formal education would wash it out of them, no formal education can instill it.

    Most of us will never achieve greatness of any sort (if we did they'd have to elevate the requirements for greatness, wouldn't they) regardless of our education. A good tertiary education, however, improves income opportunities, it is a proven fact (Google for income levels by education level for the proof if you want).

    All that said, having a PhD isn't a guarantee you'll be wealthy and being a high school drop out isn't a guarantee to send you to jail - but that would be the way I'd bet.

    BTW: I think enough of the device that I purchased one. I am also following the C-One project in the hopes it will be available for consumer level users (rather than developer) real soon now. The C-One is really impressive and makes the C64DTV look like a toy (wait, the C64DTV IS a toy!).

    jbs

  173. Hacking the DTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people are already hacking the thing and writing code for it! http://thedarkside.ath.cx/dtv/

  174. Loaders, of course! by hereticmessiah · · Score: 1

    Have you never played Delta?

    --
    I don't like trolls and mod against me if you like, but I'd prefer if you'd reply.