Sharp is still selling the compet printing calculators, which should be enough for most K-12 students and store clerks. Buying more calculator than you need is for suckers
Under no circumstances are any units in a company to have even contact with each other, much less share work product. This leads to unacceptable things, like collaborations over lunch and generally helping each other out and making a more efficient company. If we have a more efficient company, that may mean we have to lay off even more employees, and this cannot happen in this economy because we'd then pass reporting requirements for layoffs and be subject to higher FICA taxes.
Roberti's big thing is that nobody's yet used RFID data in a crime. So the upshot is that as long as people just break it for research, it's still secure. And people wonder why the blackhats make out like bandits on the first breaches of any given protocol, because nobody protected against them when it was merely a subject of research. Good luck with that, tell me how that works out for you.
As if anyone needed much further proof, basically Geek Squad is proving that they're not REALLY geeks, as geeks typically are anti-trademark-trumps-all.
This is the board that hired Carly, setting a new standard for "worst personnel decision". Compared to that, this doesn't even make a blip on the radar.
I don't know what about an IBM model M and a selectric keyboard implies that there's any difference at all in how you use them. Standard typography has evolved to two spaces between sentences, PERIOD. This is not up for discussion, nor should it be. There's no significantly new information that implies that this should change, except that more and more people are freaking lazy, and language should not evolve because of laziness. Man up, hit that spacebar twice, and quit whining
BTDT, it wasn't particularly realistic, or in fact triggering. I'd say that video games have a long way to go before they come close to being a problem in this area. I'd more worry about the minor issue that the agendas are transparent to even a 13-year old, much less someone that was actually there. For SOME reason, vets don't like to be told that their time and efforts were for nothing.
Does anyone else notice here that the "elite school" is going to be a HUGE PITA? first, you'll have helicopter parents doing MORE stuff (like making their kids teachers life hell when they MARK SOMETHING WRONG on their precious snowflake's paper) to make sure their kids get to the 5th year HS, then idiots that have no business caring about the 5th year HS are going to make it a requirement, can you imagine being told by the local McD's "sorry, you only have a 4 year HS degree, the guy we hired has a 5-year".
We also know how well the battle of little big horn went, but that has nothing to do with routing either
what about the fact that neither has merit?
on
Net Neutrality or Not?
·
· Score: 3, Informative
The proper response to tiering is a TCP/IP death penalty. Basically "if they tier, don't peer". If $FUCKTARDCORP wants to make a tiered intarweb, source-route around their asses. If they screw up the last mile, find another ISP. This is a battle that should be fought in routing protocols and markets, not in Crapitol Hell.
let's see, a program for tracing the route of packets: windows: tracert. unix: traceroute finding out the interface information windows: winipcfg/ipcfg (depending on version) unix: ifconfig clearing the screen windows: cls (only intuitive if you remember microsoft basic) unix: clear comparing files windows: fc unix: diff getting a shell from GUI windows: command/cmd (again, depending on version) unix: xterm
Meanwhile, you have the right to commit libel, as I have the right to sue you for it, if I can prove that you said it. Seigenthaler has the same option. What he is advocating is prior restraint.
his real issue is that he CAN'T prove who said it because of a catch-22. he can't sue the libeller because he doesn't know who it is, he can't find out who it is because he can't compel the common carrier to give up the name of the libeller without suing THEM, but that's statutorily prohibited.
Had his son done this on NBC, do you think for a moment that NBC would not be named in the suit?
I tell them a case of beer or Coke (their choice of brand, and I don't quibble about whether they have a few with me while I'm fixing) and *I* set the time. If *they* set the time, it's business, and they get business rates.
They make PCMCIA versions of the rest of their lineup: I doubt one will be long in coming. Of course, the rest of their lineup also starts at $500, so don't expect cheap...
How can Cactus Data Shield "protect" Audio CDs, when the people who wrote teh spec (Phillips) says that TPM'd "CD"s aren't supposed to use the trademark? Cactus Data cannot protect CDs, because once Cactus Data goes on, it's not a CD.
Sharp is still selling the compet printing calculators, which should be enough for most K-12 students and store clerks. Buying more calculator than you need is for suckers
Somehow in my perusal of gizmodo, slashdot, ars, and other tech sites, did I miss the "android-guided SAM" or "iphone-guided SAM"?
Without a credible threat, the DHS ought to STFU and GBTW
Why are you paying attention to your firewall for virus alerts? Do you do the same for your word processor? It makes about as much sense.
Under no circumstances are any units in a company to have even contact with each other, much less share work product. This leads to unacceptable things, like collaborations over lunch and generally helping each other out and making a more efficient company. If we have a more efficient company, that may mean we have to lay off even more employees, and this cannot happen in this economy because we'd then pass reporting requirements for layoffs and be subject to higher FICA taxes.
Roberti's big thing is that nobody's yet used RFID data in a crime. So the upshot is that as long as people just break it for research, it's still secure. And people wonder why the blackhats make out like bandits on the first breaches of any given protocol, because nobody protected against them when it was merely a subject of research. Good luck with that, tell me how that works out for you.
As if anyone needed much further proof, basically Geek Squad is proving that they're not REALLY geeks, as geeks typically are anti-trademark-trumps-all.
This is the board that hired Carly, setting a new standard for "worst personnel decision". Compared to that, this doesn't even make a blip on the radar.
I don't know what about an IBM model M and a selectric keyboard implies that there's any difference at all in how you use them. Standard typography has evolved to two spaces between sentences, PERIOD. This is not up for discussion, nor should it be. There's no significantly new information that implies that this should change, except that more and more people are freaking lazy, and language should not evolve because of laziness. Man up, hit that spacebar twice, and quit whining
BTDT, it wasn't particularly realistic, or in fact triggering. I'd say that video games have a long way to go before they come close to being a problem in this area. I'd more worry about the minor issue that the agendas are transparent to even a 13-year old, much less someone that was actually there. For SOME reason, vets don't like to be told that their time and efforts were for nothing.
Does anyone else notice here that the "elite school" is going to be a HUGE PITA? first, you'll have helicopter parents doing MORE stuff (like making their kids teachers life hell when they MARK SOMETHING WRONG on their precious snowflake's paper) to make sure their kids get to the 5th year HS, then idiots that have no business caring about the 5th year HS are going to make it a requirement, can you imagine being told by the local McD's "sorry, you only have a 4 year HS degree, the guy we hired has a 5-year".
the conclusion drawn is pretty much one that you're taught in basic-level game theory. If its easy to solve, nobody wants to play it
We also know how well the battle of little big horn went, but that has nothing to do with routing either
The proper response to tiering is a TCP/IP death penalty. Basically "if they tier, don't peer". If $FUCKTARDCORP wants to make a tiered intarweb, source-route around their asses. If they screw up the last mile, find another ISP. This is a battle that should be fought in routing protocols and markets, not in Crapitol Hell.
let's see, a program for tracing the route of packets:
windows: tracert. unix: traceroute
finding out the interface information
windows: winipcfg/ipcfg (depending on version) unix: ifconfig
clearing the screen
windows: cls (only intuitive if you remember microsoft basic) unix: clear
comparing files
windows: fc unix: diff
getting a shell from GUI
windows: command/cmd (again, depending on version) unix: xterm
yep. MUCH more intuitive
thief! come back here with my .sig
Can you say Krakatau? Worse, Krakatau is building up again, much like St Helens. I'll take your bet.
If karma was scored for stories, cmdrtaco would be posting at -1 ATM
his real issue is that he CAN'T prove who said it because of a catch-22. he can't sue the libeller because he doesn't know who it is, he can't find out who it is because he can't compel the common carrier to give up the name of the libeller without suing THEM, but that's statutorily prohibited.
Had his son done this on NBC, do you think for a moment that NBC would not be named in the suit?
I tell them a case of beer or Coke (their choice of brand, and I don't quibble about whether they have a few with me while I'm fixing) and *I* set the time. If *they* set the time, it's business, and they get business rates.
uhm, did anyone actually do research on human beans? EVERY product they have is bogus. They're culture jammers
>isn't gmail still in 'beta' stages? if so, isn't a review of
>spam filtering techniques a little premature?
What part of Beta TEST escapes you here?
Fine, land it at the typical BLM airport with approximately 2500' of runway.
They make PCMCIA versions of the rest of their lineup: I doubt one will be long in coming. Of course, the rest of their lineup also starts at $500, so don't expect cheap...
hell, look at wal-mart.
The Seattle P-I has a story about it
How can Cactus Data Shield "protect" Audio CDs, when the people who wrote teh spec (Phillips) says that TPM'd "CD"s aren't supposed to use the trademark? Cactus Data cannot protect CDs, because once Cactus Data goes on, it's not a CD.