Not true. Many of us use fake names and stuff. While it's true that using fake names is against FB's policy, that policy is not an affidavit. The only punishment FB can implement is to down the page.
What you think doesn't matter. What matters is that Anonymous has been reduced to a bunch of script kiddies who wouldn't make a good wart on a real hacker's ass.
It came from no anons because they are all in jail. It came from Anonymous and those kids wouldn't make a good wart on a hacker's ass. If they want to release The Interview, why don't they just do it?
They are impotent little wimps hoping some glory dust will settle on them.
Oxymoronically, the real Anonymous are incarcerated.
The Constitution doesn't have much to say about drugs or same sex marriage or women's reproductive rights.
The Constitution provides the big picture and, from there, the states do what they can and then the counties and cities write ordinances.
We The People don't have the stroke to second-guess the Constitution unless we can apply due process.
For instance, we are free to roam about the country and assemble except if we are sent to jail or don't have a permit, respectively.
Some federal housing prohibits firearms on the premises, and tenants waiver their 2nd amendment right.
So, the laws you are discussing fall within the Constitution as long as due process has been applied.
To pick one: Same sex marriage is a civil right. While there are faith-based arguments that use, "the sanctity of marriage," "against nature," "against the (Christian) bible, etc.
None of those meet the standard of due process, so the higher standard, the Constitution, whereby "all men are created equal," prevails.
They are thinking that Sony makes a lot of fucking money and should have spent some of it making goddam sure only need-to-know people had root access and that the IT department was staffed by competent, enabled people, and they are thinking this is not a freedom of speech issue, rather it's a Darwinistic weeding of crappy-ass naive corporate assholes and stuff.
Slashdot Mirror
Get well soon.
Anonymous has it's moments.
Especially the moments where the only people with talent (but not enough to go undetected) were captured.
Anonymous ... isn't so much.
Which has precisely nothing to do with the Mayans, since no Europeans visited any diseases upon them.
This.
And, poor farming practices -- not entirely the Mayan's fault -- and a refusal to migrate away from great wealth and technology.
Citation needed.
It's a pain in the ass to have your own website and maintain it. Facebook has done all the work for us.
It's much easier to spank Facebook in court.
Of course, the real answer is to use fake accounts.
Not true. Many of us use fake names and stuff. While it's true that using fake names is against FB's policy, that policy is not an affidavit. The only punishment FB can implement is to down the page.
Sorry, your font does not trace to NK.
... new meaning to, "darknet."
It's not Anonymous. The perps that had any talent are all in jail.
What you think doesn't matter. What matters is that Anonymous has been reduced to a bunch of script kiddies who wouldn't make a good wart on a real hacker's ass.
The inherent problem with Anonymous is lack of talent.
It came from no anons because they are all in jail. It came from Anonymous and those kids wouldn't make a good wart on a hacker's ass. If they want to release The Interview, why don't they just do it?
They are impotent little wimps hoping some glory dust will settle on them.
Oxymoronically, the real Anonymous are incarcerated.
Why are you leaning on them?
I'm a button-pusher.
Because they made a statement.
Not really. Those people who are featured in TFA are them.
Anonymous fizzled right after the kingpins were jailed, which btw, is not a good recommendation for their anonymity.
Now, Anonymous is a bunch of script kiddies who are reduced to throwing LOIC at weak sites for DDOS lasting a few hours at most.
Every time I lean on them, they send me death threats and stuff.
Fuck Anonymous.
What was the topic?
... that's the best guess at this point.
If the FBI actually had proof, they'd share that evidence with infosec so the rest of us could look at the method and double-check our practices.
You can't be that anonymous, can you?
... anything.
TFA is a waste of time.
There's no best practice revelations or stuff.
It's just a repeat of what every news site and pundit has said already.
The Constitution doesn't have much to say about drugs or same sex marriage or women's reproductive rights.
The Constitution provides the big picture and, from there, the states do what they can and then the counties and cities write ordinances.
We The People don't have the stroke to second-guess the Constitution unless we can apply due process.
For instance, we are free to roam about the country and assemble except if we are sent to jail or don't have a permit, respectively.
Some federal housing prohibits firearms on the premises, and tenants waiver their 2nd amendment right.
So, the laws you are discussing fall within the Constitution as long as due process has been applied.
To pick one: Same sex marriage is a civil right. While there are faith-based arguments that use, "the sanctity of marriage," "against nature," "against the (Christian) bible, etc.
None of those meet the standard of due process, so the higher standard, the Constitution, whereby "all men are created equal," prevails.
So it is written, so let it be done and stuff.
... this is similar in nature to same sex marriage, and women's reproductive rights.
It's legal some places and banned in others.
America needs to make up its mind. Which way are we going to go?
The decision should be based on case law and public need and citizen's rights.
Legalize all that shit and let's play spin the bottle and stuff.
yw
Virtually meaningless is to associate Apple with Android.
And the steel, coal and general chemistry industries.
They are thinking that Sony makes a lot of fucking money and should have spent some of it making goddam sure only need-to-know people had root access and that the IT department was staffed by competent, enabled people, and they are thinking this is not a freedom of speech issue, rather it's a Darwinistic weeding of crappy-ass naive corporate assholes and stuff.