Products ARE worth what people are willing to pay for them. That is a cold stone fact..
The price is determined by what the buyer is prepared to pay, and what the seller is willing to accept. It is rare, but an ethical seller can decide a price is too *high* and refuse to sell except at a lower price.
I've got a software+hardware project I'd like to (when it works) release as BSD/GPL/open-source. I'd be flattered if it was popular enough get knock-offs and derivatives. But I don't want to have to deal with my software not quite working right for these third party hardwares. So can I restrict use of my software+firmware+hardware to, "yes, here's all the code and design, open source, but if you change anything don't use my VID+PID, get your own"? Is this still open source, and can I still use the GPL? (BTW, I got my VID+PID from http://www.mcselec.com/ for 15euro, and there's open hardware projects, OpenMoko, I think, that also provide them.)
I want to give making my own valves a go, but first I've got to overhaul my vacuum pump, because it doesn't suck. (Well, I need at least 35torr, and it has trouble getting to 120torr.) I've got this book and like it: Instruments of Amplification. It's not so much a howto guide as a recounting of "I did this, and this is how it worked". Useful tips on how to cut open bulbs and harvest filaments, how to drill glass, basics of vacuum working and lots else.
For transmitting there's the HackRF which is a few mW output and is the one I've played with. Also another supplier that has cheaper, transmit only versions; the HackRF Blue For quite a bit more, there's MIMO capable devices such as the Ettus USRP that lets you run your own GSM basestation among other things. And for a more stand alone device, there's always the PortableSDR I've got a HackRF and am having fun with it trying to make a network analyzer. The others, I've just heard about.
I go backpacking with my phone, and it has changeable batteries. I take a universal charger and a flat pack wall wart. Some campsites have "charge your device" facilities. I feel better about leaving a battery and eBay special charger unattended, and it means I've still got my device, with Kindle, to read in the tent.
No-one - that is to say, no-one with an ounce of scientific credibility - is claiming it's a warp drive. There's no reason to even start to consider the idea that it might be a warp drive.
Slashdot Mirror
Products ARE worth what people are willing to pay for them. That is a cold stone fact..
The price is determined by what the buyer is prepared to pay, and what the seller is willing to accept. It is rare, but an ethical seller can decide a price is too *high* and refuse to sell except at a lower price.
I've got a software+hardware project I'd like to (when it works) release as BSD/GPL/open-source. I'd be flattered if it was popular enough get knock-offs and derivatives. But I don't want to have to deal with my software not quite working right for these third party hardwares. So can I restrict use of my software+firmware+hardware to, "yes, here's all the code and design, open source, but if you change anything don't use my VID+PID, get your own"? Is this still open source, and can I still use the GPL? (BTW, I got my VID+PID from http://www.mcselec.com/ for 15euro, and there's open hardware projects, OpenMoko, I think, that also provide them.)
You aren't the only one.
I want to give making my own valves a go, but first I've got to overhaul my vacuum pump, because it doesn't suck. (Well, I need at least 35torr, and it has trouble getting to 120torr.)
I've got this book and like it: Instruments of Amplification.
It's not so much a howto guide as a recounting of "I did this, and this is how it worked". Useful tips on how to cut open bulbs and harvest filaments, how to drill glass, basics of vacuum working and lots else.
TP-Link stuff is generally pretty OK, but with OpenWRT (for the models and versions which are capable) is very nice.
At a guess, another layer of spaghetti code got added.
Well, yeah. And TCMD. I still miss file descriptions, even though NTFS and HPFS support the concept, there's just not the tools to use them.
For transmitting there's the HackRF which is a few mW output and is the one I've played with. Also another supplier that has cheaper, transmit only versions; the HackRF Blue
For quite a bit more, there's MIMO capable devices such as the Ettus USRP that lets you run your own GSM basestation among other things.
And for a more stand alone device, there's always the PortableSDR
I've got a HackRF and am having fun with it trying to make a network analyzer. The others, I've just heard about.
Finally, a reason for tequila!
Decimate must always mean a tenth, just like December is always the tenth month.
5) WinIoT doesn't spy.
Yet.
I've always understood a scientific "law" to be a description of what nature does, and a "theory" to be an explanation for why that is so.
I go backpacking with my phone, and it has changeable batteries. I take a universal charger and a flat pack wall wart. Some campsites have "charge your device" facilities. I feel better about leaving a battery and eBay special charger unattended, and it means I've still got my device, with Kindle, to read in the tent.
Only 11 blades to go.
But it will get blamed for it. The Windows NT kernel has a very sophisticated security model, and look how well the rest of Windows builds on that.
Try jerky.
Ah, me too.
That would leave the most power in the hands of the corporations.
ftfy
... then end up doing JAVA/SQL, but that's not the point!
Were the cookies any good?
No, they're retro, going on paleo.
I agree, except you've over-rated HyperTerminal.
This could take a while...
Damnit - that's contagious.
No-one - that is to say, no-one with an ounce of scientific credibility - is claiming it's a warp drive. There's no reason to even start to consider the idea that it might be a warp drive.
Oopsie.
Or you could just put a nuclear reactor on the plane. Or cut out the electric bit in the middle and go straight for a nuclear jet engine.