That's true but that's how politics works. Parties lose favor with old themes, so they go looking for new ones that will get people to vote for them. That's the purpose of your vote, to (theoretically) kick them out for not doing what people want.
White men committing suicide 3x more than any other racial/gender group is yet another sign of their privilege! We need to figure out how to get those number of black women killing themselves up for equality! (Very strongly/s to be clear).
You can literally just google it and find them. It's not hard.
I don't understand why anyone installs a video camera in a toilet to video women peeing, but there are numerous cases of that as well, and those kind of people would be happy to use this.
3 comments, all critical of the women for complaining. So you're all okay with sexual harassment and discrimination by sex when it happens to women. You guys are like a broken AI - predictable responses that could be churned out by a bot. Or just cut-n-paste whole threads from previous discussions, because it's always the same, whether it's about pay, sexual harassment, discrimination in its many forms -
I see you're doing the classic project. These feminist-themed topics are always very predictable like a broken AI. Was the a man involved? He was bad and wrong. Was there any kind of sexual tension involved? Bad and wrong, women should not be involved in sex ever. That's the feminist narrative.
and then you wonder why your cubby-farm mates are almost all dudes.
Women chose professions based on social status, a group of people constantly pushing "computers are bad for women" is not in any way interested in women actually working in the field. They're interesting in keeping women out of it.
Actually real actual women (not fake feminist straw-women) chose environments with what feminists define as "harrassment" as vastly preferrable to boring coding working behind a computer. Sales environments are far far more aggressive and obnoxious, but given it an an option, women vastly prefer to do that rather than dry computer work. The pathological need to drive minor social conflict into hysteria only benefits the employers who prefer their employees to be sexless lifeless drones.
The irony is that the goal is to better exploit women's labor, not to "protect" them. Studies have consistently showed that unmarried women are more profitable than married women are. There's a very clear line that women that never get married are more profitable.
So these themes are pushed heavily to make sure that women stay socially isolated from men and single. Women are encouraged to look with disgust or disdain any time a man does anything that might lead to dating.
Both of these things are bad advice.
It's true about core muscles but back pain also involves the glutes, and other overly tight and strong muscles that need to be relaxed. A lot of people can't train their core muscles because other muscle groups are tight and pulling things out of place keeping the core muscles from engaging.
Crunches are an absolutely terrible exercise for core strength. They only work the least important core muscle, and making that muscle overly strong while neglecting the other core muscles causes disfunction and issues.
Everyone I know (including myself) who tried barbell training with squats, deadlifts, and presses seriously injure themselves doing it. My coworker didn't have back pain before doing squats, now he does.
No thanks.
Select * FROM employeeDB where gender='F' ORDER BY role, year DESC
Select * FROM employeeDB where Gender='M' ORDER BY role, year DESC
There you go.
No doubt if the genders were reversed you'd find it unfair to compare:
- The straight while male with 6 months of experience and a 2 year degree, to
- The woman who wrote a small OS in high school, went to a top tier university, dropped out to start her own company, which was purchased for millions of dollars and now she works for google
No doubt you suddenly realize why comparing their salaries and claiming the straight white male should be paid more would be "unfair".
Sounds like you're trying to recreate the time period, just with the genders reversed, and without women having to pay the price that men did of dying overseas in warfare.
Any system that punishes only women earning less than men is really a system that says women must be paid more because they're women.
It's the usual tricks, at this point I assume it's:
- Using the word "children" to refer to "teenagers"
- Using vague but suggestive phrases like "sexualized images" to refer to any sexually suggestive aspect of the image
Thus "teen girl puts on pushup bra, aims camera at her face and boobs, takes picture" becomes "sexualized images of children".
Nope. That's not how racism was ended (on a large society scale).
When racism became economically beneficial, slavery happened.
When racism became an economic liability, suddenly slavery and racism were bad enough to get rid of. The US had a civil war. The US imported Jews from Germany like Einstein, which demonstrated that the Nazi's racism was shooting themselves in the foot.
The only monitor out of at least 5 that I bought and returned that my eyes liked was an older 2009 apple cinema display.
The focusing system in your eyes does poorly with blue light. Guess what they use to backlight modern monitors? A blue led, masked to create the other colors. I think because of a combination of cost, energy efficiency, and trying to meet color reproduction specs, they've been using one of the worst possible backlights in monitors.
Another thing that helped a lot was buying new glasses with an anti-reflective coating. I don't mean any of the computer-specific stuff, but the regular fifty dollar anti-glare coating helped a lot to.
It seems like computer monitors aren't taken seriously by the industry. A lot of money and new cool tech goes into smartphones displays, and tv's. Computer monitors get the short end of the stick.
It's hard to have a peaceful revolution, because there's no non-facist party. Trump is nutty, but just look at the left here - we have a power and attention hungry man, who changed into a woman, so he could complain that women were horribly oppressed and harrassed and things are so hard - as a woman, and things would be better if women were treated like men are.
I'll try to lay this out.
- He's a man
- Chooses to become a woman
- Once a woman
- Spends all his/her time complaining that women are "oppressed" and harrassed and mistreated and the only reason he/she has problem is because they're a woman
- It's been widely showed and rumored that this person created accounts to harrass themselves so they could continue playing the victim
This person is nuts. They make Trump look sane and safe in comparison. You know how pissed some people are that Trump banned immigrants from certain countries? In Canada they something similar, they just banned single males:
https://www.theguardian.com/wo...
I see no difference in philosophy between these 2 kinds of facists.
What this proves is that you can make number say whatever you want them to say.
How is this even a question? JD Power has companies pay them to produce "studies".
"This study paid for by large cell network providers and expensive phone manufacturers"
"Gee, did they find that you should join a large network and pay large amounts of money for your phone?"
"Why yes they did! What a shocker. Up next - republicans say they're the best, and democrats say they're totally the best! After that, luxury automobiles make people happier - this study funded by lexus and bmw. After that larger houses make people happier and their kids grow up healthier, says a leading research group funded by a large homebuilding company. What's that? That's right, you'd enjoy this news broadcast a lot more on a large 4k tv - says expert study, funded by samsung, sony, and lg. What shocking info will we bring you next?"
I wish I was a woman where apparently sex just falls out the sky every 2 seconds so it doesn't matter if you miss a bunch.
But in a guys reality, the worst that happens is actually that she assumes that you don't like her because you "could" have made a move and didn't, so she goes and sleeps with someone else. Now he's her boyfriend, there's never again an opening to date her and they get married and have kids, but only after your continued interest in her means you don't pursue other girls and she subtley scares other girls away - until after you're out of college and no longer surrounded by women at which time she slowly cuts off contact with you because it would be "weird" as she is married now and you're left with an empty dead end job and no romantic prospects in your 30's wondering where you went wrong.
One day another guy from your college friend group adds you on facebook, you get together to talk, he tells you about how she talked all the time about how much she liked you, and was really upset you didn't make the move you were supposed to, so she got herself drunk at a party and fucked the guy from her biology class who wasn't as nieve as you - that's her husband now.
Then you realize that some people just use "rape" as an excuse to be narcissistic assholes on the internet.
All of the software developers I've worked with who just want to get things done are happy with SVN.
All of the software developers I've worked with who don't care if anything gets done, they just want to be loud and feel in charge, want to use Git. When other developers inevitably have issues with the pointless additional complexity of Git, they always have a big drama train full of excuses about how it's everyone elses fault not Git. Hint: it's Git's fault.
The kind of landlords making these agreements already charge rent based on what they call "fair market value" which is basically whatever they think they can get people to pay that will maximize their profit. These kind of landlords are going to charge exactly the same kind of rent regardless of whether they get comcast kickbacks or not because their rental prices are not determined by their costs in any way to begin with.
Yes, clearly the fact she doesn't want to sit around all day cooking and cleaning for you is because feminism has "ruined" her, and not because cooking and cleaning suck and she'd rather spend her life on something that interests her rather than being an unpaid maid.
Women staying at home are not profitable. To maximize the profit to be made off women you need to convince them that they have to work.
Feminism is the group that does this, their message basically comes down to "making a sandwhich for your husband is oppression, spending 9 hours a day making sandwhiches for strangers is 'freedom'".
Studies on women's happiness has shown it's dropped every year since about 1973, the more feminism women get, the more unhappy they get.
Google for "womens happiness declines" and you can find the numerous studies done that all show the same thing.
As a developer I disagree with your language and tone but feel exactly the same way about needing a different solution.
In my experience agile makes managers inneffective little tyrants. Managers with big ego's thinking they're a special little snowflake trying to pretend programming is a place where you can come up with a simple 6-8 hour chunk of work every single day that gets accomplished with no bugs and no unpredictable behavior day after day week after week. LOL.
As an experienced developer, I know that of 10 tasks, 7 will go well, 2 will take extra time or cause bugs, and 1 will be a total clusterf!@#. But with a longer cycle, I can do a decent job of time estimates to have the extra time in there where I know things will go wrong. I don't have any idea which task it will be beforehand - I just know if will be one of them. With Agile the manager once again has a big ego freakout when task #4 ends up taking 4 times longer than the other tasks. Well boo-hoo - we've been doing this for years, and it happens every time. You just don't know which task it will be that causes the web page to stop working for no good reason, or triggers a compatibility issue on the server because they setup the jvm wrong, or works fine in Firefox but doesn't work in IE because of an IE bug - etc.
Just because your manager's huge ego means that he thinks that if we just say some inspirational sayings every morning and tell him everything is going great, that that's suddenly going to make all of our tasks easy and predictable and will magically remove that bug that pops up because John's calendar library uses getById, but Tom's page puts a name on the firm, then Thales updated the html header type, and the page doesn't work when I add a calendar to it in IE10. The managers ego is sooooo offended by that - why isn't your task done in my neat little timeframe? The manager is a special snowflake, that's supposed to make these things never happen any more.
At least with waterfall I can somewhat plan out that most tasks will go well, but 1 or 2 will be a nightmare and average them out in the schedule.
Yeah! They need to reject thug culture and start embracing the way better white culture! Where...
https://afsp.org/about-suicide...
- Men die by suicide 3.5x more often than women.
- White males accounted for 7 of 10 suicides in 2014.
- The rate of suicide is highest in middle age — white men in particular.
Wait...why the hell would they want to give up their culture for shitty "makes me want to put a bullet in my own head" white male culture again?
Maybe African Americans and Hispanics just don't want to work 16 hour days with an expensive mortgage to cover.
You mean maybe women blacks and hispanics don't want to enjoy the "white male privilege" that results in this?
https://afsp.org/about-suicide...
- Men die by suicide 3.5x more often than women.
- White males accounted for 7 of 10 suicides (in 2014)
- The rate of suicide is highest in middle age — white men in particular
"misogyny" is just a word for some women to use to call a man a bitch. It's 100% the same word with the same meaning just directed at the other gender.
It could be that media that women's interests are wider, on average, or that an equivalent zone for men to the 'chick flic' hasn't been discovered. I don't know.
On average, men tend to specialize more. Women have a "wider" range of interests but they don't get as deeply into them as men do. Like a woman might have a casual interest in football, baseball, and golf, whereas a man only likes football. But the man will know the stats of all the football players on half the teams, whereas the woman will only know a few of the players names. I'm just making an example. Not saying one is "better", but I am saying that a wider range of interests comes with less knowledge and investment in each of them.
Slashdot Mirror
It's all just politics in the end.
That's true but that's how politics works. Parties lose favor with old themes, so they go looking for new ones that will get people to vote for them. That's the purpose of your vote, to (theoretically) kick them out for not doing what people want.
White men committing suicide 3x more than any other racial/gender group is yet another sign of their privilege! We need to figure out how to get those number of black women killing themselves up for equality! (Very strongly /s to be clear).
You can literally just google it and find them. It's not hard. I don't understand why anyone installs a video camera in a toilet to video women peeing, but there are numerous cases of that as well, and those kind of people would be happy to use this.
3 comments, all critical of the women for complaining. So you're all okay with sexual harassment and discrimination by sex when it happens to women. You guys are like a broken AI - predictable responses that could be churned out by a bot. Or just cut-n-paste whole threads from previous discussions, because it's always the same, whether it's about pay, sexual harassment, discrimination in its many forms -
I see you're doing the classic project. These feminist-themed topics are always very predictable like a broken AI. Was the a man involved? He was bad and wrong. Was there any kind of sexual tension involved? Bad and wrong, women should not be involved in sex ever. That's the feminist narrative.
and then you wonder why your cubby-farm mates are almost all dudes.
Women chose professions based on social status, a group of people constantly pushing "computers are bad for women" is not in any way interested in women actually working in the field. They're interesting in keeping women out of it. Actually real actual women (not fake feminist straw-women) chose environments with what feminists define as "harrassment" as vastly preferrable to boring coding working behind a computer. Sales environments are far far more aggressive and obnoxious, but given it an an option, women vastly prefer to do that rather than dry computer work. The pathological need to drive minor social conflict into hysteria only benefits the employers who prefer their employees to be sexless lifeless drones.
The irony is that the goal is to better exploit women's labor, not to "protect" them. Studies have consistently showed that unmarried women are more profitable than married women are. There's a very clear line that women that never get married are more profitable. So these themes are pushed heavily to make sure that women stay socially isolated from men and single. Women are encouraged to look with disgust or disdain any time a man does anything that might lead to dating.
Both of these things are bad advice. It's true about core muscles but back pain also involves the glutes, and other overly tight and strong muscles that need to be relaxed. A lot of people can't train their core muscles because other muscle groups are tight and pulling things out of place keeping the core muscles from engaging. Crunches are an absolutely terrible exercise for core strength. They only work the least important core muscle, and making that muscle overly strong while neglecting the other core muscles causes disfunction and issues.
Everyone I know (including myself) who tried barbell training with squats, deadlifts, and presses seriously injure themselves doing it. My coworker didn't have back pain before doing squats, now he does. No thanks.
Select * FROM employeeDB where gender='F' ORDER BY role, year DESC Select * FROM employeeDB where Gender='M' ORDER BY role, year DESC There you go.
No doubt if the genders were reversed you'd find it unfair to compare: - The straight while male with 6 months of experience and a 2 year degree, to - The woman who wrote a small OS in high school, went to a top tier university, dropped out to start her own company, which was purchased for millions of dollars and now she works for google No doubt you suddenly realize why comparing their salaries and claiming the straight white male should be paid more would be "unfair".
Sounds like you're trying to recreate the time period, just with the genders reversed, and without women having to pay the price that men did of dying overseas in warfare. Any system that punishes only women earning less than men is really a system that says women must be paid more because they're women.
That's right, everyone nows babies are brought by storks, your patents got married then one day a stork showed up and that's how you came to be.
That's hilarious, sounds like India had a better manager so their team didn't have to do several revisions to cover for the managers ego.
It's the usual tricks, at this point I assume it's:
- Using the word "children" to refer to "teenagers"
- Using vague but suggestive phrases like "sexualized images" to refer to any sexually suggestive aspect of the image
Thus "teen girl puts on pushup bra, aims camera at her face and boobs, takes picture" becomes "sexualized images of children".
Nope. That's not how racism was ended (on a large society scale). When racism became economically beneficial, slavery happened. When racism became an economic liability, suddenly slavery and racism were bad enough to get rid of. The US had a civil war. The US imported Jews from Germany like Einstein, which demonstrated that the Nazi's racism was shooting themselves in the foot.
The only monitor out of at least 5 that I bought and returned that my eyes liked was an older 2009 apple cinema display. The focusing system in your eyes does poorly with blue light. Guess what they use to backlight modern monitors? A blue led, masked to create the other colors. I think because of a combination of cost, energy efficiency, and trying to meet color reproduction specs, they've been using one of the worst possible backlights in monitors. Another thing that helped a lot was buying new glasses with an anti-reflective coating. I don't mean any of the computer-specific stuff, but the regular fifty dollar anti-glare coating helped a lot to. It seems like computer monitors aren't taken seriously by the industry. A lot of money and new cool tech goes into smartphones displays, and tv's. Computer monitors get the short end of the stick.
It's hard to have a peaceful revolution, because there's no non-facist party. Trump is nutty, but just look at the left here - we have a power and attention hungry man, who changed into a woman, so he could complain that women were horribly oppressed and harrassed and things are so hard - as a woman, and things would be better if women were treated like men are. I'll try to lay this out. - He's a man - Chooses to become a woman - Once a woman - Spends all his/her time complaining that women are "oppressed" and harrassed and mistreated and the only reason he/she has problem is because they're a woman - It's been widely showed and rumored that this person created accounts to harrass themselves so they could continue playing the victim This person is nuts. They make Trump look sane and safe in comparison. You know how pissed some people are that Trump banned immigrants from certain countries? In Canada they something similar, they just banned single males: https://www.theguardian.com/wo... I see no difference in philosophy between these 2 kinds of facists.
What this proves is that you can make number say whatever you want them to say.
How is this even a question? JD Power has companies pay them to produce "studies". "This study paid for by large cell network providers and expensive phone manufacturers" "Gee, did they find that you should join a large network and pay large amounts of money for your phone?" "Why yes they did! What a shocker. Up next - republicans say they're the best, and democrats say they're totally the best! After that, luxury automobiles make people happier - this study funded by lexus and bmw. After that larger houses make people happier and their kids grow up healthier, says a leading research group funded by a large homebuilding company. What's that? That's right, you'd enjoy this news broadcast a lot more on a large 4k tv - says expert study, funded by samsung, sony, and lg. What shocking info will we bring you next?"
I wish I was a woman where apparently sex just falls out the sky every 2 seconds so it doesn't matter if you miss a bunch. But in a guys reality, the worst that happens is actually that she assumes that you don't like her because you "could" have made a move and didn't, so she goes and sleeps with someone else. Now he's her boyfriend, there's never again an opening to date her and they get married and have kids, but only after your continued interest in her means you don't pursue other girls and she subtley scares other girls away - until after you're out of college and no longer surrounded by women at which time she slowly cuts off contact with you because it would be "weird" as she is married now and you're left with an empty dead end job and no romantic prospects in your 30's wondering where you went wrong. One day another guy from your college friend group adds you on facebook, you get together to talk, he tells you about how she talked all the time about how much she liked you, and was really upset you didn't make the move you were supposed to, so she got herself drunk at a party and fucked the guy from her biology class who wasn't as nieve as you - that's her husband now. Then you realize that some people just use "rape" as an excuse to be narcissistic assholes on the internet.
All of the software developers I've worked with who just want to get things done are happy with SVN. All of the software developers I've worked with who don't care if anything gets done, they just want to be loud and feel in charge, want to use Git. When other developers inevitably have issues with the pointless additional complexity of Git, they always have a big drama train full of excuses about how it's everyone elses fault not Git. Hint: it's Git's fault.
The kind of landlords making these agreements already charge rent based on what they call "fair market value" which is basically whatever they think they can get people to pay that will maximize their profit. These kind of landlords are going to charge exactly the same kind of rent regardless of whether they get comcast kickbacks or not because their rental prices are not determined by their costs in any way to begin with.
Yes, clearly the fact she doesn't want to sit around all day cooking and cleaning for you is because feminism has "ruined" her, and not because cooking and cleaning suck and she'd rather spend her life on something that interests her rather than being an unpaid maid.
Women staying at home are not profitable. To maximize the profit to be made off women you need to convince them that they have to work. Feminism is the group that does this, their message basically comes down to "making a sandwhich for your husband is oppression, spending 9 hours a day making sandwhiches for strangers is 'freedom'". Studies on women's happiness has shown it's dropped every year since about 1973, the more feminism women get, the more unhappy they get. Google for "womens happiness declines" and you can find the numerous studies done that all show the same thing.
As a developer I disagree with your language and tone but feel exactly the same way about needing a different solution. In my experience agile makes managers inneffective little tyrants. Managers with big ego's thinking they're a special little snowflake trying to pretend programming is a place where you can come up with a simple 6-8 hour chunk of work every single day that gets accomplished with no bugs and no unpredictable behavior day after day week after week. LOL. As an experienced developer, I know that of 10 tasks, 7 will go well, 2 will take extra time or cause bugs, and 1 will be a total clusterf!@#. But with a longer cycle, I can do a decent job of time estimates to have the extra time in there where I know things will go wrong. I don't have any idea which task it will be beforehand - I just know if will be one of them. With Agile the manager once again has a big ego freakout when task #4 ends up taking 4 times longer than the other tasks. Well boo-hoo - we've been doing this for years, and it happens every time. You just don't know which task it will be that causes the web page to stop working for no good reason, or triggers a compatibility issue on the server because they setup the jvm wrong, or works fine in Firefox but doesn't work in IE because of an IE bug - etc. Just because your manager's huge ego means that he thinks that if we just say some inspirational sayings every morning and tell him everything is going great, that that's suddenly going to make all of our tasks easy and predictable and will magically remove that bug that pops up because John's calendar library uses getById, but Tom's page puts a name on the firm, then Thales updated the html header type, and the page doesn't work when I add a calendar to it in IE10. The managers ego is sooooo offended by that - why isn't your task done in my neat little timeframe? The manager is a special snowflake, that's supposed to make these things never happen any more. At least with waterfall I can somewhat plan out that most tasks will go well, but 1 or 2 will be a nightmare and average them out in the schedule.
Yeah! They need to reject thug culture and start embracing the way better white culture! Where... https://afsp.org/about-suicide... - Men die by suicide 3.5x more often than women. - White males accounted for 7 of 10 suicides in 2014. - The rate of suicide is highest in middle age — white men in particular. Wait...why the hell would they want to give up their culture for shitty "makes me want to put a bullet in my own head" white male culture again?
Maybe African Americans and Hispanics just don't want to work 16 hour days with an expensive mortgage to cover.
You mean maybe women blacks and hispanics don't want to enjoy the "white male privilege" that results in this? https://afsp.org/about-suicide... - Men die by suicide 3.5x more often than women. - White males accounted for 7 of 10 suicides (in 2014) - The rate of suicide is highest in middle age — white men in particular
"misogyny" is just a word for some women to use to call a man a bitch. It's 100% the same word with the same meaning just directed at the other gender.
It could be that media that women's interests are wider, on average, or that an equivalent zone for men to the 'chick flic' hasn't been discovered. I don't know.
On average, men tend to specialize more. Women have a "wider" range of interests but they don't get as deeply into them as men do. Like a woman might have a casual interest in football, baseball, and golf, whereas a man only likes football. But the man will know the stats of all the football players on half the teams, whereas the woman will only know a few of the players names. I'm just making an example. Not saying one is "better", but I am saying that a wider range of interests comes with less knowledge and investment in each of them.