Well to be fair I did have a resume with the agency for years. Most agencies will call you every few years to see if you're thinking of changing jobs. I used to find it annoying but I figured that I do get a benefit from it.
You presume that case where the lady sued McDonalds because the coffee was hot was a frivolous case.
You have to be able to try to sue anyone for anything. It's up to the system to decide which cases are frivolous and which cases are not. Otherwise you may never be able to hold accountable those that should be because on the surface what they did doesn't seem like a big deal.
I think they monitor any e-mail the employee sends; not just personal e-mails. I.e. e-mails that go from Bob the programmer to Jenny the accounts-receivable lady explaining how to use the new version of the "Just Pay Me" software would be analysed to see if Bob is getting sick of working at AAA Dodads.
His philosophy gels well with nerds like us. He likes to treat his investing as if he were buying a whole business instead of little numbers on a screen.
I sort of share your view but keep in mind that most investors will want a company to keep all of its profits and NOT pay dividends while the company is still able to make a larger return on that retained profit.
Apple has so much retained profit that it can't use it fast enough to stimulate growth. So the best thing to do is to pay some of that profit off as a dividend.
To put it another way: retaining profit and not paying dividends is the thing a company should do while it can still grow. If a company can make 30% return on equity (number out of thin air) then you want them to keep the equity they create so they can make another 30% next year. When that return on equity drops to below what you can get investing in another company or a bank account then give the investors the profits and let them put in other shares or just in a bank account.
Think of investing as a higher interest earning bank account that requires you to do a shit-tonne of analysis to make sure your money is always invested in the right place.
But wouldn't the developer discount their app if they don't get the sales numbers they were after? If I were selling an app at $5 and no one bought it I'd try to price it down to $2.50 or something and see how it went. Isn't that the process you're talking about?
Isn't that the same as your $10M house example? If my house were on the market for $10M and no one bought it, then it'd be on the market for a year (or month, whatever) before I finally cracked and reduced the price to something that would sell.
Sure the app store doesn't have that direct price negotiation but neither does a website with an app for purchase. I can't just negotiate a cheaper price with Adobe for Photoshop! But Adobe can reduce the price of the software if they feel the lower price will yield more sales.
The 30% that Apple takes is a bargain! Let them handle distribution, credit card payment and to some degree marketing & exposure.
You're not helping the developer by not buying their app just because you don't want Apple taking the developer's money. The fact is that the developer can focus on coding rather than all the messy human stuff thanks to Apple.
Same here! Guys make the same sound too. I love Marco Arment but sometimes listening to his pod cast is tiring because he's constantly speaking with a creaky voice.
Seriously. Sorry, I know there are a lot of programmers on Slashdot and you think you know everything there is about computers, but most software developers I've known, no matter how brilliant, don't understand how to do IT support. They don't know how to make a stable system. They're one step away from the guy who wants admin access to his own machine because he upgraded his own video card once and he "knows what he's doing".
Now depending on the situation, it may still be a good idea to give developers some more leeway, but only because they need it. It can be a necessary evil, but be sure to have an "software developer" image ready, because they *will* trash their computers and expect you to fix it immediately.
I don't mean to make flamebait, but it needs to be said.
Yeah fair enough. Sometimes we do need more privileges but I agree that even a developer that *does* know what he's doing will still lunch his computer at some point. Whenever I've needed help from IT (I'm a developer) I've always been apologetic and accepted their time constraints. Are not most developers like this?
I don't buy it as a hipster e-penis. So I have no interest in wasting my time with rigid-functionality cripple-gadgets.)
THEN DON'T BUY IT!
I don't see the value in a Louis Vutton wallet because in my opinion they look awful and are overly expensive for what they are. I don't, though, go around criticising people for having them. I just make my choice as a FREE CONSUMER and not buy one.
I used to think Apple fanboys were preachy and annoying but they have nothing on the Andriod Ninnies that feel the need for everyone to have Android phones.
For some people the only reason they use a particular OS is because the app they want to use only runs on that OS. Once that app becomes useless/annoying to them then there's nothing stopping going back to the OS they want to use.
What if the system has more than one user and the both play that game? Wouldn't it be neat if when user A logs in, the saved games are his and not of user B's?
Slashdot Mirror
... take it.
His point is that it's not the hiring company that thought he wasn't suitable, the recruitment agency thought that.
The company might have been an awesome place to work for but he couldn't get through the wall of ignorance that the recruitment agency put up.
I suppose I should have written "see". Although I do hear what I read in my head. Does that count?
Me too!
(2 points to whoever gets the reference)
I don't :(
I want to hear more posts like this!
I got my current call off a cold call.
Well to be fair I did have a resume with the agency for years. Most agencies will call you every few years to see if you're thinking of changing jobs. I used to find it annoying but I figured that I do get a benefit from it.
You presume that case where the lady sued McDonalds because the coffee was hot was a frivolous case.
You have to be able to try to sue anyone for anything. It's up to the system to decide which cases are frivolous and which cases are not. Otherwise you may never be able to hold accountable those that should be because on the surface what they did doesn't seem like a big deal.
I think they monitor any e-mail the employee sends; not just personal e-mails. I.e. e-mails that go from Bob the programmer to Jenny the accounts-receivable lady explaining how to use the new version of the "Just Pay Me" software would be analysed to see if Bob is getting sick of working at AAA Dodads.
A lot of people treat it that way and that's where value investors make their money.
Take a listen to Roger Montgomery's latest ASX podcast/talk
Audio: http://secure-au.imrworldwide.com/cgi-bin/b?cg=av&ci=asx&tu=http://www.asx.com.au/podcast/asx-investor-hour-2012021.mp3
Slides: http://secure-au.imrworldwide.com/cgi-bin/b?cg=av&ci=asx&tu=http://www.asx.com.au/documents/slides/asx-investor-hour-20120221.pdf
His philosophy gels well with nerds like us. He likes to treat his investing as if he were buying a whole business instead of little numbers on a screen.
I sort of share your view but keep in mind that most investors will want a company to keep all of its profits and NOT pay dividends while the company is still able to make a larger return on that retained profit.
Apple has so much retained profit that it can't use it fast enough to stimulate growth. So the best thing to do is to pay some of that profit off as a dividend.
To put it another way: retaining profit and not paying dividends is the thing a company should do while it can still grow. If a company can make 30% return on equity (number out of thin air) then you want them to keep the equity they create so they can make another 30% next year. When that return on equity drops to below what you can get investing in another company or a bank account then give the investors the profits and let them put in other shares or just in a bank account.
Think of investing as a higher interest earning bank account that requires you to do a shit-tonne of analysis to make sure your money is always invested in the right place.
But wouldn't the developer discount their app if they don't get the sales numbers they were after? If I were selling an app at $5 and no one bought it I'd try to price it down to $2.50 or something and see how it went. Isn't that the process you're talking about?
Isn't that the same as your $10M house example? If my house were on the market for $10M and no one bought it, then it'd be on the market for a year (or month, whatever) before I finally cracked and reduced the price to something that would sell.
Sure the app store doesn't have that direct price negotiation but neither does a website with an app for purchase. I can't just negotiate a cheaper price with Adobe for Photoshop! But Adobe can reduce the price of the software if they feel the lower price will yield more sales.
The 30% that Apple takes is a bargain! Let them handle distribution, credit card payment and to some degree marketing & exposure.
You're not helping the developer by not buying their app just because you don't want Apple taking the developer's money. The fact is that the developer can focus on coding rather than all the messy human stuff thanks to Apple.
Same here! Guys make the same sound too. I love Marco Arment but sometimes listening to his pod cast is tiring because he's constantly speaking with a creaky voice.
Named, not names
lol I suck
You're, not your're
Canon, not Cannon (the company isn't names after a way to shoot things)
Take a chill pill Phil!
Seriously. Sorry, I know there are a lot of programmers on Slashdot and you think you know everything there is about computers, but most software developers I've known, no matter how brilliant, don't understand how to do IT support. They don't know how to make a stable system. They're one step away from the guy who wants admin access to his own machine because he upgraded his own video card once and he "knows what he's doing".
Now depending on the situation, it may still be a good idea to give developers some more leeway, but only because they need it. It can be a necessary evil, but be sure to have an "software developer" image ready, because they *will* trash their computers and expect you to fix it immediately.
I don't mean to make flamebait, but it needs to be said.
Yeah fair enough. Sometimes we do need more privileges but I agree that even a developer that *does* know what he's doing will still lunch his computer at some point. Whenever I've needed help from IT (I'm a developer) I've always been apologetic and accepted their time constraints. Are not most developers like this?
I don't buy it as a hipster e-penis. So I have no interest in wasting my time with rigid-functionality cripple-gadgets.)
THEN DON'T BUY IT!
I don't see the value in a Louis Vutton wallet because in my opinion they look awful and are overly expensive for what they are. I don't, though, go around criticising people for having them. I just make my choice as a FREE CONSUMER and not buy one.
I used to think Apple fanboys were preachy and annoying but they have nothing on the Andriod Ninnies that feel the need for everyone to have Android phones.
For some people the only reason they use a particular OS is because the app they want to use only runs on that OS. Once that app becomes useless/annoying to them then there's nothing stopping going back to the OS they want to use.
Pretty much yeah ... I can't tell you what the PIN for my credit card is but I can type it out if you give me a key pad that ISN'T upside down!
I mean really ... why the hell are there keypads with 7 8 & 9 on the bottom!? Madness!
haha that sounded like the 'things I care more about than you' rant by Dr Cox in Scrubs! ... oh wait, I'm the only one that watches that show
He explained what he meant. How is that comment 'Informative' anyway?
What if the system has more than one user and the both play that game? Wouldn't it be neat if when user A logs in, the saved games are his and not of user B's?
Ubuntu using Compiz chews RAM and processing power too but I still use it.
Oh wait I forgot where I am ... yeah M$ am teh fail lulz
Thanks Dr Phil!
You obviously wouldn't upgrade until you've stopped using magic quotes.