Not surprising at all. When a company takes on a new CEO he looks to get some easy wins quickly, and cutting employees makes the company seem "lean and mean." In the case of Satya, we may not expect him to lay off the employees who stood in the way of his rise to power -- he doesn't seem tyrannical like Jobs or maniacal like his predecessor Ballmer. But if he ever wanted retribution, now is the time.
or Win 8.1 update 1 (start button? not start menu? wtf Microsoft? they truly don't get it.
or OSX Mavericks (anyone ever test mail.app before fucking up your customers' emails? and to make labels dots to the far right of files and folders is FAR less convenient than coloring the actual files and folders themselves. Just like how apple fucked up labels when they took them out of OSX, then re-added them wrongly.
the real difference is that the owners are people, and are supposed to abide by laws, but as corporations, there are few forms of punishment that stick. corporations have all the benefits of people, yet none of the responsibilities
I can see from the statements above (which are difficult to decipher) that the powers in charge are pretty much brain dead. Taxis provide a ton of licensing money to cities, but my experiences with Uber were much better than taxi experiences. The drivers always showed up, the ride was cleaner than a taxi, and although it was expensive it still costs less than owning a car and paying for maintenance and insurance. Even if they ban "uber" there's no way to prevent private citizens from trying to earn a little scratch.
It's not really a noble act to steal digital documents. Just because you can doesn't mean you should. Sorry about the suicide but that's just how things turn out sometimes, dawin-wise.
The sexual assault comes from hiring hookers and not following their terms of the verbal agreement -- "wear a condom or don't have sex". The hookers were totally in the right for calling Assange out for being an asshole.
could you commit suicide with the oculus rift by jumping off a fake grand canyon and suffering a heart attack? or commit murder by making someone view a frightening VR world?
or Kris. or Jo/e
Not surprising at all. When a company takes on a new CEO he looks to get some easy wins quickly, and cutting employees makes the company seem "lean and mean." In the case of Satya, we may not expect him to lay off the employees who stood in the way of his rise to power -- he doesn't seem tyrannical like Jobs or maniacal like his predecessor Ballmer. But if he ever wanted retribution, now is the time.
nice
https://www.google.com/search?...
you have a bad credit score? no bank account for you, ya lousy bum
the quickest way to a cashless society is make everybody broke.
no more beef for the 99%. we'll all be eating bugs in the future.
http://news.nationalpost.com/2...
or perhaps it's from a stargate
thanks, nathan, you scumsucking patent troll!
or Win 8.1 update 1 (start button? not start menu? wtf Microsoft? they truly don't get it.
or OSX Mavericks (anyone ever test mail.app before fucking up your customers' emails? and to make labels dots to the far right of files and folders is FAR less convenient than coloring the actual files and folders themselves. Just like how apple fucked up labels when they took them out of OSX, then re-added them wrongly.
the internet is made up of people, and people inherently cannot be trusted.
the real difference is that the owners are people, and are supposed to abide by laws, but as corporations, there are few forms of punishment that stick. corporations have all the benefits of people, yet none of the responsibilities
I can see from the statements above (which are difficult to decipher) that the powers in charge are pretty much brain dead. Taxis provide a ton of licensing money to cities, but my experiences with Uber were much better than taxi experiences. The drivers always showed up, the ride was cleaner than a taxi, and although it was expensive it still costs less than owning a car and paying for maintenance and insurance. Even if they ban "uber" there's no way to prevent private citizens from trying to earn a little scratch.
fucking jesus. these government assholes are so full of crap. but then again, i repeat myself.
It's not really a noble act to steal digital documents. Just because you can doesn't mean you should. Sorry about the suicide but that's just how things turn out sometimes, dawin-wise.
The sexual assault comes from hiring hookers and not following their terms of the verbal agreement -- "wear a condom or don't have sex". The hookers were totally in the right for calling Assange out for being an asshole.
she can find the cloud behind every silver lining
and my 128-bit crypto-key
this:
http://www.theonion.com/video/...
i hope he has a whole wing devoted to jar jar binks
if other nations want to limit google searches to only "favorable" found sets, then HELL NO do not give away control over the internet.
in this crappy economy, there's only so many people who can afford luxury cars like the prius and organic meat, yadda yadda.
how many pings fit in a wallow?
Since there's a ton of scanned, searchable PDF D&D books, that did NOT come from the copyright-holder, I bet WotC is pissed about this result.
I've been saying this for years: as we leave copper telephony behind, E911 services over VOIP must be prioritized over other internet traffic.
could you commit suicide with the oculus rift by jumping off a fake grand canyon and suffering a heart attack? or commit murder by making someone view a frightening VR world?
great point! tesla wanted all warfare to be handled by robots