It is laughable at really, that ISP people think they can travel back in time and claim ownership or part ownership of what someone else has said, done, or thought of first. History cannot be erased. If they can't handle customer 'comment' data belonging absolutely to the customer then they should not present a system capable of taking comments. If they can't handle customer data belonging absolutely to the customer then they shouldn't present a system capable of taking data from the customer.
Rhetorically, basically you start off in life with plenty of food to eat which allows you to grow, and you end up at the end of life with lots of money to EAT? Go figure!
"It takes money to make money." is not true because part of the profit can't be used to travel back in time to the point where the first amount of money was spent in order to declare money made. Money can't be used to effect time travel.
As the victim I know a thief has written some fake news. In rough language, a child is born guilty due to information transference (like electrical spark transference), because the thief had gained information from the victim that enabled the spark and the child to exist, It is very simple, use electricity become a thief. The mere participation in sex is using electricity and results in guilt due to the static potential difference between the female and male in their ground state.
There seems to be a case for some free software that blocks fake news based on the users basic input. For example, I have no children and will never have a child or children. A child born from a thief is in possession of stolen property. Every now and then a fake website pops up with a news story like "Are your teens strung out on tech?" which is obviously fake. Rhetorically, Are you going to die and leave the computers contents with your fake news? It's a bit like running a Nuclear Power station and leaving it to melt down by not shutting it down before dying.
Reminds me of the scientists that thought asking God "So who created you?" was okay and could survive after asking such a question! Science was invented by the mentally ill people!
My boss, when I was at Allied Telesis Labs, while beside his boss, said to me: "As far as you are concerned he (pointing to his boss) is God.". Suffice to say I left with a smile and the delusionals are still in business today. Reminds me of that song, "Everybody wants to rule the world" by the band "Tears for fears".
It is better to accept everything said as being true than be the guilty party telling a lie, when it all unravels. Victims tend to survive (in possibly another life) and the guilty tend to die in prison.
Someone may have forgotten to tell the grad that a lie was told. The lie was, that "the reason for going to school/university was to obtain employment.". The actual reason for school/university is to learn how things were/are made to prepare the student to cope on their own in the outside world.
It is a lot harder for a single person (someone who follows the right-wing philosophy) to manufacture a nuclear bomb, than a UNION of people (those who follow the left-wing philosophy). If Putin did have some influence in making Donald Trump the President of America, I say good on him.
There is a special place in hell for the medical professionals/scientists who used stolen electricity to start the first ever cell division process in a lab. The "can't un-see it" phenomenon might be the end of the human species.
"Trump would be a disaster for innovation.". You can't innovate if you don't have a proper key! Lying = dying. For example, rhetorically, how was the magnetic field created? Those 145 classified themselves as liars by opposing my decision. The message really is as simple as it appears, do as I tell you or die horribly.
One only has to view the Wikipedia article for God, realise that the God article is wrong, and then realise that all other articles are therefore wrong because they are all descended from the God Article (descended from God).
If you have sex and create a baby, you help to make the human species extinct. And there will be no traceable link to the past humans, just like humans have had in the past an instinct to kill something smaller like an elephant stepping on an mouse.
Rhetorically, when will computer scientists ever learn. When the computer builder dies the computer stops working. Recent dying and deaths: The analogue Television. Other examples, dinosaurs, some life species. And there are some things that aren't in books. Just as there will be a future where someone can't recreate something from the past. And incest is just one human species killer marching with the other killers.
Maybe the board and management of Pfizer realised they are heading to being convicted of a crime that has the death penalty as punishment and are positioning themselves so that the tools to allow the punishment to proceed are not available.
Rhetorically, I wonder when computer science teachers are going to start teaching better? For example, free means no cost and no license and no terms and conditions and no privacy policy etcetera. An application that is free for personal use but is not for commercial use IS NOT FREE. It is true and correct that money can never be made as a computer programmer, and that should be drummed into students at ever moment of their tuition and it should also be taught at every moment that if you genuinely don't like computers then you shouldn't use one and that you have to like the computer more than the content of the internet to use the internet. It was called a hobby for a reason. Please don't fall for the IBM crap that the computer was made to help business, or even further back in time that the pen and paper and mathematics were created to help businesses add up the bill. 9 times out of 10 the money for terrorists in the computer industry comes from the reserves of those that are injured and/or handicapped and use a computer as a support tool, and the money is essentially stolen, just like a terrorist takes something causing death, and the disabled don't have the strength or life force left to go through the whole process of saying NO (i.e. a confrontation with someone stronger). As for if those 9 out of 10 disabled people use the internet and/or a computer because they actually like the computer and not what it can do or show for them, that's another issue entirely.
Slashdot Mirror
One can only surmise that the majority, of the senate and ISP's, want the Internet to change to a one-way traffic "PUSH" only data system.
It is laughable at really, that ISP people think they can travel back in time and claim ownership or part ownership of what someone else has said, done, or thought of first. History cannot be erased. If they can't handle customer 'comment' data belonging absolutely to the customer then they should not present a system capable of taking comments. If they can't handle customer data belonging absolutely to the customer then they shouldn't present a system capable of taking data from the customer.
Rhetorically, basically you start off in life with plenty of food to eat which allows you to grow, and you end up at the end of life with lots of money to EAT? Go figure!
"It takes money to make money." is not true because part of the profit can't be used to travel back in time to the point where the first amount of money was spent in order to declare money made. Money can't be used to effect time travel.
The difference between me and you hopefully will not continue to be that I am telling the truth and you continue to copy. Copying is wrong.
As the victim I know a thief has written some fake news. In rough language, a child is born guilty due to information transference (like electrical spark transference), because the thief had gained information from the victim that enabled the spark and the child to exist, It is very simple, use electricity become a thief. The mere participation in sex is using electricity and results in guilt due to the static potential difference between the female and male in their ground state.
There seems to be a case for some free software that blocks fake news based on the users basic input. For example, I have no children and will never have a child or children. A child born from a thief is in possession of stolen property. Every now and then a fake website pops up with a news story like "Are your teens strung out on tech?" which is obviously fake. Rhetorically, Are you going to die and leave the computers contents with your fake news? It's a bit like running a Nuclear Power station and leaving it to melt down by not shutting it down before dying.
Reminds me of the scientists that thought asking God "So who created you?" was okay and could survive after asking such a question! Science was invented by the mentally ill people!
Oh yeah, it was me that was smiling.
My boss, when I was at Allied Telesis Labs, while beside his boss, said to me: "As far as you are concerned he (pointing to his boss) is God.". Suffice to say I left with a smile and the delusionals are still in business today. Reminds me of that song, "Everybody wants to rule the world" by the band "Tears for fears".
It is better to accept everything said as being true than be the guilty party telling a lie, when it all unravels. Victims tend to survive (in possibly another life) and the guilty tend to die in prison.
You've got your definitions of words all wrong. I used to be God.
Not only do I bet she is ugly, I know she is ugly!
Someone may have forgotten to tell the grad that a lie was told. The lie was, that "the reason for going to school/university was to obtain employment.". The actual reason for school/university is to learn how things were/are made to prepare the student to cope on their own in the outside world.
It is a lot harder for a single person (someone who follows the right-wing philosophy) to manufacture a nuclear bomb, than a UNION of people (those who follow the left-wing philosophy). If Putin did have some influence in making Donald Trump the President of America, I say good on him.
There is a special place in hell for the medical professionals/scientists who used stolen electricity to start the first ever cell division process in a lab. The "can't un-see it" phenomenon might be the end of the human species.
Hey females, listen up, at this stage you can leave your prison cell to go plant a tree. For the area, maybe a orange tree is appropriate.
"Trump would be a disaster for innovation.". You can't innovate if you don't have a proper key! Lying = dying. For example, rhetorically, how was the magnetic field created? Those 145 classified themselves as liars by opposing my decision. The message really is as simple as it appears, do as I tell you or die horribly.
One only has to view the Wikipedia article for God, realise that the God article is wrong, and then realise that all other articles are therefore wrong because they are all descended from the God Article (descended from God).
If you have sex and create a baby, you help to make the human species extinct. And there will be no traceable link to the past humans, just like humans have had in the past an instinct to kill something smaller like an elephant stepping on an mouse.
Another in the march is the Wikipedia article for God.
Rhetorically, when will computer scientists ever learn. When the computer builder dies the computer stops working. Recent dying and deaths: The analogue Television. Other examples, dinosaurs, some life species. And there are some things that aren't in books. Just as there will be a future where someone can't recreate something from the past. And incest is just one human species killer marching with the other killers.
Mark is not a dictator as he can't time travel. Rhetorically, besides, when did the word dictator become a bad thing? God is a dictator.
Maybe the board and management of Pfizer realised they are heading to being convicted of a crime that has the death penalty as punishment and are positioning themselves so that the tools to allow the punishment to proceed are not available.
Rhetorically, I wonder when computer science teachers are going to start teaching better? For example, free means no cost and no license and no terms and conditions and no privacy policy etcetera. An application that is free for personal use but is not for commercial use IS NOT FREE. It is true and correct that money can never be made as a computer programmer, and that should be drummed into students at ever moment of their tuition and it should also be taught at every moment that if you genuinely don't like computers then you shouldn't use one and that you have to like the computer more than the content of the internet to use the internet. It was called a hobby for a reason. Please don't fall for the IBM crap that the computer was made to help business, or even further back in time that the pen and paper and mathematics were created to help businesses add up the bill. 9 times out of 10 the money for terrorists in the computer industry comes from the reserves of those that are injured and/or handicapped and use a computer as a support tool, and the money is essentially stolen, just like a terrorist takes something causing death, and the disabled don't have the strength or life force left to go through the whole process of saying NO (i.e. a confrontation with someone stronger). As for if those 9 out of 10 disabled people use the internet and/or a computer because they actually like the computer and not what it can do or show for them, that's another issue entirely.