/. has for number of years pushed political stories masquerading as news, basically the same crap that the MSM pushes through and in many cases regurgitating the same 'news'. I don't even come here often anymore because there is no tech news of interest here (for that I suggest devzone).
Seriously 'Quitter'? These are just people changing jobs; never mind the ones that were laid off or fired. I guess it's too much in the eyes of WSJ to let the peons change their allegiance. I guess they'd prefer the slave workers to keep working until the same place until they die; without raise.
Since this is 4th of July, I give a big FU to WSJ and hooray for some independence and dignity for the average worker.
Even the proton may decay and yet someone actually write a paper (or at least a headline) that suggest no limit on longevity? As our effective mortality rate is a perfect 100% which means there is absolutely zero factual evident to suggest otherwise. Also just from reading the summary, their findings seem to actually indicate the chance of dying does not worse after a certain age but that does not imply no limit on longevity.
And once again some people make the retarded assumption that somehow we are special. From discovery of evolution to special relativity, we found that our notion of 'special' status in the universe is extremely misguided. It is sad and pathetic to keep seeing this from people, maybe even scientists no less.
I know you are trolling but even as a huge fan of Linux, one should know that network kernel codes are known to be better in the BSD world and the latter also have a much stronger focus on security. It is no secret that a lot of system vendor OS are based off on BSD (and no doubt that their licensing also plays a huge part).
His popularity came from his disability; not his actual scientific accomplishment (while still good; is arguably not that great). For example, the former Lucasian Professor Paul Dirac is a much more accomplished physicist than Hawking.
USA didn't stop Hilter (at least it doesn't deserve most of the credit); it's mainly Hilter's defeat in Russia that did him in. You should learn some real history. This is assuming you are ignorant enough to use "we" to mean USA, if not my apologies.
Not discussing whether it is even scientifically feasible, I abhor the idea that people will live "forever" in a youthful human body. Because the last thing that this world needs is the ability for the rich and powerful to live even longer, like some real life vampires that will literally prey on the rest of humanity. Before they solve aging, they better work on improving humanity itself, because biologically we are all selfish monkeys due to our genetics.
US is a much more hypocritical country and a greater threat to the rest of the world in terms of starting war, given its terrible records of warmongering. And idiots who keep shouting China is a totalitarian regime is either a troll and/or no idea how China actually operate. Its government is a meritocracy that has election from its party member. It is not really that much different than in US, instead in US you have the illusion that you vote matters, when all you are doing is just choosing one of the two chosen people (unless someone like Trump comes along, in which case all hell breaks loose and the MSM go apeshit.
Because in Canada they actually care more about the common people interests versus big corporations; which is what democracy should strive to be, politicians voted in by the public should actually look after common people's interest. I'd argue it is even common sense that RIAA or whatever big corporation interest group should not have the power to bankrupt an average consumer who is not commercially profiting, but again in Canada it is also quite unheard of for someone to go bankrupt due to medical issue either.
No shit that US drugs companies care more about $ than helping people, in fact I would say they prefer to make a killing (pun intended) on it. To a greater extent, the same argument goes for/against universal health care as it is really about how much a country values about its citizen's health versus profitability of the its medical/drug industry.
It is not, the original source article is written in English. My point is that as usual,./ didn't read the article and whoever at BBC made a bigger deal when it is clearly that the original article talked about innovation throughout the article.
It just looks like a mistake in their title; the actual article just talks about innovation. Of course, the BBC has to blow it out of proportion and the typical response from the sheep is just.. typical.
At least not until we start achieving some sort of artificial consciousness. Although current Deep Learning type of neural networks are amazing, they are not (considered as) conscious. They also lack imagination and understanding; see https://blog.keras.io/the-limi...
There is no real left or right in US politics, at least not anymore in recent memory. They are both in bed with the corporation and deep state. I think it was CIA that reported the last real left-leaning US president was Jimmy Carter.
Slashdot Mirror
Then don't use windows I guess is the answer..
typo: dzone not devzone..
/. has for number of years pushed political stories masquerading as news, basically the same crap that the MSM pushes through and in many cases regurgitating the same 'news'. I don't even come here often anymore because there is no tech news of interest here (for that I suggest devzone).
Seriously 'Quitter'? These are just people changing jobs; never mind the ones that were laid off or fired. I guess it's too much in the eyes of WSJ to let the peons change their allegiance. I guess they'd prefer the slave workers to keep working until the same place until they die; without raise. Since this is 4th of July, I give a big FU to WSJ and hooray for some independence and dignity for the average worker.
Even the proton may decay and yet someone actually write a paper (or at least a headline) that suggest no limit on longevity? As our effective mortality rate is a perfect 100% which means there is absolutely zero factual evident to suggest otherwise. Also just from reading the summary, their findings seem to actually indicate the chance of dying does not worse after a certain age but that does not imply no limit on longevity.
And once again some people make the retarded assumption that somehow we are special. From discovery of evolution to special relativity, we found that our notion of 'special' status in the universe is extremely misguided. It is sad and pathetic to keep seeing this from people, maybe even scientists no less.
I know you are trolling but even as a huge fan of Linux, one should know that network kernel codes are known to be better in the BSD world and the latter also have a much stronger focus on security. It is no secret that a lot of system vendor OS are based off on BSD (and no doubt that their licensing also plays a huge part).
His popularity came from his disability; not his actual scientific accomplishment (while still good; is arguably not that great). For example, the former Lucasian Professor Paul Dirac is a much more accomplished physicist than Hawking.
Uncovering the truth and doing "The Right Thing".
This study just shows that people with better grades doesn't necessarily use better password; nothing more or less.
Exactly, there are whole cults/religions out there that build churches and it is equally illogical. Most people are on average, pretty illogical.
USA didn't stop Hilter (at least it doesn't deserve most of the credit); it's mainly Hilter's defeat in Russia that did him in. You should learn some real history. This is assuming you are ignorant enough to use "we" to mean USA, if not my apologies.
Not discussing whether it is even scientifically feasible, I abhor the idea that people will live "forever" in a youthful human body. Because the last thing that this world needs is the ability for the rich and powerful to live even longer, like some real life vampires that will literally prey on the rest of humanity. Before they solve aging, they better work on improving humanity itself, because biologically we are all selfish monkeys due to our genetics.
US is a much more hypocritical country and a greater threat to the rest of the world in terms of starting war, given its terrible records of warmongering. And idiots who keep shouting China is a totalitarian regime is either a troll and/or no idea how China actually operate. Its government is a meritocracy that has election from its party member. It is not really that much different than in US, instead in US you have the illusion that you vote matters, when all you are doing is just choosing one of the two chosen people (unless someone like Trump comes along, in which case all hell breaks loose and the MSM go apeshit.
Because in Canada they actually care more about the common people interests versus big corporations; which is what democracy should strive to be, politicians voted in by the public should actually look after common people's interest. I'd argue it is even common sense that RIAA or whatever big corporation interest group should not have the power to bankrupt an average consumer who is not commercially profiting, but again in Canada it is also quite unheard of for someone to go bankrupt due to medical issue either.
No shit that US drugs companies care more about $ than helping people, in fact I would say they prefer to make a killing (pun intended) on it. To a greater extent, the same argument goes for/against universal health care as it is really about how much a country values about its citizen's health versus profitability of the its medical/drug industry.
It is not, the original source article is written in English. My point is that as usual, ./ didn't read the article and whoever at BBC made a bigger deal when it is clearly that the original article talked about innovation throughout the article.
2018 Deconomy conference was held in Seoul, South Korea on April 3-4th. https://www.deconomy.com/
The source article is written in English.
The source article is written in English; you can try reading it.
It just looks like a mistake in their title; the actual article just talks about innovation. Of course, the BBC has to blow it out of proportion and the typical response from the sheep is just .. typical.
At least not until we start achieving some sort of artificial consciousness. Although current Deep Learning type of neural networks are amazing, they are not (considered as) conscious. They also lack imagination and understanding; see https://blog.keras.io/the-limi...
That they did many feasibility studies on how it can withstand earthquake or even storm level wind for that matter.
Through docker which can also run in windows/mac, you can already run many version of Linux.
There is no real left or right in US politics, at least not anymore in recent memory. They are both in bed with the corporation and deep state. I think it was CIA that reported the last real left-leaning US president was Jimmy Carter.