Slashdot Mirror


The Screen Savers Reunited

HABITcky writes "Leo Laporte, Patrick Norton, Kevin Rose, and Robert Heron have gotten together and recorded their first podcast of The Return Of The Screen Savers (ROTSS) It's a 56kbps MP3Pro file weighing in at around 14MB. Join them for 34 minutes of Skyping fun as they discuss driving in the dust, cell phones, Kevin's new webcast, Systm, and the demise of TechTV. They plan to make this a weekly broadcast."

191 comments

  1. I LOVED TSS by CoolSilver · · Score: 0

    I completely love this already. Keep it up guys!

    1. Re:I LOVED TSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It needs Kate. The show just isn't right with out her ...

    2. Re:I LOVED TSS by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I too am glad they're back, and I truely hope they can keep this up. I wonder if this will affect Kevin Rose who is still working for G4TV on Attack of the Show (the renamed Screen Savers which completely blows).

      --
      Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
    3. Re:I LOVED TSS by illumnatLA · · Score: 5, Interesting
      The thing that worked about TSS was that you had Leo who has been a broadcast professional for many years in addition to being a print tech journalist. He was very good with interviews and keeping the show rolling.

      Patrick, also a print journalist, had a bit of geek in him, but was bitter enough about technology to question things rather than drool over the latest new gadget.

      Jessica, of course, eye candy with a brain... what else could you ask for???

      Kevin Rose was always better doing his little bit pieces than he ever was a host.

      Sarah just annoys me (and I hear from a friend of mine who was a set painter for the LA version of TSS that when they first got down here, little Sarah was stomping around bitching about how their set wasn't nearly as cool looking as Martin Sargent's--of course look where he is now.)

      G4 is now using that lovely Hollywood idea of creating programming by looking at the marketing numbers... "Well, my Excel sheet says that if we change TSS to 'Attack of the Show' blah, blah, blah." Merely the fact that they have wardrobe people should tell you something. Do you think Patrick Norton could've gotten away with wearing his utility kilt on G4?

      Yep... Everything that made TechTV semi-interesting to watch has gone away. Why did G4 even bother to buy TechTV?? Oh, yeah, that's right, TechTV actually had dial space on many cable and satellite systems. G4 didn't because who would actually want to watch a network who's programming was pretty much exclusively gaming?

      Here's an example of the brilliant G4 programming: "Cinematech"
      From G4's website
      Complementing the gameplay of many high-end games is an extraordinary assortment of cinematics and trailers. The quality of these mini-movies is so incredible that gamers and non-gamers alike watch them repeatedly, simply for the entertainment value. So dim the lights, grab a bag of popcorn and watch.
      Yep... nothing like watching the screen of someone playing a video game for a half hour. Why, it's so in depth it gives me chills. The creator of that program must be cut from the cloth of the finest tapestry.

      Anyway... listen to the Podcast. It's interesting to hear Kevin Rose and Robert Heron talk about the TV by marketing numbers that G4 is using. Hopefully the podcast will continue on and eventually become a video cast of some sort.

      BTW, here's the direct link to the podcast if you're using some sort of podcast receiving software:

      http://leoville.tv/podcasts/tlr

      --J
      --
      Web hosting that doesn't suck!Dreamhost
    4. Re:I LOVED TSS by JustinCredible · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Cinematech is actually the one show I found to be interesting on G4, it's just game trailers for upcoming games. It's a nice thing to watch for a few minutes when you're eating or something. It's not like you watch some dudes play counterstrike for 30 minutes, that is another one of their shows, arena I believe.

    5. Re:I LOVED TSS by RubberDogBone · · Score: 2, Informative
      Cinematech is not"just game trailers for upcoming games" as you said.

      It's cutscenes, FMV, trailers, and whatever else from old games, new games, upcoming games, etc. Mostly cutscenes and intros. Not many trailers.

      That's not to say any of it is actually GOOD, because damn little of it IS good. It's just that it's not merely trailers for upcoming games. Nitpicking.

      Yes, Arena is the show where you watch other people play games. Arena is a microcosm of what's wrong with G4: anyone who plays video games or computer games would most likely prefer to PLAY the games themselves rather than watch SOMEBODY ELSE play the games.

      If they have time or the desire to sit there and watch other people play, either they're too broke to buy games (great advertising demo: the poor and broke!) or they lost the TV remote and can't change the channel, OR they're stuck in a hospital bed with broken limbs and can't change the channel.

      I deliberately configured my office so I cannot see the TV when I am working at my computer. I used to leave Tech TV on just as background noise all day long. Can't do that with G4 because it's too boring. Instead I tend to leave the Science channel (whoo! Slightly better than G4 anyway), NWI (bye), or my DVD player screensaver running.

      --
      Sig for hire.
    6. Re:I LOVED TSS by genrader · · Score: 1

      Gah, how long did you watch TSS for? It already went down the drain when they got rid of Megan and Morgan and gave Martin Sargent his own stupid TV show. By the time Sarah and Jessica were on there, TSS got really boring.

    7. Re:I LOVED TSS by thegoogler · · Score: 1
      Uhhm.. not that im a major fan of cinematech or anything, but i just wanted to point out your somewhat of an error(flamebait?):
      Complementing the gameplay of many high-end games is an extraordinary assortment of cinematics and trailers. The quality of these mini-movies

      uhhm... no.. what they show(or what they used to, i haven't watched g4 for a while) is cutscenes/intro sequences to games, 3dcg/high rez prerendered stuff, and ocasionally a few short(30 sec/1 minute) clips of games that haven't come out yet, but its mostly just cutscenes/story movies from games.. not gameplay.

      and yea, its not that great. either were most of there dud idea's for shows

    8. Re:I LOVED TSS by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      totally agree.
      Jessica had a brain? whaaa???? If she didi, it wasn't when it came to technology. She didn't know crap about computers. She is hot, but the coupld of times they had her cohost were jaughable at best.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    9. Re:I LOVED TSS by funkify · · Score: 2, Interesting

      of course look where he is now

      Well, where is Martin Sargent now? Is Unscrewed cancelled? What is he doing? I thought he was cool, and I would be curious to know where I could see him. TIA.

    10. Re:I LOVED TSS by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      Megan left because she was pregnant.

  2. Very cool.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Very cool..

    Now all they need is a few DV cams and a QTSS (QuickTime Streaming Server) and a big pipe.

    Viva la Revolution!!!!

  3. Cool by nocomment · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sounds like it might be cool. But not as cool as Slashdot Radio was.

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    1. Re:Cool by Soko · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sounds like it might be cool. But not as cool as Slashdot Radio [thesync.com] was.

      Moderation: (-1, Asskissing)

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:Cool by AndyL · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought when I read this. Glad I'm not the only one.

    3. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LUG Radio is rather enjoyable. It's Linux centric so don't bother listening if you don't know what Linux is.

    4. Re:Cool by Cylix · · Score: 1

      I thought slashdot radio was funny.

      Sure they just rehashed the last weeks slashdot, but there were some laughs in there.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  4. Who are these people... by kunwon1 · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...And why do we care?

    --
    Specialization is for insects. -Heinlein
    1. Re:Who are these people... by Sebby · · Score: 4, Insightful
      here

      Pretty much the only interesting information show TechTV had, and G4 wished it had.

      --

      AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    2. Re:Who are these people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      On behalf of the Slashdot moderators I would like to sincerely apologize. We didn't realize we posted a story about people that kunwon1 (user since February 2005, webmaster of the incredibly popular akadave.com) doesn't know or care about. This simply isn't the place for esoteric or "geek" knowledge, particularly about hosts of a long-fogotten television show on an obscure network.

      Our new motto, as approved by our parent company ThinkGeek(tm): It Just Works. All stories must be accessible by everyone, dammit! Please accept our apologies, another story about the demise of Star Trek Enterprise is on the way!

    3. Re:Who are these people... by c.emmertfoster · · Score: 1

      So popular, in fact, that his site has been Slashdotted. Wowzas.

      --
      We can neither love nor pity nor forgive. If you make a slip in handling us you die!
    4. Re:Who are these people... by mangus_angus · · Score: 1

      You DARE call yourself a geek?!

    5. Re:Who are these people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do your research before you start bashing or ill write a bash script to blast you to smithereens

    6. Re:Who are these people... by Adrilla · · Score: 2, Informative

      G4 did have it, they decided to 'tweak' it until it became the unwatchable incarnation that is now called "Attack of the Show"

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    7. Re:Who are these people... by Sexy+Bern · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Mod parent up.

      Not all slashdotters are American, or are in America.

      Same goes for the "politics.slashdot.org" masthead. Stars and stripes for an EU (Mandelson/Microsoft) story? FFS.

  5. Kate... by Keamos · · Score: 1

    They should get Kate in on it. I never cared for Patrick when I knew Kate is still around.

    1. Re:Kate... by Cocteaustin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I too miss Kate. Before she made it big on the tube we used to temp together at BigCo(tm). Good times, good times. Looks like she's plying her trade in NYC now...

    2. Re:Kate... by Araxen · · Score: 1

      Kate was annoying. Patrick is miles better and actually has a clue about computers.

    3. Re:Kate... by thirty2bit · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'd rather have a root canal than listen to Kate's whiny voice. Patrick was way better of a co-host for Leo. And he's more technically adept than Kate. She's just not a techno-babe.

  6. Great News! by XMetal2001 · · Score: 2

    While I was never a huge fan of the show(back when it was decent), it was pretty entertaining and worth watching. What G4 has done to the channel drives me crazy. I want the old TechTV days back!

    1. Re:Great News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's friday night. I'm a loser.

    2. Re:Great News! by vdub12 · · Score: 0

      I know what you mean G4 sucks. It was a tech channel and they turned it in to a gaming channel. The only reson the got it was so they could get satlite viewers. They planed on killing TechTV from the begining

    3. Re:Great News! by jav1231 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, there was something about Kate you couldn't put your finger one. What with restraining orders and stalking laws.

    4. Re:Great News! by drfishy · · Score: 1

      TechTV? Bleh, whatever, bring ZDTV back! Long live Kate Botello!

    5. Re:Great News! by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Forget that, I want the old ZDTV days back! Back then, TSS was actually +1 Informative instead of -1 Redundant.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  7. hmm by Tomfrh · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    sounds fascinating doesn't it..

    1. Re:hmm by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "sounds fascinating doesn't it.."

      I thought Mr. Spock couldn't use contractions!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:hmm by werewolf1031 · · Score: 1
      I thought Mr. Spock couldn't use contractions!

      You're thinking of Data. But to confuse one for the other is quite understandable...

      McCoy: "You a Vulcan, son? I don't see no pointed ears."
      Data: "No sir. I am an android."
      McCoy: "Almost as bad..."

    3. Re:hmm by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "I thought Mr. Spock couldn't use contractions!"

      Good lord. There's a question that should be on the Slashdot registration form, right under the "are you over 13" bit.

    4. Re:hmm by Tore+S+B · · Score: 1

      I thought Mr. Spock couldn't use contractions!

      You are probably thinking of Data. But the actor did accidentaly use contractions several times, which didn't stop Wesley crusher from realizing that Lore, Data's evil twin, was posing as Data in one episode.

      Surprisingly, I do not live with my parents.

      --
      toresbe
  8. Cool, I've missed them by Sebby · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Ever since G4, I've basically stopped watching "TechTV" since it's no longer, well, 'TechTV'. TSS was just about the only info show I watched on it (besides battlebots etc), and pretty much the only raison d'être of the station. Glad to see they're back in this format.

    US stations have such a knack for taking great channels (or TV shows), and totally foobar them in a vain attempt to 'improve' them.

    --

    AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    1. Re:Cool, I've missed them by LoadStar · · Score: 1
      Ever since G4, I've basically stopped watching "TechTV" since it's no longer, well, 'TechTV'. TSS was just about the only info show I watched on it (besides battlebots etc), and pretty much the only raison d'être of the station. Glad to see they're back in this format.

      BattleBots was a Comedy Central production. The show that was on TechTV was rebroadcasts of BBC's Robot Wars, I believe. Yes, I know, I'm probably nitpicking.

    2. Re:Cool, I've missed them by Sebby · · Score: 1
      I'm probably nitpicking.

      Of course you are!

      Naah!, I'm kidding. It's also rerun on other channels too. What I meant was that TSS was *the* show worth getting the channel for; the others were just icing on the cake. Not sure I would've gotten it if TSS hadn't been there.

      --

      AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    3. Re:Cool, I've missed them by Soko · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you can get Canadian cable, you can catch Leo on Call for Help. Almost like the Screen Savers, and Amber is hawt.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    4. Re:Cool, I've missed them by Minced · · Score: 1

      Well you got to understand the fact you have to carefully cultivate idiots so that you can manipulate them later on.

    5. Re:Cool, I've missed them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is hard to understand the thinking at G4.

      Why does G4 not relent and give us techie types just a little more tech than games and the fluff?

      Why does PBS or some other channel not pick up on the concept. Seems like there might be a demand for a TSS like program (more tech and less fluff).

      TSS is really missed!

    6. Re:Cool, I've missed them by GeorgeMcBay · · Score: 4, Insightful


      US stations have such a knack for taking great channels (or TV shows), and totally foobar them in a vain attempt to 'improve' them.


      The blame really belongs to the viewers, not the stations.

      If these good shows were doing at all well in the ratings, the network execs wouldn't dare to change a thing. Generally when they "screw up a good show" it is a last ditch effort to try to find a viewership when everything else has failed. Since they aren't in the business of losing money, there is really nobody to blame but the masses.. for not tuning in to quality shows.

    7. Re:Cool, I've missed them by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I haven't watched TV for a couple years now, but I caught a few shows on G4 this week. It's okay, but it's entirely game oriented and few of the people are likeable. They all seem like wannabe actresses and actors just taking whatever job they can get. With only a few exceptions, they seem like people who probably walk off the set when filming is done and sneer at the retarded dorks they have to cater to. Especially that block-necked guy who hosts that show where teams compete in videogames on the air.

      As far as hot chicks - there's only really Morgan Webb (which, really, should be more than enough for anybody) and the blonde punkish chick from that show with the douchebag guy and some other chick. Whatever happened to Jessika from TechTV? Hot little red head. Yum.

      I really think that the best venue for the quality guys from TechTV (this includes Kevin Rose, Yoshi, Leo, Patrick and a few others) is online. Ditch the network and produce your own material. Distribute it via BitTorrent in xvid format. Kind of following up on Kevin Rose's website.

      I'm not much for television and even less for TechTV/G4. As it is, I will probably switch to G4 when I'm really bored and need some background noise.

    8. Re:Cool, I've missed them by Harker · · Score: 1

      I still watch G4 to some extent, but really there are only two shows worth watching (Anime Unleashed (sometimes) and X-Play) and I'm glad they finally dropped the Screensavers name from the show, since it really isn't any more.

      The new show is Ok on it's own, but pretty lame at times. *shrug* Maybe it'll improve, but I doubt it.

      This (the podcast) is a good thing, IMO. I miss the original crew. Hopefully, they'll bring back what we used to get with TechTV.

      H.

      --
      When VCR's are outlawed, only outlaws will have VCR's.
    9. Re:Cool, I've missed them by multipartmixed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > there is really nobody to blame but the masses..

      No... we can blame the Neilsen Families. I say we round 'em up and lynch 'em.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    10. Re:Cool, I've missed them by AliasMoze · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Amber is hawt." Of course she is. Her freakin' name is Amber.

    11. Re:Cool, I've missed them by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's EMBER, not Amber. ;)

      --
      "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
      -- Ryan Stiles
    12. Re:Cool, I've missed them by ekwhite · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't believe you are correct in this case. TechTV actually had HIGHER ratings than G4. Comcast Cable, the owner of G4, bought TechTV from Paul Allen with the express intent of getting rid of the competition. What I can't understand is why G4 did not keep the best shows,as it would have only improved their competitive position. They must have the WORST programmers ever.

    13. Re:Cool, I've missed them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they seem like people who probably walk off the set when filming is done and sneer at the retarded dorks they have to cater to.

      I get that impression as well. To which I respond, "fuck you guys."

    14. Re:Cool, I've missed them by oDDmON+oUT · · Score: 1

      Why does G4 not relent and give us techie types just a little more tech than games and the fluff?

      There's not enough money in it.

      Why does PBS or some other channel not pick up on the concept. Seems like there might be a demand for a TSS like program (more tech and less fluff).

      The bottom line anymore is to make profits in syndication, advertising may cover production costs.

      How interesting would it be to hear about Blaster removal three years after the initial release?

      --
      Some days it's just not worth
      chewing through my restraints.
    15. Re:Cool, I've missed them by innerweb · · Score: 1
      Its a cable company. Just like Reality TV, they look for the most profitable venue, not the best venue.

      That is one reason why I still firmly believe that distributors of content and producers of content are an unholy marriage.

      InnerWeb

      --
      Freud might say that Intelligent Design is religion's ID.
    16. Re:Cool, I've missed them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You miss the point. TechTV was more profitable than G4. It had more viewers. It had higher wage viewers, hence, more profitable advertisers.

      Sure, the schlock on G4 is cheap to produce, but so was the much better quality material on TechTV. They were both pretty inexpensive to produce. But TechTV earned its large audience over many years, G4 merely bought it out, and I'll wager they aren't making as much money as they would have if Comcast had kept them as two seperate channels.

    17. Re:Cool, I've missed them by LuxFX · · Score: 1

      ...pretty much the only raison d'être of the station

      There was an extremely cool series that TechTV used to show called "Big Thinkers," with each episode on a modern geniuses like Michio Kaku, Scott Adams, and Neal Stephenson. That show became my 'other' reason to watch TechTV. It was only on for a while though....

      I keep wishing the show would come out on DVD. But I'm betting that since G4 that possibility has gone from bad to worse.

      --
      Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
    18. Re:Cool, I've missed them by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Amber's nervous/unstable-sounding laughter gives me the shivers. Monica was way hotter.

    19. Re:Cool, I've missed them by Aaton · · Score: 1
      Its all about consolidation of resources. When G4/Comcast grabbed TechTV they removed the competitions and they didn't want to run two studio's. One had to go. The studio in the S.F. closes it doors and if you weren't willing to move your were out of a job. I just guessing since some of the hosts moved while others stayed.

      I use to like TSS from time to time, heck my girlfriend who is not that tech savvy liked the show alot. Now with the "Attack of the (stupid) Show" its mind less and dull. With choppy jump cuts and randomly babbling hosts. They have a short sit down chat with the guest which can be good but after that it channel flipping time.

      Even the set design looks like its being shot at one of those poorly supported community public access studios. The production quality of the G4 studio shows to me always looks flat and cheap. Maybe they could save some more bucks and just make it a radio show or podcast if they don't want to higher another set designe team and turn on some more lights.

      Maybe being in my 30's I'm completely out of there demograhics now. TechTV's TSS worked for everyone before it was purchased. I knew teens and 50+ year olds who watched the show. Now is seems to me G4 really only cares about the 8 - 25 year old market.

    20. Re:Cool, I've missed them by writermike · · Score: 1

      If these good shows were doing at all well in the ratings, the network execs wouldn't dare to change a thing. Generally when they "screw up a good show" it is a last ditch effort to try to find a viewership when everything else has failed.

      I see your point.

      But one must wonder if the sampling technology used to determine a shows viewship is hopelessly inadequate sometimes.

      If the data says that 5,000 geeks watch it, then perhaps instead of trying to make the show appeal to the general "more people," they should find out why THOSE geeks like it and then tweak the show to make it more palatable to the millions of similar-geeks who aren't watching for some reason.

      --
      If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
    21. Re:Cool, I've missed them by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      Canada and some Australian providers, actually (not on G4, there's some tech channel or something in Australia that picked it up). It beats everything else on Call for Help, just a shame that the American G4 hasn't the sense to show it.

      Not sure which program it replaces on the Canadian G4, it's all junk anyways.

    22. Re:Cool, I've missed them by Starsmore · · Score: 1
      Attack of the Show is just yesterday's Slashdot frontpage, most of the time.

      Their whole advertising is so out of whack. 'We get you the good sh*t before it's gone!'. BS. It should be 'We'll show you yesterday's slashdot news today!'

      --
      "If Common Sense was so common, it wouldn't be such a valued trait."
  9. My only hope.... by Y-Crate · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ....being that they can get Kate Botello to make a few guest appearances. Then it will be a true reunion.

  10. Leo Was Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He was what made that show watchable. And, as far as I know, he was the only one with any previous experience in that field. Kevin and the new batch are kinda' out of their element on Live TV, in my opinion.

    Leo knew when the guest was becoming uninteresting, and would switch the subject - fast. The new breed kinda' drag on, and commit the most cardinal sin of Live Broadcast: stand in silence.

    But, they're prettier than the old ones, I guess. Have to keep the eyecandy on display for their new audience...

    1. Re:Leo Was Good by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I could only take Leo in small doses. I understand that he has his fans. And he seems like he's a nice enough guy. But I cringed whenever he got the bit between his teeth and started on one of his kicks.

      Having said that - I thought worked well teamed up with Patrick Norton. Patrick delivered the info. And when he was busy searching or otherwise occupied, Leo did a nice job at keeping everyone distracted. And, as you pointed out, Leo had a good feel for how (and when) to get the show moving along.

    2. Re:Leo Was Good by globalar · · Score: 1

      The whole concept is really all about conversation and information sharing. Leo is well-versed in both - so well in fact that he draws these qualities out of other people and gets them talking. Half the time I want to join in on the conversation with some info and ask a couple questions. That's the mark of a good show right there.

      I bet this can be done with only audio just as well - let's hope Leo sees what he has here.

  11. Bah! by Queer+Boy · · Score: 3, Funny

    What's the point of reuniting the Screen Savers if I can't ogle Patrick Norton?

    --
    Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    1. Re:Bah! by istewart · · Score: 3, Funny

      Those with a puritanical bent can pretend that the parent poster actually typed "Kate Botello."

    2. Re:Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'd rather ogle both of them.

  12. Ummmm... by ghoda_x · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...first podcast of The Return Of The Screen Savers (ROTSS)...

    In TFA it's called Revenge of the Screen Savers.

    --

    Give me but one firm spot on which to stand, and I will move the earth.
    - Archimedes
    1. Re:Ummmm... by HABITcky · · Score: 1

      Shit. My bad.

    2. Re:Ummmm... by VValdo · · Score: 3, Funny

      In TFA it's called Revenge of the Screen Savers.

      It may be now, but I hear an original "Return of the Screen Savers" poster is worth a lot of $ on ebay...

      W

      --
      -------------------
      This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    3. Re:Ummmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you.

      Let me repeat that.

      FUCK YOU.

      Now I have Pepsi covering my monitor, courtesy of my nostrils. :p

    4. Re:Ummmm... by EMH_Mark3 · · Score: 1

      They probably called it 'Return Of The Screen Savers' in the blurb to cut down on bootlegged promotionnal material :)

      --
      Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me
  13. The Screen Savers by Space_Soldier · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I used to watch it during 2000-2002. After that, I only watched during sweapstake answers live hour:08 - hour:15 (I still didn't watch the show). After that, as you all know, it went down hill. The marketing geniuses that come from the same pool that keep bringing us crappy movies thought that they'll be able to teach us what quality is, and that they will make a few dollars at the same time. They were wrong, and a good show was destroyed. A little more time passed and the entire station was destroyed. Maybe Leo and Patrick they will make a video show like The Broken if the audio show is successful.

    1. Re:The Screen Savers by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      TV stations are really becoming irrelivant. Imagine if amature video ventures like The Broken, and the potential this has all start to take off. Now think future generation(or hack-modded) tivos/xboxes/cable boxes/whatever being able to automaticly subscribe for new shows when they come out just as easily as you could subscribe to a tivo season pass of something on cable. There will be no difference to the end user,and we'll all be better off.
      The downside of course is funding and publicity, but those arnt nearly as important if you're making a show to make a good show rather than to make money.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
  14. Thine Blasphemy haft been Thwarted!! by Forezt · · Score: 0

    The unfaithful hath denounced the second coming of The Screensavers! But behold, my brothers and sisters, for thine holy light shall shine again... ;)

  15. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do the editors make such a folly? Honestly...

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Keamos · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Slashdot. You must be new here.

  16. Where are the geek-babes! by OmegaGeek · · Score: 1

    I think this is a great idea! Leo and Patrick ruled on TSS, and since they've gone I cancelled my subscription to G4TechTV. Only one thing is needed to make this complete - bring back Jessica Corbin!!

    --
    Even heroes have the right to dream
    1. Re:Where are the geek-babes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good thing you did, after that happend they got rid of leo and patrick. that left kevin and sara, and brought in alex. It was bad but tolerable to watch, alex wasnt a patrick replacement but atleast he was funny and knew what he was talking about. After the warez incedent, they replaced him with a dork and a chick. They make the show absolutly unwatchable to this day.

    2. Re:Where are the geek-babes! by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      What warez incident?

  17. The Site by ClosedSource · · Score: 2, Informative

    I only watched Leo Laporte on The Site. That was back in the early days of MSNBC when they actually tried to do something different.

    In those days the motto for The News with Brian Williams was "It's not your father's news program". Then before you knew it, MSNBC was too conservative to be your father's news channel.

  18. Interesting Idea... by jsight · · Score: 1

    It's interesting to see this show returning, even in this limited form. It would be nice if they had a version with video.

    I wonder if there's still some hope of another network picking this up at some point?

  19. Torrent by numbski · · Score: 1

    http://www.numbski.net/downloads/TLR20050417.mp3.t orrent

    In case anyone is interested.

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    1. Re:Torrent by mrterrysilver · · Score: 1

      torrent isn't working. anyone have a working one?

      --
      -mr silver
  20. MP3Pro?? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    MP3Pro??

    WTF?

    Yeah, I know it is backwards compatible with regular mp3 players, but who just about nobody uses it, or has the "pro" decoder part installed. They should have gone with regular mp3 for backwards compatibility and a second copy with a completely different, more efficient low-bitrate codec like wma.

    (Now, who thought I was going to say vorbis?)

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re: MP3Pro?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Now, who thought I was going to say vorbis?)

      You did say vorbis :)

    2. Re: MP3Pro?? by davmoo · · Score: 1

      I wish I had a mod point to give you this week.

      This was my only complaint with RoTSS, their selection of MP3pro. The way Leo, Patrick and Kevin pushed Linux and open source, I thought OGG would have been a lot better choice.

      --
      I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    3. Re: MP3Pro?? by bawdymonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm assuming they didn't go with OGG since iPod doesn't support it (although plenty of alternatives do.)

      The MP3Pro decision was probably based on the fact that it's supposed to have better sound quality than vanilla MP3, IIRC.

    4. Re: MP3Pro?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it has better quality if you have a player that can decode the "pro" part of the stream. A 56 kbps mp3PRO stream would be interpeted by a non "pro" players as a 38 (or so) regular mp3 stream.

      Ohh, and by the way. The iPod does support mp3PRO just as good as OGG Vosbis!

      I would like a low bitrate AAC for us iPodders.

    5. Re: MP3Pro?? by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but this is voice we're talking about. Quality is nearly irrelevant.

    6. Re: MP3Pro?? by shish · · Score: 1
      efficient low-bitrate codec like wma.

      If it's just voices, speex would probably be a lot better

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    7. Re: MP3Pro?? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I don't see why they couldn't provide multiple formats. Ogg for those who know what it is and know its benefits (which will help ogg's midshare grow), MP3 for others who'd rather take longer to download it because they don't know what an "ogg" is, maybe WMA.

  21. It was over long ago. by Before+The+End+Chaos · · Score: 1

    I still want ZDTV back.

    --
    If you think you're a hardcore roleplayer, come prove it to us at ArmageddonMUD.
    1. Re:It was over long ago. by Construct+X · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. I miss it.

  22. An audio show about geeks in cyberspace by scourfish · · Score: 1

    they could call it "Geeks in Spa- oh wait, nevermind.

  23. Nice to hear from them again by boring,+tired · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Leo Laporte was the only good talent on that channel. He was a technology fanatic first and a TV host second. He did a good job of hosting, he seemed like an average guy who knew his stuff, and not a phony TV personality. The others either tried too hard to be cool or were too nerdy. It's a shame he had to leave TechTV but I'd rather see him out there on his own than hosting the suckified version of Screen Savers that exists today.

    1. Re:Nice to hear from them again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      i hated him.. he seemed dumb as a brick

      patrick was smart but leo was always trying to be funny or silly and never got things right and was just really computer illiterate

  24. tss? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    post-leo tss was for tools,
    i mean cmon, saving space in your ipod by getting rid of the album art embedded in the file? ack

    I'm surprised to see so many tools on slashdot drooling over this sound bite.

    leo was/is capable of much more than this pseudo-geek spankfest

    1. Re:tss? by Keamos · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, I'm suprised so many people are drooling over it seeing as Leo took a shot at how shitty (and it's true) Slashdot is...

    2. Re:tss? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      In what sense? Did he just say it sucked in general, or did he have issue with some specific aspect of slashdot?

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    3. Re:tss? by JustinCredible · · Score: 1

      I believe he was commenting on Kevin Rose's digg.com and how it's better than slashdot because some cowboy isn't editing the stories, but it's edited by the people. Something to that effect.

    4. Re:tss? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually he said "some taco" :) mmmmmm taco

  25. Awesome by FyberOptic · · Score: 1

    I pretty much boycotted G4 after they raped TSS to death. Thank goodness they finally took the name off that piece of crap show they replaced it with. Ironically, they replaced it with a totally stupid name!

    But this is great, we get some of the best of the TechTV staff in a radio show. I'll definately be tuning in. No greedy executives involved!

    1. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take cover its ATTACK of the CRAP!

      same garbage... diffent SET! who knew???!!!

  26. AotS by Kadence · · Score: 1

    The new show is definitely way inferior to the old one. And Attack of the Show is a miserable name.

  27. Soledad O'Brian, DevNull, and Cliff Stoll rocked! by green+pizza · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I loved The Site, I watched it almost every weekday for about two years. They canceled it after preempting it with the Princess Diana death broadcasts.

    The Site was the perfect blend of high tech news and tech-related interest stories. I never cared much for ZDTV/TechTV/G4, they were actually "too geeky" in a bad sort of way.

    Leo Laporte was the voice and actor (motion caption) for the tech gossip character "DevNull" (Laporte's old radio handle). He was also "Technical Managing Producer" of the hour-long show, so he did most of his work behind the scenes. The show was actually recorded in the same studio where all of the TechTV shows were, except they had just one huge room, a "working set" where segments were recorded all day while researchers, TV show webmasters, and others were hard at work in the background. These people were often featured in their own segments. It was very cool to hear from the show's own tech people (the show's site was originally hosted on a SPARCstation 20 running Apache and connected to a single T1). I loved the little details like that. And yet they really didn't dwell on the really technical aspects.

    Soledad O'Brian was a great host, I think that job fit her better than the current news gigs she does these days. There was also a really good band of reporters for the show, Craig Miller was awesome, I wonder what he's up to these days? Lots of people from the old science show days from KRON/Discovery Channel.

    Cliff Stoll ended each weekday show with about 5 minutes of insight, rants, and stories from his home in Berkeley.

    TheSite was a nice grounded "magazine" look into the dotcom world. They interviewed a lot of visionaries and up-and-coming people in the industry. Lots of cool viewpoints and persepctives. Too bad their budget didn't allow for travel beyond the SF Bay / Silicon Valley area.

    I really miss TheSite, but there won't even be anything like it. Even in it's best days, The Screen Savers was just a bunch of unwashed geeks hanging around Leo Laporte. Lots of geek details, flash, and no substance. *sigh*

  28. TheSite was even better than TSS by green+pizza · · Score: 2, Informative

    Laporte's original TV gig, TheSite, was even better. See more here

    TheSite was one of the first shows on MSNBC when it first came on the air. Unlike the other shows on the network, it was produced by ZDTV (long before they had their own channel). It was more classy, more professional, and yet seemed more interesting than anything on ZDTV/TechTV/G4.

    Too bad it was canceled 2.5 years later, before most people had even heard of MSNBC, let alone the show itself.

    1. Re:TheSite was even better than TSS by Adrilla · · Score: 2, Informative

      Soledad O'brien was hot. But that virtual reality character was useless.

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
  29. For as out-of-touch... by Electroly · · Score: 1

    For as out-of-touch The Screen Savers was, I guess I shouldn't be at all surprised that they picked something as arcane as MP3Pro for their distribution format.

    1. Re:For as out-of-touch... by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      Well, it is a podcast. That means you're quite able to produce something of greater value in a better format, should you wish, Too bad you don't have to name recognition.

      Good luck with that.

  30. Soledad O'Brian was just as good by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    Back in his days before TSS and Call for Help, Laporte did a lot of behind the scenes work for TheSite on MSNBC. Soledad O'Brian did a great job of hosting that show.

    Laporte has a long background with the tech industry and computers, he had a computer tech support call in radio show back before most people had computers in their home. He's not so much "smart" as he is a quick learner and good speaker. In this respect, Soledad O'Brian was just as good.

  31. Please never watch G4techblahwhatevertv by porp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm a big fan of Leo and watched the screensavers even before Patrick joined--when they had that girl (sure I know her name, but ugh, why mention it.) It was a really great/entertaining show that you could catch replays of during the day and not ruin your habitual, primetime TV schedule.

    Sure, Leo didn't know everything and would sometimes say shit that wasn't right, but he had a TV personality. He was educated and talented in television entertainment. I miss him.

    I have no idea what the tv executives were thinking after the two consecutive buy outs or whatever the hell you call them, but Leo showed up less and less with each one until he was no more. Though I never watched the show much in the past 5 years, I remember when it was good, and I did watch it with Patrick and Leo riding in the convertibles, and I do remember that I liked it.

    To the now owners of G4TechTvCnetZDtvblah, I never change the channel to your network. You guys can go to hell and take shows like w1nn3r and 3l1te with you.

    porp

    1. Re:Please never watch G4techblahwhatevertv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in soviet russia leo sucks your dick you stupid fuck

  32. Slashdotted at 1am? by autocracy · · Score: 1

    Ouch... it's downloading at about 4kbs. Bittorrent: http://templar.storyinmemo.com/TLR20050417.mp3.tor rent

    --
    SIG: HUP
    1. Re:Slashdotted at 1am? by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      ETA...six minutes. Better than eleven hours for the direct link!

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    2. Re:Slashdotted at 1am? by autocracy · · Score: 1

      I blame your 'net connection for that... I have 10mbit and I'm not getting touched.

      --
      SIG: HUP
    3. Re:Slashdotted at 1am? by humankind · · Score: 1

      1:40 for the torrent. That's not worth complaining about. I guess by now a lot of people have it open.

    4. Re:Slashdotted at 1am? by zaffir · · Score: 1

      THANK YOU!

      no caps no caps no caps

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
  33. I like to think I'm mostly on top of new tech but by Ziviyr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What is podcasting?

    An ipod thing? Ipods can't broadcast? Isn't this coming over the net anyways?

    Why have I not googled before mouthing off here?

    --

    Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  34. Re:Soledad O'Brian, DevNull, and Cliff Stoll rocke by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

    Mmmm...Soledad. She was even better on "The Next Step" in the Discovery Channel's pre-suck days.

    --
    Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
  35. Downhill since 1995... by green+pizza · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Laporte and Ziff Davis started their TV venture in 1995 with "TheSite" on MSNBC. Awesome hour long daily show hosted by Soledad O'Brian and a bunch of over very talented folks. MSNBC canceled the show during a big programming change in 1997. I really miss that show.

    In 1998 ZD started their own TV channel. The Screen Savers started out as a very crappy replacement for TheSite. I still enjoyed it, but you could tell that the company was now using the same resources to make about 5 hours of TV a day rather than 1 hour.

    The Screen Savers was really starting to suck by the time ZDTV became TechTV.

    Soon G4 got involved and totally ruined what little was left of the original ZD venture. Thankfully they finally changed the name of the show.

    1. Re:Downhill since 1995... by gozar · · Score: 1
      Laporte and Ziff Davis started their TV venture in 1995 with "TheSite" on MSNBC. Awesome hour long daily show hosted by Soledad O'Brian and a bunch of over very talented folks. MSNBC canceled the show during a big programming change in 1997. I really miss that show.

      Wasn't CNet (the TV show) on around this time? I think I was watching it on USA. It had Solidad O'Brien and some other guy.

      --
      What, me worry?
    2. Re:Downhill since 1995... by green+pizza · · Score: 1

      Wasn't CNet (the TV show) on around this time? I think I was watching it on USA. It had Solidad O'Brien and some other guy.
      That was Gina Smith. She later joined up with Larry Ellison to market the N|C (New Internet Computer).

    3. Re:Downhill since 1995... by ArizonaJer · · Score: 1
      Thankfully they finally changed the name of the show.

      And, thankfully, they picked a really crappy name -- Attack of the Show -- so that no one will be tempted to watch it.

      --
      Jeremy Butler
      www.ScreenSite.org
      www.TVCrit.com
    4. Re:Downhill since 1995... by vistic · · Score: 1

      I remember them demoing the original blue BeBox (not sure if the original was PPC or if it used the AT&T Hobbit). Was pretty darned cool.

      Also don't forget their little virtual reality type guy they had on the show... what was his name?

  36. Torrent... by Keamos · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:Torrent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative my ass. It's a registration-required link. >.>

  37. Bad link on website by erobertstad · · Score: 1

    http://leoville.tv/tlr/TLR20050417.mp3

    The link on the site isn't working right (mp3 file doesn't paly all the way though, use this one.

  38. joy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YES!!!

    Why did that super rich guy sell/hand over control of TechTV anyways? He is the worlds third richest nerd, or so i've heard.

    1. Re:joy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Gates is both the worlds richest man and a nerd. An evil nerd, perhaps, but a nerd nonetheless.

  39. Could I get a mirror please? by osrevad · · Score: 1

    and thank you.

  40. Re:Soledad O'Brian, DevNull, and Cliff Stoll rocke by green+pizza · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mmmm...Soledad. She was even better on "The Next Step" in the Discovery Channel's pre-suck days.

    Several of the reporters/hosts on TheSite came from The Next Step / The Know Zone and Beyond 2000. :)

    Next Step, Know Zone, and later, The Answer Guys, were produced by KRON TV in San Francisco. Beyond 2000 was also shown on Discovery channel via KRON, but it was mostly produced in Australia. Next Step actually lived on for a few years after it was taken off Discovery, but you had to live in the SF Bay / Silicon Valley area to watch it. I think all of those shows are gone now. KRON isn't what it used to be. Last I saw, Henry Tannenbaum was hosting some gardening show...

  41. is kevin rose really behind fuckedgoogle.com ? by googisgod · · Score: 0
    1. Re:is kevin rose really behind fuckedgoogle.com ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TSS is the best thing in tech in T.V. i swear to god i will hate G4 as long as i live (yes these are pretty intense emotions) they ruined a great channel i watched these guys since ZDTV when sumi das, Jim Louderback, Leo and others are the host i love pat, jessica, kevin, sarah and every one that hosted The Screen Savers, and it saddens me that g4 made it go away now every time i see my relatives or friends watching G4 i tell them not to watch it ever!!!.. i hope they loose money cause i hate them with a passion the exec's must be high when they made those decisions do they think people actually find thier programming even remotely interesting?? G4 can kiss my mocha complexion ass and go to the deepest most hosttest place in hell and did i mention i hate G4???

  42. Re:Soledad O'Brian, DevNull, and Cliff Stoll rocke by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

    Hmph. My cable company didn't pick up MSNBC until a couple of months before they switched formats, so I barely remember "TheSite." "Beyond 2000" was a good show too, their pronunciation of aluminun (aluminium) gave away their Australian-ness. For some reason, I don't remember watching "The Know Zone." Well, enough for me. I'm way too young to be reminiscing about classic basic cable.

    --
    Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
  43. Uh? by Dark+Coder · · Score: 1

    Why does this title remind me of "Flying Toasters?"

  44. Why not use OGG? by IoN_PuLse · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering why they used mp3Pro instead of ogg.

    1. Re:Why not use OGG? by mh101 · · Score: 1

      That would limit their audience. AFAIK iTunes and WMP cannot play OGGs out of the box, and I know my iPod can't. If this was something really popular that would have millions of people wanting to download, then they could get away with using OGG in an attempt to give it a boost, and prompt Apple & Microsoft to include OGG support in their next versions.

      And to be honest, how many people outside of the Slashdot crowd would really care what the file format is in? As long as they can play it without much trouble, they'll be happy.

      --
      Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
  45. W00t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    W000000000000ooooT

    GG~

    Ramsinks.com

  46. Don't mind by Schlaefer · · Score: 1

    It is no podcast - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podcast - or can someone point to an rss feed to subscribe?

    1. Re:Don't mind by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      It was podcast via Leo Laporte's "The Laporte Report" podcast http://leoville.tv/podcasts/tlr

  47. I was on it by shird · · Score: 1

    sort of :) The only episode I ever watched was an episode where the presented a vulnerability I discovered in Microsoft's help center which got overhyped. It was the hcp://windows/* delete file type exploit. Pretty cool.

    --
    I.O.U One Sig.
  48. When G4 screws up X Play... by Metsys · · Score: 1

    I didn't like the idea of having TechTV be gobbled up by a video game channel when it first was announced. All the shows that I liked went to crap or went away.

    Whats funny is that my favorite show, Extended Play (now X Play), which was in fact a show about video games, got ruined. I tried to watch a few episodes recently and I just couldn't. I can't watch that show anymore.

    You know G4 is screwing everything up when they ruin a show about video games.

    1. Re:When G4 screws up X Play... by zaffir · · Score: 1

      Funny, XPlay is one of the few shows that survived that horrible merger rather unscathed. The changes involved in going from from Extended Play to X Play were improvements, IMO, and G4 has (for the most part) left this show alone.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
  49. G4 can go to ehll along with its idiot exec's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TSS is the best thing in tech in T.V. i swear to god i will hate G4 as long as i live (yes these are pretty intense emotions) they ruined a great channel i watched these guys since ZDTV when sumi das, Jim Louderback, Leo and others are the host i love pat, jessica, kevin, sarah and every one that hosted The Screen Savers, and it saddens me that g4 made it go away now every time i see my relatives or friends watching G4 i tell them not to watch it ever!!!.. i hope they loose money cause i hate them with a passion the exec's must be high when they made those decisions do they think people actually find thier programming even remotely interesting?? G4 can kiss my mocha complexion ass and go to the deepest most hosttest place in hell and did i mention i hate G4???

  50. Is this proof? by phos-phoros · · Score: 1

    That a corporate entity can indeed have a male organ of copulation and urinary excretion. Just my two cents , but I feel that Comcast has taken the piss on having dropped shows such as TSS & Call for Help from their lineup.

    1. Re:Is this proof? by phos-phoros · · Score: 1

      damnit...I meant a small male organ of copulation and urinary excretion! ;) where did you say that edit button was again?

  51. Interesting. by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll have to listen, I stopped my tivo for season for TSS.

    Who wants to watch 20 somethings that know nothing about tech other than "Wow that Sony PSP is cool...."

    Umm. I'm the 30 something that buys all the neat toys, the first ones to buy the new phones, pda's, and hardware. So, you insult us. Nice, we go off on the next place to get our tech news. Too bad Slashdot is about it. If slashdot could just a TV Show.

  52. Where is Martin Sargent? by elucido · · Score: 1

    Martin Sargent needs to create his own show and put it online. He could use this http://participatoryculture.org/

    1. Re:Where is Martin Sargent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      martin lost his show because he found out bashing people loses ratings.

    2. Re:Where is Martin Sargent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Martin lost his show because he was annoying, geeky, not funny.... need I go on?

  53. Just create a new TechTV by elucido · · Score: 1

    Create a new TechTV using DTV and IPTV technology. http://participatoryculture.org/

  54. If you want it, help make it. by elucido · · Score: 1

    There are new technologies now like DTV and IPTV, anyone can make their own show now. All you have to do is help build the technology and create a petition for a new TechIPTV

  55. Hey, clean that up by skomes · · Score: 1

    Kevin Rose? He isn't an original, he's one of the people that came in as TSS went to shit. I'd rather see yoshi, and martin sargent!! Martin was actually funny, and entertaining to watch, and Yoshi's creativeness was always great (the nintendo pc is my favourite). I used to love TSS, with the new set though, came the beginning of the end. Anyways, bring back the originals.

    1. Re:Hey, clean that up by mattkinabrewmindspri · · Score: 1

      Yes, Kevin Rose was a late addition to TSS, but he wasn't a bad addition to the show. He seems to know his stuff.

    2. Re:Hey, clean that up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kevin doesn't know shit. He's just a wannabe poser. Seriously, I can't count how many times he's thrown out industry buzzwords and made comments without even understanding what he was saying. Out of all the TSS staff, Kevin annoys me the most because he pretends to be more and know more than anyone else.

    3. Re:Hey, clean that up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original Screen Savers was ok, but would you really rather have Leo and the gang back to tell you for the nth time how to open a folder? Or cram all the existing game consoles into a huge unweildy box?

      I've gotta be one of the few people who like the new show -- it doesn't automatically assume that all its viewers are total newbies. They give more useful tips, like how to make a portable iPod charger, or how to create encrypted disk volumes. For a while there, Call for Help, Screen Savers, and Dave Chalk's show were all basically the same thing: newbie advice on the most basic tasks, about as useful as Dotto's Data Cafe. So why's everyone so upset that they added a bit of actual non-sanitized genuine humor and started giving useful advice? Sure, Pat, Leo, and Yoshi were ok hosts, but I just couldn't watch that show because it was like PC Sesame Street.

      http://www.g4tv.com/host/49/Kevin_Rose/index.htm l

      BTW, have you even taken a single course on computing? There's a reason he seems to know more than the others, and I don't think he really flaunts it. Maybe YOU don't understand what he's saying? You'd rather just have Leo tell you to get a Mac? Or some fine D-Link equipment in every episode? Or is it just that if you didn't make your own PC from scratch like Steve Wozniak, you're just some punk poser? Jeez, get a life, you haters

  56. I liked Kevin's quote by Rollie+Hawk · · Score: 1

    "We still want to do another episode of thebroken."

    --
    Before any liberals are tempted to mod up one of my comments, a word of warning: I'm actually making fun of you.
    1. Re:I liked Kevin's quote by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      Good, i've been waiting since the last one!

      More hacking with Ramzi! *grins*

    2. Re:I liked Kevin's quote by bird603568 · · Score: 0

      Wow did that place go down hill fast. I remember being one on the first 200 there they @ around a few months later all it was omg sub7, |-|0vv c$n 1 h4x teh gibson??

    3. Re:I liked Kevin's quote by Rollie+Hawk · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't have closed your forums, bird603568.

      --
      Before any liberals are tempted to mod up one of my comments, a word of warning: I'm actually making fun of you.
    4. Re:I liked Kevin's quote by bird603568 · · Score: 0

      I dont rember haveing a forum.

  57. Thoughts on TSS/TechTV by humankind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I first saw TechTV, I was very impressed. I especially like how one of the policies that Leo implemented on TSS was to go live and if the computer crashed, show it on TV, and using Windows, many times their OS would crash in the middle of demos. They felt it was important to let people know that this happens to everybody and not just neophytes, and that ideally it should be avoidable and that was their way of sending a message to the software developers that if their products weren't stable, at least TSS wouldn't cover it up.

    One problem these days with product reviews is that the line between editorial and advertising is to narrow, you don't know who to trust. TSS and some of the other shows on the early TechTV were very good about calling attention to products that, well, sucked and didn't live up to their claims. This probably alienated potential advertisers but it generated hardcore loyalty among viewers like me who felt that many of the personalities on TechTV were honorable and trustworthy.

    When the network started running all kinds of weird fluff/syndicated crap, things started to decline. More emphasis was put on gaming and less on technology, more on goofy gadgets and less on core applications and utilities. When G4 took over the network, it was nearly dead and I haven't watched since.

    I agree with others that Leo has a good personality for television, but sometimes I felt he was a little too animated and "fatherly". In contrast, Patrick and Kevin and others were more peer-like in the manner in which they presented information and news. Leo had more of a slightly patronizing hyper-exagerated-enthusiasm that I felt was over the top and annoying at times. But I can't deny that he was very knowledgable and capable. I would love to see the old crew back together again.

  58. Excellent! by jejones · · Score: 1

    This is very good news.

    Attack of the Show would be an embarrassment to a local cable access channel. Lame hosts with delusions of talent and comedy, pointless sketches, lame guests (Tom Green leaps to mind), and the closest I've seen them come to actual tech content is shoving a (fortunately small) web server up someone's posterior. As Dave Barry would say, I am not making this up.

  59. Limited resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the holes in the open source culture is this idea that if you want it, you should help make it.

    You can really only make one or two things at once. You should therefore only help to make something if you are qualified to do it very quickly and well, and if you want it more than anything else you might help do.

    It is therefore very useful for people who aren't making something to say what they want, so the people who are making it can make it better.

    I suspect most of the time, it really boils down to "sign up to help, download the code, then fiddle with it until you're bored enough of the concept to not want it anymore." That's an effective way of dealing with desire, but perhaps not the most useful to society.

  60. Geeks talking about Tech - Intelligent Talk by gadlaw · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm listening to the podcast right now and I'm hearing product reviews about noise cancelling headphones, cell phone companies and talk about other tech products that I'm interested in. Straight up talk and no bull without regard to what the 'suits' say they can say about this product or that product. What could be better or more interesting than that? I'll listen to further broadcasts.

    --
    Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
  61. WMA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anything would sound better than WMA. WMA isn't even as good as old mp3 format. Suggesting to use WMA just goes to show how one has clearly no idea what the codec sounds like.

    AAC, ogg or speex would be better alternatives (AAC having by far the best support).

  62. Kat by sharkman67 · · Score: 2, Informative

    What about Kat http://www.catschwartz.com/. She was good to spank off to. Especially after her nudes surfaced on the 'net.

  63. Re:Soledad O'Brian, DevNull, and Cliff Stoll rocke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never much liked The Know Zone. It seemed to be aimed at non-tech people. You know, "normal" people.

    Beyond 2000 was great though. I watched every episode. It was so cool (back in the early '90s) to be the only person who knew about virtual reality and adaptive optics and lots of other cool technologies.

    Do you remember Toward 2000? The Discovery Channel showed reruns of that for a while too.

  64. Mirror Found by gav1n · · Score: 0

    For anyone getting slow download speed on the podcast, I found this mirror which is remarkably faster: http://www.blogsnow.com/mtrack/51156794.html

  65. damn thi is old..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /. is really in bad shape, not only when they steal from digg, is when they post stuff about the late screen savers... tsk tsk tsk

  66. Leo makes "Random Taco" call on Slashdot vs Digg by scupper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At 23:30 into the 34:44 min podcast mp3, Kevin starts taking about a DVI lcd deal he scooped, and Leo weighs in asking if he'd seen it on digg.com. About 24:00, Leo makes the ""Random Taco" call concerning /. editors, while discussing the differences between /. and digg. Shhwweeet! I love this podcast.

  67. Video, torrent, pay by telemonster · · Score: 1

    Too bad they can't make DivX shows and distro them via bittorrent. Perhaps come up with a low cost subscription model, say $1/month for 4 episodes. If it got popular enough, they could generate revenue from advertisements (with a please do not remove the ads from the file intro). Next thing you know, homebrew PVRs are retrieving the show weekly, and the internet is allowing us to successfully subvert the commercial broadcast & cable TV networks.

    --
    Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
  68. G4's not COMPLETELY worthless... by DeXtroMe · · Score: 1

    While I agree with almost every negative sentiment expressed here towards the abomination that is G4tv there is ONE show on the network I have set up to record every week on my DVR. Icons is a kick ass show for anyone with even an inkling of interest in game development or just games in general. It covers everything from the history of Atari to the development of the OddWorld games, with interviews with all of the key players in the video game industry. It's often very compelling, and goes into way more details than you would generally expect from a 'Making Of' special. Check it out.

    1. Re:G4's not COMPLETELY worthless... by Rightcoast · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree it isn't a bad show at all.

      If I remember right though I saw that on plain old Tech TV. Making it just one of the only things they haven't completely fux0red.

    2. Re:G4's not COMPLETELY worthless... by DeXtroMe · · Score: 1

      BTW what the hell happened to Martin Sargent and Unscrewed. 'It was cancelled dipshit', I know but what's the deal? It certainly wasn't one of the worst shows G4 chose to air, anyone got some inside dirt as to why Martin is no more?

  69. Re:Leo makes "Random Taco" call on Slashdot vs Dig by boarder8925 · · Score: 1

    To be exact, at 24:47, Leo starts talking about digg. At 26:19, he makes the "Random Taco" jab.

  70. Re:Soledad O'Brian, DevNull, and Cliff Stoll rocke by writermike · · Score: 1

    Soledad O'Brian was a great host, I think that job fit her better than the current news gigs she does these days.

    I dunno. Soledad O'Brian seemed so frustrated to me. Some of the jousts with DevNull seemed a little edgy at times. I always thought it was because she wanted to do Real News (tm).

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
  71. Official site by boarder8925 · · Score: 1

    Official site for ROTSS:

    http://www.trotss.com/

  72. Re:Soledad O'Brian, DevNull, and Cliff Stoll rocke by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    DevNull used some mild sexual innuendo with Soledad once in a while, and I think it made her uncomfortable.

  73. Awesome! by Stopher2475 · · Score: 0

    Glad to see these guys back. It just sucks that this show died b/c of corporate mergers and bigwigs. It seemed to have an audience. Now they have people on G4 who are still looking for the 'any' key on thier computers. I guess there wasn't enough air time on cable for motorcycle building shows and retarded reality tv. Good luck guys. I will listen loyally and I want to see Megan Morrone again.

  74. Fresh content, great style, thanks and keep it up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was very refreshing, it was like listening in to "people in the know" talking openly without restrictions about everything tech.

    It's a lot like when a few of my geek friends get together but a lot more interesting.

    I loved it, don't change anything, keep the ads few unlike the media giants, and you have yourself a winner!

  75. Return of the Screen savers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Some of The Screen Savers...YOSHI and ROBERT HERON are also playing a role in "From the Shadows.tv" it's a new internet release program that was released last week.

  76. You can't see Jessica on a podcast :( by gmknobl · · Score: 1

    The few things that bugged me about TSS such as Leo's rather overtly sexual comments that, I felt, went over the bounds of decency, were not nearly enough to take away from the plain excellent content produced by techies for techies.

    G4, of course, is by non-techies for acne cases and it shows. Sucks and always will. Don't watch the show at all. When TSS and CFH were on, I started watching many other shows on TechTV, such as the wonderful John Dvorak's breakfast hour debate show (They still owe me a mug that ZDNet!).

    Think they can get JD on ROTSS? That would be fun.

    Unfortunatly, you can't look at the beautiful women they use to have on, on a podcast!

  77. Sweet! by AlUVA01 · · Score: 1

    In my opinion this is a great show with tons of humor and useful info. All I need is a first season dvd pack :)