See, I prefer to compare kazaa to bongs. You can buy a bong, you can own it, but the moment you use it, you're breaking the law (in most states in the US). Nobody smokes tobacco out of those things - Oh sure, you can, but who does?
I am unsure as to whether or not your post is perfectly lucid to me, although we seem to agree. I did say God is dead. When I say this, I refer to the superhero in the bible - I am not atheist, just not religous. When I speak of killing, I speak of killing in regards to asserting your God - yes those that pillage and rape my community should endure the wrath of my community - I will not do it in God's name. You are already aware of my thoughts toward the bible, so quoting it, whether for or against my cause, has no value to me.
Your comments have been interesting and I now consider you a friend - at least here on/.
God doesn't write books, #1 The old testament is transcription into hebrew from Armenian verbal accounts i.e. Hearsay at best #2 Jews Don't recognize the new testament #3 Paul wrote the new testament (mostly) #4
In conclusion, it's all bullshit and is nothing but a basis for war, inquisition, and Zionism - and - the cause of more deaths than all diseases combined. Stop war by first abolishing religion. Accept that a truly omnipotent god would not be involved in such petty ventures on such an insignificant planet. Kill to assert your god? Sounds like the ultimate oxymoron to me. (although I do not believe this is what you were asserting)
Re:Of course they are, after all God chose them!
on
Build Your Own Mortar
·
· Score: -1, Flamebait
Excuse me sir, and pardon my stupidity, but what is a libeterian? Also, could you be troubled to define obvisiously? I would also like to see the word spelled phonetically as I am having a hard time sounding it out. See, I am new to this country, one of those - how do you say - immigrannts - and I need to brush up on my English to begin my lifelong dream job at McDonald's. I was wondering if an articulate person with such a wonderful grasp on the English language - and reality in general - such as yourself could explain these wonderful new words to me. I am also interested in these dividends you speak of. I have little money and would love to try to earn some to feed my children. Thank you for any help you can offer. Your humble servant, Manuel Escabar
pssst, it's not so easy to get a job WITH a college degree. A masters, an Army veteran from the signal core and 5 years experience - not one that pays more than a cosco worker anyway.
I must agree. I was raised in wichita Falls - couldn't wait to get old enough to move the fuck out. Nothing there but drugs, hicks, and high school girl humping pathetic airmen.
When I was in college, I worked for an internet billing/hosting company. Needless to say, our prime customers were porn site operators - and we geared our programs to that demographic. One of the duties of installing a new client was to check the site for content of illegal activity, i.e. kiddie porn/warez. This meant every new site had to be gone through page by page. Yes, at first it was cool, but you saw EVERYTHING, not just the porn you wanted, you had to look at gay/ballon/scat/beastiality/fat/stomping etc sites. This got old pretty quick. The worst (right above the hardcore gay sites) is when you DID find a kiddie porn site - that shit will turn your stomach. On the upside, you had access to LOTS of free logins for the sites you wanted for viewing at home. Alas, porn at work, day in day out - All day, saturates you and eventually degrades your labido.
This MUST be a troll. I feel that the ten commandments in Alabama prevents me from be a practicing reality-ist, a new and upcoming religion.
Do you realize there are only two relevant commandments? The one about stealing, the other about killing - the other 8 are not illegal in America, nor should they be, nor should they be represented in a place that makes decisions concerning law (or any other public place for that matter).
ONE: 'You shall have no other gods before Me.' [not illegal]
TWO: 'You shall not make for yourself a carved image--any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.' [not illegal]
THREE: 'You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain.' [not illegal]
FOUR: 'Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.' [not illegal]
FIVE: 'Honor your father and your mother.' [not illegal]
SIX: 'You shall not murder.' *A law*
SEVEN: 'You shall not commit adultery.' [not illegal]
EIGHT: 'You shall not steal.' *A law*
NINE: 'You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.' [not illegal (unless you count purgery, but then that isn't neccessarily your neighbor)]
TEN: 'You shall not covet your neighbor's house; you shall not covet your neighbor's wife, nor his male servant, nor his female servant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor's.' [not illegal]
I have to agree. Although I am migrating from NT4 to redhat 9 on my network, I am still running NT4 as the domain controller, mail server, and webserver (I inherited this network) with Win2k, XP, and Redhat workstations. I had exactly one instance of the blaster worm - and that was from a remote user with a broadband connection in Singapore. Not one user or server had this issue - although I could see the traffic on the firewall. I am not a M$ advocate, but I also do not believe in placing blame when it is obvious that the admins just need to be more vigilant in keeping their machines patched. On a corporate network, I could give a fuck if M$ looks at my apps - I'm legal, so I make sure the auto update feature is functioning and check on random users. It is really not that difficult - and it's your job as an admin. Earn your salary you lazy fucks.
I believe the comments being copied indicate more than just comments being copied. Although, as others have pointed out, it is irrelevant due to the fact the code is public domain. The comment is not one line indicating "This reserves memory" (which would be common), there are multiple lines, with specific comments, with identical grammer. Anyone saying this is not wrong *if* it is indeed SCO IP is not being objective.
I do not think ALL conservatives are bible thumpers, it just seems that conservatives like to invoke "God" when answering a question.
For instance; "Why are you a conservative?" "We need to preserve morality. The bible says that homsexuality (etc..) is against God's law. Our founding fathers found this land on Christian principles blah, blah, blah"
Dr Laura sites Leviticus when admonishing homosexuality, although Leviticus also calls for the death of those that have 2 different crops in the same field or where their clothing is made of 2 types of material.
Conservatives generally seem to have their hearts in the right place - self responsibility, morality etc. But the basis for the argument isn't because it provides social stability or peace, but rather that it is the will of God. God is illogical as presented by those in organized religion - morality in America is declining because there really is not a good reason to be moral (you'll go to hell), if morality was presented on a logical level, illustrating the benefits (social stability and harmony between peoples) instead of the consequences (you'll go to hell), people could embrace morality not as the good thing to do, but as the logical thing to do. Thus we would all be "conservative" in a way.
As an aside, I do not think extreme liberals (Peta, Green Peace) are any different than those on the opposite end of the spectrum.
The voices at each end of the spectrum are the loudest and likely the most erroneous, the answer is closer to the middle (although the middle is indecisive).
I am curious - if the media is so liberal, and I am considered a liberal, why is it that I am always annoyed by the news? You would figure, being liberal and all, that I would love the media and agree with more than 10% of what is showed.
awwww, I answered my own question. It's that 10% that the conservatives hate - must be a liberal media since it isn't all conservative.
Forgive me for thinking about tomorrow instead of how to fill my wallet (or the wallet of an other rich guy).
Conservativism is like standing in the way of a 4 ton boulder (progress and inevitability) coming down steep hill, thinking "God" will help me.
The conservatives should quit answering questions by invoking "God" and tax cuts, and instead use reason (as in, get out of the way, or get squished when "God" doesn't show up to save you)
Why is it flame-bait when someone states an obvious fact? I have no problem with jews or any other religion/group of people - but more and more I am finding it hard not to be an anti-semite. As the parent poster pointed out, why do the Jews never learn?
It seems to me that everyone that answers a question by invoking God (Allah etc..) you are sentencing yourself and your children to death. Doesn't the fact that deaths caused by religious fundamentalism out number any disease (plaque, aids etc..)combined click in the mind of the most logic challenge that this is not the correct path? Doesn't murdering people - at all - tell you that you are as wrong as the murderers you are fighting?
Want peace? Remove god from the equation and you'll be on the short path (not there, but almost - you need to establish secular morality first)
no, I didn't forget the AC button, I truly believe what I say, mod me the way you like, but I speak truth.
.NET is Microsoft's newest programming language offerings. Basically the purpose is to integrate the web into windows applications. There is VB.NET, ASP.NET, C#, etc... The languages are actually pretty usable in a windows enviroment, and are OO. This makes them a little more powerful. I use Java, but its nice to bust out a VB.Net proprietary app that runs cleaner/ faster on a windows system. The down side is similiar to Java though, in order to run Java apps, you need the JRE, with.NET stuff, you need the HUGE ass.NET framework installed.
Why don't you address my entire post instead of pulling pieces out. Explain your reaction to:
"Flimsey? Such as the speed of light is 186000 miles per second, the earth is round, the sun is 93 million miles away. How do you know any of this is true? Do you accept any of these accepted truths? If so, why? 'Cause someone told you, or you saw pictures, or Einstein seemed like a nice enough guy?"
Or
"Define credible. If there was tangible proof, then yes you are correct - but there is not tangible proof thus it is hearsay unless I can verify it's existence through other scientific methods. As it it stands, there are orders of magnitudes greater evidence for the existence of Pluto, versus UFOs/Aliens."
I know, it's easier when you can ignore the bits of reason.
"meanwhile you can see hundreds of pictures and videos of UFOs and listen to hundreds of testimonies." Is equal to "they told me" - dumb ass. without the burded of scientific proof - dumb ass
Here let me try this.
Instead, why don't you try taking a critical thinking class. You have missed every point, responded to parts of my sentences, and drug this on far too long. You continually rant the same nonsensical mantra, then turn right around and support your argument with what you are arguing against [wtf?] I am done with this. You, sir, are too logic challenged for me to justify wasting any more of my time on -
Get some therapy, maybe that will help you with your Oedipus complex.
Slashdot Mirror
See, I prefer to compare kazaa to bongs. You can buy a bong, you can own it, but the moment you use it, you're breaking the law (in most states in the US). Nobody smokes tobacco out of those things - Oh sure, you can, but who does?
I am unsure as to whether or not your post is perfectly lucid to me, although we seem to agree. I did say God is dead. When I say this, I refer to the superhero in the bible - I am not atheist, just not religous. When I speak of killing, I speak of killing in regards to asserting your God - yes those that pillage and rape my community should endure the wrath of my community - I will not do it in God's name. You are already aware of my thoughts toward the bible, so quoting it, whether for or against my cause, has no value to me.
/.
Your comments have been interesting and I now consider you a friend - at least here on
I agree with your post except:
God doesn't write books, #1
The old testament is transcription into hebrew from Armenian verbal accounts i.e. Hearsay at best #2
Jews Don't recognize the new testament #3
Paul wrote the new testament (mostly) #4
In conclusion, it's all bullshit and is nothing but a basis for war, inquisition, and Zionism - and - the cause of more deaths than all diseases combined. Stop war by first abolishing religion. Accept that a truly omnipotent god would not be involved in such petty ventures on such an insignificant planet. Kill to assert your god? Sounds like the ultimate oxymoron to me.
(although I do not believe this is what you were asserting)
God is dead
Excuse me sir, and pardon my stupidity, but what is a libeterian? Also, could you be troubled to define obvisiously? I would also like to see the word spelled phonetically as I am having a hard time sounding it out. See, I am new to this country, one of those - how do you say - immigrannts - and I need to brush up on my English to begin my lifelong dream job at McDonald's. I was wondering if an articulate person with such a wonderful grasp on the English language - and reality in general - such as yourself could explain these wonderful new words to me. I am also interested in these dividends you speak of. I have little money and would love to try to earn some to feed my children. Thank you for any help you can offer.
Your humble servant, Manuel Escabar
pssst, it's not so easy to get a job WITH a college degree. A masters, an Army veteran from the signal core and 5 years experience - not one that pays more than a cosco worker anyway.
I must agree. I was raised in wichita Falls - couldn't wait to get old enough to move the fuck out. Nothing there but drugs, hicks, and high school girl humping pathetic airmen.
When I was in college, I worked for an internet billing/hosting company. Needless to say, our prime customers were porn site operators - and we geared our programs to that demographic. One of the duties of installing a new client was to check the site for content of illegal activity, i.e. kiddie porn/warez. This meant every new site had to be gone through page by page. Yes, at first it was cool, but you saw EVERYTHING, not just the porn you wanted, you had to look at gay/ballon/scat/beastiality/fat/stomping etc sites. This got old pretty quick. The worst (right above the hardcore gay sites) is when you DID find a kiddie porn site - that shit will turn your stomach. On the upside, you had access to LOTS of free logins for the sites you wanted for viewing at home. Alas, porn at work, day in day out - All day, saturates you and eventually degrades your labido.
Who started it? All we did is finish it.
Those that have died, have died underestimating us - just ask the Japanese - bitch.
No AC here fucker, if you're a man, bring it, otherwise, go back to your cave.
I concur with your declaration of "bullshit" and second it.
This MUST be a troll. I feel that the ten commandments in Alabama prevents me from be a practicing reality-ist, a new and upcoming religion.
Do you realize there are only two relevant commandments? The one about stealing, the other about killing - the other 8 are not illegal in America, nor should they be, nor should they be represented in a place that makes decisions concerning law (or any other public place for that matter).
ONE: 'You shall have no other gods before Me.'
[not illegal]
TWO: 'You shall not make for yourself a carved image--any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.'
[not illegal]
THREE: 'You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain.'
[not illegal]
FOUR: 'Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.'
[not illegal]
FIVE: 'Honor your father and your mother.'
[not illegal]
SIX: 'You shall not murder.'
*A law*
SEVEN: 'You shall not commit adultery.'
[not illegal]
EIGHT: 'You shall not steal.'
*A law*
NINE: 'You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.'
[not illegal (unless you count purgery, but then that isn't neccessarily your neighbor)]
TEN: 'You shall not covet your neighbor's house; you shall not covet your neighbor's wife, nor his male servant, nor his female servant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor's.'
[not illegal]
uhh, there is no article to read - it's an ask /.
I have to agree. Although I am migrating from NT4 to redhat 9 on my network, I am still running NT4 as the domain controller, mail server, and webserver (I inherited this network) with Win2k, XP, and Redhat workstations. I had exactly one instance of the blaster worm - and that was from a remote user with a broadband connection in Singapore. Not one user or server had this issue - although I could see the traffic on the firewall. I am not a M$ advocate, but I also do not believe in placing blame when it is obvious that the admins just need to be more vigilant in keeping their machines patched. On a corporate network, I could give a fuck if M$ looks at my apps - I'm legal, so I make sure the auto update feature is functioning and check on random users. It is really not that difficult - and it's your job as an admin. Earn your salary you lazy fucks.
That is both funny, and insightful.
I believe the comments being copied indicate more than just comments being copied. Although, as others have pointed out, it is irrelevant due to the fact the code is public domain. The comment is not one line indicating "This reserves memory" (which would be common), there are multiple lines, with specific comments, with identical grammer. Anyone saying this is not wrong *if* it is indeed SCO IP is not being objective.
I do not think ALL conservatives are bible thumpers, it just seems that conservatives like to invoke "God" when answering a question.
For instance;
"Why are you a conservative?"
"We need to preserve morality. The bible says that homsexuality (etc..) is against God's law. Our founding fathers found this land on Christian principles blah, blah, blah"
Dr Laura sites Leviticus when admonishing homosexuality, although Leviticus also calls for the death of those that have 2 different crops in the same field or where their clothing is made of 2 types of material.
Conservatives generally seem to have their hearts in the right place - self responsibility, morality etc. But the basis for the argument isn't because it provides social stability or peace, but rather that it is the will of God. God is illogical as presented by those in organized religion - morality in America is declining because there really is not a good reason to be moral (you'll go to hell), if morality was presented on a logical level, illustrating the benefits (social stability and harmony between peoples) instead of the consequences (you'll go to hell), people could embrace morality not as the good thing to do, but as the logical thing to do. Thus we would all be "conservative" in a way.
As an aside, I do not think extreme liberals (Peta, Green Peace) are any different than those on the opposite end of the spectrum.
The voices at each end of the spectrum are the loudest and likely the most erroneous, the answer is closer to the middle (although the middle is indecisive).
I am curious - if the media is so liberal, and I am considered a liberal, why is it that I am always annoyed by the news? You would figure, being liberal and all, that I would love the media and agree with more than 10% of what is showed.
awwww, I answered my own question. It's that 10% that the conservatives hate - must be a liberal media since it isn't all conservative.
Forgive me for thinking about tomorrow instead of how to fill my wallet (or the wallet of an other rich guy).
Conservativism is like standing in the way of a 4 ton boulder (progress and inevitability) coming down steep hill, thinking "God" will help me.
The conservatives should quit answering questions by invoking "God" and tax cuts, and instead use reason (as in, get out of the way, or get squished when "God" doesn't show up to save you)
Why is it flame-bait when someone states an obvious fact? I have no problem with jews or any other religion/group of people - but more and more I am finding it hard not to be an anti-semite. As the parent poster pointed out, why do the Jews never learn?
It seems to me that everyone that answers a question by invoking God (Allah etc..) you are sentencing yourself and your children to death. Doesn't the fact that deaths caused by religious fundamentalism out number any disease (plaque, aids etc..)combined click in the mind of the most logic challenge that this is not the correct path? Doesn't murdering people - at all - tell you that you are as wrong as the murderers you are fighting?
Want peace? Remove god from the equation and you'll be on the short path (not there, but almost - you need to establish secular morality first)
no, I didn't forget the AC button, I truly believe what I say, mod me the way you like, but I speak truth.
That's Chilisoft. They made software that enabled you to run .asps (etc..) on apache
I like browsing "raw and uncut" because I do want to see all that is said - I do appreciate a good troll.
This GNAA shit is getting out of hand. Slashdot needs troll filters. Or better yet a crap flood mod that I can exclude from my browsing.
Seriously, a good troll is art, what you dumb fucks are doing is just plain stupid.
That is funny.
When I played, I felt an urge to yank my neighbor out of his car and go on a pedestrian squashing rampage.
Suck it up you little bitch, your mom's calling, she'll make it ok.
.NET is Microsoft's newest programming language offerings. Basically the purpose is to integrate the web into windows applications. There is VB .NET, ASP .NET, C#, etc... The languages are actually pretty usable in a windows enviroment, and are OO. This makes them a little more powerful. I use Java, but its nice to bust out a VB .Net proprietary app that runs cleaner/ faster on a windows system. The down side is similiar to Java though, in order to run Java apps, you need the JRE, with .NET stuff, you need the HUGE ass .NET framework installed.
Why don't you address my entire post instead of pulling pieces out. Explain your reaction to:
"Flimsey? Such as the speed of light is 186000 miles per second, the earth is round, the sun is 93 million miles away. How do you know any of this is true? Do you accept any of these accepted truths? If so, why? 'Cause someone told you, or you saw pictures, or Einstein seemed like a nice enough guy?"
Or
"Define credible. If there was tangible proof, then yes you are correct - but there is not tangible proof thus it is hearsay unless I can verify it's existence through other scientific methods. As it it stands, there are orders of magnitudes greater evidence for the existence of Pluto, versus UFOs/Aliens."
I know, it's easier when you can ignore the bits of reason.
"meanwhile you can see hundreds of pictures and videos of UFOs and listen to hundreds of testimonies."
Is equal to "they told me" - dumb ass.
without the burded of scientific proof - dumb ass
Here let me try this.
Instead, why don't you try taking a critical thinking class.
You have missed every point, responded to parts of my sentences, and drug this on far too long. You continually rant the same nonsensical mantra, then turn right around and support your argument with what you are arguing against [wtf?] I am done with this. You, sir, are too logic challenged for me to justify wasting any more of my time on -
Get some therapy, maybe that will help you with your Oedipus complex.
Wow, you missed the point *AGAIN*
[Looks around for a huge clue stick, shakes head and gives up]