Slashdot Mirror


The Surprising Benefits of Being Unemployed

SimuAndy writes "David Dvorkin, a programmer and writer of some repute, has published an essay on The Surprising Benefits of Being Unemployed. Well worth the reading time as a small break in a busy day."

1,053 comments

  1. Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by inertia187 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Becoming a Slashdot Addict

    I have time to become intimately familiar with all of the Slashdot memes like FP!, GNAA, In Soviet Russia, and CowboyNeal. I know all of the rules for them and when they're just being faked by copy-cats. Sure, sure, I can stop any time.

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    1. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was more of a slashdot addict when I was employed. Now I have more time on my hands to do other things then sit here all day.

    2. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by KingRamsis · · Score: 5, Funny

      the other day I caught myself telling a coworker "you are trolling the meeting you should be mod'ed down" ofcourse I got a blank empty void look on his face.

    3. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by ameoba · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes... now you have all the time in the world to be a FPer. Congrats, yo, you've achieved the Amernian dream.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    4. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      you forgot... masturbating... alone... in your room...

    5. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If only the topic of GNAA was politically correct to bring up during cocktail parties, that would be a pretty good way of finding fellow Slashdotters in the crowd.

    6. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by KingRamsis · · Score: 2, Funny

      You probably work for that goatse guy trying to imagine a beowolf cluster of business plans but foiled by micro$oft.


      I did my homework and Im a proud member of Slashdot Nation.

    7. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 1

      You probably work for that goatse guy trying to imagine a beowolf cluster of business plans but foiled by micro$oft.
      I did my homework and Im a proud member of Slashdot Nation.


      If you had really done you're homework, you'd know it's SCO this week.

    8. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by SunPin · · Score: 1

      The implication...

      You actually shout at your monitor on occasion.

      I suspect you have the "crazy guy that shouts at the TV" gene.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    9. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by KingRamsis · · Score: 1

      I have this little theory that without microsoft rushing to license SCO claimed IP they would have dried out, but now they have cash to carry on their crusade of lawsuits

      Linux itself is not the issue but the entire culture of commodity software is at stake.
      anyway : $CO happy now ?

    10. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by KingRamsis · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess being in a cocktail party automatically excludes you from being a Slashdotter.

    11. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got a better way to masturbate?

    12. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He does it on a bus in public

    13. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by gerarduk · · Score: 0

      I have been a lurker on Slashdot.org for a long time, but I had to register just to make a response to this incredibly stupid article.

      It was not funny at all, it was not intelligent at all, it was just an excuse to whine about not having a job and blame it all (through some incredibly ridiculous non-existent logic) on GW!?

      It reminds me of Doonesbury, the least humorous of all comics (as his reference to Snuffy Smith indicates this guy is about as funny as rubber crutches)

      Anyway, to throw my ideas into the ring, I have just recently graduated from University in London (about a year and a half ago) and then I went to work in Paris on the stock market, all through my own hard work and ingenuity (in addition to this all being extremely difficult because I am a Yank), if this guy would get off his arse and try and get a job instead of whining all the time.

      I am well pissed about the downturn in the economy, especially as I have taught myself all about computers (which is now the dead field) but at least I work on getting a job, and if it takes hundreds of applications, well then that is what it takes.

    14. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by ebay+troll · · Score: 3, Funny

      Excellent insults. Very pleased with seller's wit. Also informed buyer of availability of "0$" to refer to Open Source. Looking forward to doing business again.

    15. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by ebay+troll · · Score: 1

      Excellent buyer, was unable to convince buyer to purchase various electronic accessories for increased stimulation. Difficult to contact, but a smooth sale. excellent, a+++++++

    16. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Being unemployed, I had time to follow the links in people's sigs to learn about their political beliefs. Now I find I only have time to entertain my own thoughts.

    17. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      all kidding aside,

      my unemployment (former microsoft admin, 500 systems) has allowed me to convert entirely to gnu/linux/freebsd....and yea..to read the wild and wooly, slashdot.

      (fuck if i know where to put commas)

      i've got enough work to pay the bills, but things are turning up. I'm admining several linux boxes, and i got little side jobs.

      life is allright.

    18. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the A++++++++++++++++++++++++

      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Reason: Your comment looks too much like ascii art.

    19. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Becoming a Slashdot Addict

      I have time to become intimately familiar with all of the Slashdot memes like FP!, GNAA, In Soviet Russia, and CowboyNeal. I know all of the rules for them and when they're just being faked by copy-cats. Sure, sure, I can stop any time."


      I, for one, welcome our new unemployed slashdot addicted overlords.

    20. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by The+Kow · · Score: 1

      Uh.. for the sake of those of us who haven't quite learned every new acronym, what is FP? :[

      I hate myself for having to ask. Hate!

      --
      Moo
    21. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come to think of it, with things as bad as they are in Germany all thanks to the Socialist Party, it should actually read "In Socialist Germany"... But what the heck, over here they don't call it "FEH" - Free Enterprise Hurrah!, it's called "Social Economy "soziale Marktwirtschaft" meaning the socialist government does its best to keep small businesses and freelancers down so everybody has to slave away either for big business at ever decreasing salaries or become dependent on dole. Free enterprise, my ass. This game sucks.

    22. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the Armenian dream? or is it the Albanian dream?

    23. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by gd23ka · · Score: 1

      I think what he means it that usually your female signicant other takes off when you're unemployed leaving you no other choice than channeling your sexual energies through your hands. I had to redirect my energies through that pathway after my old mutual masturbation partner took off because we couldn't afford our accustomed lifestyle. But hey... good riddance too! Now I got a cute plump masochist chick that totally freaks when I strap her to our bed, spank her silly with my belt and "torture" her with a huge solid metal dildo. Life is good.

    24. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by andyt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Uh.. for the sake of those of us who haven't quite learned every new acronym, what is FP? :[

      I am living the dream. Finally I can, without fear of being offtopic, do what I have always dreamed of but have never dared...

      FIRST POST!!!!!!!!111!!111!1!!!!!!

      I can now die happy.
      Thank you :-)

    25. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our new unemployed overlords.

      In Soviet Russia, employment finds creative ways to live without YOU!!!

    26. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by sms · · Score: 1

      LOL! Please, please mod this up as Funny.

    27. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this the unemployed article or the telecommuting article?

    28. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually quite a few slashdoters take cock in the tail.

    29. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      that's not a good idea... you have to network if you want to get back into the workplace! Invite some other unemployed coders over and make it a party...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    30. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by ddimas · · Score: 1
      FIRST POST!!!!!!!!111!!111!1!!!!!!

      You missed the shift key a few times.

    31. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I have more time on my hands to do other things then sit here all day.

      Yes, spoken like a true Slashdot addict. Kinda like when you hang out too much with a person who stutters, then you start stuttering yourself.

    32. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by NickFitz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mmm... you know you've been stuck at home too long when not only do you swear at inanimate objects, you also apologise to them afterwards.

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    33. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now THAT was profound. And obvious.

    34. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by ddimas · · Score: 1

      Just trying to be helpful.

    35. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by The+Kow · · Score: 1

      It's truly tragic that there's no trickle down karma at play here. You owe it all to me, and what do I get? Nothing, nada, zilch!

      --
      Moo
    36. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks. I've been trying hard to figure out why so many people on slashdot wanted a Fudge Packer. ;)
      I thought maybe this was really news for turds.

    37. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My productivity has definately decreased since setting /. as my homepage.

    38. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taco's trolling under a pseduonym? Who'd have thunk it.

    39. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best benifit of going from two jobs to one job for me and my spouse is that we are no longer considered rich by the IRS.

      While we were both working for about $45,000.00 a year each, we paid a 36 percent tax rate (27% + 1.6 medicare + 6.2 social security).

      Our 36 percent is just 3% below the 39% the rich million dollar + earners pay (38% + 1.6 for medicare).

    40. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because someone asked the question doesn't mean that answering it is on-topic, jagoff.

    41. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some /.'ers have been unemployed so long, they pour a bowl of hot grits down their pants whenever they think of Natalie Portman.

  2. lame joke festival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    insert lame joke about being employed and reading slashdot all day... oh yeah, and...

    I for one welcome our new unemployed masters!!

    1. Re:lame joke festival by MoronGames · · Score: 1

      Overlords.

      Where did masters come from? :)

      --
      hey!
    2. Re:lame joke festival by yintercept · · Score: 1

      No, the people who are unemployed and read slashdot all day long are just plain envious of the people who are employed and read slashdot all day long.

    3. Re:lame joke festival by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 0

      In this Bushed economy, unemployment does you.

      sad, that this is not a joke.

      --
      I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  3. What is this? by alex_ant · · Score: 1

    The latest findings of the Cato Institute?

  4. Convincing, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Almost was on the phone calling my PHB after reading this, but after consideration I think I will stick to being employed.

  5. Can't outsource me now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least nobody with an L-1 or H-1B visa is going to take my unemployment check.

    1. Re:Can't outsource me now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I saw an Indian Java developer climbing out of your wife's bedroom while you were fishing.

    2. Re:Can't outsource me now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw an Indian Java developer climbing out of your wife's bedroom while you were fishing.

      Oh fuck yea! hahaaa!! man mod that shit funny..
      lol..

    3. Re:Can't outsource me now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG funniest shit I've seen in weeks.

    4. Re:Can't outsource me now! by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 1

      Dang! Thieving! Varmint!

      My wife was so mad that she went back to the bass boat and pulled out the 44 and shot his butt.

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
  6. Why isn't this under humor? by bogie · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    nt
    no text
    no, really. no text.

    stupid filter.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  7. Benefits of being unemployed by Mastab286 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yep, according to my dad, one of the best books hes ever read... well worth the read

  8. Yep, the benefits of you being unemployed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...like the fact that I can get a job easier.

    1. Re:Yep, the benefits of you being unemployed... by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, it's harder to get a job when your unemployed then it is when you are employeed. Because, when your unemployeed, any future employer will want to know why and how long you have been without work. But, if you already have a job, then you have a much better reputation for current skill status and thus a better chance of swiching over to a new company.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Yep, the benefits of you being unemployed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just follow the money trail, for it will lead you to the truth.

      .. that there is no money.

      you should add that to your sig. hehheh

    3. Re:Yep, the benefits of you being unemployed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just follow the money trail, for it will lead you to the truth.

      I told you to stay off of my lawn.

    4. Re:Yep, the benefits of you being unemployed... by yintercept · · Score: 1

      When you hire a lead programmer from a competitor you have thought that you hurt the competitor (Sun Tzu approves). Also the chance that you will benefit from the contacts in the employee's.

      Who do you hurt when you hire the unemployed? No-one (Sun Tzu frowns). Obviously unemployed drone has no contacts either.

    5. Re:Yep, the benefits of you being unemployed... by StarTux · · Score: 1

      To a point, how many have the time when you're busting your butt at work to look for another job?

      Its not easy getting a job when employed either, but...At least if you're unemployed in a bad economy its not so hard to know why :).

    6. Re:Yep, the benefits of you being unemployed... by uptownguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because, when your unemployeed, any future employer will want to know why and how long you have been without work.

      (First off, I'll avoid making any comments about the difference between "your" and "you're")

      I think you are thinking pre-2001. Seriously. I've hired over 15 people for a medium-term project in the last month or two. Lots of qualified people. Some were amazingly over-qualified. But you know what? We all know that the job market sucks right now and really could care less if you have a three or six or nine month employment gap on your resume. Seriously. Listening to people spend five minutes trying to explain "why" they are currently "between jobs" gets old.

      Interview tip: Hold your head high and don't worry too much about your current employment status. Make your cover story short and to the point and then move on.

      Personal Aside: The project I have been interviewing people for is so atrociously foul that of the people we have hired, the best have already quit or are in the process of doing so. People's fears that you will jump ship because you are overqualified are justified by real world experiences.

      --


      I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
    7. Re:Yep, the benefits of you being unemployed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (First off, I'll avoid making any comments about the difference between "your" and "you're")

      Too late.

  9. check this shit out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


  10. Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    This is not THAT interesting at all to be a front-page story. Sigh, any use in my posting?

  11. The guy has no job and you say... by JusTyler · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well worth the reading time as a small break in a busy day

    He has no job, way to rub it in, you inconsiderate clod! ;)

    1. Re:The guy has no job and you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, that was mean.

      I mean, calling someone a faggot or Microsoftie passes as a common courtesy here, but I haven't seen any posts like yours before.

    2. Re:The guy has no job and you say... by r00t_of_all_evils · · Score: 1

      It's insensitive clod, you illiterate clod!

      --
      God is real, unless declared integer.
  12. Spam, eggs, spam, spam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Baked beans, spam, chicken, spam, spam, spam, spam, waffles, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, potato chips, spam, spam, spam, spam, pizzas, spam, spam, spam, and spam.

  13. Odd Todd by corz · · Score: 4, Funny
    The greatest of all unemployed people will always be Odd Todd.

    This man is my idol, and anyone who has ever been unemployed should appreciate "staring at the wall for an hour after waking 'early' up at 10:17, drinking a pot of coffay." I donated a few bucks to help his cause, and you should too, after all, he is unemployed :)

    1. Re:Odd Todd by kyoko21 · · Score: 1

      Oh man, you beat me to it. I was going to suggest that website because my friends and I (when we were laid off) lived off that site everyday to help us get through our days.

      Great site to visit!

    2. Re:Odd Todd by corz · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Oh man, you beat me to it.

      It pays to be a subscriber ;)

  14. Could such benefits have evolutionary consequence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bacterial flora of my nether regions now gets three, sometimes four days at a stretch between mass extinctions.

  15. I am now back at school by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Yes I moved back in with my parents. :-(

    But now I have less stress, met a girlfriend online and I am going back to school.

    I feel I am working towards myself and not a greedy souless corporation.

    People work to hard today. I think the divorce rate might have something to do with people doing the work of 2-3 in order for bigcorp to boast its stock price for productivity increases.

    I love programming and want to do it. However I do not want to work more then 55 hours a week. I also want to learn and better myself. Its hard with such high demands. Also young college kids are willing to work 80 hrs a week so if you don't then they steal your job!??

    In other words its now the new norm to be underpaid and overworked where 40 hr work weeks are considered "not meeting expectations".

    1. Re:I am now back at school by 11223 · · Score: 0, Funny
      "met a girlfriend online"

      How did his surgery go?

    2. Re:I am now back at school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahah, what a loser. Stop thinking about orally pleasing your mom, it's gross. Take it from me, your mom's cunt is really gross. Don't go there.

    3. Re:I am now back at school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's precisely the reason I dropped all of my CS related classes, picked up some fun/interesting classes, and plan to go become a street mime/male prostitute.

      I figure there's a nich, and it's not so demanding.

    4. Re:I am now back at school by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      I feel I am working towards myself and not a greedy souless corporation.

      Should have said: "I am working towards my greedy soulless self and not a greedy souless corporation." I mean, you _are_ American, right?

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    5. Re:I am now back at school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did his surgery go?

      The switch went fine; however, the elf ears didn't turn out so well.

    6. Re:I am now back at school by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this here greedy soulless American just wants to get a job doing something I love, earn a decent wage, and be financially independent.

      If that makes me greedy and soulless, then I'll gladly take the moniker.

      How dare you? I mean, I know you're anonymous on the Internet, but that doesn't mean you should be a dick just on general principle.

      Whatever country you're in, I'm glad I don't live there near you.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:I am now back at school by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
      Went quite well as you can see.

    8. Re:I am now back at school by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
      Good for you.

    9. Re:I am now back at school by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 0

      You left out: It's much less degrading.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    10. Re:I am now back at school by TheGrayArea · · Score: 1

      This past August I quit Microsoft. Yes, that Microsoft and moved back to my hometown. I don't have a job, but that's ok with me. We bought a house and my wife works and pays the bills. That really doesn't leave anything extra, but now I take care of my kids, take them to school in the morning, take care of the house, and there's always someone there when they get home from school in the afternoon. It's not exactly a "Leave it to Beaver" world, but I'm happier without the stress of a corporate giant sucking my life away, the kids are happier and most importantly my wife is thrilled to have me around again and not coming home late and stressed out.
      You don't need as much money as you think you do.

      --

      This space for rent.
    11. Re:I am now back at school by Kombat · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's great, good for you.

      You don't need as much money as you think you do.

      How's that retirement saving coming along?

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    12. Re:I am now back at school by TheGrayArea · · Score: 1

      >>Wow, that's great, good for you.
      Thanks. It won't last forever, but it's a nice break.
      >>You don't need as much money as you think you do.
      How's that retirement saving coming along?
      Well, Mr Mom Inc doesn't have much of a benefits plan. I'm riding on my wife's health insurance (which is better than average). I've maxed my yearly contribution to 401k for years now, so if I loose 12 months or so, it won't be that bad. That's definitely a consideration. My wife has a 401k plus a pension so we can use that when the time comes. I'm still young enough (early 30's) to get in the magic 20 years somewhere. It may be a job with the local school system as a tech (looking into that now) or it may be working at Lowe's in the electrical section. Actually, one intrigues me as much of the others. I've lost my lust for living on the bleeding edge and on the "inside" anyway. My job life will be rather mundane from here out and that's the way I like it.

      --

      This space for rent.
  16. One obvious benefit: by bersl2 · · Score: 1

    more time for pr0n. Because there's never enough time for pr0n...

    1. Re:One obvious benefit: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He mentioned that he's married. He lost the desire for sex looooong ago. :)

    2. Re:One obvious benefit: by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      He didn't lose the desire for all sex, just sex with his wife...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
  17. Been there, am doing that by JayBlalock · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Laid off in April. The usual. Have to say, pretty much everything on this list rings really true. Although in my case, the biggest benefit was:

    Time to read up on any obscure or interesting subject that sprang to mind.

    I think I advanced my self-education more in the last few months than I had in years previously. I know a whole lot more about our legal and political systems, can tell you all sorts of fun things about Wicca and Buddhism, know more about more obscure European bands than I care to name, and I'm even getting closer to really understanding why the Middle East is the way it is.

    But things are looking up. Getting out of the cube farms seem to have freed my mind. I've been taking on odd freelance jobs. I've just gotten hired by a tutoring company which'll let me more or less make my own hours. Been doing some freelance writing. I'm not out of the woods yet, but if things keep going the way they are, I may be able to build up enough contacts and experience to make a good enough living without ever stepping foot in an office, and 3/4 of it from home.

    I feel oddly like the Campbellian hero having passed through the Cave. (Week of May 15th: Read "Hero of a Thousand Faces")

    So, just to chime in with the message of this article, if you're unemployed, take heart. Look at it as an opportunity. If you've got the money to ride on for a bit, DON'T spend all your time looking for yet another cube. Use the time to boost your knowledge or skills.

    --
    Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    1. Re:Been there, am doing that by JayBlalock · · Score: 1

      Heh, I was just looking at that post again. Six months ago I would not have understood my own sig.

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    2. Re:Been there, am doing that by SunPin · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Agreed entirely. I'd take it one step further: why are we forced to work for a living? The mind has no limitations once it's free from the bonds of repetitive bullshit. I'll bet that your post represents at least a thousand people here. Our slave week boils down to nothing more than plotting for food making us no different from Cuba or any other "lesser" state. If we're busy plotting for food or we have artificial and impossible ideals f'n with our heads then we aren't focus on the system stacked against us. Everyone has to make a living but being a drone in a corporate machine is not necessary. What do we need out of this world? Not enough to warrant working for the Man again.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    3. Re:Been there, am doing that by JayBlalock · · Score: 4, Interesting
      But ultimately, it IS all about food. We're plotting to get food, one way or another. (and shelter, and sex)

      The problem, ultimately, is that as we moved away from the insular village\tribal life, the idea of people's contributions to society became more and more abstract. At its heart, the most romantic definition of money is that it's a symbol of how much you have put into society. (I know, I know) Without trying to slip into some idealized Marxist fantasy of a world-tribal culture where everyone does exactly what work they want, and is rewarded with a decent lifestyle in return, money is pretty much the closest you can get.

      Those people who have the ability to make money entirely on their own are, ultimately, in the minority. Not bragging here - I have a real problem with self-motivation that's a hinderance. Many people simply don't have the resources to work for themselves. But more than that, as our world gets more streamlined, more efficient, there simply are not enough "fun" jobs to go around. Once we were a huge nation of millions of farmers, now we have corporate owned farms with thousands of workers.

      But you can't get rid of it without getting rid of all the infrastructure we take for granted - power, the Internet, running water, etc etc. Every modern convenience creates a new category of menial drudge work that SOMEONE has to do.

      It's pretty much an unsolvable problem. If you have the resources to get out from under the corporate thumb, then more power to you. But for our world to function as it does, large numbers of people have to stay put.

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    4. Re:Been there, am doing that by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      I learned morse code and got my extra class amateur radio license. I'd never have the time to do that if it wasn't for unemployment.

      On the other hand unemployment can be frightening. I never made much before unemployment and I had a hard time paying my bills.

    5. Re:Been there, am doing that by JayBlalock · · Score: 1

      Hey great, and those're actually useful things to know. Now just gotta find a way of utilizing your newfound l33t sk1lLz.

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    6. Re:Been there, am doing that by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      Agreed entirely. I'd take it one step further: why are we forced to work for a living?

      Because no rich benefactor has yet recognized your hidden genius?

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    7. Re:Been there, am doing that by SunPin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think it's a resource problem. I think it's fear. People are afraid to step into the unknown or, as in Plato's Cave, step out to the unknown. Sure, it's scary at first because we've never seen our minds unbound. Our minds start fsckin with us for awhile while unemployed but then things settle and it's like being out in the warm light rather than a dark, stuffy cave.

      Note to moderators: I'm minding my own business and chatting with other /. denizens. Go mod somebody else down and leave me the fuck alone. You'll get yours in Meta-moderation.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    8. Re:Been there, am doing that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A similar story from my end. Let go in March and kind of stayed in limbo for several months untill deciding to move back to my old (beautiful and still populated with some good friends) college town.

      I was hoping to find more insight in that article, but most of it was humor. I've come across some real benefits of being unemployed. Most of them are based on having more time, but a few others too.

      Since losing my job, I've learned how to install and use Linux and now have my own little server. I've learned how to play mandolin. I've devoted more time to my faith and to my friends (and my computer. ;) I've become much more efficient in what I spend my money on and in how I live in general.

      And yeah, not having to wake up to an alarm clock (and consequently getting more than 5 hours of sleep a night) is nice too.

    9. Re:Been there, am doing that by JayBlalock · · Score: 1
      But that's my point. How do you propose we have a sewage system, without some poor bastard down in the tunnels keeping the flow going? Or a power grid without people spending all day climbing up and down poles?

      Those people CAN'T quit. Or else all our modern system shuts down.

      It's the Fight Club paradox - those people most necessary to run the world are the ones getting the most shat upon.

      BTW - mocking the mods will only get you modded into oblivion. If you get an unfair mod, just swallow your pride and accept it, happens to us all, griping will only make it worse.

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    10. Re:Been there, am doing that by Lurgen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I went through this last year, and it changed the way I look at work completely. I'm back in a relatively "normal" IT consulting job, but I did some time contracting and enjoyed it.

      The downside of course, and the underlying message in this guys website is that it's not easy being unemployed. He hints at the downsides, like not eating the things you used to, not having the option of going out or buying new things. Of course, he wrote that page simply to cheer himself (and maybe others) up. Pity 'bout the political statement he felt obligated to make.

      When I was out of work, I started a blog. It made a good place to gather my thoughts, and I've written up quite a few entries on the subject of job-hunting. Not that I'm a master at it, I spent 5 weeks out of work when my last contract ended and got to enjoy 5 weeks of hell.

    11. Re:Been there, am doing that by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      It was more a matter of personal improvement. I was depressed big time and needed to do something - anything.

      Now that I'm back working I know now that I can do most anything I set out to do - even learn something like morse code.

    12. Re:Been there, am doing that by Prien715 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I completely agree. I've recently graduated (BS in Comp Sci/BA in Philosophy), and have been unemployed since then. I've been learning how to play guitar better (something I've always wanted to do) and reading. Speaking of which, I'm currently reading Campell's The Power of Myth and I really enjoy it. I'd be very interested in any good material you've read on Buddhism. I've read a couple books as coursework and found them fascinating (though the neatest single thing I've found is the Jainist theory of reality (i.e. their metaphysics)).

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    13. Re:Been there, am doing that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I'd be very interested in any >> good material you've read on Buddhism You might want to try "The Power of Now" Eckhart Tolle... was an excellent companion during the unemployed days :)

    14. Re:Been there, am doing that by JayBlalock · · Score: 1
      Honestly, I'd say the easiest way to get an overview of Buddhism is to pick up a book of the Dalai Lama's teachings. Granted, there are several schools of Buddhism out there, but the Dalai Lama is an excellent teacher, so it's a fine starting point. (and generally a lot easier to get into than translations of the old scrolls) You can go explore the various paths later if you're still interested.

      "The Art of Happiness" is good for an absolute novice. If you are familiar with the basic principles, just about any collection of his writings or teachings should work fine. (I often see a book or two of his in bargain bins, even, just because there are so many collections of his lectures and speeches and whatnot.)

      Campbell's fun. Hero of a Thousand Faces is a must-read, except it will *ruin* you on action movies forever. (or, worse, lead you into pretentious debates as to whether McClain picking glass out of his feet in the bathroom represented his "cave" ;-> )

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    15. Re:Been there, am doing that by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what would qualify as a "novice". I took a (very good) course on Indian Philosophy and another on world religions as an undergrad; my professor studied Buddhism (in Tiawan I believe) for several years and was fluent enough in Korean to provide us with his own translation of the Heart Sutra. Course readings included _What_the_Buddha_Taught_ by Walpola Rahula. I've also been to a few Zen meditation sessions. The only thing I've seen about the Dalai Lama was the film Kundun, which is supposed to be fairly accurate, but I'm suprised I didn't take the obvious step of actually reading what he later wrote;) (I'm curious...what would the Dalai Lama say about his writings being released under the GPL or what license are they currently under?) Thanks for the Campell advice though. I don't think I really need to worry about having my action movies ruined. I think they're predictable enough as it is.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    16. Re:Been there, am doing that by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Funny

      I learned to speak Sanskrit and I can divide by zero.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    17. Re:Been there, am doing that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thank god every day that I'm self-employed.

    18. Re:Been there, am doing that by SunPin · · Score: 1

      These jobs you describe were once skilled/respectable labor and they still could be if industrialization didn't become so damn good at making individual lives irrelevant. For over 10 years, IT has programmed themselves into obsolescence. I'm not sure if it was orchestrated or not but harnessing millions of minds to happily write reusable code while giving it away is pretty f'n brilliant. Think about that turkey processing plant in Missouri... do you really believe that they are planning to turn *turkeys* into oil? Try surplus labor. (That last part was meant to be funny)

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    19. Re:Been there, am doing that by JayBlalock · · Score: 1
      Hmmm... While I don't think he's ever addressed the issue, based on his philosophies, I can't imagine the Dalai Lama having any objection whatsoever to his teachings being freely passed around. He has no real need for the money from their selling, and his sole expressed desire appears to be that as many people learn from his teachings and grow from them as possible.

      Of course, I think most of the profits from his books are funnelled into his campaign to free Tibet. But on the whole, I think he'd rather people learn from his teachings than to make money, even for Tibet.

      (just my interpretation)

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    20. Re:Been there, am doing that by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Are you implying that subsistence farming is fun? Working pre-dawn to dark and then falling into exhausted sleep, each day?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    21. Re:Been there, am doing that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're explaining personal fulfillment and growth to the guy who a few messages back admitted he has a serious motivation problem.

      Probably bounced off like marbles off a teflon-coated frying pan. Ding!

  18. Parent has goatse. by FannyMinstrel · · Score: 1, Troll

    Beware, Goatse.

  19. Yeah right. by sakusha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I try to convince myself I've gotten out of the rat race of Upward Mobility, and it's morally superior to have Downward Nobility. But I just want a fucken job. I helped build this industry in the early 1970s, now I'm supposed to be in the peak earning years of my career, but I'm locked out due to the bad economy. It sucks. There is nothing good about being unemployed.

    1. Re:Yeah right. by JayBlalock · · Score: 1

      "Downward Nobility." I'm going to steal that, hope you don't mind. :-)

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    2. Re:Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all yours. It never was mine, in fact, because it was a typo. I'm an idiot after all.

    3. Re:Yeah right. by sakusha · · Score: 1

      I'd give credit to the person I stole it from, if I could remember who it was.

    4. Re:Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I hear that.

      What good is 15 years of Netware experience today?

      How about someone who knows that the original PC had odd size ISA slots, so that 286 and later cards wouldn't fit?

      Who cares that you spent a million hours with DOS and QEMM getting an extra 60K of base memory so somone's blasted Autocad machine would work correctly?

      It's turning out that spending 20 years working with computers has been a really poor investment.

      I should have been a pharmacist and spent my weekends, evenings and not-having-to-wear-a-pager time doing anything else... it would have been more productive, economically speaking.

    5. Re:Yeah right. by JayBlalock · · Score: 1

      Then it's a meme and it's free for all. ;-)

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    6. Re:Yeah right. by ashot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It doesn't sound like you spent 20 years with computers, it sounds like you spent 20 years maintaining them. "working with computers" is a really broad field, and its actually one of the smartest things you could have done, and could be doing right now.

      --
      -ashot
    7. Re:Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Aren't you that blank-eyed H1B-visa intern from the Dilbert comic?

    8. Re:Yeah right. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I helped build this industry in the early 1970s, now I'm supposed to be in the peak earning years of my career

      Peak earning year in non-management IT is around 37 based on a handful of surveys I have read and personal observation. After that it starts to dip. It does not sound like you are near 37. I wonder where other careers peak? Are they what you are basing your expectations on?

      IT experience is not valued much in cubicle land. My take is that things that experience help most with, such as maintainability and a nose that can sense bad ideas, are the least visible to those who sign your paycheck.

    9. Re:Yeah right. by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      if you have been around that long then your chances of getting hired doing meaningful work is slim. Good luck to you, I hope you don't end up as a greeter at walmart.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    10. Re:Yeah right. by sakusha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm only 46, just on the edge of greylisting (I started really young). I actually went back to school and got 2 degrees in different fields, and then of course the money got sucked out of those too. America is turning into a ghost town, by the time GWB is done selling this country to Halliburton, there won't be a single job left except in the Army (and I'm too old for that).

    11. Re:Yeah right. by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Christ tell me about it ... There's also a LEGION of college students out there who are terminally screwed as well.

      Almost all of the people I graduated college with in 2001 are unemployed or severly underemployed (the lucky ones). The *lucky* folks are selling motorcylces, the less lucky are delivering pizzas etc... but most are just unemployable. Ever try to get a minimum wage job when you have a BS degree? I have a BS in CSIf you lie you have to explain why you haven't been working for the last 4 years, or in my case why my previous job was as a Systems Administrator and now I want to answer telephones at a reservation center?

      If you don't lie they are very nice to you and you get a letter in the mail a few days later saying you don't match their needs. What community college flunky manager for Hilton reservation center is going to hire an engineer to answer their phones? They probably have no doubt that you could do a good job but still they know Im gone as SOON as I find a new job and their training costs are wasted.

      I've had similiar situations with jobs where I would be underemployed, I interviewed for a job as a Computer Tech II for 20,000k a year. I had more experience/education then the MIS director who interviewed me ... was he gonna give me a job? no fucking way :) They hired some guy who could barely find the power switch on a computer -- no threat to him.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    12. Re:Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      god.

      this is a reminder to start working out. like as in EXERCISE.

      i imagine that if one is in good physical shape....50 can look like 42.

      especially in the tech industry where 30 year olds look like life just kicked the ever living crap out of them.

      fat, pasty, sweaty, scraggly beard, stains on the clothes, pimples, pale as a ghost.

      you get the idea.

      in that condition, i'm surprised that a 35 year old gets hired.

      looks like death warmed over.

    13. Re:Yeah right. by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      With a couple of degree it ought to be pretty easy to immigrate to another country. Maybe that's worth looking into. For example if you got citizenship in any EU country you can live and work throughout EU.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    14. Re:Yeah right. by sewagemaster · · Score: 1


      i'm one of those who graduated in 2001 with a B.ENG. did some masters courses last year to 'test the waters' at the university and this year i'm doing masters. guess since i wont be done school for a bit, i've just been trying not to think about it.

      what am i going to do when i'm done. PhD? well at least there's funding for PhD... maybe TA for a course or two and be able to feed myself. ultimately... eventually... we'll all have work.... one way or another.

      cant rely on parents for much longer either.

    15. Re:Yeah right. by Triv · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ever try to get a minimum wage job when you have a BS degree?

      Have you tried working at a bookstore? They crave people like that because they're smart and desperate. Sounds like a joke; it's not - I used to work with a guy at Shakespeare and Company who had a masters in english lit and was making 6.25 an hour like the rest of us. :)

      Triv

    16. Re:Yeah right. by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      jeesus. unfourtantely in the town I live in theres only 2 book stores because most of these ass-hats can't read :)

      I did know a girl though who was the manager of taco bell who had a degree in "theater costume design".

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    17. Re:Yeah right. by squaretorus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The market may be totally different in the US, but here in the UK my advice to the IT grads in unemployment hell is to apply for a fasttrack management position with a retailer.

      These guys are desperate for talent which can feed through to more senior management, and even for 'talent' that won't forget to order the bread and wine for the weekend rush. They'll start you on a decent salary and put you in a position of relative power, pensions and healthcare should all be in there too if its a big company.

      When the market in IT picks up you can hop over and answer the 'Last position' question with something a hell of a lot better than 'Pizza delivery boy for 3 years'. 'I took a fasttrack management position in retail to get some people management under my belt - within 18 months I was running my own store with responsibility for 3 satellite stores - as the IT sector is picking up I've refused a more senior management position in retail to come back to where I think I can truly kick some ass - I want a board position within 5 years'.

      Try it kids - it might just work!!

    18. Re:Yeah right. by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 1

      Sadly there is a slump in EU too...

      --
      Just saying it like it are.
    19. Re:Yeah right. by dcw3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I try to convince myself I've gotten out of the rat race of Upward Mobility, and it's morally superior to have Downward Nobility. But I just want a fucken job. I helped build this industry in the early 1970s, now I'm supposed to be in the peak earning years of my career, but I'm locked out due to the bad economy. It sucks. There is nothing good about being unemployed.

      As a 45 yr old Principal SW Eng., writing this from my cube, I'd suggest to you that peak earning years in the 40s are due more to age discrimination than to economical issues. Otherwise, you'd see the peak at retirement age. This economy is NOTHING compared to the unemployment we saw in '81. It's easy (I won't debate the merit in this thread) for companies to dump us higher paid folks and hire a couple of recent grads or H1B Visa types for less. Your best bet is to find a niche, do work that others aren't willing or able to do, keep current on tech issues, and make sure your boss is aware of the value you're adding to his bottom line (from his viewpoint, if you're not adding then your dispensible). Anyway, good luck to you...from my vantage point, it looks like things have started picking up over the last six months.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    20. Re:Yeah right. by hanssprudel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe the fact that you are limiting yourself to that town is the problem?

      Anyone who isn't willing to take any job they can get, anywhere in the world, is unemployed by choice.

    21. Re:Yeah right. by bobajobrob · · Score: 1

      Sorry but ordering stock and bossing staff around doesn't cut it for me. Creative and intellectual people would probably be happier doing something creative like programming or starting *their own* business.

    22. Re:Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I just want a fucken job.

      then go to a fucken foundry or a fucken fast food, or fucken walmart.

      there are jobs, not overpaid bullcrap jobs like were out ther before...

      it pisses me off the lazy asswipes that are too "proud" to go and work a snag grinder or pouring floor at a foundry.

      boo fricking hoo... go get your ass dirty and do some real work for once in your life.

    23. Re:Yeah right. by squaretorus · · Score: 1

      "Creative and intellectual people would probably be happier doing something creative like programming or starting *their own* business"

      Been there done that - hardly anyone else ever follows. Starting up is hard work, long hours, poor pay for a long time until you start to get the balance right. The masses dont have an entrepreneurial spirit - and will have a better 'life' with a decent salary and a shit job than with no salary and a challenging startup to run (or fail to run).

      In my experience most people who call themselves creative intellectuals are neither. Those who are both are in enough demand that unemployment isn't an issue.

      With apologies to the greatest cartoon to ever appear in Viz:

      Overqualified creative intellectual battling a system stacked against you?
      Lazy more like!

    24. Re:Yeah right. by Cederic · · Score: 1


      >> "I want a board position within 5 years"

      shit. After 5 years if you're lucky I _might_ let you write some code unsupervised.

      If you're into management, do management. if you're in IT, do IT - it's not management.

      ~Cederic

    25. Re:Yeah right. by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      make sure your boss is aware of the value you're adding to his bottom line

      That, by far, is the best advice I've seen in this discussion so far. Too often, geeks get focused on technical accomplishments (optimized network traffic, or decreased latency on servers, etc.) without understanding or communicating what that means to the business as a whole in terms of hard dollars saved or productivity gains achieved. Keep an informal log of such achievements, and when the opportunity arises, make your boss aware of them, since he can then use them to justify his own employment to his boss.

      Let's face it - very often, IT/IS work goes down some pretty unproductive paths, wasting a great deal of time and effort without making a significant difference to a company's performance. Since managers everywhere are looking to cut costs, it's best to make sure you're seen as indispensable.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    26. Re:Yeah right. by mbrod · · Score: 1

      I am quite suprised this isn't mentioned more in the media. What are College grads doing? Are they actually finding jobs?

      Nothing like getting out of college 100k in debt and hardly able to get a job as a Wal-Mart greeter. Oh, and once you get that job houses now cost about 3 times as much as they did when you started college so have fun with that one.

      Ahhh good times, good times.

    27. Re:Yeah right. by bobajobrob · · Score: 1

      "The masses dont have an entrepreneurial spirit - and will have a better 'life' with a decent salary and a shit job than with no salary and a challenging startup to run (or fail to run)."

      What people who are not categorised in "the masses"? Shit jobs stifle creativity and that makes people miserable - I don't see many happy managers from where I'm standing, just haggard stressed ones. It'd be more rewarding to live in a council house and sell dope than have a "shit job"

    28. Re:Yeah right. by bobajobrob · · Score: 1

      "In my experience most people who call themselves creative intellectuals are neither." "Lazy more like!" Apparently your experience has made you rather cynical. Creative people usually have creative roles like programmers or designers or something. Would you classify them as lazy too?

    29. Re:Yeah right. by bobajobrob · · Score: 1

      "In my experience most people who call themselves creative intellectuals are neither" In my experience, cynicism is the result of an unfulfilling life. Perhaps that's the result of having a shit job?

    30. Re:Yeah right. by squaretorus · · Score: 1

      Shit - looks like I pushed your 'special button' huh!

      Life!=Work for everyone. In fact for most (i.e. the masses). I stand by my original comment - turning up for a 37.5 hour week for a decent salary then trotting off to shag your girlfriend, play your gamecube, drink your guinness and talk about football has its attractions when compared to sitting at a keyboard 24/7 bitching about how you're so creative.

    31. Re:Yeah right. by Politburo · · Score: 1

      True... some of us consider living on the cheap from week to week, but near to the people and places we love to be more important than being able to buy that new graphics card when it comes out, but being 2500 miles from anyone you know.

    32. Re:Yeah right. by pmz · · Score: 1

      I have a BS in CSIf you lie you have to explain why you haven't been working for the last 4 years, or in my case why my previous job was as a Systems Administrator and now I want to answer telephones at a reservation center?

      Omitting that you have a BS isn't lying. If it isn't to your advantage for a particular job, don't even divulge it. It's called negotiation.

    33. Re:Yeah right. by pmz · · Score: 1

      ...by the time GWB is done selling this country to Halliburton, there won't be a single job left except in the Army (and I'm too old for that).

      The optimist in me prefers to call it a "wake of opportunity." Sure, the IT economy is being reset (vigorously), but it is basically an acknowledgement of the truth, where supply is exceeding demand in the USA. Computer Science is currently overrated and undervalued. CS grads who go months unemployed waiting for that golden programming job probably would be much better off getting a job that simply requires a bachelors degree--in anything. There are jobs out there like this, and not all of them are in sales (hopefully).

    34. Re:Yeah right. by direwolf+puppy · · Score: 1

      spoken like someone without a family. While you may be willing to uproot your kids and basically force your spouse to quit their job, there are those of us who won't.

      --


      You rush a Miracle Man, you get rotten miracles - Miracle Max, TPB
    35. Re:Yeah right. by Kintanon · · Score: 1

      That may be true. But if you're trying to go back to school, and just need enough of a job to pay a few hundred $ a month in bills why should you have to travel half way across the world? I'm trying to change fields and go into physical therapy, I've got the school situation taken care of, but I need a job in the area and there just aren't any. Even the places with NOW HIRING signs aren't hiring now. They are just collecting applications to ignore.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    36. Re:Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell come to Texas. You can't be any worse than my Instructor that spends half the class time talking about his fucked up DSL connection. Day after day after day after day etc.
      I might actually learn something I didn't already know and don't give a damn about enough to forget it.

    37. Re:Yeah right. by hanssprudel · · Score: 1

      "just need enough of a job to pay a few hundred $ a month in bills why should you have to travel half way across the world?"

      Do you even listen to yourself?

      You imply somehow that you are entitled to finding a job that suits your situation ("why should I?") You should travel half way across the world to make a few hundred bucks, because nobody around you is willing to hire you. It's that simple.

      You aren't entitled to anything. Get over it.

    38. Re:Yeah right. by hanssprudel · · Score: 1

      That is called a choice, my friend. Stop whining about the effects of the inflexible situation you have chosen.

      Besides, there are ways to deal with that. People aren't plants, they can't be "uprooted". My family got up and moved to new countries four times during my childhood, and I think I'm better off for it (multilingual for instance). You or your spouse could do a weekly commute.

      That may not be ideal, but what makes you think you are entitled to so much more?

  20. DONT CLICK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Above is the link to the missing SCO source code, you will not be able to use Linux anymore if you click. The strong NDA required for viewing the link above!!!

  21. Excellent by petabyte · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think that many more people would benefit from these joyous unemployment moments. So don't hesitate, quit today. That way those of us who are stuck day in and day out applying to hundreds of jobs with the hope they we get so much as one interview.

    Unemployment is not fun no matter what a book or an article may say. Myself, and the other 10 dozen Slashdoter's need jobs.

    1. Re:Excellent by NickFitz · · Score: 1
      Myself, and the other 10 dozen Slashdoter's need jobs.

      ...and lives, and girlfriends...

      :-)

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
  22. The reality of popcorn for the jobless by JusTyler · · Score: 4, Informative
    Speaking of things you don't need, what about that tub of buttered popcorn


    Popcorn is actually an ideal foodstuff if you're on a very tight budget. It's SO cheap!

    I bought myself a popcorn making machine for $20. Basically it's a big "hot air generating machine". You throw your popcorn kernels in, they get heated up and blown around for five minutes, then they all pop and out tumbles the popcorn.

    You can buy a bag with two lbs of kernels for about a dollar. Lasts me about 15 gigantic bowls of popcorn. Keeps your regular too. High in fibre.

    So you pay about 7 cents a bowl, which is a good stomach filler in the evening, and a cent or two for the electricity needed. Popcorn is a bargain, particularly if you like it plain, or with some salt thrown over it (as I do). Just make it YOURSELF.
    1. Re:The reality of popcorn for the jobless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Popcorn is alright, but I can't stand all the butter and crap most of them have in them. But really, it doesn't compare to a big-ass bag of generic tortilla chips and homemade (extra spicy) salsa. YEAH!
      BTW, a lot of poor folks eat cat food. It's dirt cheap and supposedly isn't that bad. I haven't tried that yet...

    2. Re:The reality of popcorn for the jobless by kdart · · Score: 1

      Yep. I just went to Costco and got a 25 pound bag of pinto beans for about $8. Those are dried beans, not canned. They are pretty healthy, and that's pretty cheap (they'll last a long time).

      (I never thought I'd see the day when I was happy about beans).

      --

      --
      The early bird catches the worm. The worm that sleeps late lives to see another day.
    3. Re:The reality of popcorn for the jobless by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      beans rule. they are a pain to cook; you have to boil them *and* throw them in the crock pot for a *long* time. the wait is worth it, though.

      buying huge amounts of hobo food is not for the timid. you'll get all sorts of strange looks buying large bags of beans no matter where you go. just compare the price of your beans to those tiny cans that go for $1 a piece and you should be the one laughing at *them*.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    4. Re:The reality of popcorn for the jobless by nfotxn · · Score: 2, Funny

      I need a machine that'll get me heated up and blown for about five minutes. It's all I need really.

      --

      _nfotxn

    5. Re:The reality of popcorn for the jobless by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      I bought myself a popcorn making machine for $20. Basically it's a big "hot air generating machine".

      I think that has more to do with corporate upper-level management than unemployment...

      You throw your popcorn kernels in,

      What, don't you have to compile them first?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    6. Re:The reality of popcorn for the jobless by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I bought myself a popcorn making machine for $20. Basically it's a big "hot air generating machine". You throw your popcorn kernels in, they get heated up and blown around for five minutes, then they all pop and out tumbles the popcorn.

      Let me tell you about a cheaper and tastier popcorn maker - a pot.

      This is pretty easy. Take 1 tablespoon of oil, peanut oil if you have it, and put it in a pot. Put the burner on high, until the oil and pot are hot. Add 1/2 cup popcorn kernels. Slosh around to coat with oil. Cover. Turn heat down to medium-high. Shake pot occasionally until popping starts. When there is a delay of about two seconds between pops the popcorn is done. You'll notice most of the oil is still on the bottom of the pan (and the lid). It takes about 20 seconds to wash them, or stick them in the dishwasher if you're short on 20 seconds. Total time is about 4 minutes, even faster than hot air.

      I used to use the hot air popper due to some sense of mystery/difficulty/danger/healthlessness about the hot oil method, but it's in storage now.

      While I'm here, for a decent low-cal topping, take some sea salt and butter powder (Molly McButter, et. al.) and grind them together in a mortar and pestle. Sprinkle sparingly on popcorn. The tiny bit of oil that does make it to the popcorn promotes adhesion.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:The reality of popcorn for the jobless by landtuna · · Score: 1

      Get a pressure cooker. It'll cut your bean cooking time in half.

    8. Re:The reality of popcorn for the jobless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought myself a popcorn making machine for $20. Basically it's a big "hot air generating machine".

      Not unlike the provinical (or state for you Yanks..) legislature...

    9. Re:The reality of popcorn for the jobless by NickFitz · · Score: 1

      Indeed. And, when you need some meat, a pressure cooker will tenderise the tough, scraggy but cheap cuts into an excellent stew, while saving a surprisingly large sum in fuel.

      I really noticed that when I was living in a grotty bedsit with a coin operated electricity meter, a Baby Belling stovelet and GBP28/week from HM Government. What the Eighties Did For Us, my arse!

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    10. Re:The reality of popcorn for the jobless by ywl · · Score: 1

      Pressure cooker will work, or course.

      But if you got a good thermo or hot-water bottle, you can simply boil the bean and put the hot water and bean in a thermo overnight. You should be able to get some nicely done bean the next morning. Basically, it's the same as boiling it in a crock pot overnight but you save some electricity (for the money or for the environment, depending on your circumstance :).

      Those thermos I referred to exist but are not very commonly used in the US. In the place where I came from, we used to have bottles with silver-coated interior that can keep water hot for more than a few hours. Those are what you need. If your city have one, check in your local China Town.

    11. Re:The reality of popcorn for the jobless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hot air popping is still more convenient, and not as expensive as the grandparent poster implied. If you're unemployed, why are you buying new appliances? I got a popcorn machine at a garage sale for 2 dollars, and it works just as well as a new one that costs ten times as much.

    12. Re:The reality of popcorn for the jobless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Popcorn is a great and cheap food -- until you bite down on a semi-popped kernal and shatter a molar. That crown cost me $750, and only because my dental insurance hadn't run out yet.

    13. Re:The reality of popcorn for the jobless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe you should have invested $5 in chewing classes.

    14. Re:The reality of popcorn for the jobless by JusTyler · · Score: 1

      I'm not unemployed, I just eat as if I am. I'm what is called a "LBYMer." I "Live Below My Means." Admittedly, even in that case, what you say should have held true, but hey :-)

  23. Triumph of the Will? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently being unemployed makes you appreciate Hitler's propaganda.

  24. Irony deficient by watchful.babbler · · Score: 5, Funny

    Surely I'm not the only one who finds a dark amusement in seeing both "The benefits of being unemployed" and "Where do I find an honest headhunter?" showing up simultaneously on the Slashdot front page.

    --
    "Freedom is kind of a hobby with me, and I have disposable income that I'll spend to find out how to get people more."
    1. Re:Irony deficient by tmark · · Score: 1

      I guess it's the people who are unemployed who also need help finding a good headhunter. I take my amusement at wondering what these articles say about the readership....

    2. Re:Irony deficient by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is dying! Slashdot is dying!

      --
      Sig it.
  25. Coincedence? by wasabii · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Heh I just applied for GM on DragonRealms right before I noticed a post on /. from SimuAndy. Now THAT"S a coincedence!

  26. Kind of unimaginative.... by puppetman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What about,

    - working on that interesting open-source software project. Good for the resume as well

    - do some volunteering (hey - just go to the park and pick up garbage for an hour or two, till the unionized city employees chase you off)

    - get in shape (running is cheap, and so are push-ups)

    - eat better; too broke to eat out, so buy lots of veggies; kick the coffee and beer habit (too expensive)

    - go to the library and get out all the "classics" (whatever your definition of a classic might be) and read them. No essay at the end required, unless you really want to.

    Time like that should be used in a positive way. The silver lining around the dark cloud. And when you go for interviews, let them know what you've been doing - makes you look like a well rounded person who knows how to organize his/her time.

    1. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by rossz · · Score: 1
      kick the coffee and beer habit


      You can have my coffee when you pry it from my cold, dead hand. The morning I wake up from a double bypass I will demand a double espresso - because that's how I start each and every day and I'm not about to let something minor like heart failure get in the way.
      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    2. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know where you buy your veggies, or how well your experienved with having no money, but anything fresh is out of most unemployed peoples ranges.

    3. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're OK

    4. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's unclear whether coffee has any relationship to heart attacks at all.

    5. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by anomalous+cohort · · Score: 1

      I've heard that the book "Do What You Want, The Money Will Follow" is a good read.

    6. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by Yaztromo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What about, ...

      Hey -- are you the one spying on me from the adjacent building? :).

      I lost my job (with a company often associated with the properties "blue" and "big", not necessarily in that order) nearly two years ago, back in January 2002. Since then, I've Open Sourced my PalmOS data synchronization project (v3.0 final is due out in the next two weeks, so go download it!!!), run about 20km per week, and do about 60 push-ups, 80 sit-ups, and 12 chin-ups a day. I completely kicked the caffiene habbit (switched from regular Coca Cola to caffiene free Coca Cola... :) ), and am eating quite a bit better (and a whole lot cheaper!).

      The only things in your list I haven't done is any volunteering (unless you consider administrating and leading development on a large Open Source project every day to be volunteer work ;) ), or going to the library (I already have three bookshelves of books here, so I've been re-reading them all).

      Oh, and I haven't kicked the beer habit -- having never picked it up in the first place, I haven't really seen the point of starting, just so I can quit.

      Yup -- unemployment is the best thing that ever happened to me. More time to work on important projects, read, eat right, and get more excercise. If only I had an un-exhaustible source of money, things would be perfect (or, barring that, a decent job would do...).

      Yaz.

    7. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by Duckman5 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yech!! classics...
      Now you've gone and conjured up some awful memories of some truly awful literature. I hated being forced to read those awful books in school. It's a wonder some of that stuff didn't turn me off to reading permenantly. I've always been partial to Mark Twain's definition: "a book nobody wants to read but everybody wishes to have read."

    8. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is ironic considering the mountains of fresh produce that get thrown away...

    9. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by krinsh · · Score: 1

      Work on that open source project?? What about work on finding a jobso you can actually get paid for something you do... or write something you can actually sell. I know a few programmers that work on a variety of platforms and use partnerships with larger business - not necessarily big businesses like Xerox but their are some - in order to make a living. Consider working with someone who has the soft skills you might not have.

      --
      I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
    10. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by couchslayer · · Score: 1

      You kidding? A pound of edible fruit/vegetables is usually a good deal cheaper than a pound of processed food... hell, I can get 1lb of carrots for $1.00, and a pound of bananas for less.

      Find me a pound of processed food of similar nutritional value for that...

      --
      If a woodchuck could, would it be too lazy to?
    11. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by MCZapf · · Score: 1
      Don't worry, research suggests that drinking coffee or tea may have health benefits. I'll leave the Google search up to you, if you're interested in learning more.

      I suspect one day scientists and dieticians will discover that everything is good for you, in moderation.

    12. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 0, Flamebait


      What about - working on that interesting open-source software project. Good for the resume as well

      Speaking as a hiring manager who reads through a fair number of resumes every month, I have to say that I typically chuck the ones that talk about open source projects. I'm looking to hire someone who will put in the effort to grow our business and boost our stock price. I'm *not* looking for some hippie programmer who's going to bide time in their day job and spend his best effort writing P2P code for the great unwashed.

      Of course, that's just me. Your results may vary.

      -a

    13. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by rmull · · Score: 1

      Yeah whatever - research also suggest that eating eggs, bacon, and screwing goats 3 times per day also has health benefits.

      --
      See you, space cowboy...
    14. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by imaginate · · Score: 1

      ummm... he did talk about working out and eating better...

      I agree with the other stuff, but geez, RTFA before critiquing

    15. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by gnunick · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm not even sure you deserve a response, what with the 'hippie programmer' troll...

      But whenever I'm involved the hiring process, those candidates who have been involved in volunteer work of _any_ kind will always get extra points from me.

      I'd rather have someone working for me who isn't soley interested in their _own_ bottom line and that Escalade they've been lusting after. Someone who's a pure mercenary seems less likely to put their heart into the project they're working on, and more likely to rip off my company any chance they get. Funny, when I worked at a certain large corporation, that could have described my boss. Nope, I wouldn't have hired him either.

      So you don't like people who are willing to contribute to society while further developing their job-related skills?

      Let me guess. You wouldn't hire some slacker like Linus Torvalds in a million years, would you?

      Damned hippie programmers. Look what the 'great unwashed' have done with that kernel he gave them!

      I'm looking to hire someone who will put in the effort to grow our business and boost our stock price.

      Right, that'll also help those super-valuable (some day...) stock options you're offering them? Oh wait, that trick doesn't work any more does it?

      Oh, I get it, you're looking for slaves. Me, I'd rather have human beings working with/for me. I pity your little hirelings.

      ta GN>

      --
      I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
    16. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > working on that interesting open-source software
      > project. Good for the resume as well

      Won't work where I live (in the Netherlands).
      When unemployed you're not supposed to perform
      *any* work that could be paid for, how remote
      that possibility might be ...

      That's why I want be employed; so that in my
      copious spare time I can be ...

      Toon Moene (g77 maintainer) :-)

    17. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I remember oh so well my days in high school being coerced to read those incredibly boring texts. I could see no logic whatsoever in fishing through reams of meaningless drivel to try to retrieve enough fictional data to satisfy the teacher's examination with a passing grade.

      But I believe we nerds have returned the favor. We have crafted very intricate computer systems those old English Literature teachers now use to type their tests on... and have all sorts of neat ways to mess them up - forcing them to either pay another nerd to fix it, or spend hours upon hours reading all the stuff you need to know to keep the thing going.

    18. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      And you make money how? Not to be rude in any way, because I am totally up for never working again, but I have been unemployed for like a year, and selling things on eBay worked great until my camera got jacked. So now it's real job time. Just curious that's all.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    19. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by Open+Council · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The most annoying thing about being unemployed is that I still can't visit all those places that I wanted to visit but didn't have the time because now that I've got the time I haven't got the money.

      On the positive side I've done the other things that people have suggested ...

      I've got involved : restructured the local borough's service delivery and IT structures..

      I'm setting up a (hopefully) useful website www.opencouncil.org to promote open source in local government and, in particular, assist in the process of persuading the decision makers, not the techies, of the merits of open source.

      I'm creating an open source product ... one for creating "Rich Internet Applications" and front-ending web-services.

      I keep trying to write that book ... over 20 years of journalism only helping a little...

      And I'm keeping myself up-to-date with new technologies.

      read lots of books ... and not just computer manuals ... discovered James Lee Burke, rediscovered Jerome K Jerome

      Actually I was able to do more when I was employed and busy. Having so much time makes it so difficult to concentrate on individual projects.

      Staying up all night does let me discover old programs on cable (2hrs of Dr Who most nights) and catch up on the episodes that I missed decades ago..

      The availability of instant messaging and email to keep in contact with old friends would take up all my time if I let it.. not having to get up early lets me match my UK time with my friends US time as well.

      The bad bits : I am annoyed that my 35 years IT experience is considered a problem - "we have a young team". That being able to understand business systems and problem solving doesn't count if you experience only covers up to version 3.475 of some software that has just released version 3.476.

      Seeing job ads that want people in "mid-career" and define that as 2 to 3 years experience. Being unable to apply for lesser jobs because they'll think I'll leave.

      And then recently watching a TV ad campaign conning people into spending their money on computer training that will guarantee them high earnings "even if you have no experience".. You have to laugh don't you ??

      --
      Paul
      www.opencouncil.org
      Open
    20. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and I haven't kicked the beer habit -- having never picked it up in the first place, I haven't really seen the point of starting, just so I can quit.

      MAN you need to drink some beer. Not for the million different flavours in a single bottle, Not for the warm glow of knowing your brand is so much cooler than everyone elses, not for that sloppy brained feeling that just seems right on a Friday night, not for the hangovers and the empty wallet. No. You need to drink beer because beer turns even the most anal geek into a creature some woman somewhere will have sex with. Re-reading books when you could be chasing women!!! MAN unemployment sucks

    21. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by pballsim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Quote:
      - working on that interesting open-source software project. Good for the resume as well

      Apparently you didn't read his resume =). He has the a very impresive resume! Worked at NASA back in the day and has been busy with lots of wonderful jobs and experience.

      I think he too over-qualified.

      Quote:
      - get in shape (running is cheap, and so are push-ups)

      - eat better; too broke to eat out, so buy lots of veggies; kick the coffee and beer habit (too expensive)

      Apparently you didn't read his page. He said he has been doing this.

      Sorry, just bitter =)
      pball

      "My kid reads your honor kids e-mail"

    22. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1


      Let me guess. You wouldn't hire some slacker like Linus Torvalds in a million years, would you? Damned hippie programmers. Look what the 'great unwashed' have done with that kernel he gave them!

      No, probably not. Anyway, last I checked he didn't turn Transmeta into a big success story.

      You can flame me and call me a troll all you want, but the fact remains that people like me are out there reading resumes, perhaps for the job you want.

      Despite your assumptions, I'm not looking for mindless robots. My coworkers are people that I still need to chat with and go to lunch with, so I prefer to hire interesting, personable people. And no, I don't expect them to be slaves. But the fact is, if my team's work doesn't get done on time, I'm the one who's going to be stuck working late to catch up. So from my perspective, I have a definite incentive not to hire slackers.

      -a

    23. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      What's the relationship between slackers and open source? I do my own open source software project after hours, it's something I and my co-workers use daily. It seems to me a lot of open-source people actually work very hard, meet difficult deadlines and have great work ethics.

      What's your beef exactly?

    24. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No, probably not. Anyway, last I checked he didn't turn Transmeta into a big success story.


      Transmetas success or failure is not up to Linus. He's but a one software-engineer at the company. You wouldn't hire anyone who has worked at a company that for some reason or another was not a huge success? Isn't that kinda stupid?
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    25. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by moonbender · · Score: 1

      (unless you consider administrating and leading development on a large Open Source project every day to be volunteer work ;) )

      Yes, I do. Why not? Covers all criteria for volunteer work.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    26. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by avrincianu · · Score: 1

      What about......

      Getting so burned out after a 10 hours a day job (programming, debugging, outsourcing) that you just had to quit after an year. Living on the money you managed to save during that year. Not even looking for a job because you need to take care of more important stuff (like summer exams -- which of course get half-blown because you were simply too tired to learn after coming home from work). Looking in horror at your pokets when you discover you just spend your last money you saved on food and don't have anything to eat tomorrow. Starting to look for a job after the summer exams only to realise there are none because all of the at least decent ones were taken and the summer jobs don't pay off enough to cover one lousy meal a day. No support from parents because they simply can't afford to support you. Spending another month looking for the coins you probably tossed on the shelves (me don't carry metals around, me afraid of lightning :D ) so that you can buy bread to fill your stomach, while working on some weird freelance projects AND doing a hell of a good job about it. Then working for a boss of a ghost software firm you have to chase each month in order to get your salary although it's your hard earned right (but finally, some real money, for a change...).

      Ah, the wonders of being a student... in our beloved country Romania. One can only hope things can't get worse than this. But indeed there is but one thing to do while being unemployed: keep yourself busy all the time, learn, get better at whatever you're good at. It has two benefits: you improve your skills and you forget when was the last time you ate.

    27. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by fyonn · · Score: 1

      everything is good for you, in moderation

      and everything is bad for you in excess. you just need to find the proper level.

      dave

    28. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      There are positive aspects, well there can be not necessarily will be. Generally, the whole experience is massively painful and destabilising ... the only way through it is to remember the adage that "whatever doesn't kill me makes me stronger", which it will. As for what happens when you come out the other side... Will the IT industry ever recover ? I'm having some very negative thoughts on this, I was out of work over a decade ago I didn't have my compsci degree then and the industry was depressed but would eventually recover, this time I am really getting the feeling that maybe all that effort will be for nothing (financially, but I still like programming) because it is not going to recover and maybe I should look around for something else ... but what, there doesn't seem to be much demand for the considerable skills of a good programmer. The future looks decidedly risky to anyone who doesn't have a current IT job.

      I've started doing some volunteer IT work, but you know what places that need this stuff are flooded with people offering their services ... which is kind of spooky. I don't know what the solution is.

      My big question is this: Has business decided that IT is no longer important ? And if they still think it is important then why aren't they hiring ?

      Just my 2 cents, but I can oly afford a couple of rings from some beer cans I found.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    29. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1
      I'm looking to hire someone who will put in the effort to grow our business and boost our stock price.

      Programmers do not grow stock price, they write code to meet business requirements that grow stock price. If these business requirements are met the stock price might grow. Stock price is driven by profit, not code.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    30. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      ...

      Dude, DRINKING beer doesn't get you chicks, it just makes you look like a sloppy drunk to them. Getting chicks to DRINK LOTS OF BEER gets you chicks.

      This has been a public service announcement. The More You Know.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    31. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      And you make money how? Not to be rude in any way, because I am totally up for never working again, but I have been unemployed for like a year, and selling things on eBay worked great until my camera got jacked. So now it's real job time. Just curious that's all.

      Two words: extensive savings :). I squirrelled away quite a bit of cash over the years, and along with my severance amount, I've been able to survive, and should continue to be able to do so for at least another 6 months or so, by which time I'm hoping that one of two good looking job prospects I've applied for will have worked out.

      Yaz.

    32. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by NickFitz · · Score: 1

      As in Woody Allen's film Sleeper , when they tell him he must smoke his cigarettes as they're good for him :-)

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    33. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1


      Transmetas success or failure is not up to Linus. He's but a one software-engineer at the company. You wouldn't hire anyone who has worked at a company that for some reason or another was not a huge success? Isn't that kinda stupid?

      I think you're ignoring my point. Transmeta hired Linus for the prestige value. I'm 99% sure that he didn't do his darndest to give Midori Linux an edge up on the competition. He was too busy worrying about Linux as a whole. There was obviously some kind of conflict, as Linus cited vendor neutrality as one of his reasons for leaving.

      And I never said that I wouldn't hire someone from a company that wasn't a success. That's just your attempt to twist my words. I said I probably wouldn't hire someone who wasn't willing to make their employer's success their #1 programming priority.

      -a

    34. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1


      What's the relationship between slackers and open source? I do my own open source software project after hours, it's something I and my co-workers use daily. It seems to me a lot of open-source people actually work very hard, meet difficult deadlines and have great work ethics. What's your beef exactly?

      I didn't mean that all open source programmers are slackers, but in filtering resumes you have to make some generalizations. I suspect that OSS contributors are the type of people who work really hard on a subject they are interested in, but what they're interested in is not necessarily the same as what needs to be done.

      I'm not saying that I wouldn't hire someone who did a little bit of OSS work here and there, but my time reading /. has convinced me that I don't want to hire some hard core free software advocate. If they're not writing OSS software, then they're probably not going to be very committed to the company. And I don't really want to hire people who aren't motivated by money.

      -a

    35. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      Transmeta hired Linus for the prestige value.


      That and because he's a top-of-the-line programmer. His resume could have nothing but his name on it, and companies would fight to hire him.

      I'm 99% sure that he didn't do his darndest to give Midori Linux an edge up on the competition.


      Linus didn't give Midori an advantage, that much is obvious. And he never claimed that he gave it at advantage. That was not his job. His job was not to work on Linux in Transmeta, his job was to work on the code-morphing-tech.

      There was obviously some kind of conflict, as Linus cited vendor neutrality as one of his reasons for leaving.


      Linus said that his reasons for leaving Transmeta (well, he didn't really leave. It's a leave of absense) was that he spent more and more time on the Kernel and less and less on Transmeta, and he felt bad because of that. Therefore it was agreed that he should focus on the kernel for a while.

      And I never said that I wouldn't hire someone from a company that wasn't a success. That's just your attempt to twist my words.


      You said (and I quote): "No, probably not [hire Linus]. Anyway, last I checked he didn't turn Transmeta into a big success story."

      In other words: "Linus works for Transmeta, and Transmeta didn't crush Intel in the mobile-space. Therefore I must not hire Linus".

      I said I probably wouldn't hire someone who wasn't willing to make their employer's success their #1 programming priority.


      No you didn't, as you can see from the quote I provided. And as I said, the reason Linus left Transmeta for now was precisely what you described. He felt bad because he spent so much time on the kernel instead of Transmeta, so he left Transmenta for now so he could focus on the kernel. Obviously his actions with his employer were a concern to him. And now he works for OSDL, where he can focus on the kernel and nothing but the kernel. So his #1 priority right now (the kernel) also happens to be his employers #1 priority right now. You should be extatic. He seems to be exactly the kind of guy you are looking for. What he does on his spare-time.... Well, that's none of your business, now is it?

      And Linux is a hobby to him. A passionate hobby. Who are you to say that "your job must be more important than your passion!"?
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    36. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1


      His resume could have nothing but his name on it, and companies would fight to hire him.

      If companies would hire him based only on his name then clearly that proves my point... that they would hire him for the prestige value.

      as I said, the reason Linus left Transmeta for now was precisely what you described. He felt bad because he spent so much time on the kernel instead of Transmeta

      That's great that he had the ethics to tell his employer that he didn't have time for his day job, but it still proves my point. Transmeta invested time and money to hire him. Now they have to go through the inconvenience of replacing him, even if it's on a temporary basis.

      You said (and I quote): "No, probably not [hire Linus]. Anyway, last I checked he didn't turn Transmeta into a big success story."

      In other words: "Linus works for Transmeta, and Transmeta didn't crush Intel in the mobile-space. Therefore I must not hire Linus".

      Perhaps you don't understand the word "anyway". At least in this context, it means "I'm about to say something logically unconnected." "Anyway" certainly does not mean "therefore". In fact, I would say that they are practically antonyms.

      And now he works for OSDL, where he can focus on the kernel and nothing but the kernel. So his #1 priority right now (the kernel) also happens to be his employers #1 priority right now.

      Right now, he got himself an academic position where he can do basically whatever he wants. Such is the advantage of being a cult of personality. Most of us don't have that luxury.

      BTW, I'm not sure why I should be ecstatic.

      -a

    37. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      If companies would hire him based only on his name then clearly that proves my point... that they would hire him for the prestige value.


      No. It would be more like "Linus Torvalds? THE Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux? A REALLY kick-ass programmer? Sign here!". He would only need his name because he is so well-known and everyone knows what he has done and what he's capable of.

      That's great that he had the ethics to tell his employer that he didn't have time for his day job, but it still proves my point. Transmeta invested time and money to hire him. Now they have to go through the inconvenience of replacing him, even if it's on a temporary basis.


      What makes you think they are replacing him? They are laying off people as we speak. Besides, Linus and Transmeta parted as friends. Transmeta supports Linus on this matter, what right do you have to tell them what to do? Isn't it up to Transmeta and Linus, and no-one else?

      It seems to me that you are never satisfied. If Linus had stayed at Transmeta you would be whining how he does not concentrate on his employer 100%. Now that he corrects the situation, you whine again. No matter what you do, it's always wrong, eh?

      Right now, he got himself an academic position where he can do basically whatever he wants. Such is the advantage of being a cult of personality. Most of us don't have that luxury.


      Most of us are not as talented as Linus is.

      BTW, I'm not sure why I should be ecstatic.


      Well, you seem to think that employees #1 priority in life should be his employer and his employers projects. And that is the case with Linus.His employers priorities are his own priorities right now.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    38. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1

      With every message, you attempt to lead me further and further from my original thesis, which is that I would tend not to hire people who moonlight as OSS contributors, and that includes Linus.

      I said that *I* wouldn't hire someone like Linus, except maybe for the prestige value. And my reasoning is based on exactly the reason why he had to take a leave of absence from Transmeta. The fact that they are now laying people off is beside the point. They certainly weren't counting on that when they hired him.

      So Linus is famous and talented and everyone knows who he is; he has no problem getting a job if he wants one. But the rest of us have to sell ourselves based on our resumes. Most people here seem to think that OSS projects look good on a resume, but as I said, I tend to toss those ones out. Maybe I'm the only one, or it could be that this practice is common among hiring managers. It's hard to tell... /. readers lead a sheltered life, seeing as how anyone who posts an unpopular opinion gets quickly modded down (as my original post was).

      -a

    39. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      > my time reading /. has convinced me that I don't
      > want to hire some hard core free software advocate

      Sure, that's reasonable. Most people on /. are just OSS users, not developers though.

      > And I don't really want to hire people who
      > aren't motivated by money.

      I'm not sure OSS developers aren't motivated by money. It's relatively easy to be motivated by that!, but indeed maybe they also can be motivated by other things, like a taste for things well done, I don't know.

    40. Re:Kind of unimaginative.... by jcravens42 · · Score: 1
      do some volunteering (hey - just go to the park and pick up garbage for an hour or two, till the unionized city employees chase you off)



      I want to second this -- but on a more serious note. A great way to explore different careers is through volunteering. NetAid Online Volunteering has a database of organizations working in or for developing countries that are recruiting online volunteers. Local online (and offline) volunteering opportunities can be found at VolunteerMatch.



      Volunteering is a great way not only to explore potential new career paths, but to also have something to put on your resume in employment gap years. Just remember that, like job searches, you have probably have to apply for several positions before you will find a volunteering opportunity.

      --
      J Cravens http://www.coyotecommunications.com
  27. A thinly veiled political rant, actually by randyest · · Score: 3, Flamebait

    The article runs the gamut, from the mildly amusing:

    Some of those benefits are obvious, and I could have anticipated them even before a supervisor tapped me on the shoulder and said he needed to talk to me about something. ("Do you have a minute?" he asked. What would have happened if I'd said no, that I was too busy?)

    To the not at all funny but trying really hard (Snuffy Smith! Egads):

    There was a character in the Snuffy Smith cartoon strip of many years ago who retired but would still get up at the crack of dawn and go down to the mill every morning just so he could thumb his nose at the place as the get-to-work whistle blew.

    It does include a few good, creative ideas useful even for the gainfully emplyed:

    Back in the glorious paycheck days, I used to think about telling [telemarketers and salespersons] I'd just lost my job. Actually, sometimes I really did tell them that, because I'm a cowardly kinda guy and it's easier to fib than to be firm. Now I don't have to fib. When I tell them I'm unemployed, they hang up or back away quickly, terrified of infection by the job-loss virus.

    As well as a few really stupid comment that make me wonder about this guy's sense of self:

    My Beard It's still growing! Well, of course it is, you say. Let me explain that, on an emotional, irrational level, I still feel relieved every morning when I realize that I still need to shave. It's still growing! Despite the way I frequently feel, I haven't really been unmanned.

    But, it also has quite a bit of offtopic, annoying, and really rather insulting partisan political nonsense:

    These [fake-job advertising scammers] are rotten enough to be members of George W. Bush's cabinet. Encountering them has taught me something about the depths of human nature.

    But perhaps the greatest benefit of being unemployed is this. I now feel absolutely free to despise George W. Bush. Oh, of course I despised him before I lost my job. But now I know I'm not alone.

    And it closes with a really stupid anti-Bush link. Sigh. Bring a salt shaker if you're going to read it all.

    --
    everything in moderation
    1. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by cscx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To add to that, anyone could find a job if they really wanted to. It's just that too many Americans are too goddamn lazy to work jobs they don't like. If you're unemployed, I don't think you have a choice, now do you? McDonalds is always hiring. Sell magazines. Mow lawns. Clean toilets. Oh, but you don't like flipping burgers? Well too damn bad, quit whining about it on your blog and complaining about how GW Bush and "da man" is keepin' you down.

    2. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by inertia187 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I blame the French.

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    3. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by be-fan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here is where you are wrong. I'd rather that a guy like this spends his time improving himself and his skills, so he can be even more productive when the economy does improve, than that he waste his time flipping burgers at Macdonalds.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    4. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by driftingwalrus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But what if you have a lot of technical skills? MacDonalds won't hire you because they're concerned that you'll run off the first instance that a better job shows up! Of course you would run off, but it means that you don't get the job. They just look at the resume and say, "What is wrong with this guy that he's applying here?!".

      So, I find myself in a situation where there is no work in my field(computers, and it's really, really dead), I don't have enough experience to work at a different trade(machinist or welder, for example), AND I know too much to get a job flipping burgers. Of course, the idea of an apprenticeship is completely out of the question, those are almost impossible to get these days. Employers *will* *not* train people. Period.

      --
      Paul Anderson
      "I drank WHAT?!" -- Socrates
    5. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by cscx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wasting time, sure. But at least it's income. He's blaming other people for his problems, but there are many people in this world who would love to have a job at McDonalds, here in the land of opportunity. You can be short-sighted like this guy, or take what you have and make the best of it.

      In short, life isn't fair. Blaming it on other people just isn't going to help.

    6. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Golias · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I've been working shit jobs for two whole years now. Temping, laboring, substitute teaching. If you have any kind of education and experience at all, I assure you that you still feel unemployed when you are that badly underemployed.

      Were it not for my sporadic tech consulting jobs, I would probably be forced to throw the last 15 years of my life out the window, and start pursuing a new career.

      Thankfully, the job market is gradually improving. I've had more interviews for programming jobs in the last 2 months than I did in the previous 22, and I'm expecting an offer sheet in the mail from at least one of them this week. I suspect that, a year from now, people will be talking about the "Bush recovery," and whoever emerges from the Democratic primary is going to be scrambling for issues to run on.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    7. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Regardless of McDonalds "Long Term Carrer" hype they tend to expect you to run to the first better job you find. I really don't think that they are going to look at your resume and see you as over qualified. (who gives a resume to a fast food joint anyway) I think that they would tend to look for people that are over qualified to work there. I mean really how good of a worker could a worker be if a worker was only qualified to work at mcdonalds?

      I would hope that even the majority of youth are over qualified to flip psuedo meat.

      -blb

      AC 'cause I don't need no stinkin slashdot account

    8. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Penguinshit · · Score: 0, Flamebait


      there are many people in this world who would love to have a job at McDonalds, here in the land of opportunity

      Unfortunately, douchebag, people like you vote for legislation to keep those people out of this country.

      We're all trying to make the best of it, but are getting exactly ZERO support from the current Administration (unless, of course, we'd like to go be cannon fodder).

      According to your logic I should just give up my house, my car, the place I love to live, and move my family to some shit-hole trailer park in BumFuck S. Dakota (apologies to S.Dakota residents) so I can actually afford to live off of the McJob some illegal alien is risking death to come into this country to have.

      All the while, your friend in the White House can have a party with his buddies wiping their asses with the Constitution and killing US soldiers so that companies like Bechtel and Halliburton (and by reference, themselves) can get rich.

      I never rant or troll as a matter of policy. But you have offended me so much with your callous disregard for what's going on in this country.

      In short, sir, FUCK YOU. I hope that we never meet in person.

    9. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by schtum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are deeply misguided. There are many people in this world who would TAKE a job at McDonalds. But love it? Not a single one. Judging from your attitude, you've never had to make that decision, have you?

    10. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by gid-goo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hey, give me 2 of whatever you're having! You've been working shit jobs for 2 fucking years and you're still gung-ho Bush. You're a die hard Republican my man. We're hemorrhaging 400k jobs a month, consumer confidence is going down, we're spending more on social services in Iraq then in the U.S., top administration officials are leaking the names of covert CIA agents, we have a humongous deficit and an administration that doesn't give a rats ass. Next November you're going to be enjoying a democratic president back in the white house. I know, the freepers and little green footballers and NRO and all you guys will attempt to smear the shit out of anyone who shows up but I don't think it will matter. Kiss president fucktard good bye.

    11. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      Don't make too broad of a generalization there. There's quite a few places in the states where even the shit jobs are few and far between. And even if you do find them, then what? Is McDonald's going to hire a teenager they'll have for years, or a programmer who they think will leave the second a job in his field opens up? The concept of overqualification exists in the minds of a lot of people doing the hiring. And even if you do get that minimum wage job, will that be enough money to rent somewhere to live, transportation to work, and healthy enough food to keep you alive? In some areas it will, and in others it wouldn't even come close.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    12. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. My job satisfaction from working at Burger King was a lot higher than my current job. The paycheck was much smaller, of course, which is why I'm not there now.

    13. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mcdonald's has no problem keeping staffed. We neither need nor want you here. If you want to work so bad, improve your own country.

    14. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by j-pimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So we have a reduction in income taxes, a removal of dividend taxes, all sorts of extensions to unemploymet insurance, and a crackdown on Wall Street corruption. What the hell else do you want?

      Now if I let all the immigrannts in this country that are dying for McDonalds jobs, that brings down the standard of living for everyone. From the libeterian point of view this is a good thing, becasue the standard of living for the immigrants goes up. However, your not arguing the libeterian view.

      As to working at McDonalds or not working at McDonalds, obvisiously this guy has savings, or credit, or a shit job at McDonalds. The wonderful thing about shit jobs at McDonalds is you get to go home at the end of shift. No staying late to be a team player. He is surviving at the moment, and looking for a "real job." As long as its not off my tax dollars I'm ok with that. And if it is off my tax dollars than obvisiously Bush is doing something about it.

      Its not governemts job to fix the economy. If they can help its nice, but the market as a whole always eventually corrects itself. Goverment is one of the forces of the market, not the only force.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    15. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you so "skilled", "clever", and "educated" that you're stupidly blind to the fact that you can give a fake or otherwise unpadded resume to a fucking burger joint? Moron.

    16. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear a lot of you "skilled workers" whining about being out of work, and yet I am earning $100,000 USD a year in a cushy engineering job AND the company I work has been hiring, not firing. I suspect that the majority of you just don't have the skills required to stay competitive.

      Just because you "ramped up" for the IT bubble of 99/00 doesn't mean you're a REAL software engineer. Might I suggest that you stop whining and return to the careers you were excelling at pre-bubble: retail, gasoline stands, food services, etc.

    17. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... I hope that you're joking. If you're just so stupid that you didn't understand what he was saying, I'll enlighten you to the fact that he was *not* happy about bush, and that what he said was a kind of lament about how people might moronically take an economic upturn to be part of Bush's *incredible* guidance (yes, that was sarcastic too).

    18. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would being a proud member of hilary & bills' clit or castrated goverment grants...er I mean business loans program? Can anyone say bust.

    19. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is always the military, nowadays that IS job security....They train too.

      --
      I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
    20. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by klevin · · Score: 1

      I would hope that even the majority of youth are over qualified to flip psuedo meat.


      After having worked in a psuedo-fastfood restaurant kitchen for a few months (I practically had to beg the manager to give me a job because of the "over qualified" issue), I've learned that there are a great many youths who are underqualified to flip burgers, or even hamburger buns. Of course, having three BOH managers plus a FOH manager who were all engaged in power plays, micromanagement and pointless rule making didn't help.
    21. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by after · · Score: 0

      You guys sound like the poor black boys that used to ride my bus to school.

      'nigah byatch what?!?! gggggggg g-unit!

    22. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen here retard, if it ever came down to it, I would take a job working at McDonalds in a heart beat if it meant putting food on my table to support my wife and my kids. Obviously from your post you support an open country whereour borders are open for those to enter freely. It is also apparent that you love this country and are quite pissed for the current situation the nation is in. How can your stance be what it is yet you disagree with the war in Iraq & Afghanistan? I have a buddy in the Seals that just got back from a tour in both countries fighting for their freedom to liberate them and hear the stories about how great it is to be a part of it. How is it not worth the money to know the US freed them from a life of horror? How can you put a price on that? Keep in mind the economy started to turn for the worst prior to GB entering office.




      By the way, piss off!

    23. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by shfted! · · Score: 1

      Seriously, dumb down your resume. Remove the things that imply you have serious computer knowledge. When you tell the truth, you don't have to tell the whole truth.

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    24. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Phroggy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But at least it's income.

      It doen't pay nearly as well as unemployment.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    25. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      But what if you have a lot of technical skills?

      If you need the job, lie. Sure, lying on your application is grounds for termination. If they find out, you could suddenly wind up unemployed again. Oh no.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    26. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Phroggy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thankfully, the job market is gradually improving.

      Remember, when you see the unemployment rate go down, it's not because people are finding jobs, it's because they've abandoned hope and are no longer trying to get a job, so they no longer get counted as "unemployed" - they're removed from the equation.

      However, for those who are still looking, yeah, maybe it is starting to get better. I've got an interview tomorrow.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    27. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by danheskett · · Score: 3, Informative

      A few points:

      We're hemorrhaging 400k jobs a month,
      No, not exactly. The most recent month statistics shows a net loss of 93,000 jobs. Check it out yourself here.

      consumer confidence is going down
      In the link above, you'll notice that one month of stastics shows a decline. The trend was upwards all summer long. Essentially things trended upwards over the summer, and are starting to trend downward. One month or two months or even three months is a very small trend. It is *NOT* considered a big economic indicator to have a month of declined consumer confidence.

      we're spending more on social services in Iraq then in the U.S
      That's patently absurd. The entire budget for the war, social services, rebuilding and operational expenses for the next 12 months does not exceed the cost of one month of social services in the US. Second, are you somehow suggesting that the social welfare of minorities like the Iraqis and muslims is somewhat less valuable than an unemployed person in the US? Which is worth more? Is one okay to be unemployed and the other not? Why? One the surface your statement belies a latent racism/nationalism that is offensive at best and abhorrent at worse.

      top administration officials are leaking the names of covert CIA agents
      One agent is in question. It is two "senior officals" in question. The persons status has not been necessarily declared to be covert. Not every analyst in the Operations Directorate is a spy. It is likely the husband of the outed agent tipped Novak off himself. Wilson told Novak that he went to Niger at the suggestion of his wife. Novak called around to confirm the story. Additionally, before Novak broke the story it was common knowledge that Plame worked for the CIA. Read Novak's defense of the situation and you'll probably change your mind on the situation.

      we have a humongous deficit and an administration that doesn't give a rats ass
      Deficts are a long-term problem, not a short-term problem. What you seem to forget is that the world economy and the US economy specifically are cyclical. Boom-bust-boom-bust etc. Look at over time and you'll see essentially its a 9-10 year cycle. I do not agree with the spending patterns of Bush or even of the last administration (or any in the last 40 years really), however, to suggest that the current administration cares not for deficits is false. To solve current deficits would require drastic short term action that is not justified by the severity of the problem. A deficit of 5% of the budget is not a serious long-term concern.

      Next November you're going to be enjoying a democratic president back in the white house
      Of course, that is possible. Anything is at this point time. But it is speculation, just FYI.

      I know, the freepers and little green footballers and NRO and all you guys will attempt to smear the shit out of anyone who shows up but I don't think it will matter
      Thats an odd statement, but I dont quite follow. NRO (I assume you mean the NRA?) is as far as organizations go blisteringly forthright about how it selects to endorse candidates. They rate candidates based on issues determined by the executive board and membership at large. They assign points on a 100-point scale and then give out a grade-letter. Are you suggesting that somehow the NRA doesn't have the right to lobby citizens to vote for candidates they support? Are the 1 Million + memberso the NRA not allowed to express their collective political opinions?

      Kiss president fucktard good bye.
      Bush may well be voted out of office in favor of a democrat. But the bigger issue here is why yourself and the author of the article puts so much weight on the office of President of the US.

      The United States is not a central

    28. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! In Canada, the men play hockey, and the women are men!

    29. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Snake_Plisken · · Score: 1

      Really, so what do they do, magically wish that their power bill gets paid every month? What kind of ridiculous statement is that? If you were sitting in front of me for your job interview tomorrow, I'd laugh you out of my office for being such a moron. Back up that laughable statement above with a shred of evidence - oh wait, thats right, you can't because it makes no sense and you're spouting shit off of the top of your head.

      --

      Eat recycled food - it's good for the environment, and OK for you.
    30. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Penguinshit · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So we have a reduction in income taxes

      I got my $400 "advance" on next year's tax liability. So what. There's no real reduction here; if you think there is, you're drinking the kool-aid, Karl.

      a removal of dividend taxes

      Oh come on now.. you can't be serious. The folks to whom a removal of this type of tax makes a difference are those who have MILLIONS of dollars invested. Those who have that kind of money to invest are those who need tax reductions the least. And don't even THINK about trying to mention Bush's re-do of Reagan's "trickle down". It didn't work then, and it won't work now.

      all sorts of extensions to unemploymet insurance

      This, in lieu of an actual job-creating economic program? No thanks. I'd rather work for my money. However, I'm not able to thanks to the ignorance or just plain disregard of your buddy in the White House.

      and a crackdown on Wall Street corruption

      Hmm.. two years and counting since Enron and no one seems to be going to jail, much less having a trial. If you mean the recent indictments of Kozlowski and Quattrone, a big yawn to you as these cases are just the tip of the scapegoat iceberg and will probably result in little more than "community service". Meanwhile, the rest of the scandals go unpunished. By the way, what's going on with Bernie Ebbers or John Rigas?

      Its not governemts job to fix the economy

      Uh, actually, yes it is. And so far, nothing is being done about it. The economy was softening prior to Bush. However, because of Bush's greed and neglect, it has continue to flounder much longer than anyone predicted. And it really isn't getting much better, despite what Fox news insists.

      but the market as a whole always eventually corrects itself

      That type of free economic thinking did well in the '30s... Thankfully a stronger engine was built during the 90s which could withstand a few years of neglect (even if a few million citizens have to bear the burden).

    31. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sorry if it sounds stupid, but it's true. They're called discouraged workers, those who have given up trying to find a job. Maybe the next time you find yourself in the situation of either believing some random person on /. or blindly trusting your government to act reasonably, you'll think twice.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    32. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by craigtay · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you can call a 500 billion dollar defeceit "recovery" then I guess we are ahead of schedule.

    33. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by breman · · Score: 1

      They just look at the resume and say,

      "Where the hell is this guys application?"

    34. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Penguinshit · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I can've believe I'm responding to an AC.. but, just to clarify my point:

      It is also apparent that you love this country and are quite pissed for the current situation the nation is in. How can your stance be what it is yet you disagree with the war in Iraq & Afghanistan?

      Afghanistan I had no problem with. There was acknowledged direct involvement in the events of 9-11 and with the perpetrators thereof. Iraq, on the other hand, was a trumped-up load of bullshit which has cost us all of our international political capital and goodwill, not to mention almost 400 US military lives (I'm not even counting Iraqi civilians). Saddam, while a despicable human, had nothing to do with 9-11 or terrorism in general, obviously in hindsight had no WMDs (either to use or give to terrorists) and was effectively bottled up in his little locale doing nothing but making laughable press releases which the rest of the Muslim world largely ignored.

      I'm glad that the Afghanis and Iraqis are free from oppressive governments. It should have stopped at Afghanistan. Where is Osama these days? Is he bunked up with Saddam in some Baghdad suburb?

      How is it not worth the money to know the US freed them from a life of horror

      How about spending 1/4 of that money here at home making sure US citizens have jobs? I'm sorry, but when I'm constantly facing the loss of MY home and MY standard of living, I have to think about MY family first. A McJob wouldn't even begin to allow me to provide for them without uprooting everything we have built in the last decade (a decision, as a family, we have made not to do).

      So I take my job as a Patriot seriously enough to speak up against the transgressions of my current government, and seek to change the persons currently in power and responsible for those transgressions.

      Btw: Read some American history. Start with Nixon, and then go back to King George (18th Century).

    35. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by mo^ · · Score: 1

      American soldiers and TV companies always get to "hear the stories about how great it is to be a part of it." Yet the rest of the world just hear about how Afghanistan has been left in the hands of warlords with no coherent government in place.

      Or from Iraqis, (my neighbours are iraqi exiles with close ties to family over there - they use my PC to communicate with their loved ones), who can only see the break down of their own community that is happening after an ill planned war and a non-existant rebuilding.

      Also I have yet to meet a soldier who could converse with iraqi's or afghanis in their native tongues, so am surprised your SEAL friend could... surely he would be a better example for the TV to show than the footage we get of spotty marines trying to talk to arabs in yankee english - to no avail.

      What i am wondering is why the rest of the world havent had the courtesy to return the favour and liberate the Americans form the junta that seized power and has since been trying to diminsih all but the basic freedoms to its citizens in the name of "homeland (sounds a bit like Motherland, or Fatherland - names used by two other violent oppressive regimes) security".

      --
      bah!*@%!
    36. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by jcr · · Score: 1, Troll

      How about spending 1/4 of that money here at home making sure US citizens have jobs?

      Great Idea! Government spending is the perfect way to ensure a healthy, thriving economy!

      Maybe for an encore, a bit more money could solve the drug problem, and improve student performance in our public schools!

      Read some American history. Start with Nixon, and then go back to King George (18th Century).

      Good advice. You should take it.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    37. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by varjag · · Score: 1

      There is always the military, nowadays that IS job security....They train too.

      They also send you to a desert full of armed people who'd like to see you dead.

      --
      Lisp is the Tengwar of programming languages.
    38. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First of all, "soak the rich" may make an appealing sound bite to people like you, but in practice it just doesn't happen. Anyone making a million bucks a year who actually pays anything close to the nominal income tax rate has an incompetent accountant. Rich people have much more influence over government than you do, and if you think that goverment is ever going to help you satisfy your envy, think again.

      Consider for a moment the possible consequences of eliminating the tax on dividend income. *anyone* could start on developing a tax-free, property income for increments of a single share price. To get into making money from property today, you pretty much have to come up with the price of a house or condo that you can rent out.

      Eliminating dividend taxes would certainly help Bill Gates and Warren Buffet, but it would help *me* a great deal more, by lowering the barriers to property income.

      Without dividend taxes, I could go and buy a stock that pays a reasonable dividend yield (RJR pays 9 percent), and reinvest the dividend annually for as long as I'm working. By the time I retired, I'd have a pretty nice, tax-free income to live on.

      The way things are today, my best bet is to buy real estate, and hope I don't get screwed over by too many deadbeat tenants.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    39. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by j-pimp · · Score: 0

      Its not governemts job to fix the economy

      Uh, actually, yes it is. And so far, nothing is being done about it. The economy was softening prior to Bush. However, because of Bush's greed and neglect, it has continue to flounder much longer than anyone predicted. And it really isn't getting much better, despite what Fox news insists.

      Ok goverments role in the economy is a matter of personal opinion. I think Bush has done to much, but I am very pro small government. How has Bush's greed caused the economy to stagnate. He has investments in oil and energy companies, and has fought to decrease our dependance on foreign oil. most peopel consider that a good thing. He has gotten the oil flowing in iraq, along with basic police, and whatever government we setup wil lbe more free then the government we overthrew. It could be another cuba incident where we give up control too fast and a new dictator takes over, but that has yet to be seen. You want to argue that we should switch to more solar and nuclear power, thats another matter entirely.

      Cutting taxes from the rich does not hurt the middle class. If you expect Bush to create jobs, how is he supposed to do thst besides "trickle down." Or I suppose you expect him to build "public works."

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    40. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


      Great Idea! Government spending is the perfect way to ensure a healthy, thriving economy!

      The current Administration seems hell-bent on spending. Only, they're borrowing from future generations to do it so they can present their fictitious "tax reduction". Oh, and they're not spending it here at home, either....

      Good advice. You should take it.

      You're surely joking with that little quip...

    41. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Koos+Baster · · Score: 1

      >In short, life isn't fair.

      True. Judging from this guy's story, he's not been treated fair.

      >Blaming it on other people just isn't going to help.

      True. It's not going to help in the short term in a society governed by capitalists. Things need to get much worse before they get any better.

      But it is my belief that in the end, the social nature of human beings will prevail, and democratic values will be restored. Look at Europe: having a better social system benefits the poor as well as society in general - and thus the corporations and milionaires.

      --
      Money is the root of all evil (Send $30 for more info)

    42. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Actually, laziness implies that these people wouldn't work any jobs. (True, it's easier to be lazier at some jobs than at others, but lazy people don't work if they can help it.) Pride is the real issue. We're computer programmers or consultants, we wear jeans and make $80k, and we have to spend half our day turning down job offers because, although they pay slightly better, they simply aren't as cool.

    43. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by gdarklighter · · Score: 1

      He has investments in oil and energy companies, and has fought to decrease our dependance on foreign oil. most peopel consider that a good thing. He has gotten the oil flowing in iraq

      Just because the oil isn't under Saddam's control doesn't make it any less foreign. When one can get a tax break from buying an H2, our dependency on oil is NOT being reduced.

      Cutting taxes from the rich does not hurt the middle class.

      No, but it certainly doesn't help the middle class, and unemployment hits the middle and lower classes the hardest. The rich, being rich (funny how that works, isn't it?) are less in need of a tax cut.

      If you expect Bush to create jobs, how is he supposed to do thst besides "trickle down." Or I suppose you expect him to build "public works."

      Reagan tried "trickle down" economics. It didn't work. And I expect him to help create jobs by stablizing the economy, rather than by spending billions of dollars looking for weapons of mass destruction.

    44. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Penguinshit · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think Bush has done to much, but I am very pro small government

      Then you should be anti-Bush, as he has drastically expanded government in his term (think "Department of Homeland Security" on top of an expanded FBI, etc.).

      He has investments in oil and energy companies

      The ones he and his buddies own? The ones who made up the secret counsel advising his energy policy?

      has fought to decrease our dependance on foreign oil

      by trying to drill in ANWR?? Are you serious?

      Cutting taxes from the rich does not hurt the middle class.

      Yes it does, because it places the burden more on our shoulders. We get to enjoy the higher tax rates on the lower end of their income bracket with a very limited ability to exploit loopholes^H^H^H^H^H^Htax shelters.

    45. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by gdarklighter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe for an encore, a bit more money could solve the drug problem, and improve student performance in our public schools!

      Actually, a spending increase would definitely improve student performance. Spending more on education leads to more qualified teachers, better facilities, and smaller classes, all of which contribute to a better learning environment.

    46. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Zakabog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But what if you have a lot of technical skills? MacDonalds won't hire you because they're concerned that you'll run off the first instance that a better job shows up!

      First of all who submits a resume to McDonalds? They have a little application you fill out and that's it. I have a ton of technical skills yet I still managed to get a job at Taco Bell. I was working their and fixing computers on the side. Fast food places are always hiring, and if you have technical skills they don't say "Hey this person is over qualified we can't hire them" they say "Hey this person is pretty smart lets hire them because they'll be a great employee."

      The only time you'll ever give a fast food place a resume is for a management position, and the only way to get one of those is with past experience as a manager (or get hired as a regular employee and work your way up to manager.) If you really find yourself not able to get a fast food job you're too lazy to try, just show up and 99% of the time they will hire you and if they don't they'll send you to one of their stores that will (the taco bell I worked at was in desperate need of people, if anyone applied at one of the other 3 locations on staten island owned by our franchise they would be sent to where I worked.)

    47. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Penguinshit · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Rich people have much more influence over government than you do, and if you think that goverment is ever going to help you satisfy your envy, think again.

      Believe you me, I was under no illusions there.. And I'm not saying "soak the rich". I'm saying "don't soak the rest of us to benefit the rich".

      To get into making money from property today, you pretty much have to come up with the price of a house or condo that you can rent out.

      Not really.. it just depends on how leveraged you want to be in the early going. It's actually much easier to break into the property market than most people think, and you have to start with shit-boxes with short-term neg-am mortgages hoping the value holds or increases. I shifted all of my invested money into property shortly before the bubble burst and my properties have so far held value (even slightly increased while others have dropped) but this was soley due to location. So far that is the only thing between me and a trailer park.

      Dividends don't really help me here, only a capital gains reduction would (if I flip short-term, which I'm not doing).

      Anyway, this isn't available to the majority of the populace. The middle and lower income folks just never see the benefit of a reduction of dividend taxes. This was intended to put more money in the pockets of business with the hope that business would spend that money creating jobs. In this economic environment, all it does is make business keep its cash reserves high for a little longer, hoping to ride out decreased revenue.

    48. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      MacDonalds won't hire you because they're concerned that you'll run off the first instance that a better job shows up!

      So why do they hire high school students?

      I don't have enough experience to work at a different trade(machinist or welder, for example),

      Perhaps you should consider going to a trade school. This would help getting the certification you need for some trades, like welding or aircraft maintenance. Of course, it would be up to you to keep your certification up to date.

      AND I know too much to get a job flipping burgers.

      Quick question: Health regulations in the US require ground beef to be cooked

      a) rare, unless the customer desires otherwise

      b) medium, unless the customer desires otherwise

      c) well done, unless the customer desires otherwise

      d) Burnt to a crisp, unless the customer desires otherwise

      Employers *will* *not* train people

      No they won't. Most won't even provide training to keep their employees up to date. So when an employee pays for the training themselves, and finds a better job someplace else, the employer sees that as a reason to *not* train people. It's nothing new, since it's been happening for over 20 years.

      Of course, five years ago, in Milwaukee, WI, there were employers paying people $10.00 an hour to learn COBOL and JCL. That was before Y2K though.

      It's adapt or starve.

      Sounds to me like you have an attitude problem, and all because you have a degree that was worth something, once.

    49. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 1

      Excuse me sir, and pardon my stupidity, but what is a libeterian? Also, could you be troubled to define obvisiously? I would also like to see the word spelled phonetically as I am having a hard time sounding it out. See, I am new to this country, one of those - how do you say - immigrannts - and I need to brush up on my English to begin my lifelong dream job at McDonald's. I was wondering if an articulate person with such a wonderful grasp on the English language - and reality in general - such as yourself could explain these wonderful new words to me. I am also interested in these dividends you speak of. I have little money and would love to try to earn some to feed my children. Thank you for any help you can offer.
      Your humble servant, Manuel Escabar

      --
      ymmv
    50. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by mt-biker · · Score: 1

      Why has the parent been labelled flamebait? Just because he criticised the posted article? That sucks.

      I poked around a bit on dvorkin's website, and have to agree with the parent poster - dvorkin is very difficult to read or take seriously. Try the section on "Ethnic Pride" from http://www.dvorkin.com/yinotjew.htm , for example. It's hard to understand how a professional programmer can create such logic!

      Maybe it goes some way to explaining why he's unemployed?

    51. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      Ok I said Bush did way to much in terms of helping the economy, hence implying I don't like him. I was hoping for MCain to win. Ideally I'd have like's Alan Keyes to be voted in, but Mcain was a more realistic chance. Yes I am against alot of increased post september 11th security. Some of it is neccessary. The campaigns in Afganastan and Iraq were, not that I'm implying that Sadam was directly or indirectly involved in the events of terror, just that they were a threat in the war against terror.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    52. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      after submission of job ap
      submission of a resume
      an interview
      a nother interview
      a physical
      and a drug test

      I got Paid Training to Pump Gas

      I'm pumping it in to Piston Aircraft, Turbo Probs, and Busness jets- not cars

    53. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by gravious · · Score: 1

      yo, i sympathise. but don't be humiliated, be humble; maybe you had an inflated view of your self-worth when you were worth more? it's a tad insulting to those that do mow lawns and clean toilets... i see where you're coming from though (to wax a tad cliched).
      all the same, i'm not even american and i hope any democrat gets in. i'm not kidding, the whole world is going to be biting its nails come US election time. this of course is a shame as the whole world has better things to be doing than worrying about yankee neo-fascism.

      --

      Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
    54. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by ghostprovidence · · Score: 1

      +5 insightful? Someone has just inspired me to meta-moderate ...

    55. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      A McDonalds job? Sounds pretty neat for me.. Eating McFries and drinking that wonderful milkshakes without paying will make me happier every day that goes on. And the industrial burger smell.. I love it!

      Regarding the american status of affairs, I'm so sorry. No health insurance, high unemployment rates, lots of bullets trying to enter your skull, an idiotic "president", lots of paranoia, stupid nationalism, apathy, lack of history knowledge, religious fundamentalism (yes, my friends, as worse as anywhere else) and the list of diseases goes on. And guess what? The whole shit has not been set in place because of foreigners getting into shitty jobs.

      Now these pundits are willing to keep their "way of life". How come? An average american eats 50 times more than a chinese and proportionally produces 1/2 less for his country's net income. For how long do you think this thing is going to last? In particular, look at the amount of indians and chinese being able to work in industry and services jobs.. Soon they will overcome the 300M american population. And the matter is about getting foreigners to enter the US?

      [Since this troll got +5, I guess I deserve it too!]

    56. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by nagora · · Score: 2, Insightful
      rather insulting partisan political nonsense

      I don't get it. Are you saying that you don't think self-proclaimed President Bush and his "cabinet" are a bunch of crooks and liars?!! I mean, we are talking about people like Rumsfeld here, a man that happily sold Saddam WMD while he was know to be using them on the Iranians? Or Dick "Dick" Chaney, who's being paid by Halliburton 1 million dollars a year to be VP! Let alone the rest of the half-crazed ultra-rightwing nut cases from the Project for the New American Century.

      Or have I mis-understood?

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    57. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by paradizelost · · Score: 1
      I am from South Dakota, just wanted to say, no offense taken. This place can be likened to HELL.

      During the summer, it hits in the 90's-100's, lots of rain, tornadoes (had 40 in 1 day this summer), etc...; then, in the winter, can get 100 or more inches of snow, gets on a regular basis to -10 degrees, and, not all that unfrequently, stay below -20 degrees Fahrenhiet(spelling?) for a month or more.

      When people tell me to go to hell, i just say "No thanks, i live there already."

      Tom Daschle is from my home town (PRICK!) L. Frank Baum( the guy who wrote the wizard of OZ) was from there as well, kinda makes me wonder if dorothy being in kansas was hopeful thinking.

      And of course you've heard of our EX-Governor, Congressman William J. Janklow (south dakota's William Clinton equivalent, just not the BJ's under the desk, cuz he's too damn ugly) who recently ran a stop sign going nearly 20MPH over the speed limit causing a motorcyclist to run into his Cadillac, killing the motorist.

      HighSchoolers are trying to get out of this state, in droves, literally, so in about 30 years, there won't be anybody here anyways.

      Interesting fact, Rhode Island, the size of 1 county in south dakota, has a higher population than South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana, and Wyoming combined.

      --
      "In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?"
    58. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by constantnormal · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You apparently failed to read the guy's resume.

      It is evident that he HAS spent a substantial amount of time over the years improving his skills, to the end that he has better (certainly broader, likely deeper) IT skills than 99% of Slashdot readers.

      And his reward for this? He's too expensive. The "improve your skills" meme is not successful when facing offshore competition at 10% of the wage rate.

      The skills he has to improve in order to stay employed are those that cannot be shipped offshore, like becoming a plumber or an electrician. Of course, this means he is required to throw away a career he has invested over 30 years in, along with all that vaunted training and experience.

      I would like to think there is a case for a domestic IT industry, but until the dismal sciences recognize the benefits of a diverse local economy over a specialized global economy, all the arguments are going to be slanted towards cutting business expense by gutting the middle classes.

      One of the major reasons Linux is so successful outside the US is that foreign governments recognize that it would be nice to have an IT industry of their own, one that does not send all the profits overseas. They're not switching to Linux to be better positioned to export IT jobs to India or China.

    59. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUCK YOU

      More insightful analysis from a typical Liberal (with the emphasis on anal).

    60. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by rsheridan6 · · Score: 1
      We're hemorrhaging 400k jobs a month, No, not exactly. The most recent month statistics shows a net loss of 93,000 jobs. Check it out yourself here.
      We "only" lost 93,000 jobs? Great, let's give the president a medal. We've actually lost around 400K jobs this year, which is about a million jobs short of the 500k+ jobs the president said would be created.
      top administration officials are leaking the names of covert CIA agents One agent is in question. ..(blah blah blah) Additionally, before Novak broke the story it was common knowledge that Plame worked for the CIA. Read Novak's defense of the situation and you'll probably change your mind on the situation.
      Oh, please. Of course Novak is going to try to minimize the fact the he outed an undercover agent. If it's no big deal, then why is the CIA going after the administration?

      Here's a quote from a former CIA analyst (and registered Republican) on PBS's newshour

      Let's be very clear about what happened. This is not an alleged abuse. This is a confirmed abuse. I worked with this woman. She started training with me. She has been undercover for three decades, she is not as Bob Novak suggested a CIA analyst. But given that, I was a CIA analyst for four years. I was undercover. I could not divulge to my family outside of my wife that I worked for the Central Intelligence Agency until I left the agency on September 30, 1989. At that point I could admit it. So the fact that she's been undercover for three decades and that has been divulged is outrageous because she was put undercover for certain reasons. One, she works in an area where people she meets with overseas could be compromised. When you start tracing back who she met with, even people who innocently met with her, who are not involved in CIA operations, could be compromised. For these journalists to argue that this is no big deal and if I hear another Republican operative suggesting that well, this was just an analyst fine, let them go undercover. Let's put them overseas and let's out them and then see how they like it. They won't be able to stand the heat.
      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
    61. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All the while, your friend in the White House can have a party with his buddies wiping their asses with the Constitution and killing US soldiers so that companies like Bechtel and Halliburton (and by reference, themselves) can get rich.

      Did you ever wonder what would have happened if the recession had started the last year of Clinton's administration instead of the first year of Bush's? Oh right, it did. It's still Bush's fault right? You do realize the President has exactly jack dick to do with stopping a recession don't you? Blame the dot-commers for fucking the market up with grossly inflated stock valuations. People were spending money that didn't exist on companies that weren't worth any real money all the while spending on credit faster than ever before!

    62. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A person with this sort of "blame everyone but me" attitude should not be surprised to find himself unemployed. When times get tough the non-producers are the first to go.

    63. Re: A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      j-pimp said:
      "If you expect Bush to create jobs, how is he supposed to do thst besides 'trickle down.' Or I suppose you expect him to build 'public works.'"
      I guess I shouldn't expect lazy, coked-up, retarded George W. Hoover to read to figure out that how we exited the previous Great Depression in the '30s was that FDR created a WPA to actually put people back to work (gee, & they could pay taxes again), and fix this country's crumbling infrastructure. The same thing needs to be done again w/a WPA to put people back to work. The official number of unemployed people is greatly underestimated, which George W. Hoover is about to find out come Nov. '04.
    64. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      Hooray for you!! Good rant sir.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    65. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      No. Blame Canada!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    66. Re: A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Azghoul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Reread your history. FDR's policies extended the great depression, didn't mitigate or end it quickly. A number of new historical economic analyses demonstrate it pretty clearly.

      Good try though.

    67. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What jumped out at me was that he is taking showers in the dark to save money on electricity. In my area, electricity is about 11 cents per kilowatt/hour. So lets say he takes a 6 minute shower and forgoes a 100 watt light bulb. He just saved .11 penny. Do this for 9 days and he's saved almost a whole penny.

      This is a bad indicator of how he prioritizes resources. I hope his future employers don't read this. :)

    68. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Kick+the+Donkey · · Score: 1

      Justin Dearing Recovering VB programmer and wanna be java guru VB and JAVA!?!?! So that's what's wrong with this guy!

      --
      /. is a bunch of nerds at a million typewriters. It's not a political conspiracy determined to undermine your beliefs.
    69. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on now.. you can't be serious. The folks to whom a removal of this type of tax makes a difference are those who have MILLIONS of dollars invested. Those who have that kind of money to invest are those who need tax reductions the least. And don't even THINK about trying to mention Bush's re-do of Reagan's "trickle down". It didn't work then, and it won't work now.

      BULLSHIT My grandparents get by on 'Social Insecurity' and the dividends from the stock his company gave him in lieu of $ (when they couldn't make payroll in the early 70's, it's damn hard to eat but looks pretty on the wall). Reducing taxes on dividends will help them immensely.

    70. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Choobius+Gothicus · · Score: 1

      I absolutely love discouraged workers. They help to hedge the competitive nature of the current market. Offshoring has put a temporary decline into the workforce, and while I improve my debugging skills preparing for the inevitable crash caused by their bad programming practices, I'm loving it when people drop out of the employment market. Go ahead: become a one income family, move back in with Mommy, go study abroad, whatever. Just get out of my way of getting that next job! Also, for the discouraged, forget the numbers. Market yourself like mad, don't just user Monster, etc to find work. Network, network, network...you only need 1 job!

    71. Re: A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Kick+the+Donkey · · Score: 1
      Reread your history. FDR's policies extended the great depression, didn't mitigate or end it quickly. A number of new historical economic analyses demonstrate it pretty clearly.

      Revisionist history in a pro-conservitive climate...

      --
      /. is a bunch of nerds at a million typewriters. It's not a political conspiracy determined to undermine your beliefs.
    72. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      Reagan tried "trickle down" economics. It didn't work. And I expect him to help create jobs by stablizing the economy, rather than by spending billions of dollars looking for weapons of mass destruction.

      Actually it did work. Reagan said that if you cut taxes across the board (which includes tax cuts for wealthy people) you would increase revenue. The next year, revenue almost doubled. With the new found money the government went on a spending binge and the "extra money" dried up.

      It definitely works as long as you are to the right of the laffer curve peak :)

      --Joey

    73. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by twbecker · · Score: 0

      I don't get it. Are you saying that you don't think self-proclaimed President Bush and his "cabinet" are a bunch of crooks and liars?!! I mean, we are talking about people like Rumsfeld here, a man that happily sold Saddam WMD while he was know to be using them on the Iranians? Or Dick "Dick" Chaney, who's being paid by Halliburton 1 million dollars a year to be VP! Let alone the rest of the half-crazed ultra-rightwing nut cases from the Project for the New American Century.

      What exactly don't you get? That some people out there actually disagree with you? That some people might actually have some shred of support for President Bush? That shouldn't be too suprising, considering he was elected by the American people (no comment please, I have no intention of debating the validity of that election). At any rate, I didn't reply to start a political flamewar, I just think it's BS that the parent comment gets modded down for pointing out how blantantly partisan this Dvorkin guy is. If the poster would have jumped on the Bush bashing bandwagon, he'd probably be +4 insightful by now. Pulllleze.

      --
      "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
    74. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by muffen · · Score: 1

      According to your logic I should just give up my house, my car, the place I love to live, and move my family to some shit-hole trailer park in BumFuck S. Dakota (apologies to S.Dakota residents) so I can actually afford to live off of the McJob some illegal alien is risking death to come into this country to have.

      I don't think that is what he was saying at all.

      Many years ago, when I got my first job (crappy techsupport job, McD would be close to better, but thats besides the point), I went on one of those training course. I can't remember what it was called, but we all called it corporate brainwashing. In that course, I learnt one thing, which I follow religiously still today. If you get upset by something, especially if its an email message or something else you can hold off responding to, hold it off. Walk around, take a five min break and have a cup of coffie, and then reply. You'll see that it will end up being better for everyone, and people like me (who really doesn't have an opinion on your post or the parent) wouldn't have to read you're offensive language.

      It's not that difficult to get your opinions through in a nice way.

    75. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " You apparently failed to read the guy's resume"

      As odd as you may think this statement, its true:

      His resume isn't filled with useful skills.

      He was a mainframe programmer...that's a great and useful skill. But as we got into the 90's, he decided to become a "web developer", and specialized in low-skill tedhnologies.

      Yes, I'm his age, and yes I hire people This resume wouldn't even get a 2nd glance. His skill set isn't that valuable.

    76. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by muffen · · Score: 1

      ...a bit more money could solve the drug problem

      Ehh... yeah.. right. The US prisons aren't full of minor marijuana offenders the way it is, you think that pumping more money into this system is a good idea.

      Not putting them in prison would probably help solving the economic problem.

      I don't really have an opinion on wether or not it should be legalized, I just think that maybe you shouldn't be put in prison for having a quarter of an ounce weed, only due to the costs.

    77. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by bradasch · · Score: 1

      This was intended to put more money in the pockets of business with the hope that business would spend that money creating jobs. In this economic environment, all it does is make business keep its cash reserves high for a little longer, hoping to ride out decreased revenue.

      Or, and that applies more where I live (Brazil), business, instead of creating more jobs, invest in the financial market, not in the production segment. It's safer these days to make money on a bank than risk it on *gasp* a business plan. That's capitalism for you!

    78. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by john.r.strohm · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is a very interesting analysis over on http://www.jerrypournelle.com that suggests that knocking Iraq over, and rebuilding it, is in fact a very good move for the US.

      Take a look at it.

    79. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by ebh · · Score: 1

      I tried getting a job flipping burgers when I was unemployed, figuring I could do that at night and look for a REAL(tm) job during the day. None of the fast-food joints would hire me because they knew I'd walk as soon as that REAL(tm) job came along.

      I suppose I could have made up a resume and a good story, and used a fake address and all that, to hide what I really do for a living, but it wasn't worth it.

    80. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by avdp · · Score: 1

      Second, are you somehow suggesting that the social welfare of minorities like the Iraqis and muslims is somewhat less valuable than an unemployed person in the US? Which is worth more? Is one okay to be unemployed and the other not? Why? One the surface your statement belies a latent racism/nationalism that is offensive at best and abhorrent at worse.

      I think he's suggesting that we should take care of our own citizen before other countries' citizen. It's a bit selfish perhaps, but I don't see how it is racist.

    81. Re: A thinly veiled political rant, actually by princewally · · Score: 1

      He did figure out how we escaped the Depression.
      WWII.
      He just hasn't taken this war far enough fast enough. War is good for the economy, as long as you don't do it half-assed.

      --

      -
      "Vengeance is fine," sayeth the Lord.
    82. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by ddimas · · Score: 1
      Wasting time, sure. But at least it's income. He's blaming other people for his problems, but there are many people in this world who would love to have a job at McDonalds, here in the land of opportunity. You can be short-sighted like this guy, or take what you have and make the best of it.

      McDonalds pays about $6.00/ hr. Try to make a mortgage payment on that. McDonald relies on the labor of teenagers (who have no bills) and retierees (who have paid all their bills). Anyone else who works there is just slowly sliding into welfare.

    83. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by pebs · · Score: 1

      McDonalds is always hiring. Sell magazines. Mow lawns. Clean toilets. Oh, but you don't like flipping burgers?

      Working for minimum wage is often not worth the time. I'd rather actually use my time for something productive, even if it is not immediately profitable. It makes no sense to waste away your life if you actually have some talent. Though in some cases, you can develop skills in areas where you didn't have them.

      For a professional, it makes more sense to wait 8-12 months for a real job than to take a full time job flipping burgers. For some of us, it'll take 2 weeks to make the same amount as 8 months of minimum wage. Why would we waste our time other than for personal development? The money is not worth it.

      --
      #!/
    84. Re: A thinly veiled political rant, actually by ddimas · · Score: 1
      He did figure out how we escaped the Depression. WWII.

      Yes, back in the days when manufacturing was actually done in the USA! This time we just made other countries richer.

    85. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by AppyPappy · · Score: 1

      Every time someone decides to screw the rich, my ass gets sore.

      --

      If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

    86. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by ddimas · · Score: 1

      Jerry Pournell write great military science fiction. In all other respects he should be assidiously avoided. On the political spectrum he is somewhat to the right of Franco.

    87. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by CaptainAmerica1941 · · Score: 1

      Do you really believe this crap? Do you honestly believe that ANY president would have American soldiers killed to turn a profit for his friends? If so, you are delusional. Instead of taking the McDonalds job, I think that you should volunteer at least 1/3 of your paycheck to the government. It's the least such a caring person as yourself should do, and will likely happen anyway if one of YOUR friends gains the White House. Good luck with your blood pressure.

    88. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by VT_hawkeye · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, a spending increase would definitely improve student performance. Spending more on education leads to more qualified teachers, better facilities, and smaller classes, all of which contribute to a better learning environment.

      The evidence indicates otherwise. Across the board, the school districts that spend the most per student are inner-city, failing systems like Atlanta, Washington, DC, Richmond, VA, Detroit, etc. -- usually several thousand more per student than the neighboring suburban districts. The extra money tends to go toward (1) gigantic, corrupt administrative bureaucracies and (2) security.

      The single most important factor for a good learning environment is the presence of interested parents. Money doesn't help that.

    89. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by danheskett · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it's no big deal, then why is the CIA going after the administration?
      Because information was leaked. And that deserves an investigation. The original quote was referring to "agents". This is one case. Not multiple. The CIA is also covering its ass, because Novak contacted them - confirmed the person in question was an employee - and didn't ask him not to print the name. They are just as much at fault. Novak stumbled upon information that he had no idea was even illicit. On top of that, as I pointed out, Wilson himself to Novak outed his own wife by confirming she worked for the CIA. The quote you provide from the CIA analyst from PBS Newshour says he couldnt dilvulge to anyone except his wife that he even worked for the CIA. Yet Wilson divulged to Novak that he was sent to Niger at the suggestion of his wife who worked at the CIA.

      The timeline is like this:

      1. Novak looks into "yellow-cake" incident.
      2. Novak wonders why a Clinton-appointee was sent on a highly sensitive mission.
      3. Novak contacts Wilson and asks him why he was chosen.
      4. Wilson says he was sent because of the influence of his wife - who is a WMD expert analyst for the CIA.
      5. Novak - now knowing that the wife is an employee of the CIA contacts administration officals to verify Wilsons story.
      6. Administration officals believing that Novak already knew that the wife was a CIA Agent (he did) and that she was "covered" as part of another government agency (he didn't know that yet) confirmed Wilson's story that he was sent to Niger due to the influence of his wife - a long time CIA employee.
      7. Novak prints a story with information he believes is open-sourced and which is clearly cross checked and verified.

      The claims coming from some are clear: Bush admin people - namely Karl Rove - purposely outed the wife to punish Wilson. The information that Novak and others provide does not support this possibility. Novak contacted Wilson, Wilson told Novak about his wife being an employee of the CIA. Novak contacted the White House for confirmation of Wilsons story, which is when the administration people gave out information that is proscribed. Clearly the law was broken by the White House people giving out information that is protected. However, there is not yet a single shred of evidence - investigation pending - that this was deliberately leaked. All signs indicate that it was Novak investigating Wilson's story that lead to the information being let out. Additionally, under the law as written the crime is mitigated if the information is no longer secret - meaning that this conversation we are having isn't a violation of the law. If anyone can prove that this information was pubic knowledge before the Novak article the crime is completely mitigated.

      Regardless of any of that though - it is very clear that the claims of deliberate retilation by the White House are unfounded at this time. There isn't anything to suggest it other than it would be conveinent for the White House and that it was physically possible. The quote from the PBS person does nothing to further the case except to confirm that the wife was in fact a CIA employee (which is now confirmed through the CIA) and that a leak did happen (which Novak said in his follow-up article).

      Bottom line? Two admin officals probably broke the law, and will likely get slapped on the wrist. In terms of who is actually responsible it is Wilson himself.

      Back to the President and jobs. There is a big difference between 4.8 million jobs and 400,000 jobs as originally claimed. A freaking huge difference. In terms of raw unemployment there is not a huge nationwide problem. Uemployment is higher than it has been in the past 15 years, but not certainly record breaking. Additionally, it has been trending downwards. On top of that economic recovery experts will gladly tell you how jobs are the last thing to recover from a recession or downturn.
      I am not suggesting that we give the President a

    90. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by danheskett · · Score: 1

      It is racist if the reason we should take care of our citizens is because of their race and not their national origin. Its a fine line for sure. We pump billions into aid to places where white people live. Why not billions to Iraq? In the last decade we've sent billions - over $200 billion at last count - to Russia and the former USSR. We've spent billions on Africa, and billions on Asia. And billions of Israel. But when it comes to Muslims/Arabs, the poster is unwillinging to spend the or lesser billions. I think the reason is race as well as national origin (meaning its not just race - its both nation and race; we support Muslims in other countries namely the US and other mid-east countries like Israel but not Arab Muslime countries in the Mid-East). It is both racist, nationalist and intensely selfish.

      That's why I pointed it out. The original poster was crying about what bastards non-democrats are yet at heart he is contradicting the stand of his own party with his blatant nationalism and racism.

    91. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Reducer2001 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Actually, Al Gore won the popular vote. He and Ralph Nader has something like 56% versus W. who only had about 42%. The other 2% was for Pat Buchanan(sp), etc.

      So, no, the people didn't elect him.

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    92. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But liberal views of racism have denied some very obvious facts about race which has hurt africa americans in a very big way.

      100,000 years of different environments, food skills and breeding has left distinguishing marks which can be attributed to race.

      IMO, no one is better then the other, but it's nice to be able to use what you have without that social culling or snobbery.

    93. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's 4 pages? Who is going to read that?

    94. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by twbecker · · Score: 0

      Amazing. So this guy gets modded +1 for having a firm grasp of the obvious? The popular vote doesn't mean dick, only the electoral college votes do. He wouldn't be in office were he not elected by the people, however indirectly. . .

      --
      "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
    95. Re: A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      Before you make a general comment like what you just did -- something that contradicts decades of conventional accepted intrepretations of historical events -- it's responsible to provide references, a summary of the new 'theories', etc.

      Oh, BTW, just because and idea is published doesn't give it any credence. An Ann Coulter revisitonist history diatribe is only good for my bird cage liner.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    96. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Xerithane · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm sorry, but when I'm constantly facing the loss of MY home and MY standard of living, I have to think about MY family first.

      If you have to worry about it I have three suggestions for you:
      1. Life insurance, accidental death.
      2. New line of work.
      3. Stop worrying.


      I'm sick of people complaining about how they are constantly facing all these great losses because they're too fucking retarded to learn that they just shouldn't be in the IT Business. If you are constantly facing the challenges of losing your shit, get out.

      Make room for the people who deserve, love, and are good at IT jobs. I don't care if you love computers, if you are a retard, get out. If you can't hold down a job, get out. If you have been unemployed for more than a year, go to realty school and become a realtor.

      There are two types of people that I hate in this world, those who aren't stupid but act stupid because it's easier and those who believe they're entitled to shit they don't earn.

      You sound exactly like the latter, and I hope you are not.
      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    97. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Do you really believe this crap? Do you honestly believe that ANY president would have American soldiers killed to turn a profit for his friends? If so, you are delusional.

      Your thinking is exactly the kind of thinking the government (any party, any country) would like you to have. Government? Doing things Wrong? Never!

    98. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by dustman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But what if you have a lot of technical skills? MacDonalds won't hire you because they're concerned that you'll run off the first instance that a better job shows up!

      Last year, I got a job stocking shelves at the Home Depot. When I applied, I was up front about the facts: I am a computer person, looking for a computer job. When I find one, you'll get two weeks notice. I am also a hard worker.

      You just have to find the right places. And the job wasn't that bad, either... It was nice to do something physical.

    99. Re: A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      You are correct about Ann Coulter and I could say the same for Al Franken.

      You are also correct that references would be "responsible" but you forget, this is /. :) That said, here's a particularly good summary.

      Oh, BTW, just because something is "conventional" doesn't make it correct.

    100. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by sshirley · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how I feel about this. I understand what youre saying.
      I was laid off as a web developer at the beginning of this mess in March 2001. I was silly and didn't look for a joe job during the 8 months I was unemployed. Then I got a job waitering. This gave me almost nothing for money (in rural North Carolina outside of Raleigh). But it did make me feel better. But after a couple of months of that I ran out of money and benefits and had to move back with the parents in Rhode Island. Anyway, since then I've been working in phone-based customer service. For what I do I get paid well. Everyday I feel unemployed though I make a decent paycheck ($14.50).
      I was at the beginning of my career when all this happened. While I am able to pay off debts and save some money, I feel as though I'm wasting time and the best years of my career. I've been doing this for 2 years now as well. I've also been working as a pharmacy tech part-time. I'm sorry to say that I'm thinking about going to pharmacy school. At least that can't be offshored!!

    101. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that it's easier to pay one's mortgage if one is unemployed and making $0/hr, than if one is employed and making $6/hr? Especially when you consider that the people most likely to move into the more lucrative store manager roles are people who start on the line, I'd say being too haughty about the pay is a bad idea. Not that you'd catch me working in a Mickey D's restaurant.

      BTW, unemployed techies may want to take a look at mcdonalds.com's "careers" page. They have four postings for IT professionals (one of the few types of postings they do have)... I'm sure those jobs pay more than $6/hr.

      As to the article in question: what a load. I'm employed but I haven't woken up to an alarm clock in years. Nor have I found that employment and beards are antithetical. Nor have I had any real difficulty avoiding the telemarketers. Not even going to touch the gratuitous Bush-bashing (which, while I share the sentiment, I don't see how it relates at all).

      --
      I do not have a signature
    102. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      Ah, the fallacy of ad homeniem, or kill the messenger.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    103. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by sshirley · · Score: 1

      Bravo!!

      Where is it written that we, as Americans, are responsible for the rest of world. The world doesn't want us there, why are we interfereing all over the world. I speak from experience. During a year spent overseas in Germany as an exchange student I had the opportunity to speak to many people about this subject. We're not particularly welcome except in the case where it involves our money. :-)

      I agree wth you on Afganistan. It involved American lives. We had a right to retaliate. But Iraq? There was nothing going oon there at the time. And to tell people that you disagree with the President...God help you!!! I was almost burned at the stake several times. American history shows that it is neccessary to disagree with you government if it dooing wrong and more impoortantly to take action (as you pointed out with King George and the colonists).

      Well said!

    104. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by pmz · · Score: 1

      Uh, actually, yes it is.

      What can the government do besides twiddling interest rates? Everything else they do is politically-motivated-candy-coated-shit-on-a-stick .

      They'd do a lot of good for the economy by stopping neglecting their bastard child of government: the federal income tax. Get rid of it. US citizens pay way too much tax for a terribly inefficient bureaucracy that can't even manage buying textbooks for school kids. However, I'd bet getting rid of the IRS would make the federal government look like a heroin addict in withdrawl. No more precious data, no more 15% creamy goodness...they'll get the shakes pretty bad (well, that's just tough).

    105. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by i0chondriac · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is the best time to go and do something like this

    106. Re: A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Elfan · · Score: 1

      guess I shouldn't expect lazy, coked-up, retarded George W. Hoover to read to figure out that how we exited the previous Great Depression in the '30s

      I belive the depression ending event to which you are refering is commonly called "World War II." And I would love it if Bush would stop trying to repeat that.

    107. Re: A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Elfan · · Score: 1

      While war is always the health of the state, it is only good for the economy if it is in a very poor state to begin with. Such as the USSR and US before WWII.

    108. Re: A thinly veiled political rant, actually by pmz · · Score: 1

      Revisionist history in a pro-conservitive climate...

      Or, is it revisionist-revisionist history? Blaming the current crop does not imply innocence for their predecessors.

    109. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by tidge · · Score: 1

      Second, are you somehow suggesting that the social welfare of minorities like the Iraqis and muslims is somewhat less valuable than an unemployed person in the US?

      Hell yes. Although, I would replace the word "valuable" with "important". Take care of your own first, then help others. It's kind of like how I give money to charity, but I don't give away so much that my kid can't eat.

    110. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by notcreative · · Score: 1
      Across the board, the school districts that spend the most per student are inner-city, failing systems like Atlanta, Washington, DC, Richmond, VA, Detroit, etc. -- usually several thousand more per student than the neighboring suburban districts.

      I hope that when you make this claim you are factoring in the very different costs of living in large urban centers versus suburban and rural areas. When you say "thousands more" it makes me suspect that you are simply comparing dollars, which is at best naive and at worst deliberately misleading. When the cost of living in NYC is 3x or 4x the cost of living in Podunk, WI, it is probably going to be more expensive to educate kids in NYC.

    111. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by pmz · · Score: 1

      Across the board, the school districts that spend the most per student are inner-city, failing systems like Atlanta, Washington, DC, Richmond, VA, Detroit, etc. -- usually several thousand more per student than the neighboring suburban districts. The extra money tends to go toward (1) gigantic, corrupt administrative bureaucracies and (2) security.

      Perhaps this is because the government allows inner cities to stagnate with social programs rather than provide genuine incentives for people to move out of the city entirely. If businesses left the inner cities decades ago, then why are there still so many people there with very high unemployment rates?!?!? The high costs of inner-city schooling are really a side-effect of other mis-guided policies.

    112. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by pmz · · Score: 1

      I don't have enough experience to work at a different trade(machinist or welder, for example), AND I know too much to get a job flipping burgers. Of course, the idea of an apprenticeship is completely out of the question, those are almost impossible to get these days. Employers *will* *not* train people. Period.

      Go to nursing school for two years. Some hospitals will pay for your education if you agree to work for them afterwards. It's nearly like a private-sector ROTC, because supply is most definitely not meeting demand in the medical industry.

    113. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Al Gore could have won the D&D Championship in Topeka too, but just like popular vote, it has nothing to do with our Presidential Election process.

    114. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by pmz · · Score: 1

      500 billion dollar defeceit

      The Republican philosophy of fiscal responsibility, etc., is pretty much historical, anymore.

      Republicans == Democrats. And, please, no one mention trivial differences between their platforms, because both parties are leading the US to tyranny--just with different candy coatings.

    115. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by HardCase · · Score: 1
      Actually, Al Gore won the popular vote. He and Ralph Nader has something like 56% versus W. who only had about 42%. The other 2% was for Pat Buchanan(sp), etc.


      George W. Bush: 47.9% 271 Electoral Votes
      Al Gore: 48.4% 266 Electoral Votes
      Ralph Nader: 2.7% 0 Electoral Votes
      Pat Buchanan: 0% 0 Electoral Votes


      The margin of victory for Gore was well within the margin of error of the polling equipment. Alas, the race was really a tie.


      -h-

    116. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      I fear you could say similar things about every cabinet run by every president since the beginning of time.

      At least Bush/Cheney/Rumsfield liberated Iraq and Afghanistan from really, really horrible governments, an achievement I think the left gives far too little credit to.

      Things are not perfect in Iraq today, but they're getting better by the day.

      I think many on the left have no conception of how horrible life in Iraq was under Saddam. I had no choice but to support this war, because I understood this.

      D

    117. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by beakburke · · Score: 1

      "We're not particularly welcome except in the case where it involves our money. :-)" Money or protection from nasty people, both of which we are doing in Iraq :) Notice that I think that we are in some places where we shouldnt be, but Iraq is not one of them. I would love to get our Army out of S Korea and Western Europe. The S Koreans are equally matched in a conventional war and could sufficiently deter any attack. Assuming that deterence applies here (and if it doesn't then all our troops don't matter either, which is the premise of the "bush doctrine") There is nothing to be gained from us stationing troops there. Naval deployments though would be fine, a carrier group etc...

      --
      ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
    118. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by iantri · · Score: 1

      Well, we've got a whole province of francophones, so it's almost the same thing..

    119. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Dividends don't really help me here, only a capital gains reduction would (if I flip short-term, which I'm not doing). ... The middle and lower income folks just never see the benefit of a reduction of dividend taxes.

      The theory behind dividends rate cuts is that they become as attractive a way to make money as stock price inflation. Because stock-price inflation profits are taxed at captial gains rates and dividends have been taxed at income rates, the emphasis from Corporate America has been on stock price inflation. This leads to short-sighted quarter-to-quarter decisions, which are ultimately bad for the economy. If a company can just go about its business making and distributing profits without depending on a silly P/E ratio, it's better for everybody, expecially the everyday workers.

      The dividends tax rate cut is the only honest attempt to prevent another Stock Market Bubble that's been proposed. Of course, it's mostly reported as Bush's plan to steal the last box of Mac & Cheese from grandmothers, so this angle doesn't receive much attention.

      The double taxation argument is also heralded, but , while true, it's such a weak argument in comparison I don't know why they stick with it. There is already so much double/triple/quadruple/... taxation in the economy it's hard to argue that dividends deserve special treatment.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    120. Re: A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Al v. Ann: The difference being that Al never pretended to be anything but humor and entertainment.

      Meh. whatever.

    121. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by PostItNote · · Score: 1

      > A deficit of 5% of the budget is not a serious long-term concern.

      Where are you from that the deficit is 5% of the budget? The deficit is 5% of our Gross Domestic Product and is definitely something to worry about.

    122. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by glesga_kiss · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Where is it written that we, as Americans, are responsible for the rest of world.

      Nowhere. Your government uses the "save the world" rant to get you onside whatever war you are in at that point; it's easier to get civilian support if they believe they are the good guys.

      The world doesn't want us there, why are we interfereing all over the world.

      The same reason that any other country interferes in another: personal gain. This can be in pure profit or political/strategic gain.

      I agree wth you on Afganistan. It involved American lives. We had a right to retaliate.

      It wasn't a retaliation. The Afgan war was in planning prior to 9/11. I believe it was around June/July when the Indian ambassidor was told by the US to expect a war in Afganistan "before the snow starts falling". 9/11 was used as propaganda to get the public onside.

      The gain? Well, Harliburton, the company directly linked to the current US regime, has been attempting to build a cross-Afgan pipe line, to ship the oil resources of the former USSR states to the north to the Persian gulf. When the Taliban awarded the contract to an Argentine company instead, the adminstration fell out with them. Prior to that, they were best-of-buddies, always in negotiations etc for the lucrative contract. The pipeline was under construction by US interests before the war was over, guarded by US troops.

      But Iraq? There was nothing going oon there at the time.

      Ah, you miss the point there. Question: where did the majority of 9/11 hijackers come from? Saudi Arabia. Where does the US rely mostly for foreign oil? Saudi Arabia.

      Back in the initial gulf war, the US convinced the Saudi's that positioning US troops in Saudi was neccessary in case Saddam advanced further than Kuwait. It is rumoured that the satelite inteligence shown to them of troops near their border was faked by the US. Previously, the US only supported the Saudi dictatorship with weapons and financing, in return, the US was able to access the oil. The US actually helped this dictatorship to power, after the previous democracy (yes, democracy) was toppled (again with US assistance) because it wasn't forthcoming to US interests.

      When the troops arrived, that's when the anti-US terrorism there really kicked off, away from the purely religious fanatics that hate all non-Islam, and into a more mainstream position. Al Qaeda's stated goal is to remove the US from Saudi, allowing them to control their own government. The "hate freedom & democracy" thing is a US propaganda lie, to prevent you from knowing why they hate you so much. If anything, that's exactly what they want, although their idea of Freedom is a bit more strict than ours.

      Anyway, back to Iraq. After Saudi, the second largest oil reserves are in Iraq. Under Saddam's regime and UN sanctions, this oil was essentially out of play for the west, increasing dependance on Saudi, a state with huge ties to terrorism and anti-US feeling.

      With Saddam gone, and a democratic government in Iraq, this oil is now available. The Saudi troops have already mostly moved to Iraq, which will become the new US reserve of power in the middle east. There will be a large US army stationed there for many years to come, even if the guerilla war ends before then.

      So, in essence, the west has actually conceeded to the terrorists goal. Of course, it's not going to work out. I estimate that the story of Saudi Arabia is going to be replayed in Iraq. There have been some good documentaries on recently on the BBC, and while there is some support for the war, the majority of the population were against it, and have lost family. Note we've never heard Iraqi soldier casualty figures on our news, they are very high. If the US is not careful, the hate for them could grow to the point that Iraqi becomes the source of a large amount of terrorism.

      American history shows that it is neccessary to disagree with you government if it dooing wrong

      And n

    123. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by avdp · · Score: 1

      I think you are reading too much in his comment. Considering the current state of the economy, he (and I, by the way) feel that the US should take better care of its own citizen before others. The fact that US has spent billions for other causes (Russia, USSR, Africa, Asia, Israel, etc) may be flying low under the radar, perhaps because most of these programs have been there for a while, they don't get as much publicity, and it is over a longer time period. The Iraq thing is causing a lot of sticker shock. I would not read racism into any of this...

      Having said all that, I do think the US needs to finish what it started in Iraq, and pay the bill for it. It's money we could use at home, but that's something te Bush administration should have thought about before starting this war.

    124. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Peaceful_Patriot · · Score: 1

      Putting on asbestos suit

      I respect many of the third party candidates and their causes. I would love to vote Green or Independent. Unfortunately, in a close race every vote counts. If those people who voted Green or Independent had voted Democrat, GWB would be back in Texas right now.

      There is something to be said for voting for the major parties in a close race.

      OK, flame me, mod me down....but please educate yourself, then VOTE!

      --
      There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
    125. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Golias · · Score: 1
      I'm not really inclined to panic too much about all the projects that are moving to Bangalore. The companies who are doing that are the same ones who were passing over US Citizens for less-qualified H1B workers during the 90's.

      So, the skinflint corporations have always been giving programming jobs to foreigners... it's just that bandwidth is now sufficient to leave them in their home countries while doing so.

      Don't worry too much about macro-economics. Choose a career that you want. I could have given up at any time over the last two years and just became a full-time public school math teacher, but I rode out the recession working whatever jobs I could find while networking and hunting for that next programming gig, because that's the career that I really want. It's not in the airline industry like my last tech job was, but our skills transfer really well across industries. If you want to be a techie, keep plugging away at it. If you would rather be a pharmacist, do that.

      Be glad that you are at the start of your career for this recession. They are much harder to deal with when you have a few years of experience and a mortgage payment to deal with, believe me!

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    126. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by William+Tanksley · · Score: 1

      Actually, a spending increase would definitely improve student performance. Spending more on education leads to more qualified teachers, better facilities, and smaller classes, all of which contribute to a better learning environment.

      This fails to be backed by history. Spending more means more administration, more regulation, more teaching to standardised tests, and more lobbying to reduce those standards and remove legitimate competition.

      Well, it doesn't ALWAYS mean that :-) -- but there are plenty of examples where that's exactly what happened, so your statement certainly should be amended to eliminate the word "definitely", and should include some discussion of how to solve the real problems, rather than just dumping more money onto them.

      I'm not against more money for education, of course; you ARE correct that it's needed. But it has to actually make it to the classes, and it has to be used wisely -- and right now, in most states of the US that's impossible.

      -Billy

    127. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by zzyzx · · Score: 1

      If you have savings, it could make more sense to spend your time looking for a job that can actually pay your bills rather than spend it at a job that never will. It takes time to find a good job.

    128. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Texas McDonald's will hire anyone.
      Come on down and see for yourself.
      You can wait 15 to 20 min. in line just to have the privilege of placing an order which is usually wrong when you get it. What's on a home style burger answer "I don't know." I guess the fellow I asked doesn't make enough to buy one and find out. After ringing up the total I offered the exact change and since it didn't jive with the total displayed on the register as to the correct change he should give me back his answer was "I don't know how to do that." So no training or experience is a plus. Since they run the burgers through a machine I think your safe as far as your ability to flip one is concerned. All in all I think the outlook for a new career at McDonald's looks exceptionally good.

      On the other hand the fact that your going to loose your Home, Vehicle, Health, Life, Disability Insurance, Wife and kids etc. is something else and I as a respected member of the Republican party and the Christian Coalition offer you my deepest condolences. We gave you $400.00 dollars back that should pay all your bills for one month NOT. Unfortunately you have to lose everything you have before we can (WILL) help you. The fact that you have dipped into your retirement fund to help sustain you during these tough times isn't going to stop us from goatse f>@%!^g you on April 15th 2004. The first and last letters of any word are all that matter hopefully you can read between the lines unless you went to school in Texas where we don't expect you to be able to reed, right, or do arithmatic. How do I know this I'm taking college courses in Texas right now and they are teaching crap I learned in 5th grade. The Texas Legislature says I have to have a well rounded education so I'm taking Music. I'm relearning shit I was taught 20 years ago and promptly forgot because it's useless crap. We here in Texas seem to have a exorbitant amount of useless music teachers we couldn't seem to find jobs for any other way. Can you play an Oboe, Flute or even a Kazoo if so we need you in Texas.

      We definitely have a lack of useless computer programmers so come on down and work at our Mickey Dee's.

      Bottom line I'm learning a new skill that they can't take away unless they move the whole damned infrastructure to India. I suggest you do the same. How many people here can program a dynamic switch so the CAD people have 100% bandwidth and the secretary has 25%. How many of you can terminate let alone tap FDDI media.
      But you don't want to hear that so keep pissing on the Spider Monkey's in the ceiling. We own you. If we were to form a coalition and strike the entire network would collapse within 30 min.

    129. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by cluckshot · · Score: 1
      Shawn Hannity nearly went postal yesterday fussing about why didn't Americans close ranks over the war on terror etc... He just couldn't understand why somebody would not support Bush. This Guy is not crazy to not like the President.

      Well being an American and a Reagan Republican I do understand why. It is pretty simple to explain. Simply sit down and figure out the logical reasonable solutions that should be done to ensure our national security and our economy. Then compare your list to the Bush Actions. He is going to come up short. Look closely the Border is WIDE OPEN and Bush opposes dealing with ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. The Secy. of Defense testified before congress that he could not run a military and buy 50% American Made. The Defense Budget is up by $300 Billion and Defense Contractors are laying off. In Iraq and Afghanistan the best description of the management is that Cpt. Klutz is in charge. These guys cannot get their act together for stupid behavior. It goes on and on.

      Domestically the Bush team thinks that Free Trade means dismantling our domestic laws and causing Americans to have to tarriff their wages 150% while competing with foreign persons and goods which pay no such taxes. They refuse to defend the rights of Investors to get access to the massive earnings of companies which are being diverted into criminal management's pockets. (It ain't capitalism when you don't get paid for your investment. It is FRAUD)

      The Bush Team is prosecuting Grandma for buy Medicine out of the Country but has withdrawn the FBI From Drug enforcement. I know! I had a case to call the FBI because Drug terrorists were destroying my neighborhood! The FBI doesn't even answer their answering machine on Drug related cases!

      John Ashcroft thinks he needs to take away more of our civil liberties while he still hasn't successfully prosecuted even one Terrorist from Al Qaeda. The Bureaucracy is Bloated to the limit and growing at 5.9% per year the highest rate in history (Per real Growth numbers).

      I as a Reagan Republican am for Smaller Government, Less Intrusion into my life, Growing Economy and strong National defense. The National Defense Budget is up but the critical defense items are not there. They have even withdrawn the on call CAP flights to "Save Money." The Government is growing fasterr than ever and the intrusion is growing too.

      There might just be a real reason to hate Bush without being unreasonable. Reality might just open one's eyes and it might just be the right thing to do. He refuses to corral corruption, defend the country and is draining our economy dry into foreign hands. Sounds like pretty good reasons to me.

      Probably the best reason to hate Bush is that he and is associates are destroying the "Reagan Revolution" as fast as they can and hijacking the term Conserviative Republican giving it a bad name.

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    130. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Digizen64 · · Score: 1

      Things are bad all over the globe, would this rationalize liberating people from cruel dictators the world over??

    131. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by VT_hawkeye · · Score: 1

      You're (deliberately?) misreading my statement. I said neighboring suburban districts -- sure, Podunk, WI will be substantially cheaper than NYC, but is Westchester County, NY c-o-l 1/3 the cost of NYC? I don't think so. I'd bet it's equal or slightly higher. I know I'd be paying a lot less to live in the City of Richmond than I am to live in the Short Pump area of Henrico County.

      Dollars-to-dollars isn't a perfect comparison, but within a metropolitan area, it's pretty reasonable.

    132. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, The people who say, "Go work at McDonalds" are never the people who actually have worked there. They are usually people with decent jobs and good incomes, or they are living off someone elses hard work..(i.e. Mommy and Daddy)

      Have you ever tried to support yourself on minimum wage? Even working 40 hrs. per week, it is impossible to pay rent, eat, pay car insurance, utilities, etc.

      In the real world, you need more than minimum wage to live if you are supporting yourself, and even more so if you have a family.

    133. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Zigg · · Score: 1

      That is really pathetic.

      You quote the wrong numbers (qualifying them with "something like" and "about"), then try to claim that the combined votes of two candidates being larger (again, by your "something like" margin) than another candidate means the latter candidate could not possibly win.

      I can use the real numbers and yet use your logic to "prove" that "the people didn't elect" Gore. See, Bush and Nader got 50.6%. Gore got 48.4%.

    134. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it doesn't mean they lose hope and stop looking, it means they are no longer getting benefits for being unemployed, which in most places is 9 months. The job market from my POV is looking slightly better. I have actually gotten a pair of unsolicited requests for resumes and what not. In any event, none of this is caused by Bush et al, nor would it have been caused by Clinton et al, its a cyclic occurance that has little to do with the government at least on the federal level. State governments have more of a factor as they are the ones that have a tendency to levy annoying use/payroll/workers comp, etc taxes on companies.

    135. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Pournelle is in many respects highly statist. Hardly right-wing.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    136. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      I'm glad that the Afghanis and Iraqis are free from oppressive governments.

      They are not.
      Think about it.

    137. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by JimFromJersey · · Score: 1

      What is a freeper and little green footballer? Why would the Nation Reconnaissance Office care?
      If the Democrats run Dean, Bush is in for another four.

      --
      between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
    138. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by kuroth · · Score: 1

      The skills he has to improve in order to stay employed are those that cannot be shipped offshore, like becoming a plumber or an electrician.

      AKA "Skilled labor", and it's what all the cool kids are doing right now.

      I know a guy that runs a refrigeration service company. He can't find mechanics, despite his generous compensation and benefits packages.

      I know another guy who runs an auto body shop. Same story.

      Another, auto repair (mechanical), same story.

      I was in the bank a few weeks ago, and the guy behind me in line was the owner of a refrigeration company (different guy that the one mentioned above). We got to talking, and I mentioned that I had worked for a refrigeration company over the summers during high school and college. Despite the fact that I had no formal training, no license to handle the gasses, and that more than a decade had passed since I held that job, he offered to hire me on the spot.

      "I can't find mechanics."

      "I'm not a mechanic. I know how the systems work, and I know how to use the tools, but I'm really not qualified for that kind of job. Look, I have soft, babylike programmer fingers."

      "I don't care. I'll hire you as a helper, you can learn as you go. When you're ready to take the certification tests, I'll pay for them."

      I politey declined but, wow, this guy sounded more desperate than any former "web developer" I've heard whining on /.

      If you're a youngin', go to you local Navy recruiter and tell him or her that you want to learn to weld. That's a ticket to a lifetime of job security if there ever was one. Even if you don't want to stay in when your enlistment is up, there is always a demand for certified welders.

      If you're going to spend money on educating yourself, learn to fix cars. Learn to fix heating and air conditioning systems. Plumbing. Electrical work. Any skilled trade will get you a job - not an air-conditioned desk job pushing a mouse around, maybe - but a good job with a fair amount of security.

      Just my $0.02. Sorry, I didn't mean to rant.

    139. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is also an aerospace engineer and a technical writer. If you only read the last job of a resume you are being horribly shortsighted

    140. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by MoronBob · · Score: 1

      Best of luck to you with your interview. I hope it goes very well.

      --
      Telecommuting! What about socialization?
    141. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Disco+Stu · · Score: 1

      So we have a reduction in income taxes, a removal of dividend taxes, all sorts of extensions to unemploymet insurance, and a crackdown on Wall Street corruption. What the hell else do you want?

      Repeal of the freaking steel tariffs. They're killing manufacturing.

    142. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by sjames · · Score: 1

      If you're unemployed, I don't think you have a choice, now do you? McDonalds is always hiring. Sell magazines. Mow lawns. Clean toilets.

      So, while doing all of that, when do you find time to look for a job that will actually get your bills paid and utilize your talents?

    143. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by calica · · Score: 1

      And in 20-30 years when all the baby boomers are gone, the medical industry is going to see a bubble burst not seen since the dot.com bubble.

    144. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by nagora · · Score: 1
      no comment please, I have no intention of debating the validity of that election

      Since it was invalid, no debate is needed.

      Disliking very bad people is not the same as being "blatently partisan", surely?

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    145. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      The timeline is like this:

      1. Novak looks into "yellow-cake" incident.
      2. Novak wonders why a Clinton-appointee was sent on a highly sensitive mission.
      3. Novak contacts Wilson and asks him why he was chosen.
      4. Wilson says he was sent because of the influence of his wife - who is a WMD expert analyst for the CIA.
      [...]

      You should not list this timeline as a matter of fact, because it is in dispute. Wilson appeared on Nightline last night, and specifically said that:

      • His wife did not urge the CIA to send him (although he could not rule out if the CIA had asked his wife about it at all)
      • He is an expert, having served in several countries in the region. He also has contacts in the relevant branches of the Nigerian government
      I'm not saying you're wrong and he's right, just that the timeline is in dispute, and you should not present it as fact. Also, consider the likelihood of readily admitting to a journalist that you got a job because of your wife's influence.
    146. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by nagora · · Score: 1
      I had no choice but to support this war, because I understood this.

      Did you also understand that you were supporting arbitary intervention in countries at the whim of people with no interest in the human rights they used to bring you on-board? Do you think you will ever see Bush act against people like Mugabie or the Chinese government?

      Did you also understand that there was a hope that the removal of Saddam, who was installed by the US and armed with WMD by a certain Mr D. Rumsfeld, could have been done in a way that would have made re-building Iraq a lot easier on the people of Iraq but that Bush's determination to get it all over with before the next election sacrificed that hope?

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    147. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Dust31 · · Score: 1


      Eliminating dividend taxes would certainly help Bill Gates and Warren Buffet, but it would help *me* a great deal more, by lowering the barriers to property income.

      Try looking into mutual funds that specialize in or concentrate on REITs, or Real Estate Investment Trusts. Different REIT mutual funds have different investment objectives (growth, income), and some specialize in different types of real estate (commercial, industrial, rental, etc.).Minimum initial investments will range from $50 into the thousands, but certainly much less than the capital required for buying actual real estate.

      Some REITs can be invested in directly, like a stock, without investing in a mutual fund. You'll have to research this for more information.

    148. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by HardCase · · Score: 1
      There is something to be said for voting for the major parties in a close race.


      Even though I tend to support one of the major parties (the one that would lose under your scenario), I agree with your strategy. It does make sense.

      ....but please educate yourself, then VOTE!


      To that I would put in the word "think" before "then Vote". Voting for a third party in a national election is really a protest vote, but if the election is close, then a little personal strategy goes a long way.


      -h-

    149. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by sshirley · · Score: 1

      My only problem is that I'm almost 30 and I am trying to get a house next year. :-) :-(

    150. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by bidule · · Score: 1
      I blame the French.


      Don't you mean: I blame the Liberty.

      --
      ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
    151. Re: A thinly veiled political rant, actually by sjames · · Score: 1

      What ended the depression was a massive gear up of industry to build for the war, and simultainiously removing many workers from the job market by employing them to go fight in the war. Any such massive gear up would have accomplished that. Once the war was over, many of the returning workers now had better training and more experiance in things also useful in a peacetime situation such as electronics, and auto and aircraft mechanics. At the same time, employers were strongly reminded that it was their patriotic duty to hire as many of these returning workers as possible, and all consumers were reminded that companies that didn't do so were un-patriotic. From there, VA loans helped the economy to switch to peacetime production.

      Bush's little war in the desert will not accomplish the same recovery in the economy. It has not removed many from the job market, the scale is too small, and many of the industries that would need to gear up are no longer in the U.S. Instead of reminding everyone that it is a U.S. company's patriotic duty to employ Americans, the politicians go on about free trade. Instead of boosting the economy, Bush is pumping even more out of it.

      If, instead, he took those many billions of dollars that he couldn't seem to find for healthcare, unemployment relief, or education for those on welfare but somehow did find when he wanted to go to war, and spent them on improving the public infrastructure in the U.S. we would now have an improving infrastructure, and the many unemployed being hired to work on those projects. Consider that the amount speant on the war so far could have easily employed 1.4 million people for a year. Those people would then start buying things and paying taxes. Other companies would then need to hire a few people to make the things that those people buy.

      That level of economic stimulation could have gotten things going, and would certainly let people know that the government was committed to fixing the problem. Instead, he blew it all on blowing things up in Iraq and now will spend more to stimulate THEIR economy. What a massive waste.

    152. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Eccles · · Score: 1

      What can the government do besides twiddling interest rates?

      Reduce wasteful spending. No more weapon programs aimed at fighting the Cold War (F-22s when nothing can touch us in the air, new attack subs, ICBM defense when terrorists use airliners, etc.) Replace Medicaid with a no-frills insurance subsidy, ditto VA hospitals. Stop fighting the War on (most but not all) Drugs. Eliminate mandatory minimum sentences that have 1% of our population in jail.

      Also, make the standards for getting a patent much harder, so business isn't crippled by patent fees & litigation. Simplify taxes. Don't try to by the United Steelworkers with a protectionist tariff. Develop software (especially with the help of Linux, OpenOffice, et al) when it's cheaper than buying tens of thousands of copies of proprietary apps for gov't computers. Develop educational materials and distribute (electronically) freely, rather than padding the coffers of textbook publishers.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    153. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Even if the casualty rate was triple you'd be safer in the Military than anywhere else.

      And many people join the Military because they already live in a area full of armed people who would like to see them dead.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    154. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by notcreative · · Score: 1
      Finally, I am going to offer you a challenge

      Your challenge ignores the fact that sometimes the best thing to do is nothing, and let events take their course. This is the principle behind laisez faire(sp) capitalism. If a president was urged to do something, or his agenda mandates that he do something, and he consciously doesn't, that is deliberate policy and yet no law or action was taken.

      I can't do 5 n 5 right at this moment, but I will throw out some generalized easy ones....

      Clinton:

      • didn't tax the internet or internet sales
      • education tax credits encouraged schoolin'
      • increased size of Ken Starr's office and provided employment for lawyers, entertainment industry
      • deadlocked an ideologically opposite congress, meaning any spending bill that went through was subject to intense scrutiny

      Dubya has never used a veto so we can assume he concurs with Congressional actions:

      • expensive weapon systems for DOD that funnel money to stockholders instead of employees or military personnel (crusader, new stealth destroyer for navy, new fighters, etc)
      • SEC appointees failed to effectively regulate companies or accounting industry despite ever more obviously dubious practices
      • underfunds IRS so that collections actions against people making more than 100k$ are basically abandoned - this increases burden on other taxpayers and therefore reduces the services they can afford and therefore increases unemployment
      • congressional buddies get a rubber stamp for any cash infusions that they'd like to give to their contributers

      These admittedly aren't the strongest points but they are at least valid, and this is off the top of my head....

    155. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by malfunct · · Score: 1
      I'd like to see the information you use to back this up as the last time I looked North and South Dakota had the best school performance and nearly the lowest spending on schools. Good schools are a result of good people something we have a growing lack of in the United States today. I don't have the slightest clue how to do it but our society needs to find a way to realign its expections of what is provided for them vs what they need to provide in return.

      My basic point if it wasn't already clear is the big downfall of schools today is that parents don't care as much how thier kids do, and so they don't make them do as well as they could. I might well be a total loser with no job right now if my parents didn't force me through school with a high expectation of my output, especially given the fact that I am borderline ADD with mild dyslexia (which might even manifest itself in my typing on this post).

      --

      "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

    156. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

      "its not governemts job to fix the economy"

      Uh, actually, yes it is. And so far, nothing is being done about it. The economy was softening prior to Bush. However, because of Bush's greed and neglect, it has continue to flounder much longer than anyone predicted. And it really isn't getting much better, despite what Fox news insists.

      NO it's NOT!

      If you want it fair; think laissez faire!

      Enough of this crap. It is not the government's job to control me, or the economy. It's bad enough they tinker with it as much as they do. You're just Bush ranting and don't even have a clue about what you are talking about.

      If you want such control over the economy, I can quote you several In Soviet Russia Jokes.

    157. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

      by trying to drill in ANWR?? Are you serious?

      You're right, no drilling in ANWAR until we've used up everyone else's oil! Then we'll soak the rest of the world

      1. Don't Drill in Anwar
      2. Use up all the rest of the world's oil
      3. Drill in Anwar
      4. PROFIT!!!
    158. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by tres · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bullshit.

      I'm sick of simple, bullheaded idiots telling me that it's my fault that the tech industry has turned into a gobbling bunch of MBA cannibals more worried about preserving their own 6 figure salary than jobs.

      You keep on the platitudes, speaking about "deserving" and "earning," but the fact of the matter is, there is no hard and fast way of defining what exactly affords one the deservedness, or defines them as "good at IT jobs;" it's all arbitrary, and getting a job is based upon many other things than deserving or aptitude.

      I don't know where you are, but out here in the real world, rarely is it what you know, but rather WHO you know that gets you in the door. So you can be a kickass coder or a great sysadmin, but it still won't get you a thing if you don't have an edge over the 500 other guys who are kickass coders or great sysadmins and also have their resume in the same pile.

      You tell me; is David Dvorkin one of the retards who should be getting out?

      I tell you what, there's two types of people that I hate: idiots who know better and greedy self-serving retards who can't see the world except through the shaft of their own ego.

      You sir, sound exactly like the latter, and I hope you are not.

      --
      Notes From Under *nix: blas.phemo.us
    159. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

      They also send you to a desert full of armed people who'd like to see you dead.

      Considering the number of Americans serving there and how many have been killed, although any is too many, your odds are actually pretty good.

    160. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      You keep on the platitudes, speaking about "deserving" and "earning," but the fact of the matter is, there is no hard and fast way of defining what exactly affords one the deservedness, or defines them as "good at IT jobs;" it's all arbitrary, and getting a job is based upon many other things than deserving or aptitude.


      Sorry, I moved to a town that has one of the highest unemployment rates and I got a job in 2 months. I've kept it for over 2 years. I know several others who came up and still don't have jobs. People who have been unemployed for over a year. What does that tell you?

      It means these people are worthless jackoffs that can't code. I know this because I've interviewed them.

      I don't know where you are, but out here in the real world, rarely is it what you know, but rather WHO you know that gets you in the door.

      Bullshit. If you know the system, and have the knowledge to buy a nice shirt and not eat your hair at the interview table it isn't hard. I didn't know a damned soul when I moved to Portland. 2 Months. I'm proof you don't need that shit. I turned a 2 week contract into a 2+ year contract.

      So you can be a kickass coder or a great sysadmin, but it still won't get you a thing if you don't have an edge over the 500 other guys who are kickass coders or great sysadmins and also have their resume in the same pile.

      There aren't 500 other guys who are kick ass coders. There aren't even 2. We interviewed like mad for several positions since I've been here. We have found one guy who was a good programmer. Not even kick ass, just good. There were several others that we brought in and didn't make the cut. The rest didn't make it through the door because on paper they look like jackasses.

      You tell me; is David Dvorkin one of the retards who should be getting out?

      How long has he been unemployed? How hard is he working for a job? Judging by his anti-Bush sentiments, the man has other issues which will prevent him from getting a job. Maybe he does interview well, I don't know him. I do know that if you go to an interview with the wookie on your shirt it doesn't make you "quirky" like it did in 97, it makes you a jackass motherfucker that isn't getting hired.

      I tell you what, there's two types of people that I hate: idiots who know better and greedy self-serving retards who can't see the world except through the shaft of their own ego.

      I'm not egocentric, I'm not self-serving, and I'm not arrogant. I'm confident. I've survived through layoffs till the company went under. I've been through what people fear most, not knowing anybody. I don't give a fuck what you think about me, because I know what I have accomplished.

      All I am is text on your screen to you, to me I succeeded in what I wanted to accomplish and haven't let anybody dictate what I will succeed or fail at. I sent out 20+ resumes a day when I was unemployed and racked up $300 cell phone bills each month on calls. I got a great job because of it.

      If you are unemployed, what's your excuse? The real reason is one of two things: You aren't good enough or you aren't trying hard enough.

      Black and white. And yes, most people do think I'm arrogant and self-serving. It doesn't bother me because I'm the one who sleeps good at night.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    161. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by rsheridan6 · · Score: 1
      , 1. Novak looks into "yellow-cake" incident. 2. Novak wonders why a Clinton-appointee was sent on a highly sensitive mission. 3. Novak contacts Wilson and asks him why he was chosen. 4. Wilson says he was sent because of the influence of his wife - who is a WMD expert analyst for the CIA.
      This is from Talking Points Memo:
      Bob Novak is is now saying that his source says that Valerie Plame was an "analyst" and not an "operative" at the CIA. Joe Wilson remembers their conversation in July a bit differently. According to what Wilson told TPM early Monday evening, when Novak first contacted him in July, he told him that he had a CIA source that told him that Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, was a "CIA operative." Would Wilson confirm it? Wilson declined to discuss the matter, as Novak's original article made clear. When Novak's article appeared, it sourced the story to "two senior administration officials."
      5. Novak - now knowing that the wife is an employee of the CIA contacts administration officals to verify Wilsons story. 6. Administration officals believing that Novak already knew that the wife was a CIA Agent (he did) and that she was "covered" as part of another government agency (he didn't know that yet) confirmed Wilson's story that he was sent to Niger due to the influence of his wife - a long time CIA employee.
      According to a newsday article on July 22:
      Novak, in an interview, said his sources had come to him with the information. "I didn't dig it out, it was given to me," he said. "They thought it was significant, they gave me the name and I used it."
      Novak is a lying sack of shit. He's trying to cover his ass, which is to be expected given the scandal that has erupted.

      As for jobs, no, the president does not determine the unemployment rate. But he can influence it. I don't want to go into too much detail, but sometimes aggregate demand needs a boost, which government can provide by either directly creating jobs (like the WPA in the 1930's or the military buildup in the 1940s and again in the 1980s, all of which substantially reduced unemployment) or by getting money into the hands of people who will spend it. This would mean normal people, not the ultra-rich who benefit from Bush's tax cut ($400 checks notwithstanding).

      The most striking example of government reducing unemployment was in Nazi Germany. When Hitler took over in 1933, unemployment was around %40 percent, under a laissez faire government. 3 years later, it was essentially nothing. (disclaimer - Hitler was a bad, bad man, not someone to be emulated. But it proves the point that government is not helpless).

      5 things Clinton did right: Acted sane and responsible (economically), didn't screw things up. He opened up more free trade and balanced the budget. Mainly, he stayed out of the way and American business created the jobs. He was lucky to be president in the 1990s, when unemployment was not a problem. (if Bush had been president in the '90s he may have been adequate, but that really doesn't matter)

      5 things Bush did wrong: Cut taxes on the rich instead of implementing a real stimulus package. Raised tariffs on steel, which only hurts our industries which *buy* steel. Brought back deficits as far as the eye can see. Failed to go after his buddies who rip off investors (think Enron), which frays the social contract necessary for people to do business.

      Ok, that's only 4, but I have to go now. The first one is the really important one, and should be enough anyway. With a proper stimulus package, the recovery would probably be over and the economy would be back on track after what was really a relatively mild recession.

      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
    162. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by jcr · · Score: 1

      The current Administration seems hell-bent on spending. ..and that would make them different from any previous administration in what way, exactly?

      Both major parties tax and tax and spend and spend. The only difference is the rhetoric.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    163. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by moving_comfort · · Score: 1

      Congrats on getting a job in Portland two years ago. Tell me this: If you were interviewing for the same job now, would you get it? Answer honestly. No, take your time. I said honestly. My guess is not. I interview people too, and one of the things we won't abide is outright arrogance. People like that (you) tend to be hard to work with, and end up causing more problems in the workplace than any benefits their supposed coding or admin skills bring. (which are often overblown - arrogance tends to inflate these "skills".) I know, I've made the mistake of overlooking this problem before in an effort to get a hot programmer to work with ASAP, and it was one of the biggest mistakes I ever made. You should feel lucky that you have the job you have, and yes, knowing someone influential in a fortune 500 company right now is as important (right now) as having hot skills. That may change as the economy picks up, but if you're denying that's the case then I have to conclude that you're clueless. Or possibly acting stupider than you are, because it's easier.

    164. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      Yes, I would get the same job. It's simple, because of my skill set. How many people have coded distributed network systems in C, C++, integrating with IDS and server monitoring systems, written mod_perl frameworks, CGI applications, Qt desktop networked applications, genetic analysis applications, dna storage and searching applications, biotech applications (EMG signal processing).

      These aren't things I know, but things I've done.

      I interview people too, and one of the things we won't abide is outright arrogance.

      I agree. If someone walks in and says, "I can code like a muthafucka" I show them the door. I don't do that. I say, "This is what I have done." I don't inflate it, I don't deflate it. I say it as it is, and I say it with the pride that comes from doing it on my own. That comes across as arrogance a lot of times, I agree. I just don't care, though. My saving grace and single talent in life is never caring what other people thought about me. I always do what I do for me, and that's why I succeed.

      You should feel lucky that you have the job you have, and yes, knowing someone influential in a fortune 500 company right now is as important (right now) as having hot skills.

      I always feel lucky for the life I have, and for knowing which opportunities to explore and harness. I also feel like I deserved all the opportunities in my life, because I've worked hard for the possibility for those opportunities to come forward. I've never had anything handed to me, even my parents made me work for my college tuition. It made me a better person.

      Or possibly acting stupider than you are, because it's easier.

      It is easier. I mostly just like to get people riled up by acting like a total obnoxious dick. In reality, I'm just a total dick.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    165. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by 17028 · · Score: 1

      You mean Joseph Goebbels, I assume. Goering was the commander of the air force.

    166. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by randyest · · Score: 1

      Close, I am saying that I don't think President elect Bush and his "cabinet" are a bunch of crooks and liars. I also don't think it's relevant to the article, and not unlike some of the arguments regarding product placement in another recent thread here, it's a dishonest sneak-attack political rant. I also think the article was pretty poor, and not funny. Worse, I think the author is also clearly a racist. Read his site. Paticularly the "Ethnic Pride" section at from http://www.dvorkin.com/yinotjew.htm.

      You've "mis-understood" a lot, obviously, regarding Cheney, Halliburton, Rumsfeld, and "half-crazed ultra-rightwing nut cases from the Project for the New American Century" whatever the hell that is. Unless you want to try to back any of that nonsense up, you should shut your stupid fucking mouth you psychopathic liberal socialist moron.

      Hey, if I'm going to get a flamebait mod for something that clearly wasn't, I'm going to come back and get my mod's worth. After all, I paid for it with my Karma, I might was well get some real flames in, right? Suck it down, liberal mods from hell.

      --
      everything in moderation
    167. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by randyest · · Score: 1

      This Guy is not crazy to not like the President.

      I didn't say he was. Feel free not to like Bush and I won't call you crazy at all. There's a lot about Bush I don't like as well. But please do try to use some argument that makes sense instead of spewing sheer juvenille ad hominem attacks and name calling in the process as the author did. Did you read his inane site? Or are you just jumping on the Bush-Bashing-Bandwagon?

      Bush opposes dealing with ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.

      Bullshit. Back it up or shut it up.

      In Iraq and Afghanistan the best description of the management is that Cpt. Klutz is in charge.

      Ditto.

      It goes on and on.

      Yes, your supply of unfounded, unsupported bullshit does seem to.

      Domestically the Bush team thinks that Free Trade means dismantling our domestic laws and causing Americans to have to tarriff their wages 150% while competing with foreign persons and goods which pay no such taxes.

      I have no idea what you're trying to say here ( "Americans to have to tarriff their wages 150%"? WTF?) and clearly, neither do you. Please try to cite something that's written by someone with a clue, maybe then I could understand what you think you mean.

      The Bush Team is prosecuting Grandma for buy Medicine out of the Country . . .

      Bullshit again. Cite or STFU.

      . . . but has withdrawn the FBI From Drug enforcement. I know! I had a case to call the FBI because Drug terrorists were destroying my neighborhood! The FBI doesn't even answer their answering machine on Drug related cases!

      The DEA is in charge of drug offenses, not the FBI. Get a clue asshat.

      There might just be a real reason to hate Bush without being unreasonable.

      Again, you didn't read (or understand) my post. I didn't say it was unreasonable to hat Bush. The author just didn't give any reasons (all ad hominem), and it was a sneak-attack political rant disguised as (bad) humor.

      He refuses to corral corruption, defend the country

      I'm getting tired of your stupid, unfounded claims. Again, try to back up some of these wild allegations or please shut your stupid pie hole.

      I know this is post is vociferous of me, but I'm taking out on you all my frustration and disdain at all the morons who posted below you. You deserve some of it, but others are much worse (and even more clueless, as hard to believe as that is). If you want to go off on crazy tangents in reply to a reasonable post that started at +5 funny and ended as flamebait, you're going to get some wrath. Have a nice day.

      --
      everything in moderation
    168. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      Wow... the resume seems to be a downward spiral really... Starting with NASA (Very impressive), working down, down down to companies I've never heard of doing fairly low level stuff.

      Quite sad really... :(

    169. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by danheskett · · Score: 1

      These admittedly aren't the strongest points but they are at least valid, and this is off the top of my head....
      Those are very weak. Those five issues are why the economy and employment tanked? Underfunding of the IRS? SEC regulation laxness even though accounting problems had started in the 90's (remember, most of the bad stuff corrected during the Bush term *happenend* during Clintons term - the illicit actions were only revealed during the Bush term)? It doesnt add up.

      The point I was making which you confirm is that the President can barely - marginally if at all - determine the course of the "economy" and specifically unemployment.

      The things you throw out are minor and very subjective. "Congressional buddies get a rubber stamp" - I mean really, are we so naive to believe the Clintons buddies (and Bush, Reagan, Carter, etc) didn't get a rubber stamp on thier pork? Of course not.

      The bottom line is that President's do not control the economy.

    170. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by danheskett · · Score: 1

      First off, the Novak issue is in dispute. Its up in the air. We will see. What is in dispute now thanks to Novak is who called who. Novak has contradicted himself on this issue. The original posted claimed it was "agents", which is clearly untrue. This is one case.

      But back to jobs. I agree that the government can take direct action to employ people and actively redistribute wealth. That is clear and straightforward. It doesn't happen often in the US often however, and Clinton did not do this directly and really not even indirectly. He did increase the size of certain government agencies, but not enough to drastically alter the employment rate (aka, not ala Germany in the 30's).

      As to your Clinton points:

      : Acted sane and responsible (economically), didn't screw things up.
      That is nothing, and can't be counted. Objective things: laws, treaties, actions only please.

      He opened up more free trade and balanced the budget.
      Bush has opened up even more free trade and exapnded lots of market space in Asia and Europe and even South America that Clinton didnt have access to. Second, Clinton signed a balanced budget, he didnt balance it. Big difference. Deficits more than anything though is a valid difference, however, in the short term, they DO NOT affect employment levels.

      Essentially what you are saying is that He was lucky to be president in the 1990s, and thats's exactly right. Clinton lucked out and got a boom economy. That's the bottom line.

      To Bush: Cut taxes on the rich instead of implementing a real stimulus packageCut taxes on the rich instead of implementing a real stimulus package
      A "real stimulus" package doesn't exisit short of the drastic direct action - and remember those don't always work. Short of hiring people to make roads that dont need building, littel cna be done in the short term to cause employment to pick up. In fact, short of the government hiring massive amounts of unemployed (1+ M) effecting even a 1% change in employment in less than 4 years is legislatively impossible. As far as taxes on the rich, over 90% of the tax package Bush passed hasn't taken effect yet, and probably never will (it will most likely be repealed before it takes effect). Its a dirty little secret but the tax cuts Bush put in take effect over 10 years. We are in year 1 of those cuts. There is no physical way this could have effected employment one way or another yet. Bush did lie by implication saying it would immediately create jobs. It wouldn't. The only thing that might help is direct cash to individuals - $400 and then $800. But that mostly too small to make a dent.

      Brought back deficits as far as the eye can see.
      Wrong answer same as before. Deficits don't affect short-term employment. Additionally, FYI, the GAO didnt predicit any of the last 3 surpluses more than 18 months before they happened. Essentially they can't predict - no one can - the complex effect of the economy and tax code on each other. All they can do is report.

      Failed to go after his buddies who rip off investors (think Enron)
      The damage was done before Bush got to office. I hear this a lot. The false returns and crimes of Enron were comitted throughout the 90's - during Bush I and Clinton's terms.

      The fundamental thing to remember is that the build-up of the 90's - aka the Clinton economy - was built on the fraud of Enron, WorldCom, and the tech bubble.

      Ok, that's only 4, but I have to go now. The first one is the really important one, and should be enough anyway. With a proper stimulus package, the recovery would probably be over and the economy would be back on track after what was really a relatively mild recession
      No, its not. There is not stimulus package that can turn around a recession in 6, 12, or even 18 months short of a massive government effort (aka, hiring unemployed people to do manual labor). Changes passed by Congress take months, and

    171. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      I suppose I wouldn't get more credibility if I told you I'm currently doing win32 api programming in C. Guess what, I am hardcore OSX/BSD at home, but I have to earn a living. And what exactly is the problem with Java? Ah yes its slow and bloated! Well, it isn't that bad, and getting alot better (kinda like mozilla if you remember the pre 1.0 milestone releases). Yes I can write in perl and C++ as well, but I dont program in perl much and I dont like C++ at all.

      Now regardless of my programming skillset, or choice of tools, your statement is implying something to the effect that bad programmers have no right to talk about politics. Good job. And yes I knnow I just took the flame bait.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    172. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      Repeal of the freaking steel tariffs. They're killing manufacturing.

      Reducing goverment, that is an idea I like.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    173. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by rsheridan6 · · Score: 1
      Look, it's just not true that government doesn't influence the unemployment rate. In general, the Federal Reserve sets employment. They have a target rate, around 5%, which they consider the "natural" rate of unemployment (the lowest rate at which inflation is not a problem). They adjust interest rates accordingly, up as unemployment gets too low, and down as unemployment gets too high. That is the main tool the government uses to control unemployment.

      here is an article that explains it better than I could. Econ 101 stuff.

      And deficits definitely do affect unemployment - they create jobs, at least in the short run. Here's an article which explains how, in a concise, readable way, if anyone is interested. The bottom line is that deficits are good during a recession (to be paid off later, when the economy improves). Even Bush calls his deficit spending a jobs package. Unfortunately, tax cuts for the rich give the least jobs per dollar of any form of deficit.

      The problem now is that the Fed has lowered interest rates about as low as they can go, and the job market is still sluggish. It's true that Clinton never had to deal with that, but that doesn't excuse Bush for failing to create jobs with his bogus "stimulus" package.

      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
    174. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by nagora · · Score: 1
      Project for the New American Century" whatever the hell that is.

      If you don't know what that is or what its aims are then you don't know squat about the current cabinet. It's also not a secret; in this 1998 document signed by, for example, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz, you can see the whole sorry plan for the current mess in Iraq: the ludicrous overstatement of Saddam's threat, the insistance that the UN need not be heeded if it gives the wrong answer, and the ever-present concern about oil. Total bullshit from start to end but it's bullshit written by the people now running your country.

      Cheney is just a stooge, he has no ability or area of intrest beyond geting contracts for the people that put him in place.

      Rumsfeld is slightly different in that he really is just an evil bastard. After shaking hands with Saddam he then helped arm him with various biological and chemical weapons. There is a copy of Saddam's shopping list at the end of this Congressional transcript but the original Senate Banking Committee report used to be available on line, but seems to have become buried beneath Google results to references to it. Rumsfeld lied in the above transcript when he said he had no knowledge of all this. In fact, he arranged the loans from the US to Iraq to pay for the bioweapons (which is where the Senate Banking Committee comes into it). The reason this was done was to help Saddam kill Iranian soldiers in the Iraq-Iran war, it was not even pretended that this would be a deterent: this was for actual use in the current conflict. The CIA later sent over specialists in biological warfare to help "calibrate" the weapons.

      This is the real reason they were so sure Saddam had WMD: Rumsfeld had seen the receipts. The assumtion was that he would never have got rid of them, whereas the reality was that he had, probably because he knew the inspectors would one day have to be let back in and he thought that the US would have to listen to those UN inspectors even if it didn't believe what it was hearing. He was wrong!

      Before you vote next time, perhaps you should find out about the people involved. Its not that hard if you are actually interested in looking.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    175. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by roard · · Score: 1

      You forgot one thing... Saddam decided to change from USD to Euro ... and as USA finance their deficit with USD, the trend of the oil states to go with Euro was a very bad thing. Obviously it wasn't the sole reason for the war :-) but I believe it was one of the reasons.

    176. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by beamdriver · · Score: 1
      Actually it did work. Reagan said that if you cut taxes across the board (which includes tax cuts for wealthy people) you would increase revenue. The next year, revenue almost doubled.

      This is a lie.

      Revenue went down after both Reagan tax cuts. It's amazing that idealogues will tell this lie over and over again and people will believe it, when it's trivial to go to the IRS web site and check for yourself.

    177. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by notcreative · · Score: 1
      I mean really, are we so naive to believe the Clintons buddies (and Bush, Reagan, Carter, etc) didn't get a rubber stamp on thier pork? Of course not.

      Actually, with respect to Clinton's presidency, that's exactly what I'm saying. You see, after 1992 there was a Congressional majority of Republicans. That means that they would like nothing better to point out that the Demoncrats were stuffing bills with pork, and then laugh and throw them out. Yes, some porky bills were still passed (for farmers who are saints, sacrificing themselves for the rest of us, etc) but you didn't see the kind of blatant taxdollar giveaways we're seeing with a Republican Congress, President, and Supreme Court. I'm not saying the Demos would be any better if they had the full house, but in that particular respect the President does have some control over the economy.

      I'm not saying that the President has absolute control over the economy in the same way I have control over my television. It is amazing to me that people argue that the President of the US, who is probably the single most powerful person in the world, is unable to affect the US economy at all. I guess all he can do is sign legislation that affects trillions of tax dollars, write executive orders that change the status of the largest employer in the country (the govt), and move the armed services around in foriegn countries, incurring massive costs. I'm sure these things have nothing to do with the rest of the economy.

    178. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by danheskett · · Score: 1

      The President *can* effect the economy, I didnt say otherwise. Just not in the *immediate* term. If on the first day of office he passed certain laws and made some changes, those will probably cycle through the economy by the end of his term.

      He cant flick a switch and then be done with it, which is what they and others claim.

      As far as pork is concerned, you are incredibly wrong. Let me explain how pork works and why you are wrong about it getting tossed out under Clinton. Pork gets slipped into *popular* bills. Bills that are approved 400-10 in the house and and 90-10 in the Senate or better. In close bills pork is mostly eliminated by the majority faction.

      The thing of it is that because of this, no one can vote against the popular bill to kill pork. When they do, it gets used against them in elections. Thats when you see someone get asked "Why did you vote against the Bill to Preserve all that is Good senator?". Of course that won't do. So an easy bill comes along - something routine - and the pork gets piled on. The most senior powerful party people get the most, and then the less powerful party people, and then the opposition party people. It's always been like that.

      To suggest it didnt happen under Clinton is absurd - even if the congress was opposed pork crosses party lines like its water under a bridge. Its all part of a complex system of bartering and trading that trascends party lines.

    179. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      Of course I understood that.

      Would you deny that Saddam is a belligerent SOB who has threatened the US constantly and with considerable malice?

      If you concede that point, the intervention was hardly arbitrary. If you hit a guy and hit him and hit him, should you be surprised if he fights back?

      Do you feel the Iraqi people would have been better off under Saddam, who was killing them at a rate of 21,000-odd a year?

      War is a horrible thing, and it can only be supported under extreme circumstances. But that doesn't mean extreme circumstances don't occasionally exist.

      The only person on the planet even remotely similar to Saddam is Kim Jong Il of North Korea. He has threatened us in similarly belligerent ways, and his people are starving. Unfortunately, thanks to the close proximity of South Korea, a war with them is a much more ticklish proposition.

      Now, it's true that these threats are not backed up all that well right now. But there's no question that Saddam and Kim have been tinkering with nuclear weapons. I would prefer to see their governments taken out before they use them.

      So I would support war with North Korea, but only if we could figure out a way to deal with the collateral damage, which could be enormous.

      I have no doubt that, even if Saddam's program wasn't in place at the time of the invasion, he would have continued it after he slid out of the intense glare of publicity. As a result, I feel he represented a genuine threat, even if it was not immediate.

      I would probably not support an invasion of Zimbabwe or China because those countries present no threat to us at this time. They are not belligerents. Castro's Cuba is an interesting borderline case. I've been there, and the people are not well off. He has been supporting Hugo Chavez' nasty Veneuzelian government. But I don't think a bloody war is the answer; waiting for Fidel to die is probably the least harmful solution.

      Hope that helps clarify my views.

      D

    180. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by nagora · · Score: 1
      If you concede that point, the intervention was hardly arbitrary.

      It's arbitary in the sense of the reasons bandied about: that Saddam was a bad person and a dictator. Well, that covers a lot of people so why pick on him particularly? As to threatening the US: so what? He wasn't going to do anything about it, there's very little evidence that he had done much in the past beyond threatening. Most of the bigger terrorist attacks, including 9/11, came from Saudi Arabia or Palestine (who actually did the Lockerbie bomb) and some from Libya. More damage is done the US citizens by the actions of Columbian drug producers than by all three of these groups.

      Do you feel the Iraqi people would have been better off under Saddam, who was killing them at a rate of 21,000-odd a year?

      No, they were not. But then who put Saddam in place? One thing that the current administration seems to simply not understand is that if you lock someone in a cell for 20+ years with a maniac that tortures and abuses them, they are unlikely to be on very good terms with you just because you eventually let them out again.

      The question is not "should Saddam have been left in power?" since that is an obvious "no", but rather, "was there a better way to get him out?" Perhaps there was, perhaps there wasn't but Bush et al did not have the patience to try anything else. Now they want help and are discovering that they've burnt their bridges by forcing a war against the wishes of many countries and people using faked and exagerated evidence.

      The only person on the planet even remotely similar to Saddam is Kim Jong Il of North Korea.

      Mugabwe is at least as bad as either at least from the point of view of his own people and there are half a dozen others in Africa who are not far behind him. But, their human rights don't come attached to US economic interests so they don't count. Again, "arbitary" as opposed to "just".

      As a result, I feel he represented a genuine threat, even if it was not immediate.

      To Israel perhaps, to the US itself? Nah.

      Hugo Chavez' nasty Veneuzelian government

      Define "nasty". The last time I looked Chavez was feeding his people in the face of massive opposition from people like Bush (who tried to have him assassinated) and Exxon (who tried to have him deposed). I know he gets a bad press in the US but that may not be unconnected to the fact that is country in the largest single producer of US oil imports and he won't bend the knee and do what he's told by outsiders.

      The problem I have with your stance, which is a common enough one, is that it revolves around the question of whether a dictator is threatening America. From a humanitarian point of view (which is the POV you used in the question about the Iraqis being better off now) what does that matter? The Chinese government is every bit as bad as the North Koreans if you are unlucky to be a native Tibetan or a prisioner in one of their political gulags (sp?). Starving Africans take very little comfort from the thought that their hunger is at least not a military worry for the occupant of the White House.

      If the objective of the current US foreign policy is to root out evil and free the world's poor and oppressed then it has my whole-hearted support. If on the other hand it is simply an excuse to allow (rich) Americans to expand their political influence and control across the globe in order to line their own pockets with no thought for the effects on the various vassel states created by this process then they can go to hell with my blessing.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    181. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      This is a lie.

      I resent that. If I am wrong, then you can say "That is inaccurate" or "That is wrong". You imply that I know the truth and continued to say something that is untrue.

      Revenue went down after both Reagan tax cuts. It's amazing that idealogues will tell this lie over and over again and people will believe it, when it's trivial to go to the IRS web site and check for yourself.

      A little bit of googling gives me this:

      >Under Reagan, marginal tax rates were cut from
      >a top of 70% to 28%. Revenues (from all taxes)
      >to the U.S. Treasury nearly doubled.
      >According .to the Budget of the U.S.
      >Government, FY 1997, Office of
      >Management .and .Budget. Revenues increased
      >from roughly $500 billion in 1980 to $1.1
      >trillion in 1990.

      I couldn't find that stats on irs.gov, but I am busy right now

    182. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by cluckshot · · Score: 1

      On September 6/7 of 2001 President Bush Welcomed V.Fox of Mexico to the White House and Mr. Fox spoke to Congress. In the month of August the Bush Administration undertook a propaganda campaign which tried to convince Americans that Border Enforcement was Impossible. Subsequent to that he on Sept 1, 2001 Ordered the US Border Patrol and US INS to cease Enforcement of the Border! On Sept 9 Mohammad Atta was arrested in Shelby County Alabama and based upon existing outstanding warrants he should have been deported by this event. Because the President's orders to honor Mr Fox, Mr. Atta went on his way!

      The Bush Administration currently is releasing Illegals arrested. They are not even processing them! The BICS (Old INS) is not enforcing any efforts in this matter! I personally know of dozens of Illegal Immigrants and have reported them. Nothing is or has or will be done about them. The Bush Administration WANTS TO END BORDER ENFORCEMENT!

      I am married to an Immigrant and Immigration is an issue I know a lot about because of it. I was also laid off from working on a US Government Warship so that they could import H-1B Labor from India on OCT 5, 2001! I could go on and on regards immigration but bluntly Bush is not on the team and you don't know what is going on if you think he is!

      Regards to Tariffing wages, you obviously don't pay income taxes or you don't understand that income taxes are a tariff of sorts on wages. Bluntly I as an American Citizen must markup my wages more than 150% in order to pay taxes on my income and live. My foreign competition if domestically located is either whole or part exempted from these taxes. If their goods or services are imported under GATT and the FTA's (Trade Promotion Authority DEMANDED BY BUSH) they are entirely US Tax Exempt. It is a foregone conclusion of that competition. But to clarify: Imagine a Super US Runner in a Race against other good runners from the world. Just before the race Uncle Sam comes by and straps on to him an Iraqi (War costs here) His Grandma, (Social Security costs here) and a few other things. The gun goes off and of course the American Runner falls flat on his face. (And so do your ignorant arguments)

      Regards the DEA vs FBI on Drugs, the only thing the DEA is doing is enforcing against Grandmas etc who are ordering their medicine from Canada so that they can eat! Canadian Options etc are being sued by Ashcrofts boys here over this.

      I could go on but I will not. Bluntly the Bush team is "Making the world safe for Democrats" with their sabotage of American Economy and National Security.

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    183. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by cluckshot · · Score: 1

      I have a link for this Ignorant Guy and please note that he denied that the Bush Administration was messed up on Immigration and that they refused to defend the country. http://www.washtimes.com/national/20031001-113722- 8560r.htm I just backed it up on "Bush opposes dealing with ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION."

      The story is very important and shows just how deep the antipathy the Bushies have is towards enforcing the law and defending the country. It is "Hot off the Presses"

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    184. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by beamdriver · · Score: 1
      It's a lie.

      The fact that you didn't know this and reported it as fact makes you misinformed. But make no mistake, the people who disseminate this supply-side nonsense are first class liars. They know it's false, but they tell it to the gullible (like you) because it suits their agenda.

      First, look at what you wrote. Tax revenues doubled over 10 years (1980 -1990)? Reagan was only president for 8 years. This calculation include a nearly 17% increase in revenue from 1980 to 1981, when Jimmy Carter was president.

      Reagan passed his first tax cut in 1982, so why are we talking about 1980? Income tax revenues fell .8% in 1983 and rose 8.5% in 1984. The second tax cut took effect in 1986 and that year income tax revenues rose 5.3 %, compared to 9.2% the year before and 13.3% the year after.

      Historically, tax revenues have gone up an average of 11% in the years from 1969 to 1997, so we need to judge the Reagan years versus history The truth is, when Reagan cut taxes, revenues were less than they should have been. There is no refuting this basic and simple fact.

      Judging the Reagan tax cut years (1982 - 1989) by history, we find that revenues increased about 7% a year, 4% less than the historical avaerage. So there was no tidal wave of money from these tax cuts. There was less money in the till than there should have been.

      Here's the Tax Stats Page, all the stats are in Excel files, so I don't want to link to them directly, but if you want to take a little time, you can run all the numbers yourself.

    185. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by dubiousdave · · Score: 1
      You need to be modded down. You are attempting to interject facts, figures, and reason into a (somewhat offtopic) slashdot argument.

      It is much easier and more comforting to blame Bush, or whomever happens to hold the office, than it is to deal with complicated things like economic cycles and shifts in global economy. How can anyone work up a really good rant on general economic trends that are beyond the control of any one person or even one government? No one can come up with a really catchy .sig based on that. Get with the program.

      --
      Thank you. Drive through.
    186. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by eglamkowski · · Score: 1

      The Federal Reserve is not accountable to the President, so even if the Fed is able to affect unemployment, that says nothing about Bush.

      In fact, the Fed isn't even really accountable to Congress either - it's an independent entity. Congress can't even hold it hostage to funding, since it isn't funded by the government either.

      I mean, there *IS* congressional oversight of the Fed, but it mostly just runs itself without interference.

      --
      Government IS the problem.
    187. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by eglamkowski · · Score: 1

      Calling it "tax cuts for the rich" is bogus anyways. As it is, the bottom 50% of income earners only pay 4% of the income tax collected, so it's not like there is much there to give back to them!

      The top 1% earn 20.8% of the income and pay 37.4% of the taxes. Giving them back 1 or 2% is hardly cataclysmic. They already pay proportionally FAR more as it is.

      You can't give a tax cut to someone who doesn't pay taxes. The people who will benefit the most from a tax cut are those who pay the most in taxes.
      Duh.

      To be in the top 1% of income earners, BTW, takes "only" $293K a year (as of 2001, anyways). A lot of traditionally left-wing people often make that much - athletes, actors, lawyers, doctors. Not to mention that succesful small business owners will frequently make at least that much as well - even a small restaurant can top $350K a year if their restaurant is reasonably popular.

      In terms of politicians, according to Forbes, 6 of the 10 richest politicians in the US are... democrats! Only 3 are republicans. Gee, who's the party of the evil, hated rich?
      http://www.forbes.com/2002/10/29/cx_dd_richpols.ht ml

      Some other good links that either confirm some of the above or just make for good reading:
      http://www.irs.gov/taxstats/article/0,,id=102886,0 0.html
      http://taxfoundation.org/SR118.pdf
      http://www.forbes.com/lists/results.jhtml?passList Id=10&passYear=2002&passListType=Person&resultsSta rt=1&resultsHowMany=25&resultsSortProperties=%2Bnu mberfield1%2C%2Bstringfield1&resultsSortCategoryNa me=rank&category1=Country+of+Citizenship&searchPar ameter1=11Str%7C%7CPatCS%7C%7CUnited+States&catego ry2=category&searchParameter2=unset

      --
      Government IS the problem.
    188. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by craigtay · · Score: 1

      Do you think a democrat president would have gone to a full blown war with Iraq? Even though I agree with your statement (Clinton, for example, bombed the hell out of a lot of places during his presidency), I think that sometimes these minor differences can potentially make a big difference.

    189. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      Reagan passed his first tax cut in 1982, so why are we talking about 1980? Income tax revenues fell .8% in 1983 and rose 8.5% in 1984. The second tax cut took effect in 1986 and that year income tax revenues rose 5.3 %, compared to 9.2% the year before and 13.3% the year after.

      Why are we talking about 88-90? I just got that data by itself.

      Historically, tax revenues have gone up an average of 11% in the years from 1969 to 1997, so we need to judge the Reagan years versus history The truth is, when Reagan cut taxes, revenues were less than they should have been. There is no refuting this basic and simple fact.

      Are you sure that it is 11% per year or 11% over those 38 years? Can you find proof that revenues were less during Reagan's administration?

      Judging the Reagan tax cut years (1982 - 1989) by history, we find that revenues increased about 7% a year, 4% less than the historical avaerage. So there was no tidal wave of money from these tax cuts. There was less money in the till than there should have been.

      Since everything I have heard is to the contrary, I need to see some facts. However, I will be glad to admit that I am wrong provided I can get some strong proof :)

      --Joey

    190. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      As you have said, there are about a million different countries that have nasty governments.

      We can't afford to take out all of them.

      So we take out those that are threatening to America. As a collateral benefit, we manage to destroy a despicable regime or two.

      I think it's moral to take out all of the bad regimes you mention. But it's not practical because we'd have to increase the defence budget by 1000%.

      So we have to stick to the countries that are the worst, both as belligerents and as bad regimes. And another factor is whether we can do it with minimal casualties, as we have in Iraq.

      Iraq fulfulled all these requirements perfectly. I don't see such a clear-cut case for war being likely at any other time within our lifetime, although North Korea comes close if they keep on selling WMD to hostile actors.

      D

    191. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      See my answers to the other person who replied.

      Enjoy!

      D

    192. Re:A thinly veiled political rant, actually by nagora · · Score: 1
      North Korea comes close if they keep on selling WMD to hostile actors.

      They're selling nuclear weapons to Charlton Heston?! Damn them. Damn them all to hell!

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  28. Definitely check out Odd Todd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's worth a look. Very funny stuff.

  29. just imagine by WormholeFiend · · Score: 0, Redundant

    a beowulf cluster of unemployed people:

    playing cards?
    watching the game on tv?
    etc.

    1. Re:just imagine by Laconian · · Score: 1

      Imagine a beowulf cluster of unemployed petrified naked Natalie Portmans! I've done the Slashdot Gods proud.

  30. and in two years... by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 2, Funny

    the other day I caught myself telling a fellow slacker "you are trolling the unemployment line you should be mod'ed down" of course I got a blank empty void look on his face. also, I really ought to move out of my mom's house soon.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
  31. Jackass parent poster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some admin get this guy's IP and forward the post to his ISP plz. veiled death threats aren't needed here..

    - undisclosed responsible /. citizen.

    1. Re:Jackass parent poster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you, censorbot.

  32. CATO by C10H14N2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    No, the CATO institute would probably have a paper on the moral duty of the unemployed to increase downward pressure on wages and how the recently homeless have merely chosen to realize capital gains by selling their houses to pay for food. The Heritage Foundation would no doubt follow up with a paper on how eliminating the capital gains tax would then be in the best interest of the future homeless population. It's the compassionately conservative thing to do.

    1. Re:CATO by EugeneK · · Score: 1

      And an inspiring story of a 40 year-old grandmother from the inner city who saved her money up from her fast food job and invested it all in Haliburton and now lives in Palm Beach in a 7 bedroom home.

  33. unemployment by Unominous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The boss told me that if I'm late for work again tomorrow, I shouldn't bother turning up on Monday.

    Woohoo! Four day weekend!!

    --
    "Smoking helps you lose weight - one lung at a time" -- A. E. Neumann
    1. Re:unemployment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Homer, have you been up all night eating cheese and reading Slashdot again?"

      "I think I'm blind!"

    2. Re:unemployment by jamesh · · Score: 1

      My favourite is
      "If you don't show up on Saturday, don't bother coming in on Sunday".

    3. Re:unemployment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Five day weekend actually :)

    4. Re:unemployment by V_drive · · Score: 1

      "why aren't you at work?"
      "they said if i come in late one more time i'm fired. i can't take that chance!"

      --
      char *mySig;
  34. For perks of being unemployed without the guilt... by goodbye_kitty · · Score: 5, Funny

    For all the perks of being unemployed without the guilt, frustration and lack of income that it brings with it...Do a PhD! ......back to the grind, another day of back-breaking research ahead...ooops...dont feel like working, i think ill go home and sleep instead....better tell the boss...wait...there is no boss...hehehe....my paper is not due till next month, ill just do it the night before.

  35. Drawback. . . by XplosiveX · · Score: 0

    A drawback about being unemployed would be to not ever get the satisfaction of having sex on your desk with a hot co-worker. ;)

  36. Who said the Slashdot editors weren't smart ? by tmark · · Score: 4, Funny

    After all, they're smart enough to realize that articles about being unemployed are likely to be of great interest to a large proportion of those people spending the most time reading Slashdot.

    Way to go after your core readership guys !

  37. What a waste of an article... by boomgopher · · Score: 1

    why would anyone bother... oh wait, "Posted by michael". Nevermind.

    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
  38. Reading this article... by Qinopio · · Score: 1
    Reading this article on the job just got me fired!

    </lie>

    --
    __________
    [Big Brick Wall]
    1. Re:Reading this article... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Thats no lie.

      --Your Boss

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  39. Cast off thy chains, all ye slaves of desire! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Move to alaska and hunt for food. Burn your BMW before your life runs out paying for it! Cube monkeys are slaves! Thinking that you need to get ahead is just a trick to keep you humping! Run! Run!

  40. "simple living" by penguin7of9 · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is actually an entire movement of people that have discovered this. Look for "simple living" on Google. "The Simple Living Guide" by Luhrs is pretty nice reading, too.

    Even if you don't want to adopt frugality and simple living right now, just knowing that you could can make you worry a lot less about the future.

    1. Re:"simple living" by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      Or, try living a day in a students shoes. Hell I could write a 500 page thesis on a similar topic to his, and none will be complaining about losing my job.

      Just to begin... Having to wake up to an alarm clock

      Well, actually 6. All of my roommates wake up at various times during the day, and if I want to sleep in (if I am sick, usually I am the first up) I have to listen to 5 other alarm clocks before mine goes off.

      Getting Rid of Telemarketers and Door-to-Door Salesmen

      These people do not dare come near us. They know we will take everything they have and eat it.

      Long-Range Planning

      Hahahaha. Like I plan dinners in the morning.

      Scamsters

      Those sketchy credit card salesmen that give you prizes with the credit cards in return for free gifts...Well we know the credit cards have insane fees and interest rates...so "Joe Blow" in "123 Fake St" is getting about 5 of those bills in the mail right now.

      My Beard

      I have a permanent 5 oclock shadow. Do not ask how or why, it just results from being a student.

      Clutter

      Wake up on your living room floor after a keg party. Stand up, and realize where you were laying is the only clear spot on the floor. Get a garbage bag...puke in it (haha dont even think about cleaning) and then go to your room which you luckily locked, and sleep the mess away.

      Snobbery

      If you even remember being snobbish, you arent poor enough yet.

      Power. Shower.

      Cold showers, always. I dont know who the magical person is that gets the first shower, but mine is always cold. And its not by choice.

      Popcorn

      You BUY these luxuries?

      Weight, Losing

      We are still gaining the frosh 50. And more.

      Weight, Lifting

      Workout daily, I can bench more than you can imagine. But students only bench and do curls. Biceps and pecs are the only muscles you workout when you are under 25...

      Triumph of the Will

      Going to the library and studying. It is like climbing mount everest. Not an easy task to bring yourself to.

      I would rant longer...but whatev

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
  41. Great (funny) unemployed link! by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1


    http://www.oddtodd.com/cartoons.html

    Watch a day in a life (Laid off Land)

    I nearly laughed myself sick! This was acutually made by a laid off dot bomber.

    (It is worth the wait, and reminded me that flash is useful for more than just annoying ads)

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  42. A real benefit by tmark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most of his "benefits" seem to have been writing with a smirk. One friend of mine who has been unemployed for about 9 months has been catching all hell from his wife. However, even she has to admit that his being unemployed and his consequent stays at home with their 2-y old son has made them much closer. For instance, before the son never ran to his father for comfort (only ever his mother), now he does. I think my friend has become a much better father largely because he is unemployed. (Of course, that doesn't stop him from wanting to leave the kid alone while he's sleeping so he can go checking out the satellite dish store down the street, because he thinks the baby monitor will reach halfway to the store, but don't tell his wife).

  43. Bitter much? by The+Tyro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sheesh... a few of flashes of insight in there, but it's mostly bitter, sarcastic, angst-ridden despair... quite depressing read, actually.

    Notice how he blames it on everyone else, as if some puppetmaster controls his destiny? (evil corporations, GW Bush, supervisors and managers). Sheesh, guy... I hate to sound like your dad, but that's life. Lots of people have been screwed out of jobs before, and lots of peolpe have had jobs that frankly sucked, but there's always work out there if you are willing to swallow some pride, and make some sacrifices. Go back to school for god's sake.

    I wish I hadn't read that depressing little piece... I'd say it was a lot higher on the despair scale than the humor scale.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:Bitter much? by mvh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      wow, now i have to say that comment was about as depressing as I can handle. The original guy seems to take life quite well.

    2. Re:Bitter much? by helix400 · · Score: 2

      Sheesh... a few of flashes of insight in there, but it's mostly bitter, sarcastic, angst-ridden despair... quite depressing read, actually. Notice how he blames it on everyone else, as if some puppetmaster controls his destiny? (evil corporations, GW Bush, supervisors and managers).

      I agree, and I can see why he's unemployed. Why would any company want a to hire high maintenance anti-capitalist whiner like that guy? His views kind of clash with want businesses need. He blames capitalism from idealogical viewpoints, and yet wants no-nosense business to glady hire him with a healthy salary.

      I know unemployment must suck like hell, but if he really wanted a job, the first step is to become a potentially useful employee. If he becomes qualified, and still can't get a job, then he has grounds to blame society.

    3. Re:Bitter much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said!

      The author needs to grow some broader shoulders. He blames everyone else but fails to recognize the common denominator - himself.

      Stomach in, chest out and shoulders back. Get some pride, show it and use it in your next interview.

      Apply for all types of jobs/contracts. You will discover lots of new and interesting jobs, possibilities and companies along the way.

      Hell, you might even get a short term contract installing software on Windows boxes getting paid by the hour to watch a progress indicator.

      I did that for a childrens hospital. Being unemployed is nothing when you look at a baby or child in an isolation chamber. Makes you realise that you have got it easy in comparison.

      Shortly after that stint at the hospital I got an excellent job in a great company. And I don't take it for granted.

    4. Re:Bitter much? by qaggaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but if he really wanted a job, the first step is to become a potentially useful employee

      Been there, done that...

      This comment obviously comes from someone who has never actually experienced the joys of unemployment. I actually agree that it is important to become a useful employee. I was unemployed for nine months last year and took the time to go back and actually read through RFCs, play with network equipment, do some volunteer work, take a few classes, and so on. And I did eventually get a job.

      On the other hand, it is as though someone else was controling my destiny. Afterall, was it my fault that the upper management of my former employer decided to divert corporate revenue away from the business (and stock holders) and into their own bonuses and golden-parachutes? Is it my fault that the stock holders often see lay offs as "trimming the fat" and reward these same executives for their "bold moves to improve the bottom line" with even larger bonuses?

      Capitalism itself may not be to blame, but surely the corrupt cabal that runs most American corporations as well as our political system should be held accountable.

      Perhaps if unemployment benefits were paid directly out of executive compensation, the unemployment rate would drop.

    5. Re:Bitter much? by Chartreuse_Zergling+ · · Score: 1

      Wow! I just realized, that if everybody would just get off their asses and follow all these people's excellent, professional advice on Slashdot, then nobody would be unemployed!

      Fucking brilliant!

      In fact, I'm thinking of quitting my job today just so I can follow some of this advice tomorrow! I can't wait!!

    6. Re:Bitter much? by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      you are right except for one thing... I think it should be depressing, the one point that is true is that there -should- in fact be a reciprocal feeling of dedication from the company. People give a lot to work for a company, they live in a particular place and their whole life depends on that, even if an employer says, "don't feel dedicated or lawyer, this is just your job", you would still be obligated to it because so much of one's life is set up supporting it. There is not, in fact, always some other job to go to.

      A lot of people just do workaday... but they fool themselves, you cannot give that much time to something and think it's separate. Time is life. A second of time is your life/soul/only currency. If you zone out, that's just psychology, you are still there being zoned out. You will feel the zombie. Most people fine a stress reducing ballance, and root for their company with much the same enthusiasm as a sports team, by which I mean constantly bad mouthing it's mistakes and still wishing that it wins.

      Of course, companies do demand loyalty and fidelity... to the limit of the law generally. Some companies try to tighten the belt without letting people go. Some companies value their good employees, and find ways to eliminate bad employees, and want their employees to be well compensated and insured. We need a situation where all companies are like that.

      --

      -pyrrho

    7. Re:Bitter much? by germann · · Score: 1

      I wish I hadn't read that depressing little piece...

      So, it's depressing and little at the same time, isn't it? Let me tell you champion something, anybody who's seen a little of the ups and downs in life will feel sympathy for this guy. Obviously, he tries to handle his situation with humour and keep his spirits up, which to my knowledge isn't easy for anybody being umemployed, especially when he's no longer in his twenties. Clearly, this wouldn't really appeal to those busy all day with what - work or feeding their arrogance? Since they still feel the presence of some obscure virus the exact way he describes, and try to avoid them as long as they can instead of facing life and people, as they are, and maybe even care a little.

    8. Re:Bitter much? by ojQj · · Score: 2, Informative
      Neither of us knows his entire story, but I had a different take on his capitalism rant. Basically he was complaining about an asymetric relationship. He gave a lot to his company, and thought that he could depend on them in return. But some companies don't realize the value of employee loyalty and don't choose to foster it, instead making brutal, but (hopefully at least) economically correct decisions which don't see any practical value in intangibles such as loyalty.

      My answer to that not would be to pretend its not true. It is. Instead, it's time to realize that companies are this way and to plan around it. A few possibilities are:

      1. Get together with others so that you can have the same kind of collective bargaining power as the monopsonists (ie create a labor monopoly, ie unionize).
      2. Make sure that the company really can't live without you by performing a critical service no one else can.
      3. Keep your skills and contacts up-to-date so that you can find another job, even while you perform consciencious work at the job you have. Don't let unpayed over-time at your current job suck away the time you need to do this.
      4. In addition to retirement savings, save to bridge potential dead periods. Negotiate your salary with the need to do this in mind.
      5. In short calculate all the costs and risks of employment into your decision making processes at all levels. Don't let optimism and the desire to like your employer corrupt your judgement.
      Just because someone has recognized that capitalism can be brutal doesn't make him a bad employee. I'd say it could make him a better employee because he enters the contract with open eyes, and a clear understanding of his position.

      The author of this article was simply saying that he didn't realize this before, and that now he does.

    9. Re:Bitter much? by rsheridan6 · · Score: 1
      I agree, and I can see why he's unemployed. Why would any company want a to hire high maintenance anti-capitalist whiner like that guy? His views kind of clash with want businesses need. He blames capitalism from idealogical viewpoints, and yet wants no-nosense business to glady hire him with a healthy salary.
      What do his views on capitalism have to do with his ability in a tech job? Or any job, except for Economics professor? They must have a different interview process where you come from, because I've never once been asked my opinion on capitalism in a job interview.
      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
    10. Re:Bitter much? by Diabolical · · Score: 1

      After reading his resume and noticing he worked for NASA in the late sixties and has been working up until now, i think he's more your dad...

      Back to school is probably not the right track for him, although a rejuvenation treatment probably is..

      Brings us back to the old problem of older, more experienced employees (and mostly more expensive) versus younger, cheaper employees (and mostly less experienced).

    11. Re:Bitter much? by sapped · · Score: 1

      Try 6 months or so of unemployment yourself. Talk to me at the end of that time with no job in sight yet. We'll see if you don't feel a little bitter at the prospect of losing everything you have built up yourself due to the decisions of others.

  44. well said by ScottSpeaks! · · Score: 1
    "...a small break in a busy day."

    Or not so busy.
    {sigh}

  45. What I really want to know... by wessto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...is at what point he gives up his monthly internet bill.

    I've been looking at my monthly budget for ways to save a few bucks and dsl is costing a lot, but I feel I can't let go of it.

    1. Re:What I really want to know... by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you use the internet for, if mostly porn and slashdot well get dial-up. If you are going to school or are actually looking for jobs DSL helps a lot when browsing 8-10 hours a day on job sites.

    2. Re:What I really want to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if(down==4 && yardsToFirst == tooMany) punt++;

      Shouldn't that be yardsToFirst >= tooMany?

    3. Re:What I really want to know... by wessto · · Score: 1

      Good point. In my situation, graduate school classes and research are much easier with a broadband connection. Also, I host a couple of websites/mail servers for my family and really like the ability to do that. I just wish it was cheaper, thats all.

  46. Okay, Dubya may be an idiot, but... by 1337_h4x0r · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    damn, this guy is OBSSESSED! Check out the link at the bottom of the article page. I can totally agree with people wondering about the policies of the president, and even not liking him as a person, but insulting someone's daughters and his family is going a wee bit far... hard to agree with his "I'm a nice guy" comment after reading his list...

    1. Re:Okay, Dubya may be an idiot, but... by dewman007 · · Score: 1

      he needs to add to his list Me: unemployed George W : STILL EMPLOYED idiot.....

    2. Re:Okay, Dubya may be an idiot, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i wonder if he knows why he is unemployed...

    3. Re:Okay, Dubya may be an idiot, but... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      Bush's daughters are Wild...and the news Media is EXTREMELY DISCRETE when they handle them...but they have to report when the girls are thrown in Jail repeatedly! Jeb's kids are just as bad....Must be that "experimenting" with cocaine George did in college.

      For all the screwing up [and down and which way] the Clinton's did, Chelsea turned out well. She's graduated from Harvard[?] now and has a job! You NEVER heard about her doing anything like the Bush girls. As People they had to do something right. What un-nerves me is that Bush and the "Right" seem to want to push their morals [I don't entirely disagree, but] on the rest of us with Drunk driving crackdown, Drug War, Iraq War, Homeland security, TIA but they can't even keep control of their OWN CHILDREN! [Bush Sr seemed to have the same issues with Jr too] These guys are supposed to increase "law" enforcement and lower crime?

      Honestly, The above isn't an insult in any way, it's fact [and very, very few] published in the newspaper. If THAT is going on [and the media are fairly nice to the prez family] how bad are they really? How can someone seriously be expected to run a COUNTRY when they can't seem to control their own selves?

    4. Re:Okay, Dubya may be an idiot, but... by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      They're still not contemptible. That was just mean. I mean, if you can pull yourself through two decades of living in that house with nothing worse than a few drug addictions, you're doing pretty fucking good.

      Those kids have got to be Cameron from Ferris Bueller's Day Off to the hundredth power by now, only with so many handlers that they never get the chance to escape from the whole thing. If I were an editor, I'd print everything they did, but only because I'm 90% sure that embarassing him that way is closest they're ever going to be able to get to killing his car.

    5. Re:Okay, Dubya may be an idiot, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The kids don't hold any office. I didn't vote for them. Clinton **lied** on numerous occasions. Remember this quote: "That depends on what 'is' is."?
      What a sack of sh*t. At least pretend to be a man and tell the f%xking truth, Bill.
      Didn't your mothers teach you not to lie?
      Didn't your mothers teach you not to tattle - lie about something someone else did?
      Didn't your mothers teach you not to treat women as objects?
      The only thing that scares me more than anyone like Clinton getting back into the office of president is the folks who think it would be a good thing.
      TIA scares me. Homeland security scares me. You guys who don't want to do anything about the root caus scares me even more.
      Dubya has proved to be a great President.
      Arnold will prove to be a great Governor of Cal, dispite the political last minute lies. How do I know? He's an honest man who has been successful at almost everything he does. The current flock of Dems are all womanizing liars with no vision who need to stop complaining and come up with a complete plan for all the problems we face.

  47. This is News for Nerds? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1


    Nothing tech related, just one person's view on being unemployeed. Are us Nerds generally that unemployeed?

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    1. Re:This is News for Nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do a Google search on either H-1B or L-1

    2. Re:This is News for Nerds? by gfordham · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds like a good Poll Idea.

      How many Slashdi are:

      Employed In Tech
      Employed In Retail
      Employed In Fast Food
      Contractor
      Unemployed
      Cowboy Neals My Surgar Daddy

      --
      When work feels overwhelming, remember that you're going to die.
    3. Re:This is News for Nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, I got done with the college in June last year and was employed with a software development job two weeks later.

      Every 3 months I am getting new Microsoft (MCSD series) or Sun (Java Developer) certification, thinking of getting maybe a couple of Cisco, too. So far I have not had problem staying where I am and know at least of couple of places who told me they'd gladly hire me if I was available (although for the same pay, not more than I make right now).

      If you want jobs, they're out there. Become a shareware developer if nothing else.

  48. Spell it out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    L - O - S - E - R

  49. lived through the no heat thing 2 winters ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Didn't have the money to fix a 25-year-old furnace shaking itself apart with a horrible delayed ignition problem (Kaboom!). Did later sell the condo at a nice profit.

    The condo had large single-pane windows that always drew comments, but did nothing for insulation. The lowest temperatures at the first floor thermostat hit low 50's (Thankfully there was a heated space below that did some good). It actually became bearable although I wouldn't want to do it again. Wore a hat, couple of long john tops, couple of t-shirts, sweat top. 2 long-john bottoms and sweat bottoms. Would sit in a chair or at my computer with a blanket (was still paying for DSL till the end!!). The worse part was my hands and face. With my nose being the worse. Should have got one of those face mask things. Sleeping was fine. Showering was avoided at all costs. Going to the bathroom also involved the shock of cold as you had to get all those layers positioned or off.

    I had very few pipes and they all ran through a heated space to me. Your pipes may break before you do. If you do the no heat thing make sure you insulate pipes. Take a small room and make it your heat space. Crank up the TV and computer and confine you activities to that area. Your own body heat can raise the ambient. You need all the help you can get.

    1. Re:lived through the no heat thing 2 winters ago by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you're in an apartment, you can just leech off the ambient heat in the building. Not that I'd do anything like that - my computers keep the place nice and toasty.

  50. Half your pay without even working 20 hours by LostCluster · · Score: 1

    He's missing one of the biggest bonuses... unemployment pay:

    Your state pays you to sit at home and make a half-hearted effort for looking for a job, even though you were already really trying anyway. Nice little bonus that reminds you the reason you lost your job in the eyes of the state was not your fault.

    1. Re:Half your pay without even working 20 hours by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      Unless of course you live in Arizona. The MAXIMUM unemployment payment is $205 per week. In my case I went from making about $1200 per week to $205.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    2. Re:Half your pay without even working 20 hours by EricWright · · Score: 1

      Wow... AZ sucks. I was making just slightly more than you per week (in NC) and I get the maximum allowable benefits of $416/wk. Of course, just as I get all that paperwork done, I get offered a 3 month contract. Good news: $40/hr. Bad news, after 3 months, it may be over, and I'll have little to no unemployment benefits, since self-employment taxes don't cover unemployment insurance... :(

      Looks like I'll be packing away the paychecks in case I'm back in line come January!

  51. This hits home... by OgreChow · · Score: 1

    His comments sound very close to my recent experiences in starting up my own business. You would be amazed at how much time you can spend comparing laundry detergent prices.

  52. You insensitive clod! :-) by Dr.+Photo · · Score: 1

    SimuAndy writes "David Dvorkin, a programmer and writer of some repute, has published an essay on The Surprising Benefits of Being Unemployed. Well worth the reading time as a small break in a busy day."

    Oh, sure... go ahead and rub it in, Mr. Busy Day!

  53. Re:For perks of being unemployed without the guilt by mlk · · Score: 1

    Or work in IT.

    --
    Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  54. Why be loyal? Your employer is scum. by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like what he says about his expectations about being loyal to the company you work for. Most of us, at least deep down, expect that those days we come in sick or work a 20 hour day will show loyality to our employer that will be repaid with loyality right back. Then wouldn't fire you.. you're as good as best buds afterall. You're in it together.

    Ha ha ha! What shock when you're fired or laid off. Does it matter how much you sacrificed for your employer? Nope, not a damn bit. All those pep talks about being in it together.. they're complete bullshit. You may as well have gone home on time every day instead of missing out on quality time. Of course now there is no way I'm going to believe any employer when then make promises and ask for loyality and a little extra effort. Two words.. blow me. I'm not going to be gungho to finish projects ahead of schedule anymore.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:Why be loyal? Your employer is scum. by MikeySquid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yea, that's what i'm talkin' about! Damn skippy.

    2. Re:Why be loyal? Your employer is scum. by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Does it matter how much you sacrificed for your employer? Nope, not a damn bit. All those pep talks about being in it together.. they're complete bullshit.

      It could be true, and your boss could be laid off at the same time you are.

      If they give you a mug or a fancy pen or a cheap desk clock with the company logo on it, that's when you know it's BS.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    3. Re:Why be loyal? Your employer is scum. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Maybe your own boss will stick up for you but do they really have much influence? Unless you're pretty high up the ladder yourself the answer is probably no. So again.. showing your company loyality will probably get you zip. They don't pay better for loyality and then don't hang on to your longer for loyality. At least not in most companies.

      The corporate structure is lacking in personal relationships to help hold things together. I think I want it to be how it is in old mafia movies. All one big disturbed family. You're not being paid for doing the job. You're being paid for guarding the back of your uncle's best friend's father. In turn they'll see that you're paid well and that neither they nor the rival shoots you through the head. If some stuff gets done along the way well that's just an extra. Remove the risk of death and that'd be about right.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    4. Re:Why be loyal? Your employer is scum. by danila · · Score: 1

      You forget that working hard helps the company and helping the company ensures it still has money to pay you. You don't have to love your employer, but you should understand that your well-being depends on the well-being of the company (while you work there).

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    5. Re:Why be loyal? Your employer is scum. by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Several years ago, someone posted an interesting observation on this site:

      Your employer owns your job. You own your career.

      Don't confuse the two. The days of corporate loyalty are long gone. Even very popular and successful business leaders of large and successful companies can not guarentee a job.

      I view my employment as a mercenary contract. My loyalty is linked to my compensation. Don't get me wrong... I am loyal to my employer. But I don't do things for free.
    6. Re:Why be loyal? Your employer is scum. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      It evidently hasn't made much difference so far. I've gone through cycles at several companies where as soon as the product was ready to ship they fired the entire development staff. That's highly motivational come the next job.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    7. Re:Why be loyal? Your employer is scum. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid it'd take one hell of an employer to convince me to be anything but paranoid of them and when I'm paranoid of lossing my job I go out of my way to find alternate jobs and make less effort at my current job. I'd rather have two part time jobs than a full time job for that reason. That way if one job decides to stab me in the back I'm not totally screwed. Unfortunately that means I'm never really doing my best for my employer. Sure, if I was getting paid well enough that I could afford to go through six month stints without work then that'd help cure my paranoia.. but in this job market that isn't happening. :)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    8. Re:Why be loyal? Your employer is scum. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I like what he says about his expectations about being loyal to the company you work for. Most of us, at least deep down, expect that those days we come in sick or work a 20 hour day will show loyality to our employer that will be repaid with loyality right back.

      Those days are at least twenty years past.

    9. Re:Why be loyal? Your employer is scum. by expro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forget that working hard helps the company and helping the company ensures it still has money to pay you.

      And let's not forget to pay the boss his millions (or hundreds of millions) of dollars in bonus. The company could get much further in loyalty paying that money to help employees, if it hadn't written them off.
    10. Re:Why be loyal? Your employer is scum. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
      Hate to say it but it but working hard does somewhat pay off.

      If you have to lay-off half a team of workers who are you going to lay off? The hardest workers or the least?

      I hate corporate America and prefer to be unemployed and living with my parents while I go to school rather then work in IT again. I had to take humiliating jobs and abusive bosses for minimal wage. Why do I need to scoop maggot filled rotting garbage with my bare hands only to get fired because my boss was having pms and is somewhat irrated when I ask her to repeat when she talks too fast!

      Yes I did this for 7/hr after being a former help desk worker. Fuck them!

      I deserve better and I hope to work at a university. I have distrust myself but in white collar jobs the ones who sell there souls to a corporation may and I emphasize may be laid off last. Also not to piss you off more or anything but I met interviewers who view people laid off as underperformers! Why? Because if you worked 80 hr weeks like the top performers then you would of not been laid off! Yes, many HR people with hundreds of resumes can afford to filter you out like that and just use silly assumptions.

    11. Re:Why be loyal? Your employer is scum. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Employee? Hell no. I'm a contractor with benefits and a different tax status.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    12. Re:Why be loyal? Your employer is scum. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Sadly, in my experience, the last person to be laid off is the person that makes the least money.. not the hardest worker.

      HR people are idiots anyway for the most part. If you want a job then you'd best feed them exactly what they want to hear. I mean really aren't most HR people just secretaries that like to think their management? Look at how many terms they get wrong in job postings. I remember one very amusing posting from around 1996 that wanted a web developer with 10 years of experience. Haha. You see stuff like that all the time.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    13. Re:Why be loyal? Your employer is scum. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree completely. I remember I was at a client's office, doing some work on their computers, and a girl who worked there said that my friend stopped by earlier and did some work too. She was referring to my boss. I replied that he was my boss, not my friend. She said that it could be both. It can never be both unless you were friends before you started working there. When someone holds your livelihood over you and has that much power over you, you can't be at the same level, which is a requirement for friendship.

  55. Guess I'm still in the forefront :-/ by MsWillow · · Score: 1

    Except that I wasn't exactly laid off, I became disabled. About seven years ago. Unlike the writer here, though, I learned a whole lot more. Useful stuff, like how to make flavored noodles, with just a package of ramen noodles and hot tap water from any public washroom, or how to make twenty dollars last five months plus, or what are the best bridges under which to sleep. Thankfully, Social Insecurity did come through, after a year or two, so at least I'm no longer on the street.

    I wish him luck. Being unemployed ain't really fun, but if he becomes homeless, he'll be able to look back at this period with longing - at least he has a safe place to sleep, for the moment.

    --

    Lemon curry?
  56. Everything this man says is true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I recently had quit a job at a large fortune 500 company developing systems software for a shaky startup. I figured, I'm young, so why not give a less structured job a try where the fruits of my labor would come back and benefit me. Well, long story short, this particular startup had some issues; there wasn't a decent chemistry, and the management was somewhat capricious, fickle, inexperienced, and unaware of just what was involved in having a legitimate, organized business. (In fact, I think unemployment caused me to realize the importance of great management.) So, with legal dilemmas and financial dilemmas at hand, I decided maybe I made a mistake joining this particular venture. So, I ended up unemployed. I stopped going out because of a lack of health insurance, and COBRA didn't really cut it, because the insurance premiums were ridiculously high.

    I ended up finding another job, but I went through everything the man who wrote the featured article went through. I was dating a girl at one point; when she knew before that I had been making money, things were fine. However, as soon as she found out that I was in trouble and that I needed employment, suddenly I became a lot less attractive and we went our separate ways. (She's now dating another guy with a nicer car and presumably more money in the bank.) Everyone kept insisting that my failures were somehow my fault. Perhaps they were, but I like to think that in the grand scheme of things, this little experience of unemployment was to teach me a lesson about the value of a job.

    In college, you'll hear a lot of talk about how engineering is worthless because it only pays some petty 5 figure salary. People like to talk about how you should start a business, and how real losers become engineers. Increasingly, there's a trend for good American engineers to try and get their MBA or JD. All in all, I find the situation really disappointing and hard to cope with. I got into engineering thinking that I would be able to build cool things and be creative. Instead, I found insane market deadlines, invasive work spaces, no offices, ridiculous cubicles, no room for creativity. But, one thing is for sure, ... unemployment taught me to have more respect for having *a* job. I just am wondering how long it will be before the pendulum swings from "job is good" to "fuck it, maybe I need the fear of unemployment or business failure to drive me into a state of action again."

    Anyway, I wish the best of luck to anyone else out there in the same situation.

    1. Re:Everything this man says is true. by mc6809e · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In college, you'll hear a lot of talk about how engineering is worthless because it only pays some petty 5 figure salary. People like to talk about how you should start a business, and how real losers become engineers. Increasingly, there's a trend for good American engineers to try and get their MBA or JD. All in all, I find the situation really disappointing and hard to cope with. I got into engineering thinking that I would be able to build cool things and be creative.

      People that run successful businesses must be good social engineers.

      And Social Engineering, being the most difficult kind of engineering pays the most.

    2. Re:Everything this man says is true. by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

      A little offtopic, and not to make any fun/rude comment at all, but any man/woman who leaves you because of your financial status is not worth your time. They would leave/cheat on you in a heart beat if the opportunity presented itself, which it would time and time again. So be glad a future did not evolve from that, because it was bleak to begin with.

      --
      Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
    3. Re:Everything this man says is true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In England we call social engineering what it is: Bullshitting. As a country we produce some of the best bullshitters on the planet, hell 75% of our economy is based on it. However for me I imagine myself looking back as an old man and evaluating what I did with my life - thats why I chose to do something that actually benefits my species.

    4. Re:Everything this man says is true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said. Once I struck out on a path of 'downward nobility' , ethical sustainable living and 'being myself' I suddenly found the quality of women I was dating went right up. Less demanding and more sincere. The 'career' women I was mixing with before were on the whole shallow gold diggers.

    5. Re:Everything this man says is true. by pmz · · Score: 1

      In college, you'll hear a lot of talk about how engineering is worthless because it only pays some petty 5 figure salary.

      College life is a fantasy, where children have yet to learn what real life really costs. This is why I almost wish I didn't go to college right away (but I did, because culture in high school says tech school is for losers).

      Our educational culture in the US is seriously fucked up. Perhaps locking our kids away for 12 years in school is unwise?

  57. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1
    Spousal Closeness
    Yes, one of the benefits of being unemployed is more time to spend w/ your spouse... Unless you don't have one. Thanks, Mr. Dvorkin, I didn't think it was possible for me to be any more depressed.
    --
    [o]_O
    1. Re:zerg by twentycavities · · Score: 1

      Dude, I don't really know for sure, but I'm pretty confident that the worst time to have a wife is when you're broke. Women can be cruel bitches about stuff like that (at least if being broke happens on a regular basis). I'm guessing the reason this guy's wife is so understanding is that they've been together for a while, and there's no doubt in her mind that he's employable or whatever. (According to his [awful] resume, he used to work at NASA.)

      --
      Monstromart: Where shopping is a baffling ordeal
    2. Re:zerg by Zardoz44 · · Score: 1
      Women can be cruel bitches about stuff like that (at least if being broke happens on a regular basis)

      There's more than one problem here. Is she cruel because you married the wrong woman, or is she cruel because you're a lazy insensitive asshole? Why are you broke all the time? Bad with money management? Can't keep a job? Why doesn't she try to make some money?

      What you're implying is that she married you for your money and you married her for a nice piece of ass, and now things are falling (have fell) apart. Insulting all women is definitely going to solve your many problems. You're an individual, blame yourself.

    3. Re:zerg by Darby · · Score: 1

      Women can be cruel bitches about stuff like that (at least if being broke happens on a regular basis).

      Some can be, but others can't or won't.

      I met my wife about a week after she got laid off from a DotBomb. That was on a Friday. The next Monday the company I worked for went out of business. We ended up moving in together about a month later. Neither of us found a steady job for almost a year. We got by by picking up small-scale jobs for local businesses, and spending a lot of time home together. (It helped that one of her hobbies was couponing. She managed to come home with 10 bags of groceries for like $5.00 one time)

      I spent more time with her that one year than I had with girlfriends I had dated for 5 years, which lead us to really know each other better than we ever had anyone else.

      The point is that some times stress and hard times bring out the worst in people, but sometimes it brings out the best.

    4. Re:zerg by twentycavities · · Score: 1

      I'm 22 / student (always broke!) / never married. Women jumping ship or being cruel bitches during hard times is a well known phenomenon. If I were married and my wife treated me like crap every time something bad happened I wouldn't blame myself.

      --
      Monstromart: Where shopping is a baffling ordeal
  58. Re:this just in!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That should have been a naked and petrified Natalie Portman. Although that meme originally originated on segfault.org. Segfault's downfall brought the meme to slashdot simultaneously with a flood of trolls.

  59. Ramen Noodle! by Duckman5 · · Score: 1

    Popcorn is great, but nothing beats Ramen Noodle. You can get like 6 for a dollar. That's like 2 or 3 days worth of meals! That's why it's the food of choice for college students (and it probably works well for the unemployed, too). Plus, unlike popcorn, it has some nutritional value. One bowl offers you 190 calories. Best of all, no additional hardware is necessary. They can be boiled, microwaved, or eaten raw (i've known people to do this). Ramen Noodle Soup rules!

    1. Re:Ramen Noodle! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well they've got carbs, but they're kinda lacking in the protein and vitamin department. Maybe you could combine them with tortilla chips & salsa and catfood pate. YEAH! ;)

    2. Re:Ramen Noodle! by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Ramen Noodle.

      I got a deal on some Cup Noodles the other day 4 for $1.00. Great because those 2 corn kernels, 3 peas, and a square millimeter of chicken meat. Really make the difference. Actually because I can make it from work using the hot water from the coffee maker. But then again working at MS, you can't starve. They've got dehydrated soup packets in the cupboard, and free coke/pepsi/dr. pepper/juice/milk/coffee etc. Everything a carbon based life form needs to exist.

    3. Re:Ramen Noodle! by rmull · · Score: 1

      If you shop at the right place you can get a whole carton for 2 bucks.

      --
      See you, space cowboy...
    4. Re:Ramen Noodle! by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      In one of the most halarious moments ever broadcast -- The Daily Show defined a new economic indicator the "Broken Dreams Index" as "The total value of ramen purchased divided by the value of all the blood donated."

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    5. Re:Ramen Noodle! by magores · · Score: 1

      I remember getting into an arguement with my dad when I was 15 or 16 or so.

      I yelled, "I can't wait until I graduate from high school so I can move out of this place."

      Dad asks, "What are you going to do for a job, for food, for a place to live?"

      I replied, "I'll find a job somewhere! And, I'll live in a box if I have to! And I'll eat Top Ramen everyday if I have to!"

      Dad's reply? "Son, you can't work up a solid shit if you eat nothing but Ramen. Stick around and go to college."

      Do I have to mention what food I lived on during college? And after I got laid off?

      (BTW... Cream of Mushroom Soup + Spaghetti Noodles is good, and so is Instant Mashed Potato Flakes mixed into Pasta Roni)

    6. Re:Ramen Noodle! by Politburo · · Score: 1

      190 calories yeah, but something like 70% of your daily sodium too! Ouch!

    7. Re:Ramen Noodle! by JusTyler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But could you work up a solid shit while on your Ramen diet?

    8. Re:Ramen Noodle! by magores · · Score: 1

      Notice the part about about Instant Mashed Potatoes.

      Tasty, and Fiber-Filled :)

  60. no u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  61. political drivel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this made slashdot???

    well.. i can sum it all up for you: " i'm angry, and i hate George W Bush"

    very childish...

  62. Re: Queeb Jackass parent poster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jgc

  63. Welcome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new unemployed overlords!

  64. Re:What to do when unemployed. by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1

    How about sign up for unemployment and look for a job.

    After all, if you put money into it, you're entitled to your 6 months, you self righetous bastard.

  65. Exercise and weight loss by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 1

    He is most certainly correct about those to subjects. When I was unemployed, I took the time to read Body for Life and I actually put it's teachings to use. I went from 210lbs to 185 and built some great abs and biceps.

    Now I'm employed again, weight 205, and can have no more time for weightlifting.

    Unemployement, it does a body good ;)

    --
    There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
  66. Priorities all wrong? by AntiGenX · · Score: 1

    This guy can't keep enough food in the fridge and is contemplating living through the winter with no heat (unless he's waaaay down south) and he can still pay his hosting fees and domain renewals? Talk about mixed up priorities....

  67. Kind of sad really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...that it takes a person having to lose their job and not be able to afford to stuff their fat face for them to lose weight. Sounds like this guy has no will power. He mentions working out, and says he has all the time in the world but then says it's still something he plans to get to some day. Whatever. As soon as he's working again he and his wife will both be back up to 400 lbs.

    The line about thinking he couldn't live without air conditioning was funny too. Now that he can't afford to insulate his body so heavily, he "realizes" he can live without air conditioning. Wow - there's a shocker. Remember when 80 degrees was considered a beautiful, warm day? Now anything over 65 and people are panting and sweating.

  68. I know it's off topic, but. . . . . by Excen · · Score: 1

    How do you get the lie thing at the end of your post to show up on screen?

    --
    "No beer until you finish your tequila!" -Leela's Dad
    1. Re:I know it's off topic, but. . . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Type &l t; lie &g t; (without spaces between lt and gt). lt (less than) is html for < and gt is html for >.

    2. Re:I know it's off topic, but. . . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or & for & to show up. Friends don't let friends use ampersand in text, only in the code.

  69. This beats visiting the welfare office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Lose your job
    2) Write letter about the joys of being unemployed
    3) Have said letter posted to huge geek website
    4) Rediscover the joys of being employed
    6) Profit!

  70. Surprising? by MeatMan · · Score: 1

    What's surprising is that this story even got posted. Is this supposed to be a 'tongue-in-cheek' sort of deal? I'm confused...
    I wouldn't consider anything this Bum writes about in relationship to the benefits of being unemployed as being "Surprising benefits...". Everyone already knows you can sleep till noon, scratch your backside and watch TV all day when you're unemployed.
    What is surprising is when someone who cares about anything or anyone other than themselves becomes unemployed, gets off their duff, and finds comparable new employment within a month with the current U.S. job market.

  71. Economics with cscx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To add to that, anyone could find a job if they really wanted to. It's just that too many Americans are too goddamn lazy to work jobs they don't like.

    Yeah, and the unemployment rate is no reflection of the state of the economy either. The unemployment rate rises and falls solely as an aggregate of people all deciding to become lazy or not at any point in time.

    McDonalds is always hiring.

    Exactly! They hire any time that they are not not hiring. And when they are not hiring that's just because they have all the staff they need. You know if this happens when a whole lot of people just up and decide not to be lazy (so that there are now too many candidates for the job), well that's not McDonald's fault!

    This is why during periods of high unemployment, when people are being lazy, there are always so many more job vacancies than there are during periods of low unemployment. Cool!

    Thanks, cscx, you've really cleared a lot of things up for me ...

  72. Objective by bluegreenone · · Score: 1
    Geez for a guy who's the author of 14 published novels you'd think he would've spent at least 5 minutes writing an objective for his resume. Seriously, resumes should tell you something about the person's goals and ideal job. Is he looking for work as a software engineer, a manager, an ice cream scooper?

    Employers don't just want a list of programming languages and work history, they want to get a sense of who is applying.

  73. Chug some by Eat+My+Turds+Guy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Well I guess you could always try devouring a fat butt nugget, you fucking human flotsam.

  74. It's All Greenspan's Fault! by Ranger · · Score: 1, Troll

    Too bad this guy is an ass. The only surprising benefit I got when I lost my job was that because I had only recently moved the state of Arizona at the time I had to file for unemployment in my previous state of residence, Oklahoma. This was surprising in that I actually got more money in my checks. I lost my job when Clinton was still president and the economy was already sliding before Dubya even took office.

    As for Greenspan, he decided to prematurely burst the economic bubble by raising interest rates. And all that corporate corruption and greed occurred under Clinton's watch. I voted for Dubya mainly to get back at the damned Democrats. This is their punishment for not doing anything about him (Clinton). We do need to dismiss Ashcroft, repeal the Patriot Act, and dismantle Fatherland, er I mean Homeland Security. You think the police state is bad now. Heaven help us if Hillary gets elected in 2008 and gets her hand on that apparatus. So vote for Dean or Clark in 2004.

    Where is our Marshall plan for Iraq? 100 points for liberating Iraq, but -110 for screwing up the peace. Thus dragging out the economic recovery.

    This is not the bitter rantings of an underemployed programmer. Oh, wait. They are. Never mind!

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  75. whee... by sootman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I haven't been this depressed since I read "Nickel and Dimed." Excellent book, btw, but don't read it expecting to be cheered up. Anyone who's out of a job, I wish you well. (Been unemployed a bit before; now I've got two.)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  76. Puss by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have worked steadily every single day of my life since I was four years old. That coal mine taught me to be a man, and it put hair on my chest.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:Puss by Alakaboo · · Score: 1

      Dad?! You read Slashdot??

  77. Yes but could you actually quit? by roninbix · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I've gotten to the point where I wonder if I couldn't make something really cool happen on my own. Except of course I'm on salary so I end up working around 2 times what I should for the job. Add to that significant travel expectations and I just have no time to advance any ideas or any side ventures on my own.

    Given my skill sets I'm sitting down and telling myself I need to leave the corporate world and go my own way. I even have a large cushion of cash to fall back on. Plus my significant hours have resulted in a minimalist livestyle anyway. I estimate I could live for 5 years on my current savings at my current lifestyle, less the costs of other activities I take up (especially significant if you try to start a business). I just don't have time to piece it together while working. And I'm pissing away valuable years if I try.

    Only one thing holding me back. My attachment to having a stable respectable job that pays decently. All the skills are there, I could easily acquire support from skilled friends in any profession I could want. I could probably scrape together 50-100K for starting money if I begged a bit without approaching professional lenders. But it's pretty hard to actually quit to do nothing and take a huge "risk" on possibilities coming through. I'm much more the type of person to try to set it all up before I quit, but I just can't seem to get the time together for that unless I quit first.

    Anybody else? Could YOU quit?

    1. Re:Yes but could you actually quit? by JayBlalock · · Score: 1
      5 years of money to ride on? I'd say go for it. If I had had those sorts of cash reserves, I would have.

      Of course, in my case, I'm not really "starting a business." I'm just taking on enough freelance work to pay the bills. (which amounts to the same thing except I don't get tax breaks. I wonder if I could incorporate myself... ;-) )

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    2. Re:Yes but could you actually quit? by cbdavis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If I had 5 years cash I'd be gone in an instant.
      Ive worked in computers since 1969 and have only
      a heart attack to show for it. I can never retire and will probably die at my desk.

      Dont do this to yourself. Take off for a long time, learn photography, go to culinary college, volunteer as a computer mentor at a local school, etc.

      I'd give anything to have trained as a plumber growing up. But no, I had to be the geek and go into computer shit.

    3. Re:Yes but could you actually quit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was in the same position. Get out now.

      I resigned from my full time position, with little more than 6 months "cash cushion" under me, I was earning $40k NZ, that was almost a year ago, now I'm earning enough that I'm not digging myself deeper into debt any more. That cash cushion didn't last 6 months ;-(

      And, you know, I'm better for it :-)

      Sure I can't do or buy the things I used to be able to, but I'm my own man (cliche I know), if I want to laze around for a day, I will, if I want to start work at midnight I will, if I don't like a particular project I won't take it on - I do only the work I want to do, when I want to do it. I can set realistic timeframes (including a goodly amount of off time) and still work faster and more efficiently because I work when I am most focused.

      My suggestions though...

      Don't underestimate how much you spend just living.. all those little things add up. You'll soon realise after your first month without a paycheck andyour bank balance is rapidly depleting.

      Don't underestimate how long it will take for you to pick up enough work to pay the bills. It's taken me 6 months to get that far, and I'm only just hanging in there.

      Don't believe the "contractors get paid shit loads" hype -- I did, I thought I could reasonably charge $30 US for programming services, it wasn't until I reduced charges to less than $10 US that people would consider me for work (I have to compete against Indian, Pakistani and eastern european people charging even less).

      Make sure you have other interests outside, join a club where you can go and be social with people - you'll spend most of your time working from home, you need to be able to talk to others once in a while.

    4. Re:Yes but could you actually quit? by tetra103 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A 5yr cash reserve is just good planning. Congrats! I don't think anyone can tell you what you should or should not do. Everyone's situation is different. I would suggest that you just concider what's important. Think of what memories you'll have later in life. You also have to play "what if". You may be a top dog now in your profession, but will it always be that way? You know the saying, "Get while the getting is good." That money pot may not be there tomorrow. Think of your health (this is a big one for me). If you're in your prime of life now, no money in the future will buy that health back. Above anything else, take your health very serious. If you have childern, no money will buy back time spent with them when they're young. And if you don't have childern, do you really want to wait until your 40 to have them? You sound like you have a good plan now and I wish you the best of luck. Just remember, money isn't everything.

      My own personal story. My prime of life was a few years back. I made a decent salary and I worked for a Wall Street firm. I was recently married and my wife and I were just turning 30. We wanted kids, but with both of us working long hours, we just couldn't see it happening. The money was so nice, that it was hard to leave. We finally made the decision that having a family sooner was better than waiting. We left the big city and moved to a smaller place near our folks (to be grandparents). We decided family was better than money. Looking back, it was the right decision to make. My former job was on the 103rd floor of the World Trade Center. I worked for Cantor and I left in 2000. I know that's not a good example and tragety can happen at any time anywhere. Still, my wife and I can't help but call it fate.

      Today we have a beutiful baby girl and I stand a very good chance of loosing my job. Honestly, it doesn't bother us to the least. Where there's a will there's a way. I may never be rich, but I'm alive and happy. You just need to prioritize what's important in your life. Use your head and follow your heart...or said differently...think things over and do what You feel is right for you. Best of luck!

    5. Re:Yes but could you actually quit? by YellowBook · · Score: 1

      I'd give anything to have trained as a plumber growing up. But no, I had to be the geek and go into computer shit.

      Well, the comparison is apt. Plumbers and IT workers are both skilled laborers, who use their specialized knowledge to repair and maintain technology that most people don't want to take the time to learn about and maintain for themselves. But plumbers make more money and have better job security (despite often having less formal education). What's the difference?

      Plumbers have a union. IT workers think they don't need one.

      --
      The scalloped tatters of the King in Yellow must cover
      Yhtill forever. (R. W. Chambers, the King in Yellow
    6. Re:Yes but could you actually quit? by Politburo · · Score: 1

      You forgot another (big imo) difference. Regulation. You can't just decide you're going to be a plumber tomorrow. You need a licence from the state. OTOH, if I was a plumber and tomorrow I wanted to be a web designer, there's nothing stopping me.

    7. Re:Yes but could you actually quit? by CONTRiC · · Score: 1

      I must say, that I agree completely with you about the plumber syndrome.

      I've recently spent tons of cash on a computer science degree, nearing completion, and have lost the desire to complete it. If I had my time back, I would have gone into a trade, at least I can obtain *some* sort of job securty.

      Even an electrician trade or something similar would provide a good long term job security (at least for the forseeable future). It's going to be a long time before plumbing/electricity is replaced by the newest and greatest thing. Heck, plumbing can be traced back thousands of years.

      Make sure you enjoy what you do and do it with all your heart.

    8. Re:Yes but could you actually quit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had 5 years cash I'd be gone in an instant.

      I suspect that this attitude makes it impossible to accumulate 5 years cash in the first place.

      Hmm... that isn't intended to sound as harsh as it does. As you pointed out, there are lots of things more important than your bank account.

    9. Re:Yes but could you actually quit? by mekkab · · Score: 1

      Dude- what you need is a significant other who will support you.

      Why? You certainy don't need the support, you have 5 years (less if you include start-up costs) of savings...

      But if they have a stable career- track job, then you can feel good about doing your own thing.

      OR I could give you the ubermensch asnwer of SNAP OUT OF IT AND FUCKING DO IT. Only those who go out on a limb get the fruit at the end! Besides- once you've quit, you've put the fire under your fanny to get moving.

      Anybody else? Could YOU quit?



      No, not yet. That piggy-back support thing? I just put my wife through law school, and she starts as an associate in 2 weeks. She's offered to bear the earning burden if I want to get my PhD, do a start-up, etc. But I really feel that I have a lot more to learn about time and project management and I know I can get that from the company I'm with and where I'm at.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    10. Re:Yes but could you actually quit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With that attitude you *WILL* die at your desk.

      If "computer shit" is not your thing, find something that is and work your ass off to get to where you can do *that* for a living.

      It's a free country. Do it while it still is. :-)

      There's plenty of unemployed geeks who'd GLADLY take your job.

      Follow your bliss, or some B.S. like that, but get out of this industry so those that WANT to be here, can be.

  78. Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quit whining about W and go find a job.

    1. Re:Give me a break by MikeySquid · · Score: 1

      Yea, you can compete with the 79,000 applicants that applied for one singe job at Infosys last month! Just stay politive and shave your beard and you can get that job! It's just a matter of lowering your expecations and pay to compete with all the H1B visa workers.

  79. the benefits of being unemployed? by bigmaddog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First, I don't think this article is irrelevant, unlike a lot of the people that posted replies so far (uh, what's this... I'm a (-1, troll) already? dammit...). Some guy's musings about his lack of a job are probably not front-page material, and posting it to Slashdot seems like shameless self-promotion, but the sad truth is that there are more and more people out there who are either unemployed or, almost if not equally as bad, underemployed (McJob, anyone?). People who went to school at the height of the late-90s high-tech boom (like me) are entering the workforce to find it flooded by people who worked through that boom, are more experienced, at least equally skilled, and are also looking for jobs. Even seemingly trivial jobs have substantial requirements of experience and obscure skills because employers know they can easily get overqualified people. At the same time, older people find themselves being edged out by the young'uns, who are willing to work longer and compromise more for less money.

    This leads to depression, sarcasm and cynicism, all of which seem come across in that writeup; most of the things he lists there are not really benefits of being unemployed but benefits of having lots of free time, which is a byproduct of unemployment but not the only way to get it. Philosophical insights and beard growth aside, you can get this stuff and still work. The trick is to have a good job, and by that I mean one that affords you lost of free time and enough money to get by. Working for the gov't is good, at least in Canada - pay's ok, hours are fixed, and the boss isn't particuarly evil. Getting into a union, though those are increasingly rare, is even better. My father always complains how lazy those union guys are - I envy their laziness, and weep every time unions lose out to big corporations.

    Personally, I've been without a job since April and haven't had much success finding for one. All I'm really going on right now is sarcasm and cynicism - the money's all gone (I guess, then, I'm also going on the good nature of my parents). I'm even starting to become cynical about my own cynicism. I go nutty periodically and produce "great" works of prose (beware of popups, and I promise that my resume is nowhere to be found), but how long can I go on? The end is not in sight...

    --

    Even as you read this, your pants are strangling your loins! Aaa!

  80. Maybe if you shaved your beard.. by suso · · Score: 1

    you'd get hired. ;-)=

  81. Unemployed? Can't find a job? Try evolving. by protogoogoo69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What good is 15 years of Netware experience today?
    How about someone who knows that the original PC had odd size ISA slots, so that 286 and later cards wouldn't fit?
    Who cares that you spent a million hours with DOS and QEMM getting an extra 60K of base memory so somone's blasted Autocad machine would work correctly?
    It's turning out that spending 20 years working with computers has been a really poor investment.


    Sad. I always thought of learning as something that makes you human (as opposed to insects? viruses?), not rich or job-secure. A lot of people specialize in some industry and when that culture/economy/technology/employer changes and they lose a job (or are about to), they whine as if they've wasted their life or they go cry to the government to try save that dying industry so that they may (selfishly) preserve their outdated niche in society.

    Its called evolution. Its a way of life. Only the fittest will survive! And you know who survives? The beings who change. Honestly, if you feel your life was wasted because you specialized in something and the only thing that made you important was that job-field, then maybe you aren't really special. Sorry, but being an intelligent human means being able to use your knowledge for something beyond a stupid job. If all you are is someone who picks up knowledge with no intent to use it beyond the scope of its context, then you are not intelligent, IMHO. But I do not believe any human in this world is NOT intelligent, just someone who has a tainted definition of life.

    So here is my suggestion to all you unemployed or job-security conscious people out there: Make yourself special, use your intelligence, and learn things with the intent of using them beyond the scope of their context. Not only will your expertise grow (hence becoming more of an asset), but you may end up creating something innovative.

    --
    ...small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri...
    1. Re:Unemployed? Can't find a job? Try evolving. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your post to some extent. But the problem is that you STILL need to live.

      Learning new skills takes time. Once you are finished, how does an expectant employer seperate your effort from run of the mill bull shit? They can't!!
      A tough, screwed up economy is just that. Sometimes survival of the fittest is survival of the luckiest. The skills neccessary to succeed are not necessarily the most needed skills by society.

      The world is a harsh place and we all can be "rolled" over very easily.

      We just need to live with it without too much pride if we escape bad times and survival if we don't.

    2. Re:Unemployed? Can't find a job? Try evolving. by Nept · · Score: 1

      do you imply that our jobs should be our life? or rather, that our jobs should enable us to live our life? If I have to spend my entire life learning new skills, this leaves precious little time for the important things in life.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    3. Re:Unemployed? Can't find a job? Try evolving. by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      >Sad. I always thought of learning as something that makes you human (as opposed to insects? viruses?), not rich or job-secure.

      NOT rich. learning something makes you not rich, not job-secure.

      No. This isn't naive, which I first thought, but it is misquided. Learning something does make you human, that is to say, it justified having a brain about 90% too big by general mamillian concensus, but it's primary purpose, the thing that brain exists to enable, is learning to make you job-secure, and basically that is rich.

      Make yourself special

      Making himself special is the granparent poster's problem. He figured out the things his employers needed, they upgraded their system and didn't upgrade him. It's about education. When you know a technical niche, it's much more general that you think, other products use the same few principles, actual fundamentals enter in slowly. You can apply the principles of one machine to another with great success, but it's dangerous to do on the clock. People need to be educated between jobs to help them map their skills... they are not students of the cultural trends so it's best for the culture to ensure people learn the next thing.

      It's not all new by a long shot.

      --

      -pyrrho

    4. Re:Unemployed? Can't find a job? Try evolving. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I agree with some of what the parent post says, in that it is generally expected these days that people will continually gain new skills and move around a lot.

      However, take my situation into consideration. I graduated with a Computing degree last summer. I have been unemployed for over a year, never having worked at all. Much as I'd love to become and electronics engineer or something (not that there are any EE jobs), that would mean another three years at university. I already have 12,000 of debt from the last four. In fact, being only 23, I have spent slightly more than one quarter of my life getting that degree (counting two years of A Levels I needed to get to university).

      What I'm saying is, I have invested a hell of a lot in an education for a specific career, that even just a couple of years ago would have been very lucrative and rewarding. It's kinda depressing to accept that you wasted so much time, effort and money, because when you have not even had a few years of work in that industry it really is a waste.

      That's why I'm not flipping burgers. I couldn't bring myself to do it, the depression would just be too much.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Unemployed? Can't find a job? Try evolving. by NickFitz · · Score: 1

      My view would be that we should find some kind of work which brings us personal fulfillment, yet for which somebody is willing to pay. Developing software is that work for me; I do it because I like doing it, and (sometimes) I also get paid for it. Others get the same reward from carving wood, or repairing thatched roofs. It's not just a computer thing.

      This means that I learn new skills simply because it makes me happy, and that's about the most important thing in life.

      Working as a freelance consultant this last few years, I've come across a lot of coders in a lot of different organisations. There always seem to be some who are there because some careers advisor or parent suggested that it was a good line of work to get into. They didn't really enjoy being there, they regarded extending their skills as a necessary chore, and the end result was that they weren't really very good at what they did. Adequate maybe; no more.

      It always seems that the companies in which these types worked had a vaguely depressing, we're-here-to-work-not-to-enjoy-ourselves atmosphere. In the places where they had only hired people who had a genuine enthusiasm for the work per se - that is, enthusiasm not just for the company's current projects, but for the whole activity of developing software - there was a genuine buzz, a sense that when one arrived in the morning, one would be mixing with a group of interesting, creative individuals, enthused with the possibilities for personal and group satisfaction offered by the work. It made me want to get up in the morning, and it takes a lot to do that.

      I've sometimes speculated on what possibilities there would have been for me to employ my natural talents if I'd lived a thousand years ago. Then I realise that I would have been a peasant, doomed to a miserable existence in a shit-filled hut. As we live in societies advanced enough to make options available to us, it's our own responsibility to find an activity we love, and then strive to be the best we can at it.

      I'm starting to sound like some poxy lifestyle guru, so I'll stop now :-)

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    6. Re:Unemployed? Can't find a job? Try evolving. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make yourself special, use your intelligence, and learn things with the intent of using them beyond the scope of their context.

      Great, just what I need, another person telling me "go back to college and pick a different career". I've still got loans from the first time through while I look for a first-time-out-of-college job.

      Why don't you take your high-and-mighty attitude and shove it?

      As for using my skills "outside the scope of their context", tell me what field other than fast food is currently hiring inexperienced people with the "wrong" degree for the field? I could always go into sales, not that an introverted geek like me would make a great salesperson. (Side note: radio shack already rejected me, wanted to know why they should train me in sales when I was just going to disappear when the economy turned around and I could get a sysadmin job. Couldn't come up with a good enough reason.)

    7. Re:Unemployed? Can't find a job? Try evolving. by protogoogoo69 · · Score: 1

      Great, just what I need, another person telling me "go back to college and pick a different career".

      If you don't like your current degree, then why did you choose it in the first place? If you based your decision on those average salary charts you got in highschool from taking the PRE-SATs, well then you were definitely misled and given too little information. My post wasn't suggesting that going to college is the answer either. There are plenty of resources on the net to self-train yourself as a code-monkey, kernel-developer, RHCE, mathematician, physicist, cryptologist, etc. Hell, go to MIT and check out their new FREE online materials (your public library has free internet if you need it). You can also start your own web hosting, email, ssh, ftp, news, dns hosting company with a little startup costs (but prolly not if your loan overburden already, unless you can find 50-100 cheapo 486s and a dsl connection and $2 for a CD-R for a linux distro). Getting a degree should not dictate your career, nor should it dictate your happiness. You control that. Worst case scenerios: You join the military to recover your financial stability until you can move on to the career you want. OR, you could pick up chess and become a grandmaster living off of $1 games in central park or $80 prizes for tournaments in your state.

      Why don't you take your high-and-mighty attitude and shove it?
      Was that meant to be a question? Honestly, I'm just trying to help. You dont have to listen.

      As for using my skills "outside the scope of their context", tell me what field other than fast food is currently hiring inexperienced people with the "wrong" degree for the field?
      There are plenty of examples of "geniuses" who started in the wrong career and then made brilliant discoveries, but I'll just name one: Einstein worked in the patent office and he had to work hard to build his math talents which didnt come naturally. Oh yeah, and then there was the time the NSA was hiring chess masters and crossword puzzle experts to try to break codes. And then there's "homeland security" who are looking for a few good crackers to help defend computer systems and track down black hats. My point being that all an employer cares about is what you CAN do, regardless of what your grades, degree, or field of specialty is in. If you work for Mcdonalds and publish a paper on the cryptanalysis of the [insert cipher name here] cryptosystem, then you've just increased your chances of getting hired by the NSA or any company looking to create enryption utilities (can you code up DES?) Or you could create a hypothetical example of a normal problem facing [insert industry here] and try to solve it on paper or make it faster using your skills from your original degree, then that would increase your chances of entering into that field which could be outside the context of the scope of your degree.

      I could always go into sales, not that an introverted geek like me would make a great salesperson.
      How about Best Buy? Curcuit City? Gateway? Dell?

      Like I said, you have to do something anyway, so why not sit down tonight and think it out. Decide what will make you happy and do it. Nothing is impossible, so don't let the particulars intimidate you. Also consider what you want out of life.

      --
      ...small furry creatures from Alpha Centauri...
    8. Re:Unemployed? Can't find a job? Try evolving. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sad.
      What's SAD is they still teach this shit in school.
      Who the fuck cares. Windows NT support's this.
      You can't buy it. It's not supported anymore.
      It's on the damned test though so learn it.
      The only reason they issued an NT patch for the blaster worm was many companies don't want to upgrade and if they didn't it would royally fuck up the internet. So upgrade, sorry that didn't help so switch operating systems. Sorry that ain't going to help either. The kernal (1.32 mb) may be OK but the rest of the OS (590 mb) is shit. When are we going to start teaching programers to pull their head out.
      The Linux kernal is OK but the rest of the OS is shit.

  82. The most important benefit by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Funny

    He left out the mst important benefit of all: the grapes are sour, anyway.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  83. Cans of food can become dangerously outdated? by space+lemming · · Score: 1

    Is that true? Really? How outdated is outdated?

    1. Re:Cans of food can become dangerously outdated? by MikeySquid · · Score: 1

      When the tops start bulging out (you can press down on the top and it moves) they are old. Throw them away before they burst. (Yes, it happens. I stocked grocery shelves before my CS degree. I wish I had that job back now!) When they burst they throw smelly rotten food all over your pantry! fun.

  84. Re:What to do when unemployed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see, unemployed people should work all day looking for work and deny themselves all pleasure (like writing an article) until they find a job? I'd like to be there when you finally lose your job and after weeks of unemployment take a break to fire off some extra wordy bitter article or email just so I can tell you to get your lazy ass back looking for work.

  85. Excellent-Borked future. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree. Unemployment ran out (dipping into IRA, OUCH!), and I'm trying for ANY job close at hand. Tomorrow will be WalMart and Krogers turn. Minimumn wage here I come. If I can't get even those then I better head for my parents house (rural living Woo Hoo!), before I get kicked out. Yeah I'll be able to work on those skills I didn't have time for, but it will not help me all that much in getting a job (small town, few opportunities to begin with, and that's before the downturn). Throw in the competition from people who already have the skills and can't get a job. Oh boy! Canada or overseas is looking better and better.

  86. Uneeded Post by Psychotic_Wrath · · Score: 1

    Every good /.er allready knows all the benifits of being unemployed.

    --

    Doctors do Massage in Longview WA now, who knew?
  87. what about freshmen (in college) by i_like_pi57 · · Score: 1

    do i count? ironically, i worked throughout high school my lack of work affords great time now, however. i finally pulled off a linux workstation that actually works... dear god, it has video acceleration now! i am reading and understanding that which i read. i actually had time to make a schedule (ximian is the greatest!) i can finally listen to all the amassed bulk of my mp3 collection and point and laugh at the riaa from ./ links life is good without a job ...and to think i'm in school to make getting a job easier. oh well

    1. Re:what about freshmen (in college) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. being a student is like having a job, except you pay your employer (the university) instead of them paying you. And the hours aren't as good.

  88. Summary by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    The poor and low-skilled blame their problems on the rich. Film at 11.

    1. Re:Summary by twentycavities · · Score: 1

      In case you're including Dvorkin in the unskilled group, you should know he has an MS in mathematics and once worked for NASA (among other sweet gigs).

      It's too bad he puts that info at the bottom of his awful four page resume, under an avalanche of HR keywords.

      --
      Monstromart: Where shopping is a baffling ordeal
    2. Re:Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poor = Lazy
      Unemployed = Lazy
      Lucky = Deserving
      Rich = Entitled

  89. Check out this guy's story... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... He knows how to live despite having been laid off!

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  90. Warning! by CiXeL · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unless you feel like opening a vein don't read this article. I am officially depressed.

  91. beggers feel bad for you by LuxFX · · Score: 1

    Once night in downtown Chicago, a begger and his girlfriend came up to my wife (then my fiance) and me as we were walking to a subway stop. He gave his story and asked for some money. I was under considerable financial pressure myself, so I vented...

    "Well, I'd like some money myself. I've got four credit cards that I maxed out paying rent while looking for a job, and just graduated college. So I owe $14,000 to credit card companies, $18,000 to my school loans, I still owe $15,000 on my car, and I owe my dad several thousand on top of that. I'm not in too good shape here."

    The guy and his girlfriend stopped and gave each other this look. The guy said solemnly, "Man, you in worse shape than me." And they walked off shaking their heads.

    --
    Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
  92. Steps to making it on minimum budget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Publish book containing simple living techniques you found on Google.
    2. ???
    3. Profit!

    Seriously, if it's not free then _someone_ is making money from it, and even if it is free then someone _else_ is making money from it! Let's capitalize on this, people!

    1. Re:Steps to making it on minimum budget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your point is what exactly? Simple living isn't about "free everything", it's not communism, it's not a vow of poverty, it's not about buying nothing, and it's not self flagellation. Read about it on the web or in a book. Yes, a physical book, something you can get for less money than getting on the web at your local library. You have heard of "libraries" (the buildings, not the collections of object files), I hope?

      And the "Simple Living Handbook" was published in 1997, a year before Google was even founded.

  93. Bitter much?-Free advice costs much. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Notice how he blames it on everyone else, as if some puppetmaster controls his destiny? (evil corporations, GW Bush, supervisors and managers). Sheesh, guy... I hate to sound like your dad, but that's life. Lots of people have been screwed out of jobs before, and lots of peolpe have had jobs that frankly sucked, but there's always work out there if you are willing to swallow some pride, and make some sacrifices. Go back to school for god's sake."

    I agree. For $25 I'll wipe your ass.
    Of course I could always go back to school and accumilate ever more debt, on top of what I got from the last time someone advised me to go to school (your predecessor) . Did you know that even students need money to live on?, then I get out and find that while I was in, my future career went to India.

    Lather, rinse, repeat, hey the "free advice" industry is booming I hear.

    1. Re:Bitter much?-Free advice costs much. by j0e_average · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never 'been there'. I was laid off a couple of years ago, and although I never fell behind on my bills, it was the worst six months in my life....period. This guy's attitude is stellar compared to mine. I was a mental wreck.

      Since then, however, my attitude towards the corporation has completely changed -- especially when they come 'round with their 'hooray team spirit rah-rah' sessions. What a crock.

  94. Corporate Loyalty by The+Kow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you contribute to your company's success and help it to advance its interests and financial health, often making sacrifices of your own time to do so, then your company will reciprocate by making sacrifices in bad times to take care of you by not depriving you of your paycheck and benefits. That's the way I thought it worked.

    Funny that, we got a nice speech today from our CTO or some guy who can walk around happily because he won't get outsourced. The speech focused on how we need to keep our performance levels "above the bar", or we'd be managed up or out. [Tangent: GOD I love that term, 'managed out' - HOW FREAKING AWESOME is that?! That's even better than right-sized!] then he goes on to tell us that no job is sacred, and that as a company who has to strive to cut a profit, if outsourcing is a more fiscal option, then they'll take it.

    I'm pretty new so I didn't even think to point out the catch-22 he had presented us with. Work hard or get fired, but even if you do work hard, you may get outsourced.

    Of course this is the truth, there's no two ways about it. Nevermind the questionable nature of a US company (enjoying US corporate laws, tariffs, quotas, et. al.) that has a majority of its workforce offshores, it's a simple fact that until something changes, be it now or thirty years from now, this is how it is. The flipside is that I have the right to work wherever the hell I want (provided they want me of course), and can leave them at any time.

    Fresh out of college, yes, but I think I'll catch on to this twisted game soon enough. The question, however, is how do you maintain a sense of optimism in spite of all this?

    --
    Moo
    1. Re:Corporate Loyalty by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Where do you think the joke of the BOFH came from?

      Jaded stories from Unix sysads about upper management and users...

      --
    2. Re:Corporate Loyalty by The+Kow · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for the Dilbert strip where the board of directors decides to outsource the CEO.

      --
      Moo
    3. Re:Corporate Loyalty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...You don't. Next time punch the guy out, walk right the hell out of there, and I guarantee you'll get free room and board (food, too!) for the next few days until the judge finds time to hear your case.

    4. Re:Corporate Loyalty by roninbix · · Score: 1
      but I think I'll catch on to this twisted game soon enough. The question, however, is how do you maintain a sense of optimism in spite of all this?

      Develop an exceedingly evil sense of humour along with your co-workers. We went through so many rounds of lay-offs that we started to joke it was another round everytime we had a corporate meeting?

      Someone says -- "Where's the accountant? In the bathroom or did he not make the cut this week?" -- Laughter from employees... dead silence from management. He'd been fired along with others.

      Started to refer to it as the "corporate survivor series".

      Another thing that helped was thinking of our company as a revolving door. We were letting good people go, every one that placed in a different company was a potential contact for when you needed a job. You wouldn't even have to say why you left, they'd already know.

  95. da Bush and da Shrub by Syntroxis · · Score: 1

    If his daddy was the Bush, would the current appointee to the White House the Shrub??

    --
    Wherever you go, there you are.
  96. check your mom out faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  97. This guy is a whiner by nomad63 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    if you are the curious type and glanced around his site, traversing the links to the other pages, it becomes obvious. I could not help sending him an email,part of which I copied below: (About your Bush vs him page) ....but I can see who is the doofus and who is not. And as you guessed, my opinion on the doofus coefficient between the you two is totally opposite of your views. As a side note, Clinton era was not the most prosperous era because the womanizer "jerk" had any capacity or capability to find and pick out a black cat out of a pan of milk, let alone managing the prosperity of world's largest economy, he was just having a plain freeride from the Reagan era economy. He, as any liberal leader does, eroded off whatever wealth accumulated for getting re-elected. Now, you and most blind liberals are blaming the economic downturn, over to the republican administration. If you have not had any economy classes in your extremely crowded education, according to your resume, let me crack you the news here : any economic measure taken today, needs 7 to 9 years till its results can be observed. I am sick and tired of the blinded liberals like you. I have been in the same jobless trenches for longer than most probably you will ever be, but never blamed it on others. If you can just look around, I am sure you can see too many menial jobs that you can do, but I am sure your "high" standarts will dictate you to spread crap instead of doing something which is really useful. ...

    --

    __________
    The more I know people, the more I love animals
    1. Re:This guy is a whiner by MikeySquid · · Score: 1

      you are soooo full of shit. I am sick and tired of right wing, money squandering fuckheads blaming liberals for your economic mess. You cannot tell me that a 250 billion dollar surplus is not beneficial to the economy, nor that a 7 TRILLION dollar deficit will not lead us down the road to economic ruin. If you don't believe it study Argentina. A little simple math shows that the $3600 a year interest payment on the national debt uses up my measly little tax break, to say nothing of paying the debt down. Take your attitude and go fuck yourself dickhead.

    2. Re:This guy is a whiner by kylef · · Score: 1
      Take your attitude and go fuck yourself dickhead.

      Very nice personal attack. Did you learn that one in economics class, Troll?

    3. Re:This guy is a whiner by Jhon · · Score: 1

      If I had the points, I'd mod you up.

      I was out of work for nearly 1 year. You know what I did? I got a job delivering Pizza. Between base pay (minimum wage) and tips, I was able to pay the rent, bills and BARELY cover holding over my medical insurance. Then I got a job doing dataentry (I can type 80+ wpm).

      Then guess what? I got a job offer that was once again in my field (and at a pay scale I'm used to)

      My advice: while you work, make and keep contact with as many people in your field as possible. It pays off as sooner or later one of them is going to point you to an interview. Take ANY job that can make you at least $10/hour. Remember that tips add up. Dataentry is an option if you know how to type (sucks worse than delivering pizza, but got me medical benefits).

      Live as if your salary was 1/2 of what it really is. Put the rest in savings or 401k. It makes hard-times a LOT easier to weather.

    4. Re:This guy is a whiner by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      Economics: 10% bullshit and 90% unfocused profanity. Hey, we get hired to predict infinitesimally insignificant details about the future using less information than a real scientist gets from a single experiment. What else are we supposed to do, fuckhole? Oh, and invest in euros. They're rising short against the yen.

      Ha! See how easy that shit is? Bet you even thought it meant something, didn't ya, fuckface?

  98. Work sucks by boudie · · Score: 0

    Come on, sure being broke has it's drawbacks, but some of the happiest times of my life were spent while unemployed. Adversity builds character and teaches you the true value of things. If your job is the most important thing in life to you, your priorities are seriously out of whack. And if you think "this economy" is bad, just remember that there is some guy in India or China right now who is smarter, hungrier and will work harder than you for almost nothing. This is the giant sucking sound that Ross Perot alluded to. You can hear it better with the power off.

  99. What I "Learned" from being out of work by SupahVee · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1 - That while average Joe Worker makes 66% more salaray than he did in 1980, Joe CEO is making 1996% more than _he_ did in 1980.

    2 - that having to sell your house after 8 months of being unemployed, SUCKS, worse than anything you can imagine.

    3 - That moving a thousand miles away from a place you consider home for a job fixing Windows boxen is about as fun as it sounds.

    4 - That companies do job postings with no intention of filling them.

    5 - That of all the oddball things that helped while having a mortgage, a newborn and no job, Wife's Unionized insurance plan is at the top of the list.

    6 - that I can now be lazy at work, and get fired, or bust my ass at work, and get fired.

    7 - that startng over is as shitty as you think it is.

    --
    "See, we plan ahead! That way, we never have to do anything now."
    1. Re:What I "Learned" from being out of work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 - That of all the oddball things that helped while having a mortgage, a newborn and no job, Wife's Unionized insurance plan is at the top of the list.

      Fucking breeder, stop cranking out the kids and perhaps you'll have the money to get another house.

    2. Re:What I "Learned" from being out of work by mandolin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      6 - that I can now be lazy at work, and get fired, or bust my ass at work, and get fired.

      Very true -- but. External commitments and priorities aside, if you're learning a lot at your current job, and get fired, it's still better than learning nothing, and getting fired.

      If you're lazy, you don't learn as much.

    3. Re:What I "Learned" from being out of work by shfted! · · Score: 0

      Your wife has de-ionized insurance? What is that?

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    4. Re:What I "Learned" from being out of work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking breeder, stop cranking out the kids and perhaps you'll have the money to get another house.

      Women want kids. If you want a wife, you get kids. That's how we all get here.

    5. Re:What I "Learned" from being out of work by gwappo · · Score: 1
      Looking at all the asshole replies to this parent's parent, I think we have just demonstrated what "silent majority" means

      Here's to hoping I'll always have money to live a life, and hoping SupahVee will soon be able to buy a new house in a neighbourhood where his kid will grow up to be proud of him.

    6. Re:What I "Learned" from being out of work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep on hearing the silent majority, they're getting louder all the time... :/

    7. Re:What I "Learned" from being out of work by pmz · · Score: 1

      Joe CEO is making 1996% more than _he_ did in 1980

      It seems shareholders are probably going to begin reining this one in a bit.

      that startng over is as shitty as you think it is.

      This is not a good generalization, because many people need to start over to explore their alternatives. Four years of experience in a shitty job can lead to wiser decision making for the next four years--and a much more fufilling experience. Money != Satisfaction.

      Your other points are very true, especially about selling a home. The real estate market just doesn't move enough (mostly) to reward short-term investments, especially considering the high costs of the transactions themselves.

    8. Re:What I "Learned" from being out of work by hawkfish · · Score: 1
      Fucking breeder, stop cranking out the kids and perhaps you'll have the money to get another house.
      When my kids are channging your diapers in the nursing home, maybe you will be glad that someone was "cranking out the kids".
      --
      You will not drink with us, but you would taste our steel? - Walter Matthau, The Pirates
    9. Re:What I "Learned" from being out of work by duggy_92127 · · Score: 1
      4 - That companies do job postings with no intention of filling them.

      I saw this from the inside fairly recently. I was the only guy doing my job, and convinced the Powers That Be that there should be somebody else. A req got signed, a listing went up, we interviewed a few people.

      Then the interviews stopped. I asked HR what's up, and they said we were in a hiring freeze. I guess I understand, and mentioned that we should probably take the listing down, then. Oh no... that would imply that the company is doing poorly or somesuch.

      So, the listing stayed up, and my contact in HR kept telling me how sad it was, people kept calling interested in the position, and they kept being put off but not told that the req was closed.

      Sucks.

      Doug

  100. Marcus Aurelius had some good things to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    When force of circumstance upsets your equanimity, lose no time in recovering your self-control, and do not remain out of tune longer than you can help. Habitual recurrence to the harmony will increase your mastery of it.

    More here.

  101. become self-employed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of these benefits apply to self-employed folks too you know.

    It's quite a nice feeling to be working on your own property (or your own rented office space) then in some Corporation's cubicle.

    It's nice to wake up at 9am every day.

    It's nice to be able to take the day off if you feel like it.

    It's nice to be able to have lunch with your girlfriend for 3 hours if you want.

    Etc. etc.

    The only downside is that many other people hate you. Why should you get to skip shaving whenever you feel like it? Why don't you have to sit in traffic? Wear a suit?

    It's funny, people have convinced themselves that unless they go through these stupid rituals, they aren't "productive members of society". Bah! Jealous bastards!

  102. Oh, he forgot... by mveloso · · Score: 1

    Kind of a lame rant, but somewhat amusing.

    He forgot:

    * expanding your music collection via KaZaa or Furthurnet

    * selling your stuff on eBay and becoming a power seller (who knew 13w3 cables were so valuable?)

    * Understanding the intricacies of shipping (see above)

    * reading every fark.com comment and even participating in photoshop contests

  103. Tired of Anti-capitalism by boatboy · · Score: 2, Troll

    To risk sounding like Seinfeld: What is the deal with anti-capitalists? Seriously. There's so much of it rampant on slashdot and elsewhere: those evil businesses, those greedy businessmen. When confronted with the alternative, though, people rarely have the gumption to be consistent in their beliefs: Don't like 'big business'? Think everybody should have equal paying jobs? Read up on Marxism and it's success this past century. If you still think 'free enterprise sucks' then at least be logical and apply that belief to your life- move to Cuba.

    Sure, I feel for anybody who doesn't have a job, but consider for a second all the people who not only have no job, but no roof over their head, no water or food- or heaven forbid- no internet access to publish essays on. Where are they? In the dictatorial, socialist, and communist countries for the most part. Clearly, if you really want to do this guy and others a favor, the right thing to do is support free enterprise.

    1. Re:Tired of Anti-capitalism by MikeySquid · · Score: 1

      You haven't read your Marx either, obviously. Neither Cuba, USSR nor China are true communist countries in that their communist revolution did not follow a capitolist society. And before you defend those evil, greedy businessmen, maybe you haven't worked for the same people I have. If you had, I doubt you would be so quick to defend them. Besides, I dont' want everyone to have eqaul paying jobs. I want to have equal opportunity, with pay commensurate with performance, not: you can make millions if you screw over your employees. very different things.

    2. Re:Tired of Anti-capitalism by Simple-Simmian · · Score: 0

      I am suprized you have the short sightedness to post such statements. Check the replies below. Soon you will be positing at zero like me. This is Slashdot the moderation is neither fair or unbiased. You are right but all important /. posts include statements that George Bush is a whore for the ruling classes (I actually agree with that one partially and I am a Libertarian) and Republicans are responsible for all evil (the parts evil Libertarians are not responsible for it seems.) Or you get modded 0 and your karma rapidly becomes bad like mine. So make sure to start including those important points to maintain your karma as positive or nutural in the future. The writer makes many good points about living simply I discovered when Jimmy Carter was president and I was unemployed. He however seems to equate his unemployment with George Bush being in office. I equate my unemployment with Gray Davis and his buddies running business out of Califorina leaving jobs only for the illegals ands and the rich bastards who donate to their election campaigns. Apperently the guy had a job when Wilson and that other guy were in office so did I. NO one is going to hire you forever and most of them will not let you know you are going to be joining the ranks of the unemployed soon if they can help it.

      --
      If you don't like what I write don't be a CS and mod it down. Refute it.
      Yea I can't spell. So what is your point?
    3. Re:Tired of Anti-capitalism by qaggaz · · Score: 1

      Then again, many countries in Europe treat housing, water, food, and income as social civil rights. Does everyone there have equal paying jobs? No, of course not, but the disparity between the salary of the top executives and the lowest paid employee is much smaller.

      If you still think 'free enterprise sucks' then at least be logical and apply that belief to your life

      I did this and moved to the Netherlands, a society that combines capitalism (yes, you can buy just about anything in Amsterdam) and socialism. Unfortunatly, foreigners do not have the same social civil rights (or else everyone would move there) so I had to leave when I lost my job. Would I go back if I could. In a minute!

      If you think that 'free enterprise is great' then at least be logical and legalize prostitution, drugs, same sex marriage, and so on.

    4. Re:Tired of Anti-capitalism by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Don't like 'big business'? Think everybody should have equal paying jobs? Read up on Marxism and it's success this past century. If you still think 'free enterprise sucks' then at least be logical and apply that belief to your life- move to Cuba.

      Ah, yes, the old "don't like it, move to Cuba [Russia/China]" argument. The argument involving only two extremes is a false dichotomy.

      There are alternatives between the excesses of American anything-goes capitalism and Stalinist tyrannical communism. In fact, most developed countries have a very reasonable balance between market forces and social welfare: Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy, etc., etc. Seems to work pretty well for their citizens, providing everyone with health care and finite work weeks and all that.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    5. Re:Tired of Anti-capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, yeah. Marxism is never "pure" enough for the real marxists out there. I've got an idea. Go find some like-minded individuals, start your own little commune, and rant at people who will take you seriously. Amazing. After 100 years, millions dead, millions more imprisoned, there are idiots out there that still believe in that garbage.

    6. Re:Tired of Anti-capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, many countries in Europe treat housing, water, food, and income as social civil rights.

      And their economies have been in the dumps long before this recession came about. I hate socialists, especially the self-righteous ones who thing it should be imposed on people. If that's what you want, MOVE.

    7. Re:Tired of Anti-capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are crazy to think that the NHS in England is some noble institution that provides health care for all. The NHS consumes more and more from the treasury and there is nothing to show for it. There little old ladies on 18 month waitng lists for a HIP REPLACEMENT. And that is the norm!!!

      And the really sad part about it, is that if you go out and buy private health care -- the gov't will tax you.

      SOCALIST HEALTH CARE SUCKS !!!!!

    8. Re:Tired of Anti-capitalism by hyphz · · Score: 1

      And I'm sick of this old argument (ie, "You don't like Capitalism, Marxism is not Capitalism, therefore you must like Marxism, even though we all know Marxism sucks".)

      Current economics does NOT provide free enterprise. Nobody but the folks who are rich to start with can afford to start up a business that has any hope of competing in most fields. And you can't get rich enough through 90% of jobs.

      But why not have "somethingelse-ism"? A new economic system which hasn't been thought of yet?

      Here's an example I've heard of. Binary Flow Capitalism. It's the old capitalism you know and love, except the country has *two* currencies. Let's call 'em redbacks and bluebacks (unlike the old style greenbacks). Here's how it works: in any transaction, when the consumer sets the price, it's paid in bluebacks. When the producer sets the price, it's paid in redbacks. They can't be exchanged.

      This immediately puts a whole bunch of throttles onto the gradual deterioration (into a "solved" system of megacorporations) that is endemic to capitalism. Taxes are charged in bluebacks (because the government sets them), so firms can't just pass them on to customers; if the firm has the power to pass costs on the customers, it must be setting the price, and thus all the money it'll get from the customers will be redbacks which are useless to pay a blueback tax. Likewise, firms have an incentive to prevent individuals getting frozen out of the economy. If the current situation arose in binary flow capitalism, all the money individuals have from the sale of labour would be bluebacks (because the consumer, their boss, set the price) but many goods would be charged in redbacks (because the firms are setting the prices), so nobody could afford anything and the firms would all collapse unless they took action to get Joe Average involved in the economy again.

    9. Re:Tired of Anti-capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yeah, yeah. Marxism is never "pure" enough for the real marxists out there."

      Yes there is. Point is that there can't can be communist states, because according to Marx state dies/become obsolete when it reaches communism. That's why Cuba and USSR were/are socialistic states not communist.

      "Go find some like-minded individuals, start your own little commune, and rant at people who will take you seriously."

      People have lived troughout centuries in communes.

      "Amazing. After 100 years, millions dead, millions more imprisoned, there are idiots out there that still believe in that garbage."

      You obilivoisly haven't even read Marx.

    10. Re:Tired of Anti-capitalism by boatboy · · Score: 1

      Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy, etc., etc. Seems to work pretty well for their citizens
      Which is why they routinely send critical patients to the US, right? Or why people flock from all over the globe to start a business in the US? All of the countries you list have removed competition from various markets inside their countries, and without exception those markets suffer from lack of innovation and quality. That's not to say there is no value in their work, or they are incompetent- just that they would be better off if they were less socialist.

      As for the Cuba remark, it was not intended as a straw-man. I do, however, think that most people who advocate socialism do not take it to its logical conclusions and do not realize that what they advocate has marked negative affect on markets- and on their personal quality of life.

      You have done a similar thing by implying that America is on the other extreme. This is not the case- in America, people have laws against fraud, and unfair labor practices. In my opinion, it is America's laws that balance market forces, social welfare, AND personal freedom to achieve one's goals. There is, however, a marked swing toward imbalance with excessive emphasis on "social welfare" that has already caused problems in energy and healthcare.

      My main point is that true social welfare is brought about by creating an atmosphere in which competing markets can innovate and create quality goods and services at reasonable prices. "Socialist" and "Liberal" philosopies seem to advocate social welfare, but typically do this by enacting legislation- which time and again fails actually hurts those it claims to help.

    11. Re:Tired of Anti-capitalism by boatboy · · Score: 1

      Besides, I dont' want everyone to have eqaul paying jobs. I want to have equal opportunity, with pay commensurate with performance
      Then you and I agree 100%. And I believe that in a capitalist, free society, this is most likely to happen. Sure, you'll have Enrons and WorldComs, but for the most part, if you want to and work hard, you can do very well in the US. This is not the case in dictatorial countries and whatever term you have for USSR, Cuba, and China.

      And before you defend those evil, greedy businessmen, maybe you haven't worked for the same people I have
      Nobody's defending evil, greedy businessmen. I am defending the honest millionare who's worked hard and earned a good living. Before you jump to conclusions about what's formed my opinion on this matter, let me say: I'm not rich at all, I have worked for lousy people, and I lost a thousand dollars to WorldCom. What I am really defending is my right to work hard and earn a living without a bunch of socialists taking my hard-earned money and telling me I'm wrong for earning it.

      Here though, is the question no socialist or liberal can answer: Given the choice between a politician, a businessman, and yourself, who do you think is more concerned with your well-being?

    12. Re:Tired of Anti-capitalism by boatboy · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot the moderation is neither fair or unbiased.
      I catch your drift, but I have found that many slashdotters, when confronted with a rational argument, will at least attempt to think it through. Which is why this topic is so frustrating- people clearly do not think it through. Simple observation shows that Americans can earn a good living through personal drive and hard work. There are more 'new millionares' here than anywhere else. Logic would dictate that there is something right about it.

    13. Re:Tired of Anti-capitalism by qaggaz · · Score: 1

      If that's what you want, MOVE.

      Did you read my post? I would gladly move. Get me a work and residence permit, and I'm on the plane tomorrow!

    14. Re:Tired of Anti-capitalism by ahacop@wmuc.umd.edu · · Score: 1


      Here though, is the question no socialist or liberal can answer: Given the choice between a politician, a businessman, and yourself, who do you think is more concerned with your well-being?


      Good question! The answer, of course, is "me". Which is why I want a true democracy and not a representative democracy. And which is why the people that work in company should own the company.

      Does this make sense? It's called anarcho-syndicalism

    15. Re:Tired of Anti-capitalism by pmz · · Score: 1

      What is the deal with anti-capitalists?

      Anti-capitalists are people who can only look as far back in history as this weeks financial report on CNN while selectively choosing historical events to further their cause. They ignore that the USA is still the most prosperous nation on the planet, due mostly to government non-involvement. The only reason why the USA can be considered to have peaked recently is that the government's arrogance is coming to fruition while the populace is too dumb and happy to do anything about it.

    16. Re:Tired of Anti-capitalism by pmz · · Score: 1

      Which is why I want a true democracy and not a representative democracy.

      Your true democracy will fail when everyone shows up to vote on American Idol rather than for President. Most Americans are STUPID. A lean (very lean) representitive government can be very effective.

    17. Re:Tired of Anti-capitalism by MikeySquid · · Score: 1

      all you communo-phobes forget that the US was founded on the communistic principles ot the township, A societal model that pretty much doesn't exist anymore. Europe has several countries that are communistic, but had no bloody communist revolution. Capitolism has produced many bloody socities as well. How about moving to Columbia? Does that appeal to you. Wanting to bring consideration for the most citizens back into the govt. does not = Stalinism. Your argument does not stand up.

    18. Re:Tired of Anti-capitalism by Darby · · Score: 1

      There is, however, a marked swing toward imbalance with excessive emphasis on "social welfare" that has already caused problems in energy and healthcare.

      Good lord. Are you honestly unaware that the energy problems were caused by private industries like Enron, for example, who produced nothing. They merely found a loophole in the system they could exploit for their own profit at the expense of the citizenry and their own freaking employees. This happened due to the deregulation of the energy industry.

      The fact that health care is a business has had almost nothing but negative effects either. What's more profitable, to pay for an expensive operation or to let the person die?
      Well, those decisions are made all the time by HMOs and they decide based on profit. Sometimes they actually do have to pay out on a claim, but without some government regulation, they wouldn't do it nearly as often.

      These are two industries which do not translate well to the private sector.

      Some type of national health care system would be the best thing for our society as a whole provided it was run properly.

      That is the catch, of course.

  104. Losing house back to old job with rifle... by tjstork · · Score: 0, Troll


    taking out the security guard on the right.
    walking forward a few hundred paces to the elevators.
    blasting the guy in the elevator.
    turning to the side and throwing a grenade in the meeting room.
    heading up to the 3rd floor.
    shooting the glass door and walking through it.
    past the first few row of cubicles as those people were in accounting and were ok
    hanging a left. blast off, sound off, cubicle one, two, three.

    well... that's kinda creepy actually.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Losing house back to old job with rifle... by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Be careful, citizen.
      Some people wear arms and anticipate these situations.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  105. Start your own company by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    I go to school full time, work as a tech at the uni (15-20 hours), a clerk at Mervyn's (4-8 hours a week if that), a programmer for a start up game company and run www.icarusindie.com (currently down due to what I assume is hardware failure since I can't get physical access to the system at this time) which is my attempt at running my own business.

    The tech job pays the bills. Mervyn's covers lunch money and the web-site is for now just a small amount of extra money every month. Proof of concept really, so now I'm moving ahead with planning out real marketing strategies.

    A kid I know has assembled his own company doing web-design, tech support, and anything else he can think of.

    If you don't want to sell your soul to the system, you should seriously consider your skill set and look into creating your own company. I'd rather IcarusIndie.com succeeded but currently it's not self sustaining so working other jobs is necessary. Which isn't a bad way to go about it. Take a job you can stand that pays well and funnel funds into starting up a company and jump ship if your company takes off. In the meantime you can use your business license to get tax write-offs which puts more money in your pocket.

    Ben

  106. sheesh, you still have a home, etc. by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    I want to hear about the benefits of being unemployed from someone who has been unemployed for long enough that the bank foreclosed on their mortgage, then had the car they were living in stolen, then had to move to the greyhound station because there's a limit to the number of days that you can sleep at the salvation army...

    This guy's still living indoors, with electricity, running water, has a friggin DVD player, and even a spouse that hasn't left him for someone with job prospects.

    He's not really qualified to comment on the perks of unemployment yet. He's living better than 90% of the world. Money is coming from SOMEWHERE. Write back when that runs out...

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    1. Re:sheesh, you still have a home, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, here's my take on it.
      My marriage barely survived.
      My newborn son is OK.
      I was out of work for 4 months, after 6 months at a new job that turned out to be a real "tour through hell".
      We ended up; selling the house before the bank foreclosed, taking bad advice from a "scum sucking" real estate agent who priced our house below the our equity we had in it, declaring bankruptcy when the bank revealed we owed them $14,000 once the house was sold.
      Suck doesn't even begin to describe the situation!
      We're back into a house again for 2 years now and only 4 since being released from bankruptcy.
      Almost $100K equity in the new house and in the process of moving to another smaller house to drop a second mortgage and allow me to retire from the "rat race" in another 2 years.
      We've learned what's important (family), and what's not (anything else).
      I've learned not to "trust" anyone, not in business....they are out for themselves and the smile preceeds the knife strike.
      I do not, and have not, ever participated in the BS and ethical slights inherent in " successful" business dealings, but have learned the hard way to watch for the shine of the blade.
      My word might be my bond, but I doubt very much it's anyone else's.
      I've kept my honesty, my sanity and my soul intact through all of it (just barely).

    2. Re:sheesh, you still have a home, etc. by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      You don't get my point...

      You are still "house people"
      with running water, electricity, your children haven't been taken from you by the State because of your inability to care for them.

      You may have been ripped off, gone into bankruptcy, made poor decisions, etc., but you have not yet dropped into poverty.

      Like I said, I want to hear how tolerable unemployment is from someone who is still there AFTER the benefits run out, AFTER they've been through all the options.

      I have a feeling I can just ask the guy sleeping at the bus stop, but I don't want to find out he has a PhD in Physics and worked for a defense contractor until a couple of years ago, etc.,etc.

      Get it?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  107. Corporate Loyalty-Revenge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Fresh out of college, yes, but I think I'll catch on to this twisted game soon enough. The question, however, is how do you maintain a sense of optimism in spite of all this?"

    Simple. Revenge. Sooner or later the tables will be turned. Even if one assumes worse case, companies abandon the US market for overseas? Other countries will realize that American companies are no more a friend to them that it was to the US. Enjoy the benefits, but watch your back. Making enemies is never a wise policy.

  108. Writer? by goldid · · Score: 1

    "writer of some repute"

    I think not. This writing is not very good. Heck, I even found a sentence fragment. Maybe with that unemployed time he can check his grammer more carefully. (Not that I mean to belittle his situation, but let's not go around calling people great writers just because some of us might share his feelings.)

  109. Different experience here by Bridog · · Score: 1

    Well, this guy is pasted together from different material than me:

    1. I'm always early, so I always wake up before my watch goes beep beep, and that is the extent of my alarm clock. But since I'm unemployed, I go back to sleep.

    2. For me it's homeless and street people. I never carry cash, so I always have to say I don't have any. Now I can say I'm unemployed.

    3. No spouse, and I don't expect to be able to impress any prospective boyfriend. Besides that, if I'm not feeling in top form, I'm going to have trouble meeting people.

    4. I think ahead, but I was much more organized and structured about my goals when I was forced to think about them, like when I worked 60 hours a week so had to schedule 2 hours per week to handle this type of thing. Now I can put them in the back of my mind and live in the moment, so I can plan things tomorrow.

    5. Scams: I have yet to put any money into a bogus `placement' firm.

    6. I shave less often, but I still can't grow a beard; it's annoying as heck.

    7. I have cleaned some, but in the last four months I really don't think that my average cleanliness has improved any. I guess I'm something like a slob now.

    8. I'm still a snob. I still drink martinis. I still buy imported cheese.

    9. I have an aversion to light, so I use as little power as possible, but certainly much more since I'm home all day.

    10. I get into movies for free.

    11. I went running some at the beginning of the summer, but exercise has never afforded me any antidepressive benefits; it just doesn't. I've done some hiking near the end of the summer, and that because I haven't been occupied with work, this is true. But I'm still in worse shape than I was.

    12. I don't exercise unless it's scheduled. I'm not scheduled unless I have some reason to be, apparently.

    13. My will power is unchanged. I have a block of non-work time; what do I want to do? Do I want to work on a hobby or sit around? Same decision. The only reason that more hobbies get done is because the total available time is greater.

    14. I don't claim to understand this society or this federalist republic.

    I have a masters degree, so I agree with the posts that note that I won't be working at MacDonalds; I'm overqualified. I've heard that several times. I've tried some other areas, but apparently I don't have enough training there. At least I still have enough room on my credit card to go out in style.

    --
    Most likely the #1 Unfunny Meta/Moderator on /.!
  110. He missed one by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 1
    My son 2.5-year-old son calls for me before his mother.

    I am his #1 and closest caretaker.

    Of course that means that I don't have time to do all the things mentioned here and in the article (unless I define reading Classics as reading picture book classics).

    Still It is a great feeling that more men should feel.

    1. Re:He missed one by Grimster · · Score: 1

      Yep this was true for me too, until my wife lost her job in July so now she's first to get to see booboo's again.

      There's less important things in this world than knowing which muppet is your 2 year old's favorite..

      --
      --- www.f-theocean.com
  111. How... by EpochVII · · Score: 1

    How the hell is this guy out of work? Did you read that resume? What chance do i have? *gulp*

    1. Re:How... by NerveGas · · Score: 1


      Over the years, I've found that the more impressive the resume, the more likely the guy is to walk in, sit down in front of a computer, and become absolutely lost. Really!

      I've had a person give me resumes that practically made him out to be the greatest computer-related worker in the world. I sat him down and asked him to write an extremely simple (10-line) Perl program. He fiddled around, got the #! line wrong, then finally admitted "I usually just cut and paste this stuff."

      That's not an isolated case, either. Every one of the unbelievably good resumes I've been handed have been from unqualified persons. Let's look at the resume in question. With all of these opinions, I could be right or wrong. I've never sat down with the man in question, so these are only opinions.

      First, the fact that he claims 13 programming languages would scare me away as an employer. Finding a person who is actually competent, qualified, and a good programmer in that many languages isn't as easy as these "I know 13 programming languages" people think. Now, he may not be a terrible programmer in those 13 languages, but employers aren't looking for people who "aren't terrible" - they're looking for someone really good. For crying out loud, the only programming instruction he lists is a week-long intensive Java course. I'm sorry, but those week-long courses (I've been to some) don't exactly make you a qualified programmer.

      Second, it's very easy to put down every vendor in the world under "Hardware Platforms". After all, you're making absolutely no substantiated claim to anything significant. Back in college, I used AIX for a couple of hours working on a physics project. I could list that under "Hardware Platforms" if I wanted.

      Third, somewhat related to the second: A lot of these claims smell to me, as an employer, as an attempt to look like more than he is. Let's look at this claim:

      I also used SQL*PLUS to for data extracts and and table and data maintenance.

      If that's all you can claim, then you probably don't have more than a passing familiarity with Oracle. "Select * from " and "delete from where..." fully substantiate the sentence he's provided, but certainly don't qualify you for a job in my company.

      While there are many more things I could pick out, I'll end with experience. In the last ten years, the only programming experience he lists has been a little bit of Java/JSP in his last job and a couple of Perl scripts. The next guy is going to come in and show ten years of solid, heavy programming development. Who do you think is going to get the job?

      Overall, the guy's career has been that of a technical writer, with occasional programming jobs mixed in. Unfortunately for him, he seems to be like so many of us that took a while to fall into a career path - first he studied mathematics for 6 years or so, did some programming, did a lot of technical writing, did a litttle programming, did a lot more technical writing, and finally seems to have decided to stick with programming.

      Well, he spent a lot of time bouncing around. Those mathematics degrees will be a great help to him in some areas of programming, but it's going to be awfully tough to find a position in web development where it will, and even tougher to find a position in technical writing that will use it. Spending 6 years of your life studying for something you're not going to use doesn't exactly get you to the top. I can say that from experience, I did exactly the same thing. The one thing that saved me was that during the 6 years that I spent studying something I'd never use, I was also out busting my butt in computer jobs to pay the bills, and I went out of my way to take jobs that would give me opportunities to learn, progress, and acquire valuable skills and experience, even if it wasn't the best job to pay the bills.

      When employers look at a potential employee, they see a big difference between those that "paid their dues" for 6 to 10 years, busting their butts, and those that took a "week long intensive Java course".

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    2. Re:How... by twbecker · · Score: 0

      I only skimmed you comment, but from what I can see you're one of these elitists that looks down on anyone whose resume is less spectacular than yours. Your company no doubt won't hire anyone without n+1 years of experience with a technology that has only existed for n years. There are plenty of us out here who have, through no fault of our own, not settled down in any one particular technical environment. My resume is similar to Dvorkin's in that I've done a little of everything, but a lot of nothing. Part of it is that I'm still deciding what to focus on, but most is that I have to take what I can find in this shit market. Your post just epitomizes, to me, the problem with hiring practices nowadays. A company will hire a complete idiot as long as he (claims to) have the requisite experience, but won't give a second look to those of us who can probably do the job better, despite having less familiarity with the particular technology. To sum up: Hire smart people who can learn what you need from them, both now and in the future, not idiots who will obsolete as soon as their tool of choice falls out of use, if not sooner.

      --
      "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
    3. Re:How... by NerveGas · · Score: 1


      Before you jump to conclusions, maybe you should actually read what you're making a judgement on.

      Perl has been around for what, two decades? And we're only looking for someone that has one or two years of good, solid programming experience in it.

      If you haven't settled down into one particular technical environment, that doesn't make you a bad person, stupid, or anything else. But not having long-term, in-depth experience and expertise in a field greatly limits the jobs you can get.

      We epitimize the problem with hiring practices? Of the past 10 people we've hired, perhaps three were actually qualified. The rest we've taken because while they weren't qualified, they were at least the most likely of the bunch. Of those 7 people, two of them have gone on to be great programmers.

      To put that in perspective, that means that our company has paid a yearly salary and training costs to *HALF* of the people we've hired, without them really giving us much of a return.

      If anything's bad with that hiring practice, it's that we're being TOO nice to people.

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    4. Re:How... by twbecker · · Score: 0

      We epitimize the problem with hiring practices? Of the past 10 people we've hired, perhaps three were actually qualified. The rest we've taken because while they weren't qualified, they were at least the most likely of the bunch. Of those 7 people, two of them have gone on to be great programmers.


      If you can't find qualified people in this market, wouldn't you agree that your standards just might be a bit too high? Because I call bullshit if you're saying you can't find a solid Perl programmer. But for arguement's sake, lets say you can't. You can either hire:

      1) Someone with a good grasp on the fundamentals of programming, and some Perl to boot but who doesn't claim to be all that + bag of chips
      OR
      2) Someone who claims to be a Perl guru, and can BS his way through an interview but who can't find his ass with both hands.

      My experience is that person 2 will get hired by companies 8 out of 10 times. Then mgmt is actually suprised when they turn out to either be unable to pick up other skills necessary to do the job, or suck even at what they supposedly knew.

      Bottom line is, tell me who all these "nice" compainies are, and I'll submit a resume tomorrow.

      --
      "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
    5. Re:How... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not find a good CS student at a university and train them to write Perl programs? Why does everyone need five years of 20-hour days in Perl to get a job?

  112. Another Benefit of Being Unemployed-Failed math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A simple equation for you.

    Large number of people+small number of jobs=?

    See what size crowbar you'll need to fit your advice into that equation.

  113. Yeah it sucks... by Grimster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok unemployment sucks, but this article is.. not that good but I digress.

    I was unemployed 2 years ago on Oct 16th I knew it was coming, around March I realized (when quarterly earnings showed 1.9 million burned 4 million in the bank, can you say dot BOMB?). So I moved back to the small town I came from figuring it'd be easier to pay a $350 a month rent payment on unemployment than it would a $1300 a month payment in the Bay Area. I moved in July and telecommuted until the end.

    I immediately started planning on starting my own business I was hoping to last until about Christmas 2001 but I got axed on Oct 16th instead. Oh well. Started my company, did some consulting here and there, made ends meet, got some customers, a few more, no more consulting was scraping by on the business, more customers, and more, and then tax time comes and I realize I owe uncle sam $13,000 in taxes (YIKES!).

    Long story shorter, I get up when I want, go to bed when I want, leave when I want and stay at home with my 3 year old son (well he'll be 3 next week). I run my business from home.

    I've always been a unix geek/linux nut/internet addict so why not make a business out of it, web hosting is the perfect job :) Now I have a decent sized income bills are paid, and I get to play around with over 50 linux boxen hosting over 11,000 web sites.

    My wife also just lost her job of over 10 years, company sold out and that's that (they were dying anyway so sell out or bankruptcy they chose sell out). So she stays home draws unemployment and plays with the kid too, a kid with two stay at home parents how lucky can he be? She also is doing some volunteer work.

    When the unemployment runs out she might start her own business, she likes decorating cakes, or maybe open a daycare. Or get into real estate she likes going out and looking at nice houses, so why not sell 'em for a living. I told her don't look for another "job" do something you LIKE instead, the money isn't important the satisfaction is.

    The economy truly sucks right now and I really would hate to be trying to find a job, but sometimes you might have better luck making your own job instead of looking for one.

    --
    --- www.f-theocean.com
    1. Re:Yeah it sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taking unemployment while not actually looking for work is fraud. The rest of society pays your bills, but more importantly, it means that people that actually deserve help end up getting less.

      Bring on the rationalizations...

    2. Re:Yeah it sucks... by Grimster · · Score: 1

      Oh she's looking and sending out resumes but the chances of finding a job that is near the pay she had before is slim and none, tho if one comes along she'll be happy to jump on it, so far, nothing's come up. So she'll keep sending out those resumes any time a job similar to her old one opens up, or something that is really attractive, but she's not exactly holding her breath. She's also quite aware that she has to look for a job, so she is, but they can't make you look for a job that's significantly below the job you had, or in another field.

      --
      --- www.f-theocean.com
    3. Re:Yeah it sucks... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Yep. I was unemployed for 5 months, which could not have come at a worse time ( I had already been had in a start-up and went from +20K in savings to -20K). While everybody was telling me to give up the tech world and/or pickup a job that pays 10-20/hours, I was busy working on 2 startups. Last jan, another start-up hired me (writing interesting software). In the mean time, I have continued working on one of the other startup and am talking to an investor in about 8 hours about a 1 million dollar investment.
      The best thing that you can do, if unemployed, is to do your own start-up. If you are not sure about the sales aspect, find a good unemployed sales person. If uncertain about managers, well, there are a number of them unemployed.
      Way to go on the hosting business.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:Yeah it sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Way to go man. Just curious, how did you manage to get 11,000 hosting customers in 2 years?

    5. Re:Yeah it sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and then tax time comes and I realize I owe uncle sam $13,000 in taxes

      Now, that's something worth complaining about.

    6. Re:Yeah it sucks... by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Congratulations, man. I did something similar in a completely different field, and being your own boss is both a) great and b) terrifying when you start. In the end, though, it's the most rewarding thing I've ever done. Of course, I don't have kids yet, so we'll see how that changes the equation :)

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    7. Re:Yeah it sucks... by Grimster · · Score: 1

      As with anything there's a certain amount of luck involved, a single forum post on anandtech.com drove in several hundred signups in just a few weeks when I was just getting started, and that thread managed to stay active for several months driving in I'm not even sure how many sales, a large competitor went belly up last july taking a large sum of prepaid hosting time with it, that drove at least 450 signups my way in a week's time. A lot of dumb luck, and a little planning.

      --
      --- www.f-theocean.com
    8. Re:Yeah it sucks... by Grimster · · Score: 1

      Yes it is, here's what really boils my blood, as a "self employed" person I pay extra taxes (self employment tax) because I'm self employed and running a small business. Also if we didn't qualify for the state run group healthcare, we couldn't get health insurance if we drove truckloads of money to Blue Cross/Blue Shields because my wife has asthma, as it is we pay just shy of $800 per month JUST in premiums (and another $200 in copays on medicine).

      If people with "real jobs" had to pay their taxes themself rather than just getting a paycheck each payday they'd get mad too, paying a couple hundred per paycheck is a whole different animal than writing a 4 figure check every 3 months to the IRS and knowing you're paying even more BECAUSE you have the audacity to try and live the american dream and start your own small company!

      With healthcare and taxes as they are it's a wonder anyone even bothers trying to start a small business, they stack the deck against you so bad it oughta be a crime. Not that I mind paying taxes but it seems to me in order to incubate small business you should see a few tax incentives, not EXTRA taxes.

      --
      --- www.f-theocean.com
    9. Re:Yeah it sucks... by Darby · · Score: 1

      Taking unemployment while not actually looking for work is fraud. The rest of society pays your bills

      I have put far more into unemployment than I will ever be allowed to get out.
      "Society" isn't paying you unemployment. It's your money that you would have had and earned interest on if it hadn't been taxed away.

    10. Re:Yeah it sucks... by emptybody · · Score: 1

      Damn straight!
      I have watched as my taxes have increased with every year. Unemployment benefits are 50% of your salary CAPPED AT 500/wk in MA.
      So, unless you make under 25000 gross.
      you are screwed.

      Not only that, you are TAXED on that money.

      Thats right, you pay taxes on money that was taken from you as a tax in the firstplace. Imagine being taxed on your tax refund check.

      --
      comment directly in my journal
    11. Re:Yeah it sucks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have put far more into unemployment than I will ever be allowed to get out.

      In Indiana, at least, the employer pays the unemployment tax. Money is not taken from the employee's paycheck.


      It's your money that you would have had and earned interest on if it hadn't been taxed away.

      Indirectly, by helping your employer earn money, you're being taxed; but you couldn't earn any interest on that money, event without the tax.

  114. Busy day? Wha? by schussat · · Score: 1
    Well worth the reading time as a small break in a busy day

    They're all unemployed. Nothin' but time!

    -schussat

    --
    The hour of noon has passed. Let us go and get some Kentucky Fried Chicken.
  115. Re:For perks of being unemployed without the guilt by linzeal · · Score: 1

    PhD canidate doing the paper the night before? Question: how many batteries do you chew through each year with your graphing calculator, or are you some sort of *shudder* liberal arts major?

  116. 14 steps. by Martigan80 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This sounds like nothing but a 14 step program. 14 ways to look at a glum problem. Well you can look at it this way there are always jobs out there-it just depends on how much pride you have.

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
  117. Look a few articles below this one. by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Open Courses at MIT.

    Not a bad idea for those with an abundance of time (I have a 2.5-year-old to take care of and entertain, so I wouldn't be able to take advantage of this).

  118. Depressing read. by zapp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is one of the most depressing things I've read in atleast a month. This guy lives in Denver, an hour away from me.
    His resume is filled with the same buzzword bullshit as mine, only more of it and with more experience.

    I feel right now like I just lost everything in the stock market. 4 years ago when I started college (investing in a skillset), those skills were climbing in value at a good rate. I remember being told that I'd be making an easy 50-60k right out of college - as in the day I graduate.

    Now the prices on my skills have collapsed. What once went for $60/share now goes for $2.50. Everyone knows Java. Or Perl, or SQL, or blah blah blah.

    I want a real career. Without computers. Without the corporation.

    Fuck this.

    --
    no comment
    1. Re:Depressing read. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in my senior year of college now finishing up my CS degree. Most of my classmates (over 80% of them) have already either changed their degree to something else (e.g. accounting, nursing), or plan to go into law school or business management after graduating.

    2. Re:Depressing read. by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Hey man, I live in the Denver area and was thinking the same thing. Email me at eazolan@yahoo.com, I'd like to have someone to bounce some ideas off of.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    3. Re:Depressing read. by altek · · Score: 1

      Wow... I am finishing my last semester in CS right now, and if I were asked to describe my current feelings, they would be your post - VERBATIM. I mean, my thoughts exactly.

      the weird part is, the vast majority of people outside the field still give reactions such as "well you're going to get a great job, computers are the way to go" and such.. the general public, even though it knows that the industry is "down", still seems to feel that the individual worker in the field is somehow still very well off.

      Isn't it great attending "career fairs" (which are more like flea markets and we're the one's up for sale), applying for hundreds of jobs all online, with no personal interaction until you achieve a status of "third-level interviewing candidate" like you just completed a few boards of a vid game...

      --
      THE MAGIC WORDS ARE SQUEAMISH OSSIFRAGE
    4. Re:Depressing read. by Carpet · · Score: 1

      Strange... I took the opposite route four years ago. Figured CS would be overcrowded, headed into sociology and economics instead.

      Now, I graduate to find that my skills (or lack thereof) are ALSO down to nill. At least you guys have hard skills to fall back on, I only got a few economic theories and sociological observations rattling around in my head.

      Been looking for five months now, everybody want either an accounting or a finance major.

      It doesn't help with quite a few alumni classes before us ALSO looking for jobs. Heck, I went to an Internship job fair and saw quite a few classmates from my year trying to compete with them juniors and seniors for a lowest-wage internship.

    5. Re:Depressing read. by varjag · · Score: 0

      I want a real career. Without computers. Without the corporation.

      So go for it man. The more people without passion for our trade leave, the more jobs will be available for those who genuinely interested in the field.

      --
      Lisp is the Tengwar of programming languages.
    6. Re:Depressing read. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So go for it man. The more people without passion for our trade leave, the more jobs will be available for those who genuinely interested in the field.
      Until they get outsourced to India then China then Eastern Europe or where ever it is cheaper.

    7. Re:Depressing read. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Not only should you thank the economy for this unfortunate situation my dead zapp, there's a group of people you should thank as well.

      During the dot-com days when everybody was going to school for CS because "that's where the money was", a lot of people got into things they A. had no interest in, and B. had absolutely no skills with. Not only is the economy in the crapper now, but these people are saturating your industry. They'll generally work for less, produce less, and most likely get by or even advance, because they aren't good at thinking in the way you are, independently, and they will just be good corporate sheep.

      Sorry to hear your misfortune.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    8. Re:Depressing read. by colinleroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I want a real career. Without computers. Without the corporation.
      Not focusing on your income may help. Where's the need to earn 60k if you can live correctly with 30?
      Let your job be only a little part of your life and you may be happier - there's so much more to do (you know, the "Real Life" people here often make fun of ;-)) than work for a company you don't care about .
      Of course this is not very valid for unemployed people. (I've been unemployed for a few monthes, just long enough to be able to consider this as nice vacations, but i wouldn't have wanted this unemployment to last too long).

      --
      blah
    9. Re:Depressing read. by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      Very similar position. Graduated last may with a degree in Math/CS from an engineering school. Couldn't find a job in the area and had no money to keep an apartment, realized that the Denver job market was over-saturated, and moved out.

      Still can't find a job, still looking with a resume I've opened to the field as being completely willing to relocate.

      Good luck everyone.

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    10. Re:Depressing read. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      His resume is filled with the same buzzword bullshit as mine, only more of it and with more experience.

      Yep, he's over-qualified for what ever position he applies for. That's buzz speak for being too old.

    11. Re:Depressing read. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol... i live in denver too.. and unemployed. denver sucks (duh).

    12. Re:Depressing read. by ill_mango · · Score: 1

      What I've realized over the few years I've been in college learning this stuff is that I'm not going to count on it to get me a job. In fact, I've started thinking of it as a hobby rather than a career.

      So I'm in a five year program and I'm not going to become a Software Engineer, some people might call that a waste. Not me. It's something I enjoy, something I'd like to know more about, but not something I will base my future life on.

      So I'll let the people who really want to run the rat race do the programming and such. It's too much stress for my lifestyle anyways. Have fun guys.

    13. Re:Depressing read. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > the more jobs will be available for those who genuinely interested

      Oh boy! Naivety just took on a whole new meaning!

      I think you'll find that the most 'genuinely interested' guys are prepared to work for 20 USD a day and live in places like Mumbai.

    14. Re:Depressing read. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... MOVE.

      florida is crying for Tech people.

      programmer? yeah, you are a dime a dozen, be a programmer+IT tech. that is what companies want now.. the IT guy that can write a nice web frontend for mysql. and unjam the printer, fix the network.

      Right now in florida many small-mid businesses are dying for a tech person to come in part time... ok so you work 3 part time jobs to equal 1.5 jobs.. .so what.. be your own boss again.

      some simple facts...

      if you be your own boss, dont be an idiot, LEARN accounting (it's not hard at all) and keep your "business" money in a different checking account and NEVER EVER use it for personal uses.

      learn to be a salesman... sell yourself as the best Tech there is.. the other guys here in town are drug-addict losers that will sell your secrets on ebay! you MUST hire me for $60.00 an hour if you dont want that slammer worm to come back....

      then learn to kiss ass hard, give the company's owner some freebies here and there. and be faster than hell.. go in and do 3 hours of work in 2 hours and if you stand there hitting on the receptionist for an hour after you are done, DONT YOU DARE charge for it.... if you screwed up, fix it for free.

      you know what that will get you? GOBS more jobs.

    15. Re:Depressing read. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're looking for something that requires an economics undergrad degree, I recommend looking to the government, especially the Dept. of Labor.

      One of my good friends graduated a little over a year ago in Econ/Poli Sci and now makes a pretty good living at the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

      Just a tip from an AC.

    16. Re:Depressing read. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Passion for our trade" is irrelevant. I love computer science; I got into it because I liked understanding what made computers work. And guess what? I burned out.

      I burned out because when I tried to work on open-source, there were too many people who insisted that for the project to succeed I had to do X, when what I was more interested in was Y. I burned out because people are all too happy to send in bug reports, even for nonexistent problems, and extremely resistant to sending in patches.

      I burned out because the corporate world isn't about *passion*, it's about *status* -- and status in the corporate world relates more to the size of your budget and how many people report to you than to your technical skill or how many times you've pulled the company fat out of the fire *this week.* And if you aren't happy putting up with this bullshit, some twit on Slashdot accuses you of having no passion for the trade.

      Yeah, I still have a job. But my last day working it is 10/31, because I'm fed up with it. I've got enough in the bank to comfortably survive for the next year, with a bit of simple living, and by that time I hope to have recovered and have been accepted into a graduate school in a field that has NOTHING to do with IT.

      I have passion for my trade. I just don't have passion for corporate bullshit.

    17. Re:Depressing read. by varjag · · Score: 1

      I burned out because when I tried to work on open-source, there were too many people who insisted that for the project to succeed I had to do X, when what I was more interested in was Y.

      I think it has more to do with social interaction than with IT.

      And if you aren't happy putting up with this bullshit, some twit on Slashdot accuses you of having no passion for the trade.

      If you went to study CS in colledge solely hoping for "easy 60K/year when you graduate", I call it no passion for the trade.

      I (and many of my coworkers) moved to the field years before the dotcom rush. In fact, my relatives and friends suggested that I choose another topic that was hot at that time. We done it our way though, survived, seen the bubble, competed with hordes of cash-hungry wannabees who can't tell TCP from UDP, seen the burst, were doing 55 hours weeks for months, survived again and we'll stay in the field because *we like it*.

      I've got enough in the bank to comfortably survive for the next year, with a bit of simple living, and by that time I hope to have recovered and have been accepted into a graduate school in a field that has NOTHING to do with IT.

      So power to you. Just don't get mad when people call things with their names.

      --
      Lisp is the Tengwar of programming languages.
    18. Re:Depressing read. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I call it no passion for the trade

      Hey man. You're not even in the trade - judging by your website you just fuck around with computers as a hobby.

      Don't diss people who have worked in the field professionally for many years.

    19. Re:Depressing read. by varjag · · Score: 1

      You're not even in the trade - judging by your website you just fuck around with computers as a hobby.

      There's my resume referenced there, smartarse.

      --
      Lisp is the Tengwar of programming languages.
    20. Re:Depressing read. by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Yay, another person who majored in CS because he/she thought it was gonna make them a ton of money.

      Hello, welcome to reality. You slaved for four years on material, probably constantly thinking "WTF does this have to do with programming?" You probably hated a lot of it. Now you're finding out that it makes no difference, because CS isn't about software engineering anyway. CS is an academic pursuit.

      Your problem is you spent your four college years thinking how to maximize your "specific" skillset. You wanted to acquire particular computer-related skills. Was that really wise? We all know how fucking fast the world changes w.r.t. computers. Why on earth would you assume that Java, Perl, SQL, etc. are going to be worth anything at all in the future?

      Instead you might have focused on your general ability to learn, to solve computation-based problems, and to pick up new languages and techniques. You would have expanded your horizon a little bit by learning about the hardware side of things -- some basic physics and circuit theory. These things will make you a valuable person, because you have the general ability to solve problems, not bang out LOCs in some specific language that will be obsolete soon.

      I just keep hearing this horror story from every CS grad I talk to lately (I graduated a year ago). It makes me sad to hear people say that they feel their 4 years were wasted, or they studied something they didn't care about. How can Computer Science still be so misunderstood?

      I wish you luck in this completely shitty economy.

    21. Re:Depressing read. by jgardn · · Score: 1

      Good riddance. I'd hate to work with someone with an attitude as terrible as yours. May you never return to the high-tech industry, and I hope your new life of picking up garbage on the street corners goes well.

      --
      The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.
    22. Re:Depressing read. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      did you just post a non obfuscated email address to slashdot? ouch.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    23. Re:Depressing read. by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      (shrug)
      Yahoo has very good spam filters.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    24. Re:Depressing read. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know what that will get you?

      outsourced?

    25. Re:Depressing read. by cableshaft · · Score: 1

      Actually, I went to a campus-hosted lecture on Globalization of the IT market, and I hear accounting majors are starting to have problems finding jobs as well. They're starting to be outsourced like crazy also. Haven't heard from the finance sector.

      --
      Creator of the popular web game Proximity
  119. What about eating your mom's food? by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

    Now that my tech company has tanked I live with my folks. (weeeeee) Apparently managerial experience, 2 degrees, and a bagillion resumes aren't enough for a web developer in San Francisco.

    Since I'm only 24, and have no savings whatsoever, I'm back at school and living with Ma and Pa. It's awesome. I no longer have sex; I have to check-in if I'm gone for too long; I get told to "be safe" 8 times a day; AND I get to eat my mom's home cooking!

    I'm sure most of you would gladly give up sex and freedom for food...right?

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:What about eating your mom's food? by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      AND I get to eat my mom's home cooking!

      Get her a cook book.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
  120. What I "Learned" from being out of work-Bottom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "2 - that having to sell your house after 8 months of being unemployed, SUCKS, worse than anything you can imagine."

    Bet the person who bought your house wasn't working at McD's. Figure out were they get their money, and your home free.

    "4 - That companies do job postings with no intention of filling them."

    That and the scam artists (what's the difference?).

    "6 - that I can now be lazy at work, and get fired, or bust my ass at work, and get fired."

    Or work 30+ years, being told how good a job you're doing, then come in one morning and find out your job went somewere else.

    "7 - that startng over is as shitty as you think it is."

    Starting were?!

    1. Re:What I "Learned" from being out of work-Bottom by Mr.+McGibby · · Score: 1

      Bet the person who bought your house wasn't working at McD's. Figure out were they get their money, and your home free.

      If they got your home free, then they probably don't have very much money.

      --
      Mad Software: Rantings on Developing So
    2. Re:What I "Learned" from being out of work-Bottom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Where' has an h, retard.

  121. What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by Segakid · · Score: 0

    How many of you want to be homeless? how many of you WANT to live in the ghetto on welfare next to prostitutes and crackhouses? I dont get it.

    1. Re:What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Being unemployed and/or underemployeed is really kind of cool. You really ought to try it for 6 months or so. I don't live in a ghetto, I'm not next to prostitutes or crackhouses. My needs are really pretty modest I've found. If I was trying to raise a family, and if someone with those kinds of responsibilities has lost a job, you have my sympathy. I live with roommates. I drive a 12 year old car. I cook most of my meals. I steal music. Oops. I mean, I infringe copyrights. =) I do occassional low stress jobs to pay the bills. My standard of living has plummeted, but I really don't care. I'm much happier. Let the Indians or the Chinese work their asses off for a change. They need the money more than i do.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by Segakid · · Score: 0

      What are you thinking? How do you survive when rent is so high? a trailor park? The projects?

    3. Re:What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Having a job comes in handy for saving for your retirement you know.

      Kinda pathetic to end up as an old man who has no one to care for him and no way of doing so himself.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    4. Re:What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by pebs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      he said he had roommates. In some cities, rent is cheap even in the nice areas. If you have 2 or 3 roommates, you can find a 3 or 4 bedroom house or apartment that is quite afordable. Owning a house also helps, which would eliminate the need to pay rent (though other expenses would probably make up for this difference).

      --
      #!/
    5. Re:What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by dogdaze · · Score: 1

      Then again, its kind of pathetic to have saved and scraped for your retirement and missed out on so much life along the way. When your nest-egg is eaten up by all the private medical insurance and/or no insurance and astronomical medical bills to keep you going, its kind of a mute effort. All I want at age 65 is a front porch and a rocking chair. Retirement is only for the super-rich - do not kid yourself. I sure want be mountain climbing or kayaking the rapids at retirement age.

    6. Re:What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's any consolation, life span for the male demographic you mentioned is averaged at about 45. Little has changed since the dark ages.

    7. Re:What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didnt happen to work an Innotech before, did you?

    8. Re:What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 0

      "In some cities, rent is cheap even in the nice areas."
      Yeah, it is amazing the difference in cost of living between different areas of the country and how people living in one situation have no clue about how it can be in a very different situation. I got married at the beginning of my 4th year (out of 5) of college, and we lived in 545 square foot 1 bedroom apartment in Toledo Ohio. It was pretty small, but it was only $300 a month rent. We learned what it is to not go out to eat much, to get creative with making meals with what's cheap or on sale at the grocery store. (hmm, noodles with cream of mushroom soup, peas, tuna, and kidney beans?...not bad.) One of the best things we learned during that time is about making a budget and STICKING TO IT! That is always the hardest part.
      When I was looking for a job nearing graduation, I was looking at housing in the silicon valley area because I had gotten an interview there, and I was a bit confused at the rent amounts of apartments out there. "Do they pay rent like quarterly or something? This says $1500! That can't be per month."
      I have now gotten(and kept--praise God) a good-paying job, but I value that time in learning what it takes to live on and what I can do without. I know that if it came down to it, I could do without a car, TV, DVD, cable internet, air conditioning, etc. The only thing my wife and I agreed we would not do without is hot water--cold showers are out of the question.
      I've also had a few crappy, low paying, hard working jobs, and I could tolerate that again if I had to to pay the bills.

      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    9. Re:What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by Peaceful_Patriot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In my last job as a basic computer application instructor at a community college, I saw MANY people who were going back to school at age 50+ to 'learn how to use computers' so they could get a job. That nice nest-egg they thought they could live on disappeared with the stockmarket crash.

      It is truely pathetic to see these people who worked most of thier life, saved, invested, did everything right, looking for some menial position to pay the mortgage.

      Funny, many of these same people will support GWBush & Co. to the end.

      --
      There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
    10. Re:What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by Kintanon · · Score: 1

      Of course, that supposes that one lives in an area where occasional low stress jobs are available.
      I recently moved to DeLand Florida and despite a few dozen "NOW HIRING" signs on various businesses in the area I've been looking for a month and still haven't gotten a job. The last time I went job hunting was 2 years ago and I was employed within a couple of weeks. This time there just don't seem to be any jobs available despite the hiring signs. Oh well.... The disbursement from my 401k should hold me for a few more months. Maybe I'll have something at Target or Walgreens or something by then... But if anyone around is in the area and knows someplaces that actually IS hiring. Let me know!

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    11. Re:What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by majestyk2000 · · Score: 1

      DELAND!! That's your problem right there. I moved from Atlanta to just up the road from Deland and I had to commute to either Jacksonville or Orlando for years before I found even a remotely relevant job close by. Submit to the inevitable and get in the mode of commuting 100 miles a day.

    12. Re:What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right... cause you sure are living the high life... always worrying about where your next rent cheque will come from. And how exactly will you pay for your porch and rocking chair? How will you keep paying for it when you're 65 and don't have any money coming in?

    13. Re:What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by instarx · · Score: 1

      All I want at age 65 is a front porch and a rocking chair. Retirement is only for the super-rich - do not kid yourself. I sure want be mountain climbing or kayaking the rapids at retirement age

      Sorry to inform you, but a front porch and a rocking chair are what you get if you DO save for retirement!

    14. Re:What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by instarx · · Score: 1

      I don't think we can blame the stock market crash on W and his minions, but we CAN blame him for the non-recovery, the lack of universal healthcare, the unwillingness of the administration to help anyone but the rich, the exploitation and destruction of the natural environment, the squandering of our tax dollars on trumped up wars, and the cancellation of our constitutional rights.

      For the hundreds of billions Bush and Company have spent (and will spend) re-building Iraq we could have had a self-sustaining universal healthcare program for every man, woman and child in this country. Now THAT would have helped the unemployed and middle class. Unfortunately for the rest of us, Mr. Bush and Company already have the best of the best in health insurance so do not see the need to spend that money. I can guarantee that Iraq will have universal healthcare for its citizens long before Americans get it. How ironic.

      I agree with you about the strange voting patterns in the country. It makes my head hurt to try and understand why so many blue-collar working people across the country support a political party that is dedicated to giving them less and less. I can understand the rich supporting Bush, but the rank and file!?

      How in the world have the Republicans managed to convince so many people into believing that patriotism means supporting the Republican party and anyone who doesn't agree wth them is not patriotic - or worse, a traitor?

    15. Re:What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by TPFH · · Score: 1

      I'm doing OK myself. I still have lots of savings and am getting unemployment. I'm still buying the occational CD and DVD. It's been a nice summer.

      OTOH I'm getting really sick of daytime TV. I don't have cable, and don't want it. I do eventually want to get a job.

      I need to do more reading and improving my skills.

      --
      This signature used to contain a cute kitty virus with ansii art. Please set the slashdot editors on fire. Thank you
    16. Re:What kinda 'diot would want to be unemployed? by Qacker · · Score: 1

      Good point. They should vote Liberterian.

      --
      Learn lisp today!
  122. Company != family by seichert · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The real benefit of this recession is that more and more people are starting to realize the difference between company and family. Your family members love you and will remain loyal to you in good times and bad. They have a vested interest in your success and happiness. They want to see you succeed at work and enjoy the fruits of your labor. The company you work for does not love you and is not loyal to you. That does not mean that individuals at your company are not compassionate and loving. However, they are not your family members.

    I suggest that you look at your company in a different manner. The company can provide you and your family with opportunity. The opportunity to earn a paycheck and possibly learn something. When the company has no need for the job that you do or can find someone to do it better or cheaper you will not have a job with that company. On the flip side when the company is no longer offering you a good paycheck or opportunity you will quit. The relationship is really no more than that. The company is not a family, clan, or tribe, just an opportunity.

    --

    Stuart Eichert

    1. Re:Company != family by Grimster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, absolutely, I've been trying to drill this into my wife's head for years, where you work is not your family, sure you like(d) working there, sure it's a good place to work, but when the chips are down they'd eat your young if it helped the bottom line.

      She found it out in July, they sold out, no warning, not even a WEEK before they closed up shop they were spouting off on how they had some good contracts coming up, etc etc etc. Less than a week later she's being "laid off" to make matters even more lovely the bastards quit paying their share of the Cobra health insurance so on Sep 1 that went away too! (luckily for us Alabama has a state run group health plan for people losing cobra or other group coverage, and our premiums are only $790 per month, yes sarcasm is implied).

      Now she's telling me how she's not getting emails every day from her friends (surprise remember how you said these people are like your family and they love you? well who's emailed you at all this week?). Not pretty to see a 29 year old woman have to learn such a hard lesson. Hey I learned it 4 years ago myself when I was 26 so I wasn't much better off.

      --
      --- www.f-theocean.com
    2. Re:Company != family by kcbrown · · Score: 1
      The company you work for does not love you and is not loyal to you. That does not mean that individuals at your company are not compassionate and loving. However, they are not your family members.

      I sometimes wonder how successful a company could be as a result of being loyal to its employees. How much loyalty on the part of employees would that generate?

      I would not be surprised in the slightest if such a company, if composed of highly talented people, were more successful than a company that doesn't have such loyalty, given otherwise roughly the same starting conditions. Say what you will about the current economy, but really good people are still rare and still hard to find (if not because such people are already employed, then because you have to sort through a whole bunch of untalented or moderately talented people to find the real gems).

      Perhaps we as a society have lost sight of what can be accomplished by a talented group of people who are loyal to each other. Before you dismiss the value of loyalty to one's comrades, remember that the military tries to maximize this loyalty during training -- they know that loyalty such as that can make the difference in battle. Would it really be so different in business?

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    3. Re:Company != family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be ignorant. The military indoctrinates you into their system so you are loyal to them. Their loyalty consists of viewing you as primarily cannon fodder.

      Also, CS people have to stop whining. Jobs are out there for good people. If you don't have a job either you're a) not looking in the right places or b) not good people :) I know plenty of my friends who are getting jobs out of college and plenty of people who are still unemployed after two years, but I could have told those people two years ago they would be here now.

    4. Re:Company != family by JimFromJersey · · Score: 1

      > Their loyalty consists of viewing you as primarily cannon fodder.

      You've never served. You cannot understand.

      --
      between the greater and lesser infinities sleep the dreams undreamt
  123. Ah pride... by quinkin · · Score: 1
    It comes before the fall I'm told...

    Just wait a few years and humility will be yours for the taking. :)

    You are implying that it is a direct consequence of your own actions that lead to your unemployment. Unfortunately the real world isn't that nice: Companies go bust, Projects are killed, and decisions are made by those least qualified to make them.

    Yes, I was desperate enough to work for less than McDonalds junior wages, programming stock management systems on oracle for a national WAN, purely so I could finish my degree... but that was when I was a single uni student without a responsibility in the world.

    As for shareware, just ask some of the shareware companies out there how they are going...

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
  124. Mods, you suck by zapp · · Score: 1

    This person (FannyMinstrel) was warning the rest of us about a goatse.cx link and got modded Troll.

    The person posting the goatse link got an offtopic.

    --
    no comment
  125. Somehow touching by darth_MALL · · Score: 1, Insightful

    not to sound fruity, but it does give reason for a pause and reflect moment

  126. Shdlsoat smytmpos.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "David Dvorak, a programmer and [..]"

  127. Oh yes - wonderful benefits ! by bushboy · · Score: 1
    Yes, it's great being unemployed !

    Absolutely no money
    Going to the cash machine and finding you don't have any money and need to go into debt.

    The bank manager calls
    After 2 months of going into overdraft, the bank manager calls and wants to meet. The upshot is he wants to terminate your account.

    You have to borrow money from family
    Another wonderful aspect of being unemployed - your savings (if you had any) have run dry, you still can't find a job and you have to stoop to borrowing money.

    Your friends and Friday drinks
    Your friends call and say "come and have a drink with us Friday afternoon", to which you reply "but I don't have any money", to which they reply "don't worry, we'll pay for your drinks"
    So you go and feel really really crappy when you can't buy a round.

    The catch-22
    It's easy to land another job when you already have one.

    If you don't have a job and are applying for a new one, they wan't to know why. The last thing you want to tell them is that you were fired or retrenched.

    I've been there, I've seen it twice in my life and the 'benefits' are far far outweighed by the negatives.

    Even if you've been savvy enough to have decent savings, just think about them being cut into while your unemployed.

    I have to admire the guy for being so optimistic, but it rarely works out that way...

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
  128. I quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I left Microsoft after 8 years as a software engineer. No, I wasn't a Microsoft stock option millionaire (I wish--missed the opportunity by 1 or 2 years), but I left with enough to take some years off. So I consider myself pretty damn lucky.

    Microsoft was a great place to work, but after eight years, it was time for a break. I was getting burned out, and taking problems at work way too seriously. Often I feel guilty about taking a temporary retirement while the economy is in the pits and skilled people are struggling to find work. But I don't plan my life around the economy. The economy can go fuck itself.

    So in my time I am studying computer science subjects I love (and were not things I could work on at MSFT), and working on projects I've put off for years. I hope to return to work (not necessarily at MSFT) in 2 years a better engineer than when I left. I'm thinking this will be a pattern: work for 7-8 years, take a 2 year retirement, and repeat until I can retire permanently.

  129. What I really want to know...Hard decisions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would still recommend dropping it, unless you can get a good deal on it. Use other people's connections. It sucks a bit, but then this whole situation sucks, and hard decisions abound. Food? DSL? Food? DSL?

  130. People know corruption when they see it. by composer777 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is America even "free enterprise"? Are you fucking kidding me? A country where a corrupt government regularly bails out it's richest? And gives billions of dollars to corporations, which immediately pay off corrupt CEO's. A country that doesn't give a shit about educatingg it's youth, because it's too busy gutting social programs and giving that money to Enron, Haliburton, et al. That's "freedom". Freedom means picking on the little guy. Apparently I'm supposed to understand that supporting a corrupt system is "freedom" to you. Call it what you want, I won't support it, and neither will a growing number of Americans. Let's not talk about fantasy land, I'm too busy trying to deal with the real world, I don't know what country you're talking about, but the country I'm living in is corrupt, and has problems that need fixing, and "freedeom" is the last thing that our business leaders are after. If you're too stupid to realize that, then I'm sorry for you.

    1. Re:People know corruption when they see it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because it's too busy gutting social programs

      Bullshit. Show me some real spending cuts anywhere and I'll show you a happy taxpayer. As for education, too much is being wasted already on unionized teachers and a huge public school bureaucracy whose job is to demand more government money. The real answer for improving education is the one the Democrats don't want to hear: privatise.

      The Federal and State governments have gotten drunk off the money they siphoned out of the economy and used it for both corporate and big government pork alike. When the economy goes sour the politicians get all nervous and the voters who live for handouts get hysterical.

      Whatcha gonna do, run out in the streets and throw a brick at the first McDonald's you see? Laughable.

    2. Re:People know corruption when they see it. by pmz · · Score: 1

      A country where a corrupt government regularly bails out it's richest?

      We need to elect new leadership.

      too busy gutting social programs and giving that money to Enron, Haliburton, et al.

      Quitting social programs is good, but the money needs to go back to the people.

      Apparently I'm supposed to understand that supporting a corrupt system is "freedom" to you. Call it what you want, I won't support it, and neither will a growing number of Americans.

      Freedom is generously allowed by the Constitution, but both Democrats and Republicans have trounced those freedoms over the past decades.

      Socialism is not the answer (neither is capitalistic anarchy, so no flames on this).

      Vote for a Libertarian if you care about freedom.

  131. Al Franken said it best by Raul654 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Consider all of the years that Bush I and II were in the White House. For each and every one of those years, you know how many net new jobs were created? None! After each year of them being president, fewer people were employed at the end of the year. Bush recovery my ass.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:Al Franken said it best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      much as I think bush II is a dumb ass and wrong for this country, I don't feel the same for his dad. While he didnt have the charisma of Clinton or Reagan, he at least knew the basics of economics and diplomacy. He didnt piss off the same allies he needed help from, and raised taxes in the face of deficits. THAT is true leadership I think, not the poor mockery we have now

      While Clinton deserves a lot of the credit for the prosperity we experienced, at least some part of it is due to Bush I

    2. Re:Al Franken said it best by Mikey-San · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As a matter of fact, when the Clinton Administration moved into the White House, their audit team discovered that things were far worse than they knew:

      http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/cl in ton/chapters/2.html

      The excerpt:

      Reich: Well, we knew the deficit was large. In fact, years before [Reagan budget chief] David Stockman had referred to '$200 billion-a-year deficits as far as the eye could see." And during the campaign, the president did talk about the importance of reducing the deficit, but it had been of second order priority to investing in education, in job skills, in health care, and a lot of other things that the country needed to do. But, obviously, when the president is on the cusp of actually governing the country, he's got to know how bad that deficit projection really is, how much damage has been done, what he's inherited in terms of an economic mess.

      And so I headed over to the Treasury Department to talk to officials over there, officials in the Bush administration, and try to get the best estimate I possibly could as to how bad the numbers really looked, how bad that deficit was going to be the next year and likely to be in years to come.

      Frontline: And you found out it was going to be worse than you had been told, and on December 7th I think it was, you go to tell the president the news. What's his reaction?

      Reich: The president was not happy when he heard that the projected deficit was much larger than we had assumed, larger than we had been told, larger than the Bush administration had told the public. He knew that it meant that we couldn't do everything that he wanted to do, everything that he had promised the public. Now, he was both upset, but he was also -- I remember this very vividly, and I was surprised at the time because he was also kind of excited. He said, "Gee, that's a great challenge. We're going to really, really have to work on that." And I remember sitting there thinking, "Now, wait a minute. This is going to set a lot of our plans back. Certainly this is going to put a major crimp in all of this public investment.

      --
      Mikey-San
      Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
    3. Re:Al Franken said it best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clinton knew in advance of being elected what the real defecit was. Pretending not to know gave him cover to pass the huge tax increase instead of the tax cut that the so-called "New Democrat" campaigned for. The public didn't buy it and showed their displeasure at being lied to by killing his party's majority in congress. It doesn't surprise me that PBS still believes Clinton. I remember waiting in November '94 for NPR announcers to mention that Democrats had lost control of the House. Not a peep out of them until it had become blindingly obvious. Revealing Republican momentum early would not have helped the party PBS/NPR consistently shills for.

      As for Reich, he's still a complete idiot. Even after Clinton dropped him like a turd, he still manages to find work doing interviews on PBS/NPR financial shows and writing books that no one reads anymore. I seem to recall him trying to run for office at one point, but we all know how that turned out.

    4. Re:Al Franken said it best by meta-monkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      And I remember sitting there thinking, "Now, wait a minute. This is going to set a lot of our plans back. Certainly this is going to put a major crimp in all of this public investment."

      Oh man, that's wonderful. "Public investment." So maybe that's where it started. Have you noticed that these days, all spending is an "investment?" We're not pouring money into failing schools! We're investing in our children! No, no, they're not farm subsidies, we're investing in middle America!

      Well, that said, I'm going to go invest in a Coke, and maybe on the way home tonight I'll stop by the video store and invest in some porn.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    5. Re:Al Franken said it best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no bush fan, but Al Franken isn't (a) funny or (b) insightful.

      His core audience seems to be f*cktards who thinks the world works "wrong".

    6. Re:Al Franken said it best by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 1

      Would you like to show the numbers on this? I'm sure I could take a couple of minutes and prove your statements completely incorrect, but I'd rather you spend the time correcting yourself for once...

    7. Re:Al Franken said it best by salesgeek · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, when the Clinton Administration moved into the White House, their audit team discovered that things were far worse than they knew

      Fortunately, after two years of Clinton cluelessness, the people elected a Republican congress that had a clue.

      Things were going VERY BADLY years one and two for Clinton. The voters bailed him out by poviding a legislative ballance to him.

      --
      -- $G
    8. Re:Al Franken said it best by Politburo · · Score: 1

      As for Reich, he's still a complete idiot. Even after Clinton dropped him like a turd, he still manages to find work doing interviews on PBS/NPR financial shows and writing books that no one reads anymore. I seem to recall him trying to run for office at one point, but we all know how that turned out.

      1. Reich left the post (according to his book).

      2. He now is a professor at Brandeis University, in addition to speaking, writing and doing sporadic TV interviews.

      3. Keep believing the party line.

    9. Re:Al Franken said it best by pmz · · Score: 1

      Consider all of the years that Bush I and II were in the White House. For each and every one of those years, you know how many net new jobs were created? None! After each year of them being president, fewer people were employed at the end of the year. Bush recovery my ass.

      I think we need to stop the pissing matches regarding past presidents and vote out the top two parties, period. Only that will begin to purge our nation of the bi-partisan political corruption we are seing. Bush, Clinton, Gore, whatever. They are pawns in all this, anyway.

    10. Re:Al Franken said it best by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, things were going so bad that Clinton and a Democratic Congress spent than the previous year for each of those two years. Something the Reagan and Bush administrations failed to do even one out of twelve years. Yeah, that's pretty bad (by Bush standards).

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  132. Plasma by TheDarkRogue · · Score: 1

    The Plasma that use to be in my blood and the $30 sitting in my pocket and the hole in my arm speak otherwise in the area of BENIFITS of being out of work.

    --
    (Score:0, Interesting)
    1. Re:Plasma by twentycavities · · Score: 1

      The waiting sucks, but you've gotta admit there are some pretty sweet perks to plasma "donation."

      * You get to see movies and TV shows you'd normally never watch, e.g. Fast and the Furious, Tomb Raider, Law & Order.

      * Attractive female staff members press up against your arm sometimes (so what if I'm pathetic).

      * (Not flamebait!) Experience diversity. Seriously. That's pretty much the only close contact I have with black people, and it helps me think of them as something other than a hostile political group.

      * Learn about hydration [the hard way]. I was dehydrated for like two years and didn't even know it 'til I started selling plasma.

      * Lastly, the sense of community. There's something nice about being in a room of people just as broke as me.

      --
      Monstromart: Where shopping is a baffling ordeal
    2. Re:Plasma by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Broke? Last time I donated plasma there were several buisness men in their suit in the waiting room, mentioning they did this twice a week because it is a good break from the stress of life and it helps people. They don't need the money, they need time when they can't be interupted.

      I have a real job now, and I wish there was a place near by, I'd be a regular just for the time to relax in the middle of the day and the feeling that I'm helping someone who needs it. (I'd donate blood, but I faint every time, giving plasma didn't bother me, but blood did - thats just me though.

    3. Re:Plasma by twentycavities · · Score: 1

      Broke? Last time I donated plasma there were several buisness men in their suit in the waiting room

      You obviously don't go to the place I go. By "several," do you mean about 1 percent of the otherwise obviously-broke donor population?

      mentioning they did this twice a week because it is a good break from the stress of life and it helps people. They don't need the money, they need time when they can't be interupted.

      I find this hard to believe. Per chance, did these "businessmen" in "suits" ask you for spare change soon after? Maybe your place is different, but where I go it can easily take three hours (not counting the driving there and back), and most of that time is spent sitting in a lousy waiting room. I can't imagine anyone with a full-time job, friends, maybe a wife, maybe kids choosing that over any other activity. Not to mention, that unlike other people-helping activities it doesn't require selflessness. If you don't do it, somebody who needs the $20 will. (Not saying you're lying...but I'd have to see it to believe it.)

      --
      Monstromart: Where shopping is a baffling ordeal
    4. re: plasma by bluGill · · Score: 1

      3 hours was about right. I got the impression that their job allowed this as a perk. Some local buisness do try to help community you know. They appear to work across the street, so it is just a matter of finding time when you are not in a meeting or otherwise occupied and doing it.

      Though honestly, I only know what it looked like: a couple guys in suits, and the one mentioned that he did this rather often and implyed it was within walking distance of work. They gave no impression that it was for money, and may have been one of the group that when they got their check signed it over to charity right there. (I'm not sure how it work cause I was in school and needed the money, but I know they made it easy to give your check to charity)

  133. Re:For perks of being unemployed without the guilt by goodbye_kitty · · Score: 1

    Heavens no, what would a liberal arts major being reading slashdot for anyway??

  134. Don't fix it by composer777 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    just stand by and let others get crushed.

    Don't point out the problems you say, just let the rich eat the poor. The economy is bad, and your solution is to ignore the corruption. Don't compalin, just keep your chin up. Great idea. Yes, you're real "optimist".

    Yes, go back to school you say. Never mind if you're still busy paying back your loans for the first time around, and you're still trying to catch up on earning money. Simply spend more. That's just great. That's exactly what America needs, is a middle class that's in even more debt, that is ever more willing and subservient to employers that don't wannt to drop a dime on education. My response to employers is "Fuck 'em." Let 'em rot, burn and implode. Why should I spend the rest of my life worrying about what their needs are? I've got a bright future without them.

  135. Re:For perks of being unemployed without the guilt by linzeal · · Score: 1

    I know scientists on rhizome, I think the net is pretty sophisticated when it comes to diversity.

  136. Time to own up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who said the Slashdot editors weren't smart ?

    Oh, that was me. Yeah, my bad, sorry.

  137. He's a little too pro-Bush for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Interesting article. But he's a little too positive about U.S. President George W. Bush. (As in, not negative enough.)

    Another subject: Why does G.W.B always have a puzzled look on his face? Because he's puzzled.

  138. living in a dream! by abolith · · Score: 1, Interesting
    "your company will reciprocate by making sacrifices in bad times to take care of you by not depriving you of your paycheck and benefits"


    HA! ya right, and the moon is made of green cheese. the only loyalty I feel for the company I work for is when they are paying me, and that varies upon the ammount they are paying me. More money = More loyalty. at least until 5:30pm then all loyalty stops and they can shove off cause I'm on my own time from then on.

    --
    if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
  139. Abbreviated version by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    "The Surprising Benefits of Being Unemployed"

    How hard is it to condense this story down to "Surprise! You have lots of time on your hands!" I know-- Slashdot's next story should be on "The surprise disappointments of being unemployed!" since we're on the Captain Obvious kick...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  140. Bye bye telemarketers by NoWhereMan · · Score: 1
    When I tell them I'm unemployed, they hang up or back away quickly, terrified of infection by the job-loss virus.

    He hit the nail on the head there. Even though the Do Not Call list is being tied up in the courts, I am regularly answering the phone again. I used to screen all calls through the answering machine, but I find it enjoyable to tell them I am unemployed. They used to call and waste my time, but it seems like they are inflicting it on themselves now.

    We both talked for years about trying to lose some weight. As you will have guessed from the preceding paragraph, we're finally doing it.

    Wish I had this benefit too! I have been riding the bicycle to most of the classes I am taking with this newfound time. I did lose a few pounds the first semester, but the extra weight I gained last holiday season is still with me.

  141. Dvorkin is alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incredible. He was completely crazy and I thought Oberon has killed him, but it seems he's quite okay if he writes books. Just take care when looking at pics in his books, you may end up in strange places...

  142. What surplus? by Simple-Simmian · · Score: 0

    What surplus? You mean the money that is owed to Social Security and other prepaid "investments" that the goverment has borrowed it hasn't paid back? The debt never gets included in the "surplus." There hasn't been a surplus since LBJ period. Get over it all politicians are whores.

    --
    If you don't like what I write don't be a CS and mod it down. Refute it.
    Yea I can't spell. So what is your point?
  143. Keep dream'in by Colonel+Panic · · Score: 3, Informative

    I suspect that, a year from now, people will be talking about the "Bush recovery," and whoever emerges from the Democratic primary is going to be scrambling for issues to run on.

    For the last two years I've been telling myself that things would be better by this time next year. Now I really doubt it. With the Gartner Group saying that over the next 18 months 10% of the remaining IT jobs are heading overseas I really don't think it'll be any better next year at this time. With consumer confidence back down where it was just before the war started because so many people are afraid they'll lose their job, I really doubt things'll be much better next year. With us spending hundreds of Billions of dollars to rebuild Iraq, I really doubt it. But maybe I'll be wrong again this year?

    Nah, I doubt it. Bye, bye Bushie, looks like it'll be a democrat next time.

    1. Re:Keep dream'in by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

      well that's what they're saying on eetimes.com - that recovery is here and it'll be more noticable by the 2nd quarter next year. but whatever, those guys are always way optimistic about these things and writing such articles just to make us feel better.

    2. Re:Keep dream'in by Colonel+Panic · · Score: 1

      well that's what they're saying on eetimes.com

      I got that Gartner statistic from EETimes.
      In an article entitled Outsourcing Causes Jitters: Is my job next?

      To quote the article:
      Gartner Inc. (Stamford, Conn.), a market analyst firm, projects that 10 percent of the information technology positions will be displaced in the next 18 months as jobs go overseas.

      That's a stunning figure. It's worse than we thought. I thought it was something like 10% over the next five years.

    3. Re:Keep dream'in by sewagemaster · · Score: 1


      oh right, that article too. the "recovery by Q2 next year" is in mp3. Looks like they just posted another mp3 few hours ago.

      http://img.cmpnet.com/eet/news/03/september/tj_r od gers_interview.mp3

      i'm one of the grads of B.Eng in yr 2001. thank goodness i did an 8-month internship in 2000 right in the peek. things started to tumble down, but us coops knew the company couldnt lay us off because we were interns and our contract was almost over. so it was bizzare seeing everyone leaving while knowing your job is perfectly safe - at the same time worry about finding one - because i graduated a year after that.

      i did some master courses last year to test the waters - now i'm doing it. still having my parents helping me out financially. probably will be done within 1.5 years. what am i going to do next. i'm screwed. but come to think of it, if i can continue with a PhD - get government bursaries, TA for a course, and do some part time sys admin job, the I think i'll be able to eat and pay my rent.

      maybe...

    4. Re:Keep dream'in by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Economic recovery != job recovery. If the IT industry can rake in American money selling foreign-made programs to foreign buyers, the american economy does well, American citizens (except those remaining in said IT companies) don't see dick all of it.

    5. Re:Keep dream'in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two years?! What in the hell have you been doing with yourself? Can't find any work? What are you good for, then? What's the problem, not enough employers looking for people with two months experience with Dreamweaver?

  144. Heh...that's a positive outlook on life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my case I wasn't so positive.

    After I dropped out of school, I kinda became depressed and did nothing but stay home on the computer for 3 years without talking to any of my old friends ever again.

    It was a colossal waste of time, because not only did the months pass like days without anything productive being done, but now that I'm back in school, I'm 3 years older than my classmates and it feels embarassing. The guys and girls always have that "WTF?" expression on their face when they find out my age.

  145. Re: what is FP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you must be joking, but JIC: FP = First Post ... :\

  146. Back to the roots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was unemployed when I was born and I'll be unemployed when I'll die.

  147. There's a few more benefits... by JackJudge · · Score: 1

    ...if you have the moral latitude to embrace them.
    During the early 90's I acquired, thru no fault of my own, a bad credit history. I wasn't in debt and never had been, but despite seeing my wages increase more than six fold over the next decade I couldn't even get a standard credit card, let alone anything more ambitious.
    So when I was forced to move I closed all my accounts and "forgot" to leave a forwarding address.
    Now I'm unemployed and living in a small rented flat my credit history has been left behind. Accounts and plastic once denied me are now mine for the asking.
    Then there's the black economy, a little buying and selling turns a nice profit. A card in the supermarket bulletin board gets me casual work repairing PCs, tuition, Internet advice and even some web design.
    My DSL connection along with my provider's free web space is enough to run a website that also generates income.
    Every penny earned is a penny in my pocket. I don't feel guilty about not paying tax, if The Man doesn't want me at his party then I'm not gonna pay to try and get in. I've paid enough over the years.
    The best bit though is that I've fallen off the radar as far as Big Brother is concerned. I still get unemployment even though I've conveniently forgotten my National Insurance number. I feel like I've been reborn sometimes.
    I'm 36 with little formal education so my days in the mainstream IT industry are almost certainly over. But I'm not a wage slave anymore. No more crushing onto packed and overheated Tube trains, no more games of pedestrian roulette with London's drivers and couriers. No more rushed lunches (my ulcer hasn't kicked in for over a year!), no more general crap of inner-city life. No more stress. I used to say "I work to live, not the other way around" an attitude that didn't sit well with most managers, but since being unemployed I've found I've actually acquired a life. It's much simpler than the old one, not as fancy, but much more enjoyable.

  148. You have to laugh, don't you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The most annoying thing about being unemployed is that I still can't visit all those places that I wanted to visit but didn't have the time because now that I've got the time I haven't got the money.

    On the positive side I've done the other things that people have suggested ...

    I've got involved : restructured the local borough's service delivery and IT structures..

    I'm setting up a (hopefully) useful website www.opencouncil.org to promote open source in local government and, in particular, assist in the process of persuading the decision makers, not the techies, of the merits of open source.

    I'm creating an open source product ... one for creating "Rich Internet Applications" and front-ending web-services.

    I keep trying to write that book ... over 20 years of journalism only helping a little...

    And I'm keeping myself up-to-date with new technologies.

    Actually I was able to do more when I was employed and busy. Having so much time makes it so difficult to concentrate on individual projects.

    Staying up all night does let me discover old programs on cable (2hrs of Dr Who most nights) and catch up on the episodes that I missed decades ago..

    The availability of instant messaging and email to keep in contact with old friends would take up all my time if I let it..

    The bad bits : I am annoyed that my 35 years IT experience is considered a problem - "we have a young team". That being able to understand business systems and problem solving doesn't count if you experience only covers up to version 3.475 of some software that has just released version 3.476.

    Seeing job ads that want people in "mid-career" and define that as 2 to 3 years experience. Being unable to apply for lesser jobs because they'll think I'll leave.

    And then recently watching a TV ad campaign conning people into spending their money on computer training that will guarantee them high earnings "even if they have no experience".. You have to laugh don't you ??

    Paul
    -------------------
    www.opencouncil.org
    -------------------

  149. A good read on the subject of saving money by DownTheLongRoad · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Read "Suriviving without a salary" by Charles Long. Make sure to check it out from the library instead of buying it(as mentioned in the book itself). Charles Long is the true penny pinching non-salaried person. Some of his ideas can be far out such as when he comments on how he started to shower in the rain(that is until he almost got hit by lightning).

    It's a good guide for learning how to end the daily consumer culture grind.

  150. pitter-patter, pitter-patter, splat, pitter-patter by jxliv7 · · Score: 1
    this article is by a writer of some repute?

    i don't want to rain on the long unemployment parade, but this article is really not a class act.

    it's unorganized and it's mostly irrelavant. it's trying to sing the blues, but it doesn't have any soul.

    worse, i find this "blog" only slightly applicable to the real world of job searching -- the worry like ohmigod, rewrite my resume over and over, work on cover letters, fax/email resume after resume, the anxiety over qualifying for unemployment and then making the checks cover my bills, read the want ads, try to dress up appropriately and prep for an interview, sign up for every internet job site, trying not to get depressed over not getting any responses, call ANY friends on my personal network, make cold calls out of the yellow pages to get job leads, stop eating out to save money, wonder who in the family you can hit up for money, and feeling guilty that you can't do more to get employed.

  151. Blame Game by Barkmullz · · Score: 1


    "But perhaps the greatest benefit of being unemployed is this. I now feel absolutely free to despise George W. Bush"

    I found your article funny. However, the last paragraph indicates that you are a complete kneebiter.

    Wowbagger

    --
    Ronald said nothing. He flung himself from the room, flung himself upon his horse, and rode madly off in all directions.
  152. study some history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can fucking have a godamned recession for 300 years with that kind of fucked up thinking.

    I say let the robots flip the burgers... humans are for software and hardware engineering. Maybe keep some human surgeons, but the reset of you, fuck you, and in your case, HOW many toilets have you cleaned for a living... who paid for you to go to school --- did you go yet? quit whining about people whining.

  153. No surprise here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the jobs are being shipped to India, so US engineers will have lots of opportunities to fine-tune 'benefits of being unemployed' list.

  154. but it has helped. by pyrrho · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It got the weekend, the forty hour week. (Unless your exempt). It got rid of Monarchy (unless you're british etc.) It got national health care (well, if you are british). Blaming stuff on other people has helped in a lot of cases.

    He said that dedication to a company deserves reciprocal dedication from a company. Is there a problem with that in particular?

    --

    -pyrrho

    1. Re:but it has helped. by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      I also thought blaming other people was the American national hobby, via the medium of litigation.

      You go and kill someone? Blame a computer game, or music, or TV. In short anyone but yourself.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    2. Re:but it has helped. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Blaming stuff on other people has helped in a lot of cases.

      It also got us the holocaust, so it's kind of a mixed bag.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  155. Not that I expect this to be seen, but... by geekwench · · Score: 1
    ...it seems to me that anyone who works in the glass house of the tech market right now shouldn't be tossing around high-velocity stones.
    The overall job market in Denver sucks rocks through a straw right now. I can say this with authority, because I live there. I've seen people in all sectors of the market sweating blood to keep their jobs, and looking for months on end when they get laid off. Other parts of the country may be recovering, but Denver is historically one of the last places to feel an economic downturn, and one of the very last to come back from one.

    Yes, Mr. Dvorkin is being extremely tongue-in-cheek in his essay. Sometimes, black humor is the only way to keep from ripping your hair out in handfulls. (And, to those helpful souls who have griped about Mr. Dvorkin's writing style, I cheerfully direct you to Messrs. Strunk and White, to learn the difference between "formal" and "informal".) David Dvorkin has both my support and my sympathies.

    To all of his vocal detractors, I hope that you're never in the position of trying to figure out how that unemployment check is going to cover your mortgage, and still allow you to eat.

    --
    Doing my level best to piss off the religious right wing...
    1. Re:Not that I expect this to be seen, but... by Valafar · · Score: 1

      I live in Denver as well and I can say with relative authority that the reason so many "techies" are having trouble finding jobs is because their resumes are terrible. I currently run the development department for a financial company and we're building out significantly ( 8 development positions currently open). I have received over 100 resumes in the last month and have done a grand total of 6 interviews, because the resumes SUCK. Blatant lying ("I have 3 years of Visual C# 3.0 Experience") to 50 jobs in 6 months. It's no surprise to me at all that these people can't find jobs. Even if they manage to get an interview, their interview skills are just atrocious.

      I'm glad the tech market is depressed. We're weeding out the people who think a couple of years experience with ASP and HTML make them "senior level developers".

      Ultimately it's about networking. Work hard, learn everything you can (and stay humble) and keep in touch with everyone you have worked with in the last 5 years. Finding a job isn't about posting a resume to Monster or DICE and then waiting for the calls to come it. It's about pounding the pavement, being creative and learning how to do simple things like writing a good resume and presenting yourself well during an interview.

  156. You do understand.. by composer777 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That people are unemployed because there AREN'T ANY FUCKING JOBS TO BE FILLED, DON'T YOU? If there is a 7% unemployment, which is an understatment, it's really above 10%, then that means, that no matter how hard those people try, they are SOL. There just aren't jobs for that 10%, period. They can throw there shoulders back all they want, they can quack like a fucking duck for that matter, it's not going to make a bunch of jobs appear, stupid. According to your logic, all America has to do is throw it's shoulders back, and corporations are going to pull out of India, move back ashore, the government is going to clean up it's corruption, start investing in education, and everyone will be happy again.

    I'm supposed to believe that your way of "not taking it for granted", is to promote an ideology that trivializes the plight of that 10+% that doesn't have a job? In other words, those poor people whose plight you are using, ironically, to trivialize their plight. You have to be the stupidest, most superstitious fool that I've met in a long time. Just because you worked in a children's hosptial and a job magically appeared doesn't mean that the same magic trick is going to work for everyone else. I know people that have been out of work for YEARS. I bet if you hopped on one leg and got a job the next day, you would be telling people to do that too.

    1. Re:You do understand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent post!

      Perhaps one day, the reality of globalization, outsourcing and the 'race for the bottom' will finally hit home.

    2. Re:You do understand.. by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      There are jobs out there. This guy just doesn't want to do any of them. Open up the paper. Look in the classified section. See the pages and pages of jobs open? There's got to be SOMETHING there he can do. Just that there are lots of things there he WON'T do.

      This guy claims to have all kinds of computer skills. GREAT! You don't have to work for a computer company to put those to use. Print out some fliers and stick them up around town "Computer busted? Need a network? Call UnemployedComputerGuy today!" The guy should get off his ass and DO SOMETHING to get employed, rather than just post a rant on his website and wait for the magic job fairy to come around and grant his every wish.

      Oh, and yes, I have worked for a big corporation, yes, I've been unemployed before, and yes, I've started my own business.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    3. Re:You do understand.. by pmz · · Score: 1

      That people are unemployed because there AREN'T ANY FUCKING JOBS TO BE FILLED, DON'T YOU?

      1) end the minimum wage
      2) end the federal income tax

      boom

    4. Re:You do understand.. by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that'll do it!

      1) All the shit jobs now get paid even less, despite the right wing's claims that the market forces would stabilize on a just wage. Turns out the market is just out to make money for themselves (gasp!). Maybe a few more job openings, but not at a desirable wage to a former tech worker.

      2) Federal funding is severely curtailed, and the states, who since the introduction of the income tax have come to live off of federal assistance, clamor to find new means of income (very similar to what has already occured with Bush's tax cut).

      Jobs?

    5. Re:You do understand.. by pmz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that'll do it!

      Just not overnight. Write back in thirty years.

      In the meantime, all the polticians will get bored with their prized tax-toy taken away from them.

      1) All the shit jobs now get paid even less, despite the right wing's claims that the market forces would stabilize on a just wage. Turns out the market is just out to make money for themselves (gasp!).

      Employees are fully a part of that market (funny, that). The main responsibility of the government is to enforce every person's will to work rights.

      2) Federal funding is severely curtailed, and the states, who since the introduction of the income tax have come to live off of federal assistance, clamor to find new means of income (very similar to what has already occured with Bush's tax cut).

      They are like a 950 lb. man trying to get off of the couch for the first time in years. Covered in his own feces, it'll take a while to get cleaned up and back into shape.

      Knee-jerk policies extending federal benefits here and there and providing subsidies to states only does long-term harm by preserving an unhealthy status quo.

    6. Re:You do understand.. by Politburo · · Score: 1

      The federal government does not provide subsidies to states. They assist states by funding large-scale projects which generally benefit more than just the state in question. The biggest example of this is transportation funding.

      Things cost money. Government costs money. In our current lifestyle (and perhaps in the whole modern world), there's no way out of it.

    7. Re:You do understand.. by pmz · · Score: 1

      The federal government does not provide subsidies to states.

      Then explain all the grants regarding public schooling and housing subsidies, for example.

      The biggest example of this is transportation funding.

      The interstate highway system has military significance for national defense (a post-WWII strategy). Aside from that, most public transportation systems are failing (city busses, Amtrack, etc.).

    8. Re:You do understand.. by Politburo · · Score: 1

      I should have been more clear. We are fighting a battle of definitions. I do not really call them subsidies because the federal government provides targetted funds to states. These funds frequently have a specific purpose and cannot be spent as the state sees fit.

      Public Transportation systems (in properly planned areas) are failing for one reason and only one reason: lack of funding. (The other 80% of the Public Transit battle is planning. Without proper land use, transit will never work.)

      The interstate highway system's benefit is clearly commercial and not military. This may not have been realized when it was first built, but this is most certainly the case today (part of this has to do with increased reliance on the auto since the 1950s (or was that because the interstate highway system was around? heh) and decreased use of trains for both passengers and freight).

    9. Re:You do understand.. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Just not overnight. Write back in thirty years.

      Wait. You want us to wait 30 years for the economy to shake itself back together after reopening the doors to 10c/hour wages when we have people today who can't get by with multiple jobs at $6-7/hour? I mean, we can't even wait 2-3 years before people start despairing like this. You advocate both dropping the bottom out on the working poor while cutting all the funding that pays for our welfare programs, our health and social security programs, as well as all the other important law and safety enforcement programs in the federal government. This will drive straight into the streets all the people who work as janitors, stock boys, fruit pickers, and in other essential yet invisible roles that form the underlying machinery of the economy.

      You're advocating pure financial and social chaos! Are you sure you're not a Marxist? After all, this is the ideal recipe for a revolution of the Proletariat.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    10. Re:You do understand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly how many of the ~10 million unemployed people out there do you think could do this before the market for it became saturated?

    11. Re:You do understand.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You left out the last step

      3) Serious/Severe crack down on illegal immigration. Mow your own damn lawn or pay the kid down the street what he wants, and don't expect to pay some illegal immigrant $2 an hour to do it.

    12. Re:You do understand.. by pmz · · Score: 1

      You advocate both dropping the bottom out on the working poor while cutting all the funding that pays for our welfare programs, our health and social security programs, as well as all the other important law and safety enforcement programs in the federal government.

      No I don't. The only way to get rid of the minimum wage successfully is to do so gradually. Over thirty years or more. I wasn't clear about this earlier. For every week's worth of damage done by the Dems and the Repubs it'll take a decade to fix it.

    13. Re:You do understand.. by AVee · · Score: 1

      because there AREN'T ANY FUCKING JOBS TO BE FILLED, DON'T YOU?

      Well, how about stopping people that do half a job but get paid for about 5000 jobs and how about stopping people from doing 1.5 job when they get paid for just one? Wouldn't that solve the problem?

    14. Re:You do understand.. by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "I know people that have been out of work for YEARS."

      Do they still live indoors? Drive cars? Maintain custody of their children? Eat one or more meals a day? How?

      I can't say I'd be saying yes to any of those questions SIX MONTHS after being unemployed. I'm asking, because I'd really like to know. Sort-of as a clue to making a survival plan if it happens.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  157. The contract route can work by benwaggoner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After I got laid off 2.5 years ago, I decided to go the contract route, and it has been pretty good. The key is to have existing clients, and unique skill sets. I was the lead consultant for my former company, but a lot of the potential customers for that kind of service had competing products. So once I was on my own, a lot of my initial clients made products that competed with my former employer's stuff. My billable hours actually went UP.

    Glad I never signed that non-compete!

    Anyway, it's important to note that the business didn't really take off until I decided it really was a business, not just what I was doing until I found another job. Once I decided this is what I wanted to be doing for the next ten years, I was motivated to go out, take out some loans, spend the capital to get some marketing, and that kind of thing. The average service business like this isn't really profitable for the first two years. If you accept that and plan accordingly, that's not a big problem.

    The mistake I've seen others make is to blow their whole nest egg early in the process, not leaving enough to live on as things start to get rolling. What a business is evolves a lot depending on what clients you actually land, so you need to keep enough money in reserve to be able to keep adjust the plan mid-stream.

  158. "Quit whining and update your skills!" by Colonel+Panic · · Score: 1

    OK, it got your attention. Lots of people use that reply on threads like this - they just haven't lost their jobs yet.

    Looking at this guy's resume really shows that 'updating your skills' isn't going to help much given the economic pressures (including outsourcing) we're under right now. We're witnessing an epic shift of knowledge, power and money away from the US and to various well-positioned third-world countries (primarily India and China right now). Perhaps this shift was inevitable, but it also looks like the current adiministration is trying to accelerate it. Perhaps different policies could have at least slowed it down so it would cause less hardship and destruction of the middle class, but again, the current administration doesn't really care as they sit in their finely appointed digs and lecture us on how outsourcing saves money and is in the longrun benefits the economy (while you're waiting for the benefits, there are still spaces under the freeway overpass and you can pick up a big cardboard box out behind the appliance store).

    If you're 'updating your skills' in hope that doing so will get you a job in the near future then you're engagine in futility similar to trying to swim against a tidal wave... Unless you're 'updating your skills' in a different direction, like becoming a mortician - with the aging of the babyboomers that's probably one of the few industries that will grow over the next couple of decades (and it's tough to outsource).

    1. Re:"Quit whining and update your skills!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking at this guy's resume really shows that 'updating your skills' isn't going to help much given the economic pressures (including outsourcing) we're under right now.

      Wow. What a profound opinion. Especially considering that when we try and fill a position as simple as a Perl CGI programmer, we have to wade through 50 to 100 applicants to find even *one* semi-qualified individual. Really. We've even made people start taking a quiz before we'll even look at their resumes.

      Of course, a lot of this depends on where you live. Where I'm at, I hear nothing but constant whining about how there aren't any jobs out there in the IT sector. But all of those people that do the whining are the same ones that really don't know jack, don't have any really useful skills, and are at best a paper-MCSE.

      steve

    2. Re:"Quit whining and update your skills!" by mankey+wanker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, we won't be alone for long:

      http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/invest/extra /P 62115.asp?Printer

      Management, legal, sales, and even regular office staffers will be joining our ranks soon!

      What I think is funny is how Management people in particular have seen themselves as invulnerable as they happily gobbled up bonus after bonus for doing the layoff dirty work of the even higher-up than themselves. The thing is, when there's nobody left to manage they too are out the door. Surely, they saw this coming?

      I had lunch with my girlfriend's dad the other week where he was in full silverback glory:

      "I don't know anything about computers," he said, looking squarely down his nose at me, "I just run the IT department for the whole corporation."

      Maybe not for much longer, y'old fart!

    3. Re:"Quit whining and update your skills!" by awfar · · Score: 1


      You advertise a job as a Perl CGI programmer? What exactly is that? What is the career path for that job in your organization? You get what you ask for.

      You said it yourself; "as simple as a Perl CGI Programmer"

    4. Re:"Quit whining and update your skills!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said!

      It seems we are just a bunch of 'skills' to an employer rather than being a talented, knowledgable and adaptive individual.

      If a guy is a good developer, then he will be successful whether he's using Perl, Python, C++, VB, Java or whatever - and he will pick up other languages and technologies quickly.

      But oh no! You must have N years experience just knocking out CGI scripts in Perl. Brilliant!

    5. Re:"Quit whining and update your skills!" by BigGerman · · Score: 1
      Indeed. With all those fat cats in the White House...

      Now if I got your attention, lets take care of this crap.
      What outsourcing has to do with this particular guy's employment problems? Businesses _naturally_ will pick the route of the less expense. Outsourcing of low level programming jobs is a natural thing, like gravity or sunlight.

      Updating of your skills IS going to help and this guy's resume is not a good example. He had development jobs in 60s, 70s and 80s. I would expect to see a senior position and a hands-on management position later on on his resume. Instead, it is CGI crap and web development. It is this guy's fault and Evil Republicans have nothing to do with it.
      Ever heard of survival of the fittest? To be fit as a developer today, you need to be sharper than others, learn the new things all the time (open source is good way to do it but even better, start your own company and try to roll a product out. You will fail but the experience is priceless). If you are Java guy (not like Dvorkin, the real hard core EJB and OOP guy), look at dot NET, see what they got right. If you are a Oracle DBA, learn Postgres because your 120K a year days may be numbered. The point is - ADJUST, control the situation and when the outsourcing comes you will end up directing and managing them Indians instead of flipping burgers and complaining about social security.

    6. Re:"Quit whining and update your skills!" by mankey+wanker · · Score: 1

      The point is - ADJUST, control the situation and when the outsourcing comes you will end up directing and managing them Indians instead of flipping burgers and complaining about social security.

      Uh, only if I want to live in India also most likely. But by then, as it is already happening to India in fact, somewhere cheaper still will come along.

      I have this funny feeling they can just hire some Indian managers cheap in the meanwhile.

  159. Well duh! by Daetrin · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The _only_ disadvantage to being unemployed is that you don't have any money. (At least if you're like most of us and aren't independently wealthy)

    If you're unemployed you don't have any money, if you're employed you don't have any time.

    If you're retired, you have (some) money and time, but you're old. If you're young and independently wealthy, you suck and i hate you :)

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  160. Showering in the dark?! by alien_blueprint · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How much it really cost to keep a light on while you have a shower?

    The obsession people have with not leaving lights on even for a few minutes has always bothered me, because it's really the last thing you should be concerned about. I'll have to look at my electricity bill when I get home and work it out ... I did do this exercise once to defeat an annoying co-habitant, but I can't remember the exact result. It really was not worth talking about, even for (at the time) starving students :) 20 cents to run a light for 24 hours, or something like that. I remember giving her one dollar, and requesting that she therefore never bug me about lights again, as those few minutes I leave lights on are now covered for at least a year.

    And then there are flourescent lights. In that case, they are cheaper to run, *but* it takes a lot of electricity to start them up. The equivalent of about 30 minutes worth of running time IIRC. This means that if you walk into and out of a room switching the damned flourescent light on and off, you are actually costing much more money then just leaving it on! And yes, the ex-roommate kept switching the flourescent kitchen light off, and then back on again, every ten minutes.

    1. Re:Showering in the dark?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then there are flourescent lights. In that case, they are cheaper to run, *but* it takes a lot of electricity to start them up. The equivalent of about 30 minutes worth of running time IIRC

      Wow, are you easily suckered.

      You're keen on doing some electrical calculations, so let's do some more. An average fluorescent fixture with two lamps draws about 0.75 to 1 amp, depending on the losses in the ballast. Let's assume 0.75 amps. We'll take the startup time of a fixture to be about a second.

      So, to draw 30 minutes' worth of power in one second, how much do you have to draw? 1350. Enough to not just melt your wires, but probably vaporize them. (Especially since inside the fixture, they usually use 16-gauge wire.)

      If you're going to get self-congratulatory for being the rational one of the pair, perhaps you should look into some of your other assumptions, too.

      steve

    2. Re:Showering in the dark?! by alien_blueprint · · Score: 1

      So, to draw 30 minutes' worth of power in one second, how much do you have to draw? 1350. Enough to not just melt your wires, but probably vaporize them. (Especially since inside the fixture, they usually use 16-gauge wire.)

      Can't say I have any idea what the melting point is in terms of amps. I'll check the details of your argument later, but you're right though, I've just been carting about this urban legend and never really critically thought about it. Thanks. I'll have to work out what it does draw on startup, so I can get it vaguely right next time.

      If you're going to get self-congratulatory for being the rational one of the pair, perhaps you should look into some of your other assumptions, too.

      So, you are claiming that turning the flourscent light on and off continously will save power?

    3. Re:Showering in the dark?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you are claiming that turning the flourscent light on and off continously will save power?

      Nowhere did I ever make any claim that could be even remotely construed to mean anything like that. Calm down, tiger, think with your head.

      Considering that the largest electrical service you can normally get to your home in the US is a 200-amp service, and that the cable that it comes on is nearly two inches in diameter, you can imagine what kind of cable you'd need for over a thousand amps. : )

      steve

    4. Re:Showering in the dark?! by alien_blueprint · · Score: 1

      Nowhere did I ever make any claim that could be even remotely construed to mean anything like that. Calm down, tiger, think with your head

      Sorry. I was just wanting to know what you thought it would be, and answered hastily.

      I looked at the site of my local electricity supplier, and it would be more like 20c an *hour* to run a 100 watt bulb, assuming that "kWh" is what I think it is (kilowatt hours). That's probably what the result was 5 years ago as well. I think I still have a case for not worrying about the damned shower ... and definitely one against continuous nagging for leaving a light on for two whole minutes ;)

      Considering that the largest electrical service you can normally get to your home in the US is a 200-amp service, and that the cable that it comes on is nearly two inches in diameter, you can imagine what kind of cable you'd need for over a thousand amps. : )

      I'm in Australia ... I don't know the amperage here. It's 240 *volts* AC here. I did want to ask, isn't kilowatts the right thing to be concerned about WRT the melting point of the wire? I guess you're just assuming the voltage is constant, so you just talk in amps? I haven't thought about this since high school, clearly :)

    5. Re:Showering in the dark?! by alien_blueprint · · Score: 1

      run a 100 watt bulb

      Okaaaay, it's late in the day here, but I fscked up here. Since the bulb is only watts, not kilowatts, it's 0.02c an hour to run it.

      So, that's 48c a day to run to continously. Not far off in the first place ... given the intervening time period for forgetfulness. Or am I completely wrong, and it's time to go home for the night? ;)

    6. Re:Showering in the dark?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So, to draw 30 minutes' worth of power in one second, how much do you have to draw? 1350. Enough to not just melt your wires, but probably vaporize them. (Especially since inside the fixture, they usually use 16-gauge wire.)

      What voltage? All US electricity is in the range 115-125V, 60Hz. All circuit breaker/fuse boxes use 15 or 20 amp breakers/fuses.

      That's 1725 Watts for a 115V, 15A circuit, to 2500 Watts for a 125V, 20A circuit.

      If that 1350 is Watts (you don't specify the units), that's well below the point that a breaker/fuse would open, and the fixture could not be sold. It would be a fire hazard under the National Fire Code. It wouldn't pass the UL approval tests.

      I suppose some nerd could try to make his own flourescent lamp, though.

    7. Re:Showering in the dark?! by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      So, that's 48c a day to run to continously.


      Actually, .02/hr * 24 hrs = .48c a day ... a little less than half a penny.

      Were you off on your units (2 hundredths of a cent per hour) or your math (2400 hours in a day)?
    8. Re:Showering in the dark?! by alien_blueprint · · Score: 1

      I knew it was time to go home :(

      The answer is neither! It was an interpretation error. I read the answer from Python ("0.48") as 48 cents, not 0.48 of one cent, which it was, because I went and did something else for a bit before hitting "enter".

      That will teach me to be switching between work and /. I should just pick one or the other.

      But since I'm home now, it's Soul Calibur II time ... and the point is well and truly made that leaving a light on when showering is effectively zero cost!

      I hope.

    9. Re:Showering in the dark?! by alien_blueprint · · Score: 1

      Before I fire up the 'cube, I'm worried now that it's too damned low.

      Here's the reasoning. It costs me 18.8 cents for 100 kilowatt hours. So, for a hundred watt light bulb (say), its:

      $ python
      >>> 18.8 / 100 / 1000 * 100 * 24 [enter]
      0.45119999999999993

      That's 18.8 / 100 kWh (for 1 kwh) / 1000 (back to watts) * 100 (wattage of light) * 24 hours.

      If this is right, I'm never turning another light off ever. I can't help thinking that someone who worked on the Viking probe might know something I don't, though ... ;)

    10. Re:Showering in the dark?! by alien_blueprint · · Score: 1

      The problem is, I can't interpret this table

      It says "total price" for the first 100 kWh is 18.8 cents, then it says in the column header "cost per unit" after that in parentheses. So ... which one is right?

      I guess total != total, or something. So it's really 18.8 per kilowatt hour, otherwise the price cutoff here in this table is pointless.

      So ...

      >>> 18.8 / 1000 * 100 * 24 [enter]
      45.120000000000005

      45 cents! But wait, I've forgotten the GST ...

      >>> (18.8+1.71) / 1000 * 100 * 24
      49.224000000000004

      Right. There it is. So I *will* turn lights off, but I still will not let anyone nag me about it ;)

  161. So, don't follow the crowd, boys and girls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the moral of the story. Check out this poor guy's resume: Java, VB, blah, blah, blah. He's got an MS in math, but the work he's done makes him completely interchangeable with any random coder in India or Russia.

    He could have been a graphics guru, a kernel hacker, a security expert, or any of a dozen other jobs that are in demand and probably well within his capabilities, but the fact that he lists Visio and MS Word on his resume would make me just toss him on the pile with all the MSCEs.

    I mean, come on! Look at this:

    I maintained and developed locators and lead systems. InfoNow's CGI software is written in Java and JSP. Client data is stored in Oracle tables, and client access is peformed via the Web - that is, a Web browser serves as the interface through which clients view and modify their data. For new applications for which I was responsible, I designed the table schema and Java classes and wrote the Java and JSP code. On other projects, I functioned as a team member, usually using existing tables and classes. Code used embedded SQL queries. I also used SQL*PLUS to for data extracts and and table and data maintenance.

    Now I ask you, does it get any more generic than that?

    If you go ahead and read all the way to the bottom it gets interesting; the guy worked on the Viking missions to Mars, but how many people reading the resume would ever get that far?

    1. Re:So, don't follow the crowd, boys and girls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you go ahead and read all the way to the bottom it gets interesting; the guy worked on the Viking missions to Mars, but how many people reading the resume would ever get that far?

      Well, the dumbass fucking hiring managers and bloated fatass HR blimps wouldn't, but then again, they can't read anyway.

      Nice troll.

  162. Forum to find such people? by daybyter · · Score: 1

    Hi! Where can I find such an unemployed webdesigner/programmer to start a collab? I have an idea for a website and look for someone to collab on the international version. TIA, Andreas

    1. Re:Forum to find such people? by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      From the posts you see on Slashdot, it would seem as if half of the people who post here would fit the bill. : )

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  163. right on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A deficit of 5% of the budget is not a serious long-term concern.

    you're right, if you get another Clinton in there is plenty of time!

    remember how under Reagan it was like, "OOOH my GOD, we are dying from these deficites, and the world will soon implode from the weight of the deficit upon it's surface". All we had to do was hire someone like Clinton and boom... solved. No problem. All Fine. Money in da bank. World revolution in Information. Republican... Terrorism...Fuck-The-Frenchism... Haliburtin' Lickin Good... Recession. Job loss. CIA vs. WH. Iraq. Quagmire.

    Democrats: Four Star Generals! Ambassador! Democrat Fighter Against WMD!

    Democrats look honest again... and that was SOMETHING IN THE DOIN" I CAN TELL YOU!

  164. Simple truths by master_p · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    1. Capitalism sucks as bad as communism. It just takes a little longer to realise...but you realise it well when you are fired and you can't find a job.

    2. People high up in the ladder get all the money. Their profits have increased vastly in the last 20 years.

    3. Companies sell their products with up to 90% profit, especially those that outsource production. And the profit fills the pockets of their owners.

    4. Job = self-respect.

    5. The modern way of life is not humane enough. There is not enough time to get in true contact with your own people.

    6. Poor people in India living in a cardbox are happier than average Joe that has a loan and a house to pay and sleeps and wakes up with the anxiety of when the next brick is coming from.

    7. If you ever realized how good rich people live, a revolution would be started in a minute.

    8. If you ever realized how richer rich people have become, a revolution would be started in a minute: 90% of the US' wealth is owned by 5% of the people.

    9. If you ever realized that the rich people got rich by stealing, and no one descent has ever been rich (there maybe a few exceptions), a revolution would be started in a minute. ...but a revolution will not start, because we are all sucked into our little everyday reality...the system has managed to create a different reality for each one of us. (I hope the FBI doesn't read this.)

    1. Re:Simple truths by NerveGas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1. Capitalism sucks as bad as communism. It just takes a little longer to realise...but you realise it well when you are fired and you can't find a job.

      Making a comparatively huge wage for years, then spending a while unemployed before making another (comparatively) huge wage is much better than being forced to work in a tedious, menial, or back-breaking job for your whole life with no hope of ever escaping abject poverty. If that isn't clear to you, maybe you could use a stint in a poor country to help you see the real world. If you've never lived outside of the U.S., you've never seen what a hard life really is.

      3. Companies sell their products with up to 90% profit, especially those that outsource production. And the profit fills the pockets of their owners

      If you think that many companies make 90% profits, you obviously don't understand the costs of doing business. Any market where a company can repeatedly make a profit anywhere near that level is a market that will soon be flooded with competition. For a company to make actual profits even in the very low double-digits is very, very good.

      7. If you ever realized how good rich people live, a revolution would be started in a minute.

      If you've ever lived in a truly poor nation, you'd realize that you, by virtue of the fact that you're even posting on Slashdot, are likely within the wealthiest 5% of the entire world. The lifestyle accorded to an American working for minimum wage is literally an impossible dream to hundreds of millions of people.

      9. If you ever realized that the rich people got rich by stealing,

      Yes, we all know that poor people never obtain their means through criminal means.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    2. Re:Simple truths by silverbax · · Score: 1

      "Making a comparatively huge wage for years, then spending a while unemployed before making another (comparatively) huge wage is much better than being forced to work in a tedious, menial, or back-breaking job for your whole life with no hope of ever escaping abject poverty."

      That's the whole point. This is reality for many in the United States, not just overseas.

    3. Re:Simple truths by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      Bull Crap.

      I get so sick of people taking like this.

      You education is free in the us, get good grades get a scholarship it's not that hard if you are willing to work and work hard getting good grades.

      I taught hs math for a while, guess many of the students never tried. They wouldn't work, they wanted to smoke, play sports, play music, whatever but didn't want to study.

      Do I feel sorry for them? Yes, people tried to make them see how many doors they were shutting but that's about all you can do.
      So now these folks have lousy back breaking tedious jobs but they made that decision a long time ago.

    4. Re:Simple truths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lifestyle accorded to an American working for minimum wage

      What lifestyle is that? Living at a bus stop and eating stray animals?

      Minimum wage might, might buy groceries, and that's it.

    5. Re:Simple truths by NerveGas · · Score: 1


      My friend's uncle was homeless and had very little education. While he was sleeping in a homeless shelter, he had a good idea. He busted his butt to make it happen, how he's literally a millionaire.

      There is no other place on Earth where poor people have as MANY chances as under a capitalistic society.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    6. Re:Simple truths by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      It looks like you've never lived in a truly poor country.

      Remember that even at $12,000 per year, you are still within the most wealthy 11% of the world.

      To people that have never lived outside of the United States, it's incomprehensible how anyone could survive without a three-room apartment, a car that's still under factory warranty, a leather sofa, and all of the pre-made, frozen food you can eat.

      A month's supply of rice costs you what, $30? And unless you live in the middle of manhatten or silicon valley and refuse to commute, you *can* find housing for a few hundred per month. It'll be small, cramped, ugly, run-down, and you might have long commutes to work, but you know what? That $350 per month it costs you for rice and a crappy sty of an apartment can be paid for on minimum wage.

      To review, that means that if you're (a) willing to work, and (b) financially frugal, you are guaranteed to at least have a roof over your head and some food.

      That doesn't sound like much of a life to most of us, but after seeing how truly poor people live, the fact that you're even guaranteed a roof over your head and some rice is actually not that bad.

      In fact, I've known people who made *barely* more than minimum wage, and managed to have a decent apartment, a car, a television, take belly-dancing classes, and overall have a pretty decent life.

      I've also seen such poverty that if you even had a 20-year old, run-down, beat-up car, that established you firmly in the middle class. And if you had a telephone to boot, that put you in the upper middle class.

      Really. Before anyone complains about the quality of life in the United States, they need to go spend a couple of years living the way most of the world lives. I can remember coming back to the United States and feeling greedy and awful just for the fact that I had carpet, for crying out loud.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    7. Re:Simple truths by pmz · · Score: 1

      1. Capitalism sucks as bad as communism. It just takes a little longer to realise...but you realise it well when you are fired and you can't find a job.

      So you like it, then you are fired, then, suddenly, you don't like it. You are a child.

      3. Companies sell their products with up to 90% profit, especially those that outsource production. And the profit fills the pockets of their owners.

      There is a long line of companies lining up to take down Microsoft, for example. StarOffice/OpenOffice.org is going to be the real killer (multiplatform with open storage formats). So, will you still be bitching when you see a monopoly disected by normal market forces, dropping prices all around to everyone's benefit?

      5. The modern way of life is not humane enough. There is not enough time to get in true contact with your own people.

      That's because were still hundreds or thousands of years from a truly mature economy. We are still pretty primitive, considering, for example, that so many fundamental diseases are still treated with guesswork (many cancers, auto-immune diseases, mental degeneration, etc.). We are still in an era where captialism has lots of milage left for aggressive growth. One day (in a few thousand years), perhaps there will no longer be room for growth, but, until then, we are not finished.

      6. Poor people in India living in a cardbox are happier than average Joe that has a loan and a house to pay and sleeps and wakes up with the anxiety of when the next brick is coming from.

      Have you really taken the time to research this one?

      7. If you ever realized how good rich people live, a revolution would be started in a minute.

      Have you ever known a rich person? 99% of them are normal people with normal day-to-day issues; they just have lots and lots of money for any number of reasons (earned it, inherited it, etc.). These are the people to take on the risks to make your job possible.

      (there maybe a few exceptions)

      There are a lot of exceptions.

    8. Re:Simple truths by jamesmrankinjr · · Score: 1

      If you think that many companies make 90% profits, you obviously don't understand the costs of doing business. Any market where a company can repeatedly make a profit anywhere near that level is a market that will soon be flooded with competition.

      Microsoft.

      Peace be with you,
      -jimbo

    9. Re:Simple truths by master_p · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Making a comparatively huge wage for years, then spending a while unemployed before making another (comparatively) huge wage

      So you are in the 5% that makes a huge wage ? what about the rest ?

      is much better than being forced to work in a tedious, menial, or back-breaking job for your whole life with no hope of ever escaping abject poverty.

      But I did not say Communism is better. I said that in the long run, Capitalism is as bad as Communism. Since you don't seem to understand anything, let me explain it to you:

      • money goes where money is; eventually, only a few will have all the money; we are not far off from this situation.
      • Capitalism, as aggressive as in US, promotes the primal instincts of each person, instead of promoting humanetarian values. A person living in the US (and other capitalistic areas) is a wild animal, always scared, on a loan and a mortgage...in the work place, most people look to eat you alive in order to promote themselves over you...the scary thing is that you accept this animal behaviour as normal!!!

      If that isn't clear to you, maybe you could use a stint in a poor country to help you see the real world. If you've never lived outside of the U.S., you've never seen what a hard life really is

      I am living outside the US. But I have lived in the UK for a year. I am in a position to judge clearer than you the benefits of a mixed system, where Capitalism is not so aggressive. I can go to work and be really open to people, much more than when in US. In the 8 hours that I work, I can steal a couple of hours once in a while and do nothing (because I am tired!!!), and I know that my colleague will not say it to the boss, because he is not an antagonist to me!!! The company can't fire me so easily without paying me some amount of money!!! and if I am fired, I don't have to go through the agony of not having health care!!!

      Is it just coincidence that the poor people in the US are millions ? is it just a coincidence that you are a trigger-happy society ? which country has the most gun-related incidents ? which country has the highest rates in criminality ? is it a coincidence that more than 1 million people have been added to the class of poor people in the last year ? is it a coincidence that after the .net fiasco, there were huge scandals like Enron ? what did these managers do ? they stole money!!!

      If you think that many companies make 90% profits, you obviously don't understand the costs of doing business. Any market where a company can repeatedly make a profit anywhere near that level is a market that will soon be flooded with competition. For a company to make actual profits even in the very low double-digits is very, very good

      But you don't understand that it's the production cost that allows this situation to rise, not the actual profit!!! For example, the pair of Air Jordans that one wears and cost you 100 bucks cost 5 bucks for Nike to make in a sweat shop!!! And that's true for other companies as well, like Reebok, Spalding etc... with asians working 16 hours in a day, with wages like 1 dollar, at shitty places, without proper air conditioning....yeah, this type of Capitalism is really good!!! wake up, buddy...

      If you've ever lived in a truly poor nation, you'd realize that you, by virtue of the fact that you're even posting on Slashdot, are likely within the wealthiest 5% of the entire world. The lifestyle accorded to an American working for minimum wage is literally an impossible dream to hundreds of millions of people.

      This is because of the following reasons:

      • US and EU do not allow the cheap agricultural products of Africa and other areas to enter their markets!!! they actually impose restrictions, in order to promote their own products!!! how is that for a 'free' market ?
      • US imposes restrictions in many products. A recent example is steel: last year US introduc
    10. Re:Simple truths by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      money goes where money is; eventually, only a few will have all the money; we are not far off from this situation.

      Actually, historically, the reason that capitalism works is because advancement comes from the bottom. All throughout the development of nations, it's been the workers that have developped all of the advancements: Precisely because the workers can (and do) make money by doing so.

      Saying that in the long run, communism is no worse than capitalism is completely wrong. Both living conditions AND humanitarian values are much better under a capitalistic republic. If you disagree, I'd like you to tell me of a communistic society where humanitarian values are as good as they are in the U.S..

      Those sweatshops in Thailand usually pay the workers better and treat them better than other jobs in their country. They bring an influx of money to local economies that otherwise would remain stagnant. It helps both us and them.

      US and EU do not allow the cheap agricultural products of Africa and other areas to enter their markets!!! they actually impose restrictions, in order to promote their own products!!! how is that for a 'free' market ?

      By dropping trade barriers, it would help both our countries and theirs. However, then people would complain that we were taking advantage of those poor, exploited nations, making them do our dirty work for pennies on the dollar, despite the fact that it would be HELPING them.

      By the way, if you'd like a better idea of WHY most African nations are so dirt poor, read "The Wealth and Poverty of Nations". Some of the largest reasons have probably never even occurred to you.

      Point to me one poor person that got rich (or even relatively wealthy) by doing an honest job and being honest for the whole of his/her
      life.


      My friend's relative was living in a homeless shelter, completely homeless, and not very well educated. This was back in the early 80's, if I recall. Do you remember how Izod shirts were so popular? He had an idea to make little embroidered thingies like the lizard logos on Izods, and sell them to people who make their own clothes - helping them dress their kids stylishly at a much lower price.

      He hustled his butt off, got some backing, and sold enough of them to make himelf a millionaire. Whether he's remained honest the rest of his life, I don't know, but the fact remains that he made himself a millionaire through honest means.

      Precisely because Capitalism works by allowing advancement from the bottom, the lower and middle classes are better off than they are under any other form of government. Under an idealistic socialism, the very lowest classes *could* be better off than under capitalism, but so far, nobody has been able to come up with anything even resembling an ideal socialism on any significant scale, and never will be.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    11. Re:Simple truths by master_p · · Score: 1

      Actually, historically, the reason that capitalism works is because advancement comes from the bottom. All throughout the development of nations, it's been the workers that have developped all of the advancements: Precisely because the workers can (and do) make money by doing so

      Yeah, we can really see that now: 5% of the population owns 90% of wealth.

      Both living conditions AND humanitarian values are much better under a capitalistic republic. If you disagree, I'd like you to tell me of a communistic society where humanitarian values are as good as they are in the U.S

      Yeah, that's why when you faint in a public place, in a big city, no one cares to help you. It's because of these humanetarian values. That's why you have the largest percentage of rape, murder and steal.

      Those sweatshops in Thailand usually pay the workers better and treat them better than other jobs in their country. They bring an influx of money to local economies that otherwise would remain stagnant. It helps both us and them

      What a hypocrisy!!! that's a lie. I can't imagine you just said sweatshops are good for them. I can't see how a US or EU citizen could ever accept working under such conditions...why should a Thailand one accept it ? is he/she a lesser human ? The only people that are helped by this situation is each corporation's executives as they rub their hands with glee because they have found the goose that lays the golden eggs.

      However, then people would complain that we were taking advantage of those poor, exploited nations, making them do our dirty work for pennies on the dollar, despite the fact that it would be HELPING them

      No one would say that. By dropping the trade barriers, they would at last sell their products and get money. As they get money, their initially very low prices will rise. That's the true free market, not the one we currently have.

      By the way, if you'd like a better idea of WHY most African nations are so dirt poor, read The Wealth and Poverty of Nations. Some of the largest reasons have probably never even occurred to you

      Shhh...don't tell me it is not the exploitation by Europeans and Americans!!! don't tell me it is not that we, white people, have gone over their with guns and taken from them their gold and diamonds, exploited their land and their natural resources, forced them to live in ghettos even in their own countries, sold arms to them, and generally divide and conquer!!!

      By the way, mr David Landes tells us in that book that poor countries failed to adapt to the industrial revolution due to cultural traits!!! that's simply not true, because the poor countries don't lack culture, they simply have a different form of culture!!! The only reason we are richer is because we have aggresively exploited our environments.

      Have in mind that the amount of money each country has is always equal to the value of gold in its treasury; that's why a country is not allowed to print more money than that value. But how did this gold get there in the first place ? maybe by looting other countries ?

      He hustled his butt off, got some backing, and sold enough of them to make himelf a millionaire

      The only people that get rich under capitalism is those that trade things, i.e. get materials, process it, and then sell the goods to others. The average Joe is poor. Most of us average Joes don't even own a piece of land, for Christ's sake...don't even have our own house!!!

    12. Re:Simple truths by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we can really see that now: 5% of the population owns 90% of wealth.

      I don't think you'll find a society where that is NOT true. However, even the POOR people in the US live better than the great majority of the rest of the world. No matter how you slice it, that alone says something good about our country.

      That's why you have the largest percentage of rape, murder and steal.

      We don't. Not at all. There are places all over the world that make the U.S.'s crime rates look like nothing.

      I can't see how a US or EU citizen could ever accept working under such conditions...why should a Thailand one accept it ? is he/she a lesser human ?

      Why would a Thai person accept it? Because his alternatives are worse. I'm not in any sense saying that I wouldn't like them to make more money, but no matter how much emotion or self-righteousness you put on it, the facts remain: Those sweatshops do provide a better living more those people than they could otherwise obtain, and the influx of money helps the local economy.

      Now, if I ran one of those sweatshops, I could not in good conscience pay them that little. But, I still can't argue the fact that the people are better off than they would be without the sweatshops.

      Here's a little wakeup call for you: If you think the treatment those people suffer in the sweatshops is bad, you should see how much worse the locally owned shops treat them.

      Shhh...don't tell me it is not the exploitation by Europeans and Americans!!! don't tell me it is not that we, white people, have gone over their with guns and taken from them their gold and diamonds, exploited their land and their natural resources, forced them to live in ghettos even in their own countries, sold arms to them, and generally divide and conquer!!!

      If you've read the book, you've seen that it's because of a combination of many factors. You've also seen that Whites and Europeans weren't the only ones over there oppressing, killing, and enslaving, the Arabic nations were doing that long before us.

      By the way, mr David Landes tells us in that book that poor countries failed to adapt to the industrial revolution due to cultural traits!!! that's simply not true, because the poor countries don't lack culture, they simply have a different form of culture!!! The only reason we are richer is because we have aggresively exploited our environments.

      You seem to have either not read that book, or not understood it. Mr. Landes never once said that they did not have culture, or that they had less culture, only that cultural traits that they DID have prevented some countries from adapting. The same thing happens today, even on a personal level.

      The only people that get rich under capitalism is those that trade things, i.e. get materials, process it, and then sell the goods to others

      How else do you want people to get rich?

      The average Joe is poor. Most of us average Joes don't even own a piece of land, for Christ's sake...don't even have our own house!!!

      The guy I knew that got rich didn't own a single thing. Owning a house is not a prerequisite to getting rich. And guess what: MOST of the world would be willing to slit your throat to live the way even a poor person in the U.S. lives.

      If you don't believe that, then you should spend some time living with truly poor people. I don't know where you're from, but it sounds like you've never spent any time outside of a wealthy, industrialized nation.

      steve

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  165. I hate to sound cruel, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy's resume kind of, well, sucks.

    That doesn't make him a bad person, but he's done a poor job managing his career.

    Too much trendy "..I've heard computers are a good field to get into..." and a complete lack okf what makes good resume fodder down the road.

    1. Re:I hate to sound cruel, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too much trendy "..I've heard computers are a good field to get into..."

      Yeah, back when computers filled entire rooms. Sure thing, troll.

  166. The definition of success... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recently, when boarding a train, I caught the tail-end of someone else's conversation...

    "I hear that the definition of success is someone who gets up in the morning... does whatever they want all day.. and goes to bed at night"..

    "No" I though... That's the definition of unemployment.

  167. Which part worth reading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well worth the reading time as a small break in a busy day...

    And exactly how does a guy whining about Bush in every other sentence and the fact that he has to eat generic canned vegetables amount to "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters."?

  168. Im Pritty sure.. by ChickenKillr · · Score: 1

    Im pritty sure mcdonalds dont care if your unemployed or not. Infact, they'd probably hire unemployed over employed, because if your employed, it'd be sad too work for mcdonalds if your higher up. The only worst job would be bill gates's foot massager. Even if it payed alot. (no offence too mcdonalds peeps :o)

    --
    "Fear teh chickens.. do not use teh window, use teh curtain." ~ChickenKillr
  169. I was made redundant too by PurpleWizard · · Score: 1
    I can totally agree with the lack of symmetry in the commitment expected of employee compared with the compassion, consideration or simple concern the employer offers.

    It made me realise how big a hypocrites they are too. Every regular company meeting there was at least 5 minutes saying to us "you are the company", "without you we couldn't do what we do".

    Well news for the men at the top we didn't f*ck up (habit with the spelling of profanities for passing through the e-mail filters) getting new business. We did your end of getting projects done as asked. But who gets goodbyed?

    I'm actually much happier for it. Having had the summer off I'll start work again before the end of the year doing what ever comes along. Even making coffee. I work to live not live to work

  170. education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    exempt employees should get two weeks of paid education leave a year for employee selected education (separate from work related education)

    The nature of the job requires keeping up with new stuff. You do also need a life.

    1. Re:education by Nept · · Score: 1

      if this were ever mandated as law, it would just be another incentive for employers to outsource work to India, China, etc.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
  171. PARENT IS GOATSE, PLEASE AVOID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a nasty picture, don't put the link in your browser.

  172. He's right you know. by roninbix · · Score: 1

    They don't count kids, retired persons, or anyone not actively trying to find a job. Give up looking and you fall into the latter category. As for what they do. Some live off their savings, go back to school, travel, become a stay-at-home parent, or whatever. We had a guy at my work quit and paint things for himself for a year and a half (living off savings) before looking for work again. Bit stressed out.

  173. Worse than you thought maybe. by roninbix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    4 years ago my company lost 95% of it's revenue generating contracts (programming consulting at the time) in a 3 month period, 35-40% went to India. As an added insult we had to train them while laying off our staff, and keep 1 person around on an el cheapo retainer just in case they screwed up badly down there and needed help. We helped ensure there was no risk to them while they screwed us. Course, since then we rebuilt and have recovered significantly by creating different products. But man did that period of time suck. Remember that 10% isn't evenly spread out.

  174. that's why you're unemployed now... by muyuubyou · · Score: 1

    ...ah!! all those sniffing and spying over the traffic of your employees does wonders!!

    Just get a good sysadmin lackey with no friends within the company.

  175. Ageism by Bakajin · · Score: 1

    This guy could be suffereing from the extra burden of ageism also. His resume shows that he has started working for Nasa in working since 1967. That means that he is probably about 57 years old and looking for work as a programmer.

  176. Unemployed for 5 months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was a March layoff. Funny thing, I never thought I'd be let go since I was young, relatively speaking.

    The usual thing you hear is, "better you than me, you'll have no problem finding a job." This from co-workers and other middle-aged employeed people.

    I didn't see it. For the last few months I pushed real hard to get a job, particularly in a prospering market area. It was a no go. The only responses I've got were from staffing firms. So, I gave it another ultimate go, handing out revised resumes to friends and all the jobs I took an interest in.

    My friend told me he was jobless for 8 months, so he suggested, just get used to the empty ride. I figured employees wouldn't be knocking down my door, so I picked up a few things.

    I learned how to do wood flooring, installed wood floors in all my rooms. I taught myself how to do home improvement skills, painting, texturing, adding trim around walls and such. I taught myself how to do tiling. I burned a bit of cash to do something I always wanted to do, but never had the time. I also made a website, re-learn web making skills. I also got back to exercising and eating right, lost a lot of weight.

    I got a lot of things done, but I only see it as keeping myself from going crazy.

  177. Not just a rant it's true... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 3, Interesting
    <rant>
    This is true, my brother in law decided to get a new job and got the idea to move into locomotive maintenance (he's a truck mechanic). He called up a number of train operators in the UK and was told at every turn that they don't train people any more, he should go to Virgin trains (apparently the only ones in the UK who still train/educate personnel), complete their training course and then when his contract with Virgin expires they would be happy to hire him. So in summary the training program of every train operator in the UK consists of poaching the people trained/educated by the few haples idiots in the corporate community (in this case Virgin trains) who still still live up to their obligation to provide their field of industry with a new crop of trained professionals. This attitude is pretty typical for much of Europe, of course I dont know how things are in the United States but I can't imagine they are much different. Companies are screaming for:

    - Experienced personnel

    They are not:

    - Providing training programmes
    - Entry level jobs

    Apparently the overhead involved in training new personnel or hiring somebody with less than a minimum of 5 years experience is too great for this to be a viable option for modern European companies. Just getting an engineering degree is insufficient. They only ray of sunshie here is that they are prepared to hire you, even if you are not especially experienced, if you have a set of cetificates the length of your arm. Unfortunately most certificates are obscenely expensive to get, they are slightly less obscenely expensive to maintain and in Germany at least, where I used to work, many companies seem to expect you to pay for your vast portfolio of obscenely expensive certificates out of your own pocket and to do the studying on your own time. And with all of this plus the ever present danger of being dropped like hot potato (ie getting your ass fired) every time one of the CO's feel in a mood to draw the magic cost cutting sword from its stone and go on a crusade, they expect you to be loyal to the company. It kind of makes me glad that after 6 months of being unemployed I finally found a job with one of those haples idiot companies that will still hire people with limited experience.
    </rant>
    Have karma will burn it!
    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
    1. Re:Not just a rant it's true... by coldtone · · Score: 1


      They are not:

      - Providing training programmes
      - Entry level jobs

      The biggest thing preventing the creation of entry-level jobs is wage. Either though a minimum wage, or a union forcing a higher wage and long term commitments.

      Learning a skill on the job is very expensive. The employer has to incur tons of hidden costs associated to showing a kid the ropes. (Time from other employees, fixing the green horns screw-ups, any formal training or certification adds to this cost.) There is just no way an employer is going to spend this expense on new employees and in addition to that give them a high wage and job security. Considering of course that the employee might turn out to be no good, or more likely decide the work isn't form them.

      Want more entry-level positions? Then get rid of the laws and rules that force these positions to be too expensive.

    2. Re:Not just a rant it's true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It kinda makes you wanna stay with the company that paid for your training, I'd guess. They'd at least have a reason to fire you on a whim. (They paid your way, now they're sending you on your way.)

      And to fill you in on the situation in the oh-so-wonderful USA, well, it's the same. I've been looking for an IT job for 3 years. My only constraint is that I don't want to relocate. Nobody in this area is hiring people with less than 5 years of IT experience and an industry-specific skill.

    3. Re:Not just a rant it's true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly more true than I would like to mention.

      My spouse took an entry level legal position after finishing a year long training program. Two months later she was fired for not having enough experince!

      They didn't really want entry level, they just wanted to give entry level pay.

      It worked out for her anyway. She still works in the legal field, but doesn't have to work for the ambulance chasers anymore, and her new job pays better.

    4. Re:Not just a rant it's true... by Zirnike · · Score: 1

      Removing the requirement that you pay people a barely adequate wage is not an adequate solution to the problem... Now instead of their being no entry level jobs, no one can afford to TAKE entry level jobs.

      --
      I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
  178. Another George W. Bush... by The_Real_MrRabbit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    bashing article in the guise of post-employment enlightenment.

    Don't people have better things to do then live for every opportunity to bash someone...geesh...

    Go hound the IRS or something...or join Al-Queda...

    =8-)

    1. Re:Another George W. Bush... by lugar · · Score: 1

      Why is it that certain sectors of society refuse to take any personal responsibility? Everything needs to be 'politically correct' unless it deals with a Conservative in office. Typical double-standard. I agree Rabbit. People should grow a backbone and take responsibility of themselves! Don't depend on everyone else to take care of you. The article was nonsense, a writing of despiration and Bush-bashing, not something I consider insightful or humorous.

  179. Ramen Noodle is people!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no text

  180. Yes, I expected some creativity from a programmer by Morgaine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pretty odd really, his entire set of "benefits" were almost entirely negative, or at least presented negatively: for example, not needing to wake up to the alarm clock, yet waking up anyway at the crack of dawn owing to a sense of dread. That seems to stem from a less than positive outlook on life, and it isn't really all that consistent with the title of the essay.

    As a freelancer, I go through long periods between contracts as part of normal operation, and yes, one does turn down the spending knob to its lowest setting, but it's entirely a positive experience. One simply doesn't need to keep up with the Jones's every time they go out to the restaurant, buy a new DVD, or upgrade their car. Life in the affluent west is great ... as long as you don't fall for the hype, and you keep the telly firmly switched off, and you do your own thing.

    And as a programmer, assuming that it's in your blood and not just a job, then "your own thing" really means being creative with computers.

    So, I'd have expected a long list of new technologies that he'd always meant to catch up on and now has the time, and a long list of personal projects that he always wanted to develop and at last has the opportunity, etc etc.

    Being positive is in the mind, and has almost nothing to do with external circumstances, and definitely has nothing to do with financial circumstances.

    Just keep that telly firmly switched off, as it's the primary instrument of evil hype and distorted goals, and it will not help you to feel happy in yourself unless you have the cash that the advertisers implicitly require viewers to have. The messaging is largely subliminal or implicit too in "entertainment" features, so it's not enoough to simply avoid the adverts. Stick to online games ... same square format, no evil hype. :-)

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
  181. Americans who have work work too much by Nice2Cats · · Score: 5, Interesting
    (I realize that my subject line might sound cynical to those out of work; sorry for that.)

    There is actually an entire movement of people that have discovered this.

    There is at least an entire continent that has discovered this: Europe. Industrialized nations all of them, the top nations on all quality of life rankings, little violence, though a bit crowded. Now check the hours they work. Now realize that, by law, they have weeks and weeks of vacation time -- if I remember correctly, it is 20 days by federal law for Germany. You have 35 hour work weeks in a lot of places. You have paid maternity leave and sick leave. You can't be fired at the drop of a hat.

    Why does this work? You don't buy every piece of crap that some ad throws in your face. Consumer spending is two-thirds of the U.S. economy. In Germany (to stick with the example), it is about one third. You don't pay your CEOs so much money that a company's pay chart has to have a logarithmic scale: Read up on what the Daimler managers at DaimlerChrysler get and what the Chrysler managers get. Try to explain -- with a straight face -- why some Chrysler manager who couldn't keep his company from being de facto swallowed gets more money than they guy who is now his boss.

    It used to be that the U.S. economists pointed to all of this and said, yeah, sure, you have universal medical care while we have children who can't get antibiotics, you are home with your families while we are putting in more hours than the Japanese, and you are getting tan on Spain's beaches five weeks out of every year while we don't dare take those pitiful few days of vacation we have. But your unemployment is high and not coming down.

    Well, guess what: This is basically going to be a jobless recovery. Maybe some of Europe's prices can't compete with the U.S., but nobody can compete with India, and even India can't compete with China, or government-sponsored slave labor in Burma. Your job is ending up in Asia just like everybody else's. And do you really think that it is going to come back in our lifetime? Fool.

    Tell me again why you are spending all that time at work while those Europeans are at home after 35 hours and playing with their children. What is the justification? More to the point, what is wrong with you? Why are you supporting, maybe even defending this system instead of trying to change it?

    Remember when Tyler Durden told you that you are not your job?

    Advertising has these people chasing cars and clothes they don't need. Generations have been working in jobs they hate, just so they can buy what they really don't need.
    Fight Club, book (which this quote is from) and film, are so hated by the establishment not because of the violence, but because the CEOs and such ilk are deathly afraid that the American middle class will figure out that it isn't worth it -- that the Europeans (though politically they might be loathsome cowards), might have the right idea here. That you don't need to by the latest gadget, follow the newest fad, buy the newest gizmo. They might decide that quality of life is more important than blowing their paycheck on crap just to keep the GDP up by one more decimal point. They might decide they don't want to be bombarded with ads morning, noon, and night.

    They might not want to make their carreers the center of their lives anymore. They might not want to define themselves by the job they have. They might not be content anymore to start living only after they have stopped working.

    It's you choice, really. The U.S. is just about the only real democracy on the planet (ironically, all of those Europeans are living in republics). You can change the system, and get this country's priorities straight -- once you have gotten yours straight.

    1. Re:Americans who have work work too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The U.S. is just about the only real democracy on the planet.

      Oh yes Sir! The finest politicians money can buy! The guy with the most bucks wins.

      I don't know whether to be affronted by your ignorance and arrogance or taken aback by your staggering naivety.

      > all of those Europeans are living in republics

      Please take the time and trouble to inform yourself before sharing your opinions.

    2. Re:Americans who have work work too much by archen · · Score: 1

      he U.S. is just about the only real democracy on the planet (ironically, all of those Europeans are living in republics).

      The U.S. is a democratic republic, but yes we are a republic. Recite the pledge of allegence once.

    3. Re:Americans who have work work too much by dlc3007 · · Score: 1

      America is a Republic, btw. Hence the line in the Pledge of Allegiance: "...and to the Republic for which it stands..."

    4. Re:Americans who have work work too much by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... But we Americans have many benefits not enjoyed by other countries.

      I like being able to go the grocery store and being able to pick from 20 different kinds of peppers (and only 1 mile from my house). Or 50 different types of meats.

      I like the convenience of the rare trip to Taco Bell.

      I like being able to travel less than 10 miles and get goods and services to do pretty much anything I can imagine.

      I like my large yard, nice cars, and house. I don't have money. My cars were used and my house was a VA house that needed serious structural repair. I did all the work myself and now have a great house in a great location. All for a cheap price.

      And I don't mind working for all that. Not all that hard work is wasted, we get stuff done.

      That's the reason for our technology and military power. Other countries complain, complain, complain, but we worked damn hard for all we have. And I'm just scratching the surface.

      I do agree with you about the consumerism of America. The fads and trends are stupid wastes of time and I don't participate in any way. America needs to simplify, work less, and focus on family more.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    5. Re:Americans who have work work too much by Doofus · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you check, you'll see that the United States is also a republic.

      Source: The Constitution.

      Alternate Source: The Pledge of Allegiance

      Have a great day!

      --
      If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; ... it invites anarchy. - Brandeis
    6. Re:Americans who have work work too much by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The Pledge of Allegiance is a reference to be relied upon for discovering truth? Therefor "God" exists and we're UNDER "him"? PTUI.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  182. Other topics for discussion by Indio_do_Xingu · · Score: 1

    What about: the surprising benefits of being dead?

  183. Dirty pool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that article should have been written by a genuine out-of-worker, it could have led to gainful employment.

  184. Oh you kids.. by Walterk · · Score: 1

    you had it easy! Ever since I came out of the womb I had to work in a copper mine, toiling away, working 36 hours a day, 9 days a week, 400 days a year! Then when we got home, our parents used to thrash us to bits with a broken bottle and dance on our graves singing "Halleluja"! Each and every day.

  185. Re:Depressing read (I feel your pain) by BadElf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've made the same realization. Good tech jobs requiring what used to be not-so-popular skills and paid 50-60k were everywhere. Now it seems everyone and their dog can write code and the employers know that -- no more 50-60k jobs.

    I got the boot from a good job only to find out they hired someone new at half the rate just a couple of weeks later. And now, having been actively looking for work for the past 9 months, I see that the few companies that *are* hiring are paying even less than that.

    I'm no longer looking for the good tech jobs anymore. Instead, I've enrolled at the local university to earn a B.A. in English -- or maybe psychology -- or anything else that doesn't smell like IT or technology.

    I figure I'll always have the tech experience to fall back on if that market recovers, but in the meantime I'll have earned a degree in something completely different with completely different opportunities.

  186. lazy bastage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the irony is this guy hates bush. the guy that extended his ee benefits.. maybe if he spent more time trying to find work, he wouldn't have the time to sit on his ass all day and do shit that doesn't get him a job.

    I was jobless last month for 2 weeks. instead of writing, cleaning, not shaving and eating hot dogs, I went out and really searched. I did consulting work at old places of employment. I contacted everyone I knew and everyone elses friends.

    The end result was 5 interviews in less than a week and a half and a job.

    1. Re:lazy bastage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush? bush has done more to screw over the regular working person than anyone in my lifetime! He makes Nixon look honest!

  187. Kinda sad by Headius · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was out of work for a while when everything went under. Actually, I was out of work twice, once right at the end of 2000 and once in late 2001. The first time was because a major corporation decided to trim the fat and clear out an assload of consultants. I don't blame them for that, and I wasn't really sorry to go. The second time, I was working for an HMO provider, and they went belly-up because of shady accounting practices. Neither time was really related to the bubble.

    However, the first time I was only out of work for a month, and the second time for about three months. During the inbetween times I kept studying software development, cleaning up my resume, and tossing it off. In the end, I got those new jobs because I actually had the skills necessary for "senior"-level positions.

    This guy's resume is exactly the kind I walk away from. He's floated from language to language, technology to technology, and doesn't have a mastery of any of them. I won't go into specifics, but this looks exactly like a guy that doesn't learn anything he doesn't pick up from his current job. One job leads to another only by virtue of what odd jobs his former employer required him to do. A single one-off project in language X produces a marketable skill? I've been doing server-side Java development for 7 years and the market is still a tough nut to crack.

    Learn how to do something (software development or tech writing, for example) and learn how to do it really well..the jobs will follow.

    1. Re:Kinda sad by BigGerman · · Score: 1

      just curious:
      if you started Java server-side development 7 years ago (1996?), what server side technology you were using back then - Jigsaw, GNUJSP?

    2. Re:Kinda sad by Headius · · Score: 1

      Java was used mainly as a glue layer between an ERP and the web services. We had developed our own template language which was called directly by web requests. Almost all of it was created new for a few specific projects. It wasn't the greatest marriage of technologies, but it worked ok, and I think parts of it are still in service today.

      Now that you mention it, it was more like Spring of 1997, so more like 6.5 years. I just tossed off a round estimate.

    3. Re:Kinda sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy's resume is exactly the kind I walk away from. He's floated from language to language, technology to technology, and doesn't have a mastery of any of them.

      Oh, you'll just walk away, huh?

      THE MAN HAS A MASTERS DEGREE IN MATHEMATICS AND WORKED ON THE APOLLO PROGRAM!

      He's floated from language to language, technology to technology, and doesn't have a mastery of any of them.

      Prove it.

      I won't go into specifics, but this looks exactly like a guy that doesn't learn anything he doesn't pick up from his current job.

      This is such absolute bullshit I can't believe it. I can think of a couple of things he didn't pick up on the job, like a MASTERS DEGREE IN MATHEMATICS.

    4. Re:Kinda sad by kstumpf · · Score: 1

      So you suggest investing all of my effort in 'mastering' a single language/technology which may or may not be in demand 5-10 years from now? No thanks. Careful or you may end up hanging out with ex-Pascal developers.

    5. Re:Kinda sad by Headius · · Score: 1

      No, I suggest learning whatever you choose to do really damned well. The reason so many "Java developers" are out of work is because they've got 2-3 years experience writing JSPs...that doesn't qualify as a deep exposure to the language. When I look into new languages, I try to get as much experience as I can in ALL aspects of that platform. When the next big thing hits, I'll either already be intimately familiar with it, or I'll damn well make myself familiar.

      Anything worth learning is worth learning well. Too many people, when the dotcoms were flying high, were told they were "developers" because they could write HTML and perhaps a little scripting or Java. Now they're wondering why they can't find work. I get too many of their resumes to count, and I'm tired of it.

      Any chimp can create HTML and do basic scripting or coding in 20 languages. Knowing how to implement real, quality solutions takes a lot more time, effort, and experience.

    6. Re:Kinda sad by Headius · · Score: 1

      Not surprising an AC would flame me, but just because he has an MS doesn't mean he knows enough to get a job...it means he has theoretical or technical (more often theoretical or research) training in some field. Would I hire someone solely based on an MS? No, I've turned down a number of MS grads. Would I be more likely to hire this guy than a recent MS grad? Yes, if he was qualified for the position.

      No matter how smart or well educated you are or how many great projects you've worked on, you're only worth what you can accomplish now. The minute you become stagnant, you might as well join middle management.

    7. Re:Kinda sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but just because he has an MS doesn't mean he knows enough to get a job

      That's like saying just because he has a pilot's license, it doesn't mean he knows what a propeller is.

      it means he has theoretical or technical (more often theoretical or research) training in some field.

      No, it means he has a Masters Degree in Mathematics. I have theoretical training in mathematics. It doesn't mean I can call up UCLA and have them fax me a Masters Degree.

      Would I hire someone solely based on an MS? No,

      I would. Anybody with the dedication to ATTEMPT much less COMPLETE a Masters Degree deserves at least that much.

      No matter how smart or well educated you are or how many great projects you've worked on, you're only worth what you can accomplish now.

      Yep, typical short-sighted, slap-a-label-on-it, next-quarter's-numbers thinking. No long term planning. No institutional knowledge. No respect for intangible benefits. No community. No joy, dedication or awareness of the place a business has in society.

      If this approach were sound, playoff series in sports would be unnecessary. The team with the best stats would simply be awarded the championship because it is mathematically (pun intended) impossible for them to lose.

      But, the Angels are the World Champions of Baseball, and the Cubs are in the playoffs. Therefore, there is something other than rows and columns of numbers that leads to success.

      But since it doesn't show up on a balance sheet, management doesn't care. Business is no longer about achievement, values or careers. It's all about how much fuckin' money they can squeeze out of the balance sheet by lunch. That is a fact.

  188. This is slashdot stuff? by iggychaos · · Score: 1

    The topic would be fun.. but this article sucked. It was boring as snot. Some reput indeed.

  189. I saw a dark side of unemployment first hand by vudufixit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A friend of mine, still living at home at the age of 29, got laid off from a major entertainment firm over two years ago. Got a six-month severance package, with benefits, AND unemployment insurance. Decided to wait a couple of months to really look for a job. Then the Sept 11, 2001 attacks really finished off the job market. Look, everyone's free to live their life as they see fit, but someone who collects that much money and doesn't seem to care about working is crapping on everyone that got a measly package and WANTS to work. He's even turned his nose up at fairly decent paying temp work ($15-$20) an hour, because it "wasn't what he wanted to do." So he's hurting his own chances of getting another job with a HUGE gap in his employment history. And setting himself up to not have the resources to start a family and retire well. He doesn't realize that these are peak earning years for us. In effect, he's retired at the age of 29 with not much in the way of assets. I'm sure he'll be working well into his 70's...

  190. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed-Failed math by Azghoul · · Score: 1

    Maybe if a few more people would create their own damn jobs...

    It shocks me that people like you believe jobs are just "there" and should be filled. Here's some information you should remember: For each job, there's someone out there who's taken a chance at creating it.

    Why not try to become the guy who creates the jobs? Are you afraid to do so? There are dozens of SBA grants and assistance programs around. There are dozens of IDAs and other local government agencies to help out.

    Instead of whining about it and blaming the Republicrats, why not get out there and start something of your own? Take the chance!

  191. Did anyone read the rest of his page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy is the atypical left wing loony. He has to have a reason to hate Bush. Get over it and that everything was so rosey during the Clinton years. Clinton road the dotcom bubble. It busted while he was still in office. Bush came it with all of that and had 911 added to it. Some people really need to get over it and make the best of the situation.

    1. Re:Did anyone read the rest of his page? by shelby289 · · Score: 1

      He sounds like an aging hippy that got cut because he wasn't the new kid on the block anymore. I agree some people need to get over how much thet hate Bush and direct their anger,or energy some where else.

      --
      This is the way the world ends, not with a bang , but a wimper
    2. Re:Did anyone read the rest of his page? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a Right wing whacko Rush Limbaugh sympathizer. The right wingers are RUINING AMERICA!!

  192. Re:For perks of being unemployed without the guilt by chialea · · Score: 1

    I'm a PhD-type, and neither do I use a calculator, nor am I a libarts type (except in my Copious Free Time). These things certainly do not form a partition of the disciplines available!

    Lea

    (see, I talk like an academic, at least!)

  193. What's Keeping This Site Up? by BlackBolt · · Score: 1

    My world is falling apart, this teeny little site isn't going down! The full wrath of Slashdot, and it withstands our onslaught with impunity!

    WHY. WON'T. YOU. GO. DOWN?

    Dammit, Slashdot isn't like it used to be. We used to be feared. We used to be somebody. We were like the Mongol Hordes swarming like a plague over the net, destroying all who were in our path.

    Now we can't even take down an unemployed guy's resume site and blog. (*sighs dejectedly*)

    clickity-click-reload-reload-click-clickity-clic k- reload-reload-click-clickity-click-reload- reload-click

    Awwwww, C'MON! This isn't FAIR!

  194. Losing Weight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's right about the losing weight part. I was unemployed for a month and a half and lost 25 lbs. There was no excuse for not going to the gym, and there's no one there at 10am. Plus I was poor so I didn't eat as much as I used to.

    Another benefit: The Price Is Right!!!

  195. wage slave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like some people don't fully appreciate how addicted they are until they can't find their next fix, some wage slaves don't get how trapped they are by the system until they are between jobs.

    JUST SAY NO !!

  196. Leave the government out of it... by alexhmit01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look, you want a simple life, go get it. You want a short week, go for it. You want a 35 hour job and can't get one, start your own business and see if you can provide one.

    It's not enough that 46 cents of every dollar my company produces goes into a government coffer before hitting one of the employees bank acounts?

    How many chains do you want to put on us.

    Without excessive government interference, we'd be twice the size we are now (read that as "creating more jobs" for those of you that believe in our Marxist/Fascist economy).

    The middle class is getting squeezed by your policies. The government bails out/subsizes the biggest businesses to keep the stop market rising, which shifts tax money to the richest Americans (because they own stocks). Then the tax code hits people generating income.

    So: produce wealth, get it taxed away. Simply own wealth, and much of that money comes back to you.

    The government taxes productive businesses to give it to unproductive ones to "keep existing jobs."

    Sure, the Steel Tariffs saved jobs in the steel industry. For every job saved, how many jobs were lost/not created in the automotive industry because of higher steel prices. How many jobs were not created in corporate America because the company car-fleet costs more than it should? How many jobs were lost in the computer industry because consumers had less discretionary spending because their car lease costs an extra $10-$20/month.

    All this meddling destroys economic growth, and is killing those of us willing to work 60-100 hours/week greating the economic engine that the rest of you live off of.

    Alex

    1. Re:Leave the government out of it... by meta-monkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hear, hear. Alex, if I had mod points, you'd get them.

      I couldn't stand the corporate rat race, so I got out and started my own small business, and I love it. I work more for about the same amount of money, but I'm my own boss and I make my own hours.

      However, I never realized quite how much the government squeezes little guys like me until I got out on my own. The stupid taxes I have to pay for no good reason just boggle my mind. The worst ones are the "fees." See, I know, they're "fees" because it says in big bold letters on the form, "THIS IS NOT A TAX."

      For instance, the Florida Department of Corporations informed me that, after already paying my city and county for an occupational license, and paying the federal government to register my corporation, I need to pay them another $200 to register my corporation with them. Now, if I don't pay the "fee", they disolve my corporation. So, it's $200, that I pay to the government, for no obvious service, and if I don't do it, they disolve my company. Well, it sure is great to know it's NOT A TAX, though! Rat bastards every one of 'em...

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    2. Re:Leave the government out of it... by lobsterGun · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm in favor of small government and all, but when you say things like...
      Without excessive government interference, we'd be twice the size we are now


      I feel I must point out that some amount of government interference is a good thing. Good things (as well as bad) have come out of government interference (things like civil rights etc).

      and when you say your bit about Tarifs
      Sure, the Steel Tariffs saved jobs in the steel industry....


      I say that's a bad example. I submit that there is such a thing as a strategic industry - an industry that a nation needs if only for it's own ability to defend itself. A strong nation must be able to provide from within, the tools that it needs to make war. Saving the American steel industry is a necessary evil. Now if you had mentioned that crap that we went through with that tarrif on wine and grape seeds I'd have agreed with you 100%.
    3. Re:Leave the government out of it... by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      A strong nation must be able to provide from within, the tools that it needs to make war.
      Hm. I never thought of this.
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    4. Re:Leave the government out of it... by jgardn · · Score: 1

      While the government taxes half of what a company makes, it isn't true that that company would double in size if the taxes were cut to zero.

      The truth is that the company would experience far greater growth. Think of the effects on the entire economy. The company would instantly double its profits, sure. But all of the company's customers would have doubled their profits as well. And all the company's suppliers would have doubled their profits as well. So the stuff the company buys is going to be cheaper, because the suppliers can afford to lower the price to be more competitive, and can afford to build that modernized factory that produces the same goods at a higher quality and at a lower price. The company is also going to sell a ton more stuff, because the customers are able to afford it. Increased revenues with lower costs means even more profits.

      Companies and the people who get very rich from those companies also do other things with their extra money besides expanding their coffers and hiring more employees. They build hospitals, roads, stadiums, and other things that don't lead directly to more profits. They give money to charities, they give money to schools, build schools, and equip the schools with modern technology. If they could, they would probably even send their own employees to teach at said schools occasionally. It's called the "human spirit", and it has the nasty effect of turning perfectly greedy capitalists into philanthropic nightmares. The level of their charitable contributions far exceed anything the Federal, State, and City governments can ever hope of doing. The worth of their contributions, and the effectiveness of their projects, also far exceeds any brain-dead socialist policy that the government can hope to implement. Even the greediest of philanthropists, Bill Gates, even by giving away his own company's software in an attempt to dominate the education industry with his software, is doing more to help students than the Federal Government has ever dreamed of doing.

      --
      The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.
    5. Re:Leave the government out of it... by Politburo · · Score: 1

      One of the problems with government is that the frequently make very fine distinctions where most people would not. For instance, the government uses both taxes and fees (among other devices such as tariffs) to collect income. While both of these may appear to be ways to get your money, they actually have different definitions.

      Taxes are rated fees collected by the government, usually on income, sales, and property. The rate may not be the same for everyone (Progressive Tax Brackets), but it is a fee calculated using some other metrics.

      Fees are the same for everyone. It doesn't matter if you make 10 million or 10 dollars a year, you will still pay $17 to renew your driver's licence in New Jersey. According to your link, all corporations will pay the same fee to register in the State of Florida.

    6. Re:Leave the government out of it... by pmz · · Score: 1

      "THIS IS NOT A TAX."

      That's because it's a FUCKING PIECE-OF-SHIT TAX that props up some politicians fantasy about saving jobs/feeding the poor/funding schools while simultaneously taking away your ability to do the same ten times more efficiently than the government only dreams about.

    7. Re:Leave the government out of it... by mojoNYC · · Score: 1
      sorry you have to pay taxes, but that's part of the deal here (or it used to be) --why don't you hire one of those ex-enron accountants and go offshore?

      in a few years, we will really see the efffects of corporate welfare, and the republicans fight against ANY taxes...when all of the social programs are gone and the underclass finally says 'enough', there will be massive instability in our country--of course, the top of the pyramid will be hiding out in their gated communities...

      when i hear tax rants like this, i wonder where the source is...where do you live? do you think it's an anomaly that NY and CA provide the bulk of the country's GNP, and also that they are both Democratic states? being a new yorker, i will tell you it's because every day here, you're forced to interact with people from all nations and socioeconomic levels, and you realize that society needs a contribution from everybody in order to work...

      it's easy to rant about welfare mothers and illegal immigrants, but the reality is, that social programs from the government provide essential resources to help people move out of the vicious cycle of poverty and violence--which is something that the current govt policies are doing their best to kill--don't kid yourself, your taxes are an insurance policy against destabilization of the fabric of our country...

      and if you're really worried about your tax dollars, why don't you ask the Pentagon to account for the billions of dollars that they 'lose' each month?

    8. Re:Leave the government out of it... by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      I know, I know, I understand the distinction, but I just find it humorous that they take the time to print in bold capital letters "THIS IS NOT A TAX". I guess that's just supposed to make me feel better. "Well, it's money I have to pay to the government or else dire consequences will befall me, but, hey, at least it's not a tax."

      On the other hand, some of the actual business TAXES are pretty crazy, too. For instance, my county sent me a notice a few months back about my "tangible property tax liability." I'm a photographer. I've bought many cameras. When I buy a camera, I pay sales tax on it. However, the county thinks that, because I then use that camera to make money, I owe more tax on it. So they want an extra ~3%, on top of the 6% sales tax I already paid. For every year I own the camera. Of course, the value of the camera will depreciate, so I'll pay less on it next year than this year, but still, it's ridiculous to get taxed 3% of the total worth of all assets in my business every single year. And it's not just big stuff like cameras for a photographer or a Hustler Super Z mower for a landscaper, it's stuff like computers, desks, office chairs, staplers, etc etc etc.

      I don't care if you call it a fee, a tax, or a mugging, it's still rotten.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    9. Re:Leave the government out of it... by arbarbonif · · Score: 1

      I think we are WAY overdue for massive instability and downright revolution. It is basically the refactoring of society, clearing out the cruft that has bloated everything into unreconizability.

      It will suck to go through (assuming you survive) but it will be better for the long term. Of course the people on top will fight tooth and nail against it, providing crutches to the downtrodden so they forget how to walk. If they learn how to walk, breaking thier legs and saying, "Look at these nice crutches I made you."

    10. Re:Leave the government out of it... by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Government costs money. Until we learn to pay for it like Canada and Europe do, the government will have to continue to use tricks to get money, while running up debt.

    11. Re:Leave the government out of it... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Government costs money, but it's a scam at any price.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    12. Re:Leave the government out of it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh ya, Canadians love paying taxes so much, something like 30% of our economy has moved completely underground. And that number is growing every year.

      We trade more cash around than drug dealers, just to try to keep a little of what we earn to spend ourselves.

    13. Re:Leave the government out of it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are almost right...

      The underclasses do need help, but you are asking for it from the wrong place. Charity should NEVER come from the government. All that does is create a huge system of (over)paid (and underworked) government employees who suck up the money that should be going to help those in need in the first place.

      We have a great place for charity money to go: Churches and Synagogues (and other religious organizations). Most of the people who deal with the charities in these organizations donate their time so there is very little overhead and far more money gets to those who need it.

      Unfortunately the radicals in this country have been pronouncing for years that any time the government deals with a religious organization they are in violation of the first amendment. These losers should go back and read the Bill of Rights and what led up to them. The Establishment clause says that there can never be a Church of the United States (like the Church of England). It does not say that the Ten Commandments cannot be on a plaque in a courthouse or that voluntary prayer in school is not allowed.

      The Federal government needs to print the money and defend the country. (Note to Pres. Bush: Kick out the illegal aliens!) It should do nothing more.

      NY and CA do not create the bulk of the GNP because they are democrat - you have the cause and effect reversed. They are democrat because all of the money is there so all the liberals moved there so that they could control and redistribute all that money. After all, what else do liberals do?

      Republicans do not fight against any tax, they fight against unfair taxes. Republican nirvana would either be a flat income tax or a consumption-based tax. Either tax all income at the same rate or tax all sales at the same rate. Allow no loopholes at all. That is what is truly fair and what a conservative wants, not the redistribution of wealth. Even with the latest round of tax cuts, the top 5% of wage-earners in the country pay 75% of the taxes.

      Now, for those who will not flip burgers - you deserve to become homeless. I have flipped burgers, filled stock in a pharmacy and in a department store, and would continue to do so if it is what it would take to take care of my family.

      There is no such thing as a job too meanial or too boring to put food on the table or a roof over the heads of my family. My company closed in October of 2001 and I did whatever work I could for over a year until I was able to find a partner and put together a small company. It may work or it may not. We have a reall good product that a number of big-name companies are interested in licensing. We have about 7 weeks of money left. If we run out I have no problem going to every single business in the area and asking if they need any help at all.

      It is really sickening to hear all of the people on here whining about what the government and businesses owe them. They owe you nothing more than pay for the work you do. If you do it well, you may have a way to get them to compensate you more. Everyone that is whining in here about how their company let them go was certainly singing a different tuine when they were getting all those raises in the late 90s to keep them from leaving before the clinton recession hit in 2000 (It was actually November 1999 that I started noticing things turning around as Qualcomm stock started to drop).

      If you work in an industry that is constantly changing (IT), how do you expect "experience" from 10 years ago to help you? It wikll only help if you keep up-to-date with the latest technologies and can prove it by showing all of the varying things you have done over the years and how well you learn new technologies.

      I am sure I will get flamed for this, but I don't really care, since almost everyone on here does nothing but whine.

    14. Re:Leave the government out of it... by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      If you can think of a situation where America would be in a war that lasts long enough for us to need to import steel, and where every single steel producing nation is against us, then maybe you'd have a point. That kind of thing just doesn't happen any more. Any war big enough to have all the steel producing nations against us would be over in minutes (nukes). In any smaller war, we could import steel (I don't know off the top of my head who the big steel producers are, but I'd guess China and most of the former Warsaw Pact; the Soviets and Maoists were big on heavy industry).

      As for the whole governemnt thing, he did specify "excessive" government interference, so I think he agrees that government interference is necessary. On the other hand, I don't think civil rights are necessarily a good example. The government, for a long time, was the biggest impediment to equality, by specifying "seperate but equal" for schools, by segregating public busses, etc. Civil rights laws were only passed because a majority of the US population was in favor of it, and if a majority of the population believed people should be equal, why did we need a law, anyway?

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    15. Re:Leave the government out of it... by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, taxes don't just disappear. Every dollar taxed is a dollar spent on wages, on infrastructure, or on handouts (which can be counted as the same thing as wages, just wages for not doing anything). I'm all for cutting taxes and government expenditures, but don't think the economy would immediately double in size. There are plenty of companies, like Boeing, that depend heavily on governement defense contracts. There are plenty of individuals, such as SS recipients and government employees, who would lose their incomes. So NOT all of the customers would double their profits. In fact, simple economics shows that if you want to pull the country out of a depression, the way that gets you the most bang for your buck is government spending, not reduced taxes, because people will save some of the money that they get back in reduced taxes, whereas in increase in the government's budget will go 100% toward spending.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    16. Re:Leave the government out of it... by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1

      It's not enough that 46 cents of every dollar my company produces goes into a government coffer before hitting one of the employees bank acounts?

      That money doesn't go into "government coffers", it goes to pay for basic retirement benefits, teachers, public health, health care, clean cities, social services, etc.

      Without that, you wouldn't have a business. Your company on its own couldn't afford to create the roads, infrastructure, security, safety, laws, contracts, etc. privately that the government provides. In fact, it was precisely to allow companies like yours to exist that we, the people, have the government and taxes we have.

      It's ironic that small business people like yourself are often the ones belly-aching about this most because if that ever changes, you will be the first to go: security, education, and all the other things you depend on don't come from the tooth fairy.

      The government taxes productive businesses to give it to unproductive ones to "keep existing jobs."

      Your business (I'm assuming Feratech is your business) is probably not productive in a net sense: most of the value you give to your customers is not something you created but something that the US government's investment in networking research and infrastructure created over the last three decades. In effect, your wealth was indirectly taken out of the pockets of hundreds of millions of tax payers.

      There is nothing wrong with that--that's a choice we as a society made. What is wrong is that rather than thanking your stars for your good fortune of being in a position to receive such a windfall, by living in the US, you are being arrogant about it and belittle people less fortunate than yourself.

      But we agree to a certain degree: the government does waste a lot of money on "unproductive businesses". The biggest unproductive chunk is the US military, which is probably about 10x the size it needs to be. Farm subsidies, airline subsidies, and steel protectionism are other areas of colossal waste. If you want to see where your tax dollars are being wasted, that's the place to look.

      Without excessive government interference, we'd be twice the size we are now (read that as "creating more jobs" for those of you that believe in our Marxist/Fascist economy).

      US government services are already at a minimal level. If white collar law enforcement, education, healthcare, retirement, infrastructure, research funding, etc. get squeezed any more, businesses like yours simply won't be able to exist anymore.

      We have had the kind of laissez-faire capitalism you seem to advocate before. Read about it in your history books.

  197. Where did you hear that? by brokeninside · · Score: 1
    Objectives are over-rated. Most hiring managers ignore them at best. Consider what Christopher M. Russo of USENIX had to say on the question.
    I have started cutting these "Objectives" out and hanging them on my wall so I can look up occasionally and get a chuckle on an otherwise tense day. All job objectives tend to boil down to the following statement: "Seeking a position where I can work insanely long hours and use my godlike skills to solve impossibly complicated problems while working hand in hand with people who love me dearly because I'm such an amazing person."

    Oh please. These types of statements are neither honest nor objective. More often than not, they are just plain silly.

    For the most part, I personally feel that objectives and goals are a waste of space unless you really know what you want, and it is fairly specific. If you genuinely know, for example, that you are "seeking a management position in the technology field, preferably in IT, secondarily in development" or something like it, then great! Those people who have the job that you are looking for may call you. Those people who are looking for a peanut vendor will not. Perfection.

    Additionally, most current resume books advise leaving off the objective. Some will suggest replacing it with a summary.
  198. Diversify by xtal · · Score: 1

    I'm a EE. I'm thanking my lucky stars, because most people here will hire (or displace) someone with a CS degree for me. I remember deciding to do EE over physics in class one day in high school. Big day, that was.

    Anyhow - I don't just program - learn how to do something else. I've been learning how to rebuild engines - not the oil change stuff, the jack the engine out of the car variety. I've already had people approach me wondering if I can do work for them, and I've made a few bucks on the side. Anyone who can fix a computer or program can fix a car - hell, there's even programming involved.

    Same applies for industrial controls. There are many factories and production lines using older control systems - you can make them faster and more profitable by changing the electronics a little. I make a nice side income there, too.

    If things are really bad - move. If you don't want to, make do.

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:Diversify by HardCase · · Score: 1
      Anyhow - I don't just program - learn how to do something else. I've been learning how to rebuild engines - not the oil change stuff, the jack the engine out of the car variety. I've already had people approach me wondering if I can do work for them, and I've made a few bucks on the side. Anyone who can fix a computer or program can fix a car - hell, there's even programming involved.


      That's an excellent point. I'm an EE too, not because it's where the jobs were, but because I enjoy the field. I've managed to keep my job, but I also keep my eyes open and plan for the worst. I've saved money and make some on the side building and refinishing furniture. I do that because I enjoy it - it's not tech-related and it give me an opportunity to wind down from my "real" job.


      For those of us still gainfully employed, I would take your suggestion a step further. Learn to do something else that is unrelated to what you are doing now. If you're a programmer, learn to do something that has nothing to do with computers (it's possible...I don't have any computer-controlled woodworking tools). Do it because you want to do it, because it's fun. Get good at it. Hopefully you'll never have to fall back on it, but maybe it will be the backstop that keeps the mortgage paid or the lights on.


      -h-

  199. The Gartner Group? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "With the Gartner Group saying that over the next 18 months 10% of the remaining IT jobs are heading overseas"

    The gartner group also said that OS/2 would capture 35% of the market by 1994.

    What does that tell you?

    1. Re:The Gartner Group? by Colonel+Panic · · Score: 1

      The gartner group also said that OS/2 would capture 35% of the market by 1994.

      Yeah, you're right. Could be they're way low with that 10% estimate - maybe it's more like 20%.

  200. How do you afford the guilt for those benefits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people are posting about some of the benefits of having the time off after being laid off. Sure, the article was mostly sarcastic, but then there are replies about doing work around the house or upgrading your skills. People I know expect that too: clean the basement, fix up the house, have dinner ready when my wife gets home, work on a Masters, get a bunch of useless certifications (ignored without actual jobs experience).

    But how can you afford the guilt? The more I try doing , the guiltier I feel. If I have time or money to do whatever project, why am I not spending that time getting another job or figuring out another way to earn a living? I do less of these projects now than I did when I had no time to do them.

  201. Starting my own business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I gave up and walked away from the whole establishment after applying for a goverment business loan a few year back.

    I was turned down, of course, yet within 2 months I saw my company name driving around town, my business and clients being serviced by somebody else. The woman who did the paper work for the loan gave the idea to her sister. The business lasted about four years before going bankrupt (it was predictable and I had worked in an expansion). But the whole experience left a really foul taste in my mouth.

    1. Re:Starting my own business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to canada.

  202. You do understand..Insanity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called the curse of the eternal optimist.

    1-Optimist #1 I adviced (see reply). It's not just "jobs" we need, but enough of them to sustain the economy.

    I recommend reading this book for an understanding of HOW this situation is different than before, and WHY all this "advice" will not work as before.

    Remember the definition of insanity, is to do the same thing repeatedly, hoping for the same results.

  203. Heat in Winter... by jazman · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the stuff you hear on Jerry Springer when a lardarse gets heckled for being fat - "Heat in winter, shade in summer, baby", like, as if those "suprising benefits" make it worthwhile.

  204. join the army! by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Despite two recent wars killing lots of US soldiers, plus 12+ month tours in 130-degree desert dirt, the US army and reserves are having a record recruiting year. Its not pure patriotism, but economics. Most recruits said they need a steady job. Have to be under 35 to join.

  205. Work less, buy less by Drasil · · Score: 1

    Work less, buy less

    I saw that phrase spray painted on a wall in Carlisle (northern England) in 2001. I have to say it's one of the most profound and insightful phrases I have ever come across.

    The fact is that, as Marx and Engels correctly stated, capitalism leads to massive over-production, and because of this must constantly search for new markets for the goods it produces in order to justify itself. Now we have rampant globalisation it is no longer sufficient for this expansion to be geographical in nature. Instead the cult of marketing is used to persuade people that they need what recently didn't exist.

    I have expierienced poverty (or what passes for poverty in the industrialised west), and I have also expierienced a more conventional middle class existence. I can honestly say that you do not need what the arch-capitalists are trying to sell you.

    Why spend an hour commuting in your polluting vehicle to work all day in a job you hate for people you despise? Is that whay you really want to do with your life? Do the suger-water, status symbols, foreign holidays and useless junk make it worth while? I don't think so.

    I am not in favour of 'sponging' off society, that is not the answer either. Instead: Work less, buy less.

  206. Radical career change needed by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

    I know a number of former IT people who languished in umemployment for a long time before they realized those jobs are gone and never coming back, just like the steel mill jobs here in Pittsburgh. Now, one works at Marshalls (discount store), one drives a limo, and one sells furniture for a living. And they are better off.

  207. He should consider retirement!! by mustangdavis · · Score: 1

    Did you read his resume??? He has been working since 1967 (for NASA) and had a job up through this year (2003). If I'm doing the math correctly, he's been working for 36 years!!!! He also has a master's degree, so it is hard to say if he was working while he got that or if he stayed in school during that time, which should place him at about 58 - 60 years old!!!! He had some NICE jobs, so there had to have been SOME money that could have been saved. And after 36 years, and by the article, it sounds like he has his house paid off .... Unfortunately, this sounds like typical American downsizing ... and that due to his age. However, he should be able to begin to collect social security and (hopefully) find a much more stress free job (working at the local super market) ... which should be enough to get by on ... and should still provide him with LOTS of time to do all of the things he mentioned in the article. During this kind of economy, retirement might actually be the better option .... (again, depending on his actual age ... I'm only speculating as to what I think his age MIGHT be) Just some food for thought ... Now for the younger people, I have no idea what to say ... but I've been there, and done that ... and it sucks!

  208. *That's* your resume? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His resume sucks. Lots of stuff that sounded good in the 90's, but looks useless now.

    I swear kids these days can't manage their careers properly.

  209. $60K????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $60K? That won't pay my BMW's payment.

    You need 6 figures to live properly in today's economy.

    If you're getting by on $30K, you're living in poverty.

    1. Re:$60K????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $60k covers my Corvette payment, rent and food just fine. Learn to cook or sell your BMW.

    2. Re:$60K????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      $60K? That won't pay my BMW's payment.

      Your problem is that you're an idiot. Why are you making BMW payments when you could be making Civic or Corolla payments?

  210. Choad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, having looked at the guy's website and found his picture, it's no surprise he's unemployed. Look at him. The guy's a total ass-choad.

  211. Yeah it sucks...Basic math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all fine. Are you going to be a customer of my new business?(1) Remember right now quite a few of the established companies are complaining that people aren't buying what they're selling. This is absolutely the worst environment to start a business in, and the cost of failure is even higher than it normally is.

    (1) This advice also doesn't really address what's wrong with the US. A few will survive on their home-brewed businesses while the majority fail, because their plan to knock potential customers in the head and drag them in didn't work. You can't sustain an economy on the minority. Fix the underlying problem, and maybe your advice will have a chance.

  212. stupid leftist rant by Minter92 · · Score: 0

    Apearently being unemployed doesn't stop you from being a blinded liberal ranting againts the evils of Bush.. Sigh its morons like this that are ruining this country. Open your eyes you moronic liberal. Oh wait moronic liberal that's redundent.

  213. YES by CiXeL · · Score: 1

    "Second, are you somehow suggesting that the social welfare of minorities like the Iraqis and muslims is somewhat less valuable than an unemployed person in the US? Which is worth more? Is one okay to be unemployed and the other not? Why? One the surface your statement belies a latent racism/nationalism that is offensive at best and abhorrent at worse."

    You're dead on bud, I don't care about some fucktard camel jockey. I want a goddamn job!

    1. Re:YES by danheskett · · Score: 1

      Okay, that's fine. As long as that is the case. You are racist plus a nationalist. I am all for nationlism but not racism. Just checking what your position is.

      The original posted was also suggesting that he is a liberal. I am pointing out the flaw in his belief system. An inherent belief of modern liberalism is that nationalism and racism are both objectively wrong.

    2. Re:YES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool, come on over an clean my toilets, I'll give you $10 if you do a good job. BTW, drop the attitude or the deals off.

  214. Cubs games by hayriye · · Score: 1

    If you live in Chicago, you can go to day games in Wrigley Field.

  215. whatever by everflow · · Score: 1

    i'm not sure, if its just your current view of your situation, or you made an "unlucky" decisions a few years ago.

    in my opion, as long as you are not rich enough, making a decision about education should be about a career you can live on AND is a matter of interest to you. so ... even though current circumstances eliminates the earnig-perspective (which is not an easy one ... i know), it shouldn't feel like "wasted so much time, effort and money" because you spent these learning interesting stuff - you could have done worse.

    1. Re:whatever by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      everflow: "making a decision about education should be about a career you can live on AND is a matter of interest to you"

      This is basically the position that the UK govt. takes. When you are unemployed, they put pressure on you to find a job, and the "advisors" who help you actually get comission when you do eventually get off their books. However, they understand that you need to do something that you are at least vaugly interested in, and if you have qualifications they don't expect you to take something unskilled.

      There is a lot of logic in that, because it turns out that if you push people into jobs they don't like, they tend to underperform and get fired, and then they are even more unemployable.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  216. losing weight and saving by malice95 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Boy can I relate to this one.. When I was unemployed I lost 30 lbs. I think from just sheer worrying about getting another job, increased activity around the house, and stress. Now that I am back to work I quickly put the weight back on, but being unemployed has taught me quite a few lessons,

    1. SAVE!! (and I dont mean 50$ here and there) Hundreds of dollars or more a month if possible. You will need it if you are ever out of work for a long period of time. I just payed off my car so I am going to take every penny of that payment and put it in savings every month.

    2. Unemployment doesnt pay shit

    3. Its very easy to get used to living and eating well. Buy generic all the time if you can. Its just as good in most cases and every penny counts.

    4. In this economy its not a matter of If a rainy day is going to come, its WHEN a rainy day comes.

  217. Older than I Thought by ReadParse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While reading this article, which is really good, by the way, I clicked on the "resume" link and glanced at it. I figured he was a dot-com generation guy who had gotten out of school and started working for six-figured salaries until his various employers started showing up on f**kedcompany.com. You know, the same old story of the IT workers who didn't how much they had until they lost it. But Holy Astronauts, Batman! This guy worked on the friggin' APOLLO program. He worked at NASA from 1967-1971 (the year I was born).

  218. dumb story... by TheShadow · · Score: 1

    There michael goes again... posting dumb stories.

    In Soviet Russia... Dumb stories post MICHAEL!

    --

    --
    "What do you want me to do? Whack a guy? Off a guy? Whack off a guy? Cause I'm married."
  219. A rant that doesn't even make sense by siskbc · · Score: 5, Insightful
    And it closes with a really stupid anti-Bush link. Sigh. Bring a salt shaker if you're going to read it all.

    I agree, and I'll even say I don't understand how anyone of even lukewarm intelligence can blame the dot-bomb collapse on Bush. Don't get me wrong - I don't *like* Bush, and there's *plenty* that he directly answers for - but this isn't it.

    The economy was already heading south by the end of 2000, and the crash was, by that time, completely inevitable. Christ himself (I mean Greenspan) couldn't prevent it.

    So if you actually feel like blaming a President for the collapse, Clinton's your man.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:A rant that doesn't even make sense by Digizen64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, presidents don't control the economy but can influence the bone-crushing depths of a recession through sound fiscal, policy and social initiatives. Bush is a one trick pony i.e tax cuts. Clinton didn't create the boom nor did they create the bomb, they did do what they thought would create a favorable climate for an emerging Internet-enabled economy.

    2. Re:A rant that doesn't even make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if you read what Christ was saying at the time you KNOW he was TRYING to pop it.

      He kept raising interest rates and saying dot-com stocks were overvalued, etc. He went out of his way to destroy it. Probably too far.

    3. Re:A rant that doesn't even make sense by Aetrix · · Score: 1

      Can I point out something to you:

      The Dow Jones Index 1990-1999

      The Dow Jones Index 2000-2009

      Please note the current US administration is proudly featured over the top of the chart.

      Here's another good one: The NASDAQ

      The NASDAQ from Oct 97 - Sept 03.

      Our economy was driven into the ground by two things: 1. 9/11 2. The war on Iraq. If you notice, the economy started to recover after 9/11 but then the decision to go to "war" in Iraq and driven the economy down even further.

      --

      "One touch of Darwin makes the whole world kin." George Bernard Shaw
    4. Re:A rant that doesn't even make sense by jafac · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      One might not blame Bush. But one might blame the ideology of his party. Or the 1996 Republican Contract On America, which gutted the SEC, and signalled to all the fraudster's out there. . . LET'S GET READY TO RUMBLE!

      Additionally, the biggest responsibility for the economic decline goes to Hugo Chavez, who got Opec to cut supplies in 1999, causing an energy price spike. For those who believe high taxes causes the economy to slow down - high energy prices also do the same thing. For those who call it Clinton's Recession, recall that Clinton attempted to tap the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to mitigate the price spikes, and the Republicans tried to stop it. Then the Largest donator to the Republican party and George W Bush, Enron, used the crisis to fraudulently fix markets in California to bilk consumers out of billions. The dotcom crash was a side-effect.

      Then when you look at the Republican tendency to reduce rules, and the Bush record on lax enforcement of white collar crime, and his political appointments (Poindexter?!), and the conflicts of interest evident in each one, and add that to the Bush S&L scandal in 1990, Iran-Contra of the 1980's, a pattern emerges.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    5. Re:A rant that doesn't even make sense by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      And when the war was finally started, the economy started taking a sharp upturn - something that was delayed months by the pandering apologist appeasers and people who were simply anti-Bush for the sake of being anti-Bush.

      In case you haven't noticed, the stock market is booming. My 401k is up 50% since the beginning of this year. It's called supply side economics, and has traditionally been a precursor to lower unemployment. It's along the lines of "teach a man to fish" philosophy - put the money where jobs can be created so that people can get employed.

      The simple fact is that Clinton can't take credit for the boom in the 90's any more than Bush can take the blame.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    6. Re:A rant that doesn't even make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the toilet-bowl economy many of us are currently swimming in was not caused entirely by the dot-bomb. i would go so far as to argue that the dot-bomb was merely the canary in the mineshaft... an indicator of just how fucked the *rest* of our system largely was|is.

    7. Re:A rant that doesn't even make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      supply side economics is just more masturbatory mass psychology. complete wank. economics as generally practiced - supply-side or not - has as more to do with the failures of the model in question than the successes.

  220. Willfully Unemployed by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    Not too long ago, I resigned my (reasonably well paying) job without an immediate offer. I did this because of personal obligations which were impossible to fill while at my job at the time. These personal oblications began to become legally complicated and at the end, after much deliberation, I resigned my job and became willfully unemployed. At the moment I have no income. Period.

    At the same time, I have never worked so hard in all my life. Although I am able to spend time with my family, I have never before worked 13-hour days 6-7 days a week! I am developing new software with the hope that I can leverage it in developing a consulting business (and I am not legally able to be employed in the country where I am for the next 3-4 weeks anyway).

    I have found I am more creative than ever, and I am more *productive* than ever. I call that a real benefit. Now if I could get some income ;-)

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:Willfully Unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the spirit of capitalist every where. There is a growing underground economy, it starts when you start doing some work for your aunt or cousin and ends with a steady stream of people you *know*.

  221. job market/economy is improving... by way2slo · · Score: 1
    At least in the IT sector. Basically, the Baby Boomers are all starting to retire and the number of college graduates is only a small fraction of that segment of the population. Over time, there will be more jobs than people.

    On the political discussion, Alan Greenspan has more influence over the economy than whoever the president happens to be. I could never understand why people automatically give credit to the leader of the executive branch of the government for anything that happens to the economy. Was Hoover responsible for the stock market crash of '29? No. He just happened to be in office that year. Same with Clinton and the internet bubble. That's why you got to do you own thinking on these, or any, issues. People will try to sell you circumstantial evidense as hard fact and get you to buy into their ideas/scam.

  222. If you won't be doing much for a year anyway... by mizukami · · Score: 1

    Please consider teaching, especially if you are in the U.S. There is a huge demand for teachers of science, math, foreign language, special education, and other fields.

    Many states have special programs to attract new teachers from business and industry that, in effect, will give you not only teaching licensure but also a Master's degree-- for free (in the form of grants, forgiven loans, etc.)

    Teaching is of course a challenging job, and you'll never get rich doing it, but then again you can say that about working in a cubicle farm. But there's this Warm Fuzzy Feeling that you get when your blood, sweat, and tears are for the betterment of mankind, not stockholder profit.

    --
    CC-licensed translations of Japanese fiction: http://tonygonz.blogspot.com/
  223. WTF by IdJit · · Score: 1

    Since when is someone's pathetic blog considered news? Sweet jesus on a motorbike!! There's gotta be something relevant happening out there SOMEWHERE!!

  224. Genuinely Uninspired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How genuinely uninspired. Do the slashdot editors actually read submissions?

  225. This guy is a self-loather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy has so little self esteem to feel good about himself he compares himself to the president. All while making no logical sense:

    "I'm better than the president so I must be good!"

    "The president is awful!"

    "But I'm better than the president so I must be good!"

    It is no wonder this guy has been unemployed for two years. Attitudes such as this guy's inferiority complex and his elitism come out in interviewers, especially trained interviewers.

    I do feel for the guy because he is in a bad spot. He is a software developer in his fifties. Few will want to hire him, because of the very real age discrimation in the high-tech industry. Also, based on his resume, he greatest contributions to society were in his first two jobs, working on the space program. No wonder he has complex, he peaked way too soon.

    And of course, he knows whose fault it is that his career peaked in 1972 and he was never able contribute to society in the same way again. George W. Bush.

  226. Why would you work for minimu wage? by Kombat · · Score: 1

    This advice is not very practical. I live in Canada. When you get laid off from a high-tech firm up here (as I and 4 of my closest friends have been), you get nothing from the government until your severance runs out. The government's calculations, however, are a little different from your former employer's. Your former employer gives you about 4 months of salary, which the government believes should last you 6 months. Then, there is a 2 week grace period, then your EI benefits start. However, you get paid at the end of each period, so there's 2 more weeks with no money coming in, for a total of 7 months.

    Now, EI in Canada caps off at $400/week (minus income tax, of course - you gotta charge income tax on EI benefits, it only makes sense, right?), so you see about $700 every two weeks, once the benefits kick in. They'll keep on flowing for 50 weeks.

    If you get a job during this time - any job - the benefits stop and the clock resets.

    Now do some math. You get almost a full year of benefits, paying $400/week. You would have to find a full-time job that paid at least $10/hour just to match that. And while you were flipping those burgers at Micky-D's, earning a ludicrous salary compared to your high-school co-workers, you are unable to look for a job in your field because you're too busy cleaning deep friers and asking "you want fries with that?"

    The banks, however, still expect you to keep paying the $500/month you owe them for those student loans they gave you to get that fancy, expensive techy education. Of course, they give you a break on the interest while you're unemployed (if you file for interest relief), but now that you're working again, they expect you to resume the payments.

    Not to mention rent, gas, insurance, utilities, groceries... all that was OK when EI was kicking in the $400/week, because you could devote 100% of your time to looking for a job and getting back into the game. But if we took your advice (which amounts to little more than "suck it up and take a crappy job which gives you less than you'd get from EI doing nothing at all"), we'd be stuck in that low-paying sh*t job indefinitely, as we slowly bled ourselves into bankruptcy.

    Great advice.

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  227. sleep... by kidlinux · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a student one of the most important things I've learned is getting up early. That is, not sleeping in. Getting up by 8am every day makes me more productive than I would have ever guessed. Any later than that, and my day is toast. It's strange.

    An even better combination is getting up bloody early and going to the gym. My gym opens at 6:30am, and I'm there when the doors open. A jog and some good stretching is a great way to get fired up for the day. Some weights too, if I have time. I did this in the summer before work too. Makes my day much better.

    I even did it when I was home from school and before I started work. You'd be surprised at how nice mornings can be.

    Whatever you do, don't sleep in! (well, maybe on the weekends once in a while ;) Seriously, getting up early makes a big difference. Even when I'm fartin around on my computer. I though hackin code was all about stayin up late - it's all about gettin up early! It's just a matter of self-control. You're workin on somethin and you just wanna keep goin - but it's that much better with a fresh mind in the early morning. Some problems I've spent hours on the night before I'll wake up the next day and solve in 5 minutes. It's crazy.

    Try it!

    --
    -kidlinux.
  228. How To Be Disloyal by radtea · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This article is mostly dead-on, but misses the mark in two respects on the loyalty question.

    In the first place, it's wrong to say that companies are loyal to their Boards of Directors, or shareholders. The fact is that companies are loyal to nothing whatsoever, except possibly to the neurotic personal needs of their executives and managers. If companies were loyal to their boards or shareholders we wouldn't see the gross mis-management and poor corporate governance that is all too common.

    In the second place, employees should not just not be loyal, they should be actively disloyal, in the sense that every employee should be in the job market all the time. Seriously.

    That means keeping your resume up-to-date, and reading the job ads in your field (print and on-line) regularly. If you see something that looks particularly interesting, don't be shy about applying for it, and if you get an interview go for it. It'll keep your interview skills in shape, and you never know--it might be your dream job. Don't worry about wasting anyone's time: as mentioned by other posters, companies advertise jobs they have no intention of filling, so turn-about is fair play.

    Furthermore, you should be fairly up-front with your current employer about this attitude after you've been with them for a year or so. You don't have to make a big deal of it--just mention casually now and then that you've seen that Company X is hiring (it helps if Company X is a well-known competitor, as your boss won't know if you're keen and keeping an eye on the market or thinking of jumping ship.)

    No matter who you work for, you are your own boss. You are the only boss who will ever care about your career, your goals, your well-being or the well-being of your family.

    After moving into the tech world from academia seven years ago, I've had five jobs. I jumped ship twice, companies folded twice, and I'm currently running my own business after a period of unemployment resulting from the last company folding, so I know whereof I speak. Both as a developer and a manager I pursued the policy I've outlined above.

    As a manager, I encouraged members of my team to do the same--I wanted them to be able to walk in the door in the morning and ask, "What has the company done for me lately?" and be able to find an answer that would motivate them to work hard and well, which they did. Of course, part of the answer to that question is always, "Paid my salary", which is important to keep in mind.

    Senior management, of course, did not like my attitude--amongst other things, they were unhappy that I insisted that every member of the development team actually take all the accrued vacation owing to them! But so long as my team kept mysteriously producing outstanding results they had to put up with it.

    And equally unsurprisingly, those outstanding results did not stop half my team from being laid off (over my objections) a few months prior to the company folding up.

    --Tom

    --
    Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    1. Re:How To Be Disloyal by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      No matter who you work for, you are your own boss. You are the only boss who will ever care about your career, your goals, your well-being or the well-being of your family.

      This is one of the key reasons the workplace is such a shithole these days. It wasn't like this 40 and 50 years ago, when coworkers (including management) were part of the community just like neighbors.

      It's not a coincidence that people were actually "employed" then, as opposed to "being paid for a while." It was not uncommon for people to work at the same company for decades.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  229. Some Esential Truths... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A Loser is always Loser

    A Winner is always a Winner

    Having spend 16 months sans job, with a new baby showing up about 3/4 of the way through it, I can safely say, that your attitude towards life is what makes it (and you) a good, worthwhile Winner, or a pathatic, whiney Loser.

    Remember, a loser not only looks to lay blame for their predicment on ANYONE else, but insists on holding that someone else repsonsible for fixing their problem.

    A winner will note how they got screwed, remember not to let it happen again, and WORK to pull themselves out of whatever mire they are stuck in.

    There were times, when I was looking at the mounting doctor bills, borrowed money payments, and other things stacking up, when I wondered if _I_ was truly worthless, because I couldn't find someone to pay me full time (like everyone else, I did the consultant thing to tide me over).

    Every time, I came back to the fact that we let dumb asses screw up our businesses, and the Head Honcho in DC did NOTHING not even think about providing oversite, we have to pay the price for their lack of responsibility.

    The fact that it was all coming home to roost a few MONTHS before 9/11 happened, and that so many companies blamed that tradegy for their failure sickened me. This was going to happen one way or another, because too many companies used their VC money and the media to inflate and overhype themselves, with the SOLE purpose of rapeing their investors.

    When companies are not in business to make money, but to 'increase shareholder value', that is always a bad sign. When a company is in business to 'build enough value to sell to another company' that is a REALLY bad sign. Yet over and over again, we saw BILLIONS of dollars handed over to people who's express purpose was to do exactly that! They called it 'The New Economy' and said all the old rules were wrong...

    Yea, Right.

    It wasn't my fault I had lost my job, but it was my problem. What was I doing about it... Well for one thing, I woke up early every morning. I had a routine. I had a new job, I would tell myself. I was now in marketing, and the product was ME. First 2 or 3 hours of the morning was spent pouring over 10 diffrent on-line newspapers (they have better want-ads than monster, with less competition). A break for Lunch. After noon was spent calling as many new prospects as I could looking for full or part time work. Break for dinner, and I would sit back and enjoy the fact that I had not wasted a day.

    Of course, it was nice to be able to do that at home, with my lovely wife (and eventualy child) to comfort me, and remind me why I wanted to do what I was doing.

    I considered starting my own business, but remembering how hard I had worked at previous ones, decided that now as not the time.

    I survived. You will too, if you keep your head up, and continue to BELIEVE your skills are worthy of getting paid. If you can't convince yourself, you sure arn't going to convince anyone else they should pay you!

    If you believe your skills are not going to get you the 'big check', for whatever reason (lack of experience, too much competition, etc), then you are in the wrong business. Your carreer needs to provide you with satisfaction beyond just the money you expect to gain. If you REALLY enjoy what you are doing, the money is a secondary consideration.

    When you are successful at what you do, that will result in you making lots of money. Don't make the mistake of thinking making a lot of money makes you sucessful. Most of the time making a lot of money is the RESULT of sucess.

    So, your goal should not be to make the big paycheck, INITIALY, your goal should be to be the BEST at whatever it is you do. That will LEAD to the big paycheck, if that is what you want.

    If your goal is making a lot of money, you will FAIL. Only the guys that work in the mint make money. If you want to EARN a lot of money, see the previous paragraph.

    After working at my new job for only six months, we have virtualy erased all the debt built up during our 'vacation', and are closing on a new house at the end of the month...

    Go and do Likewise, The money is out there. If you can't be bothered to pick it up, I have no sympathy for you.

  230. You do understand..Call of the optimist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " There are jobs out there. This guy just doesn't want to do any of them. Open up the paper. Look in the classified section. See the pages and pages of jobs open? There's got to be SOMETHING there he can do. Just that there are lots of things there he WON'T do."

    Oh yeah! That's what's wrong with all of the unemployed. They will not take all of the jobs listed in the paper. You know? I'd give you a penny for your thoughts, but I don't want to overpay for stupid advice.

    1. Re:You do understand..Call of the optimist. by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that was what is wrong with ALL the unemployed, just this guy. But to make the claim that there are NO jobs, when there are clearly MANY jobs, is foolish.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  231. Older than I Thought-preconceptions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    " While reading this article, which is really good, by the way, I clicked on the "resume" link and glanced at it. I figured he was a dot-com generation guy who had gotten out of school and started working for six-figured salaries until his various employers started showing up on f**kedcompany.com. "

    And there in lies most of the problem. Nearly everyone replying, comes in with bad preconceptions.

    I got news for everyone. There are a lot of people out of work, whom the dot.com never even touched. There were a lot of people who only made 5 figures, or less. Just because a few made out well doesn't mean we all did.

  232. If you like this article... by hamhocks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you liked this article, then definitely must read Juliet B. Schor's "The Overspent American: Why We Want What We Don't Need." She makes a great argument that Americans, by default, are caught in a see-want-borrow-buy-repay cycle.

    The problem is marketers who traditionally appealled to the top 5% of income earners (e.g. Tommy Hillfiger) now direct their marketing efforts to all 100% of households. Whereas 95% of households never knew who Hillfiger was 20 years ago, everybody does does. And now that we see, we want, and borrow (because we're not among the top 5% of income earners) to buy, and repay. The repay part is a kicker. This means working longer hours in a job you may not even like because you have to pay back you $15,000 in credit card debt.

    Ms. Schor makes a very well-researched article that explores the different influences that contribute to the desire to purchase. She also includes a discussion of how some people have bucked the trend to more by going less. She calls these folks, like the author above, "downshifters."

    As a freshly minted "downshifter," I highly recommend the read.

  233. Education is the main benefit of unemployment. by $criptah · · Score: 1

    The article is interesting, but misleading. See, I was unemployed for several weeks and I found the same benefits of having a butt load of free time. I started designing my own site, running, reading more physics books, etc. However, I could not do any of these things without thinking "How am I going to survive without money?" Also, I have learned a couple of things.

    For example, I have found out that corporations do not give a damn about their employees when shit hits the fan. Businesses are good to you when they're doing well. If not, the owners will pocket the money and disappear faster than a prom dress. Moreover, I learned how to work the system.

    Yes, even humans should go through a social evolution and learn how to survive. Please do not waste your time while you're unemployed and learn how to fight back. As for me, I learned some taxation laws. Specifically, how to write things off taxes, how benefit from college loans and mortgages. Additionally, I signed up for several college courses that I am going to attend for free! That is right, free education. It is very easy to do, especially when you're unemployed or have a small income. Next year I am going to go to UMass and because my last years W2 forms (and taxt returns) scream "This dude is broke!" I am going to get a full ride paid for by the state of Massachusetts. I am going to take a few business and English classes, mainly to improve my weak areas: economics and grammar. I am sure that the rest of you could learn something. Later.

  234. can't get work volunteering either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have plenty of free time and like to play on the internet. My church needs a www site. Seems like a good opportunity to volunteer, right? Not so fast. They've been talking about doing it for years and there is a committee to pursue exactly that. The committee members don't have time (since they work) and they don't want anyone to get started without them. I have a lot less patience for that when I'm not being paid to be bored and frustrated. Oh well, back to slashdot.

  235. europe style govt/living may be unattainable by Cryofan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    America is too big now to be able to control our own govt. Look at what they are doing--cramming in every possible immigrant so as to continue to lower wages and increase real estate values, etc. With so fragmented a populace, how can we possibly fight back against our own govt?

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  236. He must be a Democrat, too. by pmz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From his GWB rant: "Both men know that the Clinton presidency was the country's longest and most profound sustained era of growing optimism, wealth, opportunity, and hope!"

    What a trivial and superficial inference to make about a 4-year presidency which lies in the midst of much longer business cycles. The success of the USA really has little to do with Democrats or Republicans. Instead, it has to do with the US Constitution providing the essential freedom for people to seek prosperity. All the last several decades of government has succeeded in doing is slowing that progress through obsessive regulation that often trumps our original freedoms in favor of political ends.

    Here's a hint: even the Democrats can't save us from GWB and his cronies, because their only differences are the causes they use to front their agendas.

  237. Europe is not that great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever lived in Europe? I have. I don't really know about the rest of Europe, but Spain is not at all what you just described.

    Do they have universal health care? Yes, but it sucks. A lot. The dental is worse. If you saw the average person's teeth, you'd get private dental care, I guarantee it.

    Do they work less? They sure do. In fact, an enormous chunk don't work at all! They live in government housing with government subsidie and get there government health care. Is it good living? No! It's horrible!

    And do you think it's good that they don't work as much altogether? Of course not! To get anything fixed over there, even when you are paying, takes forever. Good service is not to be found, except at bars.

    Consumer Spending? I'm sure they spend a lot less on "consumer products", but only because they spend all of their money on beer, cigarettes, high -price gas, and way over-priced telephone service.

    I admit that slowing down and spending omre time on important things is a really good idea, but Europe (Spain at least) is not a good example of this. Spend time with kids? No one even pays attention to their kids over there. The kids all grow up in the streets.

  238. Know we know why! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But perhaps the greatest benefit of being unemployed is this. I now feel absolutely free to despise George W. Bush. Oh, of course I despised him before I lost my job. But now I know I'm not alone."

    I guess now we know why you're unemployed ... you blame others for your own lack of initiative!

    Loser.

  239. Would it be a troll if the rifle were open source? by tjstork · · Score: 1


    Are the drinks free on a hijacked jet?

    I dunno..

    --
    This is my sig.
  240. What a Hypocrite by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    On the one hand he gladly admits that he buys the store brands because they're cheaper--and yet he complains that his employer let him go because he's too expensive. That's the essence of the free market: he was selling his labour at too high a price for what his employer could afford, exactly like the name brands are selling at too high a price for him to afford. The situations are exactly parallel.

    And he should note that the recession is not Bush's fault, but Clinton's, and that the recovery is doing as well as it can, given that the public sector is as large as it is (the public sector acts as a deadweight on the economy: not too bad when it's strong, but terrible when it's weak).

    1. Re:What a Hypocrite by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1
      he was selling his labour at too high a price for what his employer could afford, exactly like the name brands are selling at too high a price for him to afford. The situations are exactly parallel.

      Except that one is a can of food and the other is a person.

      the recession is not Bush's fault, but Clinton's

      This is debateable, and it is perhaps neither. But Bush hasn't done a whole lot to help. Giving more money to people who already have alot doesn't create better investment opportunities. And when companies get free money they just increase top management bonuses. Supply side economics is a myth. I was laid off about two years ago. I found a better job within a few months, so I was one of the lucky ones. But I must say that it was hard to believe that the company couldn't afford my $40,000 salary while the CEO was making $600,000 and had taken home $25 million in stock options the previous year. I understand that it is a matter of priorities, but don't tell me they have no choice.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    2. Re:What a Hypocrite by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      The can of food is made by people. The corporation employing those people is funded by people. It makes exactly as much sense to continue employing an expensive worker as it does to continute shopping at an expensive store, or purchasing an expensive product.

    3. Re:What a Hypocrite by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1
      I get your point, and you are correct. Corporations have to make belt tightening decisions like any financial entity. I just bristle a bit when we apply the same cold calculus to a person's livelihood as we do to a can of food. This is why I added the anecdote about my previous employer. I would like to see some CEO's taking a pay cut before laying people off. I have heard of it happening, but it is rare. Or maybe the employee could be offered a pay cut. If it were done in good faith (i.e. without top management continuing to make millions) it might go over.

      A can of food does not have a family to support. Though I agree with your assesment, I don't like to reduce people to producers or resources. I think it is detrimental to us as people and as a society. I have observed that business' overarching concern is to it's immediate bottom line and it bums me out. I guess thi si what makes me a damn liberal. Just my emotional $0.02.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  241. Re:Depressing read (I feel your pain) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm no longer looking for the good tech jobs anymore. Instead, I've enrolled at the local university to earn a B.A. in English -- or maybe psychology -- or anything else that doesn't smell like IT or technology."

    Oh yeah, a BA in English is going to bring the 50-60k your desired, right? Get out of my career you carpetbagger!

  242. Some clarifications by the original poster by Nice2Cats · · Score: 1
    Oh yes Sir! The finest politicians money can buy! The guy with the most bucks wins.

    Er, no. You are thinking of the U.S. legal system. In the political system, you need a certain amount of money, but after a that level is reached, it can go either way.

    You, Sir, are a troll, and an Anonymous Coward to boot, but I've got some time on my hands, and there are some missunderstandings here that could spread.

    First, "democracy" and "republic" are technical terms here. A democracy gives the population and enormous share in saying things. A republic has a limited participation. For example, the U.S. lets you elect judges, something that is unheard of in most of Europe. You can elect police chiefs in some parts of the country, etc., etc. In Europe, only the Swiss come close to have this kind of freedom, and it is true I should have pointed this out.

    The best example is the death penalty [for the record: I am against it]. The reason why Europe doesn't have the death penalty while some U.S. states do is not because the Europeans are morally superior, but because they are not allowed any say on the matter. Basically, the governments of France and Germany and Italy are telling the population: We don't care if you want to kill criminals, you ain't going to get it, because we are a republic and you don't get to decide these sort of things. In the U.S., as a democracy, people do get to decide, and in some places they decide they want the death penalty.

    The U.S. did in fact start off as a republic, which is why there are a lot of quotes to that effect like the Pledge. For example, the original blueprint for Senate is basically the same model as Germany's Bundesrat today: The states decide who gets to sit. But the U.S. has evolved into a democracy: The members of the U.S. Senate are elected by the people today. Is this a good thing? Good question. Look at California.

    Anyway, note that I didn't say that republics are less free than democracies or that the people there have less rights than other countries -- given the laws passed in the U.S. after 9/11, there is no way any an American could say such a thing (a right to privacy, anyone? A trip to Guantanamo?).

    What you can do in the U.S. system far better than in any European one I know of is throw the bastards out. Because U.S. politicians are elected as people, if you don't like the guy, he is gone in six years max. Most European politicians are elected via their party; if you want to get rid of them, you have vote for a completely different party. If he is high up in the party, you probably won't even get him out that way as long as the party isn't thrown out of parliament completely. Fat chance. Pity the Europeans: When they watch their news at night, they know that they will probably be seing those same faces for the rest of their lives, and there is not a damn thing they can do against it.

    This is what my last line refered to: The population in the U.S. could have a far greater influence on policy than possible in Europe -- if they wanted to, and so they could get a lot changed.

    Sadly, Americans don't go to elections that often, and so we end up where we are today.

    1. Re:Some clarifications by the original poster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are going to correct someone at least get it right. A republic is a form of government where the populace elects representatives who make laws, run the government, etc. A democracy is where the populace votes on laws directly. The US government is a republic since the populace does not directly vote on legislation. The fact that the US directly elects representatives does not make it a democracy.

    2. Re:Some clarifications by the original poster by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1

      First, "democracy" and "republic" are technical terms here. A democracy gives the population and enormous share in saying things. [...] The best example is the death penalty [for the record: I am against it]. The reason why Europe doesn't have the death penalty while some U.S. states do is not because the Europeans are morally superior, but because they are not allowed any say on the matter

      Germany, France, and Britain are, of course, democracies.

      The reason why they don't have the death penalty is because it violates their constitutions and European human rights conventions. Referendums and politicial decisions in the US are also routinely thrown out because they violate the US Constitution. In fact, I guarantee you that sooner or later, US courts will declare the death penalty unconstitutional in the US as well.

      Because U.S. politicians are elected as people, if you don't like the guy, he is gone in six years max. Most European politicians are elected via their party; if you want to get rid of them, you have vote for a completely different party. [...] Pity the Europeans: When they watch their news at night, they know that they will probably be seing those same faces for the rest of their lives, and there is not a damn thing they can do against it.

      The "choice" that US voters get is meaningless because it doesn't actually affect the policies that get enacted. Presidentail votes are about whether Clinton got a blowjob from an intern and whether Bush's drinking problem has stopped, not policy issues.

      Europeans actually have had far more meaningful political choices. Over the last couple of decades, Germany, France, and the Netherlands have gotten powerful parties standing for positions on the environment, immigration, and education, that were previously unrepresented in Europe and still are nearly completely ignored by any US party with any power. There is still far more thoughtful political participation by citizens in those countries than in the US because their choices still matter.

      The population in the U.S. could have a far greater influence on policy than possible in Europe -- if they wanted to, and so they could get a lot changed.

      Theoretically, that may or may not be true. In practice, the US population has much less say in the policies of the nation than Europeans.

      Sadly, Americans don't go to elections that often, and so we end up where we are today.

      That isn't apathy, it's the simple realization that, given the way the US political system operates in practice, they don't have meaningful choices. Clinton, Dole, Gore, Bush, they are basically all roughly interchangeable. And look at the choice we get in California: Davis, Bustamante, Schwarzenegger. None of them has a coherent vision or proposals, and even if they did, they'd be foolish to articulate them before the election. There is no point in voting in most US elections.

  243. Re: what is FP? by The+Kow · · Score: 1

    there's an acronym for that?

    --
    Moo
  244. Seen, of course. Whether they will listen... by krysith · · Score: 1

    I doubt it. This is /. after all - if you can't bash someone for posting personal thoughts on the web here, where can you? ;)

    It is very nice of you to defend Mr. Dvorkin. I agree that black humor is sometimes the best way to deal with the slings and arrows of this life. Dvorkin appears to have a good sense of humor (at least, good for him, which is what really matters), so I expect that he will do fine. The real risk in unemployment is not losing your job, or your money, but rather your life, hope and mind. Some people take it very hard. As long as circumstances can get better, losing a job is only a temporary setback.

    I've been there. I spent a year not getting a paycheck, lost my girlfriend, got evicted - the whole nine yards. I have much sympathy for what many people (inside and outside the so-called "tech sector") are going through. I'm sorry things are so bad in Denver right now. It will get better. I was on the leading wave (1999-2000). Now I have a good job with a great boss, and will likely be quiting sometime in the next year to start another business (yes, the boss knows). Maybe I ought to look at Denver...

    Oh, and to anyone who is going through the unemployment blues, here are some lessons I learned:
    1) Don't take it out on those around you. Your friends and family will stick by you, but it's not their fault and they don't deserve it.
    2) Consider a career change. Maybe it's for you, maybe it's not. I was stubborn - I refused to join the "tech sector" even though that's where all the jobs were (I still get a little angry when I hear IT called that - like nuclear fusion research doesn't involve technology). I think I made the right decision for me, but it cost me a year of agony. There are other industries hiring right now. Know any unemployed nurses? If a job is more important to you than doing what you do, follow the jobs.
    3) Don't sit and sulk. Make friends with people around you. First, because friends are good, and secondly, because that's likely how you'll be hired. I got my job after mentioning to my barber that I was a physicist. Turned out she had another customer who was hiring physicists...

  245. Couldn't finish the article.... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    His bias againts George Bush was just too much to take.

  246. Re:For perks of being unemployed without the guilt by linzeal · · Score: 1
    Perhaps, I spoke too early in the morning I had to wake up at 7am (to borrow from family guy, "I did not know there was a 7am why didn't anyone tell me?") to hear a badly translated robotics course in spain with wind shear, why nasa did not use their weather control ray is beyond me?

    I apologize to all those that are neither liberal arts majors nor use calculators in their graduate study programs. Is calculator use predicative of being an engineering student mostly?

  247. Global Rich List by sleepingsquirrel · · Score: 1

    According to the Global Rich List the richest 5% in the world have a yearly salary starting at $26,000 and the richest 1% starts at $40k.

    1. Re:Global Rich List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, horseshit.

  248. Re:this just in!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IN SOVIET RUSSIA, new natalie portman masturbating hot grits pouring beowulf cluster of cowboy neal overloards welcomes YOU, for one!

  249. Commodity people by AntonyBartlett · · Score: 1
    It's the Fight Club paradox - those people most necessary to run the world are the ones getting the most shat upon.

    If you have a large enough labour pool then you can hire and fire at will. Especially if, through a process of industrialisation, you have gradually streamlined the tasks they do. At a certain point, the individual becomes powerless, you achieve liquidity, and people become a commodity.

    It's not a paradox, it's an inevitability, because the people most necessary to power our society are the ones who are going to get commoditized first.

    Sorry to sound so cheerless, but let me give you another example of a commodity: a battery. Welcome to The Matrix. Have a nice day.

    1. Re:Commodity people by AntonyBartlett · · Score: 1

      Oh, by the way, did I mention that it's us next? IT has acheived liquidity, and is starting to flow overseas (to anywhere that is "downhill" in terms of cost)

  250. Work. Why? by theolein · · Score: 1


    My last two jobs in the IT sector were so fucking painful that I now (after 3 months of unemployment) am seriously considering either starting my own business in Multimedia (my original foeld) or opening up a restaurant and leaving IT entirely.

    Those two jobs had bosses who stupid in the IT sense of the word (both would get into screaming fits of rage when their fucking Outlook or some other POS was quacking again without even trying to listen to the problems involved in whatever technology was the current boo haa). Both bosses were plainly and simply cruel (Being forced in both jobs to do everything from design webpages to fixing MSOffice problems and system admin and doing enormous amounts of overtime and being treated like shit every single fucking day). Both of them used trumped up downright lies to get me fired in the end. I was and am almost completely burned out. There were many times when I just wanted to fucking kill myself and get the fucking agony of having to work for a fucking nazi from 7AM to 9PM every day over. NO social life left, nothing.

    FUCK THEM and fuck the capitalist dream that says you're worth fuckall as a person in this world.

    I want another job and have the same problems finding one as most of the people here, but I'm simply not prepared to be a modern day cotton picker licking the bosses gangrenous dick anymore.

    1. Re:Work. Why? by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      There were many times when I just wanted to fucking kill myself and get the fucking agony of having to work for a fucking nazi from 7AM to 9PM every day over. NO social life left, nothing.

      I have walked out of those sort of jobs long before then... You know you can say "no"... nobody's forcing you to work for them...

      Personally I would never take on an offer of employment with a firm that has such expectations from it's workers... I have my pride, and I want my quality time with my children as well.

      PS. I am currently unemployed (Project finished)... and I'm enjoying it. All that time for personal projects that I never had time for before... next week, I get to try updating my kernel to 2.6... I've never dared mess with the distro before and now I've got plenty of time and a spare computer to actually do it. And it will all be going into my resume as well...

      Oh and I've got plenty of time to fix borked microsoft windows installations as well... It's a nice little earner :)

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  251. Holy smokes, MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good gravy, finally a voice of reason! At last somebody who isn't afraid to say that corporations aren't dark-hearted, evil bastards who don't give a damn about anything but their wallets. Right on!

  252. Al Franken? Your kidding right? by MoronBob · · Score: 1

    I'm so glad my employment doesn't depend on presidents or politicians. I have held a job almost continually since I was 13 and I'm now 41. Of course I some times have had to work as a cook or a gas station attendant but no president has ever prevented me from making a living or supporting my family. As for what Al Franken says: If you are listening to him for advise you have much bigger problems than unemployment.

    --
    Telecommuting! What about socialization?
    1. Re:Al Franken? Your kidding right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah well you've not had the problem of a wife that started suffering massive seizures 17 years after you were married or an autistic child.
      A gas station job won't even begin to pay the cost of medication let alone feed, house or clothe them.
      The price of just one damned smart bomb that missed it's target would sustain me for ten fuckin years.
      I guess I could just cut and run like your cowardly ass would.
      Hell I could take care of myself to if that's all I cared about.
      Have you read any of his books or seen any CSPAN video lately. I'd vote for him. He has a better grasp of what's really going on than any politician who's spouted off on any news network.

    2. Re:Al Franken? Your kidding right? by MoronBob · · Score: 1

      for your information fucknut I have a son that has epilepsy that is the result of the two brain surgeries he had because a doctor in Berkeley didnt want to miss a golf game and fucked up his delivery. He was my first son and I watched him have the first surgery at two days old. Blue fucking cross Blue fucking shield refused to pay and thats when I lost my house and everything I owned. This was after being fired for some retard punching me in the face because I told him I didnt like my asian wife being called a "gook that should be shot". I took my loses and moved to Colorado where my son developed epilepsy as a result of the surgery and the mold in the duplex we were renting which also caused kidney damage in my second son. After my wife having 5 miscarrages we have givin up on having anymore children. So look you deformed piece of shit, You don't have a monopoly on suffering. Your problem is your taking advise from someone dummer than your self and your still blaming your problems on me and everyone else. I take advise from those who have overcome their problems not from morons like Al Franken.

      --
      Telecommuting! What about socialization?
  253. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed-Failed math by Kombat · · Score: 1

    Because over 80% of all new small businesses fail in their first 24 months. And they take a frightening amount of capital with them. If you've been unemployed for 2 years, where would you get the money to pour into a new business? How long would you keep pouring money into that business if it was operating in the red?

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  254. I have a job... by Syberghost · · Score: 1

    ...you insensitive clod!

  255. Demographics will change the employment situation by Doofus · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In a recent article in Business2.0 ( September 2003), The Coming Job Boom, the authors demonstrate quite handily that over the next 20 years or so ( beginning sooner, rather than later, for the impatient or unemployed out there ), the baby boomers are going to be retiring. IN DROVES. HUGE FLOCKS, running from the workplace to drive their RVs around the country ( Side Note: Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway holding company just invested some ungodly amount in an RV insurance company. Don't think he's doing that just for a few extra bucks.)

    The article describes, sometimes in painstaking detail (and with a number of information-dense graphs), that this demographic issue is inexorable, and that the most serious problems will be in the skilled job market. Those retiring booomers are going to leave gaps in the job market the size of Meteor Crater, and those of us in Generations X and Y will have some sense of job security again.

    The authors provide a list of the jobs that will be highest in demand - and their comments in the text indicate that the shortage of tech workers in the late 1990s was nothing compared to what's coming.

    Here's some of the list:

    Systems Analyst - approx 60% growth

    DBA - approx 65% growth

    Network/System Admin - approx 80% growth

    Software engineers - between 85-100%

    So hang in there.

    --
    If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; ... it invites anarchy. - Brandeis
  256. The rich are waging war on the poor. by potnoodle · · Score: 0

    Of course we can't compete with the emerging third-world masses on wages. These irresponsible breeders keep pumping out kids that grow up to despair so much that the only recourse is to take on a slave-wage or die trying to get in to the richer countries, where they will be exploited again, but not so much as before (and drag down local wages, therefore exporting their misery). It's quite strange to see that the US can put up tariffs for steel but not for IT services... No unions for geeks I suppose. No unity, no common voice, so most get shafted. The real problem of this sick planet is greed. The Fat Pigs that control most of the capitalist system (admirable in many ways) are not interested in long-term responsibility. They are there to fill their pockets and "after me, the deluge, for all I care". It's this selfish attitude that is destroying the hopes and aspirations of millions of young and not-so-young people today. "oh, we know." they will say, but do nothing because it is not in their interest. They are just too many of us on this planet and it's only getting worse. Too many people + rich getting richer + middle classes getting poorer = WAR. Whether it's only an economic war remains to be seen. Oh, and to employers moaning about state charges being too high, I don't hear you complaining about the way having lots of unemployed around allows you to drag down wages and standards of living of those you employ !

  257. Also, network as much as possible by xtal · · Score: 1

    Bodywork is another good one. Lots of work, and opportunnity to work for cash under the table. The worse the economy gets, the more work there is, too. I try to learn how to do something completely different every few years. Things that didn't seem to be practical (turbocharging hondas) have lead to things that are practical - much better understanding of control systems and noise tolerant embedded systems.

    Networking is really important as well. Most of the jobs I've gotten have been the result of giving talks at shows, publishing papers and code, taking advantage of opportunities to talk to factory owners, you name it. There's nobody who can do a better job selling (or sinking) yourself than you. They've also come from the oddest places - the racing club I am a member of and race under, for example.

    Unfortunately, networking and technically minded people seem to mix like oil and water.

    --
    ..don't panic
  258. Re:Another Benefit of Being Unemployed-Failed math by Azghoul · · Score: 1

    Yeah, you're right. Far better to complain that the President (!) isn't creating a job for you...

  259. Not really by siskbc · · Score: 1
    Uh, presidents don't control the economy but can influence the bone-crushing depths of a recession through sound fiscal, policy and social initiatives. Bush is a one trick pony i.e tax cuts. Clinton didn't create the boom nor did they create the bomb, they did do what they thought would create a favorable climate for an emerging Internet-enabled economy.

    I agree presidents don't create booms or busts, but as you contend Bush should have softened the blow, then Clinton should have muted the boom.

    Also, the bust was absolutely inevitable. When you have a million programmers hired by companies who are guaranteed to go under, there is nothing else that CAN happen.

    As for preventing the bone-crushing depths of this recession, this has actually been a relatively mild one for everyone except programmers, which as per my previous analysis, there was no way to prevent that shakeout.

    Bottom line, if you think Bush was to blame for the recession, what would you have done differently?

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:Not really by Digizen64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, manufacturing jobs have been hit harder than programmers. Imagine if Clinton had tried to mute the boom. The howls from the pundits would have been deafening. In hindsight, accounting standards should have been better enforced. It's a no-brainer what Bush should have done. It's a demand-side problem, a demand-side problem deserves a demand-side solution. Tax-cuts geared towards consumers would have made far more sense than capital gains guts and dividend taxes reduced. Creating demand should have been the goal. Bush should have cuts taxes significantly towards middle and lower income earners. We haven't been facing a problem with productivity and companies have a glut of infrastructure. Companies didn't need more money to invest in growth, they needed to get people and companies to buy more of their products and services.

    2. Re:Not really by siskbc · · Score: 1
      Actually, manufacturing jobs have been hit harder than programmers. Imagine if Clinton had tried to mute the boom. The howls from the pundits would have been deafening.

      You're right. Notice I'm not blaming Clinton for what he did or didn't do - hindsight's easy - but I am saying that what happened then directly caused what's happening now, and I don't think Bush should be blamed for it if Clinton's not.

      It's a no-brainer what Bush should have done. It's a demand-side problem, a demand-side problem deserves a demand-side solution. Bush should have cuts taxes significantly towards middle and lower income earners.

      So you agree that taxes being cut do stimulate the economy, but disagree with who got the pie? I probably agree with that.

      Companies didn't need more money to invest in growth,

      Two problems: 1) you're right on the glut angle - overproduction in the 90's led to no demand for industrial stuff now. But - 2) without stimulating industrial demand, recovery won't happen.

      I think Bush is attempting to stimulate industrial demand as much as possible, which will be tough, and while much of it is political paybacks, the economy won't come around without it.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    3. Re:Not really by Digizen64 · · Score: 1

      So you agree that taxes being cut do stimulate the economy, but disagree with who got the pie? I probably agree with that.

      Sure, tax cuts can be stimulative...Laffer Curve would teach us that. We just have to make sure to keep equilibrium.

      I hope he is trying to stimulate industrial growth, here in Chicago we depend on it manufacturing as the basis of our economy more than most large cities.

    4. Re:Not really by siskbc · · Score: 1
      Sure, tax cuts can be stimulative...Laffer Curve would teach us that. We just have to make sure to keep equilibrium.

      What, you actually think that not giving all the money to rich people is a bad thing? ;)

      I'll be the first to grant that the reduction on cap gains tax is bullshit.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    5. Re:Not really by Digizen64 · · Score: 1

      Oh no! Just saying if we cut too much we won't be stimulating jack.

  260. Blame Yourself, Not the Government by KnarfO · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dvorkin, like so many on both ends of the pollitical spectrum, places the blame for his predicament not on his own shoulders, but at the feet of the opposing pollitical party. Get real! 90% of all polliticians give nothing more than token lip service to the plight of the un- or under-employed.

    He'll find solutions to his problems much faster if he wakes up and takes responsibility for his career, instead of waiting for some populus pandering pollitico to come rescue him.

    --


    "Creativity is allowing ones self to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep" - Scott Adams
  261. Please by The+Tyro · · Score: 1

    spare me the "you've never been there, man!! You just don't know!" rant.

    Everyone's been stuck in dead-end jobs. Many people have been broke, had to live on noodles, had to move out of their place and in with friends to save on precious, dwindling cash reserves... There's jobs out there if you're willing to swallow a little pride. It may not be what you want, but it's only temporary. It may grate on his I'm-the-computer-elite ethos, but he could even do in-home tech support... hell, advertise in the upscale neighborhoods and fleece those despised computer-dumb yuppies for a fortune... that'd surely assuage his member-of-the-proletariat angst. Even if he stripped his resume and got a job as a tech-support monkey, his vast computer knowledge should shine through in about five minutes... and if he made sure the right people noticed it, he might find himself running the show in no time. It helps to be willing to dial back your expectations in order to get your foot in the door.

    He may have to sell his house on the lake and get a cheaper place, which sucks, but is a reasonable thing to do when your income drops. Lots of people's fortunes go up and down... the key is to be able to adapt.

    I'm not saying the original poster is a bad person... my comment had more to do with his psychology. I think he's depressed, looking for someone to blame, and generally feeling helpless... and yet, he's the ONLY ONE with the power to change his situation. Admitting that, however, would take away his "I'm a victim" ego defense, and force him to take responsibility for alleviating his own plight. His situation is very common... and so is his reaction to it. He seems like an insightful enough chap, so I expect he'll snap back.

    Sometimes holding up a mirror to someone is the best thing you can do.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  262. No windows in Kansas? by zipwow · · Score: 1
    It was amusing, but the part that confused me was this:

    Kent's home [is] nicely designed, letting lots of light (in Kansas?)..


    I'm a Kansas native, and I can tell you for sure that the sun shines there just like everywhere else. What's this comment about?

    -Zipwow
    --
    I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
    1. Re:No windows in Kansas? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      I think he was saying that they wouldn't have huge bay windows in Kansas because of the tornados. At least that's how I interpreted it. It made me cock my head too.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  263. I know, I've been there. May be again. . . by jafac · · Score: 1

    bitter much?

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  264. Do the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you have less than 5 years experience in IT, all of which is 3 years old or more.

    I think you need to find a new field and leave IT to the people who belong in it.

    It's the overcrowding of the field by people who have no business being in it that has made jobs hard to come by.

  265. Not unemployed by Joney · · Score: 1

    Exactly. If we could count the number of displaced workers, people who went to college to get a degree in something, now working at some random job just to have a job, I think the numbers would be truly frightening.
    I am not unemployed. I am a receptionist, with a BS.

  266. Re:Yes, I expected some creativity from a programm by jafuser · · Score: 1

    I have to agree with the online games helping to save money. A $15/month subscription fee to save me from being bored and going out to spend $200/week on gadgets and other junk I don't need, is a good investment.

    I'll also agree with the idea to keep the television turned off. I quit watching a couple years ago, and the first thing I noticed when I was clear of the stench, was just how bad it had really become.

    --
    Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  267. Mildly Disingenuous. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    At best, that's a disingenuous statistic. When we hear about someone making twenty bucks a week in Calcutta, we forget that the cost of living is concomitantly lower there. A dollar here ain't worth much. A dollar in Calcutta will support someone in a nontrivial manner.

    Hell, think about a job making $50k a year in Nowhere, Flyover State versus the same job in the Bay Area. You can live like a king in a small town for what a shoebox in Manhattan costs.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  268. Follow up story: by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The Surprising Benefits of Not Having a Girlfriend"

    * No one complains about your lack of showers! (well, nobody important that is.)

    * More money available for important things!

    * No risks for pregancy!

    * Plenty of room in bed!

    * No need for showing your feelings!

  269. Your evidence doesn't support your conclusions by siskbc · · Score: 1
    Our economy was driven into the ground by two things: 1. 9/11 2. The war on Iraq. If you notice, the economy started to recover after 9/11 but then the decision to go to "war" in Iraq and driven the economy down even further.

    First, the economy was in a mild recession before 9/11. The recession began around March 2001, and you'd have to be an idiot or a member of the DNC to actually believe Bush managed to start a recession in 2 months. Your Nasdaq was in steep decline before the inauguration. So Bush must have been such a terrible president that the economy tanked in anticipation of his arrival, huh?

    Second, blaming 9/11 on Bush would be idiotic. Also, the economy kept falling from October 2001 to March 2002, when the war was announced, so your timeline doesn't even make sense - the market only recovered from the immediate spike of 9/11, not the consequences. The war also had nothing to do with the economy from your own evidence, as the markets flattened out and started raising soon afterwards continuing up to now. I don't believe it, but if the war had any effect, from your own evidence a rational observer would estimate it to be a positive influence. I claim no correlation.

    Your correlation is nonexistent. From your own evidence, things didn't happen when you claim. The bust started before inauguration, and the economy's actually picked up since the war. Naturally, since you're partisan, you'll not blame the bust on annual, fraudulent, and unsustainable 40% annual growth under Clinton (again, from your Nasdaq chart), because that wouldn't support your partisan message.

    If you're going to quote those financials, give me months where events correlate to trends, because from what you say, you don't have it. Again, I don't like Bush either, but there's no reason to blame him for things that aren't his fault.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  270. Ok, I'll bite by Raul654 · · Score: 1

    According to the Department of Labor, here were the unemployment rates for January of the following years:
    1989: 5.4%

    1990: 5.4%

    1991: 6.4%

    1992: 7.3%

    1993: 7.3%
    ...

    2001: 4.1%

    2002: 5.6%

    2003: 5.7%

    Not a single year of decline. Period.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:Ok, I'll bite by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for taking the time to look this up!

  271. Re:For perks of being unemployed without the guilt by Sangui5 · · Score: 1

    Being gainfully employed (or at least not hemmoraging too much employed) as a graduate student, the one thing I feel is necesary to add is this:

    If you don't like popcorn, ramen noodles are almost as cheap, and come in a variety of fun flavours.

  272. Energy prices? by siskbc · · Score: 1
    One might not blame Bush. But one might blame the ideology of his party. Or the 1996 Republican Contract On America, which gutted the SEC, and signalled to all the fraudster's out there. . . LET'S GET READY TO RUMBLE!

    Just wondering, but doesn't the executive branch have more control over the SEC than Congress? Seems to me this is something Bill could have done something about. I could be wrong there, if so scratch that.

    Additionally, the biggest responsibility for the economic decline goes to Hugo Chavez, who got Opec to cut supplies in 1999, causing an energy price spike.

    No way. First, the economy was far too high then, and some brakes on the economy would have been welcome in 1999, if anything this would have prolonged things. Second, the timing's off - things didn't go south then, but over a year later.

    Then when you look at the Republican tendency to reduce rules, and the Bush record on lax enforcement of white collar crime, and his political appointments (Poindexter?!), and the conflicts of interest evident in each one, and add that to the Bush S&L scandal in 1990, Iran-Contra of the 1980's, a pattern emerges.

    Wow, that's an irrelevant and mixed bag. Hell, throw in Whitewater while you're at it, I'm sure that had something to do with the economy going south.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  273. Re:For perks of being unemployed without the guilt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Daddy's paying the bills.
    Enough said.

  274. Surprising benefits of being dead by garymcg · · Score: 1

    1. Normal geek-level body odor smells like roses compared to my decomposing peer group

    2. No more meetings!!!

    3. Or spam!

    4. Extra-hot chicks enjoy epic challenge of making dead man come.

    5. RIAA getting bad publicity from suing me.

    6. Have more time to vote repeatedly in Chicago municipal elections.

    --
    --If 50,000 people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing.
  275. Is the word "meme" becoming a meme?? by pierreg0 · · Score: 1

    > I have time to become intimately familiar with all of the Slashdot memes ...

    I know this is offtopic, but ... the word "meme" is occurring more often every day in posts. I'll admit that my vocabulary is not up to par when compared to many geeks, but I had never heard this word before slashdot. Now it's occurring in every day conversations. So ... a few questions:

    1) Can a single word become a meme from being (re)introduced into every day vocabulary? (I think the answer is yes - consider the word "Rad" in the 80's, or more hideously the current usage of the word "tight").

    2) If a single word can become a meme, does "meme" fit into this category?

    3) Has the word "meme" been in common use for decades, and I am just vocabularily challenged?

    4) Can you dodge off-topic mods by starting your post with an off-topic disclaimer (disclaimer: this question is very off-topic)?

    1. Re:Is the word "meme" becoming a meme?? by inertia187 · · Score: 1

      1) Can a single word become a meme from being (re)introduced into every day vocabulary? (I think the answer is yes - consider the word "Rad" in the 80's, or more hideously the current usage of the word "tight").

      I should think so. Your examples are proof positive.

      2) If a single word can become a meme, does "meme" fit into this category?

      In a word, yes. Just like the GNU Public License is Licensed under the GNU Public License, meme can be a meme. Then you start to get into the fun meta language. So, we need to define meme using meta-meme language.

      3) Has the word "meme" been in common use for decades, and I am just vocabularily challenged?

      I don't know about common, but it's been around for a few millennia at least in some form or another.

      4) Can you dodge off-topic mods by starting your post with an off-topic disclaimer (disclaimer: this question is very off-topic)?

      Not to my knowledge. Anyone who can, probably just lucked out.

      By the way, in case you're wondering, my sources tell me that "meme" rymes with "team" not "mimi."

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
  276. 30% deficit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > A deficit of 5% of the budget is not a serious long-term concern.

    No, but a deficit of 25% of the budget - spending over 30% more than you have - IS a serious problem.

    Check out the actual budget figures - http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2004/summar ytables.html

    Including the $87 billion requested for Iraq, the 2004 budget is spending $2359 billion on revenues of $1797 billion, for a deficit of $562 billion or very nearly one-third of the government's total income (31.3% of total revenues).

    That's like you earning $30k per year but spending $40k - do that for a few years, and you're screwed unless you get a great new job. Is it wise for the government to gamble that it'll get a great new job in the next few years?

  277. true by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    but that's not too helpful

    --

    -pyrrho

    1. Re:true by ThaReetLad · · Score: 1

      it's extremely helpful if you get a 6 figure payout.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
  278. Gentoo! by DrCode · · Score: 1

    My old SuSE 6.2 version of linux was desperately out-of-date, and being unemployed, I didn't want to spend even a few dollars on a new distribution. But I did have lots of free time.
    And a dialup account has no limits on what you can download.

    So... each night, my PC would download Gentoo packages, and would then spend the day compiling them. I actually ended up downloading over .5Gb through a 56K modem.

  279. Re:Yes, I expected some creativity from a programm by cableshaft · · Score: 1

    Or just cultivate a healthy Counter-Strike (or insert fave RTS/FPS here) addiction and save yourself from having to pay monthly fees :).

    --
    Creator of the popular web game Proximity
  280. well yeah by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    no doubt, a big mixed bag... but you can't rule blaming someone else out! It might actually be their fault.

    --

    -pyrrho

  281. Re: Rat Race by ArunAdvani · · Score: 1

    The trouble with the Rat Race is that even if you win, you are still a rat.

  282. Niche by DrCode · · Score: 1

    Funny that you should mention "finding a niche". I've done all sorts of software over the years, but the one thing that's gotten me hired during the last decade is knowing how to hack out grammars with Yacc/Lex.

  283. Spousal closeness? You've got to be kidding. by heroine · · Score: 1

    Sound like a lot of reasons not to become unemployed are being played up to show up his boss for laying him off.

    Spousal closeness is not a good thing in most marriages. Personally the one good thing about being unemployed is being able to do what you want to do all the time instead of doing what someone else wants you to do. If it makes enough money to support life it's even better.

  284. OK, what do I do? by r_j_prahad · · Score: 1

    I just got on long term disability due to an auto accident. The policy is what is commonly called an "own occupation" policy, i.e. I have at least two years income before I either (a) get told to find a job I can do from a wheelchair, or (b) I get an extension, i.e. another year of disability pay and rehabilitation (not considered very likely for a computer geek).

    The IT profession is a train wreck, my CEO is a clueless PHB, my supervisor is a workplace bully, my users are all morons. I have a golden opportunity in the next 24 months to learn another profession, just as long as I can do it from a wheelchair. What should I learn to do? What's a good job field for us mildly autistic ex-geeks on wheels?

    1. Re:OK, what do I do? by jcravens42 · · Score: 1
      I have a golden opportunity in the next 24 months to learn another profession, just as long as I can do it from a wheelchair. What should I learn to do? What's a good job field for us mildly autistic ex-geeks on wheels?

      What do you want to do? What topics or tasks are interesting to you? I'm a big believer in following your heart when it comes to pursuing a career, or thinking about a particular education path. A career counselor can help.

      A great way to explore different careers is through volunteering, and if mobility is an issue for you as far as getting onsite to locations, then think about online volunteering. There are organizations that have opportunities for online volunteers that are totally tech related -- building an e-commerce site, constructing a database -- and that have very little to do with tech (researching topics, writing stories for newsletters, editing proposals, mentoring young people, translating documents, consulting, etc.).

      NetAid Online Volunteering has a database of organizations working in or for developing countries that are recruiting online volunteers. Local online (and offline) volunteering opportunities can be found at VolunteerMatch.

      Volunteering is a great way not only to explore potential new career paths, but to also have something to put on your resume in employment gap years. Just remember that, like job searches, you have probably have to apply for several positions before you will find a volunteering opportunity.

      --
      J Cravens http://www.coyotecommunications.com
  285. Re:For perks of being unemployed without the guilt by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    >Do a PhD!

    Do you realize how much it *costs* to do that?

    How long it takes?

    That you still have to house, feed, and clothe yourself? And that it's entirely possible to fail? Even if you do get into a program, you have to stay there, which means turning down any job opportunities outside where your university is?

    (For me, that last one is the biggest challenge).

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  286. Side Effects of Unemployment by pyro_peter_911 · · Score: 1

    I was laid off October 1st last year. My wife and I had our first kid on July 3rd of this year. In retrospect, perhaps I should have spent that October 1st evening polishing up ye olde resume...

    Peter

    BTW, the job title of househusband isn't nearly as bad as I expected.

  287. News Flash! by hondo77 · · Score: 1

    Not having a job means you have the time to do things for yourself instead of your employer.

    End of article. What amazing insight. Move along.

    --
    I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  288. Roger Waters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Will you accept your second-class status,
    A nation of waitresses and waiters,
    Will you fix their martinis,
    Will you stand still for it,
    Will you take to the hills
    (from Radio KAOS)
  289. The only thing Jimmy Carter ever said I agree with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was that the President, *ANY* President, has at most 10% effect on the econony while he is President. He's right, and this stupid game of blaming the current occupant of the White House becuase of the policies of those that came before needs to stop.

    I always find it much more interesting that no matter how much money a President has, by the time he is out of office for 6 months he is a Certifed Millionare.

  290. Only one solution. by roninbix · · Score: 1
    1)Start a company.

    2)Take over the emerging Chinese domestic market across the board.

    3)Make huge cash over there as their economy booms.

    4)Make a second wave of huge cash after their exchange rate skyrockets.

    5)Hire "competent" managers from here and send them to work all over your company right before selling it to assure it's slow snowballing destruction (slow so the effects won't be associated with you).

    6)Take all your money back here.

    7)Buy everything.

    8)Rewrite the rules so that the economy doesn't suck in this way, and can't ever again.

  291. Division of efforts and focus. by roninbix · · Score: 1
    Even at my company open source dev would not go over well. It's not a slacker thing, it's a lack of focus thing.

    It wouldn't get you filtered out immediately, but it would be a thing we'd watch for. Basically it would add subtle tests to your interview to see if you would focus on our problems or spend your nights forgetting our issues and coming to work thinking about other things. Answer every question I ask with an example from the same open source project you spent 35 hours working on last we and you're not getting the job. We don't need people with confused priorities who may overwork themselves in their off hours. I'd feel a lot better if I knew you weren't going to work on any such projects during your employment with us. Putting it down as historical achievements is better than a currently active one, but not much. For us, it would earn you nothing, and could be used against you. Even if you do it, leave it off your resume if you have anything else.

    Your point about meeting difficult deadlines in open source is not a good one either and I wouldn't mention that in an interview at my company. I don't want there to be two deadlines next Friday, one for my project and one for your open source project. It's not a competition I want to have. You're hired to make my deadlines in preference to all others.

    Also, if you hijack my interview to get me involved in the design and implementation of your personal pet project, I will feel justified in not hiring you as you're already demonstrating what I feared. I like people who can get involved. I don't like people that are already involved in the wrong thing.

    Worst of all, I'm a coder, not an hr person. I care because if you drop the ball because you needed to work on an external project (paid or not) then I'll be the one picking it up for you in my off-hours. Hell, if I wanted to code in my off-hours I'd rather take up a cool open source project of my own than do your work for you.

    1. Re:Division of efforts and focus. by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Interesting points you are making, however maybe the open-source project I've been working on was in fact the focus of my previous employment, i.e: it was developed on during working hours with the approval of the hierarchy. These things happen, this is in fact the case for me for example, and it is happening more and more.

      The good thing about OSS projects is you can really check the proficiency of the candidate. You can look at his/her code, see if it works, if the candidate uses correct methodologies, if the documentation is written, etc.

      This is extra information that the candidate is giving you that is very unlikely to come out of any classic interview. What if you found that the code is brilliant (not in my example)?

    2. Re:Division of efforts and focus. by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1


      Interesting points you are making, however maybe the open-source project I've been working on was in fact the focus of my previous employment, i.e: it was developed on during working hours with the approval of the hierarchy.

      In that case, I would put it on your resume, but as a job, not a hobby. I have hired several people who worked for companies that developed OSS products. As long as they're not the idealogical OSS type, it's okay. I just find it funny how many people put it on their resume that they would prefer to work on an OSS project, then they apply to a company that writes proprietary code. Those resumes get chucked immediately.

      -a

  292. Cable by roninbix · · Score: 1

    Haven't had cable TV in 4 years. Haven't missed it. Actually believe my quality of life went _up_. Apparently a lot of people spent those 4 years watching something called "Survivor" and it's 800 clones. Was it worth it? Doesn't sound like it.

  293. Sheesh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hmm. We have a special section in our performance reviews for learning to accept criticism in a constructive way. You wouldn't do well on that section. It's a problem for many programmers actually. Goes against their inflated egos or something. ;)

    This all started with a small bit of feedback from God! Awful 2 to give a heads up that being a hard core open source fanatic wouldn't go over well with all employers. Then you all jumped on him and started picking apart his words with irrelevant examples as if you could refute the truth of it through logic. It doesn't work that way. This is a major problem with people in IT. More often than not, you can replace God! Awful 2 with a customer or a team member trying to open the eyes of a project team heading towards an expensive mistake. This kind of attitude costs money, time, and makes your customers look elsewhere for people who will listen to their concerns. Customers are the worst because they frequently can't express their reasoning well enough to persist in an argument with a programmer. They often need help fleshing out their point, not being shut down. Shutting them up doesn't make it go away.

    After all, who gives a shit about Linus? YOU are not Linus, so how is anything related to him or his circumstances relevant, much less worth getting into involved nitpicking over. Especially when that isn't the point, or even related to it. You may not realize how far off the mark you are when you say That was not his job. These days programmers ARE held accountable to performance in the market, particularly in regards to individual customers for b2b. It's becoming, or has become, a part of the expectations of the job. Turtleshelling in the "it's not my job to sell the product" hole doesn't go far anymore. These days I go on just as many site trips for marketing and requirements analysis as I do for actual go-lives. And I find I am personally responsible for ensuring that what we're building is at all times what our customers want, need, and will accept within our ability to deliver. That expectation is regardless of what I was asked to build originally. Good programmers today make things that fit the market/customer needs, and will fight to get that to happen if the current system design won't achieve it.

    As for hiring on prestige. Very few corporations hire for prestige, and the ones I know of suck hard (Rational anyone?). Good companies do not hire ideological airheads.

    End of Rant.

  294. Three Words by notcreative · · Score: 1

    "Line Item Veto"

    1. Re:Three Words by danheskett · · Score: 1

      What about it? What makes you think politicans really want pork to stop? At all.. in any way... its a win win for all of them..

  295. Re:For perks of being unemployed without the guilt by goodbye_kitty · · Score: 1

    I think the whole point is that work in IT is so hard to find that a research degree is just about the only sure way of making sure you dont end up as "data entry" in a law firm (or worse). besides...dunno what you mean about the cost...noone does a phd without a full scholarship and these are worth pretty much the same as a starting engineers salary would be after tax (depending on the level of your supervisor's interactions with industry)

  296. More Benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Study Simple Living

    Otherwise spend some time trying to understand to what larger ends your little technical efforts are being used.

    Get Fed Up with the status quo and try moving to a radical environmental sustainability project like Dancing Rabbit Eco-Village ( http://www.DancingRabbit.org)

    Learn to live a simple life that does not destroy the planet.

    Try to find others that share the same views.

    1. Re:More Benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      30% of your income is not going to the American Empire to fund its colonial redevelopment plans in the Middle East to perpetuate an antiquated, petroleum-dependent economy.

      As Ayn Rand's characters did in Atlas Shrugged, fuk you I am not going to work for a system that I don't believe in. It's much easier to take this position when you are unemployed. :-)

  297. Re:For perks of being unemployed without the guilt by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    Full scholarship. Right. These are the people who act like giving you $1500.00 is some sort of leg up.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  298. Yes. by roninbix · · Score: 1
    If the project was done as part of a job it would be viewed as positively as any other related work experience. But this is more of an extension of their current job. Very much like belonging to industry related people networking organizations. There are benefits of that type of thing for the company as well.

    However, I am very unlikely to do more than take a cursory glance at your open source code itself. If it looks like the language I'll believe that you've used it at least at a modest level. I don't expect to try to prove any more than you've seen the language before in an interview process. Ultimately, if you can't code and code well, you won't last 4 weeks. It's not that painful for the company, and it doesn't happen that often.

    Also, I structure my interview process to discover whether a candidate has coded before through other means. You can't count on everyone bringing code samples. I guess all I'm saying is that although theoretically it gives me the possibility of looking more in-depth into the exact level of your programming abilities, in practice I won't be doing that anyway.

    In my case, the total time I spend considering an applicant amounts to around 3 hours while enduring constant distractions. That includes reading the resume, preparing for the interview, doing the interview (usually an hour), reviewing cursory information like code samples, and discussing the attributes of the candidate with others involved in the hiring process.

    I am very busy, and HR tasks don't even make my top 10 list of responsibilities. My projects were months behind before we started working on them. Spending half a day finding and reviewing someone's code is usually not the best use of my time. Especially when all it tells me is that the person can code.

    I care very little whether the code is brilliant or not. In fact, I see that thought process as undesirable. I don't want brilliant code. I want cost-effective sustainable code that does the job well and has few problems. Perhaps you mean the same thing and I'm misinterpreting your statement. However, there is a tendency for coders to think complex and cool is somehow better. It's more fun perhaps. But generally it's less stable, and more difficult for other programmers to maintain or alter. It also usually costs more in time, effort and problems than something straightforward. Also, a focus on "brilliant coding" sounds a lot like ignoring the social aspects of programming. It makes it sound like if you can live in a closet and put out "brilliantly complex code" without interacting with team members, that is somehow okay. Team players and good personalities capable of handling stress well are far more important than the quality of your code. Poor coding quality can usually be improved with process (design and code reviews, coding standards), and even if not we'll just ensure that the tasks you're given are tasks where that doesn't matter so much. Core coding requiring higher quality will be redirected to others if it's a problem for you.

    Then again. We are a business software type of shop. We aren't trying to break large numbers of technical barriers (except perhaps volume processing). Perhaps "brilliance" is far more valuable in a place where you're inventing something that "can't be done". Take my comments as not representing everything that's out there for sure. It helps if you understand the environment you're applying to. Business application development is a very bottom line kind of business. Results are rarely enough. If you don't have predictable, verifiable milestones along the way, managers start pissing themselves. "Brilliant coding" rarely produces such milestones on regular intervals.

    That's my take anyway.

    1. Re:Yes. by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Thanks for taking the time to respond, first of all.

      By brilliant I mostly meant that the *result* of the code, the final product, shows something rarely seen in run-of-the-mill projects. Perhaps one very good idea in GUI design or an enlightening feature.

      Many people disparage open-source as being a kind of a copy exercise (say KDE copying the Windows look, etc). In fact the very best open-source projects (say Perl or Gcc) have very unique qualities.

      To some degree you can find those qualities in lesser projects. For example the guy who designed FLTK, a very simple GUI toolkit (www.fltk.org) did this on company time (Digital Domain, they did the rendering of Titanic). He had a very clear idea of what a GUI toolkit should be like and how it should be implemented thanks to his extensive experience with other toolkits in previous employments. The result is a simple, compact and yes, brilliant product. The style of the code itself is irrelevant. He designed this system because at the time (before GTK and QT became the things they are now) DD was rolling out *hundreds* of linux workstations to do 3D work and they needed a toolkit that would work the same on Irix and Linux.

      To me it shows this guy is super-competent. If you saw his CV, there might just be the line `designed GUI system for DD' and you would maybe start thinking: why didn't this guy use MFC or something?

      However I take your points, they are perfectly sensible. Thanks for reading so far.