One could be forgiven in assuming that this is a fail from some legal bot attempting to come up with a way to CYA EventBrite if they were ever DNCA'd as opposed to them doing evil
The tech industry is particularly wormy so these pledges are worthless
Citizen Four showed that all of the data being gathered by the tech industry is for sale and that has not changed
The only thing that will motivate tech to actually respect privacy would be meaningful laws with teeth and the people charged with making and enforcing those laws are techs best customers.
Sometimes the scandal is not what law was broken, but what the law allows. - Edward Snowden
"Russia is our most capable hostile adversary in cyber-space, so dealing with their attacks is a major priority for the National Cyber Security Centre and our US allies," said Ciaran Martin, head of the NCSC
Ciaran seems to have forgotten the tens of thousands of US trained crackers in the PRC
"For any senator who wants to study the draft TPP language, it has been made available in the basement of the Capitol, inside a secure, soundproof room. There, lawmakers surrender their cellphones and other mobile devices. Any notes taken inside the room must be left in the room.
Only aides with high-level security clearances can accompany lawmakers. Members of Congress can't ask outside industry experts or lawyers to analyze the language. They can't talk to the public about what they read. And Brown says there's no computer inside the secret room to look something up when there's confusion. You just consult the USTR official." A Trade Deal Read In Secret By Only A Few (Or Maybe None)
Per Wikipedia:
The Clinton–Lewinsky scandal was an American political sex scandal that involved 49-year-old President Bill Clinton and 22-year-old White House intern Monica Lewinsky. The sexual relationship took place between 1995 and 1997 and came to light in 1998...
The movie was in general release on 6-Jan-98 and the scandal first broke, perhaps conveniently on 17-Jan-98.
Wikipedia contributors. (2018, April 2). Clinton–Lewinsky scandal. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 18:33, April 11, 2018, from
Wag the Dog was a great movie, it was about Bill Clinton but the pearls of wisdom for it can be applied here
What is being done here could be flann.
The microphone issue is a distraction attempting to take attention away from the real issue.
That FaceBook's real value is in the information it collects about the poor saps who use it.
Conrad 'Connie' Brean: You're goddamn right, then it's got nothing to do with the B-3 Bomber! John Levy: There is no B-3 bomber. Conrad 'Connie' Brean: [Knowingly] I just said that! There is no B-3 bomber, and I don't know why these rumors get started!
Henkin, H., Mamet, D., Levinson, B., Hoffman, D., De, N. R., Heche, A., Leary, D.,... New Line Home Video (Firm). (1998). Wag the Dog. Calif.: New Line Home Video.
real world figures are an anathema to chip flippers.
If chip flip A came out with a chip with a certain number chip flip B would beg, borrow and/or steal to top it so the obfuscate things.
Besides, it doesn't matter, if we are talking pc then there are only 2 real chip pushers and they work together most of time to manage the market.
That was likely a fake/forgery. Notice on the 4th "Powerpoint Slide", Apple is by itself WAY off to the side, and doesn't just show a date, like the rest of the entries. It looks to me like someone was desperately trying to "convince" the reader that this was "True".
No sorry, it wasn't.
If you look at any of the documentation that was leaked, they used to have a copy on Cryptome you would have seen that Apple was on the list of corporations who took money for access. If it is any consolation M$ sold out before Apple.
The value in Facebook is really the analytical data that Cambridge is claimed to have fondled.
Nothing surprising really considering that he Facebook board is mainly composed of ex-alphabet mafia people.
The whole thing is designed to get sheeple to post all of their juice details so that Facebook can sell trending data
This in itself must be interesting considering that most Facebook users also have multiple accounts
Zuckerberg: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard
Zuckerberg: Just ask.
Zuckerberg: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS
[Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?
Zuckerberg: People just submitted it.
Zuckerberg: I don't know why.
Zuckerberg: They "trust me"
Zuckerberg: Dumb fucks
President for life Xi Jinping was clanging on about protectionism recently which was kind of funny coming from him.
The CPC requires corporations wishing to do business in China to partner with a Chinese firm in the same industry and to have a CPC party member on the board of the new partnership. It is a very shrewd tactic as it gives both the Chinese business and the CPC access to IP and influence over the foreign business partner and because of the rise of plutocracy in the US influence within the halls of power there.
With all of the production that has been moved to the PRC and their heavy restrictions on foreign goods it is the influence over the wealthy in the US that give the CPC any leverage over the US and so the high tariffs on US goods and seeming fearlessness in the face of a trade war.
"The Chinese government supports Chinese companies in going global. But we believe that this process should be market-oriented, with companies being the main driver." - Xi Jinping
Nothing to see here, move along.
It's just Alphabet outsourced labor enforcing the views given to them by their tech overlords.
This happened during the last election and will happen during the next one and for any other issue Alphabets overlords deem necessary.
“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” - George Orwell
Its no coincidence that the tax incentives for outsourcing labor, the lifting of tariffs on businesses manufacturing abroad and wholesale work visa abuse fall nicely into this window.
>>Which is why we license the drivers independently of registering the vehicles.
Thanks for the heads up, I guess were done with the analogies...
Barack Obama was an undocumented immigrant, you mean criminal aliens...
Yup, they made it easier for criminal aliens to get drivers licenses.
The good old US tax payer funded the assistance
The travesty of the license was not for driving a car it was so that they would have ID to make it easier to latch on to social assistance not that many of them seemed to have trouble with this before.
There is no way to prove the person driving is the one who registered the vehicle
Lots of people drive without licenses, they were giving them away to criminal aliens
*NEW floride flavored bottled water, NOW with crunchy plastic bits!*
One could be forgiven in assuming that this is a fail from some legal bot attempting to come up with a way to CYA EventBrite if they were ever DNCA'd as opposed to them doing evil
That's why Bernie ended up with a $500k vacation home when he dropped off and the DNC all resigned before the investigations could start...
The tech industry is particularly wormy so these pledges are worthless
Citizen Four showed that all of the data being gathered by the tech industry is for sale and that has not changed
The only thing that will motivate tech to actually respect privacy would be meaningful laws with teeth and the people charged with making and enforcing those laws are techs best customers.
Sometimes the scandal is not what law was broken, but what the law allows. - Edward Snowden
"Russia is our most capable hostile adversary in cyber-space, so dealing with their attacks is a major priority for the National Cyber Security Centre and our US allies," said Ciaran Martin, head of the NCSC
Ciaran seems to have forgotten the tens of thousands of US trained crackers in the PRC
"For any senator who wants to study the draft TPP language, it has been made available in the basement of the Capitol, inside a secure, soundproof room. There, lawmakers surrender their cellphones and other mobile devices. Any notes taken inside the room must be left in the room.
Only aides with high-level security clearances can accompany lawmakers. Members of Congress can't ask outside industry experts or lawyers to analyze the language. They can't talk to the public about what they read. And Brown says there's no computer inside the secret room to look something up when there's confusion. You just consult the USTR official."
A Trade Deal Read In Secret By Only A Few (Or Maybe None)
Across the pond Uber has employees rather than independent contractors.
Perhaps it is easier to buy an American judge?
British panel rules Uber drivers are employees, not contractors
Per Wikipedia:
The Clinton–Lewinsky scandal was an American political sex scandal that involved 49-year-old President Bill Clinton and 22-year-old White House intern Monica Lewinsky. The sexual relationship took place between 1995 and 1997 and came to light in 1998...
The movie was in general release on 6-Jan-98 and the scandal first broke, perhaps conveniently on 17-Jan-98.
Wikipedia contributors. (2018, April 2). Clinton–Lewinsky scandal. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 18:33, April 11, 2018, from
Was the plant in Khartoum a weapons factory?
Why does the dog wag its tail?
Because a dog is smarter than its tail.
If the tail were smarter, it would wag the dog.
Wag the Dog was a great movie, it was about Bill Clinton but the pearls of wisdom for it can be applied here
What is being done here could be flann.
The microphone issue is a distraction attempting to take attention away from the real issue. That FaceBook's real value is in the information it collects about the poor saps who use it.
Conrad 'Connie' Brean: You're goddamn right, then it's got nothing to do with the B-3 Bomber!
John Levy: There is no B-3 bomber.
Conrad 'Connie' Brean: [Knowingly] I just said that! There is no B-3 bomber, and I don't know why these rumors get started!
Henkin, H., Mamet, D., Levinson, B., Hoffman, D., De, N. R., Heche, A., Leary, D., ... New Line Home Video (Firm). (1998). Wag the Dog. Calif.: New Line Home Video.
Sheryl is fantasizing because if users had to pay for access Facebook would soon find out its actual value and dry up and blow away.
Bill and Hillary?
real world figures are an anathema to chip flippers. If chip flip A came out with a chip with a certain number chip flip B would beg, borrow and/or steal to top it so the obfuscate things. Besides, it doesn't matter, if we are talking pc then there are only 2 real chip pushers and they work together most of time to manage the market.
The PowerPoint "thingy" was in the CitizenFour package... Don't be a lazy fanboi, Do the "Think" not just the "Different". Gellman and Poitras 2013, June 7. U.S., British intelligence mining data from nine U.S. Internet companies in broad secret program
That was likely a fake/forgery. Notice on the 4th "Powerpoint Slide", Apple is by itself WAY off to the side, and doesn't just show a date, like the rest of the entries. It looks to me like someone was desperately trying to "convince" the reader that this was "True".
No sorry, it wasn't. If you look at any of the documentation that was leaked, they used to have a copy on Cryptome you would have seen that Apple was on the list of corporations who took money for access. If it is any consolation M$ sold out before Apple.
Also here:
"PRISM/US-984XN Overview
Too late, recall PRISM. Information was leaked by CitizenFour showing that Apple, amongst others was on the dole from the Feds selling access to its user base. Seifert D. (2013, June 6). Secret program gives NSA, FBI backdoor access to Apple, Google, Facebook, Microsoft data.
Swift may be FOSS but it is geared towards Apple.
Why not something more relevant like Java/Javascript/Python or Rust?
The value in Facebook is really the analytical data that Cambridge is claimed to have fondled.
Nothing surprising really considering that he Facebook board is mainly composed of ex-alphabet mafia people.
The whole thing is designed to get sheeple to post all of their juice details so that Facebook can sell trending data
This in itself must be interesting considering that most Facebook users also have multiple accounts
Zuckerberg: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard
Zuckerberg: Just ask.
Zuckerberg: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS
[Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?
Zuckerberg: People just submitted it.
Zuckerberg: I don't know why.
Zuckerberg: They "trust me"
Zuckerberg: Dumb fucks
Lazy Chinese not doing their own research.
China must stop forcing U.S. firms to share intellectual property
Command and control: China’s Communist Party extends reach into foreign companies
How China squeezes tech secrets from U.S. companies
And so on...
"Ygè shzi de xn zài t de zu l."
President for life Xi Jinping was clanging on about protectionism recently which was kind of funny coming from him.
The CPC requires corporations wishing to do business in China to partner with a Chinese firm in the same industry and to have a CPC party member on the
board of the new partnership. It is a very shrewd tactic as it gives both the Chinese business and the CPC access to IP and influence over the foreign business
partner and because of the rise of plutocracy in the US influence within the halls of power there.
With all of the production that has been moved to the PRC and their heavy restrictions on foreign goods it is the influence over the wealthy in the US that give the CPC any leverage over the US and so the high tariffs on US goods and seeming fearlessness in the face of a trade war.
"The Chinese government supports Chinese companies in going global. But we believe that this process should be market-oriented, with companies being the main driver." - Xi Jinping
It's not like Cisco isn't already letting the CPC insert backdoors in firmware anyway.
Nothing to see here, move along. It's just Alphabet outsourced labor enforcing the views given to them by their tech overlords.
This happened during the last election and will happen during the next one and for any other issue Alphabets overlords deem necessary.
“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” - George Orwell
This one looks like its had its messages contorted in its rush to be PC.
Its no coincidence that the tax incentives for outsourcing labor, the lifting of tariffs on businesses manufacturing abroad and wholesale work visa abuse fall nicely into this window.
>>Which is why we license the drivers independently of registering the vehicles.
Thanks for the heads up, I guess were done with the analogies...
Barack Obama was an undocumented immigrant, you mean criminal aliens...
Yup, they made it easier for criminal aliens to get drivers licenses.
The good old US tax payer funded the assistance
The travesty of the license was not for driving a car it was so that they would have ID to make it easier to latch on to social assistance not that many of them seemed to have trouble with this before.
There is no way to prove the person driving is the one who registered the vehicle
Lots of people drive without licenses, they were giving them away to criminal aliens