It could be a felony murder case. Put simply, if you are committing a felony and as a result someone is killed - regardless of whether there was any intent - you can be charged with murder.
This leads to unusual situations. For example, if two people break into a house together and the home owner shoots and kills one of them, the second burglar may be charged with murder.
So, assuming that swatting is a felony, if it leads to a death, then the person responsible could be charged with felony murder.
If you read the article you would have seen that it is about the new robots that they have installed. It even talks about the original two (the ones talked about in your article) and the upgrades with the new models.
The problem with that logic is that they have the same value regardless of how you obtained them. If I get your point, you are saying that the person who mined a bitcoin will value it less because mining it was easier and took less money than the person who paid $2k for a bitcoin someone else mined.
I guess if you feel that way, there are likely others that do as well. However, it doesn't make much sense because either of those bitcoins could be exchanged for $2k at any time.
Is that because it was named after a great hunter, or because it was named after the leader of the people that built the Tower of Babel - leading to the multitude of languages? Or are you going the Bugs Bunny route?
Accepting gays is equivalent to accepting that Catholics do not use contraception. Trying to discourage or prevent others from using or even learning about contraception is the equivalent of trying to force people to be gay.
A child is about a 1,000 times more likely to be killed by drowning in a neighbor's pool than abducted by a total stranger. 10,000 times more likely to be seriously injured or even killed playing school sports. And 100 times more likely to be struck by lightning.
Parents need to stop watching CSI and Criminal Minds and Law & Order.
Ok, fine...
So build the tracking device with proper flotation devices, padding, and a lightning rod with good grounding then the problem's solved.
Most of those are good point - but I think a couple were explained in the movie (if my one viewing serves me well)
4. The Narada was at Earth when it was drilling in SF bay. I think what happened was the Enterprise warped in around Saturn and then Scotty beamed Kirk & Spock to the Narada (remember he talked about beaming Archer's dog from one planet to another). Then after Spock destroyed the drill, he went to warp and the Narada chased him - so the final battle with the Narada could be well away from Earth (especially with how fast warp seems to be in this movie - and Spock's ship was supposed to be fast and from the future)
5. I thought it did suffer damage - it seemed to be listing and have parts of it be destroyed. I think that is what kept it from destroying the escaping shuttlecraft.
Out of curiosity, how does being blind in one eye effect your experience like that?
I don't mean to be offensive - I am just missing something here...
If I am watching a 3D movie (wearing the glasses) and close one eye, I just see a regular image. Of course, I loose the 3D effect, but other than that, it looks perfectly normal (other than the cheesy attempts to wow people with the 3D just start looking silly).
If you were to wear the polarized glasses, wouldn't it just look normal to you as well?
It is poorly worded in the article, but in this case, maximum thickness means the maximum thickness for that particular year and average thickness means the average maximum thickness for all years since 1950.
So they really are comparing this year's maximum thickness to the average of the maximum thickness for all other years.
Evolution can only progress when those with unfit genes die without producing offspring. The moment that we started caring the weak and the sick, we put an end to evolution.
They can get away with it due to their customer base. Apple always has marketed itself as the easier to use, simpler user interface product and as such their user base is made up of people who either buy the line that "it just works this way" or would rather have someone else change the battery because that is just to difficult to do on your own.
I mean, this is the company with the one button mouse, right? It always reminds me of preschool toys.
I am surprised that Apple products don't come with a padded helmet for their users protection.
Ecologically, from a global warming POV, having diesel *not* emit useless soot is absolutely catastrophic, as the carbon has to go somewhere. It's either soot, or carbon dioxide.
When you RTFA, did you notice that the diesel was being produced by organic waste? That means plants. The CO2 that is released in that process will be equivalent to the amount of CO2 taken out of the atmosphere by the organic material when it was growing. That is hardly 'absolutely catastrophic'.
You can not store anti-hydrogen or anti-oxygen or any other antimatter in regular (i.e., matter) containers. Matter and antimatter have a strong tendency to quickly convert into energy when they are brought into contact with each other. The electron shells of matter atoms tend to keep them separated since the magnetic force overwhelms the gravitational force at close distances. However, the positron shell of an antimatter atom tends to draw it towards matter atoms. You can keep antimatter ions (i.e., an anti-proton) in a magnetic bottle, but that doesn't work for neutral atoms.
Slashdot Mirror
The sewage is not metered. It is inferred from the clean water meter.
It could be a felony murder case. Put simply, if you are committing a felony and as a result someone is killed - regardless of whether there was any intent - you can be charged with murder.
This leads to unusual situations. For example, if two people break into a house together and the home owner shoots and kills one of them, the second burglar may be charged with murder.
So, assuming that swatting is a felony, if it leads to a death, then the person responsible could be charged with felony murder.
You do realize that Rolex watches are only certified to be within -4/+6 seconds per day, right? (COSC chronometer certification)
Even cheap Quartz watches have significantly greater accuracy than that.
If you read the article you would have seen that it is about the new robots that they have installed. It even talks about the original two (the ones talked about in your article) and the upgrades with the new models.
The problem with that logic is that they have the same value regardless of how you obtained them. If I get your point, you are saying that the person who mined a bitcoin will value it less because mining it was easier and took less money than the person who paid $2k for a bitcoin someone else mined.
I guess if you feel that way, there are likely others that do as well. However, it doesn't make much sense because either of those bitcoins could be exchanged for $2k at any time.
Depends on how you turned them down....
Are you actually confused by CS (computer science) and EE (electrical engineering)? If so, I think you should look for some other forums.
I could see someone not getting MNC and SME right away - but it isn't that much of a thought exercise to figure it out.
Is that because it was named after a great hunter, or because it was named after the leader of the people that built the Tower of Babel - leading to the multitude of languages? Or are you going the Bugs Bunny route?
>> hydrogen + oxygen + energy = water. and water + energy = hydrogen + oxygen
>does not compute
Technically it is:
2H2 + energy = 4H
O2 + energy = 2O
4H + 2O = water + energy
Then the equations are reversable.
Accepting gays is equivalent to accepting that Catholics do not use contraception. Trying to discourage or prevent others from using or even learning about contraception is the equivalent of trying to force people to be gay.
Who would have thought?
A child is about a 1,000 times more likely to be killed by drowning in a neighbor's pool than abducted by a total stranger. 10,000 times more likely to be seriously injured or even killed playing school sports. And 100 times more likely to be struck by lightning.
Parents need to stop watching CSI and Criminal Minds and Law & Order.
Ok, fine...
So build the tracking device with proper flotation devices, padding, and a lightning rod with good grounding then the problem's solved.
Not so hard to figure out.
Most of those are good point - but I think a couple were explained in the movie (if my one viewing serves me well)
4. The Narada was at Earth when it was drilling in SF bay. I think what happened was the Enterprise warped in around Saturn and then Scotty beamed Kirk & Spock to the Narada (remember he talked about beaming Archer's dog from one planet to another). Then after Spock destroyed the drill, he went to warp and the Narada chased him - so the final battle with the Narada could be well away from Earth (especially with how fast warp seems to be in this movie - and Spock's ship was supposed to be fast and from the future)
5. I thought it did suffer damage - it seemed to be listing and have parts of it be destroyed. I think that is what kept it from destroying the escaping shuttlecraft.
Out of curiosity, how does being blind in one eye effect your experience like that?
I don't mean to be offensive - I am just missing something here...
If I am watching a 3D movie (wearing the glasses) and close one eye, I just see a regular image. Of course, I loose the 3D effect, but other than that, it looks perfectly normal (other than the cheesy attempts to wow people with the 3D just start looking silly).
If you were to wear the polarized glasses, wouldn't it just look normal to you as well?
It is poorly worded in the article, but in this case, maximum thickness means the maximum thickness for that particular year and average thickness means the average maximum thickness for all years since 1950.
So they really are comparing this year's maximum thickness to the average of the maximum thickness for all other years.
But it was worded very poorly.
They had the option to shut down their analog prior to February 17th as well. Some places started as early as September of last year.
The February 17th date no longer holds any significance other than an historical footnote.
Evolution can only progress when those with unfit genes die without producing offspring. The moment that we started caring the weak and the sick, we put an end to evolution.
They can get away with it due to their customer base. Apple always has marketed itself as the easier to use, simpler user interface product and as such their user base is made up of people who either buy the line that "it just works this way" or would rather have someone else change the battery because that is just to difficult to do on your own.
I mean, this is the company with the one button mouse, right? It always reminds me of preschool toys.
I am surprised that Apple products don't come with a padded helmet for their users protection.
Ecologically, from a global warming POV, having diesel *not* emit useless soot is absolutely catastrophic, as the carbon has to go somewhere. It's either soot, or carbon dioxide.
When you RTFA, did you notice that the diesel was being produced by organic waste? That means plants. The CO2 that is released in that process will be equivalent to the amount of CO2 taken out of the atmosphere by the organic material when it was growing. That is hardly 'absolutely catastrophic'.
Actually, Yakov Smirnoff used the phrase "In Soviet Russia" well before the fall of the USSR.
You can not store anti-hydrogen or anti-oxygen or any other antimatter in regular (i.e., matter) containers. Matter and antimatter have a strong tendency to quickly convert into energy when they are brought into contact with each other. The electron shells of matter atoms tend to keep them separated since the magnetic force overwhelms the gravitational force at close distances. However, the positron shell of an antimatter atom tends to draw it towards matter atoms. You can keep antimatter ions (i.e., an anti-proton) in a magnetic bottle, but that doesn't work for neutral atoms.
Exactly. The need to create controversy between creationism and evolution only arises when one places limits and assumptions upon God's abilities.
The old Milli Vanilli test.
bravo.
That's a bunch of B.S. I mean, some of those are good, but there is no way you can play OMGWTFBBQ for more than 18 days without getting bored.