Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. Much more likely that they're so enthralled by their discovery that they can't help boasting.
Read the Hugh Grant story. The Prime Minister himself is implicated. A significant number of police are implicated. Murdocracy has corrupted politics itself in the UK. I'm not amazed the government has done nothing, I'm amazed they're allowing the story to build up steam.
In every debate using the worm here (Oz), at least one media organization always accuses the others of manipulating theirs, regardless of the result. So if you weren't already influenced then you had to ignore the deliberate media muddling of the issues. On top of the normal deliberate media muddling of course. But it doesn't stop commentators twittering them as a spectator sport anyway. This may be why we had a record 1.6% deliberate donkey vote in our last federal election.
The good thing about this is that companies with this mindset from the beginning need a rock solid market opportunity to get too big to ignore. Yes, Facebook is in a good position now, but its really only at the whim of favoritism. Missteps expose their complete sociopathy, and I don't think Facebook is so central to the industry that anyone cares if they fall.
As I see it, Oracle has abused it's own open standards process to control the biggest new segment of the Java client market, smartphones. This obviously affects Android and Dalvik. Unfortunately, that's also the case for the crucial server end member, ASF. ASF now has no reason to support the roadmap for Java clients, and Oracle can also refuse to accept the requirements of ASF projects. Oracle probably has a strategy for this, for example using networking effects to force ASF to implement extensions, but whatever the result, you're looking at a fragmented Java standard again, ie square one.
My problem isn't so much the learning curve of replacing one with the other - it's the competency of whoever ends up doing it. Whatever the business case, surely the majority of admins are going to be Windows-only: how is that going to succeed? If you have a business case and a good Unix admin, terrific. But I'm guessing that Microsoft isn't so worried about Unix servers taking over the enterprise because they have to get past the Microsoft-trained admin. He's going to raise hell with the CTO if he's forced to migrate servers, or worse, the job gets outsourced. SambaN+1 had better be awesomely user-friendly for it to be even seriously considered.
OTOH, a future Samba with built-in dynamic DNS is going to rock my world.
Then try googling east german border guard trial and learn something instead of lazy comments like that. Surprise surprise there have been prosecutions. Are we learning history yet?
I'd actually argue that words haven't lost their power at all, its just that the taboo moves on to different words. For example, what does the word terrorist mean to you? In different eras, we are acculturated to the power of different words depending on those words usefulness to those who wish to wield power. Paying attention to the use of words is an enlightening experience.
His problem really is "we can't compete with free, so let's claim free can't compete with us" and uses a classic fallacy of deductive logic to make his case. Other than that it's a classic private enterprise whine that the government ain't fair. It's also doubtful what open standards he can point to as incompetent given the OOXML mess. Then he throws in a bunch of stats to prove he's winning. Drone drone drone.
Make good food more affordable then, make time to prepare good food a priority. Don't blame the working poor for taking the easy way out in their 2-job-a-day lives to feed their families. I hear this particular justification from better off people all the time who have no idea how most people are getting by today. Next time, look at the checkout chick and ask yourself how they're feeding themselves on minimum wage. Then get off your sanctimonious high horse.
Slashdot Mirror
whatcha gonna do when they pirate YOU.
I'm sure they valued the software highly enough. What they failed to value were the developers. Ironically, this was Sun's failure also.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. Much more likely that they're so enthralled by their discovery that they can't help boasting.
Balls!
Read the Hugh Grant story. The Prime Minister himself is implicated. A significant number of police are implicated. Murdocracy has corrupted politics itself in the UK. I'm not amazed the government has done nothing, I'm amazed they're allowing the story to build up steam.
I'm certain that the Elders of the Internet would never allow Satanism to flourish. Unless it hadn't been properly demagnetized...
In every debate using the worm here (Oz), at least one media organization always accuses the others of manipulating theirs, regardless of the result. So if you weren't already influenced then you had to ignore the deliberate media muddling of the issues. On top of the normal deliberate media muddling of course. But it doesn't stop commentators twittering them as a spectator sport anyway. This may be why we had a record 1.6% deliberate donkey vote in our last federal election.
The groundwork they did will be most sought-after.
Uh Oh!
Yep, its all in the textbook.
The good thing about this is that companies with this mindset from the beginning need a rock solid market opportunity to get too big to ignore. Yes, Facebook is in a good position now, but its really only at the whim of favoritism. Missteps expose their complete sociopathy, and I don't think Facebook is so central to the industry that anyone cares if they fall.
Personally, I'm waiting for iPad 3.5, when it will really be finished!
these are the same geniuses who thought laptops could travel in APCs.
.so Perl programmers watched the other Matrix movies, I knew it.
are under close observation and medication, any profanity is silently ignored.
He won't play their game. Not playing the game is bad, mkay.
...now Australian politicians will copy it. I foresee Labor party branches stacking Barnaby Joyce's electorate...
http://soundcloud.com/penguinmusic/omgwtfbbq
As I see it, Oracle has abused it's own open standards process to control the biggest new segment of the Java client market, smartphones. This obviously affects Android and Dalvik. Unfortunately, that's also the case for the crucial server end member, ASF. ASF now has no reason to support the roadmap for Java clients, and Oracle can also refuse to accept the requirements of ASF projects. Oracle probably has a strategy for this, for example using networking effects to force ASF to implement extensions, but whatever the result, you're looking at a fragmented Java standard again, ie square one.
My problem isn't so much the learning curve of replacing one with the other - it's the competency of whoever ends up doing it. Whatever the business case, surely the majority of admins are going to be Windows-only: how is that going to succeed? If you have a business case and a good Unix admin, terrific. But I'm guessing that Microsoft isn't so worried about Unix servers taking over the enterprise because they have to get past the Microsoft-trained admin. He's going to raise hell with the CTO if he's forced to migrate servers, or worse, the job gets outsourced. SambaN+1 had better be awesomely user-friendly for it to be even seriously considered.
OTOH, a future Samba with built-in dynamic DNS is going to rock my world.
Then try googling east german border guard trial and learn something instead of lazy comments like that. Surprise surprise there have been prosecutions. Are we learning history yet?
I'd actually argue that words haven't lost their power at all, its just that the taboo moves on to different words. For example, what does the word terrorist mean to you? In different eras, we are acculturated to the power of different words depending on those words usefulness to those who wish to wield power. Paying attention to the use of words is an enlightening experience.
His problem really is "we can't compete with free, so let's claim free can't compete with us" and uses a classic fallacy of deductive logic to make his case. Other than that it's a classic private enterprise whine that the government ain't fair. It's also doubtful what open standards he can point to as incompetent given the OOXML mess. Then he throws in a bunch of stats to prove he's winning. Drone drone drone.
Make good food more affordable then, make time to prepare good food a priority. Don't blame the working poor for taking the easy way out in their 2-job-a-day lives to feed their families. I hear this particular justification from better off people all the time who have no idea how most people are getting by today. Next time, look at the checkout chick and ask yourself how they're feeding themselves on minimum wage. Then get off your sanctimonious high horse.
Us: Because you refuse to think.
by http://www.mathstat.uottawa.ca/~rsmith/Zombies.pdf