In any case, "THESE" people as you refer to them are the real linux hackers, not corporate drones. I guess it's true not everyone will understand the one voice thing at the top
Canadian Law..not sure if this applies to the USA....
A written contract is just as legally binding as a verbal contract. One party sets out terms, the other party agrees (by clicking agree even) to those terms. That is a contract. Verbal contracts are just as legal. The problem is that with verbal, there is no proof. With no proof, how can a case hold up when taken to court? Imagine the smack down you'd get from Judge Judy.
in canada parents are not responsible for a contract regarding a non necessity (ie food, shelter, clothing).
If the kid makes a contract to obtain a necessity (purchases a pizza by delivery), parents are responsible.
If the kid agrees to anything regarding a non necessity (ie video game) parents are not responsible.
The idea being parents have to provide the life necessities, if they are not and the kid has to go out on his own, the parents aren't meeting obligations.
>> Security feature that can't be bypassed with factory tools ???
Yes?
I forgot my password, and i need my important financial data now!
but sir it meets c3 guidelines for security as per your recomendation on/.
THAT WAS BEFORE I NEEDED TO BREAK IN
Always be careful of what you wish for, you may get it.
I took a call from a customer who got Windows with his pc and wanted a refund because he was going to use linux.... (i think he's smart)
While we're talking about my recent install of xfree86 4.2.0 he mentions MS is taking over linux now with MS Linux and belives it's real. (i realize he's dumb)
I spent the required time to guide him to the domain whois to show him this page isn't owned by Microsoft. He thought the quotes on the page are real....
1) Party enters in to agreement with MicroSloth 2) Party can not pay Microsloth what they agreed to and provides a note 3) Party proposes alternate options to original agreement and MicroSloth decides against the agreement because it is not financially appealing in the long run
Hrm...they made what seems like a smart business decision without breaking any law or taking advantage of any loophole.
.... for two reasons
1) They are making us fully aware of what is going on, there is no loss of privacy
2) They are not allowing communication and monitoring it. That would be an invasion of privacy.
I applaud the gov't for coming up with an alternate solution that doesn't infringe on peoples privacy.
How do you not Remember DooM 2?
It was in gameplay/graphics/sounds/everything the same as the original Doom, but they charged you for the 2 in the title!@
>>Does this mean that Duke Nukem Forever is
>>overdue for its "Game Of The Year" award?"
Who cares, Never Winter Nights is now in stores!
This wayback machine is invaluable!
I was able to travel back to the early days of internet pr0n (click here to launch sex.com from '96) and research ancient authentication methods including "Click here if you are over 18".
I guess ISPs themselves will go back to old fashioned memos....
Imagine what happens when admins are backing up/reading the days e-mail and read the subject "Fire Admins"
Ahhh... the IBM unified voice.
In any case, "THESE" people as you refer to them are the real linux hackers, not corporate drones. I guess it's true not everyone will understand the one voice thing at the top
.... I don't think we should be slamming Nintendo. I'd gladly pay a one time cost of a few dollars to play SMB3 or the original Metroid on my GBA.
You could free up that multi-gig of space if we could find a way to uninstall MSN Messenger
Canadian Law..not sure if this applies to the USA....
A written contract is just as legally binding as a verbal contract. One party sets out terms, the other party agrees (by clicking agree even) to those terms. That is a contract. Verbal contracts are just as legal. The problem is that with verbal, there is no proof. With no proof, how can a case hold up when taken to court? Imagine the smack down you'd get from Judge Judy.
in canada parents are not responsible for a contract regarding a non necessity (ie food, shelter, clothing).
If the kid makes a contract to obtain a necessity (purchases a pizza by delivery), parents are responsible.
If the kid agrees to anything regarding a non necessity (ie video game) parents are not responsible.
The idea being parents have to provide the life necessities, if they are not and the kid has to go out on his own, the parents aren't meeting obligations.
>> Security feature that can't be bypassed with factory tools ???
/.
Yes?
I forgot my password, and i need my important financial data now!
but sir it meets c3 guidelines for security as per your recomendation on
THAT WAS BEFORE I NEEDED TO BREAK IN
Always be careful of what you wish for, you may get it.
if you had one of those I'd be taking shots at you....wtf would it need to be bullet proof?
I'd shoot you in the foot or something to steal it
You can add PC cards (WiFi) to the Compaq ipaq...
X-Files didn't leak the lone gunman story, slashdot did. Technically MTV pulled a slashdot.
that and my ThinkPad A31P beats that 3d mark score by 300+ points. The A31P has a 64mb ati firegl card...
Security through obscurity.
:)
On that note, my pong machine doesn't have any viruses either.
Actually there are two models of IBM WorkPad C3:
8602-40U = Palm V
8602-50U = Palm Vx
and for the record, my workpad C505 (ibm branded palm m505) has been great with no issue.
This pisses me off cuz being a supervisor at work I hafta yell at people who use the term firware to customers, now they can tell me to stick it.
This means they may be charging people to transfer ownership of the software....
... even though the software has already been paid for?
It doesn't take that much effort to fool people.
I took a call from a customer who got Windows with his pc and wanted a refund because he was going to use linux.... (i think he's smart)
While we're talking about my recent install of xfree86 4.2.0 he mentions MS is taking over linux now with MS Linux and belives it's real. (i realize he's dumb)
I spent the required time to guide him to the domain whois to show him this page isn't owned by Microsoft. He thought the quotes on the page are real....
sigh, anyway it's not hard to fool people
Since when does people who can't spell count as a design flaw?
Of Course They Can.....
Women of all ages fake it all the time.
Microsoft Wields Such Great Power And Puts Someone Out Of Business?
What type of business model relies entirely on one company?
Poor business model for them.
1) Party enters in to agreement with MicroSloth
2) Party can not pay Microsloth what they agreed to and provides a note
3) Party proposes alternate options to original agreement and MicroSloth decides against the agreement because it is not financially appealing in the long run
Hrm...they made what seems like a smart business decision without breaking any law or taking advantage of any loophole.
I don't see the issue.
I mean....we won't be here, I'm against putting my hard earned money towards helping people 10000 years from now, let them figure it out on their own.