Slashdot Mirror


Nintendo Ressurecting Classic NES Games to the GBA

The Pi-Guy writes "It seems contradictory to Big N's massive anti-emulation stance to introduce the GBA as an emulator itself! An official N press release states that there will be "full classic NES games for download to the GBA"." Probably not so much Duck Hunt, but it sure would be sweet to get SMB3 on my GBA. Then I could go blind!

210 comments

  1. How is that Contradictory? by slntnsnty · · Score: 1

    They (like any company concerned with profits) are not anti-emulator, they are against people distributing their games without paying them for it.

    1. Re:How is that Contradictory? by vegetablespork · · Score: 1
      To Nintendo, emulation outside Nintendo is the same thing. Of course, the emulator guys have beat them to it--there've been NES game packs for the GBA (if you're fortunate enough to have a flash cart) on various P2P networks for some time.

      Nintendo can bite my shiny metal ass.

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    2. Re:How is that Contradictory? by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 1

      Well, but even if they locked down an emulator to non-commercial games, I'll bet thet Big N would go after them anyway. Plus, remember UltraHLE? No R**s were distributed there, but they still got sued....

      --pi

    3. Re:How is that Contradictory? by slntnsnty · · Score: 1

      True, but they would view an emulator as enabling them to be distributed... Just like other companies did not want Tape Recorders... Not saying I agree with the policy, but if you are trying to make money than it makes sense in a way.

    4. Re:How is that Contradictory? by GutBomb · · Score: 2

      i played alot of roms on ultraHLE, so if you are saying that roms were never released you were wrong. my wife and i played a ton of mario64 on my PC. i don't understand your meaning. If you mean that the UltraHLE guys never distributed roms, you would be right, but i never saw the nesticle guys passing out roms either, or genecyst (maybe the same guy), or any other emulator for that matter.

    5. Re:How is that Contradictory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He means the people who wrote UltraHLE never distributed any ROMs. Them getting sued for making an emulator would be roughly equivalent to Nullsoft getting sued for making an MP3 player.

    6. Re:How is that Contradictory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because the system BIOS was included in the code..

  2. YAAFA (Yet another acronym-filled article by ObviousGuy · · Score: 3, Informative

    GBA = Game Boy Advance
    SMB3 = Super Mario Bros 3

    They aren't against emulation. They are against people other than Nintendo providing the emulation.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:YAAFA (Yet another acronym-filled article by smagoun · · Score: 1

      Thank you, Captain Obvious!

    2. Re:YAAFA (Yet another acronym-filled article by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      I am not Captain Obvious.

      Nor am I CaptainObvious.

      I am ObviousGuy.

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    3. Re:YAAFA (Yet another acronym-filled article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am not Captain Obvious [slashdot.org].

      Nor am I CaptainObvious [slashdot.org].

      I am ObviousGuy [slashdot.org].

      Obviously.

    4. Re:YAAFA (Yet another acronym-filled article by John_Booty · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      If you don't know what "GBA" or "SMB3" stands for, then this article is not for you anyway! So STFU... just kidding. :)

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
  3. Is this actually emulation? by Richard+Bannister · · Score: 1

    Original NES games are at 256*224 (or 240) resolution, which will not fit on a GBA screen. Since, according to Nintendo, emulation is illegal, I would assume that these must be rewrites?

    --
    http://www.themeparks.ie
    1. Re:Is this actually emulation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      according to what you say, copying games is also illegal, so blizzard cant copy their master cd of warcraft3?

      nintendo owns the games, so they can do whatever they like.
      serving nintendo roms on a website if you're not nintendo, is in fact illegal

    2. Re:Is this actually emulation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes and it's been done already.

      PocketNES does this by dropping every third scanline to make the image fit on the GBA screen. Nintendo will probably want to redraw the graphics to remove the visual artifacts caused by this aliasing though.

  4. Bad news for existing emulators? by ActMatrix · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are many excellent NES emulators already available for the GBA - most noteably PocketNES. I wonder if Nintendo will take an aggressive stance against these kinds of developers, and NES ROM trading in general?

    1. Re:Bad news for existing emulators? by Clue4All · · Score: 1

      Wow, that sounds like Nintendo using their power as a market leader of Nintendo game sales and distribution in an anti-competitive manner against their competition. Perhaps we should take them to court over it, because it certainly seems like it's stifling competition in the Nintendo game arena. Thoughts?

      --

      Is your browser retarded?
    2. Re:Bad news for existing emulators? by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      The difference between Nintendo and Microsoft though is that Nintendo does not have a (virtual) monopoly on the entire console industry like Microsoft does in the OS industry.

    3. Re:Bad news for existing emulators? by Cyph · · Score: 2

      Hehe, I had to read that comment at least 3 times to understand what you were trying to say. If you were in fact trying to confuse me and my fellow slashbots, you have succeeded, kind sir!

    4. Re:Bad news for existing emulators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      They have one on the portable console industry.

      Unless you consider Wonderswan to be competition.... *cough*...

    5. Re:Bad news for existing emulators? by edwdig · · Score: 2

      Well, when's the last time someone tried to release a portable in the US ? I vaguely remember one that had a pen like a PDA about 4 years ago, but it flat out sucked.

      Perhaps if people tried competing there would be competion. The GameBoy originally won out because it came out first and had a lot of good games. Since then no one has tried to compete, so of course they have a monopoly.

    6. Re:Bad news for existing emulators? by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      When Sega started releasing Sonic games on PC, they apparently used the freeware KGen emulator. If someone's already written a public-domain NES emu for GBA, why should Nintendo bother to write their own?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    7. Re:Bad news for existing emulators? by esper_child · · Score: 1

      there was the neo-geo pocket a few years back. Not that it really had many games on it. The thing is keeping Nintendo in the center ring on the portable market is the number of games for the gameboy and the backwards compatability. The NES beat the SMS by having more games, same with the SNES as well. Playstation kicked N64s ass because there were more games for the PSX than the N64 did. And in the console market PS2 will beat out teh competition due to more games to play. The only hand held that lasted any amount of time against the game boy was the Game Gear, and that came out in the GB's infancy so they were on equal grounds game wise.
      Moral of the story: he who has the most games will win out over here, doesn't matter if your system is really well designed and built (Sega Saturn, N64, SMS), it will still die if it doesn't have enough games to make a good competion in enough feilds (yes apparently the crap feild helps too judging from teh PSX's success). You can't win on your design alone, you have to play the field and get enough good companies to make games for your system, with out those games you loose.

  5. Re:first post by discstickers · · Score: 0, Troll

    Bah, you logged-in trolls suck. ACs are the way of the future....

    --
    I have a shitty sig!
  6. It has the power.... by slakdrgn · · Score: 1
    ....to run SNES games also (atleast that was my understanding..) I don't see why they don't come out with the Mario All Stars pack for GBA, that way you get a lot more for the buck.. ;)

    I've been happy with my GBA, kinda reminds me of my old NeoGeo Pocket Color.. It is interesting seeing sega games on it, thats for sure, I remember the rival thoes two had back in the SNES/Genesis days.. ;)

    It'd be nice to see a lot of SNES games ported over tho, like Bust a Move (Bubble bobble), Super Mario World, etc..

    ~slak

    1. Re:It has the power.... by norwoodites · · Score: 1

      Did Nintendo already have an emulator for the game boy to play gameboy games on snes?

    2. Re:It has the power.... by Richard+Bannister · · Score: 1

      Nope. You can't emulate a SNES on a GBA - the power simply isn't there. SNES conversions (Super Mario Advance, ...) are rewrites.

      --
      http://www.themeparks.ie
    3. Re:It has the power.... by Richard+Bannister · · Score: 1

      Nope. This isn't emulation - the Super Gameboy has the relevant bits of a Gameboy built in to it.

      --
      http://www.themeparks.ie
    4. Re:It has the power.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea um if you didnt already know Super Mario World has been ported over for some months now, along with a bunch other snes games

      supposely square is gonna port some of their final fantasy games to it

      rumor, yes, but they would be stupid not too

    5. Re:It has the power.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if they sell SMB 1 ,2, and 3 to you first, THEN release All Stars, they can milk more money out of you.

      Geez people, if you want to figure out reasoning behind Nintendo, just think of ways that you're getting screwed and it will all make sense!

    6. Re:It has the power.... by norwoodites · · Score: 1

      I said SNES which is not the advance gameboy but the super nes.

    7. Re:It has the power.... by duren686 · · Score: 1

      To recall: The Super Gameboy was a cartridge adaptor that allowed you to play gameboy games on your snes. The grandparent poster was not talking about the Gameboy Advance, but the Super Gameboy adaptor.

      --
      Y2K Compliant since the late 1890s
    8. Re:It has the power.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, he knew that and ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION **CORRECTLY**, dipshit.

      jesus, get a fucking brain or something.

    9. Re:It has the power.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Super Gameboy != Gameboy Advance.

      Super Gameboy was the thing that plugged into the Super NES and let you play Gameboy games on it. The Super Gameboy had its own processor inside (a la Super FX) to handle the Gameboy machine code, and basically used the SNES as nothing more than a display adaptor.

    10. Re:It has the power.... by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      I said SNES which is not the advance gameboy but the super nes.

      He said Super Gameboy which is not the advance gameboy but the Super Gameboy.

    11. Re:It has the power.... by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      If you consider people selling you a product (that you don't have to buy if you don't like it) "being screwed", then maybe.

    12. Re:It has the power.... by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      Super Mario World already has been ported to GBA. It's called Super Mario Advance 2, which is a bit confusing, because Super Mario Advance was actually Super Mario Bros. 2, except it wasn't, because Super Mario Bros. 2 was actually Doki Doki Panic, and the real Super Mario Bros. 2 only ever appeared in the West as Super Mario Bros: The Lost Levels on the SNES Super Mario All-Stars pack...

      (gasp)...

      Like I said, confusing...

      The next SNES port will apparently be Yoshi's Island.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  7. Hmm, I coulda sworn I didn't misspell that... by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

    2002-06-15 04:12:58 Nintendo to use GameCube to transfer NES games to GBA (articles,games) (accepted)

    Thanks Taco!! I forgot to add the spelling error into my article.

    1. Re:Hmm, I coulda sworn I didn't misspell that... by ymgve · · Score: 1

      Well, you see - to continue their excellent steganography service for the Illuminati, they are forced to make these spelling errors at least once a day. Watch those mistakes for a few days, and you'll see the pattern.

      Or not.

      (Offtopic as hell. I know. Mod away.)

  8. Classic by telstar · · Score: 2

    Bring back RC Pro Am, and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, and I'll buy a GBA.

    1. Re:Classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RC Pro AM was one of my top 5 nin games. So much fun. To have it handheld (and at work) would be so sweet!

  9. Gameboy Advance with backlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HELLO NINTENDO. I refuse to support(buy) GBA until a backlit screen is built in to the GBA. Why is this so hard to do? I hope you release an updated advance really soon.

    1. Re:Gameboy Advance with backlight by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 2, Informative

      They already have one - it's not official, but it is there. Everyone's favorite HK reseller, Lik-Sang will be selling pre-modded GBAs with the afterburner kit built-in.

      Have fun!
      --pi

    2. Re:Gameboy Advance with backlight by laddhebert · · Score: 1

      That is so true! After getting a GBA 6 months or so ago, I tried SO many ways to get my display "viewable". I bought the magnified lense and the light, which sucked tremendously. Really the only thing you can do to get decent gameplay is to sit directly under a lamp and kind of tilt the screen til you see it. They totally dropped the ball on the display.

      --
      Don't Panic.
  10. Super Mario Brothers 3 is already coming out by jkeyes · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nintendo has confirmed that SMB3 is coming to GBA and since Super Mario Advance 3 is going to be Yoshi's Island perhaps it will be Super Mario Advance 4? I've also read that in Animal Crossing they are going to include Excitebike and some other game which escapes me right now.

    1. Re:Super Mario Brothers 3 is already coming out by Kizzle · · Score: 1

      Of all the codes I knew as a kid I will never forget that one. There is just somthing magical about it. But I guess you never know when it will come in handy.

  11. Contra!? by dlur · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right A B A B Select Start

    I can't think of any other game that wasted more of my youth other than perhaps Pac Man. I'd definately buy a GBA if I could play good old regular Contra on it.

    --
    Duris MUD - The best pkill MUD. Ever.
    1. Re:Contra!? by rkabir · · Score: 1

      A remake of the third one is due out this fall.

    2. Re:Contra!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B A B A Up Down B A Left Right B A Start. TMNT all tha way!

  12. I've been doing this for a while now. by tweder · · Score: 1

    There is already a NES emulator available for the Gameboy Advance called PocketNES. This emulator is great - it runs at full speed and has great sound support. You can even link up another GBA and play 2 players with just one cartridge. You have to have a Flash Advance linker in order to play on your GBA hardware though.

  13. Re:Super Mario Brothers 3 by self+assembled+struc · · Score: 3, Informative

    what the crap are you talking about. SMB3 was the last mario for the NES. The third generation gaming platform from Nintendo (barring GB, GBC, pGB, and GBA) is the n64.

  14. They're not "anti-emulation" by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're anti-theft.

    Those classic NES games are their IP. Granted, they're years old and not that many people have the systems to play them on anymore, but actions like this show that they're still commercially viable.

    The problem with emulators is that of the ROM. ROMs can be distributed anywhere and everywhere, over file-sharing devices, eMail, and ftp warez sites. Due to the widespread theft of games in this manner, it's understandable that Nintendo doesn't support emulators.

    From Nintendo's standpoint (which is quite legal), emulators encourage theft. They are accessories to the piracy of their IP, and I for one support their stance.

    It's their games. They should be able to decide how to licence and distribute them.

    --
    Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
    1. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Due to the widespread theft of games in this manner, it's understandable that Nintendo doesn't support emulators.


      It's not theft. Copying a game does not take the game away from Nintendo. They are still free to continue selling other copies. That's the dilemma we encounter when trying to apply capitalism, which requires balancing supply and demand, to something which is infinitely and perfectly reproducible.

      Yes, it's an ethical choice to be made, but spouting corporate morality (piracy = theft = lost sales = ... = death of America!) won't get your argument anywhere.
    2. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Copying a game does not take the game away from Nintendo.

      What's your point? It's still an illegal copy of their intellectual property. It's their choice, not yours, as to how they licence it. If they cannot licence it and constrict the destribution of it via their licence, then who are we to whine whenever some corperation steals GPLed code and closed-sources it? It would be blatent hipocracy.

      Arguments of "well, you can copy it! capitalism doesn't apply!" are irrelevant.

      Yes, it's an ethical choice to be made, but spouting corporate morality (piracy = theft = lost sales = ... = death of America!) won't get your argument anywhere.

      I suggest you reread Plato, and his arguments about supporting the law. By not supporting the ethical laws of the land, you are simply inviting anarchy.

      --
      Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
    3. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by Dimensio · · Score: 1, Troll

      Really? I thought that it was well-established that "backup archival" copies of software was permissable despite software comanies attempting to dictacte otherwise.

      Of course IANAL, I'm just anal-retentive.

    4. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROM software has special copyright laws which prohibit that.

    5. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In all countries, or just the USA?

    6. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >emulators encourage theft.

      No, column punches and slim-jims encourage theft.

      Emulators may encourage piracy, however, I would make the same argument about the electricity that powers most all the pirate shops in the world (most because I suppose there's someone running an engine driven pirate book press _somewhere_). Without electricity, very little to no piracy would exist.

      >ROMs can be distributed anywhere and everywhere, over file-sharing devices, eMail, and ftp warez sites.

      So can ebooks. Let's burn them all and get rid of the piracy problem once and for all!

      >It's their games. They should be able to decide how to licence and distribute them.

      Well, I agree they can decide how to license them, but in a free country (tm) they have no right to decide how they'll be distributed after first sale.

      That would be like a publisher telling me I can't send a book I own down to China because they might copy it. Well, TFB publishers. Don't want the public to do what they want with your stuff (within copyright law, of course)? Then don't sell/give it away.

    7. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Arguments of "well, you can copy it! capitalism doesn't apply!" are irrelevant.


      Wow, nice handwaving job there. Anything that doesn't support your moral standpoint is irrelevant?

      I suggest you reread Plato, and his arguments about supporting the law. By not supporting the ethical laws of the land, you are simply inviting anarchy.


      It was Socrates, and Philosophy 101 says that ethics and morals are two quite different things. Ethics are universal, morals are the law of the land. I would not say that the attitude that (piracy = theft = destruction of freedom) is universal; e.g. outside of the USA. Would you?

      Of course it's common morality in the USA, as a capitalist nation, that we should not undermine avenues of supply to gain things for free that we would not otherwise afford. But think how silly this sounds when applied to an infinitely reproducible or recyclable item. Food replicator? Perpetual energy source?
    8. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by NachtVorst · · Score: 1

      You are right ofcourse, but please don't call this theft.

      It's 'piracy', though I prefer the term 'illegal copying'. If you steal something from someone (theft), that person no longer has the item you stole. An illegal copy is just that, a copy, and Nintendo still has the original.

      I'm not saying this is right (or wrong), but please call the beast by it's name. After all, we don't call speeding 'rape', or spreading virii 'murder'. It is typical of powerfull institutions to give something they're opposed to a fearfull name (see Communism, Fascism, 1984, etc.). 'Stealing' or 'Piracy' sounds a lot more dangerous than what it really is: illegal copying. You see the same thing happening with thing getting labelled 'terrorism' these days. Let's not let "them" get away with this.

      NachtVorst

    9. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      (from Webster) "Steal: 1 a : to take or appropriate without right or leave and with intent to keep or make use of wrongfully b : to take away by force or unjust means c : to take surreptitiously or without permission d : to appropriate to oneself or beyond one's proper share : make oneself the focus of "

      Glad to know the next time i steal a kiss that that person can never kiss anyone else again, cause i took it from them.

      The definition doesn't actually specify that the original owner has to lose posesion of what was stolen, does it? How about when a spy steals some top secret plans? Which is normally accomplished in some method that leaves the originals perfectly intact.

      If you accidently left the plans for a new invention or buisness venture lying around and i found them and copied them, and then patented it and made a few million of off your idea, you'd probably think i stole something from you. Or how bout when someone steals your credit card numbers over the net?

      I'm not a fan of the big media interests, but denying that it's stealing doesn't really get us anywhere. We can't talk about the new Information Age if we're not willing to update our understanding of exactly what information is and how we interact with it.

      If you take something that you do not have the rights to, it is stealing, it doesn't matter whether the thing yout took is tangible or not, or whether or not you left a copy behind.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    10. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Glad to know the next time i steal a kiss that that person can never kiss anyone else again, cause i took it from them.

      This doesn't help the "piracy is stealing" argument one bit. The definition of steal you are using is this (taken straight from the one true dictionary, the OED):

      2: to obtain surreptitiously or by surprise as "stole a kiss".

      Since I don't expect anyone here to know the definition of surreptitiously, here it is (from dictionary.com because I'm too lazy to type it in from the OED):

      surreptitious Pronunciation Key (sûrp-tshs)
      adj.

      1. Obtained, done, or made by clandestine or stealthy means.
      2. Acting with or marked by stealth. See Synonyms at secret.

      Stealth is, of course, the trademark of any theif with a clue, but as you can see "stealing a kiss" is nothing like the definition for "stealing software" (which would be either reproduing it and fraudulently selling it as original or shoplifting).

      >The definition doesn't actually specify that the original owner has to lose posesion of what was stolen, does it

      It very much does when we are dealing with it in a non-ephemeral sense.

      To put it clearly, the definition you are discussing is covered by the exact synonym larceny. The definition is:

      The unlawful taking and removing of another's personal property with the intent of permanently depriving the owner; theft.

      >How about when a spy steals some top secret plans?

      A spy, by definition, would be working for the enemy in an attempt to subvert the current government. Subversion is not stealing, and I find it far more likely the people he copied the plans from would not try him for stealing, but would rather try him for treason.

      >Or how bout when someone steals your credit card numbers over the net?

      You wouldn't know about it until they did monetary damage to you, which proves that they stole from you.

      >If you accidently left the plans for a new invention or buisness venture lying around and i found them and copied them, and then patented it and made a few million of off your idea, you'd probably think i stole something from you.

      Again, provable monetary damage. The plans became stolen when you used them to destroy my company and take away my money.

      >We can't talk about the new Information Age if we're not willing to update our understanding of exactly what information is and how we interact with it.

      A year or two ago dictionaries specifically updated their definitions to cover this disturbing trend to make anything and everything stealing. There is an old slashdot article about it if you care to find it. In summary, the dictionary writers decided to separate Copyright Violation from Theft because Theft requires a proof that someone lost something.

      You cannot prove you lost anything when a public work of yours is stolen. Why? Because I could, right now, copy 100 albums from the internet a week if I chose to do so. However, I do not have the salary to pay for them. Therefore the "proof" you lost money due to the fact I would have paid for those works breaks down. And, unlike regular physical stealing, such as stealing a porsche but took it anyways despite the fact I cannot afford one, you have no other losses to prove (whereas with the porsche you are now denied driving a porsche).

      >If you take something that you do not have the rights to, it is stealing, it doesn't matter whether the thing yout took is tangible or not, or whether or not you left a copy behind.

      And is it stealing if I took a picture of a military site, even if it were illegal to take one? I don't have the rights to take it, but did I therefore steal it? I still left the site intact, and didn't disturb the people there, so why is this different? Are all war reporters theives then? Perhaps they rode about with 39 other theives and Ali-Baba on camels in Afghanistan, then? :-)

      Put simply: It isn't stealing. And dictionary writers were tired of everthing being called stealing so they defined it better.

      Heck, one could say I am stealing _right now_. I could be typing this on a company computer against their wishes, so therefore I "stole their resources", did I not, even though its could be the middle of the night, and the computer is supposed to be left on, unused?

      No, I didn't.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    11. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by DarkZero · · Score: 2

      It's 'piracy', though I prefer the term 'illegal copying'.

      "Piracy", a word that basically means violent theft, is no more accurate a description of the illegal copying of intellectual property than the word "theft" itself.

    12. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 1

      How can you be so condescending when you know nothing?

      First of all, it was Plato. We know virtually nothing about Socrates (or at least his philosophy) that didn't come from Plato, and while it was clear that he greatly admired his old master, it seems fairly likely that Plato put words into his mouth from time to time. The dialogues were not verbatim transcriptions of actual conversations that Socrates had with his followers. Rather, Plato used recollections of the teachings of Socrates (after his death, of course) to give form to arguments that were at least partially (if not almost entirely) his own.

      Second, your relativistic take on the distinction between ethics and morals doesn't make any sense. Are you saying that if you were to observe a tribe of cannibals, you would describe them as immoral but not unethical? I don't care if your phi 101 professor said it; that doesn't make it so. It may be one definition, but I would not call it definitive.

    13. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      To put it clearly, the definition you are discussing is covered by the exact synonym larceny. The definition is:

      The unlawful taking and removing of another's personal property with the intent of permanently depriving the owner; theft.

      The definition i was discussing is not the one i quoted, but rather an "exact synonym" that has a different definition? That logic seems haze at best.

      I don't have access to the OED, but from the American Heritage Dictionary:
      "1: To take (the property of another) without right or permission. Synonyms: steal, purloin, filch, snitch, pilfer, cop, hook, swipe, lift, pinch. Steal is the most general: stole a car; steals research from colleagues.

      I'm glad to know that some dictionaries have taken it under their purview to define what words mean for us rather than recording their usage. We certainly don't have enough people telling us how to do things.

      However i think "To take (the property of another) without right or permission" is a very good definition for stealing.

      We can quibble about weather or not stealing someone's ideas make you a thief or not, but it is most certainly stealing. People who steal research data or excerpts from works of literature are usually reffered to as plagiarists, not thieves, possibly because the original remains in the owners possesion. Yet Webster states:
      "Plagiarize: To steal or purloin from the writings of another; to appropriate without due acknowledgement (the ideas or expressions of another)."

      You cannot prove you lost anything when a public work of yours is stolen.

      But wait! Aren't you trying to claim that it isn't stolen? Regardless, by your argument if i copy your plans for an invention, patent them, and sell the devices for millions of dollars, can i claim that you can not prove that you have lost money since you can not prove that those same people would have bought the device if you were the one marketing it?

      This is the Information Age, we have quantized information discretly (bits and bytes) and abstractly (memes and meme complexes) and view it as a thing that can be managed, manipulated, and exchanged. Information is a thing, we can measure it even if we cannot touch it, and people have the same rights to it as any other thing.

      If you steal information that belongs to someone else then you are denying them the ability to sell it to you, regardless of whether or not you would have bought it otherwise. You may decide to pay for those rights later, but if you go back two weeks later to the dealership you stole the porsche from and try to pay them for it, does that somehow mean you never stole in the first place?

      The instance of you having that information has value, and the owners can attach any price to that they want, which you can choose to pay or not pay. Once having stolen it, your intent or ability to pay or not pay are irrelevant, just as when you steal a car it doesn't matter if you could or would pay for it under other circumstances

      Perhaps the best analogy is this: if i had an uncountably infinite pile of money (Mathematicians out there, is that the right term?) and you take some of it without my permission, you have stolen it. Just because the amount i still have has not decreased does not mean that you did not take it from me or that i am undamaged. I am losing out on whatever i might have gotten in exchange for that money if things had proceded fairly.

      Like the analogy, each piece of information is a infinite source point from which it may endlessly be taken, but taking it without permision is still stealing, because you are taking something you have no right to, no matter how much of the original is left behind.

      Maybe that concept is a bit hard to wrap your mind around, but the world changes, technology changes, and our views of the world and our lanaguage need to change to adapt. Otherwise the recording industry would be declaiming "Cease and desist yon scoundrals! Thou hast done pilfered the lively spirt of our Bards' fair cries!" and you would be answering in kind.

      Note that i'm not a fan of the recording industry, but i'm not going to blind my eyes to the truth and pretend that makes everything all better. The issue isn't black and white, but i'm not afraid to face them in the grey.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    14. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by Dimensio · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware of that. Does anyone happen to have case law?

      (BTW: To whomever modded my post as "Troll", fuck you. It was a legitimate offer based on my limited understanding of copyright law, not a troll. Go fuck yourself with shards of broken glass)

    15. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I'm glad to know that some dictionaries have taken it under their purview to define what words mean for us rather than recording their usage. We certainly don't have enough people telling us how to do things.

      Yes, I'm sure we need another word that's so overused it means almost nothing, like set.

      If the word steal is to be as overused as you suggest, then I suggest it means nothing. And if it means nothing, then I don't care if you call it that.

      But if you think it actually means something, then I do care how you use it.

      This isn't a useless word such as "like" or "uh" or "err", steal should remain a word that's useful in our language. Anyone who wants to lower the precision of our language is a, uh, um, well, sorta, huh, well, you know, like, not good?

      >People who steal research data or excerpts from works of literature are usually reffered to as plagiarists, not thieves, possibly because the original remains in the owners possesion.

      I totally agree, plagarizing is stealing, because the owner is deprived of whatever benefits the plagarized material receives.

      However, we are discussing piracy, not plagarizing. Normally pirated goods remain untouched, execpt when features are removed, or copy protection broken. I've never seen pirated software that didn't include the author's name. Perhaps you have?

      >Regardless, by your argument if i copy your plans for an invention, patent them, and sell the devices for millions of dollars, can i claim that you can not prove that you have lost money since you can not prove that those same people would have bought the device if you were the one marketing it?

      No, because I would have hired you to market the goods. However, without a job I cannot purchase goods. The only defence to this is to say you would give me a job, or give me money to pay for the goods. In either case you do not benefit (you hired an employee to do nothing, or you paid me to do nothing, you still receive no benefits).

      >If you steal information that belongs to someone else then you are denying them the ability to sell it to you, regardless of whether or not you would have bought it otherwise.

      In general, denying someone the ability to sell something is not a crime in my country. Is it in yours?

      If I deny a child his allowance in punishment, have I stolen that allowance from him?

      Stealing requires the loss of a posession that you are legally entitled to. There is no legal entitlement to profit, sorry to say.

      >You may decide to pay for those rights later, but if you go back two weeks later to the dealership you stole the porsche from and try to pay them for it, does that somehow mean you never stole in the first place?

      I don't remember saying to go and pay for pirated goods after you've pirated them. This is getting off-topic...

      >Once having stolen it, your intent or ability to pay or not pay are irrelevant, just as when you steal a car it doesn't matter if you could or would pay for it under other circumstances

      I repeat: When a car is stolen, you are deprived the use of the car. When your data is "pirated" you are not deprived the use of it. When there is no deprivation of use, you must fall back on loss of something caused by the act. If the pirateer is unable to pay for anything they pirate there can be no stealing.

      This argument comes down to this absurdity: Someone at a museum puts up a piece of art. They put a price tag of $5000 on it. I, being unable to afford the art, take a picture of it instead.

      By your definition I have now stolen the art. The question I put to you is this: Prove the losses of the author. These losses cannot include the increased distrubution of the material to the public, since all copyrighted material is intended to be in the public domain (and will be so legally whether the author wants it to be or not).

      The definition of stealing clearly requires the owner to suffer a loss. Your favourite dictionary, websters, actually requires a physical component, which I am ignoring in your favour. I quote:

      "To take and carry away, feloniously; to take without right or leave, and with intent to keep wrongfully; as, to steal the personal goods of another."

      Stripping that apart, we have:

      "To take and carry away" - Carrying something away would require a physical removal of a physical item. There is no way to disagree with this, IMHO.

      "feloniously" - Stealing requires a violation of the law.

      "to take without right or leave" - This is the only half-sentence that could possibly be argued to have a non-physical loophole.

      "and with intent to keep wrongfully" - This is clear, and your example of returning the "stolen" the Porsche is actually invalidated by this, not that I totally agree with Webster's on this.

      "as, to steal the personal goods of another." - Ugh, they used the word to define the word. Personal goods are clearly defined as commodities (physical), wares (physical), Portable personal property (portable requires physicality), fabric (physical), or material (physical).

      Now, why would Webster's be as accurate as Oxford? Is there a dictionary conspiracy afoot? I strongly doubt it.

      >Just because the amount i still have has not decreased does not mean that you did not take it from me or that i am undamaged.

      Infinity cannot exist in money, or any other thing we can conceive as a tradable good. An infinite amount of money would fill the universe, even if it were just bits on memory.

      So yes, you do lose something. You lose control of the universe.

      >but taking it without permision is still stealing, because you are taking something you have no right to, no matter how much of the original is left behind

      You still have not answered my person taking a picture without permission quandary.

      Until you can explain to me how that is stealing, I put it to you that you are incorrect.

      >Maybe that concept is a bit hard to wrap your mind around

      Why is the concept that taking a picture without permission is not stealing too complex for your mind?

      Simple: You know that if you were to say that taking a picture of art is stealing, you would be wrong. Your friends would look at you in astonishment as you abuse their language.

      I put it to you to describe the illegal picture taking quandry using only the Webster's definition of stealing.

      >but the world changes, technology changes, and our views of the world and our lanaguage need to change to adapt.

      Perhaps, but language should not become less accurate when there is a perfectly good word for the action: Piracy. And I think any decent english teacher would agree on this...

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    16. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by twist420 · · Score: 1

      > ...emulators encourage theft. They are accessories to the piracy of their IP... Riiiight - so using your logic, that must mean computers should also be illegal since it encourages piracy. Knives should be illegal because they promote and incite stabbings. Telephones as well because they encourage and facilitate telemarketing scams. Gasoline seems to be directly responsible for arson. Cars because they allow drunk driving. Rocks because they can be picked up and thrown at people, causing grievous bodily harm. Those evil rocks! They're a menace to society. That's it, I'm calling my lawyer and suing GOD. Should be a sweet settlement.

    17. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      I totally agree, plagarizing is stealing, because the owner is deprived of whatever benefits the plagarized material receives.

      So you agree that something non-material can be stolen. However none of the definitions of "steal" say anything about the value of the object in question. state only "To take (the property of another) without right or permission." The value is irrelevant, only the ownership and the act of taking.

      I repeat: When a car is stolen, you are deprived the use of the car.

      Only "theft" has the caveat (in the definitions of some dictionaries) that "it must be, at least momentarily, in the complete possession of the thief."

      Although the two are similar they are not the same.

      The definitions from Webster you quote for stealing state only that you need to "take away by force or unjust means," not that it must be in complete possession of the thief. You copied the music and carried it away when you had no right to do so. That definition doesn't take note of whether or not a pristine copy remains behind, because it is stealing not theft.

      Employees at supermarkets can get charged with theft for taking home meat that has gone mildly bad and was going to be thrown out anyways. The supermarket isn't losing anything when they take it, it was going to be thrown out anyways, but it is still theft, and the employees can still be charged. Value is not the important factor.

      Stealing a car is theft.

      Stealing research material is plagiarism.

      Stealing music is copyright infringement or whatever else you wish to call it.

      They are all taking something that does not belong to you, they are all stealing.

      P.S. And as for the picture question you keep harping about, if someone has a copyright on the art, then technically yes, you are stealing, at least from the Information view, which i view as valid. They own the rights to that image, if they intend it to be for first hand viewing only, ie they've told you not to take pictures or posted signs saying not to do so, then taking pictures of it is stealing, but not theft. I don't know which particular subcategory of stealing that falls under, probably copyright infringement again. Do i care? Not particularly, go ahead, but it is still technically stealing.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    18. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense, but the word piracy in the non-violent theft sense has been around for a while now... at least as far back as pirated radio.

      While that use of "piracy" originated from an allusion to historical piracy, in its present form it can be used either way.

      Words evolve, and you can't use a word's etymological history to prove or disprove the "real" meaning of a word.

      Many words that are commonplace nowadays had completely different meanings in the past.

      When people started calling the copying of software and music "piracy", it was more in reference to pirate radio, pirated cable, etc. It just followed that convention.

      Note this:

      piracy
      n. pl. piracies
      1. a. Robbery committed at sea.
      b. A similar act of robbery, as the hijacking of an airplane.
      2. The unauthorized use or reproduction of copyrighted or patented material: software piracy.
      3. The operation of an unlicensed, illegal radio or television station.

      You can try to increase the popularity of an alternative word in an attempt to reduce the use of "piracy" to describe illegal copying, but you can't just claim the word is incorrect.

      Just like "surf" and "chat" gained new meanings, so did "piracy".

    19. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, you need to read the FAQ:

      Karma is not a measurement of your dick size!!!!

    20. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by Xenex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "If they cannot licence it and constrict the destribution of it via their licence, then who are we to whine whenever some corperation steals GPLed code and closed-sources it? It would be blatent hipocracy."

      I can see good and bad points from both sides of this argument. I am a strong supporter of Nintendo, but also like being able to get access to games that would otherwise be impossible to play (not every NES game will be ported to the GBA).

      However, I must say that your point that I have quoted deserves to be highlighted, because it's exactly right. If the way Nintendo licenses their software can just be ignored, why not ignore the all-high GNU General Public License too?

    21. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by lightspawn · · Score: 2

      They were anti-emulation.

      Up until a month or two ago they claimed ALL EMULATION WAS ILLEGAL since emulators only had one illegal use.

      After a back-and-forth between their legal department and myself, detailing legal uses of emulation (like playing Elite, a freely available NES game, or new game development) the offensive comment disappeared from their website.

      Check the internet archive for different versions of their legal FAQ.

      P.S. A hero is me!

    22. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by LtOcelot · · Score: 1

      However, I must say that your point that I have quoted deserves to be highlighted, because it's exactly right. If the way Nintendo licenses their software can just be ignored, why not ignore the all-high GNU General Public License too?

      Because the GPL is a grant of rights, and one who ignores it gains nothing -- as has been explained on Slashdot hundreds of times. Apparently both you and the person who moderated up this post overlooked those explanations, though.

    23. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by kz45 · · Score: 1

      Because the GPL is a grant of rights, and one who ignores it gains nothing -- as has been explained on Slashdot hundreds of times. Apparently both you and the person who moderated up this post overlooked those explanations, though

      really?

      tell that to the companies that comrade stallman and the FSF hounded for source.

      ignoring the GPL license gives you free sourcecode.

    24. Re:They're not "anti-emulation" by Arkhan · · Score: 1


      Please repeat after me.

      "Piracy is not theft."

      Theft removes a piece of property from another party such that they no longer have what they once had. Software/music/movie piracy makes a copy of a piece of property, leaving the original fully intact with the other party.

      News flash: The ??AA are not winning by passing laws, they are winning by changing our vocabulary.

      Once you accept that piracy == theft, you accept that "me copying my friend's CD" == "me stealing your TV", which then suggests you should apply the same laws, so why not call copying AutoCAD "Grand Larceny" and use existing laws to put the perp away for 20 years?

  15. Shut up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your title sucked.

    1. Re:Shut up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does every female in your family, but you don't hear us complaining when they accidentily give us teeth.

  16. Re:Super Mario Brothers 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SMB3 was definately for the NES.

  17. the irony was lost on me i guess. by GutBomb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it makes sense. the justification of most people using roms/abandonware is that software companies are no longer making money from those titles, and it is hard or impossible to buy them, so they pirate the rom instead. nintendo on the other hand IS still making money off of those games (just not those particularly old builds) by re-releasing them for GBA.

    1. Re:the irony was lost on me i guess. by Kizzle · · Score: 1

      I agree. And even if you do find a place to buy NES games, they are so old that they hardly work.

    2. Re:the irony was lost on me i guess. by DarkZero · · Score: 2

      Well, the other justification would be "I own the game". Games used to be a lot cheaper than they are now, and it's not uncommon for a Nintendo fan to have bought thirty or forty games before the cartridges died. Emulation allows me to get back the intellectual property that I already paid for.

      It could also be argued, although with less of a slightly less solid basis, that emulation lets us share our games again. My friends used to let me borrow their Nintendo games, but now that there are no longer physical copies of the games for them to give me, how are they supposed to share the intellectual property that they've paid for and are legally allowed to share with others? Emulation seems to be the closest way for them to do that.

    3. Re:the irony was lost on me i guess. by GutBomb · · Score: 2

      actually i seem to remember somewhere in the licence agreement for officially licensed nintendo carts that lending was against the license. however, i ignored it as i am sure everyone else did.

    4. Re:the irony was lost on me i guess. by DarkZero · · Score: 2

      actually i seem to remember somewhere in the licence agreement for officially licensed nintendo carts that lending was against the license. however, i ignored it as i am sure everyone else did.

      Nintendo has also claimed in various different venues that emulation (regardless of ROMs) and importing games (or anything, really) are against the laws of the United States of America. No one gives a shit, most importantly the courts of said country.

  18. This really isn't anything new for Nintendo by jbfaninmo · · Score: 1

    They already released Animal Crossing in Japan(as Animal Forest Plus), the game that lets you download NES games to your GBA. As I understand it, they've modified the games for GBA. They aren't straight ROMS, but reformated games that are placed on the game disc and then unlockable in the game for download. I think you can even play them in Animal Crossing on you character's NES.
    But the whole idea behind this is pretty neat. Including bonus games, whether they are new games or ports of NES or SNES in GameCube games and letting you copy them to your GBA ahould be fun.

    1. Re:This really isn't anything new for Nintendo by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 1

      I think that the game that started this trend (aside from Day of the Tentacle) was Shenmue and its sequel, both of which include an awesome collection of old arcade hits by the game's designer, Yu Suzuki. Games like Outrun, Hang-On, and Afterburner II really added some character (and some action) to the second game, for all the times when you got bored with the philosophy and mysticism.

  19. Re:Super Mario Brothers 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, I'm sitting in my living room with a barely working (but still working) Nintendo, as well as a Super Nintendo. Was the original Nintendo released in the US really nintendo's second or third generation platform, because I have SMB3 for the regular nintendo which is the earliest generation console I ever saw.

  20. Re:Super Mario Brothers 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, Super Mario Brothers 3 was for the NES. Possibly for a second-generation NES (where they modified some parts or whatever) but it was for the NES. The first (non-Game boy) Mario game was Super Mario World, the game that came with the SNES. (I happen to remember getting SMB3 for my birthday, can't remember which one; This was well before we got a SNES or Game Boy - all we had was a NES (and Intellivision, and Oddysey 3, but they hardly count)

  21. I wish by Kizzle · · Score: 2

    In a perfect world there would be a GBA game that had about every NES game there ever was. It could use a microdrive to store all of them. I have a rom collection with allmost all of the nintendo games and its about 500megs.
    But I know this is impossible due to licensing reasons :(

  22. Re:Super Mario Brothers 3 by Phosphor3k · · Score: 1

    Classic NES games (as in games for the original Nintendo Entertainment System), not classic NES games (as in games that are defined as "classic".

  23. Re:Super Mario Brothers 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes... the NES was the first gaming system Nintendo made (not counting the Game & Watch and stuff like that.) It had 3 Mario games for it. Super Mario Brothers, Super Mario Brothers 2, and Super Mario Brothers 3. I own all 3. They're in my living room. I just played Mario 3, on my NES, a couple days ago. You're an idiot!

  24. Good Games? Or good memories? by peterdaly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When it comes to old game ROMs, and related things like this I have to wonder...

    Were the games back then really good or not? By todays standards, will they still be entertaining for any length of time?

    I know everyone has great memories of older games, but is that because we played them when we were kids (in my case at least), or were they really decent? I remember wasting many hours playing Mike Tyson punchout on NES. By todays standards, that game was a joke. Punch left, punch right, uppercut, dodge.

    I guess it all comes down to how much will they charge per game, and is it worth it for the time you will spend in front of them now.

    -Pete

  25. BAD LINK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok. I can't find anything even remotely related to your statements in that press release.

    1. Re:BAD LINK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Try the end of the 2nd paragraph
      Players can download full classic NES games to the Game Boy Advance for hand-held fun on the go, and swipe trading cards through the e-Reader, which attaches to the Game Boy Advance to transport messages from the characters, game items and even music.
  26. Thankyou Nintendo. by Sk3lt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At least one gaming company supports classic gaming.

    While Sony and Microsoft are trying to battle against each other with their powerful graphics, Nintendo are making games that are targeted for their fans.

    Super Smash Brothers catered for all Nintendo fans and so are upcoming Metroid Prime and Mario Sunshine (which seems to be more gameplay focused then graphic focused).

    And now this... I applaud Nintendo for making such a good choice of not letting the past die.

    1. Re:Thankyou Nintendo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am gonna have to argue with you on the Metroid Prime part. They are not catering to me on that one. I want Metroid to be side scrolling, so what do they give me? Why an FPS of course. And it isn't even by the Metroid team. They are busy making Metroid 4 for the GBA, which I am actually looking forward to.

  27. God, you people by Wind_Walker · · Score: 5, Informative
    I swear, this is why I don't come to Slashdot for gaming news. I go to real gaming sites for gaming news.

    The games are downloadable to the GBA, yes. But that's only after you unlock them playing another game, Animal Crossing (known as Animal Forest + in Japan) for the Gamecube. Now, there's something you have to understand about Animal Crossing: 95% of people will not like this game. Imagine The Sims crossing with the talking animals found in Disney movies. That's a hint of what Animal Crossing is all about. You play the game for literally months before you can save up enough money to buy yourself a decent house, and winning NES games is purely luck-of-the-draw.

    I've talked to people in Japan who have been playing the game literally for months, and they just won their first Famicom (Japan's version of the NES) game. And it's not like they play it for a day, then pick it up next week. No, no, the game continues even when you're not playing it, using the Gamecube's internal clock. The game knows when certain things happen (raffles, sales, etc) and will not let you jump in to play them later.

    Also, the NES games are stored in local RAM on the GBA. Once you power it down, you're done. You gotta reload the game from your Gamecube.

    1. Re:God, you people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I swear, this is why I don't come to Slashdot for gaming news. I go to real [planetgamecube.com] gaming [gamespot.com] sites [gamespy.com] for gaming news."

      funny that. you probably don't go to "real gaming sites" for nerd news either.

    2. Re:God, you people by pinkpineapple · · Score: 4, Funny

      uh oh... planetgamecube.com just /.'ed:

      Error Occurred While Processing Request

      Error Diagnostic Information

      An error occurred while attempting to establish a connection to the service.

      The most likely cause of this problem is that the service is not currently running. You can use the 'Services' Control Panel to verify that the service is running and to restart it if necessary.

      Windows NT error number 2 occurred.

      I don't have a Services CP. I run Linux. Running NT on a server at its own risks...

      PPA, the girl next door.

      --
      -- I feel better now. Thanks for asking.
    3. Re:God, you people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gamespot is actually fairly decent for anouncments. and once and awhile a decent review.
      The biggest prob I have with them is their stance on advertisment money. When just to get into the site you have to dl 300k of stuff? and they are bitching about how much it costs, please! They need to find a better isp then, bw can be cheaaapo. There is more than enough bw out there in some parts of this country and they would gladly help you out. I know of at least one state that has a 98% blackout in fiber but there is no one to use it and they have more bw than some internet backbones. With a bit of work those sites could be a bit less graphic heavy also. They should offload some of the graphics/movies to the companies that make the games. That way the company that is making the game bears the brunt of advertising for their game not the news sites.

    4. Re:God, you people by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      That's all this is! A friend of mine whom I'm working with to translate a few games into English picked up Animal Forest last time he was in Japan, and while I thought his playing of zelda 1 with it was neat I never thought that'd make front page of slashdot. I don't get what it is about gaming that always seems to bring out incorrect assumptions on slashdot. From the inevitable "Dreamcast is powered by windowsCE", to the taking of ports of GBA dev kits to OS X and Linux as meaning there are no windows versions. You'd really think there'd be more people into console development and game translations around here.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    5. Re:God, you people by Phroggy · · Score: 2

      Damn it, I was just about ready to go buy a GBA. Oh well.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    6. Re:God, you people by stapedium · · Score: 1

      either that or they are all under NDAs

  28. Anit-Emulation? Bah! by GodInHell · · Score: 1

    Nintend has been building and selling emulators ever-since the super mario collection came out for the SNES.. and don't forget the gameboy cartdridge for same, which allowed people who didn't want to buy a gameboy to use their SNES instead.

    What they don't like is the whole concept of so-called 'abandonware', the providers of which often tend to assume that software not currently for sale.. is abandoned (when in reality, the publisher has some several years before copyrights and publishing rights expire).

    Then there's the whole deal with ROM trading openly illegal files. ::shrug::

    Emulation == good.
    Theft == bad.That is of course, IMHO.

    -GiH

  29. kids these days... by Requiem · · Score: 1

    up up
    down down
    left right
    left right
    B A
    start (select start for two-player)

    A B A B is right out.

  30. Obligatory "You're Wrong" comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Jesus christ on a pogo stick, you're a fucking lame-ass gamer wannabe who couldn't find a joystick if it were shoved up your mother's twat.

    The fucking code is Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A Select Start, you cum-guzzling no good waste of a human being. Next time, before you try to make a comment on something you know nothing about, shoot yourself in the head with a 35mm pistol first, and spare the rest of the world your pathetic, miserable life. Stupid wanker.

    1. Re:Obligatory "You're Wrong" comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Press Up(2), Down(2), Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A before the demonstration begins at the title screen.
      Then, press Start to begin the game in single player mode or Select + Start to begin in two player mode.

      from cheatstation.com
      http://www.cheatstation.com/cs.h tm

      and from GameFaqs.com (popups)
      http://www.gamefaqs.com/console/nes/code/7626.ht ml

      Next time, instead of racking your adolesent mind for childish insults, spend a minute backing up your shit.

      you are wrong
      I am right
      mod this , BITCH

    2. Re:Obligatory "You're Wrong" comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations on repeating what the parent poster said.

      I don't understand how this is a burn of any kind.

  31. Re:Good Games? Or good memories? by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

    A lot of old games were entertaining. They had to be. They couldn't just rest on having the best graphics. It actually needed to be a good game. The only decent games I've played in a while are Max Payne and Alice.

  32. Well it's about time! by jaaron · · Score: 1

    If I can seriously play a lot of older NES games on a GBA, then I'm definitely going to get one! I've been waiting for some legit way to play most of those games again without having to scavenge through local garage sales for old cartridges. Some of my favorite games of all time were good old 8 bit NES games (original Dragon Warrior anyone?).

    But here's what I'm really interested in seeing: Nintendo offers a legitimate way to play your favorite old games. How many people will now take Nintendo up on the offer, or will you still keep using your emulated to play downloaded ROMS? We get all upset with companies for not providing a way to get to the material we want (ROMS, MP3s) thus 'justifying' our use of questionable methods for access (think pirating). So the question at hand is when one of those companies changes, do you take them up on the offer?

    I've known quite a few people who have said, "Well, if the record companies would just offer good MP3's at a decent price, I'd support them rather than getting them off of Kazaa." or "No one makes these old games now anyways. If Nintendo offered their own emulator for a reasonable price, I'd do it. But they don't, so playing these ROMS I just downloaded is okay." I'm sure you've heard similar (somewhat faulty) logic. If that was you, well, now you don't have any excuse. So are people going to support Nintendo, or can big companies just never get it right?

    --
    Who said Freedom was Fair?
    1. Re:Well it's about time! by jaaron · · Score: 1

      okay, correction, it's not like you get to play any game you want. You have to earn them playing Animal Crossing and then download them from your GameCube.

      --
      Who said Freedom was Fair?
    2. Re:Well it's about time! by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 3, Interesting
      original Dragon Warrior anyone?
      FYI, Dragon Warrior 1 and 2 were ported to the Gameboy Colour. Possibly even works on the original Gameboy.
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    3. Re:Well it's about time! by XBoyAdv · · Score: 1

      DW I & II GBC can be played on the original Gameboy.
      DW III GBC however doesn't it. I think.

    4. Re:Well it's about time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they missed it compleatly, the took a hard line stance instead of trying to control it on their tearms. They took the stance of its all bad. they are too late. The spot price on their goods went to 0 (ie free). So now they are doing something interestnig with them. They are combining them with other games and you have to 'earn' them. So basicly you get 2 games for the price of one maybe more...

      I purchases several emu packs in the past. They are usualy done 'ok'. The only one that I have seen done that is very cool is the Namco museum for the ps2. I snaged that. It had a few games I loved plus a few I had not played before. I do purchase them. But you also need to remeber there are probably 1200+ nes games out there. Maybe 5% of those are even intersting. The rest are fairly crappy. I used to rent games to see if they were worth buying. Most were not.

      Also when I walk into a record store and AC/DC razors edge cost 23 bucks. There is something definatly wrong. I know I can get it cheaper on the web. But I KNOW I bought that same cd not 5 years ago for 10, in the SAME store. Something is definatly wrong here for a 30 cent piece of plastic that has probably made its money back years ago.

      But mostly the NES is dead. It is intersting what they are doing to combine other games to make emulation intersting again.

  33. wait a minute... by neo8750 · · Score: 1
    This new game extends game fun from NINTENDO GAMECUBE to Game Boy Advance, opening new worlds, and also links it to trading cards with the introduction of the e-Reader.

    what about all of us out there in the world who don't own a GAMECUBE? Will they come up with away to transfer games another way? All in all it is a good marketing ploy for nintendo if you have to have the gamecube to do this. Yet all i can think about is all the little kids who will miss out on great games because they don't own a GAMECUBE.

    I would love to see the original zelda on the GBA. Nothing would be having the best Zelda game ever on a portable device!

    1. Re:wait a minute... by Viewsonic · · Score: 0

      Majority of people who own a GBA and dig Nintendo based products already OWN a Gamecube. This isn't some goofy ploy, but it's reality. The Gamecube and GBA from day one have been built to interact with each other like this. Nearly 1/4 of the games scheduled to come out (and a lot that are already out now) all interact with the GBA. There shouldn't be any reason to not own a Gamecube at this point anyways. Well, if you like Nintendo games, that is. Old or new.

  34. Download from a Gamecube, not the net... by dsouth · · Score: 2, Informative

    Take a deep breath and relax...

    When they say ``download full classic NES games to the Game Boy Advance'' they mean ``Download a port of an NES or SNES game from the GameCube Animal Crossing game to the GBA''. This has been covered in most of the console gaming publications, print and web.


    Nintendo is not shipping a general NES emulator for the GBA. They are producing GC games that can use the GBA as an intelligent peripheral capable of disconnected use. Animal Crossing isn't the first game with this type of GC/GBA connectivity

    So unless taco is planning on playing through the GC version of Animal Crossing, he will
    have to go blind the old fashioned way....

  35. I don't think that's mario, Taco by kypper · · Score: 3, Funny

    Probably not so much Duck Hunt, but it sure would be sweet to get SMB3 on my GBA. Then I could go blind!

    I think it's too much time spent in your room alone that's causing that one.

  36. Re:I was censored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I missed the article; Why did they censor it?!?

  37. Too much to handle by DooBall · · Score: 0

    Gaming used to be much more simple and cheap. Buy the console and buy some games for it. Now its all about crazy accessories and extras (controllers, memory, stuff), which isn't a bad thing. But I'm running out of money attending to my Gamecube, Gameboy Advance, Xbox, and PC needs. I saw the card swipe thing at E3, and some of 'mini' games I saw were pretty basic: black and white and basic blocks. If they can fit Mario 3 onto a single swipe card, that would be impressive.

  38. Now I have a reason! by JebusTheImpaler · · Score: 1

    Now I finally have a reason to go buy a GBA.

  39. THIS is awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they convert the old Double Dragon, River City Rnasom, Bionic Commando and Codename Viper games.

  40. The old games were better... by niola · · Score: 2

    I am so glad to see this story. For years I have been telling people that the old games were better. They may not have been as graphically beautiful as today's games or have the audio fidelity, but they were more fun. Think of how many countless hours you spent playing the original Legend of Zelda. Back then most of us didn't have the Internet (or even knew what it was) so solving parts of the game was even more challenging. No web sites to go to for a hint, no people on AIM/IRC to ask. It was a big deal when you learned you could blow a whistle to open the lake to expose stairs to the seventh dungeon.

    I actually lucked out and found a guy on eBay selling newly-built 72-pin connectors for the original NES and it worked like magic. Spent days playing Kung Fu, Contra, Gauntlet, Double Dragon, Bionic Commanod, MegaMan, Ikari Warriors, etc.

    I think another thing people overlook is that due to the constraints of these older console systems, game developers had to be as optimal as possible and they did everything in assembly. Zelda and Metroid, as complex as they were for games, they took up like 700k worth of code each. Far cry from that 1.6 gigs of drive space Diablo 2 takes up :)

    --Jon

    1. Re:The old games were better... by GMontag451 · · Score: 2
      Zelda and Metroid, as complex as they were for games, they took up like 700k worth of code each.

      You think thats good, the original Super Mario Brothers game took up only 32K IIRC. They accomplished this by using certain portions of the code twice for different things. What I mean by this is that they would jump to a data byte for a different instruction. For example if they had $C000 8A 9A A8 A9, 8A would be an instruction and 9A would be its data (depending on the instruction, I don't actually remember the 6502 opcodes) but, if you jump to $C001, 9A would then be considered an instruction and A8 would be its data. By doing this, they have essentially made the same piece of code do two completely different things. It is this kind of programming that just doesn't happen anymore.

    2. Re:The old games were better... by binarytoaster · · Score: 1

      I cheated ... there WAS an automated voice mail thing that rose from the ashes of the actual Counselor's Corner service in Nintendo Power.

      Whenever I was stuck on a game, I'd get a hint from there. Was quite the lifesaver on dungeon 9 :)

  41. Cause of blindness by Chainsaw · · Score: 1, Troll
    Probably not so much Duck Hunt, but it sure would be sweet to get SMB3 on my GBA. Then I could go blind!

    That would come from too much masturbation, something that is free of charge. You won't need Nintendos help with that.

    --
    War is one of the most horrible things a human can be exposed to. And one of the worlds largest industries.
    1. Re:Cause of blindness by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1, Troll

      I would beat every airship, hoping to find the princess so I could view the object of my lust...but it was always some goofy king instead. I beat the entire game one handed! Good for you for admitting to this also, CmdrTaco!

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
  42. Re:Good Games? Or good memories? by handsomepete · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, I just managed to spend 6 straight hours playing The Legend of Zelda yesterday (and an hour trying to beat Mike Tyson the day before). I think gameplay mechanics, creativity and replay value were all *much* better/higher in the days of the Nintendo. Same holds true for the arcade games of the "old days". Going to an arcade you could find really fun games that you *wanted* to play instead of a bunch of expensive eye candy that has to lure you into playing.

    And for the record, even by today's standards the gameplay of Mike Tyson's Punch-Out is not a joke. Maybe the graphics, but video games are still all about reflexes and skill (see any good FPS), not how many buttons/moves are involved in playing the game.

  43. Re:Good Games? Or good memories? by warrior · · Score: 1

    ... Mike Tyson punchout on NES. By todays standards, that game was a joke...

    By today's standards, Mike Tyson is a joke!

    --
    Intel transfer the difficult from Hadware to software, for get more power, programmer need more technology. -- chinaitn
  44. Paperboy by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

    This was my favorite game when I was a kid. Even my mother and her father became adicted to Paper Boy. If this gets ported, then I'll buy a GBA.

  45. What's contradictory? by g4dget · · Score: 2
    They don't want free, third-party emulators exactly because they want to sell their own. Makes perfect sense to me.

    Of course, they shouldn't be able to prohibit emulators, which don't violate copyright, from being written. What they should be able to crack down on is the on-line distribution of copyrighted material.

  46. Will they port 'Lesbian Tennis'? by wackybrit · · Score: 5, Funny

    This isn't entirely a joke.

    The review of Naked Lesbian Tennis for the NES.

  47. CmdrTaco, Please Explain by psypete · · Score: 1

    what? go blind? please elaborate before my brain explodes from caring too much about your sillyness.

  48. What the GBA has become by Chemical · · Score: 1

    The GBA has become nothing more than a rehash system where Nintendo can re-release old games and make a quick buck on them again. If you take a look at the current GBA games available, a vast ammount of them are ports of Super Nintendo games, or updates of old Gameboy games. The ones that aren't are usually ports of Playstation games. So now what? Apparently they ran out of good SNES and GB games to port and are going to start digging up NES games for their "new" system? I've played these games before, Nintendo. How about some original games now?

    1. Re:What the GBA has become by XBoyAdv · · Score: 1

      Something tells me you haven't played "Advance Wars" or "Golden Sun." Both games were published by Nintendo.

    2. Re:What the GBA has become by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Advance Wars is a rehash of a Gameboy game that was never released in the United States. No I have not played Golden Sun yet.

  49. Who cares if it's pointless nostalgia? by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    Yeah, these games were not that good. So what. Baby Boomers indulge in pointless nostalgia all the time. Witness the success of various sixties-themed diners and fast-food restaurants. If playing these games for thair nostalgia value provides enjoyment -fun!- then who cares if the games are good or not? Besides, you gotta admit Marble Madness on a handheld system would be cool.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  50. Re:I was censored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's another one there now.

  51. The link doesn't say that at all!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What rubbish! There is no where in the press release that states that at all!

  52. Re:Super Mario Brothers 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >SMB3 came out for the second or third generation platform from them.

    Its interesting that a plain, 2D platform game with 8-bit mono sound was made for either the Super Nintendo or N64.

    Or perhaps you're wrong?

  53. Afterburner! by joel8x · · Score: 1

    Probably not so much Duck Hunt, but it sure would be sweet to get SMB3 on my GBA. Then I could go blind!

    Taco, you should check out the Afterburner internal lighting kit from Triton Labs. I just got mine a couple of weeks ago - it was not that fun to install, but well worth the effort. It really makes the GBA worth every penny, and proves my biggest gripe - there is no excuse not to include a backlit screen in the whole Game Boy line. I haven't even noticed a drop in battery life!

    --
    Sound waves should be free!
  54. Animal Crossing by jeffehobbs · · Score: 2


    The game mentioned in the article:

    http://www.nintendo.com/games/gamepage/gamepage_ma in.jsp?gameId=646&showMe=1

    ...looks very interesting and innovative, in both a gameplay and a graphics sense. No idea how downloadable NES games integrate into the "Animal Crossing" world though -- maybe the Animals all play old-school NES?

    ~jeff

  55. I wish by sheepab · · Score: 1

    They should sell a cartridge that you can hook up to your pc and download regular nes roms to, and charge like $100 bucks for it. I would EASILY hand over my hundred bucks for something like that.

  56. Relatively old news by vitaflo · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a feature in Animal Forest + in Japan. You can play various old NES games that you find throughout the game. For the port to America (called Animal Crossing) they are instead allowing you to link up to the GBA and play the NES games on there (I believe there will be more NES games available to play in the American version). In the Japanese version you just played the NES games on the TV, not the GBA.

    Animal Forest + has been out in Japan for a while and this has been known about for a while. I doubt it will be very popular over here since it's a very different type of game, but in Japan the game is pretty popular. Still, it's one of the games I'm looking forward to most (call me sucker for cutie-cutie Japanese games that are unique to all the "me too" games out there).

  57. Captain Rehash by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    Before they start busting the classics out of cryogenic stasis again, I'd just like to see a few more good games to accompany the handful present. Not just kicking the dead horse, but harvesting it's corpse for organs and saying, "Giddyup!"

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  58. CmdrTaco going blind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then I could go blind!

    Dude, there are plenty of other games you can play with your hands that'll accomplish the same thing.

  59. If it is for a reasonable cost.... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 2

    .... I don't think we should be slamming Nintendo. I'd gladly pay a one time cost of a few dollars to play SMB3 or the original Metroid on my GBA.

  60. OT: I need help by rosewood · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I need help!

    I need to setup redhat 7.3 not only to be a firewall/router for a local network but to also accept incoming connections so it can act as a server for Win2k/XP VPN clients

    I am so fricken lost and I need serious help!

    hop on #linuxhelp on irc.enterthegame.com or reply and tell me where to go!

    Any /.ers willing to spend a few hours helping me out would be greatly apriciated

    Thank you so much

  61. What's wrong with Duck Hunt? by lucasval · · Score: 1

    Don't you just love that funny dog laughing at you every time you failed?
    And what about the huge number of options to choose from? (ducks or plates)

    --
    This is not my opinion but my brain's
  62. Are the "Ressurecting" Bad Spelling? by cliffy2000 · · Score: 2

    One "S". Two "R"s. Good editing, folks.

  63. Re:OT: I need help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need help!

    I need to setup my girlfriend not only for a 2-way so I can watch but for some serious group action with the dike down the hall

    I am so fricken lost and I need serious help!

    hop on #nancyboy on irc.goatse.cx or reply and tell me where to go!

    Any /.ers willing to spend a few hours helping me out would be greatly apriciated

    Thank you so much

  64. They edit? by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    You're assuming they actually review the submissions in the first place. I'm thinking it's a script, personally... Nah, a script can spell.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  65. No one knows the code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    How fortuitous that I came across a comic about this very topic not 5 minutes later.

    http://www.i-mockery.com/pixelpals/comics/22.png

  66. I found this little chart by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On GameFAQs, that someone compiled of the actual games you will be able to earn in Animal Crossing. Keep in mind the game is only out in Japan, and Nintendo is messing with which games to offer Americans

    In:
    Donkey Kong
    Excitebike
    Punchout!
    Ice Climber
    Pinball
    Baseball

    Unsure:
    Balloon Fight
    Super Mario Brothers
    Tennis
    The Legend of Zelda
    Mario Bros.
    Donkey Kong 3
    Donkey Kong Jr.
    Golf
    Clu Clu Land
    Clu Clu Land Disk Version

    Low Chance of Making it:
    Donkey Kong Jr Math
    Wario's Woods

    Out:
    Gomokunarabe
    Mahjong

    So, while there are some good games on there, they are the REALLY 1st gen NES games, with not a lot of depth. I loved pinball and excitebike as much as the next kid, but they are "play an hour and get sick of it games" to me at least. (i think the NES got a little better with time Especially when it game to sports games).

    I have my doubts about whether they would actually release Super Mario Bros. or Zelda, seems like it would be smarter to hold onto those for a future GBA release.

    Too bad they couldn't get the cooperation of the 3rd parties on this. I would have loved to earn Mega Man 1-6 and maybe some RPG's. (i know, thats unreasonable.)

    Mario Bros. (NON-super) should make a great (albeit simple) GBA game.

    1. Re:I found this little chart by Servo5678 · · Score: 2
      Mario Bros. (NON-super) should make a great (albeit simple) GBA game.

      Mario Bros. is already available for GBA. You can find it on both Super Mario Advance, Super Mario Advance 2, and in the upcoming Super Mario Advance 3. It's accessible from the title screen and needs no secret code to unlock or anything. Just press Start and go. Plus, it's even multiplayer and you only need one cartridge to make it happen (2+ GBAs, though, of course).

  67. Contradictions by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2
    It seems contradictory to Big N's massive anti-emulation stance to introduce the GBA as an emulator itself!


    That's like saying it is contradictory to tell your wife not to go around having sex with random men, and then wanting to have sex with her yourself.


    Anyone else miss the days when to be a technonerd or geek, you had to be smart enough to make simple inferences, such as that Nintendo's anti-emulation stance is not actually against emulation as a technology, but rather against certain uses of emulation? What the hell has happened to the nerd/geek population?

    1. Re:Contradictions by Teutates · · Score: 0

      Things change. Now, in order to be a technonerd, all you need is a computer, linux and a connection to the internet to post on slashdot.

      I miss the older days.

  68. Populous! by samael · · Score: 2

    I'd kill to play Populous on the GBA. Now if someone could get me the name of the person I have to kill to make this happen, that'd be fantastic.

  69. I have the ultimate Game Boy Advance! by Another+AC · · Score: 1

    Ha Ha Ha!

    I've got the afterburner backlight so I can actually see my screen!

    I've got the 256Mbit flash cartridge so I can load roms onto it!

    I've got PocketNES v7a NES emulator with over 100 of my favorite NES games installed!

    It all cost $69 (GBA) + $35 (afterburner) + $159 (256mbit flash) + $45 (linker for copying roms to flash) = about $300! Hey, that's kinda expensive. BUT WORTH IT.

    HA HA HA!

    1. Re:I have the ultimate Game Boy Advance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have all that and the PAL TV out mod..

      HA HA HA!

  70. Old games on the GBA have already been released by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nintendo has been releasing old NES and SNES games on the GBA and GBC (Gameboy color) for years now. "The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past" (SNES) is coming out in about a year. Super Mario Brothers 1, 2, and 3 (Super Mario World) are already out, the first one being available on the GBC, and the other two out for the GBA. A new Metroid game (Metroid Fusion) is coming out on the GBA probably at the end of this year. Old Final Fantasy games are probably coming out in the next year. Yoshi's Island will be released sometime in the near future. Two new Castlevania games are out for the GBA (Circle of the Moon and Concerto of Midnight Sun). There are plenty of great, original games out for the GBA, and plenty of the classics. Super Street Fighter II is out as well, and SSF3 is coming out I believe this summer. A new Kirby game is also in development. Breath of Fire I and II are available. Plenty other titles available and coming out in the near future. Where have you guys been?

    1. Re:Old games on the GBA have already been released by GMontag451 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Super Mario Brothers 1, 2, and 3 (Super Mario World) are already out, the first one being available on the GBC, and the other two out for the GBA

      Super Mario 3 is not out. Super Mario World is out. Super Mario 3 was the last SMB game for the NES. Super Mario World was the first SMB game for the SNES. They are different games. If you want to give Super Mario World a number, it would be Super Mario 4.

    2. Re:Old games on the GBA have already been released by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Super Mario 2 is already out as "Super Mario Advance"

    3. Re:Old games on the GBA have already been released by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 2

      Why don't they just alleviate the confusion by calling it by its real name, "Doku Doku Panic"?

      mark

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    4. Re:Old games on the GBA have already been released by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange how you get rated "Informative" and a 4 for a few sentences which could have been summed up in one, while I was rated nothing and wrote a hell of a lot more, packed with useful information. Did you rate yourself? Or should I just take /. with a grain of salt? Ja ne.

  71. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love Windows 2000:
    C:\>uptime
    \\box has been up for: 324 day(s), 2 hour(s), 57 minute(s), 20 second(s)

  72. Re:Good Games? Or good memories? by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2

    I spent about three hours playing Yoshi's Island on the SNES this morning, and I had just popped it in to make sure my SNES was still working and to see what my save games were like.

    I can honestly say the game still plays wonderfully, and dispite the fact that Super Mario World 2: Yoshi's Island was largely ignored because of it's poorly timed release (just around the end of the SNES lifespan) I can honestly say this game in every way is classic Mario fun.

    As for even older games, I have recently had quite a bit of fun with the original Legend of Zelda, and a few really obscure titles such as Snake Rattle and Roll, Life-Force, and Blaster Master.

    So yes, some of the older games are STILL great fun today. This doesn't go for all of the games, but there are some gems that even though they don't live up to what we expect from games today, they're still classics.

    On another topic -- have you noticed that if something is done artistically, it continues to look good even when it's medium becomes obsolete?

    A great example of this is the original Super Mario Brothers game. The music is just barely polyphonic and there aren't any more than 8 colors on the whole screen at any given time but hte game is still presentable and playable. It just LOOKS good, even given the limitations of the platform.

    It just goes back to the simple rules of art. Video games are, after all, just art. Interactive Art.

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  73. Re:Super Mario Brothers 3 by Servo · · Score: 1

    It went NES->Super NES->N64.. I swear I remember playing SMB2 or 3 on the Super NES box..

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  74. Re:Good Games? Or good memories? by DarkZero · · Score: 2

    Why not try out a game that you've never played before and test it for yourself? Personally, I was only recently introduced to some NES, SNES, and Neo Geo games that I missed via emulation, and I think a lot of them have been really ingenius and a lot of fun.

  75. Re:Super Mario Brothers 3 by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 1

    It's entirely possible. The games were rereleased as "Super Mario All-Stars" on the SNES, but they originally came out for the NES.

  76. Re:Super Mario Brothers 3 by kesuki · · Score: 4, Informative

    You're forgetting one, Super Mario Brothers, The lost levels. While in the US this was on released for the SNES on a multi-game pack cart (with the other three SMB games, and Mario Bros, another NES game), it was released for the Famicom in japan.

  77. SMB3 == Killer App? by maikeru · · Score: 0

    I've always thought it was kind of weird that Nintendo skipped over porting Super Mario Bros. 3 to the GBA, particularly when clearly inferior titles such as Yoshi's Island and SMB2 got the treatment. In light of this announcement, it wouldn't at all surprise me if SMB3 was a major part of Nintendo's marketing plan for this new system.

    1. Re:SMB3 == Killer App? by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      Nintendo want to keep the best back for a while. Release SMB3 first, and the punters won't be all that impressed with SMB2. Now that they have Super Mario World, though, it's safe to release the big one. Yes, I think SMB 3 is better than SMW. I thought so first time round too... I'd like to see a Zelda collection cart on GBA... Legend of Zelda and Adventure of Link (NES), the SNES Zelda, and Zelda DX from GBC. That would be a real monster. And all within a single megabyte.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:SMB3 == Killer App? by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 1

      SMB2 (US) was a launch title for the GBA, it was called Super Mario Advance

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    3. Re:SMB3 == Killer App? by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly. They couldn't release SMB 3 or SMW first, otherwise SMB 2 would be a bit disappointing.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  78. NetBSD on Nintendo emulator under UNICOS by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    Nintendo ROCKS! The original Nintendo, the one that went bad after a few years and kids had to blow into the game cartridges in hopes of getting the damn thing to boot properly. Ah, those were the good ol' days. Not like now, with PS2s where you put a DVD in and play a game with life-like graphics. Back in the day, the graphics were blocky and crappy, so they were made up for in the quality of the games. Nowadays, games SUCK, but nobody cares because the graphics look so cool. It's like Microsoft's stupid excuse for an alleged operating system. They put all sorts of fancy graphics on that piece of crap, trying to persuade people that it works properly, but I know the truth: Windows SUCKS! But Negra Modelo rocks! I can't wait until Negra Modelo ships an operating system; it'll be just as good as the ale. And that's why the original Nintendo rocks!!! I can't wait until NetBSD comes on a Nintendo game cartridge that you have to blow into to make it boot. Oh well.

  79. Re:Good Games? Or good memories? by garcia · · Score: 2

    uhh, Ms. Pacman, nuff said.

  80. Re:Super Mario Brothers 3 by Servo · · Score: 1

    Hmmm.. bastards! Oh well :)

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  81. Re:Super Mario Brothers 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahh, someone who obviously never watched The Wizard (iirc, the game was played in the movie in the final contest between 3 or so uber-gamer-geeks)

    It's definitely a NES origional release, and probably the most hyped and anticipated (not to mention very expensive at release time) game ever released for NES.

    For the retro-crowd, It's argued that most of the NES games are better fundamentally than most of the newer stuff, just cause they are fun and playable. I'd have to agree.

  82. Classics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will buy a GBA if it can play NES, SNES, and Sega Genesis games. I'm not talking about roms either, I would like to connect my game cartridges to the GBA.

  83. Re:Good Games? Or good memories? by GrandCow · · Score: 2

    Were the games back then really good or not? By todays standards, will they still be entertaining for any length of time?

    Well I don't know about you, but me and a bunch of friends pulled out the original NES and the 50+ games we have for the system a few months back... And the games are still as fun. Remember back then the graphics were rather shitty (I can say that cause they said it on Cop Drama ;) ) so the companies had to come up with actual stuff that had good replay value. One example I can say for sure hasn't lost it's appeal is the old-school 2D platformer. Mega Man and the Super Mario games have kept us entertained for weeks, even when the new, glitsy games get boring in a few days.

    Remember: Good graphics != good games. Stuff from the old days is just as fun as it was when we were kids, and maybe a bit more so since we don't usually lose our temper as quickly as we did back then.
    --
    "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson
  84. GBA graphic architecture by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

    I briefly looked how to program for the GBA's video controller. Essentially it is just a plane-based method(similar to the plane-modes in VGA). Of course they have other fancy shit with this such as "mode 7"-like graphics and sprite-handling.

    I believe(though I am not certain) that programming graphics for the SNES and NES would be similar, and hence the huge porting of games from those platforms. But I don't think they use the same CPU(GBA uses Arm, dunno about SNES or NES). Maybe someone can enlighten me here.

    1. Re:GBA graphic architecture by sketch7 · · Score: 1

      The NES uses a modified 6502 8-bit cpu. SNES uses a 65c816 16-bit cpu.

  85. Go Blind? by evilviper · · Score: 2
    Probably not so much Duck Hunt, but it sure would be sweet to get SMB3 on my GBA. Then I could go blind!

    Johnny? Are you okay, you've been in there for a while. You aren't playing with your GBA are you?

    NO MOM!
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  86. Not Contradictory by Questioning · · Score: 1

    This is precisely why they have been anti-emulation for so long. Now they stand to gain a profit by reselling these games to old fans desperate to play them.

    However, I believe that the fact that these games have been carried over so long by emulators will make the GBA releases even more popular.

    So, how does one port ones saved games over to the GBA? And will save states be available?

  87. Gosh! (prolly redundant) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can already download NES games for your GBA.
    You can also download and play Sinclair Spectrum games on your GBA.
    *yawn*

  88. Just sell us what we want! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great. We can get games. A limited selection that are a pain to get to and of limited use. And to play those games, which I could get used copies of at about US$3-10 each (depending on title) at the local shop, I'm out probably $90 for the GBA, and $50 for the GC game. Not a particularly appealing proposition.

    Here's a better idea: For about $5, offer a CD with a couple of games and the instruction manuals in PostScript or PDF or something else platform-neutral. Throw a copy of an emulator on it, and set it up for idiot-proof operation (i. e. Win9x autorun). Promote it as an impulse buy, or offer it as pay downloads instead. Then, you're selling to the broad PC market, you don't have to try to pitch the purchase of hardware (GC/GBA) which is probably already selling at a loss for you, and people don't have to fight to get the games. I can see NES games under emulation as filling a niche for "under the table" gaming. Nobody wants to install Quake on their PC at the office, but if you slip a CD containing an emulator and Super Mario XVI in your box, you leave no evidence at 5pm.

  89. Old news. by Zerotheos · · Score: 1

    An emulator wrapper exists that 'wraps' nes roms into gba roms, which can then be stored on a flash cartridge for the GBA. This is lame news. For those of you interested: www.gbxemu.com

    1. Re:Old news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for those of you who bought the n64 gaming console, remember the original donkey kong arcade game hidden deep in the final level? i could never beat that game...

  90. Nintendo do produce a GameBoy emulator by datajack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I flew to the states a few months back, there were a selction of Gameboy colour games that passenegrs could play to relieve the boredom. The machines that these run on are actually PCs, and the words 'Copyright Nintendo' were clearly visible on a text mode screen for a fraction of a second as the emulator loaded.

  91. Not quite the same, sadly, but close by THENate · · Score: 1

    If they can demonstrate that something in the emulator is, in fact, violating some bloody copy–protection scheme (whether it works or no) OR if they can demonstrate that the emulator itself is primarily used for violation, then, the software itself can be considered a violation of the copyrights, according to the DMCA (section 1201 applies, as I recall) DMCA at http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf

    (yes, this is ridiculous, but it is the current law.)

    Similarly, those who do not defend their copyrights religiously, lose them to public domain. Both of these factors combine to make the emulation world a headache. Why else do you think these products are being so furiously persued? They know full-well that they aren't going to make a killing on the "lost sales" from the ROMs.

    Piracy, I do not condone, but I think that Fair-Use should, and frankly does include using that which you already own in any applicable media, including emulation.

    --
    -THE One True Nate
  92. Re:Super Mario Brothers 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Super Mario Bros. The Lost Levels was not so titled in Japan. It was Super Mario Bros. 2. Our SMB2 was called Doki Doki Panic in Japan, it was not an SMB game.

  93. Re:Super Mario Brothers 3 by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 2

    You forgot to mention Virtual Boy. God, I love reminding Nintendo-lovers about THAT mistake. It was as bad as Sega CD, 32X and Saturn combined!

    --

    From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

  94. Sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it sure would be sweet to get SMB3 on my GBA. Then I could go blind!

    What you choose to jerk off to on your own time, Taco, is your own business...

  95. Sod NES games ... Amiga games! by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2
    There are tonnes of classic Amiga games that would be ideally suited to the GBA. Not too complicated (due to the Amiga's control system) and yet damn good fun.

    If you're a big fan of Sensible Soccer, why not sign the petition to get it ported to the GBA?

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  96. Re:Super Mario Brothers 3 by Servo · · Score: 1

    ok, to the moderator who gave me a -1 troll, WTF? I was merely stating my opinion and fact.

    Morons.

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin