Slashdot Mirror


Palm m100s - A Pattern of Defects?

An Anonymous Coward writes about his experience with a brand-new Palm: "Having a few years experience watching co-workers scratching out Grafitti on their little palm-sized toys and being reminded of appointments by musical ring-tones, I decided to take the plunge. More of a dip into a wading pool, as I chose the Palm m105. It was inexpensive enough ($149), and the 8 MB of memory seemed a more prudent choice over the tiny 1 MB in the $99 m100. My experiences quickly turned from elation to dread, however." This is the story of a piece of hardware's inexplicable degradation within 14 days. I thought we were making hardware better than this, but over the past few years, this is becoming more the rule than the exception. Is hardware issue limited to Palm, a case of bad manufacturing of a specific product, or a sign of things to come?

"I took it home and started playing with it. The Windows Palm desktop software installed and worked fine, the HotSync cradle did what it was supposed to do, and I happily started filling up the address and date books using the stylus. Only a few hours after I started using it, the display started acting up. The lower-left corner of the touch-screen started becoming insensitive and inaccurate. Not only were the neatest attempts at Graffiti input reduced to unrecognizable scrawls (using the Graffiti tutorial to trace out what the unit thought I was writing on the screen), but buttons on the screen above the input area were being activated (despite my going nowhere near them with the stylus). Repeated attempts at recalibrating the digitizer, as well as both a soft and hard reset, failed to fix the problem.

A quick search of Google Groups yielded several threads about this issue from others experiencing the exact problem. These experiences were also confirmed by negative reviewers at CNet. Some of them went back and forth with either Palm or the retailer with multiple replacement units, none completely working and defect-free.

Having had my m105 for less than 14 days, I promptly took it back to Office Depot for another one, which they were cheerfully willing to do. The second one worked just fine except that the top power button was inoperative! I was almost willing to live with this (as I could turn it on via other buttons, and have it automatically turn off), but the power button also controls the backlight and the hard reset. Based on my experiences with two defective units, and the bad experiences others have had going through both replacement and repair with Palm, I'm wasn't sure that I wanted to try a third. I took it back for a refund (also cheerfully done, and with apologies).

Obviously my experiences are not unique or even rare. Furthermore, repeated attempts to fix the problem via replacement or repair are not successful. Is this just a poorly-engineered and manufactured product to meet a price-point? Have there been quality control problems at their new assembly plant in Mexico (Previously all Palms were made in the United States)? Should I just forget about trying to get a low-priced starter Palm for the time being?"

383 comments

  1. Small correction- palm m100 has 2MB by bugg · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Correction- the palm m100 has 2MB, not 1MB, of memory.

    What are everyone's favorite low-end ($150 or below) PDA currently? You hear so much about the Treo and whatnot, I'm wondering what's going on at the end of the market I'm interested in entering in. I just want something to organize myself. Color screens? Cellphone capability? Not for me!

    --
    -bugg
    1. Re:Small correction- palm m100 has 2MB by descentr · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm currently enjoying my Sharp Wizard 770. It has 3 MB of space and syncs with a PC. You can load programs on it just like most PDA's. The built-in keyboard is nice and responsive. The only drawback is a monochrome screen, but it has a nice electroluminescent backlight. I bought mine more than a year ago for about $80 and it works perfectly for me. Maybe it's not a fancy gadget with cellular modem options, etc. , but it does a very nice job for a low-end PDA.

    2. Re:Small correction- palm m100 has 2MB by Anonymous+Cowrad · · Score: 2, Funny

      I love my BareBones PAD.

      --

      --
      pants ahoy
    3. Re:Small correction- palm m100 has 2MB by SirPhobos · · Score: 1

      Handspring makes nice handhelds. I have a Visor Edge, ran me about $160 before tax. 8MB of memory, PalmOS, the nifty expansion slots and it actually works. What more could you ask for? :)

    4. Re:Small correction- palm m100 has 2MB by groomed · · Score: 1

      I don't know if they still make them but I'm rather happy with the Compaq Aero PocketPC. Much thinner and smaller than the iPaq and no color, but a larger display than the Palms and excellent backlight/software.

    5. Re:Small correction- palm m100 has 2MB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll happily second that. I spent a bit more for my Visor Edge (I bought it towards the end of last year). However, it's had absolutely no problems, and done everything I've asked it to do (including being dropped a couple times).

    6. Re:Small correction- palm m100 has 2MB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm still in love with my Agenda VR3 even after almost a year of ownership. There are still a few issues with the software, but it is open source so I really have no room to complain.

      Softfield is now selling these for around $105 (an extra $35 for double the RAM). With the NiMH recharging kit due out later this month I'm planning on using my VR3 even more than I currently do.

    7. Re:Small correction- palm m100 has 2MB by _Upsilon_ · · Score: 1

      I use a Sony Clie 360. Has 16MB memory, is smaller then most of the other PDAs out there, and only cost $299 CDN. (That should be close to the $150 US price range) And if you want to save another few bucks, get the 320 -- exact same system, but with 8MB.

    8. Re:Small correction- palm m100 has 2MB by lactose99 · · Score: 2

      A Handspring Visor Deluxe 8MB (in an Ice case)... I think they are down to $100-$150 now. I got mine from my employer 2 years ago.

      Since it uses PalmOS 3.0 (upgraded to 3.1), and is nearly identical to the Palm series, I'll leave future posters to describe their likes and dislikes with their Palms. The only problem I have come across is a problem with the system's RAM, which Handspring has posted a fix for on their website. Once I patched the problem, it has been working like a charm for the last 2 years. Never had a problem with the screen or touch sensitivity, and even after loading plenty of programs into it, I still have well over half of its RAM left. Even after importing my company's entire LDAP directory into it (via an exported CSV file from the company LDAP server) with 5000-or-so records, I still have plenty of space left to store whatever I please.

      I think the biggest reason I like this thing so much is because it was free. Although if it were taken away from me, I'd march right down to my local geek toy store and buy one on the spot.

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    9. Re:Small correction- palm m100 has 2MB by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      Ny Newton MessagePad is still going strong. Cost me $150CDN 2 years ago. Of course, it's a little big, but it's fast, the handwriting recognition is superb (Unlike the NewtonOS 1-1.3 variants) and the creen is still the best I've ever seen on a handheld, with the exception of the monster screen on a Newton MP2x00.

      My original Newton MessagePad is also still in use, despite the flaky HW rec in NewtonOS 1.1, at over 8 years old. It's on it's third owner (My buddy's wife).

      The Crazy Finn

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    10. Re:Small correction- palm m100 has 2MB by giverson · · Score: 1

      At my office, I've been playing with an Agenda VR3 we got from Softfield.com. I've managed to install nmap and tcpdump on it, and the ethernet adaptor is on it's way. This should be a handy tool for network diagnostics. From what I've seen, I will probably replace my Palm with one of these in the near future.

      Word to the wise, use only rechargeable NiMH AAAs. This eats alkalines for lunch.

      The 16 meg version is $135 and the ethernet adaptor is $95.

      --

      Capitalism does not lead to corruption, lack of character does.
    11. Re:Small correction- palm m100 has 2MB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...the visor edge has been great for me too. escellence battery life. extremely durable, especially with the extra free aluminum hard case that i received with it. it's tiny and fast and for the price it's going for now, a great deal.

    12. Re:Small correction- palm m100 has 2MB by WeThree · · Score: 1

      Visor Edge. Just $169 straight from handspring, free shipping, and a free aluminum hardcase (and a damn fine case IMHO). $160 from amazon w/ free shipping and no case however.

      --
      --------------------------------
      Not all who wander, are lost.
    13. Re:Small correction- palm m100 has 2MB by Cnik70 · · Score: 0

      Love my handspring visor platinum.... mainly the ablity to run Java (J2ME) on it

      --
      -Cnik
    14. Re:Small correction- palm m100 has 2MB by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      Since my IBM WorkPad 20x (rebranded PalmIII) finally died a year ago May 10, I'm on my third Handspring Visor - 1 Visor Deluxe lost/stolen, 1 skewered by an old lady's trekking pole (don't ask), and now a Visor Platinum. First one was bought new in a store the afternoon the WorkPad died. The next two bought off the Handspring website, refurbished. All three have held better calibration than the original 3Com machine. I think I paid like 180 USD for the first one, $119 for the second(refurb), and with the third, I paid the extra 20 (99>119) to go the platinum. All three 16Mb, the platinum has a faster processor and runs palmos 3.5.
      The springboard is nice. I wish it had become a standard, or at least that Handspring had enough marketshare to continue to support it. I can live with the lack of flash (no fundamental OS upgrades). Main thing is that it's a full-boat PalmOS PDA with 16MB that you can get for the same price you paid for you 1MB (maybe 2MB - see thread) 3com.

    15. Re:Small correction- palm m100 has 2MB by Telemakhos · · Score: 1

      I picked up a Sony Clie PEG-T415 early this year for around $150. It's just like a Palm, except it works right and has a legible screen -- something like twice the resolution of the Palms, which makes the fonts much more acceptable.

      It also comes with a nifty remote-control emulator called "Clie RMC" that I use to turn off the TV's in bars. Haven't been caught yet.

  2. Cheap means cheap by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

    You should have bought the higher end series, perhaps a M500 or M505. They seem to be a lot sturdier than the lower-end models. Conversely, if you look at the lower end Handspring models, they seem to be made entirely of cheap see through plastic: one drop can almost assure you a nice crack and possible inoperability.

    Then again, you could always go back to the tried and true personal organizer: pen and paper ;).

    1. Re:Cheap means cheap by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      Hey mods, what the hell is the big idea of taking out my signature?

      Sheesh.

    2. Re:Cheap means cheap by LinuxInDallas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Regardless of the cost of the device I would hope that if you buy a Palm device it should be reliable. Sure, it may not have the features of it's bigger brothers but starting to fail on the same day you buy it is just not acceptable. If there are this number of devices that are failing so quickly you can be assured that Palm most likely knew about it during the development and protoyping phase. They must have decided that putting out a piece of crap is fine as long as they can still make a buck off it. Let's face it,a lot of us are still choosing Palm based on their name and past success. Time to look at someone else.

    3. Re:Cheap means cheap by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      *boggle* Call me a newbie and mod me down to "offtopic" but sometimes my .sig is there, sometimes it isn't. Is this just me or am I stoned again? I'm stoned again, aren't I...

    4. Re:Cheap means cheap by ReverendRyan · · Score: 2, Informative

      The m505 is not the answer. Geek.com had the folloing story about the m505 having problems with its USB hotsync. Here is the article.

    5. Re:Cheap means cheap by jkastner · · Score: 1

      My first M500 started acting up after 3 weeks. It would get stuck in a permanent "input" mode and think that it was getting tapped in the middle right of the screen. Software and hardware resets didn't help, so I took it back to the place of purchase and got another. I'm going on 5 months with the new one and it is fine, even after a nasty drop which caused the memory card to fly out.

    6. Re:Cheap means cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Warning about the m505 unit:

      Palm accidentally shipped the wrong cradle for some m505's. If you own one, make sure you have the model E or H cradle.

      Using the wrong cradle will make your palm unable to hotsync via cradle.

    7. Re:Cheap means cheap by kko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      handspring != one drop wonder
      I've had my trusty visor standard (lowest of the low end visors) for about a year and two months now, and being the careless slob that I am, I have dropped it countless times, on pavement, granite floors, wooden floors, etc... I even threw it on my bed once and it bounced right off and landed on my bedroom floor... but the little beast is still alive and kicking...
      I've always had the provision of keeping the little screen protector that came with it hooked up, 'cause I never know where the little visor might end up next....
      But so far, no cracks, only a couple of scratches on the back.
      So cheap doesn't necessarily mean "cheap"....

      --
      No, seriously, I just come here for the articles.
    8. Re:Cheap means cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm on my 4th M505, due to Hot-Sync issues (i.e. lack of). Palm finally acknowledged the problem and fixed it, but it took 9 months for them to come around to it. Thankfully their advance return policy worked quite well.

    9. Re:Cheap means cheap by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      " Regardless of the cost of the device I would hope that if you buy a Palm device it should be reliable. Sure, it may not have the features of it's bigger brothers but starting to fail on the same day you buy it is just not acceptable."

      The whole point of the M100 and M105 line is that they are ultra-cheap so that people who would not normally buy one will get into the market.

      Remember the Ford Pinto? It would have cost less than $30/car to fix the defect that made them blow up in rear end collissions but they wanted the car to sell for less than $2k/unit.

      People want cheap. Remember what the submitter said:

      "More of a dip into a wading pool, as I chose the Palm m105. It was inexpensive enough ($149), and the 8 MB of memory seemed a more prudent choice over the tiny 1 MB in the $99 m100. "

    10. Re:Cheap means cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought one of the m100s, probably a year or so ago. I have never had any problems with it. At 100$ it provides everything I wanted (calender, address/phone book, to do list, cheesey games).

    11. Re:Cheap means cheap by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, and if people just starting to use your product line have a VERY bad experience, what are the chances they'll be interested in buying the more expensive stuff you want to sell?

      His "dip into a wading pool" resulted in a shark attack.

      I don't think he's going to go that route again.

      Either he'll go to a competitor, or just forget about PDAs entirely.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    12. Re:Cheap means cheap by Iron+Monkey · · Score: 1

      I have a Handspring visor standard, and so far, it has been remarkably resiliant. I did kill my first one, though - I accidentally sat on it. The case was fine, but the LCD broke, rendering it unusable.

      --
      If my enemy's enemy is my friend, what happens if my enemy is his own worst enemy?
    13. Re:Cheap means cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not likely. Most people's budget for toys doesn't change a whole lot. Mainly because who ever uses the full capabilities of their PDA? Remember back when PalmPilots had 512k memory? What're they up to now, 8mb? Unless you're loading some serious programs, that is a pathetic waste of space.

    14. Re:Cheap means cheap by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Yeah, and if people just starting to use your product line have a VERY bad experience, what are the chances they'll be interested in buying the more expensive stuff you want to sell?...Either he'll go to a competitor, or just forget about PDAs entirely."

      I certainly agree with you.

      I'm not saying that I agree with Palm's strategy. I'm just saying that I understand it.

      The moral of the story is that making crappy hardware is a bad idea.

    15. Re:Cheap means cheap by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      Yah, I had the same problem with a japanese-english dictionary once. The thing could take unbelievable punishment from being dropped and whatnot...but I leaned on my backpack while it was in it...

      Shock is no problem...pressure kills.

    16. Re:Cheap means cheap by big_hairy_mama · · Score: 2

      It seems like dropping palms (Visors or real Palms) has a lot of luck involved. I've had three palms -- one IIIe, one Vx, and one m505.

      I dropped the IIIe dozens of times, but then one day it fell out of my pocket onto some carpet from only a couple feet up and cracked the screen.

      The Vx was even more sturdy: I remember running down a hill and dropping it onto pavement from 5 feet up, watching it skid for several yards, and then picking it up without a scratch. Then one day I started keeping it in my inside jacket pocket -- a bad idea since all the protection I had was the flimsy leather cover it came with. I don't even remember it being hit by anything, but I took it out and found a big crack down the middle of the screen.

      My m505 has faired much better -- not wanting to spend another $250, I invested in a Kensington aluminum case (IMO the nicest case around -- those titanium things are too sharp). So far it hasn't been dropped, and the case allows me to keep it in my pocket without fear.

      Anyway, after many drops and relatively few failures, I can say that Palms are pretty sturdy. Most of the time. Maybe they just wear out, but I think there is a lot of luck involved. A friend of mine cracked his screen the first time he dropped it -- after only a week.

    17. Re:Cheap means cheap by monkeyfamily · · Score: 1

      8mb isn't a waste if you're using, say, Mapopolis with a few county maps, have a few HanDB databases cataloging your media collection, you like to have a wide variety of web sites available on the go via AvantGo or Plucker, not to mention the Kyle's Quest levels and Planetarium star DBs.

      Jeez, why carry around a little computer if you're hardly going to use it?

    18. Re:Cheap means cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be really new to the internet.

    19. Re:Cheap means cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the Palm was never meant to be a little computer. If you want something real, get a Jornada or ipaq.

    20. Re:Cheap means cheap by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      Actually no, I've been on it since '94.

      However, I use /. as a launching point for interesting articles, and rarely post a comment.

      You must be a real asshole. :)

      (our conclusions were based on the same faulty logic, before you go flaming me)

    21. Re:Cheap means cheap by electragician · · Score: 1

      Palm m105 user here. I'd imagine that my cheap little 105 has more hours of use on it that most. I bought it as an e-book reader for text and html documents gotten off the web and purchased from PeanutPress etc...

      I average between 1 and 2 hours of use per night on my 105, and it's over a year old now. Most of the uptime is with the backlight on as well (reading in bed). The units had only one reset since I bought it, and that was due to letting the batteries get so low that it evidently corrupted the memory. It commonly has around 3 megs of data (text files) swapped on and off it every week. It's showing over 146 days since the last reset now.

      I really haven't used the digitizer functions on the unit much, and most of the times that I have it's for writing in Notepad. I haven't used any of the other PDA's so I can't compare it's input sensitivity to the higher end models... it works fine for what I do with it though.

      Perhaps I'm just lucky, but mine has run flawlessly, and the display and other buttons and features continue to work just fine.

    22. Re:Cheap means cheap by Zeinfeld · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The whole point of the M100 and M105 line is that they are ultra-cheap so that people who would not normally buy one will get into the market. Remember the Ford Pinto? It would have cost less than $30/car to fix the defect that made them blow up in rear end collissions but they wanted the car to sell for less than $2k/unit.

      Casio appears to have worked out how to make pocket calculators that are both cheap and reliable. If Palm can't work out how to make its products more reliable they have big problems. This is not the only quality problem I have heard reported.

      The real problem is that palm has done very little of significance since the Palm VII came out almost three years ago. All the interesting stuff on PalmOS has come from Sony, Handspring and the cellular companies. Some day the dragonball processor Palms will be on the store shelves, however this is likely to be too little too late.

      Palm appear to have an Apple complex. They believe they know what customers want better than their customers. Problem there is that such companies have a habit of getting overly ideological about irrelevances.

      I recently acquired a Zaurus 5000, even though the device is first generation it has a much more useful feature set than the Palm. There are plenty of things wrong with it (memory management is hopeless, a 32Mb machine should be able to run a Web browser without any difficulty, the machines we used to design the Web all had less memory.), however the rate of progress has been pretty good. They fixed the problem with the image viewer that meant that it could now view pictures from 2 Megapixel cameras pretty quick.

      I suspect that the Zaurus and PocketPC lines will both develop quickly because they are in direct competition.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    23. Re:Cheap means cheap by BreakWindows · · Score: 2

      Cheap equals cheap

      So if I spend $150 and buy something, I should not expect it to work? My $150 TV should start flipping channels by itself and maybe the $150 stereo should shut off or only play half the CD's I put in it?

      Comparatively, the M10x series are cheaper than the M50x series. But, this is a $150 piece of electronics, not a Cracker-Jack toy. By spending less money, you should expect fewer features, not that the advertised features won't work, and the device doesn't have basic functionality.

      It should also be mentioned that on this planet, $150 for something the size, shape and apparantly the functionality of a PopTart, is not "cheap".

    24. Re:Cheap means cheap by Sharkyfour · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's not fair! Quit dissin' the Pop Tart! At least it has some nutritional value! ;-)

    25. Re:Cheap means cheap by Bryan+Andersen · · Score: 1
      Hey, that's not fair! Quit dissin' the Pop Tart! At least it has some nutritional value! ;-)

      Allergies not witstanding, the Pop Tart also won't poison you if you eat it. ;-)

    26. Re:Cheap means cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuredly the device worked flawlessly in the prototype and development phase. Thereupon engineers were either laid off or redirected and the beta and production phase were done by those without understanding of the product design, and the QA/test dept was probably brand new and suffering staffing problems. I have had several Palm IIIxe's, setup for self and others, and all always worked extremely reliably. Palm's mfr system must have undergone serious downgrades. I jumped ship to a Sony Clie T615 for the lush screen and have been quite happy with the quality of this unit.

    27. Re:Cheap means cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This poster's M105 experience reminds me of my "dip" into car ownership when I got a used 1987 Ford Tempo with 65k miles on it after I graduated high school and was going off to college. This car was an absolute piece of crap and a complete nightmare and it has turned me off to cars completely. It was always in the shop and had a string of endless problems. I've since decided that all cars are complete unreliable pieces of garbage and have gone back to simply riding a bicycle everywhere. When will a company make some kind of automobile that can go more than 500 miles without breaking down? Oh yes, I don't want to pay more than $500 for it either!

  3. Me & My Palm by Peridriga · · Score: 1

    My Palm V now adorns the top of my dresser simply as a decorative piece to woo the ladies into believing I am a sophisticated college student instead of being a beer swilling maniac.

    Now of course it refuses to turn on regardless of what type of persuasion I attempt to use. The HotSync stopped working 3 months after purchase. And the keyboard I purchased never worked.

    Ahh the wonders of technology

    1. Re:Me & My Palm by bugg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Using a PDA to woo the ladies? Yeaaaah. Good luck with that. Tell me how that works out, mmm'kay?

      --
      -bugg
    2. Re:Me & My Palm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      yeah, sounds like it will be him and his other palm if he's trying to woo the ladies in that manner.

    3. Re:Me & My Palm by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      It used to work back when they weren't common. I've had Palms since the very first one and at the time I regularly had people of both sexes coming to me to ask about it.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    4. Re:Me & My Palm by meehawl · · Score: 2

      Conversely, I've carried my Palm V around loose in my pocket for 2.5 years now and aside from all the decals wearing off to illegibility, I've been amazed at how its sturdy design has survived so long without any hardware failures.

      --

      Da Blog
    5. Re:Me & My Palm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, which sex did you go out with?

    6. Re:Me & My Palm by Kymermosst · · Score: 2

      Are you sure you know which palm you are talking about, and what you are really wooing with it?

      Maybe it's true: you get all the love you need right from your palm.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    7. Re:Me & My Palm by zaphod110676 · · Score: 1

      This is really surprising for me. I have Palm M100 that I bought almost two years ago and use constantly. It's been fantastic for the money spent on it. Palm's production standards must have dropped dramtically. It's really too bad. As an Address Book/Calendar it has really done a lot to make my life easier.

      --
      To Do: 1. Take over world 2. Pick up Milk and Bread on the way home
    8. Re:Me & My Palm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey if it's just three months then the warranty must still be good! You'll probably get a refurb model, but at least it will work, eh?

      In any case I hope everything works out in your favor!

  4. No kidding, I'm not the only one? by webslacker · · Score: 3

    My IBM C3 (a rebranded Palm V) has gone all to hell. The digitizer in the screen has to be recalibrated almost every two days now! Sometimes I can't even reach the menu bar to recalibrate the digitizer because the sensor is so far off!

    1. Re:No kidding, I'm not the only one? by webslacker · · Score: 2

      BTW, sometimes the digitizer would be so far off that I'd tap the screen, and the PDA would think I tapped somewhere A CENTIMETER AWAY.

      Screw Palm, none of my friends who bought a Clie seemed to have these problems, so that's what I'm going to replace this shiny metal turd with.

    2. Re:No kidding, I'm not the only one? by IronTek · · Score: 2

      The c3's actually a rebranded/recolored Palm Vx (that little x makes a difference!)...

      ...Having used my c3 for a year now, I've had virtually no problems, save for the button defect on it (a design defect on all Palm V/x's...nothing to do with manufacturing) that caused my battery to drain, taking all my info with it...but it was partially my fault...

      At any rate, PalmOS PDA's are getting quite cheap now. If one's going to go drop around $150-$200, I don't think the Handspring Visor Edge can be beat for the money!

    3. Re:No kidding, I'm not the only one? by mmalcolm · · Score: 1

      My IBM C3 (a rebranded Palm V) has gone all to hell. The digitizer in the screen has to be recalibrated almost every two days now! Sometimes I can't even reach the menu bar to recalibrate the digitizer because the sensor is so far off!

      I have a Palm IIIc and the digitizer needs to be calibrated about every three days. I set the Memo Pad button to start the "Welcome" program (i.e, the program that runs when you turn on your PDA for the first time or after a reset). This program allows you to set the time and calibrate the digitizer. This helps me avoid the frustration of playing "Where do I tap to get the menu?"). I know...we shouldn't have to this.

      Mario

    4. Re:No kidding, I'm not the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes the digitizer do this? Is it fixable? My Palm V seemed to get a little more off every time I powered off/on. A hard reset helped, but then it would start all over again. I hated not being able to use the menu bar!

    5. Re:No kidding, I'm not the only one? by wo1verin3 · · Score: 2

      Actually there are two models of IBM WorkPad C3:
      8602-40U = Palm V
      8602-50U = Palm Vx

      and for the record, my workpad C505 (ibm branded palm m505) has been great with no issue.

    6. Re:No kidding, I'm not the only one? by IronTek · · Score: 1

      hey, what do I know, anyway?! :-)

      ...sorry about the misinformation...which could also be thought of as having my head "up my ass," but I digress...

    7. Re:No kidding, I'm not the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Palm IIIC (note the C) is renowned for the inaccurate digitizer - apparently this is due to the extra thickness of the colour display - remember it was the first palm to have a colour capable display.

      The screen has a gel next to it that it used for something important.. I forget what exactly, but it's there.

      Because I carry mine around on my belt, the gel collects at the bottom of the screen (gravity), and every time I use after it's been vertical for a while, I have to 'massage' the screen to move the gel back into a flat horizontal shape - until I've done that, the digitizer is very unresponsive and inaccurate.

      I used an old black and white palm V the other day.. I couldn't believe how accurate the pen was on the screen.. I had become used to expecting the selected menu item to jump back and forth over two or three items when I held the pen in one place on the IIIC.

  5. Handspring by cachapa · · Score: 1

    Have you thought about the Handspring? It's almost the same as the Palm, for about the same price and it's even pretier IMO. Sony also makes palmtops with PalmOS, but they're a lot more expensive.

    1. Re:Handspring by gewalker · · Score: 1

      I like my Visor Deluxe, but don't ever drop it. Mine was knocked off a desk onto carpet (3 ft?), screen was cracked and would not work (or hotsync off the latest data either). I know others with similar story -- way too easily broken.

      Replacement was simple (though the first replacement they sent was defective too), but it cost me about $100 at the time.

    2. Re:Handspring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I purchased a handspring visor w/ 8mb on sale at CompUSA for about $80 (this was a sale, it came with a worthless Glenaire (sp?) unit, but was still a good deal).
      The Visor was a replacement for a Palm Pro (2mb?). So far, I like it quite a bit. The IR port is actually more useful than I had thought; it will even allow me to get data from a Heart Rate Monitor I recently purchased, or trade data (mostly games tho) with other PalmOS users. My only complaint- the grafitti input area became scratched up quickly. And this was with the supplied plastic stylus. It hasnt affected actually writing, its mostly just an asthetic complaint.

      The Palms are quite useful once you get in the habit of using them. For me it replaces a plethora of post-it notes, scribbles on legal pads, and hand-written notes in the margins of papers on other subjects. One function that is potentially nice is the calendar, but I have never aquired the habit of checking any calendar daily.

      One side note- there are cases made with the BodyGlove logo on them. These are made of the same stuff diving suits are (neophrene?), and are EXCELLENT. They are thick enough to protect it from even being thrown against a wall (dont ask), and very light. I even went and got one for my cell phone.

    3. Re:Handspring by PeteEMT · · Score: 1

      A tip I've found is keep your sytlus clean, even the plastic ones. The slightest bit of dirt on the tip is like sandpaper to your screen.

      I've also had good luck with those transparent "screen protectors"

      --
      Pete
    4. Re:Handspring by KeelSpawn · · Score: 1

      yes. I have a visor dlx and a visor prism. They all worked fine. I have had my dlx for almost over a year..nothing bad happened..

      --
      http://www.palmzone.net
    5. Re:Handspring by Turbyne · · Score: 0

      Get screen overlays (they make the stylus glide), use a bic pen as styli (to avoid losing those expensive styli), enter what you can via PC, don't press down when you write (just glide), and get a nice thick neoprene case.

      My black Handspring Visor Deluxe has survived 2 years of college abuse.

      Turbyne
      --
      ~A'Ëq'i4d)^'$ÊSÈòB
    6. Re:Handspring by Turbyne · · Score: 0

      Oh, and about knocking the unit on the floor - go to staples and pick up some 3M Heavy Duty double sided tape (the thick foam type), and tape your cradle to your desk. This way no matter how much clutter you're plowing around, you avoid sending your PDA over the edge (also works great for mounting wireless mice transmitters to the bottom of your desk).

      Turbyne
      --
      ~A'Ëq'i4d)^'$ÊSÈòB
    7. Re:Handspring by EvlG · · Score: 2

      I love my handsprings (this is the 3rd one i've owned) but I have definitely had problems with my Prisms.

      The first Prism I had crashed a lot - hard reset-requiring crashes that made me reload all my data. It got so bad, I bought JBBackup so that I could schedule automatic backups to my 8mb Flash Module every 6 hours.

      The buttons seem to be made poorly. The power button on my original Prism stopped working - the only way to turn it on was using an app hardkey.

      I sent the Prism back for warranty, and got another. It didn't crash any more, but several months later, the buttons were broken again. Of course now it is beyond warranty period so I am screwed. Also, the Address Book key doesn't work either. Very annoying.

      I love the device. Super expandable, nice brilliant display (much better than m505's dim, almost color-less display). But the buttons should have been made better.

  6. Other Palms by myov · · Score: 1

    Have you looked at some of the other PalmOS based PDA's? - Handspring and Handera. My Handspring Visor Deluxe works well for my needs.

    --
    I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  7. have had one for a year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    works great, my only complaint is that the plastic
    where you draw the letters is getting worn out.

  8. Ipaq worth the buckage by sh2kwave · · Score: 1, Informative

    rather pleazed with mine, yeah i still have yet to put linux on it but i us it as my mp3 player in the car, as well asa nice color screen, have even found some nice graphics utils that similar to photoshop ( humm think i am a graphix nut? ) as well as i get to play my favorite fps's :)

    1. Re:Ipaq worth the buckage by Znork · · Score: 2

      Yah, but out of a batch of 10 we got, I think 7 have been serviced within a year. The most common problem appears to be the battery giving up and dying within 5 seconds to an hour after leaving the cradle.

      I used a handheld (psion series 3) regularly for about a year in the early nineties (even coded a space invaders for it during a boring train trip :) but eventually decided the dependency on it didnt mix with the shoddy engineering in handhelds in general. They break more than the paper kind.

      Maybe I'll pick up the habit again. When they become dependable.

  9. That's really too bad by DaveWood · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've owned a Palm V and a Plam Vx; both have been rather durable and pretty reliable, although I have noticed that, as they get older, you have to continually recalibrate the "digitizer" (the touch sensors in the screen are calibrated by tapping on top of a target placed at two corners and then the center of the screen), otherwise there seems to be some "drift." Still, this is manageable.

    I would not be at all surprised to see growing pains of this kind as the company attempts to cut costs in order to move into new markets and increase profitability.

    I hope that the negative attention they're getting will force them to improve; while far from perfect, I like their work, and hope they continue to stick around.

    For an ordinary person looking for a PDA but not interested in shelling out $3-600 for an all singing all dancing 8 hour battery life Windows CE wonder, I'd recommend going on half.com or ebay and snapping up a Palm V or Vx. These can be had in perfect condition for about $60 and $100, respectively. I guess they don't make 'em like the used to - but the older models are still excellent PDAs - palm's virtue (and curse) has always been keeping things simple, so little has changed over the years.

    -David

    1. Re:That's really too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any idea what causes the "digitizer drift"?
      My Palm V started doing the same thing. Drove me crazy.

    2. Re:That's really too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My original PalmV was reliable too. I had it for 2 years before I broke the screen. I sent it back to Palm for a "repair and return" (I had had it upgraded to 8mb and wanted to get the same unit back).

      Palm lost my unit, and offered to send a new one. They sent a stock 2MB Palm V the first time (although I told them about the 8mb in my original unit). They offered to send me a Vx as a replacement - this came with a broken scroll button. They then offered another Vx. This third replacement unit seems to be working alright, but the battery doesn't seem to hold a charge as long as my old V.

      Palm's customer service is pretty easy to get through to on the phone, and they are professional and polite, but the results were very dissapointing. The simple mistake of a cracked screen ended up taking $125, several phone calls, 3 replacement units and about a month to correct.

    3. Re:That's really too bad by Ambush_Bug · · Score: 1

      I've had my m100 for over a year now, and
      I've had no problems with it.... I routinely abuse it my backpack, but it's still kicking. Maybe
      mine was made on a Monday or something....

    4. Re:That's really too bad by jrothlis · · Score: 0

      Actually Monday isn't a good day - lots of employees call in sick (leaving the factory short-staffed causing delays and bottlenecks) because they are either hung-over or just plain don't feel like going into work or want a long weekend. Tuesday to Thursday are the better days.

    5. Re:That's really too bad by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2

      For an ordinary person looking for a PDA but not interested in shelling out $3-600 for an all singing all dancing 8 hour battery life Windows CE wonder

      Fun - well I have a compaq ipaq - and when I bought it the Palm V was 499$ for a monochrome 8 meg pda. The Ipaq was 599$ for a 32 meg color display. So I bought it. 8 hours doesn't sound like a lot, but then you think about how often you use a pda constantly for 8 hours. In normal use the Ipaq seems to be perfectly fine for about 3 weeks. If you listen to mp3's on it on your way to work (like on the bus or something) like I do - and you use a solid state CF card (not the micro drive), and you know how to set up a hotkey in windows media player to turn off the screen the ipaq is actually good for about 4-5 days. Only reason I know this is because I've been working temp jobs lately where I haven't had the chance/time to charge it.

      But back when I had steady work I used to just drop it in the sync cradle and it charges all the way up in 10-30 minutes.

      And finally - I had a co-worker who had a color handspring visor (I forget the model) - it seemed to have about the same battery life as the ipaq - actually I thought it was worse since it seemed to have a little bit less conservative backlight management. Not to mention the actual display looked worse too.

      So nyahh

    6. Re:That's really too bad by DaveWood · · Score: 2

      My friend's experience with his Ipaq was much worse than yours; perhaps that's due to differences between models or simply to your obviously sophisticated approach to power management. To be specific, my experience with the Palm Vx under normal use is that it can go as long as 8 weeks. It's tough for me to extrapolate the cumulative number of hours from that, but...

      Most importantly - I'll go out on a limb and speculate a bit here - I think the $60 Palm V will be a better PDA for 80-90% of PDA users than the $600 Ipaq.

      The other thing is that, if the ipaq is replacing your discman/walkman, which many people also carry around with them, then battery life comparisons aren't really relevant. And this is definitely a great PDA feature. The only reason I wouldn't use one is because I'd be afraid to kill the PDA's battery and then not get reminded of something - the biggest reason I have the PDA in the first place. :)

      -David

    7. Re:That's really too bad by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2

      Today I might have to agree (I bought this ipaq 2 years ago) - but like I said earlier - when I bought the Ipaq it was around the same price at my brother's Palm V.

      It's also cool because when I bought the pcmcia sleeve I dropped a 802.11 wavelan card into and was able to use the company network with my handheld. Honestly - this was a palm oriented company - everyone had a palm handheld except me. There wasn't a person I'd show this too that wasn't really impressed/blown away. Only in the last few months has a few 802.11 solutions come out for palm platform.

      About music - I like the ipaq for music because if I'm traveling by bus, car or whatever I can just whip it out and listen to a few tunes - I also have some goon show episodes on it (british comedy show in the 50's and 60's) which actually take up less power to play - even on the micro drive.

      Ultimately I guess when I went out and bought a PDA I was kinda disapointed in the Palm line because they were very very very expensive, and they had little features - and I'm a geek - I like gadgets with features. My next handheld will probably be that Sharp Zarus.

      And I do use this for keeping track of appointments (it has an audible alarm and a blinking led), addresses, writing e-mail, etc. I'd honestly say if you used it just for that you could probably use it for weeks on end without charging it.

    8. Re:That's really too bad by DaveWood · · Score: 2

      No question - you should be paying the same thing for a palm as you pay for your device. Fortunately that's not the case. :)

    9. Re:That's really too bad by lacrymology.com · · Score: 1

      I've owned both the Visor Deluxe and the Visor Prism. Although I consider them to be great PDAs, I am really looking for something with similar capabilities in half the size. However, if size isn't a problem (they aren't big really, I'm just picky) then I highly recommend snagging one. I dropped my Prism right out of the box onto the hardwood floor and never experienced a problem in the 6 months that I owned it.

      --

      #
      # Modus Ponens
      #
  10. Palm IIIe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have owned a Palm IIIe for about 3 years and it has worked flawlessly-no crashes or hardware problems. I love it and haven't even thought about replacing it with a new model.

    1. Re:Palm IIIe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had only one minor issue with my IIIe - every so often it will get the date wrong (i.e. several days behind today, but correct time of day). I've been to Palm's web page - it's a hardware issue - and there is a workaround, but it's not an obvious thing to notice.

    2. Re:Palm IIIe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had my palm IIIxe for about a year and a half now and am still very pleased with it. The display is clear, the touch screen is responsive, the handwriting recognition works fine, and I've never quite hit the 8M memory limit, despite all the programs, games, and e-books on it. It exhibits none of the problems so far mentioned, despite having been dropped on numerous occasions. Maybe the quality degredation is most common among the newer low-end models...

    3. Re:Palm IIIe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have a couple IIIes and no matter what we have done with them like dropping and stepping on them they work. Sometimes the old stuff is good enough.

    4. Re:Palm IIIe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a IIIxe that I got when they came out well over a year ago. Works beautifully.

      One day it stopped working properly (started registering screenclicks randomly). After experimentation, I pulled the case out and made sure there was no dirt or debris between the screen and the case where the two contacted each other.

      Put it back together, problem solved. Some foreign object presumably was wedged between the screen and the case.

      That remains the only problem I've ever had with it.

  11. Pen and paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried that for a while, but I returned it to the store. The alarm was broken!

  12. About your broken tip calculator by jeffphil · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe you got a Willard instead of a Wizard.

    1. Re:About your broken tip calculator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably got it from Joe Sacomato, the bum.

    2. Re:About your broken tip calculator by F452 · · Score: 1

      Maybe even Bob Sacamano.

  13. Diamond Mako/revo plus by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    I love my diamond mako - really, a rebranded revo plus. Keyboard, sixteen megs of RAM, integrated word processor and spreadsheet apps, and you can find them on pricewatch for around a hundred. Like a sucker, I spent $300 for mine, but I still think it was worth the cash. Only problem is the lack of a backlight, but that's never been a real problem for me. Also, some people report battery issues.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:Diamond Mako/revo plus by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Informative
      Also, some people report battery issues.


      I've only had problems with my Psion Revo+. It now sits unused in a drawer because I can't trust data to it. It will randomly die from lack of power after any time between 1 and 4 hours of (intermittent) use.



      Luckily I also have a PalmIIIx which just plain works.



      I kind of liked the Revo but even as a light user, I expect my devices to last more than a couple hours after six hours of charge.



      From what I've gathered on Usenet, battery problems are extremely common on those machines. If you are one of the lucky few, they are great, but if you're considering getting one, it's far safer to forget about it.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    2. Re:Diamond Mako/revo plus by Ryan+Kirkpatrick · · Score: 3, Informative
      The batteries are only an issue if you do not follow the initial charging instructions. The first time you charge the batteries, you must completely charge them for something like 12 hours. Don't stop when the guage says full, keep charging them for the specified time. This calibrates the battery meter, otherwise you end up with what everyone else reports as bad batteries. If you did not do this the first time, do a hard reset and then follow the instruction, it should restore your Revo to working order.

      As for an inexpensive organizer they are the best! Got my from $144 from Sparco.com, and it is the PDA I have been looking for ever since I got my PalmPilot (yes, the original 1/2MB version). My handwriting is horrible, so the keyboard is perfect! :)

      --
      -------------------------------
      "For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain." - Phil. 1:21 (KJV)
    3. Re:Diamond Mako/revo plus by UncleFluffy · · Score: 2

      I'm still using an original Psion 5 - lower clock than the Mako/Revo, but bigger screen and a much better keyboard. It's the only PDA that I can touch-type on, which, for me is a big big plus.

      --

      What would Lemmy do?

  14. If all you need is basic organizer functions.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... go with a Handspring Visor. They have similar specs to the m105, but a much larger screen (though same resolution), and expansion capabilities.

    You might also want to look into an older Palm Vx. I've seen them for under $150 on half.com.

  15. Handspring by Apreche · · Score: 3, Informative

    Handsprings, from my experience are the most reliable PDAs. Everyone I know who has one loves it and never has a problem with it. I'm also prone to playing with PDAs on display in Staples and such, and the Handspring models are always functional. I can't say the same for any other brand. Handspring PDAs are also the most stylish.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  16. Try this then by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

    These work exceptionally well in preventing that particular problem and may even help restore some usability.

  17. You get what you pay for... by Traicovn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    unfortunately, my experiences with all handhelds has been less than satisfactory when I have purchased one for under 200.00, I guess you can say that you get what you pay for. Honestly it's somewhat hard to be able to validate paying more than 200 though for something that doesn't do everything I would like it to as easily as I would like it to yet. It's still somewhat new (and often somewhat proprietary) technology, so things change every quarter or two....

    I went through multiple windows ce units, as well as a TI Avigo and now I'm using a palm m100. I often have many problems with syncing, the software will freeze up or the palm won't talk to my desktop properly. The unit also had a dark spot in the bottom right hand side of the screen though. My favorite pda so far that I've ever owned is a tie between my Ti Avigo and my Hp JORNADA (although I don't like running windows).
    The biggest problem I've found with pda's? It's too easy to break the screen, and often they are too bulky. I like that many of them have screen covers now though, more than used to. It means fewer scratches, and units seem to be a bit better built than they were a while ago, still, you often get a flimsy plastic case when your in the 200.00 and under market, while if you go up in price you get metal alloy's or a thicker plastic case...

    --

    [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
    {Traicovn}
    1. Re:You get what you pay for... by nullard · · Score: 1

      my experiences with all handhelds has been less than satisfactory when I have purchased one for under 200.00, I guess you can say that you get what you pay for.

      If I pay $200 for something, I expect to get a lot. I expect to get what I pay for feature-wise. I wouldn't gripe about a cheap PDA not having enough ram to hold a dozen e-books at once.

      No matter what I pay, I do have a right to expect it to do what it says it does. I doubt that the documentation that comes with the Palm device says "mysteriously misinterperets stylus taps" in the feature specs.

      I expect to get what I paid for. If I pay for a brand-new or refurbished item, I expect it to work.

      --


      t'nera semordnilap
    2. Re:You get what you pay for... by ScottKin · · Score: 1

      It's nice to see another Avigo fan out there. I picked mine up for $80 at Office Depot about 4 years ago - right before the idiots at TI stopped all dev work on it and discontinued the whole line. I haven't had a single problem with it since I bought it four years ago.

      Yes, it's only monocrome...No, you can't play MP3's on it, but there's a whole bunch of independently-produced software for it, and hardware hacks to bump the available memory from 1mb up to 4mb (there is a 1mb upgrade to take it up to 2mb, but the hardware hack consists of adding additional SMD memory chips to the unit and the memory card). It syncs-up with IntelliSync perfectly.

      It's too bad that TI had to give-up on this gem so early in the game.

      --
      I don't give a rat's behind about "karma" here or anywhere else. Don't like what I have to say here? Deal with it!
    3. Re:You get what you pay for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For $200 that's exactly what you get, flaws and all. If you want a perfect device, you will pay for it. Would you pay $1000 for a device that has the exact same features as the $200 PDA but instead of having to recalibrate once a month, it never needs recalibration? If so then I've got a bridge to sell you.

    4. Re:You get what you pay for... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      Really? I paid $1024 (NZ) for my Palm Vx. That was a normal price at the time. It's going great except for the fact that they used a f'n membrane button for the power button. Now the power button only works half the time, making it pretty much useless. For that price, it wouldn't have hurt them to use the same kinda of button as the app buttons (a real button).

      I really could care less if Palm was wipped out of the market. Their hardware seems poor quality for the price, and there is no inovation in either their hardware or software division. If it wasn't for 3rd parties, Palm would be stone dead in terms of innovation.

  18. Shame by Little+Dave · · Score: 1

    Its a shame that the author is having so much trouble with his Palm, since I've found them to be very reliable and resiliant, not to mention indespensible. I've had my Vx for 18 months now, bought it on a kind of a whim since my memory was good enough that I had never felt the need for a datebook or diary before.

    It turned out that I soon found the Vx to be much more than these things, and it has gradually wormed its way into my everyday routine that I reckon I would swim naked across pirhanna infested waters with raw pork tied to my manhood to avoid it ever failing on me.

    I keep my accounts on it. I plan my future finances on a small spreadsheet. I keep my multitude of passwords, pins and usernames under 128bit encryption. I have a couple of EBooks to hand for long train journeys (read the whole of the Night's Dawn trilogy on various tube journeys). I retrieve my mail and idle on IRC. I've even coded up a little pda version of my webpage that I can access to queue up mp3s on my shoutcast server from anywhere in the house.

    In short, its had heavy usage and so far, touch wood, no failures. In fact, as disposible income worries are now lifting, I'm looking to replace it with a quicker, smarter, better model. On with colour and ethernet capabilities. Any recommendations?

    1. Re:Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPaq for ethernet. :(

  19. Palm III Style - 7 Replacements in 3 years by indigofire.net · · Score: 1

    All of the Palm's with the III style have display issues. My Dad, my brother, and I all had the same display problems which seemed to be connector flakyness (screen cutting in and out, shaking it would change the display, etc.). Being the aggressive type, I was the first to take it back to Palm, Keating Tech. the company that does support for Palm, and got a replacement, which would promptly fail. I went through this 7 times - some of them were even DOA.

    I now have a Palm Vx, and I haven't had a problem. I think the V's (and M50X's) are slightly better built than the III's (and M1XX's). I haven't figured out what I'm going to do with three dead Palm III's though.

    --
    -iF
    1. Re:Palm III Style - 7 Replacements in 3 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [[[I haven't figured out what I'm going to do with three dead Palm III's though.]]]

      Why not sell them to... http://www.usedpalmpilots.com/

    2. Re:Palm III Style - 7 Replacements in 3 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I haven't figured out what I'm going to do with three dead Palm III's though."



      Ebay! 2/3 of the crap on there is "as is", i.e. "we know it's broken but gee we really want money."

    3. Re:Palm III Style - 7 Replacements in 3 years by DarKrow · · Score: 0

      My Palm IIIe hasn't had a single issue from years of bouncing and banging inside my jacket and pants pocket with only the hard cover that comes standard to protect it. I had some problems with third party software, but everything works just fine hardware wise, except for the power button being a little unresponsive after sitting for a while. It's even taken several nasty falls - some onto pure concrete.

      Palm's stuff seems to be pretty damn sturdy to me. Don't know about the newer models though.

      --

      It lives up to it's name: http://www.sanspoint.com
  20. My m505 by nevek · · Score: 1

    I have a Palm m505 and I like it. My only complaints are that the screen is a little too dark (fixed in the m515) and sheduling appointments etc is really more of a pain than a time saver.

    I had a problem with it, it stopped hotsyncing due to an "electrostatic shock" My palm was one of the first to do this and Palm kept blaming it on my computer. Their tech support was not very good, they often just autoresponded a message that picked up key words in my complaint. And their chat with a tech support was nothing more than a bot.

    Anyway after hundreds of people complained; palm admitted that their cradles were defective and are now offering replacements.

    www.palm.com

  21. spend a little more and get a quality product by Sokie · · Score: 5, Informative

    About two and a half weeks ago, I took receipt of a refurbished Sony Clie PEG-N610C. It cost me $239 + shipping for a 320x320 16-bit color screen and overall a very high quality device. The case is aluminum and it has a nice, attractive flip cover that protects the screen.

    Since I've owned it I've "dropped" it twice. Once I knocked it out of the hotsync cradle and onto the floor about 3 feet below. No damage. The second time I brushed it against my leg while I was walking and it went spinning out onto the ground. Again, no damage. My brother dropped his Visor off the kitchen counter and shattered his screen. It you are looking to be a little more budget and don't need/want a color screen, I would recommend the PDA my roommate has, the Sony PEG-T415 (320x320 B&W, 8mb, around $200) or the Sony PEG-S320 (160x160 B&W, 8mb, around $150).

    Why Sony you may ask? While they are a bit more expensive that a lot of PDAs, the 320x320 screen on the 415 and the color models is gorgeous and they all are well built and snug in their aluminum cases. They also have Li-Ion batteries that charge when they are on the cradle (although mine has a slick system where the charger plugs into the cradle normally, but can be plugged directly into the unit and used as a travel charger) so you don't have to buy batteries for it.

    Anywho, enough advertising. I don't work for Sony, I've just been very happy with their PDAs. Clearance Club is where I got mine and they have quite a few refurbished B&W models still.

    I did quite a bit of research on PDA forums and such and had pretty bad luck finding anyone who had bad things to say about the 610 I got, and so far, I'd have to agree with the good things everyone had to say about it. Everyone I show a high res picture to just ooo's and ahh's and is incredulous when I told them I paid under $250 for it.

    -Sokie

    --
    ------
    Where are the slash-groupies? I distinctly remember being promised slash-groupies!
    1. Re:spend a little more and get a quality product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My visor has been dropped multiple times, both by itself and in a backpack, and I've never had any problems. Got it for 125 at a computer show.

    2. Re:spend a little more and get a quality product by LordSah · · Score: 2

      I've had some trouble (with my 415) with the stylus input losing calibration from time to time. Every so often, I have to recalibrate the input.

      I'm not sure if this is a hardware problem or a software problem--it only seems to happen after I've been playing solitaire on the damn thing.

      That's only complaint though. All in all, I'm really happy with it.

    3. Re:spend a little more and get a quality product by Sokie · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think the key problem in my brother's case was that it landed directly on a corner. The case of the PDA stopped while the screen continued in motion for a short distance and hit a support post inside the case, causing the classic "star pattern" fracture radiating out from one corner of the screen (and making the digitizer completely non responsive). Don't get me wrong, I think Visor makes a pretty good product, but I like the design and dimensions of my Clie alot better.

      --
      ------
      Where are the slash-groupies? I distinctly remember being promised slash-groupies!
    4. Re:spend a little more and get a quality product by Danse · · Score: 1

      That'll do it. I dropped my Visor once and it landed on the corner where the stylus is stored. The stylus was permanently jammed and could not be removed, and the screen was extremely screwed up because the jammed stylus was forcing it to separate a bit so there were all sorts of weird effects going on. I sent it back and got a replacement. Then I bought a Rhino Skin case for it. One of those neoprene ones. Didn't have to worry about dropping it after that.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    5. Re:spend a little more and get a quality product by Wrexs0ul · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't give the visor's too much grief. I have a handspring Visor Prism which survived a 12 foot fall onto concrete with almost no damage. Not that I'd recommend anyone trying this, but they are built to last.

      -Wrexsoul

      --
      --- Need web hosting?
    6. Re:spend a little more and get a quality product by jbf · · Score: 1

      Sokie,

      What do you use for a case? I have a Vx with the Palm hard case, and haven't found anything similar for Sonys, other than their latest one (NR70V?) which serves as its own case...

    7. Re:spend a little more and get a quality product by Sokie · · Score: 1

      I don't have a case yet (only had it for 2 weeks) but what about this: http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/drpalm-clie-pdaprotec tor-review.html. Targus also has some soft leather cases that work with the Clie. I found those 2 in about 5 minutes of surfing, so I'd guess there are some other options too.

      --
      ------
      Where are the slash-groupies? I distinctly remember being promised slash-groupies!
    8. Re:spend a little more and get a quality product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ah, yes. The Sony Clié. You get a nice looking PDA, a non-standard serial connector, memory sticks that work nicely in other Sony stuff, and the warm, fuzzy feeling of having given money to an RIAA member that said they would block filesharing at your ISP, your cable company, and your computer. Not to mention releasing a modified POSE and withholding source in violation of the GPL, and releasing a closed-up version of Linux for the PS2. Nice going.

      ~~~

    9. Re:spend a little more and get a quality product by nathanh · · Score: 5, Informative
      Since I've owned it I've "dropped" it twice. Once I knocked it out of the hotsync cradle and onto the floor about 3 feet below. No damage.

      Your cradle is probably in the study or bedroom, which is likely carpetted.

      The second time I brushed it against my leg while I was walking and it went spinning out onto the ground. Again, no damage.

      Spinning in what way? If it spins the right way then it would avoid sharp impact, even if hitting concrete.

      My brother dropped his Visor off the kitchen counter and shattered his screen.

      And the kitchen is tiled, right?

      Your anecdotal story is interesting but it's doesn't prove anything. Both the CLIE and PALM use glass and they both run the risk of dying even from sudden short falls (1-2 foot) onto hard surfaces. It really depends on how they fall, what edge they hit first, and how high they bounce.

    10. Re:spend a little more and get a quality product by Sokie · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you'd read some of the subsequent messages under this thread you'd notice I did extrapolate a bit on my brother's Visor. When I knocked mine off the cradle it was onto very cheap, old, dorm room carpet which is about as soft as the wall. There is no pad under it and it really is about as hard as the concrete underneath.

      But you really misinterpreted my opinion, I wasn't trying to present a weak, anecdotal example as evidence that Visor's are obviously inferior and break at the slightest instance of abuse. At least, I don't recall making that assertion anywhere.

      Of course it's possible for a Clie screen to break, but just saying they both use glass and therefore have an equal risk of breaking from a drop lacks logical merit even more than my anecdote. Perhaps one manufacturer mounts the screen inside the case differently. Perhaps the flex undergone by a plastic case tweaks the screen in such a way as to cause fracture more often. Perhaps the higher g-force shock created by a metal case makes dropping a Clie more likely to create a quantum singularity.

      Typically comments and opinions expressed publically, especially in a forum like slashdot, are anecdotal examples of a person's experience. That's what I gave. I'll readily admit that I haven't spent 18 months researching the durability of every make and model of PDA available. Nor have I forensically analyzed the likely causes of fracture in dozens of PDA's with broken screens.

      I personally believe that Clie's are physically built a little better than Visor's, based on the visible componenture and the relative heft of the units. But I don't really have any evidence to back this up besides anecdotal accounts. If someone wants to send me a bunch of Visors and Clie's (even dead ones so long as they are physically in good condition), I'd be happy to bash, drop, smash, and jar them equally and come up with some empirical evidence as to who makes a more durable PDA. But until then, anecdotal is the best I can do, that's why I didn't say anything about who made a more durable PDA in my first post.

      Whew...better stop now before the ghosts of my argumentation teachers completely take control of my body.

      -Sokie

      --
      ------
      Where are the slash-groupies? I distinctly remember being promised slash-groupies!
    11. Re:spend a little more and get a quality product by nathanh · · Score: 2
      If you'd read some of the subsequent messages under this thread you'd notice I did extrapolate a bit on my brother's Visor.

      I don't have a time machine so I didn't have an opportunity to respond to what you wrote in the thread after I had written my reply.

      The post you originally wrote and the one I replied to read a lot like "Sony Rules and Visor Sucks" based on some very anecdotal evidence. You even imply that the Visor is a "non-quality product" because your self-confessed Sony advertising means the Sony Clie is the "quality product" of your title. I was only offering ideas to make your anecdotal evidence seem less black and white. No offence was intended against your forensic and/or logical skills.

      Of course it's possible for a Clie screen to break, but just saying they both use glass and therefore have an equal risk of breaking from a drop lacks logical merit even more than my anecdote.

      If we're going to be anally retentive, I never claimed that they have an equal risk of breaking.

      PS: Nice gratuitous use of the word "quantum".

    12. Re:spend a little more and get a quality product by yesthatguy · · Score: 1

      My Prism just started cracking recently, up by where the little indentation is in the top for cases. I have mine in a case pretty much all the time, so it may just be a stress thing after a year and a half. The thing still works fine, but it's kind of disconcerting that the plastic is breaking just from normal use.

      --
      Yes! That guy!
  22. My Experience by DarkWarriorSS · · Score: 1

    I bought a refurbished Palm Vx from Palm's website, back in Janurary, I believe. I had a few problems with it, not many tho. The bulk have been my own fault. The first that I noticed was that the power button on the top, you sometimes have to press hard, and at a angle to turn it on, off, or backlight. This has gotten a little better (don't ask me why), and now will do with normal pressure. The other is that the back is scratched up, but thats me with stuff in my pocket before I got a case for it :) I only use the craddle for charging, and/or backup, every say, month, so I can't say much on that front. I mainly use it as a stand-along device. Reminders of were I have to be, homework (10th grade student here), addresses, and don't forget those games during class (did I just say that?).

    Brandon

    1. Re:My experience by MsGeek · · Score: 2
      Even more, the calibration utility with the Palm did not work -- it kept going in a constant loop.

      That's a firmware problem. Since the Palm OS on the m100 and m105 is in ROM, not EEPROM, the thing is basically fux0red and needs to be sent back.

      The first m100 I got did that. The second one was the keeper.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  23. Refurbished is better than new by yardgnome · · Score: 5, Informative

    Palm.com refurbished store.

    Oddly enough, I have never had a problem with a refurbished Palm device (even the ultra-old 3Com Pilot I bought long ago worked like a charm until I ditched it voluntarily). I know it seems counterintuitive, but maybe the best bet now is to go with something that has already broken once in the past (and has now been fixed and extensively retested by Palm). Plus, the refurbished devices can be half as expensive.

    At the moment only the m500, m505, and Vx are available in the refurbished section, but sometimes older (and even cheaper) equipment pops up.

    --
    4-star general in a one-man army.
  24. definitely not limited to palm by dlasley · · Score: 1

    i've had a RIM BlackBerry for about 6 months, and about 2 months ago it stopped seating correctly in the cradle. the cradle was replaced, but i still have to rock it into place to make sure it is actually charging (tho it always makes a solid connection without hassle). 3 others on the same floor have had the exact same problem ...

    on the high end, we've gotten a bunch of sunfire 280r servers this year, and 25% have had some kind of serious hardware problem requiring major overhauls or complete replacement. none of them are more than 3 months old.

    in both cases, it is fair to remember that both companies have been shipping their product in high volumes and probably don't do the QA that's really necessary to guarantee the best quality.

    --
    when it rains, it gets real soggy. when it pours, i'm under the tap just _waiting_ for the joy
  25. I've got quite a bit of experience with this by FallLine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Having deployed a couple hundred Palm M100 and M105s at work, I can say with certainty that the M100, and to a much lesser extent, the M105 have a problem with defective manufacture (something around 5% it seems) but are also of generally poorer construction than all other Palms. I dislike this, but I feel it is unfair to compare this series of Palm to other manufacturers because they're first generation devices and they're one of the few modern PDAs that are designed to enter the sub-100 dollar price range. All other Palms in my experience (from the IIIs, to the V series, and so on) are exceptionally reliable when you consider the amount of abuse they withstand. It's really an apples and oranges comparison. If you're willing to spend the same amount of money on a Palm as you are on the other handhelds, you can get as good, if not greater, quality.

    1. Re:I've got quite a bit of experience with this by wrenkin · · Score: 2

      I have an m100, and I agree that the quality just isn't there. It was a good choice for me, being a student and wanting an inexpensive organizer, but after having it for a while it's acquired a few quirks. The power button was the first thing to go. There was a point where you could still work it as long as you pressed very hard, but that time has long gone.

      The date book button also just got harder and harder to activate until one day it just stopped working. The way the m100s flip-cover works, it will move out of the way and allow the button to be repeatedly pressed in your pocket continually throughout the day (if it doesn't come off). This is corrected in the m125, but it's no consolation. At least you can remap the buttons so if you lose the important ones, all isn't lost.

      I havn't had any real screen problems (other than losing backlighting due to the power button), but it does seem as if my father's m125 is a little inaccurate when it comes to where you're pointing. It could be him just calibrating it differently, but It really seems off.

      To be honest, given the m100's 2MB of memory, small screen and thick body (it could have been smaller if not for the damned faceplates) I might as well have bough the actually upgradeable V, or spent a little more for a Vx. Even today, they've still got it.

      --
      -- "Is this death or is this Ohio?"
    2. Re:I've got quite a bit of experience with this by red_crayon · · Score: 1, Interesting

      M105 have a problem with defective manufacture (something around 5% it seems)

      I must be in the other 95%. I've had a Palm m105 since November 2001 and it works great.

      --
      "Never bullshit a bullshitter" All That Jazz
    3. Re:I've got quite a bit of experience with this by Phibian · · Score: 2, Informative

      I had one of the original Palm 1000s (which I later upgraded to be the equivalent of a professional for the extra memory), and then later a Palm 5000 (also upgraded), and now a Palm IIIc.

      I use my Palm extensively, to the point of actually wearing through 3 pieces of tape that I placed over the graffitti area to protect it. (I used it as a notetaking device all the way through university, including math and engineering classes). I had it on 8 hours a day, taking notes.

      My first Palm still works, although I felt its graffitti recognition started to get less accurate (and I wanted new software...) so I sold it to a friend (who still uses it). The case also cracked (this was a well known problem) and the battery cover often came off.

      My second Palm became obsolete when I won the colour one in a contest, so I gave it to my aunt who is a doctor (and she still uses it extensively as well). It was still in pretty good shape, although I had a sticky button problem due to too many games of Pacman. The graffiti recognition on this model was still fine.

      My colour Palm is pretty good, although the battery doesn't last anything like as long as the first two (only about 3.5 hours of continuous use). However, it's also doing a lot more, so I don't mind, and I'll admit that my continuous use these days tends to be games more than just using the memo editor. I'm also out of university, so battery life doesn't matter to me as much anymore... And it's pretty sturdy. It also doesn't seem to have the disintegrating case problem of the other two. On the negative side though, it (and many of the other newer Palms and Handsprings that I've tried out) is a LOT more sluggish in its responses - and that is a very bad thing for graffiti accuracy. I have to be much more precise in my writing, and can't go as fast because it doesn't seem to respond as well as the older models.

      All this to say that I've so far been quite impressed with how well the Palms have lasted under the kind of abuse I've thrown at them. I've dropped them (luckily no screen damage) and left them outside accidentally in the winter - this is a pain, because the display freezes (and is useless until it warms up), without any problems.

      Yes, there were the odd problems (sticky buttons, the graffiti area crapping out and the case cracking are the big ones that cropped up in newsgroup discussions), but I never personally encountered them in such degree that the Palm wasn't useful, and some of the problems were avoidable or fixable. (Eg glue for the case, protecting the graffiti area with tape, not pounding the buttons...) And I did notice that the gentler people are with them, the better they last - one friend had no end of issues with graffiti because he was pressing extremely hard on the screen, and his buttons stuck all the time. He sold it, and the next person had no trouble at all with it, because they had a much lighter touch!

      Actually, I'm pretty impressed with the fact that the Palm 1000 is still living a useful life more than five years later... Given this kind of history, I think it's a little unfair to say that all Palms are "shoddily built".

      I do think that the software is becoming a little less reliable (in particular the general sluggishness of the OS).

      Anyway, my two cents.

    4. Re:I've got quite a bit of experience with this by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      Really. My wife has a m100 and she loves it. I have yet to setup syncing for her yet (I have to get the pro version oh Chapura Pocket Mirror so I can sync to my calendar and her to her calendar. Her m100 has gone thru hell in her purse with not nary a problem. Least she has not reported any.

      --

      Gorkman

    5. Re:I've got quite a bit of experience with this by darkonc · · Score: 2

      I've gon through a number of palm 3's (kept on breaking the screen), but I found them rather addicting. My most recent purchase was a 100 (I'm getting tired or paying for machines and then having them break on me), and I have also had problems with it.. wierd screen glitches from time to time, and one of the buttons is a bit 'sticky'. I've chaulked it up to 'cheap build', given the price, and have just put up with it.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    6. Re:I've got quite a bit of experience with this by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      Wonder if these folks changed their casing? I looked at my wifes and it seems too fragile to want to mess with swapping the case. No matter how good that flag case looks.

      --

      Gorkman

    7. Re:I've got quite a bit of experience with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My experience is similar. I work at a computer store where we have sold over one hundred palm m100s and only a few of them have been returned as defective. On the other hand the top power button on mine has died. I wonder just how many people have similar minor problems but are unwilling to take them back to the store.

  26. PDA killer by type40 · · Score: 1

    I've had nothing but bad luck with Palm OS devices. I've got a palm IIIe that wouldn't hotsync after 3 months, Had 2 Handspring Visors that fried (bought the first one it died in 48 hours (touch screen wouldn't respond), returned it for the 2nd one that kicked off after 2 weeks (hit the power button all that would come on is the backlight).

    The only PDA that I've never had a problem with is my eMate 300 (Newton OS), five years old and all I've ever had to do was recondition the battery pack ($20).

    --
    "You can see I know very little about pimp policy." George McGovern.
    1. Re:PDA killer by berniecase · · Score: 1

      I had an original Newton, and now I have a MessagePad 120, and although they're big and heavy, they're built like tanks. I've never had a problem with either one.

  27. Palm Pro by mishan · · Score: 1

    I still have a 1MB Palm Pro, back from the early days of handhelds. It still works pretty great, aside from a minor LCD leak that is barely visible and the occasional digitizer recalibration. I haven't used it in a year, but I used heavily for a year or two before experiencing any problems. Is it just me, or is old hardware made to last?

    1. Re:Palm Pro by shumacher · · Score: 2

      It's not just you. It's like any other product cycle. Look at most people's first VCR. Built like a tank, right? How about most computers from the early 80's? You see, when something comes to market as a premium product, it tends to be made a bit better to appeal to that kind of customer. The thinking is that if the technology is going to make something cost $2000, that same buyer would probably spend $2300 and get one made really well. You can see this right now. Go into an electronics store. Look at a standard DVD player. The kind you connect to a TV. Look how it's made. Lift it up - how heavy does it feel? Look at the remote and the connectors on the back. Does that feel like quality? Now do the same thing with a DVD recorder (also, the video sort, not the PC sort).

    2. Re:Palm Pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I still have and use my 512K Palm Personal (same family as the Palm Pro) daily. I got it in 1997. I get teased by my co-workers all the time about being in the stone ages, but hell, it works and I use it for appointments, addresses, and a few applications. I'll just wait for it to be recognized as "retro" and then people will think I'm cool.

    3. Re:Palm Pro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rock on! I still use my Palm Pilot Pro (USRobotics of course) and for anyone that teases you about being in the stone age... ask them if that were one of the people using PDAs in 1997. They probably hadn't even heard of a Palm Pilot.

  28. We get what we pay for by JanneM · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everybody want to get the best possible deal whenever we buy something. This goes not only for electronics, but for all big-ticket items: homes, cars - you name it. When it comes to most stuff, we have at least a vague idea that quality costs, and is worth having. We don't usually get the car with the lowest sticker price; we get the one with the best balance between perceived mechanical reliabilty, guarantees and price - features being equal.

    But with electronics - specifically computers and related devices - we tend to act differently. We have an idea that all machines are about equal in qwuality; they tend to use the same components from the same factories, after all. Instead we have a sheet of performance figures (this much memory, that many MHz and so on), and try to find the seller with the lowest price for what we want to have.

    What we forget is of course that quality still matters. There are a lot of ways to make a functionally identical item more or less reliable and long-lasting. But by focusing on price and ignoring quality issues for so long we have been digging our own graves. If a manufacturer is to compete (and not just become a niche operator or go extinct), he needs to cut corners wherever he can. You get circuit boards manufactured by the cheapest possible technology, soldered together by the lowest bidding contractor that still barely meet very minimal standards, and pack it together with iffy, electrically noisy power supplies and/or the cheapest rechargeable batterypacks money can (or can't ) buy. Then you install it into a case that's made to be cheap and easy to assemble, but that's barely adequate to hold the package together - and totally inadequate to protect the package from the wear and tear that will be the norm for the unit. The thing works when brought out of it's box, but that's about it.

    Consider this: Let's say Palm had two models. they are identical, functionally - feature by feature, they are twins. One, however, is built to last, with a thicker glass substrate, a sturdier case, better solderings, sturdy metal contacts, 'real' key switches and so on. It's still not 'ruggedized' by any means, just a lot better at handling the daily grind. It also costs another $50 or so over the other unit. Which one will be the big seller, and which one will mostly collect dust in the showroom?

    /Janne

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    1. Re:We get what we pay for by MagPulse · · Score: 1

      There are exceptions though. Peopleware mentions HP as one company that lets its engineers hold their products to their own quality standards.

    2. Re:We get what we pay for by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Consider this: Let's say Palm had two models. they are identical, functionally - feature by feature, they are twins. One, however, is built to last, with a thicker glass substrate, a sturdier case, better solderings, sturdy metal contacts, 'real' key switches and so on. It's still not 'ruggedized' by any means, just a lot better at handling the daily grind. It also costs another $50 or so over the other unit. Which one will be the big seller, and which one will mostly collect dust in the showroom?"

      You have hit the nail on the head. You are 100% correct.

      This is what happens in the hard drive industry as well and is probably the cause of so many hard drive failures. Most people will not pay 20% for for a drive when they can get the same size drive in another brand for less money.

      HDD MANUFACTURERS ARE YOU LISTENING? - I am willing to pay $50-100 extra for a drive with a seven year warranty and pre-paid data recovery if the drive fails. There *is* a market for this!

    3. Re:We get what we pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But strangely enough doesn't let its engineers hold their management to their own quality standards.

    4. Re:We get what we pay for by JanneM · · Score: 2

      Yes, there are exceptions. How well is HP doing in the hardware commodity markets today?

      I'm not saying we'll _only_ get shoddy stuff - there is always a market for good quality. The problam is that the smaller the market, the harder it is to find the stuff, and the more expensive it'll become. And when it comes to x86 hardware, the market is comparatively small. You get a 'squeeze' of the market, with a large part at the rock bottom, a small specialist market at the (almost unattainable) top, and nothing in between.

      /Janne

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    5. Re:We get what we pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That market consists of... you. Big market. Most people I know with important data keep 1) a RAID 2) backups. You think consumers will want this service or business? If consumers, that pre-paid recovery service will be used every time some deletes a file they didn't mean to. Real cost effective.

    6. Re:We get what we pay for by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Deleting a file (accidentally or not) does not equal drive failure.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    7. Re:We get what we pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think McFly... think. The average consumer (you know... cd-rom drive as a drink holder) doesn't know the difference. They bought a drive that can get their files back if there is a problem. What if Windows ends up corrupting the file system? Does that count as drive failure? Does the consumer know?

    8. Re:We get what we pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that doesn't always hold up with HP. Their consumer-grade PC's suffered a 25% out of box dead rate, as of 2001, according to the CompUSA I brought mine back to.

      I opted for a refund.

    9. Re:We get what we pay for by tftp · · Score: 2
      Jucius: HDD MANUFACTURERS ARE YOU LISTENING? - I am willing to pay $50-100 extra for a drive with a seven year warranty

      HDD Manufacturers: No, Jucius, we'd rather prefer that your drive fails twice during 7 year period, and you have to buy two replacements instead. This way we will collect not $100 that you offered, but $500 or more, depending on how big the drive is, and we are not liable for anything.

    10. Re:We get what we pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they'll be happy when he goes and buys drives from another manufacturer, depriving them of all his additional money, plus the customers his story will help drive away (how many people decided against IBM drives due to their failure rate? I know I did.)?

      That logic only works when there are no real competitors. This is how Microsoft got away with charging $100-200 for what were mostly glorified bug fixes every year or two.

    11. Re:We get what we pay for by tftp · · Score: 2
      That logic only works when there are no real competitors

      ... or when there is no big difference between competitors. If all HDD makers are equally bad, what do you do? HDD business is not something you or me can start in a garage.

  29. Palmpilot Personal by Reverant · · Score: 1

    I have the original Palmpilot Personal (The one with the whopping 512kb of RAM). It has been working flawlessly for more than 4 years. And guess what. I don't intend to change it.

  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  31. Hardware HAS gone to hell by dr_funk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am an authorized HP repair tech and they are a prime example of the downturn in product quality. Just the other day I worked on a HP Jaserjet 4SI. This printer and never been serviced and all it needed was the routine maintinance kit (fuser, transfer roller, paper pickup rollers). The amazing thing is was this printer had a mfg. date of 1992!
    Fast forward to the next day. I have a client to whom we sold 4 new HP Netserver LP 1000r (HE wanted them, we only reccomend compaq servers). First 2 we sold him were of a batch where the SCSI cables were so cheap that if you disconnected them, they were hosed (HP Tech told me that). So when I installed the optional NetRAID controller I basically killed the cable (one died in service, we are going to go ahead and replace the other).
    Now onto the 2nd batch we sold them. One of the NICs in one of the servers started dropping packets. Then is slowly degraded until it died completely. HP doesn't send out a new main board, they send the core module (mb & case. Everything but the procs, ram, and HDs). We transfered everything to that unit. Dead. Returned that unit, ordered another. That was dead too. Still haven't got this server fixed and we are back to working on it monday. HP doesn't have a clue of what's wrong, they just want me to order 5 parts on a warranty claim (there goes our proformance metric).
    If you have ever used a DeskJet 600 series you know that HP is making some crap. Likewise if you have ever used a LaserJet 1100.
    HP still makes some good products (plotters, high end LJ), but the difference between now and 10 years ago is painfully obvious. And, I suppose, the difference with other companys is the same.
    Write in and tell your stories.

    --
    ------- Assumption is the mother of all f$#@ ups.
    1. Re:Hardware HAS gone to hell by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "HP still makes some good products (plotters, high end LJ), but the difference between now and 10 years ago is painfully obvious. And, I suppose, the difference with other companys is the same."

      That is for certain. I have an early 90's HP Laserjet and it has never failed once. And this is after going through thousands upon thousands of pages including a Master's Thesis here and there.

      On the other hand, I have seen so many crapped out HP Inkjet printers (and other brands too) that I do not know what inkjet to buy anymore.

    2. Re:Hardware HAS gone to hell by cos(0) · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention the HP DeskJet 600 series, because just this week my HP DeskJet 612 printer suddenly died. I had it hooked up to my Mandrake 8.2 workstation and one day it just wouldn't print. I attributed it to my so far inexpertness in Linux... went into PrintDrake, restarted CUPS, reinstalled the printer, all to no avail.
      Tried it on a nearby Windows XP Pro machine, and it wouldn't even detect the printer during the Plug-n-Play test.

      Oh well, perhaps it's time to consider a laser printer.

    3. Re:Hardware HAS gone to hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A while back my father got me a HP LaserJet 1100 and I thought to myself, no color, way overpriced. Anway, over the couple of years that I've owned, I've reconsidered the way overprice part. I haven't had a single problem with it at all. Under w98,2k,xp or linux. Nada. Its perfect. So I'll have to agrea with you that you get what you pay for.

      -Greg

    4. Re:Hardware HAS gone to hell by matthewmichaelagee · · Score: 5, Informative

      > HP still makes some good products (plotters, high end LJ)

      Qualify that as *high-end* plotters, as well.

      Working at a tiny architectural firm (2-3 people, depending on the workload), we finally bought a low-end HP plotter so that I could control CAD output in-house. It was a very substantial purchase for such a small firm, but critical to moving our productivity out of the nineteen-eighties. We even paid a bit more for the low-end HP compared to other companies' higher-end but less expensive offerings, because my technophobe boss was unwilling to try anything unproven and the HP plotters I'd used in previous offices had been reliable workhorses.

      Well, the other plotters I'd used weren't HP's *low-end* models. It went from adequate to spotty to unreliable to completely dead within a week. HP had on-site technicians in the office for over a month wrestling with the machine before they finally gave up and shipped us a high-end replacement model to compensate for our troubles.

      Of course, that higher-end model wasn't designed to run off of our six-year-old plot server, but it took me about a week to diagnose the undocumented buffer underruns. I ended up bringing in my own laptop to use as our full-time plot server: ten-year IT life cycles can be obnoxious.

      In a two-person office which bills clients hourly, every hour I had to sacrifice to troubleshooting and negotiating my way through HP's support labyrinth was a significant hit on productivity. The month and a half that our full years' IT expenditure sat dead on the floor did not make the boss a happy man. In the end, he swore off HP and CAD for good.

      Oh yeah, and me too. Anyone in northern California need an architect? ;)

      --
      ...m...
    5. Re:Hardware HAS gone to hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      absolutely. I bought a hp photosmart p1100 a while back and within a month it spit out two of the three prongs that are supposed to push the paper out of the printer after the page has been printed.

    6. Re:Hardware HAS gone to hell by Zymurgy · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so trusting of the LaserJet 1100. I had one for about a year and a half. One day it got a paper jam. I opened the thing up, took the toner cartridge out, pulled the paper out, put the toner back in and closed it. The thing never worked again. All it would ever print were solid black pages. I took it to some "printer guy" and he confirmed that the thing was trashed. For a laser printer, $400 is not overpriced!! I should have known better than to buy a $400 laser printer. I'm planning on replacing the shoddy 1100 with something along the lines of a LaserJet III or IIID. Something from at least as far back as 1993. That's the only way to find quality; buy old stuff!

    7. Re:Hardware HAS gone to hell by ecalkin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      well, my perspective is that hp has built a lot of crap recently, but they seem to be doing it because people want *cheap*!

      hp has to compete against lexmark which is selling some of the z-series inkjets (z31? z51?) for under $80! some of the printers sold by lexmark are cheaper than the replacement print cartridges in some places!

      why is there junk (not just hp, not just printers, etc)? because we (americans) tend to think with the wallet instead of our brains.

      it's alway been amusing to listen to someone that purchased a $400 laser printer and complain that it doesn't work as well as such-and-such printer, oh that's a $1200 printer...

      eric

    8. Re:Hardware HAS gone to hell by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      Counterpoint.

      I've owned an 1100 for over 3 years now and except for replacing a little piece so that it wouldn't feed more than one paper at a time (a known problem) and replacing the toner I've been able to go through reams and reams of paper without issue in both Windows and Linux.

      I really like the printer.

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    9. Re:Hardware HAS gone to hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have an old epson fx-80 dot matrix printer from 85 or so that still works. been through 3 deskjets. the 500 series was the on that lasted the longest. the 600 series which is what most of the newer ones are based on eat carts for lunch. They dry out or they dont work. Or they smear. My parents had one where it stoped working after 2 sheets of paper. Course the 500 series ate gears for lunch...

      Nothing better than listining to the whine of a 9pin going at a 60 or so lines per minute. Zreeeeeeeee Zreeeeeeeee Zrrrrrreeeeeeeeeee

    10. Re:Hardware HAS gone to hell by gotr00t · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I have a Cannon BJC-240 printer that I bought back in 1996, for a whopping $200 dollars. This, by today's standards, is enough to purchase a VERY good photo printer, but at that time, it was quite good, despite the fact that it had less than 300 DPI maximum. I used it heavily, and although I don't use it anymore, it still works perfectly today.

      I bought a Lexmark Z31 printer for $20 dollars last year, and it turned out to print fine for the first month, and the text was printed so well that most people couden't tell it from a sheet printed on a laser printer. However, its condition rapidly degraded. It just started turning on and off for no reason, and it did this constantly. And the ink cartridge indicator has also gone super inaccruate. It's unusuable now.

      Two months after the purchase, I made the switchover to Linux, and I stopped using Windowz almost completely. The problem then was the Z31 is a dumb printer. It must recieve all instruction from the host computer, and it dosen't even have it's own buit in fontset! Much less support PCL or PS. Since there was no Linux driver, I had to buy a more expensive Epson Stylus C60 printer, which seems to work fine still.

      In conclusion, you get what you pay for. Today, hardware may be getting cheaper and cheaper, yet the quality of this cheap stuff has plummetted.

    11. Re:Hardware HAS gone to hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1100! I've seen quite a few of them just randomly start printing in grey instead of black. Add that to the extra-thin fonts built in. Everyone complains about the fonts when running reports from their AS/400 terminal package, they have to set everything to "bold" to make it look almost as good as the LJ4 (best HP ever made!)

    12. Re:Hardware HAS gone to hell by inflex · · Score: 2, Interesting
      One factor which tends to be forgotten when it comes to printing is the duty cycle. Most injets are designed to last a certain number of prints then, quite simply, die (of course, you have to consume the mandatory number of cartridge replacements to compensate for the printers initial loss leading sale).


      Having worked at a company which purchased a lot of the HP injets, I can certainly attest to them being exceptionally reliable... in breaking down after 1 month. The cause though was in part the people using them. HP6xx printers are not really designed to have 100 pages / day run through them, let alone full colour por^H^H^Hholiday photos. Stick with 5 pages a day and it should last you a year before going pop.


      Personally, I still use HP printers, or EPSON. The best in my history books are the EPSON EPL-5200 (fantastic paper path) and HP4P/Plus/M series. These days I'm trying out the HP2200D[uplex]. Surviving well so far.


      Oh, on another note, my wife's HP630c just died (11 months, 15 days old). . . time for the Tektronix Phaser.

    13. Re:Hardware HAS gone to hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that this has much to do with HP (other than laserjet II compatibility) - anyone remember the first series Okidata OL400? The heavy, solid low to the ground model not the subsequent cheap ass featherwieght plastic shitbox. That original OL400 was one rugged, simple, reliable machine. I could strip and rebuild one of those babies in about 15 minutes flat. I worked with these in the Canadian navy around 1991/92 and I bet they still have hundreds of them in use.

    14. Re:Hardware HAS gone to hell by llywrch · · Score: 2

      > well, my perspective is that hp has built a lot of crap recently, but they seem to be doing it because people want *cheap*!

      We all have heard the saying about being penny wise & pound foolish.

      In late 1992 I bought an HP LaserJet IIP+ for about $900.--. It has proven to be almost unstoppable: after I had it for 2 years or so, it developed a constant squeak, but never gave it much attention, until it broke in 1998. The repair shop reported that the squeak was due to a broken part which had been broken for 4 years! At this rate, I expect it to easily outlast my current computer.

      I always wondered about the people who settled with buying the $100 to $150 printers: perhaps they did expect to buy a new printer with each new computer.

      Geoff

      --
      I think I see a trend here. Maybe for them it really would be easier to muzzle the entire internet than to produce p
  32. All Palms were made in the US ? by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Informative
    Have there been quality control problems at their new assembly plant in Mexico (Previously all Palms were made in the United States)?


    FWIW, my trusty PalmIIIx which is several years old sports a "made in malaysia" sticker.
    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
    1. Re:All Palms were made in the US ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And my Palm IIIxe has a sticker saying it was assembled in Mexico. It works just fine, but I'm sure had it been put together in America it would run 10 times faster or something.

    2. Re:All Palms were made in the US ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My IIIxe that is about 3 years old was made in Mexico.

    3. Re:All Palms were made in the US ? by __Reason__ · · Score: 1

      My USR Pilot 1000 (1996) says "Made in Singapore".

    4. Re:All Palms were made in the US ? by Basje · · Score: 2

      Apperently not. I have a nice little anecdote about this. A friend of me, bought his palm III over here in the Netherlands. On the back it says made in Singapore.

      Then, 2 months later, I was on a trip, and bought one at Singapore Airport. That unit was made in the USA!

      I don't know the ideas behind the palm distribution channels, but I'm not thinking much of it.

      --
      the pun is mightier than the sword
  33. Funny... by Space+Coyote · · Score: 2

    A friend of mine has a Newtwon MessagePad that still works beautifully, despite all the snobbish snearing from people with their fancy new Palms which seem to e made of tissue paper for all the problems they seem to have with them. :)

    --
    ___
    Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.
    1. Re:Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My model 100 has been working great. You know, from TSR .. Radio Shack ;-)

    2. Re:Funny... by meehawl · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      despite all the snobbish snearing from people with their fancy new Palms

      And of course, the Newton's so damn heavy you can use it to club all the Palm owners senseless. Of course, people with those clunky heavy CE things will give you a run for your money.

      --

      Da Blog
  34. Try Handspring by SkyLord · · Score: 2, Informative

    I got my Handspring (The most basic model, 2M memory) for around $100 over a year ago. It's been sturdy and held up well, and is expandable.

    Fry's Electronics even sells refurbs for good prices for the Deluxe's (8M mem) and some of the later models.

    I still use my Handspring, and am waiting to see the direction of the product lines before jumping up to a high priced/performance unit.

    I stayed away from the M series because they just seemed too low end.

    --
    Me - Professional Computer Geek
    1. Re:Try Handspring by Sauron23 · · Score: 1

      Bought a refurbished Handspring Visor deluxe a few months ago from Fry's. Paid $89.00US. Installed X-Master (Free Hackmaster replacement) and Greenlighthack to reverse the backlight. Synchs up with Outlook on the Windows machine perfectly. For what I needed, a note, list, text reader it works perfectly. I'm not interested in watching videos or playing Doom in color on my PDA so the 160X160 grayscale is fine. Best perhaps is stuffing 3M's small yellow post-it notes into the expansion slot for the beam impaired to take phone numbers and such.

  35. My experience by auximini · · Score: 3, Informative

    I received a Palm m105 from a friend who got his free with a Dell computer. I first noticed that the display pad was always out of sync with the stylus. Even more, the calibration utility with the Palm did not work -- it kept going in a constant loop. After posting to a couple forums and trying out some freeware calibration programs, I just decided to call Palm up.

    They were very helpful with the problem and gave me instructions on sending the unit in. Within 2 weeks I had a brand new m105 that works perfectly.

    As most of the forums already say, there definately is a defect problem with the 105's. It sucks, yeah, but because Palm handled my situation smoothly, I'm not too mad about it.

    --
    Even a stopped clock gives the right time twice a day.
  36. True with just about any product by Peyna · · Score: 3

    I think this is true with just about any product. Electrical devices are probably even more susceciptible to defects/damages during processing. For example: We had an iPaq at my place of employment that worked fine for about a week, and then the screen went dead. It would come on, then fade out and disappear, no matter what we did we couldn't fix it; ended up having to get it replaced under warranty.

    The same is true with other products, such as vehicles. Any given vehicle may actually be repaired or have parts replaced, etc. many times before it leaves the assembly line, and even while it is out in the lot at the factory. The auto industry, or at least the factory where I worked seemed to have a much better way of dealing with this; and defects found after leaving manufacturing were at a minimum.

    Maybe the electronics industry just needs to rehaul some manufacturing processes and defect detection and correction. I've had my share of bad motherboards, monitors, and other parts to deal with it. The cost to them in repairs must be pretty high. Although, it would be nice if they would pick up shipping costs at more places for warranty work. I don't have to pay anything at all except price in gas to get my car to the dealer to get it fixed; why should I pay to ship back a defective product to get it replaced?

    --
    What?
    1. Re:True with just about any product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, I meant to look up a few words before hitting submit.

      Change 'susceciptible' to 'susceptible', and 'rehaul' to 'revamp'.

    2. Re:True with just about any product by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Maybe the electronics industry just needs to rehaul some manufacturing processes and defect detection and correction. I've had my share of bad motherboards, monitors, and other parts to deal with it."

      It's about statistics. The auto industry is decades old and the statistics and testing methods used to detect undue variance in productions methods are well developed.

      Much of the rise of "Japan == Quality" in many industries (especially automobiles) can be credited to a man named Deming.

      His work on quality assurance was accepted in Japan far more readily than anywhere else. I think the electronics industry has a lot to learn from him. The lack of proper use of statistics in QA often leads to undue numbers of bad products leaving factories.

    3. Re:True with just about any product by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Yeah, all the talked about at the truck plant I worked at was quality quality quality. I'm not sure who keeps track of the numbers, but even mistakes that are corrected before vehicles leave the factory are counted and considered part of 'quality' (Obviously they effect cost). Anyway, I agree, the electronics industry seems to be leaning towards producing as much as possible without QA. I think it noticed more, because individual people are buying more and more electronics, and therefore more likely to encounter a faulty product. Whereas, if all you ever bought was 1 tv and a microwave, the chances of them being defective are slim. When you've got tons of computers and other stuff, the chances you'll get a defective product go up; regardless of the actual percentage of defective products that shipped.

      --
      What?
  37. It is called infant mortality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Having had my m105 for less than 14 days, I promptly took it back to Office Depot for another one, which they were cheerfully willing to do."
    " It is called infant mortality. If something is going to break due to manufacturing flaws. It breaks very quickly. Which is also why extended warranties are such a rip-off. Just bug Palm to death. Write letters and emails to the most senior person you can find. Tell them what is wrong and what you want them to do to fix it. Always remember, it cost 3 times more to get a new customer than to retain and old one.
  38. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  39. Don't feel bad by AciDive · · Score: 1

    I own one of the first Palm Vx's that was ever made. The first few hundred of the palm Vx had bad memory chips installed in them and after you put about 2-3 MB of data on the dambed thing the palm would crash and all attempts to get the thing going again would fail. The only way to get the palm going again was a hard reset and a resync of all your data. But geuss what as soon a you resynced your data and turned it back on it would crash again. In the end the only way that you could keep the thing going way to download a patch from palm that was finally released after 6-8 months of everyone that had one of the affected palms bitching and when the patch was finally released and you installed it you lost anywhere from .5-1.5 MB of storage space which realy sucks.

    --
    "Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect." Linus Torvalds
  40. Older units are rock solid.... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

    My 1000 series has survived many horrors and still works to this day, even though it has been deligated to my 10 year old daughter as a toy.
    my PalmIIIx also has worked perfectly. accepts drops without a complaint, and never gives me fits or operation errors except when I tried to upgrade it to Palm OS 4.1... I downgraded back to 3.53 after the asenine bloat they stuffed in 4.1 (I never knew you could slow a palm device down to the speed of a Windows CE device... 4.1 does it well...)

    I have noticed that the newer M series looked rather cheaply made... smaller screen (WTF is up with that?) and my next purchase will not be a palm device but a Sony as they seem to be the ones that picked up the ball and are creating the quality palmos based devices...

    Older ones are bullet proof..

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  41. I run... by aetherspoon · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... an HP Jornada 547. Before you flame the pure living crap out of me for running WinCE, hear me out.

    It is the best OS I have ever ran a PDA under. Hell, it beats a lot of OSes on the PC even. I have yet to see it completely crash to the point where I need to reload it (I've had it for a little over a year), which is something I can't say for Palm. I also have no problems hardware wise, nothing is insensitive, and it works perfectly fine for me! That, and I like color. I dislike Palm due to previous problems with their hardware AND OS.

    --
    --- Ãther SPOON!
    1. Re:I run... by wik · · Score: 2

      Do Jornada's still have the reset button on the top of the keyboard, right next to the left shift key?

      It didn't take long for me to realize why the designers put it there. I crashed a new one several times in a period of about 15 minutes. Granted, this was my roommate's toy, three years ago. I hope the robustness of the hardware/wince has gotten better since then, but this was somewhat disconcerting.

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    2. Re:I run... by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      > I have yet to see it completely crash to the point where I need to reload it

      I should bloody well hope not!...

      I should hope that there isn't a single PDA out there that has even the slightest chance of fscking itself enough to require reinstalling the OS.

      If you'd said you'd never seen it crash, full stop, then I'd be impressed.
      But this statement makes it sound like it crashes all the time...
      A PDA shouldn't crash at all....

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    3. Re:I run... by tzanger · · Score: 2

      I have yet to see it completely crash to the point where I need to reload it (I've had it for a little over a year), which is something I can't say for Palm.

      That's bullshit.

      I've owned 2 Palms in the past 5 years -- I had a Pro and then an early Vx (the case says V but it's got 8M and has not been modded) -- anyway in the past 5 years I have never had to reinstall, ever. That includes screwing around with TRG Flash, developing applications for it and daily use and abuse.

      As a matter of fact, I don't think I've heard of anyone having to reinstall all their apps on their Palm (any version). Now if you let it go dead then sure but I haven't managed to do that, even with my shitty memory.

    4. Re:I run... by prismatic · · Score: 1

      I've had to restore a backup to my palm Vx, while fiddling with editing the rom, and trying to uninstall a rom patch, etc. but it was only once.

      other than that, including my fiddling with hacks and the rom, its only crashed (requiring a soft-reset) 3 or 4 times (in six months), all withing a couple of days, and only once requiring a hard reset (the time described above)

      --
      Brian Voils
      "A university is what a college becomes when the faculty loses interest in students."
    5. Re:I run... by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      I've had my M105 for 4 months, and I've had to do one hard reset. I installed a bunch of new software, and SOMETHING hosed the device up. I couldn't delete software. It still ran fine, but as soon as I tried to delete stuff, the thing locked up, so I had to hard reset.

    6. Re:I run... by aetherspoon · · Score: 1

      Nope. Never crashed full stop. Some of the applications running on it have crashed, but those are bugs in the app itself thus far.

      --
      --- Ãther SPOON!
    7. Re:I run... by aetherspoon · · Score: 1

      Considering PDAs do not have a keyboard without buying one extra, me thinks you are lying out some random oriface in your body.

      I've had to do one hard reset now (just after I posted the comment) when attempting to load an emulator that seems was only meant to run on an iPaq (but never said otherwise).

      --
      --- Ãther SPOON!
    8. Re:I run... by wik · · Score: 2

      This particular Jornada was what they now call a "handheld PC". At the time, I wasn't aware of any "pocket PC" models (ones without a minikeyboard).

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    9. Re:I run... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first time I bought a PDA it was a gift for someone else. The one that most caught my eye was the Jornada. It was a really beautiful looking machine with it's bright, color display and industrial looking body.

      But I've owned 2 HP computers, and I've used Windows, and when I see the two combined, all sorts of RED FLAGS go up. I bought her a Palm instead.

      When I finally took the plunge myself, I picked up a Handspring Visor...just the little 2 MB jobber, and I've never needed more memory than that, and I've never had any sorts of crashes or problems (except crashes caused by my own early attempts at writing Palm OS software).

      Oh, and I no longer talk to the girl I gave the Palm to for her birthday. I hope it sucks as much as I've been reading.

      :)

    10. Re:I run... by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      >Nope. Never crashed full stop. Some of the applications running on it have crashed, but those are bugs in the app itself thus far

      well then, that's all right then :)

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  42. The 505 was the reason for the 515 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 505 has a usb sync problem (not a problem with serial sync). Palm knows about this, and will not recall the 505s. Instead, they come out with the 515, which is merely a fix to the problem, and a slightly brighter screen.

    1. Re:The 505 was the reason for the 515 by smart.id · · Score: 1

      I thought that Palm released the 515 to compete with Sony and Handspring, because they had both just released organizers with 16mb of built in memory. I may be wrong, but I think that this is why they did that.

      --
      blog & fiction: jd87
  43. Hooray for Psion by toxcspdrmn · · Score: 1

    Not quite on-topic, I know, but I just had my Psion 3a repaired (broken clamshell hinge) after 7 years of sterling service at home (in the UK) and travelling (including 3 years installing science equipment and PCs in schools in Ghana, West Africa). It doesn't have the mobile connectivity of the Palm but it does have a perfectly usable keyboard, an agenda, word processor, spreadsheet, simple card index, games and a huge amount of shareware. Oh - and I have to change the batteries once every three months.

    I did try an Agenda VR3 for a while, but fun as it was, I couldn't put up with changing the batteries on a daily basis.

    I know the Palm format is popular, and if my Psion ever finally dies I'll probably make the transition, but for now I'll stick with what is probably the most useful bit of kit I ever bought.

    --
    "E pur si muove!" - attributed to Galileo Galilei, 1564-1642
  44. palm IIIe by super-flex-o-matic · · Score: 0

    i myself got an palmIIIe thats now 1 year old and the scratches on the screen are terrible. a friend of mine got one of the first models and when i examined it, i noticed that the display material is of much higher quality and doesnt get damaged so easily as my IIIe. summing up it comes to the price you pay you get what you deserve, sadly companies should say this to their customers that if they purchase the cheap'o models material is crap.

    yeah true - one point for apple

  45. A washing machine story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember putting my m100 in my gym bag after workout a few months ago. After a fourteen hour workday, I went home and mindlessly dumped everything in the bag into the washer...

    Waking up next morning, I was too tired to curse, and kept reminding myself it was too late

    these days I carry around a pad and a pencil... I still have palm around to remind myself of my stupidity

  46. My newton is several years old and still kicking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My Newton 2100 MessagePad may be large and heavy, but guess what?

    -memory is NON VOLATILE! Mine has gone dead for months without use...plug the charger in(see below!) and guess what? Everything is STILL THERE! Amazing Apple technology! :-) Everyone I know who has a handheld device(save Newtons) has suffered data loss because the handheld's memory got wiped and they didn't have a backup on the PC. Never met a Newton user with such a problem.

    -case is made out of a slightly soft rubbery kind of plastic; I dropped it once and the rubber on a corner got chewed up, but nothing else. Builtin cover elegantly folds out of the way on the back of the unit and can even be detached.

    -two PCMCIA slots. Takes standard faxmodems and whatnot.

    -builtin Appletalk networking. It can run a full email client, a full web browser, etc. Hell, there's even a web server for it.

    -rechargeable battery lasts WEEKS

    -backlighting is ACTUALLY BACKLIGHTING. The Handspring backlight sucks; in partial light, you can't see squat because of the way the backlight system works. The Newton's screen lights up bright green just like it should.

    -natural handwriting recognition and gestures. Learns your handwriting style and uses knowledge of English language to further accuracy. Multiple ways to make corrections.

    -smarter about holding contact information than Palms. Has the concept of "businesses" and people can be attached to said business. Further has the concept of "locations" and locations can be attached to meetings etc...you get the idea.

    -it can talk. Yeah yeah..you're just jealous :-)

    In almost every regard, Apple's design(not really technology; never confuse technology with good design) is STILL ahead of everything else out there today...and the first Newton came out in 1991(TEN YEARS AGO.)

    Palm, Handspring, etc are sitting around on their asses, doing absolutely nothing to improve the actual unit; look at the Palm OS; it's still slow, clunky, outdated...

  47. Low Price? by marshac · · Score: 2, Informative

    The cool thing about technology (or uncool, depending on how you look at it) is that the absolute top of the line, most expensive tech toy out there, after a year, isn't. This means that you can hop onto ebay, or your favorite surplus website and look at those formerly spendy Palm V, or iPaqs.....I just got an iPaq 3600 last month for $200. The screen is awesome and the price can't be beat. If you take a step back and look and the differences between the newer units and those from a year (or two) ago, there really hasn't been THAT big of a reason to upgrade.

    The first iPaqs ran at 209Mhz.....guess what the brand new ones run at? Yup, 209Mhz.

  48. Unhelpful feedback by DarkVein · · Score: 1

    I was given an m100 for Christmas, used and sold on Ebay. It isn't as precise as the Sony Clié but it is far from faulty. Perhaps you're unknownlying a source of high energy bogons.

    --

    I'm as mimsy as the next borogove but your mome raths are completely outgrabe.

  49. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  50. My Experience w/ the m100 by Rob.Mathers · · Score: 1

    This is just my personal experience, but I thought I would share it with /.

    I'm a high school student in Toronto, and back in September I decided to spend some of the cash I had saved to buy a cheap PalmOS device in part to fool around with and partly to help organise my heavy workload. After doing some research, I decided on the m100, as it was the only one that was within my price range. While doing my research, I did come across some user stories talking about assorted problems with the m100 including broken digitizers and screens. However, I decided to go ahead with my purchase anyways, as I saw just as many (and probably more) glowing reviews about the m100.

    So far, it's been eight months, and I couldn't do without it. Luckily, I have only suffered two minor problems, both easily corrected. The first is that the graffiti is sometimes misinterpreted, but that is due to the enormous amount of dust and other junk on the screen (it spends its life in my pocket) and is fixed with a simple wipe with a tissue. The second problem I experienced twice a few months ago. It inexplicably crashed overnight and would not turn on the next morning. I solved this by doing a hard restart with the pinhole button on the back. The same thing happened a few hours later, and was fixed in the same manner. All data and programs were wiped, but I was able to restore everything from backups. I think this may have had something to do with the batteries (they were low at the time) as it hasn't occured since I changed them.

    My synopsis: if you're someone on a small budget who needs a good electronic organiser that can do a few extras go for the m100. Just don't expect an all in one media device.

    Anyways, hope this helps anyone who's thinking of buying a low priced PDA.

    --

    My other sig is funny!
    1. Re:My Experience w/ the m100 by wbav · · Score: 1

      This is interesting, becuase I've had just about the same experience. I found a hack to show what I'm writing so that I improved my griffiti so I have never had the first problem. I have had the second problem, mainly after installing apps that work both on color and black and white palms. Remember, hard resets suck, so backup early and often.

      --

      =================
      Unix is very user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.
    2. Re:My Experience w/ the m100 by wrenkin · · Score: 2

      I was at a university fair, and a palm rep gave me a CD with their 'educational software package'.

      Most of the stuff was pretty useless, but one cool thing they had was a thesaurus (really good when I'm away from my comp and can't use 'dict'). While it was a lot of memory to sacrifice for an m100, I tried it out.

      I searched a few words, and it worked well. I asked my dad for a suggestion. He said 'umlaut'. So I entered the word.

      4 hard resets later...

      I have no idea what they have against Germans. Seems odd that a palm-thesaurus would hose your data because it didn't like the word, or say if you mispelled it... lol.

      --
      -- "Is this death or is this Ohio?"
  51. Bad motherboards by akmed · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I bought a Asus A7V266 mobo about a year ago and starting a few months ago it decided to assassinate hard drives. No idea why. I replaced it with an Asus P4B-266 and it's worked fine (I got a new processor as well). It strikes me as odd though that such behavior would come about. As well, the ALi chipset the old board relied was supported by linux just slightly better than an AT motherboard. Anyway, I definitely wouldn't recommend those motherboards. Asus knows Intel, but for whatever reason it's still working on getting AMD right.

    1. Re:Bad motherboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The A7V266 does not have an ALI chipset. The A7A266, however, does.

    2. Re:Bad motherboards by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 2

      I have to disagree. I've built three AMD systems: A7V, A7V133, and A7V333-R, and all have been solid, as has my P3-based ASUS CUBX. OTOH, my Epox 8KHA went flakey, and it's got the same VIA KT266 chipset the A7V266 has. VIA really pooched the KT266, I had HD corruption problems until installing their WinXP IDE miniport driver, but the KT266A that quickly replaced it has been good (Epox 8KHA+ in the system I'm typing with now). ASUS is more expensive than average but I trust them over everyone else. The A7V333-R in particular has been very impressive.

  52. Palm IIIx and TRGPros have been fine by r2ravens · · Score: 2

    I bought my Palm IIIx so long ago, I don't even remember. I think it was at Thanksgiving three years ago. I believe I paid about US$200. About six months later, I dropped it and it stopped working. With a single phone call, Palm advance shipped me a replacement under warranty in one day. Ah, those were the days.

    Sometime later, when the TRGPro was being discontinued in favor of the new Handera, they were on sale at Sam's Club for about US$225 and I bought one. (For those that don't know, the TRGPro is the Palm IIIxe where the TRG folks added a CF slot and better speaker.)

    My employer bought exactly the same model TRG for each of us seven admins. In all the time since, none of my peers have ever had any problems with the TRGs.

    My IIIx is still in use by a girlfriend and she has had no problems. The only problem I have had with my TRG is some small scratches on the screen from the horizontal stiffening members in the flip-down lid. This was from the unit being bumped against things while in my pants pocket.

    Sync has never been a problem - and I sync with NT and 2000 on desktops and laptops at work and with Macs at home. I have also successfully synced with my Red Hat box.

    In short, I haven't had any significant problems. Of course I have older units. My next PDA will likely be the Handera 330 based on the track record I have seen with my TRGs.

    --
    War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength. - George Orwell or George Bush?
    1. Re:Palm IIIx and TRGPros have been fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rather off topic, but "a girlfriend"? specifically the "a". this ./er is an obvious fraud, possibly a palm marketing man.

  53. Who cares? I do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do those who make it care?

    Do those who will empty-minded buy it care?

    Do I, running Linux and happy as a clam, care about it, since I'd probably buy a PS2 + Linux Kit?

    Well, I care. It's a curiosity. The other day I saw this female elephant giving birth, kinda beautiful...

    Another beer, please... Ah, Links pre 6, wow, just downloaded pre3!

    Don't these guys know about girls?

  54. the price you pay means nothing by azosx · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    A month ago I purchased a PowerBook G4 from Apple for well over $2000. When the unit arrived, the AC port was bent to one side, making it almost impossible to plugin the AC adapter or remove it yet it did still worked. Also, the paint near the power button was peeling. Having it for only a day I contacted Apple and told them about the condition my PowerBook came in. They agreed to fix the AC port and "made an exception" to fix the peeling paint. Over two weeks later I received my PowerBook back, the peeling paint was gone but the AC port was still bent and now, not even functioning. Grease was oozing out of the LCD screen hinges that connect it to the PowerBook, and smeared all over the top, bottom, keyboard and screen. A big chunk of paint and plastic was missing off one of the LCD screen hinges, which protrude from the back, as if it had been dropped! A five inch black scratch graced the upper left hand corner of the screen and the PC card slot would not eject cards, nor would the eject button reseat into the PowerBook. In the two weeks Apple had my PowerBook, they had completely thrashed it. I called Apple up five minutes after receiving the unite from repair and told them about the condition my PowerBook came back in from repair. They transfered me to a repair admin who had the audacity to tell me I need to be "ginger" with the unit, as if I was responsible for the damage it had sustained. He then told me he would make an "exception", and fix the unit one more time. Furious after my conversation with the repair admin, I called back Apple to see what their policies were on repairing defective products, and if it was customary for them to blame any defect or damage caused by repair on the customer. I was transfered to a senior staff member who seemed genuinely appalled by my earlier experience with the repair admin. She was kind enough to place my repair order on a loop, enabling me to send it back that same day, making sure repair would be expedited. She was most kind, giving me her work contact information incase further difficulties arose. Now I wait for my PowerBook to return, hoping it will be in good condition but knowing after all it's went through, it'll never be "new" again. This has been a terrible inconvience to me because the PowerBook was purchased for the summer session of college.


    Has anyone else had a similiar experience with Apple? From what I've garnered from the internet and other Mac users, Apple is supposed to be tops in customer service, satisfaction and product quality. Unfortunately, this wasn't the case for me. I've had much better experiences with PC companies such as Dell, which I'm sure, many will refute.

    1. Re:the price you pay means nothing by FueledByRamen · · Score: 1

      I purchased a (used) Powerbook 5200c a long time ago, and it arrived with 8mb. The people claimed that they shipped it with 24mb, so did the website that I bought it from. After beginning a disassembly of the machine, I was stuck, so I called Apple tech support. Even though my machine was way out of warranty and I had probably just voided whatever was left anyhow, the tech I got was nice enough to walk me through getting at the RAM slot. It turned out that the RAM had fallen out and was rattling around inside the machine!

      --
      Every cloud has a silver lining (except for the mushroom shaped ones, which have a lining of Iridium & Strontium 90)
  55. Yes by Junky191 · · Score: 1

    I had a similar experience with Handspring- went through three of them in a month due to hardware defects. Probably because the handheld market is very crowded and highly competitive: everyone needs to cut corners and get prices down faster. Your best bet is probably to just shell out more greenbacks for a less advanced product and hope the quality is better.

  56. palmtop computing = fad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to have a Palm but now it is just collecting dust in my desk drawer. To me it seems plamtop computing was just a fad. If I want to write a note, I'll just use a piece of paper -- at least it won't require batteries.

  57. Casio E-200 by bacontaco · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Cassiopeia E-200 line of PocketPCs had a similar problem. It seems the first batch of units produced had a faulty sidelight where it would burn out, usually within 2 weeks. This happened to about 75% of the first batch of units, and I was unlucky enough to get one of those. I exchanged it for a new one and have had no problems with it, but am waiting for it to burn out once the warrantee is up...

    Casio has been very responsive about this issue and issued a new batch of units which do not have this problem. However, it just makes me wonder, do companies beta test their hardware any more? This sidelight burnt out on the defective batch usually within 14 days, under normal usage. Does this mean that they don't even beta test their products this long?

    1. Re:Casio E-200 by TeddyR · · Score: 1

      I used to be an "end user beta tester" for some hardware products... The thing is that it is no longer really worth the time and effort that correctly testing a product requires {paperwork; actually USING the product as if you just paid your last $$$$ for it}.

      [it used to be that you got a small payment to test them or even a free one of the final unit; but most companies stopped doing that; thinking that it should be an honor for the beta tester to test it]

      They dont have to listen to what we find... but some did and I KNOW it makes a difference...

      --

      --
      Time is on my side
  58. The only HP products I own... by ZxCv · · Score: 2

    have worked incredibly well since purchasing them. The first is a Jornada 548. Not the perfect PDA I'd say, but it has been rock solid for nearly 2 years now. The other is a Photosmart 1215 printer. This thing is not only fast compared to most inkjets I've owned, but also extremely quiet. Beyond that, it has built-in CF/SM card readers and apparently will print photos right from the memory cards, although I've never tried. It seems to me, that like any other hardware manufacturer, HP has their share of lemons, but also certainly has their share of high quality, reliable products.

    --

    Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
  59. Sharp WIZ 700 series by mekkab · · Score: 2

    For A long time I was loving mine (Actually a 730... a little less ram than the 770) but the screen "Crapped out" after being stuffed in a carry-on bag for 10 hours of a plane flight.
    4 columns of pixels are kaput.

    That seems a little weak to me, since the entire time the unit was folded closed.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:Sharp WIZ 700 series by descentr · · Score: 2

      I've dropped mine from heights of about 10 feet or so maybe 100 times (don't ask) and my unit still works fine. I do have the occasional column of pixels out maybe once every 100 power ons or so, but it usually goes away by the next time I use it. Display problems notwithstanding I still think it's a great gizmo.

  60. Clie is nice but the stylus stinks, literally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a Clie PEGS320 for $200 from Staples. I loved it (USB Hotsync, IRDA, jog dial, 16MB + Memory Stick expansion), but there was one problem - the stylus, after being exposed to the air for 4-5 hours, starts smelling strongly of something between pencil graphite and the exhaust of a car with gasket problems. In other words, it's really bad. Made my hands stink, and it's an absolutely inexcusable problem with it. I couldn't find any purely plastic replacement styluses for it, so after two replacement units I went and got my money back. That was after my Palm Personal 512k bit the dust after 5 years of ownership. Now THAT has to be one of the most reliable pieces of equipment out there. I wish it still worked.

    So, Sony, you've got the right idea, just bad execution of the stylus. Make sure your QA department gets a nose, and you'll have the best B&W Palm PDA out there for the money.

    1. Re:Clie is nice but the stylus stinks, literally by Sokie · · Score: 1

      Hehehe, that's weird. My stylus smells a little like aluminum but I certainly have never noticed an odor. :)

      Why did you want an only plastic stylus anyway?

      --
      ------
      Where are the slash-groupies? I distinctly remember being promised slash-groupies!
    2. Re:Clie is nice but the stylus stinks, literally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just didn't want the thing to stink. The material is irrelevant to me. I could care less if it was made of depleted uranium, as long as it didn't stink, wasn't toxic, and I didn't get hit with too many stray neutrons...

  61. Palm and PocketPC by opti6600 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd say my experience with all PDAs has been bittersweet. I had a Palm Vx and an OmniSky modem, which held up wonderfully, schlepped it to and from school from 6th to 8th grade. I truly hated the OS though, and I still do. Graffiti is wretched, a true pain to learn, because it doesnt adapt to you, you adapt to it. Plus it was monochrome, which isn't fun at all. But it kicked ass over everyone else's PDA at the time, which only showed up in 8th grade, all of which were little Handspring Visors, the low-end ones. In essence, a Palm is a very sturdy thing, but you pay a premium for it (an insane amount compared to PocketPC, in terms of what you get). I now have a CompaqHP iPaq 3650. I've had it since August, got it for my freshman year at my school. Along with a dual-expansion pack and a Toshiba hard drive, I haven't had too many problems. I've dropped it, had other people drop it, and there have been no problems in the way of it falling on the floor, with the exception of a hard drive failure about 3 months ago. The PocketPC OS is much nicer tho. As far as maintenance goes, the Palm takes the cake, it's pretty much indestructible when left alone. A PocketPC however, falls apart no matter what you do to it.

    1. Re:Palm and PocketPC by opti6600 · · Score: 1

      BTW: both drops were 5 foot drops onto hard linoleum or concrete.

  62. Handera330 by dieman · · Score: 1

    More expensive, but you get a better screen and top notch support. I've gone through 2 of them still, but both times was *no questions asked*.

    First one was due to a manufacturing defect by the company they outsource fab to. Second one somehow lost its speaker connection. Probally just needed to be plugged back in, but I decided its better off sometimes to just send it in for warranty service instead. I allways recieved a palm in exchange as fast as humanly possible from them, minus shipping time.

    What pisses me off more is that my fujitsu p2040 lifebook had its headphone jack die on me. I had to open it up and soder it up. I'll probally call up fujitsu someday to see if they are as cool as IBM and are willing to sell just replacement parts (for a fee, but it would be nice to have a second part just in case)

    --
    -- dieman - Scott Dier
  63. Palm has a history of poor quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The hardware put out by palm has a history of problems. The 505 sync problem is the latest in a long history (the 515 was released just to fix this.) You can read about the 505 problem at this site.

    Their customer service is also famous for losing returned palms, dropping orders off the face of the earth, and just generally makin unhappy customers even more unhappy. Just check out google groups on this, and you'll find tons of legit complaints against this company.

    This OS is ok, however. The hardware just plain sucks.

  64. Palm Vx by rosewood · · Score: 3

    I have and love my Palm Vx and it kills me that its no longer on the market. It is slim and efficient. I love the charge on the cradle and 8megs is more then enough for my palm. It kills me that when I service plan this Vx, I will no longer have a Vx. Oh so sad - teardrop, teardrop.

    Ive gone from Palm IIIe, IIIxe, Vx and none of them have ever given me major fits. My little sister uses the m100 we got for free, my mother and mother in law use the IIIxe, my fiance the Vx, my aunt the m505 and my uncle the m500. We all LOVE all palms and have never had any major hardware problems. My aunt even dunked her Vx in a toilet and it worked okay for a few more weeks, then we service plan'd it.

  65. m1xx series by Peartree · · Score: 1

    all of the m1xx series suck. they feel cheap. that's why i got a m505 (the m515 wasn't available when i got my m505, alas i wish i had waited 5 months).

  66. I have a m100 by acoustix · · Score: 2

    I got mine about a month or two after they came out. I've had it ever since and have had no problems with it at all.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  67. Software-Grade Quality Assurance by Ichoran · · Score: 1

    They should just ship the units with a sticker that says:

    This product has been designed and manufactured using the same level of rigor and testing as software packages from major vendors.

  68. No similar experiences -- more info? by Geartest.com · · Score: 1
    We've been testing the new Palm m130 for the last few weeks and will test the m515 shortly. A full review will be online soon but we haven't experienced any of the problems you outline.

    Did you buy and exchange your Palm at the same store? It may be that the defective units were from the same batch.

    If you (or anyone else) has any further details please let me know. I'd be interested to read more.

  69. my m100 works fine... by cl0secall · · Score: 1

    ...aside from a few scratches on the screen from repeated rounds of solitaire. I've had it since fall/2000.

    --
    Model 551, Chambered in 6mm
  70. Re:My newton is several years old and still kickin by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1

    Yeah but it's a fucking brick. BTW the faq or Newton advocacy site you got that from is out of date. Except for battery life, the ipaq has your brick beat.
    And Appletalk is irrelevant now.
    Come to think of it, the Palm V/VII and Handsprings lasted weeks on a charge too.
    Finally, 1991 is more than 10 years ago. Check your copy & paste source more thoroughly next time.

  71. "cheap" m100 , IIIe and Visor all cranking away by jpellino · · Score: 2

    I had a 'clear" IIIe, and early m100, both of which I gave away to colleagues and are still working just fine. Can't remember recalibrating them more than a time or two, they sync right up, though I think the IR on the m100 is shot - honestly? most of what I did with it was impress other people by frivolously beaming something to another Palm just to show it can be done.

    I'm now on a Visor Neo - which I'll prolly give to my fiancee now that the Edge is so cheap. (plus, next to my iBook, the Smoke colored Neo looks like it was made by Black -) and the dirt-colored Wintel box).

    As for the 'third time' - um, your implied choices are "maybe more crap" and "DEFINITELY NO PDA"

    Right now you can get a Visor Neo for $147 at any WalMart. Sturdier, far more expandable, a screen that mops the floor with the m1xx series.

    I've decided I need a minimal PDA given the 4-lb iBook - when I was on my 7-lb PB1400 I used the Palms far more than now - and the greyscale 8MB does 80% of what I need to know/do/see walking around. I know the Treo communicators combine two useful things, but I have yet to actually see one being used.

    I figure I'm going to sit on it or drop kick it sooner or later, so I won't sink major bucks into such a thing. Same reason Ihaven't gotten an iPod - there's a detente about heft and size that seems to determine dropability - I've dropped my eMap a lot, but never lost my GPS12 - never booted a CD Player, but my MP3 player is hard to keep ahold of. The iBook has yet to slip loose, but the Palms are always being saved by a quick stab. In the same vein, I've cut myself with every keychain-sized knife or tool I've ever tried to carry, but never so much as a nick from my trusty Victorinox Soldier.

    Go figure.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:"cheap" m100 , IIIe and Visor all cranking away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever hefted an iPod? They're quite heavy for their size, not "cheap" feeling in the least---a good, solid 6.5 oz.

  72. handspring by foodb4nk · · Score: 0

    I have the first version of handspring the orginal visor. Was all pumped up to get it. Later on about 2weeks into it I had problems with the display screen, the graffiti wasnt werking properly also it was always hangin up. The hot sync wasnt werking properly on it also too after about 4mnths into it also. I recently got a fatal error on it too. Had to do a hard reset on it. i was fscked when that happended cause i wasnt able to snyc the thing for about 2mnths and input my data in so i was screwed on my addys and future appointments on it. So all was lost.....Now i have start from teh beginning again.

    --
    *huh* Sig? WTF?
  73. Me too. And Palm tried to pull a fast one! by RockyMountain · · Score: 1

    My Palm m100 had the exact failure the author described.

    To Palm's credit, they did the right thing and promptly replaced it. The replacement didn't look exactly new, which bothered me because the broken Palm they were replacing was less than 1 week old!

    But, they did another thing that I thought was despicable: They tried to refuse to issue a warranty-return RMA, claiming that it must be opperator error: I couldn't really know for sure that was broken, without first getting their tech support to "talk me through my difficulty". And to get that, I was asked to PAY for a tech support contract. In other words, they tried to make me pay to have them honor their warranty.

    The bottom line: After I went mildly balistic, they backed down and agreed to issue an RMA. The replacement arrived promptly ans has worked ever since. But the bad taste lingers, and next time I need a PDA, I may well consider a Handspring or something else before I go back to Palm.

  74. 10% defect rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insider information: I worked at Palm a few years ago. At that time, the defect rate was an astonishing 10%. In fact, the problem nearly killed the then-nascent business relationship with IBM, who had a standard maximum defect rate of 0.1%. Palm has always been cursed by the hubris of Apple (from where many of its founders came) -- come up with a great concept, and avoid dealing with certain implementation practicalities.

    Having said all that, Palm freaked out at the time of the IBM deal, hired a new head of manufacturing, and supposedly remedied the problem.

  75. I paid £20 for mine, and it mostly works by JeffL · · Score: 2
    Last December, on a trip to England, my old Palm III was stolen from my jacket pocket. Of course this was pretty stupid on the theif's part, because the jacket was worth easily 3 or 4 times the Palm III's value. This was on the first day of my trip.

    The reason I still had a III was because I couldn't decide on what to replace it with, but now I was forced to choose, so I searched all over the web and decided on the IBM branded Palm Vx, which had been discontinued in the US, but was still available in the UK for a good price. I called IBM and they refused to sell it to me unless I used a credit card with a UK address. So they lost a sale.

    Turns out I would be forced to buy something in a store, and the store prices for Palm type devices are insanely higher than in the US, so I just couldn't bring myself to do it. Then I searched all around and decided I would mail order a particular Handspring or some such, and it would be waiting for me when I got back home. My boss agreed to pay for it, as the Palm III had been bought by work, and I was on a work trip.

    Then a guy I know over there told me he had a M105 that Dell sent him for free with his laptop, it was almost new, in that he had only played with it a bit, and he agreed to sell it to me for the discount price of 20. It has a much better screen than the Palm III, and of course 8MB instead of 2MB, and obviously the price was right, so I was pleased at first.

    Since then the M105 has mostly worked correctly. The case of course feels like crap. The plastic is cheap and the sections pull apart with no effort. The screen has since developed an area in the middle that is a bit too dark or too light, depending on how the contrast is adjusted. Even worse, twice now the unit has completely refused to turn on. I had to remove and reinsert the batteries to get it to come back, and at that point all of the memory was erased.

    Still, for $30 I would recommend one to anybody, but if you have to pay real money, get something else. I would also have to recommend that people avoid the newer M125. If Palm wants to get out of the hardware business and just license there OS to other manufacturers (as has been rumored occasionaly), making junk like this is certainly a good way to start.

    On product just getting worse in general? I have a $2500 (when it was new) Dell laptop that in 1.5 years has had almost every piece replaced at least once, and some of them twice or more. The only original pieces left are the actual LCD part of the screen (the plastic it is encased in has been replaced several times), the floppy drive, and the CD drive. The floppy is rarely used, and the removable CD drive spends most of its time sitting in a drawer.

    I don't abuse the machine. Mostly I carry it between the bedroom, living room, and kitchen in my house. The plastic on the case is so brittle that it cracks at regular intervals. After just getting the external power supply replaced last week, the second time, now I need to call to get the bottom replaced, because it has cracked in the same place it cracked a few months ago.

    Ironically, when entering computer lemon law into Google, the sponsored link is www.dell4me.com.

  76. This is just a side effect of capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What can you do? Nothing.

    Shorter product cycles to sell more units to provide employment for the 100's of THOUSANDS of engineers pumped out EVERY YEAR by HUNDREDS of Universities all over the world.

    Engineering is just a commodity now. No longer is the young 'geek' playing in his basement with resistors the next bright engineer, like in the 60s, it's everyone and his dog. Who's gonna hire these pseudo-engineers, who never had an interest in electronics before the campus recruiters came in with the bullshit promises of big bucks and respect? Sorry, you can't learn the art of electronics in a school. You must have an interest when young.

    'Creating' needs is the other part of the equation. Pushing basically useless technologies with glossy ads and ridiculous premises to get the demand there.

    For example, I was waiting in line to pay for some tools at a hardware store. There's a box full of business cards next to the cash register. Turns out I was waiting for this yuppie/homosexual to 'graffitti' in the name and phone number of the place, one digit at a time. Me, I just grabbed a 0.05$ business card and put it in my pocket.

    Ridiculous.

    FWIW, I have a 15 year old touch pad for my Commodore 64, it still works fine, NO recalibrating with faggy targets. So much for the 8MB 64bit 300MHz notepad.

  77. My older Palm V is working fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had my Palm V since before the Vx came out, when everyone was hacking more memory into theirs. It cost me $350 used on eBay, and has lived in my pocket (in a hard case) ever since. Its only malfunction was due to my neglect in charging the battery, when it needed a hard reset to come back to life. FlashPro saved all of my favorite apps, and the data HotSynced right back in. I am a quite satisfied customer (and no, I don't work for Palm ;-) Though I wouldn't be caught with a m100-series Palm - low-contrast plastic tiny crap screen. It's a shame Palm had to go for the low-low end of the market and tarnish their reputation for quality.

  78. Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised to see that so many people have had problems. I've had my Palm III forever, and it still works fine.

  79. Re:I got hardware problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In your case, that would be a software problem.

  80. Same for Apple by pinkpineapple · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is this part of the economic factor? After all, if your system was lasting forever, companies would have some problem justifying their investor that they can sell you stuff only once.

    I bought a PowerPC laptop back in 1995 and I could beat on the keyboard, not use a bag to carry to class, sit on it, almost anything it would take. Last year, I got a TiBook: first week, the return key broke, the next day, I hold the machine, the battery felt off the machine (while working), the screen had 5 bad pixels when I got it and the sticker feet on the bottom left the machine one at a time (without mentioning keys that scratch the screen, heat that burned my laps and locking system that doesn't work anymore.) Overall, a beautiful machine when you see it in an ad. But not built too last.

    A friend of mine has still an HP-41C in perfect working condition (made 20 years ago.)

    PPA, the girl next door.

    --
    -- I feel better now. Thanks for asking.
    1. Re:Same for Apple by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      When I flipped over my new iBook. I read the words "Designed in California Assembled in Taiwan".
      I noticed the screen wasn't properly aligned with the base, and that the top was sligtly deformed. It was closer to the base on the edges, and higher where the hinge was, it was the opposite on the front where it has rubber stoppers on the edge, and a clip pulling it down in the middle. It's only by a couple of mm's, but it's quite noticable when the top is closed. They keyboard it a bit bouncy because it dosn't fit it into the base exactly, and the key's rub against the screen when it's closed. So much for high quality. That being said, it still seems better quality that alot of PC laptops.

      The only electronic device that I have brough recently that is of good quailty is my Fuji 6900 digicam....Made in Japan by a Japaness company. Go figure...

    2. Re:Same for Apple by Beebos · · Score: 1

      I have to admit that I've had some bad Apple experiences in the past year or so. Between myself and two friends, three of the four macs we've bought have had major problems. Two replaced motherboards and one replaced LCD display.I'm sad to have to say it, 'cause I'm a big Apple fan. I still think Apple makes great computers though, and wouldn't switch to Windoze. --- Note obligatory, derogatory use of intentional mispelling of Windows!!!!! ;-) I also think Handspring makes a sturdier handheld than Palm.

  81. Map the backlight to the pen by golo · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can configure the backlight to use an upward pen swipe in the "Button" preferences

  82. Frankenstein Palm III by floateyedumpi · · Score: 1


    My girlfriend's parents had Palm III's way back in the mid 90's for about 3 years each. They had worked well and been used hard.

    Her father's began to show signs of memory corruption (random resets, etc.). Her mother dropped hers on the concrete and screen cracked. They put them in drawers and bought shiny new Palm V's. They gave the dead Palms (plus 2 cradles) to me to tinker with.

    I took the removable ROM card from the one with the cracked screen, inserted it into the other, flashed the ROM to a recent version of PalmOS, and it worked perfectly. Now, three years later, I'm still using the same frankenstein Palm III, which is chugging along with my favorite Palm App, DateBook4, among many others. Occasionally I need to reseat the ribbon cable to the screen (useful if you have phantom gray jailbars), but other than that, it's working like a charm. Not bad for a freebee rescued from the garbage bin!

    1. Re:Frankenstein Palm III by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way back in the mid 90's? The Palm III was introduced in 1998 which is a whole four years ago. So your girlfriend's parent had it for three years and you've had it for three years. That adds up to six years. You're story doesn't make sense. Let's be honest now... you've never had a girlfriend. Don't be ashamed, this is /. after all.

  83. My palm has never let me down... by azaroth42 · · Score: 1
    Every time it works like a charm, though a girlfriend would be better.

    Oh, it's a thread about PDAs. Heh.


    -- Azaroth


    Day 29, Still Not King.

  84. Toys for the boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    In my experience, the vast majority of people with this kind of gadgets have no real need for it. They always seem to be just playing with them, or looking at them in technological awe.

    In fact, these gimmicks tend to be more a pain in the neck than anything else. Why so many suckers out there are willing to cough up the $$$ for them is something that will always amaze me.

    And don't give me any crap about lifestyles: many of my colleagues, who are my same professional level (or below,) with very similar lifestyles in terms of complexity, waster many minutes a day looking at those ridiculous little screens, without managing to get done more than I.

    Face it, these thingies are just toys for wannabees who think they are very important.

  85. palm Vx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't know if retailers are still doing this, but there were all kinds of sales on palm v/vx's back around thanksgiving. Retailers were trying to clear out all their stock to make room for the m500 series. If you can find a deal on one of those I would recommend it.

  86. No problems here by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

    I've heard a few dodgy stories about Palm, but I've had my M105 for 4 months now, no problems. (Touch wood.)

    I think a lot depends on how it gets treated as the build quality is a bit crap.

  87. I have no problems with mine by GuNgA-DiN · · Score: 1

    I have a Palm M105 too and it works fine. I've never had any hardware trouble with it. However, I used to own the M100 and I did have a few problems with that one. I would guess that you just got a piece of defective hardware. Take it back and exchange it for one that works.

  88. Those crummy little PPC's (Palm etc.) by Paracelcus · · Score: 0

    Look, if it ain't got a keyboard it ain't worth a crap! I went from an Atari Protfolio to an HP200LX and now have an HP 620LX, I can do without my laptop. I've installed software that let's me do just about everything! FTP, Telnet, Vnc, PC Anywhere, Mail, WWW, Portscanning, even X86 Dos emulation! I've edited books on the thing, Now, if only they'd make it with it's own version of Mandrake or RedHat, I could die happy.

    --
    I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  89. *HP* Hardware HAS gone to hell by Mikesch · · Score: 2, Informative

    In my department, two HP 4100 series printers died within a week of purchase.. "fuser error". One 1100 series decided to just up and die for no reason. A third 4100 has developed random roller noises, that are likely a sign of things to come.

    Our main 8550 printer has never worked right, random print speed issues, resolved by using older/incorrect drivers that don't actually use any of the features you would buy an 8550 for. And no matter what driver you happen to pick, if there is paper in the manual feed tray, it will claim paper jam until you pull the paper out, and put it back in....for every single sheet. It will then print from the manual feed tray, regardless of what you choose in the print driver. Turning off manual feed entirely allows it to print from the correct try by default, but anyone wanting to use manual feed then has to turn it back on themselves. This operation, naturally is buried as the last option in the paper handling menu. In other departments, their two year old (4550 series?) printers jam when anything tries to pull from tray three. This is a problem with 6 of the 6 printers that they ordered.

    Is it really that hard to make hardware that actually works correctly any more? Seriously, these printers aren't cheap, and if we have to send back EVERY printer that comes into us for repair at least once, it really can't be saving them all that money. They could at least make them so they break 1 month out of warranty, like everything else. At least then we get something that works for a solid year, rather than random downtime while things get sent back and forth. Spare laser printers aren't exactly one of those things you keep laying around.

    And their driver support just keeps getting worse. HP 3100 combo fax/printer/copier thingy? no XP drivers downloadable from their website, you have to order the CD containing them. All we use is the print functionality, they could at least toss a 3 meg printer driver up, even if they are contractually bound from posting the software that lets you use full functionality. Same for their webcams. I have Photoshop, just give me a small twain compliant driver, and I'll be happy, I don't need Hippy Dippy Bed Bath and Fun Image Manipulation Program to come with it.

    Meanwhile, our printers bought prior to 1997 all are still working, without a peep, and with no service whatsoever, other than toner changes and paper refills. Screw you HP, and screw anyone who looks like you.

    Why do we keep buying their crap? I work for an edu that apparently has a contract with them. Spectacular.

    1. Re:*HP* Hardware HAS gone to hell by sigwinch · · Score: 2
      Is it really that hard to make hardware that actually works correctly any more?
      We have an HP4MV at work that, when you are manually feeding 11x17 paper, will occassional grab an 8.5x11 sheet from the internal tray. When it discovers the sheet isn't long enough it says "64 ERR" on the display and locks up. So we looked up "64 ERR" in the manual and it says the printer has lost its mind and to power cycle it.

      That's right, rather than fix the show-stopper mechanical flaw, or the show-stopper firmware flaw, HP just documented the hard reset.

      HP engineering quality died long before the Compaq merger.

      --

      --
      Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)

  90. Low-end palmtops by Sebbo · · Score: 2

    I got a 7x and a folding keyboard for $150 a month or so ago. I haven't bothered to activiate the (apparently pretty lackluster) wireless. Mostly I use it with WordSmith to do writing in parks and restaurants, which is pretty nice now that spring is here in New England (a couple months late).

    I've actually found the ugly little monochrome screen to be an asset for this application, since it cuts down on my habit of revising each line obsessively rather than writing something and then revising it.

    It's pretty cool--7xes are dirt cheap 'cause their wireless feature has been outmoded by more recent versions. So you buy one and you just don't use the wireless. Works for me, anyway.

  91. IMS by cruelworld · · Score: 2

    Infant Mortaility Syndrom.

    Happens to everyone. Thermal burn-in can reduce the risk, move you down the curve of the bathtub.

  92. Palm Reliability by Ookoshi · · Score: 0

    I've owned a Palm VIIx for over a year now, and it has never given me problems. It's basically a Palm III series outfitted with wireless web clipping capabilities, and it's my understanding that the III/V series Palms are equally robust. I've never had to calibrate the digitizer since I opened it and even now the graffiti is still relatively accurate (despite having been dropped). I bought a friend of mine a Handspring Visor Neo and it's been working flawlessly for him as well. It's probably a problem only experienced by the m100/105 line. This is quite sad though, as it is the line that Palm is marketing towards the general masses. Makes you wonder where the company is headed.

  93. Good Intentions, bad results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For Christmas, my Dad got me a Palm Vx. Best present I ever had, until it fried both my serial ports. The cradle worked for months, then one day, it wouldn't work on COM1, so I moved it to COM2, a week after that, it fried that port too. In order to HotSync I had to shell out $60(CAN) for a USB adapter. Admittedly it's faster, but no one should have to shell out more for a broken product. Palm wouldn't reply to my emails, and I'm not paying the exhorbitant fees they charge for phone calls. I haven't had any problems with the actual unit, which I'm greatful for, because ALL my school notes are typed on and stored on it. No more old-shool note taking for me. The portable key board: wonderful.

  94. HP Reliability by Pollux · · Score: 2

    Our first familiy computer, purchased back in 1994, was a Packard Bell. I don't need to elaborate about it breaking down four times during its use, but when we bought it, we slapped down $600 for an HP Laserjet 4L. Every ink printer looked so sloppy compared to the crisp text of the laser printer, so we figured it was a good investment.

    Eight years later, that HP Laserjet 4L is still sitting here next to the family computer. It still prints documents as good as it did out of the box. The only degrade in quality is that there's a small squeak that occurs with the paper rollers inside the printer, but it doesn't affect the functionality at all.

    When I helped out in the computer science department in our high school, I was often paged to fix a "printer disfunction." The printers that we had throughout the highschool were HPs. Most of them were Laserjet model 4's and 5's, and the rest were HP Deskjet 6xx and 7xx. Not once was I asked to ever do anything more for a Laserjet than replace the toner or clear a paper jam. On the other hand, we had to send at least one Deskjet per month to the printer repairmen. Those printers would constantly get out of alignment, smear, not take printer paper, or just in general not respond to anything from the computer.

    But remember, those LaserJet printers, when they were brand new, never sold for less than $500. Unlike much computer hardware on today's market, those printers were worth every penny.

  95. I've stopped buying PDAs until ... by Naum · · Score: 2

    ... until the quality increases. Over the past 3 years, I've purchased no less than a half-dozen PDAs (from the base Handspring model to the Sony CLIE I bought my wife for Christmas). Every single one of them, except for the Sony (and give it time, it's less than six months old ...) has had problems. Oh wait a second, I did drop one on the bathroom floor at work and the ensuing screen damage rendered it inoperable.

    But the others (all Handspring here) have all suffered from defects ranging from annoying to unusable no more - on one, the backlight stopped working 4 months after I bought it. Another, a Visor Platinum, refuses to sync - it used to be funny and I could jiggle it a little bit, but now, even after swapping the base USB plastic connector deals out, it still won't sync. A visor deluxe I bought for my wife has a several buttons that don't function properly.

    Admittedly, a few of these were "refurbished" models sold for a discount, but I was led to believe that that meant they got a little more quality testing to make sure the consumer wasn't sold a defective product. Not so in Handspring's case.

    It's just too much money to waste on an item for the dicey reliability factor. And once you start using one, putting all your info into it, having to send it off just isn't viable. Either you buy another or you go back to toting that Franklin day planner again.

    --

    AZspot
  96. Mine works fine by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

    Hmm... I've had my Palm IIIxe for over a year now and the only problem it's ever given me is that the "up" button is a little flaky (I have to press it hard, rather than just tap it). And I've even had it fall on the ground a few times, though fortunately in the fake-leather case I use. The display works perfectly, as does the digitizer. Still, if I ever get a new one, I'll probably get a Visor Neo, as it is cheap, uses AAA's, and is expandable (8 megs isn't enough for all the medical software I use).

  97. Shoddy m100 by IAmSancho · · Score: 1

    I got an m100 about a year ago to replace my IIIe whose screen had cracked in a fall. The most attractive things to me about the m100 over other handhelds at that time:
    1. Very inexpensive. $100 after a rebate.
    2. Smaller than my old IIIe.
    3. New version of Palm OS with native IR HotSync capability (for my laptop. With the IIIe, I had to use HackMaster to reroute data from the serial port to the IR port, and had to install some Serial IR drivers in W2K, but it worked fine.)
    4. Nifty date/time button (up) that can be pushed when the cover is down.

    However, almost immediately I began having problems with the device losing memory. I would sync it one morning and by the time I got back from classes to have lunch, it would not turn on at all, and after resetting it, the memory was cleared. I tried all sorts of things to fix it:
    1. Left it on my desk instead of taking it with me (maybe the shaking-about it got in my pocket was shorting something). Same problem.
    2. Putting my keys in another pocket. Perhaps they were shorting the contacts for the HotSync port on the bottom of the device (although that would be pretty bad design on Palm's part). No luck.
    3. New batteries. After a while, I noticed that this problem also caused the batteries to show a very low level after resetting, which recovered somewhat after a few minutes... so maybe it was being left on somehow.

    This problem was never resolved. It still does this sporadically, so I am reduced to entering all data on the PC and HotSyncing very regularly and not trusting the device to store important information.

    Now, the physical buttons have lost their sensitivity. I have to press the buttons VERY hard for them to contact.

    The screen flip-cover is also very cheap, especially compared to the IIIe's. It is flimsy (sways side to side) and it's made of plastic that's too flexible.

    I suppose you could say that I got what I paid for. However, I'm an optimist, so I see it this way: I'm glad I didn't pay more than I did for the screwed-up little handheld; I'm not buying from Palm again.

    --
    -------------------------

    Stupid people suck.

  98. Not only palm... by Wouter+Van+Hemel · · Score: 0

    It's not only palm. I'm increasingly worried about the quality of hardware - it seems hardware manufacturers keep pushing the limits to produce cheaper and faster electronics, just like in about all other electronic markets, but don't pay any attention to QA. My hardware is failing at a truly horrifying rate, compared to the 286's, 386's and 486's that keep on running, with all their old hardware. My old pc's outlive my newer and cooler stuff; (relatively) new harddrives crash, cpu's burn, dimms produce random data...

    You see, a pc, pda, or whatever, is _not_ like a VCR. People depend on it. It often houses invaluable data, not to mention, alltogether, it costs a hell of a lot more than some 'dumb' machine as the average VCR. A harddrive that breaks after a couple of months, no matter how cheap those things are these days, is a lot of money wasted, especially for students like me.

    And it's not just the money, ofcourse. The loss of data. The work that goes into restoring this data. The pain of re-installing the os, and fine-tuning it again.

    I wish I knew which brands I could trust... I had two HD's crashing on me in a month, my ram broke and took half of my filesystem with it, and I even had to replace my keyboard recently (it was new!) just because some keys didn't work - I traced it to an electronic problem, not just because I made it swim in coke or anything...

    With this mass-production of electronics and the broken?-throw-away-and-buy-a-new-one philosophy, I would really like to know where to turn and who to trust when it comes to stable hardware. With even big companies like IBM producing crap (cfr. the 'ibm harddisk incident'), where to turn for quality? Warranty is a main point for me now when buying new hardware (how about the warranty on that Palm?), and although this protects my finances somewhat, this does nothing for my data.

    My system crashes more because of hardware, than because of a software hangup...

    (Kudos to *BSD and Linux for that...)

    You're shit with a good os if the hardware it runs on fails. With hardware at Micro$oft-quality, does the stability of the OS still matter even...

  99. handspring visor deluxe, usually about $90 @ fry's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fry's seems to have a lot of Handspring Visor Deluxes (8meg of ram, roughly comparable feature wise to a palm III i think) in "refurbished" condition (if they're refurbs and not just marked that way to reduce inventory or something, damn, they're the most flawless refurbs I've seen) for about $90... I got one six months ago, have had nothing but good times with it. Two of my friends have also gone the Fry's/Visor Refurb route and have had good experiences...

  100. Chibi Palm-chan.... by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    I can't live without mine. m100, bought remanufactured at (gah!) Fry's. For $50. Beat that!

    Suggestion to all who are experiencing "insensitive" areas on the screen: run the digitizer calibrator every so often. Sometimes the digitizer drifts off of alignment and you need to set it right.

    Annoyance: the flip top broke off very early in the game. Hoping to replace it but since I have the thing in a Targus case it's merely an annoyance, not a problem.

    I use the onscreen keyboard almost exclusively to input data. I've gotten pretty fast at hunt-and-tap. I might get a plug-in keyboard from eBay someday but hunt-and-tap works for me. The "v" in the Graffiti alphabet always threw me, so screw that.

    Overall the PalmOS feels like I'm back in front of a MacSE. Same black-and-white graphics, similar feel in the apps.

    I'm looking forward eventually to something better...maybe a Handspring is in my future. Until then, my m100 and I are inseparable. Look for the Mahjongg freeware game on www.palm.com...it is maddeningly addictive.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  101. IIIxe vs m105 by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 2, Informative
    I agree. Last year, I chose a IIIxe over a m105. They both had the same amount of memory, and the IIIxe was about $50 cheaper. The only benefit of the m105 that I could see was the revolutionary feature of detachable, personalizable faceplates. Woohoo. The m105 also seemed a LOT more flimsy and had a weird shape and a hole in the cover (for the clock or something).

    So much for the folks saying "you get what you pay for".

  102. stay away from the m1xx. by FormShaper · · Score: 1

    I've bought about 50 broken pdas over the past few months, and restored many of them. Guess what? Probably 75% are m100 or m105. It's easy to see why, too - about 75% of the broken PDAs sold on the various auction sites are of this product line.

    About 2/3 of those, the digitizer is RIP, the remainder the motherboard is shot.

    I don't recommend these models.

    I've worked on a few Palm Vxs, and they seem much more rugged. Of those, one digitizer was cracked, one motherboard was not functioning quite right (no backlight or contrast controls). The majority of the problems I've seen with this model is jammed buttons.

    You can pick up a Vx online for about $20 more than the m105. It's thinner, slightly larger screen, same memory, internal, rechargeable battery, and more durable. For the price difference, it's an amazing device.

    I have had an m500 since January, and have had no trouble at all. I found that 8 megs was more than enough for me, but I still like the thought of the SD expansion slot. I'm sure I could have survived with a Vx though! The friend who turned me on to these uses an m505, and has had no complaints about that model; I saw a number of negative comments about the screen, etc., when I went shopping though, so I steered toward the mono screens.

    One thing I will recommend, regardless of the model, is a good case. The m500 is slim enough that the wallet cases are a good option, and the leather serves to absorb the impact when it gets dropped (which I've done two or three times so far, and with no damage). I'm a bit more nervous about the hard cases, but they look pretty spiff.

    MB

    --
    Socket 7 rocks.
  103. Do the v backwards by eean · · Score: 1

    If you do the 'v' backwards, it usually works, with the extragerated horizontal line.

    1. Re:Do the v backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a backwards 'v' look like?

    2. Re:Do the v backwards by eean · · Score: 1

      The exact same. You just draw it from the right to left.

  104. Audiovox "Thera" : avoid! by Presence2 · · Score: 1

    Last friday I switched in motorola V60 cell phone and stored away my IPAQ in the hopes that the new Adiovox Thera would combine the two. In terms of product, it did fine. The interface, gui, and features are fantasic, no complaints, and the web service rocks.

    However, the physical components, are CRAP. Within 2 days, even with a leather carry case, the screen had become blurred with lint or dust of some kind (?) - I work in a sterile server room, not a construction site. Additionally, literally every bit of paint on the buttons had rubbed off, rendering them useless except by memorization. I was able to rub off the logo above the screen merely by wiping my thumb firmly on it.. The flash card is very sticky to add and remove, and the directional fob is very sticky as well.

    I returned it for my vader phone again, and will carry around the IPAQ a little longer. Good idea audiovox.. good features.. bad hardware and cheap asthetics.

    1. Re:Audiovox "Thera" : avoid! by lanalyst · · Score: 1

      I really can't see how the Threa will hold up as a phone - and the price of the thing ($800!) - OUCH!

  105. Damn straight. by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    This is the truth. Sony sucks. Sony, because of its purchase of Columbia Pictures, is also an MPAA signatory. Think about this when you "ooh!" and "ahh" at the latest Sony toy. Buy a Clie and make Hillary Rosen and Don Jack Valenti happy. "But it's so shiny and cute!" you say? Enjoy your shiny, cute DRM locked-down PC once the Senator From Disney passes the Son of DMCA. I know I'm a broken record on this, but it seems like nobody fsckn gets the point.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:Damn straight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MPAA/Sony:
      Lest you forget, Sony also makes CD-RW and DVD+RW drives. Sony is a HUGE conglomerate as are most Japanese companies, which means they are into/own MANY different businesses in MANY different areas, and often compete with themselves.

      As to bad Sony product experiences: I purchased a cheap Sony boombox w/CD player & tape in the late 80s/early 90s and wouldn't you know it, the CD player died after a year. Other than this I haven't had a problem with higher end Sony products.

      Bottom line: cheap/low end products generally mean cut corners on manufacturing/design to reach the price point. Cheap/low end products usually have a low profit margin as well, so the company producing such items will only spend so much, if any time on it, otherwise they lose money. High end products usually have higher profit margins, and most of the time the company will kiss your a** within reason, as they know if you are happy you will buy another high end or higher end model with another hefty profit margin, and/or recomend said product to others.

      This being said, it also makes a case for extended warranties on items like PDAs & notebooks that tend to take a relative beating(not abuse.) Of course with cheap items, extended warranties probably aren't cost effective.

      Random observations:
      Poorest quality handhelds: Compaq ijunk, Handsprings, Agendas, Phillips.

      Best quality: Casio(E-125 at least), Newton, Sony, older Palms(IIIx at least).

      middle quality: ebookman, helio

  106. Very Good User Service from Palm, dubious Quality by DrRobert · · Score: 1

    I had a Palm IIIx for three years with no problems what so ever. My father had a IIIx that slowly began to digitize the pen strokes less and less accuratley. I write very very softly on the Palm; my father writes very very heavily.

    We both upgraded to m505's when they came out. After three days I dropped mine onto a concrete parking lot and kicked it into a puddle of water. Badly scratched, but still works perfectly.

    My father's m505 would never sync. He called tech support and they had a refurbished one to him overnight. The backlight came on when he hit the power button for the first time and never went off; Palm very graciously overnighted him a 3rd one. This one would not recognize the memory cards that were put into it. Again Palm overnight him another one. That one would not sync. I think he is on his fifth one now and it seems to work perfectly. Palm went above and beyond to help him and get him new ones quickly. It does seem that Palm's quality control is among the worst out there.

    It's too bad because I have found no other PDA that will do everything I want and still get lost in the pocket of my jeans.

    If I don't have it, it doesn't help me.

    If I know I have it in my pocket, it's uncomfortable.

  107. haha by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

    Is your Palm a worthless piece of junk then?

    I know, send it to China!

    graspee

  108. Re:Apple are worse.... by Steve+Cowan · · Score: 1

    1. Yes I'm very happy with the quality of my iBook/500/Combo Drive.

    2. If your drive is a burner and it won't burn CD's, I find it very hard to believe that Apple would say it's "within spec". I think you're trolling.

    3. What does Mac OS X have to do with anything?

  109. Panasonic Gigarange by Sivar · · Score: 2

    Speaking of poor quality electronics, just an "FYI" for anyone considering getting a Panasonic Gigarange telephone. I have had one, a former roomate had a different model with answering machine, and my uncle had one. ALL have died within a year, mine within 5 months. These are extremely expensive phones with great range and sound quality but a very short lifespan.
    If you get one, be sure to pick it up from a place like Best Buy and get the extended warranty! You have been warned!

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
    1. Re:Panasonic Gigarange by EvlG · · Score: 2

      I've got oa Gigarange, and every since January I can't hardly use the Caller ID functions. I can still make calls, with some loss in sound quality. But when I try to use the handset to look at caller ID, it just says out of range 9/10 times.

      Sux.

  110. Palm Hardware Alternatives by donovansmith · · Score: 1
    I have owned a refurbished Visor Deluxe for about 6 months and have been reasonably happy with it. The USB Hotsync driver is flaky (sometimes won't recognize the cradle), but otherwise it is a good unit. I use it a lot for ebook reading and AvantGo. Also handy for addresses.

    The "PDA" I use the most is my cellphone, a Sanyo SCP-6200. It's a very slim, small phone but has a lot of functionality. The calendar and phone book are invaluable in everyday use. And since it is a cellphone I have it with me all the time, which is not neccessarily the case with my Visor. Plus, it also has a web browser so I can check my Yahoo! mail whenever I want to. And it even has a voice-memo recorder. And I *know* that this thing can survive abuse...I've dropped it five times in the last week, and I've only had it for a week!

  111. The Clie is great but... by zaffir · · Score: 1

    I love my Sony Clie Peg-N610C for all the reasons other posters have listed. However, i have one gripe - the screen scratches easier than a brand new car. I've only had it for a few months and already the stylus itself has scratched the daylights out of the screen. And there are far too many scratches, especially in the graffiti area, to just pass them off as errant dust particles rubbing in some odd way.

    --
    "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
  112. Palm and USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Palm freely admitted to me that the have had manufacturing as well as engineering defects with all of their USB based PDA's, but after having returned 3 m505's i finally got one that worked and have had no problems from for about 6 mos now (knock on wood)

  113. Give me my IPAQ... by rongage · · Score: 1

    I had an old Palm 5000 (before the convenience of backlights). Worked just fine until one day the touchscreen simply died. C'est Le Vie...

    Now, I have an Ipaq 3635 and just love it. It's capable of running Linux, it has decent rechargable batteries in it, has a nice PCMCIA slot on it, it can be used as a portable security scanner, and did I mention that it can run Linux?

    The color screen is pretty decent too. It can even play mpeg files.

    Try THAT on your palm device...

    --
    Ron Gage - Westland, MI
    1. Re:Give me my IPAQ... by rudy079 · · Score: 1

      I work at a company that designs GPS software for handhelds. We are currently trying to get a working program for the PALM platform, but theyyy are sooo slow and not capable of what the IPAQ's abnd jornada's can handle... boo palm!

      --


      Grass-roots web hosting.We are poor colleg
  114. Older Palms have problems, too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I don't know which Palm it was, but a coworker's Palm was rendered inoperable from normal use and poor design. Some component inside the Palm was damaged over time by sliding the stylus into its built-in receptacle when not in use. Palm refused to address the problem properly. He bought a Handspring and will never touch a Palm again. Neither will I! Fortunately, I haven't succombed to the lure of PDAs yet...

    Shoddy workmanship is always a turn-off. My new Kensington Expert Mouse (trackball) hasn't even lasted a year, and it's already broken. I bought it to replace my 5 year old, still working Kensington of the same model. I will never buy another one of their products either. When you get crapped on by manufacturers, send them a letter stating you'll never purchase their defective merchandise again, and follow through on that threat.

    This poster's name secretly replaced with Folgers Crystals

  115. Sympathy for Palm by smoondog · · Score: 2

    In defence of palm, I think we should remember how much abuse palms take. I have a Vx that has worked constantly. It sometimes is in my pocket, in my hot car in summer, dropped and and otherwise abused. We take a bit for granted, I think, on how much sh*t we give our little pda's and expect them to work perfectly all the time.

    Ever noticed how computers seem to crash more when you seriously kicking them around (as opposed to just using word)?

    Just a thought....

    -Sean

  116. Pilot 1000 still going strong by __Reason__ · · Score: 1

    I'm still regularly using the original USRobotics Pilot 1000 that I bought in 1996!

    It runs PalmOS 3.3, and has an upgrade card giving it 2MB RAM (up from 128k) and an infrared port.

    Aside from most of the paint wearing off the buttons, and having to recalibrate the digitizer 2-3 times a week, its still works as well as the day I bought it - and even runs most current PalmOS apps!

    Maybe they don't make them as well as they used to?

  117. Pilot 5000 by metoc · · Score: 1

    I have a USRobotic Pilot 5000 w/2Mb upgrade.

    8 years old and still does what I bought it for.

  118. Palm's true strategy by jlleblanc · · Score: 1

    Palm probably wants to get out of the hardware business and just licence the PalmOS to manufacturers. They're selling these low-end devices so that they can saturate the market with PalmOS so that they can eventually be the Microsoft of handhelds. If they continue to sell sub-standard products, people will turn to Sonys, Handsprings, and others and Palm won't have to support the harware end of things to maintain their software presence.

  119. Palm Computing Quality Assurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Palm Computing has clearly indicated that they want to be to PDAs what MicroSoft is to the desktop. Anotherwords, Palm Computing would be happy if they had several hardware companies licensing PalmOS and if Palm Computing did not have to make any hardware at all. One way they seem to be going about making this happen is to allow their own QA to fall below that of the other companies that license PalmOS. So, your best bet is to go to another company for your PalmOS unit such as Handspring, HandEra or Sony.

  120. Palm IIIc by jaanime · · Score: 1

    I got a Palm IIIc model handed down to me about a year ago, and it is orgasmically wonderful. My older brother had bought it for himself a couple of years back, and it still works its magic. Only 8mb, but colored and does what it's supposed to. I got a fold-out keyboard for it, and I type my notes in class almost on a daily basis...it's better off that way because my handwriting is horrible and I'm incredibly disorganized when it comes handling paper. It's nice to type out notes and print out as many copies as you'd like, sometimes for slackers who fall asleep in class in exchange for some "dollaz," or maybe some head...harhar. I read a comment somewhere here about the flip top on the m100 coming off easily, and that happens to mine too, but it's no big deal. The graffiti mechanism still works great, and I don't know if other people use this technique, but I stick scotch tape over the pad. I was told that it makes the pad less sensitive, and therefore more accurate. Hey, whatever works, I suppose.

  121. My Palm V does the same thing by Greyfox · · Score: 2
    I've got a Palm V that worked great for about a year then started having that exact same digitizer problem. I was hoping the OS Upgrade would help this issue (Only reason I dropped the $30) but it didn't. My first Palm III worked great for a couple of years and I gave it to my room mate when I upgraded to the V. My room mate almost immediately experienced problems with the III to the point where it wouldn't even power on anymore. I ended up taking the III apart and reseating some of the components, which seems to have fixed it.


    I've pretty much decided to go with some other company when the V finally gives up the ghost. I'm still trying to decide what to get.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  122. Lid Always Breaks Within 2-3 Weeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For some reason, my lid always breaks within 2-3 weeks of use. I always carry my m105 in my front pants pocket.

    When my first lid broke, Palm had them on a 12-week backorder. In the meantime, my screen got all scratched up. Palm refused to replace it, even though it was directly due to their faulty lid (which broke quickly), and their inability to replace it when it did.

    After the 4th lid broke, Palm send me a new m104. The lid on that unit also broke within a couple of weeks. I haven't yet called them about it.

    The lids always break on the snap-on hinge that goes over the bar with two tabs that plugs into the main unit. It seems that when you open and close the lid, the snap-on hinge experiences great stresses, and fractures.

    I'll never buy another Palm again...even though they did eventually replace my m105 with the horribly scratched up screen. The lid has a bad design, and palm won't admit it. Even if they did admit it...what could they do about it?

    Has anybody else experienced broken lids? The Palm customer service representative denied it, and said I was the only person with this problem. I don't believe him.

    Will somebody please mod this up, so others can see it and respond? Thanks.

  123. Jumping to conclusions by lycias · · Score: 1
    I get the feeling that everyone's standard for deciding when a particular piece of hardware contains too high a proportion of defects is whether it happened to him or her. Considering the wide readership of slashdot and its way-above-average spending on technological goodies, someone will have had a defective unit and write about it, and these individuals will be much more vocal than those who had no problems. Just because we hear several horror stories it doesn't mean that the production standards are low, although I'm not precluding that possibility. And does one person's story about one broken PDA really merit a story here?

    Of course, there might really be a problem with certian models. I guess what we really need is some kind of site where you could register before (since otherwise only the angry buyers of defective units would report) you bought some gadget, and periodically report on how it was doing. Only then could one get a good idea of the percentage of defects in a particular model.

  124. after switchign to zaurus, can't go back by calarts_nutmeg · · Score: 1

    I got frustrated with the dumbness of the palm os, but I do use the handspring cell phone module and have found handsprings to be slightly better than the palm. Now that I use the zaurus as my main pda, I'd never go back though.

    --
    Check my site out for ogg vorbis music produced with linux.
  125. My Palm service experience by jkovach · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have had problems with Palm too....

    One day, while trying to take notes in class, I dropped my Palm IIIxe on the floor and broke the screen. (Whooooops.) Because I had the Palm folding keyboard that worked with the III series but not the newer models with their redesigned cases, I opted to pay Palm $100 to fix my unit rather than to go buy a new one. So I sent my device back, and a week later I get the exchange unit. I then threw some batteries in it and stick it in my backpack, and then when I go to use it two days later it doesn't turn on because the batteries are dead. I figured that the case I had it in was pushing one of the buttons and didn't really think much of it at the time, but after several more sets of dead batteries I did some testing and found that the device would run down batteries in 12 hours while sitting turned off in a drawer. Hard resets and a different brand of battery didn't fix it, so off it went back to Palm for another exchange...

    One week later, the second replacement arrives. In go the batteries, and I even install a fresh copy of the Hotsync software for Windows and sync with that instead of using KPilot to restore my old data. Same problem - 12 hours later, turned off in a drawer, dead batteries. So I call up Palm again and explain my situation, and they say to do another exchange, and when I asked what I could do if the new unit had the same problem they told me I could call corporate headquarters "using the number from the website." Thankfully, the third replacement worked.

    So in the end, in order to have a $100 repair performed on my Palm, I had to pay the $100, plus $5 in tax, $10 three times for return shipping and $8 for a 12 pack of batteries from the rat shack. Total of $142. Plus it took a month and three trips to the post office. Rather inconvienient, and not exactly a ringing endorsement of Palm's quality control...

  126. Re:Apple are worse.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    All this over the tray door on a cd drive???? Get a life!

  127. Numerous returns on the m100's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually work at the store mentioned above and I've had about 5 or six returns on the m100 series with the same problem. There weren't any problems when the units first came out. Then right before the m100 was discontinued the problems started popping up. It could be that OD got a bad batch, but more likely they started slacking on production quality, maybe even on the better units as well.

  128. Handspring Visor NEO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We use 6 Handspring Visor Deluxe/NEO PDAs at work. No problems. 8 MB ram plenty for databases and eBook manuals. Nothing fancy -- they just work.

  129. I bought a visor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No problems here, my 120$ 8mb Visor Deluxe is working perfectly. I love it, keep track of everything on it; homework assignments as I am still in high school. and I think the visor's look better too!

  130. Palm == bad by eap · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Ever since palm sent unsolicited phone spam to my pay per minute mobile phone, thus costing me actual $ for having to listen to one of their ads, I will have nothing to do with the company. The fact that their hardware QA is substandard does not surprise me.

  131. WinCE-based PDA quality control by FueledByRamen · · Score: 1

    I went out and bought an HP Jornada 400 series (don't remember the exact number) PDA a few years back, because it played MP3s, had a CF slot, and had a color screen (and solitare... mmmm....). Anyways, about 3 weeks later of using it lightly, the speaker stopped working, the battery life slowly declined, and the screen was hideously scratched after I BABIED the thing - I had just spent $400 on it! I took it back to Orifice Depot and got a Cassiopeia E-100 - same features, lighter, smaller, $100 less! Worked fine, until I sold it on eBay to a gentleman in Australia.

    --
    Every cloud has a silver lining (except for the mushroom shaped ones, which have a lining of Iridium & Strontium 90)
  132. Re:Similiar story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had my Aero for more than a year now and never experienced any problems.

  133. Re:Cheap means cheap <-- WRONG!!! by N473 · · Score: 1

    Hey! I thought you were a troll! Thanks for the links.

  134. Re:Cheap means cheap <-- WRONG!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What part of "most people" don't you understand? Just curious... you develop PalmOS programs in your spare time? I assume you think this is the norm? If not, I wonder why people like you are so self-centered to think that my comment doesn't apply because it doesn't apply SPECIFICALLY TO YOU. What percentage of Palm users do you think even know how to program?

    By the way, which was the first Palm (or Visor) model that you bought?

  135. The Wonders of Outsourcing by slyborg · · Score: 2, Informative

    Palm devices (and Handspring, btw) are manufactured by a company called Flextronics, one of the big 4 in outsourced manufacturing. Palm devices are manufactured in Flex Malaysia and in Guadalajara, Mexico. Flextronics sources material and handles end of line manufacturing quality. The only exception to this for Palm was the VIIx was made in a Flex facility in Fremont, I don't know if this applies to the 705.

    In any case, where many people rail about the quality of Company X's products, these days it is highly likely that Company X didn't have anything to do with making the product other than designing it. And in this age of "badge engineering" of electronics, that's not even necessarily true, as someone mentioned with the IBM WorkPad. The objective of outsourcing the manufacturing function is ultimately managing the companies stock price, not pleasing the customer. By offloading headcount and very expensive capital facilities like factories, companies try to make their return on invested capital look better.

    However, someone other than Company X now actually controls the customer's "out of box" experience. If they do this poorly, they eventually will have to eat the cost of returns and perhaps lose Company X's manufacturing business, but the loss of future sales caused by the customer's poor experience falls on Company X. And the contract manufacturer is large and has many other companies to live on, while Company X probably has a relatively small set of products, which now may have acquired a reputation for poor quality. Company X's sales drop and their stock (symbol: PALM) drops below $2...

    Ultimately the consumer is the loser, since as I mentioned, it is possible that a product area has ALL of the branded companies using contract manufacturing, possibly even the SAME manufacturer.

    I believe that using contract manufacturing for consumer systems ultimately is a loser for the companies involved since it is very difficult to avoid large batches of poor quality goods from reaching customers. So if, for example Sony, apart from being innovative with its designs, still does its own manufacturing, I think it will win share down the road, while companies that hit lower price points with inferior product will be eliminated, unless they can figure out how to create "disposable" products and do the heavy marketing needed to establish such a concept.

  136. Why Palm? by krokodil · · Score: 2

    C'mon, who buy palm nowadays? They are overpriced
    and lack features. I give them the credit for
    starting the PDA industry but most people get
    now Sony or Handspring.

    1. Re:Why Palm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear they sell a good grammar checker. I suggest you look into it.

    2. Re:Why Palm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look at the numbers, people are buying PALMs and SONY these days. Both are gaining share against the others including PocketPC.

    3. Re:Why Palm? by krokodil · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to look into
      such numbers. But where I can get them?

  137. I love my m100 by mike_lynn · · Score: 1
    My first m100's backlight didn't work, right out of the box. CompUSA cheerfully replaced it, no hassels. I needed a cheap PDA that I could read ebooks with and the m100 fit the bill perfectly (especially the one with the working backlight). The only problem I've had since is an issue where it thought a button was being pressed and would only boot into debug mode. Left the batteries out for 3 days and it's good as new (after the HotSync).

    Considering the price of the Palm, it's out-performed what I expected, has provided hours of use on end and been one of my best tool investments ever.

  138. PalmIIIe by chaosbreather · · Score: 1

    I bought a PalmIIIe a couple of years back. The screen broke when I just brushed up against a wall! I sent it back and payed the $200 (AU)replacement fee. The replacement system's screen also cracked when it fell off a stool onto carpet.

    Do all modern PDAs employ glass in their screens? Which ones are the most durable?

    --
    ...breathe the chaos in the midst of order...
    1. Re:PalmIIIe by titaniafq · · Score: 1

      I had a Palm IIIe and the exact same thing happened to me, i fell out of my pocket when I was sat in a low chair onto the floor and -POW- big crack in screen.

      I got store credit and purchased a new CDRW drive. Glass screens in PDA's has put me off but I really do want that new Sony CLIE with the fold round screen and camerea (looks like a tricorder from enterprise)

      Oh well, aside from that my only ever PDA worked fine.

      --
      -- Do not bite the bait of pleasure till you know there is no hook beneath it.
  139. Not just Palms... My horror story. by ChipX86 · · Score: 1

    I've had problems with Palms and Handsprings. About a year ago, I decided to finally buy a Palm. I went with the Palm Vx, which worked very well for a short period of time. Then the buttons stopped working correctly. They would get stuck, or they would seem to press themselves, or one button would act as another. I took it back to Office Depot (great people there, they now get most of my business) and they happily gave me a new one. That one also had similar problems, so I got another one from them. It also had the same problems.

    Very annoying. I gave up on the Vx's, but decided to try the Palm IIIc. I bought one of those, and I couldn't tap on the screen very well. With brightness over about 5%, it wouldn't register taps at all, and below 5%, it was very.. wiggly. I loaded a paint program and kept the stylus at one location, and dots flew everywhere. I took it back and got another. This one wouldn't even register any activity at any brightness level.

    This is where Office Depot truly stood out among the companies in town. They took it back and, at our request, gave us back the money. They didn't even try to get us to try another model, and didn't tell us we would only get in-store credit. They knew we were having the problems, as they would test some of the Palms that were returned and discovered I was telling the truth.

    I then went over to Handspring, and bought an Edge. This worked for a few months, and then died one day. Any screen tap would register as a tap in the lower-left corner of the screen, simulating a Menu button click. This could not be fixed with hard resets, and it turned out that several other people had the same problem.

    I sent it to Handspring and they gave me a new one. This one had dead pixels (it was a black and white PDA, btw), sound problems, and other issues. I sent it back, and got a new one. Similar problems. I've gone through 6 Visor Edges so far. The latest works, but I'm so tired of it and I know I can't rely on it. It's currently sitting in a safe place, with no charge.

    I had decided to buy a Sharp Zaurus (again, from Office Depot), and the thing works so beautifully. I finally feel confident with my PDA, and I can write my own software without having to work with the horrible PalmOS API.

    Palm and Handspring are no longer getting my business. From now on, I think I'll buy from Sharp and other larger companies.

  140. Digitizer bug (Time for class action suit?) by Nonesuch · · Score: 2

    Many, many people have this problem. Nobody has a fix. The Palm V digitizer bug is pretty well known, but Palm will not acknowledge that there is a problem. The OS upgrade has not helped.

  141. Just bad luck? by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    I've worked with several of these model 100's and 105's, and have not had a stinker yet. Perhaps your retailer had a run of flakey ones from manufacturing, or perhaps you were just "lucky". In my experience supporting hundreds of different Palm and PPC devices, there are maybe 10% - 15% DOA (bad within 30 days of purchase) and 10% go bad each year (these are logless brain dumps, and YMMV).
    I've also not had the problems you alluded to repairing a bad or broken Palm. Call the 800 number, convince the droid on the other end you are in warranty and it's bad, and (after supplying a CC in case you don't return the bad one) they send you a refurbished one in a couple days. There was a time when supplies were low and you might have to wait for a refurbished one, but those days are long past. And there have been a couple of repair droids who wanted me to go through tedious series of proofs before replacing what I knew was bad, but it does work, for me at least.

  142. Re:My newton is several years old and still kickin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the good news is that it sounds like Apple is coming out with a new PDA! I hope it is true and based off of MacOSX.
    I agree that Mac has always been ahead of it's time... too bad they've insisted on high prices and not putting their parts out on the parts market. I'd love to go to a MarketPro show and put together my own Mac from parts.

    Anyway, I have owned a HP Jornada 420, Casio E-100, iPaq H3630, Zaurus 5000D (piece of crap), and a m100. While I rarely use my m100 (bought it to develop apps), it has worked great... no complaints. As far as a PIM unit goes, it's much better than any other PDA I've owned.
    Hopefully, I'll be adding a new Newton to my list of PDAs... hopefully, it's not just a rumor this time.

  143. Redigi - app to auto call the digitizer by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    Go to Palmgear.com and check out Redigi. It's an an app that simply puts the Palm into the digitizer whenever you do a soft reset. This fixes the problem of not being able to reach the menu item that calls the digitizer because the digitizer is so out of whack.
    I'm not associated with Redigi (or Palm, for that matter...)...

  144. Casio Pocket Viewer & Palm-3e by ecarlson · · Score: 1

    The Casio Pocket Viewer PV-S400Plus is nice. It's under $80 US, has 4.Meg RAM, comes with useful apps including a spreadsheet, works with MS Office apps, you can load apps on it, it's durable, and it has a long battery life.

    A friend had an earlier model, and I almost bought one myself until another friend sold me his barely used Palm-3e for $50 (over a year ago).

    My Palm-3e has been working fine since I got it. It's been durable, and the batteries last me a few months. I just wish it was smaller, with the same sized screen, better text input, the same durability, and the same low cost.

    --
    - Eric, InvisibleRobot.com
  145. Redigi - app to autocall the digitizer by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

    I posted this in another item above, but I think the word needs to get around - there is a simple app called Redigi, and you can check it out at Palmgear.com. It puts the device into the digitizer when you do a soft reset, so you don't have to fear not being able to reach the digitizer menu item on the Palm. Freeware.

  146. Cheap is Good! by igzebier · · Score: 1

    Congratulations! Your m100 bashing has incited me into my first ever /. post!

    My Palm m100 has lasted me over a year. I carry it, use it everywhere. I wouldn't have bought it if it wasn't cheap, because I knew I would drop it, lose it, walk in the rain with it. Gadgets are mortal.

    It lives in my pants pocket without the flip cover, for quick access (and I think the cover fell off a few times). I had to dissect it gingerly once to get rid of the lint on the screen. Canned air got rid of problems with the power button not responding.

    2mb is fine for addresses and a couple of days worth of subway platform reading via AvantGo. It would be fun to have more memory for geeking out with oddball programs, but once I discovered that trying to use it as a remote control was impractical, I lost interest anyway.

    I've found that "premium" ultra batteries really don't need changing as often. Sync early and often and you won't be inconvenience when the inevitable dead battery, shock or dust induced crash occurs.

    When the Treo sprouts an Ogg/Vorbis player and a camera, and the price drops to that of the m100, I'm all over it. Until then...

  147. Re:Cheap means cheap <-- WRONG!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But regular users are my concern only when I code, not how I myself use."

    I don't know where that statement came from... I was trying to figure out if you realize that you're NOT the norm... apparently you never think of regular users even when reading /. when a post refers to them? That helps your argument how?

    I bought my Palm Pilot Pro (USRobotics) in '97. Upgraded to 2mb and v3.3.

    I have three pets, no wife and certainly no d&d (I wouldn't refer to d&d while convincing someone that you have a life). One B.S. in EE, one in CS and an M.S. in EE. Aside from Datebook (DateBk3), addresses, PocketQuicken and a few other apps, I primarily used my PalmPilot to disassemble and crack Palm shareware programs. Just a hobby of mine.

    You really are trying to demonstrate your self-centered views, aren't you? Do you think I was saying people on /. are normal? Do you think I was saying people on /. are the norm? Do you realize how little of the world (first world countries) programs? My point that you can't seem to understand is that there are MANY people out there that not only don't read /. (shocking, isn't it...) but they have problems programming their VCR and doing anything on the internet. Palm is simple enough for these people that it actually is useful to them. Why do you think Palm was the first really popular PDA? These are the people that are typical Palm users. The average people of the world.

    Do you understand the PC analogy where most people don't need a Athlon XP 2100+ and GForce4 when they're just going to do wordprocessing and play solitaire?

  148. I've had too much experience with M505s by aleclee · · Score: 1

    Like you, I'm a longtime Palm owner (back when they were still PalmPilots). I've also owned a Palm V and M505. Actually, I've owned three 505s. The first one had the power button get stuck so I couldn't turn it off (and the auto-off feature doesn't work when the power button is pushed). The second one (the first was still under warrantee) never powered up. I sent it back and the third one worked until last week. It now seems to think that the top of the screen is about 128 pixels from the top so I effectively have a 160x32 screen. Not very useful.

    I'm fed up with Palm's lack of quality and don't plan to own another Palm-manufactured device. Tomorrow I'm going to go out and buy a Clie. I like the Palm OS and figure that Sony knows how to build consumer electronics.

    --
    This message composed using 100% recycled electrons.
  149. How long is the warrantee? by Nishi-no-wan · · Score: 2
    Personal experience with Sony products show that they're only useful up until their warrantee expires. Our family Sony Trinitron's color started fading about a month after the warrantee expired. The headphone connecter to a Sony radio started failing after one year (6 month warrantee). The battery warning of my second Sony radio says the batteries are dead when it gets jolted a bit. (I didn't learn the first time.)

    Now I have a Sony VAIO PCG-XR1G. It was the top of the line when I bought it. After using it for six months, I started getting BIOS errors warning me of imbeeding hard disk failure. I backed everything up when I got it to boot, then took it in. Of course, it booted fine every time I tried to explain the problem to the dealer. So after it really failed a week later, they took it and sent it in to Sony.

    Sony replaced the disk controller, but not the hard disk. They did restore the pre-installed Windows against my wishes, despite detailed instructions on how to login and shutdown FreeBSD. If they'd have replaced the hard disk, as the BIOS was telling me was necessary, I wouldn't have minded, but...

    So, the machine worked find for another six months. Then the same BIOS errors started coming up. Again, I backed up everything and brought it in for repair. This time the warrantee was one month expired and I had to pay for a new hard disk. But the worst part was to follow.

    After another month, the "R" key on the keyboard started getting hard to press. Also, the right mouse button wasn't always working. The mouse pad quickly degraded to where I had to buy an external mouse. Other keys slowly degraded and, being a touch typist, many tasks started to become frustrating - like logging in to other servers without any "*" echos. I'm seriously considering getting a USB keyboard for my notebook computer!

    It just seems to me that Sony products have some sort of self distruct mechanism built in to go off right after their warrantee expires. I need to gaman with this keyboard for another half year or so. But I'm definately not getting a Sony computer again. No matter how good they look.

    1. Re:How long is the warrantee? by Sokie · · Score: 2

      My father has had a Sony Vaio laptop for about 3 years and it's still humming along just fine. That is wierd about your laptop, but just as anecdotal as everything I said about dropping PDAs.

      Have you found accounts of other people with similar problems with your laptop model? If so, then there is probably a problem with the design or manufacturing controls. But it's also possible you just got a lemon. Despite QA and all those good things, the auto manufacturers still put out cars that will have any and all conceivable problems and nothing can fix them. I imagine that the same applies with laptops, PDA's, and everything else.

      Personally, I just do research and try to find accounts from as many other people as possible on their experience with a product I'm looking to buy. It takes some pretty extraordinary circumstances for me to blacklist a manufacturer completely. If 500 other people tell me model XYZ has worked flawlessly for them for a year and it does everything I need at I price I like, I wouldn't exclude that product from consideration just because I had bad luck with my model PQR from the same company. Sure, I would think about my experience with PQR, but I would take the accounts of 500 other people over my single experience.

      Don't get me wrong though. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, and based on your experiences, I really don't blame you for considering Sony to be a manufacturer with a bad reputation. My experiences with them have been just the opposite though, but that doesn't mean that I will now buy exclusively Sony products.

      BTW: the warrantee on my Clie is 90 days (refurb) so if it dies by the end of the summer, I'll probably think about your conspiracy theory a bit more. ;)

      -Sokie

      --
      ------
      Where are the slash-groupies? I distinctly remember being promised slash-groupies!
  150. Oddly enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems that the newer technology gets, the worse it works. I have a PalmIII (the old one without the color screen). It has been sat on, kicked, dropped, immersed, and still works wonderfully. Go figure.

  151. Re:My newton is several years old and still kickin by MOSFET · · Score: 1

    I, being a proud owner of a Handspring Visor Neo, have noticed the backlighting is kinda strange... I used to have an old Palm Pilot Pro (1 meg model) which backlit the entire screen background, but the Visor does it differently. It lights the text instead of the background. It's very readable in total darkness, or good lighting, but gets a bit hard to read in between. I wish they included some way of switching it back to the old backlighting method.

  152. Re:My newton is several years old and still kickin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the new Palm (and Visor) devices with the new high contrast screen have the wierd backlight. I don't think there's any way to switch back.

  153. Am I the only happy M100 owner? by pyarra · · Score: 1

    I bought my little M100 about 2 years ago. It has travelled entirely around the world in my back-pack, been dropped, rained on, snowed on, ignored, had its batteries drained, synched with more Windows and Linux boxes than I care to think about... and still ticks over beautifully. It appears that I got the only good one ever made. It also saves me from boredom - the BOFH excuse calendar is my most frequently-used bit of software.

  154. As much as I liked Palmpilots.. by QueenOfSwords · · Score: 1

    I've had two Palms, a iiie (no problems, I sold it recently) and a couple of iiics. The iiic had quality control issues out the wazzo. Between touchscreen issues to creeping case cracks, they pretty much suck in actual use. My current iiic is fine (touch wood) but I don't know if I'd go with Palm again.
    There are more interesting and durable options, esp if you live in the US of A. With the more recent Palms, the quality control issues seem to have increased (perhaps cost-cutting in manufacture). Its a shame because I remember when the Palm Pro, Palm iii and Palm V were the duck's nuts for durability and usability.
    I think it's yet another unwritten but widely acknowledged rule... every new thing, no matter how innovative and well-thought out, eventually turns to crap. Restaraunts, movies (through sequels and prequels), technology companies...

    --
    -- INTX Grouch. http://www.midnightblue.net
  155. never heard anyone with m1xx problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm the owner of a popular palm mailing list and honestly this is the first time I've heard anyone complain about the m1xx series.

    Even in the CNET review you pointed out 85% of the responses were positive and CNET gave it a 7 out of 10, 30% of that is features like color, etc, which the m105 lacks, explaining most of the points lost.

    My dad has also had a m100 and m105, and I've own a m130. I now have a m515 and my girlfriend has a m100. None of these Palms had any problems with them.

    Where in the world did you buy a m100 for $99 anyway?? Currently they sell on ebay and half.com for around $40; $99 is way too much.

    If you search hard enough you'll find a complaint about everything on the market, so I don't see why one person's very rare experience with two units is enough to judge all m1xx palms by, and especially not enough to put it on /.

    I'm guessing the editor doesn't have a Palm, otherwise he/she would have probably realized this guy was just incredible unlucky and his guy's opinion would have never gotten this far. I have an opinion too, doesn't mean it should be posted on the front of /.

  156. free software fix for digitizer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there's a free software fix for that. search palmgear, I think one of the programs are called "digifix"

  157. if it's so great why doesn't Apple still make'em? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like the subject says, if the Netwon is everything you say it is then it would have taken the market by storm and never looked back.

    Must be something wrong with them because they were discontinued and Palm had no problems taking up the slack (even with it's "backlight that sucks" and no PCMCIA slots) and Pocket PC is still trying to catch up

  158. Re:Apple are worse.... by LiteForce · · Score: 1
    1:) Care to supply me with the date of manufacture of your iBook ?

    2:) I only wish I was trolling.... I have better things to do than write a shitload of fictional bad-mouthing against Apple for the amusement of others. The Apple techs didn't even bother booting the machine up to test if writing a CD worked (their own admission). Maybe I should say that writing a CD works but it cannot be read in anything afterwards - I have tried cdrecord on Mandrake 8.2/PPC, Toast on MacOS 9 and MacOS X and even iTunes.

    Yes, I have tried writing at 1x and even using a variety of CD-R and CD-RW media... trust me... the drive is screwed.

    3:) MacOS X only runs on Apple hardware. Therefore, those readers who advocate the use of MacOS X over Linux and FreeBSD are logically the owners of Apple hardware. If the response I received from Apple Technical Support is typical of that company, I can only pity those readers for being customers of such an uncaring corporate.

    My original post is the absolute truth and I stand by my words.

    --
    "Be vewy vewy quiet, I'm hunting wuntime ewwors!" - Elmer Fudd
  159. I here you brother! by bsane · · Score: 1

    I agree. Many gadgets and technologies Sony puts out are engineered to subvert fair use. I think buying electronics from Sony furthers the stranglehold of MPAA and RIAA more than anything else we have direct control over.

  160. Re:Cheap means cheap <-- WRONG!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking hell Spork.. you still play regular games of D&D? What are you like 15? Get a god damn life! Most people quit playing D&D when they hit puberty. Something you have to look forwrad to I guess eh?

  161. I proudly have owned a palm m100 since 10/00 by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

    I have owned my palm for 1 1/2 years and I had no problems with mine at all. Very reliable. 2 megs is fine for a calender and a few apps I have downloaded from the net. Anyway I have seen my father's expensive palm V die and his palm VII freeze up very badly to the point where the batteries had to be taken out while my el-cheapo palm m100 has been fine. So much for the idea that you get what you pay for. My only complaint is the cheap thick plastic used. I have dropped it at least 3 times so far and it has not broken once but its uncomfortable and thick. The outer screen cover came off about the first month since I owned it but other then that I had nothing but good luck.

    The problems many may have could be due to a specific manufactoring plant. This would explain while most have no problems at all but a few do. If the product was poorly designed like then everyone would be having trouble. After the .com crash many companies started looking for ways to reduce costs. Perhaps palm decided to try a cheaper manufactor to build them. At least mine made from the pre-.bomb is fine.

  162. Palm Pilot Personal by poisti · · Score: 1

    My Palm Pilot Personal (upgraded to 512Kb memory and IR) still works (bought it end 1998 if I remember correctly ...) though I'm using a Sony NR770C/E now

  163. My M100 is flawless by BudaDude · · Score: 1

    I got the M100 about 3 months ago after having owned the first Palm Pilot many many moons ago and never having found a use for it. I figured for $90 I would give the Palm a shot again.

    I chose the M100 specifically because it is focused, only does 3 things, and does those three things well. I don't need or want color, internet or any other crap in a handheld. That is why I have a desktop machine...

    Anyway, the M100 has far exceeded my expectations in build quality, usefulness, and reliability.

    I work in the Balkans in military bases where there is regularly no electricity, much less water and other amenities. The M100 has put up with blistering heat, frigid cold, dust, dirt, excess humidity, being dropped, etc. In fact, the little protective door has popped off twice due to getting slammed in a truck door, and my falling on my ass with the M100 in my back pocket....but the door is designed to pop off, so I have always been able to pop it back on, and it has not broken.

    Software-wise, I have had to do a soft reset twice due to a poorly programmed game. Since removing the game, everything has worked flawlessly.

    I am sorry the original poster has had so many problems, but in my case the M100 has been the perfect tool.

    So buy it from someplace that provides a good return or exchange policy. Maybe you will get a machine like mine and won't have to return it, but if you don't, then make sure you have the possibility of a return/exchange.
    ================

    --
    "What's that watermelon doing there?" - Jersey
  164. Fave cheapo PDA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not that it's available anymore, but it's pertinent to Palm's quality -- I bought my Palm III almost four years ago, for $150 when they were to be discontinued. It still works fine. Yes, it's un-sexy-looking, but I really can't justify getting anything newer/fancier while this one keeps working. I've dropped it at least 3 times, once on a hard floor (carpeting otherwise) from a height of 5 feet. Only one drop required a reset afterwards, and once, out of the blue (no dropping involved) it lost all its data. I've never had to have it worked on, screen is original, and I use my Palm every day. Consider me happy with this Palm's quality!

  165. Re:HP calculators by Phocas · · Score: 1

    I'm still using the HP 12C calculator I bought for use in university around 1988 and it still works perfectly. It's an awesome calculator. I have two others as backup but the original just won't quit.

  166. UhOh by kupo+zero · · Score: 0

    I just orderd a Palm m125 so lets hope it works.

  167. MOD m100 TO 8mb.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got my palm m100 for free from a car dealer for (not)test driving a car.

    Anyway, you can pop the m100 open and convert it to m105 very easily.

    The mod:
    http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~tew/m100hack/

    The chip:
    http://shop.brando.com.hk/8mbramchip.php

    The only problem i have had is the default protective plate that flips up and down being a pos. I replaced it with a $4 leather palm cover from a local computer store.

  168. Is competition killing quality? by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2

    This is quite interesting. People generally buy cheap technology. Those that don't, buy sophisticated, cutting edge technology. Both cutting edge and cheap technology is riddled with poor quality. Will people ever learn?

    If you spend those extra bucks on upgrading your gigahertz celeron from 128 megs of ram to 512 megs of ram, it will last performance-wise for one or two more years. But Mr. Salesman doesn't tell Mr. Doe that. He just smiles when Mr. Doe opts for the cheaper system, and says "Come back soon" with a diabolical grin as Mr. Doe leaves.

    Frankly, selling a gigahertz computer with 128 megs of ram is disgraceful. Really. It will just barely perform well enough when the customer tries it in the store. When the customer comes home, runs ICQ and an email client in addition to a web browser and Microsoft Office, it will kneel. Had the customer spent an extra hundred or so dollars on more RAM, things would be much smoother. Until the computer business cleans this up, I would advocate that some standard benchmarks be developed and mandated to be displayed with price, so that the customer can themselves see how much oomph they get for their buck.

    That was a bit of a sidetrack.

    The point is that you have big corporations with really smart people, little accountability and large resources attempting to make money. They do so by selling products. Do you really expect the average buyer to fully understand the pros and cons of the complex products we develop?

    I personally don't. It's about time we developed standards for QA, along with ethical guidelines for the stuff we sell. Basic things like "is this useful?" and "does it work?" are forgotten in the rush for dough. In addition to listening to customer feedback (both in cash and writing), we should ourselves figure out the premises we compete on. By cutting quality, and giving the cost cut to the customer, you're doing the customer a huge disservice. Please stop.

    --

    Stop the brainwash

  169. Palm IIIxe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's been about 3 years now of daily use, dropped it more times then I can remember and never had a problem (the plastic cover broke, but it doesn't matter because I have a belt holder for it)...

    You're having a run of bad luck... in general they are good, sturdy devices.

    In fact, because of the smaller screen, the m10x seems like it should be even more durable...

    I used a Compaq iPaq for a few weeks from work... now there's a piece of delicate junk.

  170. Known issues by Tinfoil · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine has some inside knowledge at Palm and recently told me about a class action suit against them for their units causing a static surge resulting in a fried serial port (old news). Even the expensive ones are prone. We have 5 or 6 m505's at work and all but one of them has been sent back at least once due to USB sync problems. After the last time, the support person finally admitted that there was indeed a problem with the cradle and he would send me out a new cradle for each unit.

    What happened to the old Palm? My Palm III was dropped no less than 15 time from my shirt pocket requiring nothing more than re-securing the display ribbon cable. Now, if you sync them they break.

  171. Rarity of this experience? by Hydro-X · · Score: 1

    Obviously my experiences are not unique or even rare.

    Actually I beg to differ:

    I promptly took it back to Office Depot for another one, which they were cheerfully willing to do.

    I took it back for a refund (also cheerfully done, and with apologies).

    Sounds pretty rare to me. :]

  172. palm is good, but good enough? by theSprocket · · Score: 1

    I have been with a palm device for a few years now, at first it was a 1 meg pro. Between its second and third year the digitizer started to drift, but predictably, about once a week it needed recalibration. During it's three years of service to me I NEVER needed to perform a soft or hard reset, though I periodically lost all my data by attempting to squeeze too much out of the batteries. Of course it's full capacity was only one meg so a total sync from my pc did not take too long. Last summer I sold it to a friend of my wife's and last I heard it is still in service no problems. Also last summer I bought an M105, this was for $200, just before the prices plummeted and also the release of the M125( bummer). During my year with the m105, I have had only one complaint; the cheap plastic screen. I, of course, am mostly at fault, after about 1200 games of smallware solfree there is a distinct star-like pattern of scratches emanating from the top right corner of the screen where you drag the cards from, to be placed on the individual stacks. The up-side to this is that as many times as I have dropped it, it never had a fault. I guess the plastic screen is quite durable. And, also with this palm, over a year of use and it has never required a reset, hard or soft, Also I've been more carefull regarding battery life and never let it get so low as to lose data. I feel that it has delivered more than expected for what was very near the bottom of the line products, I was very happy that palm marketed a really cheap PDA that had the same capity and feratures as the "over my budget" V/Vx/M50x series.
    This ends my praise section

    As I stated above, had it been available I probably would have gotten the expandability of the M125 last summer, so recently as I have been thinking of upgrading of course that is the first model that entered my mind as a possible replacement. Then I started thinking about why I really wanted expandability and realized that I did not want to lock myself into needing overpriced SD/MMC form-factor cards. I looked at visor and realized that while the springboard is well spoken of as far as usability and reliability, it is very proprietary and to be avoided. That leaves me looking at the competition, the PocketPCs. What I now know that I want is a PPC with built in expandability( not a dock like the iPaq) with a CF slot and one other, additional CF or SM or ever SD/MMC. This will allow me to use a CF 802.11 card for networking and also increase storage, simultaneously. I don't believe that any devices have this capability yet, but I am looking, and will turn to the dark side(Microsoft) as soon as something is available.

  173. Other Palms have similar problems by GlenRaphael · · Score: 3, Informative
    I've gone through a Palm Pro (screen stopped working reliably due to a loose connector being jiggled by stylus insertion), a Palm III (dropped it on the floor, the screen broke), a Handspring Visor (plugged in a camera card one day and the device just died and wouldn't wake up again), a Palm Vx (most of the buttons stopped working and the touchscreen alignment was off), and a Palm V (power button broke, two of the other buttons broke as well). Today I'm going to order a Clie.

    Palm devices have a half life of about 6 months for me, but they're too damn useful to live without, so I keep buying 'em.

    The buttons would probably last longer if I didn't play Galax.

    --
    I play Nerd-Folk!
    1. Re:Other Palms have similar problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Galax rules!

  174. Palm III was Stronger by fncll · · Score: 1

    I've owned a few different Palm III series, including my current Palm IIIc which I have been abusing for a few years now (I pound my palm every day-- wait, that sounds bad. I drop it, stuff it in my back pocket, leave it in my car to freeze in winter and boil in summer, and overclock it to the max) and never had a significant problem with any of them.

    But it seems that everyone I know has to return their M series at least once, and sometimes more, to finally get one whose workmanship is up to snuff. If it weren't for how QUICKLY they degrade, I would suspect that it was done on purpose to keep the market demand high.

  175. Err by DaveWood · · Score: 2

    By should I mean "shouldn't". :)

  176. Re:if it's so great why doesn't Apple still make'e by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple -- Steve Jobs' ego wouldn't suffer the success of his predecessor's brainchild (the Newton). [Or, from a more formal business-school viewpoint: If the Newton were allowed to succeed, Sculley would have gotten the credit but if it failed, Jobs would get the blame.]

    Just like the Roman emperors -- first thing after taking power, they killed the children of their enemies to prevent them from coming to power later. And it worked. Now, instead of talking about Apple's new cutting-edge PDA we're salivating about 17" flat-panel iMacs. Big deal. Same old stuff in a shiny new package. No new technology, just a prettier case.

  177. The problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once you return a "new" faulty unit... you will never get a "new" unit in return. You will always get a refurbished unit in exchange, which probably now has some other new "perks" to discover. Like the "always-on" feature you found in your replacement unit.

  178. USRobotics Pilot 5000 by kaijura · · Score: 1

    I can't kill this thing - I've had this old pilot for so many years i can hardly recall - maybe 7? at least. I use it constantly. It's reliable. It holds my data. It never breaks down. It doesn't have an attitude problem. The siren lure of colour displays and playing games on a pda is screaming to me. But I try as I might, I can't justify buying a new pda when this damned pilot won't die and is so freaking usable. I drop it, it doesn't even blink. HELP ME! Must kill... But I'm a tree-hugging vegetarian so I need a hit man, uh person, to take care of it for me. DAMMIT, I cannot take a life. How many years must I wait before I can buy a new pda....

  179. Conversely? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheaper Palms are poor quality, but conversely cheaper Visors are poor quality?

    Do you understand the english language?

    Do you understand the words that are coming out of my mouth?

  180. The plastic cover? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's because of the plastic film over the touch screen heats up and/or moves or something.