So were' supposed to be outraged because it's now tech companies? If anything, content operators like facebook could lend some weight to promote net neutrality as they would suffer if it were repealed.
So does the submitter suggest Amazon set up in the middle of a desert where there's no Impact? Does the desert have highly educated workers? A diverse environment and pool of talent to select from? Infrastructure? Proximity to Colleges?
The first rule of starting off or making expansions to any business to minimize the self cost by getting partners or investors. Amazon isn't going to set up in the middle of nowhere to build up from nothing like los vegas for the good of all, nor should it expect to.
The abstract should be enough for the laymen. Real scientists and those whom are experts in their field or are studying it have much to gain from those equations and 'mathematical jargon' as the summary dictates.
Don't expect Wikipedia to teach you, it is a reference and nothing more. It is however free to edit so if you have the time and patience to simplify these complex topics, then by all means go ahead. But do not expect everything to be served to you on a silver platter.
Dig up your own wire AC. You're eventually going to be using utilities or sending data over a medium you have no control over, technology can't solve every problem, that's a common misconception and why so many start ups in tech fail as they can't realize it.
Sure you can write disparaging remarks, insult other people anonymously; but the moment you start performing malicious actions causing deliberate targeted harm, that mask can come off mighty fast.
This is true. There's the backlash of 'environmental regulations' but even without them. Natural gas is beating coal on price, and extraction cost. A side benefit is that it both burns cleaner and is extracted cleaner at less risk to workers.
They're losing on all fronts, not just 'environmental'.
Then why doesn't the right build their 'societal machine'? There's Gab, and the founder isn't from a technical background (more a former YC VC) which shows in their work as they aren't getting sharp engineers making their platforms.
The radical left here pretty much built their platform from scratch with a dash of FOSS from reddit, you're telling me there's no radical right than have the technical know how to do the same?
You forget that ISPs consist of physical cables owned by them. If you're thinking about carrier provisions that force renting out of lines (ie: how boost mobile rents lines laid by AT&T and others); these are high bandwidth lines. As a company, to be forced to share your line that you dug up and planted with others which will cause congestion and degradation for your own customer base is inexcusable. They will make that argument in court and win.
Good luck convincing alternative carriers to have as much reach outside of the highly profitable areas (cities). Get screwed if you live in the country/remote/island or fringe suburb area.
If they wanted to be super-pollution-nazi serious they'd have a phase out over 20 years or so with a progressive tax on new combustion car sales. This is stupid.
These Goldilocks voltages will vary by small margins.. too small to be accurately predicted for an actual attack.
TFA tries to make the argument that this physical hack can be done remotely despite the highly controlled conditions by relying on the power and energy management utilities...
Now i've got news as an embedded developer, that sh*t isn't accurate for anything this sensitive.
Very specific data mind you. You can introduce a new concept to humans and they'd see similar concepts visualized or explained differently. One such example popular across the ages is sexual innuendo or rather innuendo in any form. You can pull context from basket cases, but pulling from the abstract is where 'True AI' as you defined would clearly outperform.
When you're taking classes, creating buzz, or selling to business partners; AI sounds much more catchy than an advanced deterministic heuristic program.
I think they're dumbing down the term just as how 'Hover Boards' were dumbed down from their original concept.
I'd consider them more voice activated assistants from the consumer ends. From the machine learning part it's just heuristics on a pile of data to find patterns.
Diversify it, and when something looks bubbly, convert a safe portion to bonds. Sure the return is horrible unless you have millions, but you plan for the worst, hope for the best.
I saw the property bubble forming and got out in 2005 by changing about 2/3s of my investments into bonds. Sure I missed out on some killer earnings, but overall, my portfolio only wiped out 1/4 of its value during the crash as I only exposed 1/3 of my savings to such risks. Still I have a heck of a ton more than if I just stuffed it in a savings account, I like to have my money work.
Generally I'm against any Biometrics; even finger scanning. It's just I don't rate this as 'more secure' than fingerprints. Someone could use a brush stroke scan of a physical van gogh painting as a password, but given ample hints and a visible base line, it can be replicated.
There was a story once of a man whom when held at gun point for the keys to his supercar, proudly proclaimed to the robber it would not start without his finger.. and guess what happened? This may or may not be true, but the principle remains the same. Rather than hiding the key, the key is you, and it can be used unwillingly without at least breaking one's willpower (torture, interrogation, threats for PW..). It's worse than a physical key which one can at least hide.
Rather than getting a court order to open your phone. They can hire a company to 3d print your face on a mannequin. Yes it is difficult, but not computationally impossible akin to current respected encryption keys and multi-factor locks.
You're saying it's impossible to sculpt a head with accurate 3d proportions to fool the sensor? People's faces change, and the scanner needs to have some tolerance. Getting in that goldilocks zone is merely a matter of how accurate the sculpt is; and with machine aided sculpting, and printing, relying on "It's too difficult to replicate" isn't a valid defense.
Slashdot Mirror
So were' supposed to be outraged because it's now tech companies? If anything, content operators like facebook could lend some weight to promote net neutrality as they would suffer if it were repealed.
I mean.. seriously?
So does the submitter suggest Amazon set up in the middle of a desert where there's no Impact? Does the desert have highly educated workers? A diverse environment and pool of talent to select from? Infrastructure? Proximity to Colleges?
The first rule of starting off or making expansions to any business to minimize the self cost by getting partners or investors. Amazon isn't going to set up in the middle of nowhere to build up from nothing like los vegas for the good of all, nor should it expect to.
The abstract should be enough for the laymen. Real scientists and those whom are experts in their field or are studying it have much to gain from those equations and 'mathematical jargon' as the summary dictates.
Don't expect Wikipedia to teach you, it is a reference and nothing more. It is however free to edit so if you have the time and patience to simplify these complex topics, then by all means go ahead. But do not expect everything to be served to you on a silver platter.
Is this the story that never ends?
Dig up your own wire AC. You're eventually going to be using utilities or sending data over a medium you have no control over, technology can't solve every problem, that's a common misconception and why so many start ups in tech fail as they can't realize it.
Buy an actual f*cking alarm clock.
The internet is forever, you can't really disappear on the grid as much as one would like to believe. You can hide, but you'll be found in time.
The best defense is not to do dumb stuff in the first place.
Sure you can write disparaging remarks, insult other people anonymously; but the moment you start performing malicious actions causing deliberate targeted harm, that mask can come off mighty fast.
What say now brown cow? Reminds me of the laser.
This is true. There's the backlash of 'environmental regulations' but even without them. Natural gas is beating coal on price, and extraction cost. A side benefit is that it both burns cleaner and is extracted cleaner at less risk to workers. They're losing on all fronts, not just 'environmental'.
Then why doesn't the right build their 'societal machine'? There's Gab, and the founder isn't from a technical background (more a former YC VC) which shows in their work as they aren't getting sharp engineers making their platforms.
The radical left here pretty much built their platform from scratch with a dash of FOSS from reddit, you're telling me there's no radical right than have the technical know how to do the same?
It's a giant wealthy tourist trap.
You forget that ISPs consist of physical cables owned by them. If you're thinking about carrier provisions that force renting out of lines (ie: how boost mobile rents lines laid by AT&T and others); these are high bandwidth lines. As a company, to be forced to share your line that you dug up and planted with others which will cause congestion and degradation for your own customer base is inexcusable. They will make that argument in court and win.
Good luck convincing alternative carriers to have as much reach outside of the highly profitable areas (cities). Get screwed if you live in the country/remote/island or fringe suburb area.
If they wanted to be super-pollution-nazi serious they'd have a phase out over 20 years or so with a progressive tax on new combustion car sales. This is stupid.
These Goldilocks voltages will vary by small margins.. too small to be accurately predicted for an actual attack.
TFA tries to make the argument that this physical hack can be done remotely despite the highly controlled conditions by relying on the power and energy management utilities...
Now i've got news as an embedded developer, that sh*t isn't accurate for anything this sensitive.
Where's my flying cars?
Very specific data mind you. You can introduce a new concept to humans and they'd see similar concepts visualized or explained differently. One such example popular across the ages is sexual innuendo or rather innuendo in any form. You can pull context from basket cases, but pulling from the abstract is where 'True AI' as you defined would clearly outperform.
When you're taking classes, creating buzz, or selling to business partners; AI sounds much more catchy than an advanced deterministic heuristic program.
I think they're dumbing down the term just as how 'Hover Boards' were dumbed down from their original concept.
I'd consider them more voice activated assistants from the consumer ends. From the machine learning part it's just heuristics on a pile of data to find patterns.
Diversify it, and when something looks bubbly, convert a safe portion to bonds. Sure the return is horrible unless you have millions, but you plan for the worst, hope for the best.
I saw the property bubble forming and got out in 2005 by changing about 2/3s of my investments into bonds. Sure I missed out on some killer earnings, but overall, my portfolio only wiped out 1/4 of its value during the crash as I only exposed 1/3 of my savings to such risks. Still I have a heck of a ton more than if I just stuffed it in a savings account, I like to have my money work.
Generally I'm against any Biometrics; even finger scanning. It's just I don't rate this as 'more secure' than fingerprints. Someone could use a brush stroke scan of a physical van gogh painting as a password, but given ample hints and a visible base line, it can be replicated.
..). It's worse than a physical key which one can at least hide.
There was a story once of a man whom when held at gun point for the keys to his supercar, proudly proclaimed to the robber it would not start without his finger.. and guess what happened? This may or may not be true, but the principle remains the same. Rather than hiding the key, the key is you, and it can be used unwillingly without at least breaking one's willpower (torture, interrogation, threats for PW
Rather than getting a court order to open your phone. They can hire a company to 3d print your face on a mannequin. Yes it is difficult, but not computationally impossible akin to current respected encryption keys and multi-factor locks.
You're saying it's impossible to sculpt a head with accurate 3d proportions to fool the sensor? People's faces change, and the scanner needs to have some tolerance. Getting in that goldilocks zone is merely a matter of how accurate the sculpt is; and with machine aided sculpting, and printing, relying on "It's too difficult to replicate" isn't a valid defense.
A good enough mask or disguise can open your devices now.
It would simply be "F*CK" right next to escape.