Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Which Businesses Will Go Away In the Next 10 Years? (nbcnews.com)

AmiMoJo writes: Ten years ago NBC published a list of business types that it predicted would disappear in the following decade. Ten years later and we can see how good their fortune telling was. What businesses do you think will go away by 2027? Who is destined to become the next buggy whip manufacturer, whose demand dried up due to changing technology and a changing world?

For reference, NBC's list was: Record stores; Camera film manufacturing; Crop dusters; Gay bars; Newspapers; Pay phones; Used bookstores; Piggy banks; Telemarketing; Coin-operated arcades.

495 comments

  1. Slashdot by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    just kidding, lighten up

    1. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why not? The quality of the community and articles is not what it was. It keeps getting passed around from company to company. It is just one corp org away form shutting down. What is left is a very loyal community. But not one that probably earns whoever owns it right now much money.

    2. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If you're kidding then you're an idiot. Slashdot will most certainly be dead in 10 years. I'd be surprised if it lasts longer than 3 years.

    3. Re:Slashdot by walterhpdx · · Score: 2

      They might make more money if they allowed subscriptions (they have been disabled for months as far as I can tell). Reddit had a great little thing going called "Reddit Gold" that you could buy that would give you...something, I don't remember what. I was always buying Reddit Gold for people who were being awesome when most people were being dicks. I'd happily support Slashdot.

    4. Re: Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Paradoxically, the quality of the comments here would be better if the posting limits were removed. It's stupid that you can only post twice before having to wait long periods of time before being able to comment again. It makes good discussion impossible. Plus it drives away good commenters. The end result is the low quality discussion we now see here so often.

    5. Re:Slashdot by hackwrench · · Score: 1

      And Slashdot Japan is dead.

    6. Re:Slashdot by RhettLivingston · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sadly, when was the last time the "slashdot effect" was actually observed to cause a virtual DOS attack due to a link from slashdot as opposed to some other site?

    7. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is old enough that it is one of those brands that will be slapped on to random websites long after it should be dead. I foresee a buzzfeed type tech click bait site grabbing the name in a few decades.

    8. Re:Slashdot by Megane · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They can't even get the comment thresholds to work anymore. They've been broken for months, I can't save any changes I make to them and have to drag the sliders every time I open a new article.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    9. Re: Slashdot by Megane · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or you could, you know, create an account and log in? The posting thresholds are effectively gone when you post with a username. Only when I use the "Post Anonymously" checkbox do I have to deal with the posting limits.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    10. Re:Slashdot by Megane · · Score: 2

      They changed their name to srad.jp, but seem to have about the same low number of posts as I remember from years past. If you want to call that dead, then it was never alive.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    11. Re:Slashdot by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Slashdot much like your own body continually dies. You know your are dying as we post, countless dead cells haunting your carcass to be replaced by new cells, you have continually died and reborn since you were first conceived. So as for slashdot, people will move on, newcomers will join, some will hung around till the day they die. The open exchange of ideas around the geek/nerd news of that day. Tearing it apart, putting it back together in new ways just because and injecting new ideas back into the human gestalt in affect programming the AI that is the internet. Slashdot certainly continually changes over time.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re: Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1999?

    13. Re: Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just switch the wifi off on my phone and poof, I can post again.

    14. Re: Slashdot by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 4, Informative

      Logged in you can only post once per minute, and if you are above a certain amount per day, every 5 minutes.
      And there is a maximum of posts per day, 25 or 50, don't remember.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    15. Re:Slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is suffering from the Wikipedia Effect. Mostly long time, heavily invested users who are intent on controlling the message with abuse of the moderation system.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re:Slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I think that's more a testament to modern CDN technology that can handle sudden surges in traffic with ease.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:Slashdot by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Kim Jong Un's barber

    18. Re:Slashdot by admin7087 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'd say the exact opposite is true. The majority of reasonable people interested in tech news stopped posting or left years ago - e.g. to various subreddits and hacker news, or no forum at all to save time - and the many newcomers from the past five years or so are messing up moderation and the submitters have turned Slashdot in some kind of political opinion and household gadget slashvertisement site. And a large army of AC trolls appeared. I used to come here to learn about things like kernel development, satellite communication, or grey hat hacking, and noways people on /. seriously discuss whether "Alexa" is an operating system.

      What you are experiencing seems to be due to changes to the mod point algorithm after the last ownership change. I believe it was designed to keep the trolls at bay and it works to some extent.

      (Disclaimer: I've lurked on Slashdot since its beginnings and posted very actively about ten years ago, under various accounts and user names that are long gone.)

    19. Re: Slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      It depends on your karma. If you have excellent karma I don't think there is any limit on maximum posts per day at all.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re: Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct. I have 5-digit userid (somewhere around 85,000) and have been reading and posting on this site since 1997! But I have not used that Iâ(TM)d to log in for several years not have I spent any significant amount of time reading and posting. Itâ(TM)s not the same site anymore and is essentially dead already.

    21. Re:Slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I post interesting technical stories from time to time, but either the staff don't accept them or sometimes if the trolls are particularly attentive they mod them down because it's me.

      The political stuff is mostly click-bait for outraged hard-line conservatives. It's a shame because there could actually be some really good debate on those stories, but any on-topic comments get modded to hell.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    22. Re:Slashdot by houghi · · Score: 1

      The only two reasons I am still here is because of habit and the way the threads are done. It is closest to how I would like to have online discussions. (The Usenet way is even better, but that was killed)

      In almost all other online media the comments are a mess. Reddit is a bit better, but is blocked where I work and to find something interesting takes a while.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    23. Re: Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you don't have JavaScript enabled (even if logged in), you can post once per 90-120 minutes or so...

    24. Re:Slashdot by houghi · · Score: 1

      When was the last time that you hosted on a server that could not handle the load of that? When it happened, it was things hosted by some small shared hosting provider. Even if the amount of people on /. would be times 10, there would not be a real issue.for sites, unless they host it at home.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    25. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a large army of AC trolls

      I've lurked on Slashdot since its beginnings and posted very actively ... under various accounts and user names

      This just goes to show that there really isn't much difference between registered users and AC users.

      In fact, if we're talking about "trolling", registered users may be far worse, like your comment proves.

      At least we know with full certainty that the "Anonymous Coward" user is a bunch of different people.

      But with registered accounts we readers can't know if it's just one person using an account, or multiple people using an account, or one person using multiple accounts, or multiple people using a set of accounts.

      Registered users are just as anonymous as "Anonymous Coward" users, but it's worse because some foolish people don't realize this and somehow think that they aren't.

    26. Re: Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you need to post more than once per minute, perhaps you are not giving your posts enough thought?

    27. Re:Slashdot by coofercat · · Score: 1

      ...where most of the readers use an adblocker ;-) /.: "Yeah, our site gets ten bajillion page views per day"
      Advertiser: "Hmm, we only see 367 ad impressions per day"

    28. Re: Slashdot by arth1 · · Score: 1

      If you need to post more than once per minute, perhaps you are not giving your posts enough thought?

      Sometimes, even though you read through the post before hitting Submit, you realize that you made an error, and want to do an immediate follow-up. But then you almost certainly get the "Slow down, cowboy!", and once you get that, you're in a mode where you have to wait a long time before you get to post.

      The false positive rate on the delay system is high enough that it causes legitimate users problems.
      And all the wishes from the (then) new owners to go through and fix what caused the posters pain seems to have been dead dreams. I really haven't seen many (or any!) fixes at all. Just new bugs.

    29. Re: Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't believe you.
      Because... â(TM)
      The old curmudgeons wouldn't be posting from an iDevice

    30. Re: Slashdot by tepples · · Score: 1

      Even at the karma cap (about 25 positive moderations past Excellent), there's still a limit of 50 per 24 hours.

    31. Re:Slashdot by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I agree with this analysis. I've been on Slashdot since very early on (I had a four-digit ID until I lost access to that account).

      In a sense, /. is a very pale imitation of what it used to be -- but really, I think it's just transformed into another type of site entirely.

      This is certainly no longer a place where productive discussions of tech news takes place.

    32. Re: Slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Obviously I'm not posting hard enough.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    33. Re:Slashdot by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Reddit is a bit better

      Honestly, I just can't figure out how to make Reddit's comment system work for me. I've tried numerous times, but I can't figure out how to get the threads to display in a sensible, chronological order. As a result, I find the site frustrating and not terribly useful.

    34. Re:Slashdot by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      Subscriptions have been broken for years at this point. I reject and block advertising for security and on principle and want a way to support the site, but they literally won't take my money.

      I had hope when the new owners took over last year but they really haven't done much besides starting to delete and censor comments. I guess they've realized they also don't know how to make the site profitable. Sourceforge has seen improvement, which is good, but it also makes me wonder if they really just wanted Sourceforge and got stuck with Slashdot as a package deal.

      I think it says something important about the modern web that nobody knows how to get money from a loyal and decades-old community with disposable income. Hint: no advertising, subscriptions, skillful editors, and responsive improvements to the site (aka the opposite of the Betapocalypse).

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    35. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Variants of this post have been written since 1999.

    36. Re: Slashdot by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      My Karma is beyond maximum since decades.

      I got mod bombed 3 times (I believe, probably only 2 times) and it took those guys half a year to drag me down that I lost my +1 bonus while posting. No idea about the implementation details.

      I filed a report, of course, and my Karma got restored and the culprits perma lost mod rights.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    37. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Several providers actually roll that into their service. If your site gets slashdotted, they just bill you for more bandwidth and processing time, and hopefully the bill is covered by your ad revenue model. People who use the cloud tend not to feel the slashdot effect very much.

    38. Re: Slashdot by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The exact same thing happened to me.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    39. Re:Slashdot by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I was always buying Reddit Gold for people who were being awesome when most people were being dicks.

      So what you're saying, cuntface, is that a high dick:awesome ratio can save a site?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    40. Re:Slashdot by rl117 · · Score: 1

      I've been reading for 20 years now (!). While I still follow slashdot, it's no longer the go-to place for interesting tech stories and discussion. I make the occasional comment, but all to often I end up thinking, what's the point? Slashdot did always have a mixture of topics, but it seems to have become increasingly general over time; politics in particular is something of little interest to me; there are far better sites if you care about that. I now look at hacker news, specific subreddits, soylent news and a few others. I'd have to say, I'm still looking for something as great as slashdot in the late '90s. Hacker news is often too oriented around silicon valley venture capital-funded startup culture, but still covers contemporary topics. There are plenty of interesting and friendly subreddits, but you have to be aware of which ones are worth the time to subscribe to. Some are excellent, and have lots of the key people in their field as active participants, which makes them valuable resources. soylent is around equivalent to slashdot but has less comments (not necessarily a bad thing, so long as the quality is high). The major change to my mind is that slashdot is where you used to get insightful opinions from key people in the tech world, from free software hackers to all sorts of other people who had valuable things to say. That's no longer the case for the most part, many of them moved elsewhere; you have to wade through a lot of ill-informed anonymous trolling to see the odd diamond in the rough.

    41. Re:Slashdot by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      You're mostly correct. I remember instances of sites hosted at home and of sites where people had dynamic content. There were cases of people begging for help to refactor their database interface. Often, sites would go static for a day. Volume was as high as thousands of requests per minute, which, yes, is low by today's standards. But I also seriously doubt Slashdot could cause a volume of thousands of request per minute for most of a day now.

      The Wikipedia article on Slashdot Effect indicates that it was in decline relative to other sites prior to being mostly obsoleted by tech.

      The name, however, is somewhat dated, as flash crowds from Slashdot were reported to be diminishing as of 2005 due to competition from similar sites.

      There was a day when Slashdot was the only site big enough and interested enough in non-mainstream sites to cause this issue on a fairly regular basis, hence the name for the effect. That day has been gone for over a decade.

    42. Re: Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, look at this. Modded down for a post that has no inflammatory statements, no political speech, no insults, just simple logic and reasoning that can easily be checked. Go ahead and look at posts for the first eight years of slashdot. Anonymity was a virtue.

      It's as if there is this concerted effort to prove the point "an ever growing majority of people are judging and moderating posts based on who said it rather than what it says" and anyone that does not conform is declared a troll and voted down to oblivion.

      The only real question is why so few people care about this trend of ignoring reason and evidence. The only thing that matters is who is speaking and maybe, maybe how they make you feel.

    43. Re: Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you recommend some of those subreddits please?

    44. Re:Slashdot by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Sliders? Sounds ghastly.

      Why not just use the drop-down box in Classic mode?

      Never had a problem with it.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    45. Re:Slashdot by Obfiscator · · Score: 1

      Huh, I think you may have expressed the reason I'm still here. I've been thinking about it through the entire thread, and it's not really the content of most comments (of course there are gems, but most comments, including the one I'm currently making, are mediocre). The format and style of the comments is just much cleaner than other sites, which makes it easier to read.

      --
      "Nothing shocks me. I'm a scientist." -Indiana Jones
    46. Re:Slashdot by Megane · · Score: 1

      Try changing them, the problem is in the code that saves them back to your user settings.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    47. Re: Slashdot by Megane · · Score: 1

      As an old, old-timer here, I can tell you that the karma cap is 50. Or at least it was before they hid it, but I don't think they would have bothered to change it.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    48. Re:Slashdot by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Not sure what you mean. I have mine set to threshold:4 to filter out the rubbish in long threads.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    49. Re:Slashdot by Megane · · Score: 1

      The problem was that when you tried to change the filter, whether through the preference panels or just by changing the sliders, it didn't save the change. So the next time, it was back to 0/0 or later 3/3. But it seems someone saw my gripe this time and fixed it, and it is now correctly staying at my preferred 2/1 setting.

      If "classic mode" still had it working, then that wasn't very helpful, because it was crap and I ditched it 15 years ago, so there is no way I would have stumbled over it. I like being able to collapse sub-threads after I read them.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    50. Re: Slashdot by trg83 · · Score: 1

      I don't have mod points at the moment, but maybe you got modded down because your points were ridiculous. A login doesn't make you any less anonymous unless you choose to use your real name or use the same screen name you use on other sites where you give your real name or personal information. It's very confusing for those of us who do log in to try to figure out which Anonymous Coward in a thread is even the same entity. Maybe they should do like Google Docs does and give anonymous users absurd nicknames like Jaunting Jackalope to at least solve that issue.

      Anonymous COWARD should somewhat give away how the site feels about anonymous posts, but whatever.

  2. Not prophetic, but very accurate by chromaexcursion · · Score: 0

    Correct on all counts. None were reaches, but they weren't trying to be sensational.

    1. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The article's headline said that these were businesses "facing extinction in ten years." In reality, very few (if any) of the businesses they identified actually are extinct.

      Within the article, they did include weasel language under almost every single item to the effect that "it will be around, but their business will decline." Of course, if they had headlined their article "10 businesses that will decline in the next 10 years," nobody would have given it a second glance.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    2. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Record stores, Camera film manufacturing, Newspapers, Pay phones, Used bookstores, Piggy banks and Coin-operated arcades were already in major decline ten years ago so no real prediction there. The others are about as common as they were. So I'd say NBC's prediction was a failure.

    3. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      No worries, mate. As soon as any given business becomes obsolete, the hipsters will rush to rediscover it, pay 10x the old price for its products, and make it fashionably cool again. It's the circle of life.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... let's see:

      Records stores: were already mostly dead in 2007, so not really a prediction;

      Camera film manufacturing: same as record stores;

      Crop dusters: fair enough, this one was well predicted (although I don't think it could be said crop dusters are fully dead yet);

      Gay bars: they got it right by predicting they would survive;

      Newspapers (in paper form): I don't think they got this one right, you still see newspapers everywhere (even in big cities) in the U.S.;

      Pay phones: accurate

      Used bookstores: accurate;

      Piggy banks: this one they got completely wrong (let's be fair here, they were predicting the next 10 years); we are far from paperless;

      Telemarketing: they got this one right by predicting it would still be around in lesser form;

      Coin-operated arcades: were already dead in 2007, except for places that have it as a kind of vintage novelty;

      The Slashdot summary is wrong, though, they didn't "publish a list of business types that would disappear in the following decade", they published a list of business types that would face extinction in the following decade, but not necessarily disappear.

    5. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by Zobeid · · Score: 1

      Record stores have bounced back, photographic film has bounced back, and telemarketing is (I'm sad to say) still going strong.

    6. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by darkain · · Score: 4, Informative

      In fact, some of those are actually on a massive rise due to recent retro trends. Arcades and more specifically Barcades are popping up all over the place now. Film cameras are as of 2017 just starting to make a retro comeback as well. Used book stores seem to be doing just fine, too. Amazon only killed off retailers, not the second hand market. In fact, vinyl records also has a surge going on right now. So like almost half their list is currently being fueled by nostalgia into new market territory.

    7. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by Chitlenz · · Score: 1

      Records stores are doing just fine. Vinyl is back in a big way, and as someone who has a ton of it I'm thrilled about it. Vinyl purchasers are pretty eclectic/odd folks in general, so there's a pervasive mindset that supports local stores when it's possible (like the Record Store Day events, and black Friday releases). My local stores have live music and all kinds of other events to make it more of an experience, plus for the most part these guys know they are terminally dependent on the people that support them, so they tend to be pretty cool folks. The linked list was crap, none of that has come to pass as they laid it out, it's in the "well but it might also" trailing categories for almost all of their points.

      --
      Imagination is the silver lining of Intelligence.
    8. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by skids · · Score: 1

      Telemarketing: they got this one right by predicting it would still be around in lesser form;

      I won't give them this one, because they didn't predict that lesser form would be of the criminal variety, and yet still manage to generate the same or greater volume of calls. They thought do-not-call would kill the industry, not just make it go underground.

      Their main failure was they didn't consider the demographics of the targetted consumer base: more senescent people, and more people with complex finances leaving them with frantic levels of concern and thus emotionally vulnerable.

    9. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct on all counts. None were reaches, but they weren't trying to be sensational.

      Dude, what the fuck are you talking about? Not a single one of the following list is accurate:

      Record stores; Camera film manufacturing; Crop dusters; Gay bars; Newspapers; Pay phones; Used bookstores; Piggy banks; Telemarketing; Coin-operated arcades.

      Vinyl is making a huge resurgence, you can still buy film if you try hard, I have no idea about crop dusters, I've been groped in a gay bar fairly recently ;-), newspapers still exist, I saw someone using a pay phone just yesterday actually, I've been in a used book store recently, seen a piggy bank in the store within the last week, telemarketers still call me, and I'm pretty sure if you look hard enough there is a coin op arcade someplace.

      So, not correct on all counts, utterly wrong in fact.

      See, the problem with idiots who try to tell us the future is they're mostly talking out of their assholes.

      I'd say that's some pretty fucking terrible prognostication.

      The fucking article, and the bullshit story from 10 years ago is just clickbait written by idiots.

    10. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by gravewax · · Score: 1

      how are they correct on all counts? by my reading they were arguably wrong on all counts. maybe payphones you could give them, the rest are all wrong and some are even stronger now than they were back then.

    11. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how the fuck do you put crop dusters in as fair enough, they are still relatively common, they are an effective fast and cheap means of spraying all over the world and until they have a more efficient and cost effective replacement they are not going to disappear. Used book stores are more popular than ever, telemarketing if anything has increased, Record stores and film have actually increased since 2007 not declined. Coin operated arcades are also making a come back.

    12. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by magarity · · Score: 1

      Record stores have bounced back, photographic film has bounced back, and telemarketing is (I'm sad to say) still going strong.

      I don't get bothered by any of these much any more, even telemarketing, but when will newspapers have the decency to die off? Someone started one up locally just a couple of months back and started tossing it onto everyone's driveway once a week. They don't even have the thoughtfulness to bring it on the morning of trash day.

    13. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by Megane · · Score: 2

      I would say that many of those businesses already died, and what we have now is the remaining niche after collapse. Just because we have automobiles and jet planes doesn't mean there isn't still a need for buggy whips.

      But telemarketing? I wish they would die. They're like roaches, always hiding except for the times when they run past you.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    14. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article's headline said that these were businesses "facing extinction in ten years." In reality, very few (if any) of the businesses they identified actually are extinct.

      Within the article, they did include weasel language under almost every single item to the effect that "it will be around, but their business will decline." Of course, if they had headlined their article "10 businesses that will decline in the next 10 years," nobody would have given it a second glance.

      Yes! I looked at that and thought "OMG, they got every single one of them wrong!" OTOH, it made me smile. : D

    15. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say that many of those businesses already died, and what we have now is the remaining niche after collapse.

      Interesting definition of "death" you have there.

    16. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by tigersha · · Score: 2

      The problem with the demise of newspapers (that people pay for) is not the newspaper, its the loss of journalism and the rise of fake news Nd anyone oublishing any unresearched crap they want.

      Poeple will pay for something they can hold in their hands. This is going to be he end of us.

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    17. Re: Not prophetic, but very accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For very Renaissance there will eventually be a renfair. Good luck making billions off that.

    18. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by war4peace · · Score: 1

      There are zounds of used bookstores where I live. I hope they never go extinct.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    19. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Don't over-estimate how big those revivals are though. Vinyl only looks like it is selling in significant volume because no-one buys music on physical media any more. CD sales are way, way down in the last decade, as are music sales in general thanks to streaming.

      I was surprised to see camera shops trying to make a comeback. There is a chain in the UK called Jessops, which had a pretty terrible reputation for being an over-priced hard-sell rip-off even back in the day. They all closed and a low grade celebrity businessman bought the name, and is trying to bring them back. But everything in there is still twice the price you can get it on online, and with online sales you have more consumer rights.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by urdak · · Score: 3, Informative

      Record stores have bounced back

      No they haven't! I have in my collection 1000 (!) CDs which I bought over the years. I used to go into record stores a lot and continuously buy more of them. But *all* the record stores I frequented have closed. When I go to shopping malls all over the world, I no longer see record stores, and don't have any opportunity to buy new CDs. The last CD I bought was a year ago, when I visited some old shopping mall and was thrilled to see a CD store, and was so thrilled that I immediately bought 3. But apparently, I'm the only one. People don't even know what to do with physical CDs any more: you can't physically stick it into your music-play phone, and the music and movie industry succeeded too well in demonizing people who "rip" their CDs and DVDs to files.

      photographic film has bounced back

      Maybe in your alternate universe :-) Nobody I know used photographic film in more than a decade. Maybe some art fans are still using it, but that's 0.01% of the market share it used to have.

      telemarketing is (I'm sad to say) still going strong.

      That I agree.

    21. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Even of the ones they got right, they weren't very right. For example, crop dusters are increasingly being replaced by drones (which can fly lower safely), rather than by big companies using the same tech (as they predict). Newspapers, as you say, don't seem to have gone anywhere, though the online editions are more popular than ever. I'd disagree on used bookstores: any time I travel in the English-speaking world, I pop into a used bookstore to find something to read, and I've not noticed a decline here. There are still a lot of them about and given the recent statistics on the decline in popularity of eBooks, I don't think they're going away any time soon. If anything, telemarketing seems to be on the increase, with cheap VoIP systems making it easy to run a callcenter in India and robodial anyone in the world. Coin-operated arcades are still around. As you say, most of them had already closed 10 years ago, but I've not seen any close since then and I have seen newer ones open.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    22. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Sort of like Elvis and disco,. It has to fade away two generations later. The generation that lived it, and their kids trying to remember their childhood

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    23. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Records stores are doing just fine.

      Depends what you mean by 'just fine' really.

      I live in a medium sized UK city. Twenty years ago there were about 15-20 record/CD shops. I think there are maybe two now.

    24. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The problem is that factual reporting is boring. Detailed investigations are expensive, and even if they do turn out to be interesting the moment you publish them every other newspaper reports the same thing the day after. So all you have left is clickbait, which can take several forms (outrage, bullshit, porn) but is always cheap and somewhat effective.

      Some newspapers are turning to patronage and it does seem to be working for them, at least for now. A few are niche enough to get away with charging, like the FT. But really, I won't miss the shitty tabloids. The sooner they die the better.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    25. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by l20502 · · Score: 1

      music and movie industry succeeded too well in demonizing people who "rip" their CDs and DVDs to files.

      You're assuming most people know how to do that or want to waste time ripping discs when it's faster to just download a copy from the internet.

    26. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by houghi · · Score: 1

      "Massive". I don't think that word means what you think it means.

      Sure these things will be available and people will still buy them. The arguments you make is like saying "the car did not kill the horse industry. There are stil horses around and people use them in traffic.

      Sure, it doubled perhaps from last year, but it is nowhere close as to what it was.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    27. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      They didn't account for the Hipster market. What seems to be taking the biggest hit, are Malls and the Big Box stores.
      The small stores with their local charm, have for the most part always had one foot in the grave. But for the most part they are still around, when they are in the right locations.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    28. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by arth1 · · Score: 1

      It depends on what you mean by "die". Lots of technologies have gone into niche markets, but if you want to buy a buggy whip today, you still can.

      My predictions over a 10-15 year time span is that the following will die or become niche products:

      - Hardcover books. Which already is mostly true - what's sold as a hardcover today is only very rarely a bound book, but a paperback that has been slapped a cardboard front and back on, and a fake cloth strip glued to the top and bottom of the spine to simulate it being bound.
      - Book stores, also for new books. Religious book stores will live a while longer.
      - DVDs.
      - Electric guitars. Artists will still need them, but artists are becoming fewer, and youngsters testing the water aren't going for guitar these days.
      - Suitcases. They are becoming cost-prohibitive for travel, where two bags with the same volume and weight costs less.
      - Tablets. They are re-introduced as a new thing every 3-4 years, and flop every time. They're too big compared to a phone, and too cumbersome to use compared to a real PC. They'll die and something new with a new name will replace them.
      - Secret votes for the public. Internet voting will kill that.
      - Open votes for the legislature.
      - Twitter and Facebook. If you think they are too big to fail, remember Yahoo, MySpace, LiveJournal...
      - Large concerts, also known as "targets".
      - http without an s.
      - Handwriting being taught in school.
      - In several countries except the US: coins
      - TV game consoles. Games will be streamed and TVs will support dumb controllers.
      - Cable TV. The cable TV companies will still control their oligopoly as internet providers and collect the danegeld, but you'll subscribe to streaming services.
      - The SysRq, Scroll Lock and Break keys on keyboards. Useful, but not Pareto useful.
      - Manual toll booths.
      - Coke Zero Calories, to be replaced with Coke Zero

      And I predict that Nehru jackets will make a comeback.

    29. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I go to shopping malls all over the world, I no longer see record stores, and don't have any opportunity to buy new CDs.

      Then you haven't gone to Japan.
      I even found a store selling cassette tapes last time I went.
      It's the country where they still use cash, fax machines and physical media.

    30. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      The big music stores are all gone. Tower Records, kaput. HMV, exited the US market. Borders (a bookstore that had a big presence in music), gone. FYE, a shadow of its former self.

      The record departments in the big box stores have also shrunk a lot. Walmart, Target, Best Buy... only a tiny bit of music left. Barnes & Noble (book store with music) has mostly withdrawn from music.

      Small record stores and local chains (like Newbury Comics here in Massachusetts and neighboring states) have survived. Some have seen a surge in business with the hipster vinyl revival, which has also increased interest in used records. Urban Outfitters, the quintessential hipster chain, has ridden that revival and substantially increased its music sales, as well as selling record players.

      One thing that NBC completely missed is the even more complete demise of video stores, though they were also already struggling in 2007. Streaming video took away most of the market. What market remains for physical video is now Redbox, the shrunken video sections in those big box stores, an occasional local chain that still sells video (Newbury Comics again), and online merchants. A few video rental places are soldiering on in small towns where high speed internet is uncommon, but they're just about extinct in cities.

    31. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Record stores have bounced back, photographic film has bounced back

      They're currently "in" with the hipsters, that's all.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    32. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      Record stores have bounced back

      When I go to shopping malls all over the world, I no longer see record stores, and don't have any opportunity to buy new CDs. The last CD I bought was a year ago, when I visited some old shopping mall and was thrilled to see a CD store, and was so thrilled that I immediately bought 3.

      I did a Google Maps search and found a record store near me. They carried mostly T-shirts and other novelties. Of the three racks of CDs they had, two had movies on DVD. They did have one bin of vinyl, all recent re-issues of odd stuff (e.g., Green Day next to Frank Sinatra next to Fleetwood Mac). Would have been very disappointed if one of the shelves of DVDs wasn't all obscure Japanese-import anime.

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    33. Re:Not prophetic, but very accurate by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

      Used bookstores: accurate; In this fetid dump of about a million souls, we haven't lost any used bookstores AFAIK. That's somewhat surprising, given that the average IQ is approximated by the individual's shoe size.

      --
      Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
  3. Universities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    They will implode under the weight of SJW idiocy and the cost of installing transgender bathrooms.

    1. Re:Universities by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

      OP made a stupid (but funny) comment, but Universities and places of higher learning could be under the pump as students don't even bother to show up for lectures and instead watch recordings instead.

      http://www.news.com.au/finance...

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
    2. Re:Universities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At my university they aren't doing anything special with the bathrooms, just putting up signs that basically say people can use whichever bathroom they want. Seems like a much easier and cheaper way of handling things.

    3. Re:Universities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can use whichever bathroom they want

      But what about for whatever they want?

    4. Re:Universities by skids · · Score: 1

      Lectures are only part of the curriculum, and even they are more interactive these days. We've seen no real decline in interest in enrollment where I work, and have not had to reduce our admissions standards in quite some time.

    5. Re: Universities by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Hardly a new prediction.

      PCU came out in 94, universities are thriving just fine (far better even).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    6. Re:Universities by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Schools based on lectures and books, regardless of the age level, should be considered "dead man walking". Hands-on teaching (carpentry and surgery) will still require a hands-on approach for a couple of decades.

      Public education takes up about half of state and local taxes. Think of all the money that would be freed up to do useful things if students were taught by computer programs. Teachers could do something productive for a change.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    7. Re:Universities by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      The University of Missouri has had a 35% decline in enrollment since the riots a couple of years ago. It's so bad at Missouri that they're renting out dorm rooms to football fans.

        Others may follow if they aren't careful. Riots are happening on college campuses more and more frequently.

    8. Re:Universities by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      As long as suckers still pay a quarter mil to get that piece of paper at the end of it all, most universities wouldn't care.

    9. Re:Universities by skids · · Score: 1

      Not in my state, and we are glad to take the offloaded business we get from not being Missouri.

    10. Re:Universities by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      But what about for whatever they want?

      It's a university. Doing whatever you want in the restroom has been the standard since at least the 50s here in the US. Personally, I've:

      • Gone to the bathroom (duh)
      • Done homework
      • Puked
      • Worked out (stall bar pull-ups FTW!)
      • Had various types of sex
      • Gotten high
      • Bandaged a friend after a bar fight
      • Recorded a demo
      • Slept

      With today's phones, you could also watch movies or attend lectures or even write and submit a paper. No end of stuff you can do in a bathroom.

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
  4. gas stations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gas stations will go away very soon...

    1. Re:gas stations by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      I think it's going to take more than 10 years for that to happen.

    2. Re:gas stations by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      Uh, what is going to to replace regular gas cars? Electric ones? Um, right. Right after autonomous driving and AI arrive...

    3. Re:gas stations by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I suspect that's more on the 30 year timeframe, as I still see cars built in the 1980s and 1990s on the road, and only the rich can afford electric so far.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    4. Re:gas stations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's going to take about 10 years from the time when a small electric car will become cheaper to buy than a similar ICE car. Ten years because people will keep driving their cars beyond that point, but as old cars are replaced by electric vehicles, gas stations are going to go away or turn into convenience stores. They will not turn into electric charging stations: If battery technology keeps improving as expected, there will be no need to charge on the go.

    5. Re:gas stations by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      exactly, though most gas stations already have convenience stores attached to them.

    6. Re: gas stations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Autonomous driving will arrive soon, but electric cars still have other limitations: short range and slow charge time.

    7. Re:gas stations by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      Other than the one that I own, I've never seen another electric car on the road.

    8. Re:gas stations by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      When are we going to see electric semi-trucks?

      A small, convenient electric car for a family is something you can happily recharge overnight. A semi. to drive for a day on electricity alone hauling a trailer with steel, and recharge overnight? Not gonna happen in the next 5-8 years at least, and to replace the existing fleets allow two more decades if you look optimistically.

      Gas stations may change the profile, but trucks will need oil for a long time yet.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    9. Re: gas stations by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      electric cars still have other limitations: short range and slow charge time.

      The range is good enough for 99% of the time. For the other 1%, I can rent a gas car.

      The charge time doesn't matter because my car charges at 2 AM while I am sleeping.

      In total, I spend a lot less time waiting for my car to charge than you spend at gas stations.

    10. Re:gas stations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new Audi A8 is already fully autonomous you just can't afford it.

    11. Re:gas stations by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Other than the one that I own, I've never seen another electric car on the road.

      That depends on where you live. In the South Bay, I see dozens every day.

      San Jose has the most of any major city in America.

      McAllen, TX has the least.

      They are even less common in rural areas where the range can be a problem.

    12. Re:gas stations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A semi-truck gets 6.5mpg...suggesting it will need about 1.25 kwH per mile if electric. So if the truck travels 500 miles a day, it would need 625 kwH.

      The new Tesla chargers are 145kW. So it doesn't sound like it will be a problem, although 625 kwH is a large battery that you would probably want to implement with futuretech.

    13. Re:gas stations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hello, Groucho. Expanding on your observation...
      For decades now, in the US the age of the average car has been rising. It has doubled since the Sixties; the average running registered car is now 12.4 years old. Cars don't wear out and rust like they used to. BTW, the average Driver is older too. People live and drive longer, and Teens no longer feel that desperate need to get a Learner's Permit six month's short of their 16th Birthday.
      Now, assuming that we can freeze Demographics, among other things, ten years from now, the average car on the US roads will have been made somewhere around early Spring, 2015, and will probably be an SUV of some sort with a 200HP Gasoline Engine. There are only three things that will accelerate acceptance of Electric, and one is quite precise.

      Between the end of the War and the 70's Gas Crises, the average new full size car was priced at 6 months of the Salary of the average working person, with "Economy" cars coming in at ~50% of that price. Which means that a Full size Electric Car needs to be around $25K, and an Electric Econobox needs to be ~$13K, in adjusted 2017 Dollars. People simply won't buy what they can't afford. Only around 5% of the US population buys a new car in a given year anyway, and this too has been relatively constant for decades.
      The second thing that needs to happen is that Gas and Diesel needs to get very expensive. 1974 Gas Shortage expensive, so over $10 a Gallon, and it has to stay there for a few years. People simply won't buy what they can't afford, unless somebody comes up with a clever way to Lease Gasoline with minimal Down Payment and and billing stretched out over 5 years. Yup, Price Controls that disconnect the price of Gas with its actual cost, through various forms of Taxation. Oh, I can hear the howls of outrage from here...
      Even then, there won't be enough Used Electric Cars to fill the need, because it still may not seem obvious at first, but New Car Sales are a very small part of the Market, and new Electric Car Sales are a very small part of that. Most people buy Used Cars. They always have.
      The third thing that needs to happen is an accelerated Junker Program. Except for Electric Cars, no car over a decade old can be allowed on the roads, anywhere. Japan something like did this, with a funny result. Countries like Ireland and much of Eastern Europe was flooded with cheap reliable five-year old Japanese cars.

      So a decade from now... yes, there will be more Electric Cars on the roads, but given current relatively Free Market conditions and purchasing trends, and without something like WWIII to muck everything up like last time, it will take, get this, _five decades_ before Electric cars outnumber the Internal Combustion ones. It's actually very simple math.
      "You Can Trust Your Car To The Man Who Wears The Star." Gas stations have some life in them yet.

    14. Re: gas stations by ngc5194 · · Score: 1

      Stay classy.

    15. Re:gas stations by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      The number of gas stations has been declining for decades, due to rising efficiency, self-serve stations, and pumps that accept credit cards. Service stations - places that sell gas and repair cars - seem to have declined the most, while gas-and-snack places have risen in comparison.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    16. Re:gas stations by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      There are a lot of peices to the puzzle of completely replacing fuel powered cars with electric ones. Making the cars cheaper and their range longer is certainly part of it but it's far from the only part.

      Figuring out where people who don't live in a house with off street parking or people who are travelling for an extended period can charge their cars is one part. Ensuring the electricity grid can deal with the extra load is another.

      Having said that I think you are right that largely gas stations won't turn into electric car charging stations. Firstly the low speed of electric charging requires much more land per vehicle served. Secondly having high current high voltage electric chargers in close proximity to dispensers for flammable liquids just seems like a bad idea from a safety perspective.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    17. Re: gas stations by AvitarX · · Score: 2

      I'd assume plug in hybrids with gas stations pretty much being limited to highways, and cities where people don't own a place to charge. Maybe rural areas, depends the range on battery.

      I don't think gas stations will die, but they'll be for the people that can't afford a driveway/nice parking garage or on road trips.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    18. Re: gas stations by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I have a 12 minute commute in a smaller medium sized area (county about 45 minutes across with 500k people.

      I see at least two different electric cars a week (a black Tesla model S, and a white model X). I see leaf's pretty regularly, but not during my commute, so I can't say the frequency as well.

      Also, I see a lot of the Chevy plug in hybrids, and maybe some of their electric, but I don't know what it'd look like.

      I'm not saying they're super common (they aren't), but they aren't even close to as rare around here as they are for you.

      Most people where I live have a driveway, which I'm sure helps.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    19. Re:gas stations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly, though most gas stations already have convenience stores attached to them.

      Speaking of convenience, hybrids with alternate fuels (e.g., butanol) may be in the future of gas stations.

    20. Re: gas stations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The charge time doesn't matter because my car charges at 2 AM while I am sleeping.

      Good for you.... in very high density population areas, a lot of people live in apartments and have no place to privately charge their car overnight. In older parts of a city, the infrastructure often doesn't even begin to support the electrical upgrades that would have to occur to service a reasonable percentage of the people that live in the area.

      Until the recharge times on an electric vehicle is comparable to fill-up times, and such charging stations are about as ubiquitous as gas stations are currently, gasoline vehicles aren't going anywhere.

    21. Re: gas stations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I gas my car once a month at most. Put nozzle in, go inside and get coffee or whatever I need. How many times a month do you charge your car? Even at a mere one minute per getting out the cord and plugging in, I beat you.

    22. Re: gas stations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ChargePoint devices debuted January providing 200mi in 20 minutes. That looks to keep the station business model viable post-gasoline.

    23. Re:gas stations by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      I'm not rich and I have an EV. In fact used ones are popular with people who can do the maths required to understand how cheap they are to own, like taxi/uber drivers. My old Leaf is an uber now.

      It will be interesting when we get to the tipping point where it's actually a real pain to own an ICE vehicle in some places, due to lack of refuelling stations in the area.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    24. Re:gas stations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When are we going to see electric semi-trucks?

      October 28th, according to Elon.

    25. Re:gas stations by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Petrol stations only make sense when the fuel isn't widely available pretty much everywhere. As such you will only find dedicated rapid charging stations on fast roads where people do long distances, and maybe a handful in cities. Most charging will be done opportunistically when the car isn't in use.

      That's what makes EVs so much more convenient. I spend much less time "refuelling" than I ever did with an ICE now, because it's extremely rare for me to stop just to charge.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    26. Re: gas stations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know who will have charging stations? McDonalds.

    27. Re: gas stations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it's a lot less time. Let's assume you can plug it in and unplug it in 30 seconds each. That's 1 minute a day. Or 7 minutes a week. I have to put gas in my car once every 10 days roughly. It takes about 5 or 6 minutes start to finish. Toss in the 1 minute out of my way I have to drive to get to the station, we're talking 7 minutes once every week and a half, vs your 10 minutes.

    28. Re: gas stations by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      electric cars still have other limitations: short range and slow charge time.

      The range is good enough for 99% of the time. For the other 1%, I can rent a gas car.

      No, you cannot. Not if everyone has an electric. Everyone will want to rent a long-range car at the same time (vacations coincide) and I can guarantee that there is no rental company who is going to stock enough cars for peak supply (that happens bi-annually). They are going to carry only enough stock to make optimal profit.

      Maybe you can Uber for that 1 out of 99 trips that use a significant range?

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    29. Re:gas stations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Georgia (USA), there are so many that the state revoked the tax credit on sales of electric cars, and added a special tag tax for electric cars because they were losing too much tax revenue off of gasoline taxes.

    30. Re:gas stations by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      There is a used market? Are they down to the $3000 range yet?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    31. Re:gas stations by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They are sub £5000 in the UK so maybe $6000 US... But I don't know what the market is like over there.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    32. Re:gas stations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Self driving trucks change the equation entirely. An owner can run his trucks 24/7, which means parking for charging is a huge hit. A work around would be a truck design that switches out the whole battery bank in a few minutes. Then you charge the bank offline.
      The same could work for cars, but that's harder because it demands standards like there are for propane tanks.
      The problem with electric is what it's always been. I can jump into my Element and drive to Cali from the East Coast the second I stop typing this. I know there will be an infrastructure to support me clear across the U.S. If I grab the guy in the next cubical to go with me we can drive straight thru.
      Until I can do that in an electric ICE cars will not disappear. Electrics might replace them for local use, but anywhere outside an urban area near the coasts you need an ICE car.

    33. Re:gas stations by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      They won't replace gas completely until a minimum wage worker earning $400 a week can afford them. About 300 British Pounds.

      I'm going out looking though- $6000 is what I paid for my 11 year old Prius

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    34. Re:gas stations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some economist suggested that as little as 18% market penetration by electric cars will be enough to push smaller gas station chains into bankruptcy. And then as gas station density declines, this will fuel (pun intended) the decline of gas powered cars, pushing the next vulnerable group of chains into bankruptcy, lather, rinse, repeat. The survivors, (Exxon, Shell, BP and maybe Chevron?) will be the ones who successfully convert into charging stations without the infrastructure costs driving them into bankruptcy.

      An equally significant consideration is if the range of the average electric car cannot be extended beyond 400 miles, the economy will change, and in unpredictable ways. This especially bodes poorly for mid-size box trucks and rental trucks used for moving. Large trucks will have room for a stupid number of batteries, but without a highly regulated charging station system and/or battery swap system, mid-size trucks and cars will be facing limits in travel not seen since the early 1950s when the biggest barrier to cross-country travel were the roads themselves.

    35. Re:gas stations by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Two anecdotes near me:
      1. A traditional family owned gas station. Pushed into bankruptcy when the owner died and turned out it was his name, personally, on the gas contract with Shell. Shell took over the station. I don't think the prevalence of priuses in the neighborhood had anything to do with it.
      2. A locally owned Chevron franchise near me recently remodeled. They added a pump for biodiesel, the roof over the pumps got covered in Solar Panels, and they added 3 parking spaces with chargers fed from the solar panels for electric, plus they are a popular mini-mart. They're doing quite well actually at the conversion- and will be selling gas and biodiesel long after everybody else is gone.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    36. Re:gas stations by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      Minimum wage workers take the bus, they don't own a car, at least not in Canada. You might be able to buy a car for $600 but the $1500/year in insurance is harder to cover.

  5. Gay Bars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahahaha thanks NBC for the laughs.

  6. Immigration Lawyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After all, once immigration is ended once and for all, who needs a lawyer?

    1. Re:Immigration Lawyer by bruce_the_moose · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All the people trying to get the fuck out

      --
      To reduce crime, make fewer things against the law.
    2. Re: Immigration Lawyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thatâ(TM)s an emigration lawyer, not immigration

    3. Re:Immigration Lawyer by Kjella · · Score: 1

      After all, once immigration is ended once and for all, who needs a lawyer?

      Can't help but hear that in this voice.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:Immigration Lawyer by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      On that subject I'll throw the UK in for consideration. Post-Brexit it either dies slowly or realizes how fucked it is and becomes a mere subsidiary of the EU.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Immigration Lawyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After all, once immigration is ended once and for all, who needs a lawyer?

      Immigration won't end, it will just shift direction.

      Rural areas aren't getting new jobs and Republicans will cut any handout making it viable for them to stay where they are.
      Without any education that might be of use in the cities they will need to migrate to other countries in search for job, and then there will be a need for immigration lawyers.

    6. Re:Immigration Lawyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the explosive growth in US division, they may just switch to the new field of interstate immigration law before ten years is up.

  7. used record stores are thriving ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... crop dusters still dust, film is making a comeback, telemarketers are still here and are still going to hell ;~)

    1. Re: used record stores are thriving ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't film niche? It's not an industry any more than knitting or what have you. An I wrong, are there widespread professional applications?

    2. Re: used record stores are thriving ... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Film is as niche as vinyl records or lamp amplifiers. Meaning not really all that niche.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    3. Re: used record stores are thriving ... by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Yes, the main widespread professional application is diagnostic imaging. Even though most modern diagnostic imaging systems are digital, film is still the preferred print medium for anything big (say, larger than an ultrasound or dental x-ray) because it's cheaper than moving around uncompressed files, easy to archive, and everyone in the medicine business knows how to use it.

      My prediction for the next 10 years is that increased bandwidth, storage, and high(er) dynamic-range displays may make film less common, but it will still be the most practical option in many places in the world.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    4. Re:used record stores are thriving ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I imagine crop dusting will continue to be done for many decades, probably for as long as we grow anything outside. However, it will mostly be done by robots (aka drones). Cheaper, more efficient, and with way less risk to human lives.

    5. Re: used record stores are thriving ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll cropdust your office for free;)

    6. Re: used record stores are thriving ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so sure about that. I was traveling this summer and ended up with pneumonia at an urgent care. They took chest x-rays. Stood me up against a stand and slipped a big flat film pack into the rack. Took a couple of pictures, replacing the film pack each time.

      I asked if there were advantages to still using film. They looked surprised. They weren't using film. It was all digital. I didn't ask technical details, but I suspect that actual chemical film is pretty rare. It sure looked like film. Those "film packs" were maybe a couple of feet on a side (well, maybe 18 inches...) Slid in and out of the rack like an old-style film plate, but They were looking at the image within minutes, no developing time, and gave me a copy of my x-rays on a CD.

    7. Re: used record stores are thriving ... by Megane · · Score: 1

      Film for x-rays was already gone at least five years ago. Dental x-rays are done with a wired USB imager. Larger x-rays use big imager packs that slot into a reader. Anything bigger than a chest x-ray is a CT scan. Most importantly, the imagers are more sensitive than film and need less radiation to do their job. And if there's a bad shot, you don't have to wait for chemical developers, you just snap another one while the patient is still at the chair/table.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    8. Re: used record stores are thriving ... by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Just to be clear, what I said was that film is the preferred print medium for anything big. In most places in the developed world, large x-rays are shot on digital (as you say) and printed to film. Many GP surgeries are not set up for a fully digital workflow yet.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    9. Re:used record stores are thriving ... by scsirob · · Score: 1

      A cropduster takes 300 Gallons of pesticide up and can spray for several hours. A drone with similar abilities is huge, very expensive, requires massive batteries and charge systems. I think cropdusters will have the economical advantage for quite some time to come.

      --
      To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    10. Re:used record stores are thriving ... by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      I think that human-crewed crop-dusting planes will be replaced by crop-dusting drones. They will still run on avgas, not batteries. The energy density per pound still favours internal combustion, not to mention volume. A drone will replace a 175 pound pilot with a few pounds of electronics, leaving more capacity for fuel and chemicals; i.e. it'll be able to stay up longer and dust more. Also, trained/licenced pilots are expensive. Insurance costs will go way down. A crash into a field won't mean a dead pilot.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  8. Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think it'd be far more likely for Mozilla to disappear long before Google does.

    Firefox is the only product of Mozilla's that really sees much use, and even it's losing market share. The latest browser stats show it has only about 5% of the market now, and essentially no presence in the mobile market (0.04%!).

    If I'm not mistaken, their search deal with Yahoo expires in 2019. Given Yahoo's state, and Firefox's almost non-existent market share, I wouldn't be optimistic about it being extended.

    After that, the rest of Mozilla's products could, in my opinion, be seen as failures, including Persona, Firefox OS, Rust, Servo, Thunderbird, and Pocket. I can't really see how any of them help bring in revenue.

    What's their greatest accomplishment as of late? Obfuscating their logo into "moz://a"!

    I think the future looks very bleak for Mozilla.

    1. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are delusional.
      Forking vs Google graveyard.

    2. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by nctritech · · Score: 1

      I and many others use Thunderbird all the time and rave about it to others. It is unfortunate that it has been neglected because with better support for Outlook stuff and Exchange Server it'd basically kill off Outlook. Outlook is a terrible program and I'm very happy to have an excellent alternative to it.

      But you're right. Mozilla has spent a lot of time not listening to its user base. I definitely understand that the user is not always right, but after the Australis shit and the looming murder of XUL/XPCOM despite WebExtensions being woefully inadequate at this stage, Mozilla is winning the "Big Rigs Over the Road Racing" YOU'RE WINNER trophy of shooting oneself in both feet with a crossbow several times in a row.

    3. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by RAID+Roach+Killer · · Score: 0

      IoT Coffins! Yay!

    4. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 5, Informative

      I doubt it. Remember that Google Chrome literately stole Safari and rebranded it Chrome

      Were you born retarded, or were you just kicked in the head by a horse later in life?

      The only thing Chrome shares in common with Safari is that older versions of Chrome used the same rendering engine as Safari called Webkit. Webkit itself was a fork of KHTML (of the Konquerer web browser,) which was written by KDE. Google, at one time, made the majority of the contributions to Webkit to support a lot more HTML5/CSS features. Google then forked only the WebCore component of Webkit because they wanted to support sandboxing, deprecate vendor tags, and use a multi-process model. This fork became the Blink rendering engine that other browsers besides Chrome use, such as Opera and Vivaldi.

      Ever since Google stopped contributing to Webkit, Apple has been developing it at a snail's pace, just like IE6 back in the day, making Safari the lowest common denominator, which is pissing off a lot of developers. Perhaps because Apple wants users on their app store (read: $$$) rather than on the web? Pretty much the same motivation Microsoft had (Microsoft literally circulated an internal memo describing the web as a threat to its cash cow, Windows.)

    5. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Except for Thunderbird, which remains in the top few email clients.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    6. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

      People still use email clients?

    7. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you sort of got that inverted with MS, Microsoft was rapidly developing IE up to IE6 because they thought the internet was a threat, Once they realised it was not a threat that is when the development really stopped for a few years. PS: every company reviews what its business threats are so this is nothing unusual, was actually surprising they realised the internet browser OS thing was never going to happen before everyone else and hence stopped the investment their.

    8. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by fafalone · · Score: 1

      This comment has been up for almost 2 hours and none of Mozilla's paid shills have showed up to explain how WebExtensions are teh b3st thing ever!! and will actually support all your favorite extensions**?
      Wait for it....

      **-If the developer completely re-writes from scratch and spends months working with Mozilla to get new WebExtensions functionality added in, so long as that functionality is Mozilla-Approved, and if it's not, the addon can just keep the features that are, as long as some part of the addon can work, it's counted, even if it won't be done for months and months after 57 breaks the old one. Mozilla is the king of pissing on their users heads and trying to convince them that not only is it raining, but the rain is a good thing, and if it ruins anything it's the manufactures fault for not re-engineering their product to be waterproof.

    9. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Asm.js was relevant and basically paved ghetto way for how the standard was done I thought?

      It didn't make them money, but aside from making browser competition a thing a while ago, that's probably their greatest achievement.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    10. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thunderbird is awesome.... as long as you only want to do mail. The reality is business doesn't just want an awesome mail client (even if they did most would be better off with webmail) they want office integration, calendar and sharing, PABX/Skype/Contact integration, device sync and integration etc etc. if all you wanted was mail then Thunderbird is hands down a winner but that is not what most want.

    11. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shockingly the browsers by the OS manufacturers are always the worst (IE/Edge and Safari) while the browsers by the internet companies (Google, Mozilla, Opera) are the best. I really wish the Apple and MS would stick to what they are good at and leave the browser development to others.

    12. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Informative

      You got most of that right, but one important correction: Chrome had a multiprocess model years before they ever forked Blink from WebKit, and WebKit already had a multiprocess model by the time Blink was forked.

      Backing up a bit, years and years prior to the split, Google baked a multiprocess model into Chromium, rather than WebKit. This gave Chrome a major competitive advantage over Safari and other browsers that relied on WebKit. Apple, of course, wanted to have a multiprocess model as well, so they later baked it directly into WebKit, but it was a significant enough departure that they forked it as WebKit 2. As you’d expect, Google didn’t contribute much (anything?) towards WebKit 2 since it wasn’t compatible with their existing multiprocess model, and, as you’d expect, Apple’s contributions towards WebKit dried up as they focused on WebKit 2. Making things even more interesting, WebKit 2 was a buggy mess for quite awhile, so Apple itself didn’t even adopt it in Safari for Mac or iOS immediately, and Google would have had even less reason to adopt it.

      Google’s eventual forking of Blink from WebKit was really the natural conclusion to the choice Apple had made years earlier when they forked WebKit 2, which was itself the natural next step after Google decided to keep its multiprocess model to itself, which was itself the natural next step after Apple left such a glaring hole in WebKit’s architecture, and so on and so in.

    13. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please don't put Mozilla in the group of best, if anything they should be ranked with MS and Apple, possibly below them as while MS and Apple rarely listen to their users fucking Mozilla never do and it is reflected in there marketshare now.

    14. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Of course.

      Or how would you deal with several email addresses?

      Opening each of them in a browser window, each of them with a different GUI?

      Oh, shudder ...

      And yes, I even use POP, as I want all my mails and mailboxes on my local machine and not somewhere on a server.

      How would I search for some mail stuff in an air plane if my mails would be on a server?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    15. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by nctritech · · Score: 1

      Thunderbird already has some of that. Lightning (the calendaring extension) comes with Thunderbird by default now. I have used extensions that two-way sync Google Calendar and Contacts with Thunderbird. Now, one could argue that extensions aren't "part of Thunderbird" but neither are the things that would enable Outlook to do most of what you mentioned. Unless they've changed it in Office 2016, Outlook's calendar sync with Google is read-only; Lightning plus Provider for Google Calendar was two-way syncing with Google many years ago.

    16. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      If you think you need POP to have local copies of email, you are so ignorant that you would also gain nothing from communicating with anyone. Which means your email is worthless anyway.

    17. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Wow, how insightful.

      There are only two mainstream 'protocols' POP and IMAP.

      And my mail app has no option for IMAP to keep local copies of everything ...

      So I guess the ignorant guy is you ... or are you just a troll?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    18. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Google then forked only the WebCore component of Webkit because they wanted to support sandboxing

      Except that Google supported sandboxing in a crappy way. Apple implemented sandboxing in WebKit, so every application that uses WebKit gets the benefit. For example, when you view an HTML email in Apple Mail, it's rendered in a separate process that has no network or filesystem access, and the changes to enable this amount to about 4 lines of code (basically, opt into this behaviour and promise that you won't use any of the deprecated APIs that it breaks). In contrast, Chrome puts the sandboxing in the browser, so anyone using Blink has to implement their own sandboxing layer.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    19. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Maybe you can save up for a copy of PINE and finally have some modern features?

    20. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About Rust:
      1/ It isn't a Mozilla product.
      2/ It is already a success: it has proven that a huge set of usual bugs can now be unveiled directly by the compiler.
      3/ Newer technologies will profit from some of the innovations in Rust. I've read that the Swift team considered implementing an ownership mechanism.

      Also, remember that Mozilla is a non-profit org.

      Still, I do worry about the future of Mozilla.

    21. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      pine is a text based mail program for terminals ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    22. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Google's way is actually the same as Apple's way, it's just not immediately obvious.

      Apple wanted multiprocess in WebKit because they WebKit as part of their OS and in other apps. Google wanted multiprocess in Chrome because Chrome /is/ their OS.

      On Google's OS the apps are just web pages. They even have apps for Chrome that are just .zip files with all the web site resources pre-downloaded for faster opening, plus a few extra local storage features.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I forward my other accounts to gmail, and there is a Chrome app for offline gmail if I ever feel the urge to do email on the plane.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    24. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by murdocj · · Score: 1

      I used Thunderbird for a while on one computer. It was a disaster. It managed to make the simple act of configuring an email account incredibly difficult. It had some sort of broken "auto-detect" feature that took a while to try to figure out the settings for the server you had entered, and then when it failed, IT DIDN'T LET YOU ENTER THE CORRECT SETTINGS. I spent God knows how much time screwing around with, thinking there must be some way to get the settings in, because nobody would be that dumb.

      Finally realized the only way to do it was to interrupt the auto-detect in middle, and then it left the UI in a state where it was possible to enter the correct settings.

      I've used a ton of email clients, going back to Eudora, and Thunderbird was far and away the worst.

    25. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by murdocj · · Score: 1

      Wow... the concept of a "compiler" that reveals bugs before runtime!!!! Amazing that no one ever thought of that before.

      Sorry, I'm being horribly sarcastic because I'm sad to see people re-inventing the wheel. I use Typescript at work and it's sad to see it try to bolt a reasonable language on top of the smoking pile that is Javascript.

      Oh well...

    26. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Developing a new major version of something is "forking" now? Fuck off back to GitHub.

    27. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Were you born retarded, or were you just kicked in the head by a horse later in life?

      Okay, OP was wrong. But is this kind of talk really necessary?

    28. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by nctritech · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that part is really crap. They should never have added it because it's useless. It never gets the settings right.

    29. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Used Outlook for years for two jobs. Both companies periodically switched between Lotus and Outlook. For a mature product from such a huge company, Outlook is astoundingly shitty.

    30. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by dougdonovan · · Score: 1

      slashdots business of the anonymous coward will go away.

    31. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      That part was so fucking dumb. You couldn't enter your own settings first. You had to let it run the test and fail first. Thanks Mozilla. Plus your Thunderbird logo looks like a blue wig on a sphere.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    32. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...my mail app has no option for IMAP to keep local copies of everything ...

      Well there's your problem...

    33. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Hehe,
      I forward my gmail mails to my own domain.
      Hm, the app sounds interesting.
      Thanx for the hint.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    34. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by leslie.satenstein · · Score: 1

      I'm not a paid shill, but I do like FF. I am familiar with the way it works and it's reliability. It may not be the fastest, but it is certainly fast enough for my browsing and interaction.

    35. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      The difference, of course, is that Mozilla is a non-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is not making a product.

      Google is a for-profit business.

      The two operate with different goals and by different rules. The end of Firefox would not be the end of Mozilla by any stretch.

    36. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Yep, because even a mediocre email client is far better than the best web-based email client I've ever used.

    37. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thunderbird freezes for me quite a bit. In fairness, that might be due to dozens of automated error emails from the web server...none of which are actually relevant to me, but I'm on the general "web developers" list anyway.

    38. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto, but I'm growing more dissatisfied:

      * Australis.
      * Status bar.
      * Pocket.
      * WebExtensions will break most of my add-ons.
      * Firefox is getting TOO slow. Bogs down other programs when I try to run them both (on an admittedly potato box, but still).

      I'm starting to consider switching to Chrome after all this :(

      Also: Minor nitpick, but FF is not reliability. Perhaps you meant to say you're familiar with its reliability?

    39. Re:Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by Tinfoil · · Score: 1

      I use the Google tool with outlook on half a dozen or so Outlook stalwarts here at the office on various levels of Outlook - two way works well enough.

    40. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      LOL do you always puke up little bits of description when somebody mentions technology?

      I mean, like, yeah, duh. If I was talking about pine treas or Pile Sol then I probably wouldn't have written PINE.

      If you really have to puke up some bullshit whenever somebody makes a technical reference, at least manage "Pine Is Not Elm" or something.

    41. Re: Mozilla will likely disappear before Google. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      No idea what you are talking about.

      I only wanted to point out that a text based email program for terminals hardly can be a valid option for working with emails in our time.

      The only text based program I ever used was: mail (and sometimes I still use it). And then we suddenly already had XWindows.

      And what has that to do with the parent idiots rants about POP and IMAP anyway?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  9. Slashdot by chihowa · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Poorly maintained forums that get sold from sucker in search of advertising revenue to sucker in search of advertising revenue. Doubly so if they don't support unicode (or if they do).

    --
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  10. zero from ten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Zero from Ten? all are still pretty common. If anything some of them have been making resurgence like record stores and coin operated arcades.

  11. Chill people by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0

    We need to consider if we'll be around in ten years before we waste time prognosticating on the businesses that will go out.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  12. buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now, admittedly, they may not be used for the same thing as they originally were, but the market is increasing.

    I'd tend to say the following:

    1. Repair stations (not tire shops) - electric cars and trucks need about half as much maintenance and a lot of it is instrument driven. A good way to diversify is add bike repairs to one of your bays, or a chai/bubble tea store.

    2. Single gender bathrooms in retail. Most places can't really afford having separate facilities, so you'll probably see most places just have a room with both fixtures. Exception: bars, restaurants.

    3. Fear based local TV news. Unhappy, scared people don't buy stuff. And TV is mostly dead.

    4. Food delivery and prepackaged meal delivery services. Those that survive will transition to restaurant delivery. Uber will vaporize as drones replace on demand delivery.

    5. Furniture places. 2025-2035 will see most people getting smaller places and getting rid of large furniture. Exception: couches, chairs. Best to diversify into Tiny Home style furniture that incorporates storage into the furniture (dual use furniture).

    6. Expensive spicy food places. As Americans age into retirees they will start wanting to go to diner type places. This won't kill ethnic foods, but a lot of current restaurants will suddenly lose foot traffic, as retirees don't eat out that much. Nobody will miss them.

    7. Parking garages. The combination of on demand self driving vehicles, more retirees, more cyclists, more pedestrians, and quiet electric transit will kill off a lot of parking garages and the attached malls. Nobody will miss them, except us skateboarders.

    8. Single family home lawn supplies. Lawns will be replaced by gardens and more people will live in multi-family towers next to green parks. But plants will be in high demand for the apartments and decks. Tiny greenhouses too.

    9. Cell phone stores. The 2025-2035 period will see ubiquitous self-powered wifi devices (like ST comms badges) that run off incidental radiation, and attach to clothes (either as sleeves, belts, broaches, or necklaces. This will save jewelry stores, of course.

    10. Wallets. See 9 above. The new devices will mostly replace wallets and purses. People will wear nifty gem sacks at their belts, in which they store their coins (see how Canada does dollars, or Euro coins).

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re: buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm reading this as you thinking everyone is going to be poorer in the future.

    2. Re:buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      11. "Double Wall" on the Mexico-USA border: many USA companies are fired in replacement by the slavery for cheaper labours.
      12. Make Mexico won't pay this wall.
      13. Failed profit.

    3. Re: buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'll still be rich. Technically, I'm worth more than Bernie Sanders, and he's a US Senator. I've been investing since I was a teen.

      I'll be fine.

      Just adapt. Realize certain things are inevitable. Including lower energy usage in American residences, higher efficiency, more distributed energy generation from renewables, drop in beef and pork consumption (partially replaced by beefalo, so cowboys will come into fashion again, with robotic exoskeletons (those things are ornery)), insect farming, and replacement of plastics with biodegradeable vegetable fiber based composites and mushrooms instead of leather.

      You'll love it!

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by walterhpdx · · Score: 1

      To tag onto this, if you've been into a Best Buy in, say, the last ten years and again in the last year, you'll notice that the software section, the movie section, and the music section has dwindled from probably 30% of floorspace to 5%. We'll still consume movies and purchase software, but the era of the DVD as a delivery vehicle for movies/software and the CD as a delivery vehicle for music should be dead by 2027.

    5. Re:buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Micro SDs are the only way to go.

      No, seriously, you will literally wear TBs of info in your jacket. Get used to it. I'm going to glam up with a bioluminescent glow sleeve and my old combat badge repurposed as a comm badge.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    6. Re: buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well sure. But apartments? Gardens for food? Not being able to afford a car? C'mon. ;)

    7. Re: buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 0

      Well sure. But apartments? Gardens for food? Not being able to afford a car? C'mon. ;)

      This is an obvious transition. I'm sorry you haven't seen how the world is changing, but it is.

      The problem is you have this concept of "owning a car". In most cases, people lease cars and don't own them. People under 35 aren't buying as many cars. Electric cars, even if larger percent of market share, are more easily used for car sharing, or on demand uses.

      It's all part of the urbanization thing. Nobody will force you to get rid of things, but choosing to live those lifestyles will become ever more unreachable or not desired by larger and larger segments of the population.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    8. Re:buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by SharpFang · · Score: 2

      I seriously doubt your assertion about cell phone stores.

      First, the current trend is "more powerful CPU, more fancy screen, more feature-packed, and try to squeeze in a better battery that can run that for a couple hours." This trend doesn't seem to be changing, and so self-powered phones won't happen anytime soon as anything but a gimmick. There's simply no way to keep all these features running off "ambient" power.

      And Wifi range is short enough there's no way you'd see these 'self-charging' phones running a mile away from the city.

      The shops may lose some impact as Internet sales and delivery to your door take over, but it's still a long way until they vanish, and certainly not because phones get replaced by "smart jewelry".

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    9. Re: buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might think so. But I long outgrew my younger living in downtown Portland/seattle days. Most everyone I know has eventually moved out of the city as they grew up (I personally live in surburban seattle and seldom if ever venture into Seattle itself). Honestly. I mostly head over the passes to eastern wa if I want to enjoy myself. And of course I own cars. Since I track them and all that. Hell. Even my Gf tracks her car. There's more to cars than getting to work or back. And I grill a lot. Prepared food delivery? Pshah. I know how to cook. I could go on. Honestly. The idea of living in a cook cutter box where I can't entertain. To stay I a small few mile radius and be part of a machine is hardly appealing to me.

    10. Re: buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well sure. But apartments? Gardens for food? Not being able to afford a car? C'mon. ;)

      The problem is you have this concept of "owning a car". In most cases, people lease cars and don't own them.

      I disbelieved and wished to challenge that, so I looked it up.

      While not "most", 30% is a much higher number than I expected.

    11. Re:buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by Strider- · · Score: 1

      . Single gender bathrooms in retail. Most places can't really afford having separate facilities, so you'll probably see most places just have a room with both fixtures. Exception: bars, restaurants.

      Actually, these are going away in bars and restaurants as well, at least here (Western Canada). A number of the local bars/restaurants have moved to a design where you have a genderless restroom, which is surrounded on all sides by full-height stalls. These aren't the stupid stalls like you see in most places, but rather completely enclosed, with a full door/lock on it. They're just marked as to whether they contain a toilet or a urinal+toilet.

      I'll admit that the first time I walked in, I backed out thinking I had walked into the wrong one (there was a woman touching up her makeup at the window), but once I figured it out, it's no big deal. Plus, if you're really worried about safety, having it brightly lit, and more foot traffic, is going to improve that far more than anything else.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    12. Re:buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by ChrisMaple · · Score: 0

      Judging by your post, schools that teach English have already disappeared.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    13. Re: buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by ChrisMaple · · Score: 0

      No matter how nice the multi-use furnishings in your compact city apartment are, a compact apartment sucks in comparison to a big house on a couple of acres in the country. I'm glad you have your delusion and I encourage you to share it with as many people as possible: more room for me out here where life is pleasant, away from the squalor and trash and noise in the city.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    14. Re:buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Use a teeny-verse battery.

    15. Re: buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only until they get old enough to be retro. Then they'll see an uptick/revival from hipsters or their 2027 equivalent

    16. Re: buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Amazingly not every one is scared of big cities and different people and likes to live in the country (suburbs) with their acres and a gun.

    17. Re: buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bernie's net worth is only like half a million, but he also has a gov pension of about $50k and the dicounted/subsidized health care.

      So if you have a pension or $500k in savings (i.e. not net worth) and are under 40, then you are golden if you don't plan to live anywhere expensive.

      If you are over 40 and don't have a pension, then you better have a lot more savings for retirement over and above your net worth.

      I just turned 40 this year, I have about $750k in savings/retirement and a net worth of about $1.2M. I also live in a relatively cheap location. According to the financial planning guy, I'm on target to be able to retire at 56 with a plan that both the wife and I live to 100. That assumes that social security completely goes away. Who knows what mess will be left for healthcare. It was looked at as ACA-type costs with inflation...so close to worst case. But I'll probably work until 65 or later if for no other reason to refresh all the toys before actually retiring, 10+ years with kids on their own and no house payments should free up a lot of funds.

    18. Re: buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To your point - most of the crap we carry around (keys, wallet, work ID) is in one way or another simply to prove who we are. All could be replaced by a single tiny chip, like a heavily encrypted RFID, that would fit in a piece of jewelry. How soon until. Cell phone fits into an earring/necklace set?
      (Better biometrics would accomplish the same thing)

    19. Re:buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

      I like your list, but I quibble with a few:

      >2. Single gender bathrooms in retail.
      With all the PC rabble-rousers, I predict that more and more locations will give up and not offer a restroom at all.
      You can't get a lawsuit for not having a gender-choice-of-the week restroom if you don't have restrooms. [[taps side of head]]

      >4. Food delivery and prepackaged meal delivery services.
      I foresee the opposite. Restaurant owners don't want to deal with delivery staff and logistics, unless they have to. (Pizza is probably the only one that makes sense, despite the hassle). 3rd party delivery companies will start to crop up once drone delivery makes it cost effective.
      Cooking at home is trending down. It's too much work, takes too much time, and makes a mess. Skills are not being passed down to the next generation.

      >8. Single family home lawn supplies. Lawns will be replaced by gardens and more people will live in multi-family towers next to green parks
      I don't know anyone who wants to live in an urban tower. That's for college students and poor people.
      As automated driving becomes mainstream, the range of suburbs will expand. I can tolerate a longer commute if I can wake up slowly with coffee and morning news. Automated driving will allow higher speed limits too, further increasing the commute range.
      I want a nice lawn. I don't want to put in the work for a lawn-sized garden. Those things are a lot of work to maintain. Ever notice that good gardens are the domain of the retired?

      >9. Cell phone stores.
      You're making many arguments here. First one is an argument against the cellphone upgrade cycle. I'm seeing that accelerating, with no end in sight.
      Second is the advancement of low power devices. There's a place for that (IoT), but not in the hand-held personal computer space. Power requirements for personal mobile computing are increasing. Batteries are increasing, not disappearing.
      Next is the actual, physical store. Ya and no. Sure, I can order a phone online - but some things are that are best done by an expert. Just yesterday I drove to a cell phone store to get them to help port a land-line number to a new cell phone. I didn't want to spend all day in phone call "wrong dept" purgatory, I just wanted an expert to get it done. Dropped in the store, and bam, a bored guy who's done it a hundred times uses his company's magic, secret web site to make it happen. Everyone's happy.

      I am surprised that you didn't' say "half of all gas stations". Electric is going to kill the gas station business model. It's going to be a slow, painful death as the market for gas slowly dries up. (see what I did there)

    20. Re: buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are assuming that is all by choice.

    21. Re: buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that is of the "new car sales". You probably don't see many 10 year old leased cars driving around.

      Leasing might be great for people who drive moderate amounts and are willing to pay more for not having to worry about repairs.

      It is definitely good for the auto makers, who essentially get to sell the car twice since the first owner is on a forced upgrade schedule.

    22. Re:buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by arth1 · · Score: 1

      10. Wallets. See 9 above. The new devices will mostly replace wallets and purses. People will wear nifty gem sacks at their belts, in which they store their coins (see how Canada does dollars, or Euro coins).

      Wallets are needed for other things. American wallets have (unlike European ones) mostly been without coin compartments to start with, and are used for credit cards, driver's licenses, SSN cards, green cards, card insurance slips and similar.
      I think coins will go away. The only place I use coins now are toll booths and old style vending machines, and I am fairly certain that both will continue the change that's already underway.

    23. Re: buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, who would want to be out there with "A" single gun. I've got a whole safe full.

    24. Re:buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2. Single gender bathrooms in retail. Most places can't really afford having separate facilities, so you'll probably see most places just have a room with both fixtures. Exception: bars, restaurants.

      Actually, numerous bars and restaurants I go to already have just a single restroom. The space they have is often smaller than retail stores so they don't dedicate the space to two restrooms. (I've never seen this in a retail store so far; either the store is small enough they don't have a public restroom, or they have two...)

    25. Re:buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Repair stations (not tire shops) - electric cars and trucks need about half as much maintenance and a lot of it is instrument driven. A good way to diversify is add bike repairs to one of your bays, or a chai/bubble tea store.
      Great if you trust dealerships not to screw you. John Deer is certainly trying to kill third party repair shops, but the major car manufacturers make too much money off of them to try to kill them too hard.

      2. Single gender bathrooms in retail. Most places can't really afford having separate facilities, so you'll probably see most places just have a room with both fixtures. Exception: bars, restaurants.
      In Canada maybe, not the U.S. In some states it would require a law or changing building codes. Not gonna happen.

      3. Fear based local TV news. Unhappy, scared people don't buy stuff. And TV is mostly dead.
      Local TV news is a revenue stream for local stations. Broadcast Networks still dominate in revenue and viewership. They still get a good percentage of their revenue from local stations, even though most of that viewership is through cable. So as long as their are local stations their will be local news.

      4. Food delivery and prepackaged meal delivery services. Those that survive will transition to restaurant delivery. Uber will vaporize as drones replace on demand delivery.
      Amazon just bought Whole Foods. Uber was never a force in food delivery except in a few high density urban areas.

      5. Furniture places. 2025-2035 will see most people getting smaller places and getting rid of large furniture. Exception: couches, chairs. Best to diversify into Tiny Home style furniture that incorporates storage into the furniture (dual use furniture).
      The only thing that would drive Americans into small places would be economic collapse. One of the primary drivers of urban spread is people moving farther from city center so they can afford larger houses. In the last seven years average home size has increased from 2300 sqft to 2600 sqft. No indicators at all that anyone but fringe members will move into a Tiny Home.

      6. Expensive spicy food places. As Americans age into retirees they will start wanting to go to diner type places. This won't kill ethnic foods, but a lot of current restaurants will suddenly lose foot traffic, as retirees don't eat out that much. Nobody will miss them.
      Except in big urban areas restaurants don't get foot traffic. Retirees with cash eat out as much or more as anyone else. Cash strapped retirees don't eat out much.

      7. Parking garages. The combination of on demand self driving vehicles, more retirees, more cyclists, more pedestrians, and quiet electric transit will kill off a lot of parking garages and the attached malls. Nobody will miss them, except us skateboarders.
      Since in most of the country you are absolutely stranded without a car, and any kind of public transportation is untenable I think this is unlikely anyplace but New York or a few other high density urban areas.

      8. Single family home lawn supplies. Lawns will be replaced by gardens and more people will live in multi-family towers next to green parks. But plants will be in high demand for the apartments and decks. Tiny greenhouses too.
      In most of the country it's cheaper to own than to rent. Home ownership increased last year. It's true that its near a 50 year low, but that because of the recession and the political climate for the 8 years after. We're in a short term downturn primarily caused by short term economic problems. History has shown that, in the U.S. at least, multi-family towers turn into slums and parks next to them hot beds of drug use and male prostitution.

      9. Cell phone stores. The 2025-2035 period will see ubiquitous self-powered wifi devices (like ST comms badges) that run off incidental radiation, and attach to clothes (either as sleeves, belts, broaches, or necklaces. This will save jewelry stores, of course.
      Wearables have generally been a niche market. The tre

    26. Re:buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      This is not about you. This entire topic is about Things That Will Go Away By 2027.

      We do still have buggy whips. We used to have whaling stations, people used kerosene for light, and 99 percent of America used to live on family farms, but now it's about 1 percent.

      Come up with your own predictions.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    27. Re:buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Fear based local TV news"

      Lol! Pure fantasy on your part. Are you not familiar with the saying "if it bleeds, it leads"? People love terrible news.

    28. Re:buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6. Expensive spicy food places

      I don't see my love of spicy food going anywhere until I die. My dad had Tabasco on the table until the day he died. Thai food isn't that much more expensive than a diner.

    29. Re:buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      6. Expensive spicy food places

      I don't see my love of spicy food going anywhere until I die. My dad had Tabasco on the table until the day he died. Thai food isn't that much more expensive than a diner.

      Personally, I make my thai and Tex-Mex and Italian and Japanese food at home. Restaurant food is so bland.

      Have you ever toured the Tabasco plantation/salt dome? I recommend it, they have a cool bird sanctuary.

      That said, I'm talking about changes from 2017 to 2027.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    30. Re: buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory counterpoint anecdote:

      I'm 37. I've owned (or sort-of owned) three cars: One actually belonged to my parents, purchased mostly for my sister and my use. The second one I drove for 11 years, until a texting driver rear-ended me. The third one is about to turn 6.

      My girlfriend (late 20s) has had four cars in the past 5 years.

    31. Re:buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by fatwilbur · · Score: 1

      This looks like a list of your personal preferences over those ten years versus what society will be doing. I especially doubt #8 - time and time again, across every city, politicians and other central-planners talk about how people want smaller places, centralized, walking distance to everything type condos for living. When it comes to actually voting with their dollars, no family ever chooses that over a SFH in the suburbs.

    32. Re:buggy whips are in an uptick (10 things) by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      These are predictions for society. Different areas will have different results.

      I remember using 1940s trucks in the 1980s in the boonies of BC, for example.

      I stand by my 10 predictions.

      Why don't you post a thread with your own 10 predictions, based on what you see changing? Complaining won't change things.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  13. Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, let it be Oracle.

    1. Re:Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've the same dream!

    2. Re:Oracle by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      How about Microsoft merge with Oracle and then merge with Comcast and Spectrum and AT&T, and then the whole ball of flaming shit burns a painful ugly death live streaming for everybody to see and dance to. Hell, I might even leave the basement to witness it in person.

  14. Easy one by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1, Troll

    Gun stores.

    1. Re:Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if they actually manage to eliminate the 2A via Constitutional means. I'm not aware of anybody floating a serious effort to eliminate or modify it. The hurdle for these changes is high, but not insurmountable so if it's done right your prediction is possible. I think a sane modification to 2A would still allow ordinary hunting and target shooting; so the gun store wouldn't totally disappear; but there would be fewer of them and less selection.

      If they try to do this outside the Constitution as is all too often the case, we'll just have a thriving black market which is sort of like gun stores going away; but not exactly. I mean... nobody bought weed from a store when it was illegal; but the *weed market* thrived. Same deal with guns.

      This, BTW, is why I believe the "militia vs. tyranny" argument is bunk. If you look at any country that degenerates into armed conflict, there's no shortage of people running in guns from the outside. Whether or not the previously peaceful regime had gun control or not isn't even mentioned. Where there's demand, there's supply.

    2. Re:Easy one by MerlTurkin · · Score: 0

      LOL! Nope. Never going to happen. Sorry anti-gun douches.

    3. Re:Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody can just purchase their mil spec machine guns directly from the manufacturers web shops. What retirement plan doesn't require a fully automated weapon of war, after all?

    4. Re:Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Only if they actually manage to eliminate the 2A via Constitutional means.

      Uhm... no. All we have to do to make gun stores decline is elect more Republicans. Democratic candidates are great for gun sales because the gun company lobby generates irrational hysteria that they're going to take guns, even though this never actually happens.

      Fun fact: The United States had strictly more gun rights at the end of Obama's presidency than it did at the start.

    5. Re:Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      National Football League.

    6. Re:Easy one by lord_mike · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm sure this is meant half jokingly, but American football as a whole is in trouble. Schools are starting to shut down their programs due to lack of interest. Parents, worried about their kids' brain health, are pushing them to play other sports. In time, the talent dropoff will be dramatic enough to significantly affect big college and pro football.

      The decline for the NFL has accelerated much faster than expected. The league's necessary adjustments for safety has made the game less interesting to watch and the recent anthem "controversies" are not helping. Attendance and viewership is down. The decline has already started and doesn't look like it will abate soon. Think that football is too big to fail? 80 years ago Boxing was the #1 sport in America. Look at the state of boxing today.

    7. Re:Easy one by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Think that football is too big to fail? 80 years ago Boxing was the #1 sport in America. Look at the state of boxing today.

      Yeah? And what'll replace it? Soccer? Please...

      (I'm being facetious. Actually, soccer's popularity is up. On the other hand, I've been hearing it's been gaining popularity since the 1980s, so...)

    8. Re:Easy one by ChrisMaple · · Score: 0

      Democrats frequently run for office claiming they're going to make it tough to legally own guns, and in some places (NYC, Chicago, Massachusetts) they've succeeded. The decision to buy a gun when a popular Democrat candidate proposes new restrictions is not irrational or hysterical, and doesn't need gun company publicity to make it happen.

      Seizure of guns has happened in the U.S.. It's the natural step following mandatory registration.

      Gun rights increased during the Obama administration because of US Supreme Court decisions and state legislative action.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    9. Re:Easy one by lord_mike · · Score: 1

      Soccer's popularity has gone up significantly in the US. Generations of kids having played the game who have become adults certainly has helped, but the all-sports/all the time TV and streaming networks has helped even more. The biggest winner is the Premier League, as American fans want to watch the best teams and have adopted their favorite ones. If MLS soccer ever is able to compete on the same level, it too will become significantly more popular.

      The younger generations are interested in "extreme" high action/less strategy types of sports, so soccer (despite it's low scoring), basketball, lacrosse (the new hip sport), rugby, and hockey are sure to make gains in the future. Golf, football, and baseball are sure to continue their declines, with baseball's decline being arrested somewhat by its high youth participation and high availability (your favorite team has a game on TV almost every day).

    10. Re: Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if they take away Americans' guns, how are they going to prevent the ex-slave revolt?

    11. Re:Easy one by The+Snowman · · Score: 2

      I'm sure this is meant half jokingly, but American football as a whole is in trouble. Schools are starting to shut down their programs due to lack of interest. Parents, worried about their kids' brain health, are pushing them to play other sports. In time, the talent dropoff will be dramatic enough to significantly affect big college and pro football.

      This is a legitimate concern (for the NFL). Fewer children playing will dry up the talent pool in another decade when those children would be at the age for the NCAA and (eventually) NFL. Sure, plenty of children will play, but consider how few of them have the necessary talent to succeed in the NCAA, and how few of those have the talent for the NFL. I did the math once and it is a small fraction of one percent of high school football players actually make it to the NFL, and most of them suck at the sport anyway. At any given time there are only enough good players to make three or four teams in the NFL.

      The NFL itself is also really unpopular, with Roger Goodell pissing off the NFL's fans at least once every season and getting booed any time he shows up on TV in front of a live audience (e.g. Super Bowl, NFL draft). I think the only reasons the NFL is still popular are: fantasy football is still a huge thing, even drawing people in that hate the sport (I know people who hate the game but still play fantasy); and some vestigial attachment to one's home team, essentially pride in one's city to include its sports teams.

      The decline for the NFL has accelerated much faster than expected. The league's necessary adjustments for safety has made the game less interesting to watch and the recent anthem "controversies" are not helping. Attendance and viewership is down. The decline has already started and doesn't look like it will abate soon. Think that football is too big to fail? 80 years ago Boxing was the #1 sport in America. Look at the state of boxing today.

      I keep hearing these arguments, but have not seen any evidence to back them up. Ratings fluctuate, and are on a general down trend, but nothing massive - it is not like the sport is unpopular, it is just not quite as popular as it was previously. It does seem, however, that ratings have followed the general trend of everything receiving lower ratings.

      This makes sense, as sports in general (in the USA) seem to have declining ratings. Cord cutting? Younger generation caring less? Who knows? It is a complex issue and there is likely not one cause, e.g. "the NFL is killing itself with how it changes the game."

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    12. Re:Easy one by stdarg · · Score: 1

      I keep hearing these arguments, but have not seen any evidence to back them up.

      http://www.rasmussenreports.co...

    13. Re:Easy one by coofercat · · Score: 2

      "...made the game less interesting to watch"? Wow - I didn't know that was possible ;-)

      More seriously though, if the NFL can fix up some of the more tedious aspects of the game, make a game last the 25 minutes of actual play, versus the 5 hours of ads + inane commentary, then it might have an exportable product. They'd have to rebrand to be the IFL, and they'd need to change the F to be something else, because most of the rest of the world thinks football is a game where you're only allowed to touch the ball with your feet. But if they can do all that, then the rest of us might be a market to grow into.

      baseball on the other hand... I can't see that catching on anywhere. It's cricket without the good bits, and cricket's got the market sown up for "sit around drinking while some people play a technical, but not terribly energetic sport".

    14. Re: Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw an interview with an FBI sniper and gun lover who pretty much said âoeIf youâ(TM)re a big enough threat that the Federal government sends me after you, youâ(TM)re dead, no matter how many guns you have. Iâ(TM)ll be in a house 300 yards away, youâ(TM)ll peek out the blinds and BOOM!â He wasnâ(TM)t bragging, just pointing out the idiocy of the argument.

    15. Re:Easy one by lord_mike · · Score: 1

      "baseball on the other hand... I can't see that catching on anywhere. It's cricket without the good bits, and cricket's got the market sown up for "sit around drinking while some people play a technical, but not terribly energetic sport"."

      Well, baseball has caught on in a lot of places. Pretty much the entire Western Hemisphere plays the game and is more popular in Latin America and South America than it is in the United States of America. Even Canada enjoys the game. Of course it is very big in Japan and several other Pacific Rim countries. Like Cricket, baseball was exported through imperial influences and has little chance of waning. It's more popular outside the US than in it. It is also showing surprising popularity in places you wouldn't expect, like Australia and the Netherlands (!!!). While it will never reach the worldwide popularity of Cricket (which is the most 2nd most popular sport worldwide), it definitely can be considered a global sport.

      Anyways, I'm a big fan of Cricket, but it's hard to argue that it is the more "energetic" sport. 3 day matches of endless batting where the nearest seats are 75 meters away. You have to be really committed to the game to appreciate it (which is also similar to baseball). As sportswriter Henry Chadwick, considered the "father" of Baseball, said about Cricket: "Americans do not care to dawdle over a sleep-inspiring game, all through the heat of a June or July day. What they do they want to do in a hurry. In baseball all is lightning. Thus the reason for the American antipathy to cricket can readily be understood." Few would say that Baseball is "lightning" today, but that just shows you how less energetic Cricket would be in comparison. I realize that nowadays they play much shorter one day and Twenty20 matches most of the time, but it's really something you have to be really committed to appreciate.

    16. Re:Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (your favorite team has a game on TV almost every day).

      Not until March 29, 2018. Sigh...

    17. Re:Easy one by mschuyler · · Score: 1

      Umm, it's neither hysterical nor irrational.

      --
      How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    18. Re: Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there is only one of him, and potentially millions of threats. Revolution is messy.

      "Some of you may die, but that is a sacrifice I am willing to make." --Lord Farquaad.

    19. Re:Easy one by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Cricket lasts for so long they have meal breaks. In fact they used to have a day off in the middle of internationals.

      That said it's still more entertaining than baseball.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    20. Re:Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes because the most played and most watched sport in the world has no chance!

    21. Re:Easy one by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      Other way round. Cricket is baseball without the good bits. Which boggles the mind.

  15. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  16. Here's a few by mattb47 · · Score: 2

    Comments here are for the US (mostly...)

    Fast food chain burger flipper -- replaced by a robot. There still will be employees at the stores, just a bunch less. Minimum wage laws have made their work too expensive.

    More and more agricultural crop picking work will be automated. Especially if Trump continues to clamp down on illegal immigration. Growers either won't be able to find workers, or the workers that remain will want too much money.

    And this will apply in a lot of other places as well. More and more low-end jobs across all sectors will be replaced by robotics and/or AI. (Except government. That will continue to be bloated, corrupt, and inefficient as ever.)

    If wireless internet access becomes cheaper and more ubiquitous, at some point that becomes the end of AM/FM and satellite radio. (I love Sirius/XM, but if they survive, it will be through relatively cheap Internet streaming, not their expensive satellite systems.) Some content remains, but it's now all streamed/podcasted.

    As both wireless and wired Internet access become cheaper and more ubiquitous, at some point that becomes the end of satellite/cable TV distribution. TV becomes distributed via the Internet instead (as already is the case several services).

    Wired phone lines (POTS) become more or less dead as well. And the phone companies largely are happy about that. They don't want to have to maintain that infrastructure, and rather make money in wireless and Internet offerings.

    Newspapers continue their demise. They aren't dead yet, but most (with a few exceptions) are doing terribly. Same with most magazines. 10 years from now, things will be even more bleak.

    Bookstores, except for used ones, die out. Used ones remain as a niche, as their product is cheap, and include collectors items. And they can be largely a warehouse for their online operations as well, selling books via Amazon and eBay.

    Despite environmentalist daydreams, gas and diesel engines will still be around and still be way most new vehicles are powered. But coal power plants will be dwindling, probably not all gone. Cheap natural gas and better solar will make dirty coal more and more unattractive. Cheap natural gas is already doing this right now.

    The country of Venezuela will be gone, at least as we know it. But it's probably going to be gone in the next year or two, and maybe less, crashing from its own failures.

    1. Re:Here's a few by JustNiz · · Score: 0

      >> Despite environmentalist daydreams, gas and diesel engines will still be around and still be way most new vehicles are powered.

      Yes they will still be around but they will be an increasingly expensive niche market. I'll bet that in 10 years they won't be even close to the majority of new vehicles.

      https://www.vox.com/energy-and...
      https://www.forbes.com/sites/w...
      https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0...
      https://www.forbes.com/sites/b...

    2. Re:Here's a few by mattb47 · · Score: 1

      Germany, France, Britain (and California) have all made lofty environmentalist targets/goals in the past. And if the majority of these cases, the goals failed. Badly. They're politically posturing free from economic or scientific reality. And even if new vehicle sales are mandated to be electrics, people will keep and maintain their existing gas/diesel vehicles. Because most can't afford a new vehicle overnight, even with tax subsidies.

      OK, Germany dumped all of it's nuclear power plants in the wake of Fukushima. And today, they probably would never do that again. The price of electricity rose tremendously, and they had to also go back to rely on dirty coal plants. It was a horrible deal, and actually much worse for the environment.

      California would have electric cars everywhere. OK, we have a bunch here in the Bay Area. But we also are have LOTS of money. Not many electrics in the Central Valley, or the Sierras, or other places outside the wealthy areas. And electrics and even hybrids are still only a small minority of vehicles.

      I'll believe in the death of the gas/diesel car when it actually happens.

      Note that Volvo is a niche car maker for the highly affluent. At least these days. (And my family owned a 1968, 1972, and 1983 Volvo. I have a soft spot for them.) They're separating themselves from others by only making electric or hybrid cars. Outside Scandinavia, they're a tiny portion of the industry.

    3. Re:Here's a few by Strider- · · Score: 1

      As both wireless and wired Internet access become cheaper and more ubiquitous, at some point that becomes the end of satellite/cable TV distribution.

      For content distribution, and contribution, satellite will still be around for a long, long time. End user distribution? that's a different beast, but until we have the full demise of the networks, especially the sports networks, satellite will still be around. It's still the single cheapest way to distribute your content to the entire continent in real-time. A typical transponder costs about $1,000,000 a year to lease, and lets you stream out 4 or so HD streams, continuously. You're distributing that to 1000s+ clients at full resolution, it's going to take a long time to surpass that.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    4. Re:Here's a few by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      I enjoy gasoline cars a lot, have a heavy investment in them both financial and emotional, but even I can see the writing is on the wall.

      https://hardware.slashdot.org/...

      I don;t believe the governments are simply posturing, I beleive they're already getting a giant hard-on over the amount of control over us that obliging us to drive so-called "intelligent" cars. Apart from the fact that the government is already facilitating the deployment obviously immature self-driving software out, their intention is clear that they want to limit and then ultimately totally remove our freedom to drive ourselves. They love that these intelligent cars are always tracking us, always phoning home and the cops/government can remotely take over/disable at a whim. I agree that they could enforce that tech on gasoline cars too, but it seems that the transition to electric facilitates its public acceptance by somehow making people think its just an expected part of the overall package and by making it "cool". Just look at Tesla as an example.
      Heck just look at the fact that you already can't buy any car made by any GM brand without Onstar already built-in and turned on (they achieve this by giving you a "free" 6 month trial), and many people have found that if you try and disconnect/remove the onstar module, the rest of the car starts failing in wierd ways. Presumably by design exactly to prevent such tampering with their spying system that you even paid for.

    5. Re: Here's a few by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re: "OK, Germany dumped all of it's nuclear power plants in the wake of Fukushima. And today, they probably would never do that again. The price of electricity rose tremendously, and they had to also go back to rely on dirty coal plants. It was a horrible deal, and actually much worse for the environment." -- Have you seen any real news lately? Germany has been overproducing electricity and giving it away for free. Wind and solar are taking over the world now.

    6. Re:Here's a few by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      > I'll believe in the death of the gas/diesel car when it
      > actually happens.

      The thing is, there's only one piece left missing in the electric car's replacement of gas/diesel: charging infrastructure.

      Oh, the superchargers are great and all. But they solve the "road trip" problem for people who own homes with enclosed garages and charging stations. They do nothing for people who don't own a house with an enclosed garage in which they can have the home charging station installed. Once people who rent and park on the street, in a driveway, or in a garage in which they are forbidden by their lease to modify the wiring... or, for that matter, people who do own their home, but don't have that garage... can pull into a charging station anywhere to juice up; electrics will sell like gangbusters. If Musk *really* wants electric cars to take off; he'd do better to forget about looking for the next SolarCity or boring tunnels and such. Rather, he should buy one of the gas station chains and, across the board, tear out the gas pumps and replace them with electric chargers.

      Myself, I fall into the "renting w/ no enclosed garage" category. So I'm still murdering dinosaurs for the foreseeable future. But if I could pull into any Chevron station to charge up, I'd have put down a deposit for a Model 3 on day one. The day that I *CAN* charge up at any Chevron (or Arco or whatever), or when I own my own home with said garage that I can have a charging unit wired into, I'll switch to electric without the slightest hesitation.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    7. Re:Here's a few by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> The thing is, there's only one piece left missing in the electric car's replacement of gas/diesel: charging infrastructure.

      Nope. There's way more missing than that. For example:
        I need a 4 wheel drive truck thats capable of going off-road and is as affordable to buy as a used F150 or 4Runner. Where's my EV option?
      Also having wait even 30 minutes to fast charge everytime its empty is still not an option. Where's my EV that can be topped up from empty in 5 minutes like my gas car can?
      Also I would never buy a car that is connected, spies on me, or phones home. Where's my EV option that doesn't have any of that?
      Also I like rugged manly vehicles not an ugly small car that looks like its been styled by and for emasculated metrosexuals. Where's my EV option?

    8. Re:Here's a few by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 wheel drive truck thats capable of going off-road... rugged manly vehicles... small car... styled by and for emasculated metrosexuals

      You know there are pills to help you with your manly issues right? They're already significantly cheaper than a car or truck. Electric or otherwise. And in December the generics will come onto the market and be that much better priced than trying to elevate yourself vehicularly.

    9. Re:Here's a few by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >>You know there are pills to help you with your manly issues right?

      Woo look at the big man who snipes will hiding behind an AC post. Come back when you've got the balls to post as yourself.

    10. Re:Here's a few by havana9 · · Score: 1

      Fast food chain burger flipper -- replaced by a robot. There still will be employees at the stores, just a bunch less. Minimum wage laws have made their work too expensive.

      You're thinking about fast food chains only, because I think that there's a market of better fast food and restaurants. Like because in every decent mall you could buy either prepackaged ham or cheese or ask to be served by a clerk and get fresly cut food. It costs a bit more, but it's of better quality without preservatives.
      Also from what I see, more cafeteria-like shops are appearing and in the other end of spectrum you could find automatic vending machines givig sandwiches, awful-tasting sandwiches.
      I think that the fast food chain premise is flawed because they are selling an inferior good coated with advertising to compensate. Giving coffe in a paper cup is cost saving but makes easy for a small bar to make a better coffee, and a bun filled with preservatives and added sugars will taste bad compared with a slice of real freshly baked bread.
      Given the obesity problem, I think it' bettet to eat less (calories) but better (quality). And at the bottom of the line, you're going to spend less.

    11. Re: Here's a few by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Germany has been overproducing electricity and giving it away for free.

      German electricity consumers, like everyone, would love to subscribe to your newsletter!

    12. Re:Here's a few by swb · · Score: 2

      I think electric cars will become another example of how well-off people are able to leverage technology to maintain an economic advantage.

      For the foreseeable future, there is no good way to own an electric car and be a renter without parking spot with a charger. Public charging will take too long and the cars won't have enough reserve to not make it a continual bother. So all of the economic benefits of owning an electric car will go to people who can afford the parking/charging setup.

      If governments start eliminating IC cars, you now basically strip the practical ability of renters and high-density area apartment dwellers of the ability to even *own* a car. This isn't a problem in the 20% of urban areas with dense housing and employment and transit, but in many others it becomes a major economic disadvantage. You may not like cars generally, but the reality is they enable a huge amount of employment flexibility and improved time efficiency for other activities.

      I'm all in favor of electric cars, but I think in subtle ways they become advantages for well off people and become unobtainable for lower income people who can now manage them. If the technology changes -- charging in the time of a gas fill, week-long charge cycles, maybe it will be a more universal benefit.

    13. Re:Here's a few by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Actually, I rather like cars... on the weekends anyway. Taking my Mazda up to the curves on Skyline or along the coast on 1 is fantastic fun. What I hate about cars is the necessity. My normal M-F commute is via mass transit. But for many things I need or want to do on the weekends, even San Francisco does not make it possible for me to get by entirely without one. I think in the US only New York has bothered to put in transit adequate to make that possible.

      Urban planning issues aside... And I do think that McMansions and suburban sprawl are goddamned stupid and don't the a lot of sympathy for their advocates... I think it IS just a matter of critical mass. Electric cars will continue to grow in popularity. And eventually, even if it's not Musk buying a chain and forcing the issue, one gas station company or another will see the opportunity and put in chargers at their locations. And then the floodgates open.

      And I wouldn't worry too much about regulations. Existing cars will almost certainly be grandfathered in. Even here in California, if you really and truly think that global warming is a hoax and that emissions standards are for communists, and you well and truly hate the idea of having to pass smog checks; you can buy a 40-year-old beater whose manufacture date predates emissions standards in order to be exempt. And more people than you think do exactly that. Californians may be known for being liberal; but we 're often ornery and contrary too.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    14. Re:Here's a few by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      I develop engines for a living. I've come to accept the fact I will have to find another career in ten years. Many of my coworkers have as well.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    15. Re:Here's a few by mattb47 · · Score: 1

      OK, read that wrong at first. But yes, distribution from the content producers will stick with satellite for now.

      End users (Dish/DirectTV, plus cable from Comcast/etc.)? Those methods are facing eventual future extinction. Might take longer than 10 years. Might be 20. But they're going away in the end.

    16. Re:Here's a few by mattb47 · · Score: 1

      Fast food is going to be the first (or one of the first) to be hit by a new robotics/automation revolution.

      Note that a robot prepared burger or sandwich or pizza or whatever can be low quality or can be high quality. There's no reason why robot prepared food can't be fresh / low-preservative / decent tasting food based on decent ingredients.

      It is a bad time in the world now to be uneducated and/or low-skilled. (If you took some garbage major in college, you can be educated, but you have no usable skills. So this is an and/or.)

    17. Re:Here's a few by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Is there really not a non-autmotive niche that you can find? I can;t beleive that all internal combustion engines in all fields will disappear at midnight on 1/1/2028.

    18. Re:Here's a few by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Is there really not a non-autmotive niche that you can find? I can;t beleive that all internal combustion engines in all fields will disappear at midnight on 1/1/2028.

      I'm sure internal combustion engines will be around for decades. However, once the automotive applications dry up, so will the vast majority of jobs. Competition will be fierce. Project funding will be low.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  17. Spammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I can dream, can't I?

    1. Re:Spammers by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Not as a market, but the new AIs will hunt them down.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:Spammers by mattb47 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the spammers will have their own AIs as well.

      The conflict will just get nastier and nastier.

  18. Find moderately sized companies w/good credit by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    they'll get eaten alive by a vulture capital firm in a leveraged buyout. Just happened to Toys-R-Us. I figure a few more retailers are next. Maybe one of the remaining sporting goods stores.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Find moderately sized companies w/good credit by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Toys-R-Us is for all practical purposes gone. It was losing money and had no hope of ever being profitable again.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  19. Lobbyists by Pseudonym · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just kidding. Lobbying will be a growth industry for the next decade at least.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    1. Re:Lobbyists by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Naw, they'll be automated:

      while(conglomerate.satisfied==false) {
        politician.bribe.percent++;
      }

    2. Re:Lobbyists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So as a politician:

      1. conglomerate.satisfied = false
      2. ???
      3. Profit!

    3. Re:Lobbyists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just shorten that down to while True:

  20. Equifax! by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    (No explanation needed.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Equifax! by coofercat · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed it took this long to get down the comments to find this one ;-)

    2. Re:Equifax! by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed it took this long to get down the comments to find this one ;-)

      So was I when I posted it. B-)

      I'm amazed it didn't get even one "funny". ;-)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  21. not much about business but ocuppations by Pirulo · · Score: 2

    Drivers, burger flippers, mechanics,

  22. Uber! by manu0601 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What company will disapear? Uber! You cannot loose money on every trip forever.

    1. Re: Uber! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Once self driving cars are fully realized they won't have to deal with all those pesky driver costs. Uber (or really, ridesharing companies) will grow, not shrink when this happens.

    2. Re: Uber! by gravewax · · Score: 2

      Once self driving cars are realised Uber won't really be relevant anymore as any company will be easily able to setup self driving services locally. Uber's current strength is its driver base, without that they are no better than any startup.

    3. Re:Uber! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft. They have ruined their OS and Office beyond repair. If it is easier to start using the competitor than next year's edition of Windows or Office, MS has no future. At every computer upgrade cycle MS loses some of its customers for good and numbers add up eventually.

    4. Re:Uber! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Uber drivers maybe. Uber themselves are scrambling to get self-driving tech working to get costs down. Well, that lawsuit might have screwed them now...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re: Uber! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a true self driving car, you would have it drive you to work and park itself. Why not have it drive other people and make bank while you arenâ(TM)t using it? Very quickly, cars will transition from something you own to a service you use. Iâ(TM)ve heard we could reduce the number of cars on the road by 90% through sharing like this. A lot of parking, congestion and sprawl problems solved.

    6. Re:Uber! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sort of business model seems to have worked out okay for Amazon in the long run.

    7. Re: Uber! by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      Once self driving cars are fully realized (...)

      You assume they survive the legal fight with Google. When in comes to self-driving cars, Uber seems to have no real assets.

    8. Re:Uber! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      That may be true, but Microsoft's death will be a long slow decline as the corporate world moves too slowly. They'll still be around in some form 10 years from now.

  23. Youtubers by gosand · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please, for the love of the gods, please let this stop being a profession.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Youtubers by MikeDataLink · · Score: 1

      Please, for the love of the gods, please let this stop being a profession.

      Why? There are some very good science and learning channels out there that I would hate to see go.

      --
      Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    2. Re:Youtubers by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      I'd guess the OP was referring to people who just talk about random stuff in their lives and -- for some bizarre reason -- become crazy popular, so much so that they become "influencers" that companies pay to promote their products.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    3. Re:Youtubers by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      No one should make a living off of ads...

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:Youtubers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! It is amazing the crap that is on youtube that has millions of views. It's obscene and likely the sign of a complete downfall of society. Of course my kids love it. Ugh!! There is some very high quality stuff on youtube with great production values, and they never get the hits like some garbage kid with a webcam does. It's terrible!

    5. Re:Youtubers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or those who play video games for people to watch. I may be an old fart, but playing video games seems like such a waste of time. But, watching others play video games?! My mind boggles. Its like watching a video of someone reading a book with no audio.

    6. Re:Youtubers by olau · · Score: 1

      I, for one, think those are great, in the sense that they are efficient compared to the comparable stuff delivered by the professionel networks/producers. There's very little overhead.

      Remember, we don't have to watch it. In that sense, it's even better than the old tv reality/talk shows.

      Paid-under-the-table promotions are bad though, that part needs to go.

    7. Re:Youtubers by gosand · · Score: 2

      I grew up with arcades, so I can appreciate video games. When my kids watch other people play video games, I don't get it either. It's not so much the video gaming part... but the inane, constant, talking. They don't shut up for 2 seconds. Although, I think that may be a reflection of our society, where people feel compelled to spout their opinion the second something comes into their mind, and send it out to the world, all day, every day.

      As I heard someone once say though, how is watching someone play video games different than watching televised sports? It's a very good point... although I don't understand or do that either.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    8. Re:Youtubers by gosand · · Score: 1

      I completely agree, there is good stuff. There is entertaining stuff. My kids like Good Mythical Morning, which is pretty good.
      Watch some of Primitive Technology. Fascinating, educational, and no talking.

      But the popularity that some people get on youtube is staggering. What they do isn't unique, or funny, or ... anything. Playing video games and constantly yelling/yammering/commenting. It's like MST3K on speed. There is no pause, they can't stop talking. Or people who fill a bathtub with something, get in it, and over-react and yell and pretend for show.

      Absolutely good stuff out there, no question. But when someone makes money off of it simply because they have lots of followers, pushing products, or promoting something just because they reach an audience. It's taking the smarmyness of television advertising to a new level.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    9. Re:Youtubers by tepples · · Score: 1

      Enjoy paying a separate $4/mo subscription to read one article on each of 20 different websites.

    10. Re: Youtubers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But people watch golf, for Godâ(TM)s sake.

    11. Re:Youtubers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which you can just avoid rather than wishing it to not be there...other people clearly enjoy it for it to make money. I also find many of them annoying and don't get why they are popular. But I believe that about many TV shows too.

    12. Re:Youtubers by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Most of the web is noise at this point. Killing off ads and going to subs would be better than allowing marketing to create an ambient field of marketing off of things that should be outright free. The entire low end of computing has been consumed by marketing. Every interface is designed to nudge you, even in file explorer and Android settings. By allowing marketing to go unchecked, they actively try and make things that should be free cost money. They make life harder for no good purpose.

      --
      Good-bye
  24. Not very good predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    NBC did not do a good job predicting:

    • Record stores - Nope (0/1) - https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/17/06/30/1837226 https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/16/12/06/1851218
    • Camera film manufacturing - Nope (0/2) - https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/17/01/07/0537247
    • Crop dusters - Nope (0/3) - https://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/local/delaware/2017/06/08/farming-air-crop-dusters-fuel-industry/380403001/
    • Gay bars - Nope (0/4) - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/michael-henry-straight-people-gay-bar_us_599ef6fce4b06d67e335f9bf
    • Newspapers - Nope (0/5) - https://www.nytimes.com/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/
    • Pay phones - Mostly True (1/6) - (Other than airports)
    • Used bookstores - Nope (1/7) - https://www.hpb.com/
    • Piggy banks - Nope (1/8) - https://www.amazon.com/Kids-Money-Banks/b?ie=UTF8&node=2491218011
    • Telemarketing - Nope (1/9) - https://mobile.slashdot.org/story/17/06/10/0533219
    • Coin-operated arcades - Mostly True (2/10) - Although the machines are still available, the arcades are rare, and many arcade chains that exist are no longer coin-operated - http://www.gameworks.com/ http://www.daveandbusters.com/

    2/10 = 20% is not a good rate of prediction

    1. Re:Not very good predictions by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you're wrong, of course as is your score of only 20%. The vinyl records for example will be for a niche market. so will film for cameras and newspapers. you're comparing gnat farts to a hurricane for most of those

    2. Re:Not very good predictions by gravewax · · Score: 1

      vinyl records are at 30 year high sales (certainly way more popular than they were back in 2007) and film is also on an upward not downward trajectory, so no those predictions were not just wrong they were fucking awful as both film and record sales have significantly grown since 2007 not decreased and certainly not become extinct.

    3. Re:Not very good predictions by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      the prediction was about record stores, which are still going away. that vinyl buying is mostly done in other places.

    4. Re:Not very good predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is incorrect, record stores have also been growing in number, remember they were at all time lows around the time of this prediction. 2014 was actually an all-time high for music and record store numbers (not sure on numbers post that as they are the last I have).

    5. Re:Not very good predictions by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Standalone commodity used book stores are toast. The six nearest me have all gone out of business in the last three years. Anything that remains will be either collectibles, or a smaller part of a store selling new books.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    6. Re:Not very good predictions by gravewax · · Score: 1

      yeah and still NO. record store numbers have been exploding, there have been articles that their numbers haven't been so high since the 80's, records are also proliferating into selling in other stores as well. I personally don't care to go back to the crappy sound of records but they are certainly increasing for both stores and sales.

    7. Re:Not very good predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in a city of just over 500k people. 10 years ago you could not buy a record here unless you found one in a second hand store. Now there are 3 dedicated stores within a 30 minute drive and probably another dozen that also have record sections. numbers are definitely going up not decreasing. Yes it is probably a Fad and will probably fade again but at the moment the prediction was probably the worst of the 10 (not that any of them were particularly good).

    8. Re:Not very good predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2nd & Charles, second biggest book retailer in the U.S. after Barnes and Noble. Just opens a huge 10,000 sqft retail location in my city.

  25. TV NETWORKS by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2

    Goodbye NBC, we hardly watched you...

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:TV NETWORKS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goodbye NBC, we hardly watched you...

      Need to throw in ABC, too.

  26. Equifax by chill · · Score: 1

    One can only hope it doesn't take 10 years.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  27. Pinball Is Back For Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dont Let It Die

    1. Re: Pinball Is Back For Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I played some pinball on VR. OK, hardly purist ... but hitting tiny zombies lurching across the table with the ball ... or having a shark swim by right in front of your face when you make a certain bonus ... some seriously cool design possibilities.

  28. Sorry, no gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's interesting how Peak Oil has disappeared from the collective consciousness in discussions about the not too distant future. News Flash: Peak Oil is here. And Peak Natural Gas is less than 10 years out. When you consider how integrally woven petroleum is to most developed nation economies -- and Capitalism in general -- plus it's role in climate change, major upheavals across all sorts of businesses should be expected. Cheap, portable alternatives to gas and diesel are going to be hard to find for things like airplanes, container ships, and construction equipment. Also, energy-intensive activities like mining, paving and concrete production will likely get very expensive. It's going to be interesting times..

    1. Re:Sorry, no gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peak Oil is less of an issue that in was. These days we now have electric vehicles, which are powered using electricity generated from coal.

    2. Re:Sorry, no gas by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Found the "Peak Oil" nut. Did you build your bunker yet?

  29. Microsoft by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Ther will probably still be some business entity around called Microsoft but it will be fully owned by the Chinese and will just be an IP troll.
    It will be pretty much irrelevant and insignificant in any real sense, They won't be making or selling any actual products by then.

    1. Re:Microsoft by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I've been waiting for decades to see MS die. I'll do some unmentionable acts on their grave when they do. The downside is some other near-monopoly will move into their place and start the cycle again.

    2. Re:Microsoft by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      Yeah I agree.
      I've a gut feeling that Google's turn to become the nominal Evil Empire of the computer world will actually be quite soon.

      I also considered Apple, but they don't have enough market share outside of phones to be taken seriously in the general computer space, besides they're pretty much universally hated already.

    3. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 10 years lol, you are kidding yourself. At this point MS is still a growing entity with increasing profit and revenue and has been that way since these silly predictions started 20 years ago. They would have to instantly stop growing right now and start haemorrhaging 10's of billions a year, instead of the current fast growth to have any hope of your prediction coming true.

    4. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm, yeah no. MS has around 140 billion cash on hand and short term investments (without taking into account any of their revenue streams or long term assets). Even if they stopped making a cent today and started losing bucket loads of money it would take them more than 10 years to get into a position where a takeover by a foreign entity would be even possible. MS will still sadly be relevant for quite a long time to come, especially with their rapid growth and marketshare of cloud computing.

    5. Re:Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS has a track record of buying crap for billions and then shutting down the companies they bought. That has happened recently with aQuantive, Skype, Nokia mobile phones and next one will be the Linkedin, which has already started a active user harassing and expelling campaign. This year there has not been any big acquisitions from MS, so next deal must be a major one, perhaps in the league of hundred billion.

    6. Re:Microsoft by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Strange, nearly every software company I worked for last years is using mostly Macs.
      But well, I only work in unix/linux Java environments lately.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re:Microsoft by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Really? Except for some marketing and graphics departments, I don't see Macs in workplaces

    8. Re:Microsoft by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm only talking about developers and development related jobs.
      The developers that don't want a Mac usually get a laptop with Linux.
      No idea what they use for 'office work'. I guess M$ :)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    9. Re:Microsoft by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      I work in an exclusively linux environment and have been doing so for maybe 20 years now over 6 different companies. Always PCs, never a mac in sight anywhere, except for one guy at one company who bought his own in.

    10. Re:Microsoft by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      >> Well, I'm only talking about developers and development related jobs.

      So am I.

    11. Re:Microsoft by NikeHerc · · Score: 2

      Microsoft. Like IBM has nearly disappeared after decades pioneering... Microsoft has very little left. It never had much, and noticeably less if you throw out all the useless, senseless crap. If there remains any good karma in the universe, microsoft will die.

      --
      Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
  30. The Trump Corporation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When all its principals are jailed...

  31. Coal miners. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    I'm not being optimistic about renewable energy use or the will of the government to stop pollution, it's just that natural gas has been gutting the coal industry and despite a recent uptick, automation is replacing most workers. The companies may survive another 7 years but the occupation as we know it will die. With no economic incentive (jobs) to keep the sector alive, politicians that aren't heavily bribed will turn on coal completely most likely by other growing sectors that bribe them better.

    Here's the long trend and here's the more recent trend.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Coal miners. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coal has several uses other than power production. So no, coal miners will not disappear.

      Do you people even bother to read about stuff, or just assume you know everything?

    2. Re:Coal miners. by Ayano · · Score: 1

      This is true. There's the backlash of 'environmental regulations' but even without them. Natural gas is beating coal on price, and extraction cost. A side benefit is that it both burns cleaner and is extracted cleaner at less risk to workers. They're losing on all fronts, not just 'environmental'.

      --
      I don't read AC
    3. Re:Coal miners. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coal miners aren't going to disappear anytime soon unless you also think Steel will no longer be being produced? perhaps you needed to bracket your statement around "Coal Miners mining for low grade coal as a fuel".

    4. Re:Coal miners. by gravewax · · Score: 1

      your graphs around mining jobs are more related to how heavily automated they are now and the heavy machinery used. We have a lot of the same doomsayers in Australia around coal and it seems to come mostly from ignorance of what coal is actually used for, for instance around 50% of the Coal mined here is actually used for steel production. Maybe the US only mines coal for use as fuel in energy generation? I doubt it but could be possible I guess.

    5. Re:Coal miners. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there's the production of Coal Tar shampoo... and other coal tar derivative ointments... other than that, I got nothing!!

    6. Re:Coal miners. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have a lot of the same doomsayers in Australia around coal and it seems to come mostly from ignorance of what coal is actually used for, for instance around 50% of the Coal mined here is actually used for steel production. Maybe the US only mines coal for use as fuel in energy generation?

      I do not know how true it is, but a chemical engineering book I have published in 2014 indicated that about 2/3 of coal mined in the US was purchased by the chemical industry, not for power production. It's used as a cheap source of carbon that is processed into other chemicals.

    7. Re:Coal miners. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 2013, 92.8 percent of US internal coal consumption was for electricity generation.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal_mining_in_the_United_States#Usage

    8. Re:Coal miners. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      misleading numbers, nearly all the coking coal is exported and used in steel production in Asian countries so the percent of mined coal used for energy production is much much lower, just the US doesn't make much steel, really only one large producer in the US and it is dwarfed by the numbers produced in other countries.

    9. Re:Coal miners. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      automation is replacing most workers

      Why do people still parrot this shit? Global labour productivity growth has been terrible for years.

  32. IBM by edi_guy · · Score: 1

    Lenevo and Tata will purchase the remnants.

    1. Re:IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recent news pointed out that IBM now has more employees in India than in the US. So merger with Tata (possibly spinning whatever hardware business is left off to Lenovo) isn't a bad prediction. Question is: when?

    2. Re:IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leading to the eventual "Ta-ta, mainframes."

  33. Re:No Mexico / US Wall needed (not a biz, but...) by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Co's won't invest in much automation R&D unless the labor actually does dry up.

  34. Hookers by jwhyche · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If the facebook has its way with virtual reality then the worlds oldest business will vanish. Cross physical feed back with AI then things get ... creepy.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    1. Re: Hookers by denis.goddard · · Score: 1

      No way. Ain't nothing like the real thing, baby. At most there is pricing pressure.

    2. Re:Hookers by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      I give mankind about 20 years once the holodeck has been created.

    3. Re: Hookers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lets see, stay at home and get off to VR porn with the help of some interconnected toys for free and then get back to playing video games or watching netflix.... or get up, drive somewhere, pay money for sex with someone who likely has a STI, and, depending on the jurisdiction, risk going to jail... or get up, get cleaned up, get dressed nicely, go somewhere to meet/wine and dine/etc. someone with the chance that it may or may not lead to sex and the risk of pregnancy. Marriage has already fallen to historically low levels. I think sex (with another living persion) is not too far behind. I suspect women will still have the biological urge to have children. If I had the money I'd invest clinics and technologies that can help women to get pregnant without the need of involving a man (other than the sperm donation of course). I think they are going to see a huge uptick in business over the coming decades.

    4. Re: Hookers by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Enjoy your day at the clinic.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    5. Re:Hookers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you have no worries. The holodeck is not possible, requiring more energy than the globe uses in a year for a simple stroll in the woods. It's not a hologram, it creates and destroys matter at whim. That woods is created and destroyed as you go.

    6. Re:Hookers by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Better than sexbots. Can you imagine when those things start getting hacked, demanding 0.5 BTC to release your genitals? And the inevitable manufacturer supplies spyware. Or when she won't give you a blowjob because her vaginal fluid tank is low and your subscription is about to expire.

      And that's before she gets turned into a Russian propaganda outlet.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Hookers by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      That will never happen, it's the second oldest profession in the world.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
  35. Slashdot is left with slash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > ... The quality of the community and articles is not what it was. It keeps getting passed around from company to company. It is just one corp org away form shutting down ...

    Back when /. was started they never delete comments for political, or for whatever silly reasons

    Now comments vanished if they contain messages that the mods do not like

    > ... What is left is a very loyal community ...

    Sorry, a lot have left, and as a result, the quality of the comments (and the commentors) has gone south

  36. one disagreement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Used book stores will be around. The idea of going paperless is now where close. People bought their 'readers' and dumped them as they don't like to read on them. We have 6 used books stores in my area for the past 30 years and only one has closed due to death in the family.

  37. Private car ownership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ride sharing + autonomous cars = no need for private ownership

  38. General Electric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not that it is even the business it was 10 years ago, but at the current track in the stock price, it could be gone in much less than 10 years.

  39. Reviewing NBC's List... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and what does that mean about similar predictions now?

    "NBC's list was: Record stores; Camera film manufacturing; Crop dusters; Gay bars; Newspapers; Pay phones; Used bookstores; Piggy banks; Telemarketing; Coin-operated arcades."

    Record stores: almost gone, but there are still a few indies around and they're doing great with the current boom in vinyl sales. i.e low-volume/niche business now.
    Film manufacturing: Kodak (owned by others) and Fuji are still in the business, but it's low-volume/niche (this will become a trend...).
    Crop Dusters: still very much in business, though the precise materials being spayed have changed a bit. PREDICTION FAIL.
    Gay bars: still very much around. PREDICTION FAIL But not a rapidly growing market niche.
    Newspapers: not gone: there are still many around, but much thinner than they used to be. Not really a prediction fail (many newspapers in fact have gone away), but we get most of our news elsewhere now.
    Pay phone: still a few around, but no more are being added. Very low-volume/niche item. Call it PREDICTION SUCCESS.
    Used Book Stores: PREDICTION FAIL. Still many around, in fact they're about the only place other than Amazon to get Real Books any more. Amazon in fact has been a boon for them - another outlet for their books.
    Piggy Banks: huh? A lot of kids don't know what coins (or cash in general) are any more. I'd call it a PREDICTION SUCCESS, though as a very small niche they're still around.
    Telemarketing: PREDICTION FAIL. No further discussion needed.
    Con-op Arcades: PREDICTION SUCCESS in their original form, but there is still a niche. They're turning up now as trendy spots for games, drinks, and food; and most multiplex theaters still have a small one. Oh, and Chuck E. Cheese isn't completely out of business yet.

  40. Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    E-commerce will grow a lot and force local retailers to close. Internet services based only on ad revenue are going to have trouble. /F

  41. legacy fail by epine · · Score: 1

    Ten years? We're talking legacy here. How about 100 years?

    Here's one that's already dying, and should continue to wither: the monologue-centric academic lecture hall.

    Here's another one that will take more than ten years but is already happening: the death of cooking (esp. baking) in U.S. volumetric units.

    No-one in the younger generation thinks accurate digital scales are exotic any longer. And what if you want to make 50% more? And the original recipe calls for 1 1/2 tsp? Oh, dear. So what, apart from inertia, keeps us locked into this weirdly discrete measurement system?

    Answer: whole chicken eggs sold in the shell.

    That could change, too, but I'm not counting this as an official answer.

    All these old printed cookbooks call for one onion. Seen an onion lately? I've picked up 10 lb bags from Costo, where every onion was 450–500 g. Seen a mushroom lately? Where I live, back in the 1980s, a mushroom was one inch across. A quarter cut was almost diced. Now I'm usually doing an 8-cut, and sometimes doing a 12-cut.

    Everything in grams. It's more durable. Please and thank you.

    1. Re:legacy fail by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      Here's another one that will take more than ten years but is already happening: the death of cooking (esp. baking) in U.S. volumetric units.

      No-one in the younger generation thinks accurate digital scales are exotic any longer. And what if you want to make 50% more? And the original recipe calls for 1 1/2 tsp? Oh, dear. So what, apart from inertia, keeps us locked into this weirdly discrete measurement system?

      Umm, hopefully we're still teaching basic math in the future. Like fractions. And multiplication.

    2. Re:legacy fail by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Growing up, owning a digital scale that could do tenths of a gram was grounds for being charged with possession of narcotics manufacturing equipment (depending on context).

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:legacy fail by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Cooking books in Europe also often use spoons etc. as measurement. They are just 'natural'.
      Or a knife tip of pepper etc.
      Of course you only do that for stuff that you more or less add by guesswork anyway. Who cares if you put 1 1/2 or 2 spoons of sugar into a receipt?

      Well, your onions and mushrooms example divides the cooks into good cooks and not so good cooks :)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re:legacy fail by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Umm, hopefully we're still teaching basic math in the future. Like fractions. And multiplication.

      That doesn't help if you don't have a 1/4 tsp measure. I do, not all spoon sets do.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:legacy fail by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      No-one in the younger generation thinks accurate digital scales are exotic any longer. And what if you want to make 50% more? And the original recipe calls for 1 1/2 tsp? Oh, dear. So what, apart from inertia, keeps us locked into this weirdly discrete measurement system?

      How accurate? My scales, which are a fairly standard set of digital ones have a resolution of 1g. At that res, the measuring spoons are more precise. 0.1g res scales are a bit more of a niche item. My guess would be that measuring spoons are going to be a bit faster for small, consistent measurements.

      I use weight measurements for everything larger.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:legacy fail by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      That seems like a user error in maintaining supplies more than a widespread problem. All the sets I've seen in stores have a 1/4 and 1/8 measurement. And unless you're increasing something like yeast for a bread recipe, it's unlikely to destroy your dish if you go a little over or under on whatever measurement you're doing.

    7. Re:legacy fail by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      You could just fill the 1/2 tsp half full... or stop using spoons and use your hands. It doesn't take too long to stop needing to measure things, and unless you're baking something odd from scratch it doesn't generally matter much if you're off a bit.

    8. Re:legacy fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, there's an app for that. You teach how to use that.

  42. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We got YOU under control, that's what really matters. And no one cares about your so-called "trolls".

  43. Re: Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Creimer, have you noticed that there are very few users who get the treatment you do? Maybe that should tell you something about how distinctly unpleasant the majority of slashdot thinks you are.

  44. Oracle by denis.goddard · · Score: 1

    'nuff said

  45. Universities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These cult-like profit-driven industries with their control of who gets what jobs need to die, or at least shrink a lot.

  46. Google, Apple, Amazon by DalM · · Score: 1

    Neither Google, Apple, nor Amazon will be around in their current form. All will be broken up in various overseas monopoly trials.

    1. Re:Google, Apple, Amazon by gravewax · · Score: 1

      None of those can be broken up by "overseas" monopoly trials, you actually have to do such a thing in their country of residence. foreign countries can only fine/place trading restrictions on them or impose tariffs, no country has the power to impose structural reform on a foreign company outside of their borders.

  47. Universities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll remain a good meeting place for SJWs to protest against anything they decide to take offence to, but they must surely be set to shrink.

    I study both at university, extra-murally, and online, using udemy and others.

    Observing them side-by-side for the last two years, online courses have been cheaper, shorter, better and more current.

  48. Re: Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Creimer is impervious to reason, logic, or indeed, reality itself. He lives in a psychotic little fantasy universe where he's the victim, the content creator, the lovable loser.

    Meanwhile, no one likes him, no one cares about his shitty ebooks, no one cares about his self-created victim status on here.

    We only care about sending more electricity into the corpse-brain and studying the reactions.

  49. Without a doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Redhat for sure. Hopefully google too.

  50. Re: Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Creimer is impervious to reason, logic, or indeed, reality itself. He lives in a psychotic little fantasy universe where he's the victim, the content creator, the lovable loser.

    That description can be applied to many non-AC users, not just Creamie.

  51. Equifax by Halo5 · · Score: 1

    The number of lawsuits is just staggering!

    --
    665: The mark on the forehead of Satan's slightly less evil brother, Stan.
  52. Re: Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot real editor NOTE: Only 3 or 4 paste-bins can handle all posts related to creimer.

    Thanks God! And it still attracts traffic.

    Exactly! We, at Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education, couldn't agree more with you!

    For the valuable /. users that might already have read the following, please note that there is an important update.

    IMPORTANT UPDATE:
    Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education has invested money to buy Chris a new chair:
    http://www.keynamics.com/image...

    Information about Christopher Dale Reimer and autistic people:

    Autistic people have obsessions about things normal people don't care. For example, one of our autistic patient went haywire when he realized that there was a penny missing in his pocket change.

    To calm him down, one of our educator pretended to have found it on the floor and gave a penny to him.

    The autistic patient condition went even worse because he realized it wasn't the same penny!

    Chris has an obsession with budgeting every penny. He doesn't understand that most people do not budget to the penny and have a flexible amount they allow for miscellaneous items.

    I am Nancy Guerrero and I am Director of Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education. We use Chris' (a.k.a. creimer,cdreimer) picture in our document because he is the hardest case we have ever had to handle:
    http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...

    Our artists were inspired by the low carb diet that Christopher follows scrupulously for the small lunch box and by the picture linked below for the rest. I am sure that you will notice the similarities such as the bump on the side of his chest and more:
    https://ibb.co/gVad65

    Please be easy on Christopher although, I am aware that some of our staff handling Chris post joke comments here and obvoiusly, the Santa Clara County Office of Education disapprove that behavior vehemently:
    https://school.discoveryeducat...

    But it isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody.

    Thank You dear users,
    -Nancy Guerrero

  53. Re: Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Khyber and Rockoon come to mind, but even they haven't progressed beyond the "itchy nose" stage. Creimer is like an intense desire to shit in a crowded elevator, he's the smell of a hundred unwashed spice factory workers on the bus in summer, he's a thousand-edged pebble in a tight shoe on a hike in the Grand Canyon.

    He's a fully-larded knothole filled with bees, he's 48 sexless years, he's a badly-written novel on a desert island, he's that fat guy on the bus that has to sit next to you with a sour milk smell, and insisting on starting a conversation with you.

    Creimer is like a yeast infection in your asscrack on that century bike ride but you didn't pack any chamois butter. He's that fay guy who hogs the shoulder fly machine for fifteen minutes doing nothing while you're trying to keep a routine going.

    Creimer is that creepy middle-aged loser with a scraggly beard in the comic book store trying to hit on the 21 year old cashier.

    And he sees nothing wrong with any of this, and is convinced the problem is you.

  54. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot does have rules about trolls only being allowed to post a few times a day...although of course some users get around it through using multiple troll accounts.

  55. No. by quantaman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dammit, that didn't make any sense.

    I guess it's time to close up shop on my Betteridge's law of headlines auto-responder consultancy.

    At least business is booming at my Poe's Law-firm.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  56. Many things mentioned in article are already gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Things that will be gone in ten years:

    - credit cards
    - cable TV
    - radios
    - taxi drivers
    - smart phones
    - car GPS
    - cashiers
    - waiters taking orders
    - ATMs
    - PIN numbers
    - AC adapters for charging

  57. Sears..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...honestly, they are nearly dead right now. And a bunch of retail outfits will not make it 10 years from now. I don't really like that, but that is the trend.

    Gordon

  58. In the next 10 years? by Ebsolas · · Score: 1

    My bet is on Equifax. Rather based on the history of how these things play out I'd be entirely shocked if it was still around come 2020.

  59. independent software consultants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In America at least, the market no longer supports independent consultants. It's all been offshored to India. Most of my friends in the business were starved out in recent years, and I myself was finally starved out this year.

    Oh, and before you get on your high horse about keeping skills up to date... I very quickly landed an employee job as Director of Devops with an American startup. The company was fucking shocked by how fast I work and how good the product is. So no, skills have nothing at all to do with it.

    My theory is, the change is not only about price. Due to very well known issues with quality, companies rarely save much money in the long run. Rather it has a lot to do with social status relations.

    The typical inbred nepotist in upper management resents working with people who are his social equals and intellectual betters, prefers bossing around slaves. By and large India-based Indian freelancers are ass-lickingly servile. Probably as a result of their repugnant caste system. My ethnically-Indian friend from LA (he's as American as any of us) was also starved out of the independent consulting business.

    1. Re:independent software consultants by jonwil · · Score: 1

      It doesn't help matters in the US when there is a specific law (the Tax Reform Act of 1986 section 1706) that made it difficult for independent contractors in IT working as an individual to continue to work as an independent contractor in many cases.

  60. other things by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    assuming they don't move on to making other things, companies that make...

    + Keyboards

    + mice

    + laptops

    + graphing calculators

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:other things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keyboards and mice will be around until someone invents a telepathic interface. Speech to text is nowhere near usable as a substitute for those of us that type all day. Aside from that, you can't cram a bunch of people into a cube farm and have them talk to their computers all day. Their voices would not hold up.

  61. Blockchain will kill many banks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, many will still be around for other things, but their core business, money transfer, will be out of their hands.

  62. Re:Google by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hope more for Facebook to go away.
    Microsoft has had its peak, but will probably not go away.
    Oracle is at larger risk. it's big and bulky with an unclear business strategy.
    Several cloud service providers are at risk.
    Some ISPs with bad customer treatments.
    Analog land lines are already dying in bulk.
    Trumps real estate business is probably at risk.
    Apple - past Jobs the vision is gone.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  63. Goodbye to ... by petes_PoV · · Score: 1
    Most forms of advisors:

    Investment advice is already done by computers, as is some type of legal advice - computerised appeals against parking tickets
    Other forms will follow: medical advice, counselling (though it doesn't even take a smartphone to say "how does that make you feel")

    Journalism. That is already dead in most publications. It just hasn't stopped moving yet.
    TV repair and other home appliances. Already on their last elbows, soon to be totally extinct.
    Train driver. Just as soon as they can unionise robots and teach them how to go on strike
    TV / Film personalities. We have already seen a few avatars (Max Headroom, anyone?) But a digital "personality" is far easier to work with
    National leaders : see TV personalities
    Postal deliveries. Does this need explaining?
    Road sweepers. The first public / road-travelling robots.
    Airport baggage handlers.
    Librarians. No more libraries

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  64. On an optimistic note by Chrisq · · Score: 0

    The appeasement of Islam business

  65. Re:Slashdot... by ls671 · · Score: 1

    You are clueless.

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  66. The next 10 years will be insane by Pezbian · · Score: 1

    Electronics Repair as a career: It won't just be stopped by lack of parts and schematics; things just won't break as much. We already have some phones that can take a swim and be fine. The day screens become more durable and batteries don't have a shelf life, that's really most of the problem.

    TV repair: (see above) It's really only the panels that break unless there's a power surge. Most remaining TV repair services will be working hand-in-hand with salvage services like what I did on the side for a few years until the screens just got too damn big to handle. Only bigger operations will be able to make it economical. And, with lighter weight and fewer nasty chemicals to deal with since the switch to LED lighting, it'll actually be okay.

    Enthusiast-targeted boutique computer stores/hardware makers: With Moore's Law slowing down and Nintendo with the Switch and plenty of phone/tablet makers having proven it already, games are getting easier to run on smaller and smaller equipment. You'll still be able to "roll-your-own", but it will be easier to just tick a few boxes on an order to get that fire-breathing GPU (which will be based on a card built for Deep Learning and other intense math stuff, as today), just don't expect twenty different brands with ten different models each, let alone a flashy heatsink, since there won't be any way to see it: big computers will be unnecessary. SSDs are small and optical is all-but-dead. Big computers will go the way of the "more fans, the better" and the big CRTs of the dot-com era.

    The local hotspots like clubs and bars: Or at least they'll need an overhaul. Dating already pretty much changed forever with the advent of Tinder and the more streamlined online dating services that could be accessed from a phone app. Going to a club or bar to meet random people, looking for that spark is pretty much history in ten years. I know there are already clubs and bars that are less about bumping music or doing shots and more about being able to just sit and chat in a relaxed atmosphere. There will get to be more of those since going to an expensive restaurant just to be away from the screaming toddlers and annoying waitstaff of Applebees et al just isn't a thing in most places.

    Silicon Valley: After seeing so many tech companies show up and thrive in the last place I ever expected (Salt Lake City area), I knew there had to be plenty of such development elsewhere, too. Yep. If you're data-heavy, all you need is that fast pipe.

    YouTube "stars": I'm not talking about bigclive, EEVBlog, AvE, AVGN, Louis Rossmann, Simon and Martina, GottLove, moviebob, or any other example who actually contributes usable content, I'm talking about the ones who thrive on the same flash in the pan trash tabloids, gossip shows, and such do: creating drama or shock. Like that numbnuts who destroys expensive shit just because his ad revenue more than makes up for it. Or that subset of douchebags who just try to create content from conflicts between other "stars" and sometimes try to drag actual content creators into their mess.

    Anything marketed directly at fat people: If your target demographic isn't worth the advertising budget, you put those dollars elsewhere. And, like it or not, people are moving around a lot more. You don't have to be at home to get on the Internet. You don't have to sit at home and wait for TV. You can be doing things. And good food is going to become easier to get access to. We are going to slim down. It's already happening.

    SAE measurements in construction: The US is going Metric. I believe in a decade we will see construction materials dual-labeled, at the very least, like Canada does with road signs. Once construction goes Metric, it's a go for the rest of the transition to be made.

    MP3 as a format: It will be left in the dust completely, as data rates and storage volumes increase. Technology is getting better. Earphones and even bluetooth speakers (if they have that aptX technology) sound good enough that FLAC or another lossless audio compressio

    --
    In a world of the blind, the one-eyed man is king--and the two-eyed man is a heretic.
    1. Re:The next 10 years will be insane by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      > SAE measurements in construction: The US is going Metric. I believe in a decade we will see construction materials dual-labeled, at the very least, like Canada does with road signs. Once construction goes Metric, it's a go for the rest of the transition to be made.

      What? In Canada everything in construction is imperial, you buy a 2x4, not something with strange number no one is using.
      Also as far as I remember all road signs in Maine are dual labeled for a long time now.

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:The next 10 years will be insane by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Pertaining the construction: For hobby woodworking it is funny to look up European plans and when you convert the metric numbers to imperial to see how to adjust it you realize they're just using metric equivalents of common imperial sizes. So... the materials are all standardized already, it'll just be whatever we call them.

    3. Re:The next 10 years will be insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 2 x 4 (or any other inch-sized lumber) isn't, and hasn't been for a long time. It'll go officially metric only when the mills are allowed to shave a bit more off the piece by rounding down. 2 x 4 is actually 1-1/2" x 3-1/2" (38 x 89 mm soft conversion); it'll go officially metric when, say, 35 x 85 is allowed. Yes, a "rough" 2 x 4 is supposed to be 2 x 4, but in recent experience they're shaved a bit tighter (by 1/8 or so) even then.

    4. Re:The next 10 years will be insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some agreement, some disagreement, some "well, it'll change but still be around."

      Electronics & TV repair (really, the same thing): surprised any of it is still around outside of the niche market of pro sound and "vintage" device repair. Fixing a screen really isn't electronics repair in the old sense - the major knowledge needed is how to get the thing open in the first place without destroying everything. The "right to repair" is dead - stuff is now designed to be unrepairable even if repair might be possible. If it stops working, throw it away and buy another one.

      Enthusiast computer makers: agree, and I'd go farther - it'll be impossible for "civilians" to have anything that's buildable or manageable by themselves.

      Local hotspots: disagree, though they might be used differently. Humans are ultimately social animals; they don't work right when physically isolated from each other. The apps are and will be used to manage the process, but there will still be meetup places.

      Silicon Valley: I've seen the place morph itself several times, so I'm not sure it'll go away. It certainly will, however, not dominate the industry (and the world) like it has in the past.

      Youtube Stars: no comment, as I have no experience with the genre. Youtube itself, however, is likely to be very different as technology and the law co-evolve.

      Fat People Marketing: huh? As tech develops, there will be MORE fat people. If you have no job because the computers do everything, and a "universal income" system develops, people will just sit somewhere and fiddle with their devices.

      Construction metrication: not in the USA! Unless (as was pointed out below) the lumber makers can shave dimensions a bit tighter to get more boards out of a log.

      MP3 and cheap/shitty sound systems: They won't go away. There will always be a market for really cheap gear that sounds like an old telephone (remember phones with black bakelite receivers?). The majority of people can't hear the difference between a flat-screen TV with tinny speakers and a high-end theater sound system. Those who *can* hear the difference will end up paying MORE money as the mass market for such things stagnates; and besides, in high-end audio, costing more is a selling point, seemingly even more so than the accuracy of the reproduction (talking about the "warmth" of the sound or "singing" treble or midrange is, in fact, talking about distortion or nonlinearity. Sorry, I'm still of the opinion that a sound system should be as close to a piece of wire with gain as possible, and any adjustments to that to compensate for difficulties with the source or the space in which it's reproduced, or even the listener's hearing, should be done separately through some kind of EQ or tone control rather than by getting an amp or speakers that "sound right"). From what I see in "high end" publications, the more you spend the less accurate the sound is after some point.

  67. My predictions for business that will be dead soon by jonwil · · Score: 2

    My predictions for business that may well be dead in the not-to-distant-future (if they aren't already):
    Video rental stores (I am surprised the ones that still exist have been able to hang on for so long given the rise of both rental kiosks and digital content purchase/rental/streaming/etc)

    Landline phones (more and more people will replace home phones completly with mobile like I have or they will get some sort of VoIP service running over cable or fibre or whatever other tech rather than actual proper old-school copper wire phones)

    Tobacconists (as less people smoke, taxes on tobacco increase and more and more general retailers like supermarkets and petrol stations are selling cigarettes, less and less people will have a reason to go to a specialty tobacconist for their tobacco products. Laws regulating how retailers can display and sell tobacco products dont help matters either)

    Paid FTP software (with free alternatives like FileZilla being as good as the paid alternatives if not better, why would anyone bother to pay for FTP software anymore?)

    Classified advertising in newspapers (why would anyone bother with newspapers when buying cars, buying property, looking for a job or buying general crap when things like Gumtree, realestate.com.au, Seek, CarSales and others in other countries are so much better)

    Printed TV guides and listings (with digital TV even free-to-air channels give you up-to-date on-screen program guides so you can see what's on and when plus if you do need to look it up without looking on your TV, the Internet has you covered for that)

    Printed phone books (I am surprised these aren't completly dead yet)

    Toy stores (with the recent bankruptcy of Toys R Us and consumers increasingly buying toys from online or from big box department stores that have lower prices than the toy retailers, could the death of the toy store be far away?)

  68. Re: Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posters like you** who make frequent long detailed posts about Creimer are quite the odd and interesting specimens. You seem to have very strong and complex feelings about Creimer and a constant need to express them in detail. Is it love? hate? envy? something else?
    Whatever it is, it's some form of strange obsession and you might want to get it looked at.

    **Are you several obsessives or just one posing as several?

  69. 2013 article! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2013 article!
    Some content farming never dies.

  70. Re: Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's love, fascination, repulsion, and pity. It's kind of the same set of reasons why you post what you do.

  71. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We got YOU under control, that's what really matters. And no one cares about your so-called "trolls".

    Who is in control: the fool who post a comment or the fools who post comments after him?

    Seems like a lot people lose their shit when creimer posts a comment.

  72. Re:My predictions for business that will be dead s by Headw1nd · · Score: 1

    Most of these are reasonable, but you are way off on tobacconists. I can't imagine why you think more locations are going to start selling cigarettes, almost all gas stations/convenience stores/general retailers already do, and have for some time. What is starting to happen is stores that used to sell them are getting out of the business, Target was the first major retailer some time back, but more recently CVS stopped selling tobacco products. Others likely aren't far behind. If anything, in the future smokers will have to go to a tobacconist because there won't be other options.

  73. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is in control: the fool who post a comment or the fools who post comments after him?

    Seems like a lot people lose their shit when creimer posts a comment.

    Pavlov’s dogs. When the master whistles, every dog takes a shit.

  74. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chris, try to put some zing into your replies.

    Everyone who disagrees with you must be Chris. Yet you’re the one who shits on command when he whistles.

  75. Re:My predictions for business that will be dead s by jonwil · · Score: 1

    Here in Australia it must be different then. All the major supermarket chains still sell cigarettes, as do many petrol stations and convenience stores. Some newsagents and other smaller businesses still sell cigarettes as well.

    As for tobacconists in Oz, a lot of the ones I see are more shops selling all sorts of crap (e.g. sports/car racing merchandise, bar/alcohol related merchandise, heck I even saw one such store selling a Hookah Pipe in the shape of a Kalashnikov) that also happen to sell cigarettes on the side.

    They probably survive more because of the other crap they sell than because of the money they make on cigarettes.

    If anything, its likely to be the smaller businesses that exit tobacco retailing whilst the big chains like Coles and Woolworths remain in the business. Newsagents as well as any independent (or independently franchised) petrol stations and convenience stores that dont make enough money from tobacco sales to cover the increasing costs will be the first to stop selling I suspect.

    I dont smoke and I am not involved in the business but I do notice what is happening and what sorts of businesses are still selling the products and what sorts are not...

  76. Re: Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Creimer, have you noticed that there are very few users who get the treatment you do? Maybe that should tell you something about how distinctly unpleasant the majority of slashdot thinks you are.

    Have you noticed how few users are still left on Slashdot? Creimer spent six months fighting your bullshit, declared victory and went home.

  77. Equifax by XB-70 · · Score: 1

    Not 'just kidding'!

    --
    *** Don't be dull.***
  78. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typical Creimer self-aggrandizing narrative, complete with non-sequitur. How does your second sentence derive from or reinforce the first sentence?

    Seems you're the one who can't resist refreshing your browser and getting in your digital feces, Chris.

    Let’s roll out the user account since you can’t wait to post another comment as AC.

  79. My wishful hope by gachunt · · Score: 1

    Pundits and 24-hour news channels

  80. Telemarketing? by DidgetMaster · · Score: 1

    I am so glad that the telemarketers disappeared and now I never get calls from strangers wanting to sell me stuff. /sarcasm

    1. Re:Telemarketing? by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      At least it is trivial to block them, now. They already seem to have dried up for anything remotely legitimate, mostly just scams these days. Once the people that remember the days of a telemarketing call that wasn't necessarily a scam are gone I can't imagine them being worth the investment from whatever shady people.

    2. Re:Telemarketing? by nerdonamotorcycle · · Score: 1

      For the most part, people put their phone numbers onto the Do Not Call list. They also switched from landlines to mobile phones, which are legally off limits for telemarketing, because the recipient of the call pays for the call.

      That pretty much put telemarketing of legitimate goods and services out of business, and left telemarketing as an advertising venue to those who were willing to break the law in the first place either by calling people on the DNC list or by calling mobile phones. Once you're willing to break one law, what's several more? The telemarketers also moved offshore where the writ of US law mostly does not run. (Mostly. About a year ago, the US and Indian governments cooperated to bust a boiler-room full of fake-IRS scammers.)

  81. Re: Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Have you noticed how few users are still left on Slashdot? "

    No, Chris, I haven't, but that's a typical creimer talking point.

    "Creimer spent six months fighting your bullshit, declared victory and went home."

    More like spent six months getting ridiculed and lambasted, decided even he doesn't have enough free time in a day to reply to everyone, and got SENT home.

    I think that interpretation is closer to the truth, don't you think, Chris?

  82. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still bitter, FakeFuck39?

  83. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More non-sequitur digital diarrhea from our favorite incontinent 400 pound Labrador.

  84. Re: Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that interpretation is closer to the truth, don't you think, Chris?

    This reminds me of an old TV show, “Everyone Hates Chris”.

  85. Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft. Like IBM has nearly disappeared after decades pioneering... Microsoft has very little left.

  86. I love Slashdot by gosand · · Score: 1

    I've been on it a long time... and I try not to keep up with 'breaking' news - the focus of now what is 'mainstream' media changes constantly, and it's exhausting.

    I come here every day or every other day. It's kind of like not going to the theater to see new movies, and waiting for them to come out on DVD/Netflix. Sure, I'm never the first to hear about something, but when I do it's still relevant and interesting to me.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  87. Smart phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smart phones. People will switch to Dick Tracy Watches with audio implants and eye glass projectors.

  88. Not Completely by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    Nothing ever completely dissapears. There are still people making a living in ways we consider obsolete. You can still buy a new buggy whip, suit of chain mail, vinyl record or roll of35mm film.It doesn't matter. Those things have gone and are functionally irellevant to 21st century life in the developed world.

    There are some groups of people who want a buggy whip for its actual purpose. Some of them are avoiding the 20th or 21st centuries for cultural or religious reasons. Others might drive horse powered buggies for fun.

    I watch someone on Youtube who is getting a suit of armour. It's an expensive hobby but it is being made by a serious professional.

    Similar things could be said of the other items I listed but they are all gone as far away as they ever will./p>

    What things will go the same way over the next 10 years?

    1. Paper books will take a lot longer but there are less in the rich developed world but that is only a drop in a small part of the world.
    2. Landline telephones do not exist in much of the world. I haven't had one for years but I know plenty of people who do. Businesses will stick with them for use in offices. Maybe in 25 years, they will be less common.
    3. Pagers/bleeps are still more widely used than people think. Those of us who are tied to them would probably not mind if they all went the way of the dodo. The technology has been around for a long time. We just need management to realise it and for old systems to be replaced as they fail. 10 years? No problem.

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  89. Re:My predictions for business that will be dead s by tepples · · Score: 1

    Video rental stores (I am surprised the ones that still exist have been able to hang on for so long given the rise of both rental kiosks and digital content purchase/rental/streaming/etc)

    Kiosks don't have older titles, and $4 to rent a movie from Amazon is more expensive than (say) $1 per night from a brick-and-mortar store like Family Video. It's even worse if you live outside the service footprint of fiber, cable, or DSL, as you have to add on $5 to $10 per GB on top of that for the Internet data transfer quota overages that satellite and cellular ISPs charge. (Examples include rural areas and Seattle.)

    Landline phones (more and more people will replace home phones completly with mobile like I have or they will get some sort of VoIP service running over cable or fibre or whatever other tech rather than actual proper old-school copper wire phones)

    Unless they live in an area where the local fiber, cable, or DSL provider bundles a landline at no additional charge with Internet access.

    Printed TV guides and listings (with digital TV even free-to-air channels give you up-to-date on-screen program guides so you can see what's on and when plus if you do need to look it up without looking on your TV, the Internet has you covered for that)

    Unlike the on-screen guide in OTA or cable TV, a printed guide doesn't cover up the program that someone else in the household is watching.

    with the recent bankruptcy of Toys R Us and consumers increasingly buying toys from online

    Online has no showroom, and though it's not quite as important for toys as for (say) clothes or laptop computers, it's still nice to get a feel for a toy's scale before buying it. (That's another reason I don't like blind boxes, apart from the duplicates.)

    or from big box department stores that have lower prices than the toy retailers

    Toys "R" Us has toys on shelves that Walmart and Target didn't have.

  90. What do you mean by "go away"? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    Crop dusters; Gay bars; Newspapers; Pay phones; Used bookstores; Piggy banks; Telemarketing; Coin-operated arcades.

    At least one of each of these things exists within a 20 mile radius of me, so NBC scored 0%.

    But some of these businesses went from being ubiquitous to being rare. Is that what's meant by "go away"?

    (Hell, we even still have a Radio Shack and two video rental stores.)

  91. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huh, why?

    By the way, looking at your post history, that was a hilarious Chuck Norris joke you posted yesterday, in the year 2017. So funny! It's great Slashdot gives you the chance to socially interact with people who normally would want nothing to do with you.

  92. Telemarketers are Alive and Well by Koreantoast · · Score: 1

    I would add that thanks to VoIP technologies, telemarketers are not only alive and well but thriving.

    1. Re:Telemarketers are Alive and Well by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      What I don't get about telemarketers is the really scammy ones about car insurance or credit cards. If you try to press 1 to talk to a human, they just hang up on you. Takes all the fun out of stringing the motherfuckers along. I used to be able to keep them going for two or three minutes before they figured it out. A friend of mine actually got yelled at by one of them. Bwahahaha. Such fun sport.

  93. Gap between redemption and barcades by tepples · · Score: 1

    Arcades and more specifically Barcades are popping up all over the place now.

    Except as far as I can tell, barcades require age 21 to enter, and other arcades are dominated by redemption games (those that spit tickets) for small children. Where does this leave people who have outgrown the shallow, often random-number-driven gameplay of redemption games but haven't reached the senior year of college yet?

    1. Re:Gap between redemption and barcades by darkain · · Score: 1

      From my experience traveling the country and personally hunting down arcades in various cities, several barcades are a mix between all-ages and 21+ depending on time of day. Also, places with the ticket games like Gameworks and Dave n Busters have a mix of games for both audiences. They generally still have competitive games like Street Fighter or what ever the current flavor of racing game is, and of course DDR. Last year, I just randomly found a barcade near Little Tokyo while in Los Angeles, just looking for a place to get some drinks with friends. Walked in, and they had a classic Street Fighter II arcade running. It was so popular, that they had it also broadcasting on their main projector for everyone to see, and the machine always had a continuous line of players! Was quite the awesome experience getting to throw down on a classic with so many fans of it around still.

    2. Re:Gap between redemption and barcades by tepples · · Score: 1

      places with the ticket games like Gameworks and Dave n Busters have a mix of games for both audiences.

      But are places like these worth planning a trip in excess of 100 miles (160 km)? I checked Google Maps, and there isn't a Gameworks in all of Indiana, and even Dave & Buster's is 90 miles away from where I live.

    3. Re:Gap between redemption and barcades by darkain · · Score: 1

      While this list is exclusive to locations that have DDR and other closely related music games, its a nice starting place to find locations of non-chain arcades throughout the country: http://www.ddrfreak.com/locati...

    4. Re:Gap between redemption and barcades by tepples · · Score: 1

      I've found that DDR Freak's list is years out of date, as it lists arcades that no longer exist (e.g. Wayne Recreation in Fort Wayne, IN) or no longer have DDR or ITG (e.g. Putt-Putt and Lazer-X in Fort Wayne, IN).

    5. Re:Gap between redemption and barcades by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      It leaves them at home on their Xbox or PlayStation.

  94. On the other hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You also don't need immigration lawyers if there are no borders.

    Once any and all immigration is legalized these lawyers will go out of business.

    Won't you please think of the lawyers?

  95. Re:My predictions for business that will be dead s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kiosks don't have older titles, and $4 to rent a movie from Amazon is more expensive than (say) $1 per night from a brick-and-mortar store like Family Video.

    Your local library is even cheaper.

    Unless they live in an area where the local fiber, cable, or DSL provider bundles a landline at no additional charge with Internet access.

    That doesn't mean they actually hook it up to anything. Phone books are free too, but good luck finding anyone who actually keeps them.

    Unlike the on-screen guide in OTA or cable TV, a printed guide doesn't cover up the program that someone else in the household is watching.

    Can't really say anything here because I haven't used one in more than 20 years. Never really found them to be terribly useful, but they were better than the endlessly scrolling non-interactive channel guides at times. You can always use the web or app version if the television is in use.

    Online has no showroom, and though it's not quite as important for toys as for (say) clothes or laptop computers, it's still nice to get a feel for a toy's scale before buying it. (That's another reason I don't like blind boxes, apart from the duplicates.)

    There's no substitute for seeing a product in person. But you have a much better chance of finding a lot of things online. I go into TRU at least once a week, and it's usually the same stuff on the shelves that's been sitting there for the last 6 months. Anything new either sells in a day or two or joins the store's permanent collection. I imagine it's the video games and baby supplies that are keeping them afloat, barely.

    Toys "R" Us has toys on shelves that Walmart and Target didn't have.

    Oh, don't get me started... They do get a lot of exclusives, both individual items (though Target and Walmart usually get their own, many exclusives are shared with online retailers like BBTS, and the prices tend to be absurdly high) and entire lines (because nobody else wants them). But they also tend to get stuck with massive overstock, partly due to their price markups, leaving them with products that have long since sold through or been clearanced out by everyone else. This comes in handy sometimes; occasionally you can find stuff from years ago that you missed the first time around or, if you're lucky, something that has been removed from the system and rings up at 3 cents. Can't be good for the store's bottom line though.

  96. Re:My predictions for business that will be dead s by nerdonamotorcycle · · Score: 1

    I suspect that as more countries and US states legalize recreational marijuana consumption, tobacconists will branch out into that market. They'll sell fancy bongs alongside the high-end cigars. "Weed sommeliers" capable of telling you the different kinds of highs you can get from different weed cultivars will become a thing, if they're not already.

  97. Crop Duster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was on my way to work the other day and found out the replacement: helicopters. A crop-dusting helicopter did a 180-turn right above me, then started dusting crops, to my surprise!

  98. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still raping the neighbor's goats?

    (PS: Chris, I never understood that particular "witty reply" of yours. Are you asking if you can go next?)

  99. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually lame jokes aside his comment history is impressive
    "They must be really special atoms since protons are 3D with a Charge radius of 0.8751(61) fm"

    Lots of good physics there. All we ever see you post is spam, daily updates about who was on your short bus, which brand of underwear you like, which hot goth girl you hit on at work... all shit that belongs on your blog and not in the comments section of slashdot.

    Ironically you cry about slashdot in your blog. Seriously creimer why is it you're so odd? Like you must be extremely weird.

  100. Kinda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing on that list I have not used this year is the record store. And I will give you film since my B&W's are kinda retro on purpose and not the mainstream which is what they were talking about. But there was a payphone at the campground this summer, Powell's Books is alive and well, my son has a piggy bank he loves and it's stuffed with rare coins. I STILL get telemarketing, although they all go to the blacklist now. And we definitely go play arcade games reguarly in addition to home based video games. Skee ball is still skee ball.

    So, dumb list, pretty much.

  101. Everything old is new again... by MercTech · · Score: 1

    The list of businesses going down from ten years ago has an interesting anomaly; the camera film business.
        There is actually a resurgence of film cameras among art students. My local camera shop is almost totally digital these days but reports a huge surge in sales of low end film cameras and B&W film. The reason is the art department at a local University having a hugely popular program called "Photography as Art" and the advanced course goes into detail on how darkroom technique creatively works with the subject matter.

    For businesses going down the tubes in the next decade; I think "record labels" will be one of the first to go. For actually purchasing music; a label is totally irrelevant. The RIAA is only relevant for dunning streaming services for royalties. If someone organizes an association of music producers; the RIAA will be defunct totally as a union of creative talents can replace an association of industrial record pressers and greedy copyright holders. "Burn to Order" will probably be common for physical recording media soon as the norm is digital. Streaming is the new radio. But those with more eclectic tastes will still want to own copies of what they like.

    Oddly, as record labels die, there is a resurgence of vinyl record companies doing audiophile pressings. I wonder if there will be a resurgence of glass recording makers as those were considered the audiophile versions back when vinyl was the mundane norm?

    Die shoe stores, Die!
    At least I hope they will but, alas, there are enough with a shoe shopping fetish to keep some open. Yet, if you are not of average size feet, you know the hate you have for all those stores with hundreds of style of shoe but all in average width. If you have wide or narrow feet, you are out of luck.
    If someone makes a way to print a template then photograph your feet on it as a way to make custom shoes by computer controlled manufacturing; they would automatically rule the 40 percent of feet that don't fit average sizing.

    --
    NRRPT/RCT
  102. Obviously by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

    Slashdot.org

  103. gone by 2027 by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    These will be gone by 2027.
    Cable TV
    Landlines
    Bitcoin

  104. That list though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For reference, NBC's list was: Record stores; Camera film manufacturing; Crop dusters; Gay bars; Newspapers; Pay phones; Used bookstores; Piggy banks; Telemarketing; Coin-operated arcades.

    Record stores; Nope, nostalgia

    Camera film manufacturing; Nope, nostalgia and art

      Crop dusters; Do they not know where their food comes from?

      Gay bars; Nope, gays like their gay bars sans breeders.

    Newspapers; Maybe twenty more years

    Pay phones; Close, but they're like vending machines.

    Used bookstores; WTF. Never! Used book stores are booming right now!

    Piggy banks; Huh? Piggy bank makers?

    Telemarketing; Phone spam? doubtful it will leave.

    Coin-operated arcades. Maybe, but nostalgia might bring it back again one more time when Gen X retires.

  105. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is a dot org website.

  106. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is a dot org website.

    That's probably why it didn't crash during the dot com bust. It's been in decline ever since.

  107. I hope I'm wrong, but.. by GingaFlash · · Score: 1

    I think outdoor recreational stores will see a decline in the next 10 years. Stores like Dicks sporting goods, Cabelas, and REI (to name a few US examples) already struggle to compete with online retailers, often due to higher markups in brick and mortar establishments for the same or similar equipment. Combine that with an industry that is on the decline (objective opinion based on what I've seen in recent years) and sales will continue to drop. Don't get me wrong, equipment for more "traditional" sports like football and baseball will still be around but for things such as camping/backpacking, canoeing, and mountain biking? I'm not so sure. Additionally, I think there will be a overall decline in publicly accessible land for these kinds of activates. I hope I'm wrong though, whatever happened to spending time outside?

  108. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well slashdot wouldn't let me post my calm well thought out post because it set off the "lameness filter"
    So I'll just have to tell you that most people don't have "trolls" who follow them everywhere. Please go get behavioral therapy you could have had a normal life by now and you'd be thinking about selling your house and retiring. You got in a spat with one or two users and then proceeded to offend the entire board with your amazon links. You need to learn how to keep yourself from doing this for your career and your friendships.. and your ability to shitpost online too I guess.

  109. Why is creimer not IP banned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please Read: A Personal Appeal from Wikipedia Founder Jimmy Wales.
    It would make me extremely happy to see the site's real moderators do their job and totally IP ban creimer.

    If a normal poster with excellent karma built up 2 alts they could completely shortcircuit the moderation system. They could post as Anonymous Coward and effectively get the same starting score as our best posters.

    A normal person with some urge to troll would assume the flaw in this plan is eventually being assigned a complete IP ban from a living breathing human but creimer demonstrates this is not true. Each day that he allowed to continue posting on slashdot is more affirmation that there are no consequences for exploiting flaws in our self moderation model. As a matter of fact it appears that site administration was compassionate enough to try to help him dodge the trolls... which he fucked up within a day.

    Sure they watched it unfold and can see he's just a shitty poster. He even spams amazon ad-links from his alts, since he's stopped doing it on his main I assume that the ad-spam was a condition of his continued presence on this site.

    Just pitch him in the trash plz.

    1. Re:Why is creimer not IP banned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can this copy-&-paste shit be modded down? Nearly every comment by cdreimer has the copy & paste comments.

    2. Re:Why is creimer not IP banned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't like it? Complain to the management. Bitching about it in the comments does nothing.

    3. Re:Why is creimer not IP banned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha fat chance. I've copy pasted the above message about IP banning you once. I don't know who the creimy dumpy or nancy gurrero copypasta is The previous time it was typed in as a legitimate appeal.

      The only people who would have seen the last message are people who browse creimer bashing threads with their filter set to zero... which is probably just creimer, his trolls, and a few people who want a cheap laugh.

      Nobody except creimer would bother to make this reply, which is why it's not modded down, nobody will bother to moderate a 0 rated AC response to the board's #1 shitposter. I really want you IP banned.

      I suspect since DICE works closely with HR departments they don't wanna get smeared for playing kick they autistic so they don't bother banning you. It is my personal opinion that they're considering shutting this whole thing down soon so why risk looking bad.

  110. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who goes to your blog? It's just people who look at your Slashdot posts. So of course your slashdot related blog posts are going to get the most views.

    I'm normal.
    You are a 48 year old virgin who is morbidly obese and will be sleeping on the street within a decade or two, with a delusional ego. You are anything but normal.

  111. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm normal."

    The only thing normal about you is your height. Everything else about you is either repulsive or off the charts. You literally couldn't even weigh yourself properly because you overloaded the industrial scale at a gym. That's normal?

    " My merry band of wanker trolls are odd."

    Odd that you lost all your karma and your user name, huh Chris?

    "I believe this has to do with the jock culture replacing nerd culture."

    Strange, I believe it has to do with your unpleasant obnoxiousness. You are disliked by nerds and jocks.

    "Jocks, of course, thinks their behavior is totally acceptable"

    With crammar like that, you sure you're not a jock?

    " and get offensive when an outsider points this out."

    Like a big baby calling out his "trolls" on his shitty personal vomit site?

    Like that?

    Now go comb the crumbs out of your white jowlbeard, you can eat those for breakfast. You know, with that 4$ a day food budget you have.

  112. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "(this morning's exchange was hilarious)"

    Chris,

    Just because it is morning in Santa Clara doesn't mean it is morning everywhere.

    For the valuable /. users that might already have read the following, please note that there is an important update.

    IMPORTANT UPDATE:
    Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education has invested money to buy Chris a new chair:
    http://www.keynamics.com/image...

    Information about Christopher Dale Reimer and autistic people:

    Autistic people have obsessions about things normal people don't care. For example, one of our autistic patient went haywire when he realized that there was a penny missing in his pocket change.

    To calm him down, one of our educator pretended to have found it on the floor and gave a penny to him.

    The autistic patient condition went even worse because he realized it wasn't the same penny!

    Chris has an obsession with budgeting every penny. He doesn't understand that most people do not budget to the penny and have a flexible amount they allow for miscellaneous items.

    I am Nancy Guerrero and I am Director of Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education. We use Chris' (a.k.a. creimer,cdreimer) picture in our document because he is the hardest case we have ever had to handle:
    http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...

    Our artists were inspired by the low carb diet that Christopher follows scrupulously for the small lunch box and by the picture linked below for the rest. I am sure that you will notice the similarities such as the bump on the side of his chest and more:
    https://ibb.co/gVad65

    Please be easy on Christopher although, I am aware that some of our staff handling Chris post joke comments here and obvoiusly, the Santa Clara County Office of Education disapprove that behavior vehemently:
    https://school.discoveryeducat...

    But it isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody.

    Thank You dear users,
    -Nancy Guerrero

  113. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C.D. Reimer is a renowned Slashdot collaborator, as he puts it himself; "Because of the quality of my posts and my article submissions, I'm a highly rated commentator and moderator."

    But does anybody ever wondered what "C.D." stands for? Well, it stands for Creimy Dumpty of course!

    Creimy Dumpty sat on the wall,
    Creimy Dumpty had a great fall.
    All the king's horses
    And all the king's men
    Couldn't put Creimy Dumpty
    Together again.

    Creimy's siblings video and theme song, very realistic, especially the pants, just like Creimy's:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Creimy's real pictures:
    Before the sex change:
    https://ibb.co/cc7Ddw
    After the sex change:
    https://ibb.co/gVad65

    Creimy's "enterprise-level" chair, he talks about it all the time on slashdot:
    http://www.keynamics.com/image...

    Creimy's head, while his supervisor was talking to him, not with him, since it is impossible to do with Creimy:
    https://school.discoveryeducat...

    Creimy acting in educational resource document, he actually confirmed himself on Slashdot that he was handled by Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education! He is really a king Dumpty!:
    http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...

  114. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I will answer the question: drama sells.

    Quit bragging about how much you sell and help me you revenue stream hogging disgusting fat sexist tube of lard, Christopher Dale Reimer!

    Now, I told you I was out of meds last week and you didn't even care to contact me you lazy fucker.

    How many time do I have to express the emergency of the situation??????

    The python click script you wrote for my pheromone revenue stream web site suddenly stopped to work!!!!!!

    You fucking incompetent python script writer!!!

    When it works, I get 4000+ clicks a day on my pheromone revenue stream web site but only 5 or 6 without it!!!!

    Now, it seems like you dont care and that you have abandoned me you heartless fucking pig!

    Bonus:
    Here is a story that creimer told me when convincing me what a hard life he had:

    The tree was him and the tree knot was his butt hole!

    So, his uncle packed his fat ass with lard and with his cock! Not that it makes much of a difference but anyway, there it is!

    Signed:
    The girl that used to love you and now hates you, burn in hell where you belong you sexist pig!

  115. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    obnoxiousness
           

    Wow! As you could guess by my name, English isn't my first language and you made me search for a definition to a word that I had never searched for before.

    And guess the funniest part? The origin a the word is Latin according to:
    http://www.dictionary.com/brow...

    Thanks a lot, dear Slashdot user!

    ---
    Nancy Guerrero
    Director
    Special Education
    Santa Clara County Office of Education

  116. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, I would have thought that's the first word in creimer's file.

  117. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello Nancy!

    Do you have any pictures of you available on-line? Google image search returns too many and I think we went to school together.

    Anyway, people who learn English as a second language can often spot the stupid errors that Creimy Dumpty makes miles away, depending on how well they master their first language in the first place.

    Creimy Dumpty can't even manage his own language, imagine a second one!

  118. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If management can't get these damn trolls under controll.

    Hey look at this, how amazing!

    Creimy-Dumpty knows how to place bold tags for specific letters of a word! He is really a miracle worker, just as we've heard.

    Congratulation Creimy-Dumpty! Maybe next you'll manage to stay on the wall.

    reference:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  119. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly! We, at Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education, couldn't agree more with you!

    For the valuable /. users that might already have read the following, please note that there is an important update.

    IMPORTANT UPDATE:
    Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education has invested money to buy Chris a new chair:
    http://www.keynamics.com/image...

    Information about Christopher Dale Reimer and autistic people:

    Autistic people have obsessions about things normal people don't care. For example, one of our autistic patient went haywire when he realized that there was a penny missing in his pocket change.

    To calm him down, one of our educator pretended to have found it on the floor and gave a penny to him.

    The autistic patient condition went even worse because he realized it wasn't the same penny!

    Chris has an obsession with budgeting every penny. He doesn't understand that most people do not budget to the penny and have a flexible amount they allow for miscellaneous items.

    I am Nancy Guerrero and I am Director of Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education. We use Chris' (a.k.a. creimer,cdreimer) picture in our document because he is the hardest case we have ever had to handle:
    http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...

    Our artists were inspired by the low carb diet that Christopher follows scrupulously for the small lunch box and by the picture linked below for the rest. I am sure that you will notice the similarities such as the bump on the side of his chest and more:
    https://ibb.co/gVad65

    Please be easy on Christopher although, I am aware that some of our staff handling Chris post joke comments here and obvoiusly, the Santa Clara County Office of Education disapprove that behavior vehemently:
    https://school.discoveryeducat...

    But it isn't Chris' fault if he is the way he is. We do the best we can do with him and he is partially integrated into society. We try to cure his abnormal need for attention but he is kind of stubborn and won't listen to anybody.

    Thank You dear users,
    -Nancy Guerrero

  120. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plus, Creimy-Dumpty is going worse by the minute. I am almost sure he meant Monday morning, not Tuesday morning pacific time. So, it would have been more than 24 hours ago anyway at the time of his post.

    He should have written "yesterday" instead of "this morning". This way, he would have had all bases covered, like in baseball.

    Creimy-Dumpty: Are you sure that you are American?

  121. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just tried to update a test file with that word in it and it is automatically blocked by our system.

    Go figure why I had to search for it!

    ---
    Nancy Guerrero
    Director
    Special Education
    Santa Clara County Office of Education

  122. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes!

    Let's make Slashdot great again!

  123. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C.D. Reimer is a renowned Slashdot collaborator, as he puts it himself; "Because of the quality of my posts and my article submissions, I'm a highly rated commentator and moderator."

    But does anybody ever wondered what "C.D." stands for? Well, it stands for Creimy Dumpty of course!

    Creimy Dumpty sat on the wall,
    Creimy Dumpty had a great fall.
    All the king's horses
    And all the king's men
    Couldn't put Creimy Dumpty
    Together again.

    Creimy's siblings video and theme song, very realistic, especially the pants, just like Creimy's:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    Creimy's real pictures:
    Before the sex change:
    https://ibb.co/cc7Ddw
    After the sex change:
    https://ibb.co/gVad65

    Creimy's "enterprise-level" chair, he talks about it all the time on slashdot:
    http://www.keynamics.com/image...

    Creimy's head, while his supervisor was talking to him, not with him, since it is impossible to do with Creimy:
    https://school.discoveryeducat...

    Creimy acting in educational resource document, he actually confirmed himself on Slashdot that he was handled by Special Education for the Santa Clara County Office of Education! He is really a king Dumpty!:
    http://www.sccoe.org/depts/stu...

  124. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed, indeed!

    Birth certificate please!

    ---
    The chief representative AC
    Let's make Slashdot great again!

  125. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey cock sucker who also like to reime assholes like the hole in a CD!

    Nobody invited you in our sub-thread so why do you have the habit of inviting yourself in all the time?

    Buzz-off our sub thread and while at it, buzz-off /.

  126. Re:Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, as an advanced version of creimer would put it: "enterprise-level" strategy to look politically correct sometimes involves eradicating words from existence, nuking them from orbit if necessary.

    That's why you guys at Special Education, Santa Clara County Office of Education have your hands tied with cases like Creimer's.

    I mean, even Dice tolerates his non-sense for the very same reasons.

  127. 4CHAN is REAL DRAMA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "he most outrageous shit by my merry band of wanker trolls became fodder for my blog. Where else on the Internet do you get falsely accused of threatening to shoot people, fake accounts are created to mock you, and dick pics of Russian schoolboys with your contact info are posted on Russian image websites?"

    You should try spamming your blog on 4chan I used to post links to my last measure shock site mirror saying will smith died and I'd get hundreds of hits. Think of all the DRAMA you can sell! You could even retire!!!

  128. None of these by sad_ · · Score: 1

    there will still be some left of everything, nothing ever really goes away.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  129. how about 30 years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't know about 10... but in 30? Almost all of them. Climate emergencies, wars over refugees, immigration, water shortages, and food shortages will eliminate all but the bare necessities, and of course the military. I'd bet my money on the people who build the parts for tanks!

  130. Taps playing for Tech by Netwoman · · Score: 0

    Predicted death of : Tesla Solar City and IoT that's not managed within the Apple or Google framework for consumer.