Walmart won't sell [my product], Walmart is a monopoly.. similar logic.
Everyone sees google play, but you can download a number of others...
- Amazon Appstore
- Getjar
- Slide Me
- Fdroid
There aren't that many but it's easy to create one's one with a little bit of elbow grease and the purchase of some cloud services. Absent of that, social media clout and side-loading applications.
It's also not a 3rd party scanner. They're developed by symbol technologies which was acquired by Motorola Solutions which was then acquired by Zebra Technologies hence making it 1st party.
Because it is a difficult problem to solve given this involves hardware handshakes which depend on hardware manufacturers playing ball. There' also a slew of other events as well; but you can sit and complain about FOSS though. That's easy to do.
People are mad because google is popular and is now using it's popularity to snuff smaller corps out which suddenly outrages people. That confuses me, it's not like a credit rating company where you have no choice. These disgusted people keep using google and giving all sorts of generic excuses for 'having to use it'. Nobody has to use google, Just because they expect super car Bugatti features doesn't mean other cars don't exist. It's like libre office users, sure everyone might be using office 365, but I don't have to use it.
Google is doing what vendors have been doing for ages. There's only outrage because it's happening with everyone's favorite 'google' did you guys really expect something different? The only twist is that people use google to find things so there's not many equivalences out there; but vendors don't like advertising other competitors on their platform/storefront/street/location/whatever.
IE used horizontal dominance to get IE where it was (you use windows, you use IE!). Google is using market dominance (Hey, be like the cool kids!). Rather than throwing tantrums, It's time to wise up on your options and stop drinking all the free kool-aid (gmail/google-drive/youtube/google-thing).
Pixel concentration will directly benefit VR due to pixelation issues. Now being unable to tell real from virtual is really a dream there. It's difficult however to emulate focus but that's another issue entirely
Computationally intense and arithmetically challenging positions will value experience. 'On the Ground' engineers whom work on the leaf ends of the spectrum (SREs) may start to be eclipsed unless they stay on top of the newest tech. There is however a move to push out older workers where I am however, but then again, these are folks whom are all about 'windows ce' and had trouble as the company geared towards android and Linux on our embedded devices. They didn't want o budge without 'training', and management switched around and decided they needed to go.
Millennials already see the writing on the wall so it can be different. However, as stated in the article, once you have a family and settle down, you become less flexible to change and begin to enjoy 'routine'. This is the trap they need to avoid to stay relevant on new technology and paradigms while accruing valuable experience across them all.
Imagine what could have been, he was the Rockstar of GC&CS until they wanted to 'fix' him. For those who are buffs of CS history, it's always a bit sad to be reminded of our science's founder, and how tragically we lost him.
The internet is a series of connections that require physical wires.
The owners of those wires will always be an authority despite any law or regulation unless you feel you can fund billions of dollars worth of fiber.
If my phone is robbed and the attacker has some bio-metric information on me, they won't be able to unlock my device. Heck if I had this new 'face-scan' tech, a Colombian drug lord could just kill me, then scan my face, instant profit.
That will always get their attention. I feel Minecraft has created a number of programmers that were never interested in the subject.
As they wish to do more, they learn on their own and seek out formal training in their secondary education. Kids these days want to see a result where as rote traditional programming classes are far more abstracted from the end result. Generally if they see the mountain, they will want to climb it.
You're accusing me of bigotry? I never once mentioned 'hate speech' or 'alt-right' or whatever is being spewed these days by the left. That's rich coming from you, but is to be expected coming from the internet. I was speaking objectively as it is a private enterprise enforcing it's terms of service on a store front they own. I can't force a business to sell my product if it might offend some of their customer base. This is the same reason Kappernick can't find a team as NFL Teams aren't forced to hire him and likewise Google can freely fire James Damore. This is free business enterprise, capitalism. The owner of the application isn't being discriminated because of race/gender/religion, but because as Google claims 'terms of service' which include the content on the app (even if out of the company's control without 'desirable' moderation) which they left vague. Is it fair? How about how 3 companies having a monopoly on your credit score which strongly controls the strings of your financial health? Welcome to the real world where Pepsi has to look after their image right or wrong in following what the majority of their customers want. Back in the 60s this was supporting Jim Crow, but now government is out of the picture so businesses respond more to their customer base. By the way, I work with smart phone manufacturers and they are a dime a dozen, so I have a better understanding on what the smart phone market action looks like compared to some random internet man. To get Google Play on your device you need to agree to their terms of service. There's nothing stopping companies from making their own store as some have in China. Android is open and as I mentioned Side-Loadable even if Gab was restricted from the store. If Google wanted to demonstrate ISP level restriction, they would have locked down partnered manufacturers to only allow Play Store applications (like apple), but they don't.
Net Neutrality and the smartphone market aren't the same. You just only see Samsung, LG, and Apple, but there are far more players than there are ISPs, they're just less desirable and off your radar. If you want to jump to a personal accusation from an objective argument, that shows bad adjudication where rather than hitting the points you attack the person, may you never occupy a management position as I do.
I think people are confusing the two. Despite some think, Google can set its own guidelines for its play store without contradiction.
The arguments for enforcing content neutrality on Google Play are at least as strong as the arguments for imposing net neutrality on ISPs.
They are not. There are other phones operation systems out there, android is just the most popular. Not to mention unlike Apple, you can side-load any application so it's not banning Gab, you can install it by side-load; the website even offers that download. There was someone who commented on windows restricting what not, he's not really worth replying to. I run Slackware and Linux Mint and have a good beat on the packages installed. If you want a platform specific store to sell your product but don't comply to that platform store's terms of service, than either you sell on another platform with lost market, or comply to sell on said store. As the platform store owner, they have a right to determine want can be sold there by their terms of service. For example. ShopRight isn't forced to sell certain products, and can promote only one brand of ice tea. That is their choice. Sure you can make the ISP-like argument that there's only so many smart phone operation systems to choose from or what not. However, just like windows; you're not forced to use it where as internet connectivity is quickly approaching utility level given the need to have access to online resources for government and business purposes.
I think people are confusing the two. Despite some think, Google can set its own guidelines for its play store without contradiction. A free and fair internet is through your ISP, and you can still search for Gab using Google's very own search engine. If they blocked Gab from search results, then you can go around yelling hypocrisy.
Wither it is good or bad idea is the area of contention, but it's not hypocritical to "a free and fair internet" if they restrict it on their personal store.
It doesn't matter how you justify it, you're pirating/copying content without paying. There's this huge love of free market so why don't you exercise it by not seeing said content.
Actually he had sh*tposts about Jewish, Muslim and that Black people are all X stereotype. Generally degrading entire groups of people from behind the wall of anonymity. Is he free to do that? Sure, but in digging up the source of the GIF, it lead to his posting history, and eventually his actual identity.
If he doesn't have the balls to say 'Yea I posted that' and show up in public with everyone knowing that he posted about that all of X people need to be gassed or Y people are useless beggars that need to get off social welfare or shot, then he should have kept it to himself.
In terms of your 'protected class' being gay or whatever doesn't make you immune to feedback on whatever crazy rant you want. If he was a minority or something else, would people just let it slide? "Oh hey bob said all X people need to go kill themselves, but he's Z so that's okay". Right.
More over, the investigation was to be expected given Trump retweeted the picture as the office of president has weight. Who's image did he retweet? What's the story about that guy who made the picture? Oh wow, look at all this hate speech and death threats, should we out him?
...Split the video cable, as well as the audio cable. Now hook them to a recording device...
They can't really be that serious, this won't happen no matter how hard he tries to sell this to studios. Overall, the trend is to amp up the theater experience and the reduce the lag time to blueray/streaming release.
Slashdot Mirror
Walmart won't sell [my product], Walmart is a monopoly.. similar logic.
Everyone sees google play, but you can download a number of others...
- Amazon Appstore
- Getjar
- Slide Me
- Fdroid
There aren't that many but it's easy to create one's one with a little bit of elbow grease and the purchase of some cloud services. Absent of that, social media clout and side-loading applications.
It's also not a 3rd party scanner. They're developed by symbol technologies which was acquired by Motorola Solutions which was then acquired by Zebra Technologies hence making it 1st party.
Not rigged, influenced. Mostly it's just a reflection of Americans seeking validating stories to share with others gullible enough to be influenced.
Because it is a difficult problem to solve given this involves hardware handshakes which depend on hardware manufacturers playing ball. There' also a slew of other events as well; but you can sit and complain about FOSS though. That's easy to do.
People are mad because google is popular and is now using it's popularity to snuff smaller corps out which suddenly outrages people. That confuses me, it's not like a credit rating company where you have no choice. These disgusted people keep using google and giving all sorts of generic excuses for 'having to use it'. Nobody has to use google, Just because they expect super car Bugatti features doesn't mean other cars don't exist. It's like libre office users, sure everyone might be using office 365, but I don't have to use it.
Google is doing what vendors have been doing for ages. There's only outrage because it's happening with everyone's favorite 'google' did you guys really expect something different? The only twist is that people use google to find things so there's not many equivalences out there; but vendors don't like advertising other competitors on their platform/storefront/street/location/whatever. IE used horizontal dominance to get IE where it was (you use windows, you use IE!). Google is using market dominance (Hey, be like the cool kids!). Rather than throwing tantrums, It's time to wise up on your options and stop drinking all the free kool-aid (gmail/google-drive/youtube/google-thing).
Pixel concentration will directly benefit VR due to pixelation issues. Now being unable to tell real from virtual is really a dream there. It's difficult however to emulate focus but that's another issue entirely
Now if every household used coal just like you, we'd look just like china!
Computationally intense and arithmetically challenging positions will value experience. 'On the Ground' engineers whom work on the leaf ends of the spectrum (SREs) may start to be eclipsed unless they stay on top of the newest tech. There is however a move to push out older workers where I am however, but then again, these are folks whom are all about 'windows ce' and had trouble as the company geared towards android and Linux on our embedded devices. They didn't want o budge without 'training', and management switched around and decided they needed to go. Millennials already see the writing on the wall so it can be different. However, as stated in the article, once you have a family and settle down, you become less flexible to change and begin to enjoy 'routine'. This is the trap they need to avoid to stay relevant on new technology and paradigms while accruing valuable experience across them all.
We all know where this is headed.
Ham Radio is also still free. Why don't we all use that? Hmm.
Imagine what could have been, he was the Rockstar of GC&CS until they wanted to 'fix' him. For those who are buffs of CS history, it's always a bit sad to be reminded of our science's founder, and how tragically we lost him.
The internet is a series of connections that require physical wires. The owners of those wires will always be an authority despite any law or regulation unless you feel you can fund billions of dollars worth of fiber.
Well I guess they did say have goals in life.
If my phone is robbed and the attacker has some bio-metric information on me, they won't be able to unlock my device. Heck if I had this new 'face-scan' tech, a Colombian drug lord could just kill me, then scan my face, instant profit.
That will always get their attention. I feel Minecraft has created a number of programmers that were never interested in the subject. As they wish to do more, they learn on their own and seek out formal training in their secondary education. Kids these days want to see a result where as rote traditional programming classes are far more abstracted from the end result. Generally if they see the mountain, they will want to climb it.
You're accusing me of bigotry? I never once mentioned 'hate speech' or 'alt-right' or whatever is being spewed these days by the left. That's rich coming from you, but is to be expected coming from the internet. I was speaking objectively as it is a private enterprise enforcing it's terms of service on a store front they own. I can't force a business to sell my product if it might offend some of their customer base. This is the same reason Kappernick can't find a team as NFL Teams aren't forced to hire him and likewise Google can freely fire James Damore. This is free business enterprise, capitalism. The owner of the application isn't being discriminated because of race/gender/religion, but because as Google claims 'terms of service' which include the content on the app (even if out of the company's control without 'desirable' moderation) which they left vague. Is it fair? How about how 3 companies having a monopoly on your credit score which strongly controls the strings of your financial health? Welcome to the real world where Pepsi has to look after their image right or wrong in following what the majority of their customers want. Back in the 60s this was supporting Jim Crow, but now government is out of the picture so businesses respond more to their customer base. By the way, I work with smart phone manufacturers and they are a dime a dozen, so I have a better understanding on what the smart phone market action looks like compared to some random internet man. To get Google Play on your device you need to agree to their terms of service. There's nothing stopping companies from making their own store as some have in China. Android is open and as I mentioned Side-Loadable even if Gab was restricted from the store. If Google wanted to demonstrate ISP level restriction, they would have locked down partnered manufacturers to only allow Play Store applications (like apple), but they don't. Net Neutrality and the smartphone market aren't the same. You just only see Samsung, LG, and Apple, but there are far more players than there are ISPs, they're just less desirable and off your radar. If you want to jump to a personal accusation from an objective argument, that shows bad adjudication where rather than hitting the points you attack the person, may you never occupy a management position as I do.
The arguments for enforcing content neutrality on Google Play are at least as strong as the arguments for imposing net neutrality on ISPs.
They are not. There are other phones operation systems out there, android is just the most popular. Not to mention unlike Apple, you can side-load any application so it's not banning Gab, you can install it by side-load; the website even offers that download. There was someone who commented on windows restricting what not, he's not really worth replying to. I run Slackware and Linux Mint and have a good beat on the packages installed. If you want a platform specific store to sell your product but don't comply to that platform store's terms of service, than either you sell on another platform with lost market, or comply to sell on said store. As the platform store owner, they have a right to determine want can be sold there by their terms of service. For example. ShopRight isn't forced to sell certain products, and can promote only one brand of ice tea. That is their choice. Sure you can make the ISP-like argument that there's only so many smart phone operation systems to choose from or what not. However, just like windows; you're not forced to use it where as internet connectivity is quickly approaching utility level given the need to have access to online resources for government and business purposes.
I think people are confusing the two. Despite some think, Google can set its own guidelines for its play store without contradiction. A free and fair internet is through your ISP, and you can still search for Gab using Google's very own search engine. If they blocked Gab from search results, then you can go around yelling hypocrisy. Wither it is good or bad idea is the area of contention, but it's not hypocritical to "a free and fair internet" if they restrict it on their personal store.
It doesn't matter how you justify it, you're pirating/copying content without paying. There's this huge love of free market so why don't you exercise it by not seeing said content.
Actually he had sh*tposts about Jewish, Muslim and that Black people are all X stereotype. Generally degrading entire groups of people from behind the wall of anonymity. Is he free to do that? Sure, but in digging up the source of the GIF, it lead to his posting history, and eventually his actual identity. If he doesn't have the balls to say 'Yea I posted that' and show up in public with everyone knowing that he posted about that all of X people need to be gassed or Y people are useless beggars that need to get off social welfare or shot, then he should have kept it to himself. In terms of your 'protected class' being gay or whatever doesn't make you immune to feedback on whatever crazy rant you want. If he was a minority or something else, would people just let it slide? "Oh hey bob said all X people need to go kill themselves, but he's Z so that's okay". Right. More over, the investigation was to be expected given Trump retweeted the picture as the office of president has weight. Who's image did he retweet? What's the story about that guy who made the picture? Oh wow, look at all this hate speech and death threats, should we out him?
Our sun ate its twin. Fitting.
...Split the video cable, as well as the audio cable. Now hook them to a recording device... They can't really be that serious, this won't happen no matter how hard he tries to sell this to studios. Overall, the trend is to amp up the theater experience and the reduce the lag time to blueray/streaming release.