Serranos are the sweet spot. Hot enough for most applications, but not so hot that you lose the flavor. As you note, they give you great control. Jalapenos will overwhelm the flavor balance of a dish if you add more for more heat. Habaneros will lose their flavor contribution if you dial them back. Serranos have enough heat that you don't need to throw off the taste profile to increase heat, and enough flavor that you can still taste them if you need to take the heat down a notch or three.
Speaking of confusing cause with effect! What you are seeing is that these people's political positions are being driven by the science. The deniers' science, on the other hand, is being driven by their politics.
There is simply no good reason these vehicles should not have detected obstacles with which they were about to collide and engaged emergency braking at the very least!
But they don't have to be perfect; only better than people, who often collide with obstacles for no good reason.
No, it has to be perceived as being better than the car-buying public's perception of their own driving skill. Regardless of how good a driver a given person objectively is, they are not going to buy an automated vehicle unless they think it can do a better job than they can.
There's a pretty significant difference between relieving drivers of a single task and relieving them of all tasks. If you have cruise control engaged, you still will be actively engaged and paying attention so you can steer. When you take away all tasks from the driver, it's much more difficult for the driver to remain engaged, which is dangerous.
What is the point to an autopilot if I have to be fully attentive and ready to take over?
What is the point of anti-lock braking if I have to be fully attentive and ready to take over?
You don't ever have to take over the anti-lock functionality of ABS, nor does ABS claim to take over the tasking of applying the brakes in the first place.
What is the point of cruise control if I have to be fully attentive and ready to take over?
Cruise control only takes away one task - you still have to be paying enough attention to your steering that your brain remains engaged enough in the process of driving and your situational awareness is not diminished in the way that it is when ALL tasks are taken over, as in the case of Autopilot.
What is the point of automatic transmission if I have to be fully attentive and ready to take over?
Situations where you have to take over the shifting functionality of an automatic transmission are so rare as to be a nonfactor for the vast majority of drivers, and where it IS necessary, the roads have signs telling you as much. Also, failure to do so results in damage to your transmission, but not a loss of control of your vehicle.
I know that humans drives in conditions when they really shouldn't.
Humans don't drive in those conditions just for the fun of it. They drive in those conditions either because the alternative is to give up their job, or because the alternative is to sit in a stopped car on the side of a road in those conditions.
Does that make them better or worse drivers?
Better, given that Autopilot can't do it at all. But that's not the point - the point is that data including the miles driven in those conditions is not comparable with Tesla Autopilot safety data.
It's not an everywhere-in-the-US thing, but it is a US thing. When I lived in Northern Virginia, it was pretty stark how much of a difference it made depending on which municipality you were in. Reston had a pretty extensive trail system that was mostly grade-separated, or crossings with lights. But as soon as you crossed into Vienna or Herndon, your choices were cul-de-sacs or arterial roads with little or no shoulder. There was one big regional trail on an old converted railroad bed, but you had to either drive there first, or take those arterial roads.
I'm as pro-third-party as anyone, but you have to understand that as it stands, our electoral system, by its very nature, is a two party system. Until we move to ranked choice voting and/or proportional representation, it will always be a two party system. Chastising people for making what realistically is the best available choice is not helpful, either.
The good news is we're seeing a new generation of candidates who aren't part of the established party machines running, and many of them (at least on the Democratic side) are willing to support electoral reforms that will allow for viable third parties. My recommendation is to support those candidates, and to push those who don't have a position to support those reforms.
The C level executives don't have anything to do with whatever half-cocked legal argument their team of lawyers decides to bring before the court. They only care about minimizing their exposure to the risk of a class action lawsuit. They don't really care how the lawyers do it so long as it works and aren't fit to judge for themselves the legal merit of their legal counsel.
They don't care WHAT the legal argument is, but they want it to be made. That's hardly having nothing to do with it.
Also, good luck actually pinning any of these activities on anyone at the C level. I agree that someone should be punished for this, but there's no guarantee the malfeasance was at the direct behest of an executive.
If we can have a felony murder rule (participants in a non-murder felony can be charged with murder for any death that occurs in the commission of the felony, regardless of whether they themselves had anything to do with the death), then we can certainly have a "buck stops with the CEO" law. The only problem is getting it passed.
Persians are in fact Caucasian. That word comes from the region of the Caucasus which, if you consult a map, is directly adjacent to modern Iran (and was historically where the Persian people originated).
Why does Chicago have a MUCH higher homicide rate than Houston?
They have "similar" population densities, and its MUCH easier to get a gun in Houston, yet FAR more murders happen in Chicago.
That's exactly what the OP did when he dismissed the reality of this tragic event. In a way it's worse - in the case of calling someone human garbage, he at least acknowledged the OP as a human being. Calling this a false flag is literal dehumanized someone who lost his life, and just to score some political points. Spare me the sanctimony, Anonymous Coward.
But somehow, half a million people not only signed up to get on the waiting list for a Model 3, but put down $1000 to do so (in a time when nearly half of Americans could not pay for an unexpected $400 expense), even knowing it would be more than a year and probably more than two before they'd get it.
DACA was put in place by the executive, which is an abuse of executive power.
Congress doesn't grant the executive unlimited funds. Therefore the executive has to prioritize how to use those funds. That would include, for example, deprioritizing the deportation of law-abiding immigrants who have been here since early childhood without proper documentation.
Our ancestors got sick of that shit and did something about it as soon as it was possible to. The joy of progress is that you don't have to put up with the same crap your ancestors did, and hopefully your descendants won't have to put up with the same crap you do.
Slashdot Mirror
Serranos are the sweet spot. Hot enough for most applications, but not so hot that you lose the flavor. As you note, they give you great control. Jalapenos will overwhelm the flavor balance of a dish if you add more for more heat. Habaneros will lose their flavor contribution if you dial them back. Serranos have enough heat that you don't need to throw off the taste profile to increase heat, and enough flavor that you can still taste them if you need to take the heat down a notch or three.
I sure am glad to find out that neither Uber nor Tesla are true Scotsmen.
Speaking of confusing cause with effect! What you are seeing is that these people's political positions are being driven by the science. The deniers' science, on the other hand, is being driven by their politics.
If "Charm" is being used as a euphemism for donations, they'll care all right.
[A]nything that sticks up from the surface more than an inch or two should be be considered a hazard to avoid.
With the potholes we have in my metro area, that would mean they wouldn't go anywhere.
There is simply no good reason these vehicles should not have detected obstacles with which they were about to collide and engaged emergency braking at the very least!
But they don't have to be perfect; only better than people, who often collide with obstacles for no good reason.
No, it has to be perceived as being better than the car-buying public's perception of their own driving skill. Regardless of how good a driver a given person objectively is, they are not going to buy an automated vehicle unless they think it can do a better job than they can.
There's a pretty significant difference between relieving drivers of a single task and relieving them of all tasks. If you have cruise control engaged, you still will be actively engaged and paying attention so you can steer. When you take away all tasks from the driver, it's much more difficult for the driver to remain engaged, which is dangerous.
What is the point to an autopilot if I have to be fully attentive and ready to take over?
What is the point of anti-lock braking if I have to be fully attentive and ready to take over?
You don't ever have to take over the anti-lock functionality of ABS, nor does ABS claim to take over the tasking of applying the brakes in the first place.
What is the point of cruise control if I have to be fully attentive and ready to take over?
Cruise control only takes away one task - you still have to be paying enough attention to your steering that your brain remains engaged enough in the process of driving and your situational awareness is not diminished in the way that it is when ALL tasks are taken over, as in the case of Autopilot.
What is the point of automatic transmission if I have to be fully attentive and ready to take over?
Situations where you have to take over the shifting functionality of an automatic transmission are so rare as to be a nonfactor for the vast majority of drivers, and where it IS necessary, the roads have signs telling you as much. Also, failure to do so results in damage to your transmission, but not a loss of control of your vehicle.
The factors you mention are factors that don't correlate with wealth at all, not factors that favor less-wealthy drivers.
I know that humans drives in conditions when they really shouldn't.
Humans don't drive in those conditions just for the fun of it. They drive in those conditions either because the alternative is to give up their job, or because the alternative is to sit in a stopped car on the side of a road in those conditions.
Does that make them better or worse drivers?
Better, given that Autopilot can't do it at all. But that's not the point - the point is that data including the miles driven in those conditions is not comparable with Tesla Autopilot safety data.
We *have* road neutrality.
It's not an everywhere-in-the-US thing, but it is a US thing. When I lived in Northern Virginia, it was pretty stark how much of a difference it made depending on which municipality you were in. Reston had a pretty extensive trail system that was mostly grade-separated, or crossings with lights. But as soon as you crossed into Vienna or Herndon, your choices were cul-de-sacs or arterial roads with little or no shoulder. There was one big regional trail on an old converted railroad bed, but you had to either drive there first, or take those arterial roads.
I'm as pro-third-party as anyone, but you have to understand that as it stands, our electoral system, by its very nature, is a two party system. Until we move to ranked choice voting and/or proportional representation, it will always be a two party system. Chastising people for making what realistically is the best available choice is not helpful, either.
The good news is we're seeing a new generation of candidates who aren't part of the established party machines running, and many of them (at least on the Democratic side) are willing to support electoral reforms that will allow for viable third parties. My recommendation is to support those candidates, and to push those who don't have a position to support those reforms.
The C level executives don't have anything to do with whatever half-cocked legal argument their team of lawyers decides to bring before the court. They only care about minimizing their exposure to the risk of a class action lawsuit. They don't really care how the lawyers do it so long as it works and aren't fit to judge for themselves the legal merit of their legal counsel.
They don't care WHAT the legal argument is, but they want it to be made. That's hardly having nothing to do with it.
Also, good luck actually pinning any of these activities on anyone at the C level. I agree that someone should be punished for this, but there's no guarantee the malfeasance was at the direct behest of an executive.
If we can have a felony murder rule (participants in a non-murder felony can be charged with murder for any death that occurs in the commission of the felony, regardless of whether they themselves had anything to do with the death), then we can certainly have a "buck stops with the CEO" law. The only problem is getting it passed.
Neil Gorsuch and Samuel Alito, too.
The word "Iranian" comes directly from the word "Aryan".
Persians are in fact Caucasian. That word comes from the region of the Caucasus which, if you consult a map, is directly adjacent to modern Iran (and was historically where the Persian people originated).
Why does Chicago have a MUCH higher homicide rate than Houston? They have "similar" population densities, and its MUCH easier to get a gun in Houston, yet FAR more murders happen in Chicago.
Chicago: Population density of 11,898 people per square mile
Houston: Population density of 3,660 people per square mile
That's not what I would call "similar". And the difference of ease in getting a firearm is the amount of time it takes to get from Chicago to Gary.
Illegal gun traffic goes the other way - from the US to Mexico. Which makes sense - the guns are made in the US, not Mexico.
Suicides and accidents count, too.
That's exactly what the OP did when he dismissed the reality of this tragic event. In a way it's worse - in the case of calling someone human garbage, he at least acknowledged the OP as a human being. Calling this a false flag is literal dehumanized someone who lost his life, and just to score some political points. Spare me the sanctimony, Anonymous Coward.
But somehow, half a million people not only signed up to get on the waiting list for a Model 3, but put down $1000 to do so (in a time when nearly half of Americans could not pay for an unexpected $400 expense), even knowing it would be more than a year and probably more than two before they'd get it.
H.L. Mencken comes to mind for some reason.
DACA was put in place by the executive, which is an abuse of executive power.
Congress doesn't grant the executive unlimited funds. Therefore the executive has to prioritize how to use those funds. That would include, for example, deprioritizing the deportation of law-abiding immigrants who have been here since early childhood without proper documentation.
And yet Congress (controlled by "conservatives") won't put that position into law.
Our ancestors got sick of that shit and did something about it as soon as it was possible to. The joy of progress is that you don't have to put up with the same crap your ancestors did, and hopefully your descendants won't have to put up with the same crap you do.
Or lost wages and all of the assorted expenses associated with lost wages ...